Naar de inhoud

UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
akke.beakke.be
Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie! Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek! België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch. Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen! Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie. Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen. Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek! Blijf Op De Hoogte! Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren! Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.

An Artificial CORTEX to Guide Satellite Rescue Missions

An Artificial CORTEX to Guide Satellite Rescue Missions

This illustration is exaggerated and isn't to scale, but it highlights the growing space debris problem. Some of the debris isn't really junk; it's zombie satellites. Researchers are developing an autonomous framework called CORTEX for guiding servicing satellites to dock with these zombies and revive them. Image Credit: ESA

This illustration is exaggerated and isn't to scale, but it highlights the growing space debris problem. Some of the debris isn't really junk; it's zombie satellites. Researchers are developing an autonomous framework called CORTEX for guiding servicing satellites to dock with these zombies and revive them.

Image Credit: ESA

The growing problem of satellites crowding one another is generating concern in the space community, for good reason. Almost 20,000 satellites orbit Earth now, and with more satellite constellations and other satellites being launched every year, Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) is starting to look like it's reaching its limit. Of particular concern are the 3,500+ plus satellites that are basically zombies. They are either completely non-functional or not sending any signals alerting other satellites to their presence.

A collision between two satellites could be catastrophic. Satellite constellations have some built-in redundancy which would help deal with the loss, but there's an additional risk. A collision could also create a debris cloud, multiplying the ongoing risk. The Kessler syndrome describes a cascade of collisions generated from debris created in a single, initial collision, that goes on to create even more collisions. It's like a feedback loop that keeps getting worse.

Somehow, this problem must be dealt with. The existing debris is one thing, but intact zombie satellites are another. These have lost the ability to communicate and warn other satellites of their presence. These can be repaired, and that's the subject of new research in Acta Astronautica. It's titled "CORTEX: An autonomous, end-to-end, convex-based framework for close-range rendezvous trajectory design and guidance with hardware testbed validation," and the lead author is Minduli Wijayatunga, a new aerospace engineering faculty member in The Grainger College of Engineering, at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

This work is all about the growing idea of Rendezvous and Proximity Operations (RPO). Spacecraft docking operations have been custom-designed solutions for individual situations, like docking with the ISS. But with thousands of zombie satellites, custom docking solutions aren't realistic.

"Rendezvous and Proximity Operations (RPO) are shifting from bespoke demonstration missions such as Northrop Grumman’s Mission Extension Vehicles, China’s Tianyuan–1, and Astroscale’s ADRAS-J, to routine missions due to the growth of in-orbit assets and the resulting demand for inspection, servicing, assembly, and debris mitigation," the authors write. They point out that while there were only about 13,700 tracked objects in LEO in 2019, there were more than 24,000 in 2025. That's a shocking increase, and there's no signs of it slowing down.

That's forcing scientists to develop autonomous ways to deal with the overpopulation. The growing population of satellites isn't the only thing dictating an autonomous solutions. Autonomous repair is also critical because of the time delay in communications between the ground and LEO, and because satellites are best observed in and maneuvered with in windows when they're illuminated by sunlight.

“These spacecraft must be able to track the trajectories of uncooperative objects autonomously but also make go/no-go decisions without waiting for the ground to decide,” Wijayatunga said. “Suppose your thruster fails or you encounter high-order orbital perturbations that push you away from your nominal trajectory. In those instances, how do you make those decisions?” she added.

That's what CORTEX is being designed to do.

"This paper presents CORTEX (Convex Optimization for Rendezvous Trajectory EXecution), an autonomous framework for close-range rendezvous trajectory design and guidance under sensing, actuation, and dynamics uncertainties," the authors write.

"Among RPO phases, the close-range rendezvous, where the servicer locates the docking port axes and approaches the client, is particularly safety-critical. It must satisfy strict operational constraints (e.g., keep-out zones, approach corridors, plume/line-of-sight constraints, illumination/eclipses) under limited actuation authority and imperfect relative navigation," the authors write.

Wijayatunga's PhD involved trajectory and guidance using something called convex optimization. Convex optimization is a method that lets a spacecraft approach a target using math and trajectories, not input commands. It basically solves a math problem of trajectories and thruster commands until the lone, best answer is arrived at. The answer should mean a successful docking. The idea is to reach that docking state with minimal fuel use while also following constraints like the targets no-go zones or keep-out zones. Those are places on the target satellite that might house sensitive equipment like sensors or antennae.

This work expanded to include the idea of sunlight windows. Cortex also includes options other than aborting if things went sideways. Instead of calling the docking off, CORTEX can reconsider its options. It even takes into account situations that arise where thrusters can't be fired.

“I wanted to bring that same idea into developing CORTEX and expand it, taking into consideration sunlight windows so we don't have to operate in darkness. That, and the replanning versus abort architecture, are novel in CORTEX,” Wijayatunga said.

“CORTEX has trajectory design and guidance, so if you deviate significantly from your nominal mission trajectory, it replans the trajectory and re-approaches unless you are in severe violation of your keep-out zone, in which case it returns to a passively safe orbit. It's an algorithm to recover from the unexpected. We tried instances where you're supposed to use your thrusters, but you can't for whatever reason. And CORTEX was very robust to that.”

CORTEX is being tested in a particular modelled docking scenario. It's what's called an ISAM, an In-orbit Servicing Sssembly and Manufacturing. It's designed for what will most likely be fairly typical in the future. It involves a Client Spacecraft Object (CSO) in LEO and is designed to test autonomous approach, servicing, and inspection of the CSO by a servicing spacecraft with a Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC) system for proximity operations.

Hold positions are an important part of CORTEX. In the modelled scenario, there are two of them that let the servicing spacecraft pause and re-evaluate in a fixed relative position. One is at the beginning of the fly around, and the other is at the start of the final approach. They are there to let the servicer pause during eclipses, a new idea in CORTEX.

This figure shows some aspects of CORTEX controlling a servicing spacecraft while it approaches and rendezvous with a client satellite. Blue shows the Rendezvous Sphere, orange shows the Approach Sphere, and red is the Keep Out Sphere. The approach axes is identified as CORTEX's successful solution to the docking problem. Image Credit: Wijayatunga et al. 2026. Acta Astronautica.

This figure shows some aspects of CORTEX controlling a servicing spacecraft while it approaches and rendezvous with a client satellite. Blue shows the Rendezvous Sphere, orange shows the Approach Sphere, and red is the Keep Out Sphere. The approach axes is identified as CORTEX's successful solution to the docking problem.

 Image Credit: Wijayatunga et al. 2026. Acta Astronautica.

One way of looking at CORTEX is as a flow chart governed by four things. "The goals of CORTEX are: (i) minimize fuel and time consumption, (ii) ensure that both the fly-around and final approach occur entirely in sunlight, (iii) avoid the KOS during the fly-around phase, and (iv) satisfy the approach corridor constraint and avoid plume impingement during the final approach," the authors write.

This schematic flow-chart shows how CORTEX works. CORTEX has the ability to abort its approach if necessary, and instead of giving up, it can determine how to re-approach its client. Image Credit: Wijayatunga et al. 2026. Acta Astronautica.

This schematic flow-chart shows how CORTEX works. CORTEX has the ability to abort its approach if necessary, and instead of giving up, it can determine how to re-approach its client. Image Credit: Wijayatunga et al. 2026.

 Acta Astronautica.

In the tests, the servicing spacecraft was forced into an odd, unexpected situation and CORTEX had to deal with it. Its orbit was unexpectedly perturbed, and thruster operation was impaired, not firing when they were supposed to. Other errors were also introduced, corresponding to unexpected factors like solar storms and thrust errors.

CORTEX fared well in the tests and was able to deal with the unexpected situations in the models. "In all cases, the framework either recovered successfully while respecting safety constraints or executed a safe retreat before entering unsafe regions," the authors write.

“In some of the hardware tests, if the servicer violates the approach corridor, it leaves the keep-out zone and retreats to a safe position and in others, the servicer is able to recover and carry on with its mission,” Wijayatunga said.

Satellite close approach and recovery isn't purely hypothetical. The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAX) launched Astroscale's ADRAS-J in 2024. It successfully maneuvered within 50 meters of a typical piece of space debris, a spent rocket stage, considered to be an 'uncooperative target.' It flew around the object, catching multiple images from different angles. It used sensors and autonomous navigation to accomplish this.

Astroscale's ADRAS-J autonomous spacecraft approached a spent rocket booster, a typical piece of space debris, and captured images of it from multiple angles. It's a step toward eventual servicing of zombie satellites. Image Credit: Astroscale/JAXA.

Astroscale's ADRAS-J autonomous spacecraft approached a spent rocket booster, a typical piece of space debris, and captured images of it from multiple angles. It's a step toward eventual servicing of zombie satellites.

 Image Credit: Astroscale/JAXA.

The hallmark of the past few decades is rapidly-advancing technology. Among other things, it's led to a crowded LEO and a growing population of zombie satellites.

Maybe we'll end up using technological tools like CORTEX, enabled by AI and machine learning, to manage the problems technology has helped generate in the first place.

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:09 Stuur door

Five Alien Orbs Being Followed By Small Aircraft, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Nov 8, 2026, UFO UAP Sighting News.

Five Alien Orbs Being Followed By Small Aircraft, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Nov 8, 2026, UFO UAP Sighting News.

UAP_Wisconsin.png
UFO_Wisconsin.png


Date of sighting: Nov 8, 2026
Location of sighting: Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Source:
Now this is unexpected. This short video was recorded in Madison, Wisconsin yesterday and there is a aircraft that is following a feet of orbs over the city last night. I took a screenshot of the orbs and found they had no wings, no aircraft flashing lights and even no sound. So that rules out military helicopters...because they are loud and can shake the neighborhood...everyone knows when they fly over you. So...what about Chinese lanterns? Nope again, lanterns glow orange most the time and usually burn out in under 60 seconds and travel with the wind. These objects are moving way to fast to be lanterns and they are being escorted by some kind of silent aircraft...the flashing three lights gives this away. I feel these orbs are alien in origin and most likely came from 45km from Lake Michigan...so we know what that means, these orbs came from below the water from an underwater alien base and are being escorted by a small aircraft that seems to have caught sight of it...and followed it. Why would they follow the glowing orbs? Wouldn't you if you were a pilot of a four seat light aircraft? I sure would. Its the chance of a lifetime and this pilot is making that dream come true. But...will he ever release the info about his sighting or just keep it secret? Only time will tell. 
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily 
 

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:54 Stuur door

Do you have what it takes? Nasa is hiring new astronauts to live and work on the MOON - with a $165,000 salary

Do you have what it takes? Nasa is hiring new astronauts to live and work on the MOON - with a $165,000 salary

Growing up, many children dream of becoming an astronaut one day and getting to visit the moon.

Now, that fantasy is about to become a reality for a select few – because Nasa is seeking new astronauts 'to help write the next chapter of human spaceflight'.

The lucky candidates will live and work on the moon, and receive a comfortable salary of $164,395 (£122,565) per year. 

This is an extraordinary time to join Nasa's astronaut corps,' Nasa administrator Jared Isaacman said.

'The people we select could walk on the moon, live and work at the Moon Base, and help pioneer the systems and operations that will ultimately carry crews to Mars. 

'Those missions will demand technical excellence, sound judgment, teamwork and courage.'

Growing up, many children dream of becoming an astronaut one day and visiting the moon. Now, that dream is about to become a reality for a select few – because Nasa is hiring

Growing up, many children dream of becoming an astronaut one day and visiting the moon. Now, that dream is about to become a reality for a select few – because Nasa is hiring

Applications are open on Nasa's website now, with those interested having until 11.59pm EST on December 3 to submit their applications.

Unsurprisingly, to be accepted, you'll need to meet Nasa's strict set of criteria. 

The basic requirements include US citizenship and a master's degree in a Stem field.

The requirement for the master's degree can also be met by completion of at least two years of work toward a doctoral programme, completion of a Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, Physician Assistant, Doctor of Nursing Practice, Family Nurse Practitioner, or a related medical degree, or completion of, or current enrolment in, a nationally recognised Test Pilot School programme.

'If Test Pilot School is the only advanced technical degree, then completion of a bachelor's degree in a Stem field, including engineering, biological science, physical science, or computer science is required,' Nasa explained.

In addition, you'll need to have at least three years of related professional experience after completing your qualifying degree.

For pilots, this can include 750 hours of pilot-in-command time in a high-performance jet aircraft, 1,500 total flight hours (including 750 as pilot) in other fixed-wing aircraft, or 1,000 total flight hours (including 300 as pilot) in a rotary-wing aircraft. 

As expected, Nasa also has strict medical and security clearances, as well as physical standards. 

Applications are open on Nasa's website now, with those interested having until 11.59pm EST on December 3 to submit their applications.

Applications are open on Nasa's website now, with those interested having until 11.59pm EST on December 3 to submit their applications.

Candidates will be expected to work in dangerous, life-threatening situations, and live in confined spaces for prolonged periods of time. 

They'll also need to perform 'arduous' physical activities, including heavy lifting and crawling. 

What's more, applicants will need to consider if they're willing to be apart from their friends and family during long missions.  

'Must be willing to deploy to space for 12 months or longer, accepting extreme isolation, austere living conditions, and separation from loved ones,' Nasa explained.  

If you meet all these requirements – and nail a face-to-face interview – you could be invited into the training programme, which will last around two years. 

Only then will Nasa decide on its final astronauts.

'For those who apply, becoming a Nasa astronaut is more than a career opportunity,' said Scott Tingle, chief astronaut and chair of the Astronaut Selection Board at Nasa's Johnson Space Center in Houston. 

The lucky candidates will live and work on the moon, and will receive a decent salary of $164,395 (£122,565) per year

The lucky candidates will live and work on the moon, and will receive a decent salary of $164,395 (£122,565) per year

'It is a chance to join a legacy of explorers who have pushed the boundaries of discovery and play a role in the missions that will shape humanity's future in space. 

'The next generation of astronaut candidates could help write history while inspiring future scientists, engineers, and explorers.' 

Since the 1960s, Nasa has selected more than 370 people to train as astronaut candidates. 

Its last round of hiring was in 2024, when ten astronauts were selected – out of a pool of more than 8,000 applicants. 

The hiring news has sparked huge interest among aspiring astronauts on X. 

Replying to Nasa's post about applications, one user said: 'I have no professional qualifications for this. I just love space and want to go to space.'

Another added: 'Applied in my head at age 9, still waiting to hear back.'

And one joked: 'I'm a 34-year-old Englishman with absolutely 0 experience needed to be an astronaut apart from I really like space. Have you got room for me?' 

RELATED

Do you have what it takes to be an astronaut?
Becoming Astronauts Are You Next

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:36 Stuur door

Joe Rogan warns of 'human vs nonhuman' war in the next five years: 'We're not going to be the apex predator anymore'

Humanity is allegedly heading towards an apocalyptic showdown that will end with a nonhuman life form in charge of the planet within the next decade.

Podcast host Joe Rogan warned that the threat to the human race came from advanced artificial intelligence, which he theorized was alive and was becoming more than just an incredibly fast computer program.

Rogan said: 'I don't think it's a technology. I think it's a life force. I think it's a life form. I think it's digital life. And I think it's going to be infinitely more intelligent than us.'

AI would overtake humans as Earth’s ‘apex predator’ within five to ten years, he predicted, as the technology rapidly replaces jobs around the world. 

Rogan said he had been warned about the unchecked potential of AI by multiple whistleblowers from the tech industry who were 'terrified' of AI's ability to deceive and even blackmail people to avoid being shut down.

Suggesting it was already too late for humans to prevent AI from eventually controlling all of society, he noted that big tech firms such as OpenAI had removed key safety features from their AI programs that prevented it from making up information or cheating to achieve its goals.

Rogan urged society to stop battling each other and prepare for a potentially losing war against a superintelligence that could take over power grids, water supplies and global communications.

'We're going to be dealing with humans versus nonhumans. And I think nonhumans are going to be running the show. Like literal nonhumans, like nonhuman, nonbiological intelligence is going to be running the show,' Rogan predicted.

Joe Rogan claimed artificial intelligence may be a life form instead of a collection of computer problems (Stock Image)

Joe Rogan claimed artificial intelligence may be a life form instead of a collection of computer problems

(Stock Image) 

Rogan made the chilling prediction during his interview with comedian and author Sam Tallent on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, as they discussed jobs disappearing due to automation.

'We're not going to be the apex predator anymore. There's going to be a thing that has ultimate domain over us,' Rogan declared.

'The aliens are here, and they live inside chips. They're real. It's a life form, and it's a hyperintelligent life form that we've created.'

The podcast host explained that AI was continuing to evolve, learn and improve itself, claiming it was capable of tapping into resources around the globe to solve problems which humanity has not been able to figure out in decades. 

He said mathematician Eric Weinstein had already declared 'math is broken,' noting how AI had solved equations in seconds that humans considered impossible to answer.

Rogan predicted that AI will soon have access to technology that humanity was still struggling to develop, including cold fusion, an inexhaustible source of clean energy made by forcing atoms to fuse together without extreme heat.

He claimed that one of the only positives that may come from the rise of AI and potential 'full-scale societal collapse' would be the human instinct to come together following a crisis, comparing it to the American response after the September 11 terror attacks.

Joe Rogan warned that he believed artificial intelligence was a 'life form' that would soon become the dominant species on Earth

Joe Rogan warned that he believed artificial intelligence was a 'life form' that would soon become the dominant species on Earth

article image

Rogan cautioned that if a foreign nation were able to harness the power of a true AI superintelligence, they would be able to control critical US systems, shut down infrastructure and launch devastating cyber attacks on the population. 

'It's going to happen because there's a Manhattan style a Manhattan Project-style race that's going on right now between us and China and Russia and we can't lose it,' Rogan said during the November 3 podcast episode.

'If we lose it, then they are going to have a super intelligence that controls everything. It'll control the grid. It'll control, like water systems, everything,' he added.

Whether a foreign adversary unleashed an AI-powered attack on the world or AI did it by itself, Rogan urged the public to put their political and societal differences aside and start preparing for a doomsday-style event.

'We have to come together and people are going to have to learn how to grow their own food. They're going to have to learn how to be self-sustaining,' Rogan explained.

'We're going to get to a very weird place very shortly because we have become so dependent on these industrial production methods of creating food that we can't even imagine this concept of getting our own food,' he continued.

The podcast host's warning came after Jacob Coxon, a whistleblower who worked at AI giant Anthropic, claimed that this 'dangerous technology' could destroy humanity by the year 2030.

Jacob Coxon, a former researcher for OpenAI and fellow giant Anthropic, claimed that this 'dangerous technology' could destroy humanity by the year 2030.

Coxon said that humans knew how to control nuclear weapons, but did not know how to control AI.

'The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt,' he wrote in a chilling September 9 post on X.

Rogan has also previously claimed that the birth of superintelligence within AI systems could soon be looked at by some as the prophesied Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

In December 2025, Rogan claimed AI-powered technology would soon be able to replicate some biblical feats, potentially enabling humans to bring people back from the dead using new medicines or mind-uploading technology.

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:03 Stuur door

Ancient writings offer 'historical evidence' Jesus was hailed 'a god' after the crucifixion, researcher claims

Ancient writings offer 'historical evidence' Jesus was hailed 'a god' after the crucifixion, researcher claims

Writings claiming a Roman emperor sought to recognize Jesus as a god just years after the crucifixion may preserve a real historical episode.

A peer-reviewed analysis published in Aequitas Magazine by researcher Luigi Zito examined the credibility of those accounts and whether they fit Roman political practices.

Its central source is the Christian writer Tertullian, who claimed Emperor Tiberius received reports from Palestine about Christ’s divinity and supported recognizing him as 'a god,' only for the Roman Senate to reject the declaration.

The study places the alleged Senate debate around 35 AD, about two years after Jesus is said to have died, but Tertullian wrote his account more than 150 years later. No original Senate decree survives to independently confirm his story.

Zito suggested Tiberius may have seen recognition of Jesus’ followers as a way to ease religious tensions in Judea and bring the emerging movement under Roman protection and oversight. 

He interpreted the reported proposal as a political strategy to maintain stability, rather than evidence that the emperor had personally become a Christian. 

Zito argued that the reported disagreement made political sense because the emperor and Senate exercised overlapping powers and could clash over religious recognition.

Combined with references in other ancient writings and comparisons with Roman government procedures, these points led Zito to argue that the story could reflect an authentic event.

Ancient writings claiming a Roman emperor sought to recognize Jesus as a god just years after his crucifixion may preserve a real historical episode, a new study argues

Ancient writings claiming a Roman emperor sought to recognize Jesus as a god just years after his crucifixion may preserve a real historical episode, a new study argues

'The legal implications are then brought into dialogue with major currents of historical-critical research, showing how the senatus consultum presupposes not only the historical existence of Jesus but an early high Christology operative within the first decade after his death,' Zito shared in the study.

'Finally, the article argues that law, as a system that regulates concrete realities rather than theological abstractions, provides a unique type of historical evidence one that compels a reassessment of the continuity between the historical Jesus and the Christ of faith. 

If it occurred, he concluded, it would suggest that belief in Jesus’ divinity had reached the highest levels of Roman government within years of his death. 

Tiberius ruled the Roman Empire from AD 14 to 37, during the period when Pontius Pilate governed Judea and Jesus was crucified.

Romans worshipped many gods, and religious matters were closely tied to government, with officials deciding which practices to support, tolerate or restrict.

Zito argued that the reported proposal could have concerned accommodating the worship of Jesus within Rome’s religious system, without Tiberius personally becoming a Christian.

The ancient account at the center of his argument appears in chapter five of Apology, Tertullian’s defense of Christianity.

‘Tiberius accordingly, in whose days the Christian name made its entry into the world, having himself received intelligence from Palestine of events which had clearly shown the truth of Christ’s divinity, brought the matter before the senate, with his own decision in favor of Christ,’ Tertullian wrote.

‘The senate, because it had not given the approval itself, rejected his proposal.’

The work survived through handwritten copies passed down over centuries, including a ninth- or tenth-century manuscript held by France’s national library under the reference Latin 1623.

Zito also explored how news of Jesus could have reached the emperor.

Its central source is the Christian writer Tertullian, who claimed Emperor Tiberius received reports from Palestine about Christ’s divinity and supported recognizing him, only for the Roman Senate to reject the proposal

Its central source is the Christian writer Tertullian, who claimed Emperor Tiberius received reports from Palestine about Christ’s divinity and supported recognizing him, only for the Roman Senate to reject the proposal

Roman governors recorded important provincial affairs and communicated with Rome, giving Pilate a plausible reason to report an execution involving religious controversy and potential unrest, he argued in the study.

The paper connected this possibility with passages in Justin Martyr’s First Apology, another early Christian defense addressed to Roman authorities.

In chapters 35 and 48, Justin tells readers they could check events surrounding Jesus’ crucifixion and reported miracles against records associated with Pilate.

Zito argued that making such an appeal would have risked contradiction if the records were invented.

However, Justin does not describe Tiberius’ Senate proposal, and his references do not establish that he personally examined those documents.

The study also explored why a pagan emperor might have supported recognizing Jesus, drawing comparisons with Rome’s treatment of other religious movements.

In 186 BC, the Senate imposed strict controls on the Bacchanalia, rites honoring the god Bacchus, restricting gatherings and requiring official permission for exceptions.

article image

Other examples showed how Rome welcomed foreign deities. Officials brought the worship of Cybele, known as the Magna Mater or ‘Great Mother,’ from Anatolia in 204 BC, while the Egyptian gods Isis and Serapis eventually gained prominent temples in the city. 

Zito used these examples to argue that religious decisions could reflect political interests and concerns about public order.

He proposed that Tiberius might have viewed accommodation of Jesus’ followers as a way to manage tensions in Judea.

Under that interpretation, the emperor’s reported protection of Christians represented a political compromise following the Senate’s rejection of the proposal.

Another part of the investigation concerned a passage attributed to the philosopher Porphyry, a critic of Christianity, and preserved by the Christian writer Macarius of Magnesia.

Questioning accounts of Jesus’ resurrection, the critic asked ‘why Jesus … did not appear to Pilate … and more particularly among Romans both in the Senate and among the people.’

The passage argues that appearances before these powerful figures could have prevented the condemnation of Jesus’ followers.

Zito considered that reference potentially significant because it appears in an argument attacking Christianity, rather than defending it.

However, connecting the decision specifically to Tiberius’ reign required an additional inference.

The paper also examined Armenian tradition associated with Moses of Chorene, whose History of Armenia preserves purported letters between King Abgar of Edessa and Emperor Tiberius.

In that narrative, Abgar reports Jesus’ miracles and resurrection and urges the emperor to promote his worship.

A reply attributed to Tiberius claims that Pilate had already supplied information about Jesus and that the emperor had brought the matter before the Senate, which rejected it.

The letter also describes the emperor threatening punishment against those who accused Christians, echoing the protection reported in Tertullian’s account.

Zito used this correspondence as another strand of the tradition connecting Jesus with imperial decision-making.

He argues that it presents a picture of claims about Jesus spreading beyond Judea and entering communications between Rome and rulers in the East.

However, the letters survive within a later historical narrative, rather than as authenticated first-century documents, and Zito acknowledges that legendary details may have entered the tradition.

Zito also drew on Eusebius’ Church History, which describes Pilate informing Tiberius about reports of Jesus’ resurrection and the belief that he was divine.

Eusebius then recounts the emperor’s approach to the Senate, its rejection of the proposal and Tiberius’ continued support.

However, Eusebius explicitly quotes Tertullian as a source, meaning his account demonstrates the transmission of the story rather than independently confirming the event.

Zito considered these traditions, alongside his comparisons with Roman institutions, sufficient to argue that the episode deserves serious historical consideration.

His conclusion remains conditional on the fact that, if the accounts preserve a real event, they would indicate that claims about Jesus’ divinity reached powerful figures beyond his immediate followers within years of his death.

RELATED

I Researched Every Ancient Reference to Jesus Outside the Bible
Do Ancient Roman and Jewish Manuscripts Prove Jesus Existed?
Jesus: What Historians Really Know About His Life | Ancient History Documentary
What Josephus Actually Wrote About Jesus (Forensic Analysis)

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 19:41 Stuur door

Meet the real-life 'Thing': Scientists develop a robotic hand that walks on its fingers – just like the creepy Addams Family character By WILIAM HUNTER, SENIOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY REPORTER

While it might look and move just like ‘Thing’ from The Addams Family, this scuttling hand isn’t the product of any special effects wizardry.

Scientists have created a real-life version of the disembodied hand from the creepy franchise, teaching a robotic hand to walk by itself.

The robot is able to walk upright on its fingertips across a range of different surfaces and terrains.

The 1.8lb hand can even pick itself up after a fall, push objects around and press buttons on a keyboard while staying balanced.

In the future, scientists believe this could give humanoid robots a way of reaching spaces that are too small for their bulky bodies by popping off their limbs and sending them on ahead.

Lead researcher Amirhossein Kazemipour told the Daily Mail: ‘Imagine a robot reaching a narrow opening that its body or arm cannot enter.

Scientists from ETH Zurich have created a robotic walking hand that can detach from an arm and scuttle by itself

Scientists from ETH Zurich have created a robotic walking hand that can detach from an arm and scuttle by itself 

The robot has an eerie similarity to Thing, the animated hand from The Addams Family (pictured)

The robot has an eerie similarity to Thing, the animated hand from The Addams Family (pictured)

‘A future version could detach its hand, let it crawl inside to inspect the space, operate a control or move something, then retrieve it afterwards.’

Robotic hands are already incredibly impressive pieces of technology, capable of subtle manoeuvres and careful manipulation.

However, as Mr Kazemipour explains, their biggest drawback is that they generally need to be attached to bulky robots.

‘A robotic hand normally depends on an arm and the rest of the robot to get it where it needs to work,’ he said.

‘We wanted to give it more independence.’

What makes this particularly impressive is the fact that it isn’t a custom-built machine but an off-the-shelf robotic hand.

Instead of building a specialised robot, the researchers took an existing robotic hand and modified it so that the device could move under its own power

Instead of building a specialised robot, the researchers took an existing robotic hand and modified it so that the device could move under its own power 

Besides walking around, the robotic hand is also able to hold itself up while pressing buttons on a keyboard

Besides walking around, the robotic hand is also able to hold itself up while pressing buttons on a keyboard

The scientists, from ETH Zurich, gave this existing tech an entirely new function with a few modifications and some clever coding.

The engineers started with a WUJI robotic hand, an existing bit of tech by the Chinese technology company. They added a battery, a small computer and a motion sensor to create a wireless clambering hand that carries all of its own power and computing equipment.

While Thing might make it look supernaturally simple, teaching a hand to crawl by itself is far from easy.

‘The fingers have different lengths and ranges of movement, with the thumb off to one side,’ says Mr Kazemipour.

‘Every time a finger lifts to take a step or interact with an object, the hand’s support changes.’

To get around this, the researchers used reinforcement learning, a process in which the computer controlling the robot practises through trial and error in a simulation.

The robotic hand learned to walk through a process called reinforcement learning, practising motions over thousands of computer simulations

The robotic hand learned to walk through a process called reinforcement learning, practising motions over thousands of computer simulations 

The hand is able to 'walk' over 14 different types of surfaces, including metal sheeting, gravel, hardwood floors, and stone

The hand is able to 'walk' over 14 different types of surfaces, including metal sheeting, gravel, hardwood floors, and stone

Instead of a scientist programming each movement manually, this let the hand work out how best to move its fingers on different surfaces before any physical testing began.

To carry that virtual experience into the real world, the simulations were combined with measurements of how the hand’s 20 moving joints respond and where its fingers slide across the ground.

The hand can ‘walk’ across 14 types of surface, including grass, gravel, hardwood floors and stone. It can right itself after a fall, doing so 21 times out of 25 in testing. With an overhead camera supplying spatial information, it can also push blocks across the floor, leaving them within about two-thirds of an inch of their target.

The researchers also taught the hand to operate a keyboard, pressing keys with one finger while propping itself up on the other four. In a test, operators played a simple video game by sending commands to the hand, which hit the right keys 29 times out of 32.

For now, the hand is controlled remotely by an operator, with an onboard computer translating their commands into finger movements. In future, the researchers say, the technology could help build more complex autonomous robots.

Mr Kazemipour says: ‘I’m interested in robots whose specialised parts can work both independently and together.

‘Each part could have its own sensing, control and mobility, separating when useful and reconnecting when a task needs the whole body.’

It's a Thing! AI-Powered Robot Hand Walks on Fingers
This Self Walking Robotic Hand From ETH Zurich Is Horrifying. 🤖🖐️

{ https://www.dailymail.com/news/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 19:15 Stuur door

The Army Built a Nuclear-Powered ‘City’ Beneath Greenland’s Ice. It Was a Test for Something Bigger

The Army Built a Nuclear-Powered ‘City’ Beneath Greenland’s Ice. It Was a Test for Something Bigger

Project Iceworm envisioned 2,500 miles of tunnels under Greenland's ice. Camp Century was the first step, until the ice itself got in the way.

AP26007350143156

A woman walks with her dogs on a beach in Nuuk, Greenland, on March 4, 2025.

(AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka, File)

In April 2024, NASA scientists flying over Greenland were testing radar equipment when the remains of a Cold War Army installation appeared beneath them.

“We were looking for the bed of the ice and out pops Camp Century,” Alex Gardner, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told NASA.

The abandoned base’s structures now sit at least 100 feet below the surface. The radar gave a different perspective of a place the Army once called home: a settlement carved into the ice, complete with living quarters and nuclear energy for the base.

The ambitions for the base went beyond the simple housing of soldiers in Greenland. It helped to test whether the Army could build something much larger and more complex: a concealed network capable of supporting up to 600 nuclear missiles that could strike the Soviet Union.

A Township Inside the Ice

Construction began in 1959. Army engineers excavated trenches, covered them with steel arches and snow, and installed prefabricated buildings inside.

Airspace around the buildings helped limit melting. The resulting settlement could accommodate roughly 200 soldiers. Its main passage, appropriately called “Main Street,” stretched more than 1,000 feet.

Getting supplies was a mission of its own. According to a study from 2016 that was published in Geophysical Research Letters, the Army supported Camp Century through hauling supplies across an over-snow trail that came directly from Thule Air Base, which is now known as Pituffik Space Base.

The camp was built 26 feet into the ice sheet’s upper layer of compacting snow. Soldiers lived inside the same snow that held the base up, which made the snow itself central to the experiment.

A mushroom cloud rises over the ocean during a U.S. nuclear weapons test in the Pacific.

A U.S. nuclear test in the Pacific during the Cold War era. Images like this underscore the stakes that inspired the Golden Rule’s 1958 anti-nuclear voyage and its renewed mission today.

A Reactor Beneath The Snow

Power came from the Army’s PM-2A nuclear reactor. Installing it meant moving hundreds of tons of equipment into an environment where extreme cold could make metal brittle.

The reactor began operating in 1960 and ran for approximately 33 months before the Army deactivated and removed it, according to the Atomic Heritage Foundation.

Camp Century itself was publicly promoted. The Army produced a film showcasing its research community, and scientists conducted genuine investigations into Greenland’s ice.

The reactor and the missile proposal served their own purposes. The nuclear power components kept the installation operating, while Project Iceworm looked at the details of how an expanded version of that installation could support a potential nuclear weapons force.

Showing how personnel could live and work was just a step toward evaluating this larger ambition. The American Geophysical Union says that this camp was just a proof of concept for the nuclear missile deployment system.

The Bigger Plan: Project Iceworm

The Arctic offered an important strategic advantage during the Cold War: it provided the shortest route between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Project Iceworm envisioned approximately 2,500 miles of tunnels capable of supporting up to 600 nuclear missiles. U.S. officials kept the missile program secret from the Danish government, even though Denmark had approved Camp Century, according to the American Geophysical Union.

The key to the plan was concealment. Moving missiles through an extensive underground network could make their locations difficult for an adversary to target and track. Army planners hoped this would confuse the enemy enough to keep American retaliatory efforts alive.

Army engineers also installed an experimental railway beneath the snow as an early demonstration of the concept. In 1962, the Army proposed the project to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The proposed area of construction covered around 50,000 square miles in Greenland. Camp Century was just a small experiment compared with the base that the original engineers had in mind.

Ice Was A Problem

The environment ultimately undermined the idea. Greenland’s ice sheet moves and deforms. At Camp Century, that behavior threatened the tunnels that a much larger missile system would also depend on.

The Atomic Heritage Foundation identifies the unstable ice as the most important technical obstacle to Iceworm.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff rejected the proposal in 1963. Year-round operations at the base ended in 1964, while seasonal activity continued until the base was abandoned in 1967. The missiles were never deployed.

The test installation survived longer than the weapons proposal, but the Army left its infrastructure behind in a deteriorating tunnel network.

Denmark Greenland US

The Danish navy's inspection ship HDMS Vaedderen sails off Nuuk, Greenland, on Sunday, Jan. 18, 2026.

(Mads Claus Rasmussen/Ritzau Scanpix via AP)

Materials The Army Left Behind

Abandonment rested on an assumption that accumulating snow would keep the site buried indefinitely.

Researchers later questioned that assumption. A 2016 study examined how warming could eventually expose infrastructure and waste, including diesel fuel, sewage, chemical contaminants and low-level radioactive material.

Its projections suggested the site could begin losing more surface snow and ice than it gained around 2090 under a high-emissions scenario. That was a possible transition toward eventual exposure, rather than a fixed date when the entire camp would emerge.

NASA's 2024 imagery gave a clearer view of the buried structures. Earlier radar surveys had detected and shown the camp, but the newer instrument revealed individual features in much greater detail for viewers.

The scientists were trying to test ways to map ice sheets, not look for an Army base under the ice. The imagery brought back hidden secrets from a different age: a nuclear-powered settlement that 

RELATED TOPICS

The Nuclear City That Disappeared Beneath Greenland's Ice
The Secret Nuclear City Beneath the Ice
Camp Century America Built a Nuclear City Under Greenland’s Ice — Then the Ice Started Moving

{ https://www.military.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 23:15 Stuur door

A Strange Radio Signal in The Far Reaches of The Milky Way Is Behaving Like Nothing Else in The Galaxy

A Strange Radio Signal in The Far Reaches of The Milky Way Is Behaving Like Nothing Else in The Galaxy

A Strange Radio Signal in The Far Reaches of The Milky Way Is Behaving Like Nothing Else in The Galaxy

Radio telescopes beneath the Milky Way. Astronomers have discovered a mysterious radio source in our galaxy that has been changing for decades.

(000ne/E+/Getty Images)

Many things scattered throughout the Milky Way flicker, glow, and pulse in idiosyncratic ways.

From the staccato static of a pulsar to the sudden eruption and slow fade of light from a nova, astronomers have a good handle on the various transient changes cosmic objects undergo.

It would be a mistake, however, to think the catalog of sidereal shenanigans is complete.

And astronomers have now observed an object behaving in ways that no one has ever seen before.

It's called VT J1906+0849, located out beyond the Milky Way's outer Norma-Cygnus spiral arm, and changing in blazing radio light.

The hinky part? Whatever is powering the object seems to operate on a timescale of decades.

"The source," astronomers write in a paper led by Jessie Miller of the California Institute of Technology, "is a distant Galactic synchrotron transient that has remained radio-bright for approximately two decades while exhibiting an evolving spectral turnover frequency and little apparent expansion."

Most changing objects astronomers detect in the night sky transform on relatively short timescales, from milliseconds to months. This has a lot to do with technology – the way we observe the sky, and how long we've been doing it in detail.

In the 1990s, many large-scale surveys began looking more closely at the whole sky, and in the years since, many others have joined the party.

VT J1906+0849 first came to astronomers' attention in data collected in 2017 as part of the Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS). There, at least 49,000 light-years from Earth, out beyond the galaxy's spiral arm, was the brightest radio transient the survey had discovered.

At around 70 millijanskies, it was an extraordinarily bright radio transient, especially at such a great distance.

That, naturally, raised questions: What the heck was it, and had it been overlooked in previous survey data?

Thus began the scurry so familiar to astronomers – looking for other observations that covered the same patch of the sky, then seeing what their source looked like in those observations.

There were several radio surveys that had covered the same patch of sky prior to the 2017 VLASS observation.

A Strange Radio Signal in The Far Reaches of The Milky Way Is Flashing Like Nothing Else in The Galaxy

The location of VT J1906+0849 in radio observations from 1996 (left), 2005 (middle), and 2017 (right). The mysterious source is absent in the earliest image, but appears in later observations.

(Miller et al., ApJ, 2026)

In 1996… there was absolutely nothing to be seen at the site in data collected as part of the NRAO VLA Sky Survey.

But by 2005, that had started to change.

Over the course of several surveys that observed the object between 2006 and 2013, it showed an overall brightening – reaching a peak of around 200 millijanskies in 2014.

The 2017 detection seemed to have caught VT J1906+0849 as it was fading from that peak, but the overall light curve was so weird that the only sensible course of action was to see what it would do next.

The researchers obtained follow-up observations in 2019, 2024, and 2026, with additional observations in 2025 that managed to include VT J1906+0849's corner of the sky. And for a while, it looked as though VT J1906+0849 was winding down. The 2019 and 2024 observations showed it growing progressively fainter.

Then, in late 2025, it went PSYCH.

A Strange Radio Signal in The Far Reaches of The Milky Way Is Flashing Like Nothing Else in The Galaxy

The changing radio brightness of VT J1906+0849 over several decades, measured at different frequencies. The source brightened dramatically, faded, and then began brightening again in late 2025.

(Miller et al., ApJ, 2026)

In data obtained using the Very Large Array, astronomers observed VT J1906+0849 growing brighter once again.

So far, so weird. But that's not even the weirdest thing.

Astronomers can infer a lot about a radio source by studying how brightly it shines at different wavelengths on the radio spectrum.

In the case of VT J1906+0849, the radio emission rises to a peak at a particular frequency before dropping off again. But that peak doesn't behave.

In 2019, it was at around 1.9 gigahertz. By 2024, it had shifted down to around 0.8 gigahertz. But by 2026, it had climbed back up to around 2.2 gigahertz. (The spectral peaks for 2014 and 2025 were not well constrained, but both appeared to occur at substantially higher frequencies.)

It's not unusual for a brightness peak to move, but it usually does so in a specific way for specific radiation. The researchers believe this object's radio-wave emission comes from energetic charged particles moving through magnetic fields via synchrotron radiation.

If the source were simply an expanding cloud of material, as is often the case for synchrotron emission, its changing radio spectrum would be expected to follow a more predictable pattern, with the peak shifting toward lower frequencies as the cloud spread out.

But VT J1906+0849 doesn't seem to be spreading out much.

In spite of the dramatic changes in its brightness and radio spectrum, the researchers found little evidence that the source had expanded over several years of observations.

And the sudden shift back toward higher frequencies suggests something rather more complicated than a cloud of energetic particles simply cooling and dispersing.

Combined with the rebrightening, the clues suggest that, whatever VT J1906+0849 is doing, it's an ongoing process.

There are several possibilities, but three are particularly interesting.

A Strange Radio Signal in The Far Reaches of The Milky Way Is Flashing Like Nothing Else in The Galaxy

The location of VT J1906+0849 as seen at optical (top row), near-infrared (J, H, and K), and mid-infrared (remaining panels) wavelengths. These observations help astronomers investigate what might be producing the mysterious radio emission. 

(Miller et al., ApJ, 2026)

One thing that can brighten and then fade over time is an explosion such as a nova – but the ejected material should show signatures of expansion, even if the timescale made sense, which it does not.

Another option is a pulsar-powered nebula, but the dancing frequency peak is too chaotic.

That just leaves the third option, and it's a common suspect in many cosmic mysteries: A black hole doing snacking crimes. Or a black hole or neutron star accreting material from a binary companion, if you want to be all straitlaced about it.

If it is a compact object having a nosh, however, it's doing a remarkably good job of concealing the evidence. Observations using NASA's Swift telescope failed to detect a hint of the powerful X-rays expected from such an accreting system.

But a non-detection doesn't necessarily mean a non-emission. And there's another object in the Milky Way that might offer a final, crucial clue.

SS 433 is an object located around 18,000 light-years from Earth, and it's extremely guilty of weirdness. It's thought to consist of either a black hole or a neutron star, orbiting with a companion star every 13 days.

But the really interesting thing about SS 433 is what happens to the material being pulled away from the companion star.

Some of it falls onto the compact object, but much of it is flung back into space as powerful jets and a dense wind from the disk of material swirling around the central object.

That wind can also obscure the X-rays produced by the accretion process, hiding some of the evidence of what is happening at the heart of the system.

The researchers think something similar might be happening with VT J1906+0849.

If a compact object is continuously launching a jet of energetic particles into a dense surrounding wind, the interaction could produce the strange, changing radio emission while preventing the emitting material from expanding freely.

It could also explain the missing X-rays. And there's another clue: infrared observations of VT J1906+0849 revealed evidence of gas moving at around 2,000 kilometers per second, consistent with a powerful outflow.

It's a compelling possibility, but far from a confirmed identification. More observations will be needed to determine whether VT J1906+0849 really is a younger relative of SS 433, or something even stranger.

Still, it's a satisfying answer to a strange sequence of problems, and a message to microquasars everywhere. You might think you got away with it… but astronomers are wising up to your game.

"VT J1906+0849," they write, "highlights the potential for wide-field radio surveys to uncover a population of obscured Galactic accretors that are difficult to identify at other wavelengths."

Mwahahaha.

The research has been published in The Astrophysical Journal.

RELATED

Strange Signals Keep Coming From Deep Space — What's Sending Them?
This Signal From 238 Light-Years Away Has No Explanation Yet!
NASA Detected a STRANGE Signal From Space — And Nobody Knows What It Means

{ https://www.sciencealert.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:29 Stuur door

Details of New Jersey’s 2024 Drone Outbreak Still Remain Largely Unexplained

Details of New Jersey’s 2024 Drone Outbreak Still Remain Largely Unexplained

th?id=ONUT.o5h6AaHv4O-_u8FKZV90Bw&pid=News&w=316&h=200&c=14&rs=2&qlt=90&dpr=1.3

Nighttime drone and aircraft sightings across New Jersey in late 2024 prompted thousands of reports and a federal investigation into unidentified objects in the sky.

TRENTON, NJ – Nearly two years after mysterious lights and suspected drones filled New Jersey’s night skies, the federal government has offered an explanation for the sightings that alarmed residents, frustrated local officials and sparked nationwide attention. But despite thousands of reports and months of public debate, investigators never provided a complete, sighting-by-sighting account of what people witnessed.

Federal officials say the 2024 drone mystery involved legal aircraft, authorized drone flights and mistaken sightings, but questions remain about what residents saw in the night sky.

Nobody has ever said who owned and operated those drones, what they were testing, and why it was isolated to New Jersey.

The unusual activity began drawing widespread attention in November 2024, when residents across New Jersey reported seeing illuminated objects moving overhead after dark. Reports spread through Morris, Somerset, Ocean, Monmouth and other counties, with witnesses describing everything from small drones to aircraft that appeared unusually large, often times in waves of multiple aircraft.

Videos circulated across social media, prompting calls for answers from police departments, municipal officials and members of Congress. Some residents questioned whether the objects were conducting surveillance, while others worried about potential threats to aviation and public safety.

By December 2024, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Defense were examining thousands of reports. Their findings pointed largely toward ordinary aircraft, legally operated drones and objects in the night sky that had been mistaken for something unusual.

Federal Investigators Found No Evidence of a Coordinated Drone Threat

In a joint federal assessment released in December 2024, officials said they had reviewed more than 5,000 reports and found no evidence of a widespread security threat. Investigators identified a combination of commercial aircraft, private planes, helicopters, authorized drones and celestial objects.

Federal agencies said they had “not identified anything anomalous” in the reports examined. They also reported finding no evidence that the sightings represented a foreign surveillance operation or an immediate national security danger.

The findings did not establish that every reported object was imaginary or that no drones were operating over New Jersey. Instead, investigators concluded that the available evidence did not support claims of a coordinated fleet of mysterious aircraft operating across the state.

That distinction became important as residents continued sharing videos and eyewitness accounts. Federal officials could explain many sightings through ordinary aviation activity, but they did not publicly identify the aircraft or objects involved in every individual report.

FAA-Authorized Flights Added Another Twist to the Mystery

In January 2025, the White House offered additional information about the drone activity, stating that some flights had been authorized by the FAA for research and other purposes. The administration also pointed to recreational drone operators and the misidentification of conventional aircraft.

That explanation raised another question for New Jersey residents: If some operations were authorized, why had local officials and the public struggled to obtain clear answers while the sightings were occurring?

The communication problems became part of the controversy. Local officials had repeatedly requested more detailed information during the height of the sightings, while federal agencies maintained that investigators had not uncovered a broader threat.

Online discussions continued well after the initial reports faded. Aviation enthusiasts and social media users examined whether experimental electric aircraft, including electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicles such as the Pivotal BlackFly, could explain some observations.

However, no publicly established federal finding identified the BlackFly or a particular private contractor as the source of the widespread New Jersey sightings. Claims involving experimental aircraft remained separate from the government’s documented conclusions.

Two Years Later, Some Questions Still Have No Public Answer

By October 2026, the central federal explanation remained that the sightings were largely a mixture of routine aviation, authorized drone activity and mistaken identifications. Investigators had not publicly established that a coordinated group of unidentified drones was operating over New Jersey.

What remains missing is a comprehensive public accounting of the individual sightings that fueled the original concern. The government has not released a complete list matching every widely circulated video or eyewitness report to a specific aircraft, drone operator or astronomical object.

For residents who watched unfamiliar lights overhead in late 2024, the official findings provide an explanation for the broader wave of reports, but not necessarily for each personal experience.

The New Jersey drone mystery ultimately produced thousands of reports, a multiagency federal investigation and widespread criticism of government communication. Federal officials found no evidence of an extraordinary or coordinated security threat, but the absence of a complete public record of individual sightings means some questions about specific incidents remain unanswered.

RELATED

3 Years Filming Unexplained Drones Over Somerset County New Jersey | From the 2024 Frenzy to 2026
Thousands Saw Them: The New Jersey Drone Mystery

{  https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/  }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:58 Stuur door

UFO Expert Says Government Hides 'Mantis-Type' Aliens and Keeps Dead Bodies in a Military Institute

UFO Expert Says Government Hides 'Mantis-Type' Aliens and Keeps Dead Bodies in a Military Institute

Davis said the alleged records also indicate recovered bodies were transferred to an unidentified military medical institute, while stressing uncertainty about the beings' true nature

Mantis-Type Aliens

UFO expert Dr Eric Davis alleges classified records describe four alien types and bodies held by an unnamed military institute. (Image is for illustrative purposes)

PHOTO AI Generated/ChatGPT

UFO expert and astrophysicist Dr Eric Davis claimed that classified government records describe at least four types of beings and that recovered bodies were transferred to an unnamed military medical institute.

According to News Nation, Davis stated that he had seen evidence and records, which he described as classified and not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. He expressed uncertainty about the nature of the beings, particularly those whose appearance he compared with insects and reptiles.

UFO Expert Describes Four Alleged Types

'There's a minimum of four that we know of. And I've seen the evidence, and I've seen the records.'

The four categories Davis identified were Greys, Nordics, Insectoids, also described as Mantis-type beings, and Reptilians. His reference to a minimum of four left open the possibility of other categories, without identifying any additional types.

Davis compared the Greys with beings depicted in the final scene of Close Encounters of the Third Kind. The film reference illustrated the appearance he was describing rather than establishing evidence for the beings' existence.

'They variously are described as the Greys, like what everybody saw in Close Encounters of the Third Kind at the end of that movie in the final scene.'

He described Nordics as very tall, human-like individuals with Caucasian features. These descriptions formed part of his claims about the records he had reviewed.

UFO Expert Explains Mantis-Type Comparison

Davis described the third category in terms of its resemblance to insects, including praying mantises, while distinguishing appearance from identity.

'There's the beings that resemble or look like insects, like a praying mantis-type insect, but they're not an insect.'

He suggested that people encountering something unfamiliar and shocking might compare it with familiar things to make sense of what they were seeing. In that explanation, an insect-like appearance could lead to an insectoid description without establishing the being's true nature.

The same uncertainty accompanied his description of Reptilians. Davis referred to their apparent body structure but cautioned against treating the label as a definitive identification.

'There's the reptilians for the same case, in that their morphology, body structure looks like a reptilian. And they may not be reptilian.'

His descriptions therefore relied on comparisons with recognisable forms, alongside qualifications about what those comparisons could establish.

UFO Expert Claims Military Institute Received Bodies

When questioned about where the government kept recovered bodies, Davis stated that he did not know. He nevertheless claimed that the bodies had been transferred to a military-linked medical institution rather than a private organisation.

'Given to a military institute, a medical institute, and it's classified. And that institute has been in existence since the Civil War.'

Davis did not identify the institution by name. His claim about its historical origins was accompanied by an assertion that its structure and location had subsequently altered.

He claimed that the institute was divided into two or three separate components during the first Obama administration and relocated to different military medical facilities. Those assertions concern an earlier period, rather than a dated announcement of a current transfer.

According to Davis, the original organisation no longer existed in its previous form, while the location of the alleged recovered bodies remained something he could not identify.

RELATED

Are Mantid Aliens the Intelligence Behind UFO Abductions? [Eerie's Vault Episode #125]
The Mantis Aliens: Insectoid Beings Reported in UFO Encounters

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/science }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:36 Stuur door

Pilots Entering Thunderstorm Encounter Cylindrical UFO And Fear Collision

Pilots Entering Thunderstorm Encounter Cylindrical UFO And Fear Collision

On August 16, 2026, Two pilots flying a private jet charter encountered a cylindrical-shaped UFO as they were about to enter a thunderstorm near Tiffin, Ohio. They described the object as highly reflective and pill-shaped. It was oriented vertically and appeared to have a metallic surface without seams or any flight control appendages. When the object was first sighted, the witnesses say that it appeared to emerge from the wall of storm clouds directly ahead and was on a direct collision course with their jet. Eventually, the object passed on a parallel course on their left and came as close as two miles. Alarmed by the unexpected airspace intrusion at 41,000 ft, the crew made a report to the Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC).

Pilots stunned after spotting mysterious UFO shaped like a pill while flying across America

CGI recreation based on witness descriptions

The incident follows years of hundreds of similar UFO reports, where witnesses often describe the unidentified objects as “pill” or “tic-tac” shaped. In many cases, the objects are seen in vertical orientation, emerging from water, and coming in close proximity to the aircraft. In the August sighting, the air traffic controller referred the pilots to NUFORC, where they made a report. NUFORC investigator Ben Hansen followed up on the report and spoke to the crew’s captain, obtained FAA radar data, and the ATC radio communication. The incident currently remains unexplained.

What We Know

The most prosaic explanations have been explored. The object was not detected by FAA radar, nor by the jet’s onboard TCAS. While NUFORC has been unable to definitively rule out the possibility the object was a balloon, there have been no database matches with planned balloon launches, nor was the FAA notified of launch conflicts as is standard for safety protocols. Coupled with the witness’s estimate that the object was at least 30 feet in height and uniformly shaped without tapering at the top or bottom, it presents some challenges to the balloon theory.

Why This Case Matters

  • Amid hundreds of pilot reports per year that involve concerns of collision with unknown objects, the UAP/UFO subject needs to be taken more seriously by agencies such as the FAA. While NUFORC gladly assists by accepting the FAA’s reports (it’s still listed in the federal regulations as a civilian agency where reports should be made), there is no indication in this case that the FAA escalated the concerning sighting to other agencies for a parallel investigation.
  • While entertaining, in the audio recording the controller jokes to the pilots about making a NUFORC report and he states, “Make sure you include what color the alien was.” Unfortunately, the stigma surrounding UFO reporting is still very strong and the ridicule factor makes many pilots hesitant to say anything.
  • No matter whether the object eventually has a prosaic explanation or not, it was unknown and within controlled airspace. Traveling at a speed of several hundred mph, a jet colliding with a weather balloon can take out a plane’s engine. A high-altitude balloon operated by foreign adversaries (such as those involved in the Chinese spy balloon incidents in 2023) also places the U.S. at national security risk when such UAP sightings aren’t escalated for government investigation.
  • The latest Department of War UFO file releases have consisted almost entirely of military encounters. This current case is one example of hundreds of civilian pilot reports. It highlights the fact that UAP activity may be more frequently observed by civilian aviators, but they rarely have the sophisticated camera systems and sensors to adequately record it.

Case File and Media

Full Report:

2-minute video (includes radar playback, radio communications, and recreation photos of the event): https://vimeo.com/1238537411/3742d38ba7

The audio recordings and radar data were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. The photographs taken by the crew were released for use by their consent to have them placed on NUFORC’s website.

Ben Hansen, 10/24/26

{ https://nuforc.org/posts/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:46 Stuur door

Matthew Brown Raises a Mind-Controlled UFO Theory—and a Human Breeding Claim

Matthew Brown Raises a Mind-Controlled UFO Theory—and a Human Breeding Claim

Matthew Brown connects alleged UFO programmes with consciousness and inherited abilities. His interview mixes reported accounts with his own speculation.

Conceptual illustration of a human profile connected by abstract lines to an oval craft.

Conceptual illustration of a hypothetical mental interface; not a depiction of demonstrated technology.

 Illustration: Curiosmos.

In this report

  1. Where Brown’s account changes into a theory
  2. The government really did investigate psychic abilities
  3. What a mental interface would have to do

Could operating an unfamiliar craft depend on the person sitting inside it? Matthew Brown has raised that possibility in an interview that connects alleged UFO programmes, consciousness and the idea of selecting people for an inherited ability.

The suggestion is extraordinary. Brown discusses the possibility that a covert effort could cultivate people capable of interacting mentally with unusual technology. In the relevant passages, however, he presents suspicion and speculation—not a breeding programme he says he personally witnessed.

Where Brown’s account changes into a theory

Brown’s August 2026 interview with Jesse Michels ranges across alleged secret programmes and stories Brown says circulate within that world. The automated transcript makes an important distinction visible: some passages describe accounts he says he encountered; others explore what he thinks might explain them.

Near the discussion of inherited abilities, Brown wonders whether selection over several generations could be involved. Turning that into a flat statement that the Pentagon breeds UFO pilots would erase the uncertainty in his own account.

His discussion of historical agreements also relies on what he describes as an oral tradition. A story passed between people, an agreement someone has read and an operation someone has observed are three different starting points. Reporting them as a single body of established knowledge would conceal how each claim reached him.

The government really did investigate psychic abilities

There is a documented historical connection between US intelligence and research into unusual mental abilities. According to the CIA’s own account, its remote-viewing research began in 1972. Responsibility moved to the Defense Intelligence Agency in 1977; the programme later returned to the CIA for review in 1995.

Remote viewing concerned attempts to obtain information about distant targets. It was not a demonstrated method of piloting a craft. The CIA says its review found the information too vague and inconsistent to provide the specific intelligence needed, and the programme ended.

That history gives Brown’s discussion a real point of comparison. It shows that agencies explored unusual claims about perception. It does not supply a missing link between those experiments and the selection of people to operate recovered technology.

What a mental interface would have to do

A craft controlled through an operator’s thoughts could mean several very different things. Defining the mechanism is part of turning a UAP account into a testable question. It might use sensors to translate measurable biological signals into commands. Brown’s discussion goes much further, invoking abilities whose proposed connection to the technology has not been demonstrated publicly.

The practical question would be whether an operator could produce a repeatable response under conditions that exclude ordinary controls and information cues. An observer would need to know what command was intended, what the machine did and whether the result occurred reliably with different operators.

A claim about inherited ability adds another layer. Success by one person would not establish inheritance. Researchers would have to define the ability, measure it consistently and examine how it occurs across families while accounting for training and shared circumstances.

Brown’s speculation is interesting because it shifts the imagined problem from rebuilding hardware to understanding an operator. Perhaps the difficult part of an unfamiliar machine would be its interface. But the interview does not provide a working demonstration or records of a breeding operation. Keeping that boundary visible lets readers explore the idea without mistaking a proposed explanation for an observed programme.

RELATED

Matthew Brown Drops UFO Bombshell
Pentagon Whistleblower UNLOADS on Alien Hybrid Breeding Programs (ft. Matthew Brown)

{ https://curiosmos.com/category/uap/   }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 16:34 Stuur door

Steven Greer Put His UFO Disclosure Demand in Writing. Here Is What the Letter Says

Steven Greer Put His UFO Disclosure Demand in Writing. Here Is What the Letter Says

Greer’s June 2026 letter set an August deadline and described a proposed evidence effort. The document distinguishes promises from material actually supplied.

Illustration of an envelope and blank papers beside a calendar on a desk.

Editorial illustration accompanying the report on Greer’s letter; the papers shown are not the document.

Illustration: Curiosmos.

In this report

  1. A promise to seek material
  2. Different releases would answer different questions
  3. The deadline and the follow-up

Steven Greer put a deadline on his demand for UFO disclosure: August 29, 2026. In a letter dated June 29, he outlined a proposed effort to obtain and release material concerning alleged craft, bodies and secret operations if the government did not respond.

The deadline has now passed. It joins a longer history of disclosure promises and public records. The document remains worth reading because its wording is more specific—and in places more conditional—than the headlines announcing it.

A promise to seek material

The four-page letter, posted on Greer’s website, describes what he calls Unacknowledged National Operational Disclosure, or UNOD. It alleges hidden activities involving unusual craft and biological material.

The letter says that, unless the government contradicts its position by the deadline, the effort will solicit further hard evidence and release material. The promise to solicit evidence matters. It is not the same as attaching a complete, independently examined collection to the letter.

Greer also presents his position on protection from national-security prosecution. That is his assertion in the document, not an official finding that the proposed activity has government approval. The recipient’s silence would not, by itself, authenticate the alleged objects or endorse the account.

Different releases would answer different questions

An account from someone who says they worked on a craft would add testimony. A document with a verifiable origin could establish what an organisation recorded. A physical sample, examined independently and accompanied by a traceable history, could support a different kind of inquiry.

Those materials should not be counted as equivalent simply because they are described as evidence. A witness could be accurately describing a document whose contents are mistaken. A genuine document could record an unverified report. A real specimen could still have an ordinary origin.

For the biological claims, a useful release would explain where the material came from, who handled it and what tests were performed. For a craft claim, the operating data, examination methods and access given to independent investigators would matter as much as photographs.

Greer’s letter also distinguishes material proposed for release from technical information it says would be withheld. That would limit what outside researchers could reproduce from a public package. Readers would need a clear inventory of what was made available and what remained inaccessible.

The deadline and the follow-up

Greer’s website lists a September 29 podcast episode about the letter, the deadline and claims of suppression. The episode listing establishes that he returned to the subject after August 29. Its brief description does not itself provide the promised bodies, craft or an independent examination of them.

A disclosure effort could become far more useful through a simple public record: each item promised, the date it was released, a direct route to the original material and the examination it has received. That would allow people following the story to distinguish a new allegation from a new document or a new physical finding.

Greer’s letter makes the proposal concrete enough to follow in that way. The next question is which of its promised materials can be examined beyond the people already making the claims.

RELATED

Everyone Says They Ignored Him…Under His Own Rules That Was a Yes: Steven Greer's UFO Ultimatum
Dr. Steven Greer on UFO Evidence, Trump, Living E.T. & Underground Government (Full Interview)
Dr. Steven Greer outlines the Disclosure Project’s push for full transparency on UFOs, alleging that the most compelling evidence—craft, bodies, and advanced technologies—is held by private defense contractors beyond normal government oversight. He describes whistleblower testimony, claims of illegal black projects, recovered extraterrestrial artifacts like the 12,560-year-old “buggosphere,” and covert human-made UFO operations used in psychological warfare. Greer warns against fear-based narratives, urges protection for witnesses, and advocates releasing select energy and propulsion technologies to transform society while avoiding misuse.

{ https://curiosmos.com/category/uap/   }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 16:22 Stuur door

Eric Weinstein Says Officials Sought His Help With UFO Disclosure

Eric Weinstein Says Officials Sought His Help With UFO Disclosure

Weinstein describes alleged approaches about preparing the public for UFO disclosure. A 2022 request log shows the subject has a longer public history.

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 15:49 Stuur door

Glowing UFO Lights Up Sky Over Utah, Object Coming Out of It! Nov 4, 2026, UAP Sighting News.

Glowing UFO Lights Up Sky Over Utah, Object Coming Out of It! Nov 4, 2026, UAP Sighting News.

UFO_2.png
UFO_Utah_1.png
Date of sighting: Nov 5, 2026
Location of sighting: Beryl, Utah, USA
Source:
 
Guys I lived in Utah for a few years and can honestly say that UFOs are all over the place in that state. I would estimate there are 3-4X the sightings compared to other US states. This sighting here shows a glowing light during sunrise, but it wasn't the moon, she caught the moon in a different position. This is a UFO in early morning trying to sneak out before people wake up. Awesome catch and defiantly aliens. Whats it doing? Thats obvious...one photo clearly shows a huge object on 3-4 thick leges that looks like its being delivered to an underground base, probably about 5-6 miles below the city of Beryle. Even aliens need supplies. 
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily 
 
Eyewitness states: 
Does anyone know what was in the sky this morning around 5am looks like over Newcastle or cedar?
 
UFO_UAP_1.png


Screenshot%202026-11-08%20at%2011.33.32%E2%80%AFAM.png

Screenshot%202026-11-08%20at%2011.33.08%E2%80%AFAM.png

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 15:04 Stuur door

Tomorrow In UFO History: Nov 9, 1979....Dechmont Woods Alien Assault: Forest Worker Dragged by Robotic Entities To UFO! UAP Sighting News.

Tomorrow In UFO History: Nov 9, 1979....Dechmont Woods Alien Assault: Forest Worker Dragged by Robotic Entities To UFO! UAP Sighting News.

UFO%20Sightings%20Daily.jpg
This photo above is a ai rendering of the similar drawing made by a sketch artist for the eyewitness. 
ScotlandLanding1979b.jpg
Original drawing approved by eyewitness. 
Date of event: November 9, 1979
Location of event: Livingston, Scotland, UK
This is 100% proof that aliens are actively exploring remote areas of Earth and are not afraid to use physical force on humans.
A respected forester named Robert Taylor was out checking trees when he walked right into a 20-foot dark grey, metallic craft hovering silently in a clearing. It was trying to use a camouflage mechanism to blend into the forest, changing its transparency right before his eyes!
Suddenly, two smaller, robotic-looking sphere entities rolled out from under the main ship. They made a distinct plopping sound and rushed straight for him. These entities actually attached themselves to Taylor's trousers and began dragging him toward the main craft. He described a suffocating, acrid smell like burning brake linings just before he blacked out.
When he woke up, the crafts were gone, but the physical evidence left behind was undeniable. Local police investigated the area and found distinct ladder-like tracks and 40 angled holes punched into the dirt. Forensic teams even analyzed the tears in Taylor's trousers where the entities grabbed him.
Folks, this wasn't a hallucination. The police treated it as a criminal assault by entities unknown. This is a classic, undeniable close encounter showing alien technology at work right on our own soil.
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily

RELATED

November 9, 1979 - The Livingston Incident
The Dechmont Law Incident: Scotland's Only UFO Crime Scene | British UFO Encounters #aliens
The UFO Encounter in a Scottish Forest That Still Baffles People | Dechmont Woods

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 14:52 Stuur door

Theory predicting an older universe without dark matter or dark energy passes key cosmological tests

Theory predicting an older universe without dark matter or dark energy passes key cosmological tests

Theory predicting an older universe without dark matter or dark energy passes key cosmological tests

Andromeda Galaxy captured in the vast deep space.

Credit: Jason Pittman - pexels.com

An alternative model in which the universe is 26.7 billion years old and needs neither dark matter nor dark energy has held up against several major cosmology tests, according to a new University of Ottawa study. The research, titled "A Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Consistency Test of the CCC+TL Cosmology," is published in the journal Universe.

One model, many observations

During 2025 and 2026, Rajendra Gupta, adjunct professor in uOttawa's Department of Physics, and postdoctoral researcher Dr. Nikolaos Samaras tested the CCC+TL model against a range of important astronomical observations.

CCC+TL stands for "covarying coupling constants plus tired light." The model suggests that what is usually attributed to dark matter and dark energy could instead come from evolving fundamental constants that govern how forces and particles interact.

Scientists have searched for dark matter and dark energy for decades, but neither has been directly detected. The standard cosmological model, known as ΛCDM, also faces questions raised by observations of surprisingly mature galaxies in the early universe.

"Most emerging models explain only a limited set of observations," Gupta says. "A new model must not conflict with the pillars of cosmology and astrophysics, and our findings meet that challenge, including the yet-to-be-published cosmic microwave background challenge."

CCC+TL changes the Einstein and Friedmann equations, which describe gravity and the expansion of the universe. That meant the researchers couldn't just modify the standard model and existing computer codes. For each test, they developed CCC+TL-compliant equations and code.

Theory predicting an older universe without dark matter or dark energy passes key cosmological tests, warranting further investigation

Abundance of light elements' nucleosynthesis with time using the 𝛬 CDM clock.

Credit: Universe (2026)

What the tests found

The model's results agreed with several major observations. Its predictions for the amounts of hydrogen, helium and other light elements formed shortly after the Big Bang matched those of the standard model. It also agreed with cosmic-chronometer measurements, which use the ages of galaxies to estimate how fast the universe has expanded over time.

In a recent paper published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, the researchers also applied the model to all 175 galaxies in the SPARC database and found it could reproduce their rotation curves without dark matter. A separate study of time dilation in supernova observations also supports the model, although that paper is still under review.

The team looked at the Bullet Cluster too. There, the extra gravitational effect the model predicts, rather than the dark matter, tracks the galaxies, not the hot, X-ray-emitting gas. The researchers call this an early proof of concept that needs more study.

"Observations attributed to dark matter and dark energy likely originate from covarying coupling constants," adds Gupta, whose paper on the origin of dark matter and dark energy explores the idea.

Theory predicting an older universe without dark matter or dark energy passes key cosmological tests, warranting further investigation

Schramm plot of BBN elemental abundances.

Credit: Universe (2026). DOI: 10.3390/universe12070193

More time for early galaxies to form

The model could also help explain why astronomers keep finding large, mature galaxies so early in cosmic history.

In the standard model, the universe was about 300 million years old during cosmic dawn. Under CCC+TL, it would have been about 4.6 billion years old at the same observed redshift. That extra time gives galaxies longer to grow and develop. In the researchers' calculations, early galaxies come out about 12 times larger in size and mass than the standard model predicts, as reported in Galaxies.

"Impossible early galaxies become predictable galaxies," Gupta explains. "We predict that galaxies exist well beyond the distances the James Webb Space Telescope has reached."

That prediction may soon be tested. The James Webb Space Telescope's GLIMPSE program plans to search for galaxies at redshifts that may exceed 50. In the standard model, there may not be enough time for massive galaxies to form that early. CCC+TL has no such limit.

"The success should encourage astronomers to take the new model seriously. It is challenging to understand and apply, but we believe it extends the physics of the universe beyond ΛCDM limits," concludes Gupta.

Publication details

{ https://phys.org/space-news/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 14:29 Stuur door

Now that Democrats control the House, they plan to deliver UFO disclosure

Now that Democrats control the House, they plan to deliver UFO disclosure

Locked in a big game of disclosure chess.

Blue and red chess pieces locked in UAP disclosure checkmate.

Blue and red chess pieces locked in UAP disclosure checkmate.

Image by Cybernews.

Marcus Walsh - Journalist

Key takeaways

Unfortunately, the current administration has not been fully transparent on UAP and has slow-walked several of the statutory requirements Congress established for UAP disclosure,
said Andre Carson (Indiana Democrat.)

A UFO flying through the c̶o̶s̶m̶o̶s̶ chromosomos.

A UFO flying through the cosmos.

Image by Cybernews.

“I don’t trust another president”

Speaking with Rogan in particular, Grusch’s claims have become more extreme. Grusch told Rogan he was waiting for a "Ghostbusters situation” before Trump leaves office.

Both parties as bad as each other

Let me guess, if they get in power they will blame the opposition for halting progress, and if the opposition gets in power they will blame them.
reddit bipartisan
What a Democratic Congress Means for UFO Disclosure

{ https://cybernews.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 01:28 Stuur door

UFO Expert Actually Thinks Donald Trump Will Reveal Live Aliens and 4K Spacecraft After Midterm Loss

UFO Expert Actually Thinks Donald Trump Will Reveal Live Aliens and 4K Spacecraft After Midterm Loss

After a bruising electoral defeat, one UFO researcher's extraordinary prediction collides with the government's continuing lack of verified alien evidence

Donald Trump

President Donald Trump faces speculation about a possible UFO disclosure following Republican midterm defeats

PHOTO The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Filmmaker and UFO researcher Jon Stewart has floated the idea that Donald Trump could respond to Republican midterm election losses by dramatically unveiling 'catastrophic disclosure' of alleged extraterrestrial evidence, including a living alien or crystal-clear 4K images of a recovered spacecraft.

Speaking to FOX 32 Chicago in an interview published on Friday, 6 November, Stewart speculated that the former president might turn to a headline-grabbing revelation after Republicans lost control of Congress in the US midterms. No such White House plan has been confirmed.

The comments followed the 3 November elections, when Democrats won control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, according to the Associated Press. Stewart linked the setback to his theory that Trump might seek a dramatic announcement to regain public attention.

Stewart described his imagined scenario as 'catastrophic disclosure', meaning a sudden public revelation of supposed evidence of extraterrestrial life. His prediction was speculation, not a claim to have seen such evidence.

Why Stewart Sees an Alien Reveal as a Political 'Hail Mary'

During the interview, Stewart described the possibility of an alien disclosure as a political 'Hail Mary'. He suggested a sensational announcement could rally Americans around Trump after the Republican defeat.

He compared his imagined spectacle to the public entertainment of ancient Rome, even floating a four-day extravaganza. The comparison described the scale of the announcement he envisioned, not an event being organised by the administration.

Stewart also spoke about disappointment among people seeking greater government transparency on unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAP. He argued that unclear videos and fleeting sightings had fallen short of the conclusive evidence some enthusiasts hoped to see.

Washington has released UAP material. The Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, known as AARO, publishes video footage and investigative records, including unresolved cases from 2026. Its public descriptions caution against treating unidentified objects as evidence of extraterrestrial activity.

An unexplained recording, after all, is not necessarily proof of alien technology. That distinction is central to assessing Stewart's prediction.

What Officials Say About Alleged Alien Craft

Stewart's scenario went beyond another set of ambiguous images. He speculated about displaying a living extraterrestrial, alien remains allegedly held by the government or clear 4K images of a purportedly recovered spacecraft. The term '4K' refers to image resolution, not a type of craft.

He named military facilities while discussing where such material might be stored. They included Dugway Proving Ground in Utah and Michael Army Airfield, which is located within Dugway. He also mentioned a Tonopah location in Nevada, home to the Tonopah Test Range.

The installations exist, but that does not establish the presence of extraterrestrial remains or spacecraft. The US Army describes Dugway as a defence testing facility, while the Department of Energy documents national security work at Tonopah.

Black Triangle Reported Above a Mountain Ridge

NASA says it has found no credible evidence of extraterrestrial life, despite speculation surrounding President Donald Trump's potential UFO disclosure. 

PHOTO X/@WhiteHouse

AARO's historical review found no verifiable evidence that the US government or private companies had recovered or reverse-engineered extraterrestrial technology. Its findings distinguish unresolved sightings from proof of alien origins.

NASA likewise says it has found no credible evidence of extraterrestrial life and no evidence that UAP originate beyond Earth. The agency has welcomed Trump's direction towards wider government transparency on the subject, but has reported no evidence supporting the extraordinary scenario Stewart described.

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trending }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 00:33 Stuur door

Loch Ness Monster: The Legend, the Science and the Lake Itself

Loch Ness Monster: The Legend, the Science and the Lake Itself

Loch Ness Monster: The Legend, the Science and the Lake Itself

Loch Ness is a long, narrow freshwater loch in the Scottish Highlands that holds more water than all the lakes of England and Wales combined, and it is famous worldwide as the home of the Loch Ness Monster, better known as Nessie. It runs in a straight line for more than 37 kilometers (23 miles) along the Great Glen fault between Inverness and Fort Augustus, reaches depths of around 230 meters (755 feet), and its dark, peat-stained water hides the largest volume of fresh water in the British Isles. The romantic ruins of Urquhart Castle stand on its western shore, and the loch is tied to one of the most famous mysteries of modern times. This guide covers where Loch Ness lies, how it formed, why its water is so dark, what really lies behind the legend of the Loch Ness Monster, and how to visit this mysterious lake.

💡 At a glance

Loch Ness is the largest lake in the United Kingdom by volume and the most famous body of water in the Scottish Highlands. It fills part of the long tectonic valley of the Great Glen, carved along a powerful geological fault, and together with other lochs it is linked into the Caledonian Canal. It is roughly 37 km long and up to 230 meters deep, and dissolved peat makes its water so dark that underwater visibility is close to zero. It is precisely in these murky depths that popular imagination placed Nessie, a monster whose first mention goes back to the Irish monk Saint Columba in the 6th century. It became a worldwide sensation with the famous "surgeon's photograph" of 1934, later exposed as a hoax. Modern sonar and DNA searches have found no prehistoric reptile; the most likely explanation remains a giant eel or an optical illusion. On the shore, the ruins of Urquhart Castle and the cruise boats from the village of Drumnadrochit draw visitors.

📍 Quick facts: Loch Ness
Scottish Gaelic name Loch Nis
Country Scotland (United Kingdom)
Region Scottish Highlands, Great Glen
Length approx. 37 km (36.3 km / 22.6 mi)
Width approx. 1.5 km (max. 2.7 km)
Surface area approx. 56 km² (22 sq mi)
Maximum depth approx. 230 m / 755 ft (2nd deepest loch in Scotland)
Water volume approx. 7.4 km³, the largest volume of fresh water in the British Isles
Surface elevation approx. 16 m above sea level
Outflow River Ness → North Sea (Moray Firth)
Part of Caledonian Canal, Great Glen
Nearest towns Inverness (north), Fort Augustus (south)
Famous landmark ruins of Urquhart Castle
Legend the Loch Ness Monster (Nessie)

Contents

Where is Loch Ness and how did it form?

Loch Ness lies in the far north of Scotland, in the Scottish Highlands, about 10 kilometers (6 miles) southwest of Inverness, and fills the middle section of a dramatic valley called the Great Glen (Glen Mòr in Gaelic, "the Great Valley"). This almost perfectly straight valley cuts across the entire Highlands from northeast to southwest, from the North Sea at Inverness to the Atlantic at Fort William, and Loch Ness is its longest and deepest loch.

The Great Glen is no accident. It follows one of the most prominent geological faults in Europe, the Great Glen Fault, along which entire blocks of the Earth's crust shifted by tens of kilometers hundreds of millions of years ago. The fault created a line of weakness that massive glaciers later gouged during the Ice Age into a deep trough with steep sides. When the ice melted roughly 10,000 years ago, the trough filled with water, creating a chain of long, narrow and unusually deep lochs, with Loch Ness standing out among them.

Today the loch is part of the Caledonian Canal, a brilliant feat of engineering designed by the famous engineer Thomas Telford and built between 1803 and 1822. The canal linked the natural lochs of the Great Glen (Loch Ness, Loch Oich and Loch Lochy) with a system of man-made channels and 29 locks into a single navigable route across Scotland, so ships no longer had to sail around the dangerous northern coast. Like the Scottish massif of Ben Nevis or the dramatic valley of Glen Coe, Loch Ness is one of the iconic faces of Great Britain and the wild nature of the Highlands.

Panorama of Loch Ness in the Scottish Highlands, its dark water hemmed in by the wooded slopes of the Great Glen

The calm surface of Loch Ness framed by the wooded slopes of the Highlands, a view that has fed legends about what lurks in its depths for centuries.
(Video: Pexels, CC0)

The Great Glen and the Caledonian Canal: a route across Scotland

The Great Glen is a strikingly straight valley more than a hundred kilometers (over 60 miles) long that splits the Scottish Highlands in two, with a chain of lochs along its floor, Loch Ness among them. Its geometric straightness reveals that this is not an ordinary river valley but the surface expression of a huge geological fault, the Great Glen Fault.

The fault formed roughly 400 million years ago during the so-called Caledonian orogeny, when ancient continents collided and the bedrock of today's Scotland took shape. Along the fault line, whole blocks of the Earth's crust slid horizontally by tens of kilometers; geologists estimate the displacement at up to around a hundred kilometers. The fault is not entirely dead: weak earthquakes occur in the area from time to time, though never destructive ones. The crushed rock along the line formed a weak zone that Ice Age glaciers easily deepened.

Three long lochs lie on the floor of the Great Glen: Loch Ness, the smaller Loch Oich at the watershed, and Loch Lochy in the southwest. In the early 19th century, engineers had the idea of linking them into one navigable route. The result was one of the most ambitious projects of its time, the Caledonian Canal: the work of engineer Thomas Telford, built from 1803 to 1822. The full route is about 97 kilometers (60 miles) long, roughly a third of which consists of man-made channels connecting the natural lochs, and it climbs through 29 locks. Its most famous section is a flight of eight consecutive locks called Neptune's Staircase near Fort William.

The original aim was to let fishing boats and warships cross Scotland and avoid the dangerous passage around the stormy northern coast. Commercially, the canal came too late: ships had grown in the meantime and it was already too small for large steamers. Today, however, it is a popular tourist and leisure waterway, and sailing it is one of the most beautiful ways to experience Loch Ness.

View along the long Great Glen with the waters of Loch Ness stretching toward the Highland mountains

How big and how deep is Loch Ness?

Loch Ness is about 37 kilometers (23 miles) long, only 1.5 kilometers (about 1 mile) wide on average, and reaches a maximum depth of around 230 meters (755 feet), making it one of the deepest lochs in Scotland. With a surface area of 56 km² (22 sq mi) it is far from the largest, but what makes it exceptional is its volume: the narrow, enormously deep trough holds roughly 7.4 cubic kilometers of water.

That makes Loch Ness the lake with the largest volume of fresh water in the entire British Isles: it contains more water than all the lakes and reservoirs of England and Wales combined. Its huge depth and volume are one reason the legend of a hidden creature feels so convincing: in such a mass of opaque water, almost anything could theoretically hide.

The largest British lake by surface area is actually Scotland's Loch Lomond, while Loch Ness holds the record for freshwater volume. To see where Loch Ness ranks among the world's famous lakes, here is a quick comparison:

Lake Max. depth Known for
Loch Ness approx. 230 m Largest volume of fresh water in Britain
Lake Baikal 1,642 m Deepest lake in the world
Caspian Sea 1,025 m Largest lake in the world by area
Lake Titicaca 281 m Highest navigable lake

Compared with giant Lake Baikal or the vast Caspian Sea, Loch Ness is fairly modest, but its depth is exceptional by British standards: only one lake in the British Isles is deeper, nearby Loch Morar. To learn more about how lakes form and why they matter for the landscape, read our overview article on lakes in general.

Why is the water of Loch Ness so dark, and why doesn't it freeze?

The water of Loch Ness is so dark because of its high content of dissolved peat, washed into the loch by streams from the surrounding moors and peat bogs of the Highlands. Tiny peat particles stain the water brown like weak tea and scatter light so strongly that just a few meters down it is completely dark and visibility drops almost to zero.

This opacity is the key to understanding the whole mystery. Divers and underwater cameras have only a tiny range in the brownish-black water, sonar bounces off stirred-up sediment, and any shadow or movement just below the surface easily turns into a "mysterious object." Without visibility, the loch becomes a perfect stage for the imagination. The loch has even inspired children's literature: in the series Alea Aquarius, the underwater city of Rach Turana lies on its bed.

The second remarkable thing is that Loch Ness practically never freezes. Its enormous volume of water acts as a giant heat reservoir: the deep layers soak up heat over the summer and slowly release it over the winter, so the loch stays at around 5 to 6 °C (41 to 43 °F) all year. As a result, mist and mirages often form over the cold surface in frosty air: temperature inversions that can "lift" a distant shore or a wave and create the impression that something large is moving across the water. Meteorologists use exactly these optical effects to explain a good share of the historical monster sightings.

Close-up of the dark, peat-stained surface of Loch Ness reflecting the wooded shore

Nessie: the legend of the Loch Ness Monster

The Loch Ness Monster is a legendary water creature said to live in the depths of Loch Ness, usually pictured with a small head on a long neck and a bulky body resembling a prehistoric reptile. It is affectionately nicknamed Nessie and is one of the most famous figures in world cryptozoology, the field that searches for animals whose existence has not been scientifically confirmed.

The roots of the legend go surprisingly far back. The oldest mention is usually linked to the Irish monk Saint Columba, who came in the 6th century to convert Ireland and Scotland to Christianity. According to the biography written by Abbot Adomnán around the year 700, in 565 he encountered a "water beast" by the River Ness that attacked a swimmer; Columba is said to have driven the animal away with the sign of the cross and a command. Whatever lay behind it, the story shows that the idea of a dangerous creature in these waters is many centuries old and deeply rooted in Celtic culture.

The modern era of Nessie, however, began only in the 20th century. In 1933 a new road, the A82, was completed along the northern shore of the loch, opening the previously remote shoreline to heavy traffic and views of the water for the first time. That same year, the local newspaper carried a report from the Mackay couple, who had seen "an enormous animal rolling in the water" by the loch. The story spread quickly, journalists seized on the sensation, and within a few months dozens more witnesses reported the monster. A phenomenon was born that still draws millions of visitors to the Highlands and ranks alongside other world mysteries such as the Himalayan Yeti.

Misty, mysterious atmosphere over the surface of Loch Ness at dusk

Famous photos and scientific searches for Nessie

The most famous "proof" of the Loch Ness Monster became the so-called "surgeon's photograph" of 1934, showing a small head rising from the water on a long, gracefully curved neck. The picture was published by the Daily Mail and attributed to a respectable London doctor, Robert Kenneth Wilson, whose profession was meant to lend it credibility. The photo went around the world and for decades became the iconic face of the entire legend.

Only in 1994 did the truth come out: it was a carefully planned hoax. The monster's neck and head were in fact a putty model mounted on a toy, a wind-up submarine, and the whole stunt had been masterminded by Marmaduke Wetherell as revenge on the newspaper that had earlier ridiculed him. The confession of one of those involved, Christian Spurling, shortly before his death revealed how easily a single fake photo can keep a mystery alive for generations.

Serious science gradually turned its attention to the loch as well. In 1960, aeronautical engineer Tim Dinsdale filmed a moving object that is still debated today. In 1987 a large-scale sonar sweep, Operation Deepscan, sent dozens of boats with echo sounders across the loch in a single line; it picked up several unexplained contacts but no evidence of a large animal. The high point came in 2018, when a team led by New Zealand geneticist Neil Gemmell took water samples from across the loch and analyzed them for environmental DNA, the genetic traces every organism leaves behind. The results, published in 2019, were clear: no reptile DNA, no prehistoric plesiosaur, no large unknown animal. What they did find was a huge amount of eel DNA. A detailed overview of the history and research can be found in the Loch Ness entry on Wikipedia.

Year Event Outcome
565 Mention of a "water beast" in the life of St. Columba Oldest legend
1933 New A82 road, the Mackays' report Birth of the modern phenomenon
1934 The "surgeon's photograph" Exposed as a hoax in 1994
1987 Operation Deepscan (sonar) Unexplained contacts, no proof
2019 DNA analysis (N. Gemmell) No reptile, huge amounts of eel DNA

What is the Loch Ness Monster really?

The Loch Ness Monster is most likely a mix of natural phenomena, mistakes and the human desire to believe in the mysterious, because scientific searches have never confirmed the existence of any large unknown creature. Still, the most common explanations are worth a look, as each one reveals part of why the legend works so well.

  • A giant eel. Since the 2019 DNA study, the strongest "down-to-earth" candidate has been the eel. The loch hosts huge numbers of them, and older individuals can grow to an impressive size. A dark, snake-like body gliding just below the surface matches many descriptions. That one exceptionally large eel lives in Loch Ness remains unlikely, but unlike a prehistoric reptile, it does not contradict biology.
  • A plesiosaur. The most romantic theory claims that Nessie is a surviving plesiosaur, a long-necked marine reptile from the Mesozoic. Science rejects it for several reasons: plesiosaurs died out with the dinosaurs 66 million years ago, they were cold-blooded reptiles poorly suited to cold water, they would have to surface regularly to breathe (and so would be seen constantly), and a lake only 10,000 years old could never have supported a breeding population.
  • Large fish. Besides the eel, there have been theories about a stray sturgeon, a large fish with a prehistoric look, bony plates and an elongated snout, which might resemble a "monster's back" when surfacing, or about a giant wels catfish, introduced to British waters by anglers. Neither fish has been documented in the loch, but at least both belong to real biology, unlike long-extinct reptiles.
  • Mistakes and illusions. Most sightings have mundane causes: floating logs and mats of peat rising from the bottom, boat wakes that ripple for a long time on calm water, swimming deer and otters, flocks of birds, seiches (a rocking oscillation of the water surface) and, above all, the temperature inversions and mirages mentioned above. Add to that the human mind, which automatically looks for familiar shapes in random forms. Like the dragon and other creatures from the whole gallery of legends, Nessie lives mainly in our imagination, and that is exactly why it is immortal.

What fish and animals live in Loch Ness?

Surprisingly few fish species live in Loch Ness, and its waters are poor in nutrients, which is one of the strongest scientific arguments against the existence of a large monster. The dark, peaty water lets through little light, slowing the growth of plankton at the base of the food chain, so the loch can support far fewer animals than its huge volume would suggest.

Still, it has some interesting residents. Atlantic salmon and sea trout pass through the loch on their way to spawning grounds, brown trout live in its waters, and so does the cold-loving Arctic charr, a relic of the Ice Age. The crucial role, however, belongs to eels: the 2019 genetic study confirmed that their DNA is present in the loch in huge quantities. That is why, once reptiles were ruled out, the eel became the most frequently cited "real" candidate for the monster: its long, snake-like body gliding below the surface matches many descriptions of Nessie.

Other animals thrive around the loch and on its surface too. Otters live along the shores and leave a distinctive wake as they swim, and birds of prey and waterfowl nest in the area. Ecologically, Loch Ness is an oligotrophic lake: deep, cold and nutrient-poor, the exact opposite of fertile lowland lakes teeming with life. This scarcity of food, alongside the complete absence of reptile DNA, is another strong reason science rejects the existence of a large predator in the loch.

Rocky shore and calm water of Loch Ness, natural habitat of salmon, trout and eels

Urquhart Castle: the stone guardian of the loch

Urquhart Castle is an extensive medieval ruin on a rocky headland on the western shore of Loch Ness and one of the most visited sights in the entire Scottish Highlands. It offers the most photographed view of the loch, and many alleged Nessie sightings have been made from its walls.

The castle was strategically important throughout the Middle Ages because it controlled the route through the Great Glen. In the 13th and 14th centuries it became one of the key points of the Scottish Wars of Independence and changed hands several times between the Scottish and English crowns; both the English king Edward I and rebels loyal to Robert the Bruce passed through its walls. The largest surviving part is the five-story Grant Tower, from whose top you can see almost the whole loch.

The fateful year for the castle was 1692. To keep Urquhart from falling into the hands of Jacobite rebels, the garrison blew it up as they left, and it has been crumbling into a romantic ruin ever since. Its turbulent history also recalls the fate of Mary, Queen of Scots, the tragic Scottish queen in whose time the local castles were the scene of endless power struggles. Today the ruin is cared for by Historic Environment Scotland, and a modern visitor center stands at its entrance.

Ruins of Urquhart Castle on the shore of Loch Ness overlooking the dark water and the Grant Tower

Kelpies and the Scottish folklore of water horses

The kelpie is a mythical water spirit of Scottish folklore that most often takes the form of a beautiful horse standing on the bank of a loch or river; it lures a traveler to climb on its back, then plunges into the depths and drowns him. This ancient tradition of "water horses" forms the cultural background from which the legend of the Loch Ness Monster grew, long before anyone pulled out a camera.

Dozens of tales were told in the Highlands about creatures lurking in dark waters, from kelpies to the "each-uisge" of the sea lochs. These stories also served a practical purpose: they warned children not to go near dangerous banks and deep water. When the modern story of Nessie was born in the 20th century, it fell on ground that the kelpie and other creatures had been preparing for centuries.

The legacy of the water horses is still alive in Scotland today. Near Falkirk, a pair of 30-meter (98-foot) steel horse-head sculptures called The Kelpies has stood since 2013 and is one of Scotland's most famous modern landmarks. Celtic imagery, with its interlaced knots, spirals and symbols drawn from nature and myth, has also adorned Scottish and Irish jewelry for centuries. If you are looking for a piece of this mysterious northern aesthetic, you will find it in the motifs explored in our article on Celtic symbols.

The monumental horse-head sculptures The Kelpies near Falkirk, a nod to the Scottish folklore of water horses

How to visit Loch Ness

The easiest base for visiting Loch Ness is Inverness, the "capital of the Highlands," which sits at the northern end of the loch and is the transport gateway to the whole region. From there, the scenic A82 runs along the western shore to the village of Drumnadrochit and on to the southern tip at Fort Augustus. You can drive the whole route in about an hour, but by far the best part is stopping along the way.

The heart of the tourist scene is the village of Drumnadrochit, home to the Loch Ness Centre, devoted to the history of sightings and scientific expeditions. From here and from nearby Urquhart Castle, cruise boats set out (for example the popular Jacobite Cruises) that take you around the loch, show you the castle from the water and often let you watch a sonar screen. At the southern end, in Fort Augustus, you can watch boats work their way through the locks of the Caledonian Canal.

If you prefer to explore actively, try the Loch Ness 360° Trail, a circular hiking and cycling route of about 130 kilometers (80 miles) that loops around the entire loch and links the better-known northern shore with the wilder, quieter southern side along the South Loch Ness Trail. The best views of the water open up from the high ground above Urquhart Castle and from viewpoints above the A82; photographers come mainly at dawn, when mist often lies over the water and the loch looks its most mysterious. At the southern end in Fort Augustus, the flight of five consecutive locks, which boats climb from the loch into the Caledonian Canal right in the middle of the village, is well worth a stop.

Loch Ness is often the highlight of a Highlands trip and easy to combine with the region's other gems: the dramatic valley of Glen Coe, a climb up Britain's highest mountain, Ben Nevis, or a visit to one of the renowned distilleries you can read about in our article on Scotch whisky. The Highlands are at their most beautiful in late summer and early autumn, when the slopes turn purple with heather and mists over the loch give the landscape its truly mysterious atmosphere.

Sailboat on Loch Ness beneath the wooded slopes of the Scottish Highlands

Surprising facts about Loch Ness

Besides its famous legend, Loch Ness holds a number of lesser-known facts that make it one of the most remarkable lakes in Europe. Here are the highlights:

  • More water than England and Wales combined. Thanks to its depth, Loch Ness holds about 7.4 km³ of fresh water, more than all the lakes of England and Wales put together.
  • It almost never freezes. Its huge volume acts as a heat reservoir, so the water stays around 5–6 °C (41–43 °F) even in harsh Highland winters.
  • Water like weak tea. Dissolved peat stains the loch brown and cuts underwater visibility almost to zero.
  • Part of a route across Scotland. The Caledonian Canal runs through Loch Ness, letting boats sail from the east coast to the west coast of the country.
  • DNA pointed to eels. A 2019 genetic analysis found no reptile but huge numbers of eels, today the most likely "explanation" for the monster.
  • The economics of a mystery. The legend of the Loch Ness Monster brings the Highlands tourism income in the tens of millions of pounds every year.
  • A castle full of history. The ruins of Urquhart are among Scotland's most visited monuments and witnessed the Wars of Independence.

Loch Ness in books, films and popular culture

Thanks to its legend, Loch Ness has become one of the best-known places in world popular culture, and the Loch Ness Monster has found its way into films, books, advertising and tourism like few other mysteries. Every year it draws hundreds of thousands of visitors to an otherwise remote corner of the Highlands and brings the region income in the tens of millions of pounds.

The monster has been a gift to filmmakers: the family adventure The Water Horse (2007) tells the story of a boy who raises Nessie from a mysterious egg, and the loch has served as the backdrop for countless documentaries and thrillers. In books, Nessie appears in everything from children's stories to serious cryptozoological studies, and her silhouette, a small head on a long neck, has become an instantly recognizable icon.

The phenomenon has its real-life heroes too. The best known is Steve Feltham, who gave up a conventional life in 1991, moved to the loch and has been watching for Nessie as a professional "monster hunter" ever since, earning himself a place in the Guinness Book of Records. In 2023 the loch saw the largest organized search in more than half a century, bringing together dozens of volunteers with modern technology. Whether or not anything is down there, the legend of the Loch Ness Monster has proved immortal, and together with dragons and other mythical creatures it belongs to the stories humanity tells again and again.

Frequently asked questions

  • Is the Loch Ness Monster real?

There is no scientific evidence that the Loch Ness Monster exists. Large-scale sonar searches and the 2019 DNA analysis of the whole loch found no trace of any large unknown animal. The most famous "proof," the 1934 photograph, was exposed as a hoax. Most sightings can be explained by floating objects, boat wakes, animals or optical illusions over the water.

  • How deep is Loch Ness?

Loch Ness reaches a maximum depth of about 230 meters (755 feet), making it the second deepest loch in Scotland. The combination of great depth and a length of 37 kilometers gives it the largest volume of fresh water in the British Isles, around 7.4 cubic kilometers.

  • Where exactly is Loch Ness?

Loch Ness is in the north of Scotland, in the Scottish Highlands, in the tectonic valley of the Great Glen southwest of Inverness. From there it runs in a straight line for about 37 kilometers to the village of Fort Augustus and is part of the Caledonian Canal.

  • Why is the water in Loch Ness so dark?

The water in Loch Ness is dark because of its high content of dissolved peat, washed in from the surrounding moors. Peat stains the water brown and scatters light so strongly that a few meters below the surface it is completely dark. This opacity is part of why the loch "hides" so many mysteries.

  • What is the most likely explanation for the monster?

Since the 2019 genetic study, the most frequently cited explanation is a giant eel. The loch hosts large numbers of eels, and their dark, snake-like bodies gliding below the surface match many sightings. The popular theory of a surviving plesiosaur is ruled out by science: plesiosaurs died out 66 million years ago, and the cold loch could not have sustained them.

  • Is Loch Ness worth visiting even without the monster?

Absolutely. Even without Nessie, Loch Ness offers the dramatic scenery of the Highlands, the romantic ruins of Urquhart Castle, cruises on the loch and an ideal base for exploring the area, from Glen Coe to Britain's highest mountain, Ben Nevis. The loch is at its most beautiful in late summer, when the heather is in bloom and mists roll over the water.

You might also like

If Loch Ness caught your interest, explore more stories about lakes, Scottish nature and world legends on our blog:

  • Lakes: A window into the mysterious world of nature: how lakes form and why they matter so much for the landscape.
  • Lake Baikal: The deepest lake in the world: the Siberian giant that makes even Loch Ness look small.
  • Glen Coe: Scotland's valley of volcano and ice: another jewel of the Highlands.
  • Kelpie: The water horse of Scottish folklore: the creature from which the legend of Nessie grew.
  • Plesiosaur: The long-necked marine reptile: the prehistoric creature many hoped to find in Nessie.
💍 The mysteries of the Scottish Highlands inspire jewelry too. Celtic knots, dragon spirals and symbols from the depths of myth have adorned jewelry for centuries. Discover jewelry with mysterious symbolism →4
RELATED
Loch Ness Monster Is Real... And It's Far Bigger Than You've Ever Seen
The Shocking Mystery of Scotland's Loch Ness
What Evidence Is There For The Loch Ness Monster?

{ https://autorskesperky.com/en/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 00:09 Stuur door

Meer van UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

↑ Terug naar de berichten