Naar de inhoud

UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
akke.beakke.be
Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie! Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek! België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch. Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen! Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie. Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen. Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek! Blijf Op De Hoogte! Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren! Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.

Are we looking for alien life the wrong way? Scientists claim extraterrestrials are out there - we just haven't been able to detect them

Are we looking for alien life the wrong way? Scientists claim extraterrestrials are out there - we just haven't been able to detect them

Astronomers have spent decades scouring the universe for signs of life and come up empty-handed - but what if they were simply looking the wrong way?

Scientists argue that extraterrestrials may be out there, but we have been overlooking, missing, or ignoring possible evidence.

The researchers call this the problem of 'false negatives', and say that it could be holding back the search for life beyond Earth.

These false negatives may mean there are signs of alien life out there, but we haven't been able to detect them yet.

Lead author Professor Inge Loes ten Kate, an astrobiologist from Utrecht University and the University of Amsterdam, told the Daily Mail that experts should be on the lookout for this issue. 

She explained that scientists could miss the signs of life when their equipment isn't up to spotting them.

However, she also warns that evidence for alien life might be slipping right under our noses because scientists simply aren't prepared to consider the possibility.

Professor ten Kate says: 'We miss it or misinterpret it because we think it is "just a mineral" or "just a gas in the atmosphere that is not produced by life"'.

Scientists say that humans might have already found alien life, but simply ignored the evidence in a 'false negative' error. Pictured: Images of the Martian surface taken by the Viking rover, which experts say may have missed vital evidence

Scientists say that humans might have already found alien life, but simply ignored the evidence in a 'false negative' error. Pictured: Images of the Martian surface taken by the Viking rover, which experts say may have missed vital evidence

Professor ten Kate says: 'New research showed that a compound, perchlorate, was present that caused the Viking results, but at the time of Viking, we had no idea a compound like that could be present at all at the surface of Mars.

'With everything we know now compared to then, we are able to redesign those experiments to give us answers that may be more indicative of life or no life.'

Another possible false negative is the recent discovery of the 'poppy seeds' and 'leopard spots' found by the Perseverance rover.

These are rings of iron-bearing minerals which, on Earth, are generally produced by biological activity.

In the context of Mars, scientists simply don't know enough to form any strong conclusions about what is going on.

However, with NASA's science budget slashed, the long-promised Sample Return Mission that would allow further investigation seems extremely unlikely.

'It would be amazing if there were a sample return mission at some point to collect those samples, as our labs on Earth may give a clear answer,' says Professor ten Kate.

The researchers are urging other scientists to focus on avoiding false negatives as well as false positives.

Scientists say that false negatives can be caused when our technology can't spot the signs of life or when scientists make assumptions about what evidence should exist (illustrated)

Scientists say that false negatives can be caused when our technology can't spot the signs of life or when scientists make assumptions about what evidence should exist (illustrated) 

To do this, scientists need to fully understand the environment they are looking at and try to think about which tests would reveal the specific life that might exist there.

While this will be easier for well-known planets like Mars than for less-understood environments like the icy moon Enceladus, progress is already being made.

'The good news is that the intentions for this are already there and quite some research has been done in this direction,' says Professor ten Kate.

'Of course, some signatures we may always miss. For example, when searching from an orbit and there is life underneath a rock or in a cave, but even there, we may find some clues in the environments we can study.'

WHAT IS THE FERMI PARADOX?

The Fermi Paradox questions why, given the estimated 200-400 billion stars and at least 100 billion planets in our galaxy, there have been no signs of alien life. 

The contradiction is named after its creator, Italian physicist Enrico Fermi.

He first posed the question back in 1950.

Fermi believed it was too extraordinary that a single extra-terrestrial signal or engineering project has yet to be detected in the universe — despite its immense vastness. 

Fermi concluded there must a barrier that limits the rise of intelligent, self-aware, technologically advanced space-colonising civilisations.

This barrier is sometimes referred to as the 'Great Filter'.

Italian physicist Enrico Fermi devised the so-called Fermi Paradox in the 1950s, which explores why there is no sign of alien life, despite the 100 billion planets in our galaxy

Italian physicist Enrico Fermi devised the so-called Fermi Paradox in the 1950s, which explores why there is no sign of alien life, despite the 100 billion planets in our galaxy

If the main obstacle preventing the colonisation of other planets is not in our past, then the barrier that will stop humanity's prospects of reaching other worlds must lie in our future, scientists have theorised.  

Professor Brian Cox believes the advances in science and engineering required by a civilisation to start conquering the stars will ultimately lead to its destruction.

He said: 'One solution to the Fermi Paradox is that it is not possible to run a world that has the power to destroy itself.

‘It may be that the growth of science and engineering inevitably outstrips the development of political expertise, leading to disaster.'

Other possible explanations for the Fermi Paradox include that intelligent alien species are out there, but lack the necessary technology to communicate with Earth.

Some believe that the distances between intelligent civilisations are too great to allow any kind of two-way communication.

If two worlds are separated by several thousand light years, it's possible that one or both civilisations would become extinct before a dialogue can be established. 

The so-called Zoo hypothesis claims intelligent alien life is out there, but deliberately avoids any contact with life on Earth to allow its natural evolution. 

RELATED VIDEOS

The The Search for Alien Life — Are We Alone? | Abandoned Earth

The Universe's DARKEST Secret: Why We'll NEVER Find Aliens!

Are We Alone in the Universe? The Search for Alien Life

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:18 Stuur door

Mystery of how the moon formed is finally solved: Study claims our lunar satellite was created in just five hours during a giant impact between Earth and a Mars–sized planet

Mystery of how the moon formed is finally solved: Study claims our lunar satellite was created in just five hours during a giant impact between Earth and a Mars–sized planet

The moon could have formed within just five hours of a colossal collision that rocked the early solar system 4.5 billion years ago, scientists suggest.

For decades, experts have believed the moon was created when a Mars–sized planet named Theia smashed into a young Earth, blasting huge amounts of molten rock into space.

This material was thought to have gradually clumped together over years to form our lunar satellite.

But a team from the Southwest Research Institute and the University of Arizona say there may be another possibility.

Using powerful computer simulations, the researchers discovered that in some scenarios, a largely intact moon emerged astonishingly quickly after the crash.

The deciding factor appeared to be temperature.

'Depending on how hot the Earth and Theia are prior to the collision, an impact can destroy Theia and produce this massive disk of debris that eventually forms the moon,' Dr Adeene Denton said.

'But when I used the same parameters as original impact modelling – down to the equal temperature structures inside both bodies – within around five hours, an intact moon emerged.'

The researchers discovered that in some scenarios, a largely intact moon emerged astonishingly quickly after the crash - in as little as five hours

The researchers discovered that in some scenarios, a largely intact moon emerged astonishingly quickly after the crash – in as little as five hours


The team discovered that the geological properties of the colliding worlds play a crucial role in what happens after the impact.

Previous models largely treated the planets as fluid–like bodies and ignored the strength of their rocks.

When the scientists factored in the strength of planetary materials and their temperature, they found dramatically different outcomes.

Hotter planets are weaker and more easily torn apart, they said.

However cooler worlds are stronger and more likely to survive the impact in one piece.

'Models have evolved to include material strength, something that's really important when you're studying collisions between smaller bodies like asteroids or for my previous paper about the formation of the Pluto–Charon system,' Dr Denton said.

'We weren't sure if it would matter for the moon or not.

'When we did the simulations, we found it actually matters quite a bit.'

When the scientists factored in the strength of planetary materials and their temperature, they found dramatically different outcomes

When the scientists factored in the strength of planetary materials and their temperature, they found dramatically different outcomes 

The findings could help explain some of the moon's unusual characteristics, including the amount of volatile materials it contains

The findings could help explain some of the moon's unusual characteristics, including the amount of volatile materials it contains

The findings, published in Astrophysical Journal Letters, could help solve one of the biggest mysteries in planetary science – exactly when the moon–forming impact occurred.

Researchers say the work could also help explain some of the moon's puzzling characteristics, including differences in its composition and the amount of volatile material it contains.

Dr Robin Canup, who carried out an earlier study on the moon's origin, said: 'These surprising and exciting new results imply a potential connection between the physical properties of the moon today, including perhaps its volatile content, and the thermal state of the Earth and Theia at the time of the giant impact.

'This in turn might help scientists better constrain when the Moon–forming event occurred.'

The researchers said explaining the close compositional makeup of the Earth and the moon remains an open scientific question.

A possible explanation is that Theia and a young Earth formed from a common region of the protoplanetary disk – a pancake–like ring of dense gas and cosmic dust.

Mars, on the other hand, is compositionally different from the Earth and the moon, which indicates it initially formed further away.

'Because Earth and Mars formed in the same neighbourhood of the solar system, they are like siblings,' Dr Denton said. 'The moon and Earth are like fraternal twins.'

Last month, an out–of–control SpaceX rocket smashed into the moon, leaving a visible crater.

The Falcon 9 second stage careened into the lunar surface at 5,400 miles per hour (8,690km/h).

READ MORE

article image

Scientists believe that the 9,920lb (4,500kg), 39ft–long (12m) rocket would have hit with a force equivalent to 15,000 sticks of dynamite, or three tonnes of TNT.

A NASA satellite captured pictures showing the result of the impact – revealing a 60–foot–wide (18m) crater surrounded by streaks of lunar rock thrown up by the rocket's impact.

WHO HAS BEEN TO THE MOON?

In total 12 people have walked on the moon.

1 + 2. Apollo 11 - July 21, 1969

Neil Armstrong made history by becoming the first person to set foot on the lunar surface, before he he was followed by crewmate Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin.

3 + 4. Apollo 12 - November 19 and 20, 1969

Pete Conrad and Alan Bean were the moon walkers on the Apollo 12 mission. 

The Apollo 12 crew experienced two lightning strikes just after their Saturn V rocket launched.

5 + 6. Apollo 14 - February 5, 1971 

Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell were part of the Apollo 14 mission. They launched on January 31, 1971, and landed in the Fra Mauro region of the moon, the original destination for Apollo 13.

7 + 8. Apollo 15 - July 31, 1971

Dave Scott and James Irwin landed on the moon and stayed for three days, until August 2.

 9 + 10. Apollo 16 - April 21, 1972

John Young and Charlie Duke were the next men to walk on the moon. When the crew reached lunar orbit, the mission almost had to be aborted because of a problem with the command and service module's main engine.

11 + 12. Apollo  17 - December 11, 1972

The final people to walk on the moon were Eugene (Gene) Cernan and Harrison (Jack) Schmitt. 

Before he left the moon, Cernan scratched the initials of his daughter Tracy into the lunar regolith. Since the moon does not experience weather conditions like wind or rain to erode anything away, her initials should stay there for a very long time. 

All the men who have been to the moon

All the men who have been to the moon 


How Was the Moon Really Born? 🌙 | Earth's Violent Past #cosmicunknown

How Was the Moon Formed? | The Giant Impact and the Worst Day Earth Ever Had

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:54 Stuur door

Stella Lansing’s UFOs, Occupants, and Other Anomalies — New Jersey & Massachusetts, 1967–1973

Stella Lansing’s UFOs, Occupants, and Other Anomalies — New Jersey & Massachusetts, 1967–1973

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 00:00 Stuur door

UFO disclosure update on new revelations and latest UAP news

UFO disclosure update on new revelations and latest UAP news ILLUSTRATIVE RECONSTRUCTION // NOT EVIDENCE

Overview

An Italian-language video update has added to the ongoing discussion around UAP disclosure, presenting what the creator describes as the latest news, new revelations, and developments circulating in UFO communities. While the summary provided does not include specific names, dates, or direct claims from the video, the topic reflects the continued momentum around unidentified anomalous phenomena, a field that has moved increasingly into public and institutional debate over the past several years.

The update appears to be positioned as a news roundup rather than a single investigative report, drawing together recent chatter from online UFO circles and broader disclosure conversations. That format has become common in UAP coverage, where new statements, alleged leaks, official comments, and media reports often arrive in rapid succession. In that environment, the challenge for viewers is distinguishing between verified developments and material that remains speculative or unconfirmed.

Latest UAP Discussion

According to the available summary, the video focuses on “new revelations” and the latest UAP news. In practical terms, that usually means a mixture of evolving public disclosures, commentary from researchers or advocates, and discussion of events that continue to fuel interest in the subject. In recent years, this has included government acknowledgment of unexplained sightings, congressional interest, and renewed attention from journalists and independent investigators.

The phrase “UFO disclosure update” suggests the video may be aimed at viewers following the broader push for transparency on the issue. Disclosure remains a contested term in the field: for some, it refers to formal government release of information; for others, it means a gradual accumulation of data, testimony, and institutional acknowledgment. The video’s framing indicates it is likely intended to keep audiences informed about where that process stands, even if the details in this summary remain limited.

Context in the UFO Community

The UFO and UAP community has become a highly active information space, especially as official interest in the subject has increased. News updates like this one often serve as a way to connect individual developments to the larger narrative of whether authorities are withholding information, slowly releasing it, or still struggling to identify the source of certain sightings. That broader context is important, because claims of “new revelations” can range from credible developments to unverified speculation.

For that reason, the value of a video like this depends heavily on the evidence behind its claims. Without a transcript or link, it is not possible to confirm what specific information was discussed. Still, the summary shows that the video is part of a larger and continuing public conversation about what governments know about UAPs, what remains unexplained, and how much of the subject can be substantiated with evidence.

Outlook

What stands out most from the summary is not a single headline-making claim, but the fact that UAP disclosure continues to attract attention across languages, platforms, and communities. An Italian-language update aimed at UFO followers underscores how international the conversation has become. Whether discussing official reports, whistleblower claims, or community-driven analysis, these updates continue to shape public expectations about what may come next.

For now, the video seems best understood as a current affairs briefing for UAP watchers, summarizing developments in a field where uncertainty remains the norm. As always with disclosure-related content, the most useful updates will be those that clearly separate confirmed facts from interpretation, helping audiences follow the issue without overstating what is actually known.

RELATED

UFO disclosure debate grows with congressional push and missing scientists questions | Backscroll

UFO News LIVE | UAV News LIVE: Trump Drops 220+ Secret UFO Files: Aliens Real or Hoax? | India Today

1 Hour of Real UFO Sightings | Bizarre UAP Footage Caught On Camera

{ https://usubjects.com/  }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 23:28 Stuur door

Did people report seeing UFOs before the 20th century?

Did people report seeing UFOs before the 20th century?

Are UFO sightings a 20th-century phenomena, or did people report seeing them earlier in history?

An illustration of a strange streak of light in the night sky

Did earlier civilizations report seeing UFOs?
(Image credit: Aaron Foster via Getty Images)

Every so often, claims of UFO sightings go viral and even spur serious research. But humans have been gazing at the sky for millennia, and reports of such sightings go way back. So what was the first recorded UFO sighting, and did it predate the mid-20th century, when reports of UFOs became more commonplace?

Unfortunately, the answer isn't clear-cut, at least when looking at pre-modern examples.

"There is no consensus on what constitutes the first recorded UFO sighting in history," Chris Aubeck, an independent researcher and director of the Magonia Exchange, an international UFO history archival project with members in 15 countries, told Live Science. This dispute is not due to a lack of accounts; many artifacts portray puzzling, celestial objects.

There's no question that human beings have depicted or reported or chronicled things about strange, anomalous things in the sky dating back to the ancient world," Greg Eghigian, a professor of history and bioethics at Penn State, told Live Science.

Related: 

You may like
  • A black and red striped planet is seen next to a large glowing sun with a curved brown strip behind it in space.

We've spent decades looking for the wrong type of alien radio signals, new paper claims

  • aerial image of a geometric geoglyph in a heavily forested area of Brazil

Lasers reveal hundreds of geoglyphs made by a mysterious civilization in the Amazon rainforest thousands of years ago

  • A black and white photo showing an open war ship as soldiers move into the water

Has there ever been a period in human history without war?

Rather, the context and form of these accounts make it difficult to pinpoint what can be definitively described as the first recorded UFO sighting. For example, according to Aubeck, ancient texts like Sumerian and Babylonian cuneiform tablets, like those in the Šumma ālu series and other divination texts from the second and first millennia B.C., provide the first known recordings of potential UFO sightings, though these are interpreted as omens. These accounts describe changing shapes in the sky and black meteors, which, at the time, were regarded as religious harbingers. However, these texts lack visual depictions or illustrations.

A black and white photo of a cuneiform tablet

The Šumma ālu cuneiform tablets from the first millennium B.C. detail the first known recordings of potential UFO sightings.

(Image credit: Purchase, 1886; The Met; Public Domain)

"I can't put a lot of stock in those stories because they're completely decontextualized from the society in which they're made," Eghigian said. These accounts may not be claims of extraterrestrials visiting Earth, but rather religious scriptures or written stories. In these cases, it can be difficult to separate cultural lore from an individual's attempt to describe a sight they could not explain, from comets to lenticular clouds.

In one example, residents of Nuremberg, Germany reported a strange aerial battle on April 14, 1561. They wrote about seeing orbs, crosses, cylinders, and a giant, mysterious black arrow-shaped object, which crash-landed in the distance. According to Hans Glaser, a local artist who made a woodcut depicting the event, the different objects in the sky "all started to fight among themselves" until "they became fatigued … fell from the sun down upon the earth 'as if they all burned' and they then wasted away on the earth with immense smoke." However, he didn't mention UFOs, only writing that "Whatever such signs mean, God alone knows."

Because their interpretation isn't clear, these bygone examples aren't necessarily claims of a UFO sighting. What's more, although humans commonly believed in alien civilizations for centuries, "what was not common was to say aliens were visiting us," Eghigian said.

a woodcut engraving and manuscript with an illustration of strange geometric shapes floating in the sky over a village

German artist Hans Glaser created a woodcut engraving that depicted a strange aerial disturbance that people in Nuremberg reported seeing on April 14, 1561.

(Image credit: Public Domain)

For Eghigian, the first definitive recorded "UFO sighting" was relatively recent. In June 1947, amateur pilot Kenneth Arnold was flying his plane around Mount Rainier in Washington in search of a crashed cargo plane, when he saw nine objects flying in formation at high speeds. According to Eghigian, Arnold suspected these were military aircraft that the public wasn't supposed to know about. He took this sighting to the local newspaper.

What to read next
  • A hand reaches out toward another hand with a starry blue boundary between them

Superintelligent AI in space could explain the Fermi Paradox

  • Two images show different sides of Mars, one being a grayscale image and the other being bright orange.

Humanity's first look at the surface of Mars shared on 50th anniversary of historic NASA landing

  • A painting of a man kneeling in front of a glowing vial with two children behind him

'His urine goes on tour around Europe, showing the kings and queens this glowing pee'

One reporter asked about how the aircraft moved, and Arnold described it as a saucer skipped across the water. This reporter turned that description into "flying saucer." The following summer, many more people reported sightings of flying saucers. In this way, the Arnold sighting kicked off modern UFO culture as we know it.

Aubeck agreed that this sighting "is widely regarded as the event that kick-started modern UFO culture."

Still, Eghigian said the public didn't immediately point to extraterrestrials in the mid-20th century. Instead, they suggested it was either the U.S. or Soviet military. This theme of paranoia and suspicion of other humans extends back to previous sightings. Eghigian said there were a number of dirigible sightings in England in 1912 and 1914, and civilians suspected the Germans.

Ultimately, understanding the history of UFO sightings helps us understand human storytelling. "Studying UFO sightings is valuable because they represent the urban legends of our time," Aubeck said. "They allow us to examine the interplay between human imagination and observation, helping us understand how cultural narratives shape our perceptions of unexplained phenomena."


The History of UFOs

{ https://www.livescience.com/space/extraterrestrial-life }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:39 Stuur door

Scientists build tiny robots without motors that can fly using sound waves alone

Scientists build tiny robots without motors that can fly using sound waves alone

A century-old trick for tuning musical instruments has been repurposed to power robots that fly, float and steer themselves using nothing but sound waves.

A close up of a green robot

A close-up of one of EPFL's sound-powered microfliers, showing its spherical resonator cavities and connecting blades
(Image credit:
EPFL/MICROBS - <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en">CC-BY-SA 4.0</a>)

If you blow across the top of an empty bottle you'll hear a clear, steady note. Now, engineers have used that same concept to power tiny robots that move without a single motor on board.

These new devices are powered entirely by sound. When the right frequency is aimed at them, hollow chambers built into their structure resonate and push out a jet of air, generating enough thrust to steer a small boat or lift a tiny flying robot off the ground.

a toy robot with a helmet

https://unsplash.com/photos/a-toy-robot-with-a-helmet-CpVrpY3InKM

The scientists described their innovation in a study published Aug. 12 in the journal Science Advances.

A 19th-century tuning trick, miniaturized

The effect behind it, known as Helmholtz resonance, was first studied in 1856 by the German physicist Hermann von Helmholtz, who was trying to invent a tool for tuning musical instruments. He noticed that when air trapped inside a cavity resonates, it also pushes out a faint jet of air.

"It isn’t very powerful when you do it with a musical instrument, because pressure is low," said study co-author Selman Sakar, an associate professor of mechanical engineering at the Swiss Federal Technology Institute of Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland. "But if you could crank up the pressure, all of a sudden that jet could become significant... in a way that the force can be harnessed for machinery," he told Live Science.

You may like
  • A red tent glows with internal light in the middle of a dark forest.

Strange 'magnetoelastic' tent generates electricity from wind, body movement and sound to power small devices

  • A gif of a drone spinning against a metal background

Meet Phantom Twist, a stealthy new drone that hides in plain sight by tricking your eyes

  • Researchers hold up a cyborg cockroach wearing a newly developed diving suit.

Scientists build tiny 'diving suit' for cockroaches, turning them into search-and-rescue cyborgs

The team realized that shrinking Helmholtz's resonators down would push the frequency needed to activate them into the ultrasonic range — meaning it's too high-pitched for humans to hear and, crucially, easier to focus with precision. Larger versions generating the same force would need audible sound loud enough to be both annoying and potentially harmful, Sakar said.

Using a specialized 3D-printing technique called two-photon printing, the researchers built hollow structures based on Helmholtz's original equations and confirmed with lab tests and computer simulations that they generated thrust as predicted.

A close up of a gold coin with three y-shaped robots next to it.

Several of the tiny, propeller-like microfliers pictured next to a Swiss franc coin for scale.

(Image credit: EPFL/MICROBS - CC-BY-SA 4.0)

Boats, rockets and tiny helicopters

The team built small boats measuring roughly 2 inches (5 centimeters) fitted with multiple resonators, each tuned to a different frequency and pointed in a different direction. By changing the pitch of a nearby speaker, the researchers could steer the boats left, right or straight ahead.

At a far smaller scale — some just 0.04 inches (1 millimeter) across — the team also built "microfliers" that generated lift two different ways: some pushed thrust downward like a rocket — but using air for the thrust — while others span tiny attached blades to fly like a helicopter, using sound waves to rotate the blades.

The technology has an advantage over conventional means of power generation because it can be built at extremely small scales, Sakar said. Conventional motors have "a fundamental limit" on miniaturization because of the physical components like magnets, coils and shafts that a motor needs to work, he said. Because these resonators are just precisely shaped hollow cavities, there's no comparable limit on how small they could eventually build.

The researchers said in the study that the same principle could eventually be used to precisely rotate and manipulate small objects in midair without touching them, or to build soft, flexible surfaces that bend and change shape on command when they "hear" a particular frequency which can be used for biomedical applications like heart stents.

For now, the study is a foundation for the researchers to build on, Sakar said. "This paper, I think, is important in the sense that we put the design principles out," he said, adding that follow-up work could focus on more applied designs, control systems or navigation.

Article Sources
  • Hwang, J., Angéloz, Q., Murugan, A. S., Lissek, H., & Sakar, M. S. (2026). Acoustic resonators as wireless actuators in air for small-scale robots. Science Advances, 12(33), eaef5620. £

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aef5620


{ https://www.livescience.com/technology/robotics }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:15 Stuur door

What lies beneath: Scientists discover six never-before-seen mystery structures lurking deep inside the Earth

What lies beneath: Scientists discover six never-before-seen mystery structures lurking deep inside the Earth

Scientists have uncovered six never-before-seen mystery structures lurking deep inside the Earth.

Although our planet's deep layers are totally inaccessible, scientists can use the seismic waves from powerful earthquakes to probe the hidden depths.

Now, Chinese scientists have uncovered structures sitting on the boundary between the viscous mantle and the liquid outer core, 1,800 miles (2,900km) beneath our feet.

These 'deep-seated scatterers' are all but invisible, except for the way that they subtly influence the path of passing seismic waves.

In their paper, published in the journal JGR Solid Earth, the scientists suggest these structures could have been formed when material from the outer layers was dragged deep into the Earth.

They could include pieces of the continental crust or even the remains of Theia, a Mars-sized protoplanet believed to have formed the moon after hitting Earth 4.5 billion years ago.

Under the vast pressures and incredible temperatures at the mantle boundary, these chunks transform, partially melt, or undergo mineral transformation.

The researchers suggest that this has left six 'thermochemical piles' of material very different from the surrounding mantle.

Scientists have uncovered six never-before-seen mystery structures lurking deep inside the Earth (labelled in dashed boxes)

Scientists have uncovered six never-before-seen mystery structures lurking deep inside the Earth (labelled in dashed boxes)

These structures are located right on the boundary between the solid yet malleable mantle and the liquid metal outer core (stock image)

These structures are located right on the boundary between the solid yet malleable mantle and the liquid metal outer core (stock image)  

While Earth looks relatively stable from our perspective up on the surface, deep below the planet is violent and dynamic, especially at the boundaries between layers.

One particularly dramatic boundary is the one between the mantle and the outer core, where solid-yet-viscous rocks meet liquid nickel and iron.

There is an enormous temperature jump across the boundary, with a difference of about 1,000°C (1,800°F) from one layer to another.

The massive heat escaping from the outer core drives convection currents in the mantle known as mantle plumes, which play a key role in determining where volcanic activity occurs on the surface.

Due to the huge density differences, seismic waves also dramatically slow down at this boundary, which allows geologists to 'see' what is going on.

To learn more about this strange part of the planet, the researchers looked at a special type of seismic wave called a PKP precursor.

These are relatively weak waves that arrive shortly before the stronger seismic waves triggered by earthquakes.

PKP precursors are extremely useful for scientists because they get scattered by the subtle differences in the hidden structures, known as heterogeneities, on the mantle boundary.

To learn more about this strange part of the planet, the researchers looked at a special type of seismic wave called a PKP precursor, weak waves that arrive shortly before the stronger seismic waves triggered by earthquakes

To learn more about this strange part of the planet, the researchers looked at a special type of seismic wave called a PKP precursor, weak waves that arrive shortly before the stronger seismic waves triggered by earthquakes

Earth's 4 major layers

The crust

The crust is the rocky outer layer where all life exists. It is between 3 and 43 miles thick.

The mantle 

The mantle is the largest of the Earth's layers and consists of hot rocks. 

Measuring about 1,802 miles thick, it makes up 84 per cent of our planet's volume. 

The outer core 

The outer core is about 1,367 miles thick and is comprised of a layer of liquid nickel and iron heated to 5,500°C (9,932°F).

The inner core 

The inner core is a hot, dense ball of iron about the size of the moon where temperatures reach 5,200°C (9,392°F).

These scattered waves then pass through the liquid outer core, but not the solid inner core, and bounce back to arrive at seismic detectors before the main wave.

The issue is, because they are so weak, PKP precursors are extremely difficult to find in seismic data and have to be manually searched for among the thousands of signals collected every year.

In their paper, the researchers explain: 'Manual identification of these precursors is inefficient, subjective, and insufficient for vast global seismic data sets.'

To get around this, the researchers trained an artificial intelligence (AI) model to spot PKP precursors in seismic data.

After training the model on human-identified waves, the team let their AI loose on over two million recordings from 5,000 different earthquakes.

Eventually, their model identified 174,929 high-quality PKP precursor signals – more than ten times all previous studies combined.

That has given an unprecedented view of the mantle boundary, revealing huge areas of previously unknown structures.

The researchers write: 'We also discovered six areas that likely host significant heterogeneities that had never been documented before, providing clear priority targets for future exploration of Earth's deep interior.'

Using an AI model, the researchers identified 174,929 high-quality PKP precursor signals from over two million recordings of 500 earthquakes. Pictured: Earthquakes with identified PKP precursors that travelled from the source (pink stars) to seismic array detectors (blue triangles).

Using an AI model, the researchers identified 174,929 high-quality PKP precursor signals from over two million recordings of 500 earthquakes. Pictured: Earthquakes with identified PKP precursors that travelled from the source (pink stars) to seismic array detectors (blue triangles).

Earlier studies have found fragmented, seemingly random structures in a few locations around the world.

article image

But this new map shows that those fragments were actually connected into much larger, continuous belts.

Currently, the researchers aren't exactly sure what these structures are made of or how they formed, only that they are different from the surrounding mantle.

However, with AI models allowing even more powerful analysis of data collected over the last few decades, the picture could soon become clearer.

The researchers add: 'As the catalogue continues to expand, its high-resolution spatiotemporal coverage will advance the refinement of fine-scale structural models of the lowermost mantle, and offer increasingly rich constraints for deepening our understanding of the geodynamic state of Earth's deep interior.'

EARTH'S LIQUID IRON CORE CREATES THE MAGNETIC FIELD

Our planet's magnetic field is believed to be generated deep down in the Earth's core.

Nobody has ever journeyed to the centre of the Earth, but by studying shockwaves from earthquakes, physicists have been able to work out its likely structure.

At the heart of the Earth is a solid inner core, two thirds of the size of the moon, made mainly of iron. 

At 5,700°C, this iron is as hot as the Sun's surface, but the crushing pressure caused by gravity prevents it from becoming liquid.

Surrounding this is the outer core there is a 1,242 mile (2,000 km) thick layer of iron, nickel, and small quantities of other metals. 

The metal here is fluid, because of the lower pressure than the inner core.

Differences in temperature, pressure and composition in the outer core cause convection currents in the molten metal as cool, dense matter sinks and warm matter rises.

The 'Coriolis' force, caused by the Earth's spin, also causes swirling whirlpools.

This flow of liquid iron generates electric currents, which in turn create magnetic fields.

Charged metals passing through these fields go on to create electric currents of their own, and so the cycle continues.

This self-sustaining loop is known as the geodynamo.

The spiralling caused by the Coriolis force means the separate magnetic fields are roughly aligned in the same direction, their combined effect adding up to produce one vast magnetic field engulfing the planet.

RELATED


Scientists Found 6 MYSTERY Structures Inside Earth 🌎😱 #shorts

What Lies Beneath? The Terrifying Truth About the Deepest Holes on Earth

What’s Really Inside Earth? Scientists Finally Explain

What’s Below Us? The Mysterious World Hidden Deep Beneath Earth

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:43 Stuur door

Noah's Ark could finally be found after tests uncover telltale signs at potential resting place

Noah's Ark could finally be found after tests uncover telltale signs at potential resting place

Scientists investigating a mysterious boat-shaped formation high in the mountains of Turkey have uncovered new clues that Noah’s Ark could be buried beneath it.

An international team examining the Durupınar Formation near Mount Ararat detected unusually high carbon levels in soil collected from inside its distinctive outline.

Tests found higher carbon levels inside the formation than in matching soil collected just a few yards away on the same hillside.

Researchers said the difference could point to a concentration of organic material, potentially the remains of ancient wood, although no timber has been recovered.

‘The amount of carbon coming from the interior of the ship is 40 percent higher than what was found outside,’ lead archaeologist Dr Cenker Atila said.

‘This raises the idea that there may be organic material or remains of wood.’

New radar scans also revealed underground anomalies that intersect at right angles, possibly indicating cavities or structural divisions beneath the surface.

The formation lies about 18 miles south of Mount Ararat, Turkey’s highest peak, and has fueled speculation about Noah’s Ark since it was identified in aerial photographs in 1959.

A ground-penetrating radar image maps unusual features hidden beneath the Durupınar Formation, with red and yellow markings identifying irregular and straight-edged anomalies

A ground-penetrating radar image maps unusual features hidden beneath the Durupınar Formation, with red and yellow markings identifying irregular and straight-edged anomalies

According to local reports, heavy rains and earthquakes in May 1948 washed away the surrounding mud, revealing the mysterious formation, which was discovered by a Kurdish shepherd.

According to the Bible, the massive vessel saved Noah, his family and every kind of animal from annihilation during a catastrophic flood that some biblical chronologies place more than 4,300 years ago.

Scripture also says that the Ark came to rest on the 'mountains of Ararat' after a 150-day flood that drowned the Earth and every living creature not sheltered inside the wooden vessel.

What is intriguing is that the formation sits near a mountain with a peak that some believe matches the ark's shape and dimensions.

According to biblical measurements, the ark was '300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high,' roughly 515 feet long, 86 feet wide and 52 feet tall.

The idea that the ark landed on Mount Ararat has long sparked debate.

While many scientists argue that the formation is a naturally occurring geological feature, others are convinced it points to something far more extraordinary.

The international team of researchers working at the site firmly believes the latter.

A mysterious geological formation perched high in the mountains of Turkey could be the site where Noah's Ark landed around 4,300 years ago

A mysterious geological formation perched high in the mountains of Turkey could be the site where Noah's Ark landed around 4,300 years ago

The researchers added further studies using infrared thermography (IRT), a heat-sensing technology that can uncover hidden structures underground, have also suggested the presence of a ship-shaped hull buried deep in the soil

The researchers added further studies using infrared thermography (IRT), a heat-sensing technology that can uncover hidden structures underground, have also suggested the presence of a ship-shaped hull buried deep in the soil

Researchers have collected around 1,000 soil samples, which are being analyzed to determine whether the high carbon levels originated from environmental processes or concentrations of organic material, including degraded wood.

Independent researcher Andrew Jones, who is part of the team, has been working at the Durupınar Formation since 2019, using ground-penetrating radar to see more than 20 feet below the surface.

Jones told the Daily Mail that a key development in the investigation was the discovery of different soil inside the mysterious formation.

Inside, the soil is less alkaline, has more organic matter and contains more potassium, which is what would be expected from decaying wood, like an ancient wooden boat, which lowers pH and adds carbon and potassium, said Jones.

According to the Bible, the massive vessel saved humanity and every kind of animal from annihilation during a catastrophic flood more than 4,300 years ago

According to the Bible, the massive vessel saved humanity and every kind of animal from annihilation during a catastrophic flood more than 4,300 years ago

The radar captured 'a series of right angles' about 20 feet down, which researchers believe could be the rooms that held animals on the ark

The radar captured 'a series of right angles' about 20 feet down, which researchers believe could be the rooms that held animals on the ark

'Tests show less than a five percent chance they're random, giving 95 percent confidence that something like a decayed wooden ship is causing them,' said Jones.

Earlier this month, the team announced that a new radar survey had detected strong subsurface anomalies and distinct layers inside the 515-foot-long formation, challenging the idea that it is one homogeneous block of rock.

Led by Dr Khosrow Bakhtar, the survey used BakhtarRadar, a specialized imaging system developed through US Air Force research, to probe deeper beneath the site than earlier scans.

A new radar survey has detected strong subsurface anomalies and distinct layers inside the 515-foot-long formation, challenging the idea that it is one homogeneous block of rock

A new radar survey has detected strong subsurface anomalies and distinct layers inside the 515-foot-long formation, challenging the idea that it is one homogeneous block of rock

'My team and I are carefully evaluating the collected subsurface data, which aids in planning the core drilling pattern to be performed at the site,' Bakhtar shared.

'We will use BakhtarRadar's unique capability to directly distinguish any still preserved petrified, man-worked timbers from the natural host formation and its varying mineralogy.'

Jones said the deeper readings processed so far had yet to reveal a clear boundary between the formation and the underlying bedrock.

The team is still analyzing the data and will use the results to select locations for core drilling that could establish what lies beneath the formation.

‘We believe the Durupınar Formation is the remains of Noah’s Ark, and that is exactly why we want to put it through the strongest scientific testing we can,’ Jones said.

However, the researchers acknowledged that the results are preliminary and that radar anomalies alone do not prove the formation has an archaeological origin.


Scientists FINALLY Entered Noah's Ark? The Truth Behind the Viral Claims

Scientists FINALLY Enter Noah’s Ark in Turkey — What They Found Inside SHOCKED Everyone!

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:21 Stuur door

Wetenschappelijke Analyse over mogelijke Ufo-Basissen en Aliens in Antarctica: Een Kritische Beschouwing

Wetenschappelijke Analyse over mogelijke  Ufo-Basissen en Aliens in Antarctica: Een Kritische Beschouwing

UFO-Antartica-large-1600x815.jpg

Inleiding

Antarctica, het meest zuidelijke continent op aarde, wekt al decennia lang zowel wetenschappelijke interesse als volksverbeelding. Met zijn onmetelijke ijsvlaktes, extreme klimaat en afgelegen ligging vormt het een gebied dat zowel wetenschappelijk waardevol als mysterieus is. Het fenomeen van vermeende UFO-bases onder het ijs van Antarctica behoort tot de meest intrigerende en controversiële onderwerpen binnen de ufologie en complottheorieën. Deze analyse beoogt een wetenschappelijke en objectieve beoordeling te geven van de claims en bewijsvoering rondom de vermeende aanwezigheid van buitenaardse bases op Antarctica, met een kritische blik op de betrouwbaarheid, bewijsgrond en wetenschappelijke consensus.

Historische Context en Ontwikkeling van de Theorieën

De fascinatie voor Antarctica en buitenaards leven ontwikkelde zich vooral in de tweede helft van de 20e eeuw, mede door de geopolitieke spanningen tijdens de Koude Oorlog en de ruimtevaartrace. In deze periode groeide de belangstelling voor de mogelijkheid van geheime bases en buitenaardse aanwezigheid, mede door de toegenomen meldingen van onverklaarbare vliegende objecten (UFO’s).

Operation High Jump (1946-1947), geleid door Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd, wordt vaak aangehaald in de context van UFO-theorieën. Officieel had deze missie tot doel het opzetten van een onderzoeksstation en het trainen van militair personeel onder extreme omstandigheden. Echter, in de alternatieve theorieën wordt beweerd dat deze expeditie bedoeld was om buitenaardse bases te detecteren en te neutraliseren. Er bestaat echter geen wetenschappelijk bewijs dat deze missie specifiek gericht was op het opsporen van buitenaardse activiteiten, en de officiële verslagen spreken vooral over klimaat- en wetenschappelijke doelen.

crashed-ufos-secret-bases-antarctica-2.jpg

Antarctica Geheime operationele basissen en gecrashte UFO’s onthuld door UFO-onderzoeker

Nazi-Expedities en Geruchten over Geheime Bases

Een andere belangrijke bron van controverse zijn de Duitse expedities in Antarctica, met name de zogenaamde “Neu-Schwabenland” expeditie (1938-1939). Conspiracy theoristen suggereren dat Nazi-Duitsland tijdens deze expeditie geheime bases heeft gevestigd onder het ijs, mogelijk met behulp van geavanceerde technologieën of buitenaardse hulp. Sommige aanhangers beweren dat er enorme gaten en ondergrondse tunnels zijn gevonden, geschikt voor het huisvesten van geavanceerde vliegtuigen of zelfs buitenaardse wezens.

Wetenschap en feiten wijzen echter uit dat de Duitse aanwezigheid in Antarctica beperkt bleef tot tijdelijke onderzoeksstations en dat geen fysiek bewijs bestaat voor de constructie van ondergrondse bases of geavanceerde technologieën. De Duitse expedities richtten zich vooral op het verkennen van het continent en het vastleggen van geografische gegevens, zonder enige documentatie of fysiek bewijs dat de claims van geheime bases ondersteunt. Bovendien heeft de internationale gemeenschap na de Tweede Wereldoorlog geen aanwijzingen gevonden voor dergelijke geheime installaties.

Geruchten over Nazi-UFO’s en Geavanceerde Technologieën

De theorie dat Nazi’s geavanceerde vliegende schotels of “UFO’s” ontwikkelden met buitenaardse technologie is populair in pseudowetenschappelijke en fictieve kringen. Volgens deze theorieën zouden nazi-wetenschappers, mogelijk geholpen door buitenaardse entiteiten, UFO-achtige voertuigen hebben gebouwd die superieure snelheid en manoeuvreerbaarheid bezaten. Sommige verhalen verwijzen naar zogenaamde “Haunebu” of “Vril”-vliegtuigen, die volgens de mythes in geheime bases onder Antarctica zouden zijn ontwikkeld.

Wetenschappelijk en historisch bewijs voor dergelijke claims ontbreekt volledig. De meeste wetenschappelijke studies tonen aan dat de technische mogelijkheden van de Nazi’s beperkt waren en niet konden leiden tot de ontwikkeling van gereedstaande UFO-achtige voertuigen met buitenaardse eigenschappen. Bovendien zijn er geen fysieke resten of betrouwbare getuigenissen die de claims van geavanceerde nazi-technologieën ondersteunen. Het crashen van een UFO in Kecksburg, Pennsylvania, in 1965, wordt vaak aangehaald in de context van geheime buitenaardse technologie, maar dit incident is nooit wetenschappelijk bevestigd en wordt algemeen beschouwd als een misinterpretatie of natuurverschijnsel.

UFO-abduction.jpg

Bewijs en Wetenschappelijke Validiteit

De kernvraag bij de claims over UFO-bases in Antarctica is de betrouwbaarheid van het beschikbare bewijs. Tot op heden zijn er geen concrete, reproduceerbare wetenschappelijke gegevens die de aanwezigheid van ondergrondse buitenaardse bases of UFO-crashes onder Antarctica ondersteunen. De meeste “bewijsstukken”, zoals satellietbeelden, worden vaak geïnterpreteerd als natuurlijke formaties of optische illusies.

Satellietbeelden tonen wel anomalieën die door sommige onderzoekers worden aangegrepen als mogelijke ingangen of structuren. Echter, de meeste van deze waarnemingen worden door experts eenvoudigweg verklaard door natuurlijke geologische formaties, sedimentvorming of optische effecten. Zonder fysiek bewijs, zoals artefacten, monsters of betrouwbare getuigenissen, blijft de claim van geheime bases speculatief.

Daarnaast heeft de wetenschap op het gebied van Antarctica uitgebreide onderzoeken uitgevoerd, gericht op geologie, glaciologie en biologie. Deze studies hebben geen aanwijzingen gevonden voor ondergrondse constructies of buitenaardse activiteiten. De extreme omstandigheden – zoals de temperaturen die kunnen dalen tot onder -80°C, de constante wind en de dikte van het ijs – maken de constructie en het onderhouden van ondergrondse bases uiterst onwaarschijnlijk zonder expliciete technologische hulp die niet wordt ondersteund door bewijs.

Wetenschappelijke en Geografische Beperkingen

De fysische omstandigheden op Antarctica vormen aanzienlijke barrières voor het bestaan van permanente bases, zeker voor buitenaardse of geheime installaties. De enorme ijsmassa’s, de moeilijk bereikbare ondergrond en de extreme weersomstandigheden maken bouw en logistiek uiterst complex en kostbaar. Bovendien is er geen bewijs dat dergelijke bases bestaan of dat er enige activiteit plaatsvindt die niet door wetenschappelijke expedities kan worden verklaard.

Daarnaast wordt het continent streng gecontroleerd door internationale verdragen, zoals het Antarctisch Verdrag (1961), dat het militaire gebruik en de exploitatie van natuurlijke hulpbronnen reguleert en het behoud van het milieu waarborgt. Het is uiterst onwaarschijnlijk dat geheime bases, vooral van buitenaardse aard, onopgemerkt blijven onder deze strikte internationale controle.

Mediacultuur en Fictie

De popularisering van het idee van geheime Nazi- of buitenaardse bases in Antarctica wordt sterk gevoed door sciencefictionfilms, boeken en pseudowetenschappelijke literatuur. Films zoals “Iron Sky” (2012) en series als “The X-Files” propaganderen het idee van verborgen bases en geheime technologieën. Deze verhalen combineren feitelijke elementen met fictie, waardoor ze aantrekkelijk en intrigerend worden voor het publiek.

De invloed van dergelijke media heeft bijgedragen aan het ontstaan en de verspreiding van complottheorieën, ondanks het ontbreken van wetenschappelijk bewijs. Het is belangrijk te onderscheiden tussen entertainment en wetenschappelijke realiteit. Fictie kan inspiratie bieden, maar mag niet worden beschouwd als bewijs.

UFO-eskimo.jpg

Wetenschappelijke Conclusie en Kritische Beschouwing

Na een uitgebreide beoordeling van de beschikbare informatie, bewijs en wetenschappelijke consensus kunnen we concluderen dat:

  • Er geen concreet bewijs bestaat voor de aanwezigheid van UFO-bases onder Antarctica.
  • Claims over nazi-geheime bases en geavanceerde buitenaardse technologieën in Antarctica zijn niet ondersteund door fysiek bewijs of betrouwbare getuigenissen.
  • Satellietbeelden en anekdotisch bewijs worden niet wetenschappelijk gevalideerd en kunnen meestal worden verklaard door natuurlijke formaties.
  • De extreme fysische omstandigheden maken het bouwen van ondergrondse bases, laat staan buitenaardse installaties, uiterst onwaarschijnlijk zonder geavanceerde technologie die niet wordt ondersteund door bewijs.
  • Culturele en mediatradities dragen bij aan de populariteit van deze theorieën, maar zij vormen geen wetenschappelijke onderbouwing.

Aanbevelingen voor Toekomstig Onderzoek

Hoewel de huidige stand van wetenschap geen bewijs levert voor UFO-bases in Antarctica, blijft het continent een fascinerend gebied voor geologisch en biologisch onderzoek. Verdere wetenschappelijke expedities, met geavanceerde technologieën zoals seismische monitoring, ondergrondse exploratie en geochemische analyses, kunnen mogelijk meer licht werpen op de mysteries van Antarctica.

Het is essentieel dat dergelijk onderzoek transparant en open gebeurt, zonder te worden beïnvloed door pseudowetenschappelijke of conspiratieve theorieën. Kritisch denken, goede wetenschappelijke methoden en verificatie blijven de hoekstenen van betrouwbare kennis.

Conclusie

De mythe van UFO-bases en Nazi-activiteiten in Antarctica blijft een intrigerend onderdeel van de populaire cultuur en complottheorieën. Echter, uit wetenschappelijk oogpunt ontbreekt het aan bewijs dat dergelijke claims ondersteunt. Antarctica is een continent vol natuurlijke wonderen en wetenschappelijke ontdekkingen, maar de verhalen over geheime buitenaardse bases behoren tot de sfeer van speculatie en fictie. Vooralsnog is het continent vooral een plek waar de wetenschap de complexe geologische en biologische processen van onze planeet onderzoekt, en niet een geheime uitvalsbasis voor buitenaardse beschavingen.

Bronnen en verder lezen

  • National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) – Antarctica Research
  • International Geophysical Year (1957-1958) en Antarctica-onderzoek
  • Rapporten en publicaties van het Antarctic Treaty Secretariat
  • Kritische wetenschappelijke analyses over UFO-claims en satellietbeelden
  • Fictie en cultuur: Analyse van representaties in media

NOTE PETER2011

Door het scheiden van feit en fictie en het baseren van conclusies op wetenschappelijke bewijsvoering, kunnen we een genuanceerder en realistischer beeld krijgen van Antarctica en de vermeende buitenaardse activiteiten daar. Het blijft een gebied dat vooral onze natuurlijke nieuwsgierigheid en wetenschappelijke interesse wekt, en minder een plek voor geheime buitenaardse bases.

GERELATEERDE VIDEO'S

Wat zit er echt verborgen in Antarctica? UFO's & geheime bases met Brad Olsen | Unveiled Aflevering 51

{ PETER2011 }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 23:34 Stuur door

Verkenning van de mysteries van parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums

Verkenning van de mysteries van parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums

Universe-x.jpg

In de uitgestrekte ruimte van het heelal schuilen mysteries die onze begrip te boven gaan, en roepen ons op om de gebieden van het onbekende te verkennen. Onder deze raadsels bevindt zich het concept van parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums als een prikkelende mogelijkheid die de menselijke verbeelding al eeuwenlang in zijn greep houdt. Recente vooruitgangen in de theoretische fysica hebben een nieuw licht geworpen op deze eeuwenoude vraag en bieden een glimp van het complexe weefsel van de realiteit en de mogelijke bestaan van parallelle werelden.

Aan de voorhoede van deze verkenning staat het fascinerende concept van de multiversumtheorie. Volgens de nieuwste inzichten in de fysica suggereert het multiversum dat ons heelal slechts één van talloze andere kan zijn, die gelijktijdig maar onafhankelijk bestaan binnen hun eigen dimensie. Deze parallelle dimensies of alternatieve universums zouden unieke natuurkundige wetten, constanten en zelfs variaties in fundamentele deeltjes bezitten, wat leidt tot een eindeloos tapijt van diverse realiteiten.

De basis van de multiversumtheorie rust op de opmerkelijke notie van kosmische inflatie, een exponentiële expansie van ruimte die kort na de oerknal plaatsvond. Deze snelle expansie creëerde talloze bellen of zakken in het weefsel van de ruimtetijd, elk representerend een apart universum met zijn eigen eigenschappen. Hoewel deze universums misschien voor altijd buiten ons bereik blijven, bestaan ze desalniettemin, parallel aan ons eigen universum, en mogelijk met geheel andere vormen van leven en onvoorstelbare wonderen.

Een intrigerende tak van de multiversumtheorie is het concept van het “Level I Multiversum,” ook bekend als het 'quilted multiversum' of de oneindige universum-theorie. In dit scenario worden parallelle universums voorgesteld als verre kosmische eilanden, gescheiden door immense kosmische uitgestrektheden. Hoewel ze mogelijk dezelfde natuurkundige wetten volgen, kunnen de materie- en energieverdelingen binnen deze universums sterk variëren, wat leidt tot gevarieerde landschappen en configuraties.

Een andere boeiende benadering binnen het multiversumkader is het “Level II Multiversum,” bekend als de bubbeluniversumtheorie of het inflatoire multiversum. Deze theorie suggereert dat ons universum slechts een van vele bellen is binnen een uitgestrekte kosmische schuim. Elk van deze bellen vertegenwoordigt een afzonderlijk universum dat ontstaat door het proces van kosmische inflatie, en dat zich onafhankelijk ontwikkelt en uitbreidt. Net als zeepbellen in de lucht bestaan deze universums in een zee van andere, elk met zijn eigen unieke realiteit.

Dieper in de theoretische wereld ligt het “Level III Multiversum,” oftewel de veel-werelden interpretatie, die een verbazingwekkend panoramisch beeld opent van mogelijkheden. Voortkomend uit de kwantummechanica, stelt deze notie voor dat elk kwantumgebeurtenis meerdere vertakkingen creëert. Elke keuze die we maken, elke kwantuminteractie, schept een veelvoud aan parallelle universums, die zich vertakken in een oneindig web van waarschijnlijkheden. In dit verbazingwekkende landschap bestaan alle denkbare uitkomsten en beslissingen, gerealiseerd in hun eigen aparte realiteit.

Universe-1600x738.jpg

Hoewel het bestaan van parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums nog in het rijk van de theorie ligt, is er op het gebied van wetenschappelijk onderzoek toch enig indicatief bewijs opgedaan. Experimentele studies bij CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) proberen het bestaan van extra dimensies buiten de drie die wij kennen, te ontrafelen. Deze experimenten, gericht op de mysteries van de deeltjesfysica op hoge energie, proberen ongrijpbare deeltjes op te sporen die mogelijk in andere dimensies kunnen ontsnappen, en zo indirect bewijs te leveren voor het bestaan van parallelle werelden.

Daarnaast biedt de kosmische microgolfachtergrondstraling, die wordt beschouwd als de resten van het vroege heelal, aanwijzingen voor een multiversum. Wetenschappers hebben de complexe patronen in deze straling bestudeerd, op zoek naar anomalieën die kunnen wijzen op interacties tussen ons universum en naburige dimensies. Hoewel deze bevindingen nog preliminair zijn en verder onderzoek vereisen, voeden ze de drang naar ontdekking en stimuleren ze de verbeelding.

Parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums hebben al lange tijd de aandacht van verhalenvertellers, die talloze werken in sciencefiction en fantasy hebben geïnspireerd. Van H.G. Wells’ “De Tijdmachine” tot Christopher Nolan’s baanbrekende film “Inception” en de uitgestrekte universums van Marvel Comics, het concept van parallelle dimensies is een vruchtbare bodem voor creatieve verkenning. Deze fictieve verhalen tonen vaak reizen tussen dimensies, waarin personages de ingewikkelde web van realiteiten navigeren, versies van zichzelf ontmoeten en de oneindige mogelijkheden van bestaan confronteren.

Toch, naarmate ons begrip van het heelal verdiept, vervagen de lijnen tussen wetenschap en fictie, en wordt de mogelijkheid van parallelle dimensies een steeds plausibeler hypothese. De zoektocht naar antwoorden gaat door, gedreven door de ontembare menselijke nieuwsgierigheid die ons al sinds mensenheugenis voortstuwt om de mysteries van het universum te ontrafelen.

Echter, terwijl het concept van parallelle dimensies onze verbeelding kan aanwakkeren en ons gevoel van verwondering kan versterken, is het van groot belang deze ideeën kritisch te benaderen. De verkenning van de theoretische fysica en de zoektocht naar empirisch bewijs vereisen rigoureuze wetenschappelijke methodologieën en strenge testen. Het bestaan van een theorie impliceert niet automatisch haar waarheid; buitengewone claims vereisen buitengewone bewijzen.

De wetenschappelijke gemeenschap is verdeeld over de vraag of parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums daadwerkelijk bestaan. Critici beweren dat deze ideeën in het domein van speculatie vallen en het empirisch fundament missen om ze als wetenschappelijke theorie te rechtvaardigen. Ze pleiten voor voorzichtigheid en roepen onderzoekers op zich te richten op toetsbare hypotheses en observeerbare fenomenen, in plaats van af te dwalen in de wereld van de verbeelding.

Desalniettemin blijven voorstanders van de multiversumtheorie de grenzen van de wetenschappelijke nieuwsgierigheid verleggen. Ze werken aan het verfijnen van wiskundige modellen, ontwikkelen nieuwe experimentele opzetten en benutten geavanceerde technologieën om het bestaan van parallelle dimensies te onderzoeken.

Naarmate we uitkijken over het uitgestrekte kosmische landschap, starend naar de verre sterren en nadenkend over de mysteries die daarbuiten liggen, blijft de aantrekkingskracht van parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums bestaan. Het is een zoektocht naar begrip, een verkenning van de fundamentele aard van de realiteit, en een bewijs van de onstuitbare menselijke drang naar kennis.

Uiteindelijk, of parallelle dimensies en alternatieve universums al dan niet bestaan, zullen hun aantrekkingskracht en inspiratie blijven voortbestaan. Ze blijven de menselijke verbeelding voeden, wetenschappelijke nieuwsgierigheid stimuleren en onze perceptie van wat mogelijk is uitdagen. Het raadsel van parallelle dimensies nodigt ons uit om verder te kijken dan de grenzen van ons bekende universum, de mysteries te omarmen die in de diepten van het bestaan verborgen liggen, en een reis te ondernemen die de grenzen van onze verbeelding overstijgt.

GERELATEERDE VIDEO's IN ENGELS


Voorbij Onze Werkelijkheid: De Verbazingwekkende Waarheid Over Parallelle Universums

De Verbazingwekkende Realiteiten van Parallelle Universums: Een Mind-Bending Reis

{ PETER2011 }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:50 Stuur door

Viewers of streaming documentary The Rendlesham UFO: The British Roswell visited by alien orbs

Viewers of streaming documentary The Rendlesham UFO: The British Roswell visited by alien orbs

Ufologist and filmmaker Mark Christopher Lee has claimed that his documentary The Rendlesham UFO: The British Roswell has led to viewers being visited by alien orbs.

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:26 Stuur door

Plasmoid orb frightens women walking dog, Blakey, PA, USA Aug 26, 2026 UAP Sighting News.

Plasmoid orb frightens women walking dog, Blakey, PA, USA Aug 26, 2026 UAP Sighting News.

Screenshot%202026-08-31%20at%2010.42.42%E2%80%AFPM.png

Screenshot%202026-08-31%20at%2010.42.34%E2%80%AFPM.png

Screenshot%202026-08-31%20at%2010.40.26%E2%80%AFPM.png


Date of sighting: August 26, 2026 8:52pm
Location of sighting: Blakely, Pennsylvania, USA
Source: NUFORC #200502
 
This glowing object looks like a plasmoid orb, glowing and as it moves its orb shape shifts a bit into an oval shape. Thats how I knew it was a plasmoid orb...a sentient entity. The object actually frightens the woman as she begins to watch and the object stops, not moving for a bit then shoots away and seems to be following the power lines. The dog is trying to pull the woman away, as if it was sensing something it was afraid of and wanted to escape the area but the eyewitness tried to control the dog to record more video of the orb. The orb changes color to a light green for a few seconds then back to white. This looks so much like the Dome of Rock UFO plasmoid orb that its blowing my mind. Its just very exciting to see this interact with the woman.
Scott C. Waring - UFO Sightings Daily
 
Eyewitness states: 
I saw the object shoot up very fast, then it went down fast, shot to the left and then flew extremely fast to the right out of sight. At approximately 8:30pm, while walking my neighbor's dog, I saw a bright white object stationary in the sky near 764 Main Street in Blakely, PA. I continued to walk. I noticed it again several blocks away. The object hovered for a long period of time and then went up very fast, then downwards very fast. It then shot to the left and then went to the right extremely fast and out of sight. It did not make the buzzing or humming sound of a drone.
It did not have blinking colored lights. I saw it again when walking home, which was where I saw it the first time. The light faded then got bright and stayed bright. It went left out of sight. I continued to walk the dog, turned around and saw it again. I have seen many drones and I am familiar with what they look like and sound like. This object was silent.

Plasmoid orb frightens women walking dog, Blakey, PA, USA Aug 26, 2026 UAP Alien paranormal news 👽

{ https://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:36 Stuur door

Reason for mysterious orange and white balls seen floating on power lines across America revealed by expert

Reason for mysterious orange and white balls seen floating on power lines across America revealed by expert

While driving along American roadways, especially near airports, many have wondered about the mysterious orange and white orbs that can be seen on top of the power lines. 

They're not just for decoration. In fact, they serve a vital purpose to keep residents safe. 

Power lines carry high voltages of electricity to homes and businesses, making them crucial to any community. If they were to be damaged or hit, it could knock out power for thousands and even create a dangerous situation where a live wire is within reach. 

So the white and orange balls are placed on the top wires of taller power lines, especially in areas where airplanes will be flying low, to make them easily recognizable to pilots, Missouri University Professor Rui Bo wrote for The Conversation. 

'They’re like bright warning signs in the sky, protecting pilots, passengers and people on the ground below,' he wrote.  

But unlike power lines, the big orange balls, which are the size of a large beach ball and weigh around 25 pounds, are not electricized. 

'They’re made of insulating materials, so electricity does not flow through them,' Bo added. 

They're typically made of plastic or fiberglass, so they can last 10 to 15 years. And their orange color is deliberate, as it is easy for pilots to spot. 

Orange balls can be seen on power lines, often in places where there are low flying aircrafts

Orange balls can be seen on power lines, often in places where there are low flying aircrafts 

The balls, which come in two halves, are the size of a large beach ball and weigh around 25 pounds

The balls, which come in two halves, are the size of a large beach ball and weigh around 25 pounds

Missouri University Professor Rui Bo said the balls act as 'warning signs'

Missouri University Professor Rui Bo said the balls act as 'warning signs'

The power lines themselves easily blend into the scenery of the houses and trees nearby, making it hard for pilots to avoid when they're flying low to land at airports, so the brightly colored balls are essential to safe navigation. 

The installation of the balls can be difficult, especially for very high power lines. It requires a specialized team, especially when a helicopter is involved. 

The power lines are not turned off during installation, meaning high voltages of electricity continue to pass through them. 

Depending on the height of the power line, a ground or air crew is required. 

Ground crews use buckets to get up high enough to secure the ball, which comes in two halves, to the line. 

Air crews, however, have to hover near the line while crews on the end of the helicopter connect it to the power line. 

The balls themselves are made of plastic or fiberglass and do not conduct electricity, despite being on a live wire

The balls themselves are made of plastic or fiberglass and do not conduct electricity, despite being on a live wire 

One lower lines, it can be install via bucket truck, but on higher lines, one has to be attached to a helicopter to do so

One lower lines, it can be install via bucket truck, but on higher lines, one has to be attached to a helicopter to do so 

The orange or white color of the ball is meant to be bright and easily visible to pilots

The orange or white color of the ball is meant to be bright and easily visible to pilots 

'They don’t need much maintenance, but utilities inspect them from time to time to make sure they haven’t cracked or faded too much,' Bo wrote. 

Most neighborhood power lines are too low to need the balls. 

The Daily Mail has reached out to Bo for comment.  

RELATED VIDEOS

Why Are Giant Orange Balls Hanging From Power Lines? 🤯

Why Are There Giant Orange Balls Hanging on Power Lines? (The Real Truth)

Why Do Power Lines Have Those Orange Balls?

{ https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/index.html }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:27 Stuur door

Lost city 'perfectly matches' Biblical site where Jesus fed the 5,000... as humble birthplace of Keeper of Heaven's Keys is uncovered

Lost city 'perfectly matches' Biblical site where Jesus fed the 5,000... as humble birthplace of Keeper of Heaven's Keys is uncovered

Archaeologists have spent a decade peeling back layers of ruins on the shores of the Sea of Galilee, searching for a 'lost' city where the Bible says Jesus performed miracles.

Now, the excavation team say they have finally found Bethsaida, the ancient city where Jesus is said to have restored a blind man's sight and fed thousands, and was home to three apostles - Peter, Andrew and Philip.

A Roman bathhouse and hundreds of fishing weights at el-Araj in northern Israel are said to match an ancient account of Bethsaida's transformation from a Jewish fishing village into a city.

Inside a ruined church dating back to the late fifth century, a mosaic invokes Peter, linking the building directly to Jesus' disciple.

Beneath the church, a first-century house wall may also support an ancient pilgrim's account that it was built over Peter and Andrew's home.

Dr Steven Notley, the excavation's academic director, told the Daily Mail he 'absolutely' believes the team has uncovered the lost biblical city that was home to the apostle Peter.

'Everything we bring out of the ground affirms and strengthens that identification,' he said.

'Nothing that we have found would challenge it at all.'

Archaeologists have uncovered stone walls they believe were part of the birthplace of Jesus' apostles

Archaeologists have uncovered stone walls they believe were part of the birthplace of Jesus' apostles 

The lost city, according to the Bible, is where Jesus performed a miracle that fed 5,000 people

The lost city, according to the Bible, is where Jesus performed a miracle that fed 5,000 people

For Notley, the ruins at el-Araj are bringing into view the setting of Gospel accounts in which Jesus restored a blind man's sight and fed thousands with five loaves and two fish.

'I think Jesus was there on multiple occasions,' Notley said. 'I think we probably have a number of miracles.'

In Mark 8:22–26, people bring a blind man to Jesus at Bethsaida. Jesus leads him outside the village before restoring his sight.

Luke 9:10–17 places Jesus and his apostles in what the King James Version calls 'a desert place belonging to the city called Bethsaida,' where he feeds about 5,000 men.

Notley believes the plain surrounding el-Araj fits that description: open grazing land beyond the settlement, rather than a sandy desert.

'We have no deserts up there,' he said. 'But they're pastoral areas, where your flocks will be eating outside of where people are living.'

'The Gospels identify this as the area where you have the feeding of the multitudes,' he added.

Inside a ruined church dating to the late fifth century, a mosaic invokes Peter, linking the building directly to Jesus¿ disciple

Inside a ruined church dating to the late fifth century, a mosaic invokes Peter, linking the building directly to Jesus' disciple 

Two walls set perpendicular to one another. One of the walls dates to the first century AD, while the second dates to the second or third century AD

Two walls set perpendicular to one another. One of the walls dates to the first century AD, while the second dates to the second or third century AD 

Jesus also rebukes Bethsaida in Matthew 11:21, saying: 'Woe unto thee, Bethsaida!' 

The passage criticizes its inhabitants for failing to repent despite the miracles performed there.

El-Araj lies just beyond the Jordan River, in territory ruled during Jesus' lifetime by Herod Philip, outside the jurisdiction of Herod Antipas, who ordered John the Baptist's execution.

Notley believes he has connected the location with Matthew 14:12–13, which describes Jesus withdrawing by boat after learning of John's death - he was beheaded by a king around 30 AD.

Although the passage does not name Bethsaida, Notley interprets the settlement's position as another reason Jesus would have spent time there.

John 1:44 supplies the connection to three apostles: 'Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.'

'At least a quarter of his disciples came from Bethsaida … it played a very important role as the setting, the stage for Jesus' life and ministry in the North,' Notley said.

The strongest archaeological clue, in his view, emerged in 2017, when researchers uncovered mosaics, marble, roof tiles and ceramic heating vents belonging to a Roman bathhouse.

The flooring of the church dates back 1,500 years. The team believes this church was built over Peter and Andrew's home as a way to honor them

The flooring of the church dates back 1,500 years. The team believes this church was built over Peter and Andrew's home as a way to honor them

Its significance comes from the first-century historian Josephus, who described Bethsaida's transformation from a village into a city. The historian also left behind his eyewitness accounts of Jesus on trial and his crucifixion.

In Antiquities of the Jews, 18.28, Josephus records how Herod Philip elevated the lakeside settlement's status and renamed it Julias.

That history gave researchers two requirements against which to test their discoveries.

'You should find evidence of a Jewish fishing village, and you should find evidence of urbanization,' Notley said. El-Araj, he argued, provides both. 

Hundreds of fishing weights point to the industry that supported the settlement, while chalkstone vessels associated with Jewish purity practices identify its religious character.

The bathhouse supplies evidence of urban development, matching the larger settlement described by Josephus.

'You do not build a Roman bath in a Jewish village,' Notley said.

This summer's excavations revealed walls built over earlier walls, showing successive phases of construction. Stone vessels continued to appear in later layers, suggesting the growing settlement retained its Jewish population.

Not only could the find prove the existence of the legendary church, but it would lead the team to the location of the home of Jesus' famed apostles Peter and Andrew - the Church of the Apostles was said to have been built atop of their residence

Not only could the find prove the existence of the legendary church, but it would lead the team to the location of the home of Jesus' famed apostles Peter and Andrew - the Church of the Apostles was said to have been built atop of their residence

'It doesn't lose its Jewish identity, it maintains that, but it's much larger,' Notley said.

He estimates the settlement covered 15 to 16 acres.

'Everywhere we're digging, we're finding extensive settlement on the site,' he said.

Notley contrasts those remains with et-Tell, a competing candidate nearly two miles inland from the modern lakeshore. He argues that its impressive Iron Age ruins give way to weaker evidence around the first century, when Josephus describes Bethsaida growing in importance.

'It completely contradicts the historical record,' he said.

Excavations at el-Araj began in 2016, with Notley working alongside excavation director Mordechai Aviam.

'Everyone thought I was crazy, everyone thought we were crazy, that there was nothing there,' Notley recalled.

A late fifth-century church added another line of evidence linking the settlement to the apostles.

'No one knew there was a church there,' he said. 'We didn't go looking for a church.'

Gilded glass mosaic pieces first suggested an elaborate Christian building, and by 2018 the team had identified the outline of a basilica.

Its discovery prompted Notley to revisit the account of Willibald, an eighth-century pilgrim who described a church at Bethsaida built over the house of Peter and Andrew.

In August 2022, researchers uncovered an intact mosaic inscription north of the apse, the church's sacred eastern section.

It honored a local official and benefactor named Constantine before seeking intercession from 'the chief of the apostles and the keeper of the keys of heaven,' in Notley's description.

Roman coins have been found at the site, supportinga theory that it was urbanized

Roman coins have been found at the site, supportinga theory that it was urbanized

Christians recognize Saint Peter, originally a fisherman, as one of the first followers of Jesus and the leader of the early Church following the ascension. He was born Simon Peter and grew up to be a fisherman until he met Jesus

Christians recognize Saint Peter, originally a fisherman, as one of the first followers of Jesus and the leader of the early Church following the ascension. He was born Simon Peter and grew up to be a fisherman until he met Jesus

The Bible says that not only was Peter the leader of the apostles, but he would receive the keys to the kingdom of heaven from Jesus. 

'That title can have no other reference than Peter, which confirms the church's identification with Peter,' he said.

For Notley, the question is why Christians would have honored Peter at this particular location. 'We have very few Byzantine churches connected with Peter,' he said of the Holy Land during that period.

Such churches generally marked places associated with Peter's appearances in the Gospels. At el-Araj, Notley believes the dedication commemorates his hometown.

Its importance lies in connecting the excavated church with Peter, consistent with both John's identification of his hometown and Willibald's description of a church there.

Willibald's account gave the team a prediction to test: if the church commemorated the apostles' home, earlier domestic remains might survive directly beneath the apse, the sacred area where relics associated with saints were often preserved.

'There should be a first-century house under the apse,' Notley recalled predicting.

In October 2023, a conservator removed and preserved the mosaic floor, allowing archaeologists to excavate below the church's most sacred area.

Gilded glass mosaic pieces first suggested an elaborate Christian building, and by 2018 the team had identified the outline of a basilica

Gilded glass mosaic pieces first suggested an elaborate Christian building, and by 2018 the team had identified the outline of a basilica

Above is a close look inside the ruins of the church

Above is a close look inside the ruins of the church

They uncovered a house wall dating to the first century, placing domestic remains from the apostles' lifetime beneath the later Christian building.

'It doesn't get much better than that,' Notley said.

The wall cannot establish who lived there, but its age and position support the tradition that the church commemorated an earlier home.

Beneath the late fifth-century basilica, researchers have also identified a fourth-century Christian structure that the team believes may have been an earlier church.

Notley connected that sequence with the early fourth-century historian Eusebius, who associated Peter and Philip with Bethsaida, suggesting Christians continued to remember the settlement's biblical significance.

'There's a continuing memory of Peter's connection to Bethsaida,' he said.

The case therefore joins evidence from different periods: a Jewish fishing community, Roman urban development and successive Christian buildings honoring an apostle whose hometown was Bethsaida.

'Everything we bring out of the ground affirms and strengthens that identification. Nothing that we have found would challenge it at all,' Notley said.

The identification does not amount to archaeological proof of miracles. 'Archaeology has its limits,' he acknowledged.

For Notley, however, the discoveries restore the setting in which the Gospels place Jesus' ministry and the lives of three of his closest followers.

'I have no difficulty seeing Jesus spending considerable time there,' he said, adding that he calls it 'the last lost city of the Gospels.'


Where Did Jesus Feed the 5,000, Walk on the Water, and Calm the Sea? Sea of Galilee Miracles!

{ https://www.dailymail.com/news/index.html 

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 18:37 Stuur door

Some of the 20 UFOs Near the Moon Are Ring-Shaped and Spin at Twice Earth's Gravity, Astronomers Claim

Some of the 20 UFOs Near the Moon Are Ring-Shaped and Spin at Twice Earth's Gravity, Astronomers Claim

Controversial observations of anomalous structures spark debate

UFO

Ukrainian astronomers claim high-speed telescope footage shows giant rotating UFOs near the Moon, though experts warn previous distance errors heavily undermine the unverified study 

PHOTO Peter Pieras/Pixabay

Astronomers at Ukraine's Main Astronomical Observatory say they have detected more than 20 unidentified flying objects near the Moon, using high-speed camera systems at the Vinarivka observatory in rural Ukraine.

The team, led by researcher Boris Zhilyaev, reports observing large ring-shaped structures close to the lunar surface, some estimated at up to 36 kilometres across and said to rotate roughly every three minutes, which they calculate would generate centrifugal forces exceeding twice Earth's gravity.

Anomalous Motion and Bold Technical Claims

Footage recorded on 16 August and 7 September 2025 captured small, fast-moving signals travelling at velocities of up to 11 kilometres per second across the lunar disc. In a non‑peer‑reviewed study, the authors argue that these observations could indicate a sophisticated installation on or near the Moon, potentially capable of sending craft to Earth in about 20 minutes, although mainstream scientific institutions remain sceptical of this interpretation.

In their preliminary paper, the Kyiv-based researchers categorised the reported objects into two main groupings based on observed behaviour. Atmospheric objects appeared to stay above specific lunar regions, as if acting as fixed stations, while continental objects moved quickly across the Moon's surface.

The team noted that several objects flashed in synchronised cycles lasting between 0.1 and 0.5 seconds, even when they appeared to be separated by hundreds of miles.

Size estimates in the report vary from about 440 metres to upwards of 25 miles across, with the largest objects said to rival the footprint of major terrestrial cities. Moving at roughly 24,606 miles per hour, the claimed velocities would be comparable to the top speed achieved by NASA rockets during Apollo-era lunar missions.

Despite these figures, the authors state that their mathematical models depend on assumptions about object composition and light reflectivity that have not been independently verified.

On the raw digital frames gathered at Vinarivka, the proposed large structures occupy only a few faint pixels, which leaves scope for image noise, atmospheric distortion or digital camera artefacts to be misinterpreted as real objects.

Methodological Concerns and Scientific Scepticism

The wider scientific community has treated the paper cautiously, in part because of the research group's previously criticised work on unidentified aerial phenomena. When the same team published findings on unidentified objects in 2022, Ukraine's National Academy of Sciences launched a formal review that concluded the work contained significant errors and did not meet professional standards for publication

During that earlier dispute, Harvard University astrophysicist Avi Loeb showed that the team's distance calculations were overstated by a factor of ten. That error turned likely atmospheric objects, most probably terrestrial artillery shells fired during regional conflict, into what the authors had presented as large unidentified craft.

Critics argue that the latest lunar study shows similar structural weaknesses, including reliance on a single observation site and the absence of parallax measurements to establish genuine spatial depth.

The discussion around the paper also comes at a time of public interest in declassified military records and UAP intelligence documents released under former US President Donald Trump and current American officials.

Pixelated 'Megastructures' Await Independent Checks

Read more
Alien

Officials at agencies such as NASA continue to state that no confirmed evidence of extraterrestrial technology has been found. Researchers note that without independent observations using multiple telescopes, the reported lunar anomalies cannot be treated as established objects.

Until such corroboration exists, the claimed ring-shaped structures and other reported UFOs remain the subject of debate rather than accepted

RELATED

👽🌕 20 UFOs Spotted Near the Moon... What's Really Going On?

20 UFOs Near the Moon? The Hollow Moon Mystery & What Lies Beneath

Ukrainian Scientists: “The Moon Is a UFO Base” Full Paper Breakdown

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/technology }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 22:17 Stuur door

NASA Explains the Spooky 'Negative-Space Jellyfish' Hovering Over Mars in New Curiosity Rover Image

NASA Explains the Spooky 'Negative-Space Jellyfish' Hovering Over Mars in New Curiosity Rover Image

A smudge on a lunar photo and a stray line in an old NASA meeting are all it takes to send humanity's imagination spinning back into the dark

NASA UFO

NASA has stepped in to clarify a decades old lunar photograph that some UFO enthusiasts say depicts a 3.4 mile long alien spacecraft suspended above the moon. 

PHOTO Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica/Wikimedia Commons

NASA has moved to explain a decades old lunar photograph that some UFO enthusiasts claim shows a 3.4-mile-long alien spacecraft hovering above the moon, after the 1967 image resurfaced online and reignited speculation about extraterrestrial life.

The black and white picture was captured by NASA's Lunar Orbiter 3 in February 1967 as the agency mapped potential landing sites ahead of the first crewed missions.

The frame shows a stark stretch of the moon's surface dominated by Theophilus crater, a vast impact site that NASA lists as about 68 miles across and 2.7 miles deep. Tucked into that landscape is an elongated smudge that has become the latest canvas for people determined to see more than geology.

UFO Blogger Claims NASA is Hiding the 'Smoking Gun'

One of the loudest voices is Scott Waring, a long-time UFO blogger, who argues that NASA's own archive hides the smoking gun. On his site, UFO Sightings Daily, he claims the strange streak is 'a long spacecraft hovering over the moon's surface' and insists the object is no trick of light or dust on the lens.

According to Waring, the scale alone should make people sit up. He writes that he compared the length of the disputed feature with Theophilus crater, taking NASA's 110 kilometre diameter figure, then judging the object to be about one twentieth as long. From that, he concludes the craft measures roughly 5.5 kilometres, or 3.4 miles, end to end.

'That's huge to us humans, but to aliens, it's considered a small shuttle craft,' he tells his readers, doubling down on the idea that we are glimpsing only a minor piece of someone else's space hardware.

He goes further, arguing that the photograph carries a chilling implication. 'This is 100 percent proof that aliens were watching humans before we ever stepped on the moon,' Waring writes, treating the picture as evidence of quiet surveillance of the Apollo programme before it even began.

NASA Apollo Missions

NASA Apollo Missions  PHOTO NASA

NASA, for its part, has said nothing of the sort. The agency has repeatedly stated that it has no evidence of extraterrestrial life and that it has yet to find any sign of past or present life on the moon or on Mars.

The elongated mark has not been classified by NASA as a craft, and neither Waring's size estimate nor his interpretation has been validated by independent imaging experts.

NASA Image Spurs Fresh Extraterrestrial Life Debate

The renewed focus on the 1967 NASA image lands in a wider political and cultural moment where official UFO files are being shuffled out of locked cabinets and into public view. The Trump administration has overseen the release of several batches of classified documents on unexplained aerial and space phenomena, giving UFO believers fresh material and, unsurprisingly, new fuel.

On 8 May, the US Department of War released hundreds of pages of documents, images and audio recordings that officials said documented reports of possible extraterrestrial sightings going back to the 1940s. Among them were transcripts from the Apollo 12 and Apollo 17 missions, the second and final crewed landings on the moon.

Those Apollo records, along with photographs taken by astronauts on the surface, detail multiple encounters with bright, fast-moving objects that appeared to dance around lunar landers or drift past capsule windows. The tone is more puzzled than panicked, but you can feel the astronauts straining to make sense of what they are seeing.

During Apollo 17 in 1972, commander Gene Cernan, lunar geologist Jack Schmitt and command module pilot Ron Evans reported a bright, flashing object some distance from their spacecraft.

Read more
NASA's Mars rover Curiosity on Sol

In one exchange, recorded in mission transcripts, Cernan says: 'It is a bright object, and it's obviously rotating because it's flashing. It's way out in the distance, as I say, because there are particles that are close by and it's obviously not one of those.'

He adds that the flashes appear in a 'very rhythmic fashion,' estimating that the object sits several Earth diameters away in their field of view as they look back at the home planet. Cernan is careful, stressing that the comparison might not 'do you any good,' but the bafflement is clear.

Later, as Apollo 17's crew fired their thrusters to change direction, Evans reported 'very bright particles or fragments or something' drifting past the windows. Schmitt chimes in that it looks like 'the Fourth of July' outside Evans' window, with 'big bright pieces tumbling slowly around the capsule.'

Evans describes the fragments as jagged, angular and solid, not fluid, and says they are mostly moving with the spacecraft but with some faster pieces zipping by. According to the mission records, he also reported taking photographs of them for analysis back on Earth.

Three years earlier, Apollo 12 astronauts also noted odd lights and objects on approach to the lunar surface, material that appears again in the newly released Trump era files. None of these reports are categorised by NASA as proof of alien craft.

Mission engineers have long pointed to mundane explanations, from ice crystals and insulation fragments to weird lighting in the vacuum. Yet the raw transcripts still make strange reading today.

NASA Briefings Mention 'Alien Starbase' in Moon Anomaly Talk

The Trump administration's third batch of UFO related files, published on 12 June, has added another wild detail to the pile. Within recorded NASA briefings held after Apollo 16 in 1972, officials can be heard referring, apparently half in jest, to an 'alien starbase' on the far side of the moon.

These briefings, which run for about 55 minutes, discuss unusual gravity readings, laser measurements and anomalies detected on the moon's far side, particularly near the Van de Graaff crater region.

One speaker notes 'a great big hole' around what the transcript calls 'Fendi graph', believed to be a garbled reference to Van de Graaff, a crater already known for its strange magnetic and geochemical quirks.

apollo 17

Apollo 17 Project  PHOTO Apollo Archive/Nasa

'On the backside of the moon around Fendi graph, that's where we get our big hole,' the participant says, before the discussion suddenly veers. Another voice remarks: 'It could be an alien star base or something. Anyway, the next slide shows the front side of the moon.'

The line, buried in a technical briefing, does not appear in the formal Apollo 16 mission transcript from 1972. NASA has not formally clarified whether the 'alien starbase' reference was a joke, a casual shorthand or something else entirely.

That ambiguity, paired with the Lunar Orbiter 3 photograph and Trump era document dumps, has given UFO believers a field day. For scientists trying to keep public expectations tethered to evidence, it is proving to be an exhausting game of cosmic whack a mole.


NASA Explains the Spooky 'Negative-Space Jellyfish' Hovering Over Mars in New Curiosity Rover Image

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trending }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:50 Stuur door

'An Absurd Idea': Scientists Want to Create an Artificial Eclipse in Space to Hunt for Alien Worlds

'An Absurd Idea': Scientists Want to Create an Artificial Eclipse in Space to Hunt for Alien Worlds

A vast flower-shaped shield, a billion‑dollar gamble and the stubborn human urge to see whether anyone else is out there

Alien

A NASA team is advancing a bold new proposal to search for alien worlds by staging an artificial eclipse in space, positioning a huge ‘starshade’ about 175,000 kilometres above Earths. 

PHOTO Razor Picz/Pinterest

A NASA team is pushing an audacious plan to hunt for alien worlds by creating an artificial eclipse in space, placing a vast 'starshade' some 175,000 kilometres above Earth so ground-based telescopes can finally see planets hidden in the glare of distant stars.

Astronomers have already confirmed thousands of exoplanets, but most were spotted indirectly, by watching stars wobble or dim as planets pass in front of them. Directly imaging an Earth-like planet is far harder.

These worlds are up to a billion times fainter than the stars they orbit, so the light astronomers care about is drowned out by the cosmic equivalent of full‑beam headlights.

The Hybrid Observatory for Earth-like Exoplanets, or HOEE, is NASA's latest attempt to fix that. The concept, described by a small NASA-led team, involves flying a giant flower-shaped screen between Earth and distant stars.

The structure, about 100 metres across, would align precisely with powerful telescopes on the ground, blocking out the starlight and revealing whatever alien planets are lurking nearby.

It is, on the face of it, deeply weird. A kind of precision space parasol. But behind the slightly mad imagery sits a serious scientific ambition that has been building for decades.

How an Artificial Eclipse Could Reveal Alien Worlds

After researchers outlined the HOEE idea as a way to supercharge existing observatories rather than building yet another multi-billion dollar space telescope from scratch. Instead of putting both mirror and shade in orbit, the hybrid model keeps the main telescope on Earth and only launches the starshade.

The principle is surprisingly simple. If you can block the light from a star before it reaches a telescope, the surrounding region becomes dark enough to expose any faint specks of light that might be orbiting it. Those specks are the potential alien planets, including, if the scientists get very lucky, a rocky world roughly the size of Earth in the so‑called habitable zone.

In this vision, the starshade would be carefully unfurled in space, its petal-like edges sculpted to minimise diffracted light. It would then sit tens of thousands of kilometres away, directly in the telescope's line of sight to a target star. Get the geometry right, and you essentially manufacture a perfect, repeatable eclipse.

The alignment demands are brutal. The shade would have to hold its position relative to the telescope and the star with fine precision over enormous distances. Even minor errors could let enough stray light through to wipe out any signal from an alien planet. That is before you factor in launches, deployments and the joys of maintaining a massive structure in orbit.

NASA's Billion-Dollar Bet on Alien Atmospheres

NASA is nowhere near green‑lighting the mission. The HOEE team is currently seeking another round of agency funding to refine the idea. Early estimates suggest the eventual starshade project could carry a price tag in the region of one billion dollars.

In space terms, that sits in the uncomfortable middle. Not cheap, clearly, but still far below the budgets of flagship missions such as the James Webb Space Telescope. The argument from advocates is blunt. If a billion buys a better shot at spotting a truly Earth-like alien world, one with the right atmosphere and temperature, then maybe it is worth it.

The scientific payoff would come from the light that reaches Earth after the artificial eclipse. By breaking that light into its component wavelengths, astronomers can look for fingerprints of gases associated with conditions that might support life. The HOEE plan focuses on detecting atmospheric chemicals such as oxygen and nitrogen, key ingredients in our own planet's habitability story.

Nobody is promising evidence of life. That kind of bold claim would demand multiple lines of proof. But identifying a world with an atmosphere that looks suspiciously familiar to ours would be a serious moment for science, and for our long-running obsession with alien possibilities.

Officials at NASA have framed the starshade concept as one tool among many in the broader search for habitable planets. The idea is not to replace existing missions, but to give them a sharper pair of eyes.

Ground-based telescopes are only getting more powerful, and coupling them with a space-borne eclipse generator could extend their reach well beyond what they were originally built for.

Alien

Alien Photo by: PHOTO Leo_Visions/Unsplash

Still, the scepticism writes itself. A giant flower-shaped umbrella floating above Earth, perfectly aligned with telescopes and distant stars, sounds less like engineering and more like science fiction.

Even some scientists have described the plan as 'absurd' in its ambition. Then again, most big shifts in astronomy, from space telescopes to gravitational wave detectors, looked slightly unhinged on paper at first.

If HOEE moves ahead, it will face all the usual battles that define modern space science, from budget fights and technical delays to competition with other marquee missions. The team backing the starshade knows that. Their pitch rests on a simple question that cuts through the noise.

If we had a realistic chance to look directly at a nearby Earth-like alien planet, one that might, in some far‑off future, even be within reach of a human visit, would we really decide that is too much trouble?


scientists created Artificial Eclipse 😯

Proba-3: The Mission Creating Artificial Solar Eclipses!

{ https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trending }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:32 Stuur door

A study claimed UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. Then scientists checked the math.

Large telescope inside an observatory dome, showing metal structure, supporting beams, and curved reflective surfaces under artificial lighting.

"200-inch Hale Telescope at the Palomar Observatory"

A study claimed UFOs orbited Earth in the 1950s. Then scientists checked the math.

In 2025, two cleverly designed studies claimed to find evidence of strange objects orbiting Earth — years before humanity had put anything in space.

The announcement made headlines. In October 2025, a group of researchers published a paper in a well-regarded, peer-reviewed astronomical journal claiming the extraordinary: They’d found evidence of objects orbiting the Earth years before the launch of any human-made artificial satellites. In another paper, they also claimed links between when these objects appeared in the sky and the dates of nuclear tests in the 1950s. If any of these results were correct, it’d represent evidence of orbiting non-human technological artifacts and an indication that whatever “piloted” these artifacts was interested in our nuclear capabilities. It’s easy to see why the papers grabbed headlines and interest. 

So, the big question hovering around these works is — like all newly published scientific papers — can their conclusions hold up to scrutiny?

The first step in answering that question has now been taken. In June, a paper, soon to be published in Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, appeared online and offered an in-depth critique of those explosive claims. Given the importance of the story for UAP/UFO studies, I want to walk you through some details of the original papers and this recent response. Understanding the details is, of course, important on its own. Were we being visited by alien spacecraft in the 1950s? That seems like an important question. There are, however, important lessons in this story concerning how science can, and should, explore the contentious UAP topic. It also raises issues about the difficulties that come when science encounters UAP/UFO culture in general. We’ll explore those too.

The VASCO project

Let’s start with the original papers that set the story in motion. Both were published by astronomer Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (a researcher at the Nordita in Stockholm) and her collaborators. For a number of years, Villarroel has spearheaded a project called VASCO (Vanishing and Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations), which is based on a really good idea. The central method is to use old photographic observations of the sky to look for signatures of advanced technology (now generally called “technosignatures”). It’s a clever concept because the farther back you go, the less human-made stuff there is in the sky to confound the search. So, the logic argues that it might be easier to find non-human technosignatures in archived data.

The two papers VASCO researchers published in 2025 relied on observations taken in the early 1950s using the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (aka POSS-I). The observations were captured on hundreds of photographic plates taken at Mount Palomar in California, and the images were later mosaiced together to form a sky map. Images of the same part of the sky were taken twice, and close in time. One plate used a red-light-sensitive emulsion, and one used a blue-light-sensitive emulsion. Villarroel’s excellent idea was to explore digitized versions of these plates and look for “transients” — things that appeared at specific locations in one of the plates but not the other (since they were taken at different times). The hypothesis was that, perhaps, these transients could be sunlight “glinting” off an orbiting object. The plates had been digitized so Villarroel and her collaborators could use computers to explore large portions of the sky and analyze the statistics of the transients.

The most important part of the first 2025 VASCO paper had the team looking at the difference between plates in Earth’s shadow and those that were not. If a reflective technological artifact were in the shadow, then there’d be no sunlight to produce glints. Therefore, those shadowed plates should have fewer or no transients. After analysis, the team claimed that not only did they find a deficit of transients in the shadowed plates, but the effect was significant at about the “22 sigma” level. (Here, sigma refers to how far away the signal — the detection of something or some feature — is from the average of the background/noise.) Usually, a “5 sigma” result is the gold standard for claiming you’ve made a discovery. A 22-sigma result is so high that it’s virtually unheard of in science. The team did note that when they used more stringent vetting of the transients, the significance dropped to the 7.6 sigma level.

A scientific paper on its own, however, is just a single step in the scientific process.

In the second paper, Stephen Bruehl (Professor of Anesthesiology at Vanderbilt University) and Villarroel looked at the timing of nuclear tests and the dates when transients were observed on the POSS-I plates. Bruehl and Villarroel claimed that there was a statistically significant overlap between when the nuclear explosions happened and when the transients were seen (i.e., the plates). In other words, it seemed like the things creating the transients (alien spaceships, perhaps) were clustering their appearances around nuclear tests.

So, of course, these papers made news. A scientific paper on its own, however, is just a single step in the scientific process. The next step is for the community to pore over the paper and see if the work holds up. Was the data set well prepared? Are the methods used to analyze that data well thought out and mathematically legitimate? Are the conclusions the authors draw from their analysis appropriate, or is there some flaw in the chain of reasoning? 

A critique of the VASCO studies

That next step just came in with a new paper called “Critical Evaluation of Studies Alleging Evidence for Technosignatures in the POSS1 – E Photographic Plates,” which was recently accepted by the Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA). As the title implies, the authors do not find the VASCO studies convincing. 

Before we dive into their critique, one noteworthy thing about the paper is its author list. It includes several working scientists who have been at the forefront of taking UAPs seriously. The lead author is Wesley Watters of Wellesley College. He is an astronomer who has written several papers reviewing UAP sightings and arguing they deserve a deeper, agnostic analysis. He has also been a member of Avi Loeb’s Galileo Project research team, which wants to study UAPs scientifically. Another author is Kevin Knuth, a physicist at the University at Albany, SUNY. Knuth published a well-known study of Navy-pilot UAP sightings exploring whether the trajectories seen by the pilots showed evidence for extreme physics at work. Knuth is also a research affiliate of the Galileo Project. What is striking about the author list is that it represents a group that cannot be seen as hostile to the basic idea that UAPs are a valid scientific problem or that they might represent technosignatures. This observation tells you nothing about the quality of their analysis and the critique that follows. It does, however, mean this is not a group of scientists with a bias against UAPs as a whole (in my experience, most astronomers do have this bias).

The Watters paper begins with an important historical example. Using photographic plates to look for things in the sky that appear and then disappear is not a new idea. For decades, astronomers tried to use photographic plates to find optical traces of the enigmatic gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), powerful explosions involving massive stars. As Watters and team show, even though a huge effort was put into the project, there were just too many “defects” on the plates that had nothing to do with the sky: problems with the photographic emulsion; dust grains on the plates; pits in the glass plate itself; errors introduced when plate copies were made, as well as other issues. It turns out that separating the defects and other issues from the real things captured by the telescope is incredibly difficult. This is especially true when you need to do it at scale — meaning you want to do statistics with tens or hundreds of thousands of potential transients. For the astronomers looking for GRBs, the photographic plates were simply not up to the job. That seems to be an important lesson for the VASCO project.

The defect problem is so bad that the Watters paper doesn’t use the term transient at all since so many of the “things” in the POSS survey aren’t transients (i.e., things seen in the sky). Instead, they begin their analysis by asking about “Selected POSS 1-E Features,” or SPFs. The Watters paper then asks several questions. What can we tell about the SPFs that the VASCO team pulled off the POSS-I plates? How did their choices of what to use effect their analysis and their claims? 

It turns out that these are not easy questions to answer because the VASCO team did not publish the dataset used in this study. That means Watters and company had to go through an exhaustive effort to determine which parts of the POSS-I survey were used and which features were selected to be explored by the VASCO group as possible transients. Once this work is done, Watters and company go on to show that this analogous dataset is full of irregularities (something also shown in an earlier paper by Nigel Hambly of the University of Edinburgh). SPFs show up more often on the edges of the plates than in the center, or features cluster on the plates in irregular ways. Worse, when mapped across the whole sky, there are big stripes and voids where no features appear at all, while in other places the features inexplicably bunch up. All this points to the real possibility that the VASCO data set simply has not been vetted carefully enough. If so many, if not most, of the features are not true astronomical transients but plate defects, that is a real problem. 

Even if some of the features on the plates are light from the sky, the Watters analysis of the analogous VASCO dataset revealed a deeper problem: the statistics. To pull statistically significant conclusions from the data, as the VASCO team hopes, the dataset as a whole must have certain properties. In particular, overall, it must be what’s called “uniformly random in distribution.” This means the features must, on average, be sprinkled randomly around in the same way as stars in the sky appear to be. Technically, this means they could be generated by what’s called a Poisson process. If you want to find statistically significant patterns in a big data set, the most common methods require that you start with data that at least approximates being uniformly random. Only in that case can you apply many of the usual mathematical methods of statistics, the methods that assure you’re not getting fooled by patterns you think you are finding. 

It’s not that the VASCO idea was bad. It was a great technosignature scientific project — but the dataset does not seem up to the task.

Because of all the problems identified in the Watters paper, the VASCO dataset cannot be considered to be uniformly random. Worse, some of the conclusions rely on small numbers of data. For example, for the all-important calculation of the Earth shadow deficit, only 11 out of the 645 plates the VASCO team used are in the Earth’s shadow. That’s not a lot of data to begin with, and it makes doing statistics shakier. But then, through careful analysis, the Watters team found that only five of these plates were fully shadowed, with the rest only partially shadowed. Worse, it appears that the majority of SPFs occur in a single plate. So now there is even less data to work with statistically, and that one plate dominates the analysis. Finally, some of the shadowed plates were in those troubled bands where something weird was going on. 

When Watters and collaborators repeated the shadow analysis, they found no significant deficit of features. The VASCO result had disappeared. These problems all stem from the misapplication of the statistical methods. Thus, that spectacular claim of a 22-sigma result is unsupportable. There was no statistically significant deficit of SPF’s in the Earth’s shadow.

The Watters team then turned to the claimed correlation between the dates of features appearing on the POSS-I plates and nuclear tests. That result also disappeared in terms of significance. The problem was that the VASCO team was not using the right number of days over which the POSS-I observations had been taken (they used 2,718 days rather than the actual 312-day time period over which their data were drawn; the POSS-I survey did not record observations every single day. Once this correction was included, the statistically significant correlation between nuclear tests and transient observations collapsed. What did exist was a relationship between when the telescope was used and when nuclear tests were done (possibly due to clear weather extending across the western states). But this had nothing to do with when features appeared on those plates.

Finally, the Watters paper concludes by showing how the whole VASCO project is plagued by a kind of circular reasoning embodied by their overuse of the term “transients” rather than “features.” Circular reasoning involves assuming the conclusion of an argument as part of its premises.  The VASCO team wants to claim that some features on the POSS-I plates are actual things in the sky that only appear once and then are gone. They use the analysis of the shadow deficit and nuclear tests to claim these are real transients. But there is no independent validation that the bulk of these “transients” are not stuff screwed up on the plates themselves. Thus, the argument doubles back on itself: the shadow-deficit analysis assumes that the plate features are real transient events, and that same analysis is cited as proof that they are real transient events.

The bottom line is that the Watters paper offers a strong critique of the two news-making VASCO studies. It’s not that the VASCO idea was bad. It was a great technosignature scientific project. Rather, like the failed GRB studies, the POSS-I dataset does not seem up to the task. So, what does it all mean?

Science and UFO culture

The first thing to note is that this is not the end of the story. Science is like the blues — it’s a call-and-response kind of thing. A scientist named Bob publishes a paper. Another scientist named Alice publishes a critique. It’s then Bob’s job to address those critiques in the next published paper. If that’s done well, then the game goes on, and Bob’s evidence and arguments get better over time until, perhaps, the scientific community recognizes it as a proven fact and even uses that fact to do the next set of studies. So, the question now is how the VASCO team responds to these criticisms.

People arguing that peer review and publication are not necessary are like players showing up to a soccer game demanding everyone use the rules of baseball.

Another key point is where this call and response get played out. Over the past 400 years, science has figured out a system that works pretty well. It’s called peer review. Bob writes a paper and submits it to a journal. The journal then sends it to other scientists who are knowledgeable in the field (hopefully experts) for review. The reviewers make comments and suggestions that must be addressed. If the paper is judged to be too deeply flawed, then it may be rejected. This process is not perfect, but it does ensure at least a first level of quality control. Most importantly, it has given us wonderful things like quantum mechanics, molecular biology, and so on.

Raising this point gets us to the sociology of the overlap between UFO culture and science. A number of times, unrefereed papers that have not been submitted to any journal have appeared online, claiming to respond to the Watters paper’s deep analysis. While there is nothing in principle wrong with this, it’s definitely not science. Instead, it’s asking interested scientists to go chasing after work that has not been vetted by anyone and stands to be a waste of time. Certainly, these papers can’t be considered part of the all-important literature on which science has built its long and incredible success. In other words, it won’t endure. People arguing against this — that peer review and publication are not necessary — are like players showing up to a soccer game demanding everyone use the rules of baseball. That’s not how that game is played, and it’s played that way for good reasons.

This takes us deeper into the difficulty for scientists attempting to deal seriously with UFO culture. Advocates for the claim that UAPs/UFOs represent technosignatures of alien visitation often complain that scientists ignore the evidence and are unwilling to take the subject seriously. This was certainly not the case with the VASCO papers. Dr. Villarroel was, for example, invited to present her results at a meeting of the important Goddard Space Flight Center technosignature lecture series. The meeting was polite, with lots of good discussion. 

When, however, scientists find fault with UAP/UFO data — as is the case with the Watters study — they are attacked as “part of the problem” or “government shills.” Online and elsewhere, it can get so unpleasant that at some point, a scientist might ask, “Why bother?” Everyone has interesting, fun research projects. Why spend time on this? 

In this way, the UAP/UFO community needs to ask itself a difficult question. Does that community want their subject to be part of the actual scientific process — where beliefs can get legitimately challenged — or do they just want to hold on to their beliefs no matter what? There is a word for the second option. It’s called religion.

I once asked Adam Riess, an astronomer who won the Nobel Prize for showing that the Universe’s expansion was accelerating, what it felt like when he made the discovery. He was just a post-doctoral researcher when he was at the telescope collecting data for the epoch-making result. What did he think as he saw the Nobel-worthy conclusion come out of his data? 

He told me he was terrified. The smartest people in the world were going to tear through everything he had done, looking for mistakes. Riess’ apprehension shows exactly why science works and why the VASCO team should have expected — and welcomed — critiques like those of Watter’s and collaborators. They are claiming something extraordinary, explosive even. It’s the duty of the rest of the scientific community to look for all the ways they might be wrong. That, after all, is the only way we can know if they are right. Isn’t the question “Are we alone?” worth that kind of effort?

RELATED

1952 UFOs in Orbit

Pentagon UFO Disclosure: All 4 Batches of Released UFO Videos 2026

{ https://bigthink.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 21:12 Stuur door

Tinfoil Is Optional

Tinfoil Is Optional

A once-fringe subject is finding a home in university research.

Tinfoil-Is-Optional.png

For decades, UFOs sat on the fringes of serious inquiry. People came forward claiming they had been abducted, had seen flying saucers in the sky, or that Area 51 is really a military base facilitating the study of UFOs and storing the bodies of extraterrestrial beings.

On the latter, Bob Lazar is top of mind. An alleged conspiracy theorist, Lazar became famous in late the 1980s for claiming that he worked on reverse-engineering extraterrestrial spacecraft for the U.S. government. He has appeared on multiple podcasts recently to promote his documentary, S4: The Bob Lazar Story.

My colleague Scott Turner, Director of Science Programs at the National Association of Scholars, tells me the subject has been plagued by “a lot of delusion and projection” since the 1950s, when UFOs became intertwined with Cold War paranoia, fears of American technological inferiority, and, eventually, fraudsters and conspiracy theorists.

Still, Turner tells me, sightings of unidentified objects in the sky “are real.” And they are real enough that some effort has gone into rebranding the subject. “UFO,” for example, has largely given way to “unidentified aerial phenomena,” or UAP, a term that does not assume every flying saucer is piloted by a little green man. In August 2020, the Department of Defense established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, formally adopting the UAP terminology.

And the government’s interest in UAPs has become much more public since.

Last September, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing titled “Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection.” During it, Rep. Eric Burlison played a “never-before-seen” video showing a U.S. military Hellfire “We Come in Peace” missile™ striking a bright object off the coast of Yemen on Oct. 30, 2024. The Hellfire missile strikes the object, sending debris flying from the point of impact. But the debris continues moving alongside the main object, almost as though the pieces remain part of the same formation.

Brandi Vincent, who covered the hearing for DefenseScoop, reported that the hearing also marked the first time an active-duty Navy official testified publicly before Congress about a UAP incident.

That official was Senior Chief Petty Officer Alexandro Wiggins, who described a February 2023 encounter aboard the USS Jackson in Whiskey 291, a restricted military training area off the coast of Southern California. Wiggins said he observed a “self-luminous,” “Tic Tac-shaped” object that did not resemble a conventional aircraft or drone, and the ship’s systems recorded the encounter on multiple sensors. The object appeared to emerge from the ocean, join three similar objects, and then disappear with “near-instantaneous acceleration.” Wiggins said there was no sonic boom or conventional propulsion signature.

Whiskey 291 is the same general training area associated with the now famous 2004 “Tic Tac” incident, footage of which was recorded by Lieutenant Chad Underwood. NBC has a rather good segment on the encounter and other reported Tic Tac sightings.

Whatever these objects are, higher education has found a reason to be interested.

The University at Albany (UAlbany), for example, recently received a major gift to advance scientific research on UAPs. UAlbany physics professor Matthew Szydagis was among the authors of a June 2025 article, “Initial Results from the First Field Expedition of UAPx to Study Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena,” published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. According to the abstract, the article details a week-long expedition to Catalina Island, where Szydagis and other researchers deployed cameras and a range of sensors to collect data on possible UAPs.

“The study of UAP is slowly moving from the fringe to the mainstream of scientific study,” Szydagis said in a university press release about the newly published research. I have not read the entire article myself, but I have reached out to Szydagis hoping to talk with him about his findings.

There is also Harvard’s Galileo Project, which aims to move the search for extraterrestrial technology from “accidental or anecdotal observations and legends” into systematic scientific research. The project webpage says it will “examine the possibility of extraterrestrial origin” for UAPs and seek to “understand the origins of interstellar objects.” The project is led by Avi Loeb, who, interestingly enough, has had some public spats with Elon Musk over the existence of aliens.

Apparently, Musk has said he has seen no evidence of aliens, prompting Loeb to write that Musk commenting on the universe based on his experience in the inner solar system is like “an ant making a statement about the planets in the Solar system after exploring an area as big as the head of a pin.” Loeb added, “It must be a rather presumptuous ant.”

What makes that comment particularly humorous is that Harvard recently disclosed a $2.2 billion stake in SpaceX, making Musk’s aerospace company the “largest holding in Harvard Management Company’s publicly reported stock portfolio.” So, if Loeb is right, Harvard has a lot riding on a rather presumptuous ant.

Of course, none of this tells us what researchers will actually find. Turner’s view is probably the safest one for now: “There’s something there.” What that something is remains another question.

Will universities find aliens? Some doubt it. Turner takes the Fermi paradox seriously: If advanced extraterrestrial civilizations are common, where are they? Despite decades spent scanning the skies,Turner notes, no one has produced the proverbial alien body or spacecraft wreckage.

What do I think? Well, I am not ready to add this one to my collection of doubts just yet. Aliens may be out there.

My tinfoil hat is at the ready.

Minding the Campus article takes a skeptical view of UFO discussions

Overview

A recent Minding the Campus essay, pointedly titled “Tinfoil Is Optional,” takes a skeptical, lightly satirical view of UFO and UAP discussions, arguing that the subject can be examined without defaulting to paranoid conspiracy thinking. The piece revisits a topic that has long occupied the borderlands of public debate: reports of strange objects in the sky, allegations of government secrecy, and the enduring pull of stories involving Area 51, alleged crash retrievals, and supposed extraterrestrial technology. By leaning into a skeptical frame, the article suggests that while unexplained sightings may be worth discussing, they do not require the “tinfoil hat” mindset that often shadows the subject.

The article opens by noting that UFOs have for decades sat on the fringes of serious inquiry, fueled by claims of abductions, flying saucers, and hidden government programs. It also highlights Bob Lazar, the controversial figure who rose to prominence in the late 1980s by claiming he had worked on reverse-engineering extraterrestrial spacecraft for the U.S. government. Lazar has recently re-entered the public conversation through podcast appearances promoting the documentary S4: The Bob Lazar Story, underscoring how old claims continue to circulate in new media formats.

From UFOs to UAPs

A central argument in the article is that the subject has long been burdened by “a lot of delusion and projection,” as Scott Turner, director of science programs at the National Association of Scholars, puts it. Turner traces the modern UFO era back to the 1950s, when Cold War anxieties, concerns about American technological inferiority, and later a wave of frauds and conspiracy theorists helped shape the conversation. Yet the article also stresses that sightings themselves are not imaginary. Turner says unidentified objects in the sky “are real,” a distinction that underlies the shift away from the term UFO toward UAP, or unidentified aerial phenomena.

That rebranding is not merely cosmetic. In August 2020, the Department of Defense established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, formally adopting the newer terminology. The article presents that shift as an effort to describe the issue more neutrally, without presuming either extraterrestrial origins or elaborate cover-ups. Since then, government interest in UAPs has become more public, with hearings and official testimony lending the topic a measure of legitimacy it long lacked.

Congressional scrutiny and recent testimony

The piece points to a major House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing held last September titled “Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection.” During the hearing, Rep. Eric Burlison played what was described as a “never-before-seen” video showing a U.S. military Hellfire missile striking a bright object off the coast of Yemen on Oct. 30, 2024. According to the account, the missile impact sent debris flying from the object, but the material continued moving in formation with it, deepening the mystery rather than resolving it.

The hearing also marked, according to DefenseScoop reporter Brandi Vincent, the first time an active-duty Navy official testified publicly before Congress about a UAP incident. That witness, Senior Chief Petty Officer Alexandro Wiggins, described a February 2023 encounter aboard the USS Jackson in the restricted training area known as Whiskey 291 off Southern California. Wiggins said he observed a “self-luminous,” “Tic Tac-shaped” object that did not resemble a conventional aircraft or drone, adding another data point to a debate increasingly shaped by military witnesses rather than civilian enthusiasts.

A skeptical but measured posture

What distinguishes “Tinfoil Is Optional” is not dismissal, but tone. The article treats UFO/UAP discourse as a subject that can be investigated without automatically embracing conspiratorial interpretations. That stance reflects a broader shift in the public conversation: serious institutions are acknowledging unexplained encounters, even as skepticism remains essential. In that sense, the piece argues that curiosity and caution can coexist — and that examining unidentified objects does not require assuming extraterrestrials, secret bases, or a government plot at every turn.

SOURCE: https://usubjects.com/ 

{ https://mindingthecampus.org/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:53 Stuur door

EARTH LIGHTS & UFOs

EARTH LIGHTS & UFOs

EARTH LIGHTS & UFOs

Excerpted from lecture script entitled "EARTH LIGHTS AND THE RE- INVENTION OF UFOLOGY" for presentation to the British UFO Research Association (BUFORA) in 1997 (see also "Everything You've Always Wanted to Know About Earth Lights" in Fortean Times 103, October 1997 - www.forteantimes.com

Few in mainstream ufology have paid much heed to the developing earth lights line of enquiry. Like Aesop's tortoise, earth lights research has passed other ufological hares either without them noticing or with them offering merely a dismissive swipe of a paw. Yet it can now attract significant funding and the interest of mainstream scientists, is provoking informed, cutting-edge scientific hypotheses as well as speculations that make the ETH look the intellectual dinosaur it is. Here, I will very briefly bring the story up to date.

History

Charles Fort was among the first to note that strange "meteors" appeared somewhat coincidentally with earthquakes. It had to wait until the 1960s, however, for veteran ufologist, John Keel, to associate the appearance of unusual lights with areas of geological faulting and magnetic anomaly, as well as with the occurrence of earthquakes. It was the French researcher, Ferdinand Lagarde, though, who most tightly focused in on the UFO-fault connection in the '60s. In the USA, John Keel likewise promoted the real phenomenon as "soft" light phenomena associated with faulting and other geophysical factors. In 1967, American author Vincent H. Gaddis made a pioneering stab at separating out luminous phenomena in his Mysterious Fires and Lights. In 1975, Andrew York and I published research on Leicestershire, in which the occurrences of recorded strange phenomena over a number of centuries were geographically mapped. Both archival accounts of meteorological anomalies together with reported UFOs were found to have had their greatest incidence over the faulted regions of the county. Two years later, Michael Persinger, a neuroscientist and geologist at Laurentian University in Canada, together with Gyslaine Lafreniére, published a study of the United States which similarly indicated a correlation between higher levels of reported UFO activity and the locations of earthquake epicentres.

Persinger and Lafreniére saw UFOs as electromagnetic phenomena arising from the tremendous energy involved in the constant rising and falling of tectonic stress in the Earth's crust, whether or not full-blown earthquakes occurred. They visualised fields of forces operating evenly and quietly over very large geographical regions which could become focused at any given time in a few small areas of particular geological resistance or instability such as fault lines, ore bodies or mineral deposits, stubborn rock outcrops, hills, mountains, and so on. They likened this to the energies in the atmosphere being equally capable of producing a gentle breeze over a wide area or a localised ferocity like a tornado. "The existence of man upon a thin shell beneath which mammoth forces constantly operate, cannot be over-emphasized," they argued. This was the first outing of what has come to be known as the Tectonic Strain Theory, or TST.

Harley Rutledge, a physics professor at Southeast Missouri State University, organised field investigation of an outbreak of lights that began in 1973 around Piedmont. The results of this were published in "Project Identification" in 1981.

An important researcher into light phenomena is John Derr, a leading U.S. geologist. In 1986, he joined with Persinger to study an earlier outbreak of lights in the Yakima Indian Reservation, Washington State. Firewardens on the reservation saw huge orange lightballs floating above rocks, as well as smaller "ping-pong balls" of light bounding along ridges. This remarkable period of sightings also included the occurrence of unusual meteorological effects such as glowing clouds indicating a charged atmosphere, and subterranean rumblings suggesting some kind of tectonic association. The firewardens organised themselves, and photographs were taken of the lights and triangulated observations using radios were made.

Toppenish Ridge, Yakima Indian Reservation; one of the localities where many lights were seen.
Toppenish Ridge, Yakima Indian Reservation; one of the localities where many lights were seen.

Derr and Persinger showed that the Yakima lights were seen most often in the vicinity of the ridges that cut across the reservation - each riddled with faulting - and with Satus Peak, the general area of a surface rupture and one of the stronger earthquakes in the region during the 13 years covered by the study. Successive reporting of lights occurred in the seven months preceding the biggest earthquake of the studied period. Regional seismic activity also increased during the times in 1972 and 1976 when most sightings were reported.

(The irony of the Yakima case is that the reservation is adjacent to the part of the Cascades Mountains where pilot Kenneth Arnold saw the flight of nine glittering objects in 1947 that initiated the flying saucer era . In fact, Arnold landed his plane at Yakima airfield shortly after his encounter. It is also worth noting that Arnold, did not, of course, se disks at all, but what he described as tadpole-shaped objects. This also struck a bell with me because as a schollchild in Leicesterhsire in 1957, I experience the powerful earth tremor there, and I recall one of our teachers decribing how he had seen a row of high flying lights earlier that afternoon. The lights looked tadpole-shaped, he said. Later, the local papers revealed that these objects had been widely seen over surrounding counties as well.)

A giant light hovers over a peak in Hessdalen Norway. Photo by Leif Havik/Project Hessdalen.
A giant light hovers over a peak in Hessdalen Norway.
Photo by Leif Havik/Project Hessdalen.

It was the outbreak of lights at Hessdalen, a valley 70 miles southeast of Trondheim in Norway, that most firmly switched on the earth lights agenda. From about November, 1981, people living in the area, which is rich in copper and other metals, began seeing unexplained lights. These appeared as spheres , 'bullets' with pointed end downwards, and inverted "Christmas tree" shapes. Colours were mainly white and yellow-white, though others were also reported. Strong, localised flashes in the sky were also observed and there were reports of underground rumbling sounds. In March, 1982, the Norwegian defence department sent two airforce officers to study the situation. By the summer of 1983, hundreds of reports of strange lights had been made by the inhabitants of Hessdalen, and so Norwegian and Swedish UFO groups formed Project Hessdalen. From 21 January to 26 February, 1984, they continuously monitored the valley using a range of instrumentation, including radar, and succeeded in obtaining photographs of strange lights plus a number of instrumental readings. Such work then continued sporadically over a few years.

1982 saw my first book on the subject, "Earth Lights", and the following year British ufologist, Jenny Randles, came out with "Pennine UFO Mystery", telling of luminous and other phenomena in the hill chain, and making connections with tectonic factors. Inspired by the Norwegian effort, Project Pennine was formed in 1986 by David Clarke, Andy Roberts and colleagues. Visual historian and writer Hilary Evans, started circulating archival portfolios called Bolide among researchers interested in what he was calling BOLs (Balls of Light).

The Devil's Elbow, a sharp bend on the B6105 in Longdendale, the Pennines. A fault crosses the road
The Devil's Elbow, a sharp bend on the B6105 in Longdendale, the Pennines. A fault crosses the road here and strange phenomena have been reported at this point.

Meanwhile, earth light activity steadily decreased in Hessdalen but over 50 observations of light phenomena were made during seismic monitoring in the Saguenay - Lake St John region of Canada by Quebec University between 1 November, 1988, and 21 January, 1989. According to a report in Nature, balls of light several yards in diameter popped out of the ground sometimes close to observers. Other balls of light, both stationary and moving, were seen many hundreds of feet in the air. Some of these had durations of up to 12 minutes. It seems that these phenomena were coincident with rising tectonic strain.

In my "Earth Lights Revelation" of 1989, with David Clarke and Andy Roberts, geochemist Paul McCartney and I published a report on our long-term investigations into an "earth lights zone" between Barmouth and Harlech in north-west Wales which had been active in 1904-5. Because useful contemporary reports had been made of these Welsh lights (which included blood-red spheres a few feet across rising from fields and roads, glittering diamond shapes hugging isolated roof ridges, and a whole range of luminous phenomena), we were able to accurately map the locations where they occurred. When these were matched with newly- available geological information it was found that the lights followed the course of a major local feature, the deep-rooted Mochras Fault, like beads on a thread. Furthermore, it transpired that between 1892 and 1906 there were several earthquakes in various parts of Wales. In October, 1904, for example, immediately prior to the onset of the Barmouth wave, there was a quake at nearby Bedgellert. (The area is also adjacent to the Lleyn Peninsula, one of Britain's most active seismic areas, and epicentre in July, 1984, of an earthquake registering 5.5 on the Richter scale. This event brought the lights back briefly - the evening before the quake, a resident saw a brilliant white light "the size of a small car" float in from the sea and disappear over the brow of a grassy dune on the beach.)

On two occasions on March 25, 1905, balls of deep red light were seen to emerge from this field next
On two occasions on March 25, 1905, balls of deep red light were seen to emerge from this field next to the chapel at Llanfair. Recently, high-tech surveying has revealed that the Mochras Fault runs directly through this field.

Into the field

By 1990, I had arrived at the conclusion that the only way to really understand the nature and mechanics of earth lights was to attempt scientific field study of them. So, working primarily under the auspices of a research/think tank group known as the International Consciousness Research Laboratories (ICRL), sufficient funding was obtained to start conducting field enquiries.

In June 1993, we looked at the so-called "Hooker Light" in New Jersey, USA. In the 1970s, crowds of youngsters regularly gathered to view a strange light that seemed to wander around on an old disused rail track near Washington Township. Then a research group calling itself "Vestigia" did work there. The track is now a pipeline corridor through a forest, and we were able to prove that the effect was caused by a visual distortion of car lights on a road that cut the corridor at an angle two miles from the viewing point.

Setting up the earth lights observation station on Mitchell's Flat, Marfa, Texas.
Setting up the earth lights observation station on Mitchell's Flat, Marfa, Texas.

Other, inconclusive studies followed, then we visited the Marfa area of Texas' Big Bend country between 6-15 March, 1994, where strange lights have been reported for over a century (the first account, in fact, dates to 1617). Physicist Hal Puthoff, also an ICRL member, joined this expedition. We were eventually able to dismiss a number of luminous effects popularly assumed to be "Marfa Lights": occasional mirage effects can raise lights normally hidden over the horizon into visibility, sometime reproducing the same lights in tiers, and lights of vehicles 30 miles or more away on the Marfa-Presidio road are so distorted that they can appear anomalous. We also determined that lights on vehicles negotiating rough tracks belonging to isolated ranches on the undulating desert- scrub area known as Mitchell Flat can look like mysterious lights skimming the ground, fusing and parting. Nevertheless, interviews with local witnesses convinced us that genuine anomalous lights probably did sporadically appear in the vast region. Acting on a tip offered by a teacher who had closely encountered a three-foot diameter light, we conducted observations in an uninhabited valley in the Chisos Mountains, on the Rio Grande 80 miles from Marfa. At 9.10 pm on 12 March, a large white flickering light was seen at the foot of a nearby mesa. It lasted for about 10 seconds. (Although I have witnessed undoubted earth lights on previous occasions, this is the only light I have seen on our organised fieldwork to date that I am absolutely sure was an anomalous lightform

Physicist Hal Puthoff works with computerised equipment during a night observation session in the de
Physicist Hal Puthoff works with computerised equipment during a night observation session in the desert near Marfa, Texas.

Between 24-27 March, 1994, Erling Strand, one of the directors of the original Project Hessdalen, convened a conference of invited international delegates variously studying earth light phenomena and plasma physics. It was the first specialist earth lights conference, held to launch a new Project Hessdalen, and went unnoticed by mainstream ufology. Strand had also taken the view that serious field research was needed to study earth lights, rather than endless theoretical debate and nitpicking. With the support of Ostfold College, Norway, where he lectures, Strand is engaged on the "wiring up"of the Hesddalen valley, which is currently experiencing a modest resurgence of earth light activity. Automatic monitoring stations (optical and instrumental) placed strategically along the valley will be triggered if electronic beams connecting them are interrupted by an earth light. As Strand comments: "We only need one light."

One of the Hessdalen Conference delegates was Professor Yoshi-hiko Ohtsuki, who is well funded to investigate reported earth lights zones around the world. He revealed that he had taken four highly- equipped expeditions to Marfa, and that on only one of them had he seen a true earth light. This changed shape only 100 yards in front of his team and was captured on multiple video cameras and electronic monitoring equipment.

Erling Strand helps to set up an earth lights observation station in the Australian Outback before t
Erling Strand helps to set up an earth lights observation station in the Australian Outback before the sun sets.
Photo: Paul Devereux.

Between 28 September and 14 October, 1995, Strand and I, accompanied by a TV producer with a Hi-8 video camera, conducted a joint expedition to the remote Kimberley region of Western Australia, acting on reports sent to Jacques Vallee and myself of strange lights in the area. We were attracted there particularly because there was no light pollution from distant trraffic or habitations. Our enquiries among local outstation workers and Aborigines indicated that light phenomena incidence had dropped off in the past decade, but lights were sometimes still seen. We had camera arrays plus a range of monitoring equipment, including a magnetometer constantly measuring the Earth's magnetic field local to our observing station, which was relocated five times during the expeditionary period. On the night of 3 October, we set up position overlooking a small valley in totally uninhabited country. Short-lived blue-white lights appeared sporadically through the night, moving against the opposite slope of the valley, half a mile away. These lights, often of low-intensity, proved elusive, but Strand may possibly have captured one of them on camera.

Monitoring and watching for the mysterious min min lights in the Australian Outback. Photos: Paul De
Monitoring and watching for the mysterious "min min lights" in the Australian Outback.
Photos: Paul Devereux.

By 8 October we had seen only a few possible anomalous lights at other locations, but that night a bright light was seen that seemed to emerge from a small hill in front of a ridge. It was vividly noticeable in an area devoid of all artificial lighting. (I should emphasise that the darkness was so unspoilt in this remote region that on one occasion we could discern the "glowing coal" of a meteorite hurtling across the sky even after its glittering trail had dissolved.) The light moved slowly downwards to the level of the desert, then disappeared. Although all our cameras were pointing in the other direction, towards an area where lights were most expected, we managed to swing a few round and hurriedly photograph the unusual light.

One of a sequence of telephoto shots of the mysterious light. Photo: Paul Devereux
One of a sequence of telephoto shots of the mysterious light. Photo: Paul Devereux

Because it was up to six miles distant, we could not absolutely determine if it was truly anomalous, but simultaneous with its appearance our magnetometer started recording huge field anomalies. (A peak-to-peak amplitude of 800 nanotesla on a 2 Hz pulsation was recorded. A normal amplitude on that frequency is less than 1 nanotesla.) The readings slowly subsided through a period of about five hours. If these events were causally connected, then the readings support one of Persinger's predictions that earth lights will be accompanied by changes in the local geomagnetic field.

What are earth lights?

There are two separate questions about earth lights - how they are produced, and what their nature is. In arguments about whether or not the TST is valid, they often get hopelessly jumbled. It doesn't matter if the TST is right or wrong, or requires further modification, it does not tell us about the properties of the phenomenon itself.

As far as the tectonic connection goes, I leave to you to have noted the repeated passing references I've been making to tectonic factors, and these could be expanded a hundredfold. It seems clear to me that seismic and geological sources are likely factors in earth light propagation. Persinger is probably correct in claiming that tectonic strain and the geomagnetic field are key players, even if the exact processes involved have yet to be fully clarified. Ohtsuki thinks that meteorlogical forces may also be implicated. In the final analysis, it is probable that whole concatenations of geophysical forces are involved.

The wild magnetometer read-out that accompanied the appearance of the light. The normal, thin trace
The wild magnetometer read-out that accompanied the appearance of the light. The normal, thin trace can be seen at the bottom. Photo: Paul Devereux.

But what is the nature of the lights themselves? The anecdotal literature contains descriptive themes that are repeated so often, from different times and places, that it is highly probable objective characteristics are being referred to. From this considerable reservoir of data, we learn that the lights can be any colour, though white, orange, deep red and yellow-gold predominate. Their size can range from ping-pong balls of luminosity to giant lightforms, though "basketball size" is common. While their shapes are usually round or spherical, tubes, cigars, rectangles, diamonds, tadpole-shapes and irregular forms have frequently been described. When witnesses have had a close looks, a teeming inner activity is sometimes reported within lightforms. Reports indicate that earth lights can issue sounds of various kinds, though hissing and buzzing noises predominate, sometimes accompanied by a feeling of pressure in the ears. Particularly bright earth lights are often said to be intense without being dazzling. Multiple earth lights seen flying together can display seemingly co-ordinated movements, as if operating within a single field, and divide and merge. They have also been seen emerging from or disappearing into the ground on numerous occasions, reinforcing a geological-tectonic connection. When free-floating, they commonly seem to prefer the vicinity of mountain peaks and ridges, isolated rooftops and rock outcrops, towers and antennae and other sharp or isolated features that tend to be charge collectors. This indicates that they have some kind of electromagnetic basis. They often haunt bodies of water such as lakes and reservoirs, and are occasionally seen glowing beneath the surface of the water. Bodies of water can apply pressure to underlying faulting (microquake activity around reservoirs is fairly common), as well as lubricating rocks - moist rocks are known to be able to emit more charged particles than dry ones.

The prevailing assumption is that earth lights are plasmas of some kind. This might possibly bes supported by the 1994 work of You-Suo Zou (of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics in Beijing's Academy of Sciences, and an associate of the Department of Meteorology at the University of Utah). He made a close study of the original Project Hessdalen's collected data, and he noted photographs of light traces which revealed a corkscrew-like effect. Zou saw this helical structure as typical of a plasma vortex in motion, a structure particularly visible in the laboratory when plasmas are breaking down.

Zou added that under certain conditions, a plasma vortex can become a kind of solitary wave (soliton) and from the behaviour of some Hessdalen lights as recorded on the project's radar, he said he observed clear evidence of wave energy propagation.

But there are three other little-known aspects noted about earth lights that might be giving us clues as to their deep nature.

  • (i) Earth lights seem to be going "on and off" all the time. Indications of this come from various sources. One example relates to a photograph taken by Tony Dodd of two lights flying over Carleton Moor, Yorkshire, on 14 March, 1983. I showed a first generation print of this to the physicist and writer, Fred Alan Wolf. Among seveal features he noted about the photograph was the fact that a faint, dark vertical line ran through each of the lights, evidence that they had been rapidly flickering - a strobing action that had left a record of the camera's shutter in the dark lines. Such strobing can be unnoticeable to the human eye, as persistence of vision (flicker fusion) gives the impression of continuous luminosity. This seems to be the case in an incident recorded by Project Hessdalen where a light observed as continuous and floating across the sky returned only intermittent radar echoes. A third example was provided by trained physicist David Kubrin and his first wife who saw a lightform hurtling along at treetop height above the Pinnacles Fault (adjacent to the San Andreas Fault) in California in 1973. As it travelled, the light created shockwaves in the air ahead of itself, indicating the presence of mass, but then the light stopped its motion instantaneously, without deceleration, suggestive of no mass. Kubrin caught the decay of the lightform on camera.
  • (ii) Earth lights can sometimes be visible from one direction, and not another. There are numerous accounts of this bizarre effect. During the 1905 Barmouth-Harlech outbreak, for instance, a four-foot- long bar of blue light hovering over the road near Egryn chapel was visible to a group of observers from one side, yet completely invisible to a group standing on the other side of the phenomenon.
  • (iii) There are occasional witness reports that an earth light does not seem to exist quite properly in space, like a poor special effect in a movie. As if it was both flat and had depth simultaneously. In 1983, for example, a farmer in the Pennines saw a red sphere of light hovering above a stream, then it started revolving while giving the impression of being flat. I have personally witnessed this unsettling aspect of lights and can vouch for its reality.

Taken collectively, such descriptions hint at a phenomenon at the very edge of normal physical manifestation. It has occurred to me that we may be seeing a macro-quantal phenomenon, a large-scale expression of the paradoxical conditions (from the viewpoint of classical physics) of the subatomic quantum field, the underpinning of all physical reality. Puthoff suspects that earth lights might be powered by something called Zero Point Energy. This is an all- pervasive energetic field, a fluctuating energy that exists even in "empty" space - the vacuum - and even at a temperature of absolute zero. It is known to have small-scale physical effects, but some scientists, Puthoff a key figure among them, feel that is possible to extract useful energy from vacuum fluctuations. It may be that nature has been doing it already, on an impressive scale, in the phenomena we call earth lights. Perhaps the lights are a kind of doorway between quantum and large-scale physical realities.

Meanwhile, David Fryberger is developing a theory which has the lights resulting from a hitherto unknown particle he calls the "vorton", more exotic even than gluons, quarks and the other subatomic entities postulated by nuclear physics.

When they finally give up some of their secrets, earth lights could have a tremendous impact on quantum and plasma physics. And they may open doors to physics we do not yet know. They may help change our very view of reality.

Earth lights and the paranormal

There may also be a consciousness connection with earth lights. Apparent paranormal phenomena is not infrequently reported in areas experiencing periods of earth lights activity. At Yakima and in the Pennines, for examples, people have reported seeing fleeting manifestations of human figures - usually of bizarre appearance.

Paul Devereux experiences mind-altering effects with the magnetic helmet in Michael Persinger's labo
Paul Devereux experiences mind-altering effects with the "magnetic helmet" in Michael Persinger's laboratory. Photo: Charla Devereux.

Voices are heard: one Yakima firewarden told of hearing "happy little voices singing" and another of a disembodied voice "hollering". Earth lights researchers argue that these are hallucinatory effects caused not only by energy fields associated with light phenomena closely encountered, but generally in an area that is producing strange luminosities, affecting brain function in witnesses. Such fields are probably, in the main, magnetic. Drawing on known clinical data, Persinger has gone to some lengths to postulate a series of physiological and mental symptoms a witness would likely experience at different distances from an earth light. Further, he has been conducting a series of experiments in which subjects are placed in a soundproof, isolated chamber, where they wear a helmet from which magnetic fields are directed at the magnetically sensitive temporal cortex, which handles dreaming and other internal imagery such as memory, among other functions. Many people who have undgone this experience report vivid inner imagery episodes in which early and infantile memories are particularly common.

In a few cases, it is possible that people who closely encounter earth lights are triggered into an "alien entity" experience or even a full-blown UFO abduction. If one reads Budd Hopkins Intruders with care, for example, it can be seen that the pseudonymous Kathy Davis encountered a ball of light before undergoing her abduction episode. In fact, everything in this classic and now famous abduction case is consistent with an earth light being produced by local tremor activity. And hers is not the only one. For instance, I think even the Travis Walton case may be amenable to an earth lights approach.

But are earth lights UFOs?

Whatever the rights or wrongs of this, the cry that inevitably goes up from mainstream ufologists is: "But earth lights aren't UFOs!" This charge brings us full circle. Certain specific queries are regularly raised, and I'll finish with the most common:

Question No.1: Surely earth lights are something other than UFOs?

A. Reports of small balls of light have always been in the ufological record, where in the past they have been identified as "drones" or "probes" sent out from alien craft. So why dismiss them now if they suddenly take on importance as phenomena in their own right?

Question No. 2 What have earth lights to do with "daylight disks"?

A. If earth lights are a form of plasma, then there is no problem with this, because a plasma seen in daylight does happen to look shiny and metallic, and is likely to have a spherical, ovoid or discoid form. Moreover, there are pitch black objects sometime seen by day (Both Strand and I have witnessed examples of these ourselves) which seem to be photon-absorbing instead of light-emitting. These bizzarre phenomena - which can be round, square or irregular in form - may relate to earth lights in the way one pole of a magnet relates to the other.

Question No.3: But what about the size usually ascribed to flying saucers? Small balls of plasma, seen as lights or even as metallic forms can't account for those, surely?

A. Some earth lights are reported as being many yards across. A modest example of this was shown in the Quebec case (above) - the size, height and duration of some of these phenomena were clearly "UFO standard". The lights at Hessdalen ranged up to even larger sizes. And lights seen at night, accounting for a huge percentage of all UFO reports, can look large if bright enough - their size is easy to overestimate. It is equally easy to falsely interpret lights at night as being on a huge dark object.

Question No.4: How do earth lights explain radar-visual cases? How can a ball of light be tracked on radar?

A. It has in fact been proven that plasmas can return radar echoes. Indeed, even plasmas that have too low a temperature to emit visible light can still reflect radar waves just like a metal surface. During the first Project Hessdalen, radar echoes were repeatedly obtained from invisible objects hovering near ridges.

Question No.5: But what about markings on the ground and damage to foliage associated with some reported UFO landings?

A. These are quite consistent with localised damage caused by energetic lightballs. Singed foliage, ground burns and grooves have all been associated with ball lightning, for example.

And so it goes. If any of the very small percentage of UFO reports that claim structured craft are genuine, they may be ET vehicles, or may be a sort of phantom effect I have discussed elsewhere. But it is exceedingly important that we not confuse an actual sighting with witness interpretation of that sighting. Interpretations and actualities can be different things. There is no reason why earth lights and ET craft shouldn't co-exist, of course, but earth lights researchers think it is an extraordinary coincidence that earth lights descriptively fit so much of what may the residue of genuinely unexplained phenomena.

Copyright:© Paul Devereux, 1997

  • Make sure to log onto: www.hauntedvalley.com (the Project Pennine site, accessible via the WebRing from this site), and www.hiof.no/crulp/prosjekter/hessdalen (if that doesn't work, then just do a search for "Hessdalen"). Both sites are highly informative and offer real-time webcam observation for earth lights.
Hessdalen Lights REAL Footage 2024 | Norway UFO Mystery Finally Explained?

{ https://www.neperos.com/ }

Hoe vind je dit bericht?
Geschreven door peter om 20:37 Stuur door

Meer van UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES

↑ Terug naar de berichten