NASA and Space Agencies around the world are preparing society for Alien Disclosure

NASA and Space Agencies around the world are preparing society for Alien Disclosure
USO: Unidentified Submerged Objects
USO: Unidentified Submerged Objects
In the past few months, we have seen a sharp increase of UFOs in our atmosphere, in space around Earth’s orbit, or even very close to the sun.
Isn’t it a little strange that we never hear about USOs? This subject seems to be “camouflaged” by the powers that be, well…let’s bring them to light:
USO sightings have been happening for a very long time, let’s take a look at Christopher Columbus:
October 11th 1492, Christopher Columbus sailed across the sea on the Santa Maria in search of America; he witnessed a USO coming out of the water then zooming around the night’s sky. As he stood on deck, he saw “a light glimmering at a great distance”. He recorded in his captain’s log that it vanished and reappeared throughout the night, flying up, down, east and west “in sudden and passing gleams”
When we look at history, there is an abundance of legendary tales of giant creatures attacking boats and even submarines! Could they just be USOs fending off any unwanted visitors? Or even some sea creatures trained by aliens to guard underwater bases?
The following is the testimony of Ghunter Krech, the captain of a UB-85; his submarine was discovered floating on the surface by the British patrol boat Coreopsis in the Atlantic ocean on 30th April 1918, the German crew quickly surrendered to the British without any resistance, which was a very unlikely occurrence for the Germans who would usually fight to their deaths:
Krech allegedly reported that the submarine had surfaced during the night for the purpose of recharging its batteries, during which there had been a violent surge of frothing water off the starboard bow. When Krech and some crew members had gone to investigate, a creature the captain described as a “strange beast” had suddenly erupted forth from the cold, dark water and begun clambering up the side of the ship, which had caused the whole submarine to start listing to the side. The beast was described as being enormous, with a small head with large eyes deeply set in a horned skull and a large mouth with sharp teeth that glinted in the moonlight. This strange monster was then claimed to have reached the forward mount gun and to have begun ferociously attacking it, chomping down on the weapon with its formidable jaws and thrashing back and forth.
Fearing that the submarine would continue to tilt under the creature’s weight until the open hatch hit the sea and sank the sub, all available crewmen had opened fire on the mysterious attacker, yet the thing had refused to let go of the gun mount. It apparently had taken a sustained, intense volley of gunfire to finally make the monster relinquish its iron grip, after which it disappeared into the sea.
The Shag Harbour incident, 1967
On the night of 04 October 1967, shortly after 11:00 PM, a UFO some 60 feet in diameter was seen to hover over the water near the tiny fishing village of Shag Harbour, Nova Scotia. The UFO, which displayed four bright lights that flashed in sequence, tilted to a 45-degree angle and descended rapidly towards the water’s surface. Upon impact, there was a bright flash and an explosive roar.
History is fascinating isn’t it? Let’s fast forward to our present time and let’s have a look at more evidence that is suppressed from the public view:
A pilot photographs some amazing underwater lights:
A massive underwater structure which looked like a secret UFO/USO facility was discovered 6.66 miles off the shores of Point Dume, Malibu, California. Could this structure be the reason for the mass UFO sightings off the coast of Malibu from the 1950’s?
Enhanced Google Earth imagery of the submerged underwater formation which creates a plateau measuring 1.35 miles by 2.45 miles wide does not appear to be naturally figured by the ocean water. The upper interior surface of the structure measures 500 feet across making it insusceptible for a nuclear attack. The entire ceiling of the mega-structure is reinforced by over 600 feet tall columns which create an opening that is 2745 feet wide and 630 feet tall!
And what about this one? No further explanations about it, and still hasn’t been debunked to this day:
Some USOs make people panic, Sweden was quick to blame the Russians for this, but of course Russia had nothing to do with it. It was a USO, plain and simple!
There is also the mysterious “Bloop” a sound recorded underwater that should not be there at all!
The following is a very good documentary covering so much about USOs:
U.I.P Summary: Oceans cover approximately 72% on planet Earth, and we know more about the surface of the moon than the seas and their abyss, there is a good reason for that. The mainstream media are quite happy to drip-feed us the truth by publishing articles about UFOs, but never about USOs! Why would that be? It is because they know too well that USOs are coming in and out of their underwater bases on a regular basis, and the powers that be do not wish for us to know about them. The real rulers of this planet are of alien origins, they are not prepared to share their secrets with their slaves!
The fear that drives our alien belief
The fear that drives our alien belief

Aliens have been in the news a lot recently—regardless of whether you think they are, or have ever been, anywhere else.
A group of former Congressmen convened at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. earlier this month to hear impassioned eyewitness testimony on everything from the Roswell “incident” to more recent, unexplained lights in the sky. Vanity Fair this month published a lengthy profile of Harvard psychiatrist John Edward Mack—a man who believed, implausibly, in alien abduction.
Meanwhile, the “world’s first comprehensive” UFO exhibition recently opened in Myrtle Beach, S.C., where organizers promise 200 artifacts ranging from replicas of the Easter Island statues to “authentic video and audio recordings of people reporting alien encounters.”
“Myrtle Beach is a hot spot for sightings,” one organizer points out in a not-quite-skeptical account of local sightings on CarolinaLive.com.
What is it about UFOs that drive so many people to believe they exist despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary? According to a 2012 National Geographic poll, 36 percent of Americans believe aliens have visited earth. And yet, as a concerned acquaintance wrote to Harvard’s Mack in 1994, such visitations “contradict virtually all of the basic laws of physics, chemistry and biology on which modern science depends.”
Researchers at the Universities of Westminster and Vienna have identified a proverbial host of factors that appear to correlate to belief in UFOs: Gender, politics, religiosity, intelligence, fantasy proneness—even certain psychological disorders, like schizophrenia.
Studies and polls have found, for instance, that conservatives and religious people believe in UFOs far less than their liberal or less religious peers. Men are more likely to believe in aliens than women. (But women, interestingly, are more likely to believe in ghosts.)
The children of believers, of which there were several at the hearings in D.C., are also more likely to spot extraterrestrial life, according to parapsychologist Harvey Irwin.
“When it comes to the Roswell incident, I believe my father and grandfather,” concluded Denice Marcel, one of the hearings’ primary Roswell witnesses, and the descendant of other Roswell truthers.
But the enduring power of UFOs doesn’t seem like something we can explain away as delusion or demographic proclivity. It seems to spring from someplace deeper—the same place, psychologists like C.G. Jung have argued, that forced early humans to make up myths to explain the weather. These stories explain things we don’t, or can’t, understand. (“I was dealing with a phenomenon that I felt could not be explained psychiatrically,” the Harvard psychiatrist who believed in alien abduction once said.)
Without these stories, psychologist Stephen Diamond explains in an essay on UFOs and the “cry for meaning,” we have to accept the fact that some things mean nothing, and others are totally beyond us—a strange, frightening and ultimately deflating thought.
In fact, it’s arguably easier to believe the universe is full of life, even hostile life, than to believe the universe holds no meaning at all. In that respect, a belief in UFOs answers many of the same questions as a belief in God—explaining, perhaps, why the religious tend to not believe in them. Both things convince us, in Diamond’s words, that we are:
“… still capable of experiencing something that lifts us out of our everyday, mundane, ordinary, banal, often seemingly purposeless lives, and [they also remind us], if only momentarily, what it means to be fully, ecstatically alive in a universe filled with beauty, mystery, terror, danger and wonder.”
The alternate narrative isn’t very compelling, which explains why conferences and museums on existentialism, if they existed, would draw far smaller crowds than Myrtle Beach’s “UFO Experience” and D.C.’s recent UFO hearings. It also accounts for the flood of Hollywood features on UFOs—500 since 1947, according to IMDB—and the relative lack of movies on the vast, dark emptiness of the unfeeling universe. (Also worth noting: according to Irwin and others, more alien movies = more UFO sightings.)
Perhaps viewers want to feel what Roy Neary felt in the 1977 hit “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.”
“I know this sounds crazy, but ever since yesterday on the road, I’ve been seeing this shape,” Neary says after seeing a UFO. “Shaving cream, pillows… Dammit! I know this. I know what this is! This means something. This is important.”
Read more by Caitlin Dewey and follow us on Facebook and Twitter at @innovations.
Scientists claimed they found elusive ‘Planet X.’ Doubting astronomers are in an uproar.
Scientists claimed they found elusive ‘Planet X.’ Doubting astronomers are in an uproar.
It’s a big, dark presence at the farthest reaches of our solar system, a mysterious force powerful enough to skew the paths of planets in orbit and yet so subtle that it slips undetected past even the most powerful telescopes on Earth. For centuries, it has eluded some of the most brilliant minds in astronomy — some say it even destroyed one. It’s the subject of endless calculations and rampant speculation, crackpot theories and countless hours spent gazing, fruitlessly, at the night sky.
It’s known as Planet X.
And on Tuesday, a group of astronomers said they’d found not just one such presence, but two of them.
“ALMA discovers the most distant object of the solar system,” read the title of one paper uploaded to the research-sharing site arXiv. “The serendipitous discovery of a possible new solar system object with ALMA,” went the other.
Using the Atacama large millimeter/submillimeter array (ALMA), a powerful telescope located in the high desert of Chile, the researchers said they’d come across two extremely large objects skimming through the outskirts of the solar system.
Though both studies were submitted to the prestigious journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, neither has been peer-reviewed or formally published — steps that are par for the course with any kind of serious scientific research but especially when pronouncements of previously unknown planets are at stake. They’re both based on limited observations — just two spottings apiece for each odd object. And even after just 48 hours online, they have garnered a great deal of skepticism within the astronomy community.
But the researchers say they posted their papers with exactly that purpose.
“We specifically wanted to reach the community that could tell us if we overlooked something, in which case we fully intend to withdraw the papers,” Wouter Vlemmings, an astronomer at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden and co-author on both studies, told Scientific American.
Here’s what Vlemmings and his colleague say they found:
A large rocky something they call “Gna” (for a fast-moving Nordic messenger goddess, one of the authors told Scientific American), that could be an asteroid-type object roughly the size of Ireland zooming around somewhere near Uranus. Alternatively, the researchers propose, it could be an undiscovered planet floating much farther out, or even a brown-dwarf (bigger than a planet, smaller than a star) passing through interstellar space.
Also, a mysterious, unnamed object that appears in the sky close to the alpha centauri system that may be a “Super-Earth” planet far beyond even Pluto or a super-cool brown dwarf that’s really far. It could also conceivably be an icy “trans Neptunian object,” of which there are plenty in the frozen darkness past the eighth planet, but the researchers say that’s less likely (it’s also, not coincidentally, less interesting).
All of which sounds pretty cool — unless you’re Mike Brown, a Cal Tech astronomer who has spent the majority of his careers scanning the farthest reaches of the solar system for just these kinds of objects.
Brown, the self-proclaimed “Pluto killer” who discovered a trans-Neptunian object (big things out past Neptune) that helped dethrone the erstwhile ninth planet back in 2005, would be thrilled to find the long-sought Planet X. He’d be almost as happy to see a paper reporting that other researchers had found it.
But these two papers, he said, are not that.
“The logical leaps are sort of astounding,” he said. “What they really saw they saw is a little blip and then six months later another little blip.”
The evidence that the researchers offer for their findings is too scanty, Brown said, and the probability that they could have stumbled across a huge, planet-like object in a tiny patch of sky is too small. Finding Planet X in the small field of vision they studied with the ALMA telescope, he said, “would be like scooping a cup full of water from the ocean and pulling out the white whale.”
Several other astronomers offered similar commentary in the days after the papers’ initial publication.
Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer with the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told Gizmodo it was a “considerable stretch” to claim a outer solar system object had been found based on the information in the reports. There could be problems with the ALMA instruments or other explanations for the “blips” that form the basis of the reports, he said.
This may be a classic case of “we should have waited for the referees’ report before going on arXiv,” he said.
“There’s so many reasons why they can’t possibly be correct,” Brown said. “It’s embarrassing to the field.”
That’s because of Planet X’s “long and sordid history,” as Brown put it. Though the notion of a ninth planet of some kind at the outer edge of the solar system is perfectly legitimate — scientists have long seen it as an explanation for irregularities in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune — it’s been plagued by false hope and unfounded “discoveries.” One 19th century researcher claimed that the planet was a star he was studying and “lost” (really he just lost track of it). Another claimed there must be as many as three planets out beyond Neptune, though he provided no evidence for his conjectures.
But no Planet X researcher was more beleaguered than Percival Lowell, who launched into the search for the distant object in an attempt to redeem himself after he became a laughing stock for suggesting that aliens might be building canals on Mars.
Little did he know that Planet X was no place to find redemption.
Lowell spent years photographing the night sky with nothing more than a primitive camera and borrowed telescope, searching for evidence of a planet whose existence was still only a theory. He died of a stroke in 1916, his search unsuccessful. A lifelong friend said that the failure “virtually killed him.”
But Lowell didn’t fail — at least, not totally. Unknown to him, Lowell actually captured a large, distant object twice in his photographs. We now call that object Pluto.
Pluto would become “Planet X” a decade later, when a farm kid named Clyde Tombaugh working at the Flagstaff, Ariz., laboratory that Lowell founded came across a small moving speck in his own photos of the sky. “That’s it!” herecalled exclaiming.
And for about 80 years, that was it. Until Brown and his fellow astronomers came along and took the title away from poor Pluto.
Meanwhile, modern analysis of the trajectories of our most far-flung space craft — things like the Voyager and Pioneer probes — has found no evidence of gravitational influence of the kind that could be attributed to a distant planet, at least not as early astronomers envisioned it.
Still, the search for Planet X has continued.
“For those of us who actually work on this, it’s embarrassing to even say you might be looking for these sort of things in the outer solar system because there have been so many crazy theories,” Brown said.
So when reports like the two arXiv studies come out, “you worry that when someone finally finds something that’s not crazy, people are going to say ‘Oh, I heard that story three months ago and it’s not real.'”
But Brown may not need to be so concerned. After all, two centuries of failure has not stopped astronomers from scanning the distant corners of our solar neighborhood, bit by bit, searching for something out there that resembles the rock we call home.
Interest in Planet X is plain to see. Even if the planet itself isn’t.
Astronomers Skeptical Over "Planet X" Claims
Two controversial new studies suggest the discovery of large objects at the outer reaches of the solar system
For decades astronomers have searched for a possible “Planet X” in the far outer reaches of our solar system, speculating that something big and dark may be lurking out there, its gravitational influence occasionally stirring up trouble in the orbits of the objects that we do see. There are major incentives to look: When astronomers sought a Planet X beyond Uranus in 1846, they discovered Neptune; when they looked for one beyond Neptune in 1930, they found Pluto. Since then, the search for a Planet X beyond Pluto has almost been too successful—astronomers have found so many new and Plutolike “trans-Neptunian objects” (TNOs) that it became more sensible to demote Pluto from planethood rather than swell the solar system’s planetary population into the hundreds. After all, even the largest of the newfound TNOs were just about Pluto’s size—astronomers knew of nothing out there worthy of the “Planet X” name.
That is, perhaps, until now. On December 8 researchers from Sweden and Mexico quietly submitted two papers to the prestigious journalAstronomy & Astrophysics, announcing their discovery of not one but two possible Planet X candidates. The quiet did not last for long. Even though neither paper has yet been accepted for peer-review and publication, the researchers uploaded both to the arXiv, a public online repository for preprint papers, where they appeared last night. Today, as claims of newfound planets in our solar system reverberate around the world innews stories and blog posts, other astronomers are reviewing the papers and reacting mostly with skepticism. The ensuing discussions between experts in public forums like Twitter and Facebook offer a rare, real-time glimpse of the sometimes messy scientific process as it unfolds.
“Normally I prefer to only upload accepted papers,” says Wouter Vlemmings, an astronomer at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden and co-author on both studies. “This time, however, we had exhausted our ideas. … With the arXiv upload we specifically wanted to reach the community that could tell us if we overlooked something, in which case we fully intend to withdraw the papers…. What I personally did not count on was the impact it has had outside the astronomy community.”
One of the candidates, nicknamed “Gna” (after a fast-moving “Nordic messenger goddess,” Vlemmings says) showed up in the sky next to the star W Aquilae whereas the other, as-yet-unnamed, appeared adjacent to our nearest neighboring star system Alpha Centauri. Astronomers detected both objects using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), a massive group of radio dishes perched in the high desert of the Chilean Andes, and thought at first that the bodies were faint glows from far-distant background galaxies. But in separate pairs of snapshots taken over a period of months, both objects seemed to move swiftly against the “fixed” background stars, suggesting a relatively close cosmic proximity to our solar system. Considerable uncertainty exists about the properties of both objects because each was observed only twice, and bodies with a wide range of sizes, compositions and distances from us could explain the measured brightness.
Gna, the researchers say, is quite likely to be something like a 200-kilometer-wide asteroid floating between Saturn and Uranus, but it could also be a free-floating Neptune-size planet drifting a hundred times farther out or a failed star—a Jupiter-size brown dwarf—passing by in nearby interstellar space. Similarly, the object seen in the direction of Alpha Centauri could conceivably be a nearby brown dwarf, a super-Earth midway in size between our planet and Neptune some six times farther out than Pluto or an impressively-sized hunk of ice much, much closer in.
Alternatively, both objects could be illusory, random blips of noise echoing through the world’s most complex and ambitious array of radio telescopes. According to Scott Sheppard, a planetary scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science involved with surveys of the outer solar system, the fact that only two observations apiece underpin both discovery claims makes them hard to swallow. “Anything could create two random detections, and you can always fit a straight line through any two points,” Sheppard says. Demonstrating that either object was real, he says, would likely require a third detection, one that shows the object’s clear, linear movement at a consistent speed.
What these objects are, and whether they exist at all, are open questions. What is certain, however, is that earlier searches have placed limits on the possibilities for any Planet X. An all-sky search by NASA’s Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer space telescope previously found no signs of any additional planets in our solar system, ruling out anything Jupiter-size within about three trillion kilometers of the sun, and anything Saturn-size within half that distance. Something smaller and dimmer like a super-Earth could still lurk out there, unseen, but to find it with such easy serendipity in routine ALMA measurements seems statistically unlikely, astronomers say.
Mike Brown, a prominent California Institute of Technology astronomer and self-described “Pluto killer” who discovered several large TNOs that dethroned the former planet, unleashed another statistical argument against the claimed new planets on Twitter. “If it is true that ALMA accidentally discovered a massive outer solar system object in its tiny, tiny, tiny, field of view,” Brown tweeted, “that would suggest that there are something like 200,000 Earth-sized planets in the outer solar system. Which, um, no.”
“Even better,” he added later, “I just realized that this many Earth-sized planets existing would destabilize the entire solar system and we would all die.” That said, Brown notes, “the idea that there might be large planets lurking in the outer solar system is perfectly plausible.”
Many of the most cutting reactions came from astronomers discussing the results on a public Facebook group devoted to imaging exoplanets—that is, planets around other stars. (Update: the group has since been made private.) After tweeting that the two papers “will launch 1,000 undoubtedly wrong blogs and news releases,” University of Rochester astronomer Eric Mamajek detailed what he believes to be serious inconsistencies in the measurements of motion and brightness for both objects. “‘Gna’ presumably stands for ‘Goofy Non-Asteroid,’” Mamajek quipped, before suggesting that the objects could perhaps be activity in faraway galaxies, simply misconstrued as being much closer to Earth. “Please pass whatever they are smoking in Onsala,” he added.
In the same group, astronomer Bruce Macintosh at Stanford University noted the “astonishing coincidence” that the first two trans-Neptunian objects discovered by ALMA would be found right next to bright stars. More likely, Macintosh guessed, is that the putative objects are actually “some residual artifact”—mirages produced in the data by quirks in ALMA’s complex calibration methods.
Vlemmings insists that he and his colleagues have already carefully checked these and several other scenarios, but to no avail. Whatever they are, the objects simply seemed to be too bright and pointlike to be explained away as far-off galaxies, and their proximity to bright stars, he says, actually helped the data calibration and reduced the likelihood of observational errors. “Still, we are certainly open to such options and have several times sent out queries to ALMA colleagues [asking] if they could conceive of how such point sources could be artificially created,” Vlemmings says. “None have yet said they think it could be done.” The trial of these claims in the court of public opinion has not come without its perks, Vlemmings adds. Although the sudden publicity was unwanted, “the most helpful feedback so far has been numerous offers to observe with other instruments.” With a little help from the rest of the astronomy community, evidence for—or against—the next Planet X may not be so far-off after all.
NASA and Space Agencies around the world are preparing society for Alien Disclosure
The unclassified NSA document that proves we intercepted 29 Extraterrestrial messages that were decoded

[VIDEO] This Can’t Be Good: Flotilla of UFOs Recharging During Thunderstorm


Montauk Project Victim Speaks Out: Greys, Reptilians, Time Travel & Mind Control Experiments

|
|
|
The Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah… Was it by Ancient Nuclear Weapons?
The Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah… Was it by Ancient Nuclear Weapons?

The Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah… Was it by Ancient Nuclear Weapons?
We can learn a lot of interesting things from the story of the destruction of the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Myth or reality, these two words which are divided by a very thin line, are enigmas in the stories about these historical cities. The legends which speak of peculiar personalities, angels and other deities who literally warned people to leave these doomed cities whose catastrophic fate was inevitable.
Sodom and Gomorrah are probably two of the most infamous cities that has existed on planet Earth. These cities have been lost for millennium, and only in recent years the sites have been tentatively identified by researchers who have proposed dozens of different theories about the historical cities and their fate. But what really happened here and what do the stories tell?
Here are some of the things we have to know when talking about Sodom and Gomorrah
The Bible tells the story of what happened:
(Genesis 18:20; 19: 24-26.28)
24 Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens. 25 Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the cities—and also the vegetation in the land. 26 But Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.
27 Early the next morning Abraham got up and returned to the place where he had stood before the Lord. 28 He looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, toward all the land of the plain, and he saw dense smoke rising from the land, like smoke from a furnace.
The cities are believed to have been located south of the Lisan Peninsula.
Some researchers call Sodom and Gomorrah the Hiroshima and Nagasaki of the distant past, 4000 years ago.
Searching the Dead Sea: Sodom and Gomorrah
We know that the Dead Sea’s surface and shores are 429 meters (1,407 ft) below sea level, Earth’s lowest elevation on land. The Dead Sea is 304 m (997 ft) deep, the deepest hypersaline lake in the world. With 34.2% salinity (in 2011), it is also one of the world’s saltiest bodies of water, though Lake Vanda in Antarctica (35%), Lake Assal in Djibouti (34.8%) Jordan and many smaller rivers flow into the Dead Sea. The Jordan river has a major significance in Judaism and Christianity and, to a more moderate degree, Islam, as the site where the Israelites crossed into the Promised Land and where Jesus of Nazareth was baptized by John the Baptist. Evaporation under the scorching sun takes place on the surface of the Dead sea at a speed of more than 230 million cubic feet per day. According to the Arab tradition there are many poisonous gases evaporating from the lake that are so hazardous that birds cannot fly over it.
UFO truthers want to make Roswell an issue for 2016. Meet their lobbyist.
UFO truthers want to make Roswell an issue for 2016. Meet their lobbyist.

One day nearly 20 years ago, Stephen Bassett realized UFO abductees needed a lobbyist.
He had spent four months working for the Program for Extraordinary Experience Research out of a modest townhouse in Cambridge, Mass., when he had the epiphany: He could continue his research with John Mack, the leading authority on the alien abductions, for the rest of his life — but it would never make a difference.
“It occurred to me that it wasn’t a scientific problem, but a political one,” he said. They could pile evidence of extraterrestrial encounters from the White House lawn to the moon, and no one would pay it any mind. What the issue needed was someone who could get the powers that be to listen.
The alien issue was really heating up in 1996, what with the summer blockbuster “Independence Day,” and Bassett worried someone else would get the same idea. So he quit his volunteer gig, piled his belongings atop his beat-up Mazda RX-7 and drove off to Washington.
“I get down there, and I file” the lobbyist papers, he recalled. “I’m the first one. Nineteen years later, I’m still the only one. I could have taken my time.”
Bassett, a balding man with expressive eyes that seem to go from blue to green, has long had one goal: Get the government to admit that it has been covering up proof of alien visits. It has been a lonely battle, but he is convinced that the stars have finally aligned for his convoluted theory, which involves the Clintons, their longtime adviser John Podesta and a now-deceased billionaire.
“I want to see disclosure by the New Hampshire primary,” he said brushing crumbs off his black dress shirt and purple tie during lunch at the National Press Club this month. “And I can make the case that it’s going to happen.”
Bassett was born in 1946 to a military family that moved all over the country. He read science fiction, built model planes and enjoyed the cheap bowling and milkshakes on the bases. His father rarely spoke to him and fought constantly with his mother. And Bassett struggled with obsessive-compulsive tendencies.
After college, he spent a couple of aimless decades freelancing as a tennis pro and business consultant, subsidized by an inheritance from his father. Then, a book changed his life.
It was called “Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens,” and unlike other literature on the subject, it was written by an acclaimed scholar: Mack, a Harvard psychiatrist with a Pulitzer Prize for biography under his belt. Mack, who died in 2004, began his research as a skeptic, interviewing dozens of subjects that he at first assumed suffered from mental illness. In the end, he wasn’t so sure.
“Yes, I take these people’s stories seriously,” Mack told the Chicago Tribune in 1994. “Yes, I think that they are telling the truth.’’
Bassett, the former sci-fi geek without a sense of place in the world, finally found something he could dedicate himself to.
In 1961, the astronomer Frank Drake came up with an equation to estimate the abundance of communicative alien civilizations.
“It’s 10,000 that we can detect,” he told The Washington Post earlier this year, but “there are a lot more.”
Considering the vastness of the universe, it’s not crazy to imagine that someone’s out there. One theory why we haven’t encountered anyone: Perhaps all advanced civilizations are doomed to come up with a technology that destroys them before they get a chance to come calling.
That’s a pretty bleak scenario. It’s no wonder that many earthlings cleave to a more optimistic theory — that alien visits have happened, but the government conspired to cover them up. According to a poll published by the Huffington Post earlier this year, about half of Americans believe in some kind of alien life, and a quarter think visitors have come to Earth.
Yet getting appointments on Capitol Hill wasn’t easy for an advocate who believed that aliens landed at Roswell in 1947 and that the nation’s leaders created a “Truth Embargo” to keep information from getting out.
“Nobody there wanted to touch it,” Bassett said.
In 2013, unable to get anything close to a real congressional hearing, he created a fake one. With a $1 million donation from a Canadian believer, Bassett paid former members of Congress such as Alaskan senator Mike Gravel and Maryland representative Roscoe Bartlett $20,000 to spend a week at the National Press Club listening to testimony about UFOs.
The hours of testimony — from former Air Force officials who believe they saw spacecraft, or accounts of animals found dissected in pastures — led to some lighthearted stories but no movement with any current members of Congress. Then came the tweet heard round the world.
The message came from Podesta, the former top aide in Bill Clinton’s White House, as he stepped down after 11 months as special adviser for President Obama.
“My biggest failure of 2014: Once again not securing the #disclosure of the UFO files. #thetruthisstilloutthere,” he tweeted on Feb. 13.
It was retweeted thousands of times and picked up by mainstream media reporters across the country — most presenting it as a joke. But to Bassett and fellow believers, this didn’t read like a bit of ironic Twitter humor. This was big.
Podesta, in fact, is probably the closest thing to an ally this issue has. He’s an “X-Files” fan who has called for greater transparency on UFO-related issues, and he wrote the foreword to a best-selling book titled “UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record.” In it, he wrote: “It’s time to find out what the truth really is that’s out there.”
The fact that Podesta was moving on to chair the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign had folks like Bassett buzzing.
“You don’t just send that out,” Bassett said. “It means something.”
By Bassett’s telling, the Clintons have been deep into the UFO issue since 1993, when billionaire Laurance Rockefeller — Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller’s grandson — began lobbying them to release all information about extraterrestrials they had.
For three years, Rockefeller corresponded and met with members of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy, according to the results of a Freedom of Information Act request filed by Grant Cameron, a Canadian researcher. In 1995, Hillary Clinton met with Rockefeller at his ranch; a memo from the office’s then-director, John H. Gibbons, alerted her that Rockefeller would “want to talk with you about his interest in extrasensory perception, paranormal phenomena, and UFOs.”
“They were engaging with the ET issue at the behest of a billionaire, and there was no coverage,” Bassett said.
Still, how does any of this suggest that the government is going to open its supposed alien-visit files before the New Hampshire primary?
“I believe Clinton’s team has calculated that they cannot make it out of the election without first dealing with the ET issue,” he said. “But what are her options? If she calls a press conference and gives it too much gravitas, she’ll still have to deal with the fundamental question of why she hasn’t talked about it in the last 23 years. The alternative is to trigger the press to ask her about it. . . . Then she can measure exactly the amount of gravitas she wants to give it.”
The tweet, Bassett believes, was intended as the bait for the media.
One small problem with the theory: Both the Clinton campaign and Podesta’s office refused to comment for this story.
Okay, let’s be real. Few people are going to take Bassett seriously.
“He makes statements that are completely unprovable and put him on the fringe,” said Leslie Kean, who wrote the UFO book that Podesta contributed to.
Yes, there have been unexplainable phenomena in the sky, she said, and sure, the government should investigate. But to claim that aliens have interacted with people just hurts the cause. “His ideas are silly and makes it harder for serious people to make progress,” she said.
Even Bassett’s closest supporters express doubt about how close we are to the truth.
“He’s one of the most overly optimistic people I’ve ever met,” said Joseph Buchman, a fellow true believer. “I find that endearing, but I don’t know if it’s quite as close to happening as he thinks it is.”
Bassett has sacrificed a lot for what he calls the “least-funded advocacy group in history.” (He says he gets about $15,000 to $20,000 in donations per year.) He often crashes on supporters’ couches. He has little time for a social life.
“It would be nice to have a mate, someone to share this with, or a kid that could likely go to the stars,” he said. “But that ship has sailed.”
It may seem like a strange cause to give your life to. But Bassett sees a larger mission. Unveiling the truth about aliens is really just the start.
“Once that is pulled down, you will see a shift in focus from the world,” he says. “More transparency, more communication among countries, an age of reform.”
If only the people of Earth realize there’s something out there greater than us, he said, perhaps then we can set aside the petty differences that are poised to destroy us.
Lots of people pray for world peace. Is it so strange for Bassett to seek help from above?
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk eyes city on Mars after successful rocket landing
By James Rogers

“This is a critical step towards establishing a city on Mars,” he said, during a conference call with reporters after Monday’s launch. “Without [reusable rockets], it would be unaffordable – it dramatically improves my confidence that a city on Mars is possible, it’s what all this is about.”
After successfully sending its Falcon 9 rocket into orbit from Cape Canaveral, Florida on the satellite launch mission, the company landed a 15-story booster rocket back on Earth.
Related: SpaceX launches rocket 6 months after accident, then lands
Musk noted that each Falcon 9 rocket costs $60 million, while the propellant for each launch costs around $200,000. “The potential cost reduction over the long term is probably in excess of a factor of 100.”
Chris Carberry, executive director of Explore Mars, a non-profit organization that aims to advance the goal of sending humans to Mars within the next two decades, applauded SpaceX’s achievement. “The landing of their first stage is quite significant,” he wrote, in an email to FoxNews.com. “It has been one of the key capabilities they have been developing to enable reusability - and to keep launch costs down. However, this capability also could help advance the goal of landing humans on Mars, by making such missions significantly less expensive.”
NASA has a 2035 target for landing humans on Mars, although Musk has previously predicted that people could be on Mars within 9 to 11 years.
Related: How NASA crews could sleep for 6 months on the journey to Mars
Musk described Monday’s landing as “a revolutionary moment” during the teleconference, noting that “no one has ever brought an orbital class booster back intact.”
SpaceX is not the only company looking to revolutionize spaceflight. Last month rival Blue Origin successfully landed a reusable rocket in a historic test flight. However, the SpaceX and Blue Origin rocket designs differ greatly, reflecting their respective orbital and sub-orbital mission goals, according to The Verge.
The next big challenge for the two firms is to keep repeating these feats, according to Carberry.
Related: NASA releases stunning image from Cassini's final close Enceladus flyby
“Both SpaceX and Blue Origin will need to show that these vehicles are truly reusable - by relaunching previously launched stages,” he explained. “While their primary markets are different (SpaceX is developing an orbital market and Blue Origin's market is suborbital - for the moment), I think the personal and corporate competition that has arisen could help to stimulate more innovation and generate more public interest.”
During the teleconference, Musk explained that, once tests have been completed, the rocket booster from Monday’s landing is unlikely to take part in future launches. “I think that we will probably keep this one on the ground, just because it’s kind of unique, it’s the first one that we have brought back,” he said, adding that SpaceX will nonetheless confirm that it can fly again.
The company, he explained, aims to re-fly one of its rocket boosters at some point during 2016, when it expects to make about a dozen spaceflights.
In a blog post prior to Monday’s launch, Musk explained that the latest Falcon 9 rocket had a number of enhancements from the prior version, such as increased boost thrust. “It also has a number of reliability enhancements, such as a redundant stage separation system and greater structural safety margins,” he added.
Monday’s mission to launch 11 small satellites was SpaceX’s first since an accident last summer. Previous landing attempts ended in fiery blasts, but those aimed for an ocean platform, whereas the latest landing used a former Atlas missile-launching site about 6 miles from the Falcon 9 launch pad.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Follow James Rogers on Twitter @jamesjrogers
Does Rh Negative Blood Type Equal Alien Heritage?
Why does the human species have so many different blood types and Rh values when we supposedly came from ‘Adam and Eve’? The biblical story of evolution no longer works as a viable explanation for evolution. Now what?Was our species genetically manipulated or were we seeded here from other star systems by aliens or, more likely, our galactic star families?
The blood of the ‘gods’
Are you an Rh Negative blood type? If so you could be a descendant of theancient astronauts themselves!
About a year and a half ago my sister Bonnie and I were discussing some of the unusual characteristics of our family. Bonnie had a problem with infants haemolytic disease. She has 0 negative blood. She has written a book including this problem called “The Deux” by Venus Thaddeus.
One of the questions we asked was why does this haemolytic disease occur? Why, along with the Rh negative blood does our family have such a high IQ (135-140 average). Why so many psychic experiences? Why this urge to ask “why?” Why the early maturity or the large head and eyes? Why have we always felt we were “different” from other people? And so many other things to set us apart.
We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions we asked. Why doesn’t anyone else ask these same questions? We are not satisfied with the answer “just because”. Are there others out there who ask the same questions? Then we heard about the possibility of the ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.
For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings.
Who are these visitors? Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?
If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants of these visitors? If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are? Who are the “Children of Israel?” Why was their seed blessed?
Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they told to preserve their genealogy? Where did Adam and Eve’s sons go to get their wives, if they were the only “humans” on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive. This factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous combinations of traits inherited from all our ancestors. Nothing more and nothing less.
Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor, their blood would have evolved the same way. Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. It would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime in the ancient past.
All other earthly primates also have this Rh factor. But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative. If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the Rh negatives come from? If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant’s haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species?
Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child. Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant.
Why would a mother’s body reject her own offspring?
Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules – a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.
No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor.
If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor?
Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene.
The average among most people is only 157%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative.
The Samaritans and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.
Could the Basque people be one of these colonies? Or could it have been the original colony on earth? The origin of the Basques is unknown. Their language is unlike any other European language.
Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of Genesis. Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Genesis 6:2 “The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose.” Who were the children of these marriages? Genesis 6:4 “God came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became mighty of old.”
From the King James Bible dictionary we find: “menchildren – men of Israel, male children of God, not children of man – Ex. 34:23.”
Ex. 34:7 states “The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation.”
It is plain that something is inherited, could it be the blood?
Blood is mentioned more often than any other word in the Bible, except God. These two words you will find on almost every page, blood and God! (The blood of the Gods?) This message has been written for thousands of years. There is a connection between the blood and the Gods.
The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, “blood brothers”, if they thought they were worthy. Could this tradition have been for a reason? Could they have actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)?
The clumping (aggulation) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye.
Could they have been told, by their ancestors, that their blood was different from that of the rest of mankind except for their brothers and sisters, from other tribes, scattered throughout the earth. Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of cosmic origin. The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy.
Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the earth? No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestry. Where did this tradition come from?
People scattered throughout the earth, who have had no-known contact with each other all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree. Why?
How important could this have been to primitive cave men? Struggling to survive, to chart their genealogy? They had no understanding of modern genetics and inheritance. So why should they preserve their genealogy?
Were they told, by the ancient astronauts, to preserve their heritage, until a future date when they would return and it would be understood? Until a time, like now, when their descendent would be able to understand the message they were leaving.
Although they probably didn’t realize the importance of preserving their genealogy, they were told that future generations would understand. Are we that future generation? Was there a message left for us to understand? Do we have the courage to look for the answer?
Do we really want to know or would we rather keep our heads buried in the sand? What we don’t know will still affect us. You will not see unless you look. Only through knowledge will we find truth.
I have searched, in vain, for scientific proof that the Rh negative blood was a natural earthly occurrence. Instead I have found proof that the Rh negative had not evolved on earth in the natural course of events.
For many years people have been searching for the wrong thing. Could the true “missing link” actually be man himself? The unknown link between earth and the stars – hybrid man.
Man may be the missing link between primate and extraterrestrial. It seems inconceivable to me that those working on the evolution theory have overlooked this possibility.
How can they state, that these people are lacking a factor contained in all other earthly primates, including the naked ape, and not ask why? What other characteristics are common among these people that are uncommon to other people? Is there a real difference other than just a different blood?
A very good comparative study between man and the primates can be found in Max Flindt’s book “Mankind, Child of the Stars,” Fawcett publisher, Books 1 and 2.
He has documented many of the characteristics we may have received from our cosmic ancestors. It does show quite conclusively that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor.
I have merely carried this idea to its logical conclusion. If mankind is a hybrid descendant of the ancient’ astronauts, surely there would be some, appearing periodically, who would be genetically very similar to them. Would this not include their psychic powers? Could the great sleeping prophet,Edgar Cayce, have been one of these? Could Jesus Christ also have been one of these?
A true descendant of the ancient astronauts. If he was a true genetic duplicate of them he would also have their powers and possibly their knowledge. I cannot say whether he was born with this knowledge or whether he established psychic communication with our cosmic family, but it is plain that he had powers far beyond those of mortal man.
Could he have been an example of what the ancient astronauts were like? Jesus stated that the Father and him were one. Could he have actually meant that literally?
He may have been an exact duplicate of his (our) ancient Father. He may have even been a clone of the cosmonauts. Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and the heavenly intervention. Could this have been implanting a clone into Mary’s sterilized egg? Could the whole egg have actually been an implant?
The Rh negative blood, which appears not to have originated on earth, may prove to be a major factor in proving mankind is a hybrid. It is not the whole answer but it is a key for unlocking the genetic puzzle of our heritage.
Tissue factors will also prove to be quite revealing. Scientists are now able to determine the tissue factors of 5,000 year old mummies. Could some of these mummies have been the ancient astronauts?
Why were these mummies preserved well enough for us to analyze their blood and tissue factors? Could there be a message in the genetic factors of the mummies themselves?
There is an interesting fact found in the book “X-Raying the Pharaohs” by James Harris and Kent Weeks, 1973 (Scribners). Upon x-raying the tomb of Makare, high priestess of Ammon, it was found that the infant buried with her labeled Prince Moutenihet was actually a female hamadryas baboon.
An examination of Makare showed she had given birth shortly before dying. Could she have given birth to the baboon found with her? Why else would it have been buried with her? A genetic throwback?
My research has shown that the majority of those with psychic powers also have Rh negative blood. Most psychic and faith healers also have this blood. Strangely enough, many of those doing research into the ancient astronaut theory and other phenomena also have Rh negative blood.
Erich von Daniken has Rh negative blood and a thirst for the truth. Brad Steiger also has Rh negative blood. His new book “Gods of Aquarius” considers this possibility. Robert Antone Wilson, author of “Illuminus”, also has this blood. There are many others, too numerous to list here.
Why is there such a large percentage of negative in these unusual fields? Could we have a vague memory of what we are looking for? It has been said that a question is not asked until the answer is known.
There are about 5,000 known blood factors and all of these must contribute to the complete picture. But the Rh negative blood is the place to start our search.
A comparative analysis is now being done and we need your help. If you are reading this, you must be one of the lost children of Israel. Anyone else would not have read this far.
References: in5D; Great Dreams;
Cover image: Ancient Aliens
hthtmltp://humansarefree.com/2014/07/does-rh-negative-blood-type-equal-alien.
Revealed: The top 5 places in Britain to see a UFO
The truth is out there... in Scotland, Wales and Wiltshire. Check out the five UK locations that are best for UFO-spotting.

You may think that the best place for spotting a UFO would be a Californian desert - but it turns out that it's a sleepy Scottish town.
Hotel website LateRooms has named the heart of 'The Falkirk Triangle' in Scotland as the UFO-spotting capital of the world. And not just that: it's named four more places in Britain where you're apparently in with a good chance of strange flying object... or more.
Here are the five places they named as the best British places for UFO-spotting...
Bonnybridge, Scotland
This small town lies in the heart of an area known to UFO enthusiasts as The Falkirk Triangle - and in the 1990s, local councillor Billy Buchanan claimed that almost half of the town’s residents had seen a UFO at one time or another. Thousands of visitors come to the area yearly in the hope of spotting a UFO - and there are more than 300 reported sightings every year.
Broad Haven, Wales
This seaside resort in south Pembrokeshire shot to fame in the 1970s after the pupils and staff of a local school claimed to have seen silver-suited aliens (and the ship they arrived in). Further sightings followed in the 'Broad Haven Triangle' - and now locals even run UFO tours.-
Rendlesham Forest, Suffolk
The site of one of Britain's most famous UFO incidents: a series of unexplained lights which were seen just outside RAF Woodbridge in December 1980, which was being used at the time by the US Air Force. This led it to be dubbed 'Britain's Roswell' - and sightings have continued to be reported, with the forest even having its own UFO trail.
Warminster, Wiltshire
In the 1960s, locals of this Wiltshire town reported a number of sightings – and it continues to be the centre of mysterious noises and strange lights in the sky. UFO-spotters are regularly seen at nearby Cradle Hill and Stonehenge, and the Wiltshire Downs are also a hotspot for crop circles.-
Cannock Chase, Staffordshire
Desribed as "the creepy creature hotspot that just keeps giving", this Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty was the scene of numerous UFO sighting in the 1980s - and has also allegedly provided locals with glimpses of werewolves, pig-men and even Big Foot. Don't say we didn't warn you...
Man Sees Military Jets Pursue Several UFOs – Confirmed by Radar / Military
Date of Event / Case File: 06/10/2015
The following report is from UFOs NorthWest, and is used on The Black Vault with permission.
Location of Sighting: Alto, New Mexico
Date of Sighting: June 10, 2015
Time of Sighting: 11:40 PM MDT
Description: The witness called the morning after his sighting. He was outside and heard a loud sound. He saw jets coming from the west. The jets were pursuing erratic flying lights. More lights appeared and the witness estimated the number at 15 to 30. More jets joined the pursuit. The activity continued for 30 to 40 minutes. The activity was eventually lost in the Northeastern sky. The witness called 911, but was not given any information about his experience. The witness also added that he was in Roswell earlier in the day and skies were mostly cloudy. He saw what he thought were military helicopters moving in and out of clouds as if they were looking for something. The witness is a pastor for a local church and a Marine Corps veteran. He has lived in the area for about five years and has never seen anything like this.
Summary Report Sent by Witness: What I saw last night has convinced me beyond any doubt that we are not alone and have much reason to be concerned: June 10th 11:40 PM, Alto, NM Military Confronts Massive UFO Flap.
Note: A check of maps show that Alto is not in a military operations area. However, the White Sands Military Operations area is around 20 miles to the West. The closest Air Force Base is Holloman which is about 30 miles to the Southwest. It would seem unlikely that the military would conduct maneuvers late at night outside of a military operations area.
Update – July 26, 2015: The radar data received from the FAA have been found to have been “redacted” in the sighting area.
Update – August 27, 2015: Kudos for the FAA. I contacted the FAA and they provided the missing data that I had thought they redacted. The FAA is to commended for their prompt response. There are many military operation areas (MOA’s) in this area where classified military activities are conducted so I was somewhat surprised that I received the data.
Update – Oct 10, 2015: The radar report has been completed. Radar shows a concentrated area of returns to the Northeast of the witness location. This is where the witness said that the UFO activity “moved to.” The area also shows presence of several military aircraft that were later observed returning to Holloman AFB. Click here to read the radar report.
Update – Dec 5, 2015: We have received a response to our FOIA from Holloman AFB inquiring about aircraft that were in the air at the time of the above sighting. Click here to view the report documenting F16 activity in the UFO sighting area
Update – Dec 9, 2015: I had a second interview with the witness. The witness said that the jets returned the following night (June 11, 2015). The log obtained from Holloman AFB confirms that jets were in the skies about the same time and for the same length of time as on June 10. The witness stated that the jet and UFO activity continued nightly for two months and abruptly ended on August 10, 2015. This new information suggests that the Air Force may have been performing routine operations, but it is still mysterious on why they would do this outside of a MOA. A search of UFO databases for MUFON and the National UFO Reporting Center did not reveal any additional reports in the area. The witness stated in his second interview that other locals had seen UFO’s, but none have reported them.
Special Note – July 30, 2015: The FAA was contacted in an attempt to fill in the “missing holes” in the radar coverage noted in the report below. Updates will be posted.
Update – August 27, 2015: The missing data has been received from the FAA. The FAA is to be commended for sending data in an area where classified military operations are conducted.
This is a special report. In the late evening of June 10, 2015 near midnight in Alto, NM a local minister saw military jets pursuing 30 to 40 erratic flying lights. The witness called 911 as the result of the sighting, but was given no information. Click here to read witness report. A look at the updated radar data shows considerable activity from military jets and several concentrated patterns of primary (possible unknown returns). The complete radar report follows.
New Mexico is rich with Military Operations Areas (MOA). The White Sands Missile Range MOA is about 20 miles to the west of Alto and another MOA is about 10 miles to the south. See gray areas in map below:
Some ground based military maneuvers are conducted in Otero County (at an unknown location). Alto is outside of Otero County & White Sands Missile Range (see map below):
There is a long range ARSR-4 radar sensor in Eagle Peak, Texas which is about 150 miles from Alto. This radar has a range of 250 nautical miles. Radar from this sensor and a short range (60 nautical miles) radar in Roswell were used to evaluate radar returns in this analysis. (See map below):
Military craft appear to the NE of witness location at 11:15 PM. (This is the start time of the radar data dump. The craft were likely in the area beforehand.) Military craft were seen approaching Holloman AFB at 11:53 PM. They likely landed not long after this. This location (to the northeast of Holloman AFB) was at the southern edge of the radar request area. (See radar map below for path of “likely” military aircraft.)
Only one military aircraft showed up as an aircraft with a transponder. (Transponder sends signal to the radar indicating position and altitude.) However, it is believed that additional aircraft were present that had their transponders turned off. It is common for the military to only have one aircraft in a “sortie” to have their transponders on. The primary returns map (radar “skin” paints) tracked other likely aircraft in the “sortie.”
The transponder indicated that the military aircraft was flying near 25,000 feet. The speeds were near 500 MPH. The transponder interrogation showed that the craft was rapidly descending as it approached Holloman AFB.
Radar showed a dense concentration of primary returns to the Northeast of the witness location. Many of these returns were likely military aircraft, but some of the returns could very well have been UFO’s. Targets were moving at very rapid speeds (near speeds of aircraft). (See map below):
The radar map doesn’t completely agree with what the witness viewed. The witness says that he first saw military aircraft approaching from the West. Radar does not show this. However, the witness says that the activity moved to Northeast of his location where it continued for some time. The radar definitely confirms this. It shows considerable military activity and a dense concentration of primary returns. Some of these primary returns could very well be the UFO’s (lights) seen by the witness. (See map above.)
The radar shows military aircraft flying in circles through the area north and east of the witness location before returning to Holloman AFB. This activity is well outside of any MOA’s. (See above maps.) Why would the military be present in considerable numbers and considerable time outside of any MOA’s? The witness has lived in the area for several years and has never seen UFO’s or a strong “military presence.”
All of the military craft and “UFO” returns were outside of MOA’s. Aerial operations (and missile launches) are normally conducted within the White Sands MOA. Some special ground based maneuvers are sometimes conducted in Otero County. Alto, NM is outside of both of these areas. A “heavy” military presence was noted by radar returns in the area and at the time the UFO’s were sighted by the witness.
Conclusion:
Update – Dec 5, 2015: We have received a response to our FOIA to Holloman AFB inquiring about aircraft that were in the air at the time of the above sighting. Although the request was heavily redacted we have determined that 12 F16 aircraft were in the air at the time of the witness sighting. The radar times agree with the FOIA response when the aircraft landed. Some of the aircraft were in the air for nearly 90 minutes. Although I don’t know the purpose of the mission (redacted), I can surmise that the aircraft radar returns in the sighting area were from Holloman AFB.
The document above shows F16 take off and landing times of F16 aircraft out of Holloman AFB. Pertinent aircraft are highlighted in yellow. Further investigation indicated that the same number of sorties were dispensed about 24 hours later for similar time periods. However, it is not known where these were sent.
http://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/man-sees-military-jets-pursue-several-ufos/
Orb UFO Filmed While Chasing After the ISS at Tremendous Speed
Pyramid-Shaped UFO Over Sao Paulo, Brazil On June 14, 2015, Video, UFO Sighting News.
UFO captured? Clancy man believes he proves they exist

Richard O’Connor sits in his Clancy home and discusses a photo, shown in the foreground, that one of his cameras has captured. He believes it is of a UFO.
(Photo: Tribune photo/Phil Drake)
CLANCY— For nearly two years Dr. Richard O’Connor has kept two cameras pointed at the sky with the deep hope and belief that something might be out there.
And then, after nearly 280,000 photos captured by motion detection, it happened.
Or maybe not.
But O’Connor’s findings of what he believes are two unidentified flying objects has set off a barrage of email exchanges, some of them angry, in the community of UFO fans and experts.
About noon on Nov. 4, his cameras captured five photos of something flying through the skies of Montana that is hard for some to explain.
“It appears to be a light source,” O’Connor said. “In my opinion, even a hardened skeptic would say ‘Wow, that is what I expect a UFO would look like.’”
But his discovery has sparked some debate, leaving the doctor to find his own photo experts to determine what his cameras may have captured.
The answers to this mystery remain up in the air.
Buy Photo
This photo, taken by a Tribune camera from an image provided by Dr. Richard O’Connor, shows an unidentified flying object he says was captured by his cameras on Nov. 4 at his Clancy home. (Photo: Tribune photo/Phil Drake)
O’Connor comes by his fascination with UFOs honestly. He said that for more than 25 years he was friends with Jesse Marcel Jr., perhaps best known for being a longtime doctor in Helena. O’Connor, now retired, worked as an anesthesiologist at St. Peter’s Hospital in Helena.
But Marcel may be even better known for something that happened to him as a child in New Mexico in July 1947.
His father, Maj. Jesse Marcel, was sent by his base commander to investigate the crash of a UFO on a ranch outside of Roswell Army Air Field. He loaded some of the wreckage into his vehicle and drove it home to show Jesse Jr., who was then 10. They couldn’t make sense of what they were seeing. According to Marcel Jr’s Sept. 1, 2013, obituary in the Helena Independent Record, The U.S. Army Air Corps issued a press release saying a “flying saucer” was found, but public uproar forced them to retract the statement and say a weather balloon had been found instead.
Those who were at the crash site were then sworn to secrecy. But in the ‘70s Marcel Sr. and his son began speaking about what they had seen, believing the coverup was a grave injustice to the public.
Marcel Jr. had a distinguished career not only as a doctor, but in the military as well. He was 76 when he died.
Dr. Richard O’Connor, left, and Dr. Jesse Marcel at the opening of the Jesse A. Marcel Library outside of Montana City in 2013. (Photo: Photo by Linda Marcel and courtesy of Dr. Richard O’Connor)
And after knowing him for nearly a quarter century, O’Connor deeply believes Marcel saw what he saw as a child.
O’Connor, 60, even set up the Jesse A. Marcel Jr. Library on his rural property and his friend was there for its dedication.
He says he told him, “Your story is important and to continue to educate the public we should open a library.”
And then he installed two Reconyx Hyperfire PC 900 Trail cameras on the southeast corner of his house with the goal of educating the public about the UFO phenomena. When triggered by motion, the cameras, which are about 30 feet off the ground, shoot 20 photos at approximately 1-second intervals.
He also posted a message on the Internet, giving the latitude and longitude of the cameras in the hopes that aliens would see it.
“Come, let us take your picture,” he said, reasoning that if they had the capability to get here they would also have the ability to find people who are reaching out to them.
The cameras were programmed to take photographs of moving objects. Among the 280,000 photos are a vast array of birds, squirrel tails and treetops dancing in the wind.
And then on Nov. 4, O’Connor says he noticed something.
Dr. Jesse Marcel, who said as a boy in 1947 that he touched wreckage from the UFO crash in Roswell, N.M. (Photo: Photo courtesy of Denise Marcel and Dr. Richard O’Connor)
“Basically what you see it a very symmetrical, smooth and reflective surface that appears to have his own life source,” he said.
Neither the FAA, nor the Air Force nor NASA handle UFO calls anymore, an FAA spokesman said, adding they are referred to National UFO Reporting Center, an organization that investigates UFO sightings and/or alien contacts. It was founded in 1974 by Robert J. Gribble.
The website features listings of UFO sightings by state. For instance, on Nov. 18, someone reported seeing three flashes of green light that lit up the entire sky after a power outage. On Nov. 11 in Great Falls, someone reported seeing a silent triangular object heading east to west before turning smoothly south and going out of sight. Massive in size. On Sept. 26, someone in Great Falls reported seeing a green glowing fireball.
O’Connor, who says he has no knowledge of how to manipulate photos on a computer, forwarded his photos to NUFORC, which were there for a few weeks and then came a query to them from the Tribune.
Peter Davenport, now the head of the NUFORC, forwarded the photos to “a skilled photo-analyst,” requesting that he try to ‘extract’ more information about the object than mere visual inspection would permit.”
NUFORC is a self-funded website that Davenport describes as a “labor of love.”
Buy Photo
Dr. Richard O’Connor stands by the cameras, mounted on the wall behind him, that were used to take the photo of what he believes is a UFO. (Photo: Tribune photo/Phil Drake)
The first review was heartening.
“Bottom line, I think the images are real, but remain a mystery,” the photo analyst wrote. “I suspect the lights in the first and last photos are sun reflections off of something rather than any propulsion system.”
And higher up in his assessment he wrote: “Thus, I conclude it is a puzzle to solve rather than a fake.”
But another analyst didn’t agree and angered O’Connor by proclaiming the photos “100 percent fake.”
O’Connor expressed his anger in an email to Davenport, saying he would get an unbiased photograph analysis. Davenport also suggests that O’Connor submit his photos to someone whose reputation he trusts.
O’Connor has also offered to take a polygraph.
O’Connor now plans to meet with various experts in photo analysis to get their take on his pictures.
In an earlier interview, O’Connor said “What you see there is what came off that camera.”
Discovering the Theory of Everything (ToE)
Discovering the Theory of Everything (ToE)
Where do UFOs and extraterrestrials reside when we aren’t observing them? The answer to this mystery reveals a deeper clue as to the true nature of these denizens of the unseen.
Observe above the theoretical diagram that is the current Standard Model of our cosmos. Notice the term COSMIC SINGULARITY at the bottom of the image. The gray “empty” space represents this region or area.
What is SINGULARITY? Here are some ideas to help make that concept more understandable.
Let me start by giving a couple of examples where science uses the term singularity.
(1) Astronomers use the term singularity to describe the insides or guts of a black hole. A black hole is a result of a massive dead star that has exploded. This exploding of a star much bigger than our sun is called a supernova. When this kind of star burns out the last of its fuel, it can no longer sustain itself and its shape of a sphere. The force of gravity then takes over and collapses the left over star material into itself to the point where no light can escape. This point where all the star’s stuff becomes an infinite SINGLE point is called a SINGULARITY. A singularity is neither matter, nor energy, nor space, nor time. It is ZERO SPACE.
(2) Another use of the term singularity is used by those who study Artificial Intelligence or AI for short. One leading AI proponent, Tom Mitchell has said, “The final theory of brain function will be an AI program.” He also said, “The synergy between AI and Brain Sciences will yield profound advances in our understanding of intelligence over the coming decade.”
We can see by these kind of statements that the goal of AI is really just man making machines in his own image by attempting to model the human brain.
Another AI pioneer Marvin Minsky said, “The brain is just a computer made of meat.”
The term singularity marks the theoretical point when the AI machine or robot moves beyond the confines of its programming, and becomes conscious and alive. How and why the robot reaches the consciousness point is unknown. Some say it is just the right number of exponential electronic connections that causes a chain reaction to life. Whatever the case, the whole “magically” becomes greater than the sum of its parts. This is the AI infinite point that is empirically undefinable. A robot who has come to life is known lovingly as Singularitarian. Ray Kurzweil’s describes the Technological Singularity in his book The Singularity is Near. There is even a YouTube song about the Singularitarian written to the tune of “I am the very model of the modern major general.”
So why do I compare the unseen dimensions with Singularity? The Christian worldview that was the basis of Western civilization and scientific enlightenment is that the Godhead, angels, fallen angels (otherwise known as demons) and heaven reside in the unseen dimensions. Man (Woman) is one part Empirical Man and one part Spiritual Man. These two parts are inseparable until death when our bodies become similar to the angels until we are reunited to our glorified physical bodies in the future. Contrary to Minsky, we are not a computer made of meat. It is the breath of God in us that is invisible and that is the life of man/woman. The invisible part of us like the black hole is greater than the sum of its
parts and defies quantification. Man is in fact already the Singularitarian. We don’t have to wait for AI to create the machine version of singularity. Life itself is singularity undefined by empirical equation.
Angels and Demons are pure spirit (Ps. 104:4). Their entrance in and out of cosmos represents that which is zero space - or Singularity which is undefined by empirical science. They can materialize (MAT) and dematerialize (DEMAT) instantaneously defying our physical laws.
When I enter 1 divided by 0 in my calculator I receive “Math Error: the number may be out of range or the functions receive the invalid argument.” This is a politically correct version of the old calculator error: UNDEFINED.
The fraction 1/0 actually is present inside Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity equation. He thought at the time it didn’t really describe anything physical, but in fact it does represent the zero space of the singularity beyond what is known as the event horizon or edge of a black hole.
So the next time you think of UFOs and ETI (extraterrestrial intelligences), which in reality are equivalent to shapeshifting demons, think of entering 1/0 in your calculator. This will describe the seeming miracle of the superphysics involved in the whole process of what is known historically as Angelology and Demonology.
Who are the 24 Elders? Important updated evidence found here…
Hubble-ruimtetelescoop kiekt voor het eerst een voorspelde - HLN.be

NASA/ESA.
STERRENKUNDE De Amerikaans-Europese Hubble-ruimtetelescoop heeft voor het eerst een foto gemaakt van een voorspelde supernova (ontploffende ster), zo heeft het Hubble Informatiecentrum bekendgemaakt.
Vele sterren beëindigen hun leven met een knal, maar slechts weinige van dergelijke ontploffingen zijn door een telescoop op heterdaad betrapt. Wanneer dit gebeurde, was dit gewoon tot goed geluk terug te voeren.
Tot 11 december 2015. Dankzij de Hubble zagen wetenschappers niet alleen een supernova in actie, maar bovenal waar en voor wanneer ze de ontploffing hadden voorspeld, zo luidt het.
Het betrof de supernova Refsdal in de sterrenstelselcluster MACS J1149.5+2222. Het licht van die cluster heeft er zowat vijf miljard jaar over gedaan om ons te bereiken. De supernova zelf deed zich veel vroeger voor, zowat tien miljard jaar geleden.