Naar de inhoud

UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
akke.beakke.be
Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie! Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek! België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch. Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen! Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie. Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen. Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek! Blijf Op De Hoogte! Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren! Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.

Categorie: André's Hoekje (ENG)

All Of The Paperwork Disappeared

All Of The Paperwork Disappeared

UFOs and Nukes author creating documentary (Video)

Warren-AFB-UFOs-ftr

UFOs and Nukes author creating documentary (Video)

Robert Hastings, the author of UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites, says he has amassed over 150 interviews with military veterans from both the US and USSR that have witnessed UFO events at nuclear weapons sites. In 2010, he brought several of these witnesses to the National Press Club in Washington D.C. to share their stories with the media. The event was streamed live by CNN. Now, Hastings wants to feature his research in a documentary, and he is asking for your help to complete it.

You can watch and download the the full press conference at Archive.org.

Hastings wrote on his website that the $100k budget for the documentary has been spent, and that he needs another $25k to finish it.

I emailed Hastings some questions about the film and why he thinks the project is so important. He says his UFO research stands apart from the rest because, “I am the only researcher who has focused on this type of UFO activity. My data base of nukes-related UFO incidents far exceeds that of any other investigator. That will come through in the film.”

He continued:

The existence and threatened use of nuclear weapons has shaped the modern world. For the first time in human history, we possess weapons which would–if used en masse–destroy civilization, as well as poison the planetary environment with radiation. The Cold War, between the US and the USSR and their allies, was the central feature in international relations for more than 50 years.

Intriguingly, as the result of American and Soviet documents being declassified, or stolen, we now know that a still unidentified outside third party, possessing vastly superior aerial craft, monitored and even disrupted the nuclear missiles operated by both superpowers during that tense era.

Moreover, evidence provided by US military personnel suggests that this startling, perhaps ominous UFO activity continues to occur to the present day.

This obviously makes the UFO phenomenon a front page story, even though the US government continues to deny its reality and the mainstream media continues to routinely report these official lies as fact.

My film examines intermittent but ongoing UFO incursions at nuclear weapons sites from the late 1940s to 2010, and is based on declassified American and stolen Soviet documents, as well as the testimony of military veterans from both the US and the USSR. Over the past 41 years, I have interview more than 150 of the former, of which twelve appear in the film.

Hastings stresses the high level of credibility these witnesses have in particular. He says, ” These are persons that the American government trusted to launch World War III, if it had come to that, by launching their nuclear ICBMs. Now, scores of those same veterans are coming forward and stating that UFOs have long monitored and even shut down those missiles.”

Hastings’ website includes an excerpt from the movie with some incredible testimony from several of the witnesses he referred to. One story in the clip is told by former US Air Force Captain Jay Earnshaw, who while stationed at Warren Air Force Base in 1965, received a call from flight control about a remarkable UFO sighting.

Earnshaw says, “He had observed, along with the rest of his response team members, what looked like five to six oblong lights stacked on top of one another just outside the gate.”

The objects did not shoot down a beam or move aggressively. Earnshaw says, “They simply were there stacked up.”

According to Earnshaw, all of the paperwork on this sighting disappeared. You can watch the clip below.

Hastings has tediously put together some of the most credible testimony available for the existence of the UFO phenomenon related to nuclear weapons. If you would like to help fund his movie, you can do so by visiting his website at www.UFOHastings.com.

{  http://www.openminds.tv/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 13:46 Stuur door

Shades of “Alien Autopsy”?

Shades of “Alien Autopsy”?

http://devoid.blogs.heraldtribune.com/14944/now-lets-see-them-pix/

Now let's see them pix!!!

/  Thursday, November 20, 2014

American University cinema instructor John Weiskopf was absolutely jazzed with the way last week’s “UFOs: Encounters by Generals, Pilots and Government Officials” conference worked out. And it wasn't just him.

“The school is extremely pleased, and they had previously been a little wary,” he said after the first — albeit brief, at three hours — university-sponsored UFO conference in memory. “There were literally close to two dozen people who helped us produce the event. Every single person was in sync in what I would definitely call an historic event. It was a remarkable day and I think American University really set a standard. It was the tone — it wasn’t sensationalistic.”

Asking the media to simultaneously entertain a UFO discussion about Roswell and air traffic safety is like giving a baby equal helpings of peas and ice cream/CREDIT: www.storiainrete.com

Asking the media to simultaneously entertain a UFO discussion about Roswell and air traffic safety is like giving equal helpings of peas and ice cream to a child/CREDIT: www.storiainrete.com

Um, well, sort of not. The key here, said Weiskopf, was scheduling a lineup of speakers based largely on author Leslie Kean’s sober assessment of the phenomenon, UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On the Record. She and two of the book’s chief contributors — former NASA scientist Richard Haines and retired Air Force colonel Charles Halt — were on the panel. But so was Thomas Carey, longtime investigator of the 1947 Roswell Incident, an event so thoroughly analyzed, cogitated, muddied, exploited, debated, disputed, contested, disfigured, wrangled, mangled, hashed, rehashed and overexposed, it has become synonymous with futility, if not cliche.

And, of course, the only major media outlet to cover the AU discussion — Washington’s news-talk station, WTOP — couldn’t help but catch the shiny Roswell bling and lead with it, big time. Who wouldn’t? After all, Carey, co-author of Witness To Roswell, claimed to have the “smoking gun” — two color Kodachrome slides, allegedly stock-dated to 1947, that purport to show a glass-encased alien cadaver.

The Kodachrome controversy has been percolating for nearly two years now, and the acrimonious fallout says far more about human ego than it does about the evidence at hand. In fact, no one outside a select few have actually seen that evidence, which Carey promised nearly 200 AU audience members would be released sometime next year. But what a tease.

The corpse, he said as reported by WTOP, was “3 and a half to 4 feet tall, the head is almost insect-like. The head has been severed, and there’s been a partial autopsy; the innards have been removed, and we believe the cadaver has been embalmed, at least at the time this picture was taken. The owners of the slide — it’s an amazing story. The woman was a high-powered Midland, Texas, lawyer with a pilot’s license. We think she was involved in intelligence in World War II, and her husband was a field geologist for an oil company.”

Shades of “Alien Autopsy.” Simply irresistable.

“Well, that was pretty sensational,” admitted Weiskopf, whose first and foremost obligation was to AU students enrolled in his “Alien Contact: Science and Science Fiction” honors course. “But I wanted to balance it out with a more popularized speaker, and Roswell is still in the popular mind.”

True that. If the points that other panelists hoped to score with larger audiences got eclipsed by the Roswell presentation, no one chose to vent on the record. Haines, whose National Aviation Reporting Center On Anomalous Phenomena focuses on aircraft safety posed by The Great Taboo, volunteered nothing but praise for AU’s hosting “such a controversial subject in an open and publicized way. I personally hope that this event might encourage other institutions of higher learning to do the same, both within their own honors program departments and also within other main-line departments.”Video                        

Halt, whose own startling UFO encounter at a U.S. airbase in southeast England in 1980 continues to provoke debate, said he was “extremely impressed” by AU’s adventurous initiative. Nevertheless, “Don’t hold your breath waiting for another university to step up,” he cautioned in an email. “Most are afraid to accept the truth and are fearful of being pilloried by the media. That said,” he added, “I see (this) as (a) glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel.”

Ever the diplomat, Kean preferred to concentrate on bridge maintenance, with an eye to the future. “AU did a superb job and everything went smoothly — and it’s amazing that they did it and got such a favorable response,” she said. “So it was extremely positive.”

‘Nuff said. At least for now.

Be Sociable, Share!
Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 23:53 Stuur door

UFOs Invade BAS

UFOs Invade BAS

Bulgaria: BAS To Investigate UFO Claims

Photo: EPA/BGNES

BAS To Investigate UFO Claims

The Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS) Institute for Space Studies recently held its first official conference on the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence, Prof. Lachezar Filipov told the Nova TV breakfast show.

“Until now this topic was sort of banned among the scientists,” he said. “But the growing public interest, not only in Bulgaria, but abroad, made BAS believe that we must respond to such phenomena.”

According to Filipov, the conference was prompted by the claims of “a serious man” that he saw a “large saucer of platinum colour, with no windows, hovering over Sofia's Kremikovtsi district” in mid-October. The witness told Filipov no one else around seemed to have noticed the flying object, or at least no one reacted.

“He found me and told me the story, but wishes to remain anonymous, because he is a serious man with large business enterprises and is afraid the people will make fun of him,” Filpov said. “He only told his wife and me.”

According to Filipov, there have been other documented cases where only one person among many, saw the UFO.

Filipov told Nova TV that the witness claims that after the “flying saucer” flew away, he experienced “a time warp” incident.

“This is why we want to set up a working group within our institute,” Filipov said. “There have been such reports previously, but no one seemed to take them very seriously. We need to investigate those claims and see how reliable they are. There are people who make things up, there are people who see things but tell nobody, there are people who find me and tell me what they saw. But most people are afraid everyone will think they're crazy. If they see that the scientists investigate such incidents, they might come out and tell us.”

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 23:20 Stuur door

Sorry, "Destroyed"!

Sorry, "Destroyed"!

John Greenewald:

"Harry Rositzke was an American spymaster whose career included researching the origins of the English language to probing the inner workings of Nazi Germany and, later, the Soviet Union. For 25 years, he ran CIA covert operations against the Soviet Union from several overseas posts as well as Washington.

Rositzke was rumored to be known as "The Falcon" -- the head of a private group called the "Aviary" which comprised of individuals with ties to the intelligence community. It is rumored that this group was responsible for leaking the original MJ-12 documents, and Rositzke, known as the "Falcon", was the head.

So, I filed a FOIA Request for Rositzke's FBI file, and received a few pages back that were from the early 1960s. They showed that an FBI informant, or maybe just a do-good citizen, wanted to offer up some information on Rositzke. It is unknown exactly who this person was, or what they wanted to offer the FBI.

In the FBI's FOIA response, they said there could be more pages responsive to my request (meaning, there was more on Rositzke) and I should file a FOIA for the rest; which I did.

After months of waiting, I received a letter from the FBI that the rest of Rositzke's file was completely destroyed on June 15th, 1987.

I have requested a lot of FBI Files in my time, on all sorts of characters, and out of all of them, the alleged MJ-12 members, and those connected to it, have a high number of files destroyed by the FBI.

Coincidence? Maybe... but thought I would throw it out there for discussion."

Here is a link to the documents: http://theblackvault.com/…/FBI-Files-The-Paranormal-Collect…

http://theblackvault.com/m/articles/view/FBI-Files-The-Paranormal-Collection#harryrositzke
Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:24 Stuur door

125 Thousand Vs *52.6 Billion

125 Thousand Vs *52.6 Billion

* The total US Black Budget for Military Intelligence was 52.6 Billion dollars, according to the Washington Post (August 2013). The leading agencies were the CIA, NRO and NSA.

Support Our Film

Knowledge is Power • Spread the Word

Robert Hastings speaking during a presentation

The U.S. government has suppressed information about UFO activity at American nuclear weapons sites for decades. Researcher Robert Hastings believes that people everywhere have a right to know the facts and has been speaking out since 1981. His 2008 book, UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites, exposed the truth for thousands of readers.

On September 27, 2010 CNN streamed his press conference from Washington D.C. resulting in considerable, widespread publicity. A Google search for the press release announcing the event had as many as 2.7 million results.

But more needs to be done if this public information campaign is to be successful.

Hastings’ nearly-completed documentary film, UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed, will inform millions of people worldwide about longstanding and ongoing incursions by UFOs at U.S. nuclear ICBM sites, sometimes resulting in the missiles malfunctioning. Documents smuggled out of Russia confirm that the Soviets also experienced such incidents.

But the $100,000 budget for the production—donated in 2013 by a supporter who wishes to remain anonymous—is nearly exhausted and an additional $25,000 is needed to complete it. Here is an excerpt:

Will you help bring this important, historic work to the public? Click the button below to make a contribution via PayPal.

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:45 Stuur door

MJ-12,Secrecy, UFOs

MJ-12,Secrecy, UFOs

by STANTON FRIEDMAN

I was out of town at the Travis Walton Sky Fire Summit conference in Arizona and have gotten behind. A number of postings made recently seem to me to be inaccurate:

  1. The claim has been made that there really hasn’t been much UFO information covered up. I have, as previously noted, several reasons for saying this isn’t true. Yes, we have 156 pages of NSA TOP SECRET UMBRA UFO Documents “released”(the NSA admitted they had them) way back in the 1980s because of the CAUS legal actions. Dozens of TSU CIA documents were also released. Doesn’t sound like much. Unfortunately the NSA documents were entirely whited out except for one sentence per page because supposedly the rest was Sources and Methods info. The only reason for the “release” was President Clinton’s signing of Executive Order 12958. Implementation was of course delayed. The new EO is 13526.Originally the CIA released no documents above SECRET. It took me 2 years to get the TSU documents usually with only a few words legible per page. All of these are of course roughly 30 years old. Also the NSA HQ told its various offices that if they should receive a request from me, not to handle it in the fashion described in regulations. Instead of replying to me, send the request to HQ, thus avoiding releasing the fact that they had materials. Is there any reason to think there is more data?
  2. Surely more was accumulated in the past 30 years. Perhaps more important we have the statement told to me first hand by USAF General Carroll Bolender (and obtained under FOIA by Robert Todd) that UFO reports which could effect National security were not part of the Blue Book System and that if BB was closed, reports which could effect national security would continue to be investigated using the procedures designed for that purpose. Namely JANAP 146 and Air Force Manual 55-11. Note these apply only to the Air Force. To the best of my knowledge none of these have been released
  3. Surely the Aerospace Defense command personnel (pilots, radar operators, spy satellite operators)have been made aware of loads of other sightings by personnel working under security. Furthermore we have all the sightings made by Navy (and army)personnel all over the world. The Navy office said they had no UFO information even after I sent them a joint ONI OSI report.
  4. It has been claimed that governments aren’t very good at keeping secrets. Let us not forget that old and powerfully wrong notion that absence of evidence is evidence for absence. Good examples of very large scale government secret keeping include the Manhattan District effort to develop atomic bombs involving tens of thousands of personnel and huge classified facilities in Oak Ridge, TN, Hanford ,WA, Los Alamos, NM,etc and the use of 5% of the electrical power in the United States. Let us not forget the Stealth Aircraft Program under Lockheed.. $10 Billion. Let us not forget the more than 10,000 people involved in breaking the German and Japanese communications codes..kept quiet until 25 years after WW 2 ended. At one time Boeing Corp. had a contract with the NRO to improve the architecture of their spy satellites. It was cancelled after many billion dollars were spent.
  5. The objection was made that when lots of secrets are kept there is a major impact on society as a kind of reaction. Best example I know is the very widespread release of false and misleading statements about UFOs by the government and media. This is demonstrated by the serious failure of the press and scientific communities to dig for truth about flying saucers. It is demonstrated also by loads of fiction being broadcast and shown, movies about aliens. Official government lies do indeed have an impact..in this case very negative
  6. We have been told that academic historians and experts on intelligence have exposed loads of classified information even though they do not have a need to know or appropriate clearance. No need for guys like me to dig into archival files. The Intelligence agencies would very much like for the public to believe that nonsense. Perhaps they could provide us with the NSA,NRO, and CIA UFO files (that we can read) ? Have they revealed much data from the $52.6 Billion spent on Military Intelligence in one recent year..most by CIA,NSA,NRO?
  7. Some have complained about the FOI being an inept procedure. I agree but it can be useful. Remember there is no central clearing house. John Greenewald has managed to dig out a ton of data as demonstrated by his Black Vault web site.. I admire his patience and skill. I have been lied to, but also been helped by FOIA people
  8. Perhaps people have forgotten the findings of the Senator Frank Church Congressional committee which found in the early 1970s that at least 400 journalists were closely connected to the CIA, some even on the payroll. Many were associated with major media groups including the New York Times, CBS, Time etc. Perhaps it is no coincidence that they haven’t blown the lid off the Cosmic Watergate. Carl Bernstein, Co-Pulitzer Prize winner of 1973 of Watergate fame, had a 25,000 word article in Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977. It appears that the public was blissfully ignorant, despite those historians and Intelligence Experts
Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:29 Stuur door

1947 "Smoking Gun" Evidence?

1947 "Smoking Gun" Evidence?

http://www.wtop.com/?nid=41&sid=3741410&pid=0&page=1

UFO experts say 'we are not alone'

367782.jpg?filter=wtop_picgallery_largeJournalist Leslie Kean showed photos taken by a government mapping plane in Costa Rica in 1971. (WTOP/Michelle Basch)

WASHINGTON -- UFOs were the topic of a panel discussion Wednesday night at American University, and one of the speakers used the occasion to reveal evidence he called a "smoking gun."

"We have come into possession of a couple of Kodachrome color slides of an alien being lying in a glass case," author and researcher Thomas Carey told the near-capacity crowd in Abramson Recital Hall. 

He's been researching the 1947 Roswell incident since 1991. 

"What's interesting is, the film is dated 1947.  We took it to the official historian of Kodak up in Rochester, New York, and he did his due diligence on it, and he said yes, this filmstrip, the slides are from 1947. It's 1947 stock. And from the emulsions on the image, it's not something that's been Photoshopped like today. It's original 1947 images, and it shows an alien who's been partially dissected lying in a case."

Carey says the being looked like what he thought an alien from the famous Roswell incident would look like. 

"3 and a half to 4 feet tall, the head is almost insect-like. The head has been severed, and there's been a partial autopsy; the innards have been removed, and we believe the cadaver has been embalmed, at least at the time this picture was taken. The owners of the slide -- it's an amazing story. The woman was a high-powered Midland, Texas, lawyer with a pilot's license.  We think she was involved in intelligence in World War II, and her husband was a field geologist for an oil company."

Carey says he plans to reveal the images early next year. 

Another panelist, Dr. Richard Haines, is a retired NASA scientist and co-founder of NARCAP (National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena), which provides pilots with an anonymous way to report sightings they can't explain.  

"We're pretty ignorant yet about what we're dealing with. And that's the birth of a science. That's how most sciences begin," he said. 

Haines says NARCAP has collected hundreds and hundreds of UFO cases. 

"Our government is not taking the subject seriously. My role, or mission, if you will, is to bring this to the attention of our aviation world, at the union level, at the airline level and at the government level. I'm finding hardly any difficulty doing that in foreign countries.  I'm having a great deal of difficulty in America, and I don't know why."

Leslie Kean is an investigative journalist, co-founder of the Coalition for Freedom of Information and author of the New York Times bestseller "UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On the Record."  

She wrote her first story about UFOs in 2000. 

"My whole life was changed at that point. I was so compelled and so interested and so curious about this UFO phenomenon, because the more I studied it, the more I realized that you couldn't write it off. … It's not like you learn ways of explaining it. You learn more and more about the mystery of it, and the incredible documentation that's out there," she said. 

During her presentation, she detailed several interesting UFO cases, and showed some photographs, including one of a shiny, circular object.

"This is an incredible photograph that was taken over Costa Rica in 1971 by a government plane, a mapping plane, that had a camera strapped underneath the aircraft.  And every 17 seconds it took a photograph of the ground. The dark area is a lake, and ... the lighter area is the land, and over that lake there's a disc-shaped object."

Kean says Chile and France have full-time government staffers who do nothing but seriously investigate UFO cases, and she thinks the same is needed in the U.S.

"I'm trying to make the point that our scientists need to get more involved. In order for that to happen, we need a government agency here that will open the doors to allowing our scientists to engage with this topic."  

The most riveting presentation of the night came from retired U.S. Air Force Colonel Charles Halt, one of the witnesses of a famous series of UFO sightings in England in 1980 known as the Rendlesham Forest incident.  

Halt says he went into the forest to check out a report that a UFO had landed there. He saw three indentations in the ground that were spaced evenly, and a Geiger counter showed abnormally high levels of radiation in the area.

During this investigation, Halt says, he and several other military members saw a flying, oval-shaped object that glowed bright orange and red, and seemed to be dripping like molten metal. 

"We're standing there in awe. I said, 'There's got to be an explanation. Ball lightning, or who knows what.'  It starts to move. It moves towards us.  It comes into the forest.  It's moving through the trees horizontally, bobbing up and down as necessary to miss the trees.  I'm thinking, ‘Oh boy. I wish I hadn't come out here. This is really getting beyond me.'" 

He says they watched it for a few minutes, until something happened. 

"Suddenly and silently, it explodes into five white objects like fireworks, and it's gone." 

Halt closed out his presentation this way:

"If I could leave you with one thing, I'd say keep an open mind, and we are not alone. I can assure you."

Follow @WTOP on Twitter and WTOP on Facebook.              

© 2014 WTOP. All Rights Reserved.

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:48 Stuur door

Area 51 Is The Yin To Roswell’s Yang

Area 51 Is The Yin To Roswell’s Yang

Desert Companion - Out there

Story by George Knapp1114_history.jpg

Twenty-five years ago this month, the author opened the door on Area 51. The story could hardly have been stranger had he found the aliens

A buzz was building inside the Kulturhuset, a community center built on Islands Brygge, the historic property on the waterfront of Copenhagen’s harbor. Inside the hall, an audience of more than 120 Danes, Norwegians, Germans and Brits were waiting to hear about a mystery that first surfaced on Las Vegas television 25 years ago. What’s the latest about Area 51, they wanted me to tell them — and whatever happened to that flying-saucer guy Bob Lazar?

Bob Lazar

Few people know better than I do how outlandish the Lazar story sounded when his tale of a secret Nevada base housing UFOs exploded onto the scene back in November 1989. To this day, it is still a bit befuddling to me that educated professionals, artists, musicians and retirees from all around Europe would gather to hear the latest scuttlebutt about the flying saucers supposedly housed in a secretive facility in the Nevada desert.

The Exopolitics Denmark conference, a two-day gathering in October, wasn’t the first to focus on the subject, and it won’t be the last. Area 51 is known around the world. Every day I receive letters, emails or phone calls from curious people in Ecuador, Iceland, Hong Kong, Russia or other far-flung places asking about Area 51 or the bookish whistleblower who put it on the map.

And that’s exactly what Lazar did. Today, Area 51 is an oxymoron of the highest order — the world’s best-known secret base. It has been mentioned in such blockbusters as The Da Vinci Code, National Treasure, an Indiana Jones sequel and Independence Day, in which Earthlings used the base to fight off an alien invasion. It’s been featured in “X-Files” episodes, inspired dozens of books, hundreds of magazine articles, songs, cartoons, poems and business enterprises.

Earlier this year, former President Clinton talked about his interest in aliens and Area 51 on the Jimmy Kimmel show. President Obama became the first sitting president to mention the name of the base — during a ceremony honoring Shirley MacLaine.

Heck, even the Kardashians visited the outskirts of the base for their reality show.

There are several businesses named after Area 51 — a rock ’n’ roll band, a couple of bars, a video game, a fireworks company, jerky stores, inflatable love dolls, a dance troupe, art exhibits and the Las Vegas triple A-baseball team. After my first televised interview with Lazar, the most prominent business in Rachel, Nev., wisely changed its name from the Rachel Bar and Grill to the Little A’Le’Inn, selling T-shirts, posters, Groom Lake wine and Bob Lazar Christmas tree ornaments, along with “Beam Me Up, Scotty” drinks at the bar and Alien Burgers in the kitchen.

The story as told by Lazar has not only persisted but has blossomed, despite overtly hostile treatment by major media outlets and some of the best-known honchos of Ufology. Many of my journalism colleagues have worked their ink-stained panties into pretzel-thick bunches by fretting about the story. Nonetheless, since the saucer stuff burst into the public consciousness, every major media organization, program and paper in the world has, sometimes reluctantly, beaten a path to Area 51’s once-obscure door. The attention has irritated some of my fellow reporters to the breaking point.

The nonexistent military base

"Sometimes I really do regret it.” On the media screen inside the Denmark hall, attendees are intently watching an edited clip of an interview with Lazar. “I almost feel like apologizing to them, saying, ‘I’m sorry. Can I have my job back?’”

It’s far too late for that — assuming he ever had a job out there in the first place. Whatever anonymity Area 51 enjoyed evaporated forever the moment Lazar spoke into a TV camera.

Groom LakeThat first interview was broadcast in May 1989. Lazar’s face was hidden and he used a pseudonym, Dennis. He claimed he worked intermittently at a location called S-4, south of Groom Lake, the main facility of Area 51. He said nine aircraft hangars had been built into the side of a mountain, adjacent to Papoose dry lake, disguised to look like the desert floor. Inside were nine flying saucers of alien origin. “Dennis” said the program was controlled by the U.S. Navy and that he and other scientists were taking the saucers apart to figure out how they worked — “reverse engineering,” he called it.

Eight months later, on Nov. 10, KLAS-TV identified Lazar by name and showed his face as part of a series called “UFOs: The Best Evidence.” To this day, it ranks as the highest rated, most-watched local news program ever produced here. Within days, Lazar’s claims had spread to Europe and Japan. TV crews and tabloid outfits flocked to Nevada. Tour buses filled with UFO enthusiasts staked out the deserts of the Tikaboo Valley. The guards, nicknamed “camo dudes,” who patrol the perimeter of Area 51 were overwhelmed by all the attention, and ticked off, too.

Before that first broadcast, the only people familiar with the name of the base were folks who worked there or at the Nevada Test Site, or who lived in one of the remote communities of central Nevada. A few journalists had written bits and pieces about the base in the ’60s and ’70s. Aviation magazines speculated about spy planes that might be flying out of Groom Lake: the sleek SR-71 Blackbird, the gangly and magnificent U-2 and a strange craft rumored to be nearly invisible to radar. Among the handful of Nevada journalists with an interest in the base were two Las Vegas muckrakers, Bob Stoldal and Ned Day, who years later would become my bosses.

Acting on a tip from a former CIA pilot and Area 51 watcher named John Lear, Day and Stoldal broke a big story about the existence of the stealth fighter, which, they reported, had been developed and tested at Area 51. Federal lawmen hauled Day in for questioning about the source of his information. Stoldal was nabbed by military security on the outskirts of the base. In the early ’80s, when they hired me to work at KLAS-TV, they told me intriguing stories about the ominous military base known by many names — The Ranch, The Box, The Watertown Strip and, best of all, Dreamland. By then the base had vanished from maps of the Test Site. The government began to pretend it didn’t exist, even though it had been acknowledged by the military as early as 1955 and had been photographed by Russian satellites. It became readily apparent that intelligence agencies and the military were flat out lying to the public, and, as lies go, it wasn’t very convincing.

Extraterrestrial Highway

'There is no delusion'

In Copenhagen, I told the audience that it no longer matters to me whether anyone believes Lazar’s wild tale. (That’s almost true.) For years after the story broke, it was a burning priority for me to try to convince the public — and my skeptical colleagues — that the story was legitimate and true. Not anymore.

These days, I focus on explaining why we took the story seriously in the first place, why we put our credibility on the line and how the tale subsequently took on a life that no one could have imagined. Like it or not, the Lazar meme is alive and well.

“Look, I’m not out there giving UFO lectures or producing tapes. I’m not in the UFO business,” Lazar told me in an interview recorded this year at my home. “I’m trying to run a scientific business, and if I’m The UFO Guy it makes it really difficult for me. It is to my benefit that people don’t believe the story. So when somebody says that they don’t believe my story, I say, ‘Great. Pass it around. I don’t want you to believe it because it makes life difficult for me.’”

These days, he owns a scientific supply company in Michigan. He doesn’t grant interviews and has done his best to put the whole episode behind him. He makes an occasional exception for me, mostly because of the strange road we have traveled together and the wars that have been fought in the odd little universe of Ufology.

“Look, I know what happened is true,” Lazar says. “There is no doubt. Period. There is no delusion.”

Groom Lake“Bob wouldn’t go to the trouble to make up a story to lie to people and then perpetuate that lie,” adds his close friend Gene Huff, a Las Vegas real-estate appraiser. “I mean, he lives in his own world and doesn’t care what people think. Bob has no idea who won the Super Bowl last year, or the World Series. He’s busy doing scientific stuff in Bob Lazar World and would not waste his time perpetuating a lie about UFOs.”

When KLAS decided to pursue Lazar’s claims, we spent eight months looking into his background and the larger story about UFOs at Area 51. On the surface, Lazar seemed an unlikely person to bring into such a sensitive program, assuming such a program exists. He likes machine guns and hookers, builds jet-powered cars, operated an outlaw fireworks spectacular and flies a skull-and-crossbones flag over his house. Hardly the profile of a stuffy government scientist. What’s more, the claims he made about places he worked and the school he attended could not be verified.

But instead of scaring us away from the story, the lack of records is what hooked us. Lazar said that prior to S-4, he had worked as a physicist on classified projects at Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico. The lab told me it had no record whatsoever of Lazar. After I found a lab phone book listing his name, and a front-page Los Alamos newspaper article that named him as a lab physicist, Los Alamos still denied having any records. A headhunting company confirmed to me that it had hired Lazar to work at the lab and would send me copies of his records — but then clammed up, refusing to return phone calls or respond to letters, later denying it ever told me that it had the records.

I interviewed four people who had personal knowledge of Lazar working at Los Alamos on classified projects, and I even took a tour of the lab with Lazar as my guide. Something was clearly wrong with this picture. Later, after Lazar got into legal hot water, I asked Nevada Rep. Jim Bilbray for help tracking down Lazar’s employment records. The congressman’s office said it was stonewalled by several agencies and had never seen anything like it.

The second thing that hooked us was Lazar’s knowledge of how things worked at Groom Lake. He says he spent very little time at Groom itself, but he knew, for instance, that a company called EG&G handled hiring. (Lazar claimed he had been sent to EG&G on a recommendation from physicist Edward Teller, whom he had met at Los Alamos.) Lazar knew that employees were flown to the base in unmarked planes or driven to Groom on buses with blacked-out windows — all true. He told us he had been interviewed by a guy who might have worked for the FBI as part of a background check for his security clearance. The agent’s name was Mike Thigpen. As it turned out, Thigpen was a real person, but he worked for something called the Office of Federal Investigation, which conducts background checks on people hired to work at the former Test Site. That part of Lazar’s story turned out to be true.

We also confirmed the existence of a location called S-4 on the Nellis range. There had been no references anywhere to such a place, but the public affairs office at Nellis confirmed to me that S-4 was a location at which the Air Force “tested certain equipment.” (If you ask them today, they will tell you they are “unable to find any such designation on any maps” of the range.) How did Lazar know it existed?

The most important information Lazar had was the location and time of test flights of the saucerlike craft. Three weeks in a row, he escorted a group of people out to the desert east of the Papoose range, and they witnessed a glowing saucer-shaped object rise above the mountains and perform dramatic maneuvers. One of the sightings was captured on videotape. I interviewed each of the people who went along, and they told me the same story. Again, how did Lazar know? There had been no reports of aerial activity at Papoose. To this day, the official story is that the government has never had a facility at that location (even though satellite maps show a road leading from Groom Lake to the spot where Lazar says the hangars were located). As an aside, earlier this year, a UFO researcher found images on Google Earth that appear to show the outline of what could be nine hangar doors on the side of Papoose dry lake.

After an inconclusive result on one polygraph test — the examiner thought Lazar was too frightened — he easily passed a second test, administered an ex-cop named Terry Tavernetti, who quizzed him about his core claims. No attempt at deception was detected. Not long after we reported Tavernetti’s findings, his office was burglarized and the charts from Lazar’s test were stolen.

Yet another reason we gave Lazar the benefit of the doubt is that we found witnesses to back up at least parts of his story. I’ve interviewed more than two dozen people who worked at Groom Lake at various times from the 1950s through the ’80s who have told me they saw saucerlike craft being tested or stored or taken apart in the vicinity of Area 51.

Groom Lake

Most telling of all are those witnesses who were subsequently visited and threatened by various Men In Black types. Six people who offered to tell me their stories say they were visited immediately afterward and ordered to keep their mouths shut. If it had happened only once, I wouldn’t think much about it. But these six people were solid citizens, not UFO nuts. One woman says she her life was threatened. Another man says he was warned about imprisonment if he talked. What this told me was that someone was listening to my phone calls. In the days before Edward Snowden’s revelations, before we took for granted that the government is listening to every call and reading every email, this knowledge really pissed us off. Years after the story broke, I spoke to two former spooks who admitted that their job was to follow me, Lazar, Lear and Huff to see who we met or spoke to, at our workplaces, homes or bars. If Lazar’s tale was baloney, why were we being followed?

Nonetheless, my approach to the Lazar material changed in the mid-’90s, for a couple of reasons. One is that I was concerned that I had crossed into advocacy instead of merely reporting on it. The fact is, it became personal. So many weird things happened during those first few years, things that are hard to explain if you weren’t there.

  Second, I reluctantly came to realize that I would never be able to prove Lazar’s claims, no matter how many witnesses came forward to verify parts of his story. The folks who run Area 51 are simply better at this stuff than I am, and were always able to deflect stories about what goes on there. So I changed my focus to merely explaining how the story played out and why I remained interested over the years.

Amazing and ridiculous

In the years since the stories broke, I’ve read the most amazing and ridiculous things about Area 51 and the saucer stories in local and national publications. Quite a few articles have poked fun at the story or at me. I’ve been the subject of at least three terrifically funny editorial cartoons in the Review Journal — all three now hang on my bathroom wall. The RJ media critic speculated that people were “rushing home at night to see my UFO reports” because they wanted to see the moment when I finally went “bull-goose loony on the air.” One columnist bestowed on me the title of “grand mullah in the church of cosmic proctology.”

  Some of this stuff was pretty funny, but it bothered me that so many journalists had made up their minds about the Area 51 stories without ever doing a bit of work on it or without interviewing any witnesses. They seemed to know ahead of time, perhaps through psychic visions, that the story was bunk. To my mind, that isn’t how journalism is supposed to work.

The most troubling failures by my colleagues has been their willingness to accept whatever stories are promulgated by the Air Force or CIA, as long as the end result is to poke fun at crazy UFO buffs.

Groom Lake

In the years since the Lazar story broke, I’ve met scores of men who worked at Groom Lake on classified projects who have told me they never saw any saucers, and I believe them. But those same men have told me they would see co-workers in the chow line every day and never know what they were working on because they couldn’t talk about it. They were reportedly ordered to lie about their work to their own spouses.

Flying Saucer

The other explanation that has been swallowed by those who don’t want the story to be true is that maybe the tale told by Lazar is part of a disinformation plot, devised by the CIA or Air Force, as a way to distract attention away from something else flying around out there.

If that was the plan, it was a miserable failure.

As a result of the saucer tales, tens of thousands of people have made the trek out into the desert to watch the skies. Media crews are out there every week. Congressional investigators have asked tough questions. No one at Groom Lake ever wanted this much attention, regardless of what they are doing these days.

Critics of the story, or of Lazar, are welcome to laugh at it all they want. But the fact is, the debate is effectively over. Area 51 is now permanently carved into the public consciousness. Area 51 is now the yin to Roswell’s yang, and the UFO stories are never going to be divorced from the base itself.

The UFO crazies won the battle. Long live Area 51.

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:34 Stuur door

Mister Spock No Sub 4 Mr. O'Brien?

Mister Spock No Sub 4 Mr. O'Brien?


(UFOs Australia narrated by Mister Spock) ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUr9xrDEhVQ

A crack in the wall

Hate to keep working a plowed field, but today we need to revisit the seminal “Sovereignty and the UFO” essay in the journal of Political Theory. That's because of what's happening tomorrow in Washington, D.C.

The "Sovereignty" piece, penned by political scientists Alexander Wendt and Raymond Duvall in 2008, laid out a theory for why America’s higher-learning institutions were incapable of entertaining serious debates on The Great Taboo.
The disconnect was more political than scientific, and the result, they argued, was intellectual poverty on a broad scale.

"Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" -- Mister Spock/CREDIT: www.fanpop.com

"Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" -- Mister Spock/CREDIT: www.fanpop.com

“If academics’ first responsibility is to tell the truth,” they declared, “then the truth is that after sixty years of modern UFOs, human beings still have no idea what they are, and are not even trying to find out. That should surprise and disturb us all, and cast doubt on the structure of rule that requires and sustains it.”

At American University, international relations professor Patrick Jackson, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education at the School of International Service, is not only familiar with the Wendt/Duvall piece, he sympathizes with major portions of it. “Science is the excitement of not knowing. I’d like to think we want our students to think more broadly than to simply reproduce in some form or fashion the same old idea they’ve heard all their lives,” says Jackson. “I mean, what is tenure if not to explore what Nietzche called untimely thoughts?”

Accordingly, on Wednesday, Jackson has volunteered to sub for PBS science reporter Miles O’Brien (scheduling conflict) and moderate AU’s three-hour panel discussion “UFOs: Encounters by Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials.”
This is a free public event extending from an honors colloquium taught by cinema professor John Weiskopf. The lineup includes USAF veteran Charles Halt (the Bentwaters incident), retired NASA scientist Richard Haines (National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena founder), Roswell investigator Thomas Carey, and New York Times bestselling author Leslie Kean (UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On the Record).

This is a big deal. Although increasing numbers of institutions are warming to the idea of sponsoring discussions about extraterrestrial intelligence, the SETI model — ETs are just like us, playing around with radio signals while conveniently stranded on some cosmic island far, far away — is about as far as they’ll typically extend their necks. Wednesday’s roundtable is different.

“How often does an honors class take a serious look at UFOs? John Weiskopf is to be commended for making this happen,” states Kean. “American University is breaking ground here which could help encourage other universities to do the same. Many people and departments at AU are rallying around this event and they all take the subject seriously. I hope this will pave the way for the academic community to become more objective and rational about this subject.”

To be sure, cautions Jackson, the classroom bridge into this exotic realm is built on the foundation of science fiction in popular culture. But it’s also a novel way of introducing students to AU’s School of International Service, one of the top-ranked foreign studies programs in the country.

“What are international relations about if not an encounter with ‘the other’ in some way? In this case, it would the alien,” says Jackson, who has yet to be convinced the evidence supports the ET premise. “If you look at Star Trek, whether it’s Klingons they’re dealing with or the Federation, it’s all international politics. What we want to do is stimulate intellectual creativity and promote robust discussion, not to shut it down by saying it’s prima facie absurd.”

Could a successful AU symposium signal to other universities that it’s OK to hold UFO forums without getting the cooties? “I could imagine a pathway,” Jackson says. “But let’s hold this forum and see what happens.

Be Sociable, Share!

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:33 Stuur door

THE UFO “WHY?” QUESTIONS

THE UFO “WHY?” QUESTIONS

The star 55 Cancri has the most confirmed planets so far of any other (excluding the sun).

The star 55 Cancri has the most confirmed planets so far of any other (excluding the sun). NASA Art

ABSTRACT

I have been fortunate enough to lecture (usually “Flying Saucers ARE Real”)   over 700 times in 18 countries. My audiences, mostly college and professional   groups, seem to have no problem accepting the detailed factual data that I   present leading to my conclusions that SOME UFOs are alien spacecraft and that   the subject of flying saucers represents a kind of Cosmic Watergate. But what   seems to be of most concern, judging  by the Question and Answer sessions, are   the “WHY?” questions. Why would saucers crash? Why would aliens visit Earth?   Why doesn’t the government tell us what it knows? Why would aliens not land on   the White House lawn or at the United Nations? Why would people fake MJ-12   documents? Why do you say SETI stands for Silly Effort To Investigate? Why have   you kept at it for 39 years? Why hasn’t the government taken you out? Perhaps   my answers will help the reader answer his “WHY?” questions, or lead to more   such questions.

   THE UFO “WHY?” QUESTIONS 

    1. WHY have you concluded that the evidence is overwhelming that Earth is   being visited by intelligently controlled Extraterrestrial Spacecraft?

    The simplest answer is that it is the only conclusion merited by the enormous   amount of evidence. In my lectures I review 5 large scale scientific studies   and ask after each one how many have read it. Typically fewer than 2% have read   any. I note the 5000-plus physical trace cases that Ted Phillips has collected from   over 70 countries. In these people see a craft land and then take off leaving   behind various markings on the soil such as burn circles, landing gear marks,   small footprints, dried out rings of soil, etc. These are not crop circles   where normally no saucer is seen. About 1/6 of these cases involve reports of   small beings. I refer to the more than 1000 abduction cases that have been   investigated by  Budd Hopkins, David Jacobs, John Mack, and Raymond Fowler and the   Betty and Barney Hill case as recorded by John G. Fuller. I review the   outstanding work by Marjorie Fish clearly indicating that Betty’s star map   makes sense and provides information not previously known to us. Furthermore, I   have spent time at 20 archives, had a security clearance for 14 years, and find   it perfectly obvious that crucial data has been withheld and many government   people have lied with regard to UFOs. Saying some UFOs are of ET origin, of   course, doesn’t answer other questions such as WHY are aliens coming here, WHY   haven’t I seen one, where are they from, etc., etc.

   2. WHY don’t the aliens, if they are real, just land on the White House lawn   and say “Take me to your leader.”?

Obviously I don’t speak for any aliens. However, let us note three facts:

A. The White House is in a forbidden flying zone. Our response to intruders   in such zones is to take immediate action to escort the intruders away or shoot   them down. As far back as the summer of 1952 when, in July, UFOs did fly over   the White House, orders were given to military interceptors to shoot down UFOs   if they don’t land when instructed to do so. This is described in detail in   Frank Feschino Jr.’s new book Shoot Them Down.  Major General Roger Ramey   proclaimed that interceptors had been scrambled hundreds of times without any   luck. As an indication of the zeal of pilots, I have heard of at least 7   specific cases in which the UFOs zapped attacking earthling aircraft. Tim Good   in his new book Need to Know recounts similar cases. I am working on a claim   by a pilot that UFOs took out 20 of our planes in Europe in the early 1950s.

   B. It may come as a surprise to many Americans, but the President of the   USA doesn’t speak for Planet Earth. After all who elected him World President?   Certainly not the billion people from India or the 1.3 billion people in China.   Obviously the UN also does not speak for Planet Earth, either.

   C. Normally, negotiations only take place between roughly equal parties.   Surely it is not difficult to see that aliens have technology far in advance of   earthling technology. Their vehicles are clearly faster, more maneuverable, and   have access to huge space carriers (mother ships) with lord-knows-what   capability. They have no reason to negotiate when they can already do what   they please.

   3. WHY in the world would aliens want to come here if, as you have claimed, we   are a primitive society whose major activity is clearly tribal warfare?

   Answers to this question depend very much on one’s picture of the local   galactic neighborhood and of the situation on our planet. The SETI cultists   seem to think we are the Crown of Creation and that there may be “as many” as   50,000 civilizations in our Milky Way Galaxy, which has a few hundred billion   stars. It is almost 100,000 light years across which, according to Frank Drake,   means there may be another civilization “only” 1000 light years away. This   would, of course, make us very special as one of the elite civilizations. I   think that there are probably many advanced civilizations within our local   neighborhood on planets around some of the 2300 stars within 54 light years,   especially the 46 that are very similar to the sun. The driving fact here is   that we have only had fancy technology for perhaps 100 years. But the earth is   about 4.5 billion years old and has been suitable for life for well over a   billion years.


    Just  down the street, 39.4 light years away, we find a pair of   sun-like stars, Zeta 1 and Zeta 2 Reticuli. These are only an 1/8 of a light   year apart from each other, but are a billion years older than the sun. In   other words, there has been a great deal of time for other civilizations to   establish themselves. Having an easily observable neighbor nearby would provide
far more incentive for the development of interstellar travel than we have out   here in the boondocks. My view is, per a fine analogy from physicist Beatriz   Gabo Rivera, that we are like the gorillas in a nature preserve in Africa who   know nothing about what is going on outside the preserve. I think aliens have   been traipsing around the neighborhood for a very long time indeed. I think it   is hilarious that Dr. Seth Shostak, one of the noisier SETI guys, says there is   nobody at ZR 1 or ZR 2, because they were listened to by a Southern Radio   Observatory 10 years ago. One would think he knows what equipment and frequency   alien communicators way ahead of us would use, and that they are trying to   attract our attention, which is totally absurd.

   Answers also depend greatly on how difficult it is to travel within the   neighborhood. If one is a SETI cultist noting (as on the terrible Peter   Jennings, Feb. 24, 2005, TV mockumentary) that our fastest spacecraft is the   Voyager probe and that it would take 70,000 years to get to the nearest star,   trips would be very uncommon indeed. A much more realistic approach is to note   that Voyager hasn’t had a propulsion system on it since it left Earth. It   is coasting, helped by some cosmic freeloading. Can we estimate the time it   takes to cross the ocean by throwing a bottle in? Can we tell how long it would   take to fly from New York to Los Angeles by putting a feather in the air? It   took Charles Lindberg 33 hours to cross the Atlantic. The Concorde did it in   just a few hours. The space station goes around the entire earth in 90 minutes.   Electromagnetic signals take 1/7 of a second to circumscribe the earth.

   Remember, we have just started on our technological kick. Think back to 1900.   Note no TV or radio or microwaves or nuclear power plants or satellites or DNA   testing or lasers or computers or airplanes or rockets or nuclear weapons or   transplanted organs. I am convinced that, unless we   stupidly destroy ourselves, there will be a time when star travel is not   considered any more far out than crossing the Atlantic on a 747 is today. I   recently flew nonstop from Newark, New Jersey, to Hong Kong, China, in less   than 17 hours. Nuclear submarines circumnavigate the globe without surfacing.   Obviously there are those who think star travel is impossible. If that were   true, which it isn’t, obviously nobody could be coming here from the stars.

Think of all the people going through O’Hare Airport in a year and the   huge variety of reasons for travel. To get the ball rolling, here are some   reasons for coming here. I am sure the reader can think of more:

  A. Graduate students doing their thesis work on the development of a primitive   society, on a planet where, amazingly, there is no planetary government, and where   there are many different languages; on various strange biological specimens, or on   genetic variations  of the intelligent beings.

   B. Broadcasters with weekly shows such as “Idiocy in the Boondocks.”

C. Mining engineers similar to those who went to California and the Klondike   and Australia for gold, or to Texas and the Middle East for oil. As it happens,   the earth is the densest planet in the solar system, so would be expected to   have more of the rare but very important very heavy metals such as gold,   uranium, rhenium, platinum, tungsten, osmium, etc. These are all much denser   than lead. We know from studying star spectra that they are rare. They also   have very special properties.

D. Mining engineers extracting more common metals from the nodules on the bottom of   the ocean and from the asteroids between Mars and Jupiter. We have been talking   about doing this. Obviously war is much more important than ocean mining to us,   so we build nuclear submarines to stay in the depths of the ocean carrying   their multitude of nuclear tipped missiles. There are also abundant supplies of   so-called rare earths, many used in the electronics and nuclear industries. It   should not be forgotten that a century ago the primary use for uranium was to   prepare yellow glazes for pottery. Zirconium and titanium were essentially   worthless. Now nuclear navies use zirconium based alloys because of their   splendid nuclear and anticorrosion properties. Titanium is used in aircraft   like the SR-71 because of its high strength and low density.

   E. Operators of refueling and rest and relaxation centers on the back side of   the moon or in the depths of the ocean or in the asteroid belt.

   F. Visitors checking on old colonies established by their ancestors.   Perhaps there were many different ones which might explain why we have black,   brown, red, yellow and white races.

   G. Jailers. This may be a penal colony on which aliens dropped off their bad boys and   girls and that is why we are so nasty to each other. Georgia and Australia were   first settled by convicts. Letting the convicts go bother other civilizations   who, unlike us, have learned to live peacefully, may be a no-no in the galactic   rule book.

   H. Vacationers. This may be a recreation center. Notice how many people visit Hawaii and Las   Vegas and Orlando. If the travel wasn’t easy, how many would venture forth to   see Mickey Mouse or gaming tables or surfing beaches?

   I. Specimen gathererers for ET zoos and aquariums. We are still   finding new specimens.

   J. Local galactic horticultural societies collecting specimens for   their displays and genetic cross breeding.

   K. Medical researchers. They may have to evaluate the genetic material of loads of   specimens to find genetic defects or super-special genes. There are a number of   conditions whose frequency in the population is quite small (for example, only one person   in 14,000 has hemophilia) so many specimens must be checked.

   L. Honymooners. Perhaps this is the honeymoon capital for this corner of the neighborhood.   Special rates for a week on Earth… side trips to the moon and Mars…

M. Cartographers. Local neighborhood maps may describe, for example, the   equivalent of English coaling stations in the 19th century.

   N. Sports enthusiasts. There may be special excursions to observe various such events. Don’t   forget that a World Championship Chess match was held in Iceland.

   O. Scouts seeking the best site for a new amusement park in the solar system.

   P. Weapons inspectors. If we make the eminently reasonable assumption that every advanced   civilization is concerned about its own survival and security, than we would   expect that our development of Weapons of Mass Destruction and the means for   delivering them in the local neighborhood would be of great concern. Clearly   after World War II it should take less than a century for us to master fission and   fusion and other new technologies to allow us to take our brand of   friendship/hostility… out there. Thus, a logical reason to visit is to   quarantine us until we develop a technique for learning to live at peace with   each other. No galactic federation new-member committee would allow us to join.   Too primitive.I suspect that the SETI cultists think they would be welcome   guests. Not very likely.

   Q. Producers. Having worked on a lot of motion picture documentaries at many locations, I   would suggest perhaps some visitors are planning epic fiction and factual   movies for film companies at home… shooting on location hither and yon.

    4. WHY is the government not   telling what it knows?

   Are they afraid of War of the Worlds panic? I hardly   think so. After all, New Jersey was being destroyed by Martians. What could we   do against them? Panic was not inappropriate.  First we have to recognize there   is a Cosmic Watergate and a long history of government lies about UFOs such as   I described in Ref. 1, which lists lies from the FBI, CIA, USAF, NSA, etc.   Some want to insist that (A) governments can’t keep secrets, and (B) the real   secret is that they don’t know what is going on and can’t admit that either.

    I disagree with both. A few examples of secret-keeping that have leaked out: The   Manhattan Engineering District employed 130,000 people to develop the atomic   bomb at a cost of several billion dollars in total secrecy during World War II. The   Allies broke the German code during World War II and had 12,000 people working at   Bletchley Park in the UK intercepting, decoding and translating German military   communications. If the secret had come out, the Germans would have changed   their codes. There was really nothing in public until 25 years later despite   the obviously great improvements in technology. We also had broken the Japanese   military codes — again in secret. With regard to B, note that the military   agencies have monitoring systems that provide far more information than we   civilians can obtain — and in secret.

   The Naval Research Laboratory finally admitted in 1995 that it had launched a
bunch of Corona electromagnetic intelligence satellites to monitor Soviet radar   and communications systems starting in 1960, after 12 secret failures. The   first one that worked provided more data than all the previous secret U-2   flights that preceded it. The Soviets knew about the U-2, but dared not admit   that they couldn’t do anything about it. The American people had not been   informed. Similarly the Soviets had shot down a number of military   reconnaissance aircraft probing Russia, North  Korea, and China causing the   loss of 166 crew members. Their families were lied to: unfortunate accident,   crashed at sea, etc. It was not until 2001 that the USA had a meeting with families   of the crew members that they were told what happened, even though most of the   losses occurred in the 1940s, 50s, and 60s. Medals were distributed.   William Burrows tells the story in his book By Any Means Necessary (Ref. 2).

   The National Reconnaissance Office first admitted in 2005 that it had launched   7 Poppy satellites between 1962 and 1971. Their function was to conduct very   sophisticated monitoring of electronic and radar installations on Soviet ships.   Thousands of people were involved.

    So yes, indeed, secrets can be kept. The annual US Black Budget is estimated at   30-40 billion dollars. That is a lot of secrecy.

     So WHY keep UFOs secret?

  A. All major countries and many terrorist groups would   very much like to duplicate the flight technology of the saucers. They can   literally fly circles around our vehicles, move at very high speed, make right   angle turns, move straight up and down — typically with little noise, no visible   engines, no exhaust. They would make wonderful weapons delivery and defensive   systems. Since we have recovered wreckage at least as early as 1947 (see   Crash at Corona, Ref. 3) we would have set up a highly classified project   (call it Operation Majestic 12 as described in my book TOP SECRET/MAJIC (Ref.   4)) to try both to evaluate the wreckage and to obtain measurements of flight   characteristics using airborne and spaceborne and earth-based radar sets,   cameras, electromagnetic sensors, and other instrumentation. Surely governments   have very much more sophisticated instruments and observation platforms than do   private individuals. The key rule here is that one can’t tell one’s friends   without telling one’s enemies. It appears that there have been many UFO crashes   including ones overseas (Varginha, Brazil, for example). There is a long   history of countries gathering and evaluating crashed vehicles of their   enemies. This does not require a conspiracy; everybody has the same self   interest concerns.

   B. Each country worries about its enemies determining the secrets of saucer   technology before they do and must be concerned about how to defend against new   vehicles and also how to learn what the other guy has already learned. Soviet   spies at Los Alamos apparently shortened the time it took the Soviets to test   their first A-bomb (1949) by at least a year.

   C. What if an announcement were made, by highly trusted individuals around the   world, such as the Queen and the Pope, saying that indeed SOME UFOs are ET   spacecraft? Here are some things I believe would happen:

   (1) Church attendance would increase.

   (2) Mental hospital admissions would increase.

   (3) The stock market would go down; uncertainty is always the enemy.

   (4) Based on my more than 600 college lectures, the younger generation, which,   unlike me, was never alive when there wasn’t a space program, would push   for a new view of ourselves as EARTHLINGS instead of as Americans, Canadians,   Greeks, Peruvians, etc. Many would think that would be great. But I know of no   government on Earth that wants its citizens to owe their primary allegiance to   the planet (where it belongs) instead of to individual national governments.   Nationalism is the only game in town. I believe that alien visitors — they may   be our landlords, for all we know — think of us as earthlings even though,   because of our military traffic, they would be well aware of different ruling   groups in different places.

   D. A small group of religious fundamentalists (Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson   come to mind) have already loudly proclaimed that UFOs are the work of the   devil and there is no other intelligent life outside Earth. What an insult to   the notion of an all powerful GOD! They would be up the creek without a   religious paddle if an announcement were to be made. They have had a great deal   of political clout.

   E. Making an announcement would require that governments admit they have been   lying through their teeth for decades. I don’t know of any government that   wants to do that.

   F. If an announcement were carefully made without the scare mongering of “War   of the Worlds”, a lot of people would think that surely, aliens, who can come   here, must be far more advanced technologically than are we, since we can’t go   out there. This would strongly suggest that soon there would be new methods of   energy production, air and ground transport, computers and communication   systems, i.e. economic chaos. We are not very good at large scale economic   changes in a hurry. Think of the Soviet Union which, at our strong demands, had   democracy, elections, freedom, capitalism. On the average, except for the high   price of oil, are Russians better off today than they were 17 years ago??

   G. Because I am convinced that military pilots in many countries have been   disintegrated or “disappeared” by UFOs, I think governments would all be very   resistant to telling their citizens that we tried to attack UFOs and they   returned the favor — only they succeeded. The head of the American Rocket   Society in 1952 took President Truman to task for the attack orders. Frank   Feschino Jr. (Shoot Them Down) has gathered hundreds of reports of supposed   airplane crashes in the USA and overseas in the early 1950s. Three military   pilots, each of whom flew over 100 missions in Korea where they had to deal with   marauding MIGs, crashed when they came back home. That seems very suspicious   to me.

5. WHY would saucers crash?

Usually this is accompanied by a comment that it   makes no sense that a sophisticated vehicle coming from many light years away   could possibly crash.   Please note that the vehicle could have come from a   base on the back side of the moon, in the asteroid belt, on Mars or some alien   “coaling station” in the local neighborhood. I once did 25 college lectures in   35 days in 15 states. I was gone all the time from when I left home until I   returned rather than going back and forth to home after each lecture.

  A. In the first place, there are many indications that what crashed at   Roswell and in the Plains of San Agustin in New Mexico in early July, 1947,   were small Earth excursion modules rather than the interstellar, very large   vehicles (space carriers? mother ships?) which would have brought them to Earth   just as our large aircraft carriers carry 75 or so small airplanes whose mode   of propulsion is distinctly different from that of the carrier.

   B. Secondly, when we examine major efforts by the Transportation Safety Board   to determine the cause of aircraft crashes, we often find, after much effort,   that it was simple unexpected things ranging from loose bolts, to ingested   birds, to faulty wiring, to pilot error, to ice in the wrong place. It could   have been very high atmospheric electricity levels because of storms or the   great dryness of the desert air. Or unexpected high altitude hail. We know a   radar set was on over at White Sands because of an impending rocket launch and   the fact that it used vacuum tubes. This was a tracking radar pointed North.   Crossing the beam might have led to a small hiccup in the control system for a   magnetoaerodynamic propulsion system leading to a collision and subsequent   collision of the lead saucer and its wingman’s saucer. Perhaps a US   military rocket launched in the neighborhood might have inadvertently homed in   on a saucer. Perhaps there was a momentary loss of attention when the Trinity   highly radioactive site, at which the first atomic bomb was tested, was noted.   We certainly have no reason to believe that aliens never make mistakes, or   never run into the unexpected. Some day perhaps the government will release the   report that was undoubtedly written as to the causes of the crashes. Just   because we don’t have that report, it doesn’t mean the event   didn’t take place.

   6. WHY haven’t you seen a flying saucer?

   I have no idea, though I have mostly   lived in cities and am watching for traffic rather than looking to the skies. I   check my audiences after my lectures and find that typically 10% have seen one,   which covers many decades. Only 10% of those were reported. I have never seen   Tokyo either or had polio or HIV. I know people who have seen Tokyo, had polio,   or HIV. I spent many years chasing neutrons and gamma rays. Never saw one of   them either. They are also real.

   7. WHY do you say SETI stands for Silly Effort to Investigate?

    Frankly I find that there is very little science behind the SETI effort. It is   assumed that there are civilizations using communication technologies similar   to ones we have developed to try to attract our attention. It assumes there is   no colonization and no migration and that nobody is coming here. They assume   that because it takes less energy to send signals than to travel, that nobody   is traveling. Of course nobody flies from Newark to Hong Kong because the   Internet and telephone is cheaper! Hah. It is all fancily dressed hogwash. They   could easily be thousands or millions of years ahead of us. An AM radio   doesn’t pick up FM signals. A German General just before the start of   World War II in Europe noted (see Ref. 2) that the Brits were building a whole   array of tall (more than 200') towers with cross pieces which he figured had to   be part of a radar net. The Graf Zeppelin slowly moved parallel to the array   and listened and found no signals. The frequency being used was 10 times higher   than what the Germans were using and they fortunately were never aware of how   well their planes were being tracked.

   If civilizations, with a great deal of common heritage and similar background   and access to similar science, can’t correctly predict the technique to   be used by similar people a few hundred miles away, why assume we can   second-guess aliens? They persistently say there is no evidence for UFOs, but   always avoid dealing with the large scale scientific studies. Check their   references. Look carefully at the Drake Equation, their Holy Grail. We have no   way to determine the lifetime of a civilization, or the fraction of planets that   have intelligent life or that develop technology. We have data on one   “civilization” on one planet in one solar system. Real scientists   don’t extrapolate or interpolate from one data point. The SETI people omit   colonization and migration which could greatly lengthen the life span of a   civilization. That is pseudoscience, no matter how many degreed professionals   are involved. Admittedly, their job security is dependent on nobody   coming here…

8. WHY hasn’t the government taken out Stan Friedman, if what he is saying   about a Cosmic Watergate and overwhelming evidence that we have visitors   is true?

    Obviously I don’t speak for the government. I am careful in what I say, and I   don’t break the law in seeking classified data from people with clearances. I   may be doing exactly what they want, that is, preparing the public for the date   when the great secret is released. I have never had an unlisted telephone   number. It is in my books and on my website. All those lonely drives to Roswell   would provide plenty of opportunity. My answering service is instructed to give   out my travel information to callers. Frankly, I can’t live my life looking   over my shoulder. Some have suggested I was too well known and that a sudden death   would be suspicious…

9. WHY would people fake a bunch of MJ-12 documents?

   I am not a psychiatrist, but I would suggest to enhance status;

to think “Gotcha”; or to disinform the public so that the fake   documents would be an excuse for labeling such genuine documents as the   Eisenhower Briefing Document, the Truman-Forrestal Memo, and the Cutler-Twining   Memo as frauds. Or, perhaps, might it be to be able to claim that the   proponents are stupid or are disinformation specialists? The same old tired   false anti-MJ-12 arguments keep being put forth despite the fact that I have   demonstrated that they are nonsense. The Majestic 12 article in Wikipedia is   loaded with false and misleading claims. For example, in the 5000-word   afterword in TOP SECRET/MAJIC 2nd Edition (2005), in   “Update on Operation Majestic 12” (see www.stantonfriedman.com), in   “Roswell and the MJ-12 Documents in the New Millennium” (Ref.5),   and in my “Review of Case MJ-12” also on my website I demolish the   anti’s and show that other MJ-12 documents are fraudulent. Remember, one of the   key rules for debunkers is “Don’t bother me with the facts, my mind   is made up.” Another is “Do your research by proclamation,   investigation is too much trouble and the public won’t know the   difference.” I distinctly showed that at least seven of the supposed   MJ-12 documents provided to Timothy Cooper are emulations of real documents   published in books and generally available. They were retyped, much handwritten   material was Xeroxed or scanned, and the two were combined. And there were   often factual misstatements. Deuterium is not light hydrogen. Sandia   is in New Mexico, while General Spaatz was not in New Mexico on   July 7, 1947 (I found his flight log and a newspaper article and desk calendar   indicating he was in Port Aransas, Texas, fishing).

   Some of the statements from the phony emulations were repeated in other   documents which means the latter ones were also phony. I have been told that   when good information is leaked, bad is put out so as to confuse things and imply the   real ones are phony: guilt by association. It is interesting that Colonel   Richard Weaver, author of the grossly misleading USAF Book The Roswell Report:   Truth vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert (see Ref. 5) had as his military   specialty “Disinformation.” He provided the fiction.

   10. WHY have you kept at it since reading Ruppelt’s book in 1958 and giving   your first lecture in 1967?

   I enjoy being on the stage and the very   enthusiastic response I get from my audiences, especially from the technical   societies. I am pleased when people tell me that they decided to teach a course   about UFOs, after hearing me talk. I can think of no subject more important to   the future for my children and grandson than the notion of an earthling   orientation in the hope of helping stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons.   What is more exciting than alien visitations and government cover-ups? I   believe I bring a unique background to my presentations:

  A. So far as I know I have worked on more cancelled high technology classified   programs than anybody and so can deal with those silly “It would violate   the laws of Physics” arguments. Not many have worked on nuclear   airplanes, or in general on fission and fusion propulsion systems.

   B. Because I worked on many classified programs and have visited 20 archives, I   am in a better position than most to deal with the silly “Secrets   can’t be kept” notions.

   C. Because I have probably had to answer about 40,000 questions at lectures and   on talk shows and in classes, I have been forced to think about the questions   such as the “WHY?” questions, more than most.

   D. I was very fortunate to be able to find that my memory was good and reliable   (at least until recently) and I could give acceptable answers in a hurry. Being   on debate teams in high school probably helped a lot. I have been very lucky,   first to have worked on so many leading edge classified programs, and second to   be able to provide so many presentations to attentive audiences.  


Stanton Friedman

Contact me (fsphys@bellaliant.net)
www.stantonfriedman.com 


REFERENCES

  1. Friedman, Stanton T. “Government UFO Lies.” MUFON 2005 Conference   Proceedings and at <a href="http: www.stantonfriedman.com?="">www.stantonfriedman.com.

    2. Burrows, William E. By Any Means Necessary: America’s Secret Air War in   the Cold War New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2001. 399 pp.

   3. Berliner, Don, and Stanton T. Friedman. Crash at Corona Marlowe &   Co., (Paraview Special Edition) 2004. 227 pp. $17.00 including S&H   from UFORI, POB 958, Houlton, ME 04730-0958. Autographed by STF.

    4. Friedman, Stanton T. TOP SECRET/MAJIC 2nd Edition. Marlowe & Co.,   2005. 296 pp. $17.00 including S&H from UFORI. Autographed.

    5. Weaver, Colonel Richard L. “The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction in the   New Mexico Desert.” US Government Printing Office, 1995 (about 1000 pp.).  

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:22 Stuur door

Meer van UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

↑ Terug naar de berichten