Naar de inhoud

UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
akke.beakke.be
Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie! Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek! België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch. Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen! Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie. Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen. Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek! Blijf Op De Hoogte! Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren! Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.

Archief

Paula R-AI-dcliffe! Watch the moment a robot wins the Beijing half marathon - beating the human record by almost 7 minutes

During last year's shambolic Beijing robot half marathon, humanoid machines tripped, shuffled, and occasionally shattered into pieces as they collapsed under the strain.

But 12 months later, supporters looked on in awe as a new generation of speedy robotic racers left the human athletes in the dust.

More than 100 robots competed alongside 12,000 human counterparts, separated by a barrier to prevent collisions.

Lightning, the winning bot developed by Chinese smartphone maker Honor, not only beat the best human that day but smashed the world record, set only last month.

The robot completed the 13.1-mile (21 km) course in a blistering 50 minutes and 26 seconds, far faster than the 57 minutes and 20 seconds record set by Ugandan runner Jacob Kiplimo.

That was more than three times faster than last year's winning robot, which finished the race in a time of two hours and 40 minutes.

In another stark example of just how quickly robot technology has advanced, nearly half of this year's entries raced autonomously, navigating the winding course without human intervention.

Honor, a Huawei spin–off company, bagged all three podium spots with self–navigating robots – all of which posted world–record–breaking times.

A humanoid robot smashed the human competition at the Beijing half marathon, finishing the 13–mile (21 km) course in a blistering 50 minutes and 26 seconds 

Not every robot competitor performed quite as well as Lightning, and there were still a number of robots that crumbled under the pressure.

In one incident, a robot tripped and collapsed before crossing the start line, bursting into dozens of pieces as it continued to thrash on the ground.

There were also familiar navigation errors, with robots bumping into barriers or suddenly veering off in an unexpected direction.

However, the overall quality of the humanoid robots on display was an astonishing improvement over the last race just 12 months ago.

Xioadi Du, an engineer from Honor's winning team, said that the record–breaking bot had been developed intensively over the last year.

The engineer said that Lightning had been fitted with extra–long 90 to 95 cm legs to mimic the build of human elite runners.

The robot is also fitted with liquid cooling technology to help manage the intense heat generated by its massive leg motors.

According to the state media outlet Global Times, one Honor robot actually posted an even faster time of 48 minutes and 19 seconds but was pushed off the podium under the weighted scoring rules for being remotely controlled. 

Lightning, the winning robot designed by smartphone maker Honor, beat the human record of 57 minutes and 20 seconds set by Ugandan runner Jacob Kiplimo last month
Lightning, the winning robot designed by smartphone maker Honor, beat the human record of 57 minutes and 20 seconds set by Ugandan runner Jacob Kiplimo last month
More than 100 robots competed in the race, running separated by a barrier from their human competitors

More than 100 robots competed in the race, running separated by a barrier from their human competitors

Mr Du says: 'Running faster may not seem meaningful at first, but it enables technology transfer, for example, into structural reliability and cooling, and eventually industrial applications.'

However, he added that the technology was still in its nascent stage, with plenty more advancements ahead in the coming years.

Amongst the crowd of onlookers, the mood was a mixture awe and apprehension as fans considered the consequences of robots overtaking humans for the first time.

Han Chenyu, a 25–year–old student who watched the race from behind a safety barrier, told AFP she thought the event was 'pretty cool'.

However, Ms Han added: 'As someone who works for a living, I'm a little worried about it sometimes. I feel like technology is advancing so fast that it might start affecting people's jobs.'

Likewise, Xie Lei, 41, who watched Sunday's race with his family, said: 'For thousands of years, humans have been at the top on planet Earth.

'But now, look at robots. Just in terms of autonomous navigation, at least in this specific sport event, they're already starting to surpass us.

'On one hand, it does make you feel a little bit sad for humanity. But at the same time, technology, especially in recent years, has given us so much imagination.'

In a massive improvement from the 2025 robot half marathon, more than half of the entries ran the course autonomously and navigated without human intervention

In a massive improvement from the 2025 robot half marathon, more than half of the entries ran the course autonomously and navigated without human intervention 

There were still a few robotic disasters, with a number of robots collapsing, tripping, or running into the barriers

There were still a few robotic disasters, with a number of robots collapsing, tripping, or running into the barriers 

China has become increasingly keen to showcase national advances in humanoid robotics.

Earlier this year, during the CCTV Spring Festival gala, which is China's most–watched TV show, dozens of Unitree robots demonstrated their kung fu skills.

Wearing red vests, the robots performed kicks, flips, and even moves with nunchucks, swords, and poles.

article image

Amazingly, their daring performance took place just metres away from human child performers.

In the future, it is hoped that robots will replace human workers in areas such as factory labour and even in caring for the elderly in social care settings. 

Three Chinese companies, AGIBOT, Unitree Robotics and UBTech Robotics Corp, are widely considered to be leading developers of this technology. 

This is particularly important for China, which has one of the fastest ageing populations on Earth and a dwindling supply of working–age adults.

According to the World Health Organisation, the population of people over 60 years old in China is projected to reach 28 per cent by 2040.

WILL YOUR JOB BE TAKEN BY A ROBOT? PHYSICAL JOBS ARE AT THE GREATEST RISK

Physical jobs in predictable environments, including machine-operators and fast-food workers, are the most likely to be replaced by robots.

Management consultancy firm McKinsey, based in New York, focused on the amount of jobs that would be lost to automation, and what professions were most at risk.

The report said collecting and processing data are two other categories of activities that increasingly can be done better and faster with machines. 

This could displace large amounts of labour - for instance, in mortgages, paralegal work, accounting, and back-office transaction processing.

Conversely, jobs in unpredictable environments are least are risk.

The report added: 'Occupations such as gardeners, plumbers, or providers of child- and eldercare - will also generally see less automation by 2030, because they are technically difficult to automate and often command relatively lower wages, which makes automation a less attractive business proposition.'

RELATED

Beijing World's First Humanoid Robot Half-marathon Highlights


Humanoid robots to compete in Beijing half-marathon

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 18:47 Stuur door

Een ‘blindengeleidehond’ die kan terugpraten, dat is straks mogelijk en het helpt blinden enorm

20260407_RobotServiceDog02_jwc-954x636_1.jpg

Een ‘blindengeleidehond’ die kan terugpraten, dat is straks mogelijk en het helpt blinden enorm

Stel je voor: Je vertelt je geleidehond dat je dorst hebt. Hij antwoordt dat er in de gang een fonteintje is en dat je twee deuren moet openen om daar te komen, maar dat er in de keuken een waterkoeler staat die sneller te bereiken is. Een echte hond kan dat niet, een robotgeleidehond van Binghamton University wel.

Onderzoekers van deze Amerikaanse universiteit ontwikkelden een systeem dat een robothond laat communiceren door middel van een taalmodel. Zo kan de ‘hond’ heen en weer communiceren met zijn gebruiker: hij vertelt wat de route is en stelt de snelste alternatieven voor en welke obstakels er onderweg zijn.

Veel blinden, weinig honden

Wereldwijd zijn er miljoenen mensen die blind of zeer slechtziend zijn. Veel van deze mensen hebben baat bij een blindengeleidehond. Deze honden zijn echter duur, het opleidingstraject is intensief en er is een beperkt aantal honden per jaar beschikbaar. Volgens KNGF Geleidehonden kost het opleiden van een hond gemiddeld 40.000 duizend euro. Niet elke hond haalt bovendien de eindstreep. Zodra de opleiding is gestart, valt ongeveer 20 procent van de honden alsnog af, bijvoorbeeld door medische redenen of gedrag. Ook werkt een blindengeleidehond met een vast aantal aangeleerde commando’s. Hoewel dit behulpzaam is in alledaagse situaties als het vermijden van obstakels of het instappen in de trein, zijn er door de grote opkomst van taalmodellen meer dingen mogelijk.

Toegevoegde waarde

Wat die taalmodellen vooral toevoegen, is iets wat echte honden simpelweg niet kunnen: uitleggen wat ze doen en waarom. Dat communiceren noemen de onderzoekers plan verbalization: het vooraf uitleggen van mogelijke routes. Tijdens het lopen gebeurt er nog iets anders. De robot blijft namelijk vertellen wat er om je heen gebeurt, zoals “we lopen nu door een lange gang” of “we naderen een deur”. Dat heet scene verbalization en helpt gebruikers om een beter beeld van hun omgeving te krijgen. Maar werkt het ook in de praktijk?

Getest met blinde deelnemers

Om te kijken of dit echt werkt, testten de onderzoekers het systeem met zes blinde deelnemers in een kantooromgeving. De robot vroeg waar iemand heen wilde, stelde verschillende routes voor en begeleidde diegene vervolgens stap voor stap naar de bestemming. De deelnemers waren vooral positief over de combinatie van uitleg vooraf en begeleiding onderweg. Juist die combinatie gaf hen meer controle en overzicht. Tegelijkertijd was er ook een kanttekening: sommige deelnemers voelden zich nog iets minder veilig dan met een echte hond, mogelijk doordat de technologie nog onbekend is.

Wat een hond niet kan vervangen

Een robotgeleidehond kan veel, maar volgens KNGF Geleidehonden zijn er ook aspecten die lastig of misschien zelfs onmogelijk te vervangen zijn. Het samenwerken tussen een gebruiker en een geleidehond is een voortdurend samenspel, waarbij de hond niet alleen obstakels vermijdt, maar ook subtiele signalen van de gebruiker oppikt. Die afstemming ontwikkelt zich in de loop van de tijd tot een sterke vertrouwensband, die bijdraagt aan zowel veiligheid als zelfstandigheid. Daarnaast speelt de hond ook een sociale rol: mensen stappen makkelijker op iemand af met een hond, wat het aangaan van contact vergemakkelijkt. Daarmee is een geleidehond niet alleen een praktisch hulpmiddel, maar ook een maatje, iets wat technologie voorlopig nog niet kan evenaren.

Nog niet klaar voor de straat

De robotgeleidehond is dus veelbelovend, maar nog lang niet af. Voor de veiligheid werd de robot tijdens de test bestuurd door een operator. Ook moet het systeem nog leren omgaan met complexere en drukkere omgevingen, zoals buiten op straat.
Daarnaast werkt de robot nu nog met een vooraf bekende kaart van de omgeving. In nieuwe of onbekende ruimtes is dat dus nog een uitdaging.
Toch laat dit onderzoek zien waar het naartoe kan gaan. Waar een echte geleidehond vooral reageert op commando’s, kan een robot straks meedenken, uitleg geven en zelfs alternatieven voorstellen maar het is nog de vraag of hij ooit de rol van de hond volledig kan overnemen.

Bronmateriaal

GERELATEERDE VIDEO'S

Robotic guide dogs could reshape the future for the blind and visually impaired

Robot guide dog among inclusive innovations to help visitors with disabilities at Gardens by the Bay

Revolutionary AI RoboGuide Dog: Enhancing Mobility for the Visually Impaired

{ https://scientias.nl/nieuws/mens-gezondheid-psychologie/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 17:53 Stuur door

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory has Discovered 11,000 New Asteroids, and It's Barely Even Started!

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory has Discovered 11,000 New Asteroids, and It's Barely Even Started!

A model of the inner Solar System showing the asteroids discovered by Rubin in light teal. Known asteroids are dark blue. Credit: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory/NSF NOIRLab/SLAC/AURA/R/NASA/Goddard/ESA/Gaia/DPAC A model of the inner Solar System showing the asteroids discovered by Rubin in light teal. Known asteroids are dark blue. Credit: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory/NSF NOIRLab/SLAC/AURA/R/NASA/Goddard/ESA/Gaia/DPAC

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory was built with an ambitious purpose in mind. As part of its 10-year Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), the Rubin Observatory will gather about 30 petabytes of data. This will include creating an inventory of the Solar System, transient objects (such as supernovae and variable stars), and mapping the Milky Way. Using preliminary data gathered by the Observatory, scientists have already discovered 11,000 new asteroids in the Solar System. These results were confirmed by the International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center (IAU-MPC).

This constitutes the largest single batch of asteroid discoveries in the past year. The discoveries were the result of 1 million observations spanning a month and a half, covering over 11,000 new asteroids and more than 80,000 already known asteroids. The new data was acquired as part of Rubin’s early optimization surveys and is a testament to Rubin's sophisticated instruments. It also offers a preview of the impact Rubin will have on Solar System science once it begins the LSST campaign next year.

Mario Juric, a faculty member at the University of Washington and the Rubin Solar System Lead Scientist, explained in an official press release:

This first large submission after Rubin First Look is just the tip of the iceberg and shows that the observatory is ready. What used to take years or decades to discover, Rubin will unearth in months. We are beginning to deliver on Rubin’s promise to fundamentally reshape our inventory of the Solar System and open the door to discoveries we haven’t yet imagined.

A rendering of the inner Solar System showing the asteroids discovered by Rubin in light teal. Known asteroids are dark blue. Credit: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory/NSF NOIRLab/SLAC/AURA/R/NASA/Goddard/ESA/Gaia/DPAC

*A rendering of the inner Solar System showing the asteroids discovered by Rubin in light teal. Known asteroids are dark blue.

Credit: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory/NSF NOIRLab/SLAC/AURA/R/NASA/Goddard/ESA/Gaia/DPAC*

The dataset includes 33 previously unknown near-Earth objects (NEOs), the largest of which measures about 500 meters (1640 ft) in diameter. This is especially significant given that some NEOs are classified as potentially hazardous objects (PHOs), those that could impact Earth in the future. None of the newly-discovered objects poses a threat to Earth. Once fully operational, Rubin is expected to reveal nearly 90,000 new NEOs, nearly doubling the number of known NEOs larger than 140 meters to around 70%, some of which may be PHOs. This will make Rubin a vital part of planetary defense.

The dataset also includes roughly 380 trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), two of which have extremely large, elongated orbits. At their farthest point (periapsis), these two objects (provisionally named 2025 LS2 and 2025 MX348) are roughly 1000 times farther away from the Sun than Earth. This places them among the 30 most distant minor planets known. The newly discovered objects are a significant addition to the 5,000 TNOs discovered over the past three decades, representing a significant growth in the study of these icy, distant objects.

Former MPC Director Matthew Holman, a Senior Astrophysicist at the Harvard & Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), spearheaded the work on the TNO discovery pipeline. “Searching for a TNO is like searching for a needle in a field of haystacks — out of millions of flickering sources in the sky, teaching a computer to sift through billions of combinations and identify those that are likely to be distant worlds in our Solar System required novel algorithmic approaches,” he said.

Along with Kevin Napier, a research scientist at the CfA, Holman developed the algorithms to detect distant Solar System objects with Rubin data. “Objects like these offer a tantalizing probe of the Solar System’s outermost reaches, from telling us how the planets moved early on in the Solar System’s history, to whether a hitherto undiscovered 9th large planet may still be out there,” he added.

Orbital distribution of 11,097 newly discovered asteroids from NSF–DOE Rubin Observatory's Early Optimization Survey. Credit: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory/NSF NOIRLab/SLAC/AURA/R/NASA/Goddard/ESA/Gaia/DPAC*

Orbital distribution of 11,097 newly discovered asteroids from NSF–DOE Rubin Observatory's Early Optimization Survey.

Credit: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory/NSF NOIRLab/SLAC/AURA/R/NASA/Goddard/ESA/Gaia/DPAC*

Ari Heinze, a research assistant at the University of Washington, built the software that enabled their detection with Jacob Kurlander, a graduate student at the University of Washington. As he noted:

Rubin’s unique observing cadence required a whole new software architecture for asteroid discovery. We built it, and it works. Even with just early, engineering-quality data, Rubin discovered 11,000 asteroids and measured more precise orbits for tens of thousands more. It seems pretty clear this observatory will revolutionize our knowledge of the asteroid belt.

The MPC's verification of this large group of asteroids also means the entire scientific community can access the data, refine orbits, and begin analysis immediately. And these discoveries are just the beginning, given that the LSST hasn't even started yet! Over the course of this ten-year survey, scientists expect Rubin to discover this many asteroids every two to three nights in the first few years. This will triple the census of known asteroids and increase the number of known TNOs by close to a factor of 10.

The discoveries were made possible by Rubin's unique combination of a large mirror, its LSST digital camera (the largest ever built), and highly sophisticated software. These capabilities, along with the advanced data pipelines, are enabling the detection of faint, fast-moving objects in our Solar System. Rubin can survey the sky with roughly six times the sensitivity of most current asteroid searches, allowing it to detect smaller and more distant objects than ever before. This will improve our understanding of the Solar System and its evolutionary history.

People are encouraged to visit the Rubin Orbitviewer site and the Small Body Explorer to learn more about the newly discovered asteroids and interact with them virtually.

Further Reading: 

RELATED VIDEOS

Rubin Observatory Discovers Over 11,000 Asteroids #space #science #discovery #universe #asteroid

11,000 Asteroids We Never Saw Coming

Millions of New Asteroids - How The Vera Rubin Telescope Changes Everything

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 16:50 Stuur door

Ancient Egypt secrets emerge from breakthrough Giza discovery

Ancient Egypt secrets emerge from breakthrough Giza discovery

An important breakthrough

©The Daily Digest

An important breakthrough
Egyptian officials declared a significant archaeological breakthrough in 2023 with the discovery of a previously unknown corridor within the Great Pyramid of Giza, one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. This marks the first such find in a millennium, potentially paving the way for further revelations about this ancient structure.

A great discovery

©Provided by The Daily Digest

A great discovery

At the north entrance of the pyramid

©Provided by The Daily Digest

At the north entrance of the pyramid
At a press conference in front of the Pyramid of Giza in early March of 2023, Egypt's Minister of Tourism and Antiquities, Ahmed Issa, said that the tunnel was discovered on the north side of the pyramid.

What does the tunnel look like?

©Provided by The Daily Digest

What does the tunnel look like?
Egypt's Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities said in the statement that the mysterious tunnel was nine meters long or 30 feet long and more than two meters or six feet wide.

Groundbreaking technology

©Provided by The Daily Digest

Groundbreaking technology
Thanks to an endoscopic camera with a diameter of 5 mm, which penetrated between the stones without causing any damage, scientists were able to take pictures. These show a stone cavity with a gabled roof.

An international scientific mission

©Provided by The Daily Digest

An international scientific mission
This secret room was discovered as part of an international research project called ScanPyramids. Since 2015, German, French, Japanese and Canadian universities have been collaborating with Egyptian archaeologists to study the pyramids and learn more about the construction methods used to build the pyramids more than 4,500 years ago.

Look through the stones

©Provided by The Daily Digest

Look through the stones
ScanPyramids' mission is to use non-invasive technologies to look through the stones to discover previously unknown internal structures within the pyramids.

©Provided by The Daily Digest

"We didn't want to dig indiscriminately"
Ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic testing are the techniques used to discover this space through the stones. "We already knew in 2017 that there was a cavity behind it, we just didn't want to dig indiscriminately (...), so additional measurements were needed," explains research engineer Sébastien Procureur, who worked on the project.

A space that remains mysterious

©Provided by The Daily Digest

A space that remains mysterious
"Discovering an empty space in a pyramid is something special," explains German professor Christian Große, leader of the research team. "But the fact that this space is large enough to accommodate several people makes it even more important."

What was it for?

©Provided by The Daily Digest

What was it for?
According to Zahi Hawass, a famous Egyptian archaeologist, it is "very possible" that this room is "protecting something". It could even house a huge treasure: "In my opinion, it protects the true burial chamber of the Egyptian monarch Khufu," adds the Egyptologist.

©Provided by The Daily Digest

"There is not the direct connection that we could hope for"
Sébastien Procureur remains more skeptical: "That's a bit of the bad news: there isn't the hoped-for direct connection to the 'Big Void' (the so-called 'great void' at the heart of the pyramid where the pharaoh's body is said to be)". However, research is ongoing to clarify this question.

The Great Pyramid of Khufu

©Provided by The Daily Digest

The Great Pyramid of Khufu
The Pyramid of Khufu is the largest of the Pyramids of Giza. For thousands of years it was the tallest, most voluminous and most massive man-made structure in the world. It was built about 45 centuries ago (ca. 2551-2528 BC) to house the body of the pharaoh Khufu, the second ruler of the dynasty.

A fascinating construction

©Provided by The Daily Digest

A fascinating construction
An achievement that has always impressed and fascinated scientists. Its many architectural features are further mysteries that have not been solved until now. The researchers' only certainty today is the relatively short construction period: just 25 years.

The existence of the 'Big Void' was discovered in 2017

©Provided by The Daily Digest

The existence of the 'Big Void' was discovered in 2017
The "Big Void" is one of the questions that are still unanswered about the Khufu pyramid. Its existence was discovered by the Scan Pyramids teams in 2017. It is a "cavity at least 35 meters long and about 3 meters high," as Sébastien Procureur explains in an interview for Sciences et Avenir magazine.

What is in the 'Big Void'?

©Provided by The Daily Digest

What is in the 'Big Void'?
Archaeologists don't yet know what's in the 'Big Void'. Hypotheses vary, it could simply be a cavity formed during the construction of the pyramid or, what scientists hope, the real burial chamber of the pharaoh Khufu.

The Mystery of Pharaoh Khufu

©Provided by The Daily Digest

The Mystery of Pharaoh Khufu
The tomb of Khufu could contain all the treasures of this ancient king, but also the corpse of the pharaoh, which has not yet been discovered.

The research goes on

©Provided by The Daily Digest

The research goes on
Only one thing is certain: the pyramid has not yet revealed all its secrets to us. The Scan Pyramids teams intend to deepen their research to gather new data and make more discoveries.

RELATED VIDEOS

The Forgotten Secrets of Ancient Egypt: Pyramids' Forbidden Truths 🤯

Scientists Just Discovered Something INSIDE the Great Pyramid…

PYRAMIDS OF EGYPT MYSTERIES Finally Explained | How the Egypt Pyramids Were Really Built

{ © The Daily Digest }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 16:17 Stuur door

Five Years Prior, the Mars Helicopter Ingenuity Conducted Its Inaugural Flight

Five Years Prior, the Mars Helicopter Ingenuity Conducted Its Inaugural Flight

Five years ago, a man-made machine made its first powered flight in the atmosphere of another celestial body. That machine was the Ingenuity helicopter. Its flights in the Martian atmosphere marked a true breakthrough in Earth science.

The Ingenuity helicopter on Mars. Source: Wikipedia

Spaceflight to other planets

On April 19, 2021, exactly five years ago, the Ingenuity helicopter made the first-ever flight on Mars. It lasted only 39 seconds, and all the craft did during that time was rise vertically 3 meters into the air, hover briefly, and land. Yet it is still compared to the Wright brothers’ first flight, which lasted about the same amount of time.

To understand why Ingenuity is so important for the advancement of global technology, we need to understand what aerodynamic flight is and why it is so important for our civilization.

In the little more than a century since the Wright brothers’ first flight, aviation has become the primary means of long-distance travel, reducing journeys between continents to a matter of days. And all because a lift, which arises on any surface with an aerodynamic profile moving through a gaseous medium, is generated relatively easily.

Aerodynamic profile. Source: Wikipedia

All you need to do is create a wing or blade with a flat underside and a convex upper surface, and the pressure difference between them will begin to lift the aircraft into the air. And there’s no real difference: this effect is created using either a static wing or a rotor blade.

The only problem is that it is practically impossible to use this effective method beyond Earth. In most cases, other celestial bodies either have no atmosphere at all, or their atmospheres are extremely thin, or the temperature and pressure increase extremely rapidly with depth.

Therefore, instead of wings and rotors, it has been proposed to use jet propulsion for flight on other planets. This is by no means an economical or simple solution, which is why most research vehicles continue to crawl across the surfaces of celestial bodies.

The Martian atmosphere. Source: Wikipedia

Mars and Saturn’s moon, Titan, are considered to be relatively well-suited for aerodynamic flight. And since the latter is far too distant from Earth, the Red Planet remained the leading candidate for the first flight beyond Earth for several decades.

The road to the Martian helicopter

AeroVironment has been developing Mars helicopter projects with NASA’s support since at least the early 1990s. The company is one of the leading developers of unmanned aerial vehicles and a regular supplier of drones to the U.S. military.

However, even for her, the task of building a helicopter for Mars was extremely challenging. Although at first glance, it all seemed relatively simple. All that was needed was to ensure that the rotor’s lift was 20–30 percent greater than the force of gravity. Gravity on Mars is 2.5 times weaker than on Earth, and it would seem that this greatly simplifies the task.

Early prototype. Source: Wikipedia

However, the Red Planet’s atmosphere is 100-160 times less dense than Earth’s. And this significantly alters many of the parameters taken into account in Bernoulli’s equation, which describes lift. Again, it seems that this can be compensated for by making the blades longer and increasing their rotational speed.

But this raises new problems. When the speed of a thin, long blade approaches the speed of sound in the medium in which it rotates, powerful vibrations occur that try to twist and destroy it. On Earth, experimental models have managed to partially overcome this barrier, but the solutions used in them are not suitable for Mars.

To make matters worse, the low density of the atmosphere means that the speed of sound there is about 250 m/s, compared to 340 m/s on Earth. This means that the rotors there must rotate even more slowly to avoid breaking apart.

All of this led to many at NASA doubting that a Martian helicopter made sense. However, in the early 2010s, AeroVironment did develop a concept for a craft with two rotors mounted on a single axis but rotating in opposite directions. Each rotor spins at just 2,600 RPM. According to calculations, this is sufficient to lift the aircraft above the Martian surface in most cases. However, NASA once again declined to send it to Mars, as it would have had to be transported to the Red Planet alongside the new rover, then simply called Mars 2020, and the latter was already overloaded with equipment.

Preparations for the Mars 2020 mission. Source: phys.org

However, the initiative group built a series of models and demonstrated through field tests that the autonomous helicopter would indeed fly. NASA relented, and it was soon announced that Ingenuity, the first flying drone in space, would land on Mars in February 2021 alongside the Perseverance rover, although mission engineers later said that it was the rover that should have been named “Perseverance.”

The Ingenuity design

Although the name, which means “ingenuity,” is also very fitting for this device, because its design is truly something else. The fuselage – essentially a platform housing electrical equipment, four landing gear legs, and a mast – measures 195×163×136 mm. In fact, it is a toy that weighs just 1.8 kg.

The mast is equipped with two rotors, each with a blade span of 1,210 mm. Above these two rotors is a rectangular solar panel with a total area of 544 cm². This panel supplies power to the batteries, which in turn drive the rotors.

The Ingenuity design. Source: Wikipedia

It carries no payload other than the Ingenuity camera. Its main objective is to demonstrate that the very concept of a Martian helicopter works. And this small helicopter has fully succeeded in doing so.

The fact that Ingenuity did not carry any scientific instruments does not mean that it had no sensors at all. It was equipped with accelerometers, three-axis tilt sensors, and other equipment. All of this was necessary to ensure its orientation in space.

The thing is, unlike Earth, no navigation satellites are orbiting Mars. So you cannot just turn on the GPS module. And a compass is useless on the Red Planet because of the weakness of its global magnetic field.

Therefore, an inertial navigation system was used. Simply put, the spacecraft calculated on its own how far and in which direction it had traveled from a predetermined point, and thus determined its location.

Ingenuity’s electrical diagram. Source: Wikipedia

However, it did not have a traditional onboard gyroscope system. The aircraft relied on accelerometers and other sensors. This method, however, is extremely imprecise. Therefore, after each flight, mission specialists manually refined the helicopter’s position by comparing the images it captured with a high-precision map of the area.

Thanks to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter’s many years of operation in Martian orbit, even objects as small as 25 cm were identified. The engineers had plenty of time to do this, since the spacecraft itself flew by Mars approximately once every two weeks.

However, the duration of a single flight never exceeded 2 minutes. This was not due to battery capacity, but rather to the design of the rotor drive. Due to weight constraints, it was not equipped with any heat sinks. As a result, it heated up at a rate of approximately 1 °C per second. The thermal insulation used provided some protection for the rest of the equipment against this heat. However, Ingenuity generally could not fly for long, and in fact, its flights were more like very prolonged hops.

But the most significant feature of the Martian helicopter’s design was that it was impossible to control it directly. After all, the signal delay from Earth could be as long as 22 minutes. Therefore, instead of direct control, before each flight on Ingenuity.

Superior conjunction of the Sun and Mars. Source: phys.org

Moreover, due to weight restrictions, the rover simply did not have any serious antennas. It was physically incapable of communicating with either Earth or the relay satellite in Mars orbit. All it could do was maintain communication with Perseverance, through which all commands were transmitted.

Furthermore, from time to time, the Sun would come between Earth and Mars. In such cases, commands simply could not be sent to either spacecraft for several days. The rover would automatically collect data from the helicopter and transmit it to Earth.

Mars mission

The Mars 2020 Rover Mission launched from Earth on July 30, 2020. On February 18, 2021, Perseverance landed in the Jezero Crater region. Initially, it focused on activating and testing its own systems, but on March 21, it removed the protective cover from Ingenuity. Engineers began preparing it for launch. The first attempt to spin the rotors took place on April 9, but the motors shut down on their own. The next attempt was on April 11, but the onboard computer malfunctioned. Finally, on April 19, it made its first flight.

Ingenuity on Mars. Source: Wikipedia

In that flight and several that followed, it was demonstrated that rotorcraft can operate effectively on Mars, and with that, Ingenuity’s primary objective was accomplished. When it was first being prepared for the mission, engineers cautiously estimated that it would operate for only 30 days, during which time it would make several flights.

It was assumed that it would be able to continue flying. But at first, no one had given any thought to how to organize that. The thing is, as mentioned earlier, the helicopter could not stray too far from Perseverance, and the rover had its own mission – collecting samples in the bed of the ancient Neretva River. Fortunately, it was able to fly often enough and far enough to keep up with it.

The spacecraft successfully withstood seasonal changes, dust storms, and a loss of communication during the planet’s superior conjunction with the Sun. It continued to operate until January 2024 and completed a total of 72 flights. However, during the last of these flights, a failed landing destroyed one of its rotors and severely damaged the other. Shortly thereafter, NASA announced the end of the mission.

The combined path of Ingenuity and Perseverance. Source: Wikipedia

Nevertheless, it is still considered an enormous success. Ingenuity not only demonstrated that the concept of a helicopter on Mars works, but also exceeded its expected operational lifespan several times.

What’s next?

Ingenuity’s success means that scientists will continue to explore the use of helicopters in missions to other planets in the future. One of the first such missions will be the Dragonfly multirotor drone, which is set to explore Titan. The mission is scheduled to launch in July 2028, but it will not reach its destination, Saturn, until 2036.

Some other helicopter may already be operating on Mars by then. Scientists have already proposed several projects to NASA, but the agency says it has no plans to land new rovers on the Red Planet, which means it will not be transporting helicopters either. However, things could change in the future.

Aerodynamic flight is too efficient to be ruled out wherever it is feasible. It is quite possible that in the future it will be implemented not only on Mars but also on Venus, despite the harsh conditions that exist on that planet.

RELATED VIDEOS

Ingenuity Mars Helicopter: The Story of an Impossible Flight | NASA Makes History on Mars

See Ingenuity’s Flight Map: 72 Helicopter Flights on Mars

What Happened to Martian Helicopter! (Sleep Special)

{ https://universemagazine.com/en/articles-en/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 23:46 Stuur door

The Divine Prodigy: Was the "Killer" Jesus of the Apocrypha the Real Version?

The Divine Prodigy: Was the "Killer" Jesus of the Apocrypha the Real Version?

Tring Tiles depicting stories from Jesus’s childhood recounted in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas

For nearly two millennia, the global consciousness has been shaped by a specific, carefully curated image of Jesus Christ. We know him as the "Prince of Peace," the man of ultimate sorrows who preached forgiveness and turned the other cheek. Yet, there is a gaping hole in this narrative, a silence that lasts nearly eighteen years. While the canonical Gospels of the New Testament jump from his birth to his ministry at age thirty, early Christian history was once filled with stories of what happened in between.

These "missing years" were not always empty. In the second and third centuries, a collection of texts known as the "Infancy Gospels" circulated widely throughout the Roman Empire. The most famous, and perhaps the most disturbing, is the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. It does not describe a child of perfect, serene holiness. Instead, it presents a young Jesus who is volatile, impulsive, and possessed of a power so raw that it terrified everyone around him.

What if our modern perception of Jesus is sanitized? By examining these "lost" accounts, we are forced to ask a provocative question: Was the young Messiah a dangerous prodigy who had to learn the value of human life through trial and error? If so, the implications for theology and history are staggering.

The Silent Gap: Why the Apocrypha Filled the Void

The silence of the four canonical Gospels regarding Jesus’ childhood is one of the greatest mysteries in religious history. Aside from a brief mention in Luke about a twelve-year-old Jesus debating in the Temple, the Bible leaves us with a total vacuum. For the early followers of Christ, this was unacceptable. They wanted to know: did the Son of God have to learn to walk? Did he play with other children? Did he ever get angry?

A photograph of folio 32 of Nag Hammadi Codex II

A photograph of folio 32 of Nag Hammadi Codex II, a 4th-century codex containing the beginning of the Gospel of Thomas. This is not the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, but it is highly relevant as a strong contextual image for non-canonical Jesus traditions.

(Public Domain) 

The Infancy Gospel of Thomas was likely written to satisfy this curiosity. However, the author did not write a "Sunday school" story. The text paints a portrait of a child who is fully divine but not yet fully "civilized." In this version of history, divinity is not a state of moral perfection, but a terrifying source of energy. The young Jesus is a god in the body of a boy, and like any boy, he is prone to tantrums, jealousy, and revenge.

This "Killer Jesus" narrative was not some fringe cult belief. It was a major tradition that forced the early Church to decide what kind of savior they wanted to present to the world. By choosing to exclude these stories, the Church may have buried a more complex, humanized version of divinity, one that reflects the messy, often violent reality of growing up.

Medieval tile discovered in Tring, UK, and drawing of the same

Medieval tile discovered in Tring, UK, and drawing of the same, depicting an event from Jesus’ childhood. Two scenes: left, a boy dies because he spoilt a pool that Jesus made; right: he is brought back to life and walks away. 

 (CC BY NC SA 4.0)

The First Victim: The Curse of the Withered Boy

The most infamous story in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas occurs when Jesus is just five years old. The setting is a stream after a rainstorm. Jesus is playing in the mud, creating small pools of water and molding twelve sparrows out of clay. It is the Sabbath, a day when work and creation are strictly forbidden. When a fellow child, the son of Annas the scribe, sees Jesus "working" on the holy day, he takes a willow branch and destroys the pools.

In the canonical Gospels, we might expect Jesus to forgive the boy. But the Infant Jesus reacts with cold, divine fury. He looks at the child and says, "You insolent, godless dunderhead, what did the pools and the waters do to harm you? Behold, now you also shall wither like a tree, and you shall yield neither leaves nor root nor fruit." The text records that the boy immediately withered away entirely.

This was not a mistake; it was a deliberate use of power. It suggests an early Christian belief that the Messiah’s power was a double-edged sword. To have the power to save also meant having the power to destroy. This "unfiltered" Jesus challenges the idea that holiness and harmlessness are the same thing.

Violence in the Streets: The Boy Who Ran Too Fast

P. Chester Beatty I, folio 13 14, recto

Papyrus 45 (P. Chester Beatty I), an early New Testament papyrus in codex form.

Shortly after the incident with the withered boy, Jesus is walking through the village when another child runs by and accidentally bumps into his shoulder. The reaction is instantaneous. Jesus cries out, "You shall go no further on your way!" and the boy falls dead on the spot.

The parents of the dead child, horrified and grieving, confront Joseph, Jesus’ earthly father. They cry out, "What kind of child is this? Every word he speaks becomes a finished deed!" This social tension is a recurring theme throughout the text. The community is not in awe of Jesus; they are in a state of constant, paralyzing fear. They beg Joseph to take his son away from the village or to "teach him to bless and not to curse."

This brings us to a radical interpretation: Was Jesus a "problem child" for the holy family? The text suggests that Joseph and Mary struggled to contain a force they did not fully understand. It presents a version of the Messiah who had to be taught how to be "good" by his human parents, reversing the traditional roles of teacher and student.

The Classroom Conflict: Striking the Teacher

Education in the ancient world was often characterized by strict discipline and rote memorization. In the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, Jesus is sent to a teacher named Zacchaeus to learn the alphabet. However, the child God refused to be a passive student. When the teacher attempted to explain the letter "Alpha," Jesus demanded to know the spiritual and mystical meaning behind the shape of the letter first.

When Zacchaeus, frustrated by the boy's perceived arrogance, struck him on the head, the result was catastrophic. Jesus did not submit to the discipline; he unleashed a curse that caused the teacher to fall into a deep, death-like stupor or blindness. A second teacher who tried to discipline him suffered a similar fate.

This highlights a key theme: the "Killer Jesus" was a figure who could not be controlled by human institutions. Whether it was the law of the Sabbath or the authority of a teacher, Jesus stood above them all. But this sovereignty came at a price, a trail of bodies and broken lives in his wake. It suggests that the path to becoming the "Good Shepherd" was paved with the mistakes of a powerful youth.

The Turning Point: Redemption and Restoration

A 6th-century icon of Christ from Saint Catherine’s Monastery in Sinai shows the authoritative sacred image that later Christianity elevated

A 6th-century icon of Christ from Saint Catherine’s Monastery in Sinai shows the authoritative sacred image that later Christianity elevated, in sharp contrast to the volatile child figure in apocryphal tradition.

(Public Domain) 

If the Infancy Gospel of Thomas ended there, it would be a horror story. However, the narrative has a profound arc of development. As Jesus grows older, his relationship with his power begins to change. He starts to realize the consequences of his actions. In the latter half of the book, Jesus begins to use his powers to undo the damage he has caused.

He raises the child who fell from the roof (Zeno), he heals his brother James from a poisonous snake bite, and he eventually restores the "withered" boy and the blinded teachers. This suggests that the "true" story of Jesus’ childhood was one of maturation. He was not born with the moral compass of a thirty-year-old; he had to develop it.

This version of Jesus is arguably more inspiring than the "perfect" version. It suggests that the Messiah truly understood the human struggle with anger and power because he had lived through it himself. He didn't just "act" human; he was human, complete with the flaws and growing pains of childhood, amplified by the power of a creator.

Archeology of the Forbidden: The 2024 Hamburg Fragment

For many years, critics dismissed the Infancy Gospel of Thomas as a late medieval invention, a collection of "fairy tales" that no early Christian could have possibly believed. This changed in June 2024, when a groundbreaking discovery was made in the State and University Library in Hamburg, Germany.

Two papyrologists, Lajos Berkes and Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, identified a small fragment of papyrus, codenamed P.Hamb.Graec. 1011, that contained the earliest known Greek version of the text. Dating back to the 4th or 5th century AD, this fragment is at least 600 years older than any other copy we possess. It measures 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) by 5 centimeters (1.9 inches) and describes the miracle of the clay sparrows.

Papyrus fragment of the Infancy Gospel of Thomas from the 4th to 5th century

Papyrus fragment of the Infancy Gospel of Thomas from the 4th to 5th century. 

(Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg/Public Domain)

This discovery proves that these "shocking" stories were not a late invention. They were a central part of the Christian literary landscape during the very era when the Bible was being finalized. Early Christians were reading these stories of a "volatile" Jesus alongside the more peaceful accounts of Matthew and John. It shows that for centuries, the "Killer Jesus" was a legitimate, albeit controversial, way to understand the savior.

Reperceiving Jesus: The "Raw" Divinity

Why would early Christians write and read stories about Jesus killing children? From a modern perspective, it seems blasphemous. But in the ancient world, power was often equated with danger. The gods of the Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians were not "nice." They were majestic, terrifying, and often vengeful. To an ancient reader, a Jesus who could strike down his enemies as a child was a Jesus who was authentically divine.

By stripping away the "monstrous" aspects of his youth, the later Church may have accidentally distanced Jesus from the reality of power. The Infancy Gospel of Thomas offers a version where Jesus is a "holy terror" before he becomes a "holy savior." This suggests that the journey to holiness is a process of learning to restrain one's own ego and power for the sake of others.

Perhaps we have perceived Jesus wrong by insisting on his lifelong "meekness." If these ancient texts are to be believed, his ultimate sacrifice on the cross was not just a victory over death, but a victory over his own inherent, destructive power. He chose to die, even though he had the power to kill.

The Legacy of the Infancy Gospel

Even after the Church officially banned the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, its influence persisted. You can see echoes of these stories in medieval art, where Jesus is often depicted as a small adult with an intense, knowing gaze. In Islamic tradition, the Quran even includes the story of the clay sparrows, showing how far these "apocryphal" traditions traveled.

Today, the "Killer Jesus" remains a shadow in the back of our religious history. He is the Messiah that the official record tried to delete, but who refuses to stay buried. In an age where we value "authenticity" and "raw" human experience, the Jesus of the Infancy Gospel of Thomas feels strangely modern. He is a savior who is not a statue of white marble, but a living, breathing, and occasionally dangerous human being.

Whether we view these stories as historical fact or theological metaphor, they remind us that the story of Jesus is far older, darker, and more complex than the version we find in a standard pew Bible. The "missing years" are missing for a reason, but as archaeology continues to unearth the fragments of the past, the "Boy Who Could Kill" continues to haunt our understanding of the divine.

By Marius Albertsen 

FAQs

  • Why was the Infancy Gospel of Thomas left out of the Bible? The early Church leaders, such as Irenaeus, considered the text "heretical" and inconsistent with the character of Jesus as presented in the four canonical Gospels. They felt the portrayal of a vengeful Jesus did not align with the message of love and sacrifice.
  • Does this mean Jesus was actually a violent child? Historically, there is no way to verify these events. Most scholars believe the text is "pseudepigraphal," meaning it was written by an anonymous author using Thomas’ name to give the stories authority. It is viewed as a theological exploration of Jesus' power rather than a literal biography.
  • Where can I see the Hamburg Papyrus? The fragment is held at the State and University Library in Hamburg, Germany. Since its identification in 2024, it has become a focal point for researchers studying early Christian papyri and the evolution of the "Infancy" traditions.

References

{ https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 23:21 Stuur door

String of scientist deaths, vanishings fuels expert talks of shadow ops and silenced secrets: 'Very serious'

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:49 Stuur door

Mysterious deaths, disappearances of 10+ elite US scientists fuel a storm of UFO-related conspiracy theories in media reports; White House breaks silence and launches joint investigation with FBI

Mysterious deaths, disappearances of 10+ elite US scientists fuel a storm of UFO-related conspiracy theories in media reports; White House breaks silence and launches joint investigation with FBI

White House, FBI doing 'LINK ANALYSIS' on 11 missing, dead scientists

Photo: A screenshot of the Fox News coverage on White House vowing to investigate recent cases of missing and died scientists

Photo: A screenshot of the Fox News coverage on White House vowing to investigate recent cases of missing and died scientists


Who Is Eliminating America's Top 10 Scientists? FBI Investigates a Disturbing Pattern

White House to investigate disappearance of 10 UFO scientists | The Right Squa
Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:24 Stuur door

World’s Largest Association of Aerospace and Aeronautical Engineers Joins Call for Scientific Inquiry of UFOs

Image: Unsplash/Debrief

World’s Largest Association of Aerospace and Aeronautical Engineers Joins Call for Scientific Inquiry of UFOs

Since the Department of Defense (DoD) released the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force’s preliminary findings in June of this year, science-minded groups like the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Harvard University’s professor-led Galileo Project have joined the effort to explain encounters with unidentified aerial objects increasingly reported by both military and civilian pilots.

Now, the world’s largest association of aeronautical and aerospace engineers, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), boasting an active membership nearing 30,000 aerospace industry specialists, have joined that same push to study unidentified aerial phenomena.

Unlike the DoD, which is studying these events for threat identification purposes (something the US military has done on and off since 1947) or NASA and Galileo, who are both looking into the issue for scientific reasons, the August 6th panel that took place during the AIAA’s annual convention had a much more prosaic concern in mind: crew and passenger safety.

“We need everyone’s help on this, and we just do it in a way that is transparent,” said former US Navy Pilot Ryan Graves, one of the six panelists to speak at the safety session and a first-hand witness to the UAP phenomenon. “Because, at the end of the day, you know, like I said, very pragmatically, you know, we’re flying around objects out there at hundreds of miles an hour with people’s families on board. It’s just a matter of time, frankly [before we have a collision]. I’m surprised it hasn’t happened already.”

Three still images from videos of purported UAP released by the US Navy in 2018.

(Images: DoD)

The Panel

Alongside Graves, the session’s five other speakers included Dr. Ravi Kopparapu, a NASA Goddard Space Flight Center scientist, Dr. Kevin Knuth, an Associate Professor of Physics at the State University of New York (SUNY) in Albany, Peter Reali, an electrical engineer and Board Director of the Scientific Coalition of UAP Studies (SCU), Ted Roe, the Director of Research at the National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP), and Philippe Ailleris, a veteran Project Controller for the European Space Agency (ESA).

Ed Stanton, Chair of the AIAA’s Air Traffic Management Integration Committee, moderated what would turn out to be a nearly five-hour session, highlighting the need for his committee and the entire association to take this emerging safety situation seriously.

“Professional conduct will be expected in this session,” declared Stanton at the day’s open. “Comments or questions that are outside of this will neither be tolerated nor permitted.”

Given the panel’s positive reactions, it was a welcomed message from the committee chair of such a staid, scientifically minded organization like the AIAA, and one that set the tone for the serious and often riveting discourse that would follow.

The Presentations

Dr. Kopparapu was the first to speak, leading off with a general discussion about the phenomenon’s history from a scientific perspective while also noting that “this is my first time attending an aeronautics conference.” Like Stanton, Kopparapu kept his message on point with potentially verifiable mathematical principles, periodically stating he wasn’t interested in explanations that relied on “exotic physics.”

Kopparapu was followed by Dr. Knuth, whose talk covered the potential real-world physics behind the unusual flight characteristics described by UAP observers dating back to the 1940s. Knuth’s talk mirrored many of the points made in his 2019 paper on the same subject, including a lengthy analysis of past and present cases. Like Kopparapu, the physics professor focused much of his discussion on the efforts made by scientists back in the 1950s and 1960s who were trying to explain what military and civilian aviators of that era were reporting. Also, like Kopparapu, Knuth noted how much of this data was recorded before there was a stigma attached while also outlining steps that can be taken in the future to help that stigma go away.

Following a riveting presentation by Graves, who once again recounted his own UAP experiences as well as those conveyed to him by his fellow aviators (including some unnamed US Air Force pilots), the SCU’s Reali focused his time on the 2004 USS Nimitz UAP incident. 

More commonly known as the Tic Tac incident, Reali’s recounting included a range of calculations done by his SCU group concerning the physics-defying descriptions of the craft’s movements purportedly captured on RADAR, as well as a discussion of the effects on the surrounding environment such extreme movements should have caused. Like previous presenters, Reali’s talk focused heavily on science and data, calling for an increase in both going forward.

NARCAP’s Director Roe gave a much broader analysis of the phenomenon, including highlighting his organization’s collection of witness accounts that date back to 1916. Roe also offered a harrowing account of an orb of light he personally witnessed up close when visiting a site where he was told others had seen similar things.

Another particularly interesting moment came when the NARCAP director discussed the occasional reports of electromagnetic (EM) interference purportedly caused by UAPs. Specifically, he noted that in all of the 57 cases on file with his organization where EM effects were connected to a UAP sighting, the crafts were all described the same way, as balls of light.

When asked by The Debrief to restate that statistic, Roe said, “all fifty-seven of the cases where pilots recorded concurrent failures of onboard electrical systems, as reported during the UAP incident, described the UAPs as balls of light.” When pressed further by The Debrief for clarification of this seemingly significant point, Roe repeated the claim. “We have no data that we’re detecting electrical interference from any of the other UAP.”

In response to another attendee’s question, Roe addressed historical reports of crashes potentially caused by UAPs, including possible collisions with “flying saucers.” He concluded that many such reports exist, but none have enough data or independent confirmation to be accepted as actual fact.

In 1952 UFOs were seen over Washington D.C. challenging the UFO Taboo From July 12 to July 29, 1952, a series of UFO sightings occurred over Washington D.C. in one of the most publicized UFO “flaps” in U.S. history. (Source: The New York Times) ESA Project Director Philip Ailleris presented last, proposing that researchers comb existing satellite imagery databases to search for UAP, thus avoiding any equipment costs associated with other proposed efforts. “There’s a huge increase of observation satellites launched into orbit [annually],” said Ailleris. “And obviously, this results in a massive increase of data collected.

When asked by The Debrief if he also supported efforts to re-task satellites to look for UAP, he indicated that there was more than enough high-quality data in existing photographic databases to conduct a thorough search while avoiding the costs and complications associated with re-tasking a satellite.

“We have to take advantage of what is available,” Ailleris told The Debrief. “We have to retrieve the data from the existing databases.” 

When asked about the idea of trying to launch a dedicated UAP searching satellite rather than using those already in orbit, Ailleris reiterated the simplicity of his approach. “I don’t advocate for building a separate, dedicated detection system.”

In his conclusion, the ESA’s project manager listed several satellite archives, including some held by his current employer, that he says have vast databases of high-resolution images of Earth’s atmosphere that are ripe for study. Throughout his brief yet thoughtful presentation, Ailleris made sure to note that his work in this area is not connected to his work at the ESA, but is purely one of personal interest..


Session Conclusion and Recommendations

Following the individual sessions, the final scheduled presentation once again fell to Graves, who, as mentioned, had been chosen by his fellow panelists to speak for the group. In that capacity, he presented the AIAA and its legions of members who will have the opportunity to view the session on video, with a set of formal recommendations. 

First, Graves explained that the DNI report indicated that some UAP are real objects. Scientifically studying them should not be stigmatized. He recommends additional sessions introduced within key science/aerospace meetings. He also expressed the need for a panel of experts from different disciplines to identify needed data collection methods and instruments.

Secondly, he proposed a Civilian Scientist Panel responsible for curating unclassified data for public consumption & understanding. This panel would ensure any scientific data or discoveries were available for peer review.

Finally, he proposed that historical data concerning UAP is crucial. He recommends an established routine availability of unclassified sensor data on UAP for peer-reviewed scientific analysis. He also explained that current civilian aircrews feel comfortable submitting aviation safety reports related to UAP without fear of retribution by creating standardized FAA reporting protocols.

To UFO, or not to UFO

Although not part of the formal recommendations, the panel did discuss the pros and cons of including ufologists in any future efforts. While most noted the concerns with stigma issues, they all agreed that it is standard practice in any scientific undertaking first to understand the historical context of the phenomenon to be studied before actually conducting said study.

“I understand that scientists don’t want to get into that,” noted Dr. Knuth during the session’s final Q & A. “But the problem is that scientists haven’t studied this topic for 75 years. We’ve known about these things for 75 years, but it has not been scientifically studied. And that’s left a vacuum [where] pseudoscientists come in.”

After a brief pause, Dr. Knuth furthered this point. 

“The fault lies with the scientists who haven’t studied it. And at this point, the only people who know anything about this are the ufologists who’ve been studying the pseudoscientists. So, if you want to get jump-started, if you want to get some idea of what you’re dealing with, which is one thing you have to do before you just go out there and look with a telescope, you have to get some idea of what people think they know. So you have to look at someone for that expertise, even though it’s not the expertise that you’re hoping for.”

Many panelists and attendees seemingly agreed that having at least one or two select “UFO experts” on the team would probably do more good than harm. 

Final Takeaway

A lot of scientific material and historically collected data were covered in each presentation, and each presenter clearly spent significant time and energy putting their talks together. As a result, the entire gathering seemed to come off as hoped; a sober, rational discussion by scientists and engineers, as well as one particularly impressive pilot, centered on a handful of crucial components. 

This phenomenon is real, it is a safety issue, more and better data is needed to understand what is occurring, and a stigma-free environment is as critical as anything to making that happen.

As an attendee, the biggest surprise was just how mundane and refreshingly similar this panel was to every other AIAA technical session. It had aviators, scientists, and engineers all discussing their subject as soberly and considered as if they were trying to figure out how to assess and improve a flight crew’s workload (an actual panel at this same conference).

Finally, it seemed that at nearly any other time, the single largest group of aerospace and aeronautical engineers hosting a session on UAPs and safety would have almost surely made headlines, many of which would have just taken the opportunity to mock the phenomenon with snarky takes and X-Files theme music. 

However, in a world where the DoD, NASA, and a sitting Harvard professor are all joining the hunt to understand the numerous reports of objects in our skies whose shape and performance often seem to defy conventional explanations, this session on UAP and flight safety came off as both incredibly poignant and incredibly ‘normal’ all at the same time.

And unsurprisingly, just like the entire dry-yet-riveting session, the down-to-earth Graves seemed to sum the panel’s goals the best.

“We all would like to see a reality where this is a problem that everyone is working on,” he said near the session’s close. “And that when a conclusion is drawn, it is done so in a peer-reviewed manner for scientific analysis. Not just the United States, but worldwide.”

RELATED VIDEOS

UFOs & a controversial documentary | Newsmaker
The Global Threat (Full Episode) | UFOs: Investigating the Unknown

Netherlands UFO Encounter! Civilian Witnesses Report.Then This Happens

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/science/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 18:42 Stuur door

Robots Are Learning Complex Tasks by Watching Humans and Other Robots

robots that learn by watching other robots

Image by Vilius Kukanauskas from Pixabay

Robots Are Learning Complex Tasks by Watching Humans and Other Robots

A team of scientists from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland has revealed a new framework that embeds robots with an internal understanding of their own tools and abilities, as well as their functional limitations, called ‘kinetic intelligence.’

The researchers behind the novel framework said their approach gave the robots the unprecedented, if not somewhat dystopian-sounding, ability to learn new skills from other robots regardless of their functional similarity.

While still in the experimental stage, the team said that their learning from demonstrations (LfD) framework could dramatically improve efficiency in multi-robot environments such as large retail warehouses and automotive assembly plants by reducing training times of robotic systems designed to work together.

Learning Complex Tasks Remains Challenging for Robots of Different Designs

According to a statement announcing the sci-fi-sounding framework that lets robots learn complex tasks by watching other robots, some LfD systems already exist. However, these earlier versions cannot be transferred between different robotic systems, limiting them to a single robotic platform learning from an identical ‘trained’ model.

“Most LfD methods remain tied to the robot they were trained on,” the research team explained in a published study detailing their work.

As robotic systems become more prevalent in the workforce, their complexity and capabilities are also expected to continue to increase. The research team notes that this increasing “freedom of motion” will open the door to training methods that allow differently constructed robotic platforms to learn to accomplish tasks regularly performed by robots of a different, but similarly versatile, design. However, they also note that this increasing complexity will only increase the need for simpler training methods that don’t require hours of human intervention.

“Teaching robots new skills should be as natural as showing rather than programming,” the researchers explained. “Learning from demonstration (LfD) moves toward this goal by allowing users to guide a robot or sketch a desired motion, enabling learning without writing a line of code.”

Embedding Kinematic Intelligence on Differently Constructed Platforms

To remove human trainers from the equation, the EPFL team evaluated and classified different 3-jointed robots based on joint spacing and movement constraints. After testing various autonomous learning approaches, the team designed a framework that models potential workplaces, identifies ‘feasible’ motion trajectories based on how they had previously classified the robot, and then executes a safe movement within each robot’s specific design capabilities.

“(We) embedded kinematic intelligence into the control policy, ensuring constraint-awareness and predictable behavior regardless of design variations,” they explained.

The team notes that this framework “endows robots with kinematic intelligence: an internal understanding of their own joint limits, singularities, and connectivity.”

“Instead of correcting for these constraints after learning, we embedded them directly into the control policy from the outset,” they explained. “

Tests Validate Learning From Their Demonstration Framework After a Single Observation

To validate their new framework, the team tested it across several industrial robots with varying abilities and limitations. According to the study authors, this included “diverse simulated and real robots, both redundant and nonredundant, with varied link geometries and joint configurations.”

During each test, a human ‘trainer’ would perform a specified task to demonstrate the desired result. For example, the researchers would trace out the letters of a word or manipulate objects as if they were on a simulated assembly line.

After a single human demonstration, the robotic platforms with the embedded kinetic intelligence framework showed the uncanny ability to adapt their own tools to achieve the same result, regardless of design limitations. The researchers said this included demonstrating the ability to reproduce the traced characters, and to “push, pick-and-place, and throw objects successfully.”

“The Demonstrated Skill Executes Safely and Consistently Across Robots”

When discussing the successful tests, the researchers noted that robots imbued with kinetic intelligence could observe one or more demonstrations, extract a “globally stable dynamical system,” and produce behaviors that remain valid across robots with different physical tools and limitations. They also noted that one robot could watch another perform the skill and adapt its unique configuration to achieve the same result, without accidents or damage.

“The demonstrated skill executes safely and consistently across robots without retuning, thereby achieving cross-robot skill transfer,” they explained.

When discussing possible applications of their LfD framework that lets robots learn by watching other robots, they note that the entire design was grounded in the category of three-revolute (3R) robots, “which form the building blocks of many commercial robots.”

“This classification enables a joint space policy that preserves user intent and adapts to robot-specific constraints,” they conclude.

The study “Demonstrate once, execute on many: Kinematic intelligence for cross-robot skill transfer” was published in Science Robotics.

  • Christopher Plain is a Science Fiction and Fantasy novelist and Head Science Writer at The Debrief. Follow and connect with him on X, learn about his books at plainfiction.com, or email him directly at christopher@thedebrief.org.
RELATED VIDEOS

Humanoid Robots Learn by Watching Us #shorts


How Robots Learn Real-World Tasks

Why Every Tech Expert is Now Watching This New AI Robot

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/science/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 18:11 Stuur door

Meer van UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

↑ Terug naar de berichten