As NASA’s astronaut crew, engineers, and mission specialists prepare to make history with the forthcoming launch, here are five things you should know about Artemis II, its crew, and what its scientific missions will include while in orbit.

The Artemis II Mission

A focal point of the Artemis II mission involves the fact that this will be the first time NASA has launched a crew aboard its foundational deep space rocket, the SLS (Space Launch System), and the agency’s new Orion spacecraft.

While in orbit, the mission will provide NASA with the first real opportunity to test the operability of the spacecraft’s systems while having a space-bound crew on board. Not only that, but the mission’s trajectory will carry its astronaut crew farther than any human has traveled into space.

Fundamentally, Artemis II will offer a proving ground for NASA’s most state-of-the-art space exploration capabilities, while setting the pace for future missions that will travel to the lunar surface and, if all goes according to plan, establish a long-term presence on the Moon. This will not only support ongoing lunar science and exploration but will mark an important steppingstone on the path toward eventual crewed explorations of Mars. 

The Crew: First of “The Artemis Generation”  

NASA has selected a team of four astronauts for the Artemis II mission. The crew consists of Commander Reid Wiseman, a former Naval aviator and Chief of the Astronaut Office; Pilot Victor Glover, also a former Naval aviator who previously served as a pilot on the SpaceX Crew-1 mission; Mission Specialist Christina Koch, who currently holds the record for the longest single spaceflight by a woman; and Mission Specialist Jeremy Hansen, a Canadian Space Agency astronaut.

(Left to Right): CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut Jeremy Hansen, NASA astronauts Victor Glover, Reid Wiseman, and Christina Koch, will comprise the Artemis II crew (Image Credit: NASA/Kim Shiflett).

Notably, this foursome will be the first crew to carry NASA’s Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft in a journey around the Moon, offering the first full systems test of the spacecraft’s capabilities in a full-scale space mission.

Astronaut Health Experiments

The Artemis II crew will perform a range of science experiments during their mission, many of which will focus on astronaut health to provide NASA with an unprecedented look at the impact of deep space travel on humans. Here’s a quick look at several of the health-related experiments the Artemis II crew will be conducting.

• ARCHeR: NASA’s Artemis Research for Crew Health and Readiness (ARCHeR) will focus on monitoring the crew’s sleep patterns, activity while on board, and overall well-being, which will inform future planning efforts to ensure optimal human health and performance in space.

NASA image depicting the actigraphy device that certain Artemis II astronauts will wear during their mission around the Moon. The device will measure the crew members’ motion, sleep patterns, and exposure to light

(Image Credit: NASA/Helen Arase Vargas).

• AVATAR: The A Virtual Astronaut Tissue Analog Response (AVATAR) study will comprise investigations into the effects of increased exposure to radiation and microgravity that the Artemis II crew will experience, monitored using organ-on-a-chip devices.
• Immune Biomarkers: During Artemis II, blood and saliva samples will also be monitored to study the impact of deep space travel on the immune system.
• Artemis II Standard Measures: Ongoing health information will be provided by each Artemis II astronaut, which will be stored in a data bank for use in future studies related to astronaut health.
• Radiation Studies: Additional monitoring of radiation levels within and outside the Orion capsule will allow NASA’s science team to characterize the deep space environment.

Lunar Science Studies

Since Artemis II marks the first time humans have journeyed to the Moon in more than 50 years, marking what NASA has dubbed “The Artemis Generation” of space exploration, the mission will collect large volumes of data related to lunar science.

During the crew’s passage by the far side of the Moon, the NASA astronauts will perform a three-hour analysis and image collection operation to photograph the Moon’s ancient lava flows, impact craters, and geological features.

Preparation for this portion of their mission included studies on Earth in moonlike environments like deserts and rocky landscapes, which help to inform them about many of the features they will document.

Above: Cindy Evans (left), the Artemis geology training lead at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, appears alongside NASA astronaut and Artemis II mission specialist Christina Koch, as they study geologic features in Iceland during Artemis II crew geology training in August 2024 (Image Credit: Robert Markowitz / NASA-JSC).

Other Artemis II Mission Objectives

• CubeSats: A range of other scientific studies will during the Artemis II mission, which will enable further studies that will be undertaken remotely by several of NASA’s international partners around the world, which include the transport of CubeSats aboard Artemis II.

“Space agencies from Germany, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Argentina will fly CubeSats aboard Artemis II,” NASA’s Artemis II website states. “The CubeSats, which have their own distinct objectives from NASA’s primary mission of sending four astronauts around the Moon, will be deployed in high Earth orbit.”

“In addition to the CubeSats, the German Aerospace Center (DLR) will conduct radiation research,” NASA’s statement reads.

• Payload Management: While the Artemis II astronauts are hard at work in deep space, back on Earth at the Payload and Mission Operations Division at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, NASA’s flight control team will be continuously monitoring the crew’s progress, while also managing several additional science priorities aboard the spacecraft from the facility’s Lunar Utilization Control Area.
• 

See Also

NASA’s Perseverance Rover Gets Photobombed in Latest Red Planet Robotic Selfie

• Real-Time Science Operations: Additionally, NASA will have a team specializing in the study of impact craters, lunar ice, tectonic activity, and volcanism on hand to provide real-time analysis and additional resources to the Artemis crew, all of which will be transmitted from the Science Evaluation Room located in the mission control facility at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas.
• Space Weather Studies: Since Artemis II will be carrying humans far beyond Earth’s magnetosphere, the magnetic bubble that shields our planet from potentially harmful space weather emanating from the Sun, scientists at NASA, as well as its partners at NOAA, will be offering ongoing space weather forecasting to the Artemis II mission manager, flight director, and console operators throughout the duration of the mission.

Earth’s aurora as seen from space (Image Credit: NASA).

Specifically, the NASA and NOAA teams will be watching for potential coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar flares, which have the potential to impact not only certain capabilities of the systems on board the spacecraft but also could potentially have a harmful impact on human health.

One Step Beyond

Once the official launch window for Artemis II has been determined, NASA will begin final preparations for launching the astronaut crew on its roughly 10-day mission from Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

From there, the Artemis II crew will spend its first couple of days testing Orion’s systems, as well as undertaking a targeting demonstration while still close to Earth. From there, the team will begin their journey toward the Moon.

A burn from Orion’s European-built service module will propel the spacecraft into a four-day-long outbound trajectory, which will carry the Artemis II astronauts around the Moon’s far side on a figure-eight path that will extend more than 230,000 miles from Earth, and about 4,600 miles beyond the Moon at its farthest point.

Following the crew’s loop around the Moon, the mission will then enter a fuel-efficient free-return path that will rely on the gravitational properties of the Earth and the Moon to help bring Orion back home, which will eliminate any significant requirement for propulsion on the crew’s way home.

Official NASA portrait of the Artemis II astronauts (Image Credit: NASA).

In the final phase of their return, the crew will endure a high-speed, high-temperature reentry not unlike past crewed missions have undergone before they splash down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of San Diego. There, recovery teams comprised of NASA and Department of Defense personnel will retrieve the Artemis II astronauts.

In the days ahead, NASA will provide ongoing details as its teams continue preparations for the forthcoming launch, marking a major leap for human space exploration in the twenty-first century, and the initiation of the Artemis Generation of crewed deep space missions to study the Moon and beyond.

• Micah Hanks is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of The Debrief. A longtime reporter on science, defense, and technology with a focus on space and astronomy, he can be reached at micah@thedebrief.org. Follow him on X @MicahHanks, and at micahhanks.com
  

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/space/ }

Out-of-control Chinese rocket smashes into the South Pacific Ocean - after Britain was put on red-alert over the potential of falling debris

• READ MORE: Step–by–step graphic reveals what will happen during Artemis II

By WILIAM HUNTER, SENIOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY REPORTER

An out-of-control Chinese rocket has crashed into the Southern Pacific Ocean, after Britain readied the emergency alert system over fears of falling debris. 

Earlier today, the UK government asked mobile network providers to ensure the alert system is operational, in preparation for a potential impact.

However, the rocket has now safely landed in the ocean some 1,200 miles (2,000 km) southeast of New Zealand. 

The rocket, a Chinese Zhuque–3 launched in early December, crashed to Earth at 12:39 GMT, according to the US Space Force. 

With an estimated mass of 11 tonnes, the EU's Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) agency had cautioned that ZQ–3 R/B was 'quite a sizeable object deserving careful monitoring.' 

While the vast majority of space debris which falls on Earth either burns up in the atmosphere or is never found, experts say we can be certain this rocket fell safely. 

Dr Marco Lanbroek, a debris tracking expert from the Delft University of Technology, says he 'strongly suspects' that the US Space Force observed the re-entry fireball using a space-based satellite. 

This puts an end to intense uncertainty over the rocket's potential landing site, after predictions suggested it could hit Northern Europe and the UK. 

The government asked mobile network operators to ensure the national emergency alert system is ready, as an out–of–control Chinese rocket (pictured) hurtles to Earth 

The rocket was launched by private space firm LandSpace from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in China's Gansu Province on December 3, 2025.

The experimental rocket, dubbed ZQ–3 R/B, successfully reached orbit, but its reusable booster stage, modelled after the SpaceX Falcon 9, exploded during landing.

The upper stages and its 'dummy' cargo, in the form of a large metal tank, have been slowly slipping out of orbit.  

The rocket's shallow angle of re–entry had made it extremely difficult to predict exactly where any of the pieces might fall.

At the time, Professor Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer from the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and expert on tracking space debris, told the Daily Mail: 'It will pass over the Inverness–Aberdeen area at 1200 UTC, so there's a small – a few per cent – chance it could re–enter there, otherwise it won't happen over the UK.'

It is not uncommon for pieces of rocket and satellite debris to fall to Earth, with debris passing over the UK about 70 times a month.

The overwhelming majority of the material is burned up upon re–entry due to friction with the atmosphere.

Despite earlier predictions that the rocket could land over Europe and the UK, observations now show that it has landed safely in the ocean  

The UK government asked mobile network providers to ensure the alert system is operational, in preparation for the possibility of an alert being issued 

In some cases, very large pieces of debris or fragments of heat–resistant materials, such as stainless steel or titanium, can make it to Earth.

However, these pieces generally disperse over the oceans or unpopulated areas.

The government also stresses that the 'readiness check' conducted by the mobile network providers is a routine practice that does not indicate that an alert will be issued.

A UK government spokesperson told the Daily Mail: 'It is extremely unlikely that any debris enters UK airspace.

'As you'd expect, we have well rehearsed plans for a variety of different risks including those related to space, that are tested routinely with partners.'

While there is almost no chance that this falling rocket will cause damage to life or property, researchers have warned that the risk of space debris is increasing.

The only recorded case of someone being hit by space debris occurred in 1997, when a woman was struck but not hurt by a 16–gram piece of a US–made Delta II rocket.

The rocket was launched by private space firm LandSpace from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in China's Gansu Province on December 3, 2025. It has been slowly falling out of orbit since and has now crashed back to Earth

This is not the first time that a Chinese rocket has fallen to Earth. In 2024, fragments of a Long March 3B booster stage fell metres from homes in China's Guangxi province 

As the number of commercial launches increases, so too does the volume of 'uncontrolled' re–entries.

A recent study by scientists at the University of British Columbia suggested that there is now a 10 per cent chance that one or more people will be killed by space junk in the next decade.

Likewise, researchers have increasingly warned that falling debris could pose a threat to air travel, with a 26 per cent chance of something falling through some of the world's busiest airspace in any given year.

Read More

•  'The smell would be intolerable!' NASA reveals cramped quarters where astronauts will live for days 

The actual chances of a plane being hit are currently very small, but a large piece of space junk could lead to widespread closures and travel chaos.

However, a 2020 study estimated that the risk of any given commercial flight being hit could rise to around one in 1,000 by 2030.

Nor is this the first time that a large Chinese–made rocket has unexpectedly crashed out of orbit.

In 2024, an almost complete Long March 3B booster stage fell over a village in a forested area of China's Guangxi Province, exploding in a dramatic fireball.

WHAT IS SPACE JUNK? MORE THAN 170 MILLION PIECES OF DEAD SATELLITES, SPENT ROCKETS AND FLAKES OF PAINT POSE 'THREAT' TO SPACE INDUSTRY

There are an estimated 170 million pieces of so-called 'space junk' - left behind after missions that can be as big as spent rocket stages or as small as paint flakes - in orbit alongside some US$700 billion (£555bn) of space infrastructure.

But only 27,000 are tracked, and with the fragments able to travel at speeds above 16,777 mph (27,000kmh), even tiny pieces could seriously damage or destroy satellites.

However, traditional gripping methods don't work in space, as suction cups do not function in a vacuum and temperatures are too cold for substances like tape and glue.

Grippers based around magnets are useless because most of the debris in orbit around Earth is not magnetic.

Around 500,000 pieces of human-made debris (artist's impression) currently orbit our planet, made up of disused satellites, bits of spacecraft and spent rockets

Most proposed solutions, including debris harpoons, either require or cause forceful interaction with the debris, which could push those objects in unintended, unpredictable directions.

Scientists point to two events that have badly worsened the problem of space junk.

The first was in February 2009, when an Iridium telecoms satellite and Kosmos-2251, a Russian military satellite, accidentally collided.

The second was in January 2007, when China tested an anti-satellite weapon on an old Fengyun weather satellite.

Experts also pointed to two sites that have become worryingly cluttered.

One is low Earth orbit which is used by satnav satellites, the ISS, China's manned missions and the Hubble telescope, among others.

The other is in geostationary orbit, and is used by communications, weather and surveillance satellites that must maintain a fixed position relative to Earth. 

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

Opinion by Michael Levanduski

 

Humans’ learning about nuclear concepts that led to nuclear energy and nuclear bombs was one of the most important turning points in human history.

This represented the first time that humanity started ‘playing’ with technology that could literally destroy our whole species (not to mention the whole world). In addition, nuclear technology meant the potential for almost limitless clean energy, even if we haven’t yet taken full advantage.

So, if nuclear technology is such an important point in our evolution, it would make sense if aliens (if they exist) would take an interest.

Since the earliest days of nuclear testing and development, there have been reports of strange lights and unidentified objects up in the atmosphere around nuclear facilities. A group of researchers decided to gather up all the data on this subject (there is a lot) and put it together to try to see if it could be determined what was really causing the unidentified aerial phenomena.

The study was published in Scientific Reports, and while they definitely cannot confirm that it was aliens, they also can’t completely rule it out.

The team looked at transient ‘star-like’ objects that were reported or even seen in images, often taken from cameras at these facilities. The Vanishing & Appearing Sources During a Century of Observations project has been around since 2017, working on compiling all of these reports.

In the paper, the team writes:

“These short-lived transients (lasting less than one exposure time of 50 min) have point spread functions and are absent in images taken shortly before the transients appear and in all images from subsequent surveys. In some cases multiple transients appear in a single image, exhibiting characteristics not easily accounted for by prosaic explanations (e.g., gravitational lensing, gamma ray bursts, fragmenting asteroids, plate defects).”

Given the fact that this all happened over half a century ago makes it hard to identify exactly where the lights or sightings came from. The researchers wrote in the paper:

“From 1951 until the launch of Sputnik in 1957, at least 124 above-ground nuclear tests were conducted by the United States (US), Soviet Union, and Great Britain. In some circumstances, nuclear radiation is known to cause a visible glow (i.e., Cherenkov radiation). […] Consistent with this concept, glowing ‘fireballs’ in the sky were reported in multiple instances to occur shortly after nuclear tests in locations where significant nuclear fallout was expected.”

There is no confirmed explanation for these events. Not surprisingly, many will say that they could be either aliens or drones sent by aliens to investigate the fact that humans have entered a nuclear age.

Another option is that nuclear tests could cause an atmospheric phenomenon that is not yet fully understood. Since nuclear tests are pretty rare (thankfully), it is not something that is easy to study.

While they may not know what caused these types of signings, it does seem clear that something happened around the nuclear testing sites during that time period, given all the evidence.

• James Webb Just Spotted City Lights on a Nearby Alien Planet

{ https://twistedsifter.com/category/stories/}

OVER A LARGE BOX of untouched donuts in Washington’s Longworth House Office Building, Congressional representatives sat rapt as a visiting Brazilian neurosurgeon described what it was like to stare back at the large lilac-colored eyes of a highly intelligent, nonhuman being.

So, not your usual Capitol Hill meeting.

Archival image of witnesses Liliane Silva, 14 (left), Valquira Silva, 16 (center), and their friend Katia Xavier, 21, after encountering the creature on Jan. 30, 1996 (Image Credit: Copyright © Falcon Scout Media. Image used with permission).

In her statement, the mother of the Silva sisters, Luiza Helena da Silva, said she went back with Katia about twenty or thirty minutes later to find the creature gone. But she said it left behind a footprint with three large toes and an acrid odor that remained in her nose for several weeks.

Sometime later, the mother said she was visited by four strange men dressed in black, offering a briefcase filled with cash if her daughters would go on television and lie by describing the creature as a calf, a sick dog, or a sick human. She refused, saying she was very frightened by the visit.

Yet another videotaped witness, unnamed and his face obscured, said he was in the army in 1996 and helped transport the being from the hospital in Varginha to Três Corações and from there to Campinas, where other soldiers took over. Upon returning to Três Corações, he said, “There was talk the Americans had the creature, having transported it to an undisclosed location.”

At the news conference, Dr. Italo was questioned about his contact with the nonhuman being in the Varginha hospital room. Was it bleeding? Agitated?

“It was initially OK, it just looked out the window,” Dr. Italo replied. He said that instantly, “I was not there as a doctor anymore. The being was looking straight at me. The more he looked at me, the more I had a feeling of peace; it was transmitting peace. It looked at everything happening as if it was taking notes, like a great observer of everything happening around it.”

Asked if he had had any subsequent contacts with nonhuman intelligence, the doctor replied simply, “No.”

Fox said the videos of the entities are held by people too afraid to release them, but that for the first time, he may have the help of Brazilian Senator Girão and Representative Burlison, who is currently working on strengthening whistleblower protection for UAP witnesses.

In Varginha, individuals continue to come forward. On Jan. 26, Rosangela Ramos appeared on camera with James Fox, saying that her late husband, Pedro Luiz Aguiar, the chief of police in Três Corações in 1996, who had been on duty during the incident, claimed he had also witnessed the creature, although she had no further details. Aguiar died in December.

At the news conference, Burlison called for international transparency.

Dr. Italo Venturelli (left) shakes hands with Rep. Eric Burlison during an emotional moment during Burlison’s spontaneous remarks at the press conference,  as Carlos de Sousa looks on (Image Credit: Copyright David E. West Photography. Image used with permission).

“If there’s any government that’s holding information about the knowledge of whether or not we are alone or not alone in the universe, that is not for any government, no matter how powerful it is, to withhold from the rest of humanity,” Burlison said, to general applause.

Dr. Italo says he has no regrets about coming forward.

“The truth is, I saw the being,” he said. “He was not a being from our planet. We are talking about something that changes the concept of humanity.”

“It’s important for people to know.”

•  Additional materials related to this story, including written statements and video recordings of testimony from Brazilian witnesses, can be found here.
• A Portuguese language translation of this article will soon be published by The Debrief.
• Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean, with Helene Cooper, co-authored the 2017 New York Times exclusive that revealed the secret Pentagon unit investigating UFOs, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Blumenthal and Kean broke the story of whistleblower David Grusch in The Debrief in 2023. Blumenthal was a staff reporter for The New York Times from 1964 to 2009 and is the author of The Believer: Alien Encounters, Hard Science, and the Passion of John Mack (2021, University of New Mexico Press). Kean has reported on UFOs for twenty-five years and is the author of UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go on the Record (2010, Harmony Books/Crown), a New York Times bestseller.
• Images featured in this article have been provided courtesy of their respective creators and may not be reproduced elsewhere without express written permission. 

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/science/ }

Something Is Moving Under the Oceans – and Navies Know It

For decades, unexplained encounters with unidentified objects have not been limited to the skies. Beneath the ocean’s surface, military submarines from multiple nations have reported interactions with fast-moving, intelligent, and technologically superior objects commonly referred to as Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs). These encounters, discussed in detail on Jim Harold’s Paranormal Podcast, raise serious questions about what may be operating in Earth’s oceans and why official acknowledgment remains minimal.

Why Submarine Encounters Are Uniquely Concerning

Submarines operate in extreme isolation, with little margin for error. A single hull separates the crew from crushing ocean pressure, and in the case of ballistic missile submarines, these vessels carry nuclear weapons capable of triggering global catastrophe. Any unidentified object interacting with such platforms represents not only a mystery but a significant strategic and security concern.

Reports from submariners are especially notable because these individuals rely on advanced sonar, navigation systems, and strict operational protocols. When unexplained objects are detected repeatedly under such conditions, dismissing the encounters becomes increasingly difficult.

Soviet Navy Encounters and the “Croakers”

During the 1970s and early 1980s, the Soviet Navy documented numerous underwater encounters involving strange acoustic signals. These sounds resembled croaking or frog-like noises, leading Soviet crews to nickname the objects “Kavaki,” meaning “croakers.”

• Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure with Jim Harold: The Submarine UFO Encounters the Military Refuses to Acknowledge:

According to the accounts, these submerged objects demonstrated extraordinary capabilities:

• They could rapidly approach and withdraw from submarines
• They circled vessels in a deliberate manner
• They displayed speeds far exceeding known underwater technology

Initially, Soviet analysts suspected advanced American devices. However, the performance of these objects quickly ruled out known U.S. technology. The conclusion was troubling: whatever these objects were, they did not belong to any recognized military power. Although studies were reportedly conducted, their findings remain classified, and public information largely disappeared following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Chinese Military Observations and Silent Documentation

Public information about Chinese encounters with UFOs and USOs is scarce, but evidence suggests that China has quietly taken the phenomenon seriously. Since the late 1970s, particularly after China began opening up to the world, the country has reportedly collected and analyzed a large number of UFO reports, comparable in volume to those in the United States.

China’s military is said to operate a structured, multi-level reporting system that gathers sightings from across the country and subjects selected cases to deeper analysis. While underwater sightings are rarer than aerial ones, China’s heavy naval presence in strategic waterways such as the South China Sea makes it highly likely that USO incidents are monitored, even if never publicly discussed.

A Pattern That Predates Modern Technology

One of the most compelling aspects of submarine and maritime UFO encounters is their historical consistency. Accounts stretching back centuries describe objects emerging from or interacting with the ocean in ways that closely resemble modern reports.

A well-documented case from August 12, 1825, recorded by Royal Navy ship physician Andrew Bloxom, describes a glowing orange orb rising from the ocean at night. The light was so intense that objects on the deck were clearly visible. The object submerged, re-emerged, and eventually disappeared. This account predates modern aviation and submarine technology by generations.

A similar incident occurred nearly 150 years later in 1971, involving the USS John F. Kennedy. A glowing orange object appeared near the aircraft carrier, coinciding with system disruptions and a rapid shift to battle stations. The similarities between these two events suggest a long-standing phenomenon rather than isolated anomalies.

Shapes, Behavior, and Possible Changes Over Time

Most reported USOs appear to maintain their shape and structure while transitioning between water and air. Spherical objects are among the most frequently described, often glowing orange or appearing metallic gray when unilluminated.

Triangular objects represent a notable development. While rare or uncertain in earlier reports, triangular USOs begin appearing more consistently from the late 1970s onward. This raises questions about whether the phenomenon has evolved or whether earlier observers lacked the means to accurately identify such shapes.

Even in the 19th century, sailors reported mechanical-looking objects over open oceans. An 1870 account from the middle of the Atlantic Ocean describes a structured craft flying beneath cloud cover at a time when no known human technology could explain such behavior.

Transmedium Capabilities: The Defining Feature

Perhaps the most significant finding discussed in the source material is that most USO encounters are transmedium in nature. Based on a dataset of over 670 carefully selected cases:

• More than half involved objects entering or exiting the water
• Roughly one-fifth were observed exclusively underwater
• A smaller percentage hovered just above the water’s surface

These objects appear capable of moving between air and water without visible propulsion, without slowing down, and without changing shape. Such performance defies conventional engineering and challenges current understanding of physics.

Why Militaries Remain Silent

The lack of official acknowledgment may not stem from disbelief but from uncertainty. Admitting the presence of unidentified objects capable of outperforming submarines and disabling systems would raise profound questions about national security, technological superiority, and defense readiness.

For military institutions, acknowledging such encounters without an explanation may be seen as more destabilizing than remaining silent.

Submarine UFO encounters represent one of the most overlooked yet potentially significant aspects of the unidentified phenomena. Reported by multiple nations, spanning centuries, and involving trained military personnel, these incidents display remarkable consistency in behavior and capability.

Whether the explanation lies in unknown natural processes, undisclosed technology, or something entirely beyond current understanding, one fact remains clear: the oceans may conceal advanced phenomena that humanity has yet to fully comprehend, and militaries around the world may know more than they are willing to admit.

RELATED VIDEOS 

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

Afgetapt Bloed, Medisch Nauwkeurige Sneden, En Onbeantwoorde Vragen: De Verminkingen van Runderen (Cattle Mutilations }

Zijn zij de slachtoffers van een onbekend buitenaards experiment...

Inleiding

Sinds de jaren zeventig van de twintigste eeuw hebben mysterieuze en macabere gebeurtenissen de aandacht getrokken van onderzoekers, wetenschappers en wetshandhavers wereldwijd: de zogenaamde koeienmutilaties. Wat begon als sporadische incidenten in de Verenigde Staten, groeide uit tot een archetype van het onverklaarbare en het bovennatuurlijke, met meldingen die zich verspreidden over meerdere continenten. Ondanks decennia van onderzoek en talloze theorieën blijft het fenomeen onduidelijk en omgeven door speculatie.

In dit artikel zullen we het fenomeen van de koeienmutilaties gedetailleerd analyseren vanuit een wetenschappelijk perspectief. We onderzoeken de aard van de mutilaties, de gebruikte methoden, de mogelijke oorzaken, de bestudeerde gevallen en de relevante vragen die nog altijd onbeantwoord zijn. Daarbij zullen we voorbeelden aanhalen, bewijsstukken bespreken en verschillende hypothesen evalueren, zowel natuurlijke als bovennatuurlijke.

De aard en kenmerken van de mutilaties

Medisch en forensisch profiel

Een kenmerkend aspect van koeienmutilaties is de uiterst precieze en doelgerichte wijze waarop de dieren gestript worden van bepaalde lichaamsdelen. Vaak zijn de volgende kenmerken waarneembaar:

• AFGETAPT bloed: Het lichaam is bijna geheel bloedeloos, vaak met duidelijke bloeduitstortingen rondom de wondranden.
• Precisie sneden: De wondpatronen vertonen chirurgische precisie. Sneden zijn recht, relatief glad en oppervlakkig, wat suggereert dat ze met een zeer scherp scherpmes of instrument zijn gedaan.
• Verwijdering van specifieke organen: Vooral de ogen, tong, hart, longen, genitale organen, en gespeende spieren worden vaak verwijderd. De essentiële organen zoals het hart en de longen ontbreken meestal.
• Geen tekenen van geweld of gescheurd: De wonden vertonen geen tekenen van vechtpartijen, beten of scherpe tanden. Er zijn geen sporen van ongevallen of roofdieren, oftewel dieren die dergelijke mutilaties zouden kunnen veroorzaken.
• Ontbreken van bloedstolsels en sporen: Het bloed lijkt uit het lichaam te zijn gehaald met een chirurgische precisie, zonder dat sporen van bloedstolsels of gebruik van traditionele snijwapens zichtbaar zijn.

Voorbeeld van een mutilatie

Een van de bekendste gevallen vond plaats in 1975 in Colorado, Verenigde Staten. Een rund werd gevonden in een weide, met een kleine, gladgesneden wond rond de nek en zonder enige tekenen van strijd. Het dier was bijna volledig ontladen van bloed, en zijn onderlichaam was leeggehaald: de ogen, tong en organen van de romp waren verdwenen. De wond was zo perfect dat sommige onderzoekers dachten aan de werkwijze van een chirurg.

Deze twee verminkte koeien werden woensdag gevonden door boeren uit de omgeving van Parker en Wilford, terwijl het aantal verminkingen in het gebied blijft toenemen. De dode jaarling, die achtergelaten is, werd woensdag in de omgeving van Wilford gevonden en was al enkele dagen dood. Het jaarling had zijn oren, tong en geslachtsorganen niet. Fremont County-deputy Terry Thompson controleert het lichaam van een dode koe, rechts, gevonden op de Margaret McMinn-boerderij in Parker. De koe werd woensdagochtend vroeg gedood en haar geslachtsorganen werden verwijderd en een deel van haar bloed was afgevoerd. Het kantoor van de sheriff heeft geen aanwijzingen over wie de verminkingen uitvoert. Onderschrift gedateerd 2 oktober 1975. | Met dank aan Idaho Falls Post Register

Verzameld bewijs en onopgeloste details

Naast de fysieke kenmerken biedt het bewijs dat vaak wordt verzameld, vragen op die nog altijd niet volledig beantwoord zijn:

• Bloedanalyse: Het bloed dat werd gevonden, vertoonde vaak tekenen van ernstiger bloedverlies dan mogelijk met conventionele methoden te veroorzaken is. Soms was het bloed verder afgeleid van het lichaam door een soort “drainage.”
• DNA-onderzoek: In sommige gevallen werden DNA-monsters uit de wonden gehaald. De resultaten toonden geen sporen van menselijke aanwezigheid of bekende parasieten of bacteriën.
• Elektrisch en chemisch bewijs: Er zijn aanwijzingen dat sommige mutilaties met behulp van geavanceerd technisch of chemisch materiaal worden uitgevoerd, hoewel dit nietconsistent in alle gevallen wordt gevonden.

Mogelijke oorzaken en hypothesen

Omdat de mutilaties zo minutieus en doelgericht lijken, hebben onderzoekers verschillende hypothesen aangevoerd, variërend van natuurlijke tot bovennatuurlijke verklaringen.

Natuurlijke en biologische oorzaken

Predator- of roofdier-aanvallen

Een eerste en voor de hand liggende verklaring is dat roofdieren of andere dieren verantwoordelijk zijn. Echter, afgezien van de duidelijke sporen van dergelijke dieren — tanden, krassen, of sporen op het lichaam — ontbreken in veel gevallen bewijs dat een ander dier de mutilatie heeft uitgevoerd. Bovendien, de chirurgische precisie en het ontbreken van bloedstolsels zijn inconsistent met natuurlijke roofdier-aanvallen.

Infectie of ziekte

Sommigen suggereren dat bepaalde ziekten of parasieten kunnen leiden tot gedragsveranderingen die tot lichamelijke schade leiden. Maar dit verklaart zelden de specifieke sneden en verwijderde organen.

Toegepaste landbouwbehandelingen en medische ingrepen

In de jaren 80 werd gesuggereerd dat boeren of onderzoekers met militaire of farmaceutische technologieën experimenteren, bijvoorbeeld het gebruik van lasers of geavanceerde medische apparatuur, om dieren te markeren of te bestuderen.

Mysterieuze verminkingen teisteren deze ranch in Colorado

Technologische en buitenaardse theorieën

Ufo's en buitenaardse wezens

De meest iconische hypothese is dat buitenaardse wezens betrokken zijn bij de mutilaties. Volgens deze theorie zouden UFO’s of buitenaardse onderzoekers de dieren gebruiken voor experimenten, waarbij zij organen wegnemen voor genetisch onderzoek zonder de rest van het lichaam te beschadigen.

Voorbeeld: In de jaren 70 en 80 werden meerdere meldingen gedaan van Ufo’s die in de buurt van mutilatieplaatsen werden waargenomen. Sommige getuigen meldde dat ze lichtverschijnselen zagen of zelfs buitenaardse wezens.

Militair en geheime experimenten

Een andere verklaring is dat overheids- of militaire instanties geavanceerde technologieën testen, bijvoorbeeld laser- of plasmatechnologieën, en dat de mutilaties onderdeel zijn van experimenten met biologische en genetische technieken. Deze hypothese wordt ondersteund door het feit dat sommige mutilaties lijken op technische experimenten die niet voor het publiek bekend zijn.

Paranormale en bovennatuurlijke verklaringen

Naast de bovengenoemde theorieën bestaan er ook meer onconventionele overtuigingen dat de mutilaties verband houden met bovennatuurlijke factoren, zoals geesten, energieweerstanden of kosmische krachten. Echter, wetenschappelijk bewijs voor dergelijke verklaringen ontbreekt grotendeels.

Analyse van belangrijke casussen

De aard en complexiteit van de mutilaties maken ze tot intrigerende problemen voor wetenschappers en onderzoeksgroepen. Hier volgen enkele belangrijke casussen die illustreren hoe het fenomeen zich voordoet en waarom het nog steeds mysterieus blijft.

Case 1: The Carmichael Ranch (New Mexico, 1979)

In dit geval werd een koe gevonden met een bijna chirurgische snede rond de nek, zonder verwondingen die doen denken aan een aanval door roofdieren. Het bloed was bijna volledig verdwenen. Lab-analyses toonden een afwezigheid van DNA dat overeenkwam met menselijke of dierenlijke bronnen, behalve dat van het dier zelf. De politie concludeerde dat geen natuurlijke oorzaak kon worden vastgesteld.

Case 2: The Norton Farm (Verenigde Staten, 1980)

Een kalf werd gevonden met organen verwijderd onder chirurgisch schone omstandigheden. Dit en soortgelijke gevallen veroorzaakten een golf van publieke angst en media-aandacht. Desondanks bleven de onderzoekers ongelukkig met de afwezigheid van bewijs dat een natuurlijke verklaring konden ondersteunen.

Wetenschappelijke en praktische vragen

Ondanks uitgebreide onderzoeken blijven veel vragen onbeantwoord:

• Hoe worden de wonden zo precies en doelgericht gemaakt?
• Waarom worden organen verwijderd zonder enige zichtbare verwonding of bloedvergissing?
• Welke technologie of middelen zouden hiervoor nodig zijn?
• Hoe kunnen we de afwezigheid van bewijs voor menselijke of dierlijke betrokkenheid verklaren?
• Zijn er overeenkomsten tussen verschillende mutilatiegevallen die op een gemeenschappelijke dader of oorzaak wijzen?

Conclusie

De koeienmutilaties blijven een raadsel dat vele theorieën oproept, van natuurlijke oorzaken tot bovennatuurlijke verklaringen. Hoewel de bewijsstukken vaak wijzen op een uiterst doelgerichte en chirurgisch precieze uitvoering, ontbreekt het aan overtuigend bewijs dat een natuurlijke of menselijke actor verantwoordelijk is.

Wat de ware oorzaak ook moge zijn, het fenomeen benadrukt onze beperkte kennis van biologische, technologische en misschien zelfs bovennatuurlijke processen. Het blijft een onderwerp van fascinerende speculatie en onderzoek, met de wetenschap zeker nog niet klaar met het ontrafelen van dit mysterie.

Aanbevelingen voor verder onderzoek

Om het onbegrijpelijke fenomeen van koeienmutilaties verder te kunnen doorgronden, worden de volgende aanpakken aanbevolen:

• Gedetailleerde forensische analyse van nieuwe gevallen
• Gebruik van geavanceerde DNA- en chemische testingstechnieken
• Monitoring en observatie van mogelijke locaties met behulp van camera’s en drones
• Interdisciplinair onderzoek dat nauwer samenwerkt tussen biologen, ingenieurs, forensisch experts, en astronomen
• Bewustwording en educatie onder betrokken agrariërs en het publiek

In zekere zin biedt het fenomeen niet alleen een uitdaging voor de wetenschap, maar ook een diepere reflectie op onze kennis van de wereld en onze plaats daarin. Het blijft een waarachtig mysterie dat ons echoot dat sommige vragen mogelijk nooit volledig beantwoord zullen worden, tenzij er nieuwe technologieën of baanbrekende inzichten opdoemen.

• OPMERKING PETER2011 : Deze uitgebreide analyse tracht zowel de bewezen feitelijke gegevens als de verschillende interpretaties te belichten, om zo een evenwichtig en informatief beeld te scheppen van de complexe en intrigerende kwestie van de koeienmutilaties.

{  PETER2011 }

Ominous warning for humanity as insects mysteriously 'fall silent'

• READ MORE: Americans warned about rise of evil ladybugs 

By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

The world's insects are falling silent at an alarming rate, a development a critical care physician has warned may signal a looming crisis for humanity.

Dr Joseph Varon, a Houston-based doctor, issued the stark warning this week, saying insects, including beetles, butterflies, moths, flies, mosquitoes and bees, are disappearing at dramatic rates, a 'critical red flag for ecological instability.'

Varon likened the growing quiet to a dangerous moment in medicine, when a patient suddenly goes silent just before a system failure.

'In medicine, silence can be more alarming than noise,' he wrote in The Defender. 'A patient who abruptly stops voicing discomfort or a monitor that ceases activity may signal system failure rather than resolution.'

'Ecology presents a similar scenario,' Varon added. 'And right now, the silence is deeply concerning.'

This disappearance threatens the foods humans rely on most, including fruits, vegetables, nuts and legumes. 

Key nutrients, vitamins, minerals and antioxidants would also disappear, potentially weakening immune resilience, increasing chronic disease risk, and altering the balance of human health in ways scientists are only beginning to understand. 

'The current silence should not be interpreted as stability. It is a warning,' said Varon.

The doctor warned that without insects, humans will not only loose essential food, but be exposed to an increased risk of chronic diseases

A pivotal warning came from a German study that tracked flying insect biomass in protected areas over nearly 30 years. 

By 2016, researchers found populations had collapsed by more than 75 percent, even in regions shielded from industrial activity.

Global assessments indicate that over 40 percent of insect species are currently in decline. 

Looking ahead, predictions suggest that by 2030, up to a quarter of insect species could be lost or at high risk, highlighting a continued, rapid downward trend.

The losses were documented not in industrial landscapes, but in nature preserves intended to shield wildlife from harm.

'Without insects, food systems collapse not just quantitatively, but qualitatively. Nutrient diversity declines. Resilience vanishes. Dependency on industrial inputs increases,' Varon wrote in The Defender.

From a physician's perspective, the disappearance of insects is a warning signal, a population-level biomarker of environmental stress and toxicity.

'The rise in chronic disease, metabolic dysfunction, and immune dysregulation cannot be cleanly separated from the ecological context in which humans now live,' Varon said.

Dr Joseph Varon, a Houston-based doctor, issued the stark warning this week, saying insects, including beetles, butterflies, moths, flies, mosquitoes and bees, are disappearing at dramatic rates, a 'critical red flag for ecological instability'

'Clinicians may observe these impacts as patients present with increased allergic reactions, resistance to antibiotics, and nutritional deficiencies. 

'For instance, a patient experiencing recurrent respiratory infections could be linked to pollen shifts due to changing insect populations.'

In medicine, when a sensitive system falters first, it signals early danger. Insects occupy that sentinel role in biology. 

Their short lifespans, high metabolisms, and reliance on environmental cues make them exceptionally vulnerable to chemical, nutritional, and electromagnetic disruptions, often long before humans show obvious signs of illness, explained Varon.

Increasing evidence links many of these same exposures to human endocrine disruption, immune dysfunction, neurodevelopmental effects, and metabolic disease. 

Neonicotinoid pesticides, for instance, are designed to target insect nervous systems, yet analogous pathways exist in mammals, influencing neurodevelopment and autonomic function. 

Low-level chronic exposures may not trigger immediate toxicity, but medicine has repeatedly shown that the absence of acute symptoms does not equal safety.

'Imagine a diabetic patient struggling with persistent slow-healing ulcers,' said Varon. 

'These wounds, resistant to typical treatment, become a vivid illustration of micronutrient decline due to pollinator loss.'

Deficiencies in vital nutrients like vitamin C and zinc, essential for immune defense and tissue repair, show how pollinator loss translates into real-world health consequences, he added.

'It is essential for medical professionals to integrate environmental health assessments into their practice, amplifying the connectivity between ecological and human health,' said Varon.

By acting now, clinicians can help avert an ecological crisis and ensure a sustainable future for both the planet and human life.

'Civilizations do not fall only from war or economics. They fall when the living systems that sustain them are quietly dismantled.'

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html } 

{ https://medium.com/ }