The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie!
Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek!
België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek
In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch.
Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie
Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen!
Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit
Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie.
Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie
Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen.
Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen
Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek!
Blijf Op De Hoogte!
Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren!
Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
15-02-2025
Scientists Uncover Possible Explanation for Bizarre ‘Atmospheric Ghosts’ Phenomenon
Scientists Uncover Possible Explanation for Bizarre ‘Atmospheric Ghosts’ Phenomenon
To be clear, we’re talking about the afterglow from transient luminous events, not the specters of dead people.
Four years ago, a green “ghost” appeared over a thunderstorm cloud in the Mediterranean Sea. To the delight of Spanish scientists, this ephemeral sighting finally offered a rare window into a little-known phenomenon playing out high in Earth’s skies.
When lightning strikes, it sometimes triggers the release of a violent optical emission at altitudes between 50 and 90 km above the thunderstorm cloud. These millisecond-long events, called transient luminous events (TLEs), are mysterious.
They can be shaped like jellyfish. These are known as sprites. Other TLE forms exist, boasting playful names like halos and elves. Just a few years ago, thrill seekers and citizen scientists discovered a new TLE, hovering above a sprite, called a ghost. While sprites appear red owing to the nitrogen in Earth’s atmosphere, and blue at more shallow altitudes due to higher atmospheric pressure, ghosts are green. They appear during and after the sprites, like fuzz on top of the jellyfish.
A green ghost, seen here, is a luminous glow that sometimes appears above a jellyfish sprite and lasts briefly after the sprite’s flash.
Thomas Ashcraft
This puzzling afterglow was the subject of a new paper published in the journal Nature Communications on Tuesday.
Finding a Good Ghost
Researcher María Passas Varo led a team to use a special instrument called the Granada Sprite Spectrograph and Polarimeter (GRASSP), located outside Barcelona, to make a clear ghost sighting.
She and other atmospheric researchers were intrigued when, in the early half of 2019, storm chaser Hank Schyma noticed something new: in the wake of a sprite over the skies of Oklahoma, there was a greenish afterglow. He called the emerald-colored splotch a ghost, short for Green emissions from excited Oxygen in Sprite Tops. The idea behind the name was that, since oxygen is associated with the verdant tones of auroras, that the gas creates the ghosts.
Passas Varo, a telecommunications engineer, spectroscopist, and surveyor of atmospheric electricity based at the Astrophysics Institute of Andalucía in Spain, searched relentlessly for a new ghost. But finding one that GRASSP could glean a lot of data from was hard.
“We have analyzed more than 2,000 spectra, one by one, with the naked eye. We only found one good spectrum of a ghost. So, it is a lot of work. It is tedious,” she tells Inverse.
A red sprite (circled) appears and just as quickly disappears. This triptych is part of a sequence from an April 2012 video taken onboard the International Space Station.
Then they finally found a science-worthy ghost, radiating from a thunderstorm cloud in the Mediterranean Sea on September 21, 2019. It was their best candidate for spectrographic analysis, in which the team peered into light from the ghost for clues about its composition.
They found a surprise. Oxygen was present, as they expected. But the team also found evidence of iron.
Iron is present in Earth’s upper atmosphere. It comes from the interplanetary dust particles that enter our atmosphere. But according to Passas Varo, it’s usually found at much higher altitudes.
Approximately one in every 100 sprites have ghosts. These events sometimes happen, but aren’t consistent. What makes a ghost appear could be a combination of different phenomena, and iron might provide a special clue.
A Need for Harmony
Cumulonimbus clouds are towers made of water droplets and ice crystals. These tiny particles journey along the updraft from the hot base of the cloud higher and higher until they reach the chilly top. Sometimes, they become larger molecules. If they bang against one another, they produce static electricity. These charged particles create lightning.
What goes down must be balanced in another form, and this need for harmony could be what causes the sprites and jets and all the other TLE oddities.
“When the lightning occurs, when the lightning strikes the ground, then an electric field appears above the cloud because you have to maintain, somehow, the balance of the electric field of the global electrical circuit,” Passas Varo tells Inverse. “Once you have this big discharge in the form of huge lightning downwards, then an electric field develops upwards. And this electric field develops a transient luminous event.”
One possible explanation for ghosts is that the sonic boom we know as thunder is, in one way or another, disrupting the iron from its usual altitude. Gravity waves on Earth, which are vertical, could also be playing a role in producing ghosts.
But what is clear is that a plethora of new observations are necessary. Passas Varo and the team have one good spectrum of a ghost but say it will take 99 more to get a clearer picture of what’s really happening.
David Rankin, an engineer with the NASA-funded Catalina Sky Survey Project, has sketched the 'risk corridor' according to the asteroid's current trajectory.
If 2024 YR4 really does hit Earth in 2032, it should fall somewhere in a narrow band stretching from northern South America across the Pacific to sub-Saharan Africa and into Asia.
Worryingly, this path extends over several densely populated regions including Chennai, India and Hainan Island, China.
Currently, NASA estimates that the asteroid has a one in 48, or 2.1 per cent, chance of colliding with the planet on December 22, 2032.
And with a diameter of up to 90 metres (300ft), or roughly the size of the Statue of Liberty, it could cause devastating damage to any populated area along the risk corridor.
If it were to strike, experts suggest it could unleash a blast equal to eight megatons of TNT - more than 500 times the size of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
Scientists have predicted the exact path (shown in red) where the city-destroying asteroid 2024 YR4 could hit Earth. It should fall somewhere in a narrow band stretching from northern South America across the Pacific to sub-Saharan Africa and into Asia
The asteroid is currently the only large asteroid with an impact probability greater than one per cent and has been awarded the rare rating of three on the Torino Scale, a scale for measuring the danger posed by asteroids.
The 'God of Chaos' asteroid 99942 Apophis is the only other object in the history of astronomy to be given a rating of three or higher on this scale.
While the odds of 2024 YR4 hitting Earth are still slim, Dr Rankin was able to use data about its orbit to predict where it might hit.
In the scenario where the asteroid does indeed collide with Earth, the 'risk corridor' threatens countries including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Sudan, Nigeria, Venezuela, Colombia, and Ecuador.
Where it lands will also determine just how powerful the impact is, with regions at the end of the corridor more likely to receive a glancing blow.
However, there currently isn't enough information to say where along this risk corridor the asteroid is most likely to hit.
Dr Rankin told Space.com: 'Size and are big players in possible damage, along with impact location.
NASA predicts that the asteroid 2024 YR4 currently has a one in 48, or 2.1 per cent, chance of hitting Earth on December 22, 2032 (stock image)
What do we know about 2024 YR4?
First detected: December 27, 2024
Estimated size: 40-90 metres (130-300 feet)
Speed relative to Earth: 29,000 miles per hour (46,800 kmph)
Date of closest pass: December 2, 2032
Probability of impact: 2.3 per cent (one in 43)
Destructive potential: A 'city killer' on a scale on the Tunguska asteroid, which detonated with a force equal to 15-30 megatons of TNT.
Where it could hit: 'Risk corridor' threatens countries including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Sudan, Nigeria, Venezuela, Colombia, and Ecuador
'It's hard to constrain size and composition with the current orbital situation, as it's outbound. Typically, the best way to constrain size is with radar observations and those are not possible right now.'
It is currently estimated that the blast would be similar in size to the Tunguska asteroid which detonated in an air-burst explosion in 1908.
While this blast hit an unpopulated area, the shockwave still flattened an estimated 80 million trees over 830 square miles (2,150 square kilometres) - more than twice the land area of New York.
A blast this powerful would topple residential buildings and cause fatalities up to 12 miles (18.9 km) in any direction from the epicentre.
In the coming months, NASA and ESA hope to use Earth's most powerful telescopes to further refine their predictions about the asteroid's orbit.
This includes a rare emergency decision to grant an international team of scientists the use of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to study 2024 YR4.
This team will use the JWST's infrared sensors to measure the heat radiating from the asteroid to make a better prediction of its size and orbit.
With an estimated size of up to 90 metres (300 ft), or roughly the size of the Statue of Liberty, 2024 YR4 could hit Earth with a blast equal to eight megatons of TNT (artist's impression)
Asteroid 2024 YR4 is about the same size as the Tunguska asteroid, which caused the largest impact event in recorded history when it shot through Earth's atmosphere in 1908, flattening 830 square miles (2,150 square km) of forest (pictured)
Scientists will also have a good opportunity to learn more about the asteroid when it makes its first close pass of Earth in March at a distance of around 5 million miles (8 million kilometres).
The world's space agencies currently predict that the impact probability will drop towards zero as they learn more, but an impact cannot currently be ruled out.
Dr Rankin's calculations suggest that there is a one in 333 chance that 2024 YR4 will collide with the lunar surface, creating a brilliant but otherwise harmless explosion that could be seen from Earth with the naked eye.
However, for the countries along this predicted risk corridor, these predictions raise the chilling possibility that they may face a devastating collision within the next eight years.
Currently, NASA would not be able to deflect an asteroid if it were heading for Earth but it could mitigate the impact and take measures that would protect lives and property.
This would include evacuating the impact area and moving key infrastructure.
Finding out about the orbit trajectory, size, shape, mass, composition and rotational dynamics would help experts determine the severity of a potential impact.
However, the key to mitigating damage is to find any potential threat as early as possible.
NASA and the European Space Agency completed a test which slammed a refrigerator-sized spacecraft into the asteroid Dimorphos.
The test is to see whether small satellites are capable of preventing asteroids from colliding with Earth.
The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) used what is known as a kinetic impactor technique—striking the asteroid to shift its orbit.
The impact could change the speed of a threatening asteroid by a small fraction of its total velocity, but by doing so well before the predicted impact, this small nudge will add up over time to a big shift of the asteroid's path away from Earth.
This was the first-ever mission to demonstrate an asteroid deflection technique for planetary defence.
The results of the trial are expected to be confirmed by the Hera mission in December 2026.
Should Astronauts Add Jumping to their Workout Routine?
Italian astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti uses the Advanced Resistive Exercise Device aboard the International Space Station to simulate weightlifting in microgravity Credit:NASA / ESA
Should Astronauts Add Jumping to their Workout Routine?
It’s a familiar sight to see astronauts on board ISS on exercise equipment to minimise muscle and bone loss from weightlessness. A new study suggests that jumping workouts could help astronauts prevent cartilage damage during long missions to the Moon and Mars. They found that the knee cartilage in mice seems to grow stronger after jumping exercises, potentially counteracting the effects of low gravity on joint health. If effective in humans, this approach could be included in pre-flight routines or adapted for space missions.
In space, astronauts experience significant loss of bone and muscle mass due to microgravity. Without Earth’s gravitational pull, bones lose density, increasing fracture risk, while muscles, especially in the lower body and spine, weaken from reduced use. This deterioration can impair mobility when back on Earth and effect overall health. To combat this, astronauts follow rigorous exercise routines, including resistance and cardiovascular training, to maintain strength and bone integrity.
ESA astronaut Alexander Gerst gets a workout on the Advanced Resistive Exercise Device (ARED). Credit: NASA
The next obvious step as we reach out into the Solar System is the red planet Mars. Heading that far out into space will demand long periods of time in space since its a 9 month journey there. Permanent bases on the Moon too will test our physiology to its limits so managing the slow degradation is a big challenge to space agencies. A paper published by lead author Marco Chiaberge from the John Hopkins University has explored the knee joints of mice and how their cartilage grows thicker if they jump! They suggest astronauts should embed jumping activities into their exercise regiment.
Mars seen before, left, and during, right, a global dust storm in 2001. Credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS
Cartilage cushions the joints between bones and decreases friction allowing for pain free movement. Unlike many other tissues in the body, cartilage does not regenerate as quickly so it is important to protect it. Prolonged periods of inactivity, even from bed rest but especially long duration space flight can accelerate the degradation. It’s also been shown that radiation from space can accelerate the effect too.
To maintain a strong healthy body, astronauts spend a lot of time, up to 2 hours a day running on treadmills. This has previously shown to slow the breakdown of cartilage but the new study has shown that jumping based movements is particularly effective.
(Credit: Merlin74/Shutterstock)
The team of researchers found that, over a nine week program of reduced movement, mice experienced a 14% reduction in cartilage thickness in joints. Other mice performed jumping movements three times a week and their cartilage was found to be show a 26% increase compared to a control group of mice. Compared to the group that had restricted movement, the jumping mice had 110% thicker cartilage. The study also showed that jumping activities increased bone strength too with the jumping mice having a 15% higher density than the control.
JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency) astronaut Satoshi Furukawa pedals on the upgraded CEVIS system.
NASA
An interesting piece of research but further work is needed to see whether jumping would herald in the same benefits to humans but the study is promising. If so, then jumping exercises are likely to be a part of pre-flight and inflight exercise programs for astronauts. It is likely that for this to be a reality in the micro-gravitational environment, astronauts will be attached to strong elasticated material to simulate the pull of gravity.
Curiosity’s Other Important Job: Studying Martian Clouds
NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover captured this feather-shaped iridescent cloud just after sunset on Jan. 27, 2023. Studying the colors in iridescent clouds tells scientists something about particle size within the clouds and how they grow over time. These clouds were captured as part of a seasonal imaging campaign to study noctilucent, or “night-shining” clouds. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS
Curiosity’s Other Important Job: Studying Martian Clouds
MSL Curiosity is primarily a rockhound. It’s at Gale Crater, examining the rocks there and on Mt. Sharp, which sits in the middle of the crater and rises 5.5 km above the crater floor. But Curiosity is also a skywatcher, and its primary camera, Mastcam, was built with Martian clouds in mind.
When the sun set on Mars’ Gale Crater on January 17th, MSL Curiosity spent 16 minutes capturing images of the sky with Mastcam, the rover’s primary camera system. The images are part of an effort to understand noctilucent clouds, which are made of CO2 ice and only form over certain regions.
In the animation below, the 16 minutes of images have been sped up by about 480 times. “The white plumes falling out of the clouds are carbon dioxide ice that would evaporate closer to the Martian surface,” NASA says in a press release. “Appearing briefly at the bottom of the images are water-ice clouds travelling in the opposite direction roughly 31 miles (50 kilometres) above the rover.”
Earth has noctilucent clouds, too. They form in the upper atmosphere and are only visible during twilight when the atmosphere’s lower layers are in the shade and the upper atmosphere is sunlit. They form from water ice crystals between 76 to 85 km altitude and are the highest clouds in the atmosphere.
Mars’ noctilucent clouds are similar, but the main difference is that they contain carbon dioxide ice. They form at an altitude of around 60 to 80 km and are also classified as mesospheric clouds. On Mars, they occur in the Fall over the southern hemisphere. Only Mars’ high-altitude clouds containing carbon dioxide ice display iridescent colours.
This is the fourth year in succession that Curiosity has seen these noctilucent clouds. Its Mastcam instrument has different filters that let it see different wavelengths of light, and some of those filters are used to study the composition and particle size in clouds. It also has stereo vision, which helps scientists determine cloud height, shape, and the speed at which they’re moving. It can also observe the Sun through filters and determine how much sunlight the atmosphere is blocking. That tells scientists how much dust and ice is in the atmosphere and how it changes over time.
“I’ll always remember the first time I saw those iridescent clouds and was sure at first it was some color artifact,” he said in a press release. “Now it’s become so predictable that we can plan our shots in advance; the clouds show up at exactly the same time of year.”
These clouds form only in early Martian fall and only in the southern hemisphere. Their iridescence is from uniform particle size, which indicates that the clouds had a brief evolution in a uniform environment. When clouds are both noctilucent and iridescent, they’re called nacreous clouds. It’s interesting to note that these colours would be easily seen by an astronaut on the Martian surface.
This figure from the paper shows iridescent clouds in cylindrical projections. Each image was taken on a separate day. (d) is twice the resolution of the others. (e) shows a corona in the clouds caused by low variance in CO2 ice particle size. Image Credit: Lemmon et al. 2024.
One of the mysteries behind these clouds concerns their location. They’re only seen in Mars’ southern hemisphere, and the Perseverance rover, which is in the Jezero Crater in the northern hemisphere, has never seen them. It seems pretty clear that they only form in certain locations, but the reasons why are unknown.
Lemmon says that gravity waves, which are atmospheric phenomena separate from astrophysical gravitational waves, could be responsible. They cool the atmosphere and could give rise to clouds of frozen CO2. “Carbon dioxide was not expected to be condensing into ice here, so something is cooling it to the point that it could happen. But Martian gravity waves are not fully understood, and we’re not entirely sure what is causing twilight clouds to form in one place but not another,” Lemmon said.
Scientists need more data to better understand these clouds. Curiosity wasn’t the only one to see them; the InSight lander did, too. But they could only see for a few hundred kilometres around their landing sites and their data is incomplete. “Orbiters capable of sunset and twilight times could constrain the cloud altitude,” Lemmon and his co-authors write in their paper.
There are unanswered questions about these clouds. Scientists would like to understand how quickly particles in these clouds evolve. They’d also like to know what the nature of the corona-forming layer is. A larger data sample could help answer these questions, as could more time-lapse imagery.
American astronomers have christened this rocky exoplanet 'YZ Ceti b,' asserting that it's a prime candidate for an Earth-like magnetic field, which could be crucial in humanity's quest for alien life.
The discovery has been hailed as significant for identifying a planet likely to have a magnetic field and offering a future technique to discover more such planets.
Using a radio telescope, the scientists detected a recurring radio signal from exoplanet YZ Ceti b, located approximately 70.5 trillion miles from Earth.
They speculate that these waves could be produced by interactions between the exoplanet's magnetic field and its host star, a small red dwarf named YZ Ceti.
This finding is essential for pinpointing a planet likely to have a magnetic field and establishing a foundation to discover similar planets in the future.
The researchers further suggested that this could mean witnessing the Northern Lights phenomenon - a result of interactions between magnetic fields and solar weather - on distant planets and stars could be possible.
Magnetic fields are vital in preventing a planet's atmospheric erosion caused by stellar emissions over time.
Using a radio telescope, the scientists found exoplanet YZ Ceti b
Drs. Sebastian Pineda and Jackie Villadsen have recently identified a repetitive radio signal from YC Ceti, a red dwarf star located 12 light years away. For context, one light year is nearly 5.88 trillion miles.
The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, a prominent radio telescope managed by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory under the US National Science Foundation, was the instrument that allowed them to gain deeper insights into the magnetic dynamics between distant stars and their planets.
This groundbreaking work, outlined in Nature Astronomy, was also funded by the independent federal agency, the National Science Foundation (NSF).
Joe Pesce from NSF, who works as the program director for the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, hails these discoveries as key in the ongoing quest to find life on other worlds, emphasizing, "The search for potentially habitable or life-bearing worlds in other solar systems depends in part on being able to determine if rocky, Earth-like exoplanets actually have magnetic fields."
Recent research marks a significant advancement in exoplanet studies, indicating that some rocky planets beyond our solar system may have magnetic fields. This discovery was achieved through a novel technique that could help identify more of these intriguing worlds.
Dr. Pineda of the University of Colorado, located on America's west coast, expressed the team's elation at detecting planetary radio emissions similar to those Earth emits: "We saw the initial burst, and it looked beautiful," he said enthusiastically.
Moments of scientific triumph followed as Pineda recounted: "When we saw it again, it was very indicative that, OK - maybe we really have something here."
Dr. Pineda noted that a sturdy magnetic field can be pivotal for a planet's ability to retain its atmosphere.
From the other side of the country, Assistant Professor Villadsen of Bucknell University remarked on the distinctiveness of their findings: "I witnessed something that no one has observed before."
Prior detections of exoplanetary magnetic fields were mainly limited to gas giants resembling Jupiter. However, unearthing Earth-sized counterparts calls for different, refined methods.
Since magnetic fields are inherently intangible, detecting their presence around distant planets poses a significant astronomical challenge that Assistant Prof Villadsen and her team are committed to addressing.
She explained their strategy: "We're looking for planets that are really close to their stars and are a similar size to Earth."
"These planets are way too close to their stars to be somewhere you could live, but because they are so close the planet is kind of ploughing through a bunch of stuff coming off the star."
"If the planet has a magnetic field and it ploughs through enough star stuff, it will cause the star to emit bright radio waves."
RELATED VIDEOS
A star-planet system with a COHERENT radio signal from an AURORA
NASA Discovers New Substances on Mars: Implications for Future Exploration and Understanding of the Red Planet
Introduction
The quest to understand Mars has captivated scientists and enthusiasts alike for decades. With its striking similarities to Earth and its potential to harbor life, the Red Planet has been a focal point of exploration for NASA and other space agencies around the globe. Recent discoveries of new substances on Mars have opened up exciting avenues for research and exploration. This article delves into the significance of these findings, the methods used to uncover them, and what they mean for the future of Mars exploration.
The Historical Context of Mars Exploration
Mars, often referred to as the "Red Planet" due to its reddish appearance from iron oxide (rust) on its surface, has been a subject of human fascination for centuries. The first observations of Mars were made through telescopes in the 1600s, but it wasn't until the 20th century that space missions began to provide detailed information about its atmosphere, surface, and potential for life.
NASA's Viking missions in the 1970s were pivotal, providing the first close-up images and data about the Martian surface. Subsequent missions, including the Mars Pathfinder, Mars Exploration Rovers (Spirit and Opportunity), and the Mars Science Laboratory (Curiosity), have progressively advanced our understanding of the planet.
The Curiosity rover, which landed in Gale Crater in 2012, has been a key player in Mars exploration. It has analyzed various rocks and soil samples, providing evidence of past water flows and organic molecules, which are crucial for understanding the planet's potential for life.
NASA Finds Ancient Organic Material, Mysterious Methane on Mars - This low-angle self-portrait of NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover shows the vehicle at the site from which it reached down to drill into a rock target called “Buckskin” on lower Mount Sharp.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS
Recent Discoveries: New Substances on Mars
NASA's ongoing missions have recently reported the discovery of new substances on Mars, particularly through the Perseverance rover and the Ingenuity helicopter. Perseverance, which landed on Mars in February 2021, has been tasked with seeking signs of ancient life and collecting rock and soil samples for future return to Earth.
Organic Molecules and Their Significance
One of the most groundbreaking discoveries from Perseverance has been the identification of organic molecules in Martian rocks. Organic molecules are carbon-based compounds that are often associated with life. Their presence does not confirm life on Mars but suggests that the building blocks of life may exist on the planet.
NASA scientists have detected these molecules using the Scanning Habitable Environments with Raman & Luminescence for Organics & Chemicals (SHERLOC) instrument, which utilizes advanced spectroscopy techniques to analyze the composition of rock samples. This discovery has revived discussions about the potential for past microbial life on Mars.
NASA's Curiosity Rover Discovers Mysterious Crystals On Mars
Salts and Their Geological Implications
Another significant finding from Perseverance is the presence of various salts in the Martian soil. These salts, including perchlorates, are of particular interest because they can provide insights into the planet's past climate and potential for habitability. Salts can indicate the presence of liquid water in the past, as they often form in evaporative environments.
The discovery of salts raises questions about the history of water on Mars. Understanding the distribution and concentration of these salts can help scientists reconstruct the planet's climatic history and assess whether conditions were ever suitable for life.
Curiosity Mars Rover captured this on Martian sand on February 13, 2022
Unusual Rock Formations and Their Composition
Perseverance has also encountered unusual rock formations that suggest a complex geological history. These formations, characterized by unique textures and mineral compositions, may tell a story of past volcanic activity, sedimentation, and erosion.
Researchers are employing a variety of analytical techniques to understand the mineralogy of these rocks. The ChemCam instrument, which uses laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, has been instrumental in identifying the elemental composition of Martian rocks, revealing a diverse geological landscape.
The Role of Ingenuity in Exploration
The Ingenuity helicopter, accompanying Perseverance, has demonstrated the feasibility of powered flight on another planet. Its successful flights have not only provided aerial perspectives of the Martian terrain but have also guided Perseverance to scientifically interesting locations.
Ingenuity's ability to scout the landscape has been invaluable in directing the rover to areas with promising geological features. This synergy between the two missions highlights the potential for innovative technologies in planetary exploration.
A photograph of a "Silver Mountain" rock sample collected by NASA's Perseverance Mars Rover as it explores the rim of Jezero Crater.
(Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)
Implications for Future Mars Missions
The discoveries made by Perseverance and Ingenuity have profound implications for future Mars exploration. As NASA plans for the Artemis program and aims to return humans to the Moon, the lessons learned from Mars missions will inform the agency's approach to exploring other celestial bodies.
Sample Return Missions
One of the most ambitious goals of the current Mars exploration program is the return of samples to Earth. The Mars Sample Return mission, a collaboration between NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA), aims to bring back rock and soil samples collected by Perseverance. Analyzing these samples in terrestrial laboratories could yield insights that are currently beyond our reach with remote sensing and in-situ analysis.
Search for Life
The discoveries of organic molecules and salts have intensified the search for life on Mars. Future missions will likely focus on identifying biosignatures—chemical indicators of past or present biological activity. This search will involve more sophisticated instruments capable of detecting and analyzing potential life forms, including microbial life.
Human Exploration
As NASA prepares for the eventual human exploration of Mars, understanding the planet's geology, climate, and potential hazards will be crucial. The presence of resources, such as water in the form of ice or brines, will play a significant role in sustaining human life on Mars. Future missions will prioritize the identification and assessment of these resources.
Public Interest and International Collaboration
The discoveries on Mars have also sparked renewed public interest in space exploration. NASA's commitment to transparency and engagement with the public has fostered a sense of excitement and curiosity about the Red Planet. Educational outreach programs and interactive platforms have allowed people worldwide to participate in the journey of discovery.
Moreover, international collaboration in space exploration has become increasingly important. As countries like China, the United Arab Emirates, and India launch their Mars missions, the sharing of data and findings can enhance our collective understanding of the planet. Collaborative efforts can also help address the challenges of planetary exploration, including technology development and resource allocation.
Conclusion
The recent discoveries of new substances on Mars mark a significant milestone in our exploration of the Red Planet. The identification of organic molecules, salts, and unique geological formations has profound implications for our understanding of Mars' past and its potential to support life.
As NASA and other space agencies continue their missions, the integration of innovative technologies and international collaboration will be key to unlocking the mysteries of Mars. The quest for knowledge about our neighboring planet is not only a scientific endeavor but also an opportunity to inspire future generations to explore the cosmos.
In the coming years, as we await the return of samples from Mars and prepare for human exploration, the discoveries made today will shape our understanding of life beyond Earth and our place in the universe. The journey to Mars is just beginning, and the excitement of discovery continues to propel us forward into the unknown.
RELATED VIDEOS
10 Years On Mars: The Full Journey
NASA reveals Perseverance rover's discoveries on Mars | full video
An international team of astronomers has announced the discovery of a new dwarf planet in our Solar System, finding a distant object beyond Neptune that circles the Sun in a spectacularly wide orbit.
Dubbed 2015 RR245 by the International Astronomical Union while they come up with a better name, the dwarf planet is about 700 kilometres in diameter, and its elongated orbit sends it out some 120 times further from the Sun than Earth. So it's a pretty distant neighbour.
Astronomers are finding more of these dwarf planets in the Kuiper belt all the time, but even so RR245 stands out for its size and orbit. In fact, the scientists who found it – as part of the Outer Solar System Origins Survey (OSSOS) – say it's the largest OSSOS discovery to date, of more than 500 trans-Neptunian objects identified by the Survey.
"The icy worlds beyond Neptune trace how the giant planets formed and then moved out from the Sun. They let us piece together the history of our Solar System," said researcher Michele Bannister from the University of Victoria in British Columbia, Canada. "But almost all of these icy worlds are painfully small and faint: it's really exciting to find one that's large and bright enough that we can study it in detail."
RR245's huge orbit – which you can see in the image above – takes it about 700 years to circle the Sun, and the researchers say it's currently travelling in for its closest approach, which will see it get within 5 billion kilometres of the Sun sometime around 2096.
That's after spending hundreds of years at more than 12 billion kilometres from the Sun, although the team acknowledges there's still a lot to be confirmed about RR245's precise movements, as we've only been able to observe just a tiny fraction of its epic loop so far.
Scientists think there were once many more of these dwarf planets in our Solar System, but most were destroyed or ejected when the larger planets in our Solar System moved to their current positions. But now RR245 joins the ranks of other survivors from this period – such as Ceres, Pluto, Haumea, Makemake, and Eris, which have all been recognised as dwarf planets by the International Astronomical Union – amidst the tens of thousands of much smaller objects beyond Neptune.
The researchers first spotted the dwarf planet in February, when astronomer JJ Kavelaars from the National Research Council of Canada was sifting through OSSOS data recorded in September 2015.
"There it was on the screen," said Bannister, "this dot of light moving so slowly that it had to be at least twice as far as Neptune from the Sun."
The team suggests it's possible that RR245 may be one of the last large worlds detected beyond Neptune with today's telescopes, as the brightest dwarf planets have already been mapped – although the debut of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope next decade could turn up new discoveries we haven't been able to detect so far.
"OSSOS was designed to map the orbital structure of the outer Solar System to decipher its history," said one of the researchers, Brett Gladman of the University of British Columbia in Canada. "While not designed to efficiently detect dwarf planets, we're delighted to have found one on such an interesting orbit."
But beyond helping us map the outer reaches of our Solar System, the discovery of these dwarf planets – and their unique geological composition – helps us understand more about the cosmic past in our corner of the galaxy.
"They are the closest thing to a time capsule that transports us to the birth of the Solar System," astrophysicist Pedro Lacerda from Queen's University Belfast in Northern Ireland, who wasn't involved with the discovery, told Ian Sample at The Guardian. "You can make an analogy with fossils, which tell us about creatures long gone."
Terrifying animation reveals the projected path of the 'city-destroying' asteroid heading towards Earth - as scientists warn the MOON could also be in the firing line
This is actually slightly less than previous estimates, which suggested there was a 2.3 per cent (one in 43) chance of impact.
Meanwhile, the scientist predicts there's a roughly 0.3 per cent (one in 333) chance of 2024 YR4 hitting the moon.
If the asteroid does hit Earth, the impact could release a blast of energy equivalent to 15 megatons of TNT - 100 times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima during World War II.
David Rankin, operations engineer for the University of Arizona's Catalina Sky Survey, calculated the route 2024 YR4 is most likely to take (white line). Showing the precise collision course which could lead to a deadly impact
A terrifying new simulation reveals the path of the city-killer asteroid 2024 YR4 which has a 2.1 per cent probability of colliding with Earth in 2032
(stock image)
The asteroid was first detected by the NASA-funded Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station in December last year.
Although that probability has now slightly decreased, 2024 YR4 is still the only large asteroid with an impact probability greater than one per cent - making it by far Earth's biggest threat.
However, Dr Rankin's calculations present a chilling new possibility that the asteroid could collide with the moon instead.
In a post on BlueSky, Dr Rankin revealed that there was a roughly 0.3 per cent chance of 2024 YR4 hitting the moon.
Without any atmosphere to slow its approach, the asteroid would slam into the lunar surface at a staggering speed of 31,000 miles per hour (50,000 kilometres per hour).
The collision would unleash an explosion 343 times the size of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and carve out a crater up to 1.2 miles (2km) across.
Should it hit the moon, it is most likely to land in the region stretching south from the Mare Crisium, a large plain of solidified lava, to the crater Tycho.
Asteroid 2024 YR4 is about the same size as the Tunguska asteroid, which caused the largest impact event in recorded history when it shot through Earth's atmosphere in 1908, flattening 830 square miles (2,150 square km) of forest (pictured)
Analysis of 2024 YR4's orbit indicates that the asteroid will most likely pass by Earth on December 22, 2032. However, new calculations suggest that it could also collide with the moon
What do we know about 2024 YR4?
First detected: December 27, 2024
Estimated size: 40-90 metres (130-300 feet)
Speed relative to Earth: 29,000 miles per hour (46,800 kmph)
Date of closest pass: December 2, 2032
Probability of impact: 2.1 per cent (one in 48)
Destructive potential:A 'city killer' on a scale on the Tunguska asteroid, which detonated with a force equal to 15-30 megatons of TNT.
This could be concerning since this would place the impact on the side of the moon facing Earth, potentially exposing us to a shower of lunar shrapnel.
Thankfully, experts say that the Earth likely wouldn't be harmed by any impact which occurs on the moon.
Dr Rankin told New Scientist: 'There is the possibility this would eject some material back out that could hit the Earth, but I highly doubt it would cause any major threat.'
Unlike a large object such as 2024 YR4, these smaller pieces of debris should burn up harmlessly in the atmosphere creating nothing more than a particularly bright meteor shower.
In fact, some experts suggest that the collision between the asteroid and the moon could create a truly spectacular display.
Gareth Collins, a professor of planetary science at Imperial College London, told New Scientist: 'The impact flash of vaporised rock would be visible from Earth, even in the daytime.'
That means any keen stargazers on Earth could see the moment the asteroid detonates on the lunar surface with the naked eye.
However, it is currently seven times more likely to hit Earth rather than the moon.
Without any atmosphere to slow it down, the asteroid would hit the moon at 31,000 miles per hour (50,000 kilometres per hour), creating an explosion bright enough to see from Earth with the naked eye
These probabilities are likely to change in the future as scientists gather more information about the asteroid's orbit.
The current estimates for 2024 YR4's orbital path, speed, and size come from hundreds of images taken by powerful telescopes all around the world.
However, over such a short period of time, it is difficult to precisely predict where the asteroid will travel.
While astronomers hope that the probability of an impact will rapidly fall towards zero, a direct collision with Earth cannot be ruled out.
The JWST will record the heat emitted by the asteroid using its infrared sensors which will give a more accurate estimate for its size.
A team of ESA scientists will make one observation in March when the asteroid reaches its peak brightness and another in May as it travels away from Earth.
This will be the last chance to observe 2024 YR4 before it becomes too dim to see from Earth until it returns again in 2028.
The European Space Agency has been given emergency access to the James Webb Space Telescope (pictured) to measure the asteroid's size more accurately
Already, NASA has reached a hugely-important milestone with the DART asteroid deflection mission. In September 2022, the DART spacecraft was intentionally crashed into Dimorphos, an asteroid 6.8 million miles away. A similar method could be used to deflect asteroid 2024 YR4 before it reaches Earth
Those observations will be critical for determining whether the world's space agencies need to take action to divert its course.
In a post on X, Dr Robin George Andrews, a volcanologist and author based in London, points out that we 'have less than eight years to potentially deal with it'.
'You need 10 years or more to build, plan and execute an asteroid deflection mission,' he said.
Terrifying projected path of 'city-destroying' asteroid
Currently, NASA would not be able to deflect an asteroid if it were heading for Earth but it could mitigate the impact and take measures that would protect lives and property.
This would include evacuating the impact area and moving key infrastructure.
Finding out about the orbit trajectory, size, shape, mass, composition and rotational dynamics would help experts determine the severity of a potential impact.
However, the key to mitigating damage is to find any potential threat as early as possible.
NASA and the European Space Agency completed a test which slammed a refrigerator-sized spacecraft into the asteroid Dimorphos.
The test is to see whether small satellites are capable of preventing asteroids from colliding with Earth.
The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) used what is known as a kinetic impactor technique—striking the asteroid to shift its orbit.
The impact could change the speed of a threatening asteroid by a small fraction of its total velocity, but by doing so well before the predicted impact, this small nudge will add up over time to a big shift of the asteroid's path away from Earth.
This was the first-ever mission to demonstrate an asteroid deflection technique for planetary defence.
The results of the trial are expected to be confirmed by the Hera mission in December 2026.
RELATED VIDEOS
Terrifying NASA Update: Doomsday Asteroid Heading Towards Earth
NASA will send astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams home from the International Space Station early on a previously used SpaceX Dragon space capsule, not on a brand-new one, the agency announced.
A NASA astronaut testing equipment on a spacewalk outside the International Space Station.
(Image credit: NASA)
Stranded Starliner astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams finally have a return date to head back to Earth, and it's a few weeks earlier than previously expected.
NASA announced Tuesday (Feb. 11) that the two astronauts, who hitched a ride to the International Space Station (ISS) on a Boeing Starliner spacecraft last June, will head home on a SpaceX Dragon capsule that will leave Earth with the ISS Crew-10 on Wednesday, March 12. After a few days' handover period, Williams and Wilmore will leave the ISS with the rest of the Crew-9 mission, after having spent about 250 consecutive days in orbit.
NASA's Boeing Starliner astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams will now return to Earth on a SpaceX Dragon capsule in February 2025.
(Image credit: NASA)
Williams and Wilmore were initially meant to spend about a week in space, but problems with the propulsion and helium systems on their Boeing Starliner led NASA to return the capsule to Earth empty after three months of troubleshooting couldn't resolve the issues. The capsule ended up landing safely in New Mexico on Sept. 7, 2024. However, a watchdog report just released by the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel found that new thruster problems did appear during the descent. In October, The Wall Street Journal reported that Boeing is in the early stages of considering a sale of its space business, including Starliner.
In December 2024, NASA announced that Williams and Wilmore would return on a newly designed SpaceX Dragon capsule in late March 2025 at the earliest. But now, the astronauts and the rest of Crew-9 will come home on a previously flown Dragon capsule, the Endurance. This will allow the swap between Crew-9 and Crew-10 to happen sooner while SpaceX continues to finalize the interior and final integration of the new Dragon capsule, according to NASA.
Along with Wilmore and Williams, astronaut Nick Hague and Roscosmos cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov will leave the ISS in March. They'll be replaced by NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency astronaut Takuya Onishi, and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov. The precise day of the return will be determined by weather conditions near Florida, where Endurance will splash down.
Astronomers have long suspected that several moons in our Solar System, including those orbiting Jupiter, Saturn,Uranus, and Neptune, may conceal vast liquid oceans beneath their frozen crusts. Now, new research suggests that Uranus’s moon Ariel might be offering a rare glimpse into its hidden depths.
Cracks in Ariel’s Surface May Expose Its Interior
Deep chasms mark Ariel’s surface, and researchers believe these fractures could be transporting material from the moon’s interior to the surface. Among the substances detected is carbon dioxide ice, which suggests the possibility of chemical processes occurring below the crust. If these deposits originated from within Ariel, they may provide a unique window into the moon’s subsurface environment—without the need for complex drilling missions.
“If we’re right, these medial grooves are probably the best candidates for sourcing those carbon oxide deposits and uncovering more details about the moon’s interior,” says planetary geologist Chloe Beddingfield of Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Unlike other surface features, these chasms appear to be the only structures facilitating material movement from Ariel’s interior, making them particularly valuable for future study.
Scientists analyzing Ariel’s terrain have found striking similarities to a geological process observed on Earth known as spreading. This occurs along volcanic ridges where the seafloor slowly separates, allowing molten material to rise and form new crust.
On Ariel, a similar process could be unfolding as warmer material from the moon’s interior forces its way up, splitting the icy surface before filling the cracks. Researchers tested this theory by digitally aligning the two sides of Ariel’s chasms as if “zipping them back up,” and found a perfect match. The presence of parallel grooves along some chasm floors further supports the idea that material has been accumulating over time through repeated geological activity.
Could a Hidden Ocean Be Driving These Changes?
Another factor influencing Ariel’s surface could be gravitational interactions between Uranus and its moons. These interactions, known as orbital resonance, create internal heating that can melt ice and sustain liquid water beneath the crust.
Recent observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) provide compelling evidence that a hidden ocean may exist beneath Ariel’s surface. If so, this ocean might be responsible for the carbon dioxide deposits seen within the moon’s deep chasms. However, current data is insufficient to determine the exact size and depth of this possible ocean.
“The size of Ariel’s possible ocean and its depth beneath the surface can only be estimated, but it may be too isolated to interact with spreading centers,” Beddingfield explains.
Despite significant advancements in planetary exploration, much about Ariel remains unknown. While the Voyager 2 spacecraft provided valuable data during its 1986 flyby, it lacked the instruments needed to map the precise distribution of ices on the moon’s surface. Future missions with more advanced sensors will be crucial in determining whether Ariel is truly home to a hidden ocean—and what that might mean for our understanding of ocean worlds beyond Earth.
RELATED VIDEOS
Moons of Planet Uranus - Mind blowing facts revealed
While thousands of asteroids pass harmlessly through space, a select few have orbits that bring them dangerously close to Earth. These objects, classified as potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs), are actively monitored by NASA, ESA, and other space agencies. Though the probability of impact remains low for most of them, even a small chance is enough to warrant continuous tracking. Here are the five most dangerous asteroids that could collide with Earth and are currently being monitored.
1. 2024 YR4
Potential Impact Date: December 22, 2032
Estimated Size: 40–90 meters
Impact Probability: 1 in 43 (2.3%)
Energy Release Upon Impact: Equivalent to 8 megatons of TNT
Discovered in late 2024, 2024 YR4 is currently the most concerning asteroid on record due to its high impact probability. The latest NASA observations indicate a 2.3% chance of collision in 2032—which translates to 1 in 43 odds.
If 2024 YR4 were to strike Earth, it could cause severe regional devastation, releasing an explosion about 500 times stronger than the Hiroshima bomb. The potential impact zone, known as the “risk corridor,” stretches across the Pacific Ocean, South America, the Atlantic, Africa, and parts of Asia.
Although further tracking will likely lower the impact probability, 2024 YR4 is a top priority for planetary defense experts.
Energy Release Upon Impact: Equivalent to 1.4 billion tons of TNT
Bennu is one of the most well-studied potentially hazardous asteroids, thanks to NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission, which returned samples in 2023.
Although the impact probability is low, a collision would be catastrophic—releasing enough energy to cause continent-wide destruction and severe climate disruptions. NASA scientists continue to monitor Bennu to determine if future deflection strategies will be necessary.
3. 1950 DA
Potential Impact Date: March 16, 2880
Estimated Size:1,300 meters
Impact Probability: 1 in 34,500 (0.0029%)
Energy Release Upon Impact: Equivalent to 75 billion tons of TNT
1950 DA is a massive asteroid that, despite its low impact probability, remains a serious long-term threat. If it were to hit Earth, it would cause global devastation—triggering tsunamis, firestorms, and potentially a planet-wide climate crisis.
Although the impact risk is expected to decrease with further observations, planetary defense programs continue to monitor this colossal object.
4. 2023 VD3
Potential Impact Date: November 8, 2034
Estimated Size:11–24 meters
Impact Probability: 1 in 387 (0.26%)
Energy Release Upon Impact: Comparable to the Chelyabinsk meteor event
Although 2023 VD3 is much smaller than the other asteroids on this list, its relatively high impact probability makes it a major concern. With a 1 in 387 chance of impact in 2034, it has one of the highest statistical risks currently known.
While it wouldn’t cause a global disaster, an asteroid of this size could explode in the atmosphere, producing a shockwave strong enough to damage buildings and injure thousands—similar to the Chelyabinsk event in 2013, where a 20-meter asteroid caused widespread damage.
Further observations will determine whether 2023 VD3 will safely pass Earth or require further attention.
5. 1979 XB
Potential Impact Date: December 14, 2113
Estimated Size:400–900 meters
Impact Probability: 1 in 1.8 million (0.000055%)
Energy Release Upon Impact: Equivalent to 30 billion tons of TNT
First observed in 1979, 1979 XB is one of the largest asteroids on the risk list. Because of its size, a collision with Earth would have severe global consequences, similar to the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs.
However, 1979 XB is classified as a lost asteroid, meaning its exact orbit is uncertain. Scientists are working to relocate it and refine its trajectory to confirm whether it poses a real long-term risk.
Can We Stop an Asteroid Impact?
While none of these asteroids pose an imminent danger, scientists are working on planetary defense strategies to ensure Earth’s safety.
NASA’s DART Mission– Successfully altered an asteroid’s trajectory in 2022, proving that impact deflection is possible.
Upcoming Space Missions– Future missions will explore gravity tractors, nuclear deflection, and other techniques to steer dangerous asteroids away from Earth.
Advanced Tracking Systems – Telescopes like ATLAS, Pan-STARRS, and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are improving our ability to detect threats decades in advance.
The likelihood of a catastrophic asteroid impact remains low, but continuous tracking is critical for ensuring early detection and possible deflection efforts.
Among all the asteroids being monitored, 2024 YR4 is the most immediate concern due to its relatively high impact probability in 2032. While ongoing observations will likely refine its trajectory, planetary defense experts are paying close attention—ensuring that if an asteroid ever truly threatens Earth, we’ll be ready.
RELATED VIDEOS
Top 10 Most Dangerous Asteroids That Could Hit Earth!
Earth’s Greatest Threat? Meet the Most Dangerous ASTEROIDS Lurking in Space!
A Blown-Glass Structure Could House Astronauts on the Moon
Humanity will eventually need somewhere to live on the Moon. While aesthetics might not be the primary consideration when deciding what kind of habitat to build, it sure doesn’t hurt. The more pleasing the look of the habitat, the better, but ultimately, the functionality will determine whether or not it will be built. Dr. Martin Bermudez thinks he found a sweet synergy that was both functional and aesthetically pleasing with his design for a spherical lunar habitat made out of blown glass. NASA apparently agrees there’s potential there, as he recently received a NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Phase I grant to flesh out the concept further.
Bermudez’s vision’s artistic design looks like something out of an Arthur C. Clarke novel: a glass sphere rising off the lunar surface that could potentially contain living and work areas for dozens of people. His firm, Skyeports, is founded on creating these blown glass structures in space.
The design has some challenges, as Dr. Bermudez discusses in an interview with Fraser. First is how to build this thing. It’s far too large to ship in any conventional lunar lander. However, there’s also no air on the Moon to use as the blown gas to create the spherical shape. Dr. Bermudez plans to utilize argon, which would initially be shipped up from Earth to fill the sphere. Argon has several advantages in that it’s a noble gas and not very reactive, so it’s unlikely to explode in the furnace while the glass is blown.
Video animation showing the blown glass concept. Credit – Skyeports YouTube Channel
Surprisingly, the lack of outside air pressure actually makes it easier to form a sphere than it would be on Earth since less pressure would be necessary to expand the sphere outwards. There are some nuances in the glass as well, with it being more like a glass lattice with embedded titanium or aluminum to make it stronger. Specific kinds of glass, such as borosilicate glass, could potentially add to the strength of the glass itself.
Most of the materials required to create such a structure could already be found on the lunar surface. Lunar regolith is full of the raw building materials required to make the structure work. Some of it has already been blasted into glass-like structures called agglutinates when micrometeoroids hit the lunar surface.
Those micrometeoroid impacts pose another risk to the glass sphere. Dr. Bermudez suggests having multiple layers of glass protecting the habitat, each with a layer of argon between them, like modern-day double-glazed windows. He suggests that spinning the outer layer might also provide some advantage, as will the spherical shape itself, as the impact force will dissipate better into the structure than it would on a flat surface.
Fraser interviews Dr. Martin Bermudez, the PI of the new NIAC project.
Dr. Bermudez’s dreams don’t stop at the Moon, though. He suggests such a glass-blown structure could be useful on Mars or asteroids, where the microgravity would make it even easier to create these structures. On Mars, such a habitat might be limited to the top of Olympus Mons, where the atmosphere is thinner, and there isn’t as much wind and dust that could erode away the outer layers.
Many use cases exist for a structure like this, though many technical challenges remain. NIAC is the place for novel ideas that could potentially impact space exploration, and this one certainly fits that bill. As Dr. Bermudez works through de-risking his design, we get closer than ever to a future of aesthetically pleasing habitats on the Moon and everywhere else in the solar system.
Image of the most recent Orientale basin geologic map at 1:200,000-scale, which improves upon past geologic maps of the region that were 1:5,000,000-scale. The project focused on impact melt (depicted in red), which was created from the extreme heat of the high-speed impact and has been preserved for potentially billions of years. The stars represent potential landing sites for future sample return missions that scientists can analyze back on Earth to determine the absolute age of Oriental basin.
How can a geologic map of a lunar impact crater created billions of years ago help future human and robotic missions to the lunar surface? This is what a recent study published in The Planetary Science Journal hopes to address as an international team of researchers produced arguably the most in-depth, comprehensive, and highest resolution geologic maps of Orientale basin, which is one of the largest and oldest geologic structures on the Moon. This study has the potential to help scientists, engineers, and mission planners develop sample return missions that could place absolute ages on the Moon’s geology, resulting in better understanding the formation and evolution of our Moon and the Earth.
For the study, the researchers created a 1:200,000-scale geologic map of the Moon’s Orientale basin while focusing on identifying what are known as impact melt deposits, which are molten rocks created from a high-speed impact and intense heat that cooled and is now frozen in time, thus preserving its geologic record of when it was formed billions of years ago. The 1:200,000-scale means the map is 200,000 times smaller than in real life. Additionally, one pixel on the geologic map is equal to 100 meters, or approximately the size of an American gridiron football field, which improves upon previous Orientale basin geologic maps that were created at 1:5,000,000-scale.
“We chose to map Oriental basin because it’s simultaneously old and young,” said Dr. Kirby Runyon, who is a Research Scientist at the Planetary Science Institute and lead author of the study. “We think it’s about 3.8 billion years old, which is young enough to still have its impact melt freshly exposed at the surface, yet old enough to have accumulated large impact craters on top of it as well, complicating the picture. We chose to map Orientale to test melt-identification strategies for older, more degraded impact basins whose ages we’d like to know.”
The goal of the study is to not only create an improved geologic map of Orientale basin, but to provide a foundation for future missions to potentially obtain surface samples of the impact melt and return them to Earth for analysis. Such analyses would reveal absolute ages of the impact melt through radiometric dating since these samples have been frozen in time for potentially billions of years. These results could help scientists unravel the Earth’s impact history, as both the Earth and Moon were potentially formed around the same period.
Along with the targeted impact melt, the team successfully identified and mapped a myriad of geologic features within Orientale basin as part of the new geologic map, including smaller craters within Orientale, fractures, fault lines, calderas, crater ejecta, and mare (volcanic basalt deposits), while also constructing a top-to-bottom map of Orientale basin, also called a stratigraphic map, that shows the most recent layers on top with the oldest layers on the bottom.
Image of the most recent Orientale basin geologic map at 1:200,000-scale, which improves upon past geologic maps of the region that were 1:5,000,000-scale. The project focused on impact melt (depicted in red), which was created from the extreme heat of the high-speed impact and has been preserved for potentially billions of years. The stars represent potential landing sites for future sample return missions that scientists can analyze back on Earth to determine the absolute age of Oriental basin. (Credit: Runyon et al.)
Unlike Earth, whose surface processes like plate tectonics and multitude of weather processes have erased impacts from billions of years ago, the preserved lunar geologic record could provide incredible insight into not only Earth’s impact history, but both how and when life first emerged on our planet. This is due to Orientale basin’s crater size and age, as such a large impact on Earth billions of years ago could have postponed or reset how and when life first emerged on the Earth.
“Giant impacts – like the one that formed Orientale – can vaporize an ocean and kill any life that had already started,” said Dr. Runyon. “Some recent modeling has shown that we probably never totally sterilized Earth during these big impacts, but we don’t know for sure. At some point our oceans could have been vaporized from impacts, then recondensed and rained out repeatedly. If that happened a number of times, it’s only after the last time that life could have gotten a foothold.”
While Orientale basin is one of the most striking features on the lunar surface, more than approximately 75 percent of it is not visible from Earth due to its location at the lunar nearside and farside boundary on the western limb of the Moon as observed from the Earth. Therefore, studying the Orientale basin is only possible with spacecraft. Despite this, Orientale basin was first suggested to be an impact crater during the 1960s when scientists at the University of Arizona’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory used groundbreaking techniques to “image” the sides of the Moon not visible to Earth using telescopic images taken from the Earth.
While NASA is focused on returning astronauts to the lunar surface with its Artemis program with the goal of establishing a permanent human presence on the Moon, returning scientific samples from Orientale basin could provide enormous scientific benefits for helping us better understand both the age of the Moon but also how and when life emerged on Earth billions of years ago.
How will the Orientale basin geologic map help us better understand the Moon’s and Earth’s history in the coming years and decades? Only time will tell, and this is why we science!
Space Updates: A Lunar Map for the Best Places to Get Samples
Kans dat asteroïde aarde raakt in 2032 is bijna verdubbeld: moeten we ons zorgen maken om 2024 YR4?
Er is een kleine kans dat in 2032 een asteroïde zal inslaan op onze planeet. Tot die conclusie kwamen astronomen recent na het bestuderen van de baan van 2024 YR4 rond de zon. Volgens nieuwe berekeningen is die kans inmiddels net niet verdubbeld. Moeten we ons zorgen maken? Waar en hoe hard kan ze inslaan? En kunnen we daar iets tegen ondernemen? HLN-wetenschapsexpert Martijn Peters stelt gerust en licht de situatie toe.
Martijn Peters
Wat weten we over 2024 YR4?
Astronomen zagen 2024 YR4 voor het eerst vliegen op 27 december 2024 met het ‘Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System’, ook bekend als de ATLAS-telescoop, in Chili. Dat gebeurde pas twee dagen nadat de asteroïde op 828,800 kilometer langs de aarde raasde, waarna ze de ontdekking officieel hebben gerapporteerd aan de nodige instanties.
De asteroïde is volgens eerste metingen zo’n 40 tot 90 meter groot en heeft een steenachtige samenstelling. Dat ze de grootte niet exact kunnen bepalen, komt doordat ze die inschatten met behulp van zonlicht dat de ruimterots weerkaatst. Het kan dus gaan om een asteroïde van 40 meter die veel licht reflecteert of eentje van 90 meter die weinig licht reflecteert, en alles daartussenin.
2024 YR4 is een zogenaamd ‘Near-Earth Object’ (NEO), een ruimterots waarvan de baan hem tot binnen een straal van 195 miljoen kilometer van de zon brengt. Zo’n omwenteling rond de zon kost 2024 YR4 net geen vier jaar. Maar zijn bekendheid heeft 2024 YR4 niet aan al deze eigenschappen te danken, maar vooral aan zijn opvallende stijging op de bekende Sentry lijst van NASA. Daarop kan je alle NEO’s terugvinden die een kans hebben om hier op aarde in te slaan.
2024 YR4 beweegt nu weg van ons en zal na april niet meer zichtbaar zijn met de meeste van onze telescopen
HLN-wetenschapsexpert Martijn Peters
Hoe groot is die kans momenteel?
Eerst hadden de astronomen berekend dat die kans op een inslag op 22 december 2032 zo’n 1,2 procent bedroeg. Maar nieuwe waarnemingen van 2024 YR4 en analyses hebben die nu bijgesteld naar 2,1 procent. Dat is net geen verdubbeling. Wetenschappers blijven de asteroïde dan ook nauwlettend in de gaten houden met verschillende telescopen van het International Asteroid Warning Network en zullen in maart en mei de James Webb Space Telescope op de ruimterots richten om hem beter te kunnen bestuderen. Zo willen ze te weten komen wat de exacte grootte is van 2024 YR4. Dat zal makkelijker gaan met het infraroodlicht dat de ruimtetelescoop kan waarnemen.
Hoe bereken je die kans?
De rode lijn bestaat uit 500 punten waarop de asteroïde de aarde zou kunnen passeren op 22 december 2032. Zo’n lijn kan links of rechts van de aarde liggen of onze planeet kruisen. Dat laatste is momenteel het geval. Dan kan je de kans van impact berekenen door de lengte te nemen van de rode lijn en te kijken hoeveel procent daarvan de breedte van de aarde is (zo’n 12.756 km). In dit geval is dat 2,1 procent.
Die stijging is normaal en op zich niets om wakker over te liggen. De kans op een inslag van een asteroïde neemt vaak eerst toe, om dan na bijkomende observaties snel tot nul te dalen. Want in het begin zit er nog veel onzekerheid op de precieze baan waarmee een asteroïde langs onze planeet vliegt. Dat venster kan verkleinen door bijkomende metingen, waardoor het percentage even toeneemt (als de aarde binnen dit venster blijft liggen). Maar als toekomstige metingen het venster verder verkleinen en daaruit blijkt dat de aarde erbuiten valt, dan kan de kans plots naar 0 procent zakken.
Of dat snel zal gebeuren, is nog maar de vraag. 2024 YR4 beweegt nu weg van ons en zal na april niet meer zichtbaar zijn met de meeste van onze telescopen. Het kan dus zijn dat de asteroïde al te ver weg is voor we een impact kunnen uitsluiten. Dan is het wachten tot juni 2028 voor ze terug in beeld komt.
De score voor impactrisico is relatief laag, maar is wel het tweede hoogste cijfer ooit toegekend aan een asteroïde
HLN-wetenschapsexpert Martijn Peters
Stel dat de kans aanwezig blijft, hoe gevaarlijk is dat dan voor ons?
Daarvoor kunnen we kijken naar twee schalen waarop wetenschappers de asteroïde indelen en die ons iets leren over het inslagrisico. Dit zijn de ‘Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale’ en de ‘Torino Impact Hazard Scale’. Op die eerste heeft 2024 YR4 een score van - 0,34 gekregen en op de tweede een score van 3.
Een negatieve score op de Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale betekent dat de impactdreiging van 2024 YR4 lager is dan het gemiddelde achtergrondrisico. Daarmee bedoelen astronomen het risico dat een ruimteobject van die grootte inslaat op aarde. Een waarde lager dan - 2 betekent zoveel als ‘geen zorgen’. Ligt de waarde tussen - 2 en 0 betekent ‘deze asteroïde moeten we in de gaten houden’. Bij een waarde tussen 0 en +2 ‘is er reden voor bezorgdheid’ en een waarde hoger dan +2 geeft ‘kans op inslag is 100 keer hoger dan gemiddeld, alle hens aan dek’.
De Torino Impact Hazard Scale gaat tot 10. Drie valt onder een code geel. Dat betekent dat het risico groot genoeg is om de aandacht te vereisen van de wetenschappelijke instanties, maar dat het geen alarmerende situatie betreft. Daarnaast heb je ook code oranje of rood. Die staan voor een echte bedreiging of een zekere inslag. De score van 3 is relatief laag, maar is wel het tweede hoogste cijfer ooit toegekend aan een asteroïde.
De asteroïde Apophis haalde begin jaren 2000 even een score van 4 (met een impactkans van bijna 3 procent), maar verder onderzoek wees uit dat er geen gevaar dreigde in 2029. Mogelijk herhaalt dit scenario zich voor 22 december 2032 en wordt dit een dag zoals een ander.
De impact is zes keer krachtiger dan de zwaarste bom in het arsenaal van de VS
HLN-wetenschapsexpert Martijn Peters
Hoe gaan we hier internationaal mee om?
Omdat de asteroïde groter is dan 50 meter en een impactkans heeft van meer dan 1 procent binnen de komende 50 jaar, zijn de twee door de VN goedgekeurde asteroïdereactiegroepen in gang geschoten. Dat zijn het ‘International Asteroid Warning Network’ (IAWN) en de ‘Space Mission Planning Advisory Group’ (SMPAG). Dit doen ze enkel als die drempels overschreden zijn. Het IAWN staat onder meer in voor de internationale coördinatie van alle organisaties die de baan en de eigenschappen van de asteroïde verder gaan bestuderen. Het SMPAG kijkt dan weer hoe we die bedreiging moeten onschadelijk maken indien nodig.
Waar kan ze inslaan op aarde en wat zijn dan de gevolgen?
Asteroïde 2024 YR4 valt niet onder de zogenaamde ‘mogelijk-gevaarlijk-objecten’. Daarvoor is ze te klein, aangezien die minstens 140 meter in diameter moeten zijn.
Dat betekent echter niet dat ze, moest ze op aarde terechtkomen, geen gevaar zou vormen. Want als de asteroïde in bewoond gebied valt met een snelheid van 17,32 km/s en een stad treft, dan is de impact equivalent aan 7,6 megaton TNT. Ter vergelijking, de atoombom op Hiroshima was 0,015 megaton en de krachtigste bom in het arsenaal van de Verenigde Staten (B83) is 1,2 megaton.
Een asteroïde van die grootte is nog niet zo lang geleden al eens hier op aarde terechtgekomen. Op 30 juni in 1908 vond de krachtigste explosie van de 20ste eeuw plaats in Tunguska boven de Siberische vlaktes. Deze asteroïde was naar schatting zo’n 50 à 100 meter groot en veroorzaakte enorm veel schade, gelukkig in onbewoonbaar gebied. Over een oppervlakte van 2.000 vierkante kilometer, ruim twee keer New York, lagen vrijwel alle bomen tegen de grond nadat de asteroïde in de lucht was ontploft.
Volgens voorlopige berekeningen lopen wij in Europa geen gevaar. De Duitse astronoom Daniel Bamberger (Northolt Branch Observatories) heeft de huidige observaties gebruikt om de mogelijke locatie van impact te beperken: dat zou ergens op een lange lijn zijn die zich uitstrekt van de Stille Oceaan voor de kust van Mexico, door Ecuador en noordelijk Zuid-Amerika, over de Atlantische Oceaan, door centraal Afrika (van Kenia tot Somalië) en dan dwars door naar noordelijk India. Dit beslaat grote stukken oceaan, maar ook bevolkte gebieden en enkele grote steden.
Wat kunnen we doen als ze effectief zou inslaan?
Het probleem is dat we nog niet echt een manier hebben om onszelf tegen zo’n asteroïde te verdedigen. Wetenschappers werken volop aan de ontwikkeling van nieuwe manieren om zo’n botsing te kunnen vermijden. Meestal door de baan van de asteroïde of komeet te veranderen. Dat kan bijvoorbeeld door ertegen te vliegen met een ruimtetuig, zoals recent werd getest met de DART missie, of met een nucleair explosief. Onze enige kans om dit te doen zou dan waarschijnlijk in 2028 zijn als 2024 YR4 opnieuw langsvliegt.
Als we tegen dan geen manier hebben gevonden om een impact te vermijden, zal het de enige realistische optie wellicht zijn om iedereen te evacueren in de gebieden waar de ruimterots kan inslaan.
NASA’s Webb Reveals the Ancient Surfaces of Trans-Neptunian Objects
NASA’s Webb Reveals the Ancient Surfaces of Trans-Neptunian Objects
Trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) are icy bodies ranging in size from Pluto and Eris (dwarf planets with diameters of about 1,500 miles) down to tens of miles (Arrokoth) and even smaller. TNOs are on orbits comparable in size, or even much larger than, that of Neptune. The existence of TNOs was postulated by Kenneth Edgeworth, and later by Gerard Kuiper, in the 1950s; the region of space occupied by TNOs is usually referred to as the Kuiper Belt, and TNOs themselves, sometimes referred to as Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs).
The orbits of TNOs are extremely diverse but fall into groupings that reflect the outward migration of Uranus and Neptune early in the history of the formation of the solar system. As such, TNOs hold the keys to understanding that early history. However, it took NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope and its unparalleled ability to study the materials on the surfaces of TNOs to fully begin to grasp what they can tell us about our origins. Here Bryan Holler and John Stansberry from the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) in Baltimore describe how Webb is expanding our knowledge of these objects.
Images of the trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) Pluto [left] and Arrokoth [right], the primary flyby targets of NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft in 2015 and 2019. NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope is capable of obtaining observations for in-depth studies of a wide range of TNOs that both complement, and go beyond what was learned by New Horizons. (Image credits: NASA/SwRI/JHU-APL)Pluto was the first TNO discovered, in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh at the Lowell Observatory. It wasn’t until 1992 that the second TNO (1992 QB1, now named Albion) was discovered, by Dave Jewitt at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Jane Luu at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Now over 5,000 TNOs have been identified. The orbits of TNOs reveal an “architecture” that records the history of how the orbits of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune evolved early in solar system history. Computer models indicate that as Uranus and Neptune migrated outward into the primordial disk of TNOs, they ejected many objects and shepherded the remaining TNOs onto the orbits we see today. These present-day orbits are classified based on their orbital distances, eccentricity (ellipticity of the orbit), and inclination (tilt with respect to the plane that the planets orbit in). Of particular interest are objects on dynamically “cold” classical orbits, with very low inclination and eccentricity. The computer models indicate that these cold-classical objects still occupy their primordial orbits, and so represent an undisturbed remnant of the original protoplanetary disk. These TNOs truly represent the pristine building blocks of the planets, and one of them, Arrokoth, was visited and studied up-close by the New Horizons spacecraft in January 2019.
Of the TNOs whose orbits were perturbed during giant-planet migration, it is difficult to trace them back to where they formed. Yet it is only by studying the composition of individual TNOs that we can hope to map out the composition of the primordial outer disk. TNOs are on very distant orbits from the Sun, and are very cold, below minus 280 degrees Fahrenheit (about minus 170 degrees Celsius), so their surfaces could provide information about the original composition of planetesimals within the disk. Webb is the first observatory able to provide detailed compositional information about typical TNOs (with diameters less than about 500 miles, or 800 kilometers) because of its large primary mirror and highly sensitive instruments. In particular, the Near Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) has for the first time revealed TNO compositions in exquisite detail.
Spectra for the three TNO spectral classes identified for the first time using data from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope. The heavy solid line in each panel is the average of over a dozen TNO spectra within each class. Prominent features in each spectrum are highlighted and/or labeled with the name of the molecule, or class of materials, responsible for absorbing at those wavelengths. Credit: Adapted from Pinilla-Alonso et al. 2024.
Webb’s NIRSpec divides light at wavelengths between about 1 and 5 microns into hundreds or thousands of individual colors. The relative brightness of those colors as a function of wavelength is a spectrum. Different materials exhibit different spectra that help identify the composition of the object observed. Because the TNOs formed in the cold, outer portions of the protoplanetary disk, it has long been expected that they would have surfaces dominated by ices of molecules that are gases or liquids at Earth’s surface, e.g. water (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), and methane (CH4), among others. Further, radiation from the Sun and outside the solar system alters the chemistry, creating new, more complex hydrocarbon (organic) molecules such as methanol (CH3OH), acetylene (C2H2), and ethane (C2H6). Webb data has confirmed this, but in unexpected ways, and in unprecedented detail.
Within the first two years of science operations, Webb has taken high-quality spectra of over 75 TNOs and provided the first comprehensive look at what they are made of, including nearly 60 objects from the Large Cycle 1 program called “DiSCo-TNOs” (program ID #2418, PI: Noemí Pinilla-Alonso). The major result from the large dataset from the DiSCo-TNOs program is the identification of three spectral classes, which is the first evidence for distinct surface compositions, that was completely unexpected based on earlier studies. These classifications are named based on the spectral shape in the 2.5–4 micron region, with the deepest band centered at 3.0 microns generated by molecules that contain an oxygen-hydrogen bond, such as water. Bowl-type spectra are dominated by the absorption features of water ice, with some carbon dioxide ice, and indications of silicate-rich dust. Double-dip spectra have absorption features due to complex organic molecules, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide ices. Cliff spectra have even more complex organic materials and carbon dioxide than Double-dips, and also include features due to CH3OH. Double-dip spectra indicate very abundant and pure carbon dioxide ice, as evidenced by the two reflectance peaks (never observed outside of a laboratory) bounding the 4.27 micron band. The three spectral types are also distinct in their color at the shortest visible wavelengths, with bowls being least red, double-dips intermediate, and cliffs reddest.
The DiSCo-TNOs team hypothesizes in Pinilla-Alonso et al. (2024) that these different spectral types are the result of higher temperatures closer to the Sun, and colder temperatures farther out. Specifically, the Bowl types formed closer to the Sun and were subject to higher temperatures that essentially baked off the carbon dioxide and methane. These compounds were more stable on Double-dips and Cliffs, which formed farther out. An important clue leading to that hypothesis is that all of the objects on undisturbed cold-classical orbits are Cliffs. TNOs on other orbits include objects from all three compositional types, as would be expected due to the dynamical reshuffling as Neptune migrated outward, as described above.
Looking ahead, Webb continues to carry out a robust program of TNO observations each year, with new and exciting programs selected by the community for execution. Cycle 3 will see imaging and spectroscopy of a handful of TNOs and their satellites, including the first-ever spectral observations of the “extreme” TNOs, with orbits that take them well into interstellar space. Another program aims to circle back to targets observed in the first year of science operations to get an even more detailed look at the materials that led to the formation of TNOs in the protosolar nebula. Two other programs focus on imaging and spectroscopy of TNO binary systems to better understand the origins of TNO satellites, either via giant impacts or co-formation via gravitational collapse. Who knows what new ideas and exciting discoveries the next year will bring?
Editor’s Note:These findings have been published in Nature Astronomy.
Being wiped out by a massive space rock that hits Earth at thousands of miles an hour may sound like a plot worthy of a Hollywood film.
But a newly-discovered space rock, called 2024 YR4, really is heading our way.
Only discovered at the end of last year, 2024 YR4 is somewhere between 130 to 300 ft (40 to 90 metres) in diameter – so likely bigger than the Statue of Liberty.
Dr Robin George Andrews, a volcanologist and author based in London, points out that we 'have less than eight years to potentially deal with it'.
'You need 10 years or more to build, plan and execute an asteroid deflection mission,' he said.
'We don't have much time.'
Scientists currently predict that the 90-metre-wide (300 feet) asteroid 2024 YR4 has a one in 43 chance of hitting Earth in 2032. If it does it would cause widespread damage to a populated area
Dr Robin George Andrews, a volcanologist and author based in London, says 'we might not be able to stop 2024 YR4'
NASA's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission, surely one of its greatest feats ever, demonstrated how a space rock could potentially be thrown off a collision course with Earth by crashing a spacecraft into it.
The DART spacecraft launched from California in November 2021 and completed its 10-month journey when it hit the asteroid Dimorphos on September 26, 2022.
Dimorphos, around 560 feet in diameter, orbits a larger asteroid called Didymos, both of which are around 6.8 million miles away from our planet.
However, neither Dimorphos nor its Didymos posed any danger to Earth; instead, DART was rehearsal of what may be required if a space rock does one day threaten our planet.
Although he acknowledged DART 'worked wonders', Dr Andrews said we 'might not be able to stop 2024 YR4' in a similar way.
'It doesn't mean we can use kinetic impactors like it to deflect any asteroid whenever we want,' he said.
'So much could go wrong if we try and hit it with something like DART.'
On average, Earth is hit by a football pitch-sized rock every 5,000 years, and a civilisation-ending asteroid every one million years, according to NASA's Near-Earth Object Program
Already, NASA has reached a hugely-important milestone with the DART asteroid deflection mission. In September 2022, the DART spacecraft was intentionally crashed into Dimorphos, an asteroid 6.8 million miles away
The Dimorphos space rock is pictured here as seen by the DART spacecraft 11 seconds before impact
What is 2024 YR4?
2024 YR4 is a 'city killer' asteroid determined to have a low chance of impacting Earth on December 2, 2032.
It was first spotted in late December last year by astronomers at the NASA-funded Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System station in Chile.
Since then, this rock has become a growing matter of concern as the probability of an impact rises.
When first spotted, NASA assigned the asteroid an impact probability of 1.2 per cent that it would hit Earth, but that has since increased to 2.3 per cent.
Most asteroids are not solid rock but 'rubble piles' – clusters of loose boulders, stones and sand held together by the weak mutual gravity of space.
At the moment, we don’t know the exact size of 2024 YR4, or even if it's a rubble pile asteroid too – but hitting rubble pile asteroids with a spacecraft like DART could potentially generate a cloud of debris that could head towards Earth anyway.
'Nobody wants to accidentally "disrupt" an asteroid, because those components can still head for Earth,' Dr Andrews said.
There's also the chance that a mammoth space effort akin to DART wouldn't even sufficiently alter the asteroid's path.
'With only a few years down the line, we could accidentally deflect it – but not enough to make it avoid the planet,' the expert added.
'Then, it still hits Earth, just somewhere else that wasn't going to be hit.'
He added: 'I'm not saying a kinetic impactor mission, or missions, couldn't work.
'But we don't have much time, and we don't have enough info about this rapidly fading asteroid to properly inform our planetary defense decisions yet.'
Asteroid 2024 YR4 is about the same size as the Tunguska asteroid, which caused the largest impact event in recorded history when it shot through Earth's atmosphere in 1908, flattening 830 square miles (2,150 square km) of forest (pictured)
It's worth remembering that 2024 YR4 has a 1-in-43 (2.3 per cent) chance of impacting Earth on December 2032.
Dr Andrews stressed 'the odds of an impact remain low', likening the situation to having 43 buttons in front of you and being asked to press one of them.
'I don’t think you should be concerned,' he said in an accompanying blog post.
'When more observations come in, it’s probable that the impact odds will plummet to a zero as the orbit of the asteroid is more precisely defined.'
If its point of impact is in the middle of a desert, or in the ocean, it will 'harm nobody', but if it hits a town or city, it will 'destroy much of it'.
On average, Earth is hit by a football pitch-sized rock every 5,000 years, and a civilisation-ending asteroid every one million years, according to NASA's Near-Earth Object Program.
Last year, a NASA report found we're poorly-prepared for an asteroid collision, even if we detected the object 14 years in advance.
Asteroid 2024 YR4 is thought to be at least the same size as the Tunguska asteroid – which had an estimated diameter of 130 feet, according to NASA.
Tunguska caused the largest impact event in recorded history when it shot through Earth's atmosphere in 1908, flattening 830 square miles (2,150 square km) of forest.
Many lost consciousness and at least three people passed away as a direct consequence of the Tunguska event, according to a 2019 study.
POTENTIAL METHODS FOR ELIMINATING THE THREAT OF AN ASTEROID
DART is one of many concepts of how to negate the threat of an asteroid that have been suggested over the years.
Multiple bumps
Scientists in California have been firing projectiles at meteorites to simulate the best methods of altering the course of an asteroid so that it wouldn't hit Earth.
According to the results so far, an asteroid like Bennu that is rich in carbon could need several small bumps to charge its course.
'These results indicate multiple successive impacts may be required to deflect rather than disrupt asteroids, particularly carbonaceous asteroids,' researchers said.
Nuke
Another idea, known simply as 'nuke', involves blowing up a nuclear explosive close to the asteroid.
However, this could create smaller but still potentially dangerous fragments of rock that could spin off in all directions, potentially towards Earth.
Ion Beam Deflection
With Ion Beam Deflection, plumes from a space probe's thrusters would be directed towards the asteroid to gently push on its surface over a wide area.
A thruster firing in the opposite direction would be needed to keep the spacecraft at a constant distance from the asteroid.
Gravity tractor
And yet another concept, gravity tractor, would deflect the asteroid without physically contacting it, but instead by using only its gravitational field to transmit a required impulse.
Professor Colin Snodgrass, an astronomer at the University of Edinburgh said: 'There have been a few concepts suggested, such as a ‘gravity tractor’ to slowly tow an asteroid away instead of pushing it with a kinetic impactor.
'But the kinetic impactor is definitely the simplest technology to use on the sort of timescale that is most likely to be of concern for this size of asteroid, i.e. years to decades warning time.'
RELATED VIDEOS
Asteroid 2024 YR4: Could It Hit Earth in 2032?
Asteroid 2024 YR4: Should You Be Worried?
Real Danger! Leading Scientists Warn of Imminent Asteroid 2024 YR4 Threat
NASA engineers were reportedly left baffled recently after receiving a perplexing series of coded messages from a point in space nearly 15 billion miles from Earth, according to a recent update shared by the U.S. space agency.
The message, decoded by Ken Chaffin and daughter Keli, is not static but is in motion as the white dots are arranged into the five amino acids.
Ken Chaffin
The signals, consisting of a strange, repetitive batch of binary code, were coming from a familiar source: the farthest manmade object from Earth.
According to an update that appeared this week on NASA’s blog devoted to solar activity, The Sun Spot, engineers have been attempting to resolve a problem occurring with one of the three computers onboard the Voyager 1 probe.
Since late 1977, Voyager 1 has been carrying out its mission to study the outer Solar System and interstellar space. Presently, the distant space probe remains in communication from its position several billions of miles from Earth through NASA’s Deep Space Network.
However, an issue affecting the probe’s flight data system (FDS) is now impacting its ability to communicate with its telemetry modulation unit (TMU), one of the spacecraft’s subsystems, which is preventing it from relaying any science or engineering data back to Earth.
Voyager 1 is still receiving information NASA engineers are transmitting to it, and the probe does appear to still be attempting to execute commands, wrote Miles Hatfield from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center on December 12
Voyager 1’s FDS is primarily equipped to monitor the spacecraft’s instrumentation and retrieve data from these systems, along with the collection of engineering data that conveys the probe’s overall vitals. Periodically, this information is combined into data packages that the spacecraft’s TMU dispatches back to NASA.
Generated in binary code, these messages normally appear in a standard series of 1s and 0s. However, NASA engineers were perplexed recently when the decoded data packages Voyager 1 was sending appeared to be repetitive, as though some functions of the TMU were “stuck.”
Troubleshooting by NASA engineers revealed that the problem appears to be originating further up the chain from within the FDS, rather than the TMU itself.
Last weekend, Voyager team engineers attempted a restart of the FDS—a feat that, presumably, would be at least mildly complicated for any system that requires communication across a 15 billion-mile distance. However, current attempts to restore the FDS have remained unsuccessful, and they are expected to continue. While NASA remains optimistic that they will be able to reinstate proper communications from the spacecraft, doing so may require days or even as much as several weeks.
One of the problems the Voyager team faces, in addition to working across incredible distances to communicate with an Earthly spacecraft drifting at a solid 38,210 miles per hour on its way through interstellar space, has to do with technology that is now several decades old.
Infographic showing Voyager 1’s progress since it was launched in 1977
(Credit: NASA).
“Finding solutions to challenges the probes encounter often entails consulting original, decades-old documents written by engineers who didn’t anticipate the issues that are arising today,” Hatfield wrote this week. “As a result, it takes time for the team to understand how a new command will affect the spacecraft’s operations to avoid unintended consequences.”
Once commands are finally determined to be safe to send to Voyager 1, engineers have to wait almost a full day for the messages to reach the spacecraft. Add to that the response time for the spacecraft to send its replies, and a total of close to 45 hours are required just to determine whether any single command has successfully initiated a correct response from the spacecraft.
One of the most iconic NASA spacecraft, Voyager 1 crossed into interstellar space in 2012, and its likeness has spawned several pop cultural portrayals, which include the appearance of a fictional Voyager 6 probe enhanced by alien artificial intelligence in the 1979 film Star Trek: The Motion Picture.
The aging spacecraft operates a radio transmitter 15 bn miles away that it hasn't used since 1981
Je hebt waarschijnlijk wel eens gehoord van Mars als het volgende grote avontuur van de mensheid. Maar hoe zou het leven op de rode planeet er werkelijk uitzien? Vergeet de clichés van sciencefictionfilms waarin iedereen chromen ruimtepakken draagt en tegen groene buitenaardse wezens vecht.
Hier zijn enkele sleutelelementen, gegeven door kunstmatige intelligentie, om je voor te stellen hoe het leven op Mars eruit zou kunnen zien:
1. Onder druk staande en luchtdichte habitats
De atmosfeer van Mars bestaat voornamelijk uit koolstofdioxide , met een zeer lage atmosferische druk (ongeveer 1% van die van de aarde).
Om te kunnen ademen en voldoende druk te kunnen handhaven, zouden habitats volledig omsloten moeten zijn, mogelijk begraven of bedekt met regoliet (stof van Mars) ter bescherming tegen straling .
2. Overlevingssystemen en middelen
De aanvoer van water, voedsel en zuurstof zou voornamelijk afhangen van recycling en het gebruik van hulpbronnen ter plaatse.
Water kan worden gewonnen uit ondergrondse ijs- of permafrostafzettingen .
Zuurstof kan worden geproduceerd door zuurstof te extraheren uit CO₂ op Mars of door water te elektrolyseren.
3. Lokale voedselproductie
De kolonisten konden niet uitsluitend vertrouwen op geïmporteerde reserves . Ze zouden bovengrondse teeltsystemen moeten opzetten ( hydrocultuur , aeroponics ), of kassen onder druk ontwikkelen om planten te kweken.
Planten zouden een cruciale rol spelen bij luchtrecycling , voedselproductie en psychologische ondersteuning voor bewoners.
4.Milieu en gezondheid
De zwaartekracht van Mars bedraagt ongeveer een derde van die van de aarde, wat op de lange termijn de gezondheid (spieren, botten, bloedcirculatie) zou kunnen beïnvloeden.
Kosmische en zonnestraling zijn veel intenser dan op grondniveau, vooral zonder een mondiaal magnetisch schild . Beschermende maatregelen (ondergrondse constructies, regolietenschilden) zouden essentieel zijn.
Extreme temperaturen (vaak ruim onder 0°C ) vereisen het gebruik van drukpakken en efficiënte verwarmingssystemen .
5. Dagelijks leven en sociale organisatie
Het isolement en de kleine bevolking vereisen een grote veelzijdigheid van de kolonisten, die in staat zijn om faciliteiten te onderhouden , voedsel te produceren , wetenschappelijk onderzoek uit te voeren en nog veel meer.
Verkenningsmissies buiten zouden worden uitgevoerd in pakken die speciaal waren ontworpen voor lage druk en voor het hanteren van schurend Marsstof .
Leven in besloten ruimtes zou de nadruk leggen op samenwerking , communicatie en psychologische ondersteuning , om de cohesie te behouden en de stress te vermijden die met isolatie gepaard gaat.
6. Sleuteltechnologieën
3D-printen en additieve productie om snel structuren en reserveonderdelen te bouwen.
Robots en drones om gevaarlijke taken te automatiseren (ijswinning, reparaties buitenshuis).
Geavanceerde recyclingsystemen om het hergebruik van water, lucht en afval te maximaliseren.
Over het geheel genomen zou het leven op Mars een combinatie van geavanceerde technologieën, fysiologische en psychologische aanpassingen en ultra-efficiënt beheer van hulpbronnen vereisen. De leefgebieden zouden heel anders zijn dan onze aardse huizen, maar wie weet? Over een paar decennia zal misschien een van onze nakomelingen dit artikel lezen vanuit een koepel op Mars.
NASA CubeSat Discovers New Radiation Belts After Intense Solar Storm
The May 2024 solar storm created two extra radiation belts. One of the new belts, shown in purple, included a population of protons, giving it a unique composition that hadn’t been seen before. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/Kristen Perrin
NASA CubeSat Discovers New Radiation Belts After Intense Solar Storm
In a groundbreaking discovery, a NASA CubeSat has detected new radiation belts around Earth following a powerful solar storm in May 2024. This discovery reshapes our understanding of how solar activity interacts with Earth’s magnetic field, creating new zones of trapped particles. CubeSat, which was designed to study space weather, has captured data that could have major benefits for satellite operations, astronaut safety, and future space missions. As solar activity intensifies in the coming years, this discovery highlights the need for continued monitoring of the interactions between the Earth and Sun.
The radiation belts around Earth, known as the Van Allen Belts, are doughnut-shaped regions of charged particles trapped by Earth’s magnetic field. The belts that were discovered in 1958 by the Explorer 1 mission consist mostly of high-energy electrons and protons originating from the Sun. The inner belt, located about 600 to 6,000 kilometres above Earth, contains highly energetic protons, while the outer belt, extending from 13,500 to 60,000 kilometres is mostly made up of electrons. These radiation zones pose risks to satellites, astronauts, and space missions, requiring shielding and careful navigation.
The Van Allen radiation belts surrounding Earth. Image: NASA
Something largely unexpected happened back in May 2024 when a large solar storm hit Earth. In the days that followed, high energy particles from the Sun bathed the Earth sparking auroral displays and disrupting GPS communications. A NASA satellite has since discovered this storm created two new but temporary radiation belts that circle the Earth. The two belts sit between the other two existing belts and form concentric rings above the equator.
Ohio’s Aurora 05-10-2024, captured in front of John Chumack’s observatory domes at JBSPO in Yellow Springs, Ohio. Credit: John Chumack, used by permission. Canon 6DDSLR 16mm F2.8 lens, ISO 1250, 10 second Exp.
The discovery was made by the Colorado Inner Radiation Belt Experiment Satellite (bit of a mouthful so it’s shortened to CIRBE) on 6 February this year. The announcement was made in the Journal of Geophysical Research : Space and Physics. The CubeSat had been in space for about a year before it experienced what NASA reported as an anomaly and the satellite went quiet on 15 April. The satellite was out of action during the storm in May last year but it unexpectedly leapt back to life on 15 June. It then resumed taking measurements and it was this that led to the discovery of the new belts. Understanding them is of crucial importance since satellites heading into geostationary orbits have to travel through the radiation belts.
The CIRBE Cube Sat in the laboratory before launch. CIRBE was designed and built by LASP at the University of Colorado Boulder. Xinlin Li/LASP/CU Boulder
It’s not unusual for temporary belts to be identified following large solar storms but these new belts seem to last much longer. Previously the temporary belts were sustained for around four weeks but the new belts seem to have lasted for more than three months. They are composed mostly of electrons like the outer belt but with the new innermost belt hosting a substantial quantity of protons too.
Quite how long the new belts will last will depend on solar storms that follow and how strong they are. Larger storms tend to have more energy and are more likely to destroy the particles in the belts, knocking them out of their orbit. A solar storm in June reduced the size of one of the new belts and another storm in August of last year almost completely destroyed it.
Breakfast is the most important meal of the day - especially if you're headed into space.
However, astronauts have revealed why their Breakfast of Champions is an American classic high in fat, low in fiber, and consistently linked to heart disease.
As the first US astronaut to go into outer space, he was also responsible for starting traditions, even when it came to his breakfast.
Instead of traditionally healthier options like fruit and whole-grain toast, Shepard chose steak and eggs before launch.
Shortly after, in 1969, Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins all followed suit before staking America's claim on the moon.
But American tradition isn't the main reason astronauts pick steak and eggs.
NASA picked the meal due because it's high in protein and low in fiber, which helps astronauts stay full longer without needing to go to the bathroom during a flight.
Alan Shepard, pictured here, made history in 1961 as the first American in space. He also pioneered the astronaut tradition of eating steak and eggs for breakfast
Astronauts have historically chosen steak and eggs because the dish is high in protein but low in fiber. This keeps them full for longer but limits bowel movements
Steak and eggs are two of the most protein-rich foods.
One serving of steak, about three and a half ounces, contains 25 grams of protein, and one large eggs has an extra six grams.
Health officials recommend consuming 0.36 grams of protein per pound of weight.
This means a person who weighs 140 pounds should eat about 53 grams of protein every day.
Protein helps reduce levels of ghrelin, a hormone that controls hunger, and boosts levels of peptide YY, a hormone that increases satiety or fullness.
This means protein-rich foods are more likely to keep people full for longer amounts of time.
Astronauts have limited storage space for food in their aircrafts, so being able to eat fewer meals to stay full is likely ideal for them.
Additionally, neither steak nor eggs contain any fiber.
Fiber normally adds bulk to stools, making them easier to pass and leading to more frequent bowel movements.
Not getting enough fiber leads to difficulty passing bowel movements.
This is ideal for astronauts not only because they may need to sit for long periods of time, but bathroom breaks are far from simple in space.
Pictured above are astronauts currently stranded on the International Space Station sharing a meal
On the International Space Station, for example, there are only three specialized toilets, which use a vacuum system to suck waste away.
The ISS usually has anywhere from three to 13 astronauts on board at any given time, meaning there short and limited bathroom breaks can keep bathrooms from getting backed up.
Steak and eggs have notoriously been linked to chronic diseases like heart disease due to high saturated fat content potentially blocking arteries.
One study from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), for example, found eating red meat every day truples the amount of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) in the gut, a chemical thought to increase cholesterol.
However, astronauts largely rely on rehydrated and pantry foods while in space, so it's unlikely steak and eggs is everyday cuisine.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.