Even toelichten de dag die wordt ingericht is niet enkel met MENSEN en VLIEGTUIGEN van
ANTWERP AIRPORT
Een kern van 5 personen van WINGS FOR CHILDREN VZW en van JEUGD & LUCHTVAART VZW zijn een gans jaar aktief betrokken bij alles in kannen en kruiken te brengen
OP de dag zelf hebben we een 40 tal vrijwilligers die komen helpen en het personeel van de
ANTWERPSE LUCHTHAVEN en de VERKEERSLEIDERS van BELGOCONTROL
Er komen VLIEGTUIGEN van BELGISCHE FIRMA's en zelfs een DC3 uit NEDERLAND
waarvan de bemanningen gratis werken , van de stad bekomen we
NADARBAREELEN ,PLANTEN en WC's , SNOEJES, FRUIT en GIFTEN van een aantal
SPONSERS; medewerking van de POLITIE -ANTWERPEN om de aankomende kinderen met
BUSSEN of TREIN te begeleiden
Van de LUCHTCOMPONENT van de KRIJGSMACHT wat we vroeger DE BELGISCHE
LUCHTMACHT noemden ook een VLIEGTUIG via FLAG steun, om niet te vergeten het
personeel van de instellingen om de gehandicapten te begelieden en te verzorgen
IK hoop dat ik niemand vergeten ben en indien zo ASAP een mailje a.u.b !!
WIJ HOPEN DAT DE WEERGODEN de dag 28 weer gunstig gezind zullen zijn om van 29
SEPTEMBER 2009 weer een ONVERGETELIJKE dag te maken voor DE KINDEREN
Out of many conversations with persons involved in the ECONOMICS of SESAR dit I breng forward the specifics needs of GA, AWO and MIL AIRSPACE USERS
However most of the NEW EQUIPMENT on the GROUND and in the AIRCRAFT for the SESAR project are not delivering any benefit for this AIRSPACE USERS
Out of the CBA does it apaer thad there is a NEGATIVE CBA resulting for this operations
Some of the EXPERTS working on the FINANCIAL aspect are convinced thad the requirement to obtain SUPPORT for the IMPLIMINTATION of SESAR ther is a need to find a way to obtain a zero cost for the AIRSPACE OPERATIONS who have no benefit of SESAR.
The BENEFIT are for the CAT and the BA operations and the cost involved with SESAR must be supported by this activity.
For the GA,AWO and MIL operations the EU has so far I can conclude from the conversation the intention to use EU-BUDGET for the AIRBORNE EQUIPAGE of this activity who have NO BENEFIT
I understand thad recommendation in direction of this are going to be presented to the ICB
There is a number of misconception on the activity of a LOBBYIST.
A INDUSTRY or ORGANISATION has usual a office in BRUSSELS near the EU
INSTITUTIONS where a number of EXPERTS in various subject avaible are to REPRESENT
their INDUSTRY or ORGANISATION
Not mentioned in this activity are the LOBBYIST who his main purpose is to have contacts in the various EU-INSTITUTIONS and suply information and guidance for the benefit of the activity toward the MEP and toward the various services who could be involved in the subject of intrest.
He also collect information for the EXPERTS and the REPRESENTATION og the INDUSTRY or ORGANISATION.
He does also develop contact with the presse in vieuw to have the ORGANISATION make the required PRESS RELEASES toward the persons who would use them efectively
The LOBBYIST do have contact at all levels but does not defent or promote the activity he is intrested in the public arena, the work is discrete and without reely declaring the obtained postive results.
He listen to all the PRO and CONTRA concerning what has effect on his activity but do not go in reel contestation with the CONTRA he try to inform them and change their vieuws without any publicity on the obtaind succes
He always try to avoid to make speeces in front of a audiance this is the job for the representation of the organisation or industry
