Conversations with some FLIGHT INSTRUCTERS and EXAMINATORS does it appaer thad in the
present JAR/FCL TRAINIG PROGRAM there are a lot of SAFETY ASPECTS of the PILOT-
TRAINING are lacking
Also some FTO are too mutch orientated on the FINANCIAL REVENUE instead of PILOT-
QUALITY in their final target
A very for me aceptable procedure are;
- A STUDENT PILOT in his first 15 FLYING HOURS has flown with 17 diferent FLICHT-INSTRUCERS ..???
-A STUDENT has FAILED 13 of the 15 EVALUATION FLICHTS but is kept in the TRAINING PROGRAM
-Interim THEORICAL EXAMINATION 18 from the 20 FAILED to obtain a POSITIVE RESULT
-FULL STALS are not more part of the TRAINING SYLABUS ??
-FLICHT-INSTRUCTERS have done thiet FI-SYLABUS on AIRPLANE who are NON INTENTIONAL SPIN aproved
-EXAMINATOR with a too high failure rate has been replaced on request of the FTO-MANAGEMENT without any clarification ??
THERE SEEMS to be a large difference in the QUALITY of the CPL/IR/MEL TRAINING
Reaction from the MANAGEMENT they are trained to be SECOND PILOT in CAT and will not be flying alone
CAUTION for REPRESENTATION at EU INSTITUTIONS