
From the Shroud of Turin to Noah's Ark... experts reveal science that proves the Bible is true
By Harriet Alexander and Stacy Liberatore
Photo illustration by Alyson DiCapua
It is the most printed book of all time, and it's also the most debated. For some, the Bible is a collection of parables: a series of deeply resonant stories, designed to guide you throughout your life. Yet for others it is a historical document, whose power is only enhanced by its factual accuracy.
Jeremiah J Johnston, a New Testament scholar, pastor and writer, has no doubt in his mind as to where the book belongs on his shelves. It is historical fact, he insists.
'For too long, skeptics have claimed that the Gospels are pious legends, faith-based fiction or the mythologized memoirs of early communities,' he writes in The Jesus Discoveries, published earlier this year. 'But nothing could be further from the truth.'
'The Christian faith is grounded in events that occurred in real places, involving real people and leaving real evidence. And with striking clarity, archaeology, textual discoveries and historical records are beginning to tell the story again.'
Johnston, a 45-year-old theologian and author, is a pillar of one of America's largest megachurches – the Prestonwood Baptist Church, in Plano, Texas, which regularly attracts 17,000 people a week.
A lifetime spent investigating Biblical texts has convinced Johnston of the historical accuracy of the book, he told the Daily Mail. And he has set out to explain why.
'The Bible is the most enduring and influential collection of ancient writings known to humanity,' he writes. 'Yet what makes it distinct is not simply its literary value, but the historical claims it makes. It doesn't present itself as myth, fable or detached philosophy.'
And in his 20-plus years of studies, he has since come to find that one relic many believe to be forged is in fact proof of 'the living God in the course of real history.'

Courtesy of Jeremiah J Johnston
An unabashed enthusiast, he peppers his speech with gleeful yelps, telling the Daily Mail that a Roman coin was 'the coolest thing in the world,' and calling the Dead Sea Scrolls 'the most astounding Biblical discovery of all time.'
There remain, of course, many Biblical mysteries yet to be solved.
Chief among them is perhaps the existence or otherwise of Noah's Ark. Johnston is dismissive of claims that the remains of the Ark have been found.
Andrew Jones, who runs Noah’s Ark Scans, caused a stir earlier this year when he discussed his team's work investigating a site in Turkey which for 60 years has been rumored to be the resting place of the Ark.
Jones and his team claimed they have '100 percent confirmed' that the mound is not a natural geological feature but a 'man-made object' below the surface.
'I firmly believe the Durupınar Formation represents the buried remains of Noah's Ark,' Jones told the Daily Mail.
Geologists argue that the boat-shaped mound near Mount Ararat, in eastern Turkey, is natural. But Jones and his supporters claim it could be the remnants of the Biblical boat.
Johnston has been vocal in disavowing Jones's research, saying there was rare unanimity among Bible scholars that the Turkish site was incorrect.
'The one thing all of us get along about is 100 percent certainty this geological formation in eastern Turkey is not the spot of Noah's Ark.'
He said that the scientific techniques Jones was using were inaccurate in a mountainous area, and insisted the Turkish formations were natural.
'The scientific consensus is not even close,' he said in a YouTube video in April. 'I'm talking about conservative, moderate – but even liberal, atheist, agnostic archaeologists all know that this is just to sell books. This is sensationalism that catches fire because Christians want it to be true.'
Yet he remained adamant that the discoveries he documented were, indeed, proof of the Bible's accuracy.
'Stones are still speaking. Inscriptions are still uncovered,' he writes. 'Manuscripts, ossuaries, graffiti and government records - all are emerging from the dust of time and converging with the Gospels' witness.
'These findings don't replace Scripture, but they do reinforce and illuminate it. And they help us see the figure of Jesus in sharper historical focus.'

The Shroud of Turin
Johnston arrived in Britain to study the New Testament at Middlesex University. The PhD student started out as a Turin Shroud skeptic, believing it was a medieval forgery as others had told him.
But he has since changed his mind and become one of the foremost advocates for the authenticity of the cloth – convinced it is the very shroud which covered the body of Jesus when he was taken down from the cross.
Johnston dismisses claims that the cloth is a forgery, arguing that the analyzed samples of the material, which were not taken from the center of the fabric but rather plucked from the edges, where it had been patched up, put its authenticity into question.
Certainly, there is no debate that the shroud has been altered.
It first emerged in France in around 1355, when it was put on display in a church in the village of Lirey, 120 miles southeast of Paris. The cloth was moved to the city of Chambery in 1502 and was damaged in a fire 30 years later. Nuns of the Poor Clares of Chambéry did their best to salvage the cloth over a two-week period that included much mending – and prayer.
Ultimately, in 1578, the relic was moved to a cathedral in the northern Italian city of Turin, where it remains to this day.
In 1988, scientists from three countries – teams from the British Museum, the University of Arizona and the Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule in Zurich – carbon dated postage stamp-sized segments of the cloth.
The scientific methods measuring the remaining radioactive carbon inside the material all concluded the pieces date back to medieval times.
The scientists insisted that the samples came from the main part of the cloth.
But Johnston does not accept this as fact.
He further argues in the book that the marks on the cloth are AB-type blood stains – a blood type common to at least 11 percent of Middle Eastern Jews, of which Jesus was one.
He claims there are high levels of bilirubin in the marks, the yellow pigment in bile, which he suggests shows trauma at the time of death, noting that anyone attempting a medieval forgery, even if they did paint in blood, would not be aware of the significance.
To bolster his case that the fabric came from the Middle East, Johnston notes that an Eidgenoessische criminologist and botanist, Max Frei-Sulzer, concluded in the 1970s that the shroud bore traces of 58 different species, many of which exist in the area around Jerusalem -including gundelia tournefortii – a thistle from the daisy family, and anthemis, or chamomile.
Frei-Sulzer's methods have been questioned, but the scientist, who died in 1983, has not been discredited.
Johnston claims the shroud shows signs of an intense explosion of light, which he claims is 'proof' of the resurrection.
He calls it 'a supernatural eruption that left evidence scorched into the very fabric of his burial shroud.'
Johnston writes: 'The shroud may be the photographic negative of the single most explosive event in the history of creation: the moment when death itself lost its sting and life eternal burst forth from a dark tomb.'

Courtesy of Jeremiah J Johnston
The Sudarium of Oviedo
Johnston told the Daily Mail that the sudarium, a Latin word describing a sweat cloth, or face towel, used to wipe the face of a recently-deceased person, was 'the nail in the coffin' for the 1988 carbon dating of the Turin Shroud.
He argues that the linen cloth, moved from the Middle East to Spain in around 600AD, features corresponding marks to the Turin Shroud. And he claims that both the Turin Shroud and the sudarium have marks made by the same blood type, AB. Furthermore, he argues that the stains bear traces of lung fluid, expelled when a person is crucified.
'I love the second cloth because I feel like nobody talks about it,' he told the Daily Mail. 'I feel like this has just been lost.
'And I think it's such a huge piece of the Shroud of Turin, and I mean, it's mentioned in the Bible as well.'
Critics, however, say the evidence that it was actually placed on Jesus's face is flimsy.
Courtesy of Jeremiah J Johnston
De Agostini via Getty Images
Roman Coin
The Texan scholar called the Roman coin 'the coolest thing in the world,' writing in his book that it was 'the first state-issued portrait of Christ to circulate as currency.'
He writes: 'Coins are tiny sermons. They are mass-produced, transportable, and unforgettable. They crystallize a creed in metal.'
The gold piece was created under the Emperor Justinian II, a devout Christian who ruled from 685 to 695 AD and again from 705 to 711 AD.
Christianity had become the official religion of the Roman Empire in 313 AD.
Johnston says the coin marks the first time the emperor himself is not depicted on the coin.
'The front bears the face of Jesus Christ and the reverse shows the emperor calling himself "Servant of Christ,"' writes Johnston. 'It is difficult to overstate how audacious this was.'
And he agrees with the late Alan Whanger, a Duke University professor who died in 2017, that the coin's image bears direct correlation to the Turin Shroud.
Whanger, quoted by Johnston, said he found 'massive evidence that the coin image is an extraordinarily accurate reproduction of the Shroud face, which could only have been accomplished by the artist die cutter looking directly at the Shroud face as the model for the coin.'
The coin alone is evidence of early Christianity. But it is hard to see why Johnston believes the coin reinforces historical fact.
Yet he argues that the two elements - the shroud and the coin - combine to show that the Bible was a historical text, rather than a collection of parables.
The Palatine Graffiti
Johnston also seizes on ancient Roman graffiti - or graffito, as it is known in the singular form - as yet more evidence of the Bible as historical fact.
He writes about a carving in a wall, created around 200 AD and discovered in 1857. The carving shows a man being crucified, with the head of a donkey on his body. The mocking caption, in ancient Greek, reads: 'Alexamenos worships his God.'
For Johnston, this finding is more evidence that the Scriptures are an accurate record depicting history, though it's never entirely clear how his conclusion that the image created approximately 200 years after Jesus' death, proves it.
'He has the head of a jackass, if you will,' Johnston told the Daily Mail.
Bridgeman via Getty Images
'They were mocking the Christian movement, and this is in the Second Century, and by mocking it, they only prove that the Bible stands true: that the best established fact in the ancient world is that Jesus died by Roman crucifixion at the hands of Pontius Pilate under the Emperor Tiberius Caesar on Friday April 3rd AD 33.'
The Dead Sea Scrolls
Perhaps Johnston's greatest enthusiasm is reserved for the Dead Sea Scrolls, which he told the Daily Mail were 'the most astounding Biblical discovery of all time.'
The thousands of parchment and papyrus fragments were found hidden in a series of caves 13 miles east of Jerusalem by a Bedouin shepherd in 1947.
The documents, believed to have been created between the third century BC and 70 AD, are a series of letters, calendars and descriptions of rituals for worship.
About 230 of the manuscripts are referred to as 'biblical scrolls,' according to the Israel Antiquities Authority, and these texts are now part of the Hebrew Bible.
For Johnston, the fact that the scrolls are an almost contemporary telling of the Bible proves that it was a historical document, and not a 'fairytale,' which evolved over time. Scrolls predicting Christ's birth – and his crucifixion – support this reading of the tome.
'It confirms the reliability of the Bible, the prophecy predictions of the Messiah as well, and it shows that our text is stable,' he told the Daily Mail.
{ https://www.dailymail.com/news/index.html }