Amy Eskridge Claimed Secret Space Program Members Thanked Her for a Machine She Never Built
Amy Eskridge
Although much of the attention surrounding Eskridge has focused on her claims about suppressed antigravity technology and the circumstances of her death in 2022, her account of the supposed secret space program participants remains one of the strangest parts of the interview.
Amy Catherine Eskridge was born on September 19, 1987, in Huntsville, Alabama, a city closely associated with America’s aerospace and military research. She graduated from the University of Alabama in Huntsville with a background in chemistry and biology and later became involved in research concerning gravity modification, advanced materials, propulsion, and other experimental technologies.
Her father, Richard Eskridge, was a retired NASA engineer, and the two worked together on projects involving unconventional propulsion research. She also co-founded the Institute for Exotic Science, an organization intended to support research into scientific ideas that she believed were being neglected or kept outside conventional academic institutions.
In the 2020 interview, Eskridge discussed what she described as encounters with people identifying themselves as “20-and-backers.” The term comes from a controversial secret space program narrative in which individuals allegedly serve for twenty years in classified off-world operations before being returned to Earth. Some versions of the story involve advanced spacecraft, hidden colonies, altered memories, and technology capable of manipulating time. None of these claims has been independently established, but they have circulated within UFO communities for years.
Eskridge said she had encountered several individuals making such claims through the internet. According to her, these people repeatedly approached her with an unusual expression of gratitude, thanking her for her service and for developing the same medical device. She could not understand why they were all referring to something she had never produced.
She recalled that they kept thanking her for creating the “3D holographic medpod.” In secret space program stories, such devices are described as futuristic medical chambers supposedly capable of scanning the human body, detecting diseases, repairing damaged tissues, and even regenerating organs using advanced technology. However, no machine with these extraordinary capabilities has been scientifically verified.
When Eskridge explained that she had not invented such a device, they continued speaking as though she had already completed the work. The repetition was what troubled her. She said approximately three to five people had told her similar things, and she could not understand why people who apparently did not know one another were giving her credit for the same invention.
The medpod claim became even more unusual when Eskridge explained that she had already developed an idea for how such a machine could be built. She insisted that she had worked out her intended approach before anyone contacted her to thank her.
During the conversation, Sokol also mentioned a person named Jeremiah who was reportedly developing something similar. He said they had previously discussed the project by telephone and that Jeremiah had shown Eskridge an early prototype associated with the concept.
However, the interview does not establish that a functioning holographic medical device existed or that the supposed secret space program participants possessed knowledge of future technology. Eskridge herself appeared disturbed by the repeated messages and eventually stopped communicating with the individuals because their behavior made her uncomfortable.
The story has an unusual connection to another subject discussed in the same interview: the possibility that some supposed extraterrestrial visitors might actually be humans from the future. However, Eskridge did not demonstrate that the people contacting her were time travelers, nor did she establish that they had participated in any classified space program. Her account was based on what these individuals told her and how she interpreted their behavior.
Long before the 2020 conversation, Eskridge had publicly expressed concerns about the history of antigravity research. On December 6, 2018, she delivered a presentation titled “A Historical Perspective on Anti-Gravity Technology” to the Huntsville Alabama L5 Society, commonly known as HAL5. The event took place at the Huntsville-Madison County Main Public Library and examined more than a century of unconventional propulsion ideas, including controversial experiments involving electricity, superconductors, and alleged gravity modification.
Among the researchers discussed in her presentation were physicists Ning Li and Eugene Podkletnov. Li had investigated theoretical relationships between superconductors and gravitational effects, while Podkletnov became known for controversial claims that rotating superconducting materials could produce a small reduction in an object’s apparent weight. Neither line of research has produced a generally accepted demonstration of controllable antigravity, but Eskridge believed certain experimental results deserved further investigation.
Her presentation questioned why some promising research appeared to disappear from public discussion after attracting institutional or government interest. She was particularly interested in the history of Ning Li, whose work during the 1990s had drawn attention because of its possible implications for propulsion. Li later established AC Gravity LLC and received a Defense Department research contract, after which public information about her experiments became limited. Li was sometimes described online as having mysteriously disappeared, although later reporting established that she remained in Alabama and died on July 27, 2021.
By 2020, Eskridge had developed much stronger opinions about the suppression of advanced technology. During her conversation with Rys and Sokol, she claimed that antigravity had already been independently discovered several times and that previous breakthroughs had been suppressed. She attributed part of this information to a man named Dan Cooper, whom she described as a contact associated with supposed secret space program stories.
According to Eskridge, Cooper told her that the National Security Agency possessed a list of five individuals who had independently discovered what people commonly call antigravity. In discussing the supposed list, she mentioned Nikola Tesla, Eugene Podkletnov, Ken Wheeler, Cooper himself, and her father, Richard Eskridge. Her recollection was sometimes uncertain, and she appeared to be combining information Cooper allegedly provided with her own interpretation of who the individuals might be.
She claimed Cooper had warned her that earlier discoveries had been suppressed but suggested that the situation might finally be changing. According to her account, some people wanted her to publish the research because they believed the technology should become public. Others, however, allegedly warned her that revealing it could cost her life. Eskridge described receiving completely opposite messages from different individuals, leaving her unsure whether powerful interests wanted the research released or permanently concealed.
One aspect of her scientific thinking rarely mentioned in discussions about her concerns was something she called “gravity chemistry.” Eskridge argued that if scientists could manipulate gravity or an unknown force associated with it, the applications might extend far beyond making spacecraft levitate. She believed such technology could potentially influence chemical reactions and allow researchers to break covalent bonds without requiring extremely high temperatures or pressures.
She explained that her father was primarily interested in propulsion, whereas her own chemistry background led her to imagine entirely different uses for the same hypothetical technology. She described the possibility of breaking chemical bonds at room temperature while using relatively little energy. Such an achievement, if physically possible, would have major implications for industrial chemistry and materials processing. However, the interview provided no experimental demonstration that gravitational manipulation could produce this effect, and the proposed mechanism remains speculative.
Another extraordinary part of the conversation involved physicist Hal Puthoff, a well-known figure in unconventional physics and UFO-related research. Puthoff has been associated with studies of remote viewing, advanced propulsion concepts, and later government-related investigations into unidentified aerial phenomena. Eskridge claimed that Puthoff had visited her family’s home in Huntsville three times through a connection involving an investor who was working with her father.
She explained that she had previously lived in Seattle, where she was involved in business activities concerning encrypted digital storage. During one visit home, she happened to be present when Puthoff came to the house. According to Eskridge, the two sat at her family’s dining room table while he discussed a concept she had not previously investigated: ultraterrestrials.
The idea was different from the conventional belief that UFO occupants are extraterrestrial visitors arriving from distant planets. Eskridge described ultraterrestrials as beings who might originate from Earth itself rather than somewhere else in the universe. She said they could look like ordinary human beings, making them potentially indistinguishable from the population around them. The implication was that an intelligence associated with UFOs might not need to travel across interstellar distances because its origins could be connected to Earth.
Eskridge then discussed another unusual theory involving two groups she called P-47 and P-52. She explained these designations as referring to humans approximately 47,000 and 52,000 years into the future. According to the story she described, a catastrophic event would occur in humanity’s future, killing much of the population while leaving separate groups of survivors.
Some people would supposedly retreat underground to escape the disaster, while others would survive on Earth’s surface. Over tens of thousands of years, the separate populations would follow different evolutionary paths, eventually producing forms of humanity that might appear extraordinary to people living today. Eskridge presented this as a possible explanation for the mysterious beings described in certain UFO accounts, although the recorded conversation does not establish that Puthoff personally introduced her to the specific P-47 and P-52 narrative.
She told Rys and Sokol that she had never even searched Google for alien information and claimed that much of what she knew about the subject came from conversations with people she had encountered through her family connections and scientific work.
She repeatedly emphasized that she had grown up surrounded by aerospace technology rather than UFO theories. Huntsville was home to NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, Redstone Arsenal, and numerous contractors involved in military and space systems. Her father had spent years working in that environment, and she believed this background had brought her into contact with unusual individuals and unfamiliar research ideas.
However, Eskridge’s growing interest in these subjects was accompanied by an increasingly disturbing set of personal experiences that she attributed to surveillance and intimidation. She claimed that people had repeatedly entered an apartment she previously shared with a boyfriend, apparently while both occupants were away. She described returning home on one occasion to find a USB charging cable cut in half, with one section still connected to a wall socket.
On another occasion, she said a bedroom window that had been left open was mysteriously closed when she returned home. She interpreted this as evidence that someone had entered the property and knew about a conversation she had previously had with her boyfriend. She also described finding Bluetooth headphones unplugged after leaving them charging, followed by discovering that someone appeared to have searched through her personal belongings.
Eskridge believed these incidents were deliberate attempts to frighten her. She also claimed that strangers were following her, that electronic communications were being compromised, and that some people were trying to extract information about her work.
She also described a Lexus whose license plates allegedly changed repeatedly, which she interpreted as evidence of organized surveillance. These events were presented as her personal experiences, but the recording does not provide independent evidence establishing who, if anyone, was responsible.
She also described being approached by individuals who allegedly offered financial support for experimental research but appeared more interested in obtaining technical information. Some, she believed, were using the possibility of investment to persuade researchers to reveal their ideas. Her distrust extended to certain people who had entered her personal life, although the allegations she made about their motives and affiliations have not been independently verified.
The pressure she described helps explain her unusual plan for releasing the research. At the beginning of the 2020 conversation, Eskridge discussed the possibility of publishing a scientific paper, arranging documentary coverage, and involving numerous online media outlets at approximately the same time. She wanted the information distributed widely enough that it could not easily be removed from public access.
She considered releasing a paper through an online archive rather than relying entirely on conventional academic publishing. She also discussed the possibility of involving filmmaker and UFO disclosure advocate Steven Greer, while considering how mainstream television coverage might help establish the significance of the work. Eskridge believed a coordinated release would attract public attention and make it more difficult for anyone to interfere with the information after publication.
Her concern was not limited to preserving research. She suggested that public visibility could offer some personal protection because the disappearance or death of a well-known researcher would be harder to ignore than the loss of someone working privately. She explained that the Institute for Exotic Science had partly been established to provide a recognizable public identity through which controversial research might eventually be released.
Despite those plans, no publicly available research paper has independently demonstrated the functioning antigravity technology Eskridge discussed. Her 2018 presentation remains an important record of her interests and the historical experiments she was investigating, but it was primarily a review of earlier work rather than a documented demonstration of a new gravity-modification device.
On June 11, 2022, Amy Eskridge died in Huntsville, Alabama, at the age of 34. Her family obituary, published later that month, remembered her as an intelligent and passionate researcher who questioned conventional scientific thinking and maintained an ambitious vision for future technology. Her death was reported as a suicide, although her earlier statements about threats subsequently became the subject of intense speculation within UFO and alternative-science communities.
The controversy gained renewed attention in 2026 as discussions about deceased and missing American researchers spread across social media and news outlets. Some commentators suggested that Eskridge’s death might be connected to her work, but her father, Richard Eskridge, publicly rejected that interpretation. In comments reported by NewsNation in April 2026, he stated that there was nothing suspicious about her death and pushed back against claims that she had been killed because of antigravity research.
Growing discussion on Amy Eskridge in 2026…
In April 2026, almost four years after her death, her name appeared among a growing list of American scientists and researchers whose deaths or disappearances were being publicly questioned. The renewed interest eventually reached the White House and FBI, which began examining whether any of the cases might be connected. However, investigators had not established a common explanation linking the individuals, and the review did not establish that Eskridge had been murdered or that her research was responsible for her death.
Another interesting development came in May 2026 when former Pentagon UFO official Luis Elizondo publicly confirmed that he had met Eskridge around 2018. During an interview on the UAP: Unidentified Alien Podcast, Elizondo recalled having dinner with her and her father in Huntsville, Alabama.
According to him, they believed people were trying to intimidate them over their antigravity research. He also revealed that Eskridge had offered to demonstrate the technology to him and his colleagues, but the demonstration never took place. Elizondo said he had wanted to help her and did not know why she had reportedly described him as evil.
Read also:
Around the same time, journalist Ross Coulthart revealed that he had communicated with Eskridge before her death and that she had claimed to have achieved a major breakthrough in antigravity technology. Coulthart believed her death deserved further investigation, although he acknowledged that the various missing and deceased scientists being discussed were not necessarily connected. His comments added another firsthand account of Eskridge speaking privately about a supposed breakthrough, but they did not establish whether such a discovery had actually been made.
Former British intelligence officer Franc Milburn also attracted attention after discussing messages he said Eskridge had sent him shortly before she died. According to Milburn, Eskridge repeatedly expressed fears about her safety and claimed that someone had targeted her with a directed-energy weapon. He said she had sent him photographs of injuries and warned that she would never take her own life. Milburn also claimed to have spoken with her approximately four hours before her death. His statements generated renewed discussion about the circumstances surrounding her final months, although the alleged attacks and their possible connection to her death have not been independently verified.
Her father, Richard Eskridge, publicly disagreed with suggestions that his daughter had been murdered because of her research. Speaking to NewsNation in April 2026, he said he did not believe her death was suspicious. Her family also pushed back against speculation surrounding the case, making clear that they did not accept the conspiracy theories spreading online.
RELATED
{ https://howandwhys.com/ }
Amy Eskridge Claimed Secret Space Program Members Thanked Her for a Machine She Never Built
&imwidth=800&imheight=600&format=webp&quality=medium)
