Is NASA hiding the truth nature of 3I/ATLAS by showing blurry images?

Is NASA hiding the true nature of interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS? Low-resolution images and vague explanations are raising serious questions. 

NASA has finally released its long-awaited images of 3I/ATLAS and for many, the results were a major disappointment. The space agency once again repeated its narrative that the object is a “normal” comet, all while presenting extremely low-grade, fuzzy images that raised more questions than answers. 

NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) captured an image of the comet on October 2, 2025. Later, on November 19, 2025, amateur astronomers Michael Jäger and Gerald Rhemann obtained an even deeper color filtered image from Earth. 

The newest photos of the interstellar visitor, taken by a variety of spacecraft, satellites, and telescopes, were unveiled on November 19, 2025, during a NASA press conference,  the first since the U.S. government shutdown. NASA highlighted that eight different observatories contributed to the dataset. 

Among the most anticipated images were those from the HiRISE camera aboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, (see image above) which had a rare vantage point only 19 million miles from 3I/ATLAS. Yet the final product shown to the public was a blurry black-and-white smudge devoid of meaningful detail. NASA insisted the object is simply a large space rock and pushed back on claims that 3I/ATLAS is performing any maneuvers or showing any behavior inconsistent with a typical comet. 

Online, NASA’s “big reveal” was mocked as a joke. Many argued the agency was withholding clearer images and downplaying the object’s anomalies. Photos now circulating from amateur astronomers, taken with $5,000 to $10,000 telescopes, appear far sharper and more informative than anything shown by NASA, despite the agency’s billions-of-dollars worth of equipment, spacecraft, staff, and infrastructure. 

As geophysicist Stefan Burns noted in a comparison review, the agency’s best image of 3I/ATLAS looks like a street lamp on a foggy day. 

Meanwhile, Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb has identified at least 12 unexplained anomalies linked to 3I/ATLAS, further fueling speculation. NASA’s quick dismissal of all alternative interpretations only intensified online theories that the agency is trying to bury any discussion of extraterrestrial possibilities. 

In the end, NASA’s long-delayed reveal of 3I/ATLAS left many observers unimpressed and, honestly, what else did we expect? The low-resolution images only fuel the growing sense that something about this interstellar visitor isn’t being fully explained or fully shown. In other words, it feels like NASA is once again keeping the object’s true nature out of view. 

Anyway, we don’t need NASA for answers. By the time 3I/ATLAS makes its closest approach to Earth on December 19, 2025, there will be far more reliable sources ready to confirm whether it’s just a bizarre interstellar comet or something of extraterrestrial origin on a true renaissance mission.

  

{ http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/ }

Polenverschuiving: Wat zegt de wetenschap en wat is de invloed op de samenleving?

Inleiding

De afgelopen weken is er opnieuw een golf van online discussies ontstaan over een vermeende “pole shift”. Deze term wordt in diverse contexten gebruikt, variërend van een natuurverschijnsel dat in de geologische geschiedenis voorkomt tot spectulatieve theorieën over snelle en catastrofale verschuivingen van de aardrotatie. In sommige online kringen richt men zich op het idee dat de Noord- en Zuidpool op korte termijn zullen veranderen, wat zou kunnen leiden tot enorme natuurrampen en maatschappelijke chaos. Aan de andere kant worden berichten vaak versterkt door angstzaaiende verhalen die niet wetenschappelijk onderbouwd zijn. Het is daarom belangrijk om deze claims kritisch en wetenschappelijk te analyseren. In dit artikel bespreken we de wetenschappelijke feiten rond pole shifts, de historische context, de verbanden met bepaalde alternatieve theorieën en de maatschappelijke impact.

Wetenschappelijke context: Wat zegt de geofysica?

Magnetische poolomkeringen

Een veel besproken verschijnsel in de geofysica is de zogenaamde magnetische pole reversal, of te wel het omkeren van het aardmagnetisch veld. Dit natuurlijke proces vindt plaats over zeer lange tijdschalen, meestal elke enkele honderdduizenden tot miljoenen jaren. Tijdens een reversie ontrafeld het aardmagnetisch veld niet plotseling, maar verloopt het langzaam en geleidelijk. Wetenschappers hebben dat bijvoorbeeld kunnen vaststellen aan de hand van ijsboringen, gesteenten en fossielen die aanwijzingen bevatten over het magnetisch veld van de aarde in het verleden.

De meest recente reversie, de Brunhes-Matuyama overgang, vond ongeveer 780.000 jaar geleden plaats. Tijdens zo’n reversie kunnen de magnetische noord- en zuidpolen even wegvallen of verwisselen, maar het aardmagnetisch veld wordt nooit compleet uitgeschakeld of plotseling omgekeerd in een korte periode. Volgens Dr. Lena Ortiz, professoraal geofysica aan de Universiteit van Melbourne, “wordt het veld zwakker en kan het wanordelijk worden voor enkele duizenden jaren, maar het proces verloopt vooral geleidelijk. Er is geen bewijs dat er een snel, wereldwijde flip kan plaatsvinden die het dagelijks leven onmiddellijk beïnvloedt.”

Werkelijke polaire verschuiving

Naast de magnetische reversies bestaat er ook het fenomeen van “true polar wander” (TPW). Bij TPW verschuift de aardrotatieas relatief ten opzichte van de aardkorst en de mantel, wat zich over miljoenen jaren voltrekt. Dit verschijnsel is een natuurlijk onderdeel van de aardontwikkeling en heeft geen directe impact op kortetermijngebeurtenissen. Dit verschijnsel leidt niet tot snelle veranderingen in het klimaat of natuurrampen, maar moet begrepen worden als onderdeel van langetermijnprocessen.

Betrouwbaarheid en waarschuwingssystemen

Tot op heden zijn er geen aanwijzingen dat een plotselinge, snelle pole shift op korte termijn zal plaatsvinden. Geofysische instellingen zoals Geoscience Australia, het European Space Agency en de US Geological Survey houden de aardmagnetische velden nauwlettend in de gaten en zullen pas waarschuwen bij concrete anomalieën. Het ontbreken van betrouwbare bewijzen betekent dat de angst voor een onmiddellijke catastrofe niet op wetenschappelijke grounds staat.

Verbanden met UFO's en paranormale theorieën

Historische en culturele aansluiting

De pole-shiftmythe koppelt zich vaak aan verhalen over buitenaardse wezens en geheime regeringsprojecten. In dat kader wordt gesuggereerd dat bepaalde overheden of aliens kennis zouden hebben van een naderend wereldomvattend verschuivingsproces dat niet aan het zicht van het publiek wordt onttrokken. Proponenten beweren dat zo’n event grote evacuaties zou uitlokken of dat geheime technologieën zouden onthuld worden.

Waarom ontstaan deze theorieën?

Deze verhalen zijn vooral populair omdat ze inspelen op de menselijke behoefte aanbetrouwbare verklaringen voor grote onzekerheden en onbegrijpelijke natuurrampen. Daarnaast spelen geheime overheidsprojecten, complottheorieën en het fenomeen van de ‘angst voor de onbekende’ een grote rol. In de context van UFO's en paranormale theorieën wordt de pole shift vaak gekoppeld aan ideeën over ‘extraterrestriële interventie’ of het bestaan van geheime bases waar zich technologieën bevinden die ons kunnen beschermen of juist doen falen. Deze verhalen worden versterkt door populaire media, films en fictie, waardoor ze aantrekkelijk zijn voor een breed publiek dat op zoek is naar antwoorden op onbekende fenomenen.

Wetenschappelijk gezien ontbreken echter bewijs en solide gegevens om deze theorieën te ondersteunen. Er is geen concreet bewijs dat buitenaardse wezens betrokken zijn bij de aardmagnetische eigenschappen van onze planeet, noch dat geheime regeringsprojecten werkzaam zijn die een wereldwijde pole shift zouden kunnen triggeren. Het koppelen van dergelijke verhalen aan “pole shifts” dient vooral om angst en verwarring te zaaien, maar mist een wetenschappelijke onderbouwing.

© Shutterstock

Maatschappelijke impact en maatschappelijke reacties

De angst voor een pole shift of soortgelijke catastrofes kan grote maatschappelijke gevolgen hebben. In het verleden zagen we dat dergelijke angsten leidde tot de opkomst van ‘doomsday-bewegingen’ en groepen die geloven dat de wereld op korte termijn ondergaat. Dit kan leiden tot onrust, paniek en zelfs gedragsveranderingen, zoals het verzamelen van voedselvoorraden, het bouwen van bunkers of het verspreiden van desinformatie via sociale media.

Zaken als massahysterie en paniekreacties zijn niet nieuw. Anno 2024 is de digitale samenleving bijzonder gevoelig voor dergelijke berichten, waardoor desinformatie snel verspreid wordt en difficult te corrigeren is. Overheden en wetenschappers proberen vaak via officiële kanalen duidelijkheid te scheppen en feiten te communiceren, maar de virale aard van de media maakt het moeilijk om achterhaalde theorieën terug te dringen.

Daarnaast kunnen deze angsten ook leiden tot sociale vervreemding en wantrouwen jegens wetenschappelijke instellingen en overheden. Er ontstaat een ‘alternatieve waarheid’ waarin feit en fictie door elkaar lopen, wat de maatschappelijke cohesie onder druk zet. Het is daarom belangrijk dat er kritische mediawijsheid wordt bevorderd en dat er transparantie is over de wetenschappelijke stand van zaken.

Het aardmagneetveld in kaart gebracht met satelliet data, ESA SWAM missie. De kleuren geven de sterkte van het veld aan, waarbij rood het sterkst en blauw het zwakst.

Historische context: Hoe vaak en hoe lang duren pole shifts?

Een groot misverstand is dat mensen denken dat pole shifts frequent en abrupt plaatsvinden. In de geschiedenis van de aarde zijn er wel degelijk veranderingen geweest in de positie van magnetische polen, maar dit gebeuren gebeurt over gigantische tijdsintervallen. De geologische gegevens wijzen uit dat reversies in het magnetisch veld duizenden tot honderdduizenden jaren duren, en dat er geen bewijs is voor een snelle of onmiddellijke omkering.

De meest recente magnetische reversie, Brunhes-Matuyama genoemd, vond ongeveer 780.000 jaar geleden plaats. Tijdens dat proces viel het magnetische veld tijdelijk uit, voordat het weer terugkeerde in de tegengestelde richting. Voor de mensen van toen was het ongemakkelijk, maar er was geen sprake van natuurrampen of wereldwijde chaos.

Het idee van een snelle pole shift is vooral populair in populaire cultuur en complottheorieën, maar de wetenschap wijst duidelijk uit dat zulke gebeurtenissen niet op korte termijn plaatsvinden. Wat wel mogelijk is, en dat onderzoek bevestigt, is dat het aardmagnetisch veld in de loop van miljoenen jaren kan veranderen en dat dit inderdaad gevolgen kan hebben voor bijvoorbeeld communicatie- en navigatiesystemen.

Kansen en risico’s van natuurrijke fenomenen

Hoewel de meeste wetenschappers elimineren dat een snelle pole shift zich op korte termijn zal voordoen, is het belangrijk om te realiseren dat de aarde wel degelijk onderhevig is aan natuurlijke fenomenen die het functioneren van onze planeet beïnvloeden. Zo hebben we te maken met perioden van vulkanische activiteit, aardbevingen en klimaatveranderingen. Al deze factoren kunnen, indien ze zich op grote schaal voordoen, invloed hebben op de samenleving en het ecosysteem.

De klimaatverandering bijvoorbeeld, die intense weersomstandigheden en zeespiegelstijgingen veroorzaakt, heeft nu al ingrijpende effecten op menselijke samenlevingen wereldwijd. Het is essentieel dat we deze risico’s serieus nemen en ons aanpassen aan de veranderende omstandigheden. Dit betekent investeren in preventie, duurzaamheid en het versterken van onze infrastructuur.

Daarnaast is het van belang dat we leren omgaan met onzekerheden. Dat kan door het ontwikkelen van waarschuwings- en monitoringsystemen, zoals het Europees Samenwerkingsprogramma voor aardbevingswaarneming en de NASA Magnetische Velden Tracker. Deze systemen kunnen echter geen voorspellingen doen over langetermijngebeurtenissen zoals pole shifts, maar kunnen wel helpen bij het anticiperen op andere natuurfenomenen waaraan we wel risico’s lopen.

De rol van media en wetenschap in het bestrijden van paniek

De media spelen een cruciale rol in de manier waarop informatie wordt gedeeld en geconsumeerd door het grote publiek. Bij onderwerpen die gevoelig liggen, zoals de vermeende pole shift, is het belangrijk dat journalisten hun verantwoordelijkheid nemen door feitelijke, wetenschappelijk onderbouwde informatie te presenteren. Te snelle of sensationele berichtgeving kan leiden tot onnodige paniek en verwarring.

Wetenschappers en overheidsinstellingen moeten proactief communiceren over de feiten en duidelijk aangeven wat de beperkingen van onze kennis zijn. Duidelijkheid en transparantie helpen om vertrouwen te behouden en het juiste begrip te stimuleren. Het is tevens belangrijk dat er educatie wordt ingezet om mensen mediawijs te maken en te leren onderscheid te maken tussen wetenschappelijke feiten en fictie.

Educatieve campagn campagnes en informatievoorziening kunnen ook een rol spelen in het voorkomen van hysterische reacties. Door jongeren en volwassenen te informeren over de natuurlijke processen van de aarde, de tijdschalen waarin veranderingen plaatsvinden en de huidige monitoringtechnologieën, worden paniek en desinformatie moeilijker te laten wortelen.

Conclusie: Wat kunnen we leren uit de wetenschap en hoe vermijden we paniek?

De angst voor een plotselinge pole shift die de wereld in korte tijd verandert, wordt door de wetenschap volledig ontkracht. Het bestuderen van aardmagnetische reversies en andere geologische processen tonen aan dat dergelijke veranderingen zeer langzaam en over lange tijdschalen plaatsvinden. Geologen, geofysici en klimaatwetenschappers werken sinds decennia aan het monitoren van de planeet, en er is geen wetenschappelijk bewijs voor een snelle of catastrofale pole shift op korte termijn.

Het is belangrijk dat we kritisch blijven nadenken over de informatie die we ontvangen en dat we vertrouwen op wetenschappelijke bronnen. Complotdenken en sensationele verhalen zorgen voor angst en verwarring, terwijl de realiteit anders is: onze aarde is dynamisch, maar haar veranderingen verlopen geleidelijk en voorspelbaar. De beste manier om onze samenleving te beschermen, is investeren in kennis, infrastructuur en preventie, en de communicatie over natuurlijke risico’s te baseren op feiten.

Tot slot moeten we begrijpen dat angst vooral ontstaat bij onwetendheid en onzekerheid. Door education, transparantie en het delen van wetenschappelijke inzichten kunnen we die angsten verminderen en een samenleving creëren die beter voorbereid is op de uitdagingen die de toekomst biedt. Het zich bewust zijn van de natuurlijke processen waarvoor de aarde staat, geeft niet alleen rust, maar ook kracht om op een verantwoorde en geïnformeerde manier met de wereld om te gaan.

Aanbevelingen en toekomstige onderzoekslijnen

Hoewel de huidige wetenschappelijke kennis duidelijk aangeeft dat een snelle pole shift in de nabije toekomst onwaarschijnlijk is, blijft het noodzakelijk om de aarde en haar magnetische velden nauwlettend te monitoren. Nieuwe technologieën en methoden ontwikkelen zich voortdurend, waardoor we beter inzicht kunnen krijgen in de langetermijntrends en potentiële gevaren.

Het stimuleren van internationale samenwerking is essentieel. Door gegevensdeling en gezamenlijke onderzoeksinitiatieven kunnen we een beter beeld krijgen van de wereldwijde veranderingen binnen onze planeet en onze atmosfeer. Daarnaast moet er meer geïnvesteerd worden in het verbeteren van de voorlichtingscampagnes, om desinformatie en paniek te voorkomen.

Ook is het van belang om het bewustzijn over natuurlijke processen te vergroten. Educatieprogramma's op scholen en in de media kunnen helpen om families en gemeenschappen voor te bereiden op verschillende scenario’s, zonder daarbij angst aan te jagen. Het verkennen van andere planeten en het ontwikkelen van technologische innovatie kunnen op lange termijn ook bijdragen aan het vergroten van onze veerkracht.

Tot slot moeten beleidsmakers en w wetenschappers samenwerken om de belangrijkste risico’s te identificeren en proactief maatregelen te nemen. Het versterken van ons maatschappelijke verdedigingssysteem tegen natuurlijke rampen en het stimuleren van duurzame ontwikkeling zijn belangrijke stappen in het voorbereiden op een onvoorspelbare en complexe wereld.

Samenvatting

In dit artikel hebben we besproken dat de angst voor een plotselinge, wereldwijde pole shift niet gebaseerd is op wetenschappelijke feiten. Magnetische pole reversals en andere natuurlijke processen vinden plaats over enorme tijdschalen en verlopen meestal geleidelijk. Hoewel het menselijk verstand geneigd is om snel te reageren op onbegrepen fenomenen, is het cruciaal om kritisch te blijven en te vertrouwen op wetenschappelijke inzichten. De maatschappelijke reactie op deze angsten moet vooral gericht zijn op educatie, wetenschap en transparantie. Alleen door kennis te vergroten en desinformatie tegen te gaan, kunnen we voorkomen dat angst ons gaat beheersen en een ongefundeerd gevoel van onveiligheid ontstaat. De aarde is niet immuun voor veranderingen, maar haar natuurlijke dynamiek vereist vooral dat wij voorbereid en geïnformeerd zijn, zodat we adequaat kunnen reageren op de uitdagingen die de toekomst brengt.

{ PETER2011 }

Overview

A recent YouTube video posted by Jesse Michels, a self‑identified former intelligence analyst, has ignited a fresh wave of discussion on the r/StrangeEarth subreddit. In the clip, Michels claims to possess “explosive insights” into unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) that he says point to a sustained government cover‑up and the existence of non‑human intelligence. The video quickly gathered attention, prompting Reddit users to debate the credibility of the allegations, the potential implications for ongoing UAP hearings, and the broader conversation about alleged suppressed evidence of alien technology.

The Video and Its Claims

Michels’ presentation, which runs just under ten minutes, blends excerpts from declassified documents, alleged insider testimonies, and personal observations. He asserts that a series of recent sightings—particularly those recorded by naval pilots and commercial airliners—contain data that the U.S. government has deliberately withheld from the public. Among the most striking points he raises are references to “high‑frequency telemetry signatures” that, according to him, cannot be produced by known aerospace platforms. Michels also alludes to a “closed‑door briefing” he attended in 2022, where senior officials discussed the strategic implications of advanced propulsion technologies that appear to defy conventional physics. No independent verification of these briefings or the telemetry data has been provided, and the video contains no direct links to the primary sources he cites.

Community Reaction

Redditors responded with a mix of curiosity and skepticism. Several users highlighted the timing of the video, noting that it coincides with the U.S. Senate’s bipartisan UAP hearing scheduled for later this month. “If there really is new evidence, now would be the time to bring it to Congress,” one commenter wrote, urging transparency. Others cautioned against “hype‑driven speculation,” pointing out that past UFO claims have often resurfaced without substantive proof. A frequent theme was the call for “hard data” – radar logs, sensor readouts, or authenticated documents – to move the conversation beyond anecdote. Some participants referenced the Pentagon’s 2021 release of three Navy videos, arguing that while those clips confirmed anomalous sightings, they did not substantiate the more extraordinary claims made by Michels.

Broader Context

The resurgence of public interest in UAPs follows a series of official steps taken by the U.S. government over the past three years. In 2020, the Department of Defense established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, later succeeded by the All‑Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) in 2022. Congressional committees have held multiple hearings, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a preliminary assessment in June 2021 that documented 144 incidents, many of which remained unexplained. Michels’ video taps into a growing narrative among fringe researchers that these institutional efforts are merely a façade, designed to “manage the narrative” while withholding transformative technology. Academic circles, however, remain cautious, emphasizing the need for peer‑reviewed analysis before drawing conclusions about extraterrestrial involvement.

Next Steps and Outlook

While the video has amplified discussion on platforms like Reddit, it has not yet prompted formal inquiries from governmental bodies. Analysts suggest that any credible new evidence would likely be presented to the upcoming Senate hearing, where lawmakers have signaled a willingness to request classified briefings. In the meantime, experts advise the public to await verification from reputable sources, such as the AARO or independent scientific institutions, before accepting Michels’ assertions. As the UAP debate continues to evolve, the balance between open inquiry and rigorous evidence remains the critical yardstick for separating legitimate discovery from speculation.

{  https://usubjects.com/  }

4

© HLN - Gtty

Martijn Peters

Dat er drones waargenomen zijn in ons luchtruim, daar twijfelt niemand meer aan. Maar of dat ook betekent dat elke melding er effectief een is? Dat is een andere zaak. Hoe herken je dan zo’n drone en welke andere zaken kan je ‘s nachts nog spotten?

DRONES

Schaalmodel van de Boeing X-48B, een experimenteel vliegtuig ontwikkeld door Boeing en NASA, Rogers Dry Lake, NASA Dryden.

Een Amerikaanse MQ-9 Reaper in Afghanistan

Illustratiebeeld van een weerballon.  © Getty Images

Illustratiebeeld - verlichting op hoge gebouwen en kranen.  © Getty Images

{ https://www.hln.be/ }

EXCLUSIVE - Top fighter pilot breaks 45-year silence to reveal bombshell UFO encounter with '50ft triangular craft' at nuclear base

By JOSH BOSWELL, US SENIOR NEWS REPORTER and CHRIS SHARP

A former Top Gun pilot has come forward as a new witness linked to a 1980 UFO incident dubbed 'the British Roswell'.

Decorated US fighter pilot Dan Isbell, 69, broke a 45-year silence to reveal his encounter with a 50ft triangular craft surrounded by multicolored 'plasma' light near a nuclear base he was stationed at in England on December 26, 1980.

The incident is significant as it occurred on the same day that US Air Force personnel at another English nuclear base, RAF Woodbridge, in Suffolk, saw a similar craft descending into neighboring Rendlesham Forest – then got so close they could touch the metallic object.

The Rendlesham UFO incident was captured on audio tape by a senior officer, written up in reports released three years later, and became the UK's most famous out-of-this-world encounter.

Isbell's sighting adds to the theory by UFO researchers that the strange objects were targeting military bases housing nuclear weapons, a pattern which has been highlighted in reports by the Department of Defense's UFO-monitoring office.

That night in 1980, Isbell was a 24-year-old first lieutenant working Christmas shifts as a pilot of nuclear-capable fighter jets at RAF Upper Heyford in Oxfordshire, while his superiors with families took time off.

In an interview with the Daily Mail, he said that around 10pm on December 26, he was driving his imported red Corvette along a country road between the airbase and the US servicemen's accommodation when he saw something he couldn't explain.

'In my rear view mirror I saw some unusual multicolored lights traveling very rapidly, just over the trees to the side of the road,' he said. 'As it zipped past me, it just stopped instantaneously.'

US fighter pilot Dan Isbell spoke publicly for the first time about his encounter with a massive UFO while he was stationed at RAF Upper Heyford in Oxfordshire in 1980 

Isbell, pictured sitting in a flight-test-modified F-16A at the Hill Aerospace Museum in 2018, was a 24-year-old first lieutenant working a shift on the nuclear base when he witnessed the rare event 

Isbell said he pulled over and watched what appeared to be a silent, floating, 50ft craft.

'It was triangular, but it had sort of a curved nose. Around the bottom, there were multi-colored changing lights, almost like a plasma,' he said.

'We were very well trained before we were declared mission-qualified, on how to identify every type of aircraft and helicopter that belonged to NATO or the Soviet Union. It was quite clear this was not conventional.'

Isbell said he started to make his way across a golf course on the side of the road towards the object, getting within 150ft.

'As I walked toward it, it began to slowly descend down,' he said.

'But then I began to realize that the stigma of a UFO sighting was death to a pilot's career. So I quickly reversed course.

'I hurried back to my car and went home. I didn't tell anyone for 45 years,' Isbell added.

In the early hours of the same day, about 110 miles away on the east English coast in Suffolk, American officers at another USAF base holding nuclear weapons saw a similar object.

The former fighter pilot shared an FBI Forensic Artist Drawing of his UFO encounters in 1980 

At the time of the supposed UFO sighting, Isbell was working at night at the RAF Upper Heyford (pictured) a former Royal Air Force and US Air Force base in Oxfordshire, England 

Isbell is pictured during his time as 514th Flight Test Squadron Commander between June 1994 to June 1997

After seeing a strange light descend into Rendlesham Forest, two USAF security patrolmen were sent to investigate.

According to a memo written by deputy base commander Lt. Col. Charles Halt, they saw an apparent nine-foot craft, 'metallic in appearance and triangular in shape', which 'illuminated the entire forest with a white light'.

'The object itself had a pulsing red light on top and a bank(s) of blue lights underneath,' said Halt's memo, released under the Freedom of Information Act in 1983.

'The object was hovering or on legs. As the patrolmen approached the object, it maneuvered through the trees and disappeared. At this time the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy.'

Two days later, while investigating marks on the trees and ground believed to be left by the craft, Halt himself witnessed strange lights and recorded his reaction on an audio tape, which was also released to researchers in 1984.

Skeptical researchers, including Ian Ridpath, say the marks on trees were foresters' axe cuts, indentations in the ground were animal burrows, and the lights were from a nearby lighthouse.

But one of the patrolmen sent out on December 26, Sgt. Jim Penniston, claims he saw the craft up close, and even sketched it in a notepad a few days later.

In 2015 the other patrolman, Airman First Class John Burroughs, received medical disability benefits for alleged radiation poisoning linked to the event, with the help of Senator John McCain, after a yearslong battle with the Pentagon which had strangely classified his medical records. 

Isbell's encounter would've occurred on the same day that US Air Force personnel at another base 110 miles away at RAF Woodbridge on England's east coast reported seeing a similar craft descending into the nearby Rendlesham Forest – where a sculpture of the reported UFO now stands 

This photograph shows police examining the alleged landing site of another 'triangular craft' in Rendlesham Forest in Suffolk, England, the morning of the alleged sighting on December 26, 1980

Deep marks and indentations on the trees and ground at the Rendlesham Forest were believed to be left by the UFO, however, this was disputed by skeptical researchers, including Ian Ridpath, who say they were from foresters' axe cuts

Former British police detective and UFO researcher Gary Heseltine, who wrote a book on the incident and helped Isbell come forward, says the pilot's sighting the same day as the Rendlesham incident at another UK nuclear base is significant.

'Dan Isbell is as credible a witness you could ever wish for,' Heseltine, who wrote the book Non-Human: The Rendlesham Forest UFO Incidents, told the Daily Mail.

He described Isbell as 'someone with a stellar flight career' giving 'high caliber witness testimony'.

'His account offers a remarkable circumstantial link to Britain's most famous case, the Rendlesham Forest Incident that occurred in late December 1980.'

Heseltine now runs a site for UK pilots to report UAP (unidentified anomalous phenomena) incidents, ukpilotsreportinguap.co.uk. 

Isbell said it was the first, but not the last, time he had a UFO encounter.

Later in the 1980s he became a test pilot at Edwards Air Force Base in southern California. One night in 1990, he drove out on his motorbike to a secluded area near the base to stargaze.

'Suddenly this large wedge-like shape started blanking out the stars above my head,' he said.

'There were no lights anywhere on it. It was absolutely solid black, but huge… Hundreds of feet across.

In a January 1981 memo of the Rendlesham Forest incident, Deputy Base Commander Lt. Col. Charles Halt documented the December 26 sighting (reported as December 27 by Halt) describing the craft as 'metallic in appearance and triangular in shape'

UFO researcher Gary Heseltine wrote a book on the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident, Non-Human, which included Isbell's account 

'I felt a little electrostatic on my skin.

'I certainly wasn't going to tell anybody about that,' he added. 'I did not hang around long enough to see the back end of it.'

Then two decades later in 2014, the now-retired pilot was in the hot tub in the back yard of his home in Silver Springs, Florida, when he said the night was lit up with a bright blue-green glow.

'It encompassed me and the hot tub,' Isbell told the Daily Mail. 'The beam came to a point above me, probably 2-300ft high.'

He said the bright light prevented him from making out the object. But then the alleged encounter got even stranger.

'The beam went out, but immediately a large sphere of plasma enveloped whatever it was,' he said.

The sphere doubled, then quadrupled in size, then vanished, he said.

'The acceleration was so fast, it just disappeared,' Isbell said.

After retiring from the Air Force, Isbell became a consultant with a security clearance, working on lasers and directed energy weapons.

He said he has decided to finally come forward with his UFO stories now, after leaving his classified role.

'I have nothing else to worry about. I have retired out of all that. They can take away my security clearance, it doesn't matter anymore,' he said

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

EXCLUSIVE - Police chopper was forced to take 'emergency evasive action' after being targeted by UFO over US air base last year, unearthed report reveals

By JOSH BOSWELL, US SENIOR NEWS REPORTER and CHRIS SHARP

A police helicopter was forced to take emergency action during a terrifying encounter with mysterious high-speed 'drones' over a US air base last year - in an incident officials would later dismiss as nothing more than a passing fighter jet. 

But newly released video and incident logs of the November 22, 2024 event now tell a very different - and far more alarming - story, the Daily Mail can exclusively reveal. 

Witness even described one of the unidentified flying objects as a 'tic-tac' - the same oblong shape reported by Navy aviators in a now infamous 2004 encounter. 

The Daily Mail obtained images taken from a National Police Air Service (NPAS) EC135 chopper of one of the unidentified craft, which was said to have 'targeted' and come close to colliding with the helicopter mid-air around RAF Lakenheath, a US military base in England.

The incident occurred amid weeks of reports of drones and unidentified objects breaching airspace over US military bases in New Jersey, the wider northeast, and overseas.

A report by a UK aviation safety board attributed the chopper's close encounter to pilots misidentifying an American F-15 fighter jet flying in the area.

But British police logs released under the Freedom of Information Act describe multiple, hi-tech drones 'targeting' and appearing to pursue the law enforcement helicopter at high speeds. 

'They were forced to take emergency evasive action in relation to a drone which came within a dangerously close proximity to them,' said an incident log from Suffolk Police, recounting a debrief of the chopper pilots. 

The UK's National Police Air Service (NPAS) helicopter (stock image) had a near miss with mysterious 'drones' seen flying over a US military base in England in November 2024 

A newly released police report reveals NPAS pilots said they were forced to 'take emergency evasive action' during the late-night encounter with the unidentified objects over RAF Lakenheath (pictured)

'They had to perform an emergency dive and described that they were pursued in the dive by two drones who matched their speed approx 165 knots and then pursued them for several minutes out of the area.

'They feel that drones have targeted them and chased them off at approx 140 knots [161mph].'

A UK military source, who has viewed the entire 30-minute video captured by the chopper's infrared camera, said there was more to the incident than a close brush with a fighter jet.

'In the 30-minute video with pilot audio, nobody mentions F-15s,' the source said. 

'They only talk about the drones. How they're basically mirroring the helicopter's movements. How fast the drones are going. That they're basically forcing them out of the area.'

The source added that the footage shows one object pursuing the craft performing maneuvers impossible for a fighter jet.

'A fixed-wing craft is caught on the video, where you can see a corkscrew move,' the insider said. 'An F-15 cannot make a small corkscrew turn like that.'

The Daily Mail obtained a short section from the chopper video showing a small object, no more than a blob on the infrared camera, slowly moving towards the top right of the screen.

A screengrab of the helicopter video obtained by the Daily Mail shows a small object, which appears as a tiny blob on the infrared camera, slowly moving towards the top right of the screen

Radar data cited in the reported issued by the UK Airprox Board, concluded that the 'drones' were actually the lights of a US Air Force F-15 Eagle jet and showed the two aircraft coming within 1,700ft of each other

The local police incident logs from November 20-22, 2024 reveal a slew of drone sightings across three bases used by the US Air Force in the English counties of Suffolk and Norfolk: RAF Feltwell, RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall.

'Over past 2 nights there have been approx 20 drones flying over RAF's Mildenhall, Feltwell and Lakenheath. This has been between 1800-0000 hrs,' said a Suffolk Police log from November 21.

'They report that due to the size of said drones, the pilots could be 'miles and miles' away,' the log added, with 'they' appearing to refer to UK military police protecting the airbases.

'Mildenhall/Lakenheath/Feltwell - believed 10-15 drones have been at each one - and appear not to be "hobby drones",' the logs said.

One police report from Lakenheath said an officer had 'night vision goggles and can see 5-6 drones [near the highway] A1065 coming back over airfield'.

An 'informant' in the logs told police they saw 'multiple drones' which were 'very large and they make a lot of noise'.

The witness in the November 22 logs described what they saw around the airbase as 'large stationary things - tictacs - they are not birds.'

'The drones are well lit - they are not trying to hide themselves and they are flying very low now,' another log from November 22 said.

The UK Airprox Board, which investigates mid-air near misses, published a report concluding that the NPAS crew had misidentified an American F-15 fighter jet (stock image) flying in the area

Logs obtained by the Daily Mail show an 'informant' described what they saw around the airbase as 'large stationary things - tictacs'

'Informant opened the door of his house while on the line to me and call taker could hear one of the drones going over. It sounded like an aircraft. 

'The drones are flying over Informant's property in both directions.'

A crime report from November 21 summarizing the incidents stated that there were '10-15 drones flying around bases and potentially into the base airspace.'

'This is third occurrence this week according to MOD police and US base have stated they have had to ground aircraft due to going across flightpaths,' the report added.

The investigation was handed over to the UK Ministry of Defence Police, which has not published the findings of its probe.

The police logs were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by researcher Rowland Hume, who shared the material with the Daily Mail.

Mike Morgan, a retired senior police detective who has also been researching the incident, told the Daily Mail he was disappointed in the lack of transparency from authorities.

'There is a whole series of question marks about what went on in November 2024. 

The reported 'tic tac' description of the unidentified craft, echoes accounts of the infamous UFO sighting by Navy aviators in 2004 (pictured) 

'I have run into repeated efforts by the authorities to avoid answering even the most basic questions, such as, how many people have been detained or how many drones seized,' Morgan said.

'What is so secret about this investigation?'

The incident was largely written off when the UK Airprox Board, the official body that investigates mid-air near misses, published a report concluding that the 'drones' seen by the NPAS crew were actually the lights of a US Air Force F-15 Eagle jet.

Radar data cited in the report showed the chopper and jet coming within 1,700ft of each other. But the report said nothing else unknown was picked up on radar.

Trained British meteorologist Stuart Onyeche, who works for a defense company and has researched the incident, told the Daily Mail that he believes the fighter jet and police chopper were both pursuing the advanced drones.

'I'm inclined to trust the initial detail and assessment of the experienced helicopter pilots that we see noted in these logs, which was that they were forced to take evasive action due to the close proximity of some kind of unmanned drone,' Onyeche said.

'It's unarguable that an F-15 was also in the vicinity as reported in the airprox, but an unanswered question is what was the F-15 being tasked to do or look for?' he added.

'Were the helicopter and F-15 in fact both converging on the unidentified 'drones'?'

Craft encroaching on airspace at US bases both home and abroad have shown signs of using advanced technology, capable of confounding anti-drone measures used by the authorities.

A joint report by the FBI, US Department of Defense and NASA obtained by the Daily Mail last year warned that their detection and signal jamming equipment had 'failed' to stop incursions by advanced drones, including at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia.

The base was swarmed with dozens of drones for weeks in December 2023, creating a security panic. 

The incident was kept secret until it was revealed by defense magazine The Warzone in March 2024.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }

Scientists put moss on the outside of the International Space Station for 9 months — then kept it growing back on Earth

Previous experiments have explored how plants might cope in space, but so far, they have focused on larger organisms such as bacteria or plant crops. Now, researchers have shown that samples of the moss Physcomitrium patens (P. Patens) can not only survive but thrive in space.

First, the researchers tested three cell types of P. patens from various stages in the moss's reproductive cycle. They found that sporophytes — cell structures that encase spores — showed the greatest stress tolerance when exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light, freezing and heat.

Sporophyte samples were then placed outside of the ISS in a special exposure facility attached to Japan’s Kibo module, where the samples lived for around nine months in 2022. After this time, the samples were returned to Earth.

"Surprisingly, over 80% of the spores survived and many germinated normally," study lead author Tomomichi Fujita, a professor of plant biology at Hokkaido University in Japan, told Live Science in an email. From this study, Fujita and his team developed a model that suggests the moss spores could actually survive for up to 5,600 days in space, or around 15 years.

Back on Earth, the team found that most of the conditions — including the vacuum of space, microgravity and extreme temperature fluctuations — had a limited impact on the moss spores. However, samples that were exposed to light, particularly high-energy wavelengths of UV light, fared less well. Levels of pigments used by the moss for photosynthesis, such as chlorophyll a, were significantly reduced as a result of light damage, which affected later moss growth.

Even though some moss samples faced damage from the conditions of outer space, P. patens still fared much better than other plant species that have been previously tested under similar conditions. Fujita thinks the protective, spongy casing surrounding the spores may help defend against UV light and dehydration.

"This protective role may have evolved early in land plant history to help mosses colonize terrestrial habitats," he said.

While this may seem like an exercise in testing the limits of a single species, the "spores' success in space could offer a biological stepping stone for building ecosystems beyond our planet," Fujita said. In the future, he hopes to test other species and better understand how these resilient cells survive such stressful conditions.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.livescience.com/space }

Tracking Mars' Ice Ages From Space

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

NASA's long–awaited images of the mysterious object zipping through our solar system confirm 3I/ATLAS is a comet – and NOT an alien spacecraft

• READ MORE: Is this how the world will end? Earth will be SWALLOWED by sun 

By SHIVALI BEST, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR 

NASA has shared its long–awaited images of the mysterious object zipping through our solar system – finally confirming its true identity. 

Since it was first spotted in July, the object – dubbed 3I/ATLAS – has captivated scientists and internet users alike, even prompting Kim Kardashian to ask NASA for answers.

Many scientists maintained it was merely a comet visiting us from a different solar system. 

However, others – including a member of US Congress and a Harvard researcher – were convinced that the object was an alien spacecraft. 

Now, NASA has released photos snapped by three of its Mars spacecraft as they passed just 18 million miles away from the object. 

These pictures can finally put any speculation to rest, as they confirm the object's identity.

And unfortunately for alien hunters, the US space agency says that 3I/ATLAS is a comet.  

'We want very much to find signs of life in the universe... but 3I/ATLAS is a comet,' said Amit Kshatriya, a senior NASA official, at a press conference on Wednesday. 

NASA has shared its long–awaited images of the mysterious object zipping through our solar system – finally confirming its true identity. Pictured: a photo taken on October 2 by the HiRISE camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

These pictures can finally put any speculation to rest, as they confirm the object's true identity as a comet. Pictured: a photo taken on October 9 by NASA's MAVEN spacecraft

NASA's Mars spacecraft zoomed in on the comet as it passed just 18 million miles (29 million kilometers) away. 

In the first image, snapped by HiRISE, the comet looks like a fuzzy white ball. 

'Captured at a scale of roughly 19 miles (30 kilometers) per pixel, 3I/ATLAS looks like a pixelated white ball on the HiRISE imagery,' NASA explained. 

'That ball is a cloud of dust and ice called the coma, which the comet shed as it continued its trajectory past Mars.'

Further analysis of these pictures should allow NASA to estimate the size of the comet's nucleus – its central core of ice and dust. 

NASA's MAVEN spacecraft, meanwhile, snapped the comet in two unique ways using its UV camera. 

'First, IUVS took multiple images of the comet in several wavelengths, much like using various filters on a camera,' NASA explained. 

'Then it snapped high–resolution UV images to identify the hydrogen coming from 3I/ATLAS.'

Captured at a scale of roughly 19 miles (30 kilometers) per pixel, 3I/ATLAS looks like a pixelated white ball on the HiRISE imagery. That ball is a cloud of dust and ice called the coma, which the comet shed as it continued its trajectory past Mars

Down on the surface of Mars, NASA's Perseverance rover even caught a snap of the comet, using its Mastcam–Z camera

Scientists now hope to be able to study a combination of these images to identify a variety of molecules and better understand the comet's composition.

Down on the surface of Mars, NASA's Perseverance rover even caught a snap of the comet, using its Mastcam–Z camera. 

'The exposure had to be exceptionally long to detect such a faint object. Unlike telescopes that track objects as they move, Mastcam–Z is fixed in place during long exposures,' the space agency added. 

NASA has also recently shared photos of the comet taken by its STEREO observatory, and its SOHO spacecraft.  

Speaking to AFP, Thomas Puzia, an astrophysicist who led the team at the Chilean observatory that made the discovery, described the widespread discussion surrounding the comet as 'amazing'. 

However, he said: 'It's very dangerous and to a certain degree misleading to put speculations ahead of scientific process.

'The facts, all of them without exception, point to a normal object that is coming from the interstellar space to us.'

He added the comet was 'very exceptional in its nature, but it's nothing that we cannot explain with physics.'

NASA has also recently shared photos of the comet taken by its STEREO observatory, and its SOHO spacecraft

The idea that the comet could have been an alien spacecraft were driven by Harvard Professor Avi Loeb – who remains unconvinced by NASA's explanation. 

'Obviously, it could be natural,' he told AFP. 

'But I said: we have to consider the possibility that it's technological because if it is then the implications for humanity will be huge.'

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/index.html }