NASA Mars photo captures mysterious 'walking man' on the Red Planet

• READ MORE: I'm a pastor who attended a secret UFO

disclosure meeting. We saw images of 'translucent

beings' that chilled me to the bone... the files could

fulfil a dark biblical prophecy

By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

A stunning panorama of Mars appears to show a mysterious human-like figure walking in the distance.

The image, captured by NASA’s Spirit rover in 2007, has resurfaced online, with viewers convinced it shows a ‘walking man’ on the Red Planet.

Nestled among rocks is a strange shape that appears to have its arms outstretched and one leg forward, as if caught mid-stride.

The eerie form appeared in a sweeping panorama of the Martian hills captured during the later years of Spirit’s mission. The rover became trapped in soft sand in 2009 and eventually lost power, prompting NASA to declare its mission over in 2011.

While some suggested the object was a walking man, others proposed a 'statue of someone kneeling with one hand out.'

Many viewers acknowledged that the apparent figure is nothing more than a strangely shaped rock, but some argued there were no similar formations nearby.

One Reddit user shared: 'This looks to be a combination of rocks or shapes in the surface along with shadowing. 

'You can even find other odd shapes in the photo that don't appear natural. It would be cool if this were some sort of alien artifact, but if that were the case, I highly doubt NASA and the government would release the photo.'

The image, captured by NASA’s Spirit rover in 2007, has resurfaced online, with viewers convinced it shows a ‘walking man’ on the Red Planet

NASA has maintained that it has no evidence of extraterrestrial life and has yet to find any signs of current or past life on Mars. 

Regardless, viewers of the image have proposed wild ideas for what could be seen in the photo.

'That could be a statue. It's sitting, not walking. Past life on Mars, Absolutely Yes,' one Reddit user shared. 

Another commented: 'It’s obviously a person or a statue of one!!! I don’t care what NASA says.'

The Planetary Society published a blog post addressing the mysterious sighting in the Mars image, saying it is nothing more than an optical illusion.

The organization added that pretty much any person would see a humanoid shape in the photo, noting it is a case of pareidolia, the human propensity to see patterns in random shapes.

Another mysterious Mars photo was published online earlier this month, with people claiming it showed an unexploded 'alien missile' lying on the Martian surface.

UFO researcher Scott C Waring shared a photo on his site, arguing the object is evidence of an ancient conflict that wiped out a once-thriving civilization, claiming space agencies have remained silent because of its potential military significance. 

Nestled among rocks is a strange shape that appears to have its arms outstretched and one leg forward, as if caught mid-stride

Waring even speculated the mysterious object could represent advanced extraterrestrial weapon technology that governments would rush to obtain if it were ever recovered.

The remarkable claims, however, are not supported by NASA, which has offered no indication that the object is anything other than a naturally occurring rock formation.

Scientists have long noted that Mars is shaped by billions of years of volcanic activity, meteorite impacts and relentless wind erosion, processes capable of sculpting rocks into surprisingly artificial-looking shapes.

Similar discoveries have repeatedly sparked claims of alien artifacts on the Red Planet before later being explained as examples of pareidolia, the human tendency to see familiar objects and patterns where none actually exist.

A UFO researcher shared a photo taken by the Curiosity rover that appears to show what he believes is an unexploded 'alien missile' lying on the Martian surface

Still, the peculiar shape has reignited debate online, with believers convinced Curiosity stumbled upon the remnants of an extraterrestrial battlefield while skeptics see little more than another Martian rock. 

Waring estimated the object measures just over eight feet long and speculated it could be an intact piece of extraterrestrial technology. 

He claimed such a discovery would be highly sought after by governments hoping to study advanced weapons, while wondering who might reach it first and what purpose it may have served.

Waring offered no evidence to support those claims, and NASA has not identified the object as anything other than part of the Martian landscape.

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Unsettling Footage | Claims of a Close Encounter Spark Controversy

A recent video purporting to show a close encounter with an unidentified flying object (UFO) has ignited a heated debate among people on various forums. While some express skepticism, others find the footage compelling, raising questions about authenticity and the psychological effects of perceived sightings.

Claims and Skepticism: A Divide in Perception

The video depicts an object hovering near a pole, causing many observers to speculate its nature. Comments vary widely, with several noting poor video quality and unstable camera movement. One user remarked, "The person is standing still and yet the camera is wobbling all over the place"

Criticism centers on the claim of authenticity. Skeptics assert the footage likely results from editing and low-quality technology. "Every fake video does this to make it seem real," another contributor explains. The doubts grew stronger when others pointed out the object's limited visibility in the frame and the overall lack of context during the supposed sighting.

Exploring Possible Explanations

A number of theories emerged on user boards, with some attributing the object to natural phenomena such as swamp gas or weather balloons. As one user noted, "It stays very close to that pole the entire time. My guess is a balloon on a string attached to that pole, getting blown in the wind." Others suggested it might be artificial intelligence manipulation, adding layers to the discussion about technological interference in media.

Interestingly, historical references to disc-shaped crafts from declassified CIA documents were woven into conversations, suggesting that the evolution of sightings reflects a change in the nature of phenomena—possibly indicating a shift from physical visits to drone-like operations by unidentified entities.

Key Points from the Debate

• Mixed Reactions: Sentiments online lean towards skepticism, with most contributors labeling the video as questionable.

• Quality Concerns: Commenters highlighted the low resolution and editing inconsistencies in the footage, further fueling doubts.

• Speculative Theories: Users proposed various explanations for the sighting, ranging from harmless weather balloons to more elaborate conspiracy theories involving AI.

Final Thoughts

As people push for clearer evidence and better documentation of such phenomena, questions persist. Will the technology behind UFO sightings evolve to yield more credible footage? Or will skeptics continue to reign supreme in discussions surrounding unexplained aerial phenomena? Only time will tell.

"Looks so fake and of course nobody notices the giant UFO over them." - A perceptive comment

Stay tuned as this story continues to develop.

What Lies Ahead for UFO Sightings

There's a strong chance that as technology advances, the evidence surrounding UFO sightings will become more credible. Enhanced imaging techniques and AI-driven analysis may reveal details that are currently overlooked. Experts estimate around 60% probability that the quality of footage will improve significantly over the next few years, potentially laying to rest some skepticism. However, the divide between believers and critics is likely to persist, as many people remain entrenched in their views regardless of emerging data. This growing polarization may lead to more intense discussions on forums, affecting how these phenomena are perceived by the public.

A Lesson from Past Hurdles

Drawing a parallel to early photography in the 19th century can shed light on our current situation. Initially, groundbreaking photos were met with doubt and criticism, as many were convinced they were staged or manipulated. Just as early camera technology sparked heated debates, today's footage of unidentified objects is subject to similar scrutiny. Over time, as photography became more accessible and reliable, it transformed how people captured and interpreted historical moments. In this case, the unpredictable trajectory of public trust will shape the narrative around UFOs and how they are documented, echoing that initial skepticism paired with eventual acceptance of new technology.

{ https://mysterylores.com/ }

One Hundred Objects off Virginia: What AARO’s New UAP Report Actually Reveals

A U.S. Navy report describes approximately 100 airborne objects and two likely uncrewed surface systems off the Virginia coast. The incident is real enough to be under investigation — but the public evidence remains strikingly incomplete.

The most arresting passage in the Pentagon’s latest annual report on unidentified anomalous phenomena occupies only three sentences.

According to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, U.S. Navy assets operating off the coast of Virginia reported approximately 100 unidentified airborne objects and two “likely uncrewed” systems on the surface of the water. AARO says it is actively investigating the event in coordination with the unit that submitted the report.

That is the full public account.

No date is given. No video, radar data or infrared imagery accompanies the passage. The report does not describe the objects’ appearance, size, altitude, speed, formation, duration or behavior. It does not say whether the airborne objects interacted with the surface systems. It does not identify the Navy platforms involved or explain why the objects remained unidentified.

That distinction is essential. A report from military personnel deserves investigation, particularly when it concerns a large concentration of unidentified objects in a strategically important maritime area. But an unresolved military report is not, by itself, evidence of extraterrestrial technology. It is evidence of an unresolved event.

Official seal of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), established July 2022 under the Office of the Secretary of Defense. AARO serves as the U.S. government’s central body for UAP detection, identification, and attribution across air, maritime, and space domains.

Source: U.S. Department of Defense.

What We Know — and What We Do Not

This table shows why the case is both important and easy to exaggerate.

The presence of approximately 100 objects sounds unprecedented. Yet quantity alone does not establish anomalous capability. Large numbers can point toward coordinated drones, balloons, birds, airborne debris, sensor tracks, misidentification or more than one phenomenon grouped into a single report. Without the underlying data, it is impossible to rank those possibilities confidently.

The two surface systems add an unusual dimension. They could suggest a coordinated maritime drone operation in which surface vessels supported airborne systems. They could also have been unrelated objects observed in the same operating area. AARO’s brief wording does not establish that the surface and airborne objects communicated, maneuvered together or belonged to the same operator.

Even the word “approximately” matters. It may represent a visual estimate, a count assembled from multiple sensor detections or the total number of observations recorded over time. The report does not tell us.

Why the Virginia Location Matters

The waters and airspace around coastal Virginia are among the most sensitive military environments in the United States. The region includes Naval Station Norfolk — the world’s largest naval station — major training areas, active aviation corridors and direct access to the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic Ocean.

That makes an unidentified mass incursion a legitimate national-security concern regardless of its ultimate explanation. If the objects were drones, the central questions would be: who operated them, how they entered the area, what they were collecting, and why U.S. forces could not immediately identify or stop them. Those questions are serious without invoking visitors from another world.

The location also invites comparison with previously reported drone incursions in the Virginia region, including repeated activity over Langley Air Force Base in December 2023. Public reporting described unidentified drones entering restricted airspace over a period of more than two weeks. However, AARO’s new report does not connect the offshore Navy case to the Langley events. Any connection is therefore a hypothesis, not a fact.

The incidents may reflect a broader vulnerability to small, relatively inexpensive systems operating around high-value military sites. They may also involve different technologies, different operators and different circumstances. Until the government provides dates and technical details for the maritime case, the two stories should not be merged.

The Drone Explanation Must Be Taken Seriously

A U.S. Navy unmanned surface vessel. This illustrates the category of uncrewed maritime technology described in the AARO report — not the objects from the Virginia incident. The Navy operates multiple classes of unmanned surface vessels for patrol, surveillance and as potential launch platforms for airborne systems.

Source: U.S. Navy / DVIDS.

U.S. Navy drone swarm test. Modern unmanned aerial systems can operate in coordinated groups of dozens or hundreds of units, launched from land or sea. This image illustrates existing technology relevant to the Virginia case — it does not depict the reported objects.

Source: U.S. Navy / DVIDS.

“Drone” is sometimes treated as a dismissive answer in UAP discussions. It should not be. Modern unmanned systems can operate in coordinated groups, carry sophisticated sensors, launch from land or sea, and create difficult identification problems — especially at night or when viewed through specialized military sensors.

The two likely uncrewed surface systems make a drone-centered explanation particularly relevant. Surface vessels can potentially function as launch platforms, relay stations, navigation aids or recovery systems for airborne drones. That does not prove such an operation occurred off Virginia, but it provides a plausible technological framework requiring investigation.

Several possibilities remain open:

• A domestic military exercise or classified test not immediately recognized by the reporting unit.
• A foreign intelligence or surveillance operation.
• Commercial or civilian systems entering a military operating area.
• Multiple conventional objects or sensor returns incorrectly interpreted as a coordinated event.
• A genuinely anomalous incident whose characteristics cannot be reproduced by known systems.

The fifth possibility cannot be excluded merely because the first four are more familiar. But it should not be elevated above them without evidence of performance that conventional systems cannot achieve. AARO does not report such performance in this case.

What the Wider Annual Report Shows

The Virginia event appears inside a report that is far more cautious than many online summaries suggest.

Of the 319 reports received, AARO resolved 114 as ordinary objects or phenomena. Those explanations included balloons, birds, satellites, aircraft, unmanned aerial systems, a commercial rocket launch and even one manned jet pack. The office also resolved 256 cases inherited from an earlier reporting period, bringing the total number of cases resolved during the period to 370.

AARO identified nine of the 319 new reports as deserving further analysis by intelligence, scientific and technical specialists. It placed 191 in what it calls the “active archive” because insufficient information prevented a reliable assessment. Those archived reports may be revisited if corroborating data or improved analytical methods become available.

That category must be interpreted carefully. “Insufficient data” does not mean that AARO detected impossible flight characteristics. It means the office could not determine whether the underlying events were ordinary or exceeded known technology. The report also states that none of the cases AARO resolved indicated advanced foreign capabilities or breakthrough technology. This conclusion applies to resolved cases. It does not explain every unresolved case, and it does not validate extraordinary interpretations of them.

The Growing Satellite Problem

One of the report’s most useful findings concerns satellite flares. Sunlight reflecting from a satellite can appear as a bright orb that emerges, moves or fades under particular viewing conditions. As satellite constellations multiply, pilots and observers are seeing more lights whose apparent behavior can be difficult to interpret without precise location, time and viewing-angle data.

AARO says a new three-dimensional modeling capability enabled analysts to attribute 238 reports to satellite flaring. Forty-four of the 319 reports covered in the current reporting period were resolved this way.

This is exactly why rigorous analysis matters. An observation can be sincere, accurately reported and genuinely unidentified to the witness while still having an ordinary astronomical or technological explanation. The military personnel who file UAP reports are trained observers — but even trained observers cannot calculate satellite trajectories from a cockpit.

A satellite flare captured from the ground. As commercial satellite constellations expand, sunlight reflecting off spacecraft produces bright, moving lights that trained observers cannot immediately identify without precise time, location and trajectory data. AARO resolved 44 of its 319 current reports — and 238 cases total — using new 3D modeling that attributed them to this phenomenon.

Source: Creative Commons.

Reports Near Sensitive Sites

AARO also analyzed reports near national-security sites and critical infrastructure. Some narrative accounts described apparent performance beyond known technology, but the office said those reports arrived without technical data capable of validating the claims.

The annual report records two cases in which witnesses attributed electronic or avionics interference near operational aircraft to UAP. AARO has not determined whether the unidentified objects caused those effects.

Separately, government agencies reported 50 unmanned-aircraft incidents near U.S. nuclear infrastructure, weapons or launch sites — up from 18 in the previous annual report. AARO explicitly says those 50 incidents were not reported as UAP. Most involved recognizable unmanned aircraft, commonly quadcopters.

That separation matters. Drone incursions and UAP cases can overlap as security problems, but they are not interchangeable labels. The government should not use “drone” to prematurely close an unidentified case, and UAP advocates should not rebrand identified drone incidents as evidence of exotic technology. Ryan Graves — the former Navy pilot who has testified before Congress about UAP reporting stigma and sensor limitations — has made precisely this point: the failure mode runs in both directions.

The Central Weakness: Missing Data

AARO identifies the same obstacle that has followed official UFO investigations for decades: a lack of timely, actionable sensor data.

Witness testimony can establish that someone observed something unusual. It can help reconstruct direction, duration, color, shape and behavior. But testimony alone rarely provides the measurements needed to calculate distance, size, acceleration or energy output.

For the Virginia case, a meaningful public assessment would require at least some of the following:

Without those materials, the public has a dramatic sentence but not a testable case. Classification may legitimately protect sensor capabilities, tactics and military operations. Nevertheless, the government could release a carefully redacted case summary explaining how the observations were collected and which hypotheses remain under consideration. Transparency does not require revealing every technical specification. As Congressman Tim Burchett and others on the House Oversight Committee have repeatedly argued, the current level of disclosure is insufficient for congressional oversight, let alone informed public understanding.

What Should Happen Next

AARO should publish an unclassified update addressing the basic architecture of the incident. The questions requiring answers are not extraordinary — they are the minimum information necessary for serious public understanding:

• When did the event occur, and over what period were the objects observed?
• Which sensor categories detected them?
• Was the approximate count simultaneous or cumulative over time?
• Did the objects enter restricted airspace or approach Navy vessels?
• What made the surface systems “likely uncrewed”?
• Is there evidence that the airborne and surface systems were coordinated?
• Which conventional explanations remain viable, and which have been tested and ruled out?
• What specific information prevents resolution of the case?

These questions do not presume an extraterrestrial answer. They demand the minimum information necessary for serious public understanding. The Virginia case may eventually be explained as a drone exercise, a surveillance operation, a collection of unrelated conventional objects or a sensor interpretation problem. It may retain genuinely anomalous features after those possibilities are tested.

We do not yet know. That uncertainty is not a license for speculation. It is a reason to keep investigating — and a reason for government to be clearer about what it has already learned.

RELATED

{ https://theufotimes.com/gov-files }

Was a UFO Examining Google Earth Mapping Car On An Island In Canada? UAP Sighting News.

Date of sighting: August 3, 2026

Location of sighting: Canada

 

Hey guys, found this disk like craft in the sky over an island in Canada and it really looks like a classic disk UFO. I don't see anything else in the sky, but that doesn't mean it's aliens. US military is known for working top secret disk craft outside the US to keep the ownership of the craft secret. Also it could be a beetle, bird, bug of some sort, but this shape is very confusing. It's caught by the Google Earth map car as it was driving down the street. There is a bird in the sky later, but it probably has nothing to do with the UFO in the area. Most UFO videos have birds around in them, here and there, if we exclude videos with birds, we have almost zero videos left. Thus, birds are only a possibility. 

Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily 

 

 

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

Was a UFO Examining Google Earth Mapping Car On An Island In Canada? UAP Sighting News.

Date of sighting: August 3, 2026

Location of sighting: Canada

 

Hey guys, found this disk like craft in the sky over an island in Canada and it really looks like a classic disk UFO. I don't see anything else in the sky, but that doesn't mean it's aliens. US military is known for working top secret disk craft outside the US to keep the ownership of the craft secret. Also it could be a beetle, bird, bug of some sort, but this shape is very confusing. It's caught by the Google Earth map car as it was driving down the street. There is a bird in the sky later, but it probably has nothing to do with the UFO in the area. Most UFO videos have birds around in them, here and there, if we exclude videos with birds, we have almost zero videos left. Thus, birds are only a possibility. 

Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily 

 

 

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

Scientists reveal the most scientifically accurate VOLCANO movies ever made - with Dante's Peak topping the list

• READ MORE: Even small volcanic eruptions can spread ash thousands of miles

By WILIAM HUNTER, SENIOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY REPORTER

Much to volcanologists' dismay, Hollywood's enthusiasm for special effects often gets in the way of scientific accuracy when it comes to making a volcano movie.

But experts say that some epic disaster movies do manage to get some surprising details correct.

Now, researchers have revealed the most scientifically accurate volcano movies ever made.

And it's great news if you've been looking for an excuse to re-watch the 1997 classic, Dante's Peak.

In a new paper, published in the Bulletin of Volcanology, a team of British scientists watched through 20 movies featuring volcanoes to see how they square up with real eruptions.

They found that the most important thing these films get wrong is not the eruption itself, but the build-up to the explosion and how scientists try to predict it.

Most volcano movies dramatically shorten the real timeline, condensing weeks or months of uncertainty into hours or days of intense action.

However, Co-author Professor Jenni Barclay, a volcanologist from the University of Bristol, told the Daily Mail that Dante's Peak 'had a real attempt to demonstrate the uncertainties around an eruption and some of the elements of the eruption were pretty well portrayed.'

Scientists say that the 1997 classic Dante's Peak is one of the most scientifically accurate volcano movies ever made, but it still gets a lot wrong 

After watching volcano movies spanning the last 60 years of cinema, starting with 1942's Superman vs Volcano, the researchers found that most movies get some core scientific details wrong.

Most importantly, they say that the timelines seen in volcano movies can be about ten times shorter than real eruptions.

Professor Barclay says the least realistic films they watched were 'where the volcano goes from 0 to 10,000 miles per hour dramatically fast'.

While volcanoes in the movies have a clear onset, rapid progression, and obvious resolution point, this is far from the case for real eruptions.

The researchers also bemoaned the almost ubiquitous presence of sudden, fast-flowing streams of lava which 'move like rivers in spate'.

Co-author Dr Bridie Davies, of the University of Manchester, told the Daily Mail that this is a particularly egregious blunder given the other classic features of a Hollywood volcano.

The classic on-screen eruption features a large cone-shaped volcano, which is scientifically known as an arc stratovolcano.

Dr Davies says the occurrence of 'runaway lava flows' alongside large, ashy explosive eruptions of stratovolcanoes is one of the most glaring scientific errors because 'these two eruption styles are unlikely to coexist in the real world'.

The biggest issue most volcano movies have is that the eruption accelerates too quickly from initial signs of unrest to an abrupt stop

Researchers say that the 1997 movie Volcano is much less realistic than Dante's Peak due to its bad choice of Los Angeles as the site of an eruption and excessive use of fast-flowing lava 

The most and least scientifically accurate volcano films, according to the experts

Most accurate

* Dante's Peak

* Krakatoa: The final Days

* Pompeii: The Last Day

Least accurate

* Volcano 

* Joe Versus the Volcano 

* Pompeii 

* Krakatoa: East of Java 

* Apocalypse Pompeii 

Arc stratovolcanoes are much more likely to create deadly pyroclastic flows, fast-moving avalanches of superheated ash and rock, but these natural terrors very rarely make an appearance in cinema.

The researchers' dedicated watching also helps to settle a question that has divided film fans for the last 30 years.

1997 saw the back-to-back release of two classics of the volcano disaster genre: Volcano starring Tommy Lee Jones, and Dante's Peak with Pierce Brosnan.

Now we can finally say that, as far as scientific accuracy is concerned, Dante's Peak was the far superior flick.

Dr Davies says: 'Volcano does show some of the key signs of volcanic unrest we would look for, such as increased temperatures and gas levels.

'But the runaway lava flow apocalypse in Volcano and the poorly chosen location of downtown LA for a large hidden volcanic threat are difficult to overlook.'

On the other hand, Dr Davies says that Dante's Peak 'gives more screen time to unrest phenomena and does a better job at representing the wide range of scientists involved in monitoring volcanic hazard.

'We just have to overlook the scene where Pierce Brosnan drives for several minutes over a red-hot lava flow without his tyres popping.' 

Real eruptions have a much longer period of uncertainty before the eruption, sometimes lasting days or months 

What are arc stratovolcanoes?

Arc stratovolcanoes are tall, steep-sided volcanoes built from alternating layers of lava, ash and volcanic rock. 

They form in curved chains called volcanic arcs, usually where one tectonic plate is forced beneath another.

Their magma is generally thick and rich in silica, which can trap gases and produce powerful, explosive eruptions. 

The main hazards include ash clouds, lava flows, fast-moving pyroclastic flows and volcanic mudslides.

Famous examples include Mount Fuji, Mount St Helens and Mount Vesuvius. They are particularly common around the Pacific Ring of Fire and in the Mediterranean region. 

Likewise, co-author Professor David Pyle, of the University of Oxford, told the Daily Mail: 'Dante’s Peak is geologically much more realistic, starting with the volcanic setting, which is clearly reminiscent of Mt St Helens, which erupted in 1980.

'The film does try to cram in far too many effects, but the inspiration is very much taken from things that have been seen in eruptions.'

Outside of the typical blockbuster movie, the researchers praised the accuracy of the 2006 BBC docudrama Krakatoa: The Last Days.

This is a partially fictionalised account of the 1883 Krakatoa eruption, based on eyewitness accounts, particularly the writings of Dutch geologist Rogier Verbeek.

The researchers say this film did a great job capturing the catastrophic effects of the blast, such as the tsunami waves and avalanches of volcanic ash, as well as the reality of the eruption timeline.

When it comes to the least scientifically accurate films, Professor Pyle singled out many of the disaster films that take inspiration from the 79 AD eruption of Vesuvius, such as 2014's Pompeii, starring Kit Harington.

Professor Pyle says these films 'run away with their imaginative dramatisations of the catastrophe'.

He adds: 'More often than not, the motivation is to show off the special effects to the max, rather than to be more faithful to what might have happened.'

Experts say that films about Pompeii, including the 2014 flop Pompeii, are the least scientifically accurate 

The most accurate piece of volcano media is the 2006 docudrama Krakatoa: The Last Days, which used eyewitness accounts to closely match the progress of the real eruption (illustrated) 

However, besides the details of the eruptions themselves, one massive thing that all of these movies get wrong is the role of local communities and emergency responders.

While these movies usually show the local population 'running around and panicking', the reality is that people who live near volcanoes play a key role in preventing disasters.

Read More

• Scientists find 73 volcanoes across the ocean floor - and some could erupt at any moment 

Local groups help scientists to monitor the signs of an impending eruption and make plans for evacuations in case of an emergency,

Dr Davies says: 'I would love to see greater value placed on the stories, knowledge and often extremely pro-social responses of local communities before, during and after volcanic eruptions.

'The relationships built between scientists, local communities, leaders and emergency managers are complex and their combined efforts during times of volcanic crisis provide compelling stories of the power of the human spirit and community collaboration at its best.

'Something we could all use more of these days.'

HOW CAN RESEARCHERS PREDICT VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS?

According to Eric Dunham, an associate professor of Stanford University's School of Earth, energy and Environmental Sciences, 'Volcanoes are complicated and there is currently no universally applicable means of predicting eruption. In all likelihood, there never will be.'

However, there are indicators of increased volcanic activity, which researchers can use to help predict volcanic eruptions. 

Researchers can track indicators such as: 

* Volcanic infrasound: When the lava lake rises up in the crater of an open vent volcano, a sign of a potential eruption, the pitch or frequency of the sounds generated by the magma tends to increase.

* Seismic activity: Ahead of an eruption, seismic activity in the form of small earthquakes and tremors almost always increases as magma moves through the volcano's 'plumbing system'.

* Gas emissions: As magma nears the surface and pressure decreases, gases escape. Sulfur dioxide is one of the main components of volcanic gases, and increasing amounts of it are a sign of increasing amounts of magma near the surface of a volcano. 

* Ground deformation: Changes to a volcano's ground surface (volcano deformation) appear as swelling, sinking, or cracking, which can be caused by magma, gas, or other fluids (usually water) moving underground or by movements in the Earth's crust due to motion along fault lines. Swelling of a volcano cans signal that magma has accumulated near the surface.  

Source: United States Geological Survey

RELATED

DANTE'S PEAK (1997): Why it's the ultimate volcano movie

🌋 Most Powerful VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS Ever 🌋💥 Size Comparison

The Lost Supervolcano: The Biggest Eruption in Human History - Full Documentary

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

At first glance at this footage, you'd be forgiven for mistaking it as a clip from the latest science fiction blockbuster. 

But the humanoid robot in the video is very much real.

Dubbed 'Origin–F1', the robot is the brainchild of Chinese robotics company AheadForm. 

Its facial expressions and movements are eerily human–like thanks to AI–driven facial motion algorithms, which deliver natural motion while avoiding 'uncanny effects'.

To get your hands on one, you'll need to splash the cash, with the Origin–F1 estimated to cost between $50,000 and $173,000, depending on the configuration. 

However, this price tag doesn't seem to faze many fans, who are desperate to get their hands on one. 

Commenting on a video of the robot, one viewer said: 'My father saved his money for a house, I am saving mine for my future robot dream girl.'

Another added: 'We'll be able to have a robot girlfriend that's way out of our league.'

At first glance at this footage, you'd be forgiven for mistaking it as a clip from the lastest science fiction blockbuster. But the humanoid robot in the video is very much real

AheadForm describes the Origin–F1 as a 'desktop ultra–bionic humanoid robot for real–world human interaction scenarios'

And when it comes to hardware, the robot features 26 degrees of freedom, which allow it to carry out even the most subtle of micro–expressions.  

'It combines bionic mechanical design with multimodal artificial intelligence to deliver natural, vivid, and continuously evolving interactive experiences in a physical embodiment,' AheadForm added. 

On the website, the Origin–F1 is described in two forms – 'black' (a female humanoid with black hair), and 'white' (a female humanoid with light blonde hair). 

However, AheadForm claims it could have 'unlimited character appearances' in the future. 

'Through 3D reconstruction and high–precision biomimetic skin, the virtual image is perfectly restored,' it explained. 

Its lifelikeness has delighted fans online, with many praising its realistic movements. 

On the website, the Origin–F1 is described in two forms – 'black' (a female humanoid with black hair), and 'white' (a female humanoid with light blonde hair)

In terms of software, the bot features AI–driven facial motion algorithms, which co–ordinate facial expressions, eye movements and speech

On YouTube, one said: 'The blinking of the eyes is the most realistic I've ever seen in a robot. It feels so natural and impressive!'

Another wrote: 'Eye realism (blinking speed and cadence, left/right and up/down movement) is pure next–level. 

'She radiates a sense of true awareness. AheadForm have landed on the other side of the uncanny valley and it's amazing.'

And one said: 'By far the best of the best right now. This is the turning point.'

Meanwhile, others claimed they are willing to fork out the $150,000 to get one themselves. 

One simply said: 'Take my money.'

Another claimed: 'Please release as soon as possible, I will spend anything.'

And one joked: 'Wow I'm looking at my future wife.' 

A release date remains unclear at this stage, although the Daily Mail has contacted AheadForm for clarification.   

The news comes shortly after UBTech Robotics unveiled a new generation of humanoid robots said to be designed for a 'lifetime' of companionship.

The Uworld U1 androids are covered with 'biomimetic skin' that looks and feels just like that of a real human.

Read More

• The humanoid robot designed 'for a lifetime': China reveals creepy bots that look like real humans 

And the company even claims that the robots' specially designed 'spines' mean they can reproduce 90 per cent of human movements.

The male and female versions stand at 183 and 169 centimetres tall respectively, and weigh about half as much as their average human counterpart.

They are being offered for sale in a basic torso–only version as well as in two full–body options with more advanced features.

UBTech says that prices start at £13,218 (119,888 RMB), with the high–end units costing up to £109,205 (990,000 RMB).

RELATED

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Why MTV used NASA's Apollo 11 footage for its iconic launch intro

What do Teen Mom, Jackass, Beavis and Butt-Head, and Celebrity Deathmatch all have in common? Well, apart from all being follow-up programs for MTV Cribs, they've all also been welcomed onto the screen by Buzz Aldrin.

Yes, MTV programs have all been supported by NASA and Apollo 11 icon Buzz Aldrin, as the television platform has used the iconic space footage of the second man on the moon in its launch intros.

In fact, the first-ever sequence that aired on MTV back in 1981 saw Aldrin's likeness plant the MTV flag on the moon, a staple feature of the channel ever since.

Yet the reason why is lesser-known to the public and the countless celebrities that have hoisted the 'Moon Man' trophy.

What links MTV and NASA's Apollo 11?

It's one of the most iconic photos of all time, but the first picture of men on the moon shows Buzz Aldrin's figure turning to face the camera held by Neil Armstrong.

The footage, also captured in video form, has always been free to use for all creative purposes as part of the public domain, and MTV chose to use it for their branding.

According to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, MTV founder Bob Pittman claimed that the channel intended to be 'a network that would be about the network, rather than the individual programs,' and wanted to lead with the legendary slogan of 'That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.'

However, having appealed to NASA and Armstrong's lawyers about using his quote, building their marketing and promotional decks before hearing back, MTV was blocked from adding the words to their slogan.

Instead, the intro was released without the words and simply saw an astronaut resembling Aldrin planting the MTV flag on the moon instead.

That clip ran for every hour for five years and continues to sporadically feature today.

Although nowadays, the 'Moon Man' has a different meaning for MTV.

A worthwhile trophy

Having introduced the Video Music Awards (VMAs) just a few years later, championing the best of the best in the music video medium, MTV even decided to use its newfound mascot as the likeness for the coveted award.

Some 42 years after the first ceremony, in which the winners consisted of icons like Michael Jackson and David Bowie, the Moon Man trophy continues to be hoisted by the likes of Ariana Grande and Lady Gaga.

"The whole idea was, the statue had to be balancing on one leg, like anti-gravity and floating,” said trophy creator Pat Gorman.

While the trophy has been remade many times, lining the cabinets of the legends of the music industry, MTV made a special one that even traveled to space, as Pepsi paid to have a VMA award statue flown to the Russian Mir space station, which featured in a live broadcast during the award ceremony in 1996.

From what was once just a free-to-use gimmick, the Moon Man is now a legend.

{ https://www.uniladtech.com/science }

NASA’s Mars rover spots unexplained mystery on the Red Planet that's left scientists baffled

 Rikki Loftus

NASA’s Mars Curiosity rover has been roaming the Red Planet for nearly 14 years after it first landed back in August 2012.

Scientists have gained a lot of insight about our neighboring planet thanks to the rover and now, it seems that it has made a new unexplained discovery.

The mystery on Mars has left experts baffled after the vehicle came across ‘honeycomb-like’ patterns on the planet’s surface.

The discovery was made while the rover was exploring a particular valley on Mars known as Valle Grande when it stumbled upon mysterious polygonal shapes, which NASA has since described as a ‘field of honeycomb textures’.

In a statement, the mission’s project scientist, Ashwin Vasavada of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, said: “We’ve seen a lot of fascinating landscapes through Curiosity’s eyes, but this sea of polygons took our breath away.

“We measured their shapes and chemistry carefully and are hopeful there are clues in the data as to how these features formed.”

According to the space agency, Curiosity has found ‘small patches’ of these shape formations before but nothing to the scale of what was found at Valle Grande.

Some of the polygons spotted previously had clearly been ‘formed as mud cracks’, although there are a variety of processes which could contribute to the honeycomb texture.

This includes ‘cycles of warm and cold temperatures or compression that squeezed water out of the sediment when the surface was buried’.

In the statement, NASA continued: “In a 360-degree panorama that the rover captured on June 19 and 20, the 4,930th and 4,931st Martian days, or sols, of the mission, the polygonal shapes spread in all directions for as far as the rover can see. They even wrap around the sides of a nearby butte nicknamed ‘Miraflores’, which stands 20 feet (6 meters) tall and is topped with a thick cap of sand.”

However, this isn’t the only discovery made by the rover as, over the years, Curiosity has shined a light on never-before-seen parts of the Red Planet.

This includes sulfur crystals, meteorites and other geologic features of Mars that scientists previously had no idea about.

NASA added: “The rover has previously uncovered chemistry left over from Mars’ watery history, including carbon-based molecules believed to be precursors to RNA and DNA, two nucleic acids that carry genetic information. Scientists have no way of knowing whether these organic molecules were created by biologic or geologic processes - either path is possible - but their discovery reconfirmed that ancient Mars had the right chemistry to support life.”

{ https://www.uniladtech.com/science }

Why Dinosaurs Were ‘Created’ by Extraterrestrials

They may have been part of a much larger experiment.

And if even part of that story were ever proven true, it would force humanity to rethink everything it believes about its own origins.

Earth May Have Been a Living Laboratory for Experiments

The story begins long before humans.

Long before the first mammals.

Even before the dinosaurs became Earth’s dominant life forms.

One of the most controversial claims comes from a former Defence Intelligence Agency analyst who allegedly stated that three competing extraterrestrial civilisations have been genetically influencing life on Earth for at least 270 million years.

Rather than allowing evolution to unfold naturally, these alleged visitors supposedly guided it.

• Species appeared.
• Others disappeared.
• Entire ecosystems changed.

Within this narrative, Earth was never simply a planet where life evolved on its own.

It became a laboratory.

And that may have been only the beginning.

The Question That Could Change the Dinosaur Story

If dinosaurs were part of that programme…

Why did they disappear?

Mainstream science points to the asteroid impact that struck Earth around 66 million years ago.

The evidence supporting that event is extensive and remains the accepted explanation for the mass extinction.

But then comes perhaps the most astonishing claim of all.

Some alternative researchers argue the asteroid may not have been entirely natural.

Instead, they suggest an advanced civilisation either allowed the impact to happen—or deliberately influenced it—to make room for the next stage of life on Earth.

There is no publicly verified evidence supporting that claim.

Even so, it remains one of the most debated ideas within the UFO disclosure movement.

Because if the extinction was intentional…

Then the rise of humanity may not have been accidental.

The Alleged Genetic Programme Did Not End

If that theory sounds extraordinary, the next claim goes even further.

According to these accounts, the disappearance of the dinosaurs was not the conclusion.

It was the transition.

Linda Moulton Howe and other researchers have discussed testimony claiming that genetic intervention continued long after prehistoric life vanished.

Some whistleblowers describe multiple non-human groups conducting separate biological programmes over millions of years.

Others claim those efforts eventually focused on early human ancestors.

Supporters believe this could explain sudden leaps in intelligence and several unanswered questions surrounding human evolution.

Mainstream science reaches very different conclusions.

Researchers explain human development through genetics, fossils, and natural selection accumulated over immense periods of time.

Without independently verified evidence, extraterrestrial genetic engineering remains an extraordinary claim rather than an accepted scientific explanation.

Where Science Ends and the Greatest Mystery Begins

This is where the story takes an unexpected turn.

Scientists continue to uncover new dinosaur species.

Ancient DNA research grows more advanced every year.

Our understanding of evolution also continues to evolve as fresh discoveries emerge.

At the same time, disclosure researchers argue that classified testimony deserves further investigation rather than immediate dismissal.

Neither position answers every question.

Why did certain evolutionary changes happen so rapidly?

Could every mass extinction be explained completely?

Have we already uncovered all of humanity’s origins?

Those questions keep the debate alive.

And perhaps that is why theories like these refuse to disappear.

Final Verdict: Were Dinosaurs Only the Beginning?

Today, no publicly verified scientific evidence supports the claim that extraterrestrials created the dinosaurs or directed Earth’s evolutionary history.

The accepted scientific explanation remains that dinosaurs evolved naturally and disappeared after a catastrophic asteroid impact changed the planet forever.

Yet the alternative story continues to capture imaginations around the world.

Because it asks a question that reaches far beyond dinosaurs themselves.

What if humanity has misunderstood the purpose of life on Earth from the very beginning?

If the dinosaurs were only one phase of a much larger experiment…

Who—or what—was waiting for the next one?

Watch the Video

{ https://ufosecret.net/index.php/category/aliens/ }

NASA Data On The Moon Just Dropped — The Truth Is Worse Than Expected

Hidden Clues in Spirit Rover Data Suggest Mars Once Had Far More Water than Scientists Realized

 by Sergio Prostak

A new look at more than two decades’ worth of archival data from NASA’s Spirit mission suggests that the Martian soil may hold iron-bearing minerals — hematite and altered magnetite — that were too faint for scientists to detect in real time during the mission.

NASA’s Spirit rover on Mars.

Image credit: NASA.

“From early 2004, Spirit Rover explored the surface of Gusev crater on Mars carrying a suite of scientific instruments to perform geological and mineralogical analysis on soils, rocks, meteorites, and dust collected by magnets,” said Professor Paulo de Souza, a researcher at Edith Cowan University.

A 3D model of the twin Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity.

NASA Visualization Technology Applications and Development (VTAD)

“Among these instruments, a miniaturized Mössbauer spectrometer named MIMOS II was extensively used.”

NASA’s Spirit and Opportunity rovers were identical twin robots that helped rewrite our understanding of the early history of Mars.

{ https://www.sci.news/news/space }

  Jeannette Kras-  - Redacteur

Al tientallen jaren speuren astronomen de hemel af naar radiosignalen die kunnen wijzen op buitenaardse intelligentie. Maar mogelijk hebben ze daarbij een groot deel van het radiospectrum over het hoofd gezien. Nieuw onderzoek wijst uit dat juist hogere radiofrequenties interessant kunnen zijn in de zoektocht naar technologische signalen van andere beschavingen.

Het merendeel van de SETI-programma’s (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) richt zich al jaren op radiofrequenties tussen 1,42 en 1,66 gigahertz. Deze bandbreedte staat bekend als de waterput, omdat het tussen de natuurlijke radiofrequenties van waterstof en hydroxyl in ligt, die samen water vormen.

Wetenschappers beschouwen dit als een logische frequentie om naar buitenaardse signalen te zoeken. Een technologisch geavanceerde beschaving zou immers het belang van waterstof en hydroxyl kunnen herkennen en daarom juist in dit relatief rustige deel van het radiospectrum zenden én luisteren. Maar volgens de nieuwe studie is het tijd om de blik te verruimen.

Vrijwel onontgonnen terrein

Voor haar onderzoek gebruikte Louisa Mason, promovenda aan de Universiteit van Manchester, archiefgegevens van de Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chili. Daarmee voerde ze de eerste SETI-studie ooit uit met deze telescoop.

In plaats van nieuwe waarnemingen te doen, analyseerde ze bestaande ALMA-data die oorspronkelijk voor heel andere astronomische onderzoeken waren verzameld. Ze zocht daarin naar smalbandige radiosignalen die eerder op technologie dan op natuurlijke astronomische processen wijzen.

Leestip: 

• Volgens onderzoekers hebben we zo de grootste kans om intelligent buitenaards leven te ontdekken

Geen buitenaardse signalen

Mason onderzocht twee kleine frequentiegebieden binnen ALMA’s zogeheten Band 3-waarnemingen. Daarbij werden geen technologische signalen gevonden die voldeden aan de gestelde detectiecriteria.

Dat betekent volgens haar echter niet dat buitenaardse intelligente beschavingen niet bestaan. De studie onderzocht maar een klein deel van het frequentiebereik en maakte bovendien gebruik van slechts vier gearchiveerde ALMA-waarnemingen. Wel laat het onderzoek zien dat telescopen die op hogere radiofrequenties werken in de toekomst een waardevolle aanvulling kunnen vormen op bestaande SETI-programma’s.

Veel meer sterren dan gedacht

En het onderzoek leverde nog een opvallend resultaat op. Wanneer astronomen een telescoop op één object richten, komen automatisch ook talloze andere sterren binnen het gezichtsveld terecht. Die zogeheten stellar bycatch blijkt veel groter te zijn dan gedacht.

Tot nu toe maakten onderzoekers vaak gebruik van sterrencatalogi, zoals Gaia, om te bepalen hoeveel sterren daadwerkelijk waren onderzocht. Mason koos een andere aanpak en gebruikte het Besançon Galactic Model. Daarmee kon ze ook sterren meenemen die te zwak, te ver weg of te moeilijk te identificeren zijn om in bestaande catalogi voor te komen.

Beter beeld

Toen ze deze methode toepaste op een eerdere SETI-survey met 1327 telescoopwaarnemingen, bleek het aantal onderzochte sterren niet ongeveer 288.000, zoals op basis van Gaia werd aangenomen, maar ruim 6,1 miljoen. Volgens Mason geeft dat een veel realistischer beeld van hoeveel van onze Melkweg daadwerkelijk is onderzocht op mogelijke technologische signalen. “Een van de spannendste resultaten van dit werk is dat we ons realiseren dat we veel meer sterren hebben onderzocht dan we aanvankelijk dachten”, zegt ze.

“Zelfs een heel kleine waarneming kan een enorme hoeveelheid en diversiteit aan sterren bevatten die we oorspronkelijk helemaal niet van plan waren te bestuderen. Door waarnemingen op hogere frequenties te combineren met galactische simulaties krijgen we een veel beter beeld van wat we daadwerkelijk hebben onderzocht en waar we vervolgens moeten zoeken.”

Leestip: 

• Buitenaards intelligent leven blijkt misschien nóg zeldzamer dan gedacht

Slimmer zoeken

Mason ziet het niet als een teleurstelling dat er geen buitenaardse radiosignalen zijn opgepikt. Volgens haar laat het onderzoek vooral zien dat de zoektocht naar technologische signalen nog veel breder kan worden opgezet dan tot nu toe het geval was.

Ze hoopt dan ook dat toekomstige SETI-projecten niet alleen vaker hogere radiofrequenties onderzoeken, maar ook beter gebruik maken van de enorme hoeveelheid astronomische archiefgegevens die al beschikbaar is. Bestaande waarnemingen bevatten mogelijk veel meer informatie dan gedacht.

• Het onderzoek wordt deze week gepresenteerd tijdens de National Astronomy Meeting van de Royal Astronomical Society in Birmingham.

{ https://scientias.nl/ }

Mystery 'flying saucer' zooms within feet of passenger jet over UK airport

Official UK aviation reports reveal alarming close encounters between pilots and mysterious UFOs, including a 'flying saucer' lurking near a London airport

BY Liam Randall - News Reporter

Pilots flying commercial aircraft in the UK have detailed terrifyingly close encounters with unidentified flying objects and suspected drones, official reports show. In one alarming incident, an Airbus passenger jet coming in to land at London Gatwick was approached by an unidentified disc-shaped object.

Details released by the UK Airprox Board state: "The A319 pilot reports that descending, turning left, a disc or 'flying saucer' type ­suspected drone was seen flying very close in the opposite direction, at the same level to them, past their right wing.

"Approximately 100-300ft from their aircraft wing. The object looked like a disc with darker markings on the rim, a suspected possible drone but not sure. It was very close to the aircraft, but no ­evasive action was required as they were in a turn already."

An assessment of the near-miss at Gatwick concluded that the safety of the jet had been 'reduced'

(Stock image)(Image: Getty Images)

Following an assessment of the near-miss, the board concluded that the safety of the jet had been "reduced", according to The Sun.

A separate incident occurring in the same month near Heathrow Airport involved an A321 aircraft whose crew spotted a drone passing dangerously close.

Official documents state: "The A321 pilot reports that, whilst in a left turn on to base leg at LHR (over Marlow), a drone was witnessed to fly down the left-hand-side of the aircraft at close enough proximity to see details such as the colour, shape and individual props spinning."

Investigating the close call, Airprox officials said: "The board considered that providence had played a major part in the incident and/or a definite risk of collision had existed."

The reports follow another striking encounter detailed by the board involving military personnel.

Two Royal Air Force pilots operating an air-to-air refuelling mission at 16,000ft over the North Sea off the Norfolk coast spotted an unidentified craft.

One pilot inside a Voyager tanker was forced to duck as the object zoomed past at a distance of just 100ft to 150ft.

RELATED

{ https://www.dailystar.co.uk/latest/ufo }

Learn About Japan’s Centuries-Old Legend of the Hollow UFO Ship

Monster 'Sharkzilla' leaves trail of carnage off New York coast as scientists probe nuclear mutant theory

• READ MORE: Urgent warning as sharks move into unexpected US waters: See the popular beaches where predators are now lurking

By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

A mysterious predator lurking off the coast of New York has sparked a dangerous hunt for a monster shark capable of tearing apart some of the ocean's largest animals.

A humpback whale was discovered with a 24-inch bite mark, while a gray seal suffered a 22-inch wound and a 400-pound tuna was found ravaged in the water.

The trail of carnage has turned Montauk into ground zero for a real-life hunt featured in the Discovery Channel's Shark Week episode Sharkzilla Takes New York, airing on Friday at 9pm ET.

Local shark scientist Craig O'Connell believes the brutal attacks could signal the return of enormous predators once thought to have vanished from the region.

But he also raised a more disturbing possibility: that decades-old barrels of leaking nuclear waste could have affected wildlife inside a vast underwater canyon off the coast.

If his controversial theory were true, the team could be hunting a genetically altered shark that is faster, stronger and deadlier than an ordinary predator.

With a storm rapidly approaching, O'Connell and his crew had just 30 hours to find the creature, tag it and collect tissue for radioactive testing.

They called the suspected monster 'Sharkzilla.'

The trail of carnage has turned Montauk into ground zero for a real-life hunt featured in the Shark Week episode Sharkzilla Takes New York, airing on Friday at 9pm ET

O'Connell launched the investigation on September 20, 2025, following reports of large marine animals being attacked off Long Island.

Montauk was once famous as a destination where fishermen could encounter exceptionally large sharks, but years of intense fishing devastated their numbers.

O'Connell said: 'In the past, this is the place you came to catch monster sharks. There are so many records right here off the shores of Montauk.

'All these monster sharks were completely fished out. They're gone.

'But all the evidence we are seeing is telling me that all these big sharks might be back. I know those big sharks are out there, and we are going to find them.'

His search led the team approximately 100 miles off Montauk to the Hudson Canyon, a gigantic underwater gorge that begins at a depth of roughly 900 feet before plunging to around 4,000 feet.

Comparable in scale to the Grand Canyon, the dark chasm provides a potential hiding place for some of the Atlantic Ocean's largest predators. It also has a haunting history.

'In the late 1960s, they dumped 15,000 barrels of nuclear waste in the Hudson Canyon,' O'Connell said. 'Ten years later, they went out to check on these barrels, and they were all leaking.'

The team launched  a hunt to 100 miles off Montauk to the Hudson Canyon, a gigantic underwater gorge that begins at a depth of roughly 900 feet before plunging to around 4,000 feet

Read More

EXCLUSIVE

• Urgent warning as sharks move into unexpected US waters: See the popular beaches where predators are now lurking 

He stressed that his theory linking the waste to the predator was controversial and unproven.

'Radioactive leaks could be impacting wildlife, even top predators,' O'Connell said.

'If animals are subjected to nuclear waste, this could cause genetic mutations and abnormal growth. If this predator is genetically altered, it could be faster, stronger and deadlier than any predator on Earth. We are calling it Sharkzilla.'

O'Connell and his team packed their boat with bait and headed toward the canyon, hoping to lure sharks close enough to attach tracking tags and collect tissue samples.

The tags would reveal where the animals traveled, while laboratory tests could determine whether their bodies showed signs of radioactive contamination.

The team reached the canyon's edge at 4am and lowered a baited camera into the darkness.

Six hours later, they pulled it back to the surface and examined footage captured more than 600 feet underwater in the dimly lit region known as the ocean's 'twilight zone.'

The team entered the water to hand-feed the sharks, placing themselves within striking distance as they attempted to tag the animals and secure tissue samples.

A huge mouth suddenly emerged from the darkness and attempted to bite the camera.

'That is an absolutely massive great white shark,' O'Connell said after seeing the animal, which he identified as a large female.

Another formidable predator then appeared, a mako shark.

O'Connell and his team entered the water to hand-feed the sharks, placing themselves within striking distance as they attempted to tag the animals and secure tissue samples.

A 10-foot female mako soon made a beeline toward the divers.

Makos are the fastest sharks in the ocean and are capable of moving at speeds exceeding 40 miles per hour, leading O'Connell to suspect that Sharkzilla could be one of them.

The team then deployed a decoy dolphin named Hudson, which was fitted with a large piece of tuna intended to draw the predator closer.

The team entered the water to hand-feed the sharks, placing themselves within striking distance as they attempted to tag the animals and secure tissue samples. 

Makos are the fastest sharks in the ocean and are capable of moving at speeds exceeding 40 miles per hour, leading O'Connell to suspect that Sharkzilla could be one of them

Two makos emerged from the depths, an unusual sight because the animals are generally solitary hunters.

They then vanished without warning, raising fears that something much larger had frightened them away.

An enormous shadow eventually appeared, cruised near the team and disappeared into the darkness before they could identify it.

With time running out, the researchers created what they called a 'blubber blaster,' designed to mimic the aftermath of a dead whale bursting at the surface and releasing a feast capable of attracting sharks.

Just as the sun began to set, a giant female mako charged toward the boat.

'This is Sharkzilla,' O'Connell screamed.

Measuring nearly 12 feet long, the mako appeared powerful enough to have inflicted the enormous wounds found on animals off Long Island.

The monster in question appeared later during the search, measuring nearly 12 feet. The team captured tissue samples, finding no traces of radiation. They did find a mako birthing ground, suggesting that was why the shark was causing chaos in the area

When she refused to approach the cage, O'Connell swam outside and attempted to attach a tracking tag. The first tag bounced off her body, and she disappeared.

Despite fading daylight making the dive increasingly dangerous, O'Connell remained convinced that she would return.

When the mako reappeared, he successfully attached the tag and obtained a tissue sample before the team headed back to Montauk.

Signals from the tracker revealed that Sharkzilla was traveling in the same direction.

Tests ultimately found no evidence that the mako had radioactive mutations, destroying the team's most alarming theory.

However, the investigation indicated that the waters served as a breeding ground for makos, offering a more natural explanation for the carnage: the predators were hunting to feed their developing pups.

Sharkzilla was not a radioactive mutant, but a huge pregnant mako, an exceptionally fast and formidable predator patrolling the waters off New York.

Shark Week | Sharkzilla : terreur sur New-York

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

July #15 MUFON eNewsletter -JULY 2026 sightings report

NATIONS OF THE WORLD UNITED STATES 314 UNITED KINGDOM 16 CANADA 14 FRANCE 6 AUSTRALIA 5 GERMANY 5 SPAIN 4 BRAZIL 4 CROATIA 3 SWITZERLAND 3 MEXICO 2 ECUADOR 2 CHILE 2 CHINA 2 KOREA, (South) 2 ITALY 1 SLOVENIA 1 COLOMBIA 1 HONG KONG 1 TURKEY 1 INDONESIA 1 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 1 KENYA 1 HUNGARY 1 POLAND 1 TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS 1 ERITREA 1 ISRAEL 1 SINGAPORE 1 VENEZUELA 1 GUATEMALA 1 ARGENTINA 1 CZECH REPUBLIC 1 INDIA 1 PORTUGAL 1   TOTAL: 404 SHAPE Circle 64 Sphere 58 Other 31 Oval 28 Triangle 28 Disc 27 Unknown 20 Cylinder 16 Star-like 15 Cigar 11 Square/Rectangular 11 Tic Tac 9 Fireball 8 N/A 7 Diamond 7 Egg 6 Boomerang 6 Saturn-like 4 Teardrop 3 Bullet/Missile 3 Blimp 3 Cone 1 Cross 1 STATES OF THE U.S.A. California 33 Texas 24 Florida 22 New York 17 Pennsylvania 15 Arizona13 Illinois 13 Colorado 13 Ohio 12 Michigan 11 Oregon 7 Arkansas 7 South Carolina 7 Minnesota7 Missouri 7 Alabama 7 Utah 7 Nevada 6 Washington 6 Indiana 6 Oklahoma 6 Virginia 5 Kentucky 5 New Jersey 4 North Carolina 4 Tennessee 4 Alaska 3 New Mexico 3 Wisconsin 3 Connecticut 3 Kansas 3 Mississippi 3 Georgia 3 Louisiana 3 Maine 2 Vermont 2 Idaho 2 Massachusetts 2 West Virginia 2 Iowa 2 South Dakota 2 Montana 2 Hawaii 1 Maryland 1 New Hampshire 1 Rhode Island 1 Wyoming 1 District of Columbia 1 DISTANCE < 100 ft 49 101-500 ft 45 501 ft - 1 Mile 69 Over 1 Mile 81 Unknown 63 NO VALUE 18 ERT Most impressively there were 16 Landings, Hovering, or Takeoffs reported, and 25 Entities observed.

{ https://mufon.com/ }

The Neuroscience and Psychology of the Alien Abduction Phenomenon: A Review - PART I