Geen fotobeschrijving beschikbaar.

Geen fotobeschrijving beschikbaar.

Carl Sagan Space GIF by Feliks Tomasz Konczakowski

X Files Ufo GIF by SeeRoswell.com

1990: Petit-Rechain, Belgium triangle UFO photograph - Think AboutIts

Ufo Pentagon GIF

ufo abduction GIF by Ski Mask The Slump God

Flying Sci-Fi GIF by Feliks Tomasz Konczakowski

Season 3 Ufo GIF by Paramount+

DEAR VISITOR,


MY BLOG EXISTS NEARLY 13 YEARS AND 8  MONTH.

ON 17/03/2025 MORE THAN 2.600.110

VISITORS FROM 135 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.

THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 500 GUESTS PER DAY.

THANK YOU FOR VISITING  MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.


Goodbye
PETER2011

De bronafbeelding bekijken

De bronafbeelding bekijken

Beste bezoeker, bedankt voor uw bezoek.

Dear visitor, thank you for your visit.

Cher visiteur, je vous remercie de votre visite.

Liebe Besucher, vielen Dank für Ihren Besuch.

Estimado visitante, gracias por su visita.

Gentile visitatore, grazie per la vostra visita.

Inhoud blog
  • De Onthulling van het CIA-document: Sovjetstrijdkrachten
  • CIA document claims Soviet forces ‘turned to stone by alien attack’
  • Mysterious Black Tower Spotted Near Area 51 Reignites Alien Technology Conspiracy Theories
  • GPT-4.5 is the first AI model to pass an authentic Turing test, scientists say
  • Alien Dyson spheres could really exist — but only in this 1 type of star system, new study hints
  • Het Zoeken naar Leven in de
  • Scientists Propose Looking for Life in Galaxy’s ‘Computational Zones’
  • Researchers Propose a New Way to Search for Evidence of Life
  • The Aliens Didn’t Fight Back…We Just Stood Too Close When They Went Home! UFO UAP Sighting News.
  • UFO Over Moscow, Russia Can't Be Shot Down! April 9, 2025, UAP Drone Sighting News.
  • Robert Orel Dean, NATO Intelligence, Aliens are walking among us, UFO UAP Sighting News.
  • Veel levens Over Tijd en Ruimte: Boeiende Verhalen van Reïncarnatie
  • Many Lives Across Time and Space? Enthralling Tales of Reincarnation
  • Strange Lights, Circling Objects, and Backyard Aliens: The 1926 Wave of UFO and Humanoid Encounters
  • Greatest Flood in History Created Mediterranean Sea in Just a Few Months!
  • 10 Insights Into The Silurian Hypothesis And Advanced Civilizations
  • Kunnen we bewijs vinden van een geavanceerde beschaving vóór de mensheid, verborgen in de oude lagen van de aarde?
  • The Lost Labyrinth of Egypt Might Still Be Hidden Beneath the Desert
  • The Baghdad Battery Still Sparks Debate About Ancient Electricity and Unexplained Knowledge
  • Door Cam Catches Glowing Orb Over Pine Bluff, Arkansas April 10, 2025, UFO UAP Sighting News.
    Categorieën
  • ALIEN LIFE, UFO- CRASHES, ABDUCTIONS, MEN IN BLACK, ed ( FR. , NL; E ) (3422)
  • André's Hoekje (ENG) (745)
  • André's Snelkoppelingen (ENG) (383)
  • ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr ) (1819)
  • ARTICLES of MUFON ( ENG) (451)
  • Artikels / PETER2011 (NL EN.) (165)
  • ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART (12629)
  • Before it's news (ENG.) (5702)
  • Belgisch UFO-meldpunt / Frederick Delaere ( NL) (16)
  • Diversen (Eng, NL en Fr) (4241)
  • FILER FILES - overzicht met foto's met dank aan Georges Filer en WWW.nationalUFOCenter.com (ENG) (929)
  • Frederick's NEWS ITEMS (ENG en NL) (112)
  • HLN.be - Het Laatste Nieuws ( NL) (1698)
  • INGRID's WEETJES (NL) (6)
  • Kathleen Marden 's News about Abductions... ( ENG) (33)
  • LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG) (10742)
  • Michel GRANGER - a French researcher ( Fr) (19)
  • MYSTERIES ( Fr, Nl, E) (2076)
  • MYSTERIES , Complot Theories, ed ( EN, FR, NL ) (399)
  • Myths, legends, unknown cultures and civilizations (46)
  • National UFO Center {NUFOC} (110)
  • News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG ) (6049)
  • NIEUWS VAN JAN ( NL) (42)
  • Nieuws van Paul ( NL) (17)
  • NineForNews. nl ( new ipv NIBURU.nl) (NL) (3712)
  • Oliver's WebLog ( ENG en NL) (118)
  • Paul SCHROEDER ( ENG) (98)
  • Reseau Francophone MUFON / EUROPE ( FR) (87)
  • références - MAGONIE (Fr) (486)
  • Ruins, strange artifacts on other planets, moons, ed ( Fr, EN, NL ) (580)
  • SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL ) (775)
  • UFO DIGEST / a Weekly Newsletter - thanks that I may publish this on my blog (ENG) (125)
  • UFOs , UAPs , USOS (3118)
  • Vincent'snieuws ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Who is Stanton FRIEDMAN - follow his news (ENG) (16)
  • WHO IS WHO? ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Zoeken in blog

    Beoordeel dit blog
      Zeer goed
      Goed
      Voldoende
      Nog wat bijwerken
      Nog veel werk aan
     

    The purpose of  this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and  free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category.
    Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
     

    Archief per maand
  • 04-2025
  • 03-2025
  • 02-2025
  • 01-2025
  • 12-2024
  • 11-2024
  • 10-2024
  • 09-2024
  • 08-2024
  • 07-2024
  • 06-2024
  • 05-2024
  • 04-2024
  • 03-2024
  • 02-2024
  • 01-2024
  • 12-2023
  • 11-2023
  • 10-2023
  • 09-2023
  • 08-2023
  • 07-2023
  • 06-2023
  • 05-2023
  • 04-2023
  • 03-2023
  • 02-2023
  • 01-2023
  • 12-2022
  • 11-2022
  • 10-2022
  • 09-2022
  • 08-2022
  • 07-2022
  • 06-2022
  • 05-2022
  • 04-2022
  • 03-2022
  • 02-2022
  • 01-2022
  • 12-2021
  • 11-2021
  • 10-2021
  • 09-2021
  • 08-2021
  • 07-2021
  • 06-2021
  • 05-2021
  • 04-2021
  • 03-2021
  • 02-2021
  • 01-2021
  • 12-2020
  • 11-2020
  • 10-2020
  • 09-2020
  • 08-2020
  • 07-2020
  • 06-2020
  • 05-2020
  • 04-2020
  • 03-2020
  • 02-2020
  • 01-2020
  • 12-2019
  • 11-2019
  • 10-2019
  • 09-2019
  • 08-2019
  • 07-2019
  • 06-2019
  • 05-2019
  • 04-2019
  • 03-2019
  • 02-2019
  • 01-2019
  • 12-2018
  • 11-2018
  • 10-2018
  • 09-2018
  • 08-2018
  • 07-2018
  • 06-2018
  • 05-2018
  • 04-2018
  • 03-2018
  • 02-2018
  • 01-2018
  • 12-2017
  • 11-2017
  • 10-2017
  • 09-2017
  • 08-2017
  • 07-2017
  • 06-2017
  • 05-2017
  • 04-2017
  • 03-2017
  • 02-2017
  • 01-2017
  • 12-2016
  • 11-2016
  • 10-2016
  • 09-2016
  • 08-2016
  • 07-2016
  • 06-2016
  • 05-2016
  • 04-2016
  • 03-2016
  • 02-2016
  • 01-2016
  • 12-2015
  • 11-2015
  • 10-2015
  • 09-2015
  • 08-2015
  • 07-2015
  • 06-2015
  • 05-2015
  • 04-2015
  • 03-2015
  • 02-2015
  • 01-2015
  • 12-2014
  • 11-2014
  • 10-2014
  • 09-2014
  • 08-2014
  • 07-2014
  • 06-2014
  • 05-2014
  • 04-2014
  • 03-2014
  • 02-2014
  • 01-2014
  • 12-2013
  • 11-2013
  • 10-2013
  • 09-2013
  • 08-2013
  • 07-2013
  • 06-2013
  • 05-2013
  • 04-2013
  • 03-2013
  • 02-2013
  • 01-2013
  • 12-2012
  • 11-2012
  • 10-2012
  • 09-2012
  • 08-2012
  • 07-2012
  • 06-2012
  • 05-2012
  • 04-2012
  • 03-2012
  • 02-2012
  • 01-2012
  • 12-2011
  • 11-2011
  • 10-2011
  • 09-2011
  • 08-2011
  • 07-2011
  • 06-2011
    Rondvraag / Poll
    Bestaan UFO's echt? Are UFOs real?Les OVNIS existent-ils vraiement?
    Ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / Non
    Bekijk resultaat

    Rondvraag / Poll
    Denk Jij dat UFO's buitenaards zijn? Do You think that UFOs are extraterrestrial? Les OVNIS sont- ils ET?
    ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / NON
    Bekijk resultaat

    E-mail mij

    Druk oponderstaande knop om mij te e-mailen.

    Blog als favoriet !
    FORUM

    Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum

    Zoeken in blog

    Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.

    In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!

    In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.

    BEDANKT!!!

    Een interessant adres?
    UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
    UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
    Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie! Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek! België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch. Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen! Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie. Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen. Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek! Blijf Op De Hoogte! Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren! Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
    15-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.China Has Launched New Generation Transport Shocking the US

    China Has Launched New Generation Transport Shocking the US

    China Has Launched New Generation Transport System SHOCKING the US and the World

    China is rapidly emerging as a global leader in engine innovation, showcasing impressive advancements that are pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. Their technology is developing at a breakneck pace, challenging the US to keep up with their rapid revolution. While China has consistently delivered awesome, futuristic innovations, their dominance now extends to the engine department. It’s time for the market to meet these new-generation engines, combining both beauty and quality .


    China Has Launched New Generation Transport SHOCKING The US

    https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/list/v2_top_beyond_science.html }

    15-02-2025 om 16:06 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    14-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Deze slimme uitvinding haalt CO2 uit de lucht en maakt er brandstof van

    Deze slimme uitvinding haalt CO2 uit de lucht en maakt er brandstof van.

    Andrei Stiru

    Wetenschappers hebben een apparaat ontwikkeld dat twee grote uitdagingen van onze tijd aanpakt: het verwijderen van CO2 uit de atmosfeer én het produceren van duurzame brandstof.

    CO2-afvang, oftewel het verwijderen van kooldioxide uit de atmosfeer, is een van de vele middelen die kunnen worden ingezet in de strijd tegen klimaatverandering. Het principe is eenvoudig: vang het broeikasgas af en sla het op. Onderzoekers aan de Universiteit van Cambridge hebben echter een andere oplossing bedacht. In plaats van het gas op te slaan, willen zij het meteen gebruiken om er brandstof mee te maken. De onderzoekers publiceerden hun bevindingen in het wetenschappelijke vakblad Nature Energy.

    Spons voor CO2
    Het systeem werkt op zonne-energie en kan overdag CO2 omzetten in synthesegas, een waardevol mengsel van waterstof en koolmonoxide. Het apparaat bestaat uit twee compartimenten. Het eerste deel vangt CO2 uit de lucht met behulp van een speciaal absorptiemateriaal op basis van silica en polyethyleenimine. Dit materiaal werkt als een spons die selectief CO2-moleculen uit de lucht filtert. Het heeft een extreem groot oppervlak (vergelijkbaar met ongeveer twee voetbalvelden per gram) waardoor het zeer effectief CO2 kan vangen. Tijdens tests kon het materiaal gedurende ongeveer 9 uur lang alle CO2 uit de toegevoerde lucht filteren voordat het verzadigd raakte.

    In het tweede compartiment vindt de chemische omzetting plaats. Hier zorgt geconcentreerd zonlicht, opgevangen door een parabolische spiegel die het drie keer sterker maakt dan normaal zonlicht, voor de benodigde energie om de opgevangen CO2 om te zetten in synthesegas. Dit gebeurt met behulp van een katalysator die bestaat uit titaniumdioxide gecombineerd met een kobalthoudend molecuul.

    Dag en nacht
    Het systeem maakt slim gebruik van het dag-nachtritme. Tijdens de nachtelijke uren vangt het apparaat CO2 op uit de lucht. Overdag, als de zon schijnt, wordt deze opgevangen CO2 omgezet in bruikbare brandstof. Belangrijk is dat het proces stabiel blijft en meerdere cycli kan doorlopen zonder significant verlies van efficiëntie. Het systeem kan zelfs worden aangepast om de verhouding tussen waterstof en koolmonoxide in het eindproduct te optimaliseren, afhankelijk van de gewenste toepassing. Het geproduceerde synthesegas is een tussenproduct dat de industrie kan gebruiken voor het maken van verschillende brandstoffen en chemicaliën. Het wordt bijvoorbeeld gebruikt voor de productie van methanol, synthetische diesel en andere vloeibare brandstoffen. Ook dient het als grondstof voor diverse industriële chemicaliën.

    Energiezuinig
    Het systeem heeft geen hoge temperaturen of druk nodig, wat het volgens de onderzoekers energiezuiniger maakt dan bestaande methoden. Ook kan het direct CO2 uit de lucht halen, zonder dat eerst concentratie nodig is. Dit is een belangrijke vooruitgang, want momenteel is CO2-afvang uit de lucht nog zeer duur. De meeste bestaande systemen verbruiken veel energie en hebben dure installaties nodig. Dit nieuwe zonnegedreven systeem zou deze kosten aanzienlijk kunnen verlagen doordat het direct bruikbare brandstof produceert en weinig energie verbruikt.

    Als grondstof voor het proces gebruiken de onderzoekers gerecycled PET-plastic. Dit plastic wordt eerst afgebroken tot ethyleenglycol, dat vervolgens dient als elektronendonor in de chemische reactie. Zo worden meteen twee afvalstromen ingezet: CO2 uit de lucht en plastic afval.

    Vooral handig in zonnige regio’s
    Het systeem blijkt vooral geschikt voor gebieden met veel zonlicht. In tropische en subtropische regio’s zou de technologie optimaal kunnen functioneren, waarbij de dagelijkse zonnecyclus perfect aansluit bij het proces van nachtelijke CO2-opvang en omzetting overdag. Hoewel het systeem nu nog op laboratoriumschaal werkt, geloven de wetenschappers dat het makkelijk kan worden opgeschaald. De gebruikte materialen zijn relatief goedkoop en het proces is modulair opgezet, wat uitbreiding vergemakkelijkt.

    Bronmateriaal


    Hybrid Direct Air Capture of CO2 – Water-Positive Carbon Dioxide Removal

    Direct Air Capture of CO2 from the Atmosphere | Carbon Engineering

    { https://scientias.nl/}

    14-02-2025 om 23:44 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.This alien-like field of mirrors in the desert was once the future of solar energy. It’s closing after just 11 years

    Ivanpah was the largest concentrated solar power facility in the world when it opened in 2014, just over a decade, it's slated to close.

    Ivanpah was the largest concentrated solar power facility in the world when it opened in 2014, just over a decade, it's slated to close. 

    David McNew/Getty Images

    This alien-like field of mirrors in the desert was once the future of solar energy. It’s closing after just 11 years

    Story by Laura Paddison, CNN

    From a distance, the Ivanpah solar plant looks like a shimmering lake in the Mojave Desert. Up close, it’s a vast alien-like installation of hundreds of thousand of mirrors pointed at three towers, each taller than the Statue of Liberty.

    When this plant opened near the California-Nevada border in early 2014, it was pitched as the future of solar power. Just over a decade later, it’s closing.

    The plant’s co-owner NRG Energy announced in January it was unwinding contracts with power companies and, subject to regulatory approval, would begin closing the plant in early 2026, readying the site to potentially be repurposed for a new kind of solar energy.

    For some, Ivanpah now stands as a huge, shiny monument to wasted tax dollars and environmental damage — campaign groups long criticized the plant for its impact on desert wildlife. For others, failures like this are a natural part of the race to find the winning solutions for the clean energy transition.

    When Ivanpah was conceived, its technology, called concentrated solar or thermal solar, was considered a potential breakthrough.

    It works like this: Hundreds of thousands of computer-controlled mirrors called “heliostats” track the sun and concentrate its rays onto three towers, each around 450 feet tall and topped with water-filled boilers. The sun’s hyper-concentrated energy turns this water to steam, which drives a turbine to create electricity.

    One of the key selling points of this solar technology is the ability to store heat, allowing the production of electricity at night or when the sun isn’t shining without needing batteries.

    The project got buy-in from the government with $1.6 billion in Department of Energy loan guarantees, and from utilities Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Southern California Edison, which both entered long-term agreements to buy Ivanpah’s power.

    In 2014, it started commercial operations as the world’s largest solar thermal plant, spread across around 5 square miles of federal desert.

    “This project is a symbol of the exciting progress we are seeing across the industry,” said then Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, in February 2014 during a dedication ceremony at the site.

    So, where did it go wrong?

    First, the technology proved finnicky and never quite worked as well as intended, said Jenny Chase, a solar analyst at BloombergNEF.

    These kinds of plants “are just technically really difficult to operate,” she told CNN. They combine all the tricky, mechanical parts of a fossil fuel plant — running a turbine and maintaining many moving parts — with the challenges of a distributed energy source. The technology relies on mirrors tracking the sun exactly. “It’s really hard to get those all lined up perfectly and keep them lined up at all times,” Chase said.

    But perhaps the biggest problem for Ivanpah is that photovoltaic solar — the technology used in solar panels — became really, really cheap.

    In some parts of the world “you can basically buy a solar module for the price of a fence panel,” Chase said. At the time Ivanpah was built, “nobody really would have dreamed that photovoltaics would be this cheap, and batteries are doing a similar thing,” she added.

    California's $2.2 billion dollar Ivanpah Solar Plant is a concentrated solar thermal plant in the California Mohave Desert. - Jason Andrew/Redux

    California's $2.2 billion dollar Ivanpah Solar Plant is a concentrated solar thermal plant in the California Mohave Desert.
    Jason Andrew/Redux
    Ivanpah's around 350,000 mirrors focus sunlight onto three towers, where water is turned to steam to generate electricity. - Jim West/REA/Redux
    Ivanpah's around 350,000 mirrors focus sunlight onto three towers, where water is turned to steam to generate electricity.
    Jim West/REA/Redux
    Wild burros are seen near the Ivanpah solar power plant on August 26, 2022. - David McNew/Getty Images
    Wild burros are seen near the Ivanpah solar power plant on August 26, 2022. 
    David McNew/Getty Images

    A spokesperson for NRG said prices were competitive when the power agreements were signed in 2009. But over time, advancements in other types of solar technology “led to more efficient, cost effective and flexible options for producing reliable clean energy.”

    In January, NRG finalized negotiations with PG&E to terminate power purchase agreements which were supposed to end in 2039. This “will provide significant savings for California ratepayers,” the company’s spokesperson said.

    A spokesperson for Southern California Edison said it was in ongoing discussions with the plant owners and the DOE about its contract.

    For critics of Ivanpah, its imminent demise is proof the plant should never have been built.

    It “was a financial boondoggle and environmental disaster,” said Julia Dowell, senior campaign organizer at the Sierra Club, an environmental organization. “The project’s construction destroyed irreplaceable pristine desert habitat,” she told CNN.

    Ivanpahs’s location in the sweeping, sun-drenched Mojave Desert may have seemed ideal for generating solar power, but it is also a habitat for threatened desert tortoises. While the plant’s developers agreed to a series of measures to protect and relocate the animals, many environmentalists believed the plant should not have been approved.

    The Ivanpah plant is set to begin closing in 2026, with units decommissioned to prepare the land to potentially be repurposed for a different kind of solar power. - Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images

    The Ivanpah plant is set to begin closing in 2026, with units decommissioned to prepare the land to potentially be repurposed for a different kind of solar power.
    Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images

    The other big issue was bird deaths. Reports of “streamers” — birds incinerated midair by the beams of intense heat from the mirrors — solidified opposition.

    NRG did not respond to specific questions about the plant’s impact on wildlife.

    Some commentators are using Ivanpah to make the case that renewable energy projects should not receive government money, a view that appears to fit with the new administration’s. One of President Donald Trump’s first actions was to pause approvals of new renewable energy projects on federal land.

    But renewable energy experts say it’s important for governments to invest in a range of clean technologies, and many of those they have invested in, such as photovoltaics, have worked out.

    It wasn’t clear which solar technologies would prove most cost effective when Ivanpah was being built 15 years ago, said Kenneth Gillingham, an economics professor at Yale School of the Environment.

    “Picking winners is extremely difficult,“ he told CNN, “and it’s not a problem that some technologies are outcompeted by others, as long as innovation continues occurring.”

    For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

    RELATED VIDEOS

    The Unexplored Mojave: Ivanpah Dry Lake

    Ivanpah Solar Plant in 4K

    Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System - Solar Energy Drone Aerial Tour DJI Inspire 3

    14-02-2025 om 16:10 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    11-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.'Real-life Iron Man' strikes deal with the military to use his futuristic JET SUIT - allowing soldiers to soar over warzones at more than 85mph

    He's gained a reputation as the 'real-life Iron Man', thanks to his futuristic jet suit. 

    Now British engineer, Richard Browning, is on a mission to bring jet packs to the military.

    His futuristic jet suit uses five gas turbines to reach heights of up to 20 feet (six metres) at impressive speeds of up to 85 mph. 

    He's struck a deal with two western allies to equip militaries with the gizmo, allowing armed commandos to soar over warzones and land on enemy ships. 

    Troops will be able to board hostile ships in the style of James Bond, without having to descend on ropes from a helicopter or climb on a ladder from another vessel. 

    'We do something that looks like it should be in a Marvel film and it does look spectacular, but actually it's now a serious international business,' Browning told the Times.

    'We are in the process of signing several deals with two western allies, in particular for marine mobility, enabling special forces to rapidly secure maritime targets.'

    Marvel fans who fancy taking to the skies can try the jet suit at Goodwood Estate in West Sussex or in California – although the experience costs a whopping £6,600 ($8,200).

    Developed by inventor Richard Browning from Gravity Industries, the suit uses five gas turbines that produce over 1,000 brake horsepower to gain flight

    Developed by inventor Richard Browning from Gravity Industries, the suit uses five gas turbines that produce over 1,000 brake horsepower to gain flight

    Richard Browning, a Royal Marines reservist for six years and Cardiff University graduate, wanted to augment the human body with enough technology to be able to fly

    Richard Browning, a Royal Marines reservist for six years and Cardiff University graduate, wanted to augment the human body with enough technology to be able to fly

    Mr Browning's invention is often compared to the suits worn by Tony Stark/Iron Man in the Marvel comics and films (pictured)

    Mr Browning's invention is often compared to the suits worn by Tony Stark/Iron Man in the Marvel comics and films (pictured)

    Already, British Royal Navy marines used the jet packs to jump from boat to boat in the English Channel to prepare for future boarding operations. 

    Astonishing video shows marines taking off from a rig fixed on to a small boat behind HMS Tamar and flying on to its deck. 

    Mr Browning founded Gravity Industries in March 2017 with the mission of augmenting the human body with enough technology to be able to fly. 

    Less than a decade later, Gravity Industries has flown the jet suit at more than 300 events in 50 different countries, including Vietnam at the end of last year. 

    Mr Browning said: 'The Jet Suit produces up to 144kg of thrust; the thrust to weight ratio works out to be greater than any known Jet Fighter we are aware of.' 

    The futuristic contraption is fitted with five downward-facing turbine engines that produce hot exhaust gases, the company explains. 

    As the burning gases expand and blast out through the nozzle down towards the ground, the pilot is thrust upwards. 

    Because most of the engines are positioned at the end of the user's hands, it's simply a case of moving the arms to be able to fly in the desired direction.

    This is not the first time that the Mr Browning's invention has taken to the air for the pleasure of the British Armed Forces. Pictured: Mr Browning above Farnborough International Airport

    This is not the first time that the Mr Browning's invention has taken to the air for the pleasure of the British Armed Forces. Pictured: Mr Browning above Farnborough International Airport

    It can reach impressive speeds of up to 85 mph and heights of up to 20 feet (6 metres), with a total flight time of up to 10 minutes. Pictured, Mr Browning in flight above the Farnborough International airport in November 2021

    It can reach impressive speeds of up to 85 mph and heights of up to 20 feet (6 metres), with a total flight time of up to 10 minutes. Pictured, Mr Browning in flight above the Farnborough International airport in November 2021

    In Thunderball (1965), James Bond (Sean Connery) used a Bell Textron Rocket Belt to escape the scene after killing French antagonist Jacques Bouvar

    The real-life Iron Man suit

    Number of turbines: 5

    Fuel: Jet A1 Kerosene, Premium Diesel

    Engine: 1050bhp / 144kg

    RPM = 120,000

    Fight timeUp to 8 minutes

    Pilot weight: Under 13 stone (85kg) wearing current Jet Suit

    It takes off vertically, much like the suit in the James Bond film Thunderball, while a display screen inside the helmet gives updates on fuel consumption. 

    Aside from its military applications and allowing members of the public to fly, the suit has potential for mountain rescue charities and emergency response scenarios. 

    Eventually, in dangerous situations such as wildfire or remote mountainsides, professional staff wearing the pack could potentially perform life-threatening rescues.

    In 2022, a paramedic wearing the suit flew up a hill in winds of over 30 miles per hour and heavy rain as part of a successful proof of concept

    'The medic response stuff we don't see as a profit centre,' Browning – a Royal Marines reservist for six years and Cardiff University graduate – told the Times. 

    'But it is still incredibly important to us and we have plans to launch a separate charity to scale this life-saving capability.'

    Gravity Industries, which employs 25 people, recently raised $10 million in funding after being valued at $72 million (£58 million) – up from $36 million (£29 million) two years ago. 

    The company was recognized by Guinness World Record for the fastest flight in a body-controlled jet suit in November 2019 at 85 mph (135 kmph). 

    Aside from its military applications and allowing members of the public to fly, the suit has potential for mountain rescue charities and emergency response scenarios. Pictured in Lake District

    Aside from its military applications and allowing members of the public to fly, the suit has potential for mountain rescue charities and emergency response scenarios. Pictured in Lake District

    Richard Browning CEO of Gravity Industries and the Chief Test Pilot, wears a Jet Suit and flies with second Test Pilot during a demonstration flight on May 22, 2019 in Belgrade, Serbia

    Richard Browning CEO of Gravity Industries and the Chief Test Pilot, wears a Jet Suit and flies with second Test Pilot during a demonstration flight on May 22, 2019 in Belgrade, Serbia

    READ MORE

    article image

    At the time, Browning powered the contraption 1,640ft along the length of Brighton Pier in challenging weather conditions with sparks in his wake. 

    More recently, Browning flew the device at Army People Conference in Farnborough to demonstrate its potential for application by British soldiers. 

    The adventurer took off and landed both on the hood of a nearby jeep and the cabin roof of a truck before flying to a balcony filled with army onlookers. 

    And as part of a promo with Domino's in summer 2023, pizzas were flown in to the Glastonbury Festival site. 

    An early version of the flight pack was dubbed Daedalus after the father of Icarus – the pair in Greek mythology who flew with wings made from feathers and wax – although the name is no longer used on the company's website. 

    According to the legendary tale, Icarus died when he flew too close to the sun and the wax holding the feathers together melted. 

    The real-life Jetsons! Flying taxi dubbed 'Blackbird' can spin and move in any direction thanks to a futuristic propulsion system 

    Those who grew up in the 1960s may remember the classic Hanna-Barbera cartoon 'The Jetsons', depicting a near-future where flying cars roam the skies. 

    While this may sound like pure fantasy, experts in Austria say their new vehicle will take to the air in 2025 - heralding a new milestone in passenger transport. 

    CycloTech, an aviation firm based in Linz, has unveiled Blackbird, a flying taxi that uses a futuristic boat-inspired all-electric propulsion system. 

    Blackbird has '360-degree manoeuvrability' thanks to a system of rotors that go round and round like the classic 'Voith Schneider' propeller on a ship. 

    Measuring 16 feet (4.9 metres) long and with a maximum take-off weight of 340kg, the aircraft carries two people through the air at up to 74 mph (120 km per hour). 

    RELATED VIDEOS


    Real Life Iron Man Jet Suit

    'Real-life Iron Man' demonstrates his futuristic JET SUIT to Army bosses in UK- News 360 Tv

    Real Life Iron Man Jet Suit

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

    11-02-2025 om 21:26 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    10-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Yes, Humans Have Achieved ‘Teleportation’ with a Quantum Supercomputer—This May Help Teleport a Human One Day

    Teleportation with a Quantum Supercomputer

    Yes, Humans Have Achieved ‘Teleportation’ with a Quantum Supercomputer—This May Help Teleport a Human One Day

    Yes, humans have achieved ‘teleportation’ with a quantum supercomputer, but it’s not your Sci-Fi teleportation. Scientists want to teleport an entire human—can they do it? Let’s find out with this new Earth-Shattering discovery!

    Scientists at Oxford found a way to connect two separate quantum computers so they can work together as one. They did this using something called quantum teleportation.

    But this isn’t the kind of teleportation you see in sci-fi movies—nothing physically moves. Instead, information is transferred instantly from one place to another without actually traveling through space.

    Quantum computers are super powerful, but they need millions of qubits to solve big problems. The problem is, cramming millions of qubits into one machine is nearly impossible. Instead of making one giant quantum computer, the researchers figured out how to link multiple smaller quantum computers together—like connecting tiny puzzle pieces to make a bigger, more powerful system.

    Scientists have teleported quantum information before, but this is the first time they have teleported logical gates—the basic building blocks of a computer program. This means the linked quantum computers can now work together to run complex programs, just like a single, bigger quantum machine.

    In short: They found a way to link quantum computers together using teleportation, making them work as one big system. This could help quantum computers become more powerful and practical in the real world.

    Researchers at the University of Oxford connected two separate quantum processors using a special “photonic network interface,” making them work together as one fully connected quantum computer.

    This breakthrough could help solve complex problems that regular computers cannot handle. To be truly useful, quantum computers need to process millions of qubits (the basic unit of quantum information). However, fitting so many processors into one machine would make it extremely large.

    The new approach links smaller quantum devices together, allowing them to share the work. In theory, this method can connect as many processors as needed

    While quantum teleportation has been done before, this study is the first to teleport “logical gates,” which are the basic building blocks of quantum algorithms, across a network. This could lead to a future “quantum internet,” where distant quantum processors form a super-secure network for communication and computing.

    quantum computer
    Dougal Main and Beth Nichol working on the distributed quantum computer
    (John Cairns)

    Lead researcher Dougal Main explained that, unlike previous teleportation experiments, their method allows separate quantum systems to interact. By carefully designing these interactions, they created logical quantum gates between qubits in different quantum computers, effectively linking them together as one system.

    To test their method, the team ran Grover’s search algorithm, which can find items in large, unorganized datasets much faster than a regular computer. The success of this experiment shows how linking multiple quantum devices can lead to powerful, scalable quantum computers—potentially solving complex problems in hours that would take today’s supercomputers years to complete. (Study)

    This is not your Sci-Fi Teleportation but it’s Magical

    Scientists first proved that teleportation was possible in 1993. A team from IBM wrote a paper explaining how they could teleport a quantum state (not a physical object). Five years later, researchers from California and the U.K. successfully teleported a photon—a tiny particle of light—through a special cable.

    Teleportation, like flying cars and time travel, sounds like science fiction, but scientists believe that improvements in quantum computing could make it real.

    So far, most teleportation experiments have used photons. But in 2020, scientists found that teleporting electrons might also be possible. Electrons could be better for teleportation because they can hold their quantum states longe

    Quantum computing is based on the weird science of quantum entanglement, which has nothing to do with our everyday experience of Newtonian mechanics, like masses, forces, and their related effects.

    Instead of physically sending qubits from one computer to another, they used quantum teleportation to transfer quantum information instantly. This is possible due to a phenomenon called quantum entanglement, in which two particles (qubits) are mysteriously linked, no matter how far apart they are.

    Scientists entangle two qubits (tiny quantum particles). Entangled qubits are like a magical pair—if you change one, the other instantly changes, no matter how far apart they are. This means they stay connected, even if one is on Earth and the other is on the Moon.

    They used light (photons) to transfer quantum information between computers. This act acts like a bridge, allowing separate quantum processors to “talk” to each other.

    The team didn’t just teleport individual qubits; they teleported logical gates (the basic operations of a quantum computer). This allowed the separate quantum computers to process data together as if they were part of the same system.

    • Quantum entanglement: Where two particles, such as a pair of photons, remain correlated even when separated by vast distances. This allows them to share information without having to travel physically.
    • Quantum teleportation: The transfer of quantum information over long distances almost instantly, using entanglement.

    Scientists Want to Teleport a Human—Could This Breakthrough Make It Possible?

    Moving an entire human from one place to another—like in sci-fi movies—is not possible yet. The human body has about 10^27 atoms, and each atom is made of even smaller particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons. These tiny parts also have their own even smaller parts, like quarks and muons, each with a unique quantum state.

    To teleport a person, we’d have to calculate an unimaginably huge number of quantum states and rebuild them perfectly in a new location.

    In the past, sci-fi writers thought teleportation meant breaking matter apart, sending it somewhere, and putting it back together. But quantum entanglement shows that teleportation isn’t about moving physical matter—it’s about transferring information that describes a quantum state, according to physicist Paul Davies.

    If we can overcome the challenge of processing power—something that better quantum computers might help with—could teleporting a human be as easy as scanning their body and sending the data like an email attachment?

    However, a physics rule (the uncertainty principle) says we can’t know both the speed and position of a particle at the same time. This means no matter how carefully we scan every particle in your body, the copy will never be 100% perfect.

    What could these small errors mean? Maybe your teleported self looks fine but suddenly enjoys broccoli, even though you used to hate it. Or worse, the errors could be serious, causing big problems when your body is reassembled.

    Even if we succeed in addressing all of these challenges, we must consider a philosophical question: do the atoms in your body and all their quantum states constitute the being you consider to be, well, you?

    Experimental and theoretical physicist John Clauser—who, along with his colleagues won the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics for their work on quantum entanglement—has a take on this question that might give you pause.

    “Imagine you’re told that if you step into this box, every atom in your body will be disassembled, effectively leaving your body totally destroyed, thereby killing you,” Clauser says. “Furthermore, you’re also told that afterwards, a replicant of you starts walking around . . . taking over your life as you once knew it . . . would you step into that box? I certainly wouldn’t!”

    Read also:

    While the direct teleportation of matter remains speculative, some theoretical frameworks suggest alternative approaches: If the human mind can be fully understood as a quantum system, it might one day be possible to “upload” and “download” consciousness.

    Emerging studies in quantum biology suggest that quantum phenomena may play a role in human consciousness.

    Dr. Hameroff’s research focuses on the role of microtubules—protein structures within cells—in consciousness. He proposed, alongside Sir Roger Penrose, the Orch OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) model of consciousness in the 1990s.

    This theory suggests that consciousness arises from quantum computing processes within the brain’s microtubules, with influences from the fundamental structure of spacetime at the quantum level. According to the model, this could explain phenomena like perception, self-awareness, and potentially even spirituality and the afterlife, connecting consciousness to the basic fabric of the universe.

    Dr. Stuart Hameroff has been interested in the mystery of consciousness for almost his entire life. Instead of studying brain science or psychology, Hameroff became interested in anesthetics—drugs that cause loss of consciousness—because of their connection to consciousness. (Click here to read the full article)

    “I thought about neurology, psychology, and neurosurgery, but none of those seemed to address the problem of consciousness,” says Hameroff, a retired anesthesiology professor from the University of Arizona. He remembers when he first came to the university and met the chair of the anesthesia department. The chair said, “If you want to understand consciousness, figure out how anesthesia works because we don’t know how it works.”

    Dr. Hameroff suggests that at its core, consciousness can be understood as “awareness,” which he equates to having a “phenomenal experience”—the subjective, first-person experience of the world around us or our inner thoughts and feelings.

    In recent years, research showing quantum effects in biological systems, including microtubules, has given some critics reason to reconsider. Dr. Hameroff believes the focus on AI and computation has shifted attention away from the true nature of consciousness. Despite the criticism, he continues to defend the theory, even exploring the possibility that consciousness could predate life itself, a view he admits leans into the spiritual realm.

    Quantum Entanglement in Neurons May Actually Explain Consciousness

    In their newly published paper, Shanghai University physicists Zefei Liu and Yong-Cong Chen and biomedical engineer Ping Ao from Sichuan University in China explain how entangled photons emitted by carbon-hydrogen bonds in nerve cell insulation could synchronize activity within the brain. (Source)

    Their findings come just months after another quantum phenomenon known as superradiance was identified in cellular frameworks, drawing attention to a highly speculative theory on consciousness called the Penrose-Hameroff ‘orchestrated-objective reduction’ model.

    Scientists have had a whole other reason to staple their skeptic hat on tight when it comes to quantum theories of consciousness – the sloppy tides of biology have long been considered too chaotic, too noisy, and too ‘big’ for quantum mechanics to emerge in any significant way.

    Proposed by the highly respected physicist Roger Penrose and the American anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, the model suggests networks of cytoskeleton tubules that lend structure to cells – in this case, our neurons – act as a kind of quantum computer that somehow shapes our thinking.

    The movement of these connected photons through the brain’s biochemistry might help link processes that are important for the brain’s ability to synchronize.

    The word “might” is doing a lot of work here. While there are many scientific discoveries that support parts of this idea, there’s currently only evidence that entangled photons affect biological processes in photosynthesis.

    That doesn’t mean there aren’t examples of quantum biology in animals. There is growing evidence that the electron spins in certain proteins, called cryptochromes, can be affected by magnetic fields, which may help explain how some animals navigate long distances.

    We’re still far from proving that anything beyond classical chemistry happens in our brains, or that our brain functions are controlled by a quantum force. But it may be time to reconsider whether quantum phenomena have any impact on at least some of the brain’s basic functions.

    RELATED VIDEOS


    Quantum Teleportation FINALLY Achieved After 27 Years

    Quantum Teleportation Made Possible! Scientists Achieved Near-Perfect Results

    Quantum Teleportation is real!! Here's how it works | Documentary Unwind

    What Is Quantum Teleportation?

    https://howandwhys.com/ }

    10-02-2025 om 16:30 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    08-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.This British Scientist Proposes Controversial Theory: We May Be Living 52 Million Lives in a Simulation

    Dr. Melvin Vopson simulation

    This British Scientist Proposes Controversial Theory: We May Be Living 52 Million Lives in a Simulation

    Dr. Melvin Vopson suggests a controversial theory that we may be living 52 million lives in a simulation, as one real-world lifetime could feel like 4.2 billion years in simulated time.

    Dr. Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, suggests that we might be living in a computer simulation, much like in The Matrix. He believes that certain signs in our daily lives hint that reality might not be what it seems. He explores the question: if we are in a simulated world, what is its purpose?

    Dr Vopson makes scientific observations and measurements to support his theory. His theory is considered controversial which suggests that time can slow down in a simulation. Just like dreams feel long but last only a short time in real life, a whole lifetime in a simulated world could happen in just one real-world minute. This means a person could live many lifetimes by repeating these short simulations, potentially experiencing 52 million lifetimes in one human lifespan.

    Dr. Melvin Vopson has previously published research suggesting that information has mass and that all elementary particles – the smallest known building blocks of the universe – store information about themselves, similar to the way humans have DNA.

    In 2022, he discovered a new law of physics that could predict genetic mutations in organisms, including viruses, and help judge their potential consequences. It is based on the second law of thermodynamics, which establishes that entropy – a measure of disorder in an isolated system – can only increase or stay the same.

    Dr. Melvin Vopson
    Dr. Melvin Vopson

    Dr. Vopson had expected that the entropy in information systems would also increase over time, but on examining the evolution of these systems he realized it remains constant or decreases. That’s when he established the second law of information dynamics, or infodynamics, which could significantly impact genetics research and evolution theory.

    Dr. Vopson presents three possible explanations. One idea is that we willingly entered this simulation before birth, choosing to live in an exciting, artificial world rather than a dull real one. In this view, life is like a highly advanced virtual reality game meant for entertainment.

    Another possibility is that we are part of an experiment designed to solve real-world problems. This theory suggests that humans in the future create simulations like ours to test solutions for global crises such as climate change or war. If one of these simulations finds a solution, it could be applied in the real world.

    The third idea is that time in the simulation moves much slower than in reality. A few minutes in the real world could last for centuries here, allowing us to live multiple lifetimes. Thus, by choosing to exist in the simulation, we might experience a form of immortality.

    According to this idea, in the same way, that our dreams can feel days long but last only minutes in real life, an entire lifetime in a simulated universe could take just one minute in the real world. That means a person could become virtually immortal by stacking up these one-minute simulated lives across their entire human lifetime, leaving 52 million chained lifetimes behind. (Source)

    Although Dr. Vopson admits these are just theories and not proven by science, some of his research suggests that the universe could be a giant computer. He is not alone in this belief—figures like Elon Musk have also speculated that reality might be a simulation.

    In 2022, Dr. Vopson discovered a new law of physics that could predict genetic mutations in organisms, including viruses, and help judge their potential consequences.

    It is based on the second law of thermodynamics, which establishes that entropy – a measure of disorder in an isolated system – can only increase or stay the same.

    Dr. Vopson had expected that the entropy in information systems would also increase over time, but on examining the evolution of these systems he realized it remains constant or decreases. That’s when he established the second law of information dynamics, or infodynamics, which could significantly impact genetics research and evolution theory.

    Dr Vopson said: “I knew then that this revelation had far-reaching implications across various scientific disciplines.

    “What I wanted to do next is put the law to the test and see if it could further support the simulation hypothesis by moving it on from the philosophical realm to mainstream science.”

    Information theory is the study of how information is measured, stored, and shared. It was first developed by a mathematician named Claude Shannon and is now used in many areas of science, including physics.

    In 2022, Dr. Vopson and another physicist, Serban Lepadatu, introduced a new idea called the “second law of infodynamics.”

    This idea is similar to a well-known rule in physics called the “second law of thermodynamics,” which says that disorder (called entropy) in the universe always increases or stays the same over time. In simple terms, things naturally become more chaotic.

    However, Dr. Vopson found that in information systems—such as digital data or genetic code—the opposite happens. Instead of becoming more disordered, these systems become more organized over time.

    He tested this idea on different systems and found that it supports the theory that our universe might be a simulation. This is because, unlike in nature where things become more chaotic, information systems tend to become more efficient and structured. The patterns we see in nature might be a way of organizing information, which fits with the idea of a simulated world.

    Key findings include:

    • Biological Systems: The second law of infodynamics challenges the conventional understanding of genetic mutations, suggesting that they follow a pattern governed by information entropy. This discovery has profound implications for fields such as genetic research, evolutionary biology, genetic therapies, pharmacology, virology, and pandemic monitoring.
    • Atomic Physics: The paper explains the behavior of electrons in multi-electron atoms, providing insights into phenomena like Hund’s rule; which states that the term with maximum multiplicity lies lowest in energy. Electrons arrange themselves in a way that minimizes their information entropy, shedding light on atomic physics and the stability of chemicals.
    • Cosmology: The second law of infodynamics is shown to be a cosmological necessity, with thermodynamic considerations applied to an adiabatically expanding universe supporting its validity.

    “The paper also provides an explanation for the prevalence of symmetry in the universe”, explained Dr. Vopson.

    Dr. Vopson argues that this law plays a role in atomic physics (electron arrangement), cosmology, and biological systems. This last one is where Dr. Vopson makes a big claim: contrary to Charles Darwin’s idea that mutations occur randomly, mutations actually occur so that information entropy is minimized.

    He analyzed the constantly mutating SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. COVID-19) virus, and his paper on that investigation—shows a “unique correlation between the information and the dynamics of the genetic mutations.”

    “A super complex universe like ours, if it were a simulation, would require a built-in data optimization and compression in order to reduce the computational power and the data storage requirements to run the simulation,” Dr. Vopson wrote. (Source)

    Dr. Vopson tested his new idea, called the “second law of infodynamics,” by studying digital information.

    He wrote the word “INFORMATION” in binary (a computer code using 1s and 0s) onto a tiny magnetic surface. Over time, as the system went through many cycles at room temperature, the information started to fade. After 1,990 cycles, it disappeared completely. This matched his theory, which says that information naturally gets lost over time, becoming simpler.

    Read also:

    Dr. Vopson was surprised and excited that his idea applied to many different systems. He believes the law could be universal. However, he made it clear that, while his study supports the idea that the universe might be a simulation, it doesn’t prove it for sure. He hopes his work will encourage more research and that other scientists will find new ways to test this idea.

    He also suggested another experiment to check his theory. If scientists smash matter and antimatter (opposites of each other) together, they might see low-energy light particles appear. This would show that information is being erased, proving his law of infodynamics in action.

    Information physics suggests that everything we see as physical might actually be made of bits of information.

    This means our universe could be a simulation. The idea isn’t new—John Archibald Wheeler suggested in 1989 that the universe might emerge from information.

    In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom argued that it’s likely we are living in such a simulation, as advanced civilizations might create simulations that are impossible to tell apart from reality.

    Physicist Seth Lloyd from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US took the simulation hypothesis to the next level by suggesting that the entire universe could be a giant quantum computer. (Source)

    Dr. Vopson noted that the simulation hypothesis has attracted the interest of many public figures, such as Elon Musk and Neil deGrasse Tyson, along with other people from all walks of life, showing that it has a broad appeal.

    RELATED VIDEOS


    The Simulation Theory

    Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains the Simulation Hypothesis

    Are We Living in A Simulation - Simulation Theory Explained- Are We Real - Is this World an illusion

    https://howandwhys.com/ } 

    08-02-2025 om 18:25 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    07-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Terrifying robot dog can walk, climb, and even backflip on almost any terrain - but concerned viewers predict it will be 'hunting down every last human before long'

    The idea of a robotic dog that can move on almost any terrain might sound like something from the latest episode of Black Mirror

    But as this terrifying footage shows, it has now become a reality. 

    The state-of-the-art robot dog is called Lynx, and is the brainchild of Chinese company, Deep Robotics. 

    Equipped with four wheels instead of paws, the bot can walk, climb, and even backflip on everything from rocks to snow. 

    Deep Robtics hopes that it could be used in search and rescue operations. 

    However, some sceptics have already raised concerns about the four-legged robot. 

    'I know these are gonna be hunting down every last human before long,' one user commented on the video. 

    However, they reluctantly added: 'But this is also just legitimately cool as hell.'

    The state-of-the-art robot dog is called Lynx, and is the brainchild of Chinese company, Deep Robotics

    The state-of-the-art robot dog is called Lynx, and is the brainchild of Chinese company, Deep Robotics

    Equipped with four wheels instead of paws, the bot can walk, climb, and even backflip on everything from rocks to snow

    Equipped with four wheels instead of paws, the bot can walk, climb, and even backflip on everything from rocks to snow

    Lynx stands at just under one metre tall, and weighs 30kg - around the same size as a Labrador Retriever. 

    'DEEPRoboticsLynx all-terrain robot boasts a compact and agile design with exceptional adaptability to diverse terrains,' Deep Robotics explains on its website. 

    'By leveraging its distinctive wheel-leg motion, DEEPRoboticsLynx strikes an optimal balance between speed and agility, carrying forward DEEP Robotics' deep expertise in embodied intelligence and industry applications.'

    According to the firm, the robot is able to climb platforms up to 80cm tall and navigate continuous steps reaching up to 22cm tall. 

    Meanwhile, when it's on the move, the bot can reach top speeds of five metres/second (11mph). 

    It also comes with an IP54 protection rating, meaning it is suitable for use in all weather conditions. 

    Equipped with a wide-angle camera, the bot could be used to access hard-to-reach areas during search and rescue missions. 

    Unsurprisingly, it comes with a fairly hefty price-tag. 

    According to the firm, the robot is able to climb platforms up to 80cm tall and navigate continuous steps reaching up to 22cm tall

    According to the firm, the robot is able to climb platforms up to 80cm tall and navigate continuous steps reaching up to 22cm tall

    Unsurprisingly, it comes with a fairly hefty price-tag. Lynx will set buyers back by $17,999 (£14,520.65)

    Unsurprisingly, it comes with a fairly hefty price-tag. Lynx will set buyers back by $17,999 (£14,520.65)

    Lynx will set buyers back by $17,999 (£14,520.65)!

    The response to the bot has been overwhelmingly positive on social media. 

    article image

    Commenting on Deep Robotics' video showcasing the robot, one user wrote: 'That's crazy. This kind of robots with such agility were still a science fiction several years ago.'

    Another added: 'this is the most hardcore flex I've ever seen in the history of robotics.'

    And one joked: 'the first couple of jump clips had me wondering if those were real or cgi because of how well the lynx did it!'

    However, others were slightly more sceptical of the robot. 

    'Cant wait for this thing to chase me down in the future,' one user wrote, while another said: 'This 100% was a black mirror episode.'

    WHAT IS BOSTON DYNAMICS' SPOT MINI ROBO-DOG?

    Boston Dynamics first showed off Spot, the most advanced robot dog ever created, in a video posted in November 2017.

    The firm, best known for Atlas, its 5 foot 9 (1.7 metre) humanoid robot, has revealed a new 'lightweight' version of its robot Spot.

    The robotic canine was shown trotting around a yard, with the promise that more information from the notoriously secretive firm is 'coming soon'.

    Boston Dynamics tease upcoming video of new robot - Spot

    'Spot is a small four-legged robot that comfortably fits in an office or home' the firm says on its website.

    It weighs 25 kg (55 lb), or 30 kg (66 lb) when you include the robotic arm.

    Spot is all-electric and can go for about 90 minutes on a charge, depending on what it is doing, the firm says, boasting 'Spot is the quietest robot we have built.' 

    Spot was first unveiled in 2016, and a previous version of the mini version of spot with a strange extendable neck has been shown off helping around the house. 

    In the firm's previous video, the robot is shown walking out of the firm's HQ and into what appears to be a home.

    There, it helps load a dishwasher and carries a can to the trash.

    It also at one point encounters a dropped banana skin and falls dramatically - but uses its extendable neck to push itself back up. 

    'Spot is one of the quietest robots we have ever built, the firm says, due to its electric motors.

    'It has a variety of sensors, including depth cameras, a solid state gyro (IMU) and proprioception sensors in the limbs. 

    'These sensors help with navigation and mobile manipulation. 

    'Spot performs some tasks autonomously, but often uses a human for high-level guidance.' 

    RELATED VIDEOS


    China reveals unstoppable all-terrain robo-dog on wheels

    5 Best Robot Dogs You Can Buy In 2025

    Amazing Robotic Dog tricks

    Robot dog with gun brings Black Mirror into terrifying reality

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

    07-02-2025 om 21:31 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    06-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Watch humanoid robots waltzing seamlessly with humans thanks to AI motion tracking software upgrade

    Watch humanoid robots waltzing seamlessly with humans thanks to AI motion tracking software upgrade

    ExBody2: Advanced Expressive Humanoid Whole-Body Control

    Humanoid robots could soon move in a far more realistic manner — and even dance just like us — thanks to a new software framework for tracking human motion.

    Developed by researchers at UC San Diego, UC Berkeley, MIT, and Nvidia, "ExBody2" is a new technology that enables humanoid robots to perform realistic movements based on detailed scans and motion-tracked visualizations of humans.

    The researchers hope that future humanoid robots could perform a much wider range of tasks by mimicking human movements more accurately. For example, the teaching method could help robots operate in roles requiring fine movements — such as retrieving items from shelves — or moving with care around humans or other machines.

    Robot mirroring human.

    (Image credit: Exbody 2)

    ExBody2 works by taking simulated movements based on motion-capture scans of humans and translating them into usable motion data for the robot to replicate. The framework can replicate complex movements using the robot, which would let robots move less rigidly and adapt to different tasks without needing extensive retraining.

    Related: 

    Discover the 8 Weirdest Robots in the World in 2025

    This is all taught using reinforcement learning, a subset of machine learning in which the robot is fed large amounts of data to ensure it takes the optimal route in any given situation. Good outputs, simulated by researchers, are assigned positive or negative scores to "reward" the model for desirable outcomes, which here meant replicating motions precisely without compromising the bot's stability.

    The framework can also take short motion clips, such as a few seconds of dancing, and synthesize new frames of movement for reference, to enable robots to complete longer-duration movements.

    Dancing with robots

    In a video posted to YouTube, a robot trained through ExBody2 dances, spars and exercises alongside a human subject. Additionally, the robot mimics a researcher's movement in real time, using additional code titled "HybrIK: Hybrid Analytical-Neural Inverse Kinematics for Body Mesh Recovery" developed by the Machine Vision and Intelligence Group at Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

    At present, ExBody2's dataset is largely focused on upper-body movements. In a study, uploaded Dec. 17, 2024 to the preprint server ArXiv, the researchers behind the framework explained that this is due to concerns that introducing too much movement in the lower half of the robot will cause instability.

    "Overly simplistic tasks could limit the training policy's ability to generalize to new situations, while overly complex tasks might exceed the robot's operational capabilities, leading to ineffective learning outcomes," they wrote. "Part of our dataset preparation, therefore, includes the exclusion or modification of entries that featured complex lower body movements beyond the robot's capabilities."

    The researchers' dataset contains more than 2,800 movements, with 1,919 of these coming from the Archive of Motion Capture As Surface Shapes (AMASS) dataset. This is a large dataset of human motions, including more than 11,000 individual human movements and 40 hours of detailed motion data, intended for non-commercial deep learning — when a neural network is trained on vast amounts of data to identify or reproduce patterns.

    Having proven ExBody2's effectiveness at replicating human-like movement in humanoid robots, the team will now turn to the problem of achieving these results without having to manually curate datasets to ensure only suitable information is available to the framework. The researchers suggest that, in the future, automated dataset collection will help smooth this process.

    RELATED VIDEOS


    Meet Ameca, the world's 'most advanced' humanoid robot

    5 Most Realistic Humanoid Robots in The World

    This Is The First LIQUID Robot, And It’s Unbelievable

    15 Most Incredible Giant Robots In The World

    7 STRANGEST New Robots

    https://www.livescience.com/ }

    06-02-2025 om 17:12 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    05-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Incredible images capture US Navy testing its new laser weapon that NEVER runs out of power

    Incredible images capture US Navy testing its new laser weapon that NEVER runs out of power

    The US Navy has released stunning images showing its incredible new drone-destroying laser weapon in action for the first time.

    The HELIOS system was tested aboard the USS Preble, with photos capturing its bright beam shooting an unmanned aerial vehicle out of the sky.

    HELIOS, which stands for High Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance, was developed by Lockheed Martin in 2021 and delivered to the Navy a year later.

    The system blasts more than 60 kilowatts of directed energy, enough to power up to 60 homes, at the speed of light and can hit targets up to five miles away.

    It is designed to counter a range of threats, including drones, small boats, and potentially incoming missiles.

    HELIOS was also designed to disrupt the intelligence and reconnaissance sensors on enemy vessels.

    The testing comes as threats against America's warships are growing as foreign nations stock their arsenals with drones and anti-ship missiles.

    The US Naval Institute said in a recent report: 'The drone threat has been around for years, but the Navy has yet to prioritize defending against these easily acquired weapons.'

    The US Navy conducted the first tests of its drone-kill laser weapon. HELIOS can fire for as long as it has power, which it collects from the ship

    The US Navy conducted the first tests of its drone-kill laser weapon. HELIOS can fire for as long as it has power, which it collects from the ship

    'Expecting sailors who shoot shotguns, rifles, or machine guns twice a year on a range to be able to engage multiple small, fast-moving targets is unreasonable, 'the report added.

    'Even if a few sailors were expert shooters capable of shooting down drones, it likely would take a few minutes from the first report of a potential drone to identify the drone, raise the alarm, and bring key weapons and associated ammunition to bear against the threat—time the ship might not have.'

    But the Navy sees its new HELIOS as a way to fight back, showing off its capabilities on the open ocean.

    The US Center for Countermeasures (CCM) released details on the testing, SWNS reported.

    'CCM supported the Navy’s demonstration on USS Preble (DDG 88) to verify and validate the functionality, performance, and capability of the HEL with Integrated Optical Dazzler and Surveillance system against an unmanned aerial vehicle target, it shared in a report. 

    The weapon was integrated into the ship's combat system, enhancing its target detection and tracking capabilities. 

    HELIOS can fire for as long as it has power, which it collects from the ship.

    The system blasts more than 60 kilowatts of directed energy, enough to power up to 60 homes, at the speed of light and can hit targets up to five miles away

    The system blasts more than 60 kilowatts of directed energy, enough to power up to 60 homes, at the speed of light and can hit targets up to five miles away

    The HELIOS system was tested aboard the USS Preble, with photos showing its bright beam shooting an unmanned aerial vehicle out of the sky

    The HELIOS system was tested aboard the USS Preble, with photos showing its bright beam shooting an unmanned aerial vehicle out of the sky

    And because the ship's power source is constantly replenished, the laser has an unlimited supply of power. 

    The test comes as a Homeland Security Advisor and billionaire Marc Andreessen suggested AI-powered jets will be the main fighters in future wars.

    Speaking on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast in November, Andreessen said jets that travel five times the speed of sound, Mach 5, are going to be more common 'within a few years.'

    article image

    'Image a thousand of these things coming over the horizon right at you,' Andreessen said. 'It really changes the fundamental equation of war.' 

    He explain that instead of needing the most soldiers and material to win, people with the most technology and money will take over.

    Andreessen also noted that there are 'a bunch of reasons' why he believes a future of AI-piloted fighter jets is all but inevitable.

    'Part of it is simply the speed of processing,' Andreessen explained.

    'But the other big thing is, if you don't have a human in the plane, you don't have [...] 'the Spam in the Can.''

    'You don't have the human body in the plane to keep alive, which means you can be a lot faster,' the billionaire White House advisor continued, 'much higher G-forces.'

    RELATED VIDEOS

    US Navy testing its new laser weapon that never runs out of power

    "Incredible Images: U.S. Navy Tests Powerful New Laser Weapon!"


    US Navy Tests Tesla's Advanced Laser Weapon System

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

    05-02-2025 om 15:53 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    04-02-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Lieven Scheire over Chinese AI die wereld verbaast: “Geheime projecten zou ik niet bespreken met DeepSeek”
    Kopfoto Lieve Scheire
    PREMIUM
    Kopfoto Lieve Scheire © UAntwerpen, GTT, montage HLN

    Lieven Scheire over Chinese AI die wereld verbaast: “Geheime projecten zou ik niet bespreken met DeepSeek

    InterviewDat wij, Vlamingen, ook ‘mee’ zijn met artificiële intelligentie danken we toch ook aan Lieven Scheire, succesvol theatermaker over AI en sinds kort eredoctor in wetenschapscommunicatie (UAntwerpen). Wat vindt hij van het Chinese DeepSeek, dat voor een ‘habbekrats’ een gratis ChatGPT bouwde? “Dit is bijzonder pijnlijk voor de VS.”


    Deepseek AI Assistant: ALWAYS ON Python AI Agent for Engineers that SHIP

    DeepSeek facts vs hype, model distillation, and open source competition

    Kan je aan ons, leken, nog even uitleggen hoe die Chinese start-up DeepSeek de AI-wereld op z’n kop zette?

    Lieven Scheire: “Het lijkt erop dat DeepSeek een taalmodel in AI bouwde dat even krachtig is als dat van ChatGPT, maar voor een fractie van de kosten. Machinelearning laat een computerprogramma zichzelf aanpassen door miljoenen voorbeelden te verwerken, het “neurale netwerk” in die computer wordt dan stap voor stap verbeterd tot het werkt. Tot nu toe werd altijd gezegd dat je alleen zulke krachtige AI kunt ontwikkelen als je beschikt over de nieuwste, duurste computerchips. Maar DeepSeek beweert nu dat het ook met 6 miljoen dollar kan, terwijl anderen miljarden nodig hebben.”

    Als je genoeg computer­kracht hebt – en we spreken dan al over een kmo met een stevige server – kun je het model downloaden. Je kunt thuis met je eigen DeepSeek werken, zonder dat er verbinding met het internet of met China nodig is

    Lieven Scheire

    Meer dan 1.000 miljard aan beurswaarde ging bij AI-bedrijven in rook op.

    “De concurrentiepositie van ChatGPT van OpenAI is plotseling onderuitgehaald. En het toekomstperspectief van chipfabrikant Nvidia komt onder druk. Als blijkt dat die krachtigste chips niet meer nodig zijn, verandert dat alles. Stel het je voor als een goudkoorts waarbij Nvidia bulldozers verkoopt waarmee je goud kan delven en in China graven ze met een simpele spade evenveel op. Geopolitiek gezien is het bijzonder pijnlijk voor de VS. Zij probeerden China te beperken: ‘Jullie krijgen onze geavanceerde chips niet.’ Maar nu zegt China: ‘Dankjewel voor die sancties, want we hebben ontdekt dat we die straffe chips helemaal niet nodig hebben.’ Dit is echt enorm. Ik belde al verschillende AI-wetenschappers, die wel wat gewend zijn en ook zij trekken grote ogen. Vanavond treed ik op in Roosendaal (Scheire toert momenteel met z’n theatershow ‘Artificiële Intelligentie’ door Nederland en het Verenigd Koninkrijk, red.) en ik moét hier gewoon iets over vertellen. Dit is te groot om te negeren.”

    Lieven Scheire toert momenteel door Nederland en het Verenigd Koninkrijk met zijn theatershow over AI. Daarin krijgt DeepSeek ook meteen aandacht.
    Lieven Scheire toert momenteel door Nederland en het Verenigd Koninkrijk met zijn theatershow over AI. Daarin krijgt DeepSeek ook meteen aandacht. 
    © VTM

    DeepSeek kan toch niets meer dan ChatGPT? Waarom is er dan, behalve dat het dus goedkoper kan, zoveel fuss?

    “Belangrijk is dat het hele model van DeepSeek ‘open source’ is. Bij OpenAI houden ze wat ze ontwikkelen gesloten als een zwarte doos. Het is hun uitvinding en ze vragen geld aan gebruikers voor toegang. Maar DeepSeek maakt alles openbaar. Als je genoeg computerkracht hebt – en we spreken dan al over een kmo met een stevige server – kun je het model downloaden. Je kunt thuis met je eigen DeepSeek werken zonder dat er verbinding met het internet of met China nodig is. Dit zet bedrijven zoals Microsoft, die fors hebben geïnvesteerd in OpenAI, onder druk.’”

    Net toen Trump aankondig­de dat hij 500 miljard dollar zou investeren om de VS op de eerste plek te houden in AI, lanceerde China DeepSeek. Een toevallige timing? Misschien niet. Dit is een wa­ke-up­call voor de VS

    Lieven Scheire

    DeepSeek claimt efficiënter te zijn, zowel in ontwikkelingskosten als in energieverbruik. Da’s toch vooral goed nieuws, want dan is er een duurzame toekomst voor dat energieverslindende AI?

    “Voor energieverbruik zou dit goed nieuws kunnen zijn, maar dat is nog afwachten. AI is een consumentenproduct geworden. Zolang een tiental grote onderzoeksinstellingen veel energie gebruiken, valt dat nog mee. Maar als miljarden mensen dagelijks AI gebruiken, zit je met een ander probleem. DeepSeek zou dat proces efficiënter kunnen maken. Maar we blijven mensen: zodra iets goedkoper en sneller kan, willen we meer. Dat zagen we ook met computers. Het zou me niet verbazen als we die efficiëntiewinst in energieverbruik gebruiken voor nog ingewikkeldere modellen, in plaats van voor duurzaamheid.”

    “Als je geheime projecten hebt, zou ik die niet met DeepSeek bespreken. Maar eerlijk gezegd weet ik niet of je dat bij ChatGPT wel veilig kunt doen.”
    “Als je geheime projecten hebt, zou ik die niet met DeepSeek bespreken. Maar eerlijk gezegd weet ik niet of je dat bij ChatGPT wel veilig kunt doen.” 
    © ID/ Christophe De Muynck

    Eindelijk iedereen een robot in huis.

    “Op dit moment zijn taalmodellen nog steeds dé revolutie binnen AI. Beeldherkenning en andere vormen van AI ontwikkelen zich ook, maar waar iedereen naar streeft, is de ontwikkeling van artificial general intelligence (AGI): een AI-systeem dat niet één specifieke taak uitvoert, maar alles kan. Volgens veel onderzoekers komt dat steeds dichterbij, terwijl anderen het nog als een luchtkasteel beschouwen. Toch lijkt één ding zeker: als er meer rekenkracht beschikbaar komt door efficiëntere methoden, zoals die van DeepSeek, zal dat vrijwel zeker gebruikt worden in de race naar AGI.”

    Sommigen vergelijken deze AI-race tussen de VS en China met het ‘Spoetnik-moment’ van de Koude Oorlog. Zie jij die vergelijking?

    “Ja, die vergelijking is goed gekozen. Spoetnik was voor de VS een koude douche: opeens had de grote vijand een satelliet die boven het hoofd van de Amerikanen hing. Nu hebben we iets vergelijkbaars. Net toen Trump aankondigde dat hij 500 miljard dollar zou investeren om de VS op de eerste plek te houden in AI, lanceerde China DeepSeek. Een toevallige timing? Misschien niet. Dit is een wake-upcall voor de VS. Ze gaan daar hun aanpak moeten herzien. Waar ze tot nu toe vertrouwden op dure hardware en brute rekenkracht, laat DeepSeek zien dat het ook anders kan: efficiënter en goedkoper. Dit zal niet alleen Amerikaanse bedrijven aan het denken zetten, maar ook Aziatische en Europese start-ups, die hun eigen plannen voor een ChatGPT-alternatief wellicht in de prullenbak gooien om te kijken hoe DeepSeek dit heeft gedaan. Wat ontwikkeling betreft, is dit fantastisch natuurlijk, maar laat ons hopen dat het geopolitiek niet nog meer opschudding veroorzaakt.”

    Je waarschuwde al voor ‘de dag dat de leerling-tovenaar ermee aan de slag gaat’ en ook grote namen in de AI-wereld zeggen dat wie de race wint, technologie kan ontwikkelen die de mensheid niet meer onder controle krijgt. Komen we dichter bij dat moment?

    “Da’s een lastige vraag. Zelfs de grootste specialisten hebben compleet tegengestelde meningen. Sommigen waarschuwen dat de ‘geest uit de fles’ is en dat dergelijke technologieën hun eigen gang kunnen gaan, zonder menselijke controle. Aan de andere kant zijn er collega-wetenschappers, die ook aan de wieg stonden van AI, die benadrukken dat we altijd de mogelijkheid hebben om de stekker eruit te trekken.”

    DeepSeek komt uit China en dat roept vragen op over privacy en dataveiligheid. Hoe moeten we daarmee omgaan?

    “Het lijkt me logisch dat ze data verzamelen en gebruikers profileren op basis van vragen die je stelt. Als je geheime projecten hebt, zou ik die niet met DeepSeek bespreken. Maar eerlijk gezegd weet ik niet of je dat bij ChatGPT wel veilig kunt doen.”

    LEES OOK.

    https://www.hln.be/ }

    04-02-2025 om 17:20 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.12 pivotal moments in the history of robotics, from Isaac Asimov to self-driving cars

    12 pivotal moments in the history of robotics, from Isaac Asimov to self-driving cars

    In the image a silver, faceless, humanoid, robot stands still as a lady take a photo of the robot on her phone
    (Image credit: VCG / VCG via Getty Images)

    Few technologies have captured the human imagination in quite the same way as robots. The idea of machines that can walk and talk like us has been a staple of science fiction for decades. The reality has been more prosaic — most real-world robots are disembodied arms relegated to dull and repetitive factory work. But recent breakthroughs in both artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic hardware mean that the smart, humanoids of our imaginations are getting ever closer to reality.

    Here are 12 of the most important milestones that got us here.

    1921 — Invention of the term "robot"

    R.U.R.'. Poster for puppet version of a 1920 science-fiction play by Karel Capek.

    (Image credit: Heritage Art/Heritage Images via Getty Images)

    Since antiquity, people had imagined the possibility of artificial humans — from the clay Golems of Jewish folklore to the mechanical servants of the Greek god Hephaestus. History is also littered with examples of complex automata designed to wow audiences with their life-like movements. But the word "robot" was first introduced by the Czech writer Karel Čapek in his 1921 play R.U.R., which stands for Rossumovi Univerzální Roboti (Rossum's Universal Robots). The term is derived from the Czech word "robota," which means forced labor, and the play features artificial workers made of synthetic organic matter that rise up against their human masters — a narrative that would be echoed in many later works.

    1942 — Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics

    View of American science fiction & mystery writer Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992) as he attends at the 5th Avenue Book Fair, New York.

    (Image credit: Rita Barros/Getty Images)

    Robots became a popular science fiction trope, with legendary author Isaac Asimov featuring them prominently in many of his stories. A major theme of his work was how these artificial humans would interact with human society. In his 1942 short story "Runaround" he introduced the Three Laws of Robotics, which were supposed to govern how all robots in his fictional universe operated. The first law prohibited the robots from harming humans, the second mandated robots to obey humans unless it violated the first law, and the third ordered the machines to protect themselves as long as that didn't conflict with the two other laws. While entirely fictional, Asimov's three laws were influential on the development of ethical frameworks for AI and robotics.

    1961 — The first industrial robot

    Robot arm.

    It didn't take long for ideas from science fiction to filter through to the real world. In the early 1950s, serial inventor George Devol began work on a robotic arm that could perform repetitive tasks in factories. He teamed up with entrepreneur Joseph Engelberger to form Unimation, the world's first robotics company, and in 1961 their Unimate robot went to work on the assembly line at a General Motors plant in New Jersey. The hydraulically-powered arm had five degrees of freedom (DoF) — a measure of dexterity that means its arm could move or rotate in five different directions. Programming the device required the user to physically move the arm to different positions to teach it the required sequence of actions, which was then recorded in a magnetic storage device known as a drum memory.

    1966 — World's first intelligent mobile robot

    A photo of Shakey the Robot in its case at the Computer History Museum.

    (Image credit: Marshall Astor from San Pedro, United States, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons)

    While significant progress had been made on the mechanical capabilities of robots by the mid-1960s, they were still essentially dumb machines that needed to be programmed by hand. In 1966, researchers at the Stanford Research Institute started work on a wheeled robot with cameras and touch sensors that could reason about its actions, make plans and navigate the real world. It could move between multiple rooms autonomously, avoiding obstacles, opening doors, flicking light switches and pushing boxes around. The robot, which the team named "Shakey," received significant media attention — in 1970 — Life magazine even referred to it as the first electronic person." A key advance behind the robot was its layered software architecture, which enabled it to reason through tasks, something replicated in many subsequent robots.

    1969 — The Stanford Arm spawns a new industry

    The Stanford arm, the first electric robot with closed-form arm solution, Invented and built by Victor Scheinman while at Stanford University

    (Image credit: Gildardo Sánchez, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons)

    While the Unimate was the first robotic arm to go into production, the Stanford Arm became the blueprint for the emerging industrial robotics industry. Designed in 1969 by Victor Scheinman, who was then a student in the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab, the six-DoF arm was electrically powered and controlled by a computer. Over the following years Scheinman built increasingly sophisticated versions of the arm at both Stanford and MIT, before eventually starting a company called Vicarm Inc. in 1974 to commercialize his work. He ended up selling his designs to Unimation in 1977, which released the Programmable Universal Machine for Assembly (PUMA) robot in 1978. The initial customer was General Motors, which used it to assemble automotive subcomponents.

    1970 — First robotic rover sent to the Moon

    Historical rover.

    (Image credit: NASA)

    The birth of robotics overlapped with another major technological leap — the advent of the Space Age. Scientists recognized that machines that could be controlled remotely or even operate autonomously could be a powerful tool for exploring the solar system. In 1970, the Soviet Union landed Lunokhod 1, the world's first robotic rover, on the moon. Shaped like a bathtub and with eight independently powered wheels, the rover could be controlled remotely from Earth via antennas and a feed from four cameras. The solar-powered vehicle operated for almost a year, roughly three and half times longer than it was designed to last, and travelled 6.5 miles (10.5 kilometers). It also used extendable probes to carry out more than 500 tests on the mechanical properties of lunar soil.

    1990 — Rodney Brooks rewrites AI for robotics

    Stock photo with AI symbol in the center connected to a blue lit circuit.

    (Image credit: Panuwat Sikham via Getty Images)

    By the 1980s, industrial robots that could carry out repetitive tasks in controlled environments had become commonplace, but efforts to create more flexible and autonomous machines were foundering. Australian roboticist Rodney Brooks had the intuition that this plateau was due to the top-down approach researchers were taking. This involved a focus on imbuing machines with abstract reasoning skills and developing complex systems of mathematical symbols to represent the world around them. Instead, he took inspiration from nature and focused on the feedback loops between sensing and action that enable sophisticated behavior in animals. He demonstrated that by taking this bottom-up approach, outlined in the 1990 paper Elephants Don't Play Chess, it was possible to combine multiple simple behavioral modules to solve challenges beyond the robots that existed at the time.

    1996 — Honda unveils first humanoid walking robot

    Despite considerable progress in robotics, most machines were a far cry from the mechanical people depicted in sci-fi. That changed in 1996 when Honda unveiled its P2 robot, which was the first humanoid robot capable of walking independently on two legs. The company had started working on the problem of bipedal locomotion in the late 1980s by studying, and trying to replicate, how humans walked. Research on P2 and its successors P3 and P4 eventually culminated in the development of the company's iconic ASIMO humanoid robot, which was unveiled for the first time in 2000 and set the standard for humanoid robotics going forward.

    2000 — The da Vinci surgical robot cleared by the FDA

    Intuitive Surgical da Vinci Sp Single Port Robotic Surgical System
    While most commercial robotics companies focused on machines designed to replace brute labor in factories, Intuitive Surgical decided to focus on the delicate process of minimally invasive surgery. They built a four-armed robotic surgical system called da Vinci that could be controlled remotely by a surgeon. The arms were capable of holding surgical instruments like scalpels, graspers and scissors and enabled the surgeon to carry out ultra-precise movements. The device was cleared for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2000 and has been used in more than 14 million procedures.

    2010 — Google unveils self driving car project

    Front view of Waymo self driving car in San Francisco, California, August 20, 2024.

    (Image credit: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)

    There had been scattered experiments in autonomous vehicles over the years, but the first company to devote serious resources to the idea was Google. The firm began developing self-driving cars in 2009 and drove more than 140,000 miles on public roads before announcing the project in October 2010. Earlier experiments were carried out in a modified Toyota Prius with a safety driver behind the wheel. But in 2015 the company carried out the first fully autonomous ride on a public road in a custom-built vehicle with steering wheel or pedals. After rebranding as Waymo, the company started its first public trials of a driverless taxi service in Phoenix, Arizona in 2017.

    2012 — The DARPA robotics challenge is launched

    Computer Science in Robotics PhD Alex Stumpf of TU Darmstadt positions the ViGIR (Virginia-Germany Interdisciplinary Robotics) Team robot for testing in preparation for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Robotics Challenge April 10, 2015 in Blacksburg, Virginia.

    (Image credit: Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    One of the major catalysts for recent breakthroughs in smart, humanoid robots was the DARPA Robotics Challenge. Launched by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in 2012, the competition challenged teams to develop semi-autonomous robots that could carry out complex tasks in simulated disaster zones. The bots were tasked with walking across rubble, climbing ladders, closing leaky valves and even driving a utility vehicle. The finals were held in 2015. While some teams competed with their own robots, six were provided with humanoid Atlas robots built by Boston Dynamics. The company continued to develop the robot after the competition was over, showing off increasingly advanced capabilities over the years such as running outdoors, jumping and tackling parkour courses.

    2020 — The first bipedal robot goes on sale

    Unitree Introducing | Unitree G1 Humanoid Agent | AI Avatar | Price from $16K
    The startup Agility Robotics became the first company to release a commercial bipedal robot after selling two units of its Digit model to Ford. While not strictly a humanoid, thanks to its "backward" legs that work more like a bird's than a person's, the robot is roughly the size and shape of a small human and designed to help out in warehouses and other industrial settings. The release marked the beginning of a boom in commercial humanoid robotics, with companies like Tesla, Figure and 1X unveiling their own offerings shortly afterwards. And costs are falling rapidly — earlier this year Chinese company Unitree released its G1 humanoid robot, which costs just $16,000.

    Decoding Asimov: The Three Laws of Robotics Explained

    #2 Evolution of Robotics | Introduction to Robotics

    https://www.livescience.com/ }

    04-02-2025 om 00:00 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    31-01-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.How Many Dimensions Does Our Universe Really Have?

    How Many Dimensions Does Our Universe Really Have?

    Does our Universe have extra dimensions, and how do they influence our reality?

    How Many Dimensions Does Our Universe Really Have?

    StockByM/iStock

    Theoretical physics is a fascinating and (at times) amusing field. While most people would not claim to know much about this field of research, many of its more advanced concepts come up in popular culture all the time. In fact, words like “nuclear,” “quantum,” and “multiverse” are often key to the plot of our favorite TV shows and movies.

    On the other hand, some of the more advanced concepts in theoretical physics (when described) sound more like philosophy and metaphysics than science. In fact, some theories even manage to blur the lines between science and religion and are generally met by either awe or dismissal (depending upon who’s listening).

    Consider the idea of “extra dimensions,” which many people would assume refers to the existence of dimensions parallel to our own where things are slightly or vastly different — aka. “multiverse” theory. In truth, the theory of extra dimensions deals with the possible existence of extra dimensions beyond the ones we are immediately aware of.

    While this kind of talk may sound like something farfetched or purely speculative, it is actually a vital part of our understanding of how our Universe works. If and when we determine how many dimensions our Universe has (and what each of them does), we will finally have a Theory of Everything (ToE) and know how it all fits together.

    Dimensions 101

    To break it down, the term “dimension” refers to any mathematical measurement. This can generally refer to a physical measurement (an object or space) or a temporal measurement (time). There are three dimensions that we experience daily, which define the length, width, and depth of all objects in our Universe (the x, y, and z-axis, respectively).

    However, scientists maintain that to understand the laws of nature, one must include a “fourth dimension,” which is time. Without this coordinate, the position, velocity, and acceleration of objects in our Universe cannot be properly measured. It’s not enough to know where an object is in terms of three spatial coordinates. You also need to know when the object was where.

    Beyond these four dimensions, theoretical physicists have ventured that there may be more at play. The number of dimensions varies, but the purpose behind extra dimensions is to find ways of unifying the known laws of the Universe, which theoretical physicists have been trying to do for about a century.

    The reason has to do with two very interesting fields of study: Quantum Mechanics (QM) and General Relativity (GR). These fields emerged during the early 20th century and were almost concurrent with each other. Whereas QM has many forebears (Planck, Heisenberg, Schrodinger, et al.), GR owes its existence, at least initially, to Albert Einstein — though many of his ideas were refinements on earlier theories.

    For the record, Einstein also contributed to the development of QM through his research on the behavior of light. In any case, whereas Quantum Mechanics (QM) describes how energy and matter behave at the atomic and subatomic levels, General Relativity (GR) describes how matter, energy, and spacetime behave on larger scales in the presence of gravity.

    The funny thing is, our greatest scientific minds have been trying to figure out how these two fields fit together for almost a century. Both appear to work just fine on their own, but where they come together into a single coherent system, that remains largely a mystery.

    Four fundamental forces

    After thousands of years of research into nature and the laws that govern it, scientists have determined that four fundamental forces govern all matter-energy interactions. These forces, and the fundamental particles that make up all matter (quarks, leptons, gauge bosons, and scalar bosons), are part of The Standard Model of particle physics. These forces are:

    • Electromagnetism
    • Weak Nuclear Force
    • Strong Nuclear Force
    • Gravitation

    The first three forces are all described by the field of Quantum Mechanics and are associated with specific subatomic particles. Electromagnetism is associated with electrons (a lepton), which are responsible for electricity, magnetism, and all forms of electromagnetic radiation. That includes visible light (color), heat, microwaves, radio waves, ultraviolet radiation, and gamma rays.

    Source: NASA

    The weak nuclear force deals with interactions between subatomic particles responsible for the radioactive decay of atoms and is associated with particles smaller than a proton (bosons). At higher energies, this force merges with electromagnetism, which has given rise to the unified term “electroweak force.”

    The strong nuclear force governs particles that are the size of protons and neutrons (hadrons) and is so-named because it is approximately 137 times as strong as electromagnetism, millions of times stronger than the weak nuclear force, and 1038 times as strong as gravitation. It causes quarks to come together to form larger protons and neutrons and binds them to create atomic nuclei.

    Finally, there is gravitation, which is the weakest of the four forces and deals with interactions between massive objects (asteroids, planets, stars, galaxies, and the large-scale structure of the Universe.) Unlike the other three forces, there is no known subatomic particle that describes gravitation or gravitational interactions.

    This is why scientists are forced to study physics in terms of QM or GR (depending on the scales involved), but generally not both combined. Because of this, scientists have been trying to come up with a theoretical framework for unifying gravity with the other forces. Attempts to do so generally fall under the heading of “quantum gravity” or a Theory of Everything (ToE).

    String Theory in 11 Dimensions Simplified | Mr.GK

    How many dimensions are there?

    Attempts to create a unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism can be traced to German physicist Theodor Kaluza (1885–1954). In 1921, he published a paper where he presented an extended interpretation of Einstein’s Field Equations. This theory was built on the idea of a 5D Universe, which included a dimension beyond the common 4D of space and time.

    In 1926, Swedish theoretical physicist Oskar Klein offered a quantum interpretation of Kaluza’s 5D theory. In Klein’s extension, the fifth dimension was curled up, microscopic, and could take the form of a circle that had a 10-30 cm radius. In the 1930s, work was undertaken on the Kaluza field theory by Einstein and his colleagues at Princeton. By the 1940s, the theory was formally completed and given the name Kaluza-Klein theory.

    The work of Kaluza and Klein predicted the emergence of String Theory (ST), which was first proposed during the 1960s. By the 1990s, multiple interpretations emerged, including Superstring Theory, Loop-Quantum Gravity, M-theory, and Supergravity. Each of these theories entails the existence of “extra dimensions,” “hyperspace,” or something similar.

    To summarize, ST states that the point-like particles of particle physics are actually one-dimensional objects called “strings.” Over distances larger than the string scale, they resemble ordinary particles, though their mass, charge, and other properties are determined by the string’s vibrational state. In one state, the string corresponds to the graviton, which is what causes gravitation.

    Source: NASA

    Superstring theory, a variation on ST, requires the existence of 10 spacetime dimensions. These include the four dimensions immediately apparent to us (length, width, depth, time) and six more that are not. 

    These extra six dimensions are curled up into a compact space. On order the string scale (10-33 cm) we wouldn’t be able to detect the presence of these extra dimensions directly because they’re just too small. 

    According to the theory, the fifth and sixth dimensions deal with possible worlds that began with the same initial conditions. 

    The fifth dimension encompasses worlds with slightly different outcomes than ours, while the sixth is where a plane of possible worlds would be visible. The seventh dimension is where one could see possible worlds that started with different initial conditions and then branched out infinitely — hence why the term “infinity” is used to describe them.

    The eighth dimension would similarly give us a plane of these “infinities,” while in the ninth dimension, all possible Universes and laws of physics could be seen. In the tenth dimension, anything and everything possible in terms of cosmic evolution are accessible. Beyond that, nothing can be seen by living creatures that are part of the spacetime continuum.

    M-theory, which combines five distinct superstring theories, posits the existence of 11 dimensions — ten spatial and one time. This variation on superstring theory is considered attractive because of the phenomena it predicts. For one, M-theory predicts the existence of the graviton, which is consistent with string theory as a whole and offers an explanation for quantum gravity.

    It also predicts a phenomenon similar to black hole evaporation, where black holes emit “Hawking radiation” and lose mass over time. Some variations of superstring theory also predict the existence of Einstein-Rosen bridges — aka. “wormholes.” Another approach, Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG), posits that gravity is completely different from the other fundamental forces and that space-time itself is made of quantized, discrete bits, in the form of tiny, one-dimensional loops.

    Some versions of supergravity theory also promote an 11-D model of spacetime, with 4 common dimensions and 7 hyperspace dimensions. There’s also “brane theory,” which posits that the Universe is made up of multidimensional vibrating “membranes” that have mass and a charge and can propagate through spacetime.

    To date, there is no experimental evidence for the existence of “extra dimensions,” “hyperspace,” or anything beyond the four dimensions we can perceive.

    Why can’t we see them?

    Alas, the question remains. If additional dimensions are required for the laws of physics to make sense, why can’t we confirm their existence? There are two possibilities: one, what we think we know about physics is wrong, or two, the dimensions of spacetime beyond the 4D we experience are so subtle or tiny that they are invisible to our current experiments.

    On its face, the first possibility seems highly unlikely. After all, ongoing particle experiments — like those conducted with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) — have confirmed that the Standard Model of particle physics is correct. Similarly, General Relativity has been confirmed many times over since Einstein formally proposed it in 1915.

    Source: Wikimedia Commons/Jbourjai

    That leaves us with the second possibility: that extra dimensions cannot be measured or characterized using current methods and experiments. A well-studied possibility is that dimensions are “curled up” at tiny scales, which means their properties and influence on spacetime could only be measured at subatomic levels.

    Another possibility is “compactification,” where certain dimensions are finite or temporal in nature. In short, this theory posits that curled-up dimensions become very small or close in on themselves to form circles. If this is true, then the six extra dimensions would likely take the form of a Calabi–Yau manifold (these are shapes that satisfy the requirement needed for the six “unseen” spatial dimensions of string theory).

    For astrophysicists and theoretical physicists, compactification and the idea that extra dimensions are tiny explains why the Universe still exists billions of years after its emergence. If these dimensions were larger, they would accommodate enough matter to trigger gravitational collapses and the formation of black holes (which would consume the rest of the Universe).

    The fact that the cosmos still exists after 13.8 billion years, and shows no sign of being torn apart, would suggest that this theory is sound. Alternatively, the laws of physics may operate differently in these extra dimensions. Either way, there’s still the unanswered question of how we might observe and study them.

    How do we find them?

    So if the Universe really does have extra dimensions that are imperceptible to us, how are we going to find evidence of their existence and determine their properties? One possibility is to look for them through particle physics experiments, like those conducted by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) — the operators of the LHC — and other particle accelerator labs.

    At CERN, scientists boost particles to high energies before smashing them together and measuring the resulting cascade of subatomic particles. Detectors gather clues about the particles, such as their speed, mass, and charge, which can be used to work out their identity.

    Theories involving extra dimensions predict that there must be heavier versions of standard particles recurring at higher and higher energies as they navigate smaller dimensions. These would have exactly the same properties as standard particles (and so be visible to detectors like those at CERN) but at a greater mass. If evidence of these were to be found, this might suggest the presence of extra dimensions. 

    Another way is to look back through time towards the period known as “Cosmic Dawn,” roughly 100 to 500 million years after the Big Bang, when the first stars and galaxies formed. Even if extra dimensions are imperceptible to detection today, they would have influenced the evolution of the Universe from the very beginning.

    To date, astronomers have been unable to see this far back in time since no telescopes have been sensitive enough. This will change in the near future, thanks to next-generation instruments like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (RST), the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT), and the Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT).

    Source: Suvendu Giri

    This coincides nicely with existing Dark Matter and Dark Energy surveys that are observing early comic history in the hopes of measuring their influence on cosmic evolution. Since some theorists venture that the existence of extra dimensions could help explain the “Dark Universe,” these observations could address several mysteries at once.

    This dual approach is not unlike our current understanding of the Universe, which scientists can only understand in one of two ways — the largest (GR) and tiniest of scales (QM). By observing the Universe with a very wide and very tight-angle lense, we may be able to account for all the forces governing it.

    11 Dimensions Explained - Higher Dimensions Explained - All Dimensions Explained - Dimensions

    Much like other ToE candidates, the belief that the universe is made up of ten dimensions or more is an attempt to take all the physical laws we understand and find out how they fit together. In that respect, it’s like assembling a puzzle, where each piece makes sense to us, but we are unaware of what the bigger picture looks like.

    It’s not enough to put pieces together wherever they appear to match. We also need to have an overall idea of what the framework is, a mental picture of what it will look like when it is finished. This helps to guide our efforts so we can anticipate how it will all come together.

    RELATED VIDEOS

    The Multiverse Hypothesis Explained by Neil deGrasse Tyson

    11 Dimensions Explained - Higher Dimensions Explained - All Dimensions Explained #dimensions

    https://interestingengineering.com/ }

    31-01-2025 om 15:40 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Could we travel to parallel universes?

    Could we travel to parallel universes?

    An illustration of a person in a cockpit of a spacecraft and traveling through light at warp speeds.
    What would it take to access another universe?
     (Image credit: Devrimb/Getty Images)

    While parallel universes are a staple of science fiction, there are some real scientific theories to support them. But if parallel universes do exist, could we ever travel to them? It certainly wouldn't be easy, but let's explore this possibility.

    Parallel universes crop up in two places in physical theories. One is in our conception of inflation, the theory of the extremely early universe. In those tumultuous times, many universes may have inflated all at once (and kept going) and branched out into a tremendous number of individual universes, each with their own kinds of physics and arrangements of matter. But traveling to the other universes wouldn't be easy, because they're far beyond our observable horizon and moving away faster than the speed of light. That would take a lot of frequent flyer miles.

    The other potential multiverse is in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. This interpretation says that when some random quantum process occurs, one "universe" gets one of the possible results, while other universes get the others. Thus, the multiverse is constantly being filled with every possible quantum possibility.


    How Many Dimensions Does The Universe Have?

    But how would we get to one of those parallel universes?

    The trick is to build a time machine. It doesn't matter how you do it; you just need to go back in time. Normally, going back in time introduces all sorts of nasty paradoxes, like the infamous grandfather paradox, or, less violently, inconsistent histories. Try going back in time and destroying your time machine. Now it doesn't exist, which means you can't go back in time to destroy it, which means it should exist.

    Related: 

    Perhaps time travel into the past is forbidden for exactly these reasons, according to Stephen Hawking's chronology protection conjecture. Or perhaps time travel into the past is allowed, but with one strict rule: You can't change the past. This is known as Igor Novikov's self-consistency conjecture. But how could you go into the past without changing it?

    Could we travel to parallel universes?

    One possible answer is that when you travel into the past, you don't go into your own past. Instead, you slip into another history. If you go back in time and kill Hitler, you're not killing the Hitler of your past; you're killing somebody else's. And in that alternate universe, Hitler was always killed by a time-traveling assassin from another universe. When you return to the future, you come back home, with an unchanged past.

    The many-worlds interpretation offers a natural platform for creating these alternate histories. If the universe is constantly splitting and branching anyway, then time travel simply moves you from one of those branches to another. Or, in another possibility, when you go back in time, you create a new branch that didn't exist before.

    While this all sounds neat and tidy, it runs into the slight complication that nobody has ever gotten it to work. We don't know how this process actually unfolds or through what mechanism the alternate history emerges.

    Attempts to navigate the issue by studying quantum mechanics have had mixed results. Left to their own devices, quantum fields tend to go haywire when time machines are involved. You can stabilize them — if you give up some of the core tenets of the theory, like the correspondence principle or unitarity, which say that quantum processes eventually lead to macroscopic behavior and that fundamental reactions are reversible. Nobody is really willing to give those up, since they seem central to the theory — so we're stuck on that front.

    Besides, even classical, non-quantum systems run into issues. Let's say you have a switch that can turn your time machine on and off — say, by opening or closing a wormhole. We don't know how the alternate histories can accommodate changes in their space-time structures like that, regardless of whatever quantum processes are happening on a subatomic level.

    However, if we could build a time machine, we could easily test whether alternate histories are created. All we'd have to do is change something in the past that you remember. If you're not allowed to do it (say, no matter how hard you try, you just can't kill Hitler), then you know there's only one timeline with a past that is locked in stone. But if you accomplish the mission, then you know that alternate histories are real and that the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics might be valid.

    We don't know if any of this is possible. On the other hand, we can't exactly rule it out. Time travel into the past seems forbidden but for reasons we can't readily discern. Our past seems to be gone forever — but it's also possible that it's just one branch of many and that visiting alternate universes is as easy as … Well, it's not easy at all.


    Could we travel to parallel universes?

    { https://www.livescience.com/space }

    31-01-2025 om 14:35 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    28-01-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.First mouse with two biological FATHERS reaches adulthood - in breakthrough that could pave the way for gay men to have children

    First mouse with two biological FATHERS reaches adulthood - in breakthrough that could pave the way for gay men to have children

    The first mouse with two biological fathers has survived until adulthood, a new study has revealed.

    Researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences say they have succeeded in breeding mice using only genetic material from two males.

    Through a technique called 'embryonic stem cell engineering’, scientists created eggs from the sperm of one father which could be fertilised by the other.

    The stem cell technique used by the researchers is not entirely new, but all previous attempts faced seemingly insurmountable problems.

    Mice bred using two sets of male genes either failed to grow at all or were born with severe developmental defects that prevented them from reaching adulthood.

    However, by editing 20 different genes in the mice's stem cells, the researchers were able to prevent these issues.

    Co-author of the study Dr Wei Li says: 'This work will help to address a number of limitations in stem cell and regenerative medicine research.'

    While it is currently only possible in mice, this major breakthrough could pave the way for gay men to have children who are biologically related to both fathers. 

    Researchers have successfully bred a mouse (right) that has two male parents (one pictured left) and can survive to adulthood by editing their genes to overcome developmental challenges

    Researchers have successfully bred a mouse (right) that has two male parents (one pictured left) and can survive to adulthood by editing their genes to overcome developmental challenges 

    In order to breed offspring which have two biological fathers, the researchers first needed to transform the male sex cells from one parent into female sex cells.

    The scientists took sperm from a mouse and injected it into a type of cell called an oocyte - an immature egg cell that has had its genetic material removed in a process called enucleation.

    This created a stem cell - a type of cell with the potential to become any other type of cell in the body - which contained only male DNA from the first parent.

    The researchers then took one of these stem cells and a sperm cell from another male and injected both into another enucleated immature egg.

    These male cells combined to create an embryonic stem cell containing the DNA of both parents, which was then used to create an embryo which could be implanted in a surrogate mother.

    Once the embryo had developed, the mother gave birth to the offspring, which contained only genetic material from the two males.

    Scientists have known for a long time that this is possible and have managed to create viable embryos using the technique.

    However, no one has previously managed to create 'bi-paternal' mice that are actually capable of surviving to adulthood.

    By changing genes which control how the parents' chromosomes combine, the bi-paternal mice lived much longer and could even survive weaning. Edited mice are shown by the dark blue line

    By changing genes which control how the parents' chromosomes combine, the bi-paternal mice lived much longer and could even survive weaning. Edited mice are shown by the dark blue line 

    How was the mouse created?

    1. Scientists take sperm from a mouse and inject it into a cell called an oocyte - an immature egg cell that has had its genetic material removed in a process called enucleation.
    2. This creates a stem cell - a type of cell with the potential to become any other type of cell in the body.
    3. Researchers then take one of these stem cells and a sperm cell from another male and inject both into another enucleated immature egg.
    4. These male cells combine to create an embryonic stem cell containing the DNA of both parents, which is then used to create an embryo which can be implanted into a surrogate mother.
    5. Once the embryo develops, the mother gives birth to the offspring, which contains only genetic material from the two males.

    During heterosexual reproduction, genetic material from a male carried by the sperm combines with genetic material from a female contained in the egg, or ovum.

    When this happens, a group of genes called 'homologous chromosomes' from the mother come together with those from the father and combine in a process called 'crossing over'.

    But when both sets of homologous chromosomes come from either two males or two females, the genes don't copy over properly, leading to 'imprinting abnormalities'.

    These abnormalities can cause developmental defects which prevent the offspring from living healthy lives.

    Co-author Dr Qi Zhou says: 'The unique characteristics of imprinting genes have led scientists to believe that they are a fundamental barrier to unisexual reproduction in mammals.

    'Even when constructing bi-maternal or bi-paternal embryos artificially, they fail to develop properly, and they stall at some point during development due to these genes.'

    In this study, the researchers used a gene editing technology called CRISPR to make changes to mice's DNA in order to prevent imprinting abnormalities.

    After creating stem cells from the first male's sperm, they inserted or removed sections of genetic code at 20 places in the mice's DNA that control imprinting.

    Using a technique called CRISPR, the researchers modified 20 genes in one of the male mice. This prevented their offspring developing defects which led to earlier death (stock image)

    Using a technique called CRISPR, the researchers modified 20 genes in one of the male mice. This prevented their offspring developing defects which led to earlier death (stock image) 

    When these genetically modified stem cells were combined with the sperm from another male, they were much more likely to develop properly.

    These changes resulted in mice with two fathers who were able to live until adulthood for the first time ever.

    Study co-author Dr Guan-Zheng Luo, of Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou, says: 'These findings provide strong evidence that imprinting abnormalities are the main barrier to mammalian unisexual reproduction.

    'This approach can significantly improve the developmental outcomes of embryonic stem cells and cloned animals, paving a promising path for the advancement of regenerative medicine.'

    The authors do acknowledge some significant limitations to these findings.

    Only 11.8 per cent of the viable embryos were capable of developing to birth and not every pup which was born lived to adulthood.

    The mice that did live to adulthood showed altered growth, shortened lifespans, and were sterile.

    However, these results show the first promising steps towards giving gay men the option to have children who are related to both of their fathers.

    In the future, the development of this technique could allow gay men to have children who are genetically related to both partners. However, gene editing techniques are currently not permitted for use on humans (stock image)

    In the future, the development of this technique could allow gay men to have children who are genetically related to both partners. However, gene editing techniques are currently not permitted for use on humans (stock image)

    In theory, it could be possible to use a similar technique to create an embryo using stem cells derived from one human partner and sperm from the other.

    Although the child would still need to be carried to term by a female surrogate, they would have genetic material only from both of their fathers.

    Currently, the researchers are planning to try this approach in larger animals like monkeys - and warn that the technological hurdles will be significantly larger.

    That means getting the technique to work in humans could require years of effort. 

    However, not everyone is convinced that scientists should try to pursue this technology in humans, even if it is possible.

    article image

    Lukasz Konieczka, executive director of the LGBT+ charity Mosaic Trust, told MailOnline: ''I do understand that some might have a strong desire to have biological children as it offers some virtual immortality, as psychologists call it.

    'I do not think it is necessary to spend time and resources on such technology as we still have children who are alive today, stuck in a care system due to neglectful or abusive biological parents.'

    Since the technique requires editing the genome of the parent's stem cells, it is also prohibited in humans.

    The International Society for Stem Cell Research's ethical guidelines for stem cell research do not allow heritable genome editing for reproductive purposes nor the use of human stem cell-derived gametes for reproduction because they are deemed as currently unsafe.

    WHAT ARE INTERNATIONAL LAWS ON USING HUMAN EMBRYOS IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH?

    European Union

    Since 1984, the European Union has provided funding for scientific research through a series of framework programs for research and technological development. 

    This include providing funding for research using embryonic stem cells as well as a human embryonic stem cell registery, which began operations in April 2007 in order to make more efficient use of pre-existing embryonic stem cell lines.

    More recently, a legal battle over whether stem cell techniques can be patented may alter the research landscape, as the removal of the legal protections provided by the patent system might greatly dampen incentives for stem cell research in the EU

    United Kingdom

    In the UK, the law states that the use of embryos in stem cell research can only be carried out with authority from the Human Fertilisation and Embryo Authority (HFEA).

    Licences are only granted if the HFEA is satisfied that any proposed use of embryos is absolutely necessary for the purposes of the research. 

    Research is allowed only in the following conditions:

      • To increase knowledge about the causes of congenital disease
      • To promote advances in the treatment of infertility7
      • To increase knowledge about the causes of miscarriages.

      • To develop more effective techniques of contraception.
      • To develop methods for detecting the presence of gene or chromosome abnormalities.
      • To increase knowledge about the development of embryos.
      • To increase knowledge about serious disease.
      • To enable any such knowledge to be applied in developing treatments for serious disease.

    United States 

    State laws regarding embryonic stem cells vary widely, with some restricting their use and others permitting certain activities.

    Approaches to stem cell research policy range from statutes in eight states—California, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York— which encourage embryonic stem cell research, to South Dakota's law, which strictly forbids research on embryos regardless of their source. 

    States that specifically permit embryonic stem cell research have established guidelines for scientists such as consent requirements and approval and review processes for projects. 

    In Massachusetts, for example, experiments can be performed on embryos that have not experienced more than 14 days of development.

    RELATED VIDEO


    A Mouse With Two Dads — and a New Frontier for Biology | Katsuhiko Hayashi | TED

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

    28-01-2025 om 23:34 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Chinese researchers just built an open-source rival to ChatGPT in 2 months. Silicon Valley is freaked out.

    Chinese researchers just built an open-source rival to ChatGPT in 2 months. Silicon Valley is freaked out.

    The DeepSeek logo displayed on a smartphone screen.

    The DeepSeek logo displayed on a smartphone screen. 
    (Image credit: VCG/VCG via Getty Images)

    China has released a cheap, open-source rival to OpenAI's ChatGPT, and it has some scientists excited and Silicon Valley worried.

    China’s AI Models Challenge OpenAI’s Lead – Deepseek, Marco-1, OpenMMLab Explained

    DeepSeek, the Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) lab behind the innovation, unveiled its free large language model (LLM) DeepSeek-V3 in late December 2024 and claims it was trained in two months for just $5.58 million — a fraction of the time and cost required by its Silicon Valley competitors.

    Following hot on its heels is an even newer model called DeepSeek-R1, released Monday (Jan. 20). In third-party benchmark tests, DeepSeek-V3 matched the capabilities of OpenAI's GPT-4o and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 3.5 while outperforming others, such as Meta's Llama 3.1 and Alibaba's Qwen2.5, in tasks that included problem-solving, coding and math.

    Now, R1 has also surpassed ChatGPT's latest o1 model in many of the same tests. This impressive performance at a fraction of the cost of other models, its semi-open-source nature, and its training on significantly less graphics processing units (GPUs) has wowed AI experts and raised the specter of China's AI models surpassing their U.S. counterparts.

    "We should take the developments out of China very, very seriously," Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft, a strategic partner of OpenAI, said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 22..

    Related: 

    AI systems learn using training data taken from human input, which enables them to generate output based on the probabilities of different patterns cropping up in that training dataset.

    For large language models, these data are text. For instance, OpenAI's GPT-3.5, which was released in 2023, was trained on roughly 570GB of text data from the repository Common Crawl — which amounts to roughly 300 billion words — taken from books, online articles, Wikipedia and other webpages.

    Reasoning models, such as R1 and o1, are an upgraded version of standard LLMs that use a method called "chain of thought" to backtrack and reevaluate their logic, which enables them to tackle more complex tasks with greater accuracy.

    This has made reasoning models popular among scientists and engineers who are looking to integrate AI into their work.

    But unlike ChatGPT's o1, DeepSeek is an "open-weight" model that (although its training data remains proprietary) enables users to peer inside and modify its algorithm. Just as important is its reduced price for users — 27 times less than o1.

    Besides its performance, the hype around DeepSeek comes from its cost efficiency; the model's shoestring budget is minuscule compared with the tens of millions to hundreds of millions that rival companies spend to train its competitors.

    In addition, U.S. export controls, which limit Chinese companies' access to the best AI computing chips, forced R1's developers to build smarter, more energy-efficient algorithms to compensate for their lack of computing power. ChatGPT reportedly needed 10,000 Nvidia GPUs to process its training data, DeepSeek engineers say they achieved similar results with just over 2,000.

    How much this will translate into useful scientific and technical applications, or whether DeepSeek has simply trained its model to ace benchmark tests, remains to be seen. Scientists and AI investors are watching closely.

    DeepSeek R1 Revolutionizing AI with Superior Reasoning

    https://www.livescience.com/ }

    28-01-2025 om 22:07 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    22-01-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Nuclear fusion breakthrough: China's 'artificial sun' reactor sets a new world record by generating a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds - taking the world closer towards limitless clean energy

    Nuclear fusion breakthrough: China's 'artificial sun' reactor sets a new world record by generating a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds - taking the world closer towards limitless clean energy

    If we want to rely on nuclear fusion to power the world's homes, the first step is making reactors that can run as hot and as long as possible. 

    Now, China's 'artificial sun' reactor – officially called 'Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak' (EAST) – has set a new world record, bringing the goal of limitless clean energy ever closer. 

    The reactor, located in Hefei in Anhui province, generated a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds at 180million°F (100million°C) – seven times hotter than the sun's core. 

    It surpasses the previous world record of 403 seconds, also set by EAST in 2023. 

    EAST could be a precursor to the first ever fusion power plants that supply power directly to the grid and electricity to people's homes. 

    These power plants could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the power-generation sector by diverting away from the use of fossil fuels like coal and gas. 

    Fusion differs from fission (the technique currently used in nuclear power plants), because the former fuses two atomic nuclei instead of splitting one (fission). 

    Unlike fission, fusion carries no risk of catastrophic nuclear accidents – like that seen in Fukushima in Japan in 2011 – and produces far less radioactive waste than current power plants, its exponents say.

    China's 'artificial sun' reactor - officially called 'Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak' (EAST) - has set a new world record, bringing the goal of limitless clean energy ever closer. The reactor, located in Hefei in Anhui province, generated a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds at 180million°F (100million°C) - seven times hotter than the sun's core

    China's 'artificial sun' reactor - officially called 'Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak' (EAST) - has set a new world record, bringing the goal of limitless clean energy ever closer. The reactor, located in Hefei in Anhui province, generated a steady loop of plasma for 1,066 seconds at 180million°F (100million°C) - seven times hotter than the sun's core 

    If nuclear fusion experiments can be harnessed on a much larger scale, reactors hotter than anything else in the solar system will provide limitless clean energy. Tokamak Energy is a private company based at the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy in Oxfordshire

    If nuclear fusion experiments can be harnessed on a much larger scale, reactors hotter than anything else in the solar system will provide limitless clean energy. Tokamak Energy is a private company based at the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy in Oxfordshire

    China's 'artificial sun' is operated by the Institute of Plasma Physics (ASIPP) at Hefei Institutes of Physical Science on behalf of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. 

    The new world record, achieved on Monday, marks a critical step toward a functional fusion reactor, according to ASIPP director Professor Song Yuntao.

    'A fusion device must achieve stable operation at high efficiency for thousands of seconds to enable the self-sustaining circulation of plasma, which is essential for the continuous power generation of future fusion plants,' he said. 

    Global scientists have worked for more than 70 years on trying to achieve this feat, according to a release from State Council Information Office, central propaganda department of the ruling Chinese Communist Party. 

    Gong Xianzu, head of the division of EAST physics and experimental operations, said they have upgraded several EAST systems since the last round of experiments. 

    For example, the heating system, which previously operated at the equivalent of nearly 70,000 household microwave ovens, has now doubled its power output. 

    'The ultimate goal of an artificial sun is to create nuclear fusion like the sun, providing humanity with an endless, clean energy source,' the release says. 

    Fusion – generally considered the holy grail of energy – could also enable 'space exploration beyond the solar system', by providing rockets with more powerful propulsion systems. 

    China's self-designed 'artificial sun' - a device to harness the energy of fusion, has made an important advance by achieving a temperature of 180 million °F (100 million °C) in plasma

    China's self-designed 'artificial sun' - a device to harness the energy of fusion, has made an important advance by achieving a temperature of 180 million °F (100 million °C) in plasma

    This photo shows the control center of the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) in Hefei, east China's Anhui Province, January 20, 2025

    This photo shows the control center of the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) in Hefei, east China's Anhui Province, January 20, 2025

    A staff member performs an upgrade to the experimental advanced superconducting tokamak (EAST) at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) on April 28, 2021

    A staff member performs an upgrade to the experimental advanced superconducting tokamak (EAST) at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) on April 28, 2021

    Nuclear fusion vs. nuclear fission 

    Nuclear fusion and nuclear fission are nuclear processes, in that they involve nuclear forces to change the nucleus of atoms.

    Fusion joins two light elements (with a low atomic mass number), forming a heavier element. For fusion to occur, hydrogen atoms are placed under high heat and pressure until they fuse together.

    Meanwhile, fission splits a heavy element (with a high atomic mass number) into fragments.

    In both cases, energy is freed because the mass of the remaining nucleus is smaller than the mass of the reacting nuclei.

    Both reactions release energy which, in a power plant, would be used to boil water to drive a steam generator, thus producing electricity. 

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency

    At the heart of EAST and other fusion reactors around the world is a tokamak, a doughnut-shaped device initially conceptualised in the 1950s by Soviet physicists. 

    Inside, under the influence of extreme heat and pressure, gaseous hydrogen fuel becomes a plasma – a hot, electrically charged gas. 

    Plasma is often referred to as the fourth state of matter after solid, liquid and gas, and comprises over 99 per cent of the visible universe, including most of our sun. 

    In the tokamak, the plasma is trapped and pressurised by magnetic fields until the energised plasma particles start to collide.

    As the particles fuse into helium, they release enormous amounts of energy, mimicking the process that occurs naturally in the centre of stars like our sun.

    The only by-products of fusion reactions are small amounts of helium, an inert gas which can be safely released without harming the environment. 

    As a result, fusion reactors have long been touted as the best clean energy source – although the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists claims they are 'far from perfect'.

    As yet, the energy input required to produce the temperatures and pressures that enable significant fusion reactions in hydrogen isotopes don't justify the fusion energy that's actually being generated, the nonprofit organization points out. 

    At the heart of EAST and other fusion reactors around the world is the tokamak, a doughnut-shaped device initially conceptualised in the 1950s by Soviet physicists. Inside, under the influence of extreme heat and pressure, gaseous hydrogen fuel becomes a plasma ¿ a hot, electrically charged gas

    At the heart of EAST and other fusion reactors around the world is the tokamak, a doughnut-shaped device initially conceptualised in the 1950s by Soviet physicists. Inside, under the influence of extreme heat and pressure, gaseous hydrogen fuel becomes a plasma – a hot, electrically charged gas

    Gong Xianzu, head of division of the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) Physics and Experimental Operations, watches the experimental data on January 15, 2025 in Hefei, Anhui Province of China

    Gong Xianzu, head of division of the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) Physics and Experimental Operations, watches the experimental data on January 15, 2025 in Hefei, Anhui Province of China

    Nuclear fusion is still in the research and development phase - while nuclear fission is already making electricity. Pictured, nuclear power plant in Wuhan, China

    Nuclear fusion is still in the research and development phase - while nuclear fission is already making electricity. Pictured, nuclear power plant in Wuhan, China

    Fusion power works by colliding heavy hydrogen atoms to form helium - releasing vast amounts of energy in the process, as occurs naturally in the centre of stars

    Fusion power works by colliding heavy hydrogen atoms to form helium - releasing vast amounts of energy in the process, as occurs naturally in the centre of stars

    Why are there no nuclear fusion plants yet? 

    Unlike nuclear fission, the nuclear fusion reaction in a tokamak is an inherently safe reaction. 

    But fusion is a finely balanced reaction which is very sensitive to the conditions.

    The reaction will die if the plasma is too cold or too hot, or if there is too much fuel or not enough, or too many contaminants, or if the magnetic fields are not set up just right to control the turbulence of the hot plasma. 

    This is why fusion is still in the research and development phase - and fission is already making electricity. 

    Source: EUROfusion  

    It's worth bearing in mind that EAST, as the name suggests, is China's 'experimental' reactor project – and may yet pave the way for the first nuclear fusion power plants. 

    Chinese experts say: 'The mission of the EAST project is to develop an advanced fully superconducting tokamak so as to establish solid scientific and technological bases for the future continuous operation of tokamak fusion devices.' 

    Of course there are already nuclear power plants around the world, but they use nuclear fission, which has the disadvantage of generating unstable nuclei, some of which are radioactive for millions of years. 

    Fusion, on the other hand, does not create any long-lived radioactive nuclear waste but instead helium, which is an inert gas. 

    Fusion fuel is made up of deuterium and tritium, which are isotopes of hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, giving scientists hopes of 'unlimited energy'. 

    The Chinese team plan to use the nuclear fusion reactor in collaboration with scientists in France working on the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER).

    The Provence-based ITER project is expected to begin delivering power in 2035, and will become the world's biggest reactor once completed. 

    Meanwhile, the SPARC nuclear fusion reactor, a US project involving MIT, is currently in development in Devens, Massachusetts and scheduled to start operations in 2026. 

    Construction of ITER, the world's largest nuclear fusion project that will replicate the reactions that power the sun in pursuit of clean power

    Construction of ITER, the world's largest nuclear fusion project that will replicate the reactions that power the sun in pursuit of clean power

    In 2024, Korea's artificial sun' (pictured) ran at 100 million°C (180 million°F) for 48 seconds - seven times hotter than the sun's core

    In 2024, Korea's artificial sun' (pictured) ran at 100 million°C (180 million°F) for 48 seconds - seven times hotter than the sun's core

    article image

    South Korea also has its own 'artificial sun', the Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR), which has run at 180million°F (100million°C) for 48 seconds. 

    Japan's reactor, called JT-60SA and switched on in Naka north of Tokyo late 2023, is a six-storey-high machine measuring 50 feet high and 44 feet wide. 

    Built and operated jointly by Europe and Japan, JT-60SA will be the world's largest fusion reactor until the completion of ITER in France.

    Other smaller reactors are being built and tested – including the ST40 in Oxfordshire, which is more squashed-up and compact compared with other 'doughnut-shaped' reactors. 

    The Joint European Torus (JET), also located in Oxfordshire, released a total of 69 megajoules of energy over five seconds before being decommissioned. 

    They could all be precursors to fusion power plants that supply power directly to the grid and electricity to people's homes. 

    HOW A FUSION REACTOR WORKS

    Fusion is the process by which a gas is heated up and separated into its constituent ions and electrons. 

    It involves light elements, such as hydrogen, smashing together to form heavier elements, such as helium. 

    For fusion to occur, hydrogen atoms are placed under high heat and pressure until they fuse together.

    The tokamak (artist's impression) is the most developed magnetic confinement system and is the basis for the design of many modern fusion reactors. The purple at the center of the diagram shows the plasma inside 

    The tokamak (artist's impression) is the most developed magnetic confinement system and is the basis for the design of many modern fusion reactors. The purple at the center of the diagram shows the plasma inside 

    When deuterium and tritium nuclei - which can be found in hydrogen - fuse, they form a helium nucleus, a neutron and a lot of energy.

    This is done by heating the fuel to temperatures in excess of 150 million°C and forming a hot plasma, a gaseous soup of subatomic particles.

    Strong magnetic fields are used to keep the plasma away from the reactor's walls, so that it doesn't cool down and lose its energy potential.

    These fields are produced by superconducting coils surrounding the vessel and by an electrical current driven through the plasma.

    For energy production, plasma has to be confined for a sufficiently long period for fusion to occur.

    When ions get hot enough, they can overcome their mutual repulsion and collide, fusing together. 

    When this happens, they release around one million times more energy than a chemical reaction and three to four times more than a conventional nuclear fission reactor.

    China is making a 'mini sun' as global fusion race heats up | World News | WION

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

    22-01-2025 om 23:36 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    16-01-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The looming quantum apocalypse: What you need to know!

    The looming quantum apocalypse: What you need to know!

    Quantum computing, a transformative field leveraging quantum mechanics, has the potential to solve complex problems far beyond the reach of classical computers. While it promises significant advancements, it also poses risks, such as breaking cryptographic codes, threatening global data security. 

    For example: At NASA's Quantum Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (QuAIL), experiments revealed unprecedented computational power and successfully solved the unsolvable problem. However, the quantum computer began generating independent and unconventional outputs, leading to speculation that it could think for itself or even connect with extraterrestrial intelligence. Concerned about the implications, NASA halted its quantum computing project in 2023, though some believe the research continued in secret. 
    Separately, researchers have hypothesized that advanced extraterrestrial civilizations might use black holes as quantum computers for computation and communication. highlighting the mysterious potential of these quantum systems to explore phenomena beyond Earthly understanding. 
    A fictional scenario (watch video below) illustrates the dangers of quantum technology spiraling out of control: 
    A mysterious data transfer lights up NSA monitors at 3 AM. Within hours, hospital records flash across Times Square billboards. Dating app messages spill onto every screen in the city. 
    Bank accounts vanish. Traffic lights freeze. Autonomous vehicles crash through shopping malls. Intelligence agencies scramble as decades of encrypted messages suddenly unlock. Someone or something has broken the unbreakable - the mathematical foundations that protect everything from banking passwords to nuclear launch codes. 
    The quantum apocalypse arrives years ahead of schedule. But as chaos spreads, patterns start to surface. The timing seems too perfect, the targets too precise. 
    Deep beneath the Pentagon, analysts notice something strange: some messages were decrypted months ago. The chaos isn't random - it's cover for something bigger.
      

    https://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/ }

    16-01-2025 om 14:44 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    12-01-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Vier onverwachte AI-ontdekkingen: van het ontcijferen van eeuwenoude papyrusrollen tot walviscommunicatie

    Vier onverwachte AI-ontdekkingen: van het ontcijferen van eeuwenoude papyrusrollen tot walviscommunicatie

    2024 was de grote doorbraak van AI. In recordtempo veranderde kunstmatige intelligentie ons leven, én dat van de wetenschap. Van het ontcijferen van eeuwenoude papyrusrollen tot het begrijpen van walviscommunicatie, AI draait er zijn hand niet voor om.

    We noemen een aantal belangrijke wetenschappelijke ontdekkingen die zonder kunstmatige intelligentie niet mogelijk waren geweest. Zo lukte het om de Papyri van Herculaneum te ontcijferen. Deze honderden eeuwenoude boekrollen zijn verkoold door de uitbarsting van de Vesuvius in het jaar 79 na Christus. De inhoud is daarom altijd een mysterie gebleven. Het openen van de broze documenten zou ze namelijk direct vernietigen. Maar dankzij hoge resolutie-röntgenfoto’s en de kracht van AI is een doorbraak bereikt: meer dan 2000 letters zijn ontcijferd zonder de boekrollen open te maken of aan te tasten. De teksten bieden een uniek inkijkje in het leven en de ideeën van het oude Rome en Griekenland. Wetenschappers schatten dat binnenkort zo’n 90 procent van vier rollen is ontcijferd. Dit is mogelijk omdat AI ijzersterk is in het herkennen van patronen, en in staat is om het contrast tussen de inkt en de koolstoflaag zichtbaar te maken.

    Superkracht
    Volgens Brent Seales, computerwetenschapper aan de Universiteit van Kentucky, functioneert AI als een ‘soort superkracht’: het maakt onzichtbare details zichtbaar, legt hij uit aan de wetenschapsafdeling van CNN. De Vesuvius Challenge, een wedstrijd om de decodeersnelheid te verhogen, laat zien hoe AI complexe problemen oplost – met een werkwijze en snelheid die tot voor kort ondenkbaar was.

    Walvisgeluiden decoderen
    Wetenschappers zetten AI ook in om dierlijke communicatie beter te begrijpen, zoals het mysterieuze ‘klikalfabet’ van potvissen. Onderzoekers analyseerden bijna 9000 klikreeksen – korte stoten van klikgeluiden, die ‘codas’ genoemd worden. Hiervoor luisterden ze het onderlinge gebabbel van ongeveer zestig potvissen in de Caraïbische Zee minutieus af. Ze ontdekten met behulp van AI subtiele patronen in tempo, ritme en toonhoogte, vergelijkbaar met menselijk gepraat.

    Zo identificeerden zij achttien soorten ritmes en vijf verschillende tempo’s. Artificiële intelligentie maakt deze structuren zichtbaar, maar de betekenis van de klikgeluiden blijft nog steeds een raadsel. De volgende stap is om de klikgeluiden aan hun gedrag te koppelen en ook echt te kunnen communiceren met de walvissen. De verwachting is dat AI hierbij zal kunnen helpen.

    Verborgen archeologische schatten
    Op het droge helpt AI archeologen bij het ontdekken van verborgen locaties, zoals de mysterieuze Nazca-lijnen in Peru. Deze gigantische symbolen zijn alleen vanuit de lucht zichtbaar en zijn de afgelopen honderd jaar meer en meer in kaart gebracht. Een team onder leiding van de Japanse professor Masato Sakai trainde een AI-model om 430 bekende symbolen te analyseren. Zo verdubbelde binnen enkele maanden het aantal gedocumenteerde geogliefen.

    Toch is het systeem zeker niet perfect: het identificeerde tienduizenden potentiële locaties, waarvan slechts een klein percentage veelbelovend bleek. AI biedt echter enorme kansen voor de archeologie, vooral in afgelegen en ontoegankelijke gebieden. Het combineren van menselijke expertise met AI-modellen versnelt de ontdekkingen en leidt tot inzichten die zonder de hulp van AI niet mogelijk waren.

    De bouwstenen van het leven ontrafelen
    AI leidt ook tot een revolutie in de biologie, vooral bij het onderzoeken van eiwitten – de moleculen die verantwoordelijk zijn voor bijna alle processen in het menselijk lichaam. Het begrijpen van de driedimensionale structuren van eiwitten was tot voor kort een tijdrovend proces. Met AlphaFold, een AI-tool ontwikkeld door Google DeepMind, kunnen wetenschappers nu de structuur van bijna alle 200 miljoen bekende eiwitten voorspellen. Dit bespaart enorm veel tijd en biedt nieuwe mogelijkheden in de geneeskunde en fundamentele biologie. AlphaFold wordt al door meer dan twee miljoen onderzoekers wereldwijd gebruikt. Hoewel de tool ook zijn beperkingen heeft, bijvoorbeeld bij het voorspellen van mutaties, wordt het beschouwd als een enorme doorbraak in de wetenschap.

    Het onbenutte potentieel van AI
    AI is geen perfecte technologie: de zogenaamde black box waarin veel modellen opereren maakt sommige resultaten moeilijk reproduceerbaar. Toch is de impact van AI op wetenschappelijk onderzoek enorm. Het biedt ongekende mogelijkheden om complexe problemen op te lossen en verborgen patronen te ontdekken – of het nu gaat om eeuwenoude teksten, de taal van walvissen of de chemie van het leven. In 2024 is AI niet alleen een hulpmiddel gebleken, maar een belangrijke katalysator voor innovatie en het begrip van de wereld om ons heen.

    Bronmateriaal

    RELATED VIDEOS


    ‘A sort of superpower’: Unexpected revelations made possible by AI

    2024 Artificial Intelligence Crash Course: A Comprehensive Guide to AI

    AI Tipping Point | Full Documentary | Curiosity Stream

    https://scientias.nl/nieuws/green-tech/ }

    12-01-2025 om 23:52 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    11-01-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Watch This Liquid Metal Robot Escape From Jail, Just Like ‘Terminator 2’

    (Carnegie Mellon University/Chinese University of Hong Kong)

    Watch This Liquid Metal Robot Escape From Jail, Just Like ‘Terminator 2’

    A new video shows a human-shaped ‘robot’ escaping from a miniature jail by transforming itself into a liquid metal state and then slipping through the bars, evoking imagery from popular films like Terminator 2.

    Eerily, just like the villain from the aforementioned movie, the robot used in the demonstration was also able to coalesce back into its original shape once it was free.

    To accomplish a task right out of a science fiction movie, researchers from Carnegie Mellon University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong had to create an entirely new type of material that includes magnets and metal. Dubbed a “magnetoactive solid-liquid phase transitional machine,” the futuristic material was made by embedding magnetic particles into a base of gallium. The researchers chose gallium due to its low melting point of only 85.6 °F (or 29.8 °C).

    You can see a video featuring this fascinating–and unusual–accomplishment below:

    Magnetic Particles and Gallium are the secret ingredients in a Shape Shifting liquid metal robot

    According to the researchers involved, the magnetic particles offer other benefits, too.

    “The magnetic particles here have two roles,” explained senior author and mechanical engineer Carmel Majidi of Carnegie Mellon University. “One is that they make the material responsive to an alternating magnetic field, so you can, through induction, heat up the material and cause the phase change.”

    Along with this unique heating ability that doesn’t require an outside heating source to change from a solid state to a liquid one, Majidi says the magnetic particles also give the robots the ability to move in response to the magnetic field. This is particularly significant since the primary function of any robot is the ability to move around and perform various functions.

    “Giving robots the ability to switch between liquid and solid states endows them with more functionality,” says Chengfeng Pan, an engineer at The Chinese University of Hong Kong who led the study.

    Liquid Metal Robot Passes a wide range of tests

    To understand the limits of their new shape-shifting liquid metal robot, the researchers put it through a number of tests. This included using magnetic fields to make the robot jump over moats, climb walls, and even split itself into two smaller robots to move other objects around before coalescing back together.

    “Now, we’re pushing this material system in more practical ways to solve some very specific medical and engineering problems,” said Pan.

    To test some of those potential bio-medical applications, the team used the robot to remove a foreign object from a model of a human stomach and then deliver on-demand drugs to the same stomach.

    “Future work should further explore how these robots could be used within a biomedical context,” said Majidi, “but much more study will be required to delve into how this could actually be used for drug delivery or for removing foreign objects.”


    To show how it could help screw together parts in hard-to-reach places, the team melted some of the metal into the threaded screw socket and then allowed it to harden in place. They even used the conductive ability of their liquid metal robot to show how it could perform soldering tasks in extremely tight confines by melting into them and then re-hardening to perform its tasks.

    Extreme Liquid Phase Allows For Sci-Fi Jailbreak

    In the case of the video provided by researchers, the ability to change from a solid state to a liquid metal state allows the robot-shaped metal to escape a tiny prison. This is due to what the researchers describe as an “extremely liquid phase.” Other shape-shifting materials typically have a liquid phase that is much more viscous than the newly created material.

    “What we’re showing are just one-off demonstrations, proofs of concept,” said Majidi.

    Of course, the robot from the video wasn’t able to travel back in time or track down a tween-aged John Connor. But given its ability to shape-shift from a solid metal state to a liquid one and then back to a solid, it’s pretty much guaranteed that if the robot could talk, it would say, “I’ll be back!”


    Real-Life T-1000? Watch This Liquid Metal Robot Escape Jail! #ai #robotics

    https://thedebrief.org/category/science/ }

    11-01-2025 om 01:27 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
    10-01-2025
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Flying electric vehicle 'straight out of Star Wars' reaches 65mph as it soars higher than the Statue of Liberty

    It looks like something straight out of Star Wars.

    But this new electric flying vehicle is the latest in a line of aerodynamic EVs set to take over the skies over the next decade.

    The stylish $300,000 Manta M4 offers space for one passenger and takes off from land and sea, but can only land in water.

    The Manta M4 travels up to 65 miles per hour and weighs as much as a small jet ski.

    The vehicle is steered using a joystick, allowing riders to soar up to 500 feet above the ground — about the height of two Statue of Liberty, or half the height of the Empire State Building.

    Riders are protected by a glass hood, which will protect against wind speed and keep users safe from the craft's three propellers. 

    The craft gets 30 minutes of power with an electric battery or three hours using one of its hydrogen fuel cells.

    Revealed at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las VegasNevada, founder David Simchon told DailyMail.com how his vehicle would surely be the next pleasure craft of the skies.

    Only a model of the vehicle was shown, but the company, called SimTechLabs, says the full product will be unveiled at a boat show in Florida next month when it hits the market for the first time.

    Pictured above is a model of the Manta M4, which will debut at a boat show in Florida next month

    Pictured above is a model of the Manta M4, which will debut at a boat show in Florida next month

    The device uses three propellers to take off from land or water, and can fly at 65mph for up to 30 minutes using its electric battery

    The device uses three propellers to take off from land or water, and can fly at 65mph for up to 30 minutes using its electric battery

    Simchon said that users will not need a license due to the craft’s lightweight design that is at under 300lbs, meaning it is considered ultra-light, a point where the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) does not require users to have a license.

    However, owners without a pilot's license will have to follow the FAA's regulations and airspace restrictions.

    Manta M4 has a thermal onboard system to detect and warn of birds and other dangers in the air and a system emitting ultrasonic sounds to scare away sharks that may be lurking in the water beneath.

    The base features a 360-degree camera, allowing riders to capture breathtaking views of the world below while they fly — or check the water below for any signs of rocks or sharks.

    It also features eight ultrasonic sensors, 16 sonar disruptions sensors and four thermal cameras to capture scenes of its surroundings and avoid oncoming obstacles. 

    In a worst-case scenario of the craft losing power, it has three parachutes that will deploy to ensure a safe landing.

    It is the second craft to be launched by SimTech labs after it launched a flying aircraft called the Icarus Project in 2024.

    Flying aircraft and taxis — some autonomously operated — are expected to be routinely whizzing around US skies within the next few years, according to the FAA.

    And it’s the same in the UK, where the Government says it expects them to be ‘routinely’ in operation by 2028.

    Manta M4 has a thermal onboard system to detect and warn of birds and other dangers in the air and a system emitting ultrasonic sounds to scare away sharks that may be lurking in the water beneath

    Manta M4 has a thermal onboard system to detect and warn of birds and other dangers in the air and a system emitting ultrasonic sounds to scare away sharks that may be lurking in the water beneath

    Developer SimTechLabs prices the craft at $300,000 for one. Ten are set to go on sale

    Developer SimTechLabs prices the craft at $300,000 for one. Ten are set to go on sale

    The former head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Sergio Cecutta and who resigned in 2023, said at the time that one of his major achievements was fast-tracking progress to get electric airtaxis into the skies.

    Another UFO-like craft was also revealed at CES — called the ‘Invo Moon’ — that could carry up to three passengers through US skies. 

    And Toyota debuted its Joby aircraft which is expected to go on sale later this Year.

    RELATED VIDEO


    Flying vehicle on display at CES in Las Vegas

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

    10-01-2025 om 21:22 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )


    Afbeeldingsresultaten voor  welcome to my website tekst

    De bronafbeelding bekijken


    De bronafbeelding bekijken


    MUFON’s New Social Network

    0_groot


    Mijn favorieten
  • Verhalen TINNY * SF
  • IFO-databank van Belgisch UFO meldpunt
  • Belgisch UFO meldpunt
  • The Black Vault
  • Terry's Theories UFO Sightings. Its a Youtube Channel thats really overlooked, but has a lot of great and recent sightings on it.
  • . UFO Institute: A cool guy who works hard
  • YOUTUBE kanaal van het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt
  • LATEST UFO SIGHTINGS

  • DES LIENS AVEC LE RESEAU FRANCOPHONE DE MUFON ET MUFONEUROP
  • BELGISCH UFO-NETWERK BUFON
  • RFacebook BUFON
  • MUFONFRANCE
  • MUFON RHÔNE-ALPES
  • MUFON MIDI-PYRÉNNÉES
  • MUFON HAUTE-NORMANDIE
  • MUFON MAROC
  • MUFON ALSACE LORRAINE
  • MUFON USA
  • Site du REUB ASBL

    Other links with friends / bloggers # not always UFOs
  • PANGRadio MarcSima
  • Blog 2 Bernward
  • Nederlandse UFO-groep
  • Ufologie Liège
  • NIBURU
  • Disclose TV
  • UFO- Sightings - HOTSPOT
  • Website van BUFON ( Belgisch UFO-Netwerk)
  • The Ciizen Hearing on Disclosure
  • Exopolitics Finland: LINKS

    LINKS OF THE BLOGS OF MY FACEBOOK-FRIENDS
  • ufologie -Guillaume Perrot
  • UFOMOTION
  • CENTRE DE RECHERCHE OVNI PARASPYCHOLOGIE SCIENCE - CROPS -
  • SOCIAL PARANORMAL Magazine
  • TJ Morris ACO Associations, Clubs, Organizations - TJ Morris ACO Social Service Club for...
  • C.E.R.P.I. BELGIQUE
  • Attaqued'un Autre Monde - Christian Macé
  • UFOSPOTTINGNEDERLAND
  • homepage UFOSPOTTINGNEDERLAND
  • PARANORMAL JOURNEY GUIDE

    WELCOME TO THIS BLOG! I HOPE THAT YOU ENJOY THE LECTURE OF ALL ISSUES. If you did see a UFO, you can always mail it to us. Best wishes.

    Beste bezoeker,
    Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere op
     www.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief  maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming!
    DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK.
    BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...


    Laatste commentaren
  • crop cirkels (herman)
        op UFO'S FORM CROP CIRCLE IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS - SCOTLAND 1996
  • crop cirkels (herman)
        op UFO'S FORM CROP CIRCLE IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS - SCOTLAND 1996
  • Een zonnige vrijdag middag en avond (Patricia)
        op MUFON UFO Symposium with Greg Meholic: Advanced Propulsion For Interstellar Travel
  • Dropbox

    Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...


    Gastenboek
  • Nog een fijne avond
  • Hallo Lieverd
  • kiekeboe
  • Een goeie middag bezoekje
  • Zomaar een blogbezoekje

    Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!


    Over mijzelf
    Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
    Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
    Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
    Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
    Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën... Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
    Zoeken in blog


    LINKS NAAR BEKENDE UFO-VERENIGINGEN - DEEL 1
  • http://www.ufonieuws.nl/
  • http://www.grenswetenschap.nl/
  • http://www.beamsinvestigations.org.uk/
  • http://www.mufon.com/
  • http://www.ufomeldpunt.be/
  • http://www.ufowijzer.nl/
  • http://www.ufoplaza.nl/
  • http://www.ufowereld.nl/
  • http://www.stantonfriedman.com/
  • http://ufo.start.be/

    LINKS NAAR BEKENDE UFO-VERENIGINGEN - DEEL 2
  • www.ufo.be
  • www.caelestia.be
  • ufo.startpagina.nl.
  • www.wszechocean.blogspot.com.
  • AsocCivil Unifa
  • UFO DISCLOSURE PROJECT

  • Startpagina !


    ">


    Een interessant adres?

    Mijn favorieten
  • Verhalen


  • Blog tegen de regels? Meld het ons!
    Gratis blog op http://blog.seniorennet.be - SeniorenNet Blogs, eenvoudig, gratis en snel jouw eigen blog!