My tentative perspective … don't shoot me!
My tentative perspective … don't shoot me!
1940s event captured on late 1940s Kodachrome film. There has only been serious doubt whether the slides have anything whatsoever to do with the July, 1947 Roswell incident. The question I have been asking myself is whether the researchers involved -- or anyone else for that matter -- have made the investigative effort to determine at which "museum" the picture might have been taken, that had such a "being" on display, apparently lying next to a "gorilla" or "ape" head, apparently also equipped with a caption card. It would seem reasonable to assume that there must be some official body which holds historical 1940s records of "weird" and "freaky" museums in the US or abroad. It would seem rather odd to me at least that there wouldn't be more pictures of this particular "museum" and this particular "being" with an "ape" head apparently lying adjacent to it. If one could find relevant evidence to that effect, that would put this matter to rest for always I guess, as has e.g. been done with an indepth investigation into the mid 1990s alien autopsy film, which had also been heavily debated on prior and after the televised presentation and dismissed as a fraud or an autopsy of a deformed human being by "experts". The investigation ultimately led to the participants involved in the hoaxing of this autopsy film. Now, there is common agreement that this footage is a hoax because of the unmasking of the main leading actors.
specialists presented what they said were never before seen photos of a
purported alien body from the 1947 Roswell, N.M., crash.(Reuters)
Alien Roswell Slides▬Be Witness Extraterrestre de Roswell y Diapositivas
05/05/2015 - YouTube

























<img typeof="foaf:Image" src="http://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/Blemmyae_0.jpg?itok=ElR6OcrW">


De afbeeldingen zijn echter van een dergelijke belabberde kwaliteit dat, ondanks dat het beeldmateriaal gedateerd kan worden, er nauwelijks echte details zichtbaar zijn. Opvallend is ook dat de twee dia’s van beduidender slechtere kwaliteit zijn dan de overige gevonden dia’s.
}







