Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie!
Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek!
België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek
In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch.
Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie
Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen!
Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit
Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie.
Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie
Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen.
Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen
Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek!
Blijf Op De Hoogte!
Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren!
Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
For decades, scientists have thought that human consciousness arises from the newest and most sophisticated parts of the brain.
But a Cambridgescientist now claims that the fundamental basis of our experience may be controlled by a far more primal structure.
In a review of over a century of scientific research, neuroscientist Dr Peter Coppola examined stimulation studies, animal experiments, and neurological case reports.
Based on this wide-ranging evidence, Dr Coppola argues that consciousness might arise from our ancient 'lizard brain'.
If true, that would mean that consciousness is not such a uniquely human trait as scientists had once thought.
Writing in The Conversation, Dr Coppola says: 'These reports are striking evidence that suggests maybe the oldest parts of the brain are enough for basic consciousness.
'In turn, this may influence patient care as well as how we think about animal rights.
'In fact, consciousness might be more common than we realised.'
For decades, scientists have thought that human consciousness arises from the newest and most sophisticated parts of the brain. But now, a Cambridge scientist claims that the fundamental basis of our experience may be controlled by a far more primal structure (stock image)
The human brain is a little like a Russian nesting doll, with the parts that evolved most recently on the outside and the older, more basic parts nestled towards the centre.
The recently evolved outermost part of the brain is known as the cortex, which is responsible for complex tasks like memory, thinking, learning, reasoning, and problem-solving.
Meanwhile, the inner region, known as the sub-cortex, hasn't changed much in over 500 million years of evolution.
Often referred to as the 'lizard brain', these primal areas are responsible for monitoring basic impulses and sensations such as hunger, thirst, pain, pleasure, and fear.
Previously, scientists thought that the most recently evolved areas of the cortex, known as the neocortex, were the likely origin of conscious experiences.
The subcortex was considered necessary for consciousness, like how electricity is necessary to make a television work, but not sufficient to create consciousness by itself.
However, Dr Coppola says that scientists have been underestimating the importance of the brain's oldest regions.
Dr Coppola looked at a type of experiment called a stimulation study in which electricity or magnets are used to interfere with parts of the brain.
Scientists had previously thought that consciousness, the subjective awareness of experience, was produced in the more recently evolved outer region of the brain known as the cortex
Instead, neurologist Dr Peter Coppola says that consciousness is likely produced by the more ancient sections of the brain known as the subcortex and the hind-brain (illustrated)
What is consciousness?
Consciousness is the subjective awareness of 'what it is like' to experience the world.
There are two major questions scientists have about consciousness: a so-called easy problem and a hard problem.
The easy problem is the underlying biological processes which control perception, memory and attention.
The hard problem is to understand how and why physical processes should come with a subjective experience at all.
For example, why does banging our funny bone hurt? Why do our bodies not simply register the bodily damage?
Some scientists and philosophers think that we may never be able to answer the hard problem of consciousness.
Interfering with the neocortex produces powerful effects, including changing your sense of self, creating hallucinations, or affecting your judgment, but affecting the patterns of the deeper regions produces even more profound effects.
Dr Coppola says: 'We can induce depression, wake a monkey from anaesthesia or knock a mouse unconscious. Even stimulating the cerebellum, long considered irrelevant, can change your conscious sensory perception.'
This was a strong hint that the older regions of the brain were very important for consciousness, but it wasn't enough to show that the lizard brain alone was capable of producing consciousness.
To make that jump, Dr Coppola looked at cases where people and animals have had parts of their brains damaged or removed.
Damaging the cortex and neocortex produces changes in conscious experience, but damage to the subcortex and other deep regions often leads to the total destruction of consciousness through death or coma.
Even more strikingly, there are rare cases of children born with a condition called hydranencephaly that causes them to lack most of their cortex.
Dr Coppola says: 'According to medical textbooks, these people should be in a permanent vegetative state.
'However, there are reports that these people can feel upset, play, recognise people or show enjoyment of music.'
In rare cases, children can be born without most of their neocortex (pictured) but still appear to have a conscious experience. This suggests that it is only the older regions which are necessary for consciousness
Likewise, Dr Coppola refers to a number of 'extreme' experiments on animals in which rats, cats, and monkeys had their neocortex surgically removed.
Even without this supposedly vital part of the brain, the animals were able to show emotion, groom themselves, parent their young, and even learn.
This suggests that the subcortex alone is sufficient to produce some level of conscious experience.
However, this doesn't mean that the cortex and neocortex aren't adding anything to our human consciousness.
Dr Coppola says: 'The newer parts of the brain – as well as the cerebellum – seem to expand and refine your consciousness.'
These regions take the basic building blocks of awareness and add in the language, moral reasoning, sense of self, and creativity that make human consciousness unique.
That would explain how the richness of human consciousness is able to emerge out of such primitive pieces of brain machinery.
But, if Dr Coppola is correct, this means that a basic level of consciousness is likely older and much more widespread than anyone had previously thought.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is one of the most recently developed forms of neuroimaging.
It measures the metabolic changes that occur within the brain, such as changes in blood flow.
Medical professionals may use fMRI to detect abnormalities within the brain that cannot be found with other imaging techniques, measure the effects of stroke or disease, or guide brain treatment.
It can also be used to examine the brain’s anatomy and determine which parts of the brain are handling critical functions.
A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan uses a magnetic field rather than X-rays to take pictures of body.
The MRI scanner is a hollow machine with a tube running horizontally through its middle.
You lie on a bed that slides into the tube of the scanner.
Equipment used in fMRI scans uses the same technology, but is more compact and lightweight.
The main difference between a normal MRI scan and a fMRI scan is the results that can be obtained.
Whereas a normal MRI scan gives pictures of the structure of the brain, a functional MRI scan shows which parts of the brain are activated when certain tasks are carried out.
Moon landing conspiracy theories are reignited online as NASA reveals details for the Artemis II mission – as one sceptic jokes 'I hope they have better CGI this time'
The focus of many commenters' ire is the fact that it has been over 50 years since NASA launched a mission to the moon.
Given that Artemis II won't actually land on the moon, some conspiracy theorists have been left unsure why NASA seemingly can't replicate a feat first achieved in 1969.
While this has boosted long-debunked claims that the original moon landings were faked, some commenters have gone even further.
The wild theories posted online claim that humans have never even been to space, while others even claim that space itself is somehow 'fake'.
Taking to X, one sceptically-minded commenter joked: 'I hope they have better CGI'.
As NASA unveils the details for the Artemis II mission, lunar conspiracy theories have reignited and spread like wildfire on social media. Pictured: Buzz Aldrin on the moon in 1969
As early as February next year, NASA will launch the Artemis II mission and send four astronauts (pictured from left: Christina Koch, Victor Glover, Reid Wiseman, and Jeremy Hansen) on a 10-day trip around the moon in the first crewed lunar mission in over 50 years
However, on social media, NASA's announcement of the mission's details ignited a wave of conspiracy theories that spread like wildfire over X, formerly Twitter
One internet-dwelling conspiracy theorist joked that NASA's rocket launches were as fake as 'pro wrestling in zero gravity'
Early next year, four NASA astronauts will launch from Earth aboard an Orion spaceship powered by the powerful Space Launch System (SLS) rocket.
Over 10 days, the crew will travel 5,700 miles (9,200 km) past the moon, testing the onboard systems and gathering data on their bodies' reactions, before returning to Earth.
During this time, they will reach the furthest point from Earth ever travelled to by a human and become the first people to travel to the moon in over 50 years.
On X, one commenter wrote: 'I believe that the American missions of the 1950s are fake unless modern humans land on the moon. It's been over 70 years and we still can't go to the moon?'
'So NASA are going to the moon again but they are not actually landing what a load of fake BS,' another chimed in.
One commenter complained that this was 'one of the reasons I don't believe that humans have ever been to the moon.'
The Artemis II mission is not intended to land on the moon, but rather to test out the spacecraft and systems that will be used for the first crewed landing in the Artemis III mission
However, the fact that Artemis II will not feature a lunar landing left some commenters confused as to why the space agency seemingly cannot replicate a feat it first completed in 1969
One commenter complained that they could no longer believe in the reality of anything NASA does or claims to do
NASA's Artemis Mission Timeline
Artemis I
- Uncrewed lunar flight test
- Launched November, 2022
Artemis II
- Crewed Lunar Flyby
- Launch planned for April, 2026
Artemis III
- Crewed Surface Landing
- Launch planned for mid-2027
Artemis IV
- Building First Lunar Space Station
- Launch targeting September 2028
Another vented: 'It befuddles me how people can still believe NASA after 60+ years of fake moon landings and a bunch of excuses since.'
And one commenter even joked: 'Watching these launches is like watching pro wrestling in zero gravity. Everyone knows it's fake, but the show must go on.'
But for those already deeply involved in the world of NASA conspiracy theories, this announcement of the Artemis II mission triggered a flurry of bizarre claims.
Most strangely of all, the lunar mission seemed to prompt many commenters to deny the existence of space itself.
In a wild rant, one commenter wrote: 'The first task of any elected President is to sign over the budget for NASA, the National Academy of Space Actors. Money plays a role but the ultimate reason for fake Space is to hide God & dismiss Creation with Pseudoscience.'
'NASA spends $60M per day of tax payers money to make fake videos about them floating in space,' another claimed.
Another added: 'Space is fake. We never went to the moon. The first astronauts were diving actors. NASA in Houston is a movie set.'
However, like so many online conspiracy theories, many commenters had one big reason for doubting the existence of the space missions: The Flat Earth theory.
Another conspiracy theorist claimed that the lack of a lunar landing in Artemis II was one of the reasons they 'don't believe that humans have ever been to the moon'
The news of the mission pushed some conspiracy theorists into wild rants about secret societies, flat Earth, elaborate cover-ups and the moon landings
One particularly frustrated conspiracy theorist wrote: 'Earth isn't a spinning space ball; it's a fixed plane covered by a firmament they've desperately tried to hide with fake space missions and NASA's $60 million a day budget scam.'
They continued to rant: 'The moon landing? Filmed on a soundstage by Freemason puppets under Operation Mockingbird control.'
While another complained about 'the lying NASA who lied to the world about the Earth being flat.'
Although there is obviously no basis in reality for any of these claims, the number of people who believe in anti-scientific conspiracy theories remains extremely high.
Studies have found that between 10 and 12 per cent of Americans believe that the Moon landings were faked.
Interestingly, while rates of support for other conspiracy theories have remained stable, NASA conspiracies have become more popular.
According to one study from the University of Miami, the number of Americans who believe the moon landing was faked almost doubled from six per cent to 10 per cent between June 2020 and May 2021.
How do we know the moon landings weren't fake?
Physical evidence
When the Apollo 11 mission landed on the moon, they did more than jump about and take a few photos.
The crew placed a retroreflector array on the lunar surface consisting of 100 glass prisms which act like a giant mirror.
This allows observatories on the Earth to bounce lasers off the moon and accurately determine its exact distance from Earth.
Additionally, the Apollo missions brought back 382 kg (842 lbs) of rock samples from six different lunar sights.
These have been repeatedly analysed by independent scientists, showing that they have a unique chemical composition which is different to the rocks on Earth.
Observations at the time
In addition to this evidence, we also have contemporary observations which show the exact moment the lander touched down on the moon.
At the Jodrell Bank radio telescope in Cheshire, Sir Bernard Lovell and his team accurately recorded the precise path of the lunar lander.
These recordings are so precise that you can even see the precise moment that Neil Armstrong took manual control of the lander.
This gives us fantastic evidence from the time that shows the lander touching down on the moon.
The weakness of counter arguments
Another key reason we know the moon landings are real is the lack of any evidence that suggests they are faked.
One of the most common conspiracy claims is that the shadows in a photo taken by Neil Armstrong are not parallel.
But even on Earth, it is easy to observe situations where two parallel lines do not appear parallel whenever a low sun is shining over uneven ground.
People also question how the flag planted on the moon could be waving as if in the wind.
However, a closer examination of the flag in the photo clearly shows that there is a metal pole keeping it held up.
The flag is crumpled after being stored for four days en route and remains wrinkled precisely because there is no wind and little gravity on the moon.
Finally, to keep a fake moon landing secret and prevent any evidence from escaping would require the complicity of thousands of scientists, officials, camera crews, and set builders for over five decades.
The idea that this is possible for any government on Earth is simply much less plausible than the idea that a rocket carried a crew to the moon.
A persistent conspiracy theory Have you ever heard the term “chemtrails”? If so, you’re not alone—this concept has become one of the most persistent and widely discussed weather-related conspiracy theories of the 21st century.
From weather manipulation to population control Proponents claim that the visible trails left by airplanes, commonly known as contrails, are actually chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed into the atmosphere for purposes ranging from weather manipulation to population control.
Photo: By Infrogmation of New Orleans - Photo by Infrogmation, CC BY-SA 2.5, Wikimedia Commons
An idea that captured the imagination of millions Despite a lack of scientific evidence supporting these claims, the idea has captured the imagination of millions around the world, fueled by viral videos, social media posts, and anecdotal reports. Understanding the origins and spread of the chemtrail theory offers a fascinating glimpse into how modern myths can take flight in the digital age.
What's that in the sky In big cities you can often see a multitude of clouds in the sky in the form of lines that cross the horizon. But what are these little white trails in the sky?
Chemtrails-poison in the sky? These clouds are used to support the "Chemtrails" conspiracy theory. They are said to be poison clouds that some very bad people are using to intoxicate us. But why?
Is the drought caused by a super evil secret elite? In the face of climate change and lack of precipitation in many place worldwide, the "chemtrail" theory has been relaunched with a new argument..
Are airplanes causing droughts? Some conspiracy theorist say that it doesn't rain because airplanes prevent rain and cause drought, and that's evident in the sky full of contrails. Again the question arises: Why would anyone do such a thing?
Conspiracy theories are constantly being adapted In reality, the chemtrails theory, like all conspiracy theories, is constantly updated depending on the current situation.
It all started in the 1990s over vaccines It all started in the 1990s with fears of mass obfuscations, morphed into anti-vaccination discourse (yes, some believed those clouds would be an attempt to vaccinate us from the air).
Is someone manipulating the weather from above? Now there are people who claim the traces left from airplanes in the skies are evidence that someone is manipulating the weather.
A simple explanation The explanation for the contrails we see in the sky is simple, and scientists keep repeating it: it's vapor emitted by commercial airliners (or other aircraft) that condenses and turns into ice crystals that hang in the sky hover. So it's not a mystery.
A pandora's box of weird ideas Starting from this premise, a wide range of beliefs opens up with different hypotheses between the mystical, the apocalyptic and the absurd.
The origin: real experiments But like all fears, the chemtrails theory has some reality in its origin. In fact, in the 20th century there were experiments in which the population was sprayed with potentially toxic elements.
Great Britain: 1950s According to 'The Independent', citing a government report, there were army tests between 1955 and 1963 in which zinc cadmium sulphide was dropped on the south and west coasts of Great Britain.
San Francisco: 1950s Another experiment conducted in San Francisco in 1950 is also widely cited. As reported in an article in Smithsonian Magazine, a Navy ship "airsprayed (the bacterium) Serratia marcescens for six days about two miles off the northern California coast." The spread of the bacterium was then analyzed to see what a biological attack would look like.
Two precedents that mean nothing Experiments like this fuel conspiracy fantasies, but the reality is that if someone was doing something in our skies surely they would try not to draw so much attention to their actions, right?
Offensive against science In reality, almost all conspiracy theories aim to challenge scientific discourse. Science, according to conspiracy theorists, is an artificial narrative full of lies constructed by the big corporations or secret societies that rule the world.
The flat earth and other new religions Belief in chemtrails has a lot to do with religion, as does the belief in a flat Earth and other theories. One can only arrive at these convictions by crossing the line of the established. Only the initiated understand the meaning of certain lines in the sky.
How relevant is it that there are people who believe in chemtrails? Debunking these conspiracy theories and misinformation is important: spreading them helps spread messages of hate and fear that are harmful to society.
Reptilian Theory and Anti-Semitism Evidence of this is that an eccentric and seemingly "innocent" theory like the reptilian theory (which posits that an extraterrestrial race lives among us as humans) in some cases has been shown to conceal anti-Semitic utterances.
Sometimes it's celebrities who spread these theories And then there is the propensity of certain celebrities to be gullible and to propagate theories like chemtrails. Here's Kylie Jenner's conspiracy tweet from 2015.
They're not toxic, but so many planes aren't good The answer is that these contrails are not a toxic product, but according to the European Commission, air traffic is responsible for 13.9% of environmentally harmful CO2 emissions. Therefore, for the good of mankind, these trails that we see should disappear as much as possible.
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) has announced a new record set by the Psyche mission. It successfully sent a laser signal to Earth from a distance of 350 million kilometers. That’s more than the distance between our planet and Mars.
Infrared photograph showing the moment when Table Mountain Observatory transmits a laser signal to the Psyche spacecraft. Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech
The Psyche mission was launched in 2023 with the aim of studying Psyche, a 220-kilometer metal asteroid that, according to one hypothesis, may be a fragment of the core of a dead protoplanet. The spacecraft is scheduled to reach it in 2029.
In addition to studying the asteroid, Psyche also has the function of a “tester.” NASA specialists installed an experimental optical communication system on board. Its main advantage over traditional radio communication is its much higher (10 to 100 times) data transfer rate. Lasers can transmit complex scientific information, as well as high-definition images and videos. This is especially important for the next stage of space exploration, when humans will travel to the Moon and Mars and will need to quickly send large amounts of data back to Earth.
The first experiment took place on December 11, 2023, when Psyche was 31 million kilometers from Earth. The spacecraft sent a 15-second video of a cat to Earth (it was preloaded before launch). The data transfer rate was 267 Mbit/s. This is a couple of orders of magnitude faster than when using radio communication.
JPL specialists repeated the experiment several times in the future. As Psyche moved away from Earth, the data transfer rate gradually decreased (for example, when the spacecraft was 226 million km away, it was 25 Mbit/s), but it was still much faster than traditional radio communications. In addition, engineers tested another innovation in the form of duplicate data. The spacecraft successfully demonstrated that it can simultaneously use both radio and laser communication systems to communicate with Earth. The radio data was transmitted to NASA’s Deep Space Network, and the laser data was received by the Hale telescope at Palomar Observatory. The photons captured by it were then directed to a highly efficient detector array, where the information encoded in them was processed.
Almost two years after the start, JPL specialists conducted the 65th and final experiment. During the mission, Psyche once again broke the distance record by successfully sending a signal from a distance of 350 million km. This corresponds to the radius of the inner boundary of the asteroid belt.
According to scientists, the experiments successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the technology. Data encoded by lasers can be reliably transmitted, received, and decoded after passing hundreds of millions of kilometers. In total, Psyche transmitted 13.6 terabits of data to Earth over the entire period. At the same time, the data transfer rate turned out to be even higher than expected. All this means that the technology has great prospects, especially when space agencies face the challenge of transmitting large amounts of high-resolution images and data from the Moon and Mars.
During the total lunar eclipse on September 7, 2025, astrophotographers Gerald Rhemann and Michael Jäger took unique photographs of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS. Their observations revealed a surprising fact: the comet that visited our Solar System glowed green. This discovery put scientists in front of a new exciting puzzle, because previous data on the chemical composition of this comet doesn’t explain this phenomenon.
Illustration of comet 3I/ATLAS with a green tail, generated by Copilot AI
For comets in our Solar System, green glow is a common phenomenon. It occurs when solar heat warms the comet, causing the ice to sublimate into gas and form an atmosphere (comet). Molecules in this gas, particularly dicarbon (C2), begin to glow under the influence of solar radiation, creating a characteristic green glow. However, this is not the case for the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS.
Original photo of 3I/ATLAS in green. Photo: Michael Jäger/Gerald Rhemann
Previous studies, including those conducted with JWST, have shown that this comet has a very unusual chemical composition. It was found to contain elevated levels of carbon dioxide, as well as traces of nickel and cyanogen (CN). However, no dicarbon (C2) molecules, which are traditionally responsible for the green color, were found. This has left scientists at a dead end.
The mystery becomes even more complicated when you consider the conclusions of astronomer Luis Salazar Manzano from the University of Michigan. His team finds that Comet 3I/ATLAS shows a lot of “carbon chain depletion” — meaning it has significantly fewer C2 and C3 molecules than any other comet we know of. The early detection of cyanogen only reinforces this strange chemical anomaly.
This means that either dicarbon is present but has not yet been detected due to unique conditions, or some other, as yet unknown molecule is responsible for the green glow. Both options make this interstellar traveler an extremely valuable object for study.
Scientists hope to find answers to these questions in the near future. According to forecasts, comet 3I/ATLAS will come closest to Earth in December 2025. This will provide astronomers with a unique opportunity to conduct a series of detailed observations and finally unravel the mystery of its green glow. Each such discovery expands our understanding of what celestial bodies far beyond our Solar System are made of and how they are formed.
Black Pyramid UFO Over Trenton, Texas Sept 9, 2025 Video, UAP Paranormal Sighting News.
Date of sighting: September 9, 2025
Location of sighting: Trenton, Texas, USA
This report just in at NUFORC. A black pyramid shaped UFO was seen moving across the sky in Texas this week. The UFO was silent and flying low at 30 meters from the ground. The object really appears to be rotation very slowly scaling the area around it...turning to get a better view of its surrounds. Texes is a UFO hotspot in the US and this sighting is defiantly a top ten in videos from the states. I wonder if it was heading to the Bush Ranch which is George W. Bush's House in Texas. In 2008, the "Stephenville UFO incident" involved dozens of people seeing a large, fast-moving object, which radar data suggested was heading south-southeast, or toward President George W. Bush's Crawford ranch. Was Bush an alien himself...getting visits from family and friends from distant worlds?
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily
Source: NUFORC
Eyewitness states:
Lights on object It came over trees at approximately 100 feet. It looked like the entire edge of it was illuminated or like a pulsating light. It was still daylight so it was hard to tell. It was moving relatively slow at approximately 20-30 miles per hour. There was absolutely no sound coming from the object. It looked like it changed shapes.
White UFO Has Aura Around It, Hovers In Place 30 min! Arizona Sept 10, 2025, UAP Paranormal sighting News.
Date of sighting: Sept 10, 2025
Location of sighting: Oak Creek Canyon, Arizona, USA
Source: NUFORC
This is amazing and it's similar to what I recorded in Utah last week and what was recorded in Idaho the same day. This UFO has a detail that is just 100% proof of it being alien tech...it has an aura around it. Area 51 scientist Bob Lazar once said UFOs have auras around them not to confuse photos and make them blurry, but because it's a byproduct of the UFOs propulsion system.
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily
Eyewitness states:
I thought it was a child's balloon at first but the wind was blowing and this thing never moved. It looked like a white balloon at first. The wind was blowing and this object never moved. Duration lasted about 30 minutes.
Moon zig-zags in weird space eclipse! NASA blames a ‘glitch’ — Really?
Something strange just happened in orbit. On Sept. 21st, NOAA’s CCOR-1 coronagraph onboard the GOES-19 satellite recorded what appears to be the first natural solar eclipse ever observed from space.
In the clip, the Moon doesn’t glide smoothly across the Sun as expected — instead, it zig-zags in a bizarre path, almost as if something was tugging at it.
Coincidence? According to NASA: it could be linked to a “yaw flip maneuver” scheduled for the next day, but the timing has sparked questions.
Even weirder: during the eclipse, the Moon only covered the Sun’s bright disk, yet the entire glowing corona suddenly vanished and everything went just black.
But NASA explained it away as a “quirk of image processing,” where the software subtracted too much light and erased the corona. But for many skywatchers, it looks like more than just a computer glitch.
NASA, as always, gives an explanation that raises more questions than answers. The bizarre event suggests that something, whether natural or engineered, interfered.
Are they covering up the reality of what’s out there?
See the extraordinary event for yourself in the clip below:
For all Viktor Hovland's recent difficulties in predicting the outcomes to his shots, his partner on the course, Ludvig Aberg, has faced an identical battle in trying to second-guess the direction of their conversations. From aliens to philosophy, that can be a diverse road.
It remains to be seen if Luke Donald will follow conventional wisdom by pairing them here at Bethpage Black, reprising the relationship that pulled off a 9&7 foursomes mauling of Scottie Scheffler and Brooks Koepka in Rome two years ago.
To that end, there has been a mild surprise in the fact they have not yet been grouped together in two practise sessions across Tuesday and Wednesday. Keeping them apart so far might be interpreted as an early sleight of hand by Donald, or even a breather for Aberg, who has supplied an insight into those wild chats with his Norwegian friend, one of the most eccentric characters in golf.
'We get along,' said Aberg on Wednesday. 'He's a funny guy to have funny conversations with. They can go in any direction that you don't really expect.
'He's always into sort of the UFO deals and all those things, so it's quite interesting. I'm not quite down that road just yet. If I hang out with him long enough, I might be. Again, you never really know where it's going to go, which is quite interesting.'
Hovland, whose most recent readings have included the works of Plato, spoke earlier this month about the challenges in his game. A fifth-placed finish at Wentworth on his last outing suggests the world No 12 is in good shape, but he admitted there that his 'soul' was aching over the frequency with which he was struggling to control his shots.
Luke Donald is mulling over whether to use Viktor Hovland and Ludvig Aberg (pictured) as a pairing in the Ryder Cup
Aberg revealed his 2023 partner (pictured) has a love for UFOs and carries out some interesting conversations
Aberg added: 'We had a good time in Rome, and we've played multiple practice rounds since, and our caddies get along great, too. He's a good friend to have on Tour and in the team room here.'
The Swede was a breakthrough star in Rome, scoring two points from four just months after turning professional.
He said: 'I think the biggest thing that I take away from those couple days, and maybe especially that morning (against Scheffler and Koepka), was just the validation for myself, that I'm able to do that. Because obviously before I played in Rome, I hadn't even met those guys. I had never shaken their hands. I had never had a conversation with them.
'For me to get there and to bring out a result like that was a big deal for me personally, to know that I'm able to beat those guys at times. I had a really good partner that day, which always helps. But it was a cool experience and probably something that I won't forget.'
Now, researchers think this strange signal, dubbed GW190521, could have arrived from a parallel universe.
In a pre-print paper, a team led by Dr Qi Lai of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences argues that GW190521 could be an 'echo' of a wormhole collapsing.
Since the wormhole would only be open for a very short time, this would explain why GW190521 seems to cut off abruptly.
Although their modelling suggests this scenario isn't very likely, Dr Lai says evidence cannot rule out that the signal travelled to Earth from another universe.
Researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences say that the strange signal might have travelled to Earth from another universe (stock image)
The signal, known as GW190521, was less than 10 milliseconds in length and lacked the normal rising signal associated with two black holes spiralling towards each other
The researchers modelled what this wormhole signal would look like (illustrated) and compared it to the real data from GW190521. They found that the data could not rule out a wormhole as the explanation
According to Einstein's theory of relativity, objects with mass stretch and pull the fabric of spacetime, like weights placed on the surface of a trampoline.
One important consequence of this is that collisions between very massive objects create ripples which spread throughout the fabric of reality over enormous distances.
That gives the signal produced by merging binary black holes a rising chirp-like pattern, which is a telltale sign of a black hole collision.
So far, scientists have used gravitational waves to detect about 300 collisions between binary black holes, each producing the same drawn-out chirp.
What makes GW190521 so unusual is that it is missing the rising part of the signal produced when the black holes spiral inwards.
Given that the resulting object was roughly 141 times the mass of the sun, scientists should have been able to detect this part of the signal if it occurred.
Currently, the best explanation for this unusual signal is a chance encounter between two black holes that smashed directly into one another without spiralling.
In 2019, scientists detected a burst of gravitational waves, ripples in spacetime usually caused by colliding black holes, that didn't match any other signal previously recorded. Pictured: artist's impression of two black holes colliding
If the collision between two black holes briefly created a wormhole, the echo of their collision would pass through the throat of the wormhole into our universe, where it would appear as a brief burst of gravitational waves
What are gravitational waves?
Gravitational waves are ripples in the fabric of space-time which are caused by the collision of massive, dense objects.
When objects like black holes or neutron stars violently accelerate in collisions, they squeeze and stretch the space in their path.
This creates waves which spread through spacetime at the speed of light over vast distances.
Scientists use very long laser beams to measure these very slight disturbances in the fabric of space.
However, Dr Lai says that a wormhole in another universe is also a plausible explanation.
In their paper, Dr Lai and his co-authors write: 'The wormhole represents such an object connecting either two separate universes or two distant regions in a single universe through a throat.'
If the merger of two black holes produced a short-lived wormhole like this, we might be able to hear a brief snippet of the chirp echoing into our own universe.
When the wormhole snaps shut, the signal would be cut off to leave a very brief burst of gravitational waves.
Dr Lai adds: 'The ringdown signal after BBHs (binary black holes) merged in another universe can pass through the throat of a wormhole and be detected in our universe as a short-duration echo pulse.'
Dr Lai and his colleagues created a mathematical model of what this wormhole signal would look like and compared it to the data from the real GW190521 signal captured by the LIGO and Virgo gravitational wave detectors.
The researchers also created a model for a sudden collision in our own universe and compared the results.
They found that the standard collision model did fit the data better, but only just.
Currently, the best explanation for GW190521 (illustrated) is that a chance encounter between two black holes that collided suddenly without spiralling around each other. But a wormhole is still a viable explanation
That means the wormhole model is still a viable explanation for the GW190521 collision.
In their paper, the researchers write that the preference for the standard collision was 'not significant enough to rule out the possibility that the echo-for-wormhole model is a viable hypothesis for the GW190521 event.'
If true, this would not only prove that wormholes exist but also give scientists a powerful new tool to study them.
That would allow scientists their first-ever glimpse into a universe beyond our own.
LIGO is made up of two observatories that detect gravitational waves by splitting a laser beam and sending it down several mile long tunnels before merging the light waves together again.
A passing gravitational wave changes the shape of space by a tiny amount, and the LIGO was built with the ability to measure a change in distance just one-ten-thousandth the width of a proton.
However, this sensitivity means any amount of noise, even people running at the site, or raindrops, can be detected.
The LIGO detectors are interferometers that shine a laser through a vacuum down two arms in the shape of an L that are each 2.5 miles (four kilometers) in length.
The light from the laser bounces back and forth between mirrors on each end of the L, and scientists measure the length of both arms using the light.
If there's a disturbance in space-time, such as a gravitational wave, the time the light takes to travel the distance will be slightly different in each arm making one arm look longer than the other.
LIGO (pictured) is made up of two observatories that detect gravitational waves by splitting a laser beam and sending it down several mile (kilometer) long tunnels before merging the light waves together again
Ligo scientists measure the interference in the two beams of light when they come back to meet, which reveals information on the space-time disturbance.
The ensure the results are accurate, LIGO uses two observatories, 1,870 miles (3,000 kilometers) apart, which operate synchronously, each double-checking the other's observations.
The noise at each detector should be completely uncorrelated, meaning a noise like a storm nearby one detector doesn't show up as noise in the other.
Some of the sources of 'noise' the team say they contend with include: 'a constant 'hiss' from photons arriving like raindrops at our light detectors; rumbles from seismic noise like earthquakes and the oceans pounding on the Earth's crust; strong winds shaking the buildings enough to affect our detectors.'
However, if a gravitational wave is found, it should create a similar signal in both instruments nearly simultaneously.
Meer van UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
The ancient part of your brain that controls your consciousness, found by scientists
Infrared photograph showing the moment when Table Mountain Observatory transmits a laser signal to the Psyche spacecraft.
Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech
