The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie!
Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek!
België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek
In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch.
Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie
Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen!
Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit
Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie.
Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie
Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen.
Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen
Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek!
Blijf Op De Hoogte!
Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren!
Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
22-01-2026
NASA drops a MAJOR hint at the medical emergency that triggered a historic evacuation of astronauts on the ISS - as it reveals a portable ultrasound machine was critical
NASAhas dropped a major hint at the medical emergency that triggered a historic evacuation of astronauts from the International Space Station.
During their first public appearance since returning to Earth, the astronauts revealed that a portable ultrasound machine was 'super handy' during the crisis.
NASA astronaut Mike Fincke, pilot for the ill–fated Crew–11 mission, said that the machine had been used when medical issues arose on January 7.
'Having a portable ultrasound machine helped us in this situation; we were able to take a look at things that we didn't have,' he explained.
While Mr Fincke did not elaborate on the medical emergency, the fact that an ultrasound was used suggests two likely reasons.
Firstly, ultrasound scans are often used to examine how astronauts' cardiac systems are functioning in low gravity.
The other main use for ultrasound in space is to monitor astronauts' eye health.
However, ultrasound can also be used as a general diagnostic tool in a vast number of medical cases – so it remains unclear what the medical emergency was, or how ultrasound proved useful.
NASA astronaut Mike Fincke (pictured), pilot for the ill–fated Crew–11 mission, has shared a major hint as to why the space agency was forced to evacuate the ISS
The members of Crew–11 were forced to return to Earth a month ahead of schedule due to an unspecified medical emergency. Left to Right: Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov, NASA astronauts Mike Fincke and Zena Cardman, and Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui
During the press conference, Mr Fincke explained that the crew had lots of experience using the ultrasound machine to track changes in the human body, so 'when we had this emergency, the ultrasound machine came in super handy'.
The Crew–11 pilot even went so far as to claim that all future spaceflights should be equipped with portable ultrasound machines.
'Of course, we didn't have other big machines that we have here on planet Earth,' he said.
'We do try to make sure that everybody before we fly are really, really not prone to surprises. But sometimes things happen and surprises happen, and the team was ready … preparation was super important.'
The Crew-11 astronautas splashed back to Earth last Thursday, following NASA's first medical evacuation in 65 years of spaceflight, and the first time that the ISS has ever been evacuated.
That crew included NASA astronauts Zena Cardman, Mike Fincke, Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui, and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov.
The ISS is equipped with a modified off–the–shelf ultrasound machine called Ultrasound 2 that is primarily used for cardiac and ocular scans. Pictured: NASA astronaut Mike Fossum uses the Ultrasound 2 to scan the heart of crewmate Satoshi Furukawa
Health issues that can arise on the ISS
Blood clots
Bone and muscle atrophy
Loss of vision
Radiation damage
Circadian rhythm disruption
Accelerated ageing
General health decline
Prior to their departure, NASA's chief health and medical officer, Dr James Polk, said that the astronaut was 'absolutely stable' and that this was not an 'emergent evacuation'.
Dr Polk added: 'We're not immediately disembarking and getting the astronaut down, but it leaves that lingering risk and lingering question as to what that diagnosis is, and that means there is some lingering risk for that astronaut onboard.'
NASA has remained extremely reticent to discuss any of the details of the medical emergency or which member of the crew it might have affected.
However, this latest update from Mr Fincke is the first clue as to what might have happened.
Ultrasound imaging sends a beam of soundwaves into the body and records how they bounce back to a receiver.
As the sound moves at different speeds through different types of tissue, you can 'see' inside the body without using any invasive methods.
Since 2011, the ISS has carried a modified off–the–shelf ultrasound machine called Ultrasound 2 that is used in both biomedical research and routine health checkups.
On Earth, sound has a huge array of uses, ranging from diagnosing gallbladder diseases and kidney stones to checking the health and gender of unborn babies.
One of the main uses for the ultrasound scanner is to monitor the cardiac and vascular health of astronauts, who are more at risk of conditions like blood clots, hardening arteries, and changes in blood pressure.
Pictured: NASA astronaut Kevin Ford (right) trains with the Ultrasound 2 on Earth
However, on the ISS, Ultrasound 2 is generally used for two main medical issues - cardiac and ocular problems.
In a constant state of free–fall induced microgravity, blood tends to drift up from the astronauts' feet and collect around their head and chest.
In 2020, a NASA astronaut developed a large clot in their internal jugular vein during spaceflight and was forced to stretch the station's dwindling supply of blood thinners to last more than 40 days until supplies could be sent.
The other main use for ultrasound in space is to monitor astronauts' eye health.
As fluids build up in the head, they can cause swelling that triggers a collection of changes in the eye and brain called 'spaceflight–associated neuro–ocular syndrome'.
Increased pressure around the optic nerve causes swelling in the connection between the eye and the brain, and flattening of the back of the eye.
This can lead to blurred vision and long–term damage to an astronaut's vision.
NASA also uses the ultrasound scanner for monthly ocular health checks to ensure astronauts' vision is not being damaged by the buildup of fluids in the head. Pictured: NASA astronaut Leroy Chiao performs an ultrasound examination of the eye on cosmonaut Salizhan Sharipov
Once a month, astronauts on the ISS are required to use Ultrasound 2 to perform ocular scans to keep track of this condition.
NASA's Zena Cardman, who commanded the crew's early return flight with SpaceX, said that the space station is set up as well as it can be for medical emergencies.
She added that NASA 'made all the right decisions' in cancelling the spacewalk, which would have been her first, and prioritising the crew's well–being.
Likewise, Japan's Kimiya Yui said he was surprised how well all the preflight training paid off in dealing with the health concerns.
Mr Yui said: 'We can handle any kind of difficult situation. This is actually very, very good experience for the future of human spaceflight.'
The International Space Station (ISS) is a $100 billion (£80 billion) science and engineering laboratory that orbits 250 miles (400 km) above Earth.
It has been permanently staffed by rotating crews of astronauts and cosmonauts since November 2000.
Crews have come mainly from the US and Russia, but the Japanese space agency JAXA and European space agency ESA have also sent astronauts.
The International Space Station has been continuously occupied for more than 20 years and has been expended with multiple new modules added and upgrades to systems
Research conducted aboard the ISS often requires one or more of the unusual conditions present in low Earth orbit, such as low-gravity or oxygen.
ISS studies have investigated human research, space medicine, life sciences, physical sciences, astronomy and meteorology.
The US space agency, NASA, spends about $3 billion (£2.4 billion) a year on the space station program, with the remaining funding coming from international partners, including Europe, Russia and Japan.
So far 244 individuals from 19 countries have visited the station, and among them eight private citizens who spent up to $50 million for their visit.
There is an ongoing debate about the future of the station beyond 2025, when it is thought some of the original structure will reach 'end of life'.
Russia, a major partner in the station, plans to launch its own orbital platform around then, with Axiom Space, a private firm, planning to send its own modules for purely commercial use to the station at the same time.
NASA, ESA, JAXA and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) are working together to build a space station in orbit around the moon, and Russia and China are working on a similar project, that would also include a base on the surface.
LIVE: NASA's ISS change of command ceremony goes ahead early for medical evacuation
The world gets weirder the closer you get to the speed of light. Melmak/65 Images/Pixabay
When we were kids, we were amazed that Superman could travel "faster than a speeding bullet." We could even picture him, chasing down a projectile fired from a weapon, his right arm outstretched, his cape rippling behind him. If he traveled at half the bullet's speed, the rate at which the bullet moved away from him would halve. If he did indeed travel faster than the bullet, he would overtake it and lead the way. Go, Superman!
In other words, Superman's aerial antics obeyed Newton's views of space and time: that the positions and motions of objects in space should all be measurable relative to an absolute, nonmoving frame of reference [source: Rynasiewicz].
In the early 1900s, scientists held firm to the Newtonian view of the world. Then a German-born mathematician and physicist by the name of Albert Einstein came along and changed everything. In 1905, Einstein published his theory of special relativity, which put forth a startling idea: There is no preferred frame of reference. Everything, even time, is relative.
Two important principles underpinned his theory. The first stated that the same laws of physics apply equally in all constantly moving frames of reference. The second said that the speed of light — about 186,000 miles per second (300,000 kilometers per second) — is constant and independent of the observer's motion or the source of light. According to Einstein, if Superman were to chase a light beam at half the speed of light, the beam would continue to move away from him at exactly the same speed [source: Stein, AMNH.org].
These concepts seem deceptively simple, but they have some mind-bending implications. One of the biggest is represented by Einstein's famous equation, E = mc², where E is energy, m is mass and c is the speed of light.
According to this equation, mass and energy are the same physical entity and can be changed into each other. Because of this equivalence, the energy an object has due to its motion will increase its mass. In other words, the faster an object moves, the greater its mass. This only becomes noticeable when an object moves really quickly. If it moves at 10 percent the speed of light, for example, its mass will only be 0.5 percent more than normal. But if it moves at 90 percent the speed of light, its mass will double [source: LBL.gov].
As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass rises precipitously. If an object tries to travel 186,000 miles per second, its mass becomes infinite, and so does the energy required to move it. For this reason, no normal object can travel as fast or faster than the speed of light.
That answers our question, but let's have a little fun and modify the question slightly.£
What If We Could Travel Faster Than Light?
Almost As Fast As the Speed of Light?
We covered the original question, but what if we tweaked it to say, "What if you traveled almost as fast as the speed of light?" In that case, you would experience some interesting effects. One famous result is something physicists call time dilation, which describes how time runs more slowly for objects moving very rapidly. If you flew on a rocket traveling 90 percent of light-speed, the passage of time for you would be halved. Your watch would advance only 10 minutes, while more than 20 minutes would pass for an Earthbound observer [source: May]
You would also experience some strange visual consequences. One such consequence is called aberration, and it refers to how your entire field of view would shrink down to a tiny, tunnel-shaped "window" out in front of your spacecraft. This happens because photons (those exceedingly tiny packets of light) — even photons behind you — appear to come in from the forward direction.
In addition, you would notice an extreme Doppler effect, which would cause light waves from stars in front of you to crowd together, making the objects appear blue. Light waves from stars behind you would spread apart and appear red. The faster you go, the more extreme this phenomenon becomes until all visible light from stars in front of the spacecraft and stars to the rear become completely shifted out of the known visible spectrum (the colors humans can see). When these stars move out of your perceptible wavelength, they simply appear to fade to black or vanish against the background.
Of course, if you want to travel faster than a speeding photon, you'll need more than the same rocket technology we've been using for decades.
In a March 2021 paper published in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, astrophysicist Erik Lentz of the University of Göttingen in Germany proposed the idea of rearranging space-time to create a warp bubble, inside which a spacecraft might be able to travel at faster-than-light speeds.
What Is Hyperspace? Exploring the Science Behind FTL
Speed of Light FAQ
Is there anything faster than the speed of light?
No, there isn’t. As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass rises steeply - so much so that the object’s mass becomes infinite and so does the energy required to make it move. Since such a case remains impossible, no known object can travel as fast or faster than the speed of light.
How fast is the speed of light in miles?
The speed of light in a vacuum is 299,792 kilometers per second, which translates to 186,282 miles per second. Hypothetically, this means that if an object could travel at the speed of light, it could go around the Earth 7.5 times in one second.
Why is "c" the speed of light?
In Einstein's equation, the speed of light in a vacuum is represented by a lowercase “c†for "constant" or from the Latin term “celeritasâ€, which means "speed" to the power of two (squared).
What is the speed of light on Earth?
The speed of light can slow depending on what it’s traveling through. Light bends when it comes in contact with any matter - even dust - causing a slight decrease in speed. That said, light traveling through Earth's atmosphere moves almost as fast as the speed of light in a vacuum.
Related Articles
Data Sent via Infrared Light Could Make WiFi Hundreds of Times Faster
American Museum of Natural History. "A Matter of Time. " Amnh.org. (Feb. 16, 2022) https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/einstein/time/a-matter-of-time
Brandeker, Alexis. "What would a relativistic interstellar traveler see?" Usenet Physics FAQ. May 2002. (Feb. 16, 2022J) http://www.desy.de/user/projects/Physics/Relativity/SR/Spaceship/spaceship.html
Carl Sagan's Cosmos. "Travels in Space and Time." YouTube. Video uploaded Nov. 27, 2006 (Feb. 16, 2022 ) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2t8hUaaZVJg
Hawking, Stephen. "The Illustrated Brief History of Time. " Bantam. 1996. (Feb. 16. 2022) https://bit.ly/367UGpZ
EurekAlert! "Breaking the warp barrier for faster-than-light travel. " Eurekalert.org. March 9, 2021. (Feb. 16, 2022) https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/642756
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "Mass, Energy, the Speed of Light – It's Not Intuitive! " Lbl.gov. 1996. (Feb. 16, 2022) https://www2.lbl.gov/MicroWorlds/teachers/massenergy.pdf
Lemonick, Michael D. "Will We Ever Travel at the Speed of Light?" Time. Apr. 10, 2000. (Feb. 16, 2022), 2011) http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,996616,00.html
May, Andrew. "What is time dilation? " LiveScience. Nov. 17, 2021. (Feb. 16, 2022) https://www.livescience.com/what-is-time-dilation
NOVA Physics + Math. "Carl Sagan Ponders Time Travel." NOVA. Oct. 12, 1999. (Feb. 16, 2022) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/Sagan-Time-Travel.html
Ptak, Andy. "The Speed of Light in a Rocket." NASA's Imagine the Universe: Ask An Astrophysicist. Jan. 2, 1997. (Feb. 16, 2022) http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970102c.html
Rynasiewicz, Robert, "Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion."Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2014. (Feb. 16, 2022) https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=newton-stm
Stein, Vicky. "Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity. " Space.com. Sept. 20, 2021. (Feb. 16, 2022) https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html
Van Zyl, Miezam (project editor)."Universe: The Definitive Visual Guide." Dorling Kindersley Limited. 2020. (Feb. 16, 2022) https://bit.ly/33q5Mpm.
The internet has once again become a battleground for science fiction. At the beginning of the year, a rumor spread rapidly online: allegedly, on August 12, 2026, Earth will completely lose its gravity for seven seconds. This, they say, will lead to mass casualties. What’s more, NASA is already spending an astronomical $89 billion of taxpayer money on the mysterious Project Anchor to combat the consequences. The conspiracy theory became so widespread that people even stopped listening to scientists who claimed that it was impossible. Therefore, the space agency was forced to intervene to calm the audience.
Photo of a total solar eclipse. Source: Unsplash
Official denial
A NASA representative gave a comprehensive response tofact-checkers, calling this theory complete nonsense. “The Earth will not lose its gravity because it is directly related to the planet’s mass,” the spokesperson said.
For gravity to disappear, Earth would have to suddenly lose all its mass — from its core to its atmosphere. If this were to happen, problems would begin well before the hypothetical date, and they would be much more serious long before gravity was completely lost.
Where do such myths come from?
Such misinformation is actively spread on social media
The rumor seems to have arisen from a combination of two facts: a real astronomical phenomenon — the total solar eclipse on August 12, 2026 — and a misunderstanding of physics. The Sun and Moon actually create tidal forces, but these have a minimal effect on the Earth’s surface and are entirely predictable. These forces cannot possibly “turn off” the planet’s global gravity.
What should you really pay attention to?
So, we won’t be experiencing seven seconds of weightlessness. But a total solar eclipse is a real and exciting event. NASA emphasizes that it is important to observe it as safely as possible. You can only look at the Sun without special protective glasses for a brief moment during the total phase, when the Moon completely covers the solar disk. As soon as even the smallest edge of the Sun appears, you must immediately use eye protection.
This story is a vivid example of how confusion over basic scientific concepts can give rise to large-scale hoaxes. Gravity is a fundamental and constant property of our planet, and the main cosmic show in August is not its disappearance, but an impressive eclipse that is well worth watching.
Astronaut Sunita Williams is now best known to the general public as one of the two crew members of the Starliner spacecraft who, due to its malfunction, were stuck on the ISS for almost a year. In fact, she has flown into space three times, but is now ending her career as a space traveler.
Sunita Williams. Source: phys.org
Circumstances of the astronaut’s resignation
Sunita Williams is retiring. The NASA astronaut has been in the news over the past couple of years mainly because she and Barry Wilmore were stranded on the International Space Station after significant technical problems were discovered on their Starliner spacecraft.
The space agency announced the news on Tuesday, saying her resignation took effect at the end of December. Williams’ partner on the failed Boeing capsule test flight, Barry Wilmore, left NASA last summer.
Williams and Wilmore flew to the space station in 2024, becoming the first people to travel on Boeing’s Starliner crew capsule. Their mission was supposed to last only a week, but it stretched out to more than nine months due to problems with Starliner. They finally returned home in March last year on a SpaceX spacecraft.
In the next few missions, Boeing’s Starliner will transport cargo to the ISS, not people. NASA wants to make sure that all of the capsule’s engine problems and other technical issues are resolved before putting anyone on board. A test launch is planned for later this year.
Sunita Williams’ achievements in space
In fact, Williams’ resignation cannot be called a failure. After all, she is already 60 years old, and even before her career at NASA, she managed to rise to the rank of captain in the US Navy as a combat helicopter pilot. She participated in several military missions.
This was followed by 27 years at NASA and three space flights totaling 608 days. At one point, Williams held the record for the longest time spent in space by a woman. She also made 10 spacewalks totaling 60 hours and 19 minutes.
Thus, Williams’ mission on Starliner was originally intended to be the culmination of her career. New NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman called her “a trailblazer in human spaceflight.” “Congratulations on your well-deserved retirement,” he added in a statement.
In fact, it is quite possible that Sunita Williams will fly into space again. Only not as a NASA astronaut, but as an employee of some private space company. At least, that’s what happened to her colleague Peggy Whitson.
Once bitten, twice shy? NASA astronaut who famously spent 9 months stuck in space dramatically RETIRES less than a year after returning to solid ground
Once bitten, twice shy? NASA astronaut who famously spent 9 months stuck in space dramatically RETIRES less than a year after returning to solid ground
Suni Williams, a NASA astronaut who famously spent nine months stuck in space, has dramatically retired, less than one year after returning to solid ground.
Ms Williams and fellow astronaut, Butch Wilmore, returned to Earth on March 19 last year, aboard aSpaceX Crew Dragon capsule which splashed down off the coast of Florida.
The pair had left Earth in June 2024, planning to undertake an eight–day test flight of the new Boeing Starliner capsule to the International Space Station (ISS).
However, after the Starliner capsule developed numerous technical issues during the flight, the astronauts were forced to wait until the next crew rotation to return to Earth.
In total, the pair spent 286 days in space – 278 days more than they had initially planned.
Despite the traumatic experience, Ms Wiliams maintains that 'space is my absolute favourite place to be'.
'It's been an incredible honor to have served in the Astronaut Office and have had the opportunity to fly in space three times,' she said.
'The International Space Station, the people, the engineering, and the science are truly awe–inspiring and have made the next steps of exploration to the Moon and Mars possible. I hope the foundation we set has made these bold steps a little easier.'
Suni Williams, a NASAastronaut who famously spent nine months stuck in space, has dramatically retired, less than one year after returning to solid ground
The unexpectedly long visit to space appeared to take its toll on the 60–year–old. As the days rolled by, health experts and NASA insiders began to raise concerns that Ms Williams was rapidly losing weight
In total, Ms Williams spent 27 years in service, completing three missions aboard the ISS.
'Suni Williams has been a trailblazer in human spaceflight, shaping the future of exploration through her leadership aboard the space station and paving the way for commercial missions to low Earth orbit,' said NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman.
'Her work advancing science and technology has laid the foundation for Artemis missions to the Moon and advancing toward Mars, and her extraordinary achievements will continue to inspire generations to dream big and push the boundaries of what's possible.
'Congratulations on your well–deserved retirement, and thank you for your service to NASA and our nation.'
Ms Williams' 286–day stint on the ISS saw her total days logged in space skyrocket to 608 – second on the list of cumulative time in space by a NASA astronaut.
However, the unexpectedly long visit to space appeared to take its toll on the 60–year–old.
As the days rolled by, health experts and NASA insiders began to raise concerns that Ms Williams was rapidly losing weight.
Photos showed her looking gaunt upon returning to Earth, although Ms Williams maintained that she didn't actually lose any weight.
Ms Williams and fellow astronaut, Butch Wilmore, returned to Earth on March 19 last year, aboard a SpaceXCrew Dragon capsule which splashed down off the coast of Florida
'I think things shift around quite a bit, you probably heard of a fluid shift,' she said.
'Folks in space you know, their heads look a little bit bigger because the fluid evens out along the body.'
The question is simple: why haven’t humans returned to the Moon since Apollo 17 in 1972? The main reason is money. After the first Moon landing in July 1969 with Apollo 11, there were only six more missions with the same goal.
Only five of those missions actually landed on the Moon. What once looked like a steady effort to explore the Moon is now seen, in 2026, as an unfinished goal with many cancelled missions. Apollo 17 is still the last time people went to the Moon, and that is likely to stay true for a while.
The Royal Museums Greenwich website also looked into this question and came to a similar answer: cost is the main reason for no new Moon landings. As they put it, "Going to the Moon in 1969" was "extremely expensive".
Why haven’t humans walked on the Moon again?
At first, the Kennedy administration planned to spend about $7 billion on the Moon program. But as the same website explains, the final cost ended up being $20 billion.
Today, most governments are not willing to spend so much money on a Moon mission that, for now, would mostly just make news and be remembered in history books. In the end, money matters most, and the world’s priorities have changed.
Shift in priorities
Another reason for fewer Moon missions is a change in thinking. In the 1960s and 1970s, countries competed and showed their ambition through space exploration. Now, most goals are closer to home, and money goes to more immediate needs.
More money is now spent on military technology, while research, education, and NASA’s budget in the United States have all been cut. This has also led to fewer new images of people walking on the Moon.
Why haven’t humans walked on the Moon again?
The next step in exploring the Moon may involve sending robots instead of astronauts. An article in the Encyclopedia Britannica says robotic landings are being considered. Robots need fewer supplies than people, who require "water, oxygen, food, and other essentials to survive."
NASA’s Artemis II Rollout and Mission Overview News Conference (Jan. 16, 2026)
Also, several countries and private companies are already working on robotic Moon projects that could help future missions with people, as the same article notes.
They won't land on the moon, but...
Still, in 2026, NASA astronauts will orbit the Moon again, but they won’t land. In late December 2025, Telemundo reported on the Artemis II mission, which could launch in early February 2026 if everything goes as planned. This 10-day trip around the Moon will be "the closest approach of humans to the Moon in over half a century."
Why haven’t humans walked on the Moon again?
This mission will test NASA’s Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft. Both have had major delays and gone over budget in the United States during the past decade.
Aurora alert! The colossal solar storm could impact and trigger impressive northern lights.
Aurora alert! The colossal solar storm could impact and trigger impressive northern lights.
(Image credit: Image inset left: NASA SDO, right: NOAA SWPC, graphic made in Canva Pro.)
The sun sure has woken up this week, unleashing a powerful X-class solar flare on Jan. 18 that hurled a colossal, fast-moving coronal mass ejection (CME) directly toward Earth. That CME has now arrived, triggering severe (G4) geomagnetic storm conditions far earlier than initially forecast.
Full-halo CME from the X1.9 flare. The three bright specks of light (left to right) are Venus, Mercury and Mars.
(Image credit: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center)
The shock wave from the CME struck at 2:38 p.m. EST (1938 GMT) on Jan. 19, according to NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center, which confirmed that G4 storm levels were reached shortly after impact. The storm is ongoing, and space weather forecasters say CME passage will continue through the evening, keeping the door open for more aurora activity tonight.
Sun unleashes powerful X-flare, CME hits Earth sparking severe geomagnetic storm
Why the CME's impact depends on its magnetic orientation
CME arrivals are notoriously difficult to forecast. Their speed, direction of travel and — most importantly — their magnetic orientation all determine how strongly (if at all) they will interact with Earth's magnetic field.
If the CME's magnetic field is oriented southward, a component known as the Bz, it can more easily link up with Earth's northward-pointing magnetic field, allowing energy to pour into our planet's magnetosphere and trigger geomagnetic storm conditions.
X1.9 solar flare erupts from the sun on Jan. 18. (Image credit: NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory)
If the Bz is instead oriented northward, Earth's magnetic field largely deflects the incoming energy, effectively "closing the door," and what looked like a promising space weather event can end up being a bit of a nothing burger.
Some CMEs contain a mixture of southward and northward magnetic fields, which can lead to stop-start or fluctuating geomagnetic activity. These events keep space weather forecasters and aurora chasers very much on their toes.
Even now, after the CME has arrived, we won't fully understand its magnetic orientation until it's sampled in real time by solar wind monitoring spacecraft like DSCOVR and ACE, positioned upstream of Earth.
NASA model of the incoming CME and predicted arrival time. (Image credit: NASA)
What's an X-class solar flare?
Solar flares are ranked in ascending strength from A, B, C and M up to X, with each letter representing a tenfold increase in intensity. X-class flares are the strongest eruptions and the number following the X indicates how powerful the event is. Today's flare was measured at X1.9, putting it in the upper tier of solar outbursts.
The powerful flare from sunspot region AR4341 peaked at 1:09 p.m. EST (1809 GMT), according to NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center. The eruption triggered strong (R3) radio blackouts across the sunlit side of Earth, with the most severe disruptions concentrated over the Americas.
The X1.9 solar flare triggered radio blackouts across the Americas. (Image credit: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center)
What is a CME and how can it affect Earth?
A CME is a massive expulsion of plasma from the sun that carries a magnetic field. If a CME hits Earth's magnetosphere — the protective magnetic "bubble" generated by our planet — it can trigger a geomagnetic storm.
These geomagnetic storms vary in intensity and are therefore classified on a scale from minor (G1) to extreme (G5). Current forecasts from the U.K. Met Office suggest the incoming CME could produce strong (G3) to severe (G4) geomagnetic storm conditions.
Storms of this magnitude can disrupt satellite operations, degrade GPS navigation and increase atmospheric drag on spacecraft. They can also supercharge auroral activity, potentially pushing the northern lights far beyond their usual high-latitude haunts and into mid-latitude regions near 45° latitude.
Editor's note: This article was updated on Jan. 19 at 4:30 p.m. EST (2130 GMT) to reflect that the coronal mass ejection (CME) has arrived and triggered G4 (severe) geomagnetic storm conditions, according to NOAA. Forecasts and visibility potential may continue to evolve as the storm progresses.
Sun unleashes powerful X-flare, CME hits Earth sparking severe geomagnetic storm
Less than a week ago, a unique discovery was made. Astronomers managed to find a comet from the Kreutz family at the greatest distance in history. The comet was given the temporary designation 6AC4721, and it is now the focus of attention for a large number of professionals and amateurs. Some comets from the Kreutz family become so spectacular that they are given the status of Great Comets. But will 6AC4721 succeed in doing so?
Unique discovery
On January 13, 2026, a new faint object with a magnitude of +17.8 was discovered using the 28-centimeter telescope at the AMACS1 observatory in San Pedro de Atacama (Chile), operating as part of the MAPS program. The object was moving against the backdrop of stars. It was added to the Minor Planet Center (MPC) database under the temporary designation 6AC4721, where it awaits confirmation by other observatories.
Renowned comet discoverer Alan Hale photographed 6AC4721 the day after its discovery, on January 14. Source: astronomynow.com.
Its uniqueness became apparent quite quickly. Professionals and amateurs agree that it is a sun-grazing comet belonging to the Kreutz (or Kroyts) family, one of the families whose comets approach the Sun at an extremely close distance. In this case, it will remain approximately 760,000 kilometers from the center of the star, which is only ~64,000 km from the photosphere. So, comets from the Kreutz family are very rarely found using ground-based telescopes. Success in the case of 6AC4721 gives hope that the comet will be very bright in just a few weeks.
Usually, comets from the Kreutz family are discovered in images taken by space solar coronagraphs. In this sense, the SOHO observatory is unrivalled. Physically, such comets are often very small, literally a few dozen meters in size, and therefore impossible to see from a great distance. They only become visible when they approach the Sun, when the heated ice of the nucleus actively sublimates, and the comet grows a tail and coma.
What is even more striking is the time that will pass between the discovery of 6AC4721 and its passage through perihelion, the point in its orbit closest to the Sun. According to available data, the comet will be near our star on April 4, which means that almost three months will pass between its discovery and perihelion! Accordingly, the distance from the Sun of 2.056 astronomical units, at which the comet was first seen, is an absolute record for Kreutz comets. Previously, this record was held by the legendary comet C/1965 S1 (Ikeya–Seki), discovered 33 days before perihelion.
Surprisingly, despite more than 120 observations accumulated by January 19, the comet has not yet been given a permanent designation and is still listed on the MPC database’s page for possible new comets. Most likely, it will be the first comet registered in 2026, so it will be designated C/2026 A1.
Gerald Rhemann and Michael Jäger were the first to obtain a color image of comet 6AC4721, photographing it on the evening of January 17.
Like a butterfly to the light
Being a sungrazing comet is very risky. These icy bodies often approach the Sun at a distance less than its radius. The intense stress from powerful gravity and heating often leads to the disintegration of the comet’s nucleus. However, at the same time, the comet puts on a real celestial show.
It is believed that comets of the Kreutz family, to which 6AC4721 belongs, originate from a single large cometary body. Their orbits are very similar to the trajectory of the Great Comet, which was observed near the Sun in the winter of 372–371 BC. It probably fragmented, and the fragments continued to move along similar trajectories.
In 1106, a true queen of comets appeared — it could be seen near the Sun even during the day. Nowadays, scientists mostly agree that the Great Comet of 1106 came from the one seen in 372–371 BC. There’s evidence that it also broke up, creating a big subgroup of cometary bodies.
Heinrich Kreutz noticed the similarity between the orbits of the Great Comets of 1843 and 1843 and the orbit of the comet of 1106, and suggested that they had a common origin. Therefore, the comet family was named after Kreutz.
Image of comet C/1965 S1 (Ikeya–Seki) taken by Roger Lynds in 1965. Source: Wikipedia
This family includes such famous comets as C/1965 S1 (Ikeya–Seki) and C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy). However, their fates were different. The first one broke up into at least three pieces before reaching perihelion. The second one managed to survive its encounter with the Sun mainly thanks to its large nucleus, which was about 500 m in size.
For now, scientists predict an unenviable fate for 6AC4721: as it approaches perihelion, the comet will most likely disintegrate. But only time will tell what will actually happen. After all, this is the first comet in the Kreutz family to be caught at such a great distance, so its behavior is difficult to predict.
Will we be able to see this comet?
Bad news for the Northern Hemisphere: the orbits of the Kreutz family comets are such that they are mainly visible from the Southern Hemisphere. However, near its perihelion, 6AC4721 may still give us a chance. The best conditions will occur around April 4, but the window of opportunity will be very short. In addition, the comet will be at a very small angular distance from the Sun, which will make observation significantly more difficult.
If the comet does not disintegrate as it approaches the Sun and survives to perihelion, it could become very bright and, in this sense, the most interesting comet of 2026. In a favorable scenario, we will see spectacular images from astrophotographers and space coronagraphs, and we will be able to admire its magnificent tail.
Based on materials from the Telegram channel “Всесвіт у кишені” (Universe in Your Pocket) which is administered by the public organization of astronomy popularizers “Шлях до Всесвіту.” (Way to the Universe).
On the night of January 19-20, residents of many regions of the Earth were able to see auroras. They were accompanied by the most powerful radiation storm of the 21st century.
Aurora borealis observed on January 19–20, 2026. The photo was taken in the Netherlands. Source: Josh Walet/SIPA/picture alliance
On January 18, the Sun produced a powerful X1.9 class flare. It was accompanied by a coronal mass ejection — a cloud of plasma that was directed toward Earth. Experts predicted that it would reach our planet on January 20. In reality, the emission came much faster — already on the evening of January 19. The reason was that the speed of the solar wind turned out to be much higher than predicted.
Aurora borealis observed on January 19–20, 2026. The photo was taken in Greenland. Source: Josefsen photo
After interacting with the Earth’s magnetosphere, the eruption resulted in a powerful G4-class geomagnetic storm. The resulting auroras were observed much further south than usual, including in Ukraine. Some photographs of this remarkable celestial spectacle were taken at around 30 degrees north latitude.
Aurora borealis observed on January 19–20, 2026, above Lviv. Source: Artur Abramiv/ZUMA/picture alliance
In theory, auroras could have been observed further south, but this was prevented by a change in the BZ index, which took on a positive value. This stopped their “advance”. Nevertheless, the storm that passed became one of the most powerful in the current cycle of solar activity.
The events of January 19–20 are also interesting as they were accompanied by a powerful radiation storm caused by an increase in the concentration of solar protons to record levels in the 21st century. Such events do not pose a threat to Earth, as charged particles are unable to reach the Earth’s surface. However, they can interfere with the operation of satellites, cause navigation errors, and disrupt radio communications. In addition, there is an increased radiation hazard for astronauts during spacewalks, as well as for passengers on transpolar flights.
NOAA warning of an S4-class radiation storm
The recent radiation storm was classified as S4 by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Although a higher level of S5 is theoretically possible, it has never been recorded in the history of observations. So S4 is the actual maximum. The last time the S4-class radiation storm was observed was in 2003. However, the recent storm exceeded it in strength.
AP
For more details on how auroras occur and where and when they can be observed, read our article.
James Webb telescope reveals sharpest-ever look at the edge of a black hole — and it could solve a major galactic mystery
James Webb telescope reveals sharpest-ever look at the edge of a black hole — and it could solve a major galactic mystery
Story by Ivan Farkas
Astronomers have revealed theJames Webb Space Telescope's(JWST) sharpest-ever image of the area around a black hole. The spectacular view could help solve a decades-long mystery while reversing a long-held belief about space's most extreme objects.
Since the 1990s, astronomers have observed a curious brightness in infrared wavelengths surrounding the active supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centers of some galaxies. Previously, they attributed these excess infrared emissions to the outflows — superheated streams of matter blasted from black holes.
But in a new study published Jan. 13 in the journal Nature Communications, an international team of researchers used JWST to look into the heart of the nearby Circinus galaxy, located only about 13 million light-years from Earth, to reveal the area around the galaxy's SMBH.
The data from JWST, paired with numerous ground-based observations, reveal that the infrared excess is coming from the disk of dusty material that's falling into the Circinus galaxy's central SMBH, rather than from material flowing away from it.
This galactic revelation can help astronomers better understand the growth and evolution of SMBHs, as well as these massive dark monsters' influence on their host galaxies.
Of doughnuts and disks
Active black holes like those at the centers of galaxies are fed by a giant ring of infalling gas and dust. As a black hole draws material from the inner wall of this "doughnut," known as a torus, the material forms a thinner accretion disk that spirals into the black hole like water spiraling into a drain.
An illustration of a supermassive black hole spewing an energetic outburst into space
(Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Ralf Crawford (STScI))
The black hole's tidal forces accelerate the infalling matter to great speeds. The resulting friction within the disk causes the swirling matter to emit light that glows so brightly that it obscures astronomers' view of the inner region around the black hole.
Yet black holes are not vacuum cleaners, and even they have a feeding limit. So they blast some of the swirling material back into space, in the form of jets or "winds." Therefore, an understanding of the nature of a black hole's torus, accretion disk and outflows is key to knowing how black holes of various sizes accrete and expel matter to potentially shape their host galaxies by quenching or enhancing star formation across galactic scales.
This image from NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope shows the Circinus galaxy. A close-up of its core from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope shows the inner face of the hole of the donut-shaped disk of gas disk glowing in infrared light. The outer ring appears as dark spots.
| Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez (University of South Carolina), Deepashri Thatte (STScI); Image Processing: Alyssa Pagan (STScI); Acknowledgment: NSF's NOIRLab, CTIO
Resolving a long-standing mystery
The dense gas and bright starlight in Circinus previously prevented astronomers from viewing the galaxy's central region and SMBH in detail.
"In order to study the supermassive black hole, despite being unable to resolve it, they had to obtain the total intensity of the inner region of the galaxy over a large wavelength range and then feed that data into models," lead study author Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez, a galaxy evolution researcher at the University of South Carolina, said in a NASA statement.
Earlier models separately fit the observed spectra of the torus, accretion disk and outflows, but they couldn't resolve the region in its entirety. As a result, astronomers could not explain which part of the SMBH's surroundings caused the excess emissions in infrared light.
JWST's advanced capabilities allowed astronomers to peer through the dust and starlight of Circinus so they could get a sharper view of the SMBH's environment. To do so, they used an imaging technique known as interferometry.
Ground-based interferometry generally requires an array of telescopes or mirrors that work together to gather and combine light from a celestial object over a large area. By combining light from multiple sources, this method causes the electromagnetic waves that form that light to create interference patterns that astronomers can analyze to reveal the sizes, shapes and other characteristics of those objects.
Unlike these terrestrial facilities, however, the space-based JWST can operate as its own interferometer array via its aperture masking interferometer (AMI), a component of the telescope's Near-Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) instrument. Like a camera aperture, AMI is an opaque physical mask with seven small, hexagonal holes that control the amount and direction of light entering JWST's detectors.
Overall, AMI effectively doubles JWST's resolution. "This allows us to see images twice as sharp," Joel Sanchez-Bermudez, an astrophysicist at the National University of Mexico and co-author of the study, said in the statement. "Instead of Webb's 6.5-meter [21 feet] diameter, it's like we are observing this region with a 13-meter space telescope."
By doubling its resolution, JWST captured its sharpest-ever view of a 33-light-year-wide area at the center of Circinus. This unprecedented image allowed researchers to calculate that the majority — around 87% — of the excess infrared emissions come from the dusty disk that's actively feeding the central black hole; "the inner surface of the hole of the doughnut," Lopez-Rodriguez said via email. Whereas previous research had suggested that the excess may have come from hot dusty winds, or even the galaxy’s residual starlight, the team found that less than 1% of these emissions come from the energetic outflows streaming away from the SMBH.
The accretion may be extinguishing star formation in the center of Circinus, but confirming this will require a different type of JWST-based observation, Lopez-Rodriguez said.
An invaluable perspective
An illustration of the James Webb Space Telescope in orbit
(Image credit: Getty Images)
In addition to revealing previously hidden SMBH mechanics, this research highlights the potential of JWST-based interferometry for studying various celestial objects, including other active SMBHs at the cores of nearby galaxies. By increasing the sample size, astronomers hope to determine whether the infrared emissions from other SMBHs are due to their dusty disks or to their hot outflows.
"AMI has to be used — in order to get precious JWST time — on targets which cannot be done from the ground, or at wavelengths that are blocked by the Earth's atmosphere," study co-author Julien Girard, a senior research scientist at the Space Telescope Science Institute, told Live Science via email.
AMI-based observations can better illuminate our own solar system; they recently offered a detailed look at the volcanoes on Jupiter's hellish moon Io, Girard added. So AMI can observe diverse cosmic objects of varying shapes and sizes, from moons oozing with lava to black holes obscured by dust. In the future, it could help astronomers detect moons around prominent asteroids or reveal the orbits and masses of multistar systems, Girard added.
Like this article? For more stories like this, follow us on MSN by clicking the +Follow button at the top of this page.
NASA has revealed the sharpest ever look at the edge of a black hole, and it could solve a decades–old galactic mystery.
Located 13 million light–years from Earth, the Circinus Galaxy is home to a supermassive black hole that is constantly blasting radiation into space.
The clouds of hot gas surrounding this black hole are so bright that seeing any real details has previously been all but impossible.
Now, NASA has used the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to unveil the strange and powerful forces on the very edge of this black hole.
Supermassive black holes like the one in Circinus remain active by constantly consuming matter from the surrounding galaxy.
Scientists had observed that this process creates a huge amount of infrared energy, but most telescopes weren't sensitive enough to see where it was coming from.
Previously, scientists thought most of this radiation was coming from the black hole's 'outflow' – a stream of superheated matter fired out from the core.
Now, these new observations from the JWST have turned that expectation on its head.
NASA has revealed the closest ever look at the edge of a black hole 13 million light–years from Earth, and it could help solve a decades–old galactic mystery. Pictured: The new James Webb Space Telescope image overlaid on the Hubble image
A black hole is the ultra–dense heart of a dead star where gravity is so strong that not even light can escape.
Supermassive black holes, like the one in the Circinus Galaxy, become 'active' by consuming vast quantities of matter from their surrounding galaxy.
As this matter falls inwards, it forms a dense doughnut–shaped ring called a torus that orbits the black hole.
A supermassive black hole gathers material from the torus' inner walls to form an accretion disc, a swirling whirlpool of matter that circles the black hole like water going down a drain.
This accretion disk starts to get hotter through friction until it begins to glow bright enough to show up on our telescopes.
Although astronomers' models make predictions about how these different parts should interact, it is extremely difficult to see this process in action.
The light from the accretion disk blocks out any details, while the incredibly dense torus hides the inner region of infalling matter from view.
The Circinus galaxy is home to an active supermassive black hole that constantly blasts infrared radiation into space. However, scientists have struggled to determine exactly where around the black hole this radiation comes from
Scientists would try to fit the different wavelengths of light they observed to the emissions from different regions of the black hole, but not everything could be made to fit neatly.
Most notably, some telescopes could detect an excess of infrared light coming from somewhere in the black hole, but didn't have the resolution to work out where it was coming from.
Lead author Dr Enrique Lopez–Rodriguez, of the University of South Carolina, says: 'Since the 90s, it has not been possible to explain excess infrared emissions that come from hot dust at the cores of active galaxies, meaning the models only take into account either the torus or the outflows, but cannot explain that excess.'
Models assumed that most of the mass, and therefore most of the emissions, would be in the outflow.
But to test this, astronomers needed a way to both filter out the interfering starlight and distinguish the infrared emissions of the torus from those of the outflows.
Luckily, the JWST offered an innovative solution to both of these problems.
The scientists used a tool called the Aperture Masking Interferometer, which essentially converts JWST into several smaller telescopes that all work together.
On Earth, interferometers are usually many different radio or optical telescopes that work together as if they were a single, enormous observatory.
Using a new technique, scientists were able to determine that most of the radiation is coming from a swirling doughnut of matter known as the taurus, not from the jet of ejected matter as previous studies had believed
The JWST can replicate this same trick by using a special cover with seven hexagonal holes.
Dr Lopez–Rodriguez told the Daily Mail: 'Interferometry is the technique that provides us with the highest angular resolution possible.
'Using aperture masking interferometry with the JWST is like observing with a 13–meter space telescope instead of a 6.5–meter one.'
Gathering data with this technique, the scientists were able to create an image of the central region.
This is the first extragalactic observation from an infrared interferometer in space, and offers an unprecedented look into the core of an active galaxy.
Contrary to previous estimates, around 87 per cent of the infrared emissions from hot dust in Circinus come from the areas closest to the black hole, while the outflow contributes less than one per cent.
This is a total reversal of what had been predicted by astronomers' best models for supermassive black holes.
However, while the mystery of Circinus' black hole has been solved, there are billions more supermassive black holes out there in the universe.
These images were possible thanks to a technique that converts the James Webb Space Telescope's mirror (artist's impression) into several smaller lenses that all work together to provide extreme resolution in a very small area
Circinus' accretion disc was only moderately bright, so it makes sense that the torus would dominate its emissions.
But for brighter black holes, the opposite might still be the case, and far more case studies will be needed.
With this research, astronomers found a technique to investigate any black holes they chose, so long as they are bright enough for the Aperture Masking Interferometer to be useful.
Dr Lopez–Rodriguez says: 'We need a statistical sample of black holes, perhaps a dozen or two dozen, to understand how mass in their accretion disks and their outflows relate to their power.'
Black holes are so dense and their gravitational pull is so strong that no form of radiation can escape them - not even light.
They act as intense sources of gravity which hoover up dust and gas around them. Their intense gravitational pull is thought to be what stars in galaxies orbit around.
How they are formed is still poorly understood. Astronomers believe they may form when a large cloud of gas up to 100,000 times bigger than the sun, collapses into a black hole.
Many of these black hole seeds then merge to form much larger supermassive black holes, which are found at the centre of every known massive galaxy.
Alternatively, a supermassive black hole seed could come from a giant star, about 100 times the sun's mass, that ultimately forms into a black hole after it runs out of fuel and collapses.
When these giant stars die, they also go 'supernova', a huge explosion that expels the matter from the outer layers of the star into deep space.
NASA has debunked a wild conspiracy theory doing the rounds on social media.
The bizarre theory claims that on August 12, at exactly 14.33 GMT (9.33 ET), Earth will lose gravity for seven seconds.
According to its proponents, this 'secret' was revealed in a NASA document named 'Project Anchor', leaked in November 2024.
And the disaster could lead to at least '40 million deaths from falls'.
Unsurprisingly, thousands of concerned viewers took to X to discuss the claims.
'If this is fake, why does it have a date, a project name, and a budget?' one user asked on the platform.
While another concerned commenter added: 'There's gonna be a lot of injuries when everyone comes crashing back down then if it was to happen.'
Now, NASA's experts have put the case to bed once and for all – pointing out that the wacky theory fundamentally misunderstands how gravity works.
NASA has debunked a wild conspiracy theory that the world will lose gravity for seven seconds on August 12
According to NASA, there is no way that the Earth can 'lose' gravity without losing mass, which means this theory is totally without basis
Despite the conspiracy theorists' claims, there is absolutely no trace of any leaked document or mention of Project Anchor online prior to December last year.
A NASA spokesman told fact–checking website Snopes: 'The Earth will not lose gravity on August 12, 2026.
'Earth's gravity, or total gravitational force, is determined by its mass.
'The only way for the Earth to lose gravity would be for the Earth system, the combined mass of its core, mantle, crust, ocean, terrestrial water, and atmosphere, to lose mass.'
Although the exact origins of the conspiracy are unknown, one of the earliest references is from an Instagram user named @mr_danya_of.
In a lengthy post, the user wrote: 'On August 12, 2026, the world will lose gravity for seven seconds. NASA knows. They're preparing but won't tell us why.'
They claimed that this would cause '40 million deaths from falls. Infrastructure destruction. Economic Collapse lasting over ten years. Mass panic.'
The post suggests that this disruption would be caused by 'the intersection of gravitational waves' produced by colliding black holes.
On social media, conspiracy theorists have been sent into a frenzy. One claimed that the 'details are way too specific to ignore'
The post also included some of the supposed details of Project Anchor, claiming that it had a budget of '$89 billion' and was responsible for 'building underground bunkers'.
In their very next post, the user told an entirely fabricated story about 600 people disappearing from the town of Portlock, Alaska, in 2019.
In other posts, the user claimed to work at Google, a morgue, a crematorium, a hospice, as well as being a psychiatrist and a criminologist.
But these details were apparently lost on the numerous accounts that copied the exact text from the original post and spread it over social media.
As the conspiracy spread, other users added more details and embellishments.
For example, one user wrote: 'The Earth is expected to see "zero–gravity" condition on August 12, 2026, at 14.33 UTC, when a Total Eclipse of the Sun will pass over the Arctic Ocean.'
While another user posted a video to Instagram in which they suggested: 'Maybe that's why all these billionaires are building their bunkers.'
Soon, the conspiracy theorists began to turn on each other, accusing other users of being part of the conspiracy.
One concerned conspiracy theorist worried that there might be injuries when gravity returned
However, it wasn't long before the conspiracy theorists turned on one another and accused other theorists of being part of a conspiracy
Conspiracy theorists suggested that the disruption could be caused by gravitational waves produced by colliding black holes. While gravitational waves are real and do come from colliding black holes (artist's impression), they cannot cause Earth to 'lose' gravity
One social media user wrote: 'Gravity as theory is hollow. Nice psyop though. The Deep State is keeping the rabbits busy digging a hole.'
'Makes for a great psyop to get everyone indoors without forcing a lockdown,' added another.
However, there is absolutely no basis in reality for any of these elaborate claims.
Dr William Alston, a black hole expert from the University of Hertfordshire, told the Daily Mail: 'These ripples are so weak that we have had to build the most sensitive detection equipment to see them – known as the LIGO and Virgo observatories.
'These ripples routinely pass through Earth and ourselves, very subtly squeezing and stretching us; however, this is so small – many times smaller than the size of an atom – that this change goes by completely unnoticed.'
Additionally, since gravitational waves move at the speed of light, Dr Alston says these theorists would need a 'physics-defying mechanism' to predict the date of their arrival.
Likewise, while there will indeed be a solar eclipse on August 12, this will in no way affect Earth's gravity.
One user went so far as to claim that 'gravity as a theory is hollow', branding the idea of gravitational attraction as some sort of cover–up
The date of the supposed gravitational switch coincides with a solar eclipse (pictured), but experts say this will not affect Earth's gravity
A solar eclipse occurs when the moon aligns with the sun, so that it appears obscured from our perspective.
The sun and moon do exert a gravitational pull on Earth, but this doesn't change during an eclipse.
The NASA spokesman added: 'A total solar eclipse has no unusual impact on Earth's gravity.
'The gravitational attraction of the Sun and Moon on the Earth, which doesn't impact Earth's total gravity, but does impact tidal forces, is well understood and is predictable decades in advance.'
Over the course of three online-based studies, researchers at the University of Kent showed strong links between the belief in conspiracy theories and certain psychological traits.
Narcissism and self-esteem levels have a large impact on a persons belief in conspiracy theories.
The results showed that people who rated highly on the narcissism scale and who had low self-esteem were more likely to be conspiracy believers.
However, while low self-esteem, narcissism and belief in conspiracies are strongly linked, it is not clear that one - or a combination - causes the other.
But it hints at an interesting new angle to the world of conspiracy and those who reinforce belief.
There are widely believed to be three main reasons as to why people believe in conspiracy theories.
- The desire for control and security - Conspiracy theories can give their believers a sense of control and security.
- The desire to maintain a positive self-image - People who feel socially marginalised are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories and it gives them a sense of worth in the UFO community.
-The desire for understanding and certainty - Seeking explanations for events is a natural human desire.
These three things tie in with the previously stated qualities and combine to create an avid conspiracy theorist.
Viral video alleged NASA knows Earth will briefly lose gravity for seven seconds
The countdown to the first moon mission in more than 50 years officially started Saturday, as NASA rolled out the massive rocket set to blast off in just weeks.
The 11million pound Artemis II rocket reached the launch pad at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida after nearly 12-hour crawl from its home in NASA's Vehicle Assembly Building.
The 10-day manned mission to orbit the moon is set to launch as early as February 6, marking the first manned mission to leave low Earth orbit since Apollo 17 in 1972.
Artemis II will not land on the moon, with NASA saying that the future Artemis III mission scheduled for 2027 will return humans to the lunar surface.
The space agency said Artemis, 'will send astronauts to explore the Moon for scientific discovery, economic benefits, and to build the foundation for the first crewed missions to Mars.'
The crawler-transporter 2 vehicle carried Artemis II's Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion spacecraft along a four-mile route from an assembly building to Launch Pad 39B.
At the launch pad, engineers will spend the next few days preparing SLS and Orion for a 'wet rehearsal' test that includes loading all the propellants that will blast the rocket into space.
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said the mission would fulfill 'a promise to the American people that we will return to the moon.'
Artemis II (Pictured) arrived at NASA's Launch Pad 39B Saturday evening as the space agency prepares for its first moon mission in 53 years
Pictured: The rocket will propel a four-person team, comprised of three NASA astronauts and an astronaut from the Canadian Space Agency, out of Earth's atmosphere as soon as February 6
From L-R: Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen stands alongside NASA astronauts Christina Koch, Victor Glover and Reid Wiseman. Wiseman will also serve as the mission's commander. The group of four address reporters with the rocket and spacecraft directly behind them
NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen are scheduled to briefly orbit the Earth after detaching the Orion spacecraft from its rockets and then set off on their lunar flyby.
With Artemis II now at the launching site, NASA will soon load over 700,000 gallons of super-cold liquid hydrogen and oxygen into the SLS rocket, which are the propellants that ignite and blast the craft into orbit.
NASA will then run through a fake countdown to launch, practice holds and restarts, and then safely drain the tanks of the fuel until it's time for the real launch.
These rehearsals of the fueling procedures help check for any problems with the rocket, such as leaks in the rocket tanks or valves.
If any problems are spotted, NASA will likely need to run multiple rehearsals and possibly delay the launch to one of the many alternate dates already chosen by the space agency.
February 7, 8, 10, and 11 have been chosen as potential backup launch dates if problems or weather issues postpone the February 6 launch. If something prevents a launch in February, NASA has also picked out dates in early March and April.
In September 2025, former NASA Administrator Sean Duffy publicly announced that 'about a year and a half' after the Artemis II mission, the Artemis III astronaut mission would 'land and establish a long-term presence of life on the moon led by America'.
He continued by saying that what astronauts learn from the renewed missions to the moon will help in future efforts to 'put American boots on Mars'.
Pictured: Early in the morning on Saturday, January 17, NASA begins to move the Artemis II rocket out of the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center. Next month, it will be used for the first manned mission to the moon since 1972
Over the first 24 to 48 hours in Earth orbit after blasting off, the four astronauts will conduct extensive tests of the Orion spacecraft's life support systems, guidance and navigation computers, and communications before attempting the moon mission.
The journey to the moon is scheduled to take about three to four days, ending with the spacecraft conducting a lunar flyby, looping around the far side of the moon roughly 5,500 miles above the surface.
Artemis II won't enter orbit around the moon, allowing the crew to test deep-space operations and gather data while traveling farther from Earth than any previous human mission.
The moon's gravity will help slingshot the spacecraft back toward Earth on the return leg of the trip, which will take another three to four days.
Pictured: The Artemis II rocket sits in the Vehicle Assembly Building prior to its move
Pictured: The Orion spacecraft sits atop the Artemis II rocket. The spacecraft will carry the astronauts to the moon and back
Pictured: NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman stands with the four astronauts during a press briefing
Koch emphasized how important adaptability is for an astronaut, especially since none of them have been to the moon and it's been decades since a mission like this has been undertaken.
'This idea that, yes, you train and prepare for everything, but the most important thing is that you're ready to take on what you haven't prepared for,' Koch said.
'The moon is like a witness plate for everything that's actually happened to Earth but has since been erased by our weathering processes and our tectonic processes and our other geologic processes,' the astronaut continued.
'We can actually learn more about solar system formation, more about how planets form maybe around other stars, more about the likelihood of life out there - starting with studying the moon.'
At the end of the mission, Artemis II will splash down in the Pacific Ocean, and the spacecraft and crew will be recovered with the help of the US Navy.
NASA mega-rocket for moon mission could launch in weeks
Data from NASA's Polar spacecraft, circa 1998, provided crucial clues to finding magnetic X-points.
A favorite theme of science fiction is "the portal" -- an extraordinary opening in space or time that connects travelers to distant realms. A good portal is a shortcut, a guide, a door into the unknown. If only they actually existed...
It turns out that they do, sort of, and a NASA-funded researcher at the University of Iowa has figured out how to find them.
"We call them X-points or electron diffusion regions," explains plasma physicist Jack Scudder of the University of Iowa. "They're places where the magnetic field of Earth connects to the magnetic field of the Sun, creating an uninterrupted path leading from our own planet to the sun's atmosphere 93 million miles away."
Observations by NASA's THEMIS spacecraft and Europe's Cluster probes suggest that these magnetic portals open and close dozens of times each day. They're typically located a few tens of thousands of kilometers from Earth where the geomagnetic field meets the onrushing solar wind. Most portals are small and short-lived; others are yawning, vast, and sustained. Tons of energetic particles can flow through the openings, heating Earth's upper atmosphere, sparking geomagnetic storms, and igniting bright polar auroras.
NASA is planning a mission called "MMS," short for Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission, due to launch in 2014, to study the phenomenon. Bristling with energetic particle detectors and magnetic sensors, the four spacecraft of MMS will spread out in Earth's magnetosphere and surround the portals to observe how they work.
Just one problem: Finding them. Magnetic portals are invisible, unstable, and elusive. They open and close without warning "and there are no signposts to guide us in," notes Scudder.
Actually, there are signposts, and Scudder has found them.
Portals form via the process of magnetic reconnection. Mingling lines of magnetic force from the sun and Earth criss-cross and join to create the openings. "X-points" are where the criss-cross takes place. The sudden joining of magnetic fields can propel jets of charged particles from the X-point, creating an "electron diffusion region."
To learn how to pinpoint these events, Scudder looked at data from a space probe that orbited Earth more than 10 years ago.
"In the late 1990s, NASA's Polar spacecraft spent years in Earth's magnetosphere," explains Scudder, "and it encountered many X-points during its mission."
Because Polar carried sensors similar to those of MMS, Scudder decided to see how an X-point looked to Polar. "Using Polar data, we have found five simple combinations of magnetic field and energetic particle measurements that tell us when we've come across an X-point or an electron diffusion region. A single spacecraft, properly instrumented, can make these measurements."
This means that single member of the MMS constellation using the diagnostics can find a portal and alert other members of the constellation. Mission planners long thought that MMS might have to spend a year or so learning to find portals before it could study them. Scudder's work short cuts the process, allowing MMS to get to work without delay.
It's a shortcut worthy of the best portals of fiction, only this time the portals are real. And with the new "signposts" we know how to find them.
The work of Scudder and colleagues is described in complete detail in the June 1 issue of the Physical Review Letters.
A new ScienceCast video explains how hidden portals form--and how we can find them.
Fly over the 'Grand Canyon' of Mars in high-resolution orbiter imagery
Fly over the 'Grand Canyon' of Mars in high-resolution orbiter imagery
See the 2,500 mile-long (4000 km) Valles Marineris in imagery captured the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Global topography: NASA/GSFC CTX global mosaic: NASA/MSSS/Caltech/ CTX topography: NASA/MSSS/USGS HiRISE: NASA/U.Arizona/USGS/Amazon
Tweny years ago, the New Horizons spacecraft launched from Cape Canaveral. Eight and a half years later, the whole world was talking about it when it transmitted the first-ever close-up images of Pluto’s surface back to Earth. However, its adventures actually began much earlier.
New Horizons spacecraft. Source: www.space.com
Who is interested in Pluto?
January 19 marks the 20th anniversary of the launch of the Atlas 5 rocket from the US Space Force base, which carried the New Horizons spacecraft beyond Earth’s gravitational sphere. Nowadays, it is mainly talked about in connection with the discoveries it made during its brief flyby of Pluto.
However, in reality, the interesting adventures of the probe designed to explore Pluto began long before the summer of 2015 and even long before its launch, although these adventures were a little unusual.
First, it should be noted that the first spacecraft could have reached Pluto several decades earlier. Voyager 1 could well have been that spacecraft. At least in the 1970s, during the mission planning stage, there was an idea to perform a gravitational maneuver during the flyby of Saturn, which would allow the probe to be directed towards the object that was then considered the ninth planet of the Solar System in a few years.
Voyager-1 could have been the first spacecraft to fly by Pluto. Source: www.planetary.org
However, at that time, Pluto was considered too distant and uninteresting, so preference was given to a trajectory that allowed for better exploration of Saturn’s largest moon, Titan. However, over the next 15 years, everything changed dramatically. In 1978, Pluto’s moon Charon was discovered, unusually large and close to the planet, and in 1985, its atmosphere was discovered. All this was already worth launching a spacecraft to what seemed at the time to be the most distant body in the Solar System.
In 1989-90, NASA established a working group that developed a project called Pluto 350. It was supposed to be a truly epic mission, designed to last 15 years. Initially, the spacecraft was to head for Venus and Mercury to gain speed, then perform another gravitational maneuver near Jupiter, and only then head for Pluto.
Such a cunning plan was necessary because the speed that can be achieved by the spacecraft during launch is quite limited, and the entire time it flies to Pluto, the Sun’s gravitational pull will slow it down. It will reach its destination, but it will take several decades.
of Trajectorythe New Horizons spacecraft
That is why, without an intermediate point in the form of Jupiter, which, with the right calculations, can be turned into acceleration, it is impossible to do without. But 15 years was still too long, so NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory developed another plan called Pluto Fast Flyby. It involved flying two small spacecraft for a total of seven years and performing a gravitational maneuver near Jupiter. In fact, this plan was later implemented during the New Horizons mission.
Is the flight to Pluto justified?
However, at that very moment, in 1993, after the loss of Mars Observer, the number of people willing to pay $1 billion – the estimated cost of the mission to Pluto at the time – dropped sharply. Instead, scientists’ interest only grew. The fact is that in 1987, the planet passed its equinox, and in 1989, it passed its perihelion, i.e., the point in its orbit closest to the Sun.
In addition, Pluto’s orbit is not only highly elongated but also significantly inclined to the ecliptic. This means that the most favorable moment for launching a spacecraft from Earth was in the second half of the 1980s. This crazy celestial body completes a full revolution around the Sun in 247 years.
Pluto’s orbit. Source: astrobites.org
This means that with each passing year, the spacecraft’s flight path would become longer and higher above the plane in which the rest of the planets in the Solar System revolve. This would mean higher costs and less equipment that could be delivered to the target.
In an attempt to save the mission, a desperate option was proposed: it would be launched by a Russian rocket, and Germany would provide funding in exchange for the opportunity to place its own sub-probe on board. The plan was to drop it onto one of Jupiter’s moons as the spacecraft flew through the gas giant’s system.
So, in discussions about the flight to Pluto, the topic arose that on its way there, the spacecraft should not only “sleep” but also explore something interesting as it flew past. But the plan did not work out, and in the mid-1990s, the project was abandoned.
Pluto Kuiper Express. Source: Wikipedia
But not for long, because at that very moment, more and more new objects began to be discovered beyond Neptune’s orbit. The flight plan to Pluto was taken out of the drawer again and supplemented with a section in which, after exploring the planet, the probe was to fly further and take a closer look at one of the newly discovered asteroids.
The mission was renamed Pluto Kuiper Express, and only one of the two previously planned spacecraft remained, but this did not help the project. In 1999, it was rejected again. But this time, the public was on the side of the scientists, and soon NASA had to announce a new competition, which the New Horizons won: the Shedding Light on Frontier Worlds project from the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. It was this project that was implemented.
New Horizons design
Ready for launch, the spacecraft weighed 478 kg, of which 77 kg was fuel, and was about the size of a small car. It was propelled by four main rocket engines and 12 orientation engines. All of them ran on hydrazine as a single fuel.
The payload consisted of a whole set of scientific instruments. The Alice camera provided observation of objects and spectroscopy in the ultraviolet range, Ralph performed similar studies in the infrared part of the spectrum, and the main LORRI telescope was responsible for the visible range.
NewHorizons collection. Source: Wikipedia
Also on board were the SWAP solar wind analyzer and PEPSSI. These two instruments captured all the high-energy particles that New Horizons encountered during its flight. They were designed to answer the question of how strongly solar radiation affects objects at such a distance from the sun.
The VBSDC device was responsible for studying much larger particles that the spacecraft might encounter. Also on board was the REX radio spectrometer, designed to study Pluto’s atmosphere by measuring the signal from Earth as it passed through it.
All of this was controlled by the onboard computer. Signals were sent to it from Earth via a communication system. Inside New Horizons, the temperature was maintained between 10 and 30°C.
All this required a lot of energy. Solar batteries could not be used due to Pluto’s considerable distance from the Sun. Therefore, a radioisotope thermoelectric generator with 72 plutonium “pills” was used to power New Horizons. It provided 245 watts of power.4
New Horizons radioisotope thermoelectric generator. Source: Wikipedia
Flight to Pluto
When New Horizons finally launched into space on January 19, 2006, it was launched using the most powerful modification of Atlas 5, called 551. It has five solid-fuel boosters. Thanks to this, the spacecraft was able to accelerate to 12.4 km/s. Then the acceleration unit kicked in, bringing the speed up to 16.207 km/s.
New Horizons headed for Jupiter, but only reached it a year later, in February 2007. A lot happened during that time. Back in February 2006, engineers tested the spacecraft’s cameras and used them to photograph an asteroid that at the time was known only by its number, 132524. The distance to it was then 102,000 km. Thus, at the beginning of its mission, the spacecraft enriched our collection of celestial bodies photographed from close range.
However, on August 24 of the same year, an event occurred that was significantly less pleasant for the spacecraft team. The 26th General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union adopted a new classification of bodies in the Solar System. The reason for this was the discovery of new bodies beyond Neptune’s orbit, which gave new impetus to the study of Pluto.
Lava fountain above Io. Source: Wikipedia
Ironically, under the new classification, Pluto was classified not as a large planet but as a dwarf planet. Eris’s discoverer, Michael Brown, was openly delighted about this. However, New Horizons team leader Alan Stern called the new classification complete nonsense.
This assessment is not surprising. If the new classification had been adopted a few years earlier, it would have been difficult for the New Horizons team to prove the importance of the project. However, the spacecraft was already flying in space and in September 2007 even began observing Jupiter.
The flyby itself, with its gravitational maneuver, took place in February 2007, and it was an extremely successful moment in terms of raising the mission’s prestige. Some spacecraft had already completed their exploration of the largest planet in the Solar System at that time, while others were still on their way to it. New Horizons turned out to be its main explorer.
Arrokoth. Source: Wikipedia
The probe took numerous photographs of the planet itself and its moons. The images of the four largest moons were particularly interesting, as it photographed a lava fountain on Io shooting hundreds of kilometers into space. Jupiter’s atmosphere and magnetosphere were also studied.
The mission continues
After flying past Jupiter, New Horizons went into “sleep” mode. Every two to three months, engineers would wake it up and check the systems. This continued until it approached Pluto. Then the whole world started talking about the probe, and this lasted for several weeks. And then, like any sensation, it disappeared from the public eye again.
But the spacecraft’s scientific mission did not end there. It continued to explore trans-Neptunian objects and on January 1, 2019, flew past the asteroid Arrokoth, photographing and studying it. This is the first study of such a body, and it is thanks to it that we know what the outskirts of the Solar System look like.
And the New Horizons mission continues. The radioisotope generator is expected to operate until at least 2035. We can expect that it will make many more discoveries before then.
The year 2026 should bring us many interesting events that will go down in the annals of world space exploration, from the first manned flight to the Moon in more than half a century to new Starship tests. Here are the main space expectations for the year.
The Artemis II mission
The Artemis II mission will likely be the most high-profile event of 2026. And there is hardly any need to explain why. After all, this will be the first manned flight beyond Earth’s orbit in 54 years, during which humanity will once again touch the Moon.
The Artemis II mission (concept). Source: NASA
The flight plan is as follows. The super-heavy SLS rocket will launch the Orion spacecraft with four astronauts (three representing NASA and one representing the Canadian Space Agency) into Earth orbit. After making sure that all systems are operating normally, the crew will perform a maneuver that will put the spacecraft on a trajectory for a free flyby of the Moon.
On the sixth day of the flight, Orion will fly around the Moon (the minimum approach distance will be approximately 7,400 km), after which it will turn back toward Earth under the influence of the Moon’s gravity. This will eliminate the need for the expedition to use engines to change course, which should reduce the risks for the expedition. On the tenth day of the flight, the capsule with four astronauts will enter the Earth’s atmosphere and splash down.
The Artemis II mission flight plan. Source: NASA
Of course, flying around the moon is not the same as landing on it. But still, it is difficult to deny the symbolic significance of this mission. Since the Apollo program, several generations have grown up without seeing humans fly to other celestial bodies. The flight to the Moon will clearly help to raise interest in space exploration and astronautics. Artemis II will also mark the beginning of the next stage in the new lunar race between the US and China. At the moment, the launch of the mission is scheduled for February – March 2026.
The new Starship
As in previous years, the attention of all space enthusiasts will be focused on Starship. This year, SpaceX plans to begin testing a new, even more powerful modification of the super-heavy rocket, designated V3. Its first flight is tentatively scheduled for February. It will follow the same pattern as previous tests.
Transporting Starship to the launch pad. Source: SpaceX
If V3 proves to be a more reliable rocket than its predecessor, SpaceX will begin working on the next key elements needed to transform Starship from an experimental to a working system. These include reaching orbit, landing on land, and orbital refueling.
The last element is critical for the Artemis program. Without a functioning orbital refueling system, SpaceX will not be able to fulfill its obligations to NASA. As a reminder, as part of the Artemis III mission, the Starship HLS lander, which will be refueled in near-Earth orbit by tanker ships, is to land two astronauts at the south pole of the Moon.
Given the complexity and ambition of the project, it is extremely difficult to predict how successful the V3 tests will be. But one thing is certain – they will remain one of the main events of the year.
The race for reusability
For almost ten years, SpaceX was the only company with a partially reusable orbital rocket. This allowed it to take an unprecedented position in the global launch market and start building the Starlink system, which not so long ago seemed like science fiction.
The first stage of the New Glenn rocket after landing on a barge.Source: Blue Origin
But in 2025, the situation began to change. Blue Origin became the second company in history to successfully return a rocket stage from space. The Chinese company LandSpace and the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation made their first attempts to land the stages of their Zhuque-3 and Long March 12A rockets. They failed – but it is clear that this is only the beginning. In 2026, they will make new attempts to return to the stages.
New rockets will also join the reusability race. Rocket Lab intends to launch its first medium-class Neutron carrier rocket. It features an interesting “sliding” nose cone design, which allows it to be returned to Earth together with the stage.
Artist’s impression of the Neutron rocket. Source: Rocket Lab
There are also plans to debut several other rockets with reusable first stages. These include Terran-R, Hyperbola-3, Long March 10A… Yes, the launch dates for most of them may subsequently be postponed until next year. And those rockets that do fly are unlikely to be able to return to Earth on their first attempt. Nevertheless, 2026 will likely bring us new reusable launch vehicles.
The first private orbiting station
For many years, discussions about private orbital stations did not go beyond attractive promises and concepts. Bigelow came closest to achieving this goal, even launching an experimental inflatable module that became part of the ISS. However, the company subsequently went bankrupt.
Artist’s impression of the Haven-1 orbital station. Source: Vast
Nevertheless, in 2026, we may witness the launch of the first private orbital station in history. Vast Space is attempting to accomplish this task.
Vast Space first announced its plans to build the Haven-1 orbital station in 2023. Its main difference from similar projects, which never made it past the drawing board, is its relative simplicity. While other companies typically announce complex multi-module orbital stations, Haven-1 will consist of just one 14-ton compartment with an internal volume of 80 m³, not designed for permanent human habitation. The station will rely on the Crew Dragon spacecraft’s life support system and will be able to accommodate four astronauts for 30 days.
Welding of the main body of Haven-1 has been completed. Vast Space is currently actively testing it, as well as various components of the future station, such as solar panels and the docking mechanism.
Haven-1 orbital station on a test bench. Source: Vast
Vast Space hopes to launch its station sometime in the second half of 2026. Of course, given the ambitious nature of the task, the date may change. It cannot be ruled out that the launch of Haven-1 will ultimately be postponed until 2027. But we hope that the wait will not be too long. The first commercial orbital station will clearly be a powerful stimulus for other similar projects and will accelerate their implementation.
Events in deep space
In 2026, we can also expect many interesting events in deep space. Four private missions to the Moon are planned (Blue Moon Pathfinder Mission 1, IM-3, Griffin Mission One, Blue Ghost Mission 2). China will also send its mission to our planet’s satellite. We are talking about Chang’e-7, which has a very complex architecture, including a relay satellite, a lander, a rover, and even a flying drone. It is scheduled to land on the south pole of the Moon at the end of 2026.
Selfie taken by the Tianwen-2 spacecraft. Source: CNSA
During 2026, we will also see several objects in the Solar System up close for the first time. In June, the Chinese Tianwen-2 mission will enter orbit around the asteroid Kamoʻoalewa. It is a quasi-satellite of Earth and is believed to be a fragment of the Moon that was knocked out as a result of some collision.
In June, the Japanese spacecraft Hayabusa2 will fly past the asteroid Torifune. And in December, the European spacecraft Hera will reach the double asteroid Didymos. In 2022, the DART probe crashed into its satellite Dimorph. In this way, NASA tested whether such an impact could change the orbit of a celestial body (in the future, this technology could be used to deflect dangerous objects away from Earth). Hera will carefully study Didymos and Dimorph to gather as much information as possible about how the impact affected the pair.
The Hera mission as imagined by an artist. Source: ESA
The launch of the Japanese MMX mission is also planned for the end of 2026. Its goal will be to deliver a sample of Phobos material to Earth. Along with it, a pair of ESCAPADE probes will travel to Mars, which are currently monitoring space weather at one of the Lagrange points. The European-Japanese BepiColombo mission will finally enter a permanent orbit around Mercury. After that, it will split into two separate spacecraft, which will begin studying the first planet from the Sun.
For the first time, astronomers have discovered clear evidence that some fast radio bursts (FRBs) are emitted by binary stars, according to an international team of researchers.
The powerful yet brief bursts of radio waves emanate from distant galaxiesand have puzzled scientists for some time, until a general consensus emerged that they are produced by isolated, single stars.
Now, a recent paper published in Science challenges that idea, based on observations of FRB 220529A made possible by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST), also known as China’s Sky Eye, which demonstrates that binary systems can produce FRBs.
The China Sky Eye
Located in southwestern China’s Guizhou province, FAST is also nicknamed “Tianyan,” which translates to “Heaven’s Eye” or “Sky Eye.” The radio telescope features a 1,640-foot-diameter dish, making it the largest single-dish telescope in the world, nestled within a natural depression.
The bright, millisecond-long flashes known as FRBs travel to us from distant galaxies. Generally, they are singular events, but the rare repeaters offer scientists intriguing opportunities to study the phenomena over longer periods and observe changes. Since 2020, Professor Bing Zhang has co-led a program to study these repeating FRBs. They found something remarkable in FRB 220529A, located 2.5 billion light-years from Earth.
“FRB 220529A was monitored for months and initially appeared unremarkable,’ said co-author Professor Bing Zhang. ‘Then, after a long-term observation for 17 months, something truly exciting happened.” The researchers used FAST to monitor the FRB for 20 months, eventually revealing that the source had a companion star.
Fast Radio Burst Polarization
Analyzing a radio wave’s polarization properties offers important clues about its source’s surroundings. In this FRB, the most notable feature was a sudden and dramatic polarization change known as an RM flare, indicative of a coronal mass ejection from a companion star interfering with the burst source.
“This finding provides a definitive clue to the origin of at least some repeating FRBs,” said co-author Professor Bing Zhang, Chair Professor of Astrophysics of the Department of Physics and Founding Director of the Hong Kong Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics at HKU. “The evidence strongly supports a binary system containing a magnetar—a neutron star with an extremely strong magnetic field, and a star like our Sun.”
An FRB’s linear polarization allows researchers to track its journey through space. Due to the Faraday rotation effect, a radio wave’s polarization angle rotates when it travels through magnetized plasma. That rotation can be precisely measured using a quantity called a rotation measure (RM).
“Near the end of 2023, we detected an abrupt RM increase by more than a factor of a hundred,” said lead author Dr Ye LI of Purple Mountain Observatory and the University of Science and Technology of China. “The RM then rapidly declined over two weeks, returning to its previous level. We call this an ‘RM flare’.”
Binary Sourced Fast Radio Bursts
A brief RM change like this is consistent with the FRB having intercepted a dense magnetized plasma, likely ejected from a companion star.
“Such a model works well to interpret the observations,” said co-first author Professor Yuanpei Yang, a professor from Yunnan University. “The required plasma clump is consistent with CMEs launched by the Sun and other stars in the Milky Way.”
Directly observing the companion star over these billions of light-years was not feasible, but FAST and supplemental observations from the Parkes telescope in Australia successfully confirmed its presence.
“This discovery was made possible by the persevering observations using the world’s best telescopes and the tireless work of our dedicated research team,” said co-lead author Professor Xuefeng Wu of Purple Mountain Observatory and the University of Science and Technology of China.
The work supports a proposal by Professor Bing Zhang that FRBs are generated by magnetars and that binary systems produce a geometry that allows bursts to occur more frequently, and marks the beginning of ongoing studies required to determine how common binary systems are as sources of FRBs.
Ryan Whalen covers science and technology for The Debrief. He holds an MA in History and a Master of Library and Information Science with a certificate in Data Science. He can be contacted at ryan@thedebrief.org, and follow him on Twitter @mdntwvlf.
Model of the chemical cycle on Mars that is driven by the electrostatic discharges of dust storms. Credit - WUSL
Chemistry on other worlds varies widely from that on Earth. Much of Earth’s chemistry is driven by well-understood processes, which typically involve water and heat in some form. Mars lacks both of those features, which makes how some of its chemicals formed a point of ongoing debate in the scientific community. A new paper led by Alian Wang and Neil Sturchio of Washington University of St. Louis and the University of Delaware, respectively, and published recently in Earth and Planetary Science Letters offers a new framework for understanding chemical reaction processes on Mars. Despite the differences, Earthlings will still be familiar with the driving force behind Martian chemistry - electricity.
Various rovers and orbits on and around Mars have noticed a peculiar isotopic imbalance on the surface of the Red Planet. An isotopic imbalance can occur when the ratio of two different isotopes of a particular element is skewed from the natural ratios expected. In particular, “heavy” isotopes of some of the most common elements - chlorine, oxygen, and carbon, seem to be lacking on Mars.
For example, Chlorine-37, the “heavy” isotope of that particular element, is 51 parts per thousand (ppt) less abundant than would otherwise be expected on the Martian surface. Given that it is a key ingredient in the hazardous “perchlorates” that stand as one of the major challenges to long-term biological systems living on Mars (like humans), understanding why that imbalance has occurred is key to understanding how we might mitigate the threat those chemicals represent.
Fraser discusses an idea to treat Mars of its toxic perchlorates.
The heavy isotope imbalance for carbon (11.4 ppt) and oxygen (22.8 ppt) are less pronounced, but no less important. Both are key ingredients for the formation of carbonates, which previous generations of scientists thought were evidence of previous liquid water on the planet’s surface. So what is causing these imbalances? And what does electricity have to do with it?
Another common feature of Mars’ surface are its famous dust storms. These massive storms take up a significant amount of the planet’s surface in certain seasons. They also form mini-vortices that look like miniaturized tornadoes. Importantly, those storms, and especially those vortices, cause Martian dust they kick up to rub together, eventually building up an electrostatic charge, similar to what happens when you rub a balloon on your head.
But in Mars’ weaker atmosphere, it’s relatively easy to overcome the dielectric constant of the atmosphere itself, allowing small “arcs” that are familiar to anyone who has played under a blanket in a dry room at night. These arcs, known technically as electrostatic discharges, or ESDs, are the driving force of one of the primary chemical cycles on Mars, according to the new paper.
Fraser talks about how a realistic mars mission will play out.
The authors built several test chambers, including the Planetary Environment and Analysis Chamber (PEACh), specifically to test how salts commonly found on Mars would react to the electricity produced during a dust storm. They found the ESDs that happen in dust storms create high-energy electrons that run into the CO2 that comprises the Martian atmosphere. When they do so, they create reactive radicals like CO and O. These free radicals then fall to the chloride salts that exist on the ground, bonding oxygen to them, and changing chlorine to perchlorates, the deadly substance carbon-based lifeforms would rather avoid.
But it does explain where they came from. The same process happens for carbonates, which were commonly thought to be formed by liquid water. But like their chlorinated cousins, it seems a wide variety of Mars-based chemicals can form with nothing other than static shocks during a dust storm.
This data matches up much more closely with in-situ and remote observations - in particular the lower density of “heavy” isotopes they’ve found. ESD acts like a “filter”, selecting the lighter atoms to participate in chemical reactions that form the compounds rovers like Curiosity and orbiters like ExoMars have captured. The actual physics behind that process is complicated, but needless to say, this idea that chemical cycles on Mars are driven by dust-derived electrical discharge seems to fit the data very well.
Video of dust devils captured on Mars by Curiosity. These are the types of storms that create ESDs, which then create perchlorates and carbonates on the Martian surface.
Such electrical-driven reactions have applications on more than just Mars. Venus, some of the outer Gas Giants, and even our own Moon, could have their own version of ESD-driven chemical reaction chains. While that means there’s plenty more to study, there’s also a cautionary tale for future Martian explorers. ESD is an ongoing, active process that is part of Mars’ natural, cold climate. That means that perchlorates, the deadly chemicals that might very well hinder our tentative efforts at a permanent base on the Red Planet, are constantly being created there.
While that’s certainly not a deal breaker for exploration, it is something we need to be aware of. But the authors certainly aren’t done with their exploration of the impact that small arcs of electricity have on driving chemical reactions throughout the solar system. Expect more papers about how arcs on Venus affect that planet’s surface chemistry soon.
Inside high bay 3 of NASA’s Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center, the SLS (Space Launch System) for NASA Artemis II stands fully stacked as the retractable platforms pull away. Credit: NASA
Between February and April of this year, NASA will conduct its first crewed mission beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) in over fifty years. At 09:41 p.m. EST (06:41 p.m. PDT), the Artemis II crew will launch aboard their Orion spacecraftatop the Space Launch System(SLS) from Launch Pad-39B at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. With the launch date rapidly approaching, NASA is entering the final stages of preparation, including the rollout of the SLS and Orion to the launch pad for the first time. This will be followed by the final integration and testing of the rocket and spacecraft, then launch rehearsals.
The Artemis II crew consists of NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman (commander), Victor Glover (pilot), and Christina Koch (mission specialist), and Canadian Space Agency (CSA) astronaut Jeremy Hansen (mission specialist). Building on the success of the uncrewed Artemis I mission, *Artemis II* will see this crew execute a circumlunar flight, taking them around the Moon without landing and returning them to Earth. The entire mission will take 10 days and will be the curtain-raiser for the first crewed mission to the lunar surface since Apollo 17 landed there in 1972.
The rollout is targeted for no earlier than this Saturday (Jan. 17th) and will take up to 12 hours for the rocket and crawler-transporter-2 to travel the ~6.5 km (4 mi) that lie between the Vehicle Assembly Building and Launch Pad 39B. "We are moving closer to Artemis II, with rollout just around the corner," said Lori Glaze, acting associate administrator for NASA’s Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate (ESDMD). "We have important steps remaining on our path to launch, and crew safety will remain our top priority at every turn, as we near humanity’s return to the Moon."
Teams are currently working around the clock to complete all remaining tasks ahead of the rollout, a process that has been ongoing for months. In December, during a countdown demonstration test, engineers detected a problem with a valve associated with the Orion capsule's hatch pressurization. They replaced the valve on Jan. 5th, which was followed by a successful pressure test. They also resolved a leak with the ground support hardware that is part of the loading system for pressurizing the Orion with oxygen gas. The work will continue for weeks after the SLS and Orion roll out to the launch pad.
At this point, ground crews will begin connecting electrical lines, fuel-control-system ducts, cryogenic propellant feeds, and other ground-support equipment. They will then power up all of the rocket's integrated systems for the first time to ensure they work properly with each other, the mobile launcher, and the launch pad infrastructure. The final preparation, scheduled for the end of January, will consist of a prelaunch fuel test (aka a "wet dress rehearsal") where NASA will fuel the rocket with about 2.65 million liters (700,000 US gallons) of cryogenic fuel into the rocket, conduct a launch countdown, then safely unload it.
Several countdowns are scheduled to allow mission controllers to hold, resume, and recycle back to previous times in the final 10 minutes before liftoff (aka terminal count). Several lessons from the previous mission have been integrated into this launch's preparations, including the challenges ground crews experienced while loading liquid hydrogen propellant during Artemis I's wet dress rehearsal. So in addition to carefully watching the propellant loading process, the ground teams will also closely monitor the effectiveness of recently updated procedures that limit how much nitrogen gas accumulates between the Orion crew module and the launch abort system.
Additional wet dress rehearsals may be required to make sure the vehicle is ready for flight, and NASA may opt to roll the SLS and Orion back into the VAB for additional work (as they did with Artemis I). Following a successful wet dress rehearsal, NASA's mission management team will convene a "flight readiness review" to assess the readiness of all systems before committing to a firm launch date. Once all of this is complete, and in what will be a major media event, the Artemis II astronauts will conduct a final walkdown at the pad.
While the Artemis II launch window opens as early as Friday, Feb. 6th, the mission management team may push the launch to a date before the window closes (no later than April). These launch opportunities require that the planned trajectory account for the complex orbital mechanics of Earth and the Moon. Basically, the rotation of the Earth and the Moon's orbit result in a pattern of approximately a week of launch opportunities, followed by three weeks without. The opportunities between February and April (subject to change) are available here.
NASA and its partners have high expectations for the Artemis II test flight. Much like the Apollo 10 mission, which was a dress rehearsal for the first landing on the Moon, this mission will provide the necessary experience and validate the systems that will allow humans to return to the lunar surface after more than 50 years. Currently scheduled for 2028, Artemis III will last for about 30 days and will depend on the development of the Human Landing System (HLS).
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 75 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.