In an article titled Predictive Programming by Dahria Beaver of Ohio State University, it is written that:

“Predictive Programming is the theory that the government or other higher-ups are using fictional movies or books as a mass mind control tool to make the population more accepting of planned future events.”

Researcher Alan Watt, arguably the first person to highlight Predictive Programming, described it as:

“…a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion”.  

Movies and television shows have long been recognized as powerful tools for shaping public opinion and influencing cultural norms. With their wide reach and ability to evoke emotional responses, they provide an ideal platform for disseminating messages – whether overt or covert.

In the context of predictive programming, filmmakers and showrunners may incorporate elements that reflect emerging societal trends, technological advancements, or geopolitical developments. By presenting these ideas in a fictional context, they can gauge audience reactions, plant seeds of thought, or even acclimatize viewers to certain scenarios.

Of course, as we might imagine, the notion of Predictive Programming is very much a subject of debate, with as much opposition to it as there are believers. It is, though, fascinating and concerning in equal measure—the idea that our perception of the world around us could be being shaped without us even realizing it.

A great place to start would be with the 1999 movie Eyes Wide Shut, which is awash with Masonic symbolism and appears to lay bare the workings of the so-called Illuminati. And when we consider that the film’s director, the great Stanley Kubrick, passed away just after the first screening of the film in what, to some, were slightly suspicious circumstances, then the film’s symbolism and subject matter should perhaps be examined a little more closely.

Perhaps the best place to start would be with the film’s director, Stanley Kubrick, or more specifically, his sudden death only days after the first viewing of the film. Officially, Kubrick died from a sudden heart attack, but many people believed his death was more than coincidental, especially when rumors began to circulate of scenes being cut from the film in the weeks that followed his demise.

It was said by some that many of the people in attendance at that viewing belonged to “the elite” and that after viewing the offering from Kubrick, they immediately went on a “damage limitation” mission.  It was further put forward that they knew Kubrick would not be cooperative in terms of cutting scenes away from the film, and so, ultimately, he was murdered, with his death made to look like a heart attack.

It is worth noting here, as bizarre as it sounds, that the idea of murdering a person and having it appear to be a heart attack is not that much of a stretch of the imagination. During the 1975 court hearings brought against the CIA following an investigation by the New York Times, one of the secrets of the agency, among many that were laid bare, was a weapon labeled the “heart attack” gun. This weapon fired a pin-sized shard of ice with a highly poisonous substance encased inside. When fired, the pin-sized shard of ice entered a person’s body and then immediately melted, releasing the poison and so causing a heart attack. Not only would it be highly unlikely that a mark would even be found on the body, even if it was, but there would also be no trace of the poison left to detect.

Whether it is correct to be suspicious of Kubrick’s death or not remains a matter of debate, at least to some, although it should be said, even though it wouldn’t be impossible, it is unlikely. And officially, while some changes were made in the months following his death, they were said to be more editing and cosmetic changes as opposed to the removal of scenes. As we might imagine, not everyone was convinced. We should also note that Kubrick was known to work on his films right up until the very last minute, even after public screenings, so it is not that much of a surprise that some cosmetic changes were still required.

That said, however, there are many other reasons that such ominous conspiracies surround the film, and that its purpose was to expose the underbelly of society’s elite. Indeed, the Illuminati and the conspiracies that have surrounded them, whether purely for entertainment or to shine a light on their chilling activities, run throughout the film right from the start.

The movie revolves around the main protagonist, Dr. Bill, played by Tom Cruise, who, through his job, mixes with several “high-ranking” members of society. We immediately see references to Freemasonry and suggestions of conspiracies connected to the Illuminati. For example, in the opening scenes of the film, we see Dr. Bill’s wife, Alice (played by Nicole Kidman), getting dressed, something she does while standing between two large stone pillars, which are said to represent the Masonic pillars, Boaz and Jachin. The Star of Ishtar is also seen at various times during the film.

As the film progresses, through a chance encounter with an old friend, Dr. Bill learns of a secret party for members of the elite, and manages to bluff his way inside to what is quickly revealed to be some kind of Illuminati-style sex party. He is quickly discovered during some kind of ritual, threatened, and thrown out. During this scene, where Dr. Bill is eventually uncovered as being an uninvited guest, there are multiple Masonic symbols on view. The leader of the ritual, for example, sits upon a throne that contains a double-headed eagle with a crown resting between their heads. While it could be a coincidence, the 33-degree Scottish Rite Freemasons use an almost identical double-headed eagle in their emblem.

Following this, his life begins to unravel somewhat. Furthermore, he begins to notice strange behavior and symbols all around him that he had previously been blind to. By the end of the movie, it is all but confirmed to him that elite secret societies exist and that they control the police, politicians, and even the media.

For example, one of the “sex slaves” in the film is seemingly murdered, but her death is reported in the newspaper as a “drug overdose”. This is exactly what many conspiracy writers have claimed happens to “mind-controlled sex slaves” after they have fallen out of favor with their elite masters. Even the constant references to rainbows (which we will return to shortly) are said to be a symbol of the MK-Ultra mind control techniques that some say continue secretly today.

It is further intriguing that the building where this bizarre party takes place appears to be a depiction of an infamous ball held by the Rothschild family, specifically, a ball held by Baron Guy and Baroness Marie-Helene de Rothschild at their mansion, the Chateau de Ferriers, just outside of Paris in France in 1972. We know about the surreal affair due to photographs that have since been leaked online with the arrival of the Internet. And these pictures are a combination of bizarre and morose imagery. Attendees, for example, are wearing bizarre masks ranging from chilling animal heads to pretend cages. There are also many broken children’s toys – including dismembered dolls – scattered around the many long tables, with some of these tables featuring naked mannequins upon which food is presented. The mansion was also bathed in an artificial red glow in the real-life gathering in 1972 in order to depict it being in flames. What’s more, the secretive nature of the party in the film was very real in real life, with the invites for the Rothschild party not only written in code, but written backwards so they could only be read and understood by viewing them in a mirror.

If we return to when Bill first tricks his way inside the party, we can see more references to mind control and the use of “sex slaves”. For example, he is almost immediately greeted by two “Monarch Presidential” models, which, according to some, are references to mind-control subjects who have been “trained” through mind-control techniques to be subconscious “high-level sex slaves” who also act as carriers of information between the world’s elite. It is during this scene that one of many references to rainbows is used (another apparent indicator of mind-control programming), where Bill asks one of the girls where they are going, she replies, “where the rainbow ends”, before the second girl asks, “Don’t you want to see where the rainbow ends?” There is also, incidentally, an apparent overuse of mirrors throughout the movie, said by some researchers to be yet another suggestion of mind-control.

If we stay with the notion of sex slaves a moment longer, there are a number of “scarlet women” who are involved with Dr. Bill throughout the movie. As well as the “sex slave” who is eventually murdered (or overdosed) and has noticeable scarlet hair, Dr. Bill’s wife, Alice, and their daughter both do. Another particularly eye-opening scene occurs towards the end of the film, following the discovery of one of the women at the secret party – a prostitute whom Dr. Bill had become friendly with beforehand – is discovered dead, an apparent drug overdose. Although it isn’t outright said, it is heavily implied that the woman was murdered and her death was simply made to look like an overdose, and her death was reported as such in the media. A friend of Dr. Bill’s – himself a member of the elite in question and in attendance at the party – claims that the high-ranking members of these secret societies control the police, politicians, the media – essentially, all aspects of modern life. In short, if the powers that be – the elite – wanted to have someone murdered and have their death look like an overdose, a suicide, or even a tragic accident, they could do so easily. While this might sound a little outlandish, we should perhaps not underestimate the notion that a person’s murder – if such control was extended over almost every facet of society at one level or another – could be made to appear accidental or even from natural causes, which is not at all that much of a stretch of the imagination.

Was Eyes Wide Shut a warning to society as a whole of an “elite” force all but ruling over us? One that remains almost untouchable through their discreet control of all aspects of modern life? Or was it purely entertainment from the wild and productive mind of Stanley Kubrick? Incidentally, Eyes Wide Shut is far from the only Stanley Kubrick film to have featured heavy Masonic symbolism. In fact, most of his movies feature some kind of symbolism buried in certain scenes, from The Shining to 2001: A Space Odyssey.

It certainly might make us think that we are not always watching what we think we are watching.

There are many other thought-provoking claims regarding hidden messages buried within blockbuster movies. Although there were no apparent predictions made, it is worth our time briefly exploring the 1982 blockbuster movie ET: The Extraterrestrial, or more specifically, a remark made by (then) President Ronald Reagan following a private screening of the film in the White House, a remark that was corroborated by the film’s director, Steven Spielberg, who the comment was made to. Reagan was said to lean over to Spielberg and offer “how surprised” people would be if they realized “how true all of this is”, nodding to the screen.

Years later, during promotional work for his film Super 8, Spielberg was asked about the comment. Not only did he confirm that it was true, but that what the president had said to him was, “there are a number of people in this room who know that everything on that screen is absolutely true”. Spielberg caveated his response by saying that he took President Reagan to be “having a joke” with him. However, we might imagine, especially given some of Reagan’s other remarks about UFOs, including his own encounters, that he was entirely serious.

It has been claimed that ET is based loosely on the Roswell crash. If this is the case, what is interesting is that rumors have swirled for years in UFO circles that not only were several alien entities recovered from the crash at Roswell in the summer of 1947, but that at least one of these entities was alive and survived for several years before being returned home as part of some kind of cosmic exchange.

In light of his alleged comments to Spielberg, it is worth staying with the legendary filmmaker a little while longer, and specifically, his 1977 blockbuster, Close Encounters of the Third Kind. According to some, the movie hints at the truths of an alleged secret meeting between (then) President Eisenhower at an air base in California in 1954 (at a time when he was officially undergoing emergency dental surgery) – a meeting that resulted in a human/alien exchange program, said to have existed in real-life under the name Project Serpo. Indeed, we might ask, as speculative as it might be, if there is any truth to the reality of the events depicted in ET, could this be the same for Close Encounters of the Third Kind?

It is also worth mentioning 1994’s Stargate, which leans heavily on the ancient astronaut theory, specifically, in this case, that there was some kind of extraterrestrial intervention with the ancient Egyptian civilization. While this is a purely fictional account, the idea of such alien intervention in the distant past is one that has gained widespread traction among the world’s population since the 1970s. Again, while it is pure speculation, is Stargate hinting at the accuracy of such theories? We should also note that very similar themes of alien intervention in the distant past are explored at length in the film Prometheus, the Alien franchise prequel movie released in 2012.

While the Disney franchise is harmless enough to many, conspiracies about hidden messages in its films and television shows have swirled for years. Everything from hidden sexual imagery to messages hidden in plain sight has been discussed in conspiracy circles. And while we should treat such claims with caution, it is easy to see why they would gain traction.

If we take the logo of the Disney corporation, for example, we can see, according to some people, the number “666” with the curves of the logo’s writing - one in the “W”, one in the “I-dot”, and one at the top of the “Y”.

Perhaps one of the most well-known conspiracies of symbolism and hidden messages in Disney films and shows can be found in an episode of Duck Tales. The scene takes place in a doctor’s room, where an eye-chart can be clearly seen in the background – so clearly, in fact, that in a triangular formation, the letters spell out the phrase, “ASK ABOUT ILLUMINATI”. As well as the direct message itself, the fact that the letters are in a triangle (or pyramid) shape, as well as that they are on an eye-chart (a reference to the all-seeing eye), is a great example of how such messages and symbolic meanings can be hidden in plain sight.

There are also other discreetly hidden words, pictures, and even audible phrases. Many adults have always picked up on the innuendos and double-entendres to be found in the scripts, and many others have spotted suspiciously shaped items in the background of many otherwise innocent scenes. There are some, though, that stand out.

For example, in the 1994 film The Lion King, during one scene, the main character, Simba, collapses on the ledge of a mountain. As he does so, dust flies into the air. As it disperses into the night sky, the word “SEX” is clearly spelled out. It is there with no context, and it is arguably astronomically low that the word would have been spelled out by chance. We have to ask, other than for the creator’s own amusement, why this was included.

A similar, although altogether more graphic image can be seen in The Rescuers from 1977. In one scene, in the background, a topless woman can be seen in one of the windows of the overlooking buildings. While this was likely missed by almost everyone, even the children, subliminally, the image would have registered. Incidentally, following the image becoming widespread knowledge, the Disney company attempted to recall around four million copies of it, eventually releasing the movie again in 1992, this time without the topless lady present.

While those examples might make us scratch our heads a little, the third example is a little more concerning. In the 1992 film Aladdin, during a scene where Aladdin is fending off an attack from Jasmine’s tiger, Raja, he goads the beast by saying, “Come on, good kitty….take off and go”. However, some viewers began to hear something else, and when the scene was analyzed, another, muffled voice was heard to say, “Good teenagers, take off your clothes”. As we might imagine, many people were more than worried about this allegedly hidden message, with some beginning to question just why these hidden images, references to sex, and even subliminal sexual instructions were being placed in such movies, much less movies aimed predominantly at children.

The rumors of Masonic, Illuminati, and even Satanic connections to Disney only increased when, in 2019, the former Vice President, Michael Laney, was sentenced to six years in prison for sexual offenses against a 7-year-old girl. Following the conviction, another potential victim came forward with similar accusations, but there wasn’t enough evidence to proceed with charges.

Only the previous year, in 2018, Disney actor Stormy Westmoreland was arrested on suspicion of similar crimes involving a minor. Not only did he send inappropriate photographs to what he thought was a 13-year-old boy (who was, in fact, police detectives posing as such), but he also attempted to lure the youngster to his hotel room. He was eventually sentenced to two years in prison after he entered into a plea deal. In March 2022, four Disney employees were arrested on human trafficking charges as part of an undercover sting operation in Florida, at least one of whom was involved in sending inappropriate photographs to a teenage girl.

While these crimes have been carried out by individuals and not by the corporation itself, it certainly doesn’t help when considered alongside the conspiracies of such things surrounding their name, especially when many of those images, symbols, and apparent innuendos are of their own making.  

As we know, there are a plethora of conspiracies surrounding the 9/11 attacks in September 2001, so it should perhaps not surprise us that there is also an abundance of claims of predictions of the atrocities within blockbuster movies and even television shows. What makes these fascinating conspiracies even more nuanced are alleged Masonic references and symbols often also found, sometimes in the artwork associated with the respective film or sometimes within the films themselves. One thing is clear, coincidence or not, there are apparent references to the 9/11 attacks in multiple films and have been for decades.

In the 1988 20th Century Fox film Die Hard, for example, the film’s opening lines appear to reference 9/11 when Bruce Willis’ character, John McClane – traveling by airplane at the time, incidentally - speaks with another passenger about his fear of flying, with each then discussing how they cope with such fears. The passenger states he has used his particular method for nine years, while McClane (Willis) states he has been using his for 11 years. While it might be tentative, to some, this reference to 9 and 11 in association with flying on an airplane is a clear reference to the upcoming attacks.

These claims are seemingly taken up a notch when it is pointed out that McClane fights with terrorists in a tower in the first film (the fictional Nakatomi Plaza) before battling terrorists at an airport in the second movie. And if that wasn’t enough, some people have pointed out alleged Masonic symbolism on the promotional artwork and cover for the original Die Hard video release, which shows one of McClane’s eyes covered over, leaving the other to represent the all-seeing eye.

Two years later, the sequel to the blockbuster Gremlins was released, Gremlins 2: The New Batch, by Warner Bros. During a scene in the movie, following the shutting down of a tower, no less, due to the “new batch” of gremlins escaping and causing havoc, two reporters speak to a police spokesperson outside the building. The numbers on their microphones are none other than 9 and 11.

Another intriguing connection to the 9/11 attacks, with a particularly harrowing backstory, can be found in the 1990 comedy released by Universal, Problem Child.  The film follows the antics of the Healy family, who live at number 911. As a backstory to this – and one we should treat with extreme caution – one of the main actors in Problem Child was John Ritter. Ritter died suddenly in 2003 on September 11th, which is most likely nothing but a coincidence, but is certainly a little eyebrow-raising.

The following year, in 1991, one of the biggest movies of the year, Terminator 2, was released. During one of the scenes featuring the young John Connor and his protector from the future (played by Arnold Schwarzenegger) being chased through Los Angeles, the pair approach a bridge. As they pass under it, a sign reads: “CAUTION 9’-11”. Of course, this is the maximum height of the vehicles able to pass beneath the bridge. The fact that this just happened to be 9/11, though, was too much of a coincidence to some.

Two years later, in 1993, the Super Mario Bros movie was released, and a scene at the end of the film appears, at least to some, to be a direct warning of the events to come. This scene comes towards the movie's end and shows the merging of two dimensions. At the start of this merging, the Twin Towers are clearly visible in the background. However, as the dimensions merge, the towers fall to the ground. Furthermore, as this happens, a plane is seen flying past where the towers would have been.

Another blockbuster movie—Independence Day, released in 1996—also discreetly references 9/11. During a countdown sequence, the screen shows the clock, which just happens to be at 09:11:01. To some, this is not only another reference to 9/11 but even shows the year 2001 in the seconds column. The following year, in 1997, the film The Peacemaker, starring George Clooney, was released. In one scene, Clooney can be seen standing in the middle of two platform signs—one being 9 and the other 11. The same year, an episode of The Simpsons sees the family travel to New York, with one scene showing Lisa Simpson holding up a magazine that reads, “NEW YORK, $9” – part of the background of the magazine features the silhouette of the Twin Towers, which when factored into the cover, makes it read, according to some: “NEW YORK ($)9-11”. It is interesting to note that The Simpsons have also had several other scenes in various episodes that appear to have accurately predicted future events, an entire article of which could be dedicated to.

The disaster movie Armageddon was undoubtedly one of the biggest blockbuster films of 1998, and it too had an apparent reference to 9/11. Towards the end of the film, there is a countdown scene (similar to Independence Day). At the exact moment, we see the clock on the screen, it is displaying 9 minutes and 11 seconds (9:11). In the film Enemy of the State – also released in 1998 – we see the details of one of the characters on the screen, Thomas Brian Reynolds, whose date of birth is clearly displayed as 9-11-40. In 1998’s Godzilla, there is a scene featuring a character looking at his watch. Although the time is 8:55, the little hand of the watch is on the 9 while the big hand rests on the 11.

A similar display of 9/11 can be found in The Thirteenth Floor, released the following year in 1999. During one scene, a clock on the wall can be seen set at 11:45. This time, the big hand is on the 9 while the little hand is on the 11. Yet another reference can be found in The Bone Collector, released in the same year, where the protagonist, played by Denzel Washington, is seen looking at a piece of paper that is from page 119. What’s more, the date is shown as 11/9. While these alleged references are seemingly backward (119 instead of 911), some researchers offer that many Masonic and Illuminati symbols are to be read backward, and so assert their connection to 9/11, in this instance, is perfectly valid. Also released in 1999 was the blockbuster movie The Matrix, starring Keanu Reeves. During a scene in the film, the main protagonist, Neo’s (played by Reeves) passport is shown. The date it expires is clearly seen to be September 11th, 2001. Like many of these apparent references to 9/11, this could be purely a coincidence, but it is certainly interesting that this, of all dates, was decided upon.

There are several films from 2000 that also appear to make reference to the September 11th attacks. In the movie Traffic, for example, a scene shows a delivery of boxes – all of which have the number 911 stamped upon them. There is also a scene in The 6th Day starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, who, during one particular scene, checks his schedule – the only times visible on the screen to the viewer are 9:00 and 11:00. Yet another 2000 film with apparent references to 9/11 is The Patriot, starring Mel Gibson. The opening scenes of the film feature Gibson’s character weighing a chair, during which he says: “Nine pounds, 11 ounces. That’s perfect. Perfect!” Perhaps most intriguing of all, however, is an episode of The Lone Gunmen that aired on FOX in March 2001 – only six months before the terrorist attacks. The plot of the episode follows the events of September 11th, 2001, almost entirely, featuring the hijacking of an airplane by terrorists who then crashed it into the World Trade Center.

It is also worth mentioning several intriguing points about the first two Back To The Future movies, released in 1985 and 1989, respectively, both of which appear to have suggestions of the eventual harrowing events of September 11th, 2001, as well as what appears to be several outright warnings.

In the first movie, for example, towards the climax of the film, where the main protagonist, Marty McFly (played by Michael J. Fox), is preparing to time-travel back to 1985 from 1955, he calls out to his friend, Doc Brown (played by Christopher Lloyd), that he has to “warn him about the future”. As he utters this line, the hands of the town clock are locked on the 9 and 11 positions. Furthermore, when lightning strikes the clock tower – the power of which the pair are going to use to kickstart their DeLorean, or time machine – the time is 9:59. Although it is a little bit of a reach for some, others point out that the first World Trade Center tower collapsed at 9:59 (although it did so in the morning not at night, as per the time in the film).

There are also other apparent warnings, ones that rely on the “reverse symbolism” of many secret societies. Perhaps the best example would be earlier in the movie, right before Marty McFly travels back in time for the first time. He and Doc Brown are at Twin Pines Mall, a location referred to repeatedly throughout the film, and which, to some, is a reference to the Twin Towers. During this scene, Doc Brown is gunned down by “terrorists” due to his “ripping them off” for the plutonium he required to power the DeLorean. The exact time Doc. Brown was shot – which again is referenced several times throughout the movie – was 1:16 am, which, to some people, when using reverse symbolism, is a reference to 9/11 (when viewed upside down or back to front).

Even stranger, if we subscribe to these theories for a moment, is that when Marty returns to the mall at the end of the movie following his arrival back from 1955, the area is now mysteriously called the Lone Pine Mall. Although this is due to one of the two pines referenced at the start of the film having been destroyed by Marty’s actions when he traveled back in time, to some people, it was a reference to the destruction of the Twin Towers and their replacement with the One World Trade Center in their place.  

The second movie also features another apparent warning of the Twin Tower attacks. This time, Marty and Doc Brown travel forward 30 years to 2015, with Marty eventually finding himself in the home of his future self. During this part of the film, we can see that the blinds on the McFlys’ windows show the world scenery instead of simply being blank. One of these scenes shows a bright, sunny day in New York, with the typical New York skyline – including the Twin Towers – being clearly in view. As part of the story, the blinds are faulty and constantly flicker out of view. According to some people, though, this represents the Twin Towers falling to the ground, particularly when viewed upside down (reverse symbolism once more). What’s more, they claim we, the audience, are alerted to this by the fact that the future version of Marty McFly views these blinds while upside down in some kind of futuristic medical device (due to having hurt his back).

Whether or not these references and symbolism are nothing more than coincidence remains open to debate, at least to some. The many tentative references to the Twin Towers, though, are certainly worth pondering.

Arguably, one of the earliest films to allegedly reference the September 11th attacks on the Twin Towers was released just short of 20 years earlier, the Eddie Murphy and Dan Ackroyd comedy, Trading Places. And these references appear right from the opening credits of the film. During the movie's opening minutes, we see a shot of a homeless man who has newspapers blowing around him on the cold Philadelphia streets. We see enough of these newspapers to see the numbers 9 and 11 in one of the headlines.

Without a doubt, however, it is as the film reaches its climax that the two protagonists – Billy Ray Valentine (played by Eddie Murphy) and Louis Winthorpe III (played by Dan Ackroyd) – approach the stock exchange in the Twin Towers to wreak their revenge on the Duke Brothers. As they step out of the taxi outside the building, the apparent phone number of the firm has a combination of 0s, 9s, and 1s. Given that 0s are generally not recognized in such symbolism, the only numbers left are 9s and 1s – or 9, 11.

Even more thought-provoking is a line spoken by Winthorpe moments later as the two men set out towards the building, when he states to Valentine:

“Nothing you have ever experienced can prepare you for the unbridled carnage you are about to witness…In this building, it’s either kill, or be killed!”

In the context of the film, Winthorpe is referring to the cut-throat nature of the stock exchange and the trading of commodities. However, some researchers question whether this line might have a secretive, double meaning. Only moments later in the film, as the stockbrokers wait for trading to begin, we can see a clock on the wall with its hands firmly set towards the 9 and the 11.

What makes these apparent references to 9/11 even more intriguing, and indeed unsettling, is an interview given by the film’s director, Aaron Russo, 24 years after the release of Trading Places in 2007 (and only several months before his death from bladder cancer on August 24th, 2007).

We should note that the interview in question was given to Alex Jones – an undoubtedly divisive character and one whom many people, even in conspiracy circles, simply don’t trust (largely as a result of recent court battles and seemingly baseless statements). We might also note, though, that it could be argued that during the earlier part of his career in conspiracies, Alex Jones is seen as being considerably more credible than he might be viewed in more recent years.

In the interview, Russo claimed that he had prior knowledge of the September 11th attacks following a conversation with Nick Rockefeller 11 months before the atrocities took place. Essentially, Russo claimed that the 9/11 attacks were planned, and the reason for doing so was to create such fear and anger in the American public that they would eagerly back war in oil-rich lands in the Middle East and Asia. Perhaps most chilling of all, this would be an “endless war” that would see the military “looking in caves for people” who simply weren’t there and against “no real enemy”.

Although Russo was specifically told the Twin Towers were the target, he was told that “an event” would happen in less than a year that would result in the American military invading Afghanistan and then turning their attention to Iraq in order to “take over the oil fields and establish a base in the Middle East” – a base, incidentally, that sits next to another long-term foe of the United States, Iran.

It is also interesting to note here one of the first official projects following the American occupation of Afghanistan, following the 9/11 attacks, the Afghan Oil Pipeline.

In truth, the pipeline had been proposed by the company Unocal since at least 1997. The plans would see a pipeline stretch from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to the Arabian Sea. Training forces were even dispatched to the region to train workers for the project. However, the deal was forcibly called off due to intense pressure from women’s rights activists who opposed any deals involving the Taliban regime. Once the US military machine turned its attention to Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks, the deal quietly went ahead as part of the “rebuilding” projects.

What is perhaps of most interest about Unocal is the connections the company has to Dick Cheney. Coincidentally or not, Cheney would serve on the administration of Bush Jr when work on the pipeline finally began. Who benefits? The same rich businessmen are connected to an organization named The Carlyle Group. And to understand the significance of this and why Russo’s claims are so interesting, we need to go back to the late 1970s.

During this time, George Bush Sr was in charge of the CIA. His son, meanwhile, George Bush Jr., was venturing into the oil business. He would set up Arbusto Energy. This would attract several wealthy Saudi businessmen through a mutual associate, Jim Bath, whom we will look at shortly. One of these Saudi businessmen was Salem bin Laden, brother of the now infamous Osama bin Laden.

Jim Bath had been an associate of Bush Jr. since their time at the Texas Air National Guard. This placement may be questionable in itself to some, but it would keep both men safe from the draft and out of the Vietnam War. Bath would go on to develop connections in many areas, including the CIA, which would see him as an “asset”. He would also act on behalf of wealthy Middle Eastern families and be their representative as far as business interests in the United States. One of these was the bin Ladens.

Arbusto would eventually become bankrupt and would be taken over by Harken Energy in the late 1980s. This takeover would eventually lead to one of the biggest financial scandals in American history. It also came at a time when Bush Sr. was about to become President of the United States. The underwriting of the takeover of Arbusto by Harken Energy (of $25 million) was performed by the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). The move raised an eyebrow or two, as many people connected to BCCI were the exact same people connected to Arbusto Energy. Many of these same investors, according to details in the book The Terror Conspiracy by Jim Marrs, including George Bush and other members of the Bush family, as well as the bin Laden family, were also members of a private equity company, The Carlyle Group.

By 1991, the BCCI was under investigation for money laundering activities and was ultimately shut down and prevented from trading. The connections to the (then) President of the United States, George Bush, albeit indirectly via The Carlyle Group, to a business that was called by investigators, “the most corrupt financial institution in history,” was hardly a ringing endorsement. Whether it was connected or not, a little over eighteen months later, Bush would lose the presidency to Bill Clinton.

And Bill Clinton is another person of interest here, not least because of an interview he gave to James Kilpatrick in August 1994, in which he stated his awareness of a “permanent shadow government” comprised of “bankers and government officials” that shape the political agenda. He also went on to say he realized he would have to “gain access to this inner circle” if he was going to help “shape the world!” Further still, in 1991, he received an invitation to the secretive Bilderberg meeting. The invite would come courtesy of David Rockefeller. Coincidentally or not, Bill Clinton won the 1992 US election the following year. Despite being on the other side of the left/right paradigm, there are some intriguing connections between the Clintons, specifically Bill, and the Bush family, perhaps most notably during Clinton’s time as Governor of Arkansas.

The person who would donate the most funds to Bill Clinton was Jackson Stevens. What is perhaps interesting here is that Stevens was one of the main financial investors in the aforementioned BCCI, as well as being a close friend of the Bush family. It would appear, however, that financial backing was just a front. Aside from claims of drug smuggling, which we will look at shortly, there were claims of money laundering. This would, it is claimed, take place through the Arkansas Development Finance Authority (ADFA) at a time when Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas.

One of the loudest voices regarding the matter was that of Larry Nichols. In the 1994 documentary, The Clinton Chronicles, Nichols appeared to lay bare these illegal activities while serving as the Marketing Director of ADFA. He would claim to be “sitting in the middle of Bill Clinton’s political machine”, witnessing “payoffs” and “repaid favors!” Any monies applied for also had to go through the Rose Law Firm and Hilary Clinton, for a fee of $50,000. It was when he discovered that no repayments were coming back in for the loans that he claimed he discovered money laundering activities.

Much of the money, according to Nichols, was from cocaine sales, which would be siphoned off to BCCI, which was connected to The Carlyle Group, and in turn, George Bush. Perhaps the biggest connection between the Bush family and the Clintons, however, can be found in the story of Barry Seals.

The recent movie, American Made, was based loosely on Seal’s experience. It would appear, however, that Seals’ real-life exploits are more fascinating. Seal’s most profitable and busy times in drug smuggling were in the 1980s, when he moved his operation to Mena airstrip in Arkansas – at the same time, remember, when Bill Clinton was governor of the state. There, he had specially made planes at his disposal, featuring very specifically designed nose cones that were used to smuggle drugs (cocaine).

Coincidentally, Seals, according to several court testimonies, was also used by George Bush Sr. (when he was Vice-President) as a pilot during the Iran-Contra operations that saw (then) President Reagan at the center of one of several scandals during his presidency. Many of those flights left from Mena airstrip with Bill Clinton, if you believe the claims, being fully aware and even (privately) supportive of them. Perhaps the best piece of writing (at the time) covering these exploits was an article set to be titled The Crimes of Mena. After having cleared all legal barriers for publication, the article was pulled without explanation, and is dubbed “The Greatest Story Never Told!” Arguably, the lines referring to Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Clinton sum it up: “What did they know about Mena? When did they know it? Why didn’t they do anything to stop it?”

Why indeed?

Incidentally, Barry Seals was murdered in February 1987, coincidentally or not, shortly after he began speaking publicly of the Mena airstrip activities.

So where does Osama Bin Laden fit into all of this? The first time most of the world knew the name Osama bin Laden was following the September 11th attacks. However, he had been known to the CIA since the early 1980s. Given George Bush Sr.’s CIA connections, and the connections both he and his son have to the bin Laden family, and what we have just discussed, perhaps that is not too much of a surprise. During the Soviet-Afghan conflict in the 1980s, bin Laden was on the payroll of the CIA, leading the Mujahideen against the Soviet Union. The money that arrived with him traveled through such institutes as the BCCI and came from profits from weapons and drug sales. The same weapons and drugs that went through Mena airstrip.

By the time Bill Clinton was in the White House, Osama bin Laden had “officially” gone rogue. According to intelligence reports, he had grown tired of the United States and its influence in the Middle East. Many US embassy bombings were blamed on bin Laden during this time. Some conspiracy theorists are suspicious at best about this, with claims existing that bin Laden very much remained on the CIA’s payroll.

Whatever the truth of the situation, by the morning of September 11th, 2001, with George Bush Jr. eighteen months into his first term in the White House, the bin Laden name was about to become infamous.  

While the conspiracies and questions regarding September 11th have been explored in depth, some of the basics of them are worth looking at here, if only to highlight the “coincidences” on offer again. For example, on the morning of September 11th, literally as the attacks were happening, George Bush Sr. sat in a meeting of The Carlyle Group, also attended by one of Osama bin Laden’s brothers. Considering the number of business ties already existing between the two families, some found this strange. The fact that members of the bin Laden family were not only allowed to leave the United States following the 9/11 attacks but were positively given safe passage by the US military is perhaps also of interest. This order would have presumably come from high up the ranks of the US government, given that every aircraft was grounded following the tragic events. Even though so many construction contracts were given to the bin Laden family businesses for US military bases in the Middle East, particularly Saudi Arabia, the bin Laden family’s home country was questioned.

Perhaps this last point is even more interesting, considering bin Laden and, according to the official report, fifteen of the 9/11 attackers were Saudi Arabian, that the United States would not turn its military might to Saudi Arabia (where they have interests) instead of Afghanistan (where the Afghans have oil and heroin). Make of that what you will.

Of the many different angles and claims regarding the September 11th attacks, the one thing that all who question the official story largely agree on is that they were, even if opportunistically and after the fact, used to justify the military action that would unfold in the years that followed.

It wasn’t just apparent veiled warnings of the September 11th attacks and the war that followed it, however, that Rockefeller spoke to Russo about during his conversation in late 2000. According to Russo, as well as sharing many “thoughts and ideas”, the entrepreneur presented several “business opportunities” to the filmmaker.

One of these, at least according to Russo, was a position with the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) – an invitation, incidentally, that he declined. It was during this conversation that Russo claimed the subject of population control was brought up, and the apparent desire of the CFR to reduce the planet’s population by 50 percent. Russo also claimed he was told that many people who work for the CFR (and similar organizations) are often oblivious to the real agenda of those at the very top.

Of even further intrigue, Russo offered that Rockefeller informed him that the end goal of this elite group – one whose members are wealthy beyond imagination – was to have the entire population of the world “chipped”, which would, essentially, allow them to control every aspect of society.

As to why Rockefeller should entrust such information to Russo in the first place, the filmmaker offered that they believed he was a “mover and a shaker” who they wished would “stop his political activities and join them”.

As we know, eight months after this interview, Russo was dead. And as we might imagine, there were some who weren’t fully convinced of the official cause of death, or at least, the cause of the cause of death.

Once more, while we should treat the claims with a sizeable pinch of salt, Alex Jones claimed on his show several months after his death, that Russo had confided in him off-air. He claimed that Russo had told him that his life had been “threatened” and that he believed the cancer he was suffering from (which eventually killed him) was caused by some kind of “Direct Energy Weapon” being used against him.

We should also note that Russo’s girlfriend, Heidi Gregg, stated only days after Russo’s death on August 29th, 2007 – once more on the Alex Jones show – that such claims of weapons causing Russo’s cancer were “nonsense” and that illness was caused by nothing more than “his lifestyle”.

While it is certainly reasonable to believe that Rockefeller did indeed tell Russo of planned “endless war” and false flag attacks, this information was passed to him less than a year before the September 11th attacks in late 2000, 17 years after Trading Places was released, we might ask, if the references to 9/11 in the film are accurate, then where did Russo get his information from? Did he have access to such information decades before it happened, or was he perhaps putting these references in the movie unwittingly?

At this point, it is worth noting a possible connection to the intelligence services. While we should stress that much of this is pure speculation on our part, the fact is, the intelligence agencies – including military intelligence – have more of an active role in how films and television shows are put across, particularly so with military, historical, and, interestingly or not, science-fiction. Indeed, this involvement could be the subject of discussion in its own right.

For example, if a blockbuster movie about a historical conflict was being filmed – whether it be the Second World War, Vietnam, or the Gulf conflicts – then military intelligence, as well as the intelligence agencies themselves, perhaps particularly so with the CIA, would be involved with the filmmakers in a “consultancy” capacity. This is to, officially, at least, ensure accuracy, although it almost also certainly ensures that the story is not “anti-American” or doesn’t damage the reputation of the United States. In return, filmmakers often find themselves able to shoot on location and have access to accurate replicas – ultimately, the making of their respective films is a lot smoother.

While consultancy on military films might be understandable, we might ask why science fiction films come under the same intelligence scrutiny? And we might also ask, what other “advice” these military intelligence departments might offer?    

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

 

For the purposes of our contemplation here, we might also ask ourselves whether, directly from the intelligence agencies, or from other, unknown (to the public) individuals who just might be a part of some of the elite organizations we have discussed here, could apply such influence. Could it be that the respective directors of some of the films we mentioned that have featured references to 9/11, for example, whether fleeting references or more substantial ones, such as those by Aaron Russo in Trading Places or the examples offered in the Back to the Future films, were somehow influenced into inserting such imagery and use of the numbers 9, and 11?

Indeed, many could have done so without their knowledge as to what the reference might mean or without giving little thought as to why they were asked to include such references in the first place. We might imagine, for the sake of argument and to play Devil’s Advocate for a moment, that a potential producer (essentially, a person with money to finance the project) who makes such a seemingly random and innocent request to have a close up of a clock with the hands set at 9 and 11 – done in such a way that it would not interfere with the story or the director’s vision – would have met little if any resistance.  

While the idea of hidden messages and predictions of future events in blockbuster movies is perhaps unlikely, it is not that much of a stretch of the imagination that there is more to such a notion than many people might think.

It is no secret that the world of Hollywood and the big guns that inhabit it is a world quite different from the one that most of us reside in. It is a world where some people have more influence than most could imagine, and with that influence, or perhaps even as a result of it, is access to information reserved for only a very select few.

Perhaps there is a good reason that many people over many years have stated that such groups as the Illuminati treat Hollywood as their playground, where they use the medium of the silver screen to not just tell stories and entertain, but to sway the will of the public themselves. They essentially have their audience under a self-imposed, subconscious form of mind control.

Jim Morrison’s famous quote of “Whoever controls the media, controls the mind” should perhaps be taken a little more seriously than a flippant, throw-away line.

Morrison, himself studying to be a filmmaker leading up to the success of The Doors, was certainly a perceptive person. Given that the 1960s also witnessed the beginnings of television becoming a “must-have” item in most homes in the Western world, Morrison was perhaps well placed to make his claim, and no doubt saw first-hand the effects of such a device, and indeed his own fame as a result of it, on the general public.

Indeed, the next time you settle down to watch the latest blockbuster or episode of your favorite television show, ask yourself what are you really being shown? And just might subconscious messages be taken in by the brain?

In an age where information and entertainment intersect in unprecedented ways, decoding the hidden messages within movies and television shows invites us to question, analyze, and interpret the narratives that shape our understanding of the world. As we navigate the complexities of an increasingly interconnected society, the line between fiction and reality continues to blur, leaving us to ponder the mysteries of predictive programming and its implications for the future.

For decades, UFO sightings have captivated the imagination of people around the world. However, when these sightings occur over or near military air force bases, the intrigue deepens, merging the enigma of unidentified flying objects with the high-stakes world of national security. Military bases, with their strategic significance, advanced technology, and, in many cases, nuclear capabilities, become focal points for these unexplained phenomena.

Why do UFOs appear so frequently around these high-security installations? Are these sightings the result of extraterrestrial beings conducting covert surveillance of our military might, or could they be advanced, secretive human technologies? This intertwining of military security and UFO activity raises crucial questions: Are these objects scouting potential vulnerabilities in our defense systems, or are they showcasing the cutting-edge developments of reverse-engineered technology?

Perhaps a good place to start would be with the multiple UFO encounters at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. In the early hours of October 24th, 1968, around 1 am, while most residents of North Dakota were likely asleep, a security team at the Oscar-6 launch facility at Minot Air Force Base observed a “large glowing object” overhead.

The team, responsible for overseeing an underground operation by the Target Alignment Team, immediately reported the sighting to their superior, Security Controller Staff Sergeant William Smith. They described the object as having descended near some trees close to the base.

Later, around 2:30 am, missile maintenance crew members Robert O’Connor and Lloyd Isley reported seeing an “unusual light” east of the base. At the time, they were driving to the N-7 launch facility and noted that the light seemed to be “pacing their vehicle.” Upon reaching the launch facility, they observed that the object had moved south of their position. Realizing the significance of the situation, the dispatcher connected O’Connor and Isley’s communication with Radar Approach Control (RAPCON), which recorded multiple reports from Minot Air Force Base personnel as dawn approached.

The Launch Control Facilities (LCF) on the base soon began reporting their own sightings of the strange glowing object overhead. Reports varied, with one officer describing an object that “looked like the sun,” which hovered briefly near security fencing before speeding away. He sent two team members to follow it, who tracked it for about half a mile before it landed in a clearing. As it descended, the light dimmed until it vanished completely.

An even stranger account described the object splitting into two parts, which then moved in opposite directions before rejoining and crossing each other. Other reports detailed a “large, brightly illuminated object” that would “accelerate and change direction rapidly,” with colors shifting from “brilliant white to amber and green.”

Despite the varying details, the consistent descriptions of the orange glow and the round or saucer-shaped craft underscore the reality of the events on October 24th, 1968. In addition to the ground sightings and radar detections, a returning B-52 aircraft also encountered one of the objects at close range.

Shortly after 3 am, the B-52 was returning to the base after a 10-hour high-altitude training exercise when the crew received orders from RAPCON ground control. The message was clear and direct:

"...look toward your 1:00 position for the next 15 or 16 miles and see if you notice any orange glows. Someone's spotting flying saucers again!"

Initially, the B-52 crew saw nothing unusual. However, by the time they were making their final approach to the runway around 3:50 am, they received updated information from RAPCON ground control. This report indicated that the object was now visible on their radar and should be observable in their 1:00 position within the next 3 miles. As this information came through, the B-52’s radar also detected the anomaly. Within three seconds, the object appeared to cover a distance of two miles, raising concerns about a potential mid-air collision. Navigator Captain Patrick McCaslin recalled:

"I knew whatever it was, it was something I’d never seen on radar. Nothing could move laterally two miles in three seconds and then just stop. It matched our descent rate perfectly and maintained a one-mile distance... like perfect formation!"

As the B-52 descended with the UFO maintaining a one-mile distance to its left, the UHF radio transmissions to RAPCON went dead for about 20 miles. Just before the object vanished and communications were restored, the plane's radarscope camera captured several seconds of footage showing the object "spiraling around."

Once the object disappeared and communications resumed, the crew, still unsettled, chose not to land immediately. Instead, they executed a missed landing procedure and took to the air again to circle the base before attempting another landing. Before they could do so, a high-ranking officer (a General at the base) ordered them to abandon the landing and search for the object. RAPCON had detected an unusual stationary object approximately 16 miles north-northwest of Minot Air Force Base, and it appeared to be on the ground.

The plane altered its course to investigate the radar anomaly. From 10 miles away, the pilots spotted a large “illuminated object” ahead. Major James Partin described it as resembling a “miniature sun” on the ground. As the plane flew directly overhead of the glowing craft, it turned around, inadvertently using the object's circular edge to guide the plane back 180 degrees. Co-pilot Captain Bradford Runyon noted that the craft’s exterior looked like “molten steel” due to its strange “dull reddish” glow.

The crew estimated the object to be about 100 feet wide, 200 feet long, and approximately 50 feet high. They also observed a tube-like structure extending from one side, which resembled a car bumper. The rear of this “bumper” emitted a peculiar green-yellow glow that illuminated the connecting tube. As the B-52 passed directly over the craft at an altitude of around 1500 feet, the communication systems went dead once again, just as they had when the object initially approached during the descent.

The B-52 continued its course toward Minot Air Force Base, leaving the stationary object behind. The aircraft landed at the base at 4:40 am, nearly two hours later than scheduled. Nine minutes later, at 4:49 am, the alarm systems at Launch Facility Oscar-7—both outer and inner-zone systems—triggered an alert for a boundary breach. A Security Alert Team was dispatched to investigate immediately. Upon arrival, they found that the main gate was unlocked and the side access gate was open. The team searched the interior and exterior of the facility but found no intruders, whether human or otherwise.

Meanwhile, reports of the glowing object over the N-7 facility continued. By 5:30 am, the object seemed to have "diminished" and was no longer visible. It is noteworthy that the object appeared to fade gradually rather than disappear suddenly, as if it had lost power.

In the immediate aftermath and with the benefit of hindsight, it became clear that neither the military nor its UFO investigatory branch, Project Blue Book, had any intention of thoroughly investigating the events of October 24th, 1968. There was even less interest in providing a genuine explanation to the public.

For instance, although six ground staff members were asked to complete the standard AF-117 form (Air Force Form 117 Sighting of Unidentified Phenomena Questionnaire), no attempt was made to interview any of the B-52 pilots. The efforts of private UFO investigators were the only means by which the pilots’ accounts were shared with the public.

Furthermore, in the context of the Vietnam War and the Cold War, military officers and personnel displayed an unquestioning attitude. Despite knowing that the official narrative was lacking, many believed the military would eventually disclose its findings. However, most of these findings were neither finalized nor made public. This lack of transparency led many officers, including Captain Bradford Runyon, to seek out UFO investigators. Runyon, among others, felt compelled to share his experiences after the official channels failed to provide answers.

In 1998, 30 years after the incident, Runyon contacted the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) in Chicago to report what he knew and to fill in the gaps in his understanding of the event.

While there is some debate among UFO researchers and enthusiasts regarding the authenticity of the incident, reports suggest that a similar event occurred at Minot Air Force Base two years earlier, in the fall of 1966.

The account comes from Captain David Schindele, a former U.S. military member who has since become a whistleblower. In his recent book It Never Happened, Volume 1, Schindele asserts that the nuclear facilities at the base were effectively “shut down” due to interference from UFOs or the entities behind them. According to Schindele, this shutdown meant that the nuclear weapons could not be launched, leaving the base defenseless if the UFOs were hostile. At the time, local and state newspapers did report UFO sightings, including a prominent front-page story in the December 6th, 1966, edition of the Minot Daily News, which suggested that Minot Air Force Base was a hotspot for such sightings.

Whether Schindele’s use of the newspaper article is opportunistic or not is open to interpretation. He claims that following the article’s publication, the US Air Force issued a directive to suppress such coverage. Though this might sound far-fetched and challenging to enforce, it is not an unprecedented claim. Schindele discussed his experiences in 2010 before publishing his book and alleged that orders to “remain silent” about various incidents were common for those stationed at Minot Air Force Base. Many personnel reported experiencing “otherworldly incidents” while on duty there, particularly at the surrounding facilities. The trend of whistleblowers coming forward, sometimes from different air force bases, has led to more individuals sharing their own experiences. Schindele reflects:

"We didn’t realize at the time that others were having similar experiences. But now, the truth is coming out!"

As more former servicemen reveal their stories and military and government files are declassified, interest in uncovering “the truth” is growing. However, many ex-servicemen choose to remain silent about these incidents. Does this support Schindele’s claims of recurring phenomena at the North Dakota military base, or does it cast doubt on them?

In early 2017, a video surfaced online featuring a missile security guard who claimed to have seen a “huge, blinding UFO” near Minot Air Force Base during the summer of 1972. He recounted how he and another guard observed the bright object before witnessing jets being scrambled from the base and the base going on full alert.

Just when the two guards thought things had calmed down, they saw a formation of bright objects appear overhead, flying over the launch facilities and showing particular interest in that part of the base. Even more alarming, the security guard alleged that the United States Air Force subjected him to hypnosis to prevent him from discussing the incident. Additionally, he signed confidentiality agreements to ensure he would not speak about the events.

Adding to the intrigue, there are claims that base personnel were regularly involved in “UFO retrieval operations.”

Ultimately, the events of October 1968 remain among the most compelling UFO encounters over Minot Air Force Base, assuming no additional details are yet uncovered. The key questions are why these glowing, saucer-shaped crafts appeared and lingered over the base for several hours. Equally intriguing is the significance of the landing witnessed by the B-52 crew. Was this related to the reported disarmament of nuclear weapons?

Furthermore, consider the claims made by the security guard about regular UFO retrieval operations from Minot Air Force Base. Could the base still house recovered alien technology? This raises the possibility that persistent UFO activity in North Dakota might be linked to such technology. With this in mind, how many of the recent sightings could be attributed to extraterrestrial visitors, and how many might be related to classified projects conducted by secretive US government agencies?

Given that UFO sightings in the region continue today, does Minot Air Force Base warrant more attention from UFO researchers? Could it be that a location known for housing alien technology—whether recovered from crashes or otherwise—has been hidden in plain sight, while attention is focused on bases further south and west?

Just over half a decade later, another unsettling incident occurred. Indeed, the bizarre events that unfolded at McChord Air Force Base in Washington, just south of Tacoma, in October 1972 might seem unbelievable even to the most dedicated UFO and alien enthusiasts—if they hadn’t come directly from the files of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI).

In the early afternoon of October 14th, 1972, around 1 pm, Airman First Class Steven Briggs and Airman Dennis Hillsgeck were en route from McChord Air Force Base in Pierce County, Washington, to the Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) facility. The facility was located about eight miles from the base but remained under the control of the United States government and, by extension, the U.S. Air Force, which was responsible for its operation.

The journey to the facility was brief. Upon arrival, they unlocked the secured gate and entered the area, heading straight to the TACAN building. After performing all necessary security checks, they began their scheduled systems checks of the TACAN facility. Everything was proceeding smoothly until around 2 pm, when Briggs heard a high-pitched sound coming from outside. He later described it as resembling the sound of a small plane engine. However, when he stepped outside, he quickly realized he wasn’t seeing a small plane or any other conventional aircraft.

In plain view, hovering above the TACAN building, was a “saucer-shaped object.” As he continued to watch, the object began to descend and landed just south of the main compound. Briggs immediately rushed back inside to alert Hillsgeck. After regaining his composure inside, Briggs and Hillsgeck were alarmed to see "two creatures" approaching the fence that surrounded the entire complex. Briggs quickly returned inside the base, this time to alert base security and request backup. Sergeant David Holmes was on duty at the switchboard that afternoon and listened as Briggs urgently reported that "intruders" were attempting to enter the base.

A two-man unit was dispatched to the facility, with Sergeant Dwight Reid and Airman First Class Michael Tash arriving 17 minutes later. The scene around the compound was one of confusion and concern. They found Briggs and Hillsgeck standing by their vehicle, seemingly "in a daze." Neither man could speak when asked what had happened, and Reid noticed burn marks on their faces, which raised further concern.

Reid examined the men and requested a USAF ambulance, while Tash began inspecting the surrounding area. He discovered strange markings in the soil, which was soft from the fall weather. Suddenly, Reid’s voice called out, telling Tash to look up. When he did, he saw a saucer-shaped object, likely the same one that Briggs and Hillsgeck had witnessed. Reid attempted to communicate with the security police, but his portable radio was completely dead.

Realizing the danger they were in, Reid ordered Tash to help get the two dazed men into their vehicle. They then drove away from the scene with great urgency. About a mile from the base, Reid's radio suddenly came back to life. He immediately requested additional security police to respond to the scene. One of the officers who arrived was Sergeant Darren Alexander, accompanied by his military dog, Champ. They headed toward the TACAN compound to search. However, when they were about 400 yards from the base, Champ began barking loudly.

Looking up, Alexander saw “two creatures” near one of the remote power stations around the complex. Unsure if they would understand, Alexander called out for the figures to freeze and “raise their hands.” Instead of complying, the figures began walking toward him. Noticing a strange device in one of the creature’s hands and fearing it might be a weapon, Alexander fired six shots from his revolver. He couldn’t tell if he had hit either of them. He then returned to his vehicle to radio a report of the shots fired and to request additional backup.

Within minutes, Security Alert Teams arrived at the base and began a thorough search of the grounds. During the operation, they suddenly spotted the saucer on the ground. Approaching the craft cautiously, they circled it slowly before reporting to their supervisor and awaiting further instructions.

A few moments later, Captain Henry Stone arrived at the base, where the saucer-shaped object still rested on the ground, surrounded by his men at a safe distance. As Stone took a step closer to the object, it suddenly lifted off and vanished from sight.

Shortly afterward, officials from the special investigations department arrived at the compound near McChord Air Force Base. They collected molds, took photographs, and retrieved the shells from Alexander’s revolver. They also took full statements from everyone involved. Following their investigation, they classified the incident as "Top Secret," leaving it officially unsolved and not to be discussed or acknowledged.

As mentioned earlier, there are those who doubt Collins’ account of the events. Despite his connections to other whistleblowers, such as Richard Doty, skepticism remains. However, some seemingly minor details in the case lend credibility to it. For instance, the radios mentioned in the report were identified as HT 220 models, which were indeed produced just before the incident in 1969, making them likely to have been used by the US military. Moreover, the revolver used by Sergeant Alexander, an SW Model 15 .38 Revolver, is consistent with the type of weapon issued by the US military at the time.

What should we make of the alleged encounter with alien creatures near McChord Air Force Base? While some remain skeptical, many details of the account resonate with other reports, particularly the apparent keen interest these beings—whatever or whoever they may be—seem to have in military installations across the United States and around the world.

Collins has also appeared on the well-known and widely respected show Coast to Coast, where he is described as having served in fields such as avionics, ground communication, engineering physics, and intelligence.

Additionally, this account became something of a "legend" among those stationed at McChord Air Force Base, even as far back as the late 1980s and early 1990s—long before Collins went public with his story in the early 2000s. Many legends, including modern urban legends, often have some basis in truth. Could this be the case with the supposed battle near McChord Air Force Base?

On one hand, the story aligns with numerous other accounts. Given the U.S. government's history of being less than transparent about such matters, this adds some weight to the tale. On the other hand, the lack of concrete evidence understandably leads many to question its authenticity.

However, if we consider the conspiracy theories surrounding UFOs and aliens, this doubt might be exactly what shadowy government agencies intend—keeping the public uncertain about the reality of such encounters and the circumstances surrounding UFO sightings.

Only three years later, in late October 1975, an incident over Loring Air Force Base in Maine raised compelling questions about the nature of UFOs and their apparent interest in military installations—particularly those believed to house nuclear weapons.

Notably, information about the incident was relayed in real-time to the National Military Command Center in Washington, D.C. In addition to multiple visual sightings, the objects were detected on military radar over consecutive nights. Despite these events, the entire incident was officially dismissed as a "training drill." Unsurprisingly, many of the witnesses and investigators were reluctant to accept this explanation.

The incidents began shortly before 8 pm on October 27th, 1975, at Loring Air Force Base in Maine, when a strange, glowing object was observed hovering over the base, specifically above the area where weapons were stored. Reports suggest that these weapons were concealed under fake, camouflaged huts. If the object intentionally hovered over the alleged weapons area, its awareness of their location is intriguing.

That evening, Staff Sergeant Danny Lewis was on watch duty, with the weapons area being his primary focus. When the unusual object appeared, he was the first to notice it, later estimating its altitude at around 300 feet. The object had a red navigation light on its underside, along with a white strobe-type light. Meanwhile, in the control tower, Duty Sergeant James Sampley detected the aerial anomaly on the base’s radar system. Initially, he estimated the object to be about 10 miles away, but as he observed it, the object moved in a circular route around the base before approaching the weapons storage area within mere feet.

Realizing the potential security threat and uncertain about the nature of the object, Sampley began notifying his supervisors of the situation.

As Lewis watched, the object entered the confines of the base, prompting an immediate security alert. In the control tower, Sergeant Grover Eggleston closely monitored the situation, tracking the mysterious object on one of the radar screens.

A command was issued for a manual ground search of the base, and requests were sent to all nearby military and civilian airports for any information they might have on the intruding object over Loring Air Force Base. The object hovered over the base for about 40 minutes, occasionally circling overhead before returning to its position above the weapons storage area. Eventually, it moved toward New Brunswick, disappearing from radar screens about 12 miles away.

Despite this, the base remained on high alert throughout the night and into the next day. Remarkably, the object returned the following night at nearly the same time.

Once again, just like the previous night, the craft—or one identical to it—returned at precisely 7:45 pm. Danny Lewis was on duty and once more witnessed the strange craft hovering over the base, zeroing in on the area housing the nuclear weapons. As it approached, those on duty and others watching could clearly see flashes of "orange, red, and white" from the underside of the craft.

Lewis immediately reported the encounter. Given the unusual events of the previous evening, the Wing Commander himself arrived at the nuclear weapons area and observed the strange object hovering overhead. As before, the base’s radar systems also detected the object. Several other witnesses on the base, including Sergeant Steven Eickner, reported seeing an "orange and red object, shaped like a stretched-out football." They watched in amazement as it hovered midair before its brilliant lights suddenly dimmed. The next moment, the craft was hovering only 150 feet above the runway.

Those who witnessed this bizarre event estimated the object to be at least 80 feet long. Notably, the craft appeared to have no doors or windows, as if it were made from a single piece of metallic-like material. Perhaps most intriguing was the apparent lack of a visible propulsion system, challenging our conventional understanding of flight. This aspect is often cited as a key reason for the secrecy surrounding UFOs.

The entire base was immediately placed on alert and remained so for the rest of the evening after the object moved off, once again heading toward New Brunswick as it had the previous night. Similar to the previous evening, reports were sent directly to superiors through the established chains of command. The next day, reinforcements arrived, primarily in the form of National Guard helicopters. Notably, and as we’ll discuss with Michael Wallace shortly, the Canadian government and military were granted permission to cross the Canadian-American border if necessary, provided a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) officer accompanied them. To observers, including the local press caught up in a UFO and alien abduction frenzy reminiscent of the 1970s, it seemed the military was taking these incidents very seriously.

On the evening of October 29th, another sighting occurred, leading to an RCMP officer accompanying a helicopter across the border to try to locate the aerial visitor. Despite yet another radar confirmation, the search proved unsuccessful.

The following evening saw yet another incident, confirmed both on radar and visually from the ground. However, security teams based at or near Loring Air Force Base once again failed to locate or intercept the mysterious craft. The strange and unsettling sightings continued sporadically for several weeks, tapering off as the year drew to a close.

In 2013, Michael Wallace, a former KC-135 military pilot, claimed to have direct knowledge of a UFO incident over Loring Air Force Base in 1975. This event reportedly occurred in the days following the sightings at the base.

Wallace recounted that he was returning to the base after an air-to-air refueling mission. Just days prior, all flight crews from his unit, the 42nd Bomb Wing, were summoned to an urgent meeting. At the start of the meeting, a uniformed Major informed the group that anyone without at least secret clearance had to leave. While a few personnel departed, the majority remained. The Major then revealed that a UFO had been reported over the base, specifically positioned above the "nuclear-armed B-52s" stationed near the "nuclear weapons storage facilities."

The Major provided additional details about the sighting:

“It’s hovering silently and has a few lights. It can move extremely quickly, with unconventional, rapid straight-line and vertical movements… so it’s pretty incredible technology!”

He further noted that base personnel were "pretty concerned" about the incident and that the information was not to be discussed publicly or with anyone lacking the appropriate clearance. If any pilots observed similar strange objects, they were to report them to those in command "inside this room," but otherwise, the incident should not be mentioned or acknowledged.

What Wallace revealed next is particularly noteworthy.

The Major expressed concern that the local press might become suspicious. Given the presence of civilians and the increased number of personnel and ground staff at the base, their interest in the situation would likely grow. To address these potential concerns, a cover story had already been prepared: a helicopter was supposedly coming across the Canadian border and "harassing us." This would be the official narrative for anyone outside the room. With this peculiar emergency meeting still fresh in their minds, Wallace and several other tanker planes carried out their nighttime refueling missions. Alongside Wallace's aircraft were two other KC-135s flying in formation, returning to Loring Air Force Base.

The mission had been routine until communication from the base instructed the lead plane’s commander, or cell leader, to switch to a specific frequency for an important briefing. Since this frequency was not part of the standard channels, only the cell leader would hear it. However, spurred by curiosity from the unusual meeting days earlier, Wallace remembered he had a spare radio with him. Ignoring his professional military training, he told his fellow pilots, "Let’s see what this guy is going to get briefed on!" and tuned his radio to the frequency the cell leader was instructed to use.

Before long, Wallace and his crew were covertly listening in on the cell leader’s private briefing. Wallace later speculated that the pilot of the third plane was likely doing the same. What they overheard was quite alarming. The command at Loring communicated over the secure frequency:

"Listen, the UFO is over the base again right now. We need you to transfer leadership of the formation to the number two aircraft. Then, turn off your lights and radios and proceed to the base at your own discretion!"

The cell leader responded with, "Will do." Wallace later described such a secretive command as "unusual, very unusual." Almost immediately after receiving the orders, the cell leader contacted Wallace to inform him of "special orders" to "depart the formation," appointing Wallace as the new cell leader. He added that Wallace should "let the navigators coordinate your positions when you're ready."

As Wallace prepared to lead the remaining aircraft, he observed the original lead plane turn off its lights and go radio silent. Moments later, he saw the darkened plane heading towards the base. Meanwhile, Wallace was making adjustments for his own approach to Loring Air Force Base. During this time, the communications radio crackled to life with control tower chatter that both intrigued and unsettled him.

Wallace later noted that he had listened to numerous "combat discussions" between pilots and control towers and was familiar with the stress these conversations often displayed. The discussions he overheard while preparing to lead his fellow tanker plane back to base were not exactly panicked but were close to frantic.

He recalled hearing phrases like “Did you see it?” and “Where is it now?” Even more unsettling were the mentions of the object being “back over the alert bombers!” This intense exchange continued for several minutes as Wallace awaited landing instructions. Wallace also observed an unusually high volume of voices and chatter over the airwaves, which he inferred were coming from the control tower.

Eventually, the anomalous object seemed to disappear, with chatter such as “We lost it” indicating that the object had “fallen off the radar” within seconds. Wallace found this sudden disappearance “remarkable in itself.” Following his instructions, Wallace then guided the planes to runway 36 to land.

Wallace safely landed his plane, followed shortly by the third plane. The crews then proceeded to the debriefing room, awaiting further instructions. Given the late hour, the base was relatively quiet, but the pilots were eager to discuss their experiences and find someone who might explain what had occurred while they were in the air.

They also noticed that the crew from the original third plane was nowhere to be found. Wallace speculated that the pilot and crew might be talking to the Major, who had briefed them a few days earlier. He hoped that locating them might shed more light on the events.

It wasn’t until several days later that Wallace finally saw the pilot of the first plane. He approached him to inquire about the events of the night. Instead of providing any details, the pilot simply responded:

"I can’t talk about it! You wouldn’t believe me if I did!"

With that, the pilot turned and walked away, and Wallace didn’t hear anything further about the incident. It appeared that the object over Loring Air Force Base in late October 1975 may have continued to linger over the base for several weeks thereafter. Wallace would later remark that he had “never experienced anything as incredible as that.

Interestingly, just after 10 pm on October 30th, on-duty personnel at Wurtsmith Air Force Base reported observing a peculiar object hovering over the base. The object exhibited unusual movement patterns. Initially, it seemed to the witnesses that the object might be a helicopter. However, Airman Martin Tackabury noted seeing a strange white light shining directly downward.

What made the object even more peculiar was its complete silence. Tackabury was uncertain whether this was because the noise of a large tanker plane in the vicinity was masking it. When he looked up again, the strange object appeared to be flying in front of and below the tanker plane. Upon closer inspection, it seemed to move in a way that was not typical of a helicopter.

The situation became even more unsettling for the security personnel stationed at the back gate of the base, where the weapons were stored. They saw the “strange helicopter without lights” suddenly appear over the storage facility. As the object drew closer, it became increasingly clear that it did not resemble a conventional helicopter, leaving the security personnel uncertain about the nature of the craft.

Meanwhile, the base’s control tower suddenly picked up the object on the radar screen.

Sometime after 10:30 p.m., a tanker plane returning from a refueling mission received new coordinates to investigate an anomalous aircraft. Following the control tower's instructions, the crew soon spotted the strange craft. Navigator Captain Myron Taylor described seeing something resembling “strobe lights flashing irregularly.”

The plane tracked the object as it flew over Lake Huron. Unexpectedly, the object changed direction and headed south. The plane followed it toward Saginaw Bay but eventually lost sight of it. They searched the area for several minutes but were unable to relocate the craft. They then returned to Wurtsmith Air Force Base. Strangely, on their way back, the object reappeared and seemed to be following the tanker plane.

When the crew turned the plane around to pursue the object, it abruptly “took off” and disappeared in the opposite direction. The incident remains unexplained and intriguing, sharing similarities with the encounters over Loring Air Force Base.

The sightings over Loring Air Force Base are shrouded in deep mystery and speculation, likely due to the involvement of nuclear weapons and the apparent focus of UFOs on these sites Although this case may not hold the same level of prominence as other high-profile incidents, it fits well into the broader UFO narrative in terms of timing, location, and the specifics of the events.

Was there a cover-up surrounding these incidents, and is there still undisclosed information about them and other similar cases? Could these alleged cover-ups be genuine, albeit misguided, efforts to protect the public from potential threats to the United States or even the world? Or are the motivations behind these actions more self-serving and insidious?

As with nearly all UFO cases, especially those involving military forces, there are numerous fragments of potential explanations to consider. These fragments are not only constantly evolving but also interact with other similar incidents, which themselves are in a state of perpetual change, all within the broader context of global events.

The following year, over a two-night period in January 1976, a student journalist known as "Bruce" observed several mysterious objects over Cannon Air Force Base in New Mexico. On the first night, he was alone, while on the second, multiple witnesses were present. During this time, military jets were scrambled to engage in a "cat and mouse" chase with these unusual and apparently "trespassing" crafts.

Following the public disclosure of these incidents, Bruce received alarming warnings from both enigmatic phone callers and concerned neighbors who reported strange occurrences around his home in his absence. This case, like several others, has resurfaced in UFO research due to the Internet, and it might offer another crucial piece of the puzzle in our quest for answers. What exactly transpired during those January nights in 1976, and why did these events continue to trouble the United States government for decades?

Late in the evening of January 21st, 1976, Bruce was sitting in his truck on the outskirts of Clovis, New Mexico, near the KMTY FM 99.1 radio station transmitter. He worked part-time at the station to help fund his college education and pursue a journalism career. Although he wasn't scheduled to work that night, Bruce was called in at the last minute for transmitter tests. The station needed someone on-site, and with his financial need, Bruce agreed to the extra shift. It turned out to be a night he would never forget. As a journalist, Bruce was fortuitously positioned to witness what was about to unfold. While sitting in his truck and observing the scattered lights below, including those of Cannon Air Force Base, he noticed three unusual lights in the sky. They appeared to him like "lightbulbs on a string."

Suddenly, two of the lights dropped swiftly towards the ground, stopping just short of a collision and hovering in place. The third light remained stationary above them. As part of his "storm spotter" duties, Bruce always carried a storm spotter kit, which included binoculars. He grabbed them and focused on the two lower lights as he continued to observe their strange behavior.

Astounded by what he was witnessing, Bruce observed as many details as he could. Through the binoculars, the lights revealed a "classic saucer shape" with a "bluish glow" around them, while the underside emitted a "red radiant glow" downward. Each craft also had a distinct "dome shape" on top.

He kept his binoculars focused on the two crafts as they began to move, slowly and in perfect parallel alignment. He tracked their movement for about 15 minutes as they glided calmly over the unsuspecting people below. One of the most unusual observations he later reported was that the lights of the buildings and streets seemed to "dim significantly" as the crafts passed overhead, aligning with other reports of electrical surges linked to UFO sightings.

After contacting his employers at the station to report what he had seen, Bruce discovered that many residents, including several active state police officers, had also witnessed the strange crafts that evening. Although Bruce had not brought his camera with him as he was working that night, he returned the following evening with several members of the newsroom, where he was gaining experience. Leveraging connections on his college campus, Bruce secured keys to the roof of a dormitory. With access granted, he and a group of fellow journalists and photographers prepared to capture another sighting, hopeful for a repeat of the previous encounter. They were not disappointed.

Just before 1 am, four glowing objects reappeared in the night sky over Clovis. Determined not to miss this opportunity, Bruce successfully captured a clear photograph of the objects. Unlike their earlier appearance, the lights were now darting around rather than simply hovering. As the group on the dormitory roof watched the mesmerizing display, they heard a roar and saw several F-111 military jets launch from Cannon Air Force Base. The jets, clearly tasked with intercepting the crafts, flew directly toward the glowing objects. However, each time a jet approached, the crafts would evade rapidly, maneuvering with astonishing speed and agility. The jets, by contrast, appeared cumbersome and were unable to keep pace with the advanced objects. During the crafts' swift, precise maneuvers, a peculiar "plasma-type glow" briefly illuminated the sky. From their vantage point atop the tallest building on campus, the group observed the F-111 jets' frantic attempts with an unobstructed view.

Around 45 minutes later, at approximately 1:30 am, the events came to a sudden end. After leading the jets on an extensive chase across the night sky, the objects abruptly "shot up and vanished in an instant." The jets returned to base, their pilots likely experiencing a mix of confusion and frustration.

One witness, equipped with a powerful telescope, observed the base, particularly the runway flight line. He reported that as the objects descended near the runway, all the lights went out, reminiscent of how Bruce had noted the town lights dimming the previous evening as the crafts passed overhead. Interestingly, Bruce’s contacts at Cannon Air Force Base—who knew him from his work as a disc jockey taking music requests—revealed that the base experienced a complete power outage during part of the incident.

Additionally, according to these contacts, the base personnel, including high-ranking officers, were in a state of panic due to the unexpected appearance of the objects. The scramble of jets and the overall reaction suggested that the military at Cannon Air Force Base had no insight into the crafts' origins or intentions.

The contact also shared further details with Bruce, under the condition of anonymity. They disclosed that a new, bright lighting system was installed at the base shortly after the incident, and intriguingly, the base had quietly recorded radar activity on both nights in question.

While the US military never acknowledged any radar recordings or unusual activities, Freedom of Information Act requests eventually disclosed that F-111 jets were indeed scrambled from Cannon Air Force Base on the evening of January 22nd (into the early hours of January 23rd, 1976). The reasons for this scramble, however, remain unclear.

The situation took a dramatic turn nearly 30 years later when Bruce decided to publicly share his account. On July 16th, 2004, he appeared on the Jeff Rense Radio Show, revealing the photograph he had taken during the second night’s sighting. Four days later, at 1:30 am, he received a call from an unknown person on his private, unlisted cell phone—a number known to only a few people.

Initially, Bruce thought the call might be from one of his adult children with an urgent message. However, upon answering, he was greeted by an unfamiliar voice asking to confirm his identity. The caller claimed to urgently discuss the photographs Bruce had from the Cannon Air Force incident. Bruce initially dismissed the call as a prank, but the caller insisted:

“It would be in your best interest to discontinue this line of discussion and destroy those photographs!”

When Bruce checked the caller ID, it displayed “Number Not Available.” Before he could respond, the caller issued another warning:

“This is no joke! For the sake of your family, you need to let this go!”

Bruce tried to stay composed and asked for the caller’s identity. The response was unsettling: the caller detailed the careers and daily routines of Bruce’s children and wife, even claiming he could "fax him his entire history in seconds."

Feeling threatened, Bruce abruptly ended the call. For weeks, there was silence, and Bruce nearly pushed the incident out of his mind. However, a neighbor later informed him of unusual activity around his property. Strange cars with US government plates would park outside his home, with unfamiliar men occasionally emerging to snoop around. The neighbor's warning about these suspicious vehicles with government plates further heightened Bruce’s concern.

In the summer of 2006, reports emerged about UFO researcher Brian Vike, who had extensively investigated Bruce’s sightings and communicated with him at length. Vike claimed to possess the aforementioned photograph and intended to publish it, along with other regional images, on his website.

However, these photographs appear to be unavailable online, whether on Vike's website or elsewhere where his interviews have been featured. Despite this, it is known that Vike did capture at least one photograph clearly, albeit grainy. This raises the question: was there an effort to suppress these images? Notably, Vike withdrew from public life shortly after reports surfaced about his possession of the photographs due to health issues.

Nevertheless, Vike's investigations did lead to more detailed information becoming public. For instance, a journalist from the Clovis News Journal reported seeing "23 UFOs maneuvering in and out of complex formations" the night after the second sighting. Additionally, in the days following the incident, a strange circle was found "burned into the ground" on a New Mexico ranch, along with the recovery of a "cylindrical object of unknown origin" from the ranch's grounds.

Furthermore, another report surfaced about six months after the Cannon Air Force Base incident, adding to the growing body of information surrounding these events.

Although its authenticity cannot be verified, an anonymous witness reported to Vike that while serving as a Security Police officer at Cannon Air Force Base in July 1976, he observed similar hovering lights during a patrol.

The witness and a colleague stopped their vehicle by the roadside on the base and closely observed the objects. They described the crafts as having a blue glow on top that transitioned to white in the middle, with a green light on the underside. They checked with the control tower to confirm if any base aircraft were in the area, but none were reported. When Clovis Police contacted the base to report sightings of the same objects and inquire about possible aircraft activity, the two security guards were convinced of the objects' reality.

Two additional patrol cars arrived, with one attempting to approach the hovering craft. However, as it got closer, the object vanished. The witness remarked:

“It did not fly away! It just disappeared!”

This detail is intriguing, as many UFO reports describe objects vanishing abruptly, akin to “switching off a lightbulb,” rather than flying away.

The following night, the witness experienced an even stranger event. Around 2 am, he was awakened by a commotion in the barracks. Upon going outside, he saw 12 glowing crafts arranged in a “perfect circle” directly above the base. He reported to Vike:

“Each one was the exact same distance from the other, so I knew that this could not be by accident!”

With nearly the entire base witnessing the phenomenon, the lights extinguished one by one, as if “someone had turned off the power.”

The next evening, unable to sleep after two nights of extraordinary sightings, the witness walked around the barracks and observed the 12 lights reappearing in their circular formation. He ran to alert a superior but found that squads were already watching the skies and setting up cameras. Once again, the lights turned off one by one.

After that night, the lights did not reappear, and the location of any film footage, if it exists, remains unknown.

As we can see, then, many UFO encounters have unfolded over or near military air force facilities – and these are just a small number of those on record. Moreover, there appears to be a variety of potential reasons for these encounters.

Many military air force bases are located near nuclear facilities or storage sites for nuclear weapons. Given the destructive potential of nuclear weapons, it’s understandable why UFOs sighted near these locations could attract attention. If UFOs are indeed alien spacecraft, their interest in such sites might suggest a focus on monitoring or evaluating nuclear capabilities. The presence of nuclear weapons makes these bases strategic assets. A foreign power, whether human or non-human, might be interested in assessing the readiness, deployment, and security of these weapons. UFO researchers have made connections between nuclear weapons and the buildings that house them and these strange otherworldly objects.

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

For decades, UFO sightings have captivated the imagination of people around the world. However, when these sightings occur over or near military air force bases, the intrigue deepens, merging the enigma of unidentified flying objects with the high-stakes world of national security. Military bases, with their strategic significance, advanced technology, and, in many cases, nuclear capabilities, become focal points for these unexplained phenomena.

 

UFO sightings might also be linked to reconnaissance missions, where an advanced intelligence-gathering entity is assessing the military’s readiness and defensive measures. This could be an indication of preparation for a potential invasion or conflict, where knowing the strengths and weaknesses of a base is crucial. Observing military operations, technology, and strategies can provide insights into how a military force operates. For potential adversaries, understanding these aspects could be vital for planning effective strategies or countermeasures.

Some theories suggest that UFO sightings might be related to top-secret military aircraft utilizing advanced or reverse-engineered technology. These aircraft might exhibit capabilities that are misunderstood or misidentified as UFOs by observers.

Military bases often serve as testing grounds for new technologies. UFO sightings could therefore be experimental aircraft under development, which might be tested near high-security or high-interest areas due to their strategic relevance.

If the sightings are related to experimental aircraft, the secrecy surrounding these projects would explain the classified nature of such observations. Military and governmental bodies would need to maintain secrecy about both the technology and the purpose of these aircraft to avoid compromising national security.

The intersection of UFO sightings with military air force bases presents a multifaceted enigma involving nuclear security, reconnaissance, and advanced technology. While the sightings could indicate alien surveillance or scouting missions, they might also be linked to cutting-edge military technology and experimental aircraft. Understanding these sightings requires careful consideration of both the potential for extraterrestrial interest and the likelihood of advanced human technology.

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }