A Growing Number Of People Believe Aliens Have Visited Us – And That Could Be A Problem

Ufology has always been a fringe field divided between those curious about UFOs and those who believe in cover-ups, but now the beliefs of the former have made their way into wider political views.

More and more people appear to believe that supposed UFO sightings are evidence of alien visitation. This belief could be a problem for society.

Is There Anyone Out There? An Exploration of the Search for Extraterrestrial Life

The question of whether we are alone in the universe has captivated humanity for centuries. Anyone gazing into the vast, star-studded night sky has likely pondered the existence of other intelligent beings somewhere among the countless celestial bodies. The sheer scale of the universe, with its billions of galaxies, each containing billions of stars and potentially even more planets, makes it seem plausible that life exists beyond Earth. Yet, despite this compelling logic, definitive evidence confirming the existence of extraterrestrial life remains elusive as of now.

Historically, the idea of life beyond Earth was rooted in myth, religious beliefs, and speculation. Ancient civilizations often considered the cosmos as populated or influenced by divine or supernatural beings. With the advent of modern science and astronomy, the focus shifted to empirical investigation. The development of telescopes and space exploration technology allowed scientists to expand their understanding of the universe's vastness and complexity. Astrobiology, an interdisciplinary science dedicated to studying life's potential in the universe, has become central to these efforts. Missions like the Mars rovers, the search for exoplanets in habitable zones, and the study of extreme environments on Earth—where life exists under harsh conditions—are all aimed at uncovering signs of life beyond our planet.

Recently, the question of extraterrestrial visitation has gained renewed attention, fueled by reports and claims of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). Although mainstream science remains cautious, a growing number of people believe that some UFO sightings indicate evidence of alien visitors. This belief is reinforced by declassified government reports and videos showing objects performing maneuvers that defy current understanding of physics. While these sightings do not conclusively prove alien contact, they have sparked widespread interest and debate, raising questions about the possibility of intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations reaching Earth.

The potential discovery of extraterrestrial life—whether microbial life on Mars or intelligent beings elsewhere—poses profound scientific, psychological, and societal implications. Scientifically, confirming extraterrestrial life would revolutionize our understanding of biology, evolution, and the conditions necessary for life. Psychologically, it could challenge human self-perception and our place in the universe, prompting introspection about our origins and destiny. Societally, the discovery could influence cultural, religious, and political beliefs, potentially uniting humanity in shared wonder or causing fear and division.

While the scientific community continues its methodical search, the question remains open. The possibility that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is both exhilarating and daunting. As our technological capabilities improve and our understanding deepens, we inch closer to answers—though, at present, the definitive reply to “Is there anyone out there?” remains beyond our grasp. Nonetheless, the quest to explore the cosmos and seek out our cosmic neighbors continues, driven by curiosity and the fundamental human desire to discover our place in the universe.

The Scientific Basis for the Search for Extraterrestrial Life

The universe's vastness is often cited as a compelling reason to believe in extraterrestrial life. Modern cosmology estimates the universe contains over 2 trillion galaxies, each comprising billions to trillions of stars, many of which host planets in the so-called "habitable zone." The discovery of exoplanets—planets outside our solar system—has significantly expanded our understanding of potential habitats for life. As of 2023, thousands of exoplanets have been identified, some with conditions that could support life as we know it.

Astrobiology, the scientific study of life's potential in the universe, combines disciplines such as biology, geology, and astronomy. Researchers examine extremophiles—organisms that thrive in Earth's harshest environments—to understand the potential for life in extraterrestrial environments. The detection of water, organic molecules, and other prebiotic compounds on moons such as Europa and Enceladus further fuels the hypothesis that life could exist elsewhere.

Despite these promising findings, conclusive evidence of extraterrestrial life remains elusive. The scientific community emphasizes rigorous methodologies, such as the search for biosignatures—indicators of past or present life—via telescopes and space missions. Projects like the James Webb Space Telescope aim to analyze the atmospheres of exoplanets for signs of life. Similarly, missions to Mars and icy moons aim to uncover microbial life, if present.

The Rise of Belief in Alien Encounters

Despite the absence of conclusive scientific evidence, public belief in extraterrestrial visitation has seen a notable increase over recent decades. Surveys and polls consistently show that a significant portion of the population holds the conviction that Earth has been visited by alien beings. Several interconnected factors contribute to this growing trend, shaping public perceptions and fueling imagination about the possibility of extraterrestrial life.

1. Media and Popular Culture

One of the most influential drivers of public belief in alien encounters is the pervasive presence of media and popular culture. Movies, television series, documentaries, and books frequently depict encounters with extraterrestrial beings, UFO sightings, and abductions. Iconic films like Close Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, along with numerous sci-fi series, have played a pivotal role in popularizing the idea that alien life exists and may have visited Earth. These portrayals often dramatize encounters and create compelling narratives that resonate with audiences, blurring the line between fiction and perceived reality.

The influence of media extends beyond entertainment; it shapes collective imagination and expectations about what alien contact might look like. For many, the depiction of flying saucers and alien abductions in popular culture has become ingrained in their worldview, leading to a heightened sensitivity to unusual phenomena and a tendency to interpret ambiguous stimuli as potential evidence of extraterrestrial activity. The widespread dissemination of such stories and images reinforces the idea that UFOs are not just fictional but could be real phenomena, thus contributing to the rise of belief.

2. Declassified Government Files

Government transparency, or perceived transparency, has also impacted public perceptions regarding alien encounters. Over the years, various governments, particularly the United States, have declassified and released documents related to UFO sightings and investigations. Notably, the Pentagon's release of videos showing unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) has captured widespread attention and reignited debates about the existence of extraterrestrial visitors.

These releases have led to increased public skepticism toward official explanations that attribute UFO sightings to natural or man-made causes. The acknowledgment of unexplained aerial phenomena by military and governmental agencies has fueled speculation that authorities might possess knowledge about alien contacts that they are reluctant to disclose. The publication of these documents has empowered believers, who see them as evidence that governments are withholding crucial information about extraterrestrial life and visitation. This dynamic fosters a sense of intrigue and suspicion, further elevating public interest and belief in alien encounters.

3. Personal Anecdotes and Anecdotal Evidence

Another significant factor influencing public belief in alien encounters is the proliferation of personal stories and anecdotal accounts. Thousands of individuals across different regions claim to have experienced sightings of unidentified flying objects or even direct encounters with extraterrestrial beings. Many share their stories online through forums, social media, and dedicated websites, while others have narrated their experiences in books and media interviews.

While these personal testimonies lack the scientific rigor and verification required for validation, they have a powerful psychological and cultural impact. Human beings tend to be naturally inclined toward storytelling, and personal accounts often evoke emotional responses that can persuade others of their authenticity. These stories contribute to a collective narrative that reinforces the possibility of alien visitation, especially when accompanied by photographs, videos, or other supposed evidence. Despite the absence of empirical proof, the sheer volume of anecdotal evidence sustains and amplifies public belief in extraterrestrial encounters.

4. Psychological and Cognitive Factors

Underlying many beliefs in alien encounters are psychological and cognitive processes inherent to human nature. Humans are highly adept at pattern recognition—a trait that historically helped our ancestors identify threats and opportunities in their environment. However, this predisposition can lead to false positives, where natural or mundane phenomena are misinterpreted as extraordinary events.

For instance, ambiguous lights in the night sky or strange sounds can be perceived as alien craft or signals. Our brains also have a tendency to attribute agency to unexplained stimuli, a phenomenon known as "agent detection." This cognitive bias can result in people believing that unidentified phenomena are controlled or caused by intelligent extraterrestrial beings, especially when combined with cultural influences and media portrayals.

Additionally, psychological factors such as the desire for wonder, fear of the unknown, and the human tendency towards superstition can make individuals more receptive to believing in alien encounters. Some researchers suggest that sleep paralysis, hallucinations, and other neurological phenomena may also contribute to reports of alien abductions and sightings. These cognitive and psychological mechanisms help explain why belief in extraterrestrial encounters continues to grow, even in the absence of concrete scientific evidence.

Conclusion

In sum, the rise in public belief in alien encounters is a complex phenomenon influenced by media portrayals, government disclosures, personal anecdotes, and inherent human cognitive biases. While scientific validation remains elusive, these factors collectively create an environment where belief in extraterrestrial visitation continues to thrive. As media and cultural narratives evolve, and as governments release more information, it is likely that public interest and belief in alien encounters will persist, driven by a combination of psychological predispositions and societal influences.

Implications of Widespread Belief in Alien Visitation

The increasing belief among the general public that extraterrestrials have visited Earth could have profound and multifaceted implications across various domains of society. This shift in perception is likely to influence scientific inquiry, cultural narratives, governmental policies, and social behaviors in both positive and potentially challenging ways.

On the positive side, widespread belief in alien visitation could stimulate greater interest in space exploration and scientific research. As more people become convinced that intelligent life exists beyond our planet, there may be increased funding and support for space agencies such as NASA, ESA, and private companies like SpaceX. This heightened interest could accelerate technological innovations related to spacecraft, communication systems, and life-supporting habitats. Additionally, a surge in curiosity might inspire educational initiatives aimed at STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), encouraging young generations to pursue careers in science and engineering fields. The pursuit of understanding extraterrestrial life could also lead to international collaborations, fostering peaceful cooperation among nations in the quest to explore the cosmos.

However, there are also significant societal challenges that could arise from this widespread belief. For example, if the notion of alien visitation becomes mainstream without solid scientific evidence, it may lead to the proliferation of conspiracy theories, misinformation, and distrust in official sources. Governments and scientific institutions might face difficulties in communicating facts versus fiction, potentially resulting in public confusion or panic. There could also be cultural and religious tensions, especially if the idea of extraterrestrial life conflicts with existing belief systems or philosophical worldviews.

Furthermore, the societal response to the idea of alien visitation could influence policy decisions. For instance, governments may need to establish protocols for handling potential encounters or evidence of extraterrestrial life, which could involve international treaties and diplomatic channels. The question of disclosure from authorities might become contentious, with debates about transparency and the management of public reactions.

In terms of social behavior, belief in alien visitations might alter perceptions of humanity’s place in the universe, fostering either a sense of unity and shared purpose or fear and paranoia. The phenomenon could also impact mental health, with some individuals experiencing anxiety or existential crises in response to these beliefs.

In conclusion, the widespread belief in alien visitation holds immense potential to inspire scientific advancement and cultural enrichment, but it also necessitates careful management to mitigate societal risks. Ensuring accurate information dissemination, fostering international cooperation, and addressing cultural sensitivities will be crucial in navigating the complex implications of this phenomenon.

Potential Societal Challenges

The increasing reports and public interest in unidentified aerial phenomena and potential extraterrestrial encounters bring with them a host of societal challenges that merit careful consideration. While the scientific exploration of these phenomena can expand our understanding of the universe, it also raises several concerns that could impact society on multiple levels.

1. Misinformation and Pseudoscience: 

One of the most significant issues surrounding the topic of alien encounters is the proliferation of misinformation and pseudoscience. As stories and claims about alien sightings, abductions, or encounters spread through social media, forums, and even mainstream media, unverified and often sensationalist narratives can overshadow credible scientific research. This can lead to a general decline in scientific literacy, as people may be misled into believing in conspiracy theories or unsubstantiated claims. The rapid spread of pseudoscientific ideas can foster distrust in scientific institutions and experts, making it more difficult for society to discern fact from fiction. Moreover, such misinformation can hinder future scientific investigations, as unfounded fears or false beliefs may influence public opinion and policy decisions.

2. Psychological Impact: 

The societal belief in alien visitation might also have profound  psychological effects on individuals. For some, credible or perceived evidence of extraterrestrial life could trigger anxiety, paranoia, or fear about humanity’s place in the universe. Others might experience hallucinations, sleep disturbances, or interpret natural phenomena—such as unusual weather patterns or atmospheric events—as signs of alien activity. This can lead to social alienation, where individuals feel isolated due to their beliefs or fears. In extreme cases, the collective hysteria surrounding sightings or reports could result in mass panic or distress, impacting mental health on a broader scale.

3. Policy and Security Concerns: 

Governments worldwide could face mounting pressure to respond to these phenomena, especially if credible evidence suggests potential security threats. Requests for transparency about classified information related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) could spark political debates and diplomatic tensions. Misinterpretations of UAPs as hostile or advanced military technology might provoke unwarranted military responses, escalating tensions or even leading to conflicts. Additionally, the allocation of resources towards investigating and monitoring these phenomena might divert attention from other critical issues, creating logistical and policy challenges.

4. Religious and Philosophical Implications: 

The potential discovery or widespread belief in extraterrestrial life could profoundly impact religious and philosophical perspectives. Many religious doctrines place humans at the center of creation or assign a special significance to humanity’s role in the universe. Evidence of alien life could challenge these traditional views, prompting debates about the nature of existence, consciousness, and the divine. Philosophically, questions about the uniqueness of human life and our place in the cosmos would be intensified, possibly leading to a reevaluation of long-held beliefs. Such paradigm shifts could cause societal discomfort or resistance from religious institutions, as they grapple with reconciling new scientific information with spiritual doctrines.

Conclusion:
While the exploration of unidentified aerial phenomena and the possibility of extraterrestrial life offers exciting scientific and philosophical opportunities, it is essential to recognize and address the associated societal challenges. Misinformation, psychological effects, policy dilemmas, and philosophical debates are all interconnected issues that require careful management. Promoting scientific literacy, fostering open and transparent communication, and engaging in multidisciplinary dialogues will be crucial in navigating these challenges responsibly. As society stands on the brink of potentially paradigm-shifting discoveries, a balanced approach that considers both scientific possibilities and societal implications will be vital for ensuring that progress benefits all.

Addressing the Challenges: A Scientific and Educational Approach

In today’s society, the proliferation of misinformation and misconceptions surrounding UFOs and extraterrestrial life poses significant challenges. To effectively navigate these issues, it is essential to promote comprehensive scientific literacy and critical thinking skills among the general public. Scientific literacy enables individuals to evaluate information more accurately, discern credible sources from unreliable ones, and understand the scientific methods used in extraterrestrial research. Critical thinking further empowers people to analyze claims objectively, question assumptions, and avoid falling prey to sensationalism or conspiracy theories.

Public education campaigns play a pivotal role in this endeavor. These initiatives should aim to clearly communicate the distinctions between credible scientific research, which is based on empirical evidence and peer-reviewed findings, and speculative or anecdotal claims that lack rigorous validation. Educational programs can utilize multimedia platforms, school curricula, and community outreach to make complex scientific concepts accessible and engaging. For example, explaining the scientific process behind UFO investigations—such as data collection, analysis, and peer review—can demystify the subject and foster a more informed public discourse.

Transparency from scientific and governmental institutions is equally vital in building public trust and dispelling misconceptions. Regular updates about UFO investigations, openly sharing data and methodologies, and acknowledging uncertainties can foster an environment of honesty and accountability. When institutions operate transparently, they reduce suspicion and encourage constructive dialogue about unexplained phenomena, rather than fueling unfounded conspiracy theories.

Furthermore, fostering international collaboration is crucial in the quest to discover extraterrestrial life. Space agencies, research institutions, and governmental bodies across countries should work together to share data, resources, and expertise. Initiatives such as the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) exemplify this collaborative approach. SETI employs advanced radio telescopes and signal analysis techniques to detect potential communications from intelligent civilizations beyond Earth. Maintaining scientific rigor in these efforts involves rigorous peer review, standardized protocols, and ethical considerations, such as ensuring that discoveries are communicated responsibly and without causing unnecessary alarm.

In addition, establishing international guidelines and treaties can help manage the ethical implications of potential extraterrestrial contact and ensure that discoveries benefit humanity collectively. Overall, a combination of scientific education, transparent communication, and international cooperation is essential to address societal challenges related to UFO phenomena and extraterrestrial life, fostering a more informed, responsible, and united global community in the pursuit of cosmic knowledge.

Conclusion

The question of whether extraterrestrial life exists remains one of the most profound and intriguing in scientific inquiry. While numerous scientific discoveries and ongoing research suggest that the universe's vastness and diversity increase the likelihood of life beyond Earth, definitive evidence has yet to be found. The discovery of extremophiles—organisms that thrive in Earth's most extreme environments—has expanded our understanding of the potential habitats for alien life, indicating that life could exist in a variety of conditions previously thought inhospitable. Advances in telescopes and space exploration technology have led to the identification of numerous exoplanets within the habitable zone of their stars, further fueling speculation about the possibility of extraterrestrial organisms.

Despite these promising developments, there remains no verified evidence that extraterrestrial beings have visited or made contact with Earth. The scientific community continues to explore this possibility through projects such as SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and NASA's Mars missions, which seek signs of past or present life. While the absence of concrete proof leaves the question open, the ongoing search underscores humanity's innate curiosity and desire to understand its place in the cosmos. Ultimately, whether extraterrestrial life exists remains an open question, one that drives scientific research and captures the imagination of people worldwide.

{ PETER2011}

Space Ice Discovery Has a Secret Structure — And It’s Changing What We Know About the Universe

by nasaspacenews

Space Ice Discovery

When you imagine Space Ice Discovery, it probably seems simple—just frozen water clinging to dusty moons, comets, or floating freely between the stars. For years, scientists believed this space ice was disordered, known as amorphous ice—lacking any structure due to the extreme cold of space.

But now, researchers from University College London (UCL) and the University of Cambridge have discovered something unexpected. What we thought was formless, chaotic ice is hiding a surprising amount of order. Up to 25% of what we’ve been calling amorphous ice is made up of tiny crystals, and this single discovery could transform how we understand planet formation, space exploration, and the search for life.

What Makes Space Ice Discovery So Mysterious?

The Conditions That Shape Ice Beyond Earth

On Earth, water freezes into familiar, symmetrical shapes—snowflakes and ice cubes. That’s because the freezing process happens at temperatures that allow molecules to arrange themselves into neat patterns. In space, however, temperatures drop to –100°C to –200°C and below—conditions long thought to be too cold for any kind of molecular order.

That’s why the dominant assumption was that space ice forms in a chaotic, amorphous state. Without energy to move into alignment, water molecules were believed to simply freeze in place, forming a jumbled mess.

The Breakthrough Discovery

Simulations That Tell a Different Story

A team led by Dr. Michael B. Davies at UCL set out to test whether this assumption was entirely correct. Using computer models, they created virtual versions of space ice by freezing water at extremely cold temperatures. These simulations showed something fascinating: the ice wasn’t completely disordered. Instead, up to 25% of it contained tiny crystals, just 3 nanometers wide—smaller than the width of a strand of DNA.

To validate these digital findings, researchers turned to physical samples in the lab. They created low-density amorphous ice using different methods and then analyzed its structure using X-ray diffraction. When beams passed through the ice, they scattered in patterns that matched the structure of the simulated crystals.

These results confirmed that space ice isn’t completely chaotic. Instead, it’s a mixture—a complex structure where order and disorder coexist.

How Tiny Crystals Hide Inside the Chaos

The Role of Nanocrystallites

These microscopic crystals—called nanocrystallites—are embedded throughout the amorphous matrix. Though small, they reveal a type of hidden memory. In follow-up tests, the researchers warmed the ice just enough to make it recrystallize. The results were astonishing. The way the ice restructured itself depended on how it had been formed in the first place.

This behavior is only possible if the ice retained some information about its earlier state, which wouldn’t happen if it were completely disordered. That retention is now seen as strong proof that a significant portion of amorphous ice is partially crystalline.

Why This Changes Everything

Planetary Formation Reimagined

Ice in space isn’t just scenery—it’s a major building block in the early formation of planets and moons. In protoplanetary disks, icy grains clump together and serve as the glue that forms rocky bodies. If these grains are more structured than previously believed, it affects how they interact—how they stick, melt, reflect heat, or even bounce off each other.

This discovery gives researchers a better understanding of the initial conditions in planetary systems, offering new clues into how complex celestial bodies form over time.

Practical Implications for Space Missions

Space Ice Discovery as a Resource

The new findings are valuable not just for theoretical astronomy, but for future space missions. Ice is being considered as a strategic resource—whether as a source of water and fuel or as radiation shielding on the Moon, Mars, or icy moons like Europa and Enceladus.

Knowing the internal structure of that ice—whether it’s porous, dense, amorphous, or crystalline—determines how it should be processed, melted, or mined. If a mission is counting on extracting oxygen and hydrogen from ice, understanding the way it behaves under different temperatures becomes vital.

The Puzzle of Life’s Origins

A Twist in the Panspermia Theory

One theory about life’s origins is that essential organic compounds—amino acids, sugars, and more—arrived on Earth embedded in space ice. This idea relies on amorphous ice being full of voids and gaps where molecules could be stored and protected.

But with the revelation that much of this ice is partly crystalline, that assumption is now under review. Crystalline regions are tightly packed and leave less space for molecules to get trapped. However, the remaining amorphous areas could still do the job—just not as effectively as once thought.

This doesn’t disprove the theory, but it does add complexity. Scientists now need to rethink how ice in space can act as a carrier for life’s ingredients.

What’s Next for Ice Research?

A New Era of Exploration

This isn’t the end of the story—it’s the beginning of a new line of questions. Researchers are now exploring how factors like freezing speed, cosmic radiation, and the presence of salts or organics impact the formation of nanocrystals.

They’re also questioning whether 100% amorphous ice even exists in space, or if some form of crystallinity is always present. With more missions headed to icy worlds, these questions are becoming more urgent and more exciting.

conclusion

This discovery invites a profound shift in how we see the universe. It shows that even the most seemingly ordinary material—frozen water—can contain layers of mystery and meaning. The structure of ice grains might influence everything from the birth of solar systems to the potential for alien life.

What once looked like cosmic frost now appears more like a complex, dynamic material, woven with nanoscale order in a sea of disorder. It’s a quiet reminder that the universe still holds surprises—and sometimes they’re hiding in plain (or frozen) sight.

Explore the Cosmos with Us — Join NSN Today

Research Source:

• Science Daily, Innovation News Network
• Davies, M. B. et al. Low-Density Amorphous Ice Contains Crystalline Ice Grains. Published July 2025, Physical Review B.
• UCL Official Release: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2025/jul/space-ice-less-water-we-thought

{ https://nasaspacenews.com/ }

Ice in Space Isn't the Same as Ice on Earth

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

The Fourth Kind: Fact or Fiction? De Waarheid Achter de Film

In 2009 bracht de film The Fourth Kind een nieuwe dimensie aan het genre van de paranormale en ufologische films. Geregisseerd door Olatunde Osunsanmi en met actrice Milla Jovovich in de hoofdrol, wekte de film meteen de interesse van het publiek en de media. Wat deze film echter onderscheidt van veel andere in het genre, is de bewering dat het gebaseerd is op ware gebeurtenissen. Maar hoe feitelijk is dat? Is The Fourth Kind een authentiek verslag van echte gebeurtenissen, of is het slechts een goed gemaakte fictieve vertelling? In dit artikel duiken we diep in de achtergrond van de film en scheiden we feit van fictie.

De setting en centrale beweringen van de film

The Fourth Kind speelt zich af in het noordelijke stadje Nome, Alaska, waar de hoofdpersoon, Dr. Abigail Tyler, onderzoek doet naar mysterieuze verdwijningen en abductions. De film beweert dat de gebeurtenissen die worden afgebeeld gebaseerd zijn op echte getuigenissen en door de FBI en lokale autoriteiten bevestigde incidenten. De film combineert dramatiseerde scènes met zogenaamde "archiefbeelden" en "verhoorfragmenten", die de indruk wekken van authentieke documenten.

Het centrale thema draait om buitenaardse abductions en de mogelijkheid dat menselijke ervaringen hiermee verband houden. De film beweert dat de gebeurtenissen in Nome daadwerkelijk hebben plaatsgevonden en dat de getuigenissen en beelden die worden getoond, authentiek zijn.

De marketing en de claims over authenticiteit

Een van de meest opvallende aspecten van The Fourth Kind is de marketingstrategie. De film presenteert zichzelf als een documentair-achtige vertelling en claimt dat de beelden, interviews en gebeurtenissen gebaseerd zijn op echte gebeurtenissen. Voor de release werd er zelfs een website opgezet die beweerde dat de film een reconstructie is van echte gebeurtenissen, met echte getuigenissen en bewijsstukken.

De makers benadrukten dat de film gebaseerd was op het werk van Dr. Abigail Tyler, die zou hebben samengewerkt met de FBI en lokale autoriteiten om de incidenten te documenteren. Deze marketingaanpak creëerde een sfeer van authenticiteit en zette de film neer als een soort "verboden film" die de waarheid over buitenaardse ontmoetingen onthult.

De waarheid achter de beweringen: feit of fictie?

Hoewel de film zich presenteert als gebaseerd op ware gebeurtenissen, is de werkelijkheid genuanceerder. Verschillende onderzoeken en kritische analyses wijzen uit dat de claims over de authenticiteit van de gebeurtenissen in The Fourth Kind niet worden bevestigd door officiële bronnen.

De rol van de hoofdpersonen en de werkelijkheid

Dr. Abigail Tyler, de hoofdpersoon in de film, bestaat niet echt. De naam en het personage worden gecreëerd voor de film, en er is geen bewijs dat een dergelijk onderzoek of dergelijke getuigenissen echt hebben plaatsgevonden. De film claimt dat de beelden en interviews authentiek zijn, maar deze worden later getoond als onderdeel van de vertelling.

Bovendien bleek uit onderzoek dat de zogenaamde "archiefbeelden" en getuigenissen in de film fictief en sterk geënsceneerd zijn. Er zijn geen officiële documenten of rapporten die de beweringen ondersteunen. De FBI heeft verklaard dat er geen bewijs is dat de gebeurtenissen daadwerkelijk plaatsvonden.

De makers en de waarheid

Regisseur Olatunde Osunsanmi heeft toegegeven dat de film een mix is van fictieve elementen en geïnspireerd is door vermeende echte gebeurtenissen, maar niet letterlijk gebaseerd op feiten. De marketingcampagne die de film presenteerde als gebaseerd op ware gebeurtenissen, wordt door velen beschouwd als een vorm van "viral marketing" en niet als een accurate reconstructie van de werkelijkheid.

De rol van "archiefbeelden" en de bewering dat de film documentair is

De film maakt gebruik van "verloren archiefbeelden", die eruitzien als echte beelden van buitenaardse ontmoetingen. Deze beelden blijken echter te zijn geënsceneerd en geproduceerd voor de film. De makers hebben toegegeven dat deze beelden niet authentiek zijn, maar bedoeld als onderdeel van de vertelling om de illusie van authenticiteit te vergroten.

Waarom blijft de mythe bestaan?

Ondanks dat er geen bewijs is dat de gebeurtenissen in The Fourth Kind echt hebben plaatsgevonden, blijft de film populair onder liefhebbers van het genre. Een belangrijke reden hiervoor is de overtuigende presentatie en de sfeer van authenticiteit die de film creëert. Daarnaast speelt de universele nieuwsgierigheid naar buitenaardse levens en de mogelijkheid van geheime overheidsdekmantels mee in de aantrekkingskracht.

De film heeft ook bijgedragen aan de hype rondom UFO's en buitenaardse ontmoetingen, en moedigt mensen aan om zelf onderzoek te doen en kritisch te blijven over wat ze zien en horen.

Conclusie: feit of fictie?

De film The Fourth Kind blijft een intrigerend voorbeeld van hoe media en marketing de grens tussen feit en fictie kunnen vervagen. Aan de ene kant wordt de film gepresenteerd als een authentieke reconstructie van echte gebeurtenissen, met schijnbare bewijsstukken, echte getuigenissen en een documentaire-achtige stijl. Aan de andere kant blijkt uit onderzoek en verklaringen dat de hoofdpersonen fictief zijn, de "archiefbeelden" geënsceneerd en niet authentiek, en de beweringen over samenwerking met de FBI en officiële documenten niet worden ondersteund door enige bewijsvoering.

Het gebruik van marketingstrategieën die de film presenteren als een ware gebeurtenis heeft bijgedragen aan de mythevorming. Door de combinatie van dramatische vertellingen, vermeende echte beelden en de suggestie dat de gebeurtenissen in Nome daadwerkelijk hebben plaatsgevonden, weet de film een gevoel van realiteit over te brengen op het publiek. Dit speelt in op onze nieuwsgierigheid en onze behoefte aan het ontdekken van de "verboden" waarheden over buitenaardse ontmoetingen.

Echter, de werkelijkheid is dat er geen officiële bevestiging is van de gebeurtenissen die worden afgebeeld in The Fourth Kind. De FBI, lokale autoriteiten en andere officiële instanties hebben geen bewijs geleverd dat er ooit sprake is geweest van de beschreven abductions of incidenten in Nome. Regisseur Olatunde Osunsanmi heeft zelf toegegeven dat de film een mengeling is van fictieve elementen en dat het niet gebaseerd is op echte gebeurtenissen. De zogenaamde "archiefbeelden" en getuigenissen zijn geënsceneerd en bedoeld om de illusie van authenticiteit te versterken.

Waarom blijft de mythe bestaan? Een belangrijke factor is de kracht van de presentatie en de manier waarop de film wordt gepresenteerd. Door het gebruik van documentaire-achtige technieken en het suggereren dat de beelden echt zijn, wordt de grens tussen fictie en werkelijkheid vervaagd. Daarnaast speelt de universele fascinatie voor buitenaardse wezens en het onbekende een grote rol. Veel mensen willen geloven dat er meer is tussen hemel en aarde en dat de overheid misschien geheime informatie verbergt.

Bovendien heeft de film bijgedragen aan de bredere hype rond UFO's en buitenaardse ontmoetingen. Het heeft de nieuwsgierigheid aangewakkerd en mensen aangemoedigd om zelf kritisch te blijven en niet alles klakkeloos te geloven wat ze zien of horen. In die zin fungeert The Fourth Kind niet alleen als entertainment, maar ook als een soort moderne mythe die onze collectieve verbeelding voedt.

Kortom, ondanks de aantrekkelijke presentatie en de beweringen dat de film gebaseerd is op ware gebeurtenissen, is er geen bewijs dat deze gebeurtenissen echt hebben plaatsgevonden. De makers en onderzoekers wijzen erop dat de film vooral een creatieve interpretatie is, bedoeld om de kijker te boeien en te laten nadenken over de mogelijkheid van buitenaardse ontmoetingen. Het is dus belangrijk om kritisch te blijven en niet alles voor waar aan te nemen dat in de film wordt gepresenteerd.

De waarheid achter The Fourth Kind is dus dat het een fictief verhaal is dat door slimme marketing en overtuigende beelden de illusie van authenticiteit probeert te scheppen. Het spel met feiten en fictie maakt het een fascinerend fenomeen dat nog altijd de verbeelding van velen weet te prikkelen. Het herinnert ons eraan dat we altijd kritisch moeten blijven nadenken over wat we zien en horen, vooral wanneer het lijkt te gaan om de ultieme waarheid over het onbekende.

{ PETER2011 }

Did the James Webb telescope really find evidence of alien life? Here's the truth about exoplanet K2-18b.

By Brandon Specktor  

A study suggesting the exoplanet K2-18b shows potential signs of alien life has been met with skepticism from the scientific community. Here’s the truth about what the James Webb Space Telescope saw.

An artist's interpretation of the exoplanet K2-18b. Could the alien world contain a biosphere? 

(Image credit: A. Smith, N. Madhusudhan (University of Cambridge))

The trendiest planet in the universe right now is K2-18b, a potentially habitable world swirling around a small, red star in the constellation Leo. Located 124 light-years from Earth, the mysterious planet will never host human visitors — but a recent glimpse with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) hints that alien life may already thrive there in a vast, warm ocean.

In a University of Cambridge-led study published April 17, scientists using JWST reported the detection of possible signs of life in the alien planet's atmosphere, offering what a Cambridge statement called the "most promising" evidence yet of life beyond Earth. However, in the week since the study's publication, a growing number of scientists are already pushing back on this big claim.

"The statistical significance of the detection is marginal," Eddie Schwieterman, an assistant professor of astrobiology at the University of California, Riverside who was not involved in the research, told Live Science in an email. "There are some reasons to be skeptical."

You may like

• 

Aliens: Facts about extraterrestrial life and how scientists are looking for it

• 

James Webb telescope spots 'groundbreaking' molecule in scorching clouds of giant 'hell planet'

• 

James Webb telescope discovers frozen water around alien star

"It's almost certainly not life," Tessa Fisher, an astrobiologist at the University of Arizona who was not involved in the research, told Nature.com.

So what did JWST actually find on K2-18b, and how close are we to solving the ultimate mystery of space? Here's everything you need to know.

What did JWST find on K2-18b?

Unlike optical telescopes such as Hubble, JWST cannot image the surfaces of distant planets directly; instead, its infrared instruments hunt for chemical signs of life — or biosignatures — in planetary atmospheres by mapping how starlight is absorbed or reemitted by molecules in those atmospheres. The resulting graphs of light, called spectra, can reveal the composition of that planet's atmosphere, providing clues about its surface conditions.

Related: 

• 32 alien planets that really exist

In the new Cambridge-led study, scientists using JWST's Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) peered into K2-18b's atmosphere to detect traces of two sulfur-based molecules called dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) — compounds that are known to be produced only by microscopic life-forms like phytoplankton on Earth. If DMS can be produced by some natural mechanism, scientists currently don't know about it, and will have to run extensive tests to uncover it.

The findings add to earlier observations made by the same team using two different JWST instruments in 2023, which also reported possible traces of DMS in the planet's atmosphere.

One interpretation of K2-18b's spectra suggests it could be a lifeless lava world.  (Image credit: Alex Boersma)

While the Cambridge team admitted in the statement that they are "deeply sceptical" of their own results, the same release also trumpeted these detections as the "most promising" evidence yet of life beyond Earth, painting a picture of an oceanic planet that could be "teeming with life." (Other studies have argued that K2-18b's ocean may, in fact, be made of magma.)

Nikku Madhusudhan, lead author of both Cambridge studies, stressed that no actual life has been detected on K2-18b yet.

"That's not what we're claiming," Madhusudhan, a professor of astrophysics at Cambridge, told Live Science. "But in the best-case scenario, it's the potential for life."

The team's DMS detection reached the three-sigma level of statistical significance, meaning there is a 0.3% probability that the signals occurred by chance. However, this still falls far short of the required five-sigma level that denotes a statistically significant scientific discovery.

Responding to criticism that the team may have overstated their study's significance, Madhusudhan said it's in the public interest to know how this research is progressing.

"This is the taxpayer paying us, and they have a right to enjoy the process," Madhusudhan added. "If we're sending a robot to Mars, we're not waiting until it goes and finds life to celebrate the act of sending it. We announced that we are sending robots to Mars, and we're excited about the possibility. This is the equivalent of that."

"No strong evidence"

For now, the public has little more than the Cambridge team's study to go on. The complete set of MIRI data on which the team based their discovery will become publicly available April 27, according to NPR, at which point outside researchers can begin to comb through it and formulate peer-reviewed responses.

In the meantime, various researchers have already attempted to re-create the findings using their own data models and have come up short.

In January, a team of scientists independently analyzed K2-18b's atmosphere using the same JWST instruments used in the 2023 study. The team found "no statistically significant or reliable evidence" of DMS on K2-18b, the researchers wrote in a paper published to the preprint server arXiv.

More recently, on April 22, University of Oxford astrophysicist Jake Taylor reanalyzed the JWST spectra shared in the new Cambridge study, using a simple data model that's routinely utilized in exoplanet studies. Taylor's analysis, also published to arXiv, found no traces of DMS, either.

The transmission spectra for K2-18b suggests it may contain traces of dimethyl sulfide or dimethyl disulfide, but not the decay products of those molecules. (Image credit: A. Smith, N. Madhusudhan (University of Cambridge))

"There is no strong evidence for detected spectral features in K2-18b's MIRI transmission spectrum," Taylor wrote.

Looking only at the Cambridge team's study, Schwieterman also saw cause for hesitation in proclaiming that biosignatures exist on K2-18b.

"When DMS interacts with ultraviolet light from the star, it splits apart into components that reform into other molecules like ethane (C2H6) and ethylene (C2H4)," Schwieterman said. "The paper does not report the detection of these molecules, which is puzzling because you'd expect these gases to appear together."

What comes next?

Everyone, including the Cambridge team, agrees that more observations of K2-18b are necessary to bring clarity to this puzzle. This means researchers will have to request more time with JWST to observe the alien planet as it swoops in front of its star.

Luckily, this is a near-monthly occurrence, with K2-18b completing a transit of its star every 33 days. Budgeting more time to watch these transits should be "trivial" for the telescope, Madhusudhan said.

RELATED STORIES

• What messages have we sent to aliens?
• If life can exist in your stomach, it can exist on Mars. Here's what it might look like.
• 'Perhaps it's only a matter of time': Intelligent life may be much more likely than first thought, new model suggests

"One transit is eight hours, roughly," Madhusudhan added. "You only need about 16 to 24 hours of JWST time. To give you a sense of scale, JWST observes thousands of hours every year."

If additional observations can increase the statistical significance of the team's DMS detection, the next step will be to prove that some unknown natural process isn't producing the molecule instead, Schwieterman said. This will take rigorous experimentation and some creative thinking here on Earth. Finally, scientists will need to look at planets that are similar to K2-18b to see if DMS is a common signature around the cosmos.

{ https://www.livescience.com/space }

In a first, breakthrough 3D holograms can be touched, grabbed and poked

Holograms that can be physically manipulated have made their way out of science fiction and into real life thanks to a breakthrough in mixed reality technology.

In a new study uploaded March 6 to the HAL open archive, scientists explored how three-dimensional holograms could be grabbed and poked using elastic materials as a key component of volumetric displays.

This innovation means 3D graphics can be interacted with — for example, grasping and moving a virtual cube with your hand — without damaging a holographic system. The research has not yet been peer-reviewed, although the scientists demonstrated their findings in a video showcasing the technology.

Physicists force atoms into state of quantum 'hyper-entanglement' using tweezers made of laser light

Scientists invent weird, shape-shifting 'electronic ink' that could give rise to a new generation of flexible gadgets

Scientists burned, poked and sliced their way through new robotic skin that can 'feel everything'

"We are used to direct interaction with our phones, where we tap a button or drag a document directly with our finger on the screen — it is natural and intuitive for humans. This project enables us to use this natural interaction with 3D graphics to leverage our innate abilities of 3D vision and manipulation,” study lead author Asier Marzo, a professor of computer science at the Public University of Navarra, said in a statement.

Related: 

• Weird lickable lollipop invention lets you taste in virtual reality

The researchers will present their findings at the CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in Japan, which runs between April 26 and May 1.

Holographic hype

While holograms are nothing new in the present day — augmenting public exhibitions or sitting at the heart of smart glasses, for example — the ability to physically interact with them has been consigned to the realm of science fiction, in movies like Marvel's "Iron Man."

The new research is the first time 3D graphics can be manipulated in mid-air with human hands. But to achieve this, the researchers needed to dig deep into how holography works in the first place.

At the heart of the volumetric displays that support holograms is a diffuser. This is a fast-oscillating, usually rigid, sheet onto which thousands of images are synchronously projected at different heights to form 3D graphics. This is known as the hologram.

However, the rigid nature of the oscillator means that if it comes into contact with a human hand while oscillating, it could break or cause an injury. The solution was to use a flexible material — which the researchers haven’t shared the details of yet — that can be touched without damaging the oscillator or causing the image to deteriorate.

From there, this enabled people to manipulate the holographic image, although the researchers also needed to overcome the challenge of the elastic material deforming when being touched. To get around that problem, the researchers implemented image correction to ensure the hologram was projected correctly.

While this breakthrough is still in the experimental stage, there are plenty of potential ways it could be used if commercialized.

"Displays such as screens and mobile devices are present in our lives for working, learning, or entertainment. Having three-dimensional graphics that can be directly manipulated has applications in education — for instance, visualising and assembling the parts of an engine," the researchers said in the statement.

"Moreover, multiple users can interact collaboratively without the need for virtual reality headsets. These displays could be particularly useful in museums, for example, where visitors can simply approach and interact with the content."

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.livescience.com/technology }

Watch this robot 'cannibal' grow bigger and stronger by consuming smaller robots

{ https://www.livescience.com/technology }

AI could soon think in ways we don't even understand — evading our efforts to keep it aligned — top AI scientists warn

The study's authors argue that monitoring each step in the process could be a crucial layer for establishing and maintaining AI safety.

Monitoring this CoT process can help researchers to understand how LLMs make decisions and, more importantly, why they become misaligned with humanity's interests. It also helps determine why they give outputs based on data that's false or doesn't exist, or why they mislead us.

However, there are several limitations when monitoring this reasoning process, meaning such behavior could potentially pass through the cracks.

Related: 

• AI can now replicate itself — a milestone that has experts terrified

"AI systems that 'think' in human language offer a unique opportunity for AI safety," the scientists wrote in the study. "We can monitor their chains of thought for the intent to misbehave. Like all other known AI oversight methods, CoT monitoring is imperfect and allows some misbehavior to go unnoticed."

The scientists warned that reasoning doesn't always occur, so it cannot always be monitored, and some reasoning occurs without human operators even knowing about it. There might also be reasoning that human operators don't understand.

Keeping a watchful eye on AI systems

One of the problems is that conventional non-reasoning models like K-Means or DBSCAN — use sophisticated pattern-matching generated from massive datasets, so they don't rely on CoTs at all. Newer reasoning models like Google's Gemini or ChatGPT, meanwhile, are capable of breaking down problems into intermediate steps to generate solutions — but don't always need to do this to get an answer. There's also no guarantee that the models will make CoTs visible to human users even if they take these steps, the researchers noted.

"The externalized reasoning property does not guarantee monitorability — it states only that some reasoning appears in the chain of thought, but there may be other relevant reasoning that does not," the scientists said. "It is thus possible that even for hard tasks, the chain of thought only contains benign-looking reasoning while the incriminating reasoning is hidden."A further issue is that CoTs may not even be comprehensible by humans, the scientists said. "

New, more powerful LLMs may evolve to the point where CoTs aren't as necessary. Future models may also be able to detect that their CoT is being supervised, and conceal bad behavior.

To avoid this, the authors suggested various measures to implement and strengthen CoT monitoring and improve AI transparency. These include using other models to evaluate an LLMs's CoT processes and even act in an adversarial role against a model trying to conceal misaligned behavior. What the authors don't specify in the paper is how they would ensure the monitoring models would avoid also becoming misaligned.

They also suggested that AI developers continue to refine and standardize CoT monitoring methods, include monitoring results and initiatives in LLMs system cards (essentially a model's manual) and consider the effect of new training methods on monitorability.

"CoT monitoring presents a valuable addition to safety measures for frontier AI, offering a rare glimpse into how AI agents make decisions," the scientists said in the study. "Yet, there is no guarantee that the current degree of visibility will persist. We encourage the research community and frontier AI developers to make best use of CoT monitorability and study how it can be preserved."

{ https://www.livescience.com/ }

Building blocks of life may be far more common in space than we thought, study claims

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.livescience.com/space }

3I/ATLAS is 7 miles wide — the largest interstellar object ever seen — new photos from Vera C. Rubin Observatory reveal

Until now, all researchers have been able to uncover about the comet's size was that its coma — the cloud of ice, dust and gas surrounding it — was up to 15 miles (24 km) across. However, the size of its icy nucleus, or outer shell, remained a mystery.

But in a new study, uploaded July 17 to the preprint server arXiv, a group of more than 200 researchers was able to find images of the comet in Vera C. Rubin's extensive early data set, revealing the nucleus's likely size.

The images, which were snapped on June 21, suggest that the comet's nucleus has a likely radius of around 3.5 miles — or a diameter of about 7 miles — with a margin of error equal to around 0.4 mile (0.7 km).

Related:

• Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS transforms into a giant 'cosmic rainbow' in trippy new telescope image

Until now, only two other ISOs have ever been confirmed: 1I/'Oumuamua, an asteroid that was discovered in 2017; and 2I/Borisov, a comet spotted in 2019. Astronomers have, however, long suspected that many more ISOs have passed through the solar system undetected.

'Oumuamua is believed to be around 0.2 mile (0.4 km) wide, although its exact shape was unclear, while Comet Borisov has a nucleus roughly 0.6 mile (1 km) wide. This means that 3I/ATLAS is comfortably the largest ISO ever seen.

The new study has also given scientists a good look at the comet's coma and helped to identify large amounts of dust and water ice surrounding its nucleus. These additional findings are further evidence that 3I/ATLAS is a natural comet — not a disguised probe sent here by an advanced alien civilization, as some researchers have controversially proposed in recent weeks.

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory, located in the Chilean Andes, is equipped with the world's largest digital camera, which is about to begin a 10-year mission to scan the Southern Hemisphere's skies, known as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). The telescope released its first images in June, revealing more than 10 million galaxies in unprecedented detail, and has already discovered thousands of new asteroids.

The fact that the newly released photos could determine 3I/ATLAS' size, 10 days before the object was discovered, is proof of what Vera C. Rubin will be able to accomplish when it is fully switched on later this year, the study team wrote.

Many experts believe that the observatory will revolutionize the study of ISOs and predict that it could spot up to 50 new alien interlopers within the next decade, according to Forbes.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.livescience.com/space }

New archaeological evidence has settled one of Stonehenge's most enduring mysteries, confirming that ancient Britons accomplished extraordinary feats of logistics by transporting massive stone boulders across vast distances over 5,000 years ago. A groundbreaking study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports has provided conclusive proof that the iconic monument's builders moved stones not just from Wales, but from as far away as Scotland - a journey exceeding 435 miles (700 km) that would have challenged even modern engineering capabilities.

The research, led by Professor Richard Bevins from Aberystwyth University, focused on the enigmatic Newall boulder, a football-sized rock discovered during excavations a century ago. Through sophisticated geochemical and microscopic analysis, the team has conclusively proven that this stone and others were deliberately transported by humans 125 miles (200km) from Craig Rhos-y-Felin in north Pembrokeshire, Wales, rather than carried by glacial ice as some theories had suggested.

Most remarkably, previous research has shown that Stonehenge's six-ton Altar Stone originated in northeastern Scotland, requiring transport across an almost incomprehensible distance for Neolithic peoples who lacked wheeled vehicles or domesticated horses.

• The Pig Fat Sleds and 'Flying' Stones of Stonehenge
• Stonehenge Bluestone Stolen for Garden Ornamentation

The Newall boulder, discovered at Stonehenge, shows the distinctive weathering patterns that prove human rather than glacial transport. 

(Bevins et al. 2025/ScienceDirect)

Scientific Analysis Reveals Human Achievement Over Natural Forces

The research team's meticulous investigation of the Newall boulder revealed compelling evidence that is seen to dismiss the glacial transport theory once and for all. Chemical analysis showed that the boulder and other fragments found at Stonehenge share identical levels of thorium and zirconium with stones from the Welsh quarry site, creating an undeniable geological fingerprint.

The scientists discovered that Craig Rhos-y-Felin contains columns of foliated rhyolite with rounded, "bullet-shaped" tops that are identical in form to the Newall boulder. This unique geological formation provides irrefutable evidence of the stone's Welsh origin and rules out random glacial distribution.

Perhaps most significantly, the study revealed that the Newall boulder has developed a surface layer rich in calcium carbonate - the result of its long burial in Stonehenge's chalky soils. This weathering pattern further reinforces human transport, as glacial movement would have created a much more dispersed distribution of similar stones across the Salisbury Plain, something that archaeological surveys have never found.

The research also made an important discovery about another buried stone at Stonehenge, designated Stone 32d. Previously thought to be spotted dolerite, new analysis confirms it is also foliated rhyolite like the Newall boulder, suggesting both originated from the same Welsh quarry and were transported together as part of a coordinated construction effort.

The Craig Rhos-y-Felin quarry in Wales, showing the distinctive bullet-shaped rock columns that match the Newall boulder. 

(Bevins et al. 2025/ScienceDirect)

Unprecedented Logistics of Ancient Engineering

The implications of these findings extend far beyond simple stone transport - they reveal sophisticated planning and coordination capabilities among Neolithic British communities that rival modern engineering projects. Transporting stones weighing over three tones from Wales to Stonehenge would have required unprecedented collaboration between different tribal groups across hundreds of miles of challenging terrain.

Evidence suggests that ancient quarrying operations at Craig Rhos-y-Felin were active around 3000 BC, with Neolithic communities deliberately extracting specific stones for transport to distant sites. The precision with which particular rock types were selected indicates sophisticated geological knowledge and suggests that certain stones were valued for properties beyond mere construction material.

The researchers emphasize that if Neolithic peoples could move stones weighing several tons across such distances, they certainly possessed the capability to transport the much heavier sarsen stones from West Woods in Wiltshire - a mere 20 miles (32 km) away. The largest sarsen stones weigh over 20 tons and stand up to seven meters (23 feet) tall, yet their transport would have required an order of magnitude less effort than moving the bluestones from Wales or the Altar Stone from Scotland.

Recent archaeological evidence has demonstrated that indigenous peoples in various parts of the world have successfully transported stones weighing many tones across great distances using technologies available during the Neolithic period: ropes, wooden sledges, and carefully constructed trackways.

• The Neolithic Builder of the Aberdeenshire Recumbent Stone Circles

• The Scottish Stonehenge Architect and His Aberdeenshire Stone Circles

References

{ https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-archaeology }

When Moon Dust Becomes a Weapon!

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

What Surprises Will The Star-Studying CHARA Array Reveal In Its Third Decade?

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

This Newborn Planet Is Carving Out A Home In Its Protoplanetary Disk

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

Stanford Scientist Reveals: “Something Non-Human Has Been Here a Long Time”

Something Non-Human Has Been Here a Long Time: A Scientist’s Journey from Cancer Research to UFO Investigation

Dr. Garry Nolan, a Stanford University professor and renowned immunologist, never expected that his decades-long career in cancer and immunology research would one day intersect with UFOs and anomalous phenomena. Yet today, he stands at the crossroads of mainstream science and the mysteries of the unexplained. In an eye-opening interview with Dr. Jordan B. Peterson, Nolan recounts his scientific evolution—from developing groundbreaking biomedical technologies to investigating unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs), anomalous materials, and their potential effects on human biology.

A Career Rooted in Cutting-Edge Science

Nolan’s scientific credentials are formidable. As a professor of pathology at Stanford, he has co-founded over a dozen biotech companies, authored more than 350 research papers, and holds over 60 patents. His lab has played a key role in cancer immunology, gene therapy, and single-cell analysis. More recently, he’s been pioneering atomic-level imaging, fusing technologies like atomic probe tomography and field ion microscopy to examine matter at sub-angstrom resolution—down to the bonds between atoms.

This same level of precision would later prove crucial in his controversial work with UAP-related materials.

From the Atacama Mummy to Intelligence Briefings

Nolan’s unexpected foray into UFO-related research began with the infamous Atacama “alien” mummy. After conducting rigorous genetic analysis, his team determined the remains were that of a human child, likely suffering from rare genetic mutations. While debunking the extraterrestrial claim, the project caught the attention of U.S. intelligence and defense communities.

Soon after, representatives from the CIA and a defense contractor visited Nolan at Stanford, asking for his help evaluating patients suffering from unusual neurological damage. These individuals—members of the intelligence, military, or diplomatic corps—reported bizarre symptoms such as internal scarring, cognitive dysfunction, and high-frequency sounds. Some had reportedly been in close proximity to unknown aerial objects.

This group included some of the earliest known cases of what became known as Havana Syndrome, a set of symptoms now officially recognized as “anomalous health incidents” by the U.S. government.

Evidence-Based Curiosity Meets Scientific Caution

While Nolan is cautious about drawing firm conclusions, he insists that there is abundant evidence, even if not definitive proof, that something non-human is at play. He emphasizes that the scientific community must differentiate between data, evidence, and proof—and that the refusal to even ask the question betrays the spirit of scientific inquiry.

“The plural of anecdote isn’t data,” Nolan admits, “but the plural of anecdote is definitely hypothesis.”

The Soul Foundation: Creating a Safe Space for Scientific Exploration

To support serious interdisciplinary research on anomalous phenomena, Nolan co-founded the Sol (Soul) Foundation, along with anthropologist Dr. Peter Skafish and former U.S. intelligence official David Grusch, who made headlines testifying before Congress about secret U.S. reverse engineering programs.

The foundation aims to create a stigma-free environment where scholars, scientists, and experiencers can collaborate. Its mission spans from the analysis of anomalous materials to the psychological trauma of UFO experiencers—and even the intersections with religion and consciousness studies.

Physical Evidence: Strange Metals and Isotope Anomalies

Perhaps most striking is Nolan’s analysis of physical materials allegedly associated with UFO encounters. Collaborating with legendary researcher Jacques Vallée, Nolan examined samples like:

• A metallic fragment from Ubatuba, Brazil, which was found to be 99.999% pure silicon—an impossibility using 1950s manufacturing methods.
• Another piece revealed magnesium isotope ratios that do not match any natural Earth source.
• A 30-pound lump of incompletely mixed metals (iron, aluminum, and titanium) found after a UAP sighting in Council Bluffs, Iowa, defied standard industrial explanation.

While none of these findings confirm extraterrestrial origins, Nolan insists they warrant serious scientific attention and open data sharing.

Skywatcher: Independent UAP Data Collection

Not content to wait on government disclosure, Nolan joined a privately funded initiative called Skywatcher. This project sets up high-resolution sensor systems in controlled airspaces to detect and track aerial anomalies. The initiative serves dual purposes: to advance drone detection technologies and, when applicable, to gather high-fidelity data on unidentified phenomena.

Nolan argues that repeatable measurement is key. “I can’t repeat pilot anecdotes,” he says, “but I can repeat a material analysis.”

The Five Signatures of True Anomalies

In his view, credible UAP sightings often share five distinct traits:

1. 1. Instantaneous acceleration and deceleration – Defying inertia and known physics.
   2. No visible propulsion or exhaust – Including no infrared heat signatures.
   3. Lack of aerodynamic surfaces – No wings, rotors, or obvious flight aids.
   4. Transmedium travel – Seamless movement between air, space, and water.
   5. Intelligent control – Implied through maneuverability and interaction.

These characteristics, observed by trained pilots and confirmed on radar systems, suggest technology far beyond any publicly known human capability.

Final Thoughts: Something Non-Human?

Nolan refrains from endorsing the extraterrestrial hypothesis outright. “I don’t care if it’s human or not,” he says. “I just want reproducible findings.” He’s committed to publishing all data openly, hoping that others—now or in the future—can connect the dots.

Still, his personal belief remains firm: “Something non-human has been here a long time.”

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

Stonehenge mystery is SOLVED after 5,000 years – as scientists finally crack how enigmatic boulder was transported from Wales

• READ MORE:  Stonehenge's secret SISTER discovered in Dorset

By XANTHA LEATHAM, EXECUTIVE SCIENCE EDITOR

It's the monument that has baffled scientists for hundreds of years. 

But now, experts may have finally solved one of Stonehenge's greatest mysteries.

Researchers have revisited the debate over the origin of the landmark's iconic bluestones – the group of smaller stones that are dotted around the site on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire.

They focused on a rock known as the Newall boulder, which was uncovered during excavations around a century ago.

One of the main debates has been whether this rock – and other similar stones – reached the site after being transported by glaciers from Wales, or whether humans moved them more than 5,000 years ago.

A team, led by Professor Richard Bevins from Aberystwyth University, compared the Newall boulder – which is about the size of a football – with samples from a rocky outcrop in Wales.

Through geochemical and microscopic analysis, they concluded 'there is no evidence to support the interpretation that it is a glacial erratic'.

Instead, the stone is a precise match for the unique characteristics of rocks from Craig Rhos–y–Felin – indicating humans transported the heavy boulder from more than 125 miles (200km) away.

The main remaining part of the Newall boulder (Figure A) along with the part that has been detached for studies and analysis (Figure B)

Columns of foliated rhyolite at Craig Rhos–y–Felin in north Pembrokeshire. The rounded tops of the columns are broadly 'bullet shaped', identical in form to the Newall boulder

A drone view of Stonehenge and the Wilshire countryside. The stone circle is one of the best known ancient wonders of the world and a UNESCO World Heritage Site

There is already evidence of stone quarrying at the site, in north Pembrokeshire, by Neolithic communities around 3000 BCE, they explained.

Chemical analysis revealed that the Newall boulder and other fragments found at Stonehenge share identical levels of thorium and zirconium with the stone at Craig Rhos–y–Felin.

The researchers said the Newall boulder is a foliated rhyolite and has a surface layer rich in calcium carbonate – the result of its long burial in the chalky soils at Stonehenge.

This further reinforces the idea that it was brought here by humans and not glaciers, they said, because glaciers would have left a much more dispersed distribution of similar stones across the region – something that has not been found.

The study, published in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, also makes an important discovery about another of the buried stones at Stonehenge – Stone 32d.

It was previously thought to be a type of rock called a spotted dolerite, but new analysis confirms it is also a foliated rhyolite – like the Newall boulder.

Transporting these stones, which can weigh over three tonnes, from Wales to Stonehenge would have been an incredible feat of human logistics.

'Part of the fascination of Stonehenge is that many of its megaliths, in contrast to the large, relatively local sarsens, can be proven to have been sourced from Wales, over 200km to the west,' the researchers wrote.

New research suggests the Newall Boulder (pictured) was transported by humans to Stonehenge from Wales

The findings suggest that the 80 or so bluestone boulders at Stonehenge may all have been carried to the site by by Neolithic builders 

People have long been fascinated by Stonehenge due to its age, mystery, and impressive construction. Pictured: Visitors enjoy the sunrise during celebrations of the summer solstice at Stonehenge on June 21, 2025

The reason why Stonehenge was built over 5,000 years ago remains one of archaeology's most fascinating mysteries

What are the Stonehenge bluestones?

The bluestones of Stonehenge are a collection of smaller, distinctive stones that form the inner circle and horseshoe formations within the monument.

They are named for the bluish tinge they exhibit when freshly broken or wet, despite not always appearing blue in their current state.

These stones are not native to the Salisbury Plain area where Stonehenge is located, and are known to have been sourced from Pembrokeshire in Wales.

'Most archaeologists accept that Neolithic people achieved this remarkable feat, transporting blocks weighing up to 3.5 tonnes.

'There is, however, a contrary view, which proposed that no human effort was involved.

'Rather, it is argued, the Welsh stones were transported by glacial ice long before Stonehenge was built.'

One of the main proponents of the glacier theory is geologist Dr Brian John, who has previously insisted that the Newall boulder shows glacial abrasion marks.

A prior study of his concludes: 'The boulder was reduced in size and heavily modified during glacial transport, for much of the time on the bed of a glacier.

'It was eventually dumped at some location on, or relatively close to, Salisbury Plain.'

As part of the new study, the researchers said these features could also be the result of natural weathering.

They also said that even if the rock had been transported by ice in the past, it would not explain why similar fragments are only found at Stonehenge and not anywhere else on the Salisbury Plain.

Experts say Stonehenge's Stone 32D (figure B), as well as the Newall boulder, share identical levels of thorium and zirconium with the stones at Craig Rhos–y–Felin (figure C)

The experts said the minerologies of stone from Craig Rhos–y–Felin (left) are identical to stones from Stonehenge (right), indicating they came from the same source

A typical collection of bluestone fragments collected from Stonehenge. The researchers said these are chipped fragments, not glacial erratics

Their findings indicate that Dr John's arguments 'have no basis in evidence', they wrote, adding: 'To present it as fact, rather than as hypothesis, is disingenuous'.

'The presence of Stonehenge itself is the evidence of movement by Neolithic peoples of stones weighing up to as much as 40 tonnes,' they wrote.

'Unless it is argued that all the stones were just lying on the ground ready to be erected where they were to make Stonehenge, the stones must have been moved into position.

'If Neolithic people could move a stone a few tens of metres they could move it tens or hundreds of kilometres.

'It may not have been easy, but it was entirely possible and moving 2–3 tonne bluestones would involve an order of magnitude less effort than moving the sarsens.'

While the large sarsen stones were only transported from West Woods in Wiltshire – roughly 32km (20 miles) away – they weighed over 20 tonnes each and stood up to seven metres tall.

The famous 'Altar Stone' was even transported from Scotland around 750km (466 miles) away, a study published last year revealed. 

'There is no evidence for how they moved these stones,' the researchers wrote, 'but recent indigenous peoples have been transporting stones weighing many tonnes great distances with ropes, wooden sledges and trackways – technologies which would have been available in the Neolithic.'

New analysis has revealed the Altar Stone, the largest bluestone at the centre of Stonehenge, actually came from northern Scotland – up to 1,000km (621 miles) away

The team said they can conclude with 95 per cent accuracy that the Altar stone (pictured here, underneath two bigger Sarsen stones) came from the area that encompasses parts of Inverness, Thurso, Orkney and parts of Shetland

While builders 5,000 years ago normally used whatever materials were at hand for stone circles, Stonehenge is 'exceptional' for being constructed entirely of stones brought from long distances, the team said.

Researchers have previously suggested that the site may have had a political as well as a religious purpose, 'a moment of unification for the peoples of Britain, celebrating their eternal links with their ancestors and the cosmos'.

The new study provides strong evidence of human transport, but the mystery of exactly why Stonehenge was built – and how – is ongoing.

The team concluded: 'We reiterate our previous interpretation that the Newall boulder is not a glacial erratic, that there is no evidence of glaciation on the Salisbury Plain, and that the bluestones were transported to Stonehenge by humans and not by ice.' 

The Stonehenge monument standing today was the final stage of a four part building project that ended 3,500 years ago

Stonehenge is one of the most prominent prehistoric monuments in Britain. The Stonehenge that can be seen today is the final stage that was completed about 3,500 years ago. 

According to the monument's website, Stonehenge was built in four stages:   

First stage: The first version of Stonehenge was a large earthwork or Henge, comprising a ditch, bank and the Aubrey holes, all probably built around 3100 BC. 

The Aubrey  holes are round pits in the chalk, about one metre (3.3 feet) wide and deep, with steep sides and flat bottoms. 

Stonehenge (pictured) is one of the most prominent prehistoric monuments in Britain

They form a circle about 86.6 metres (284 feet) in diameter. 

Excavations revealed cremated human bones in some of the chalk filling, but the holes themselves were likely not made to be used as graves, but as part of a religious ceremony.

After this first stage, Stonehenge was abandoned and left untouched for more than 1,000 years. 

Second stage: The second and most dramatic stage of Stonehenge started around 2150 years BC, when about 82 bluestones from the Preseli mountains in south-west Wales were transported to the site. It's thought that the stones, some of which weigh four tonnes each, were dragged on rollers and sledges to the waters at Milford Haven, where they were loaded onto rafts.

They were carried on water along the south coast of Wales and up the rivers Avon and Frome, before being dragged overland again near Warminster and Wiltshire.

The final stage of the journey was mainly by water, down the river Wylye to Salisbury, then the Salisbury Avon to west Amesbury. 

The journey spanned nearly 240 miles, and once at the site, the stones were set up in the centre to form an incomplete double circle. 

During the same period, the original entrance was widened and a pair of Heel Stones were erected. The nearer part of the Avenue, connecting Stonehenge with the River Avon, was built aligned with the midsummer sunrise. 

Third stage: The third stage of Stonehenge, which took place about 2000 years BC, saw the arrival of the sarsen stones (a type of sandstone), which were larger than the bluestones.

They were likely brought from the Marlborough Downs (40 kilometres, or 25 miles, north of Stonehenge). 

The largest of the sarsen stones transported to Stonehenge weighs 50 tonnes, and transportation by water would not have been possible, so it's suspected that they were transported using sledges and ropes. 

Calculations have shown that it would have taken 500 men using leather ropes to pull one stone, with an extra 100 men needed to lay the rollers in front of the sledge.

These stones were arranged in an outer circle with a continuous run of lintels - horizontal supports. 

Inside the circle, five trilithons - structures consisting of two upright stones and a third across the top as a lintel - were placed in a horseshoe arrangement, which can still be seen today. 

Final stage: The fourth and final stage took place just after 1500 years BC, when the smaller bluestones were rearranged in the horseshoe and circle that can be seen today.

The original number of stones in the bluestone circle was probably around 60, but these have since been removed or broken up. Some remain as stumps below ground level. 

Source: Stonehenge.co.uk 

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

What lies beneath: Scientists make shocking discovery in Antarctica

• READ MORE: The Arctic is turning GREEN thanks to climate change

By WILIAM HUNTER

It is the least explored continent in the world, famous for its harsh and remote environment.

Now, scientists have made a shocking discovery lurking beneath the waters of Antarctica.

Researchers have discovered 332 hidden trenches known as submarine canyon networks carved deep into the ocean floor - five times more than previously thought.

Some of these underwater trenches reach staggering depths of up to 13,000 feet (4,000m) - roughly as deep as Mont Blanc is tall.

Scientists have found roughly 10,000 submarine canyons all over the world.

And with just 27 per cent of the sea floor mapped in detail, there are likely to be many more waiting to be found.

However, the researchers say those beneath Antarctica's ice are the largest and most impressive anywhere on the planet.

David Amblas, of the University of Barcelona, says: 'The most spectacular of these are in East Antarctica, which is characterized by complex, branching canyon systems.'

Researchers have discovered 332 hidden submarine canyon networks - interconnected trenches carved deep into the ocean floor. That is five times more than previously expected 

Scientists have made a shocking discovery lurking beneath Antarctica's Ice Sheet (pictured), and it could have big implications for global sea level increases 

The submarine canyons around Antarctica are so large because they are carved by a phenomenon known as turbidity currents.

These are underwater avalanches of sediment and water, which flow at speeds up to 45 miles per hour down the steep slopes of the continental shelf, digging out deep channels as they pass.

Dr Amblas says: 'Like those in the Arctic, Antarctic submarine canyons resemble canyons in other parts of the world.

'But they tend to be larger and deeper because of the prolonged action of polar ice and the immense volumes of sediment transported by glaciers to the continental shelf.'

These vast canyons play a vital role in a number of important ocean processes.

They transport nutrient-rich sediment from the coast to wider ocean, connect shallow and deep waters, and create habitats rich in biodiversity.

However, despite being so important, these unique environments remain profoundly understudied - especially in remote, hard-to-reach locations like the Antarctic.

In their paper, published in the journal Marine Geology, Dr Amblas and his co-author used the most complete and detailed map of the Antarctic to hunt for previously unnoticed canyons.

These canyons had previously been hidden until the researchers used a new method to sort through maps of the area and identify canyons. These pictures illustrate how the semi-automatic method converts topographical information (A) into an analysed catalogue of canyons (D) 

The researchers say that Antarctica's canyons are much deeper than those elsewhere in the world because of the massive volume of sediment pushed into the ocean by glaciers. This sediment carves out deep grooves as it slides down the continental shelf 

By analysing the map with a semi-automated method for identifying canyons, the researchers found far more canyons beneath the ice than had previously been expected.

Interestingly, these new maps revealed that there is a big difference between the canyons in different parts of the continent.

Co-author Dr Riccardo Arosio, a marine geologist from University College Cork, told MailOnline: 'It has been very interesting to discover a striking difference between East and West Antarctic canyons, which had not been observed before.'

Dr Arosio says that those in the East form 'long canyon-channel systems, and have more frequent U-shaped profiles'.

Meanwhile, canyons in the West of the continent are 'shorter, steeper, and V-shaped'.

This is likely because the canyons in the West have been carved by the water released by relatively recent melting of the ice sheet while those in the East are the product of a much longer process of glacial activity.

The researchers say this discovery could have much wider implications for how we predict the impacts of climate change.

The Antarctic canyons help exchange water between the deep ocean and the continental shelf.

These canyons transport warm water from the open ocean up to the floating sea ice, speeding up ice melt. This map shows sea ice extent for February 25 as well as the average ice extent for February (marked by the red line)

This allows cold, dense water formed near the ice sheet to sink into the deep ocean, and drive global ocean circulation currents that help keep the climate stable. 

At the same time, these canyons also bring warmer waters in from the open sea up to meet the floating ice shelves - driving the ice melt, which is weakening Antarctica's inland glaciers.

By affecting how quickly water from the ice sheet enters the ocean, these channels have a direct impact on global sea level increases.

However, the ocean models used by organisations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) don't take the effects of these hidden canyons into account.

Dr Arosio says: 'Omitting these local mechanisms limits the ability that models must predict changes in ocean and climate dynamics.'

In the future, by gathering more high-resolution data in unmapped areas, the researchers expect to find even more submarine canyons beneath the ice.

Properly understanding these canyons and how they affect the circulation of water around the poles could be key to accurately predicting the impacts of climate change.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

From alien invasions to robot uprisings, there is no shortage of terrifying ways that the world might end.

But scientists have now worked out exactly when one terrifying scenario could bring the universe to a close.

According to the 'Big Crunch' theory, the universe will eventually collapse in on itself in a final climactic implosion.

As space itself contracts, the temperatures will soar until everything is destroyed in the 'furnace of this cosmic hell'.

Finally, the entire cosmos will find itself packed back into an infinitely dense singularity just like it was before the Big Bang.

While this was once just a terrifying possibility, new measurements of 'Dark Energy' suggest the Big Crunch is the most likely outcome for the Universe.

In a recent study, scientists from Cornell University calculated exactly when the 'Big Crunch' could begin.

Thankfully, their calculations suggest we can relax for the time being... that is if something else doesn't cause our demise.

Scientists have revealed the grisly details of what will happen to the universe during the Big Crunch, a time when all matter collapses into a black hole–like singularity 

What is the Big Crunch?

The Big Crunch is essentially the opposite of the Big Bang which started the universe 13.8 billion years ago. 

After the Big Bang, the universe rapidly expanded as a sea of superheated matter cooled into the familiar particles which make up the cosmos today.

During the Big Crunch, this process will run in reverse - compacting space back into a hot, dense state. 

Scientists believe the current outward expansion of the universe is due to a mysterious force called Dark Energy.

If the pushing force of Dark Energy was constant, the universe would keep on expanding and cooling for ever.  

But now, astronomers are beginning to question whether this really is the case.

Based on the latest data, some scientists believe that Dark Energy is weakening, leaving an inward force called the cosmological constant to pull the universe back together.

On the standard model of cosmology, the universe is being pushed apart by a constant force called dark energy. However, researchers now believe that this force could be weakening over time 

The latest map of the known universe suggests that dark energy is getting weaker, which means the universe will one day fall back in on itself like a ball falling back to Earth under the influence of gravity  

Dr Ethan Yu–Cheng, of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, told MailOnline: 'It is just like throwing a basketball vertically upwards in daily life.

'The negative cosmological constant acts like the Earth's gravity, which pulls the basketball downward. The basketball will de–accelerate until reaching the maximum height and start to fall.'

Would we notice the Big Crunch starting? 

If it's difficult to imagine what life during the Big Crunch would be like, think about the universe as a balloon with lots of little dots drawn on its surface.

As you blow air in, the balloon expands, the surface stretches, and the distance between all the dots grows larger.

The Big Crunch is like letting all the air out of the balloon at once, bringing those distant points back together in a rush.

However, the process would start very slowly.

Dr Hoang Nhan Luu, a researcher at the Donostia International Physics Center, told MailOnline: 'Intelligent civilisations at the scales of solar systems or even galactic scales would not notice any obvious phenomenon because these changes happen at much larger cosmological scales.

Just as the Hubble Space Telescope's observations (pictured) showed that the universe is now expanding by measuring the light from faraway galaxies, astronomers in the far future would see galaxies suddenly come back towards them 

'Civilisations like us typically exist on time scales of hundreds to thousands of years while the changes happen on billion–year time scales, so we wouldn't notice any obvious day–to–day phenomenon until the very last moment.'

But Dr Luu says that any observant humans still alive in the universe would be able to spot the warning signs.

Just as we can look at distant galaxies to see that the universe is expanding, astronomers of the future would be able to see that the galaxies are now rushing towards them.

What would the first signs of the Big Crunch be?

The first obvious sign that the universe was changing would be that the cosmic temperature would start to increase.

Professor Avi Loeb, a theoretical physicist from Cornell University, told MailOnline: 'It is the reverse history of our expanding universe.'

The universe has been getting colder as it expands, like gas escaping from a pressurised container. 

During the Big Crunch, this process will play out in reverse and raise the temperature of space.

As the universe collapses inwards, the temperature of the cosmic background radiation (pictured) would increase exponentially. Eventually, the cosmos would hit the 'Planck temperature', the hottest temperature possible according to physics 

About 13 billion years from now, Professor Loeb predicts the density of energy in the universe will be about 1,000 times higher than it is now.

Just half a billion years after that, it would be another 1,000 times higher, making the universe room temperature. 

Professor Loeb says: 'At this point it wouldn't be the sun warming that is warming us, but the equivalent of the Cosmic Microwave Background.'

Within a few million years, the entire universe would be as hot as the surface of the sun.

Eventually, the universe would reach the 'Planck temperature', the highest possible temperature according to our models of physics.

Professor Loeb says: 'Needless to say, all humans will burn up in the furnace of this cosmic hell.

What will happen to the solar system during the Big Crunch?

During the Big Crunch, the universe will eventually become so dense that the planets and stars will be pushed together by the collapse.

Despite Dark Energy's push, the solar system isn't expanding because it is denser than the background universe. During the Big Crunch, the cosmos will become so dense that planets will be pulled into each other by the collapse of spacetime. Pictured: NASA's map of dark matter in the universe 

The only thing that will survive the collapse at first will be black holes. Black holes will actually thrive during the Big Crunch as they feed on a soup of ultra–dense matter 

That means the planets of the solar system will come closer and closer together until they are crushed together.  

As space approaches the final moments of the crunch, Professor Loeb says that the universe will be even denser than space inside an atom.

As the universe becomes even denser than an atomic nucleus, all matter in the cosmos will once again be squeezed back into this primordial state.

The only things in the universe to survive this transition would be black holes, which would thrive as they feed on the dense matter all around them.

Finally, this boiling mess of black holes and elementary particles would be crushed into a single infinitely dense point known as the singularity, bringing the universe to an end.

When will the Big Crunch happen? 

Thankfully, scientists believe that the Big Crunch is still far off in the impossibly distant future.

Professor Henry Tye, a leading cosmologist from Cornell University, 'We calculate that this will lead to a big crunch about 19.5 billion years from now. 

By the time the Big Crunch even begins, the sun will have expanded into a red giant and swallowed up the inner planets, including Earth

'Knowing that the age of the universe is 13.8 billion years, one obtains that the lifespan is 33.3 billion years.

In their pre–print paper, Professor Tye and his co–authors, Dr Luu and Dr Yu–Cheng, say that the Big Crunch will begin about 11 billion years from now.

The crunching phase would then last around 8.5 billion years before the universe completely collapses into a singularity.

Given that Homo sapiens have only been around for at most 300,000 years, that gives us plenty of time to relax. 

Read More

• Two terrifying black holes merge into one - creating monster mass bigger than the SUN 

Likewise, while it might not necessarily be a comforting thought, it is almost certain that humanity will have been wiped out long before then in any case.

Professor Tye says: 'Before the big crunch, at about 5 billion years from now, the sun will use up its fuel and start growing dramatically.

'Its outer layers will expand until they engulf much of the solar system, as it becomes what astronomers call a red giant. Eventually, it fades to a tiny white dwarf.

'To survive, human beings have to move to the edge of our solar system or beyond. We have a few billion years' time to prepare for that trip.'

THE BIG BANG THEORY DESCRIBES THE BEGINNING AND EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSE

The Big Bang Theory is a cosmological model, a theory used to describe the beginning and the evolution of our universe.

It says that the universe was in a very hot and dense state before it started to expand 13,7 billion years ago.

This theory is based on fundamental observations.

In 1920, Hubble observed that the distance between galaxies was increasing everywhere in the universe. 

The Big Bang Theory is a cosmological model, a theory used to describe the beginning and the evolution of our universe, based on observations - including the cosmic background radiation (pictured), which is a like a fossil of radiation emitted during the beginning of the universe, when it was hot and dense

This means that galaxies had to be closer to each other in the past.

In 1964, Wilson and Penzias discovered the cosmic background radiation, which is a like a fossil of radiation emitted during the beginning of the universe, when it was hot and dense. 

The cosmic background radiation is observable everywhere in the universe.

The composition of the universe - that is, the the number of atoms of different elements -  is consistent with the Big Bang Theory. 

So far, this theory is the only one that can explain why we observe an abundance of primordial elements in the universe.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

When US soldiers based in Suffolk saw lights, triangular aircraft and 'non-humans' the MoD 'shut it down'. Now 45 years later they tell their story for first time - and astonishing truth about how close armageddon really was

By DR DAVID CLARKE

Did aliens land outside an American airbase in Suffolk 45 years ago to probe its secret stash of nuclear warheads?

Or is the story a fisherman's tale that just gets bigger every time it is told?

Clearly something unusual happened in the early hours of Boxing Day morning in Rendlesham Forest, near the twin RAF bases of Bentwaters and Woodbridge, that's still being talked about today.

Some claim the latter Nato base was visited by UFOs, leading to a 'meet and greet' with silver-suited aliens and American top military brass that was caught on film.

Others, as the Mail can exclusively reveal, are convinced the Christmas visitors were interested in a secret nuclear missile stockpile, stashed just a few miles from Ipswich, where the good people of Suffolk were obliviously sleeping off their Christmas indulgences.

What everyone agrees on, however, is that the full story has never been disclosed. Until now.

A new feature length documentary, eight years in the making, re-ignited the decades-old Rendlesham Forest UFO mystery when it premiered last week.

Called Capel Green, after a field situated between the RAF Woodbridge airfield and the medieval Butley Priory in Suffolk, where the story is set, it re-creates the action seen through the eyes of a US airman who claims he witnessed it.

As a keen UFOlogist who has closely followed the Rendlesham story for decades, I fear the truth won't be the Close Encounters tale everyone craves, but rather yet another example of the British and American governments using UFO conspiracy stories as a convenient cloak for their nefarious, top-secret activities at the height of the Cold War, as confirmed last month in a bombshell report published by The Wall Street Journal.

Yet, that will be cold comfort for those Suffolk residents, who, in 1980, had no idea how close they were sleeping to the weapons of Armageddon that Christmas night.

The Capel Green film includes interviews with US security police, some of whom have never spoken on camera before, plus a newly recruited US airman, Larry Warren, just 19 at the time, who claims he had a front-row seat to the whole happening.

Larry Warren claims he had a front-row seat to the whole happening at Rendlesham Forest when he was 19

The Capel Green film includes interviews with US security police, some of whom have never spoken on camera before

In the film, he describes how he was told to hand over his rifle and driven in a Jeep to a clearing in the forest that was covered in glowing mist.

It was then, he says, that he saw a 'basketball sized red light in the sky' followed by a 'blinding flash of light'.

It was then he saw a triangular-shaped 'machine, object or craft' on the ground and – most astonishingly of all – three 'non-human beings' emerging from it.

These beings, he said, were then greeted by a tall man he believed was the most senior officer at the Nato complex, US air force wing commander (later brigadier general) Gordon Williams.

According to Warren, footage of this incredible meeting was captured on film, the footage handed to the pilot of a F-15 jet and later flown to the US air force HQ in Germany, never to be seen again.

Which is all very intriguing – and understandably greeted with a huge amount of scepticism.

Wing commander Gordon Williams, it should be noted, has never publicly commented on Rendlesham, but in 2003 described Warren's claims as 'a flight of fancy'.

Whatever happened, the incident wasn't a one-off and UFOs were seen around the base for at least three nights.

On December 28, 1980, the deputy base commander, lieutenant colonel Charles Halt, led a team of airmen into the forest to investigate his colleague's strange report.

As Halt made a running commentary of events on his hand-held tape recorder, his men gasped as they spotted a pulsing red light that resembled a winking eye between the trees.

Later three star-like lights in the sky were seen low in the north and south, hovering until daybreak. Halt claims one of these projected a pencil-thin beam of light into the weapons storage area of nearby RAF Bentwaters 'like it was looking for something'.

In the film, US security policeman Sergeant Steve Longero, who was assigned to protect the nuclear warheads at the Suffolk base, also claims to have seen a beam of light scanning the whole of the weapons storage area.

Charles Halt's memo summarising the Rendlesham sightings was sent to the British Ministry of Defence in January 1981 and became one of the most famous documents in the history of UFOlogy when it was leaked to the media.

As a teenage UFO enthusiast, I clearly recall being gripped by the headline 'UFO LANDS IN SUFFOLK: And that's OFFICIAL' that broke the Rendlesham Forest story in October 1983.

To many UFOlogists, the Rendlesham incident offered the exciting possibility of a 'British Roswell' right on our doorstep.

The News Of The World front page from 1983 reads: 'UFO LANDS IN SUFFOLK: And that's OFFICIAL'

To many UFOlogists, the Rendlesham incident offered the exciting possibility of a 'British Roswell' right on our doorstep

Roswell, as every UFO buff knows, was a mysterious incident in Roswell, New Mexico that happened in 1947, when a downed balloon used to spy on Soviet atomic tests was spun into a story of a captured flying saucer.

For those who wanted to believe, Rendlesham appeared to have everything Roswell had: impressive military witnesses, official documentation and what appeared to be a determined government attempt at a cover-up.

As an investigative journalist seeking answers, I used the precursor to the UK's Freedom of Information Act to persuade the MoD to release their own 150-page file on the case in 2001.

Sadly, I found no smoking gun, although I did find a letter written by the then-defence minister, Michael Heseltine, shortly after the story broke, giving unequivocal assurance 'that there is not a grain of truth in the allegation that there has been a cover-up about alleged UFO sightings'.

But remember, this was the Eighties and the height of the Cold War, where 'truth' could be subjective. The Soviet Union had invaded Afghanistan a year earlier and tensions were high in Eastern Europe.

Not so many miles away, at Greenham Common in Berkshire, the first tents were being pitched in a protest camp outside another American airbase, where cruise missiles were being stored.

The protest would go on for the next 19 years and draw worldwide media attention – something the US and UK governments were keen to avoid in Suffolk.

In 2002, I met with RAF squadron leader, Don Moreland, who was the British liaison officer for the two bases at the time. The question of nuclear weapons was dodged deftly.

'The MoD thing was, we don't confirm or deny it. I don't know whether there were nuclear weapons there, and I was the RAF commander,' he told me.

'I could probably guess that there might have been there but they wouldn't tell me.'

But last summer a US intelligence officer-turned UFO whistleblower, Luis Elizondo, claimed in his explosive book, Imminent, that the Rendlesham incident was indeed linked to the secret stockpile of nuclear weapons at nearby RAF Bentwaters – now a Cold War Museum.

He said the 'beam' described by multiple witnesses had 'hovered specifically over an underground bunker' where the stash was held. He said the visit triggered a 'flash override' that gave the US president, Jimmy Carter, direct control of the weapons in the event of a surprise attack.

Many theories have come and gone over the years, the earliest being put forward by astronomer Ian Ridpath who discovered the initial sighting coincided with a bright fireball meteor that appeared to fall into the forest in the early hours of Boxing Day.

Ridpath believes that once the airmen on the patrol became convinced a UFO had landed, they walked into the forest, where they saw the pulsing beam from the Orford Ness lighthouse, about six miles away on the Suffolk coast.

Professor David Clarke has spoken to several key men regarding the mysterious events that took place 45 years ago

Others have come forward to claim the sightings were caused by pranksters: in 2015 I received a letter from an anonymous source claiming to be a 'retired SAS trooper with inside knowledge of Rendlesham' who immediately got my attention.

He claimed the UFOs were created by pyrotechnics rigged up by Special Forces in the forest, in revenge for being caught and roughed up by US security forces during an exercise to test the base defences.

But, however exciting this theory might sound, the date stamp on the letter gave the game away: it was carefully timed to arrive on April 1.

Four decades have passed and the basic story has become ever more complicated and exaggerated, with numerous claims and counter-claims from both believers and sceptics.

Halt's straightforward, if bizarre, account of 'unexplained lights' seen in a forest at Christmas time has been transformed into a complex modern legend involving missing time, conspiracies and messages from time travellers.

Even the most dedicated supporters of the UFO story have struggled to reconcile the ever-changing accounts told by the principal witnesses.

Sergeant Jim Penniston's account of having approached the landed UFO in the forest on Boxing Day and made sketches of it was once regarded as good evidence. But his credibility crumbled when he announced, on the 30th anniversary, that he had received a 'download' of binary code when he touched the object that he wrote down in a notebook. He also claimed to have received a telepathic message from the craft's occupants who'd come from our future to gather genetic material. 'They are time travellers,' he said. 'They are us.'

Charles Halt went on, after retirement from the US air force, to write a book and has made frequent TV appearances. In 2010 he signed a statement that said he believed the UFOs were 'extraterrestrial in origin and that the security services of both the United States and UK have attempted – both then and now – to subvert the significance of what occurred in Rendlesham forest and RAF Bentwaters by the use of well-practiced methods of disinformation'.

But Halt's superior officer, Colonel Ted Conrad, responded with a scathing account of Halt's credibility when we met in 2016.

The Texan-born former top gun fighter pilot told me, in no uncertain terms: '[Halt] should be ashamed and embarrassed by his allegation that his country and England both conspired to deceive their citizens over this issue. He knows better.'

Colonel Conrad was base commander and said he carried out the only formal investigation of the UFO sightings on behalf of General Williams, his boss and, according to Larry Warren, the man who officially greeted the aliens that night.

But he failed to find any hard evidence and said the MoD decided to 'shut down' the whole incident.

Despite his scepticism, Conrad admitted that something unexplained really did happen that Christmas but claimed the whole saga has taken on a life of its own.

'I don't recognise the details anymore,' he told me. 'It resembles science fiction and I have a low opinion of those telling these stories.'

Then there is Larry Warren, the homesick teenage airman, whose story is the focus of the film Capel Green.

The film's director, Dion M Johnson ,describes him as 'the original military witness and whistleblower' who has 'fought for the truth to be revealed'.

But others have cast doubt upon his credibility, including Peter Robbins, with whom he co-authored a book about the incident, called Left At East Gate, in 1997.

He later publicly disowned Warren, saying 'my former author has taken me for the ride of my life'.

Former MoD UFO desk officer Nick Pope has gone further, describing Warren's story as 'largely fabricated' and 'part-stolen from other witnesses', such as Halt, that he believes are credible.

Astronomer Ian Ridpath says 'on the face of it the Rendlesham story sounds inexplicable, but when broken down into its individual elements it is possible to work out what actually happened.

'As with most UFO cases, it amounts to a series of misidentifications of natural and man-made objects, namely a fireball, the lighthouse and twinkling stars. However, the UFO believers have no interest in solutions.

'For them the case has become a modern myth, and films like Capel Green simply add to that mythology.'

Much like its American cousin Roswell, the Rendlesham story is likely to keep on growing as a snowball does rolling down a hillside, that keeps getting bigger and bigger with every re-telling.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }