Naar de inhoud

UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
akke.beakke.be
Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie! Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek! België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch. Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen! Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie. Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen. Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek! Blijf Op De Hoogte! Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren! Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.

Archief

Plasmoid orb frightens women walking dog, Blakey, PA, USA Aug 26, 2026 UAP Sighting News.

Plasmoid orb frightens women walking dog, Blakey, PA, USA Aug 26, 2026 UAP Sighting News.

Screenshot%202026-08-31%20at%2010.42.42%E2%80%AFPM.png

Screenshot%202026-08-31%20at%2010.42.34%E2%80%AFPM.png

Screenshot%202026-08-31%20at%2010.40.26%E2%80%AFPM.png


Date of sighting: August 26, 2026 8:52pm
Location of sighting: Blakely, Pennsylvania, USA
Source: NUFORC #200502
 
This glowing object looks like a plasmoid orb, glowing and as it moves its orb shape shifts a bit into an oval shape. Thats how I knew it was a plasmoid orb...a sentient entity. The object actually frightens the woman as she begins to watch and the object stops, not moving for a bit then shoots away and seems to be following the power lines. The dog is trying to pull the woman away, as if it was sensing something it was afraid of and wanted to escape the area but the eyewitness tried to control the dog to record more video of the orb. The orb changes color to a light green for a few seconds then back to white. This looks so much like the Dome of Rock UFO plasmoid orb that its blowing my mind. Its just very exciting to see this interact with the woman.
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily
 
Eyewitness states: 
I saw the object shoot up very fast, then it went down fast, shot to the left and then flew extremely fast to the right out of sight. At approximately 8:30pm, while walking my neighbor's dog, I saw a bright white object stationary in the sky near 764 Main Street in Blakely, PA. I continued to walk. I noticed it again several blocks away. The object hovered for a long period of time and then went up very fast, then downwards very fast. It then shot to the left and then went to the right extremely fast and out of sight. It did not make the buzzing or humming sound of a drone.
It did not have blinking colored lights. I saw it again when walking home, which was where I saw it the first time. The light faded then got bright and stayed bright. It went left out of sight. I continued to walk the dog, turned around and saw it again. I have seen many drones and I am familiar with what they look like and sound like. This object was silent.

Plasmoid orb frightens women walking dog, Blakey, PA, USA Aug 26, 2026 UAP Alien paranormal news 👽

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:36 Stuur door

Reason for mysterious orange and white balls seen floating on power lines across America revealed by expert

Reason for mysterious orange and white balls seen floating on power lines across America revealed by expert

While driving along American roadways, especially near airports, many have wondered about the mysterious orange and white orbs that can be seen on top of the power lines. 

They're not just for decoration. In fact, they serve a vital purpose to keep residents safe. 

Power lines carry high voltages of electricity to homes and businesses, making them crucial to any community. If they were to be damaged or hit, it could knock out power for thousands and even create a dangerous situation where a live wire is within reach. 

So the white and orange balls are placed on the top wires of taller power lines, especially in areas where airplanes will be flying low, to make them easily recognizable to pilots, Missouri University Professor Rui Bo wrote for The Conversation. 

'They’re like bright warning signs in the sky, protecting pilots, passengers and people on the ground below,' he wrote.  

But unlike power lines, the big orange balls, which are the size of a large beach ball and weigh around 25 pounds, are not electricized. 

'They’re made of insulating materials, so electricity does not flow through them,' Bo added. 

They're typically made of plastic or fiberglass, so they can last 10 to 15 years. And their orange color is deliberate, as it is easy for pilots to spot. 

Orange balls can be seen on power lines, often in places where there are low flying aircrafts

Orange balls can be seen on power lines, often in places where there are low flying aircrafts 

The balls, which come in two halves, are the size of a large beach ball and weigh around 25 pounds

The balls, which come in two halves, are the size of a large beach ball and weigh around 25 pounds

Missouri University Professor Rui Bo said the balls act as 'warning signs'

Missouri University Professor Rui Bo said the balls act as 'warning signs'

The power lines themselves easily blend into the scenery of the houses and trees nearby, making it hard for pilots to avoid when they're flying low to land at airports, so the brightly colored balls are essential to safe navigation. 

The installation of the balls can be difficult, especially for very high power lines. It requires a specialized team, especially when a helicopter is involved. 

The power lines are not turned off during installation, meaning high voltages of electricity continue to pass through them. 

Depending on the height of the power line, a ground or air crew is required. 

Ground crews use buckets to get up high enough to secure the ball, which comes in two halves, to the line. 

Air crews, however, have to hover near the line while crews on the end of the helicopter connect it to the power line. 

The balls themselves are made of plastic or fiberglass and do not conduct electricity, despite being on a live wire

The balls themselves are made of plastic or fiberglass and do not conduct electricity, despite being on a live wire 

One lower lines, it can be install via bucket truck, but on higher lines, one has to be attached to a helicopter to do so

One lower lines, it can be install via bucket truck, but on higher lines, one has to be attached to a helicopter to do so 

The orange or white color of the ball is meant to be bright and easily visible to pilots

The orange or white color of the ball is meant to be bright and easily visible to pilots 

'They don’t need much maintenance, but utilities inspect them from time to time to make sure they haven’t cracked or faded too much,' Bo wrote. 

Most neighborhood power lines are too low to need the balls. 

The Daily Mail has reached out to Bo for comment.  

RELATED VIDEOS

Why Are Giant Orange Balls Hanging From Power Lines? 🤯

Why Are There Giant Orange Balls Hanging on Power Lines? (The Real Truth)

Why Do Power Lines Have Those Orange Balls?

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:27 Stuur door

Lost city 'perfectly matches' Biblical site where Jesus fed the 5,000... as humble birthplace of Keeper of Heaven's Keys is uncovered

Lost city 'perfectly matches' Biblical site where Jesus fed the 5,000... as humble birthplace of Keeper of Heaven's Keys is uncovered

Archaeologists have spent a decade peeling back layers of ruins on the shores of the Sea of Galilee, searching for a 'lost' city where the Bible says Jesus performed miracles.

Now, the excavation team say they have finally found Bethsaida, the ancient city where Jesus is said to have restored a blind man's sight and fed thousands, and was home to three apostles - Peter, Andrew and Philip.

A Roman bathhouse and hundreds of fishing weights at el-Araj in northern Israel are said to match an ancient account of Bethsaida's transformation from a Jewish fishing village into a city.

Inside a ruined church dating back to the late fifth century, a mosaic invokes Peter, linking the building directly to Jesus' disciple.

Beneath the church, a first-century house wall may also support an ancient pilgrim's account that it was built over Peter and Andrew's home.

Dr Steven Notley, the excavation's academic director, told the Daily Mail he 'absolutely' believes the team has uncovered the lost biblical city that was home to the apostle Peter.

'Everything we bring out of the ground affirms and strengthens that identification,' he said.

'Nothing that we have found would challenge it at all.'

Archaeologists have uncovered stone walls they believe were part of the birthplace of Jesus' apostles

Archaeologists have uncovered stone walls they believe were part of the birthplace of Jesus' apostles 

The lost city, according to the Bible, is where Jesus performed a miracle that fed 5,000 people

The lost city, according to the Bible, is where Jesus performed a miracle that fed 5,000 people

For Notley, the ruins at el-Araj are bringing into view the setting of Gospel accounts in which Jesus restored a blind man's sight and fed thousands with five loaves and two fish.

'I think Jesus was there on multiple occasions,' Notley said. 'I think we probably have a number of miracles.'

In Mark 8:22–26, people bring a blind man to Jesus at Bethsaida. Jesus leads him outside the village before restoring his sight.

Luke 9:10–17 places Jesus and his apostles in what the King James Version calls 'a desert place belonging to the city called Bethsaida,' where he feeds about 5,000 men.

Notley believes the plain surrounding el-Araj fits that description: open grazing land beyond the settlement, rather than a sandy desert.

'We have no deserts up there,' he said. 'But they're pastoral areas, where your flocks will be eating outside of where people are living.'

'The Gospels identify this as the area where you have the feeding of the multitudes,' he added.

Inside a ruined church dating to the late fifth century, a mosaic invokes Peter, linking the building directly to Jesus¿ disciple

Inside a ruined church dating to the late fifth century, a mosaic invokes Peter, linking the building directly to Jesus' disciple 

Two walls set perpendicular to one another. One of the walls dates to the first century AD, while the second dates to the second or third century AD

Two walls set perpendicular to one another. One of the walls dates to the first century AD, while the second dates to the second or third century AD 

Jesus also rebukes Bethsaida in Matthew 11:21, saying: 'Woe unto thee, Bethsaida!' 

The passage criticizes its inhabitants for failing to repent despite the miracles performed there.

El-Araj lies just beyond the Jordan River, in territory ruled during Jesus' lifetime by Herod Philip, outside the jurisdiction of Herod Antipas, who ordered John the Baptist's execution.

Notley believes he has connected the location with Matthew 14:12–13, which describes Jesus withdrawing by boat after learning of John's death - he was beheaded by a king around 30 AD.

Although the passage does not name Bethsaida, Notley interprets the settlement's position as another reason Jesus would have spent time there.

John 1:44 supplies the connection to three apostles: 'Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.'

'At least a quarter of his disciples came from Bethsaida … it played a very important role as the setting, the stage for Jesus' life and ministry in the North,' Notley said.

The strongest archaeological clue, in his view, emerged in 2017, when researchers uncovered mosaics, marble, roof tiles and ceramic heating vents belonging to a Roman bathhouse.

The flooring of the church dates back 1,500 years. The team believes this church was built over Peter and Andrew's home as a way to honor them

The flooring of the church dates back 1,500 years. The team believes this church was built over Peter and Andrew's home as a way to honor them

Its significance comes from the first-century historian Josephus, who described Bethsaida's transformation from a village into a city. The historian also left behind his eyewitness accounts of Jesus on trial and his crucifixion.

In Antiquities of the Jews, 18.28, Josephus records how Herod Philip elevated the lakeside settlement's status and renamed it Julias.

That history gave researchers two requirements against which to test their discoveries.

'You should find evidence of a Jewish fishing village, and you should find evidence of urbanization,' Notley said. El-Araj, he argued, provides both. 

Hundreds of fishing weights point to the industry that supported the settlement, while chalkstone vessels associated with Jewish purity practices identify its religious character.

The bathhouse supplies evidence of urban development, matching the larger settlement described by Josephus.

'You do not build a Roman bath in a Jewish village,' Notley said.

This summer's excavations revealed walls built over earlier walls, showing successive phases of construction. Stone vessels continued to appear in later layers, suggesting the growing settlement retained its Jewish population.

Not only could the find prove the existence of the legendary church, but it would lead the team to the location of the home of Jesus' famed apostles Peter and Andrew - the Church of the Apostles was said to have been built atop of their residence

Not only could the find prove the existence of the legendary church, but it would lead the team to the location of the home of Jesus' famed apostles Peter and Andrew - the Church of the Apostles was said to have been built atop of their residence

'It doesn't lose its Jewish identity, it maintains that, but it's much larger,' Notley said.

He estimates the settlement covered 15 to 16 acres.

'Everywhere we're digging, we're finding extensive settlement on the site,' he said.

Notley contrasts those remains with et-Tell, a competing candidate nearly two miles inland from the modern lakeshore. He argues that its impressive Iron Age ruins give way to weaker evidence around the first century, when Josephus describes Bethsaida growing in importance.

'It completely contradicts the historical record,' he said.

Excavations at el-Araj began in 2016, with Notley working alongside excavation director Mordechai Aviam.

'Everyone thought I was crazy, everyone thought we were crazy, that there was nothing there,' Notley recalled.

A late fifth-century church added another line of evidence linking the settlement to the apostles.

'No one knew there was a church there,' he said. 'We didn't go looking for a church.'

Gilded glass mosaic pieces first suggested an elaborate Christian building, and by 2018 the team had identified the outline of a basilica.

Its discovery prompted Notley to revisit the account of Willibald, an eighth-century pilgrim who described a church at Bethsaida built over the house of Peter and Andrew.

In August 2022, researchers uncovered an intact mosaic inscription north of the apse, the church's sacred eastern section.

It honored a local official and benefactor named Constantine before seeking intercession from 'the chief of the apostles and the keeper of the keys of heaven,' in Notley's description.

Roman coins have been found at the site, supportinga theory that it was urbanized

Roman coins have been found at the site, supportinga theory that it was urbanized

Christians recognize Saint Peter, originally a fisherman, as one of the first followers of Jesus and the leader of the early Church following the ascension. He was born Simon Peter and grew up to be a fisherman until he met Jesus

Christians recognize Saint Peter, originally a fisherman, as one of the first followers of Jesus and the leader of the early Church following the ascension. He was born Simon Peter and grew up to be a fisherman until he met Jesus

The Bible says that not only was Peter the leader of the apostles, but he would receive the keys to the kingdom of heaven from Jesus. 

'That title can have no other reference than Peter, which confirms the church's identification with Peter,' he said.

For Notley, the question is why Christians would have honored Peter at this particular location. 'We have very few Byzantine churches connected with Peter,' he said of the Holy Land during that period.

Such churches generally marked places associated with Peter's appearances in the Gospels. At el-Araj, Notley believes the dedication commemorates his hometown.

Its importance lies in connecting the excavated church with Peter, consistent with both John's identification of his hometown and Willibald's description of a church there.

Willibald's account gave the team a prediction to test: if the church commemorated the apostles' home, earlier domestic remains might survive directly beneath the apse, the sacred area where relics associated with saints were often preserved.

'There should be a first-century house under the apse,' Notley recalled predicting.

In October 2023, a conservator removed and preserved the mosaic floor, allowing archaeologists to excavate below the church's most sacred area.

Gilded glass mosaic pieces first suggested an elaborate Christian building, and by 2018 the team had identified the outline of a basilica

Gilded glass mosaic pieces first suggested an elaborate Christian building, and by 2018 the team had identified the outline of a basilica

Above is a close look inside the ruins of the church

Above is a close look inside the ruins of the church

They uncovered a house wall dating to the first century, placing domestic remains from the apostles' lifetime beneath the later Christian building.

'It doesn't get much better than that,' Notley said.

The wall cannot establish who lived there, but its age and position support the tradition that the church commemorated an earlier home.

Beneath the late fifth-century basilica, researchers have also identified a fourth-century Christian structure that the team believes may have been an earlier church.

Notley connected that sequence with the early fourth-century historian Eusebius, who associated Peter and Philip with Bethsaida, suggesting Christians continued to remember the settlement's biblical significance.

'There's a continuing memory of Peter's connection to Bethsaida,' he said.

The case therefore joins evidence from different periods: a Jewish fishing community, Roman urban development and successive Christian buildings honoring an apostle whose hometown was Bethsaida.

'Everything we bring out of the ground affirms and strengthens that identification. Nothing that we have found would challenge it at all,' Notley said.

The identification does not amount to archaeological proof of miracles. 'Archaeology has its limits,' he acknowledged.

For Notley, however, the discoveries restore the setting in which the Gospels place Jesus' ministry and the lives of three of his closest followers.

'I have no difficulty seeing Jesus spending considerable time there,' he said, adding that he calls it 'the last lost city of the Gospels.'


Where Did Jesus Feed the 5,000, Walk on the Water, and Calm the Sea? Sea of Galilee Miracles!

{ https://www.dailymail.com/news/index.html 

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 18:37 Stuur door

Some of the 20 UFOs Near the Moon Are Ring-Shaped and Spin at Twice Earth's Gravity, Astronomers Claim

Some of the 20 UFOs Near the Moon Are Ring-Shaped and Spin at Twice Earth's Gravity, Astronomers Claim

Controversial observations of anomalous structures spark debate

UFO

Ukrainian astronomers claim high-speed telescope footage shows giant rotating UFOs near the Moon, though experts warn previous distance errors heavily undermine the unverified study 

PHOTO Peter Pieras/Pixabay

Astronomers at Ukraine's Main Astronomical Observatory say they have detected more than 20 unidentified flying objects near the Moon, using high-speed camera systems at the Vinarivka observatory in rural Ukraine.

The team, led by researcher Boris Zhilyaev, reports observing large ring-shaped structures close to the lunar surface, some estimated at up to 36 kilometres across and said to rotate roughly every three minutes, which they calculate would generate centrifugal forces exceeding twice Earth's gravity.

Anomalous Motion and Bold Technical Claims

Footage recorded on 16 August and 7 September 2025 captured small, fast-moving signals travelling at velocities of up to 11 kilometres per second across the lunar disc. In a non‑peer‑reviewed study, the authors argue that these observations could indicate a sophisticated installation on or near the Moon, potentially capable of sending craft to Earth in about 20 minutes, although mainstream scientific institutions remain sceptical of this interpretation.

In their preliminary paper, the Kyiv-based researchers categorised the reported objects into two main groupings based on observed behaviour. Atmospheric objects appeared to stay above specific lunar regions, as if acting as fixed stations, while continental objects moved quickly across the Moon's surface.

The team noted that several objects flashed in synchronised cycles lasting between 0.1 and 0.5 seconds, even when they appeared to be separated by hundreds of miles.

Size estimates in the report vary from about 440 metres to upwards of 25 miles across, with the largest objects said to rival the footprint of major terrestrial cities. Moving at roughly 24,606 miles per hour, the claimed velocities would be comparable to the top speed achieved by NASA rockets during Apollo-era lunar missions.

Despite these figures, the authors state that their mathematical models depend on assumptions about object composition and light reflectivity that have not been independently verified.

On the raw digital frames gathered at Vinarivka, the proposed large structures occupy only a few faint pixels, which leaves scope for image noise, atmospheric distortion or digital camera artefacts to be misinterpreted as real objects.

Methodological Concerns and Scientific Scepticism

The wider scientific community has treated the paper cautiously, in part because of the research group's previously criticised work on unidentified aerial phenomena. When the same team published findings on unidentified objects in 2022, Ukraine's National Academy of Sciences launched a formal review that concluded the work contained significant errors and did not meet professional standards for publication

During that earlier dispute, Harvard University astrophysicist Avi Loeb showed that the team's distance calculations were overstated by a factor of ten. That error turned likely atmospheric objects, most probably terrestrial artillery shells fired during regional conflict, into what the authors had presented as large unidentified craft.

Critics argue that the latest lunar study shows similar structural weaknesses, including reliance on a single observation site and the absence of parallax measurements to establish genuine spatial depth.

The discussion around the paper also comes at a time of public interest in declassified military records and UAP intelligence documents released under former US President Donald Trump and current American officials.

Pixelated 'Megastructures' Await Independent Checks

Read more
Alien

Officials at agencies such as NASA continue to state that no confirmed evidence of extraterrestrial technology has been found. Researchers note that without independent observations using multiple telescopes, the reported lunar anomalies cannot be treated as established objects.

Until such corroboration exists, the claimed ring-shaped structures and other reported UFOs remain the subject of debate rather than accepted

RELATED

👽🌕 20 UFOs Spotted Near the Moon... What's Really Going On?

20 UFOs Near the Moon? The Hollow Moon Mystery & What Lies Beneath

Ukrainian Scientists: “The Moon Is a UFO Base” Full Paper Breakdown

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/technology }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:17 Stuur door

NASA Explains the Spooky 'Negative-Space Jellyfish' Hovering Over Mars in New Curiosity Rover Image

NASA Explains the Spooky 'Negative-Space Jellyfish' Hovering Over Mars in New Curiosity Rover Image

A smudge on a lunar photo and a stray line in an old NASA meeting are all it takes to send humanity's imagination spinning back into the dark

NASA UFO

NASA has stepped in to clarify a decades old lunar photograph that some UFO enthusiasts say depicts a 3.4 mile long alien spacecraft suspended above the moon. 

PHOTO Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica/Wikimedia Commons

NASA has moved to explain a decades old lunar photograph that some UFO enthusiasts claim shows a 3.4-mile-long alien spacecraft hovering above the moon, after the 1967 image resurfaced online and reignited speculation about extraterrestrial life.

The black and white picture was captured by NASA's Lunar Orbiter 3 in February 1967 as the agency mapped potential landing sites ahead of the first crewed missions.

The frame shows a stark stretch of the moon's surface dominated by Theophilus crater, a vast impact site that NASA lists as about 68 miles across and 2.7 miles deep. Tucked into that landscape is an elongated smudge that has become the latest canvas for people determined to see more than geology.

UFO Blogger Claims NASA is Hiding the 'Smoking Gun'

One of the loudest voices is Scott Waring, a long-time UFO blogger, who argues that NASA's own archive hides the smoking gun. On his site, UFO Sightings Daily, he claims the strange streak is 'a long spacecraft hovering over the moon's surface' and insists the object is no trick of light or dust on the lens.

According to Waring, the scale alone should make people sit up. He writes that he compared the length of the disputed feature with Theophilus crater, taking NASA's 110 kilometre diameter figure, then judging the object to be about one twentieth as long. From that, he concludes the craft measures roughly 5.5 kilometres, or 3.4 miles, end to end.

'That's huge to us humans, but to aliens, it's considered a small shuttle craft,' he tells his readers, doubling down on the idea that we are glimpsing only a minor piece of someone else's space hardware.

He goes further, arguing that the photograph carries a chilling implication. 'This is 100 percent proof that aliens were watching humans before we ever stepped on the moon,' Waring writes, treating the picture as evidence of quiet surveillance of the Apollo programme before it even began.

NASA Apollo Missions

NASA Apollo Missions  PHOTO NASA

NASA, for its part, has said nothing of the sort. The agency has repeatedly stated that it has no evidence of extraterrestrial life and that it has yet to find any sign of past or present life on the moon or on Mars.

The elongated mark has not been classified by NASA as a craft, and neither Waring's size estimate nor his interpretation has been validated by independent imaging experts.

NASA Image Spurs Fresh Extraterrestrial Life Debate

The renewed focus on the 1967 NASA image lands in a wider political and cultural moment where official UFO files are being shuffled out of locked cabinets and into public view. The Trump administration has overseen the release of several batches of classified documents on unexplained aerial and space phenomena, giving UFO believers fresh material and, unsurprisingly, new fuel.

On 8 May, the US Department of War released hundreds of pages of documents, images and audio recordings that officials said documented reports of possible extraterrestrial sightings going back to the 1940s. Among them were transcripts from the Apollo 12 and Apollo 17 missions, the second and final crewed landings on the moon.

Those Apollo records, along with photographs taken by astronauts on the surface, detail multiple encounters with bright, fast-moving objects that appeared to dance around lunar landers or drift past capsule windows. The tone is more puzzled than panicked, but you can feel the astronauts straining to make sense of what they are seeing.

During Apollo 17 in 1972, commander Gene Cernan, lunar geologist Jack Schmitt and command module pilot Ron Evans reported a bright, flashing object some distance from their spacecraft.

Read more
NASA's Mars rover Curiosity on Sol

In one exchange, recorded in mission transcripts, Cernan says: 'It is a bright object, and it's obviously rotating because it's flashing. It's way out in the distance, as I say, because there are particles that are close by and it's obviously not one of those.'

He adds that the flashes appear in a 'very rhythmic fashion,' estimating that the object sits several Earth diameters away in their field of view as they look back at the home planet. Cernan is careful, stressing that the comparison might not 'do you any good,' but the bafflement is clear.

Later, as Apollo 17's crew fired their thrusters to change direction, Evans reported 'very bright particles or fragments or something' drifting past the windows. Schmitt chimes in that it looks like 'the Fourth of July' outside Evans' window, with 'big bright pieces tumbling slowly around the capsule.'

Evans describes the fragments as jagged, angular and solid, not fluid, and says they are mostly moving with the spacecraft but with some faster pieces zipping by. According to the mission records, he also reported taking photographs of them for analysis back on Earth.

Three years earlier, Apollo 12 astronauts also noted odd lights and objects on approach to the lunar surface, material that appears again in the newly released Trump era files. None of these reports are categorised by NASA as proof of alien craft.

Mission engineers have long pointed to mundane explanations, from ice crystals and insulation fragments to weird lighting in the vacuum. Yet the raw transcripts still make strange reading today.

NASA Briefings Mention 'Alien Starbase' in Moon Anomaly Talk

The Trump administration's third batch of UFO related files, published on 12 June, has added another wild detail to the pile. Within recorded NASA briefings held after Apollo 16 in 1972, officials can be heard referring, apparently half in jest, to an 'alien starbase' on the far side of the moon.

These briefings, which run for about 55 minutes, discuss unusual gravity readings, laser measurements and anomalies detected on the moon's far side, particularly near the Van de Graaff crater region.

One speaker notes 'a great big hole' around what the transcript calls 'Fendi graph', believed to be a garbled reference to Van de Graaff, a crater already known for its strange magnetic and geochemical quirks.

apollo 17

Apollo 17 Project  PHOTO Apollo Archive/Nasa

'On the backside of the moon around Fendi graph, that's where we get our big hole,' the participant says, before the discussion suddenly veers. Another voice remarks: 'It could be an alien star base or something. Anyway, the next slide shows the front side of the moon.'

The line, buried in a technical briefing, does not appear in the formal Apollo 16 mission transcript from 1972. NASA has not formally clarified whether the 'alien starbase' reference was a joke, a casual shorthand or something else entirely.

That ambiguity, paired with the Lunar Orbiter 3 photograph and Trump era document dumps, has given UFO believers a field day. For scientists trying to keep public expectations tethered to evidence, it is proving to be an exhausting game of cosmic whack a mole.


NASA Explains the Spooky 'Negative-Space Jellyfish' Hovering Over Mars in New Curiosity Rover Image

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trending }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:50 Stuur door

'An Absurd Idea': Scientists Want to Create an Artificial Eclipse in Space to Hunt for Alien Worlds

'An Absurd Idea': Scientists Want to Create an Artificial Eclipse in Space to Hunt for Alien Worlds

A vast flower-shaped shield, a billion‑dollar gamble and the stubborn human urge to see whether anyone else is out there

Alien

A NASA team is advancing a bold new proposal to search for alien worlds by staging an artificial eclipse in space, positioning a huge ‘starshade’ about 175,000 kilometres above Earths. 

PHOTO Razor Picz/Pinterest

A NASA team is pushing an audacious plan to hunt for alien worlds by creating an artificial eclipse in space, placing a vast 'starshade' some 175,000 kilometres above Earth so ground-based telescopes can finally see planets hidden in the glare of distant stars.

Astronomers have already confirmed thousands of exoplanets, but most were spotted indirectly, by watching stars wobble or dim as planets pass in front of them. Directly imaging an Earth-like planet is far harder.

These worlds are up to a billion times fainter than the stars they orbit, so the light astronomers care about is drowned out by the cosmic equivalent of full‑beam headlights.

The Hybrid Observatory for Earth-like Exoplanets, or HOEE, is NASA's latest attempt to fix that. The concept, described by a small NASA-led team, involves flying a giant flower-shaped screen between Earth and distant stars.

The structure, about 100 metres across, would align precisely with powerful telescopes on the ground, blocking out the starlight and revealing whatever alien planets are lurking nearby.

It is, on the face of it, deeply weird. A kind of precision space parasol. But behind the slightly mad imagery sits a serious scientific ambition that has been building for decades.

How an Artificial Eclipse Could Reveal Alien Worlds

After researchers outlined the HOEE idea as a way to supercharge existing observatories rather than building yet another multi-billion dollar space telescope from scratch. Instead of putting both mirror and shade in orbit, the hybrid model keeps the main telescope on Earth and only launches the starshade.

The principle is surprisingly simple. If you can block the light from a star before it reaches a telescope, the surrounding region becomes dark enough to expose any faint specks of light that might be orbiting it. Those specks are the potential alien planets, including, if the scientists get very lucky, a rocky world roughly the size of Earth in the so‑called habitable zone.

In this vision, the starshade would be carefully unfurled in space, its petal-like edges sculpted to minimise diffracted light. It would then sit tens of thousands of kilometres away, directly in the telescope's line of sight to a target star. Get the geometry right, and you essentially manufacture a perfect, repeatable eclipse.

The alignment demands are brutal. The shade would have to hold its position relative to the telescope and the star with fine precision over enormous distances. Even minor errors could let enough stray light through to wipe out any signal from an alien planet. That is before you factor in launches, deployments and the joys of maintaining a massive structure in orbit.

NASA's Billion-Dollar Bet on Alien Atmospheres

NASA is nowhere near green‑lighting the mission. The HOEE team is currently seeking another round of agency funding to refine the idea. Early estimates suggest the eventual starshade project could carry a price tag in the region of one billion dollars.

In space terms, that sits in the uncomfortable middle. Not cheap, clearly, but still far below the budgets of flagship missions such as the James Webb Space Telescope. The argument from advocates is blunt. If a billion buys a better shot at spotting a truly Earth-like alien world, one with the right atmosphere and temperature, then maybe it is worth it.

The scientific payoff would come from the light that reaches Earth after the artificial eclipse. By breaking that light into its component wavelengths, astronomers can look for fingerprints of gases associated with conditions that might support life. The HOEE plan focuses on detecting atmospheric chemicals such as oxygen and nitrogen, key ingredients in our own planet's habitability story.

Nobody is promising evidence of life. That kind of bold claim would demand multiple lines of proof. But identifying a world with an atmosphere that looks suspiciously familiar to ours would be a serious moment for science, and for our long-running obsession with alien possibilities.

Officials at NASA have framed the starshade concept as one tool among many in the broader search for habitable planets. The idea is not to replace existing missions, but to give them a sharper pair of eyes.

Ground-based telescopes are only getting more powerful, and coupling them with a space-borne eclipse generator could extend their reach well beyond what they were originally built for.

Alien

Alien Photo by: PHOTO Leo_Visions/Unsplash

Still, the scepticism writes itself. A giant flower-shaped umbrella floating above Earth, perfectly aligned with telescopes and distant stars, sounds less like engineering and more like science fiction.

Even some scientists have described the plan as 'absurd' in its ambition. Then again, most big shifts in astronomy, from space telescopes to gravitational wave detectors, looked slightly unhinged on paper at first.

If HOEE moves ahead, it will face all the usual battles that define modern space science, from budget fights and technical delays to competition with other marquee missions. The team backing the starshade knows that. Their pitch rests on a simple question that cuts through the noise.

If we had a realistic chance to look directly at a nearby Earth-like alien planet, one that might, in some far‑off future, even be within reach of a human visit, would we really decide that is too much trouble?


scientists created Artificial Eclipse 😯

Proba-3: The Mission Creating Artificial Solar Eclipses!

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trending }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:32 Stuur door

A study claimed UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. Then scientists checked the math.

Large telescope inside an observatory dome, showing metal structure, supporting beams, and curved reflective surfaces under artificial lighting.

"200-inch Hale Telescope at the Palomar Observatory"

A study claimed UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. Then scientists checked the math.

In 2025, two cleverly designed studies claimed to find evidence of strange objects orbiting Earth — years before humanity had put anything in space.

The announcement made headlines. In October 2025, a group of researchers published a paper in a well-regarded, peer-reviewed astronomical journal claiming the extraordinary: They’d found evidence of objects orbiting the Earth years before the launch of any human-made artificial satellites. In another paper, they also claimed links between when these objects appeared in the sky and the dates of nuclear tests in the 1950s. If any of these results were correct, it’d represent evidence of orbiting non-human technological artifacts and an indication that whatever “piloted” these artifacts was interested in our nuclear capabilities. It’s easy to see why the papers grabbed headlines and interest. 

So, the big question hovering around these works is — like all newly published scientific papers — can their conclusions hold up to scrutiny?

The first step in answering that question has now been taken. In June, a paper, soon to be published in Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, appeared online and offered an in-depth critique of those explosive claims. Given the importance of the story for UAP/UFO studies, I want to walk you through some details of the original papers and this recent response. Understanding the details is, of course, important on its own. Were we being visited by alien spacecraft in the 1950s? That seems like an important question. There are, however, important lessons in this story concerning how science can, and should, explore the contentious UAP topic. It also raises issues about the difficulties that come when science encounters UAP/UFO culture in general. We’ll explore those too.

The VASCO project

Let’s start with the original papers that set the story in motion. Both were published by astronomer Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (a researcher at the Nordita in Stockholm) and her collaborators. For a number of years, Villarroel has spearheaded a project called VASCO (Vanishing and Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations), which is based on a really good idea. The central method is to use old photographic observations of the sky to look for signatures of advanced technology (now generally called “technosignatures”). It’s a clever concept because the farther back you go, the less human-made stuff there is in the sky to confound the search. So, the logic argues that it might be easier to find non-human technosignatures in archived data.

The two papers VASCO researchers published in 2025 relied on observations taken in the early 1950s using the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (aka POSS-I). The observations were captured on hundreds of photographic plates taken at Mount Palomar in California, and the images were later mosaiced together to form a sky map. Images of the same part of the sky were taken twice, and close in time. One plate used a red-light-sensitive emulsion, and one used a blue-light-sensitive emulsion. Villarroel’s excellent idea was to explore digitized versions of these plates and look for “transients” — things that appeared at specific locations in one of the plates but not the other (since they were taken at different times). The hypothesis was that, perhaps, these transients could be sunlight “glinting” off an orbiting object. The plates had been digitized so Villarroel and her collaborators could use computers to explore large portions of the sky and analyze the statistics of the transients.

The most important part of the first 2025 VASCO paper had the team looking at the difference between plates in Earth’s shadow and those that were not. If a reflective technological artifact were in the shadow, then there’d be no sunlight to produce glints. Therefore, those shadowed plates should have fewer or no transients. After analysis, the team claimed that not only did they find a deficit of transients in the shadowed plates, but the effect was significant at about the “22 sigma” level. (Here, sigma refers to how far away the signal — the detection of something or some feature — is from the average of the background/noise.) Usually, a “5 sigma” result is the gold standard for claiming you’ve made a discovery. A 22-sigma result is so high that it’s virtually unheard of in science. The team did note that when they used more stringent vetting of the transients, the significance dropped to the 7.6 sigma level.

A scientific paper on its own, however, is just a single step in the scientific process.

In the second paper, Stephen Bruehl (Professor of Anesthesiology at Vanderbilt University) and Villarroel looked at the timing of nuclear tests and the dates when transients were observed on the POSS-I plates. Bruehl and Villarroel claimed that there was a statistically significant overlap between when the nuclear explosions happened and when the transients were seen (i.e., the plates). In other words, it seemed like the things creating the transients (alien spaceships, perhaps) were clustering their appearances around nuclear tests.

So, of course, these papers made news. A scientific paper on its own, however, is just a single step in the scientific process. The next step is for the community to pore over the paper and see if the work holds up. Was the data set well prepared? Are the methods used to analyze that data well thought out and mathematically legitimate? Are the conclusions the authors draw from their analysis appropriate, or is there some flaw in the chain of reasoning? 

A critique of the VASCO studies

That next step just came in with a new paper called “Critical Evaluation of Studies Alleging Evidence for Technosignatures in the POSS1 – E Photographic Plates,” which was recently accepted by the Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA). As the title implies, the authors do not find the VASCO studies convincing. 

Before we dive into their critique, one noteworthy thing about the paper is its author list. It includes several working scientists who have been at the forefront of taking UAPs seriously. The lead author is Wesley Watters of Wellesley College. He is an astronomer who has written several papers reviewing UAP sightings and arguing they deserve a deeper, agnostic analysis. He has also been a member of Avi Loeb’s Galileo Project research team, which wants to study UAPs scientifically. Another author is Kevin Knuth, a physicist at the University at Albany, SUNY. Knuth published a well-known study of Navy-pilot UAP sightings exploring whether the trajectories seen by the pilots showed evidence for extreme physics at work. Knuth is also a research affiliate of the Galileo Project. What is striking about the author list is that it represents a group that cannot be seen as hostile to the basic idea that UAPs are a valid scientific problem or that they might represent technosignatures. This observation tells you nothing about the quality of their analysis and the critique that follows. It does, however, mean this is not a group of scientists with a bias against UAPs as a whole (in my experience, most astronomers do have this bias).

The Watters paper begins with an important historical example. Using photographic plates to look for things in the sky that appear and then disappear is not a new idea. For decades, astronomers tried to use photographic plates to find optical traces of the enigmatic gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), powerful explosions involving massive stars. As Watters and team show, even though a huge effort was put into the project, there were just too many “defects” on the plates that had nothing to do with the sky: problems with the photographic emulsion; dust grains on the plates; pits in the glass plate itself; errors introduced when plate copies were made, as well as other issues. It turns out that separating the defects and other issues from the real things captured by the telescope is incredibly difficult. This is especially true when you need to do it at scale — meaning you want to do statistics with tens or hundreds of thousands of potential transients. For the astronomers looking for GRBs, the photographic plates were simply not up to the job. That seems to be an important lesson for the VASCO project.

The defect problem is so bad that the Watters paper doesn’t use the term transient at all since so many of the “things” in the POSS survey aren’t transients (i.e., things seen in the sky). Instead, they begin their analysis by asking about “Selected POSS 1-E Features,” or SPFs. The Watters paper then asks several questions. What can we tell about the SPFs that the VASCO team pulled off the POSS-I plates? How did their choices of what to use effect their analysis and their claims? 

It turns out that these are not easy questions to answer because the VASCO team did not publish the dataset used in this study. That means Watters and company had to go through an exhaustive effort to determine which parts of the POSS-I survey were used and which features were selected to be explored by the VASCO group as possible transients. Once this work is done, Watters and company go on to show that this analogous dataset is full of irregularities (something also shown in an earlier paper by Nigel Hambly of the University of Edinburgh). SPFs show up more often on the edges of the plates than in the center, or features cluster on the plates in irregular ways. Worse, when mapped across the whole sky, there are big stripes and voids where no features appear at all, while in other places the features inexplicably bunch up. All this points to the real possibility that the VASCO data set simply has not been vetted carefully enough. If so many, if not most, of the features are not true astronomical transients but plate defects, that is a real problem. 

Even if some of the features on the plates are light from the sky, the Watters analysis of the analogous VASCO dataset revealed a deeper problem: the statistics. To pull statistically significant conclusions from the data, as the VASCO team hopes, the dataset as a whole must have certain properties. In particular, overall, it must be what’s called “uniformly random in distribution.” This means the features must, on average, be sprinkled randomly around in the same way as stars in the sky appear to be. Technically, this means they could be generated by what’s called a Poisson process. If you want to find statistically significant patterns in a big data set, the most common methods require that you start with data that at least approximates being uniformly random. Only in that case can you apply many of the usual mathematical methods of statistics, the methods that assure you’re not getting fooled by patterns you think you are finding. 

It’s not that the VASCO idea was bad. It was a great technosignature scientific project — but the dataset does not seem up to the task.

Because of all the problems identified in the Watters paper, the VASCO dataset cannot be considered to be uniformly random. Worse, some of the conclusions rely on small numbers of data. For example, for the all-important calculation of the Earth shadow deficit, only 11 out of the 645 plates the VASCO team used are in the Earth’s shadow. That’s not a lot of data to begin with, and it makes doing statistics shakier. But then, through careful analysis, the Watters team found that only five of these plates were fully shadowed, with the rest only partially shadowed. Worse, it appears that the majority of SPFs occur in a single plate. So now there is even less data to work with statistically, and that one plate dominates the analysis. Finally, some of the shadowed plates were in those troubled bands where something weird was going on. 

When Watters and collaborators repeated the shadow analysis, they found no significant deficit of features. The VASCO result had disappeared. These problems all stem from the misapplication of the statistical methods. Thus, that spectacular claim of a 22-sigma result is unsupportable. There was no statistically significant deficit of SPF’s in the Earth’s shadow.

The Watters team then turned to the claimed correlation between the dates of features appearing on the POSS-I plates and nuclear tests. That result also disappeared in terms of significance. The problem was that the VASCO team was not using the right number of days over which the POSS-I observations had been taken (they used 2,718 days rather than the actual 312-day time period over which their data were drawn; the POSS-I survey did not record observations every single day. Once this correction was included, the statistically significant correlation between nuclear tests and transient observations collapsed. What did exist was a relationship between when the telescope was used and when nuclear tests were done (possibly due to clear weather extending across the western states). But this had nothing to do with when features appeared on those plates.

Finally, the Watters paper concludes by showing how the whole VASCO project is plagued by a kind of circular reasoning embodied by their overuse of the term “transients” rather than “features.” Circular reasoning involves assuming the conclusion of an argument as part of its premises.  The VASCO team wants to claim that some features on the POSS-I plates are actual things in the sky that only appear once and then are gone. They use the analysis of the shadow deficit and nuclear tests to claim these are real transients. But there is no independent validation that the bulk of these “transients” are not stuff screwed up on the plates themselves. Thus, the argument doubles back on itself: the shadow-deficit analysis assumes that the plate features are real transient events, and that same analysis is cited as proof that they are real transient events.

The bottom line is that the Watters paper offers a strong critique of the two news-making VASCO studies. It’s not that the VASCO idea was bad. It was a great technosignature scientific project. Rather, like the failed GRB studies, the POSS-I dataset does not seem up to the task. So, what does it all mean?

Science and UFO culture

The first thing to note is that this is not the end of the story. Science is like the blues — it’s a call-and-response kind of thing. A scientist named Bob publishes a paper. Another scientist named Alice publishes a critique. It’s then Bob’s job to address those critiques in the next published paper. If that’s done well, then the game goes on, and Bob’s evidence and arguments get better over time until, perhaps, the scientific community recognizes it as a proven fact and even uses that fact to do the next set of studies. So, the question now is how the VASCO team responds to these criticisms.

People arguing that peer review and publication are not necessary are like players showing up to a soccer game demanding everyone use the rules of baseball.

Another key point is where this call and response get played out. Over the past 400 years, science has figured out a system that works pretty well. It’s called peer review. Bob writes a paper and submits it to a journal. The journal then sends it to other scientists who are knowledgeable in the field (hopefully experts) for review. The reviewers make comments and suggestions that must be addressed. If the paper is judged to be too deeply flawed, then it may be rejected. This process is not perfect, but it does ensure at least a first level of quality control. Most importantly, it has given us wonderful things like quantum mechanics, molecular biology, and so on.

Raising this point gets us to the sociology of the overlap between UFO culture and science. A number of times, unrefereed papers that have not been submitted to any journal have appeared online, claiming to respond to the Watters paper’s deep analysis. While there is nothing in principle wrong with this, it’s definitely not science. Instead, it’s asking interested scientists to go chasing after work that has not been vetted by anyone and stands to be a waste of time. Certainly, these papers can’t be considered part of the all-important literature on which science has built its long and incredible success. In other words, it won’t endure. People arguing against this — that peer review and publication are not necessary — are like players showing up to a soccer game demanding everyone use the rules of baseball. That’s not how that game is played, and it’s played that way for good reasons.

This takes us deeper into the difficulty for scientists attempting to deal seriously with UFO culture. Advocates for the claim that UAPs/UFOs represent technosignatures of alien visitation often complain that scientists ignore the evidence and are unwilling to take the subject seriously. This was certainly not the case with the VASCO papers. Dr. Villarroel was, for example, invited to present her results at a meeting of the important Goddard Space Flight Center technosignature lecture series. The meeting was polite, with lots of good discussion. 

When, however, scientists find fault with UAP/UFO data — as is the case with the Watters study — they are attacked as “part of the problem” or “government shills.” Online and elsewhere, it can get so unpleasant that at some point, a scientist might ask, “Why bother?” Everyone has interesting, fun research projects. Why spend time on this? 

In this way, the UAP/UFO community needs to ask itself a difficult question. Does that community want their subject to be part of the actual scientific process — where beliefs can get legitimately challenged — or do they just want to hold on to their beliefs no matter what? There is a word for the second option. It’s called religion.

I once asked Adam Riess, an astronomer who won the Nobel Prize for showing that the Universe’s expansion was accelerating, what it felt like when he made the discovery. He was just a post-doctoral researcher when he was at the telescope collecting data for the epoch-making result. What did he think as he saw the Nobel-worthy conclusion come out of his data? 

He told me he was terrified. The smartest people in the world were going to tear through everything he had done, looking for mistakes. Riess’ apprehension shows exactly why science works and why the VASCO team should have expected — and welcomed — critiques like those of Watter’s and collaborators. They are claiming something extraordinary, explosive even. It’s the duty of the rest of the scientific community to look for all the ways they might be wrong. That, after all, is the only way we can know if they are right. Isn’t the question “Are we alone?” worth that kind of effort?

RELATED

1952 UFOs in Orbit

Pentagon UFO Disclosure: All 4 Batches of Released UFO Videos 2026

{ https://bigthink.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:12 Stuur door

Tinfoil Is Optional

Tinfoil Is Optional

A once-fringe subject is finding a home in university research.

Tinfoil-Is-Optional.png

For decades, UFOs sat on the fringes of serious inquiry. People came forward claiming they had been abducted, had seen flying saucers in the sky, or that Area 51 is really a military base facilitating the study of UFOs and storing the bodies of extraterrestrial beings.

On the latter, Bob Lazar is top of mind. An alleged conspiracy theorist, Lazar became famous in late the 1980s for claiming that he worked on reverse-engineering extraterrestrial spacecraft for the U.S. government. He has appeared on multiple podcasts recently to promote his documentary, S4: The Bob Lazar Story.

My colleague Scott Turner, Director of Science Programs at the National Association of Scholars, tells me the subject has been plagued by “a lot of delusion and projection” since the 1950s, when UFOs became intertwined with Cold War paranoia, fears of American technological inferiority, and, eventually, fraudsters and conspiracy theorists.

Still, Turner tells me, sightings of unidentified objects in the sky “are real.” And they are real enough that some effort has gone into rebranding the subject. “UFO,” for example, has largely given way to “unidentified aerial phenomena,” or UAP, a term that does not assume every flying saucer is piloted by a little green man. In August 2020, the Department of Defense established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, formally adopting the UAP terminology.

And the government’s interest in UAPs has become much more public since.

Last September, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing titled “Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection.” During it, Rep. Eric Burlison played a “never-before-seen” video showing a U.S. military Hellfire “We Come in Peace” missile™ striking a bright object off the coast of Yemen on Oct. 30, 2024. The Hellfire missile strikes the object, sending debris flying from the point of impact. But the debris continues moving alongside the main object, almost as though the pieces remain part of the same formation.

Brandi Vincent, who covered the hearing for DefenseScoop, reported that the hearing also marked the first time an active-duty Navy official testified publicly before Congress about a UAP incident.

That official was Senior Chief Petty Officer Alexandro Wiggins, who described a February 2023 encounter aboard the USS Jackson in Whiskey 291, a restricted military training area off the coast of Southern California. Wiggins said he observed a “self-luminous,” “Tic Tac-shaped” object that did not resemble a conventional aircraft or drone, and the ship’s systems recorded the encounter on multiple sensors. The object appeared to emerge from the ocean, join three similar objects, and then disappear with “near-instantaneous acceleration.” Wiggins said there was no sonic boom or conventional propulsion signature.

Whiskey 291 is the same general training area associated with the now famous 2004 “Tic Tac” incident, footage of which was recorded by Lieutenant Chad Underwood. NBC has a rather good segment on the encounter and other reported Tic Tac sightings.

Whatever these objects are, higher education has found a reason to be interested.

The University at Albany (UAlbany), for example, recently received a major gift to advance scientific research on UAPs. UAlbany physics professor Matthew Szydagis was among the authors of a June 2025 article, “Initial Results from the First Field Expedition of UAPx to Study Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena,” published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. According to the abstract, the article details a week-long expedition to Catalina Island, where Szydagis and other researchers deployed cameras and a range of sensors to collect data on possible UAPs.

“The study of UAP is slowly moving from the fringe to the mainstream of scientific study,” Szydagis said in a university press release about the newly published research. I have not read the entire article myself, but I have reached out to Szydagis hoping to talk with him about his findings.

There is also Harvard’s Galileo Project, which aims to move the search for extraterrestrial technology from “accidental or anecdotal observations and legends” into systematic scientific research. The project webpage says it will “examine the possibility of extraterrestrial origin” for UAPs and seek to “understand the origins of interstellar objects.” The project is led by Avi Loeb, who, interestingly enough, has had some public spats with Elon Musk over the existence of aliens.

Apparently, Musk has said he has seen no evidence of aliens, prompting Loeb to write that Musk commenting on the universe based on his experience in the inner solar system is like “an ant making a statement about the planets in the Solar system after exploring an area as big as the head of a pin.” Loeb added, “It must be a rather presumptuous ant.”

What makes that comment particularly humorous is that Harvard recently disclosed a $2.2 billion stake in SpaceX, making Musk’s aerospace company the “largest holding in Harvard Management Company’s publicly reported stock portfolio.” So, if Loeb is right, Harvard has a lot riding on a rather presumptuous ant.

Of course, none of this tells us what researchers will actually find. Turner’s view is probably the safest one for now: “There’s something there.” What that something is remains another question.

Will universities find aliens? Some doubt it. Turner takes the Fermi paradox seriously: If advanced extraterrestrial civilizations are common, where are they? Despite decades spent scanning the skies,Turner notes, no one has produced the proverbial alien body or spacecraft wreckage.

What do I think? Well, I am not ready to add this one to my collection of doubts just yet. Aliens may be out there.

My tinfoil hat is at the ready.

Minding the Campus article takes a skeptical view of UFO discussions

Overview

A recent Minding the Campus essay, pointedly titled “Tinfoil Is Optional,” takes a skeptical, lightly satirical view of UFO and UAP discussions, arguing that the subject can be examined without defaulting to paranoid conspiracy thinking. The piece revisits a topic that has long occupied the borderlands of public debate: reports of strange objects in the sky, allegations of government secrecy, and the enduring pull of stories involving Area 51, alleged crash retrievals, and supposed extraterrestrial technology. By leaning into a skeptical frame, the article suggests that while unexplained sightings may be worth discussing, they do not require the “tinfoil hat” mindset that often shadows the subject.

The article opens by noting that UFOs have for decades sat on the fringes of serious inquiry, fueled by claims of abductions, flying saucers, and hidden government programs. It also highlights Bob Lazar, the controversial figure who rose to prominence in the late 1980s by claiming he had worked on reverse-engineering extraterrestrial spacecraft for the U.S. government. Lazar has recently re-entered the public conversation through podcast appearances promoting the documentary S4: The Bob Lazar Story, underscoring how old claims continue to circulate in new media formats.

From UFOs to UAPs

A central argument in the article is that the subject has long been burdened by “a lot of delusion and projection,” as Scott Turner, director of science programs at the National Association of Scholars, puts it. Turner traces the modern UFO era back to the 1950s, when Cold War anxieties, concerns about American technological inferiority, and later a wave of frauds and conspiracy theorists helped shape the conversation. Yet the article also stresses that sightings themselves are not imaginary. Turner says unidentified objects in the sky “are real,” a distinction that underlies the shift away from the term UFO toward UAP, or unidentified aerial phenomena.

That rebranding is not merely cosmetic. In August 2020, the Department of Defense established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, formally adopting the newer terminology. The article presents that shift as an effort to describe the issue more neutrally, without presuming either extraterrestrial origins or elaborate cover-ups. Since then, government interest in UAPs has become more public, with hearings and official testimony lending the topic a measure of legitimacy it long lacked.

Congressional scrutiny and recent testimony

The piece points to a major House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing held last September titled “Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection.” During the hearing, Rep. Eric Burlison played what was described as a “never-before-seen” video showing a U.S. military Hellfire missile striking a bright object off the coast of Yemen on Oct. 30, 2024. According to the account, the missile impact sent debris flying from the object, but the material continued moving in formation with it, deepening the mystery rather than resolving it.

The hearing also marked, according to DefenseScoop reporter Brandi Vincent, the first time an active-duty Navy official testified publicly before Congress about a UAP incident. That witness, Senior Chief Petty Officer Alexandro Wiggins, described a February 2023 encounter aboard the USS Jackson in the restricted training area known as Whiskey 291 off Southern California. Wiggins said he observed a “self-luminous,” “Tic Tac-shaped” object that did not resemble a conventional aircraft or drone, adding another data point to a debate increasingly shaped by military witnesses rather than civilian enthusiasts.

A skeptical but measured posture

What distinguishes “Tinfoil Is Optional” is not dismissal, but tone. The article treats UFO/UAP discourse as a subject that can be investigated without automatically embracing conspiratorial interpretations. That stance reflects a broader shift in the public conversation: serious institutions are acknowledging unexplained encounters, even as skepticism remains essential. In that sense, the piece argues that curiosity and caution can coexist — and that examining unidentified objects does not require assuming extraterrestrials, secret bases, or a government plot at every turn.

SOURCE: https://usubjects.com/ 

{ https://mindingthecampus.org/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:53 Stuur door

EARTH LIGHTS & UFOs

EARTH LIGHTS & UFOs

EARTH LIGHTS & UFOs

Excerpted from lecture script entitled "EARTH LIGHTS AND THE RE- INVENTION OF UFOLOGY" for presentation to the British UFO Research Association (BUFORA) in 1997 (see also "Everything You've Always Wanted to Know About Earth Lights" in Fortean Times 103, October 1997 - www.forteantimes.com

Few in mainstream ufology have paid much heed to the developing earth lights line of enquiry. Like Aesop's tortoise, earth lights research has passed other ufological hares either without them noticing or with them offering merely a dismissive swipe of a paw. Yet it can now attract significant funding and the interest of mainstream scientists, is provoking informed, cutting-edge scientific hypotheses as well as speculations that make the ETH look the intellectual dinosaur it is. Here, I will very briefly bring the story up to date.

History

Charles Fort was among the first to note that strange "meteors" appeared somewhat coincidentally with earthquakes. It had to wait until the 1960s, however, for veteran ufologist, John Keel, to associate the appearance of unusual lights with areas of geological faulting and magnetic anomaly, as well as with the occurrence of earthquakes. It was the French researcher, Ferdinand Lagarde, though, who most tightly focused in on the UFO-fault connection in the '60s. In the USA, John Keel likewise promoted the real phenomenon as "soft" light phenomena associated with faulting and other geophysical factors. In 1967, American author Vincent H. Gaddis made a pioneering stab at separating out luminous phenomena in his Mysterious Fires and Lights. In 1975, Andrew York and I published research on Leicestershire, in which the occurrences of recorded strange phenomena over a number of centuries were geographically mapped. Both archival accounts of meteorological anomalies together with reported UFOs were found to have had their greatest incidence over the faulted regions of the county. Two years later, Michael Persinger, a neuroscientist and geologist at Laurentian University in Canada, together with Gyslaine Lafreniére, published a study of the United States which similarly indicated a correlation between higher levels of reported UFO activity and the locations of earthquake epicentres.

Persinger and Lafreniére saw UFOs as electromagnetic phenomena arising from the tremendous energy involved in the constant rising and falling of tectonic stress in the Earth's crust, whether or not full-blown earthquakes occurred. They visualised fields of forces operating evenly and quietly over very large geographical regions which could become focused at any given time in a few small areas of particular geological resistance or instability such as fault lines, ore bodies or mineral deposits, stubborn rock outcrops, hills, mountains, and so on. They likened this to the energies in the atmosphere being equally capable of producing a gentle breeze over a wide area or a localised ferocity like a tornado. "The existence of man upon a thin shell beneath which mammoth forces constantly operate, cannot be over-emphasized," they argued. This was the first outing of what has come to be known as the Tectonic Strain Theory, or TST.

Harley Rutledge, a physics professor at Southeast Missouri State University, organised field investigation of an outbreak of lights that began in 1973 around Piedmont. The results of this were published in "Project Identification" in 1981.

An important researcher into light phenomena is John Derr, a leading U.S. geologist. In 1986, he joined with Persinger to study an earlier outbreak of lights in the Yakima Indian Reservation, Washington State. Firewardens on the reservation saw huge orange lightballs floating above rocks, as well as smaller "ping-pong balls" of light bounding along ridges. This remarkable period of sightings also included the occurrence of unusual meteorological effects such as glowing clouds indicating a charged atmosphere, and subterranean rumblings suggesting some kind of tectonic association. The firewardens organised themselves, and photographs were taken of the lights and triangulated observations using radios were made.

Toppenish Ridge, Yakima Indian Reservation; one of the localities where many lights were seen.
Toppenish Ridge, Yakima Indian Reservation; one of the localities where many lights were seen.

Derr and Persinger showed that the Yakima lights were seen most often in the vicinity of the ridges that cut across the reservation - each riddled with faulting - and with Satus Peak, the general area of a surface rupture and one of the stronger earthquakes in the region during the 13 years covered by the study. Successive reporting of lights occurred in the seven months preceding the biggest earthquake of the studied period. Regional seismic activity also increased during the times in 1972 and 1976 when most sightings were reported.

(The irony of the Yakima case is that the reservation is adjacent to the part of the Cascades Mountains where pilot Kenneth Arnold saw the flight of nine glittering objects in 1947 that initiated the flying saucer era . In fact, Arnold landed his plane at Yakima airfield shortly after his encounter. It is also worth noting that Arnold, did not, of course, se disks at all, but what he described as tadpole-shaped objects. This also struck a bell with me because as a schollchild in Leicesterhsire in 1957, I experience the powerful earth tremor there, and I recall one of our teachers decribing how he had seen a row of high flying lights earlier that afternoon. The lights looked tadpole-shaped, he said. Later, the local papers revealed that these objects had been widely seen over surrounding counties as well.)

A giant light hovers over a peak in Hessdalen Norway. Photo by Leif Havik/Project Hessdalen.
A giant light hovers over a peak in Hessdalen Norway.
Photo by Leif Havik/Project Hessdalen.

It was the outbreak of lights at Hessdalen, a valley 70 miles southeast of Trondheim in Norway, that most firmly switched on the earth lights agenda. From about November, 1981, people living in the area, which is rich in copper and other metals, began seeing unexplained lights. These appeared as spheres , 'bullets' with pointed end downwards, and inverted "Christmas tree" shapes. Colours were mainly white and yellow-white, though others were also reported. Strong, localised flashes in the sky were also observed and there were reports of underground rumbling sounds. In March, 1982, the Norwegian defence department sent two airforce officers to study the situation. By the summer of 1983, hundreds of reports of strange lights had been made by the inhabitants of Hessdalen, and so Norwegian and Swedish UFO groups formed Project Hessdalen. From 21 January to 26 February, 1984, they continuously monitored the valley using a range of instrumentation, including radar, and succeeded in obtaining photographs of strange lights plus a number of instrumental readings. Such work then continued sporadically over a few years.

1982 saw my first book on the subject, "Earth Lights", and the following year British ufologist, Jenny Randles, came out with "Pennine UFO Mystery", telling of luminous and other phenomena in the hill chain, and making connections with tectonic factors. Inspired by the Norwegian effort, Project Pennine was formed in 1986 by David Clarke, Andy Roberts and colleagues. Visual historian and writer Hilary Evans, started circulating archival portfolios called Bolide among researchers interested in what he was calling BOLs (Balls of Light).

The Devil's Elbow, a sharp bend on the B6105 in Longdendale, the Pennines. A fault crosses the road
The Devil's Elbow, a sharp bend on the B6105 in Longdendale, the Pennines. A fault crosses the road here and strange phenomena have been reported at this point.

Meanwhile, earth light activity steadily decreased in Hessdalen but over 50 observations of light phenomena were made during seismic monitoring in the Saguenay - Lake St John region of Canada by Quebec University between 1 November, 1988, and 21 January, 1989. According to a report in Nature, balls of light several yards in diameter popped out of the ground sometimes close to observers. Other balls of light, both stationary and moving, were seen many hundreds of feet in the air. Some of these had durations of up to 12 minutes. It seems that these phenomena were coincident with rising tectonic strain.

In my "Earth Lights Revelation" of 1989, with David Clarke and Andy Roberts, geochemist Paul McCartney and I published a report on our long-term investigations into an "earth lights zone" between Barmouth and Harlech in north-west Wales which had been active in 1904-5. Because useful contemporary reports had been made of these Welsh lights (which included blood-red spheres a few feet across rising from fields and roads, glittering diamond shapes hugging isolated roof ridges, and a whole range of luminous phenomena), we were able to accurately map the locations where they occurred. When these were matched with newly- available geological information it was found that the lights followed the course of a major local feature, the deep-rooted Mochras Fault, like beads on a thread. Furthermore, it transpired that between 1892 and 1906 there were several earthquakes in various parts of Wales. In October, 1904, for example, immediately prior to the onset of the Barmouth wave, there was a quake at nearby Bedgellert. (The area is also adjacent to the Lleyn Peninsula, one of Britain's most active seismic areas, and epicentre in July, 1984, of an earthquake registering 5.5 on the Richter scale. This event brought the lights back briefly - the evening before the quake, a resident saw a brilliant white light "the size of a small car" float in from the sea and disappear over the brow of a grassy dune on the beach.)

On two occasions on March 25, 1905, balls of deep red light were seen to emerge from this field next
On two occasions on March 25, 1905, balls of deep red light were seen to emerge from this field next to the chapel at Llanfair. Recently, high-tech surveying has revealed that the Mochras Fault runs directly through this field.

Into the field

By 1990, I had arrived at the conclusion that the only way to really understand the nature and mechanics of earth lights was to attempt scientific field study of them. So, working primarily under the auspices of a research/think tank group known as the International Consciousness Research Laboratories (ICRL), sufficient funding was obtained to start conducting field enquiries.

In June 1993, we looked at the so-called "Hooker Light" in New Jersey, USA. In the 1970s, crowds of youngsters regularly gathered to view a strange light that seemed to wander around on an old disused rail track near Washington Township. Then a research group calling itself "Vestigia" did work there. The track is now a pipeline corridor through a forest, and we were able to prove that the effect was caused by a visual distortion of car lights on a road that cut the corridor at an angle two miles from the viewing point.

Setting up the earth lights observation station on Mitchell's Flat, Marfa, Texas.
Setting up the earth lights observation station on Mitchell's Flat, Marfa, Texas.

Other, inconclusive studies followed, then we visited the Marfa area of Texas' Big Bend country between 6-15 March, 1994, where strange lights have been reported for over a century (the first account, in fact, dates to 1617). Physicist Hal Puthoff, also an ICRL member, joined this expedition. We were eventually able to dismiss a number of luminous effects popularly assumed to be "Marfa Lights": occasional mirage effects can raise lights normally hidden over the horizon into visibility, sometime reproducing the same lights in tiers, and lights of vehicles 30 miles or more away on the Marfa-Presidio road are so distorted that they can appear anomalous. We also determined that lights on vehicles negotiating rough tracks belonging to isolated ranches on the undulating desert- scrub area known as Mitchell Flat can look like mysterious lights skimming the ground, fusing and parting. Nevertheless, interviews with local witnesses convinced us that genuine anomalous lights probably did sporadically appear in the vast region. Acting on a tip offered by a teacher who had closely encountered a three-foot diameter light, we conducted observations in an uninhabited valley in the Chisos Mountains, on the Rio Grande 80 miles from Marfa. At 9.10 pm on 12 March, a large white flickering light was seen at the foot of a nearby mesa. It lasted for about 10 seconds. (Although I have witnessed undoubted earth lights on previous occasions, this is the only light I have seen on our organised fieldwork to date that I am absolutely sure was an anomalous lightform

Physicist Hal Puthoff works with computerised equipment during a night observation session in the de
Physicist Hal Puthoff works with computerised equipment during a night observation session in the desert near Marfa, Texas.

Between 24-27 March, 1994, Erling Strand, one of the directors of the original Project Hessdalen, convened a conference of invited international delegates variously studying earth light phenomena and plasma physics. It was the first specialist earth lights conference, held to launch a new Project Hessdalen, and went unnoticed by mainstream ufology. Strand had also taken the view that serious field research was needed to study earth lights, rather than endless theoretical debate and nitpicking. With the support of Ostfold College, Norway, where he lectures, Strand is engaged on the "wiring up"of the Hesddalen valley, which is currently experiencing a modest resurgence of earth light activity. Automatic monitoring stations (optical and instrumental) placed strategically along the valley will be triggered if electronic beams connecting them are interrupted by an earth light. As Strand comments: "We only need one light."

One of the Hessdalen Conference delegates was Professor Yoshi-hiko Ohtsuki, who is well funded to investigate reported earth lights zones around the world. He revealed that he had taken four highly- equipped expeditions to Marfa, and that on only one of them had he seen a true earth light. This changed shape only 100 yards in front of his team and was captured on multiple video cameras and electronic monitoring equipment.

Erling Strand helps to set up an earth lights observation station in the Australian Outback before t
Erling Strand helps to set up an earth lights observation station in the Australian Outback before the sun sets.
Photo: Paul Devereux.

Between 28 September and 14 October, 1995, Strand and I, accompanied by a TV producer with a Hi-8 video camera, conducted a joint expedition to the remote Kimberley region of Western Australia, acting on reports sent to Jacques Vallee and myself of strange lights in the area. We were attracted there particularly because there was no light pollution from distant trraffic or habitations. Our enquiries among local outstation workers and Aborigines indicated that light phenomena incidence had dropped off in the past decade, but lights were sometimes still seen. We had camera arrays plus a range of monitoring equipment, including a magnetometer constantly measuring the Earth's magnetic field local to our observing station, which was relocated five times during the expeditionary period. On the night of 3 October, we set up position overlooking a small valley in totally uninhabited country. Short-lived blue-white lights appeared sporadically through the night, moving against the opposite slope of the valley, half a mile away. These lights, often of low-intensity, proved elusive, but Strand may possibly have captured one of them on camera.

Monitoring and watching for the mysterious min min lights in the Australian Outback. Photos: Paul De
Monitoring and watching for the mysterious "min min lights" in the Australian Outback.
Photos: Paul Devereux.

By 8 October we had seen only a few possible anomalous lights at other locations, but that night a bright light was seen that seemed to emerge from a small hill in front of a ridge. It was vividly noticeable in an area devoid of all artificial lighting. (I should emphasise that the darkness was so unspoilt in this remote region that on one occasion we could discern the "glowing coal" of a meteorite hurtling across the sky even after its glittering trail had dissolved.) The light moved slowly downwards to the level of the desert, then disappeared. Although all our cameras were pointing in the other direction, towards an area where lights were most expected, we managed to swing a few round and hurriedly photograph the unusual light.

One of a sequence of telephoto shots of the mysterious light. Photo: Paul Devereux
One of a sequence of telephoto shots of the mysterious light. Photo: Paul Devereux

Because it was up to six miles distant, we could not absolutely determine if it was truly anomalous, but simultaneous with its appearance our magnetometer started recording huge field anomalies. (A peak-to-peak amplitude of 800 nanotesla on a 2 Hz pulsation was recorded. A normal amplitude on that frequency is less than 1 nanotesla.) The readings slowly subsided through a period of about five hours. If these events were causally connected, then the readings support one of Persinger's predictions that earth lights will be accompanied by changes in the local geomagnetic field.

What are earth lights?

There are two separate questions about earth lights - how they are produced, and what their nature is. In arguments about whether or not the TST is valid, they often get hopelessly jumbled. It doesn't matter if the TST is right or wrong, or requires further modification, it does not tell us about the properties of the phenomenon itself.

As far as the tectonic connection goes, I leave to you to have noted the repeated passing references I've been making to tectonic factors, and these could be expanded a hundredfold. It seems clear to me that seismic and geological sources are likely factors in earth light propagation. Persinger is probably correct in claiming that tectonic strain and the geomagnetic field are key players, even if the exact processes involved have yet to be fully clarified. Ohtsuki thinks that meteorlogical forces may also be implicated. In the final analysis, it is probable that whole concatenations of geophysical forces are involved.

The wild magnetometer read-out that accompanied the appearance of the light. The normal, thin trace
The wild magnetometer read-out that accompanied the appearance of the light. The normal, thin trace can be seen at the bottom. Photo: Paul Devereux.

But what is the nature of the lights themselves? The anecdotal literature contains descriptive themes that are repeated so often, from different times and places, that it is highly probable objective characteristics are being referred to. From this considerable reservoir of data, we learn that the lights can be any colour, though white, orange, deep red and yellow-gold predominate. Their size can range from ping-pong balls of luminosity to giant lightforms, though "basketball size" is common. While their shapes are usually round or spherical, tubes, cigars, rectangles, diamonds, tadpole-shapes and irregular forms have frequently been described. When witnesses have had a close looks, a teeming inner activity is sometimes reported within lightforms. Reports indicate that earth lights can issue sounds of various kinds, though hissing and buzzing noises predominate, sometimes accompanied by a feeling of pressure in the ears. Particularly bright earth lights are often said to be intense without being dazzling. Multiple earth lights seen flying together can display seemingly co-ordinated movements, as if operating within a single field, and divide and merge. They have also been seen emerging from or disappearing into the ground on numerous occasions, reinforcing a geological-tectonic connection. When free-floating, they commonly seem to prefer the vicinity of mountain peaks and ridges, isolated rooftops and rock outcrops, towers and antennae and other sharp or isolated features that tend to be charge collectors. This indicates that they have some kind of electromagnetic basis. They often haunt bodies of water such as lakes and reservoirs, and are occasionally seen glowing beneath the surface of the water. Bodies of water can apply pressure to underlying faulting (microquake activity around reservoirs is fairly common), as well as lubricating rocks - moist rocks are known to be able to emit more charged particles than dry ones.

The prevailing assumption is that earth lights are plasmas of some kind. This might possibly bes supported by the 1994 work of You-Suo Zou (of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics in Beijing's Academy of Sciences, and an associate of the Department of Meteorology at the University of Utah). He made a close study of the original Project Hessdalen's collected data, and he noted photographs of light traces which revealed a corkscrew-like effect. Zou saw this helical structure as typical of a plasma vortex in motion, a structure particularly visible in the laboratory when plasmas are breaking down.

Zou added that under certain conditions, a plasma vortex can become a kind of solitary wave (soliton) and from the behaviour of some Hessdalen lights as recorded on the project's radar, he said he observed clear evidence of wave energy propagation.

But there are three other little-known aspects noted about earth lights that might be giving us clues as to their deep nature.

  • (i) Earth lights seem to be going "on and off" all the time. Indications of this come from various sources. One example relates to a photograph taken by Tony Dodd of two lights flying over Carleton Moor, Yorkshire, on 14 March, 1983. I showed a first generation print of this to the physicist and writer, Fred Alan Wolf. Among seveal features he noted about the photograph was the fact that a faint, dark vertical line ran through each of the lights, evidence that they had been rapidly flickering - a strobing action that had left a record of the camera's shutter in the dark lines. Such strobing can be unnoticeable to the human eye, as persistence of vision (flicker fusion) gives the impression of continuous luminosity. This seems to be the case in an incident recorded by Project Hessdalen where a light observed as continuous and floating across the sky returned only intermittent radar echoes. A third example was provided by trained physicist David Kubrin and his first wife who saw a lightform hurtling along at treetop height above the Pinnacles Fault (adjacent to the San Andreas Fault) in California in 1973. As it travelled, the light created shockwaves in the air ahead of itself, indicating the presence of mass, but then the light stopped its motion instantaneously, without deceleration, suggestive of no mass. Kubrin caught the decay of the lightform on camera.
  • (ii) Earth lights can sometimes be visible from one direction, and not another. There are numerous accounts of this bizarre effect. During the 1905 Barmouth-Harlech outbreak, for instance, a four-foot- long bar of blue light hovering over the road near Egryn chapel was visible to a group of observers from one side, yet completely invisible to a group standing on the other side of the phenomenon.
  • (iii) There are occasional witness reports that an earth light does not seem to exist quite properly in space, like a poor special effect in a movie. As if it was both flat and had depth simultaneously. In 1983, for example, a farmer in the Pennines saw a red sphere of light hovering above a stream, then it started revolving while giving the impression of being flat. I have personally witnessed this unsettling aspect of lights and can vouch for its reality.

Taken collectively, such descriptions hint at a phenomenon at the very edge of normal physical manifestation. It has occurred to me that we may be seeing a macro-quantal phenomenon, a large-scale expression of the paradoxical conditions (from the viewpoint of classical physics) of the subatomic quantum field, the underpinning of all physical reality. Puthoff suspects that earth lights might be powered by something called Zero Point Energy. This is an all- pervasive energetic field, a fluctuating energy that exists even in "empty" space - the vacuum - and even at a temperature of absolute zero. It is known to have small-scale physical effects, but some scientists, Puthoff a key figure among them, feel that is possible to extract useful energy from vacuum fluctuations. It may be that nature has been doing it already, on an impressive scale, in the phenomena we call earth lights. Perhaps the lights are a kind of doorway between quantum and large-scale physical realities.

Meanwhile, David Fryberger is developing a theory which has the lights resulting from a hitherto unknown particle he calls the "vorton", more exotic even than gluons, quarks and the other subatomic entities postulated by nuclear physics.

When they finally give up some of their secrets, earth lights could have a tremendous impact on quantum and plasma physics. And they may open doors to physics we do not yet know. They may help change our very view of reality.

Earth lights and the paranormal

There may also be a consciousness connection with earth lights. Apparent paranormal phenomena is not infrequently reported in areas experiencing periods of earth lights activity. At Yakima and in the Pennines, for examples, people have reported seeing fleeting manifestations of human figures - usually of bizarre appearance.

Paul Devereux experiences mind-altering effects with the magnetic helmet in Michael Persinger's labo
Paul Devereux experiences mind-altering effects with the "magnetic helmet" in Michael Persinger's laboratory. Photo: Charla Devereux.

Voices are heard: one Yakima firewarden told of hearing "happy little voices singing" and another of a disembodied voice "hollering". Earth lights researchers argue that these are hallucinatory effects caused not only by energy fields associated with light phenomena closely encountered, but generally in an area that is producing strange luminosities, affecting brain function in witnesses. Such fields are probably, in the main, magnetic. Drawing on known clinical data, Persinger has gone to some lengths to postulate a series of physiological and mental symptoms a witness would likely experience at different distances from an earth light. Further, he has been conducting a series of experiments in which subjects are placed in a soundproof, isolated chamber, where they wear a helmet from which magnetic fields are directed at the magnetically sensitive temporal cortex, which handles dreaming and other internal imagery such as memory, among other functions. Many people who have undgone this experience report vivid inner imagery episodes in which early and infantile memories are particularly common.

In a few cases, it is possible that people who closely encounter earth lights are triggered into an "alien entity" experience or even a full-blown UFO abduction. If one reads Budd Hopkins Intruders with care, for example, it can be seen that the pseudonymous Kathy Davis encountered a ball of light before undergoing her abduction episode. In fact, everything in this classic and now famous abduction case is consistent with an earth light being produced by local tremor activity. And hers is not the only one. For instance, I think even the Travis Walton case may be amenable to an earth lights approach.

But are earth lights UFOs?

Whatever the rights or wrongs of this, the cry that inevitably goes up from mainstream ufologists is: "But earth lights aren't UFOs!" This charge brings us full circle. Certain specific queries are regularly raised, and I'll finish with the most common:

Question No.1: Surely earth lights are something other than UFOs?

A. Reports of small balls of light have always been in the ufological record, where in the past they have been identified as "drones" or "probes" sent out from alien craft. So why dismiss them now if they suddenly take on importance as phenomena in their own right?

Question No. 2 What have earth lights to do with "daylight disks"?

A. If earth lights are a form of plasma, then there is no problem with this, because a plasma seen in daylight does happen to look shiny and metallic, and is likely to have a spherical, ovoid or discoid form. Moreover, there are pitch black objects sometime seen by day (Both Strand and I have witnessed examples of these ourselves) which seem to be photon-absorbing instead of light-emitting. These bizzarre phenomena - which can be round, square or irregular in form - may relate to earth lights in the way one pole of a magnet relates to the other.

Question No.3: But what about the size usually ascribed to flying saucers? Small balls of plasma, seen as lights or even as metallic forms can't account for those, surely?

A. Some earth lights are reported as being many yards across. A modest example of this was shown in the Quebec case (above) - the size, height and duration of some of these phenomena were clearly "UFO standard". The lights at Hessdalen ranged up to even larger sizes. And lights seen at night, accounting for a huge percentage of all UFO reports, can look large if bright enough - their size is easy to overestimate. It is equally easy to falsely interpret lights at night as being on a huge dark object.

Question No.4: How do earth lights explain radar-visual cases? How can a ball of light be tracked on radar?

A. It has in fact been proven that plasmas can return radar echoes. Indeed, even plasmas that have too low a temperature to emit visible light can still reflect radar waves just like a metal surface. During the first Project Hessdalen, radar echoes were repeatedly obtained from invisible objects hovering near ridges.

Question No.5: But what about markings on the ground and damage to foliage associated with some reported UFO landings?

A. These are quite consistent with localised damage caused by energetic lightballs. Singed foliage, ground burns and grooves have all been associated with ball lightning, for example.

And so it goes. If any of the very small percentage of UFO reports that claim structured craft are genuine, they may be ET vehicles, or may be a sort of phantom effect I have discussed elsewhere. But it is exceedingly important that we not confuse an actual sighting with witness interpretation of that sighting. Interpretations and actualities can be different things. There is no reason why earth lights and ET craft shouldn't co-exist, of course, but earth lights researchers think it is an extraordinary coincidence that earth lights descriptively fit so much of what may the residue of genuinely unexplained phenomena.

Copyright:© Paul Devereux, 1997

  • Make sure to log onto: www.hauntedvalley.com (the Project Pennine site, accessible via the WebRing from this site), and www.hiof.no/crulp/prosjekter/hessdalen (if that doesn't work, then just do a search for "Hessdalen"). Both sites are highly informative and offer real-time webcam observation for earth lights.
Hessdalen Lights REAL Footage 2024 | Norway UFO Mystery Finally Explained?

{ https://www.neperos.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:37 Stuur door

UFOs over RAF Lakenheath

UFOs over RAF Lakenheath

70th anniversary of 'the most puzzling and unusual' radar case in the files of the United States Air Force Project Blue Book

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 17:44 Stuur door

Meer van UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

↑ Terug naar de berichten