The government is very serious about UFOs. So why are researchers being stymied?

A photo of a UFO taken in 1957 near Holloman Air Development Center, Alamagordo, New Mexico. 

(Image credit: Bettmann/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump directed the Pentagon and other federal agencies to begin releasing government files related to UFOs and unidentified anomalous phenomena — called UAP — in February 2026, following years of pressure from Congress, military whistleblowers and the public.

Congress formally mandated UAP investigations through the National Defense Authorization Act in December 2022. The Pentagon's official UAP investigative body, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, AARO, now carries a caseload exceeding 2,000 reports dating back to 1945. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed this figure earlier this year.

The cases were submitted by military personnel, pilots and government employees describing aerial objects that could not be explained as known aircraft, drones or weather phenomena. Governments in Japan, France, Brazil and Canada also have their own formal UAP investigation programs.

Yet modern research universities remain almost entirely absent from this conversation. No major university has established a dedicated UAP research center. No federal science agency offers competitive grants for UAP inquiry. No doctoral programs train researchers in UAP methodology. The gap between what governments openly acknowledge and what universities are willing to study is, at this point, difficult to explain on purely intellectual grounds.

I have navigated this gap while conducting my own UAP research. My work developing the temporal aerospace correlation tool, a standardized framework for correlating civilian UAP sighting reports with documented rocket launch activity from Cape Canaveral, is currently under peer review at Limina: The Journal of UAP Studies.

Designing that framework meant making methodological decisions without community standards, without institutional funding and without the professional infrastructure many researchers in established fields take for granted. What is missing is not interest or data — it is the shared scaffolding that turns isolated curiosity into cumulative science.

Stigma is measurable

The most rigorous evidence for the gap between faculty interest in UAP and faculty willingness to study it comes from peer-reviewed studies by Marissa Yingling, Charlton Yingling and Bethany Bell, published in the scholarly journal Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

Across 14 disciplines at 144 major U.S. research universities, 1,460 faculty responded to their 2023 national survey. Most surveyed believed UAP research was important. Curiosity outweighed skepticism in every discipline that was part of the study. Nearly one-fifth had personally observed something aerial they could not identify. Yet fewer than 1% had ever conducted UAP-related research.

The gap was not explained by intellectual dismissal, but it was in part explained by fear. Researchers were not primarily deterred by intellectual skepticism because they doubted the topic's merits. Instead, they feared they might lose funding, face ridicule from colleagues or find their careers quietly derailed. Faculty reported being told to "be careful."

A 2024 follow-up study found that roughly 28% said they might vote against a colleague's tenure case for conducting UAP research, even when they personally believed the topic warranted study.

Historian and philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn argued that scientific communities suppress anomalous questions not because those questions are unanswerable, but because they fall outside the boundaries the community has collectively decided are worth investigating.

Sociologist Thomas Gieryn called this suppression "boundary work," referring to the active process by which scientists police what counts as legitimate science.

For UAP researchers, the data and tools to study the phenomenon exist. What may not exist is social permission to use them without professional consequence.

Creating an academic discipline

Academic disciplines do not emerge spontaneously. They require dedicated journals, agreed-upon methods, graduate programs and professional societies.

The history of cognitive neuroscience demonstrates how disciplines emerge. Before the 1980s, researchers at the intersection of neuroscience and cognitive psychology faced resistance from both parent disciplines.

These fields achieved mainstream acceptance only after targeted funding from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, new brain-imaging tools and the gradual formation of academic programs that created career pathways for researchers. Researchers at the nexus of these fields did not wait for central questions to be resolved. They built infrastructure, and the infrastructure made progress possible.

UAP studies as a discipline is developing some of these elements, but largely outside universities. The Society for UAP Studies, a nonprofit of scholars and researchers, operates Limina as a double-blind, peer-reviewed journal and has convened international symposia drawing researchers from physics, philosophy of science and the social sciences. But a nonprofit scholarly society without tenured faculty does not constitute a discipline.

To turn UAP studies into a recognized academic field would require three things.

First, funding. The Yingling studies found that competitive research grants would do more to unlock faculty participation than any other single factor. Without grants, researchers cannot hire students to assist them, maintain instruments or sustain the multiyear projects that produce meaningful results.

Second, shared methodological standards — these would entail agreed-upon procedures for collecting, recording and evaluating UAP reports — would mean findings from one research group can be compared and built upon by others.

Third, institutions could publicly affirm that they will evaluate appropriately rigorous UAP scholarship on its scientific merits during tenure reviews. Several universities have already done this for gun violence research and psychedelic-assisted therapy studies.

These are not isolated examples. Research into near-death experiences and adverse childhood experiences followed similar trajectories, moving from being a professional liability to mainstream legitimacy after the removal of institutional barriers.

The international comparison

This gap in UAP scholarship is unique to the United States. France's GEIPAN, a dedicated investigation unit within its national space agency, has operated since 1977. It has publicly archived approximately 5,300 French UAP cases, of which about 2% to 3% remain unexplained after rigorous analysis.

In 2020, Japan formalized UAP reporting protocols for its Self-Defense Forces, the branch of the Japanese military responsible for national defense. By June 2024, more than 80 lawmakers had formed a parliamentary UAP investigation group that by May 2025 had formally proposed a dedicated UAP research office to the defense minister. Canada launched its own multiagency UAP investigation survey in 2023.

None of these actions has produced a corresponding response from American research universities. Universities provide independent, peer-reviewed analyses that government programs structurally cannot.

The University of Würzburg in Germany became the first Western university to officially recognize UAP as a legitimate object of academic research in 2022, when it formally added UAP investigation to its research canon. Researchers at  15-03-2026 om 23:58 geschreven door peter  

New Details Emerge About Jimmy Carter’s Alleged 1977 UFO Briefing

Nearly five decades after Jimmy Carter entered the White House, a new claim has reignited debate about what U.S. presidents may know about unidentified flying objects. Physicist Dr. Eric Davis recently stated that Carter received a classified UFO briefing in June 1977 that allegedly contained information about contact between the United States government and non-human beings.

The claim, discussed during a podcast conversation involving Davis, Eric Weinstein and host Jesse Michaels, adds fresh details to a long-circulating story about Carter’s early presidency and his interest in the UFO phenomenon. While the claim has not been independently verified, it has drawn renewed attention to a period when UFOs briefly became a subject of serious discussion inside the White House.

The Alleged 1977 UFO Briefing

According to Davis, the briefing occurred only months after Carter took office in January 1977. What reportedly began as a routine meeting in the National Security Council conference room allegedly shifted location when the topic of UFOs emerged.

Davis claims the discussion moved to the Oval Office, where Carter was informed about classified information regarding UFOs and possible interactions between government agencies and extraterrestrial entities.

Another intriguing detail concerns the documentation of the meeting. Davis says records exist in the Jimmy Carter Presidential Library that include an attendee list. All participants are visible in the document except for two individuals whose names and affiliations remain redacted nearly fifty years later.

The existence of those redactions has fueled speculation among UFO researchers about who might have attended the meeting and what agencies they represented.

Confirmation Claims From Carter Staff

Davis also stated that the briefing was later confirmed by Alonzo McDonald, who served as a senior staff member in the Carter White House.

According to Davis, McDonald reportedly investigated the matter after hearing about the meeting and spoke directly with Carter and other participants. After doing so, McDonald allegedly concluded that the briefing did indeed occur.

If accurate, this would suggest that discussions about UFOs were occurring at the highest levels of government during Carter’s first year in office.

Links to the Controversial “Project Aquarius”

The story has also been linked to a rumored classified program known as Project Aquarius, a name that has appeared in UFO documents since the early 1980s.

Davis suggested that officials attending the meeting were given briefing documents that had to be returned afterward. Later, some of those participants allegedly reconstructed the briefing from memory. That reconstruction supposedly became known among researchers as the Aquarius document.

The document refers to a highly restricted intelligence program and mentions oversight by a small group sometimes associated with the controversial MJ-12 documents, which have long been debated within UFO research circles.

However, historians note that the Aquarius material may contain a mixture of authentic terminology and deliberate misinformation. Some versions of the documents were clearly altered over time, casting doubt on their reliability.

Carter’s Personal Interest in UFOs

The renewed attention on the story is partly due to Carter’s own history with UFO sightings.

Before becoming president, Carter publicly reported witnessing a strange object in the sky in 1969 while attending a Lions Club meeting in Georgia. During the 1976 presidential campaign, he spoke openly about the experience and promised that, if elected, he would help release UFO information to scientists and the public.

This statement created enormous public interest. Once Carter entered office, the White House reportedly received large volumes of letters from citizens asking for UFO disclosure or sharing their own sightings.

Attempts to Reopen UFO Research

Inside the administration, officials explored the possibility of creating a new scientific investigation of UFO sightings. One idea was to have NASA lead a civilian research program that would replace the U.S. Air Force’s Project Blue Book, which had been shut down in 1969.

The proposal quickly encountered resistance.

NASA officials argued that UFO reports did not justify launching a major research program. According to accounts from the period, intelligence agencies were also reluctant to reopen the issue, and the plan ultimately stalled.

By the end of 1977, the public effort to study UFOs had effectively faded away.

The United Nations UFO Proposal

The UFO topic also surfaced in international diplomacy during Carter’s presidency.

In September 1977, Carter met with Eric Gairy, the prime minister of Grenada. Gairy had a personal interest in UFO sightings and proposed that the United Nations create an international investigation into the phenomenon.

Grenada later attempted to push for a UN resolution encouraging global cooperation on UFO research. The initiative failed to gain support, with both the United States and the United Kingdom opposing the effort.

Nevertheless, the episode illustrates how visible the UFO issue had become during Carter’s first year in office.

A Moment When UFOs Reached the Political Mainstream

Despite Carter’s earlier interest, the administration eventually stopped pursuing the issue publicly. Researchers have long wondered why a president who had promised transparency on UFOs appeared to abandon the subject so quickly.

If the briefing described by Eric Davis did occur, it could provide one possible explanation. According to some accounts circulating in UFO research circles, Carter was reportedly deeply troubled after learning classified information about the phenomenon.

However, without official confirmation or newly declassified documents, the true details of what the president may have been told remain unknown.

Renewed Interest in a Historical Mystery

The recent claims from Dr. Eric Davis have prompted historians and UFO researchers to revisit the events of 1977, a year when the UFO question briefly came close to the center of American political life.

Whether the alleged briefing actually took place remains uncertain. Still, the story highlights how the subject of unidentified aerial phenomena has repeatedly intersected with government secrecy, intelligence agencies, and political decision-making.

With growing public interest in UAPs and ongoing discussions in governments around the world, the Carter era may yet reveal new insights into how leaders have privately confronted one of the most enduring mysteries of the modern age.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

15-03-2026 om 23:22 geschreven door peter  

Story by Cassian Holt

 

NASA report details failures behind Boeing Starliner ‘Type A’ mishap

© Image Credit: Bill Ingalls - Public domain/Wiki Commons

NASA on February 19, 2026, formally classified Boeing’s 2024 Crewed Flight Test of the CST-100 Starliner spacecraft as a Type A mishap, the agency’s most serious safety designation. The findings, drawn from a year-long independent investigation, point to hardware failures, qualification gaps, and cultural breakdowns at both Boeing and NASA that left two astronauts stranded at the International Space Station and created what investigators called the potential for a significant mishap. The report lands as Congress demands answers and as the agencies restructure the commercial crew contract to prevent a repeat.

What a Type A Classification Signals

In NASA’s mishap taxonomy, a Type A event involves either loss of life, permanent disability, destruction of a major asset, or damage exceeding a set dollar threshold. Applying that label to a crewed mission that returned its spacecraft intact but failed to perform as designed is itself a statement: the agency concluded the flight came close enough to catastrophe to warrant its highest investigative response. In February 2025, NASA chartered an independent Program Investigation Team to examine the technical, organizational, and cultural dimensions of the flight, as detailed in the agency’s official summary of the inquiry. That team delivered its final report on February 19, 2026, and NASA accepted it the same day, committing to corrective actions across the program.

The distinction matters for readers tracking U.S. human spaceflight because the classification triggers mandatory follow-up. NASA cannot simply file the report and move on; the agency must now implement and track each corrective action to close the investigation. For Boeing, the designation adds formal institutional weight to what was already a reputational crisis, binding the company to remediation milestones under NASA oversight. It also places Starliner’s future flights under a brighter spotlight than routine anomaly reviews, signaling that the program will not return to business as usual until independent safety officials are satisfied.

• Related video: NASA Artemis rocket booster suffers anomaly during test 

Propulsion Failures and Qualification Gaps

The investigation centered on propulsion system anomalies that surfaced during the Crewed Flight Test. While astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams remained aboard the ISS, NASA and Boeing ran ground hot-fire tests at White Sands to replicate the thruster behavior observed in orbit; those engine tests confirmed problems serious enough that NASA ultimately decided to return Starliner without its crew rather than risk a crewed reentry.

The PIT report, dated February 5, 2026, stated in its conclusion section that the mission, “while ultimately successful in preserving crew safety, revealed critical vulnerabilities” in the spacecraft’s propulsion architecture. Hardware failures and qualification gaps were among the primary findings. Qualification gaps refer to scenarios where components were certified for flight based on testing that did not fully replicate the stresses they would encounter in actual mission profiles. That disconnect between test conditions and real-world performance is a systemic issue, not a one-off parts failure, and it raises questions about whether similar gaps exist in other subsystems or programs that followed the same certification logic.

Investigators traced some of the anomalies to how thrusters behaved under extended duty cycles and thermal conditions that had not been adequately modeled. In practice, that meant Starliner’s propulsion system did not respond as expected when the flight profile deviated from nominal assumptions. The crew was never in immediate danger of losing life support on station, but the margin for a safe, controlled deorbit narrowed enough that managers judged the risk unacceptable. Returning the capsule empty was an extraordinary step, underscoring how far actual performance had diverged from the qualified envelope.

Oversight Model Under Strain

A separate NASA Office of Inspector General audit of the Commercial Crew Program had previously flagged management weaknesses and control deficiencies in how the agency supervised its commercial partners; those concerns are laid out in the watchdog’s program review. The PIT report’s findings echo those earlier warnings, suggesting that known risks went unresolved long enough to contribute to the 2024 mishap.

The commercial crew model was designed to shift development risk to private companies while NASA played a lighter oversight role than it did during the Space Shuttle era. That approach worked well with SpaceX’s Crew Dragon, which has flown multiple operational missions with relatively few major anomalies. But the Starliner investigation suggests the model’s success depends heavily on the contractor’s internal safety culture. When that culture degrades, a lighter-touch oversight framework may not catch problems early enough.

The PIT report’s emphasis on organizational and cultural factors, alongside hardware failures, points to a breakdown that was not purely technical. Boeing’s internal processes did not consistently elevate propulsion concerns to the level of formal risk acceptance, and NASA’s own management practices failed to compensate for gaps on the contractor’s side. The result was a misalignment between the level of risk NASA leadership believed it had approved and the actual vulnerabilities embedded in the system. That mismatch is precisely what the Inspector General had warned could happen if commercial partners were allowed too much autonomy without corresponding transparency.

Contract Restructured, Next Flight Changed

The fallout has already reshaped the program’s near-term future. In late 2025, NASA and Boeing modified the commercial crew contract, converting the next planned Starliner mission, designated Starliner‑1, from a crewed rotation flight to a cargo and in-flight validation mission; NASA described the revision in a contract update that emphasized risk reduction. That change means Boeing must demonstrate that its propulsion fixes work in orbit before NASA will put astronauts back on the vehicle. Propulsion issues remained under active investigation at the time of the contract modification, and the restructured mission profile reflects how far confidence in the spacecraft had fallen.

For the broader U.S. human spaceflight program, the delay compresses an already tight schedule. NASA has relied on maintaining two independent crew transportation providers to avoid single-point-of-failure dependence on any one vehicle. With Starliner sidelined from crewed duty for at least one more flight cycle, SpaceX’s Crew Dragon remains the sole American vehicle carrying astronauts to the ISS. That concentration of capability is exactly the scenario the dual-provider strategy was supposed to prevent, and it adds pressure to keep Dragon flights on time while Starliner works through its remediation plan.

The contract restructuring also has financial and industrial implications. Boeing must now absorb additional costs associated with redesign, new testing, and an uncrewed validation flight that generates no ticket revenue from NASA crew rotations. For NASA, the changes may require rebalancing manifest priorities, including how many seats it purchases and when, to ensure continuous U.S. access to orbit while honoring existing agreements with international partners.

Congressional Pressure and Accountability Demands

The report triggered immediate political scrutiny. Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology issued a statement describing the findings as evidence of a safety-culture breach with catastrophic potential, according to her public comments. That language goes further than the agency’s own framing and signals that at least some members of Congress view the incident as more than a contained engineering problem.

NASA’s administrator also publicly criticized leadership and management failures at both Boeing and NASA, according to Associated Press coverage of the press event. Lawmakers are likely to seize on those remarks in upcoming hearings, pressing for details on who approved key risk trades, how dissenting technical opinions were handled, and whether any personnel actions are warranted. The Type A classification gives Congress a clear hook to demand regular progress reports on corrective actions rather than one-time briefings.

Beyond formal oversight, the mishap has become a touchstone in debates over how far NASA should go in outsourcing critical human spaceflight functions. Supporters of the commercial model argue that the system ultimately worked: anomalies were caught, astronauts were kept safe, and the agency is now enforcing accountability. Critics counter that the near-miss underscores the limits of relying on corporate governance structures that may prioritize schedule and cost over conservative engineering judgment.

Rebuilding Confidence and Communicating Risk

Rebuilding confidence in Starliner will require more than technical fixes. The PIT report calls for strengthened safety reporting channels, clearer lines of authority for risk acceptance, and more robust cross-checks between NASA and contractor engineering teams. Implementing those recommendations will take time, and both organizations will be judged on how transparently they share progress with the public.

NASA has increasingly turned to digital platforms to explain complex missions and risks, including its streaming series and other content on the broader NASA+ service. How the agency uses those channels to discuss the Starliner mishap—balancing candor about past failures with confidence in future flights—will shape public perception as much as the engineering milestones themselves.

For the astronauts who will eventually fly on a redesigned Starliner, the Type A classification is both a warning and a promise. It acknowledges that the 2024 mission came unacceptably close to disaster, but it also commits NASA and Boeing to a level of scrutiny and reform commensurate with that risk. Whether the program emerges as a safer, more resilient second leg of America’s crewed launch capability will depend on how fully both institutions absorb the lessons now laid out in the investigation’s pages.

• This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ Morning Overview }

15-03-2026 om 22:21 geschreven door peter  

Een geschiedenis van beroemde primeurs in de ruimte

©Getty Images

Een geschiedenis van beroemde primeurs in de ruimte
Hoewel de ruimte de mens al lange tijd fascineert, duurde het tot de tweede helft van de 20e eeuw voordat ruimtevaart werkelijkheid werd, waardoor mensen verder dan onze planeet konden kijken. Vanaf de eerste vrouw in de ruimte tot de eerste beelden van de aarde hebben wetenschappers, astronauten en astronomen over de hele wereld hard gewerkt om de kosmos te verkennen.De Koude Oorlog tussen de VS en de Sovjet-Unie was een belangrijke factor die de vooruitgang van de ruimtevaart beïnvloedde. Beide landen streden om dominantie in de ruimte, en veel van de primeurs die in de ruimte werden bereikt, waren te danken aan de wens van beide landen om 'de eersten' te zijn.Klik dus verder om de opmerkelijke primeurs in de ruimtegeschiedenis te ontdekken.

©Public Domain

2021: Eerste helikopter op Mars
NASA's Perseverance-rover landde op 18 Februari 2021 met succes op Mars, samen met het eerste vliegtuig dat ooit op een andere planeet landde: de Ingenuity-helikopter.

©Public Domain

2015: Eerste succesvolle Pluto-missie
De scheervlucht kwam tot op een afstand van 12.874 km van het oppervlak van Pluto en maakte close-upbeelden van het terrein.

©Public Domain

2012: Eerste commerciële ruimtemissie
Elon Musk's SpaceX bracht het eerste commerciële bezoek aan het internationale ruimtestation in 2012. Het bedrijf stond onder contract van NASA om het station te bevoorraden.

©Public Domain

2001: 's Werelds eerste ruimtetoerist
Op 30 April 2001 arriveerde de Amerikaanse miljonair Dennis Tito (links) via een Russische Sojoez-raket bij het internationale ruimtestation en werd daarmee de eerste ruimtetoerist ter wereld.

©Public Domain

2000: Eerste bemanning van het Internationale Ruimtestation
Een combinatie van Amerikaanse en Russische astronauten, de eerste bemanning ging in 2000 aan boord van het internationale ruimtestation.

©Public Domain

1995: Eerste ontmoeting tussen Atlantis en Mir
Een teken dat de Koude Oorlog eindelijk voorbij was, was dat het Amerikaanse ruimtestation Atlantis en het Russische ruimtestation Mir elkaar voor het eerst in de ruimte ontmoetten.

©Public Domain

1995: Eerste vrouw leidt ruimteveermissie
De Amerikaanse Eileen Marie Collins werd de eerste vrouw die het bevel voerde over een Space Shuttle-missie. Ze bestuurde ook een ontmoeting met het Russische ruimtestation Mir.

©NL Beeld

1991: Eerste Britse astronaut bezoekt de ruimte
Helen Sharman was de eerste Britse astronaut en de eerste vrouwelijke bezoeker van het Mir-ruimtestation in 1991.

©Public Domain

1988: Eerste ruimteveervlucht sinds de ramp met de Challenger
In 1988 werd de Discovery de eerste space shuttle die vertrok na de ramp met de Challenger in 1986. De Challenger ontplofte bij het opstijgen, waarbij alle zeven aan boord omkwamen.

©Public Domain

1985: Eerste shuttlevlucht met Atlantis
De bouw van de Atlantis duurde ongeveer de helft van de tijd van eerdere Space Shuttles.

©Public Domain

1985: Eerste koninklijke ruimtevaart
De Saoedische sultan bin Salman Al-Saud (rechts) werd de eerste koninklijke man in de ruimte. Als lid van de Saoedische luchtmacht had hij 1.000 uur vliegervaring toen hij in 1985 deelnam aan de Discovery-missie van NASA.

©Public Domain

1983: Eerste Afro-Amerikaan in de ruimte
Guion S. Bluford was de eerste Afro-Amerikaan die in 1983 de ruimte in ging. De eerste zwarte persoon in de ruimte was echter de Cubaanse astronaut Arnaldo Tamayo Mendez in 1980. Hij maakte deel uit van een Sovjetprogramma om niet-Sovjet-astronauten aan boord van een Sovjet-ruimtevaartuig te vliegen.

©NL Beeld

1983: Eerste Amerikaanse vrouw in de ruimte
Sally Ride werd in 1983 de eerste Amerikaanse vrouw in de ruimte. Ze was ook de jongste Amerikaanse astronaut die in de ruimte heeft gevlogen, op 32-jarige leeftijd.

©Public Domain

1981: Eerste space shuttle bereikt een baan om de aarde
De eerste space shuttle, de Columbia, bereikte in 1981 een baan om de aarde.

©Public Domain

1975: Eerste internationale bemande ruimtevlucht
De twee landen waren tientallen jaren verwikkeld in een ruimterace en werkten in 1975 samen voor de eerste internationale bemande ruimtevlucht. Een Amerikaans Apollo-ruimtevaartuig ontmoette een Sovjet-Sojoez en hun bemanningen voerden samen verschillende experimenten uit.

©Public Domain

1973: Eerste skylab
Gelanceerd door NASA, bezochten drie bemanningen in de loop van de volgende twee jaar, terwijl enorme hoeveelheden ruimtegegevens werden teruggestuurd naar de missiecontrole in Houston.

©Public Domain

1971: Eerste sterfgevallen in de ruimte
In een tragische ruimte werden de Sovjet-astronauten Georgi Dobrovolsky, Vladislav Volkov en Viktor Patsayev op 30 Juni 1971 de eersten die in de ruimte omkwamen. Een kapotte ademhalingsautomaat veroorzaakte een drukval in hun ruimtevaartuig, waardoor ze binnen enkele seconden verstikten.

©NL Beeld

1969: Eerste mens op de maan
Neil Armstrong werd in 1969 de eerste man op de maan. Hij en Buzz Aldrin liepen 2,5 uur rond de maan, onderzochten en verzamelden monsters voordat ze terugkeerden naar de aarde met Michael Collins, die in een baan om de Apollo 11 was gebleven.

©Public Domain

1966: Eerste foto van de volledige aarde vanuit de baan van de maan
De eerste foto van de aarde werd op 23 Augustus 1966 vanuit de baan van de maan genomen door een NASA-shuttle.

©Public Domain

1966: Eerste bemande docking in de ruimte
Op 16 Maart 1966 maakte een bemand ruimtevaartuig zijn eerste koppelingsuitwisseling in de ruimte. De Gemini VIII, bemand door Armstrong, sloot zich aan bij het onbemande Agena-doelvoertuig, waardoor het de eerste keer was dat twee ruimtevaartuigen buiten de baan van de aarde met elkaar verbonden waren.

©Public Domain

1965: Eerste ruimtewandeling
Sovjet-astronaut Alexei Leonov was de eerste persoon die in Maart 1965 de ruimte in liep. Leonovs eerste woorden bij het verlaten van het ruimtevaartuig waren: "De aarde is rond!"

©NL Beeld

1963: Eerste vrouw in de ruimte
Sovjet-astronaut Valentina Tereshkova werd in 1963 de eerste vrouw in de ruimte. Ze bracht 71 uur door in de ruimte.

©Public Domain

1962: Eerste Amerikaan draait in een baan om de aarde
John Glenn werd in 1962 de eerste Amerikaan die in een baan om de aarde draaide. Glenn was lid van de Mercury 7 en cirkelde in minder dan vijf uur drie keer om de aarde.

©Public Domain

1961: Eerste langdurige ruimtevlucht
In tegenstelling tot de veel kortere vluchten eerder dat jaar duurde de vlucht van Sovjet-astronaut Gherman S. Titov (rechts) meer dan 25 uur. Zo werd Titov ook de eerste persoon die in de ruimte sliep.

©Public Domain

1961: Eerste Amerikaan in de ruimte
Alan Shepard werd de eerste Amerikaan in de ruimte, tijdens een reis die iets meer dan 15 minuten duurde.

©NL Beeld

1961: Eerste persoon in de ruimte
Minder dan een maand voordat Shepard de ruimte in ging, versloeg de Sovjet-Unie de VS in de ruimterace door 's werelds eerste mens de ruimte in te sturen. Yuri Gagarin werd een internationale beroemdheid na zijn terugkeer naar de aarde.

©Public Domain

1959: Amerika's eerste astronauten
De eerste Amerikaanse astronauten werden in 1959 geïntroduceerd. De leden van de groep waren finalisten van een competitief proces dat begon met meer dan 500 kandidaten. Deze "Originele Zeven" werden uiteindelijk de "Mercury Seven" genoemd, naar de naam van het ruimteproject, het Mercury-programma.

©Public Domain

1958: Eerste Amerikaanse man-in-ruimteprogramma
Project Mercury had tot doel een bemand ruimtevaartuig rond de aarde te laten draaien en te onderzoeken hoe mensen in de ruimte konden functioneren. Het project maakte tussen 1961 en 1963 zes bemande vluchten.

©NL Beeld

1957: Het eerste dier in de ruimte
Het eerste dier dat een orbitale ruimtevlucht rond de aarde maakte, was de hond Laika, aan boord van het Sovjet-ruimtevaartuig Spoetnik 2 op 3 November 1957. Ze stierf uren na de vlucht door oververhitting, tijdens de vierde baan van het vaartuig.

Bronnen:

• (Newsweek)
• (Stacker)

Zie ook:

•  Wat zijn de veiligste landen als er een derde wereldoorlog uitbreekt?

{ Stars Insider }

15-03-2026 om 21:21 geschreven door peter  

15 Fascinating Facts About the Mysterious Lost Continent of Kumari Kandam

While Atlantis and Lemuria are well-known tales of lost continents, Kumari Kandam adds another layer to the mystery, specifically tied to Tamil  history and mythology.

Deep beneath the waves of the Indian Ocean, legends whisper of a sunken land that once flourished with life, culture, and unparalleled knowledge. Known as Kumari Kandam, this mythical continent is said to have existed south of present-day India, serving as the cradle of the Tamil people—a civilization renowned for its ancient language, rich traditions, and far-reaching influence.

While modern  science has found no evidence of this lost landmass, the story of Kumari Kandam continues to intrigue, blending elements of mythology, cultural pride, and  historical speculation. Some say the Tamil people, facing a cataclysm that swallowed their homeland, spread across the globe, planting seeds of civilization in far-off lands.

Similar to the tales of Atlantis or Lemuria, Kumari Kandam invites us to explore the boundaries between myth and reality. Is it purely a creation of folklore, or does it carry echoes of forgotten history? Regardless of its factual basis, this captivating tale provides a fascinating glimpse into humanity’s enduring quest to understand its origins and preserve its stories for generations to come.

The Myth of Kumari Kandam: A Tale of Lost Civilizations

1. A South Indian Atlantis?

Kumari Kandam is often likened to the legendary Atlantis. Both are said to have been advanced civilizations that were lost to the sea, leaving only whispers of their existence in ancient texts.

2. The Tamil Connection

The Tamil people, one of the world’s oldest known cultures, are believed to have called Kumari Kandam their home. Legends suggest they migrated globally, establishing other civilizations after the catastrophic loss of their homeland.

3. More Than Atlantis and Lemuria

While Atlantis and Lemuria are well-known tales of lost continents, Kumari Kandam adds another layer to the mystery, specifically tied to Tamil history and mythology.

4. Location Below the Indian Ocean

The mythical land is said to have been located south of modern India, beneath the Indian Ocean.

Ancient Texts and Historical Claims

5. A Name from Sacred Texts

The term “Kumari Kandam” first appeared in a 15th-century version of the Skanda Purana, a major Hindu text. It was authored by Kachiappa Sivacharyar and remains central to Tamil cultural identity.

6. Etymological Roots

Contrary to popular belief, the name derives from the Sanskrit term Kumarika Khanda, emphasizing its connection to ancient Hindu traditions.

7. The Cradle of Civilization

Kumari Kandam is described in Tamil texts as the origin of human civilization, where humanity and culture first flourished.

8. Geological Theories of Lemuria

The continent was initially theorized in the 19th century to explain geological and biological similarities between India, Africa, and Madagascar, sparking connections with ancient Tamil legends.

Controversies and Modern Perspectives

9. Continental Drift vs. Myth

Modern geology dismisses the idea of Kumari Kandam as a landmass, citing the theory of continental drift, which explains the distribution of continents without invoking submerged continents.

10. Ancient Texts Speak of Submerged Lands

Despite scientific skepticism, Tamil and Sanskrit writings consistently refer to lands submerged in South India, fueling the legend of Kumari Kandam.

11. Rama’s Bridge: A 1.7-Million-Year-Old Clue?

A structure known as Rama’s Bridge, or Adam’s Bridge, in the Palk Strait has been cited as potential evidence for the lost land. Some claim this natural formation was a man-made link to Kumari Kandam.

Cultural and Historical Legacy

12. The Tamil Diaspora

Many believe the Tamil people’s migrations post-catastrophe were responsible for founding other ancient civilizations, making their cultural impact global.

13. A Tale Interwoven with Myth and Reality

Kumari Kandam blends mythological lore with historical speculation, capturing the imagination of those intrigued by ancient mysteries.

14. A Symbol of Tamil Pride

For the Tamil people, Kumari Kandam represents their ancient heritage and enduring legacy, celebrated through stories, texts, and art.

15. Unraveling the Mystery

While modern science may refute its existence, Kumari Kandam continues to be a subject of fascination, bridging the gap between legend and 

The tale of Kumari Kandam taps into our fascination with ancient mysteries and lost civilizations. Much like the stories of Atlantis or Lemuria, it blurs the line between history and myth. While there’s no scientific evidence to confirm its existence, such legends continue to capture imaginations, reflecting how cultures across the world create narratives to explain their past. Kumari Kandam, like many other myths, serves as a reminder of our collective desire to make sense of the unknown.

{ https://curiosmos.com/ }

14-03-2026 om 21:46 geschreven door peter  

According to McCasland’s wife, Susan McCasland Wilkerson, he was last seen on the morning of February 27, 2026, before she left home shortly before 11 a.m. for a scheduled medical appointment. By the time she returned home, Neil was no longer at the residence.

Reaching out to family members and friends, none provided any information indicating his whereabouts, and shortly after 3 p.m. on the same afternoon, his wife reported him missing to the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office.

On Thursday, the Office released an updated timeline of events involving the search for McCasland, along with an updated description of what he is believed to have been wearing at the time he disappeared.

The Disappearance of Neil McCasland: What We Know

McCasland was last seen at or near his home near Quail Run Court NE in Sandia Heights on Friday, February 27, 2026.

According to the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office (BCSO), a Silver Alert remains in effect as authorities continue searching for the missing retired official, amid requests for any leads members of the public may be able to provide.

McCasland is described as 5’ 11”, approximately 160 lbs, with blue eyes and white hair. He is 68-years-old.

“As the investigation has progressed, BCSO has identified items believed to be unaccounted for from the residence,” the Sheriff’s Office said on Thursday. These items include a light green, long-sleeve button-up “outdoor shirt,” a pair of hiking boots, McCasland’s wallet, and “a .38 caliber revolver with a leather holster.”

The BCSO released an image with Thursday’s announcement in which McCasland was seen wearing the shirt now believed to be among the items missing from his residence.

At 11:10 a.m., McCasland’s wife left for her medical appointment and returned within a period of one hour, noticing her husband was gone at approximately 12.04 p.m. that afternoon.

Left behind were McCasland’s personal phone and wearable devices, as well as the prescription glasses he is seen wearing in many recent photos released by the BCSO since he was reported missing. With no information about his whereabouts, Mrs. McCasland Wilkerson reached out to friends and family members, none of whom had seen or could provide information about Neil.

Shortly after 3:00 p.m. on Feb. 27, Mrs. McCasland Wilkerson reported Neil missing. According to the BCSO, “the investigation began immediately,” and a Silver Alert was issued.

At the time of McCasland’s disappearance, BCSO stated that “due to his medical issues law enforcement is concerned for his safety.” Since that time, the Sheriff’s Office has affirmed that information it obtained early in the investigation “indicated Mr. McCasland could be at some level of risk” prompting requests for assistance from the public in locating him, although adding that in accordance with privacy laws “BCSO will not release medical details or speculate about his state of mind.”

According to the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, all reports of missing persons are investigated regardless of age or other criteria. “Particular care will be exercised in cases of persons who may be considered endangered, mentally or physically impaired, under a doctor’s care, on life-sustaining medication or have been abducted,” a document outlining the Department’s policies and procedures states.

“Additionally, the department holds that every person reported as missing will be considered ‘at risk’ until significant information to the contrary is confirmed,” the document adds.

On March 3, 2026, BCSO issued an update confirming that it was coordinating closely with multiple agencies, as well as “partners at Kirtland Air Force Base to expand outreach and speed information-sharing that may assist in locating Mr. McCasland.”

“Sheriff John Allen, an Honorary Base Commander at Kirtland, is assisting with those coordination efforts,” the March 3 update stated. “Over the past several days, BCSO has utilized significant resources and has conducted extensive efforts that include neighborhood canvassing, follow-up interviews, and coordinated search operations.”

“Specialized assets have been deployed and additional partner agencies are providing assistance,” the March 3 update said, adding that “A full canvas of the neighborhood is underway, and investigators are following up on every credible tip.”

“It is unlike Neil to be out of touch from his family and friends for this length of time,” the BCSO said in an update three days later on March 6, 2026, marking one week since McCasland was first reported missing, adding that “we have not given up hope.”

In its March 6 update, the BCSO added that authorities believed McCasland “to have left his residence on foot,” adding that he is known to be “an avid outdoorsman” and to frequently “hike, run, and cycle in the Northeast Heights and the Sandia foothills.”

The following day, on Saturday, March 7, a gray U.S. Air Force sweatshirt was found by investigators assisting in the search at a location approximately 1.25 miles east of McCasland’s residence. Authorities said the item was collected and processed, and that there was no sign of blood, indications of foul play, or anything that immediately linked the article of clothing to McCasland that could be discerned at that time.

“The sweatshirt has not been confirmed by family or friends to be associated with Mr. McCasland,” the BCSO said, although adding that its discovery “prompted an additional targeted search effort in the area.”

Current State of the Search

According to the BCSO’s Thursday update, the Sheriff’s Office continues to follow any leads it receives, and the case remains active entering the third week of investigations.

“Investigators have expanded a neighborhood canvass to more than 700 homes, requesting security video and information,” the BCSO statement read. “Additional search efforts have included drone operations, helicopter support, ground searches with Search and Rescue teams, and K 9 searches.”

Despite the widespread search effort, BCSO confirmed on Thursday that it has received no confirmed sighting reports of McCasland, nor any video that appears to show him leaving the vicinity of his home, or providing any indications of where he might have gone.

“Search efforts and investigative follow up are ongoing,” The BCSO statement added.

Presently, authorities are asking the public to review footage obtained by home security cameras or other surveillance systems in the Sandia Heights and surrounding areas, particularly that which was obtained on Friday, February 27, and Saturday, February 28, with a focus on footage recorded between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. on those dates. Authorities have requested footage from around the vicinity of Quail Run Court NE “and routes leading away from the neighborhood.”

Additional requests for video footage obtained by hikers, recreational cyclists, drone operators, or others in the area have also been requested.

“If you were in the foothills or on trails February 27 to 28, please review any GoPro or phone footage and submit anything that may help,” the BCSO said on Thursday.

Speaking last week, Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen said that his teams have worked around the clock searching for clues that could lead to information about McCasland’s whereabouts.

“Our priority is finding Mr. McCasland safely,” Allen said, adding that “investigators and search teams are working continuously, and we’re coordinating closely with our local, state, and federal partners.”

“We will share confirmed updates as soon as we can while protecting the integrity of the investigation,” Allen said.

Speculations Complicate the Investigation

While requesting any information from members of the public that may lead to information about McCasland’s whereabouts, authorities have also repeatedly warned against premature conclusions and speculation about the retired USAF official’s disappearance.

• 

See Also

James Webb Space Telescope Has Spotted Something “Abnormal, Chaotic, and Strange” 60 Light-Years from Earth

“There are people who attempt to develop their own theories based on the limited information available to the public and this makes finding Neil harder,” a BSCO statement dated March 6, 2026, read.

In the past, McCasland was known to have had brief associations with individuals involved in transparency efforts related to what the military now calls unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UFOs.

Specifically, in 2016, a collection of emails from the account of John Podesta—then chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign—was published by WikiLeaks following a data breach attributed to the Russian-linked hacking group Fancy Bear. Among the messages was an email sent by musician and UFO advocate Tom DeLonge to Podesta, discussing the possibility of bringing McCasland to Podesta’s office to discuss UFO-related topics.

“[McCasland] not only knows what I’m trying to achieve, he helped assemble my advisory team,” DeLonge told Podesta. “He’s a very important man.”

The information conveyed by DeLonge in Podesta’s leaked emails generated significant public interest, especially considering McCasland’s time overseeing the Air Force Research Laboratory, a role that placed him at the center of some of the U.S. military’s most sensitive scientific and technological initiatives.

William Neil McCasland (Credit: USAF)

McCasland completed graduate studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, after which he served in the Secretary of the Air Force’s Office of Special Projects at Los Angeles Air Force Base, where he worked on highly classified payload and satellite programs. He later returned to MIT to complete his doctorate before continuing his work in advanced space and defense technologies. In the 1990s and early 2000s, his work included a position as chief engineer with the Navstar GPS Joint Program Office at Los Angeles AFB, before leading the Space Based Laser program office and directing the Space Vehicles Directorate at the Air Force Research Laboratory at Kirtland Air Force Base. Several of these assignments involved collaboration with agencies such as the National Reconnaissance Office.

McCasland went on to hold senior oversight roles at the Pentagon, which included serving as executive secretary of the Special Access Program Oversight Committee, supervising some of the nation’s most highly classified programs. His final assignment came in 2011 when he assumed leadership of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, where he oversaw billions of dollars in advanced research and development before retiring in 2013.

McCasland’s Wife Speaks

Given his past official work and short association with Tom DeLonge, it is not hard to understand why unfounded speculations have circulated online about whether McCasland’s leadership position overseeing some of the United States military’s most sensitive programs could be related to his disappearance.

In a statement released by McCasland’s wife on social media, Mrs. McCasland Wilkerson said that while it was true that her husband had been associated with UFOs through his brief work with Tom DeLonge, this had occurred after his retirement from the Air Force, at which time she says Neil merely provided consultation “on military and technical/scientific matters to lend verisimilitude to Tom’s fiction book and media activities.” At the retired official’s request, McCasland was not compensated for these consultations, Mrs. McCasland Wilkerson added.

“After the Russians hacked John Podesta’s emails … there was less contact with Tom and the community pushing for release of UFO information,” Mrs. McCasland Wilkerson’s statement added. “This connection is not a reason for someone to abduct Neil.”

McCasland’s wife also addressed the speculations that her husband may have been targeted due to his alleged knowledge of high-level U.S. military secrets related to UFOs.

“Neil does not have any special knowledge about the ET bodies and debris from the Roswell crash stored at Wright-Patt,” Mrs. McCasland Wilkerson said, though that “at this point with absolutely no sign of him, maybe the best hypothesis is that aliens beamed him up to the mothership.”

Authorities Continue Seeking Information

As the search continues, authorities have reiterated their hope that there may be residents in the Sandia Heights area who observed McCasland around the time of his disappearance, or who otherwise could have information that may prove crucial to locating him.

“We are asking for your help in finding him,” the BCSO said. “We believe there are people who have information valuable to locating Neil who have not yet spoken to law enforcement.”

“Sometimes people have information but do not come forward because they feel it may not be important,” the BSCO added in its statement last week.

“Regardless of how insignificant you think your information might be, or whether you think we are already aware of it, please contact us and allow us to make that determination.”

Law enforcement has asked anyone with information to contact the sheriff’s office Missing Persons Unit or submit tips through official reporting channels.

Anyone with information related to McCasland’s disappearance is advised to text BCSO to 847411, or you to contact the sheriff’s Missing Persons Unit directly by phone at 505-468-7070.

Information may also be uploaded directly online using the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office NM Evidence Submission Portal.

• Micah Hanks is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of The Debrief. A longtime reporter on science, defense, and technology with a focus on space and astronomy, he can be reached at micah@thedebrief.org. Follow him on X @MicahHanks, and at micahhanks.com.

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/defense/ }

14-03-2026 om 21:18 geschreven door peter  

© Angelynum

8 Mysteries About the Oldest Man in the Bible – Methuselah, and the Great Flood
Methuselah is one of the most mysterious figures in the Bible. Known as the oldest man who ever lived, he reached the astonishing age of 969 years. His story is surprisingly brief and filled with unanswered questions. He lived during a time of growing corruption, just before the Great Flood changed the world forever. As the grandfather of Noah and a descendant of Adam, Methuselah stood at a turning point between the early generations of humanity and a new beginning after divine judgment. His extraordinary lifespan, family connections, and timing have inspired centuries of curiosity. Here are eight intriguing mysteries about Methuselah and his connection to the Flood.

© Angelynum

1. How Did Methuselah Live 969 Years?
The Bible states that Methuselah lived longer than any other human, reaching 969 years. This remarkable age raises many questions.

Some believe early humans lived longer due to a purer environment or different biological conditions before the Flood.

Others suggest the numbers may have symbolic meaning, representing wisdom, honor, or spiritual completeness rather than literal years.

Ancient cultures often used large numbers to express greatness. Another theory is that time may have been measured differently in early biblical records.

Whether literal or symbolic, Methuselah’s lifespan highlights the unique nature of the world before the Flood and emphasizes the extraordinary character of the earliest generations described in Genesis.

© Angelynum

2. Did Methuselah Die the Same Year the Flood Began?
One of the most intriguing details about Methuselah is the timeline of his death. When biblical genealogies are calculated, his lifespan appears to end in the very year the Flood began.

This raises an important mystery. Did he die naturally just before the waters came, or was his death connected to the coming judgment?

Some scholars suggest his name may even carry prophetic meaning, often interpreted as his death shall bring.

If this interpretation is correct, Methuselah’s life itself may have been a countdown to the Flood.

His death could mark the moment when divine patience ended, and the long warned judgment finally began.

© Angelynum

3. Why Is So Little Written About Him?
Despite his record-breaking lifespan and important place in Noah’s family line, Methuselah receives very little attention in Scripture.

The Bible provides only his age, his family connection, and the years he lived after his son was born. This lack of detail is surprising for such a significant figure.

One mystery is whether his quiet presence was intentional. His story may represent stability and continuity during a time when humanity was slowly turning away from righteousness.

Another possibility is that his importance lies not in what he did, but in where he stands in the timeline leading to the Flood and the renewal of the world.

© Angelynum

4. What Was His Relationship With Noah?
Methuselah was Noah’s grandfather, which means he lived during Noah’s early life and possibly well into the years when the ark was being prepared.

This connection raises fascinating questions. Did Methuselah support Noah’s warning about the coming Flood?

Was he among the few who still honored God in a corrupt generation? Some traditions suggest he was a righteous man like his father Enoch and his grandson Noah.

If he witnessed the construction of the ark, his long life would have allowed him to see humanity’s moral decline firsthand.

His presence links three generations that stood at the center of one of the Bible’s most dramatic events.

© Angelynum

5. What Does His Lineage Reveal?
Methuselah belonged to a remarkable family line. His father was Enoch, the man who walked with God and was taken without experiencing death.

His grandson was Noah, chosen to survive the Flood and begin a new human era. This placement makes Methuselah a bridge between two extraordinary figures.

His lineage suggests continuity of faith through generations, even as the wider world became increasingly corrupt.

One mystery is whether this family line preserved spiritual knowledge that others had abandoned.

His position in the genealogy highlights the importance of heritage and raises questions about how faith survived during a time of widespread moral collapse.

© Angelynum

6. Why Were Lifespans So Long Before the Flood?
Methuselah’s age was not unique in his generation, though it was the longest. Many early biblical figures lived for several centuries.

This pattern suddenly changed after the Flood, when lifespans gradually shortened. The reason for this shift remains a mystery.

Some believe environmental changes after the Flood affected human longevity. Others suggest that God intentionally limited human lifespan as part of a new order for the world.

There are also symbolic interpretations, seeing long lives as a way to compress history into fewer generations.

Whatever the explanation, Methuselah represents the peak of a lifespan pattern that disappeared after the Flood reshaped human existence.

© Angelynum

7. Why Didn’t Methuselah Enter the Ark?
If Methuselah was alive during the years leading up to the Flood, a natural question arises.

Why was he not among those who entered the ark? According to the biblical timeline, he died before the Flood waters arrived.

Some interpret this as an act of mercy, sparing him from the coming destruction. Others see it as symbolic.

His long life represented God’s patience with humanity, and his death marked the end of that extended period of warning.

This mystery connects his lifespan directly to the timing of the Flood and reinforces the idea that his life had prophetic significance within the larger story.

© Angelynum

8. What Does Methuselah’s Life Symbolize?
Beyond historical questions, Methuselah’s story carries deep symbolic meaning. His extraordinary lifespan reflects divine patience and the long delay before judgment.

For generations, humanity was given time to change, yet corruption continued to grow.

His life stands as a reminder of the balance between mercy and accountability. Some interpreters see him as a living symbol of grace extended to a fallen world.

When his life ended, that period of waiting came to a close, and the Flood began a new chapter.

In this way, Methuselah represents not only longevity, but also the final moment before one of the most dramatic turning points in biblical history.

{ Angel Numbers }

14-03-2026 om 18:47 geschreven door peter  

Mysterious 'Trump' airships appearing in 100-year-old sketchbooks sparks 'time traveler' theories

By CHRIS MELORE, US ASSISTANT SCIENCE EDITOR

A wild theory claims President Donald Trump may be a time traveler, with clues scattered through art and literature for more than a century. 

Sketches of futuristic aircraft drawn by artist Charles Dellschau, a Prussian immigrant who came to the US in 1850 and died in 1923, mysteriously contain the word 'TRUMP' and even featured the number 47 - the number of presidents the US has had. 

Before his death, Dellschau created depictions of fantastical flying machines that he called 'aeros,' which often resembled a mix of early airships, balloons and primitive airplanes.

However, conspiracy theorists have seized on the repeated appearance of Trump's name and the numbers associated with both of his terms in the White House as the 45th and 47th commander-in-chief.

The extraordinary theory has also been connected to old novels by Ingersoll Lockwood from the late 1800s, which featured a young character named 'Baron Trump' who embarked on incredible adventures with a wise mentor, Don.

In Lockwood's books, Baron lives in a grand place called Castle Trump and is guided by Don, adding even more intrigue to the theory that America's first family was foretold decades before the president's birth.

While some have claimed the artist and author had some mysterious method of knowing the future, others have claimed, without evidence, that the similarities prove the Trump family has time-travel technology and used it to influence world events.

One person on social media claimed: 'Either Trump is a time traveler or someone put in 200 years of work to make a guy who wasn't even born yet look like he is one.'

Images created by Charles Dellschau in the early 1900s depicted futuristic vehicles with the word 'TRUMP' on them

The images have led to wild theories that claim the reference to Trump is a clue that the current US president is a time traveler

According to the American Visionary Art Museum in Maryland, Dellschau's fictitious aeros were powered by an anti-gravity substance he envisioned called 'NB Gas' or 'supe,' that enabled them to fly without normal fuels.

The technology is eerily similar to descriptions of UFOs, which the government calls Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, and President Trump has vowed to disclose to the American people during his term.

Dellschau's sketches also included one showing a golden-haired figure steering a machine labeled with the number 45, another link to Trump serving as the 45th president.

The mystery surrounding the Dellschau sketches has sent conspiracy theorists searching for every possible clue that Trump and his youngest son, Barron, could have traveled through time.

One quote that has gained attention is Trump saying, 'I know things that other people don’t know,' both during his 2016 presidential campaign and after he won the White House.

Trump's past comments on nuclear power have also raised eyebrows. The president has claimed that his uncle Dr John Trump, would explain the power of what's going to happen, and he was right.'

Celebrity and podcast host Logan Paul has even asked Trump's granddaughter, Kai, about the Lockwood book and whether it was proof that the human race was living in a virtual simulation.

The teen said she was certain that Barron was not a time traveler, adding: 'I don't go down those rabbit holes. I don't want to go down those rabbit holes.'

Donald Trump (Center) and Barron Trump (Right) seen during the president's second election to the White House

Trump's name and the numbers 45 and 47 are seen on multiple images, which allegedly reference his terms as the 45th and 47th president

The mystery grows even stranger when conspiracy fans begin to examine Lockwood's connection to the time travel theory.

Hewas an American political writer and novelist who wrote two children's books titled 'Baron Trump's Marvelous Underground Journey,' and 'Little Baron Trump and His Wonderful Dog Bulgar.'

However, Lockwood also created the ominous political tome, 'The Last President,' a story which opens in New York City right after the election of an enormously unpopular candidate.

The 19th-century author wrote that police officers shouted through the streets as 'mobs of vast size are organizing under the lead of anarchists and socialists, and threaten to plunder and despoil the houses of the rich who have wronged and oppressed them for so many years.'

'Baron Trump's Marvellous Underground Journey' printed in the late 1800s

Conspiracy theorists have claimed Baron Trump in the 19th century tome looks eerily similar to  Barron Trump during his father's first presidential term

In the books featuring Baron Trump, the boy visits Russia on an extraordinary adventure. Baron is guided through his adventure by Don, who is described as 'the master of all masters.'

The Trump family motto in the book is: 'The pathway to glory is strewn with pitfalls and dangers.'

In the storybook's illustrations of Baron Trump, he is lavishly dressed and decked in jewels, as he leaves Castle Trump and begins his journey to Russia to find an entrance to alternate dimensions.

As for whether time travel is actually possible or just a work of science fiction, no major scientific institution, such as NASA, has ever dismissed the theory as impossible.

In fact, many prominent scientists have claimed that time travel is possible to some degree, including a 2020 study in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity that mathematically showed backward time travel could happen without creating confusing paradoxes or breaking the rules of cause and effect.

However, famed physicist Stephen Hawking argued in his 1994 book that 'The best evidence we have that time travel is not possible, and never will be, is that we have not been invaded by hordes of tourists from the future.'

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index.html }

14-03-2026 om 15:06 geschreven door peter  

Uncovered files reveal secret operation at center of drone invasion... and why White House can deny it

• READ MORE:  Mystery as radioactive shipment goes missing in New Jersey

By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

Official records show the army has been developing and testing 'counterterrorism' drones in New Jersey for years, amid claims of a government cover-up.

A 2018 defense contract awarded $50 million to a private robotics company to develop craft capable of creating 3D maps of urban areas for a 'counter weapons of mass destruction' program.

The contract was given out by the Army's Armament Research, Development, and Engineering Center (ARDEC), which is located at the Picatinny Arsenal in Rockaway, New Jersey, where mystery drones were first reported last month.

Meanwhile, documents show the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an air restriction alert on November 21 prohibiting flights over the Picatinny base for 'special security reasons' through December 26.

The White House has claimed the drone sightings - which coincidentally began on November 18 - are not a foreign adversary, pose no threat and are not part of a US military operation. 

Retired CIA Intelligence Officer Rudy Ridolfi told DailyMail.com: 'This FAA notice shows US drone testing is happening in the area. It's a warning for others to stay out of the area during those dates. 

'While the nature of the testing isn't specified, it's most likely the testing of payloads related to reconnaissance.'

But Matt Sloane, founder of drone consulting firm AI Skyfire, told DailyMail.com that the sightings could be 'a contractor developing these drones for DoD [the Department of Defense].' 

The DoD can deny claims of third-party technologies if the drones were placed on a secure tech list for contract disclosures, which means the government is applying special restrictions to the information. 

The restrictions are added when technologies protect national security or to keep advanced systems hidden from hostile nations, and the developer holds primary liability if the government is not operating the drones, Ridolfi explained.

Experts have suggested that the government is secretly behind the drones in New Jersey, saying government contractors could be testing testing unmanned aerial systems for the Department of Defense at Picatinny Arsenal 

A Picatinny Arsenal spokesperson told DailyMail.com: 'We can confirm that they are not the result of any Picatinny Arsenal or DEVCOM Armaments Center (formerly ARDEC) directed actions.'

The government contract was awarded to Maryland-based company Robotics Research.

The FAA alert could signal signal that the contract had approval to test drones in a public area. 

'They could have been testing them in a different place on a military installation and now it was time to move the testing out to a public area,' Sloane said.

'The military has in various places around the country that are out of the way of prying eyes. Maybe it was just time to graduate that testing to the public.'

While large swaths of New Jersey are seeing drones, the White House has noted that there are more than one million drones lawfully registered in the US and many of the sightings could be hobby crafts, airplanes and even stars.

Sloane highlighted a similar drone mystery that hit Colorado from 2019 to 2020 when swarms of aerial vehicles fill the sky like the current situation in New Jersey.

Local reports at the time suggested the drones were 'a secretive Air Force program intended to keep prying eyes away from nuclear missile silos,' which are in Cheyenne.

Air Force Global Strike Command, based in Louisiana, confirmed that it conducts counter-drone exercises out of F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Cheyenne, where it is based.

The drones appeared in mid-November over the Picatinny Arsenal military base in Rockaway, also the location for the Army's Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) that develops new drone technologies for the military

The drones were described to have 'flashing or steady white, red or green lights.'

The story echoes the current situation in New Jersey - residents and local officials were demanding answers.

The drones in Colorado were also rumored to be sniffing for missing radioactive material, which has been a theory in the Garden State.

'I think (at the extreme) this could be a search operation [in New Jersey], said Ridolfi.

'One argument against that (to some degree) is the vast bulk of the sightings are at night. If it really was a national security issue, they'd be running around the clock.'

Sloane said the drones being tested by a government contractor could feature any type of attachment.

'There's cameras, gas detectors, radiation detectors,' he said.

The FAA flight restriction alert last month states the temporary ban is due to national defense and security reasons, prohibiting other aerial vehicles flying within a two-mile radius and below 2,000 feet.

However, exceptions include operations supporting national defense, law enforcement, firefighting, search and rescue, disaster response, event support, and commercial operations with a valid statement of work. 

When asked about the FAA's restriction over the base, a spokesperson for the agency said they were unaware of the alert.

Picatinny Arsenal, located in Morris County, develops advanced conventional weapon systems and ammunition and has supplied Ukraine with weapons for its fight against Russia.

The White House has claimed the drone sightings - which coincidentally began on November 18 -are not a foreign adversary, pose no threat and are not part of a US military operation (stock)

The Federal Aviation Administration also issued a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) around Picatinny from November 21 through December 26, restricting flights over the base for 'special security reasons'

Morris County was also the first area to report sightings, sparking a joint letter from 21 mayors that called for statewide action from New Jersey Gov Phil Murphy.

The initial sightings sparked fears of foreign adversaries spying on Picatinny Arsenal, but the White House has assured the public that this is not the work of Russia, China or Iran.

'I do think it's interesting that [the drones are] using position lights,' said Sloane.

'If I were a foreign adversary wanting to spy on things, I probably wouldn't have red and green lights on my drone.'

On December 10, Picatinny Arsenal recorded 17 confirmed and unconfirmed sightings of drones over its territory since November 13.

The earliest 'confirmed' sighting was reported by security personnel and the 'unconfirmed' came from unknown individuals, including locals.

Under the terms of the contract, Robotic Research was tasked with conducting technical demonstrations of autonomous unmanned systems sensing technologies and designing them with sensing technologies.

The program is focused on improving autonomy, 3D/4D mapping, localization, target ID, tracking, collective 3D visualization, weapons system integration of Unmanned Autonomous Systems and subterranean communications.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index.html }

14-03-2026 om 12:34 geschreven door peter  

The chilling truth about the mystery New Jersey drone swarm exposed in secret police files

• READ MORE: Uncovered files reveal secret operation at center of drone invasion... and why White House can deny it

By STACY LIBERATORE, US SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITOR

Mysterious drones over New Jersey in 2024 kept Americans scanning the skies for answers.

Now, newly released documents obtained by The War Zone through the Freedom of Information Act reveal what police on the ground actually saw.

The records describe officers across the state spotting large unidentified drones flying in coordinated formations, sometimes in groups of more than a dozen.

Several reports said the aircraft hovered over critical infrastructure, including reservoirs, power substations, research laboratories and military facilities.

In one incident, multiple drones forced a New Jersey State Police medevac helicopter to abort a landing before several appeared to follow it to another location.

Air traffic controllers also reported unidentified drones flying through restricted airspace near Trenton-Mercer Airport at speeds approaching 170 miles per hour, prompting warnings to pilots.

Other officers described triangular or fixed-wing drones significantly larger than consumer models, some reportedly the size of a small car and possibly capable of jamming radar signals.

The thousands of pages of emails, police reports and internal memos show law enforcement officials repeatedly warning that the aircraft could be military-grade and potentially carrying explosive payloads.

Mysterious drones over New Jersey in 2024 kept Americans scanning the skies for answers

The earliest warnings surfaced on November 18, 2024, when Watchung Police Captain Sherif Zaiton alerted officers to 'rogue drone flights' reported across the county

When President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, his administration said the drones were approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for research and other purposes. But the administration provided no further details. 

The thousands of pages of emails, police reports and internal memos obtained by The War Zone paint a far more complicated picture of the so-called 'Jersey drone scare' than the public was initially told.

While many sightings were later attributed to misidentified aircraft, stars or planets, law enforcement officers across the state documented dozens of incidents involving unusual drones operating near critical infrastructure and sensitive locations.

The objects were first reported in Morris County near the Picatinny Arsenal and over Trump's Bedminster golf course.

The earliest warnings surfaced on November 18, 2024, when Watchung Police Captain Sherif Zaiton alerted officers to 'rogue drone flights' reported across the county. 

'There have been reports county-wide of rogue drone flights, multiple drones flying in pattern over sensitive sites,' Zaiton wrote in an email to officers.

Because Trump frequently visited the region at the time, Zaiton told officers to immediately report any sightings.

The following day, Peapack and Gladstone Police Chief Stephen Ferrante warned other departments that 'multiple reports of large drones' had already been received in the area.

The thousands of pages of emails, police reports and internal memos show law enforcement officials repeatedly warning that the aircraft could be military-grade and potentially carrying explosive payloads. Pictured are reported drone sightings on the East Coast

When President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, his administration said the drones were approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for research and other purposes. But provided no further details 

The objects were first reported in Morris County near the Picatinny Arsenal and over Trump's Bedminster golf course

Read More

EXCLUSIVE

•  How Iran can bring the war to US soil in just days: See all the key targets MAPPED after terrifying California drone attack warning 

Authorities quickly realized the situation was serious enough to involve multiple agencies.

Emails show local police were coordinating with county officials, the New Jersey State Police and the FBI as reports spread across the state.

In one message to officers, Watchung Police Chief Scott Anderle warned that the aircraft were 'far bigger than typical hobbyist models' and could require special Federal Aviation Administration licensing.

He also cautioned officers to treat the drones as potentially dangerous.

'The size of the recent drones encountered makes them potentially military grade,' Anderle wrote, advising officers to call bomb squads if one landed.

Shortly after, another update suggested the aircraft was deliberately flying around county communications towers.

'Please keep this in mind,' Zaiton wrote in a follow-up message. 'We are being told to very much consider that these drones could be carrying an explosive payload.'

The drones appeared in mid-November over the Picatinny Arsenal military base in Rockaway, also the location for the Army's Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) that develops new drone technologies for the military

Newly released documents obtained by The War Zone through the Freedom of Information Act reveal what police on the ground actually saw

While many sightings were later attributed to misidentified aircraft, stars or planets, law enforcement officers across the state documented dozens of incidents involving unusual drones operating near critical infrastructure and sensitive locations.

Police reports from across New Jersey show officers repeatedly spotting drones flying in groups and following similar flight paths.

On November 19, a Raritan Borough police officer reported observing two fixed-wing drones flying at about 400 feet above the ground along nearly identical routes.

Another smaller quadcopter-style drone was seen traveling in the opposite direction.

As sightings increased, federal authorities stepped in.

On November 22, a counterterrorism coordinator with the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office sent an alert to local departments at the request of the FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Force.

The warning urged patrol officers to immediately report sightings of suspicious unmanned aircraft.

'Some of these unknown fixed-wing drones have been quite large,' the alert said.

Investigators also warned that the aircraft were being spotted near power lines, substations and military installations.

'There is a concern this could be 'out of country' nations,' the message noted.

Over the following days, police logged an escalating series of sightings.

On November 24, officers responding to a report near a reservoir and sewage plant in Parsippany said they observed more than 13 drones flying north through the area for nearly half an hour. The drones' design and size could not be identified.

Law enforcement also reported drones flying near hospitals, research laboratories and even federal restricted airspace

Authorities requested that the New Jersey State Police monitor nearby highways because the area contained critical infrastructure, including water treatment facilities.

Two days later, another officer in Branchburg reported spotting a drone hovering above a power switching station.

When the officer approached the site, the aircraft suddenly switched off its navigation lights and flew away.

Within minutes, two more drones appeared behind the property and headed north.

The drones also interfered with emergency operations.

That same evening, a New Jersey State Police medevac helicopter attempting to land at Raritan Valley Community College was forced to abort its landing after firefighters spotted multiple drones in the area.

As the helicopter diverted to another landing site, officers reported that several drones appeared to follow it. 

Police also described unusual drone shapes and formations.

An officer in Fair Hills reported seeing about ten large drones moving along a highway corridor at altitudes between 200 and 400 feet.

The aircraft were triangular, significantly larger than typical consumer drones and equipped with strobing red and white lights.

Other sightings suggested even more unusual capabilities.

At Trenton-Mercer Airport in early December, air traffic controllers tracked several unidentified aerial vehicles flying through restricted airspace.

One officer reported radar speeds reaching about 150 knots, roughly 170 miles per hour.

The activity was serious enough that airport officials issued a Notice to Airmen warning pilots about drone activity near the airport.

In another incident, Essex County Airport officials told police they believed the drones were using 'sophisticated radar jamming technology' after the aircraft appeared invisible to radar systems.

Some of the most alarming sightings occurred near critical government facilities.

On December 8, officers at the Federal Reserve building in East Rutherford reported seeing three drones hovering about 100 feet above the parking lot.

One of the drones was described as roughly the size of a motor vehicle, and photographs taken by police were attached to the report.

Law enforcement also reported drones flying near hospitals, research laboratories and even federal restricted airspace.

At the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, staff reported about 11 drones flying near the facility for more than 20 minutes. Five of the aircraft reportedly entered restricted federal airspace.

Sightings were also reported over major medical centers in the state, including Princeton Medical Center and Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital.

Despite the sheer number of reports, no arrests were made and authorities never publicly identified who was operating the drones.

Many sightings were ultimately attributed to misidentified aircraft or celestial objects.

But the police records reveal that officers across the state repeatedly encountered unusual aerial activity they could not immediately explain.

Those firsthand reports, from local patrol officers to federal investigators, highlight how much uncertainty surrounded the mysterious drone activity that gripped New Jersey during the winter of 2024.

And even now, the documents suggest one lingering question remains unanswered.

RELATED VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index.html }

14-03-2026 om 12:22 geschreven door peter