First and foremost I would like to take this opportunity to thank Armando Manocchio, the president of Una Via per Oriana, for giving me the honour of addressing the speech about the issue of “islamophobia and freedom of speech”. It’s a good thing that the organisation Una Via per Oriana strives to keep the remembrance of Oriana Fallaci vivid; and thus continues to resist the politically correct dictatorship that wishes to restrict the freedom of speech. The political legacy of Oriana Fallaci exists in that we should not submit ourselves to those who – with multiculturalism and anti-racism as dummy-arguments – bring islam in in our society as a Trojan horse, and even feed it.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Oriana Fallaci was driven by a mission, her mission consisted in prosecuting the
cowardice of Western and European politicians, and in breaching the European policy of consensus. After the 9/11-attacks Oriana Fallaci tried with her sharp writings to open the eyes of the European intellectual, political and social elite that had been collectively hummed asleep by the leftist multicultural discourse. This multiculturalism has undermined the combativeness of our European, Western society; it has hollowed the fundamentals and freedoms of our civilisation; and it has affected democracy and freedom of speech. The ideology of multiculturalism has grown into a kind of new religion with the equality and equivalent of cultures as first dogma. The simple fact that we are no longer allowed to consider our own European civilisation as superior, generates an “away-with-us”-mentality. “Away-with-us”… indeed.
Multiculturalism aggrieves Europeans with an excessive guilt complex about the West – with it’s history of colonialism, racism and Jew-slaughter – being the source of all evil. According to these multiculturalists we can liberate ourselves from this ‘original sin’ by throwing open the gates of Europe and the West for all kind of third world peoples. This dangerous and disastrous “one-world”-ideology puts on sale all what we in the West stand for.
In the mean time, we have to share our prosperity with tens of millions of third world immigrants – of whom a majority has hardly contributed to our economy or social security – that are as parasites on our system of social security and take advantage of social acquirements of the European welfare state. Mass immigration has now become the Trojan horse of a religion and social ideology that is Europe’s historical original enemy: Islam.
Ladies and gentlemen.
“Wake up, Occident, wake up! They declared war on us, and war is what they’ve got. We have to hang tough!”. This wake up call from Oriana Fallaci sounds more urgent than ever. Radical Islam has indeed declared war on us. Not today, not yesterday, but approximately one thousand four hundred years ago. The terrorist attacks on New York on 9/11, on Madrid on 3/11 (2004) and on London on 7/7 (2005) are merely a sad climax, a battle in a fourteen centuries long ongoing and continuing war.
Islam is at war with Europe and the free West. Islam only executes what’s written in the Quran, and follows Muhammed’s example. Muhammed was not a prophet, but a warlord who overcame and silenced his enemies with violence, weapons and blood spill. Quran is a “license to kill” whit unconcealed calls for waging war on dhimmi’s, the non-Muslims. Islam does not allow for the slightest space for interpretation of Quran, a book written fourteen hundred years ago.
Quran is to be applied by Muslims in a literal sense, because it’s the word of
Allah, and no doubts van be raised against these words. This leads to Islam being a
medieval religion colliding with Enlightenment, modernism and Humanism so typically for nowadays Europe.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Don’t be mislead, there's no such thing as ‘moderate Islam’. I give you a recent quote from the Turkish premier Erdogan: “There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.” Let’s cut he crap, Islam is bound for world dominance. Islam is an imperialist religion who forces their rights with violence. It’s an historical evidence that Europe is the first and most important enemy of Islam. Almost fourteen centuries Europe is resisting the islamisation of its continent. The first Islamic invasion of Europe was halted at Poitiers in 732 a.D. The second Islamic invasion was stopped at the gates of Vienna in 1683.The matter is now to halt the currently ongoing third Islamic invasion, and to push Islam back to where it belongs: to the other side of the Mediterranean.
Radical islam is nowadays fighting with other means than before: The scimitar has been replaced by the terrorists’ bomb, but apart from that less has changed. The only fundamental change is that Europe no longer dares to resist Islamic aggression and we tend to behave more and more as dhimmi’s.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Islam does not belong in Europe, not yesterday, neither today, and certainly not
tomorrow. Islam is diametrically opposed to our European morals and values. Islam is but way much more than a religion, it is in fact a political ideology, a social order and a jurisdictional system. Islam is a political ideology, a social order and a jurisdictional system that has undergone hardly any change since Medieval times. To tolerate, acknowledge and fund islam in Europe, is to throw away all European acquirements and freedoms, and return to the darkest days of Middle Ages. There are many ways in which the ongoing islamisation of Europe reveals itself. Not only do we have to give in on fundamental principles of European society, but we are also confronted with a demographic time bomb.
It was the Algerian president Boumédienne who said: "One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory." Indeed, Europe nowadays counts up to 50 million Muslims while only 50.000 lived here a century ago. Islam has grown to be the second largest religion in Europe and in twenty years cities as for example Marseilles, Malmö, Brussels and Birmingham will know a majority of Muslim inhabitants. Muslim women on average give birth to 3 to 4 children, whereas native European women barely reach an average of
one point thirty seven children. The power of the numbers is in advantage of Islam.
The European population is aware of this, and is able to observe it on daily basis.
Europeans have had enough of burqas, of chadors, of hijabs and kaftans, Europeans have had enough of the “ritual” slaughter of animals, of the boundless popping up of mosques, Quran schools, and minarets, of the Arab and Turkish writings on bus and tram, enough of halal food at the butchers and stores, of the never ending flow of sighs and demands made by Islam on behalf of “multicultural tolerance” and so called “freedom of religion”. If we want to save Europe, than we will have to push back the islamisation and end the green fascism of radical, totalitarian Islam!
Ladies and gentlemen,
If one would ask me if I’m xenophobic, than I answer: no, I do not object immigrants under condition that they behave, adapt and submit to our morals and values. If one would ask me if I’m islamofobic, than I firmly answer: “yes” since I’m worried by Islam. The biggest mistake we can make in Europe is to picture Islam – for reasons of political correctness – as a religion of peace and tolerance. Islam is indeed a religion of peace and tolerance, but unfortunately only for those Muslims who are willing to submit to Allahs’ will as written down in the Quran.
For dhimmi’s – the unbelievers – Islam is a religion of hatred, of violence and intolerance. Islamophobia is not merely a phenomena of unparalleled fear, but it is the duty of every one who wants to safeguard Europe’s future. Europe means Rome, Greece, Enlightenment and judeo-christian roots. Europe is a continent of castles and cathedrals, not of mosques and minarets. Oriana Fallaci showed us the way in her books “Rage and pride” and “The force of reason”. Therefore I wish to conclude by quoting her in “The force of reason”:
“Islam is like a pool, and a pool is a puddle of water standing still. Water that
does not flow away, does not move, and thereby is never purified. The West is like a river nourishing life. It’s like water that flows on, that’s purified and renewed in it’s course, that absorbs other water and finally reaches the vast sea. Thanks to the force of reason we’ll eventually prevail. But hence we must continuously renew, continuously absorb other water and prevent any dam against he flow of the water current.”
Filip Dewinter
4 reacties op dit bericht
drie was niet genoeg
Zit je niet op een verkeerd spoor regus ;-) ?
3 Musketiere "Eine Für Alle"
D'Artagnan zou vertolkt worden door Karl-Heinz Lambertz, de rol is al voorbehouden.
@ Jos : de volgende lichting
De drie nieuwe koninklijke bemiddelaars die hier het interieur van het koninklijk beschrijven na hun eerste rapport aan Zijne Koninklijke Majesteit te hebben overhandigd.
En de komedie gaat voort !
vr 19/09/08 14:34 (UPDATE audio) - De 3 koninklijke bemiddelaars hebben hun eindrapport voorgesteld dat als basis moet dienen voor de communautaire dialoog tussen de gemeenschappen. Eerder op de middag hadden ze het document ook al overhandigd aan de koning. De netelige kwestie BHV wordt in de tekst slim omspeeld. ( lees: SLIM !!!)
Het is duidelijk dat beide gemeenschappen het er over eens zijn dat er een grote staatshervorming moet komen. Die zou moeten resulteren in meer autonomie voor de deelstaten. IN HET JAAR STILLEKES !
Die dialoogstructuur moet ook worden opgestart met een "wit blad, zonder taboes of voorwaarden en zal zelf de werkmethode, de agenda en de thema's bepalen." IN TE VULLEN DOOR MANGAIN en co ?
Deelakkoorden kunnen dan weer worden gesloten én gestemd voor de verkiezingen van juni 2009. BORRELNOOTJES word bedoeld met "DEELAKKOORDEN3
Johny Vansevenant geeft POCO -uitleg
Beluister het mp3-audiofragment.
De nota gaat uit van een rondetafel van 12 personen (6 Vlamingen en 6 Franstaligen), maar laat ook ruimte vrij voor mensen uit de Duitstalige gemeenschap én eventuele POCO "deskundigen" naargelang het behandelde thema.
Het document zegt ook dat de kwestie BHV "niet op de agenda van de dialoogstructuur staat" (een Vlaamse eis, red.), maar "te gepasten tijde in een ander, uitgebreid onderhandelingskader" moet worden behandeld (een Waalse eis, red.). Een slimme zet, omdat daardoor allicht beide taalgroepen akkoord kunnen gaan met het verslag. TEN GEPASTE TIJDE synoniem van ONVERWIJLD
Tot slot benadrukken de onderhandelaars dat de dialoog alleen kan slagen als er inspanningen zijn langs beide kanten én als er vertrouwen is tussen de onderhandelaars.
Het is nu afwachten hoe de N-VA reageert op de tekst. Mogelijk zit het partijbestuur vandaag nog samen om de nota te bespreken.
Ook Franstaligen hebben 6 namen
Intussen circuleren ook aan Franstalige kant 6 namen voor de Franstalige delegatie. MR en PS zouden elk 2 onderhandelaars krijgen, CDH en Ecolo elk 1.
Bekijk het Windows Media Player fragment
Bekijk het QuickTime fragment
Voor de MR zou het gaat om Senaatsvoorzitter Armand Dedecker en FDF-topman Olivier Maingain (foto). Die laatste moet als tegengewicht dienen voor de aanwezigheid van Geert Bourgeois (N-VA) en Bert Anciaux (Vl.Pro) aan Vlaamse kant.
De PS stuurt Brusselaar Philippe Moureaux en wellicht ook Waals minister van Economie Jean-Claude Marcourt.
Bij Ecolo was de naam van Marcel Cheron al langer bekend. CDH zou dan weer kiezen voor André Antoine, Waals minister van Energie.
Zo zouden de delegaties er mogelijk uitzien:
waar blijven ze de truuks halen om alles op de lange baan te schuiven? wie zullen de volgende clowns zijn die de 3 musketiers gaan vervangen? de 3 CHARELS ??????