The Alien interview: Humanity was engineered and your soul never dies

The Alien interview: Humanity was engineered and your soul never dies
The Air Force Asked This Man to Investigate UFOs—Then Pushed Him Away After What He Found

Do you think the U.S. government is hiding, and possibly reverse-engineering, extraterrestrial technology? Think again. Or better yet, don’t think about it at all. Nothing to see here.
That’s the underlying message of a report released in 2024 by the Department of Defense. The 63-page “Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP)” concludes that the DoD’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) “found no evidence that any [U.S. Government] investigation, academic-sponsored research, or official review panel has confirmed that any sighting of a UAP represented extraterrestrial technology.”
The AARO, as The Guardian summarizes, is “a government office established in 2022 to detect and, as necessary, mitigate threats including ‘anomalous, unidentified space, airborne, submerged and transmedium objects’.”
This report came on the heels of, and in contradiction to, what was arguably the most high-profile hearing on UAPs—formerly known as unidentified flying objects, or UFOs—in decades: the August 2023 testimony of “whistleblower” Dave Grusch.
In the bombshell hearing, Grusch, a former member of the Pentagon’s UAP Task Force, claimed that he had been made aware of a “multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program.” But his claims were never substantiated, and while the 2024 report doesn’t mention Grusch by name, it does offer plausible explanations for the phenomena he described in his testimony.
This is hardly the first government report to debunk stories about little green men and their strange flying saucers. So, why do Americans keep clinging to conspiracy theories about extraterrestrial visitors? Blame science fiction, the AARO report says:
“A consistent theme in popular culture involves a particularly persistent narrative that the USG—or a secretive organization within it—recovered several off-world spacecraft and extraterrestrial biological remains, that it operates a program or programs to reverse engineer the recovered technology, and that it has conspired since the 1940s to keep this effort hidden from the United States Congress and the American public.
AARO recognizes that many people sincerely hold versions of these beliefs which are based on their perception of past experiences, the experiences of others whom they trust, or media and online outlets they believe to be sources of credible and verifiable information. The proliferation of television programs, books, movies, and the vast amount of internet and social media content centered on UAP-related topics most likely has influenced the public conversation on this topic, and reinforced these beliefs within some sections of the population.”
The X-Files and the internet helped guide curious people toward the fringes of ufology. But to fully understand the ongoing public skepticism regarding the government-provided explanations about aliens, we must consider the man who was once responsible for upholding these “official” stories—and examine his stunning evolution from a fellow skeptic to the world’s leading UFO advocate.
Josef Allen Hynek, who was born on May 1, 1910, developed an interest in the cosmos following an episode of illness during his childhood. The sickness steered his curiosity away from following in the footsteps of his mother and father—a schoolteacher and cigar manufacturer, respectively—and toward the universe. Biography.com writes:
“An introduction to the stars came after Hynek was bedridden with scarlet fever at age seven: Having run through their supply of children's books to read, his mom turned to textbooks, with a high school edition on astronomy capturing the boy’s attention.”
From an early age, Hynek’s passion for science was mixed with a penchant for mystery and a pursuit of philosophical thought. He had “an interest in more esoteric subjects, particularly the works of the Rosicrucian secret societies and hermetic philosopher Rudolf Steiner,” according to Biography.com.
In 1934, as a doctoral student, Hynek contributed to observations of the Nova Herculis supernova at Perkins Observatory in Ohio. By 1936, he joined Ohio State University’s Physics and Astronomy Department. His research over the next 12 years culminated in his appointment as director of the university’s McMillin Observatory.
And that’s when the U.S. government came calling—with an unusual request.
In the waning days of World War II, American fighter pilots reported seeing aircraft that were unlike any previously encountered in combat. Some described “orange, flowing lights,” while another pilot “saw a red-ish, wingless, cigar-shape object.”
These accounts reached the media, and a population exhausted by war both wondered and worried about the tales of the strange aircraft. But the occurrences were ultimately attributed to “electrostatic or electromagnetic phenomena.”
The incident involving pilot Kenneth Arnold on June 24, 1947, however, wasn’t as readily explained—and, more crucially, it wasn’t as easily dismissed. As Pop Mech previously summarized:
“While searching for a Marine Corps C-46 transport plane, experienced pilot Kenneth Arnold diverted from his original flight path to help search the southwest slope of Mount Rainier. During the search, Arnold observed nine “peculiar-looking” and possibly “completely round” objects flying in a formation that reminded him of geese. It was later estimated they were flying in excess of 1,000 miles per hour. When he reported it (and assuming they were a new type of jet or experimental military aircraft), the Army Air Corps dismissed it as a mirage or hallucination.”
When Arnold believed the Army dismissed his claims too lightly, he reached out to the press. His discussion with Bill Bequette from the East Oregonian newspaper resulted in Bequette creating the term “flying saucers” to describe the unusual objects Arnold reported seeing.
America’s intelligence apparatus was still nascent at the time; the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) dissolved in 1945, and its successor, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), wouldn’t form until three months after Arnold reported his sighting. If there were mysterious objects flying in America’s airspace, the U.S. didn’t know where they could be coming from: The USSR? Enemies abroad? Aliens from another world?
It was crucial, then, to investigate whether these claims had any truth to them, and just as important to reassure a nervous American public that there was no cause for alarm (even if that might not have been true).
The U.S. Air Force enlisted Hynek to serve as an “astronomical consultant” for “Project Sign,” its initiative dedicated to examining the multitude of reports. Throughout Project Sign, Hynek meticulously analyzed each account of unusual aerial occurrences and categorized them accordingly. Per Biography.com:
“There were those which were simply astronomical observations, like the appearance of a meteor, those explained by meteorology, like an unusually shaped cloud, and those which captured accounts of man-made objects, like balloons. That left about 20 percent with no clear explanation...”
Hynek’s later writings suggest that he had hoped for additional investigations to address the questions posed by the remaining 20 percent of unexplained cases. However, the U.S. government, apprehensive about public fears during the Cold War and the potential for those fears to be manipulated, preferred to make such questions go away. And so, Project Sign evolved into “Project Grudge.”
“The staff,” the Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena summarizes, “especially those who seemed to lean towards belief in the ‘interplanetary’ origin of UFOs, were reportedly purged from the organization.”
Project Grudge released only one report, in August 1949. “There is no evidence that objects reported upon are the result of an advanced scientific foreign development; and, therefore they constitute no direct threat to the national security,” the report determined. It concluded by recommending that “the investigation and study of reports of unidentified flying objects be reduced in scope.”
Hynek, disillusioned with the direction the investigations took, characterized Project Grudge as a “public relations campaign.”
Project Grudge’s conclusions failed to quell concerns about what people now referred to as “unidentified flying objects,” or UFOs. So the Air Force resumed its investigations once more, this time in its most famous form: “Project Blue Book.”
The Air Force again brought in Hynek for Project Blue Book, permitting him to actually conduct field investigations into these phenomena himself. Hynek’s perspective on the extraterrestrial theories regarding the unexplained sightings evolved from his days with Project Sign. As Biography.com observes:
“While he had harbored plenty of skepticism the first time around, he found his assumptions challenged by the rational recollections of witnesses, and began thinking about the legitimate scientific study of these 'Unidentified Flying Objects' or 'UFOs.'”
However, Hynek quickly realized that he was seen more as an instrument to dismiss alien speculation than as a scientist tasked with exploring such possibilities. As Biography notes, “By the 1960s, Hynek found himself in conflict with the restrictive supervision of the Air Force.”
One particularly embarrassing incident for Hynek came in 1966, when he was sent to investigate “reports of unusual lights in separate areas of Michigan over successive nights.” Hurried to provide an explanation and pressed to steer clear of extraterrestrial theories, Hynek was compelled to suggest publicly that the sightings might be attributed to “swamp gas.”
The term “swamp gas” became a proto-meme of the mid-60s, and House Minority Leader (and future president) Gerald Ford demanded answers for the seemingly shoddy investigation. “Called to testify,” Biography.com notes, “Hynek used the occasion to argue for an extensive, transparent study of UFOs.”
Hynek broke from the directives of the Air Force, and just three years later, Project Blue Book was completely terminated. But that didn’t stop the astronomer.
Freed from the constraints of the Air Force, Hynek initiated a public campaign to promote the rigorous scientific investigation of what he called “ufology.” This effort first materialized as his 1972 book, The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry.
Hynek wrote about his philosophy on the study of UFOs, his observations from decades working on Project Sign and Project Blue Book, and his scale for classifying UFO sightings, which involved both distant and close encounters. He classified distant observations as either “nocturnal lights,” “daylight discs,” or for those not seen directly by human eyes, “radar/visuals.”
The other observations—“close encounters”—also broke down into three categories. HISTORY summarizes:
“Close Encounters of the First Kind meant UFOs seen at a close enough range to make out some details. In a Close Encounter of the Second Kind, the UFO had a physical effect, such as scorching trees, frightening animals or causing car motors to suddenly conk out. In Close Encounters of the Third Kind, witnesses reported seeing occupants in or near a UFO.”
That final category inspired the title of the classic 1977 Steven Spielberg film, Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Hynek was reportedly paid for the use of the title and for his role as a consultant on the movie, and he also made a brief appearance in the Best Picture nominee. Hynek also appeared on shows like “The Dick Cavett Show” and “In Search Of...,” spoke on the university lecture circuit, and even presented on UFOs to the United Nations. His life’s work inspired a two-season TV series that aired in the 2010s, aptly named Project Blue Book.
Crucially, while Hynek openly discussed the limitations he faced during his tenure with the Air Force and was forthright about its apparent lack of genuine interest in investigating the possibility of alien encounters, his written work never fully embraced conspiracy theories. That wouldn’t be true for those who came after him.
In 1986, the year Hynek died, conspiracy theorist George C. Andrews published Extra-Terrestrials Among Us, a book that incorporated ideas of ufology into existing ideas of government conspiracies and secret organizations. In Andrews’ grand vision of a global conspiracy, he claimed extraterrestrials were behind the killing of President John F. Kennedy.
In 1991, conspiracy theorist Bill Cooper incorporated Andrews’ theories into his manifesto, Behold a Pale Horse, one of the more widely read books of fringe political conspiracies. Where Hynek kept his speculations scientific, The New Republic noted that Cooper’s co-opting of ufology was “...the tip of a spear asserting that the number one thing we had to fear was not little green men, but the government that colluded with them, appropriating their technology against us.”
Hynek’s legacy risks being overshadowed by the extreme and politically charged theories of self-proclaimed ufologists that emerged in his wake. His ambition was for ufology to gain recognition as a legitimate scientific field; however, the proliferation of conspiracy theories that came after him provided the government with further justification to dismiss the subject entirely.
The 2024 AARO report stated that during the time Hynek was working with Project Blue Book, “about 75 percent of Americans trusted the [US government] ‘to do the right thing almost always or most of the time.’” But, the report noted, since 2007, that number has never risen above 30 percent. “This lack of trust probably has contributed to the belief held by some subset of the U.S. population that the USG has not been truthful regarding knowledge of extraterrestrial craft.”
Ultimately, the Air Force’s efforts to stifle Hynek—pressuring him to offer the public standard responses to questions he wasn’t even allowed to ask—appears to have backfired.
Ironically, the Air Force’s attempts to quiet suspicions only fueled them, leading to more conspiracy theories and distrust. People came to believe that the government was hiding the truth, contrary to Hynek’s actual revelation: that, in reality, the people at the top may not care much about finding the answers after all.
Country Star Kacey Musgraves Talks About UFOs Following Her Plane, April 9, 2026, UFO Sightings Daily.
UFOs dance and disappear over Osaka, Japan April 11, 2026 UFO Sightings Daily.
EXCLUSIVE -Missing nuclear official becomes TENTH person tied to dark pattern surrounding US secrets
EXCLUSIVE - Missing nuclear official becomes TENTH person tied to dark pattern surrounding US secrets
Another person with links to America's nuclear secrets has gone missing as the disturbing list of deaths and disappearances in recent years continues to grow.
Steven Garcia, 48, vanished without a trace on August 28, 2025. He was last seen leaving his Albuquerque, New Mexico home on foot, carrying only a handgun.
An anonymous source told the Daily Mail that Garcia was a government contractor working for the Kansas City National Security Campus (KCNSC), a major facility in Albuquerque that plays a key behind-the-scenes role in America's national defense.
Specifically, KCNSC manufactures more than 80 percent of all the non-nuclear components that go into building the military's nuclear weapons.
Garcia allegedly served as a property custodian at KCNSC's New Mexico facility, giving him a top security clearance and broad access to the entire site's nuclear secrets.
The source described Garcia's work as 'a very high-level, overseeing position for all the assets. Tens, maybe hundreds of millions of dollars in equipment and assets, some of which are not classified, others would be classified.'
The government contractor's sudden disappearance marks the tenth person with ties to America's space or nuclear secrets who has died or mysteriously vanished in recent years, putting US national security experts on edge.
Moreover, four of these officials have vanished without a trace in almost the same manner as Garcia, and all had a connection to US nuclear secrets or rocket technology.

Steven Garcia (Pictured) was last seen on August 28, 2025. A source has revealed to the Daily Mail that Garcia worked as a government contractor at a key nuclear weapons facility
The Daily Mail has reached out to KCNSC and the US Department of Energy, which owns and oversees the facility, to confirm Garcia's work at the site and for comment on his disappearance.
According to police in Albuquerque, Garcia was last spotted on surveillance cameras walking out of his home on Cattail Court SW in a green camouflage shirt and shorts just after 9am local time.
He was also seen carrying a handgun, and authorities warned that Garcia 'may be a danger to himself.'
However, the anonymous source disputed any suggestions that the nuclear official may have been suicidal or was battling mental health issues.
'He was a very stable person,' they declared, adding that the possibility of Garcia being the target of foreign spies 'makes the most sense.'
Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker previously told the Daily Mail: ’Our scientists have been targeted for a long time, especially in the rocket propulsion area, by hostile foreign intelligence services.’
Days after Garcia's disappearance, KCNSC reportedly launched a desperate search for the missing contractor, including going through his work computers, emails and files for any clues to his whereabouts, but nothing has been found.
'It's a little strange that these people just keep disappearing. I mean, he literally just walked off into the desert with a firearm and a bottle of water and that was it,' the source said, comparing it to the disappearance of retired Air Force General William Neil McCasland.

William Neil McCasland, 68, was last seen around 11am on February 27 near Quail Run Court NE in Albuquerque, the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office said

Steven Garcia (Pictured) was last seen leaving his New Mexico home with a handgun and no phone, keys or wallet
McCasland, 68, who also lived in Albuquerque, vanished after leaving his home on February 27, 2026, with no phone, wearable devices or his prescription glasses. The Air Force veteran was only carrying a .38-caliber revolver.
Two other individuals in New Mexico with a connection to US nuclear facilities disappeared under identical circumstances in 2025.
Anthony Chavez and Melissa Casias both worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), one of the nation's most important nuclear research sites.
Chavez, 79, worked at the lab until his retirement in 2017, although his role there has not been made clear. Casias, 54, was an active administrative assistant at the facility and is believed to have had top security clearance.
Both were last seen leaving their homes in New Mexico on foot, leaving behind their cars, keys, wallets and phones before disappearing without a trace less than four months before Garcia vanished.
All three, Garcia, Chavez and Casias, have been tied to General McCasland, who was the former commander of the Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) and oversaw research at Kirtland Air Force Base from 2001 to 2004.
Kirtland, KCNSC and LANL work closely together on national security projects, especially research involving America's nuclear capabilities.


Anthony Chavez (Left) and Melissa Casias (Right) were both employees at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Both disappeared within weeks of each other in 2025
'That entire mission runs out of Kirtland Air Force Base. A big part of it, including the technology and the production of the technology that they use, is all built in Albuquerque. So McCasland would have absolutely known and been to these facilities,' a source revealed.
Fearing that a foreign power may be taking aim at America's nuclear program again, Swecker noted: ’I think we’ve even seen instances where nuclear scientists have been taken out. They've been assassinated.’
Meanwhile, NASA scientist Monica Jacinto Reza, 60, disappeared while hiking with friends in California on June 22, 2025.
The director of the Materials Processing Group at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has also been directly tied to General McCasland through her work to invent a space-age metal called Mondaloy. The project was funded directly by AFRL while McCasland was overseeing her lab from 2011 to 2013.
In addition to the string of disappearances in the Southwest, five scientists in key areas of research have died over the last three years, including two who were murdered in their own homes.
Nuno Loureiro, 47, was assassinated at his home in the Boston suburb of Brookline on December 15, 2025. Authorities said the gunman was Claudio Neves Valente, a former classmate from Portugal.
However, a former FBI official and independent investigators have noted that Loureiro's revolutionary work in nuclear fusion may have made him a target of a greater conspiracy against US scientists.
Astrophysicist Carl Grillmair, 67, was shot to death on the front porch of his home on February 16, 2026. The California Institute of Technology researcher's work had been heavily supported by NASA's JPL, including major space telescope missions led by NASA.
Grillmair's work with the NEOWISE and NEO Surveyor has also been linked to the Air Force, as the NASA telescopes used the same systems the military relies on to track satellites and hypersonic missiles.
Two other men with deep ties to NASA JPL died recently, with the circumstances surrounding their passings remaining a mystery.
NASA scientist Frank Maiwald reportedly died on July 4, 2024 in Los Angeles at the age of 61, but the cause of death has never been made public, and officials confirmed that an autopsy was never performed.
In June 2023, just 13 months before his death, he was the lead researcher on a breakthrough that could help future space missions detect clear signs of life on other worlds, including Jupiter’s moon Europa, Saturn’s moon Enceladus, or the dwarf planet Ceres.
Michael David Hicks, a research scientist at NASA JPL, passed away on July 30, 2023 at the age of 59, but the cause of death was never made public, and no record of an autopsy being performed could be found.
Hicks had been involved with the DART Project, NASA’s test to see if humans could deflect dangerous asteroids away from Earth. He also worked on the Deep Space 1 Mission, which tested new spacecraft technology that flew by a comet in 2001.
NASA JPL has not commented on the deaths of Maiwald or Hicks, and did not reply to Daily Mail's inquiries into the nature of the scientists' work before their deaths.
In another mysterious incident, Jason Thomas, a pharmaceutical researcher testing cancer treatments at Novartis, was found dead in a Massachusetts lake on March 17, 2026, after disappearing without a trace three months earlier.
Origines du GEIPAN, organisme français d’étude des ovnis

In the late 1970s France became the first nation to create an official government body dedicated to the study of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Established on 1 May 1977 as the Groupe d’études des phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés (GEPAN), the agency was placed under the scientific supervision of the Centre national d’études spatiales (CNES). Renamed GEIPAN (Groupe d’Études et d’Informations sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non‑identifiés) in 2005, the organization continues to collect, analyse and publish reports of UAP sightings, maintaining a transparent, scientific approach that distinguishes it from the more sensationalist UFO discourse.
The early 1970s saw a surge of media‑driven reports of strange lights and objects over French skies – headlines such as “Des ovnis dans le ciel de Perpignan” and “Tulle : des ovnis aperçus par des écoliers” dominated newspapers and television. This wave coincided with the lingering secrecy of the Cold War, which fostered public mistrust of official explanations. In February 1974, Defense Minister Robert Galley told journalist Jean‑Claude Bourret on France Inter that «il faut adopter vis‑vis de ces phénomènes une attitude d’esprit extrêmement ouverte» (an “extremely open” attitude was needed). The call for a systematic, state‑backed inquiry soon found a champion in the CNES president, who agreed to give the project a scientific mandate.
The decision to create GEPAN was driven by the Ministry of Defence’s desire for an “official voice” on the phenomenon, as recalled by Frédéric Courtade, director of GEIPAN since January 2024. “C’était la vision du ministère de la Défense qu’il fallait avoir une parole officielle,” he explains, noting that the proposal “trouva un écho favorable auprès du président du CNES, qui donna une caution scientifique à l’organisation.” From its headquarters in Toulouse, the new group assembled a multidisciplinary scientific committee, including figures such as Hubert Curien, the architect of the Ariane rocket program. This early commitment to expertise set a precedent for the agency’s methodology: rigorous data collection, peer‑reviewed analysis, and public dissemination of findings.
GEIPAN’s mandate is to collect all reports of UAPs—whether submitted by civilians, military personnel, or aviation professionals—and evaluate them against known aeronautical, astronomical, or atmospheric phenomena. Each case is classified into one of four categories: identified, identified as probable, unidentified (the “U” category), or inconclusive. Over the decades, the agency has processed thousands of sightings; approximately 3 % remain classified as “unexplained” after exhaustive analysis. Courtade stresses that “dans le langage courant, on a fini par associer le terme aux petits hommes verts; or, il n’y a pas que les extraterrestres derrière les ovnis.” The agency’s reports emphasize that an “unexplained” label does not imply extraterrestrial origin, but merely that the data available cannot be matched to any known cause.
Today GEIPAN operates as a unit of the CNES, publishing its annual “Rapport d’Analyse des PAN” on an open‑access website. The organization has benefited from renewed international interest in UAPs, especially after the U.S. Pentagon’s 2020 de‑classification of several military videos. While the French government no longer prioritises UFO research as a national security issue, GEIPAN’s scientific independence remains protected, allowing it to continue its systematic cataloguing. Courtade notes that the agency’s work “sert de référence pour les chercheurs du monde entier” and that the modest 3 % of unresolved cases “sont une invitation à approfondir nos connaissances de l’atmosphère et de la technologie aéronautique.”
As the global community re‑examines anomalous aerial observations, France’s early decision to institutionalise the study of UAPs stands as a model of transparent, evidence‑based inquiry, reminding policymakers that curiosity, when coupled with scientific rigor, can turn mystery into measurable knowledge.
Origines du GEIPAN, organisme français d’étude des ovnis

In the late 1970s France became the first nation to create an official government body dedicated to the study of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Established on 1 May 1977 as the Groupe d’études des phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés (GEPAN), the agency was placed under the scientific supervision of the Centre national d’études spatiales (CNES). Renamed GEIPAN (Groupe d’Études et d’Informations sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non‑identifiés) in 2005, the organization continues to collect, analyse and publish reports of UAP sightings, maintaining a transparent, scientific approach that distinguishes it from the more sensationalist UFO discourse.
The early 1970s saw a surge of media‑driven reports of strange lights and objects over French skies – headlines such as “Des ovnis dans le ciel de Perpignan” and “Tulle : des ovnis aperçus par des écoliers” dominated newspapers and television. This wave coincided with the lingering secrecy of the Cold War, which fostered public mistrust of official explanations. In February 1974, Defense Minister Robert Galley told journalist Jean‑Claude Bourret on France Inter that «il faut adopter vis‑vis de ces phénomènes une attitude d’esprit extrêmement ouverte» (an “extremely open” attitude was needed). The call for a systematic, state‑backed inquiry soon found a champion in the CNES president, who agreed to give the project a scientific mandate.
The decision to create GEPAN was driven by the Ministry of Defence’s desire for an “official voice” on the phenomenon, as recalled by Frédéric Courtade, director of GEIPAN since January 2024. “C’était la vision du ministère de la Défense qu’il fallait avoir une parole officielle,” he explains, noting that the proposal “trouva un écho favorable auprès du président du CNES, qui donna une caution scientifique à l’organisation.” From its headquarters in Toulouse, the new group assembled a multidisciplinary scientific committee, including figures such as Hubert Curien, the architect of the Ariane rocket program. This early commitment to expertise set a precedent for the agency’s methodology: rigorous data collection, peer‑reviewed analysis, and public dissemination of findings.
GEIPAN’s mandate is to collect all reports of UAPs—whether submitted by civilians, military personnel, or aviation professionals—and evaluate them against known aeronautical, astronomical, or atmospheric phenomena. Each case is classified into one of four categories: identified, identified as probable, unidentified (the “U” category), or inconclusive. Over the decades, the agency has processed thousands of sightings; approximately 3 % remain classified as “unexplained” after exhaustive analysis. Courtade stresses that “dans le langage courant, on a fini par associer le terme aux petits hommes verts; or, il n’y a pas que les extraterrestres derrière les ovnis.” The agency’s reports emphasize that an “unexplained” label does not imply extraterrestrial origin, but merely that the data available cannot be matched to any known cause.
Today GEIPAN operates as a unit of the CNES, publishing its annual “Rapport d’Analyse des PAN” on an open‑access website. The organization has benefited from renewed international interest in UAPs, especially after the U.S. Pentagon’s 2020 de‑classification of several military videos. While the French government no longer prioritises UFO research as a national security issue, GEIPAN’s scientific independence remains protected, allowing it to continue its systematic cataloguing. Courtade notes that the agency’s work “sert de référence pour les chercheurs du monde entier” and that the modest 3 % of unresolved cases “sont une invitation à approfondir nos connaissances de l’atmosphère et de la technologie aéronautique.”
As the global community re‑examines anomalous aerial observations, France’s early decision to institutionalise the study of UAPs stands as a model of transparent, evidence‑based inquiry, reminding policymakers that curiosity, when coupled with scientific rigor, can turn mystery into measurable knowledge.
The Dyatlov Pass Incident: New Forensic Perspectives on the Ural Mountains’ Greatest Mystery

Robot Dogs on Mars? New Study Shows Semi-Autonomous Machines Could Transform Planetary Exploration

The next generation of Mars and Moon exploration may look a little more like a household pet than a traditional rover, with robotic “dogs” one day walking across alien terrain instead of rolling over it.
In a new study published in Frontiers in Space Technologies, researchers have demonstrated that a four-legged robotic system equipped with advanced scientific instruments can autonomously explore, analyze, and identify geological targets in environments designed to mimic the surfaces of Mars and the Moon.
The findings underscore a fundamental transformation in planetary exploration: moving from slow, human-directed missions to agile, semi-autonomous technologies that can efficiently traverse and study the toughest terrains in the solar system.
“Future planetary exploration missions require advanced robotic capabilities to efficiently identify and characterize lithologies, rock textures, and mineralogies for astrobiological investigations and in-situ resource utilization (ISRU),” researchers write. “This study explores an alternative semi-autonomous, multi-target exploration strategy using a legged robotic system, which could enable faster, more efficient surface prospecting on the Moon and Mars.”
In the study, researchers used “ANYmal,” a four-legged robot built by Anybotics and specially equipped with a robotic arm carrying a microscopic imager and a Raman spectrometer—tools capable of examining rock textures and identifying mineral composition on site.
Unlike traditional wheeled rovers, which struggle on steep or unstable terrain, legged robots, like ANYmal, can access regions that have long remained out of reach, including crater walls, fractured landscapes, and ice-rich slopes.
Researchers argue that the capabilities demonstrated in this study are important for advancing efficient, independent exploration, especially in environments where communication with Earth is limited.
For decades, robotic exploration has been limited not just by engineering challenges but also by physics.
On Mars, communication delays between Earth and robotic missions can range from 3 to 22 minutes one way. That means every movement, measurement, or decision must be carefully planned in advance, often resulting in painfully slow progress. Even the most advanced rovers typically travel only a few dozen to a few hundred yards per day while scientists analyze incoming data and prepare the next set of commands.
This limitation becomes even more severe for missions seeking to explore regions farther from the solar system. Future missions to places like Saturn’s moon Titan, where delays exceed an hour, will require robots capable of making decisions largely on their own.
Researchers attempt to address this problem by testing whether a robot can autonomously identify and analyze multiple scientific targets within a single mission cycle, rather than relying on step-by-step human supervision.
To replicate real-world conditions, the team conducted a series of analog missions within controlled environments that mimicked Martian and lunar terrain.
In a laboratory known as the “Marslabor” at the University of Basel, researchers recreated Mars surface conditions using basalt fragments and hematite-rich materials. Lighting conditions were carefully adjusted to replicate the balance of direct and diffuse sunlight found on Mars.
For the lunar simulations, the team conducted experiments in near darkness to mimic the extreme lighting conditions near the Moon’s southern polar regions, where extended shadows and high contrast can obscure surface features.
The robot was tasked with identifying and analyzing various rock types known to exist on Mars and the Moon, including gypsum, carbonate rocks, basalt, dunite, and anorthosite—materials that are scientifically significant for analyzing planetary history and assessing potential resources.
The study compared two distinct exploratory strategies. In the first, a semi-autonomous, multi-target approach, human operators selected multiple targets at the start of the mission. The ANYmal robot then carried out all navigation, positioning, and scientific measurements independently.
In the second, operators used the more traditional method of guiding the ANYmal robot step by step, reviewing data after each measurement and deciding what to do next.
The results showed that across four Mars-like missions, the semi-autonomous system successfully identified targets at rates of 66.7%-100%, with mission durations as short as 12 minutes.
By contrast, the human-guided lunar mission achieved a perfect 100% success rate—but took significantly longer, requiring 41 minutes to complete. The trade-off highlights a key tension in future exploration: speed versus precision.
The robots are highly agile and capable of rapidly scanning their surroundings and flagging areas of interest
(Picture: Dr Tomaso Bontognali./Cover Media)
A major innovation in the system is the combination of two complementary instruments.
A custom-built microscopic imager captures high-resolution close-up images of rock textures, revealing features like grain size, layering, and structural patterns. Meanwhile, the Raman spectrometer mounted on the robot’s arm uses laser-based spectroscopy to identify the mineral composition of samples by detecting characteristic spectral peaks (distinctive markers in the spectrum produced when the laser light interacts with mineral molecules).
Together, these tools allow the ANYmal robot to observe, hypothesize, and confirm findings, something remarkably close to what a human geologist would do in the field.
In the Martian simulations, the system successfully identified gypsum through a distinctive Raman peak at around 1010 cm⁻¹. Meanwhile, sulfur deposits were detected at approximately 473 cm⁻¹.
In lunar simulations, the robot identified olivine-rich dunite and titanium-bearing rutile, both of which are considered important for analyzing planetary formation and potential resource extraction.
The ANYmal is a quadrupedal robot capable of carrying out research on lunar environments
(Picture: ETH Zurich/Cover Images)
Perhaps the most significant implication of the study lies not in the instruments, but in the ANYmal robot itself.
Traditional rovers, like NASA’s Curiosity and Perseverance, rely on wheels—an effective but limited solution. Steep slopes, loose regolith, and rocky obstacles can quickly halt their progress.
By contrast, legged robots, like ANYmal, can step over obstacles, maintain balance on uneven terrain, and access areas that would be inaccessible to wheeled systems.
This could open up entirely new regions for exploration, including sites most likely to preserve signs of past life—such as sedimentary layers, hydrothermal systems, and ice-rich environments.
The robot was put through its paces in Marslabor at the University of Basel
(Picture: Dr Tomaso Bontognali./Cover Media)
The study envisions robots evolving from remote-controlled tools into autonomous scientific agents.
By allowing machines to select, analyze, and prioritize targets with minimal human intervention, missions could cover more ground, gather more data, and respond dynamically to new discoveries—all while operating millions of miles from Earth.
Researchers emphasize that this approach will be essential as missions push deeper into the solar system, where communication delays make real-time control impossible.
Their results suggest that semi-autonomous systems could dramatically increase the efficiency of planetary exploration, without sacrificing scientific value.
While the results are promising, the study also highlights challenges.
Environmental factors such as dust, lighting conditions, and instrument positioning can affect data quality. In some cases, blurred images or noisy spectral readings limited the system’s ability to accurately identify targets.
Still, the overall success of the experiments suggests that these obstacles are achievable and that the benefits of semi-autonomous exploration may far outweigh the risks.
Ultimately, as space agencies prepare for a new wave of missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond, autonomous four-legged robotic explorers like ANYmal could soon move from the realm of science fiction to the reality of planetary exploration.
“Our study demonstrates that a multi-target semi-autonomous exploration approach is a viable option for geological investigations in planetary surface missions where the inability to control a robot in real-time significantly slows down exploration times and, consequently, the scientific return of the mission,” researchers conclude. “These findings emphasize the need to balance mission automation, efficiency, and scientific return based on operational constraints and planetary environments.”
Disappearance of rocket scientist takes chilling turn after link to critical defense technology comes to light
The disappearance of a rocket scientist has taken a chilling new turn after it emerged she holds a one-of-a-kind patent tied to advanced US launch systems.
Monica Jacinto Reza, 60, was last seen hiking in the rugged San Gabriel Wilderness area in the Angeles National Forest on June 22 last year, at about 9.10am local time.
Several reports in the forum EISPIRATEN indicated that a man walking about 30ft ahead of Reza on the trail to the Waterman Mountain summit turned around moments later and discovered she had vanished without a trace.
According to those familiar with the hike, Reza was carrying a backpack believed to contain several liters of water when she disappeared.
New attention has focused on Reza's work as public records highlight her role in developing advanced aerospace materials linked to high-performance propulsion systems.
Records show she is the only surviving co-creator of a 2010 patent filed with Dallis Ann Hardwick, who died of cancer in 2014, for a specialized metal designed to resist burning while remaining incredibly strong under extreme heat.
She was also credited as a co-inventor of Mondaloy, a nickel-based superalloy later used in key components of advanced propulsion systems developed through US Air Force and NASA-backed research programs.
Reza spent decades working at Rocketdyne, later part of Aerojet Rocketdyne, a major aerospace contractor involved in government propulsion programs, while retired US Major General William Neil McCasland, who oversaw related Air Force research portfolios, also went missing in June 2025.

Monica Jacinto Reza, 60, was last seen hiking in the rugged San Gabriel Wilderness area within the Angeles National Forest on the trail to Waterman Mountain summit on June 22 last year

Records show she is the only surviving co-creator of a patent filed in 2010 with Dallis Ann Hardwick, who died of cancer in 2014, for a specialized metal designed to resist burning while remaining incredibly strong under extreme heat
Reza and McCasland are among nine recent cases involving scientists with ties to aerospace, defense or nuclear research whose deaths or disappearances have drawn public attention.
Mondaloy was later used in the development of the AR1 rocket engine, a US-built system designed to replace Russian-made RD-180 engines previously used on United Launch Alliance rockets, part of a broader effort to reduce America's reliance on foreign propulsion systems.
Unlike older materials that were either strong but prone to burning or burn-resistant but weak, the alloy created by Reza and her colleague was designed to do both – remain durable while resisting ignition under extreme stress.
The metal is primarily made of nickel, strengthened with smaller amounts of cobalt, chromium, aluminum and titanium, allowing it to withstand the intense heat and pressure produced during rocket launches.
According to the patent, the material was intended for use in critical engine components such as turbines, ducts and fuel systems, where failure could lead to catastrophic damage.
Materials like Mondaloy are used in rocket engines that power launches carrying military satellites, missile-warning systems and other highly sensitive payloads into orbit, missions known as national security launches because they support US defense and intelligence systems.
Reza's work received funding and development support from the US Air Force Research Laboratory, which was commanded at one point by retired US Major General William Neil McCasland.
McCasland later went missing in June 2025, prompting a separate investigation that remains ongoing.
According to the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office, McCasland was last seen speaking with a repairman at his home around 10am before his wife left the residence about an hour later.

Reza's technology helped create the AR1 engine, set to replace Russian RD-180 engines on United Launch Alliance rockets

US Air Force Major General William Neil McCasland, 68, who was in the UFO community, went missing in February after leaving on a hike near his New Mexico home
When she returned shortly after noon, the house was empty, with his phone, prescription glassesand wearable devices left behind.
Investigators noted that his hiking boots and a .38-caliber revolver were missing and he was reported missing later that afternoon.
Search teams later discovered a US Air Force sweatshirt roughly one mile from the residence, though officials have not confirmed whether it belonged to McCasland.
Authorities have not publicly confirmed foul play in the case, and the investigation remains active.
Another mysterious case involves Michael David Hicks, a research scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who died on July 30, 2023, at the age of 59. Officials have not publicly alleged foul play in his death.
Reports also highlighted the death of NASA scientist Frank Maiwald, who died on July 4, 2024, in Los Angeles at the age of 61. Authorities confirmed that no autopsy was performed and the cause of death has not been publicly disclosed.

Michael David Hicks was a research scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory prior to his death in 2023


Frank Maiwald (left) and Carl Grillmair had deep ties to NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab in California before both men died within the last two years
Maiwald had worked at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory since 1999 and contributed to projects involving advanced satellite technology capable of scanning Earth and other planetary bodies.
Anthony Chavez, a former employee at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), disappeared on May 4, 2025. Police in Los Alamos said the search for Chavez, 79, remains ongoing with no new information released nearly a year later.
Since 2024, several additional scientists connected to aerospace research have died under separate circumstances.

Melissa Casias worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, a long-running nuclear research facility, before disappearing on June 26 last year

Anthony Chavez was an employee at the Los Alamos National Laboratory until 2017. He disappeared without a trace in May last year

Jason Thomas was found dead after being pulled from a Massachusetts lake on March 17. He had been missing since December 12
Melissa Casias has not been seen since June 26 last year, when her family said she uncharacteristically decided to work from home, but was last spotted miles from their house walking alone without her wallet, phone or keys.
Casias, 54, was an administrative assistant at LANL.
The news came about astrophysicist Carl Grillmair, 67, who was shot and killed at his California home on February 16.
The California Institute of Technology researcher had worked on major NASA-supported telescope missions, including the Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer and NEO Surveyor programs.
Those projects used infrared detection systems capable of tracking asteroids, technology that shares similarities with systems used to monitor satellites and hypersonic missiles.

Nuno Loureiro was leading efforts to create fusion energy, a form of clean energy that could upend the multi-trillion-dollar fossil fuel energy industry
While serving as commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory, McCasland oversaw programs related to space surveillance and infrared tracking systems.
Two additional researchers in Massachusetts were also found dead in separate incidents. Nuno Loureiro, a scientist working on nuclear fusion research, was shot in his Brookline home last year.
Jason Thomas, a pharmaceutical researcher studying cancer treatments at Novartis, was later found dead in a Wakefield lake on March 17 after disappearing months earlier.
Authorities have not publicly linked the cases, and officials in several investigations have said there is no confirmed evidence suggesting foul play beyond the circumstances already reported.
Two UFOs Over Ninole, Hawaii, April 7, 2026 5:43am UFO UAP Paranormal Breaking Sighting News
Light Ship over Utah, made of light entities sharing info, Utah, USA April 10, 2026, UFO UAP Sighting News.Light Ship over Utah, made of light entities sharing info, Utah, USA April 10, 2026, UFO UAP Sighting News.

The best photos from NASA's first moon mission in more than 50 years

NBC News; NASA
The Artemis II astronauts concluded their record-breaking 10-day journey on Friday with a smooth splashdown in the Pacific Ocean.
NASA’s Artemis II mission, the first crewed flight around the moon in more than 50 years, has been a feast for the eyes.
NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Christina Koch and Victor Glover and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen concluded their 10-day mission Friday evening with a splashdown landing in the Pacific Ocean.
The crew launched April 1 on the 10-day journey, which took them around the far side of the moon. They traveled farther from Earth than any humans had before, breaking the distance record set by the Apollo 13 crew in 1970.
NASA’s Artemis II Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft inside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
John Kraus / NASA
Their photos from the lunar flyby on Monday — when they saw parts of the moon that no humans had ever viewed with their own eyes — have captivated public attention.
NASA plans to release many more images from the mission now that the crew can hand over its data, rather than beaming it back from space. But for now, here are some of the best photos from Artemis II.
From left to right: Mission specialist Jeremy Hansen of CSA, pilot Victor Glover, commander Reid Wiseman and mission specialist Christina Koch walk out ahead of the launch on April 1.
Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images
The mission launched from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida. The Artemis II crew were the first people that NASA’s Orion spacecraft and Space Launch System rocket had ever carried into space.
Artemis II was one of the most highly anticipated space events in recent years, since it was the first time people have launched toward the moon since Apollo 17 in 1972.

The Artemis II mission lifts off at Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla.
Jim Watson / AFP via Getty Images

The launch was delayed several times earlier this year for rocket repairs, but when the day finally arrived, local officials in central Florida’s “Space Coast” estimated that hundreds of thousands of people flocked to the area to watch Artemis II lift off.


Jim Watson / AFP via Getty Images

Although Wiseman, Koch, Glover and Hansen did not land on the lunar surface, their mission was designed to test the rocket and capsule ahead of a planned moon landing in 2028. After that, NASA hopes to build a base on the moon and establish a long-term presence there.
On the second day of the flight, the Orion capsule performed a key engine burn to put it on a path toward the moon. The maneuver, known as a translunar injection burn, boosted the spacecraft’s velocity enough to send it out of Earth orbit.


The astronauts then spent three days journeying to the moon. Early on Monday, their Orion capsule entered a region of space known as the lunar sphere of influence, where the moon’s gravitational pull is stronger than Earth’s.

The most anticipated moment of the mission came on Monday, when the crew spent seven hours taking close-up photos of the lunar surface and observing specific sites on the moon, including impact craters, ridges and vast volcanic plains.
During their flyby around the moon’s far side, the astronauts reached a distance of 252,756 miles from Earth, which was more than 4,100 miles farther than the Apollo 13 record.

One of the first photos from the flyby released publicly showed the Artemis II crew’s view of “Earthset,” as Earth disappeared out of view behind the moon.
The photo was a nod to the iconic “Earthrise” image taken during the Apollo 8 mission in 1968, when astronauts Bill Anders, Frank Borman and Jim Lovell circumnavigated the moon. That archival image, however, captured Earth re-emerging beyond the edge of the moon, rather than dipping below it.


Other photos showed surprisingly rugged topography along the moon’s terminator, the dividing line between its illuminated side and the side cloaked in darkness.
“There’s just so much magic in the terminator — the islands of light, the valleys that look like black holes,” Glover radioed to Mission Control at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. “You’d fall straight to the center of the moon if you stepped in some of those. It’s just so visually captivating.”
The astronauts focused some of their observations on Orientale basin, a nearly 600-mile-wide crater that straddles the moon’s near and far sides. The 3.8 billion-year-old basin was formed when a large object smacked into the moon’s surface.
The crew’s high-resolution photos of features in and around the moon’s impact craters could help scientists understand how the moon formed and how its topography changed over time.

The astronauts even captured dramatic images of the moon’s crater-filled south polar region, where NASA is interested in landing astronauts on future Artemis missions.
The moon’s south pole is pockmarked with craters that are thought to be filled with water ice. But the area is significantly more challenging to navigate than those near the moon’s equator, where the Apollo astronauts touched down. NASA has said observations during the Artemis II mission could be used to pinpoint possible landing sites for missions to come.
Toward the end of their lunar flyby, the astronauts became the first to witness a solar eclipse from space. They made detailed observations over the course of about an hour, as the sun slipped behind the moon and re-emerged again on the other side.
During the early stages of the eclipse, the astronauts had to don special glasses (much like the ones worn by people on Earth to view solar eclipses) to protect their eyes until the sun’s light was fully blocked by the moon.

The eclipse photos show a darkened moon with the sun’s outermost atmosphere, the corona, glowing around the edges. In one of the images, bright points of light are visible around the edges of the moon. Those spots turned out to be planets, including Saturn, Mars and Venus.
Wiseman called the eclipse “an absolutely spectacular, magnificent experience.”
During the eclipse, as the moon was cloaked in darkness, the crew members spotted flashes of light from meteoroids smacking into the lunar surface.

While this phenomenon is rarely seen, such impacts are common on the moon because it lacks an atmosphere to protect it from incoming debris. Studying these cosmic crashes can help scientists understand the moon’s evolutionary history.
Kelsey Young, the Artemis II lunar science lead, said members of the mission’s science team were “jumping up and down literally” after the crew reported seeing six impact flashes.
After the flyby, the astronauts began their three-day journey home to Earth. By Tuesday afternoon, the Orion capsule exited the lunar sphere of influence.
During its high-stakes re-entry through Earth’s atmosphere, the Orion capsule faced extreme temperatures nearing 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

After a fiery plunge through the atmosphere, the capsule deployed its parachutes, then splashed down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of San Diego.
Country star shares stunning video of 'UFO' escorting her flight
Country music star Kacey Musgraves has made a shocking admission online, revealing she had 'the craziest UFO experience.'
Musgraves, 37, explained in an Instagram Story on Friday that she and her manager were flying from Fort Worth, Texas, to Nashville, Tennessee, when she spotted lights in the sky that 'didn't look normal.'
The Grammy-winning singer and songwriter of 'Space Cowboy' said she watched the 'orbs' for about 45 minutes, and they 'followed' her flight from Little Rock, Arkansas to her destination.
'These orbs were not moving like any craft that we can control. They were intermittently coming and going, forming triangle patterns,' she recalled.
'Sometimes they would get extremely bright and change color, change size.'
After the plane touched down, Musgraves spoke to the pilots, who reportedly told her: 'We've seen these every single night.'
'All the other pilots are seeing them, too, and nobody knows what they are,' Musgraves added, recounting what the pilots told her.
She also shared a video of the mysterious lights in the distance, which appear to trail her for some time as they loop around in the darkness of the night sky.

Country music star Kacey Musgraves has made a shocking admission online, revealing she had 'the craziest UFO experience'
Musgraves is an acclaimed American singer-songwriter known for blending country with pop and folk.
She is recognized for her witty, progressive songwriting and multiple Grammy wins, including Album of the Year for Golden Hour from 2018.
Rising from Nashville Star in 2007, she achieved fame with hits like 'Merry Go 'Round' and 'Follow Your Arrow.'
In the video, Musgraves revealed that she has seen 'many crazy things,' from 'fire burning in the sky to things she cannot explain.
She said that the lights were about 50,000 feet in the air, admitting the video quality was poor.
'It looks like I filmed them on a f***ing toaster, but that's the quality we're working with,' she said of the videos taken on her iPhone 17.
'It was hard to focus because they were far off and it was nighttime.'
She then painted a picture of what she saw, noting that the orbs were not moving like any craft that humans can control.
'They were intermittently coming and going, forming triangle patterns,' Musgraves continued.
'Sometimes they would get extremely bright and change color, change size.'

She also shared a video of the mysterious lights in the distance, which appear to trail her for some time as they loop around in the darkness of the night sky
The country singer is just one of many famous individuals who believe they have experienced an encounter of the third kind.
Singer Miley Cyrus claimed that she was not only chased by 'some sort of UFO' in San Bernardino, California, but she 'made eye contact' with the alien pilot.
She said in a 2020 interview with Interview magazine that she 'couldn't really look at the sky after' her encounter.
She said that the alien craft resembled a glowing, flying snowplow.
She said: 'I did see it flying, and my friend saw it, too. There were a couple of other cars on the road, and they also stopped to look, so I think what I saw was real.

Singer Miley Cyrus claimed that she was not only chased by 'some sort of UFO' in San Bernardino, California, but she 'made eye contact' with the alien pilot

Demi Lovato is also convinced that aliens are real, and we should stop using the word 'alien' in case it offends
'I didn't feel threatened at all, actually, but I did see a being sitting in front of the flying object.
She admitted, however, that there was a possibility the encounter could have been due to 'the weed wax' she had recently used.
Demi Lovato is also convinced that aliens are real, and we should stop using the word 'alien' in case it offends.
She said, 'I think that we have to stop calling them aliens because aliens is a derogatory term for anything.'
In a 2020 Instagram post, she revealed that she had contacted aliens through meditation.
She wrote, 'Over the past couple of months, I have dug deep into the science of consciousness and experienced not only peace and serenity as I've never known, but I also have witnessed the most incredibly profound sightings both in the sky as well as feet away from me.
'This planet is on a very negative path toward destruction, but WE can change that together.
'If we were to get one percent of the population to meditate and make contact, we would force our governments to acknowledge the truth about extraterrestrial life among us and change our destructive habits, destroying our planet.'
'True' site of Jesus' crucifixion debated as experts split between two locations
A heated debate over the exact location of Jesus' crucifixion has reignited, with Christians, scholars, and faith leaders divided over the true site of Golgotha.
Golgotha, meaning 'Place of the Skull' in Aramaic, is described in the Bible as the location of Jesus' crucifixion outside Jerusalem.
Some believe the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built directly above the site, a theory dating back to the 4th century when Roman Emperor Constantine the Great ordered a search for the location of Jesus' death and burial.
Early Christians pointed to a site they had long revered, prompting Constantine to build a church there to mark the spot.
Others argue the execution took place on a hill beyond the ancient city walls, pointing to terrain they believe better matches biblical descriptions.
Pastor Josh Howerton, who leads Lakepointe Church in Texas, recently promoted the hill theory during an episode of his podcast Live Free, saying: 'The gospels tell us Jesus was taken outside the city walls to be crucified. This fits. It's within walking distance.'
He also pointed to older photographs that he said showed the hill resembling a skull formation, with features that appeared to form eye sockets and a nose.
He presented an image from the early 1990s that some viewers interpreted as skull-like, though he suggested erosion or possible seismic activity may have altered its appearance over time.
The claims quickly drew mixed reactions online, with many people defending the traditional belief that Golgotha is beneath the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

Images of the hill outside of Jerusalem appeared to show features resembling a skull, including eye sockets and a nose

The hill near the Garden Tomb, however, looks different today due to decades of erosion, quarrying and urban development that have gradually altered the rock face
'Golgotha is at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Historical and archaeological evidence confirms it,' one commenter wrote in response to Howerton's video.
Another wrote: 'You forgot that the city walls moved out from where they were at the time of Christ’s crucifixion. The most likely location for Golgotha is the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.'
The Bible cites 'Golgotha' in several chapters, including in the books of Matthew and Mark, both of which state that Jesus was brought there to die, and the name means 'the place of the skull.'
Howerton also included the biblical accounts of Jesus being taken outside the city.
Hebrews 13:12 reads: 'And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through his own blood.'
While John 19:17 reads: 'Carrying his own cross, he went out to the place of the Skull (which in Aramaic is called Golgotha).'
Supporters of the hill theory often cite the nearby Garden Tomb as well, a rock-cut burial site discovered in the 19th century just outside Jerusalem's Damascus Gate, which they say strengthens the case for the alternative location.
The hill near the Garden Tomb, however, looks different today due to decades of erosion, quarrying and urban development that have gradually altered the rock face.

Supporters of the hill theory often cite the nearby Garden Tomb as well, a rock-cut burial site discovered in the 19th century just outside Jerusalem's Damascus Gate, which they say strengthens the case for the alternative location

Some believe the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built directly above the site, a theory dating back to the 4th century, when Roman Emperor Constantine the Great ordered a search for the location of Jesus' death and burial
Historic photographs from the late 19th and early 20th centuries show more defined features that some believed resembled a skull, but modern construction, roadwork and natural weathering have softened those formations over time.
However, most archaeologists and historians consider the Garden Tomb to be an Iron Age tomb, between the seventh and eighth centuries BC, which is too old to be the actual burial place of Jesus.
Support for the hill theory dates back to the mid-1800s, when German theologian Otto Thenius first proposed that a skull-shaped ridge north of Jerusalem could be the biblical Golgotha.
The idea gained wider attention in the late nineteenth century when British officer Major General Charles Gordon visited the site and argued that the rocky hill resembled a human skull, leading many to refer to it as Gordon's Calvary.
Other early researchers, including British surveyor Claude R Conder and biblical scholar Henry Baker Tristram, supported the location because it lay outside the ancient city walls, matching Gospel descriptions that Jesus was crucified beyond Jerusalem's boundaries.
Many historians and archaeologists continue to support the traditional belief that Jesus was crucified at the site now marked by the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem's Old City.

Pastor Josh Howerton (right), who leads Lakepointe Church in Texas , recently promoted the hill theory during an episode of his podcast Live Free , saying: The gospels tell us Jesus was taken outside the city walls to be crucified. This fits'

The claims quickly drew mixed reactions online, with many people defending the traditional belief that Golgotha is beneath the Church of the Holy Sepulchre
That theory dates back to the 4th century, when Roman Emperor Constantine the Great ordered a search for the location of Jesus' crucifixion and burial after converting to Christianity.
Early Christians in Jerusalem identified the site as Golgotha, prompting Constantine to construct a church there, establishing what became one of the oldest continuously recognized holy sites in Christianity.
Modern archaeological research has reinforced the traditional view, with scholars such as Israeli archaeologist Dan Bahat noting that the area surrounding the church was once a quarry located outside Jerusalem's city walls during the time of Jesus, consistent with biblical descriptions.
Historian Joan E Taylor, who reexamined historical and archaeological evidence in a widely cited 1998 study, concluded that the general area of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre remains the most plausible location for the crucifixion, despite ongoing debate.
A more recent discovery in 2025 uncovered remnants of an ancient garden beneath the foundation of the church, which aligns with the Gospel of John.
John 19:41 reads: 'Now in the place where he was crucified, there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulcher, wherein was never man yet laid. There laid they Jesus.'
A team from Sapienza University of Rome analyzed plant remains from the site and dated them to the pre-Christian era, placing them around the time of Jesus’ crucifixion and burial. Historians generally date his death to around 33 AD.
The moon is green and brown? Why scientists are already excited about Artemis II's historic lunar photos
Two geological findings stand out so far. One of these is impact flashes — brief but bright flashes of light from when space rocks slam into the moon, leaving craters behind.
Artemis II astronauts Reid Wiseman and Jeremy Hanson reported seeing at least five of these flashes during their lunar flyby. Geologists hope to review the crew's images, once they return to Earth, to potentially identify the craters associated with the impacts.
"The conditions that [the crew] had to view those was perfect," Osinski said, referring to the crew's passage over the lunar terminator — the stark dividing line between the moon's bright day-side and dark night-side, where contrast is heightened and flashes are easier to spot.
The lunar terminator, where day meets night, offers the highest-contrast observations. The team spotted impact flashes from falling space rocks near this area. (Image credit: NASA)Secondly, mission scientists are eager to investigate the crew’s descriptions of lunar colors. Geologists have only heard a few quick impressions from the crew so far, mainly over voice communications open to the public. But the Artemis II crew was recording more lunar flyby observations by voice and in notes in an archive that will take weeks to review.
The astronauts reported some intriguing things, such as patches of green and brown on the lunar surface.
"We do know there is color on the lunar surface," Osinski said. The human eye, he added, is more sensitive to color than the cameras on board Artemis II, so "that's definitely going to be something interesting to follow up."
For years, Osinski has been giving geologic training to Artemis II crew members. Hansen is a repeat contributor to Osinski's remote Canadian crater expeditions, often done alongside Indigenous groups. During Artemis II preparation, mission specialist Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency backup astronaut Jenni Gibbons joined Hansen and Osinski on a 2023 expedition to a moon-like crater in northern Labrador, Canada.
What to read nextArtemis II moon flyby begins: How to watch and what to know
Artemis II: NASA is preparing for a return to the moon, but why is it going back?
Some Artemis II astronauts took a geology field training and research expedition to the Kamestastin crater in northern Labrador before their mission to survey the moon. From left: Astronauts Raja Chari (NASA), Jenni Gibbons (CSA), Christina Koch (NASA) and Jeremy Hansen (CSA). (Image credit: Canadian Space Agency)Because the Artemis II astronauts could not sample the lunar surface directly, they were trained on how to make descriptions. They also used "situational awareness" for some situations, such as distinguishing between volcanic and impact processes, although the bulk of the interpretation will require months of work on Earth by geologists after the mission is complete.
But there is more that the Artemis II astronauts can provide. The astronauts form part of a group of less than 30 people who have seen the moon close up in-person, enabling them to bring human eyes and experiences to observations.
What's more, Artemis II is the first lunar astronaut mission in nearly two generations, enabling the astronauts (and their supporting scientists) to bring decades of insights into crater impacts, water ice and other features of the moon that Apollo officials did not have access to. The images Artemis II sent to Earth so far are just a subset of what's on board. Osinski said that in particular, he is interested in seeing the high-resolution 400-milimeter (16 inches) lens images by the crew to compare with images taken by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
After Artemis II returns, Osinski and other geologists will take what was learned from the astronaut observations to work on future lunar surface missions. Planning has been ongoing for the surface work for two years, with the team now working on items such as narrowing down which sites might be useful to land at, and announcing which participating scientists will join.
Jacob Bleacher, NASA's chief exploration scientist, told Live Science the geology teams are working on landing products for the first astronauts on the surface, and are expecting to get more data from commercial landing missions supporting NASA. Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost mission was the first to make it there, achieving 60 days of operations in 2025. "We procured a good bit of data from them," Bleacher said, and the hope is that more companies will touch down before Artemis IV brings astronauts to the lunar surface in 2028.
For now, geologists are already hard at work making a plan for the moon-sample return.
Osinski is co-investigator of the geology team that will support the Artemis IV astronauts. Osinski said his team will likely be working with a lower-resolution live video feed that will enable, at least to an extent, the geologists on Earth to help the astronauts on site with observations.
That said, Artemis surface astronauts may also have to make quick decisions about sampling, which will be another training regime, Osinski said, requiring them to work independently.
"They might have to be making a split-second decision on the surface, if they're running out of time at a station: you know, 'Do I choose this one or this one?' And there might not be time for the back and forth with the science team on Mission Control," Osinski said.
RELATED VIDEOS

The Ancient City of Mohenjo-Daro, a “Lost” Archaeological Enigma, Could Be Centuries Older Than Previously Thought

A century ago, when the ancient ruins of the lost city of Mohenjo-Daro were rediscovered, archaeologists hadn’t anticipated that their discovery would reveal evidence of a thriving hub of the ancient world, which had remained hidden for nearly 3,700 years.
Among the earliest discoveries at the location were what had been thought to be the remains of a Buddhist stupa. However, once major excavations were underway, much more would be revealed over the next several decades, as archaeologists unearthed the buried remains of a massive ancient city, complete with a surprisingly modern layout and rectilinear buildings, that had remained hidden under the sands of what is, today, recognized as modern southeastern Pakistan for thousands of years.
Part of what made Mohenjo-Daro so fascinating was its age: the city, eventually revealed to have been among the most expansive settlements ever seen during the time of the ancient Indus Valley Civilization, was also one of the oldest major cities in the region, with an estimated age of around 4,500 years.
Ruins seen at the ancient site of Mohenjo-Daro, which in 1980 became recognized as a Unesco World Heritage Site
(Image Credit: Gaffar772/Wikimedia/CC 3.0)
However, recent geoarchaeological studies reported by the Sindh Directorate General of Antiquities & Archaeology (DGAA) now suggest that those original estimates may have been off by several centuries, meaning that the enigmatic Mohenjo-Daro is likely far older than previously believed.
Mohenjo-Daro has captivated archaeologists since its discovery due in part to the remarkable level of sophistication exhibited by its ancient builders.
From its structural elements, which, in many ways, resemble urban planning for modern cities, to its remarkably advanced water infrastructure, which includes sewers, baths, and wells, many elements of Mohenjo-Daro set it apart from other cities of its era.

The “Great Bath” at Mohenjo-Daro, as it appeared in 2014
(Image Credit: Saqib Qayyum/CC 3.0/Wikimedia).
Going beyond just appearances, the remarkable architecture present at the ancient site, whose name translates to mean “Mound of the Dead Men,” points to an equally sophisticated social structure, which is suggestive of both cultured urban life and a central government that would be required for the management and oversight of its once-40,000-strong population.
And yet, as mysterious as the question of its origins is that of Mohenjo-Daro’s demise; the site appears to have been abandoned by around 1,700 BCE, along with most other major urban hubs that once represented the flourishing Indus Valley Civilization.
Now, in new geoarchaeological work undertaken by the Sindh Directorate General of Antiquities and Archaeology (DGAA), it appears that Mohenjo-Daro could be even older than previous estimates, which placed its rise to around 2,500 BCE.
According to new timelines for the construction of an ancient mudbrick wall encircling the site’s western Stupa Mound, one of the site’s most prominent features, recent radiocarbon dating suggests that this portion of the city dates to sometime between 2,600 and as early as 2,700 BCE, which points to activity at the site at least a century earlier than once thought.
Portions of Mohenjo-Daro’s ancient walls constructed from mudbrick, as seen at the famous archaeological site in 2013
(Image Credit: Smn121/Wikimedia/CC 4.0)
According to a statement released by the DGAA regarding their geoarchaeological re-dating of the site, these mudbrick walls “were expanded and maintained until around 2200 BCE and possibly even longer.”
“Future investigations will trace the plan of the city wall around the Stupa Mound to try and locate gateways and to determine how this wall functioned and when it began to erode,” the DGAA said.
While the new radiocarbon dates push back the timelines for Mohenjo-Daro’s earliest construction phases, several questions about the ancient site remain.
Among the site’s many mysteries, the presence of localized areas in which bricks appear to have been fused, as well as human remains suggestive of a “massacre” that may have occurred at some point, has helped give rise to beliefs involving an ancient invasion or other cataclysmic event that occurred at Mohenjo-Daro that might have contributed to its demise.
However, scholars have disputed such claims for more than half a century. As the renowned archaeologist and Indus Valley scholar George F. Dales wrote in 1964, “The details of the story of the decline and fall of the Indus civilization are, as yet, far from clear, but a pattern of contributing factors is taking shape. This pattern does not include invasion and massacre as basic factors. On the contrary, it appears that a series of natural disasters occurred–possibly as swiftly, certainly more devastating than any hypothetical invasion.”
In fact, to this day, the enigmatic Mohenjo-Daro remains threatened by the forces of nature. As the BBC reported in 2012, salty groundwater is now gradually eroding the mudbricks of the site’s ancient walls, which for thousands of years remained protected before their excavation began in the early 20th century.
“It is definitely a complicated site to protect, given the problems of salinity, humidity and rainfall,” remarked the Pakistani archaeologist Dr. Asma Ibrahim at the time, adding that “most of the attempts at conservation by the authorities have been so bad and so amateur they have only accelerated the damage.”
Given such circumstances, if efforts to preserve this ancient enigma aren’t improved, the famous city of Mohenjo-Daro—unearthed after many thousands of years—could potentially become a “lost” archaeological wonder all over again.
Artemis II duikt straks langs de verre maanzijde
Artemis II nadert zijn cruciale scheervlucht langs de Maan. De bemenste Orion-capsule verbreekt hierbij records, verliest tijdelijk contact met Aarde en maakt een zonsverduistering mee vanaf de verre maanzijde.
Het is inmiddels enkele dagen geleden dat de SLS-raket met donderend geweld opsteeg vanaf lanceercomplex 39B in Florida. De bemenste Artemis II-missie van NASA bevindt zich momenteel in de slotfase van haar reis naar de Maan, met de aanstaande scheervlucht die nog geen etmaal van ons verwijderd is. Terwijl de vierkoppige crew aan boord van de Orion-capsule ‘Integrity’ zich opmaakt voor dit hoogtepunt van deze missie, blikken we terug op de afgelopen dagen én vooruit op wat komen gaat…
(Boven:) Een hoog-resolutie selfie van de Orion-capsule, gemaakt met een camera op één van de zonnepanelen tijdens een routine-inspectie op dag 2 van de Artemis II-missie. (Onder:) De Aarde gefotografeerd door commandant Reid Wiseman vanuit het raam van Orion, kort na de translunar injection-stuwing, in de vroege nacht van 3 april 2026.
Foto: NASA/Reid Wiseman
Na de geslaagde lancering in de nacht van 1 op 2 april voerde de bemanning een reeks cruciale manoeuvres uit. Zo werd de ‘translunar injection’-stuwing van bijna zes minuten succesvol afgerond, waarmee Orion een ellipsvormige baan om Aarde op weg naar de Maan werd gezet.
(Boven:) Een zich verwijderende Aarde en de onderste zijde (de European Service Module) met hoofdmotor in beeld, bezien door een camera gehecht aan de zonnepanelen. (Onder:) Victor Glover, Jeremy Hansen en Reid Wiseman samen aan het werk in de Orion capsule, hier halverwege en tijdens dag drie van de missie op weg naar de Maan.
Foto’s: NASA
Eerder demonstreerden de astronauten al de indrukwekkende wendbaarheid van hun capsule tijdens een ‘proximity operations’-test, waarbij ze op slechts enkele tientallen meters van de bovenste rakettrap manoeuvreerden om een koppeling te simuleren en de wendbaarheid van Orion te testen. Een tijdelijk probleem met een knipperend lampje van het toilet bleek gelukkig snel verholpen, en meerdere geplande ‘outbound trajectory correction’-stuwingen, simpel: kleine en geplande koerscorrecties, werden afgelast omdat Orion al op een haast perfecte koers lag – een teken van uitzonderlijke precisie.
NASA-astronaut Christina Koch (links) neemt de controle over van de Orion-capsule tijdens een handmatige stuurtest op dag 4 van de Artemis II-missie. Naast haar zijn CSA-astronaut Jeremy Hansen (midden) en NASA-astronaut Victor Glover (rechts) te zien. Foto: NASA
De laatste dagen stonden in het teken van de voorbereiding op de scheervlucht van komende nacht: 6 op 7 april. Gisteren testte de bemanning uitgebreid hun oranje ‘Orion Crew Survival System’-ruimtepakken, waarbij ze onder meer de pakken onder druk zetten, lektests uitvoerden en de bewegingsvrijheid beoordeelden.
Victor Glover (meest links), Jeremy Hansen, Christina Koch en Reid Wiseman (meest rechts) tijdens de ceremonie waarin Hansen zijn gouden vleugels ‘Gold Wings’ ontvangt voor zijn eerste ruimtevlucht, tijdens de vijfde vluchtdag.
Foto: NASA
Ook ontvingen ze hun definitieve lijst met 30 observatie doelwitten van het maanoppervlak, waaronder het 950 kilometer brede ‘Oriëntale-bekken’. Deze inslagkrater, die grotendeels op de verre zijde van de Maan ligt, zal door de bemanning uitgebreid worden gefotografeerd en geanalyseerd:
Een screenshot van de software die de Artemis II-bemanning op hun boordcomputers ziet. De software begeleidt hen bij het uitvoeren van het wetenschappelijke observatieplan rond de Maan. Op deze afbeelding is het Oriëntale-bekken te zien, doelwit nummer 12, rechts omcirkeld.
Afbeelding: NASA
Vanaf vanavond begint het spektakel echt. Sinds vannochtend 6:41 uur (6 april, Nederlandse tijd) bevindt Orion zich in de zwaartekrachtinvloedssfeer van de Maan en zal er tot morgenavond 19:25 uur in een hyperbola vluchtbaan vertoeven, vanaf en tot aan een overgangsafstand maan-tot-capsule van 66.100 kilometer. Het absolute hoogtepunt volgt vannacht. Om 01:02 uur (7 april, Nederlandse tijd) zal Orion het dichtst bij de Maan zijn, op een afstand van slechts 6.550 kilometer boven het oppervlak. Kort daarna, om 01:07 uur, bereikt de capsule haar maximale afstand tot de Aarde: maar liefst 406.700 kilometer. Daarmee verbreken de astronauten het record van Apollo 13 uit 1970 voor de verste afstand die de mens ooit van de Aarde heeft gereisd.
Een bijzonder spannend moment volgt al iets eerder, rond 00:44 uur (7 april), wanneer Orion achter de Maan verdwijnt. Gedurende ongeveer 40 minuten is er dan radiostilte; onze natuurlijke satelliet blokkeert alle signalen. Precies op dat moment zullen de astronauten getuige zijn van een ‘Earthset’ – een Aarde ondergang – en even later, om 01:25 uur, weer een ‘Earthrise’ zien wanneer de Aarde achter de Maan terug opkomt. Direct daarna wordt het radiocontact hersteld. De klap op de vuurpijl is een zonsverduistering, zichtbaar vanuit de capsule tussen 02:35 en 03:32 uur. De zon schuift dan ruim een uur lang achter de Maan, wat de bemanning een unieke kans geeft om de corona van onze Zon te bestuderen.
Na het verlaten van de invloedssfeer van de Maan op dinsdagavond 19:25 uur en terug in die van Aarde, zal Orion op eigen kracht verder reizen. De capsule zal dan langzaam maar zeker door de zwaartekracht van de Aarde worden teruggetrokken en langzaam aan versneld terugvallen. De bemanning richt zich dan op de laatste loodjes: een vurige terugkeer in de atmosfeer van de Aarde, gevolgd door een splashdown in de Stille Oceaan. Tot die tijd genieten Wiseman, Glover, Koch en Hansen van een uitzicht dat maar weinigen hen voor hebben gegaan: een volledige Maan, gezien vanaf de verre kant.
De Aarde omringd door de duisternis van de ruimte, wordt steeds kleiner naarmate de bemanning dichter bij de Maan komt. Deze foto is genomen door Koch, één van de Artemis II-astronauten op de vijfde dag van de missie.
Foto: NASA
Artemis II nadert hiermee dus haar meest kritieke en interessante fase van deze test- en observatievlucht in de komende uren. Van een afstandsrecord in de diepere ruimte tot een angstvallige radiostilte en een eclips: de komende uren bepalen niet alleen de wetenschappelijke oogst, maar ook het succes van de eerste bemenste maanmissie in meer dan vijftig jaar. Terwijl de capsule onverbiddelijk dichterbij komt, kijken miljoenen mee – klaar om het volgende hoofdstuk in de ruimtevaartgeschiedenis te ontvouwen.
De Maan, vlak voor het slapengaan op dag 5, gezien vanuit het andere raam van Orion, kort nadat de capsule in de invloedssfeer van de Maan was gekomen. Missiespecialist Christina Koch: ‘We vallen nu naar de Maan in plaats van dat we van de Aarde wegsnellen. Wat een geweldige mijlpaal!’
Foto: NASA.Koch
Wil je het aanstaande missiedeel van Artemis II’ maanvlucht meekijken komende uren, volg dan onderstaande livestream van NASA:
…of volg onze themapagina’s Artemis, Astronauten, De Nieuwe Ruimtewedloop, of Ruimtevaart om helemaal bij te zijn in deze interessante tijden!
Uitgelezen? Luister ook eens naar de Scientias Podcast:
Explorers stumble across a secret ISLAND in Antarctica's 'danger zone' – after initially mistaking it for a dirty iceberg
Scientists exploring the Weddell Sea in the Antarctic were in for a surprise after stumbling across a secret island in an area marked a 'danger zone'.
A 93–strong team on board the Alfred Wegener Institute's (AWI) icebreaker, Polarstern, made the discovery after rough weather conditions forced them to seek shelter next to Joinville Island.
There, they spotted a strange brown landmass, which turned out to be a previously undiscovered island.
'On our route, the nautical chart showed an area with unexplored dangers to navigation, but it wasn't clear what it was or where the information came from,' explained Simon Dreutter, a specialist in underwater mapping at AWI.
'I scoured all the coastlines we had here in the bathymetry lab and went back to the bridge.
'Looking out of the window, we saw an "iceberg" that looked kind of dirty.
'On closer inspection, we realised that it was probably rock.
'We then changed course and headed in that direction and it became increasingly clear that we had an island in front of us!'

Scientists exploring the Weddell Sea in the Antarctic were in for a surprise after stumbling across a secret island in an area marked a 'danger zone'

After spotting the landmass, the team carefully steered Polarstern towards it, eventually coming within 150 metres
After spotting the landmass, the team carefully steered Polarstern towards it, eventually coming within 150 metres.
Using a drone, they were able to explore the island from above, confirming its surprisingly large size.
The island measures 130 metres long, 50 metres wide, and protrudes about 16 metres out of the water.
This makes it around the same length as the Great Pyramid of Giza.
The experts are unclear why the island is marked as a danger zone on the nautical chart, but not as a coastline in other data sets.
'On the satellite images analysed, the island could hardly be distinguished from the numerous icebergs drifting around in the immediate vicinity due to its ice cover,' they added.
However, before the island can be added to maps, it must be named.
While the team are undecided on what to name the island, many eager fans have already thrown a number of suggestions in the ring on X (formerly Twitter).

Using a drone, they were able to explore the island from above, confirming its size. The island measures 130 metres long, 50 metres wide, and protrudes about 16 metres out of the water. This makes it around the same length as the Great Pyramid of Giza

The experts are unclear why the island is marked as a danger zone on the nautical chart, but not as a coastline in other data sets

A 93–strong team on board the Alfred Wegener Institute's (AWI) icebreaker, Polarstern, made the discovery after rough weather conditions forced them to seek shelter next to Joinville Island
One user on X suggested: 'They should call it Eisberg.'
'It should be called Lummerland,' another added, in reference to the fictional, two–mountain island from Michael Ende's children's book Jim Button and Luke the Engine Driver.
And one joked: 'Bird Rendezvous Island'.
The news comes shortly after a secret islet appeared off the coast of Venice.
Previously, the islet, called Bacan, would only form in the summer months before being swept away by winter's storm surges.
But thanks to a new flood barrier this cherished refuge for tourist–shy residents has become a permanent fixture of the lagoon with its own flourishing ecosystem.
Measuring 250 metres long and 10 metres wide, the sandbank is covered with a layer of thick vegetation.
Bacan is now home to a range of marsh plants like samphire, rushes, native flowers, and small, salt–resistant cedars called tamarisk.
With new roots holding the soil in place, the island has not vanished since 2020 when the flood barrier's operators were away on holiday during a winter surge.
However, even as residents celebrate the birth of a new beach, some experts warn that this could be a troubling sign for Venice's fragile ecosystem.
Does the Ark of the Covenant really exist?©Getty Images
Does the Ark of the Covenant really exist?
The Ark of the Covenant remains one of history's enduring mysteries. It's certainly one of archaeology's most perplexing puzzles. Did this gold-plated wooden box said to house the stone tablets on which the Ten Commandments were written ever exist? If so, what happened to it? And where might this legendary artifact be hidden?
See and read the following gallery and learn more about the lost Ark by following this historic timeline.
©Getty Images
What is the Ark of the Covenant?
The Ark of the Covenant is a gold-covered wooden chest with lid cover. It's described in the Book of Exodus as containing the two stone tablets of the Ten Commandments. It was made by Bezalel, chief artisan of the Tabernacle, assisted by deputy architect Oholiab.
©Getty Images
Moses and the Ten Commandments
The Ten Commandments are a set of biblical principles relating to ethics and worship, and fundamental to Judaism and Christianity. Also known as the Tablets of Stone, they were stored in the Ark of the Covenant, which Moses took with him when he ascended biblical Mount Sinai, as written in the Book of Exodus.
©Getty Images
Mount Sinai
In the Bible, Mount Sinai is the mountain at which the Ten Commandments were given to Moses by God. Mount Sinai is one of the most sacred locations in the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic religions.
©Getty Images
The Tabernacle
What is the aforementioned Tabernacle? When carried, the Ark was always hidden under a large veil made of skins and blue cloth, always carefully concealed, even from the eyes of priests. When at rest, a tabernacle, a kind of tent, was erected and the holy Ark placed under it. The Tabernacle also served as a portable earthly dwelling place used by the Israelites. Pictured is Moses standing over the Ark under the Tabernacle.
©Public Domain
Who were the Israelites?
Any descendant of the Hebrew patriarch Jacob was known as an Israelite. The Israelites were simply members of the 12 tribes of Israel. The Ark was made one year after the Israelites' exodus from Egypt to seek the Promised Land (pictured). From here on in, the Ark is intrinsically related to the biblical Book of Exodus and the biblical Book of Joshua.
©Getty Images
Crossing the Jordan River
Pictured: the Israelites, led by Joshua, crossing the Jordan River into the Promised Land. The Bible says that the river stopped flowing the minute the Ark-Bearers (pictured) set foot in it. In fact, the Ark has been linked to several of the Old Testament's miracles.
The Battle of Jericho
The Battle of Jericho is an incident from the Book of Joshua where the walls of Jericho fell after the Israelites marched once every day for six days around the city and seven times on the seventh day, then blew their trumpets of rams' horns. Many believe that when the Israelites besieged the ancient town they carried the Ark around the city for a week.
©Getty Images
The Ark at Ai
After the Battle of Jericho, the Israelites conquered Ai, a Canaanite city. It's here that the Ark is mentioned again after Joshua laments losing the first battle for Ai–the Israelites only took the city at the second attempt. The ruins of Et-Tell in the West Bank have been identified with the city of Ai.
©Public Domain
Bethal
The Ark then turns up in Bethal, the place where Jacob falls asleep and dreams of a ladder stretching between Heaven and Earth and thronged with angels. In Bethal, the Ark is being cared for by the priest Phineas. Pictured are the ruins of Bethal in the 19th century. The Palestinian village of Beitan has been identified as the biblical Bethal.
©Getty Images
Shiloh
The Ark was later kept at Shiloh, another religious center, this time under the charge of Hophni and Phinehas, two sons of Eli. Pictured are the ruins of biblical Shiloh, circa 1910, located in the West Bank, to the west of the modern Israeli settlement town of Shilo.
©Public Domain
Eben-Ezer
According to the biblical narrative, the Ark was taken onto the battlefield at Eben-Ezer where the Israelites were defeated by the Philistines. The Ark's guardians, Hophni and Phinehas, perished and the precious chest ended up in the possession of the victors. Pictured is a fresco of the Philistine captivity of the Ark, in the Dura-Europos synagogue in Syria. Sadly, the site appears to have been destroyed by Daesh during the present-day Syrian civil war.
©Getty Images
The Ark's terrible power
The loss of the Ark is described by the daughter-in-law of Eli as a "glory [that] has departed Israel." The Philistines, meanwhile, parade the Ark throughout their land. But at each place, misfortune visits them. At Ashdod, for example, it was placed in the temple of the deity Dagon. The next day, a statue of Dagon was found toppled and broken (pictured).
©Getty Images
Plague of Ashdod
But the worst was yet to come. The people of Ashdod were struck down by God and afflicted by plague (pictured) for the sacrilege of allowing the Ark to be placed in the temple. Elsewhere, a scourge of boils was visited upon the people of Gath and of Ekron. The Ark is quickly removed from the temple.
©Getty Images
The Ark is returned
Daunted by the prospect of further calamity and ill luck, the Philistines, on advice of their diviners, decide to return the Ark to the Israelites. Pictured is the Ark's arrival at Beth Shemesh.
©Getty Images
Beth Shemesh
The Ark is set up in one of the fields where, out of curiosity, the town's men open up the golden chest and gaze inside. This unholy act results in God's wrath, with Him punishing most of the hapless onlookers with death. Pictured are the foundations of Beth Shemesh in 1898.
©Public Domain
Kiriath-Jearim
The Bethshemites rid themselves of the Ark by dispatching it to Kiriath-Jearim (pictured in 1948), where a man called Abinadab looks after it for the next 20 years.
©Getty Images
King David
The coveted chest is eventually taken from Kiriath-Jearim by King David and, amid great rejoicing, the Ark is brought to Jerusalem.
©Public Domain
King Solomon
Much later, after David's departure from Jerusalem, King Solomon worshipped before the Ark after his dream in which God promises him wisdom. Thereafter, the king ordered a temple to be built, a building suitable in size and grandeur to accommodate the mysterious and powerful chest. A special inner room, named Kodesh Hakodashim ("Holy of Holies"), was prepared to receive and house the now legendary artifact (pictured).
©Getty Images
Siege of Jerusalem
In 597 and 587 BCE, the Babylonian Empire conquered the Israelites. Jerusalem was sacked and the Ark, supposedly stored in the temple, vanished. Pictured is an artist's impression of Solomon's Temple before it was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar II, King of Babylon, after the Siege of Jerusalem of 587 BCE.
©Getty Images
What happened to the Ark?
Was the Ark destroyed, captured, or hidden? Nobody knows. But since that fateful day in Jerusalem in 587 BCE, nothing has been seen of the gold-covered wooden chest. So where could it have ended up?
©Getty Images
Josiah
A late 2nd-century rabbinic work known as the Tosefta suggests that Josiah, the king of Judah, stored away the Ark which contained the tablets, a jar of manna (an edible substance that God provided for the Israelites during their travels in the desert), a jar containing holy anointing oil, and Aaron's rod. But this claim has never been substantiated. Pictured is a print depicting Josiah with the elders of Judah and Jerusalem.
©Shutterstock
The Chapel of the Tablet
One famous claim suggests that the Ark was removed from Jerusalem and taken to Ethiopia by Menelik I after he visited his father King Solomon. The chest was supposedly placed in the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion, in the town of Axum. It was later moved to an adjoining chapel (pictured). Only a guardian monk may view the chest, and is confined to the Chapel of the Ark of the Covenant for the rest of his life, praying before it and offering incense. No one else can enter the building, and no one else has seen it. Whether or not the Ark truly resides beneath the chapel, the site still draws thousands of pilgrims each year.
©Shutterstock
Dome of the Rock
Another theory as to the Ark's whereabouts is that it was hidden below the First Temple in Jerusalem before the Babylonians destroyed it in 587 BCE. But this is a claim that simply can't be substantiated: the site is home to the Dome of the Rock, sacred in Islam. Excavating beneath it is totally out of the question.
©Shutterstock
Hidden in a cave?
Elsewhere, the Lemba people, a Bantu ethnic group native to Zimbabwe and South Africa, insist that their ancestors carried the Ark south, calling it the ngoma lungundu or "voice of God," and eventually hiding it in a deep cave in the Dumghe mountains, their spiritual home.
©Public Domain
Is the Ark in France?
French journalist Louis Charpentier, author of 'The Mysteries of Chartres Cathedral,' has made an assertion that the Ark was taken to Chartres Cathedral by the Knights Templar. Pictured is a gilded bas-relief of monks carrying the allusive chest at Auch Cathedral in France.
©Shutterstock
Did the Ark end up in Rome?
Still in Europe, the Ark of the Covenant was said to have been kept in the Basilica of St. John Lateran, surviving the pillages of Rome by the Visigoths and Vandals in the 5th century BCE, but lost forever when the original basilica was ravaged by fire, first in 1307 and again in 1361. Pictured is the building today.
©Shutterstock
The Irish link
On one occasion, Ireland was considered as the Ark's final destination. The Hill of Tara (pictured), an ancient ceremonial and burial site near Skryne in County Meath, was illegally excavated by British Israelites in the early 20th century in the belief that the hill contained the missing chest.
©Public Domain
The Anubis Shrine
Howard Carter's heart must have missed a beat when he entered the Anubis Shrine, part of Tutankhamun's tomb, on November 4, 1922. Already in awe of the treasures he and his team had stumbled upon, there in front of him was something that resembled the Ark of the Covenant. In fact, it was the wood, plaster, lacquer, and gold leaf Anubis Shrine. No matter though. Carter was about to discover an equally momentous archaeological find—Tutankhamun himself!
©Getty Images
'Raiders of the Lost Ark' (1981)
Arguably the most famous quest for archaeology's most misplaced box was on the big screen. In the 1981 movie 'Raiders of the Lost Ark,' Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) is hired by the US government to find the Ark of the Covenant before Adolf Hitler's Nazis can obtain its awesome powers.
Sources:
See also:
RELATED VIDEOS