Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.
This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.
DEAR VISITOR,
MY BLOG EXISTS ALREADY 12 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS.
ON 06/04/2024 MORE THAN 1.951.050
VISITORS FROM 134 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.
THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400GUESTS PER DAY.
THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
09-07-2011
Why our partial DNA sequencing is legitmate as proof.
How can we say we have "proof" the Starchild is
alien?
Several of you, and critics, have written to me over the
past several weeks asking how we can legitimately claim the Starchild Skull is
"alien" if we don't have its entire genome to compare to the human genome. In
fact, this very afternoon nationally syndicated radio show host Michael Medved
bothered himself to excerpt the Wackypedia article about the Starchild on his
show, announcing to his audience with apparent authority that Dr. Steven Novella
had examined the Starchild and concluded it was a "common hydrocephalic."
Let me say that Novella is a quack who has never laid
eyes on the Starchild other than photos on our website, and I don't believe he's
even a doctor. As far as I know he is a scam artist of some kind passing himself
off as a qualified skeptic. But qualified or not, he doesn't know anything of
substance about the Starchild Skull, having written about it once, way back in
1999, and since then his horribly flawed article has been taken as gospel by
mainstream scientists, Wackypedia toadies, and, now, today, Mr. Michael
Medved.
That Novella article can be read in its entirety in the
"Fight the Stupids" section of the Starchild Project website, along with my
explanations of all the asinine errors in it. So now let's get to some new facts
about the Starchild DNA testing and results that should make even "Dr." Novella
and Michael Medved perhaps have second
thoughts.
Valuable input from Roger
Cunningham
Roger Cunningham is a good friend who recently offered
me some great ammunition for dealing with critics and skeptics who insist we
can't assert anything meaningful about the Starchild's DNA until we sequence its
entire genome. We do understand that sequencing the entire genome is a must-do
in order to make our case impervious to critics and skeptics. But we also know
that from a strictly statistical standpoint, we already have enough fragments in
hand to know what the final result will be---absolutely
and definitely.
First, some background on Roger. He is an engineer with
a degree from Georgia Tech, which has one of the best engineering programs in
the U.S. While at GT and the GT Graduate School, Roger took and passed nine
courses in Statistics, Probability, and Hypothesis Testing. It is important to
know that in the undergraduate and graduate programs of nearly all scientists
other than engineers, they take at most two such courses. This is why they tend
to be totally inept at grasping the meaning and significance of statistical
data.
What follows might at first sound intimidating because
of everyone's basic unfamiliarity with statistic analysis. But if you bear with
it and read through Roger's comments, I feel sure you will understand the great
value of what he is putting forth here. At a minimum, if it gets posted in
enough places maybe it will give skeptics and critics reason to think twice
about where we are with the Starchild Skull, and where we are so obviously
taking it--straight into the history books as the world's first genuinely
"alien" being.
The ABCs of statistical analysis direct from
Roger Cunningham
(Quote) In Hypothesis Testing, even a .1% sample can be
significant if the population being measured has few or no outside influences to
cause change. DNA nucleotides and base pairs are just such a population. They
exist only in and of themselves, and never change once their host, a living
entity, is genetically established during the first few moments of conception
and gestation.
(Quote) This is called a "Confidence Interval Test."
Most scientists are not well versed in Confidence Intervals. This is why they
can reject a sample that is 2% valid "because it is too small." However, in real
statistics, which scientists are not trained in and receive only
introductory-level courses, a verified sample of .1% to 2% can be all that is
needed to prove a case, provided the Confidence Interval is
sufficient.
(Quote) Because Mitochondrial DNA is so highly
conserved, its Confidence Interval is AT MOST only on the order of .1% to .5%.
Thus, the Starchild data needs only a 99.5% Confidence Interval threshold for
its mtDNA amount to be significant. The actual 9.5% recovery (of mtDNA base
pairs) provides a 90.5% Confidence Interval threshold, which can only be termed
"overwhelming."
(Quote) It is completely legitimate to extrapolate that
9.5% recovery (multiplying it by a factor of 10.5) to firmly establish the
Starchild as "not human." If scientists were well-trained in Statistics and
Hypothesis Testing, the established 9.5% recovery would have them on their
heels.
(Quote) With only .001% recovered base pairs (approx.
30,000) of the Starchild's 3+ billion base pair nuclear genome, the required
Confidence Interval has not been achieved. Nonetheless, by establishing that
only 2% of the recovered amount (.02% x 30,000 = 600) was not found in the NIH
database (and thus not found on Earth to this point), it would statistically
confirm that the ultimate recovery of the entire genome would prove beyond doubt
that it is "not human." And, indeed, the NIH database did not contain at least a
few thousand of the base pairs from the Starchild's nuclear genome.
(Quote) These numbers solidly establish proof of the
Starchild's "alien" genetic heritage. However, because the vast majority of
scientists have no understanding of these basic statistical facts, they will
stubbornly insist that the only acceptable result is 100% recovery of both the
nuclear genome and the mitochondrial genome.
(Lloyd) Anyone who feels like challenging Roger on any
of this, or thanking him for sticking his neck out to try to help us in this
way, he can be reached at: gray22020777@gmail.com. Don't ask me
about those numbers, he's an engineer!
What it all means relative to what we do
now.
First, I'm going to do what I can to salvage the damage
caused by Michael Medved on his radio show, such as it might have been. I'll ask
for at least a few minutes on his monthly "Full Moon" show, which I am told
deals with alternative subjects. He could hardly do better than to take anything
resembling a fair and objective look at the Starchild Skull.
I also intend to keep pushing hard to try to find the
investor that we need to secure funding for the genome recovery and the
documentary films that will show the world that the testing was done correctly
and the results can be verified by any other genetics lab in the world.
Times are hard everywhere now, and even people with
great wealth are waiting to see what the U.S. Congress will do about raising our
country's debt ceiling. Until that issue is resolved, we all seem stalled in a
holding pattern. I hope to break out of it when everyone else does, but for now
it's just "wait and see." I hope you all can have the necessary patience to bear
with me as I grind through yet another of the many low points in the Starchild's
story.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 73 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
