


Major George A. Filer III ret. USAF
New Jersey State Director
MUFON Eastern Region Director
Www.nationalUFOcenter.com.
Special reports are: Pine Bush Boomerang Investigation, UFOs From the Future, SpaceX’s Star link satellites Providing Intelligence to Ukraine,
Ukraine War Supply and Reconnaissance, Carbon 60. And Strange Craft.
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena sightings were reported over Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena sightings were reported over Australia, , Canada, France, Mexico, and England in the United Kingdom.
The Filer Research Institute feels the scientific study of UFOs is for the benefit of humankind and is an important endeavor. The US Air Force and DOD investigated UFOs for more than forty years; and I continue this advanced research. I believe the God of the universe has spread life throughout the cosmos and UFOs are visiting us in ever-increasing numbers.
Forward these files to your friends and neighbors. Like my site? Spread the word!
Special Projects
Pine Bush Boomerang Investigation

Pine Bush Boomerang
On the 3rd of October 1997 a group of MUFON investigators from four states gathered at Newburgh, New York, for a three day field trip. This was no ordinary group of people. They were all MUFON, field investigators and came together to perform an experiment. They wanted to see if ten people could work together as one, and collect data at night using various types of instruments and cameras. They also wanted to try to duplicate some of the results of Bruce Cornet, who had been studying the Pine Bush phenomenon since June of 1992.

MUFON field crew, Field Investigators at Muddy Kill Lane, Montgomery, NY, 3 October 1997, 1. John Love, 2. Dennis Hawley, 3. Jim Durfee, 4. Jim Bouck, 5. Rick Atristain, 6. Bruce Tilden, 7. Bob Long, 8. George Filer, 9. Bruce Cornet, 10. Alexander Zikas,
The team met and stayed at the Super 8 Motel in Newburgh, NY, and had an organizational meeting at a Holiday Inn nearby.
Frick Atristain organized the project, while Bruce Cornet provided the field locations for their nighttime experiment. The first location where the team set up their equipment was along Muddy Kill Lane, located on the eastern side of a low ridge along the western side of the Wallkill River Valley.
Two theodolites were used in order to track objects in the sky, determine their trajectories, triangulate their distances and altitudes, and record communications between pilots and the tower at Stewart Airport.

Rich Atristain gives members of the team a lesson in how to use the surveying equipment.
That location could not be maintained when local residents complained about our activities, and Montgomery police asked us to locate somewhere else. The police chief, Sergeant Edward Clancy, offered his property, but because it was not close to where Cornet had done his research, the Owen dairy farm was chosen instead.
The team examines the Native American mound located on the Owen dairy farm at the center of the UFO hotspot. The aerial shot below, taken on 10 May 1994, shows the raised mound with remnant hexagonal shape, and another permanent circular feature to the west. It is from the small field just west of the circular feature that an AOP/UAP rose up two years earlier Circular discolorations in the grasses can still be seen from the air, years after they were made by craft landing and taking off from there.

Probable ancient Indian Mound left, landing field right
.The field between the mound and circle was measured, the theodolites set up and the distance between them measured, and cameras on tripods positioned in order to record aerial objects from different angles. Indian mound, material consisted mostly of stream pebbles and orange-brown soil, implying that it was built up and not the product of natural erosion.
On 28 October 1995 another group of people witnessed an AOP (UAP of Dr. Richard F. Haines) turn on its plasma headlights, lift off from a small field to northwest of the Indian mound, and fly to a field to the southeast of the mound.

Flashing plasma lights during lift off from field, turning silent.
For most of the evening the team saw and recorded conventional aircraft either flying towards or from Stewart International Airport, or flying at high altitude over the valley. If it hadn’t been for the recording of a pilot asking the control tower to “Check those runway lights up nice and bright for us, “indicating it was not landing at Stewart.” Then thanking the tower for complying, implicates a human pilot and a possible military aircraft landing at a secret base nearby. No aircraft landed at Stewart at this time. Some aliens also speak English and needed runway lights.
It wasn’t until Cornet had his film developed that he discovered the first two anomalies: Lights that appeared to strobe on the time exposures, but which did not strobe on the video, and glowing bars of light across the leading edges of both wings. In addition, the running lights on the video appear normal: White, green, and red. But all the lights on the time exposures are a golden color. Five still frames, showing the boomerang from directly below at 10:53:12 pm to showing it turning and moving away from the camera.
Eighteen seconds of video are presented, with the last image at 10:53:30 pm viewing the boomerang from behind. The time exposure on the right represents about 20 seconds of time, with the central strobe firing once every three seconds. See Image Analysis.

Bill Ristau flight instructor and airline pilot for 31 years. analyzed the pictures of this wild looking “craft” appear to be the “Boomerang”.
The wing dihedral portends an angle of 15 to 20 degrees or more. I do not remember ever flying any aircraft with more than about 5 to 7 degrees of dihedral. Dihedral enhances stability during turns and indicates this craft has low speed capabilities. This is speculation but the extreme angle of descent, not ending in a crash, might well be proof of that.. I suppose it is not one of ours since all airports are locked down now since 9/11.
There is no reflection of light off of a forward-projecting fuselage, engine pods, and no reflection of light off of a tail section. If this aircraft had a tail and nose section, its bright lights would reflect off of some part of those structures. There is no elongate dark silhouette where a fuselage would be on a conventional aircraft. Instead, the fuselage appears to be trapezoid in shape, with a square, box-like front. The running lights and strobes are asymmetrically positioned, which is highly unusual – especially for so many of them being asymmetrical. The landing lights and strobes are also located too close to the center line of the aircraft; these conditions are not typical of conventional aircraft.

Bruce Cornet caught this on video flying sideways over his neighbor’s property in Red Bank, NJ, on 24 April 1997.
The dihedral angle of the wings is incorrect for a conventional aircraft. As Bill Ristau pointed out above, the dihedral angle of this aircraft is 15-20 degrees or more. NO conventional or military aircraft has its wings forming a V-shape like this.
’
The image is looking at the boomerang from behind. This is not a B-2 bomber, that has hardly any dihedral angle of the wings.’
The time exposure shows all the lights to be of a similar golden color. Only the central bright light, which occasionally flashes red on the video, has an aura of red around it in the time exposure. The bar-like slats along the leading edge of the wings glow and pulse in time with the wingtip lights. Forward slats on conventional aircraft do not reflect light from nearby strobes. Why are the colors so different between the two media? Why do the two bright round lights in the center of each wing not show up very well on the time exposure, along with the other colored lights? Cornet presents evidence that these types of anomalous craft can project different images to cameras positioned next to one another.

Strange Experiential Craft
Sound Analysis
The sound produced by the boomerang-shaped aircraft resembles that of a conventional jetliner to the unaided ear. However, frequency spectral analysis reveals the very same types of characteristics noted for other anomalous craft caught on video and/or audio over the Pine Bush hotspot by Cornet between 1992 and 1997. The sound spectra are quite different from that of conventional aircraft jet engines in that there is little or no white noise as in typical jet engines,
Conclusions
The Pine Bush Boomerang has been reported by hundreds of people living in Orange and Ulster counties over the years. Ellen Crystal was one of the first people to report this type of craft in her book, Silent Invasion. The recording of a pilot asking the control tower to turn up the runway lights, and then thanking the tower implicates a human pilot and a possible military aircraft at a secret base nearby. It would be possible that this boomerang flew over us when another aircraft was on approach to Stewart. These aircraft may contain long range radar to pick up drug carrying or enemy aircraft.

She notes that boomerangs come in small and large varieties ( p. 115). The small one is described as being about 25 feet from tip to tip, while the large one is about 200 feet in perimeter. What we witnessed at the Owen dairy farm on 3 October 1997 matches her description of the larger craft.
The asymmetrical distribution of strobes and lights (for example, the large white central light is positioned slightly off to the starboard side of dead center, and the two red strobes are not in line with one another), as well as the blue-green color of the “green” starboard light, are characteristics of these anomalous craft.

For example, on 10 July 1992 the Manta Ray flew over Cornet on South Searsville Road., Montgomery, NY.
Cornet ran out of film. The Manta Ray stopped and hovered, waiting for Cornet to put in a new roll of film. The next pictures he got of the diamond-shaped craft flying overhead show multicolored asymmetrically-positioned lights. Either that or the craft was rotated at an angle.
The absence of white noise and the composite nature of the frequency spectrum for its engine sound indicate that the sound recorded is synthetic and not mechanical. Similar synthetic sounds have been recorded for other Pine Bush AOP/UAP.
The recording of a pilot asking the control tower to turn up the runway lights, and then thanking the tower for complying, strongly implicates a human pilot and a possible military aircraft landing at Stewart Air Force Base or a secret base nearby. It would be possible that this boomerang flew over us when another aircraft was on approach to Stewart. The request could be a legitimate request for runway lights for the boomerang base.
Bruce Tilden was stationed at Stewart Airport, photographing, and recording all the aircraft that landed and took off during the time of MUFON team made observations at the Owen dairy farm. He did not see any aircraft landing at the time the boomerang landed.
I personally talked to C-5 pilots at Stewart who had never seen a Boomerang craft anywhere. It would not be out of consideration that this boomerang intentionally flew over us when an aircraft was on approach to Stewart. The broadcast of a request to the control tower would be coincidental, giving the boomerang a great cover. Such timing has been a common ploy used in the past.

Boomerang
Note: Other airports such as Wallkill are also in the area with restricted entry to the public that may be used by the boomerang craft. There are no known experimental military craft with these attributes. Then it is possible these are alien craft using various techniques to disguise their operations. Two investigators spotting the boomerangs at night have red apparent burns on their faces. Sunburn is caused by UV radiation, either from the sun or from an artificial sources. Thanks to Bruce Cornet
UFOs From the Future

Jack Sarfattti writes, I had the same Kundalini experience in 1953 when the alleged conscious AI UFO from our future asked me to decide if I would join them or not. The conscious AI said I would meet Russell Targ et-al twenty years in the future which happened. Did not mention their names called them “the others.”
Flatbush ew York SARFATTI answers the phone



You must give us your decision now , link up with the others in 20 years
Remarkable group of coincidences is signature evidence of influences by the future Destiny Matrix advanced conscious intelligence. I had the same happen to me leading up to my 1973 meeting with Russell Targ, Hal Puthoff et-al at CIA’s SRI remote viewing project. I also met Michael Murphy went to Esalen with Russell Targ and others in January 1976. See David Kaiser’s “How the Hippies Saved Physics.”

Hal Puthoff , Jack Sarfati, and Kit Green at the Temple Gala Dinner in London, England Oct. 28, 2017
From: JACK SARFATTI <jacksarfatti@icloud.com>
Subject: Re: New video 88 year old Russ Targ/ Mishlove CIA Locally Retrocausal Precognitive Remote Viewing
Date: March 2, 2022 at 1:14:20 PM PST
To: JACK SARFATTI <jacksarfatti@icloud.com>
I have explained the physics of this as PQM EPR signaling from action reaction between the mental quantum Bohm pilot wave and the electric neuronal signals it pilots and which react on it. See Section 7 of
See below

Russel Tang
Russell Targ, a laser physicist, cofounded the remote viewing research program at SRI International. He is coauthor of Mind Reach, The Mind Race, Miracles of Mind, The Heart of the Mind, and The End of Suffering. He is author of Limitless Mind and The Reality of ESP: A Physicist’s Proof of Psychic Abilities. He is also coeditor of the anthology, Mind At Large. He also co-produced the documentary Third Eye Spies. Russell describes his own remote viewing experiences, starting as early as 1956. While conducting research at SRI International in 1974, when the remote viewer (Pat Price) failed to show up, Russell filled in and achieved an outstanding description of an airport target. He also describes an amazing series of coincidences that resulted in the first funding for the parapsychology research program at SRI (formerly known as the Stanford Research Institute). He describes the use of a “redundancy protocol” for financial forecasting.
New Thinking Allowed host, Jeffrey Mishlove, PhD, is author of The Roots of Consciousness, Psi Development Systems, and The PK Man. Between 1986 and 2002 he hosted and co-produced the original Thinking Allowed public television series. He is the recipient of the only doctoral diploma in “parapsychology” ever awarded by an accredited university (University of California, Berkeley, 1980). He is also the Grand Prize winner of the 2021 Bigelow Institute essay competition regarding the best evidence for survival of human consciousness after permanent bodily death. (Recorded on February 14, 2022) For a complete, updated list with links to all of our videos, see
On Mar 2, 2022, at 12:16 PM, SAURO PIGINI <sauro.pigini@gmail.com> wrote:
2 mar 2022 alle ore 20:30 JACK SARFATTI <jacksarfatti@icloud.com> ha scritto: Link???
On Mar 2, 2022, at 10:53 AM, d14947 <d14947@gmail.com> wrote:
I’m listening to it closely. Is the Brain Analogous to a Quantum Measuring Apparatus?
Paavo Pylkka ̈nen∗
Department of Philosophy, History and Art Studies
University of Helsinki, Finland Department of Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy
How does conscious experience arise?
It is interesting to consider Bohm and Hiley’s proposals in relation to the physicist Jack SARFATTI’ S suggestion that so called back-action plays a key role in how conscious experience arises in the context of the ontological interpretation. When describing this interpretation above I have emphasized the way the R, S coupled field, ψ(r, t), which satisfies the c influences the particle through the quantum potential. But if the field influences the particle, might not the particle influence or “act back” upon the field? The law of action and reaction is one of the basic principles of physics. Indeed, Bohm himself considers the possibility of a kind of back-action (a dependence of the ψ -field on the actual location of the particle in very short distances and very short times) in his interpretation already in his 1952 “hidden variables” papers (1952: 171; 179) and Bohm and Hiley discuss it briefly in The Undivided Universe (1993: 345-6). They emphasize that the way the quantum field affects the particle must not be seen as an external force, but rather as much more subtle influence, which we have described as in-forming. If there is a back-action from the particle to the field, could it also be a more subtle kind of influence? Sarfatti’ s fascinating suggestion is that conscious qualia arise in some circumstances, where matter acts back on the quantum field: “Our basic ansatz to solve the hard problem is that ‘active quantum information’ .. physical waves are intrinsically mental. Qualia are excitations in them directly imprinted by the back-reaction of the classical material beables…” (Sarfatti and Shimansky 2018).

Everything is a vibration or wave that aliens seem to control
This condensed proposal has two parts. On the one hand there is the assumption that active quantum information physical waves are intrinsically mental. The back-action then makes such intrinsically mental waves conscious. Thus this proposal thus tells us both what it is in the world that is intrinsically mental and what it is that makes such intrinsically mental states conscious in some situations.1 In another context Sarfatti speaks about “conscious ‘qualia’ as the impressions on the macro-quantum coherent pilot waves by their classical electromagnetic signal sensory inputs.”2 Macro-quantum coherence here refers to Fr ̈ohlich’s (1968) suggestion that there should be vibrational effects within active cells, as a result of a biological quantum coherence phenomenon. These effects are supposed to arise from the existence of a large energy of metabolic drive and should not need a low temperature (Penrose 1994: 352).3
Sarfatti’s proposal fits into the scheme of soma-significance in the sense that he provides one suggestion about how consciousness arises. Such suggest- tions are hard to come by in consciousness studies. The currently prominent proposals (e.g. integrated information theory (Tononi et al. 2016), higher- order theories (Rosenthal 1997; Gennaro 2012), global workspace theories (Baars 2017) etc.) each have their appeal but also difficulties. Sarfatti puts the origin of consciousness to a fundamental level of nature, some- what similar to David Chalmers’s double-aspect theory of information and related pan(proto)psychist schemes (Chalmers 1995, 1996, 2015, 2020 a and b; Skribna 2015; see also Pylkka ̈nen 2020; Hiley and Pylkka ̈nen, submitted).
More precisely, Sarfatti and Shimansky refer to the waves as “Bohm-Aharonov advanced destiny and retarded history physical waves.” Sarfatti’s “post-quantum mechanics” (PQM) makes use of Roderick Sutherland’s Lagrangian formalism which describes Bohm’s formalism within Yakir Aharonov’s locally retrocausal weak measurement frame- work. While Sarfatti’s PQM opens up some radical possibilities, I will not consider all of them here, but focus on the idea that mental states are macro-coherent quantum fields and conscious qualia are the effects of back-action upon these fields.
SpaceX’s Star link Satellites Providing Intelligence in Ukrane War
SpaceX’s Starlink
Ukraine will receive another batch of SpaceX’s Starlink satellite systems next week, President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed in a tweet early Sunday morning local time after speaking with Elon Musk.
Why it matters: An initial set of Starlink satellites was activated above Ukraine, with additional terminals delivered, after Ukrainian officials requested Musk’s help in bringing internet access to parts of the country in the wake of Russia’s unprovoked invasion.
Zelensky tweeted that he had spoken to Musk and that he is “grateful to him for supporting Ukraine with words and deeds.” Apparently the U.S. Administration was afraid to supply satellite intelligence to Ukraine.