The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
31-10-2013
Daytime UFO filmed over Mexico City on 13th October 2013
Daytime UFO filmed over Mexico City on 13th October 2013
New video footage of a bright UFO recorded in the daytime sky above Mexico City on 13th October 2013.
Army Colonel Reveals Amazing Skinwalker Ranch Stories | VIDEO
By openmindstv YouTube 10-29-13
Retired Army Colonel John Alexander was part of a group researchers and scientists who investigated reports of cattle mutilations and other strange occurrence at Skinwalker Ranch. The ranch is located southeast of Ballard, Utah, and was previously known as the Sherman Ranch. For years stories of cattle mutilations, sightings of UFOs, orbs and bigfoot, among other paranormal events, have been reported on the ranch. . . .
WASHINGTON POST PUBLISHES ANOTHER NSA BOMBSHELL THE DAY AFTER US INTELLIGENCE OFFICIALS' DENIALS OF SPYING IN EUROPE
NSA infiltrates links to Yahoo, Google data centers worldwide, Snowden documents say (By Barton Gellman)
The National Security Agency has secretly broken into the main communications links that connect Yahoo and Google data centers around the world, according to documents obtained from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and interviews with knowledgeable officials
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:Oliver's WebLog ( ENG en NL)
CLAPPERS CLAPTRAP: NSA MAN DOETH PROTEST TOO MUCH, METHINKS
CLAPPERS CLAPTRAP: NSA MAN DOETH PROTEST TOO MUCH, METHINKS
Amid the global furor over the NSA spying on our European allies, and this weekends massive demonstrations in Washington, DC, against this agencys unconstitutional invasion of privacy at home, two top NSA official strongly denied that they had eavesdropped on our allies.
Which reminded this writer of the famous quote from Shakespeares play Hamlet (from Wikipedia):
The lady doth protest too much, methinks. The quote comes from Shakespeares Hamlet, act III, scene II, where it is spoken by Queen Gertrude, Hamlets mother. In Shakespeares time, protest meant vow or declare solemnly. The context is a play within a play, and the Queen criticizes the Player Queens speech on the grounds that excessive avowal of her plan to not remarry after the Player Kings death sounds hollow and insincere. Today, protest means declare an objection, so the phrase has come to mean that one can insist so passionately about something not being true that people suspect the opposite of what one is saying.
This is worth repeating: Insist so passionately about something not being true that people suspect the opposite of what one is saying.
Thats what todays Clapper claptrap sounded like. An insult to our intelligence. Anyone who buys into such lie and deny lines probably also believed Bill Clinton in 1998 when he claimed, I did not have sexual relations with that woman.
Meanwhile, if President Obama indeed did not know about the NSA spying on European officials, such as Germanys Angela Merkel, as his administration now claims, how come no one at NSA has been fired since Obama found out about it from the European media stories, if not his own people? Why has the president not spoken out himself against it?
Silence is acquiescence, they say. By remaining silent instead of condemning the NSA spying, Obama is showing us that may be a part of the problem.
No surprise there. Birds of a feather flock together (see New York Times proves another President has been caught lying to American public: Impeach Obama?; From Obama vs. Obama flip-flops to outright deception).
Amid the global furor over the NSA spying on our European allies,
and this weekend's massive demonst...
LikeLoading...
30-10-2013 om 10:56
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
UFO sighting over Albuquerque, New Mexico on 27th October 2013
UFO sighting over Albuquerque, New Mexico on 27th October 2013 .
Witness said: I am from the East Coast (CT) visiting a childhood friend in Albuquerque, NM (from Thursday, 10/24 through 10/28/13). After finishing dinner at the PF Changs restaurant (at 4440 The 25th Way NE, Albuquerque, NM) on Sunday, 10/27/13, my friend and I headed to the parking lot when my friend noticed a very bright light hovering in the sky over the general area above the roof of a hotel (I think a Drury Inn?) in the same parking lot. We stood for about a minute or two debating what we were looking at, since when focusing on two points on the hotels roof the light wasnt moving. So we decided to get in the car and decided to head SW in the direction of the light outside the city limits where the light pollution was less. It was odd because it was hazy/some cloud cover in the night sky and the stars werent many, and the ones that were visible in this parking lot werent that bright. So this light dominated the sky even in a well-lit parking lot and was rather big and round in appearance. We noted the time on the car clock as 7:58 p.m. (MT) when we got into the car.
We headed up Paseo Del Norte (road) heading West in my friends car. As my friend was driving we noticed planes flying in the sky and they were distinctly smaller, had the typical red and blue blinking lights, and less bright than this light which appeared stationary and unwavering in the night sky. So, as my friend drove her car, I kept my eye on the light so as not to lose its orientation in the sky. The planes appeared to fly under or around the bright light, but it was the planes in the foreground and background that made it clear this wasnt an airplane. And as the planes moved, this light did not.
We stopped at a sharp curve in this road which is the perimeter to a local airfield (Double Eagle?). There are no streetlights at this point and this area is considered behind the volcanoes which, I guess, means something to you if youre from this area. (Its a dark area from which to view the Albuquerque valley and see the entire city from a terrific perspective.). The photos I took are not really very good. These were taken with a Panasonic Lumix F 2.8 25-600 mm camera, which I had on me in a backpack for my visit with my friend and her family, as well as to capture our day outings in and around the Albuquerque area. The photos simply show a bright light. Its odd because there was no moon visible in the sky tonight and this object, to the naked eye changed colors to include flashes of bluish-green, red orange and yellow before descending below an apparent cloud cover, as the light lit up a layer of low clouds making the light a muted, warm orange, and making it apparent that this light was descending behind/below the cloud cover. Finally, even the warm bright light wasnt visible as even a muted light in the sky and we drove to my friends home in the Albuquerque area.
We thought maybe a weather balloon? Do they emit bright lights that appear constant? Did anyone else see this tonight?
PBS recalls 'War of the Worlds' radio broadcast of 75 years ago
PBS recalls 'War of the Worlds' radio broadcast of 75 years ago In the age before Twitter rumors, phony viral videos and fake news stories posted on the Internet, radio actors convinced jittery listeners that Martians were laying waste to the East Coast a hoax recalled in an upcoming PBS documentary.
Seventy five years ago, Americans were in the throes of an economic collapse and nervous about Nazi aggression overseas when Orson Welles and his Mercury Theatre on the Air presented an adaptation of H.G. Wells The War of the Worlds. Using realistic news bulletins during the Oct. 30, 1938 broadcast, Welles hoodwinked a large number of CBS listeners estimates range from several thousand to more than 1 million into believing that Martians had landed in Grovers Mill, N.J., and were advancing on Manhattan.
Switchboards at newspapers and police stations buzzed from Springfield to San Francisco, with calls from panicked listeners who feared poisonous gas or incineration from the Martian death rays. In the aftermath, CBS apologized, the Federal Communications Commission took no punitive action, the Mercury Theatre picked up a much-needed commercial sponsor, and Hollywood was interested in signing Welles to a movie deal.
PBS American Experience, produced by WGBH in Boston and seen locally on WGBY/57, will air a documentary on Tuesday night, marking the panic broadcasts 75th anniversary.
Cathleen O'Connell
Producer-director Cathleen OConnells documentary includes interviews with Welles eldest daughter, Chris Welles Feder; director and Welles confidante Peter Bogdanovich; and dramatizations of letters sent to Welles by radio listeners and preserved by his loyal aide, the late Richard Wilson.
The documentary examines what OConnell calls the million dollar question Did the 23-year-old Welles set out to deliberately panic listeners?
Our film incorporates a dozen or so letters that were written to Welles and the Mercury Theater from this collection. We also used a couple of letters from the FCC collection at the National Archives, but the bulk of the letters are from the Wilson collection, OConnell said.
A former student at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, where the collection is held, A. Brad Schwartz, had written a history thesis using the letters as his primary source material, so he was our guide through the Wilson materials pointing out particularly relevant and evocative letters.
She added, We wanted to find a way to tell this story that brought some freshness to it, and because the broadcast was 75 years ago, there arent a lot of folks who heard the broadcast that we could talk to. But we thought what if we could go back in time and talk to people right after they heard the broadcast? So we used these letters as a way to deliver first person accounts of the night of the broadcast.
Actor-director Orson Welles, left, photographed with English author H.G. Wells when they met in San Antonio, Texas, on Nov. 30, 1940. The pair were discussing events in Europe when this picture was taken. (AP file photo)
I personally think that Welles did not have a deliberate agenda to create a panic. I believe he set out to create a work of art that was engaging, fresh and edgy. I think he certainly wanted to entertain his audience, and himself as well, but I dont think he set out in a calculated way to engineer a panic, nor could he in any way have predicted the response to the radio program, OConnell said.
That being said, I think he was a very canny entertainer and a brilliant self-promoter and certainly was not displeased in the publicity and attention that the broadcast brought to him. Just a note on the word panic the extent of the panic remains unknown while certainly some people panicked that night, and we share letters from those who did, many listeners did not believe the program. The exact numbers will never be truly known.
OConnell reviewed interviews Welles gave recalling the broadcast in the decades before his death in 1985, but she chose not to include them.
He offered a few different takes on it in different interviews so it was hard to sort out the truth from spin ... so we decided to let the broadcast speak for itself, OConnell said.
We did, however, include Welles press conference the day after the broadcast which is a wonderful piece of archival material. We also talked a lot about that press conference in editorial meetings how much of that press conference is true remorse and how much is performance. I think probably its a little of both!
Welles daughter, Chris Welles Feder, said The War of the Worlds broadcast altered her fathers career.
The national panic caused by the radio drama made my father internationally famous, and led to his leaving the theater and becoming a movie director in Hollywood, Feder said. My mother (Virginia Nicolson) deplored this move, as she believed my fathers true genius lay in the theater, but fortunately he didnt listen to her or we wouldnt have Citizen Kane.
Feder added, I first heard War of the Worlds on a set of old LPs when I was in my teens. I found it very tame, because I was listening to it in a different era when households had television sets, and the nation was not on the brink of World War II.
It is hard for us to imagine in 2013 the enormous power that radio had in 1938, when it was the main source of news, Feder said. In 1938, there was no way to Google the broadcast.
Prior taking on the project, OConnell said she was aware of Welles career as a filmmaker (Citizen Kane), and actor (The Third Man), but less familiar with work in the 1930s on Broadway and radio.
Im thrilled that our film throws a spotlight on this lesser-known part of his life, as this is an incredibly fertile and creative time of his career, where hes experimenting with some of the techniques he will use later in motion pictures, OConnell said. The fact that he was 23 when he did the War of the Worlds stuck with me the most I think. Today we have wunderkinds like Mark Zuckerberg, who have made such an impact on our lives Welles is totally in this category of culture maker extraordinaire, hes definitely a prodigy.
29-10-2013 om 23:37
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Debunker Hoaxes -- The Bogus "Venus Cleared for Landing" Story
Debunker Hoaxes -- The Bogus "Venus Cleared for Landing" Story FYI from Brad Sparks
Debunker
Hoaxes -- The Bogus "Venus Cleared for Landing" Story
Recently, my attention was called to a story
in Allan Hendry's UFO
Handbook of 1979, by a Euroskeptic who was properly
cautious in bringing it up, saying "If cited
correctly" by Hendry, then it
might be instructive. Purportedly, the Detroit, Mich., airport controllers had
many times "cleared" the planet Venus to land at the airport.
In the first of two statements by Hendry, the
context is one nestled among numbered CUFOS UFO / IFO cases (details omitted as
not relevant to the point, which is that they were numbered). Yet the Venus
story itself has no case number. In fact, it doesn't even rise to the level of
an actual story but is more of an aphorism or a quip.
Hendry, p. 27:
Venus continued to attract attention as a "UFO" throughout the period of my study. The witness in case 519 [sighted etc.]
....In cases
890 and 896, the
witnesses [sighted etc.]....
My favorite
comment, however, was provided by the FAA at Detroit Metropolitan Airport: "Do you know how
many times we've cleared Venus to land?" [No
case number]
Hendry p. 102:
I was
once told by a member of the
FAA control at the Detroit Metropolitan
Airport, "Do you know how many
times we have cleared Venus to
land?" [No case
number]
I can answer the alleged anonymous airport
official's misleading question: ZERO. Yes, that's right, the
story is a complete and total fiction. The planet Venus cannot radio for clearance to land -- I mean to even have
to explain this is ridiculous, Venus is an inanimate object incapable of
intelligent thought and communication, radio or otherwise.
An aircraft that tries to land at a busy
airport in a restricted airway without obtaining radio clearance first is either an emergency due to radio failure or disability of
the pilot, or it is a potential hijacking or
terrorist aircraft or some hostile attack activity. It is an extremely
serious matter, not to be laughed off as just "lights in the sky playing
tricks." The airport radar will have been checked by controllers
to verify that an aircraft is coming in on a standard approach path and/or is a
hazard to other flights. Repeated efforts will have been made to establish
radio contact. When there is no response, swift emergency action will be taken.
It would be in all the newspapers and the
subject of official FAA or NTSB investigation and by similar agencies in other
countries if it ever occurred there. The AF would be alerted to scramble
fighters to intercept unless it was clearly just a pilot in trouble and not
suspicious or hostile action. Having something like this happen at night is an
especially dangerous situation. We would know all about it. Hendry would have
been able to provide names, dates, places, the whole works -- if anything like
it had actually ever happened.
And why only Detroit airport anyway?
Doesn't Venus radio other airports for clearance to land??? What about Jupiter
and Sirius, don't they radio too???
The more I thought about it the more I was struck
by the absurdity of the story insinuating that Detroit Airport controllers had
many times "cleared" the planet Venus to "land" at the airport. This seems to
be something of a debunker article of faith, a prooftext for the stupidity of
even trained air traffic controllers. Yet it is not even claimed to be a UFO
sighting.
We are supposed to believe that Venus just shines
brightly in the sky one evening and that busy air traffic controllers then
become mesmerized by the sight and actually go through their procedures to
"clear" the planet for landing -- the specifics of those "clearance procedures"
being conveniently hazy in this debunker thought-balloon. It is a grossly
embarrassing act of folly -- if it ever happened. Therefore, this cautionary
tale supposedly tells us that UFO cases at airports can just be similar
stupidity and it instructs us on how stupid people can be if even air traffic
controllers can make such mammoth mistakes of "misperception" (whatever that
loaded term really means, which I contend is a nonsense term anyway, but that's
another story for another day).
But in reality it is an example of a debunker hoax. Yes, debunkers, can and do
perpetrate hoaxes, just like the Adamskis of the world. But it is a category of
event or fabricated non-event that is not recognized or studied or debated.
There seems to be the attitude that debunkers are just skeptics trying to
defend "truth," so by very definition they don't engage in untruthful or
fraudulent hoaxes, right?
The genre of debunker hoaxes -- not mistakes or
confused slipups, but perpetrated frauds -- include the following and I'm sure
the list can be extended with further thought and research:
The
faked "Roswell" map and balloon data (with bad math like 100/12 = 350 instead of
8.5, etc.) to support the nonexistent, cancelled Project Mogul Flight 4, the
600+ feet of rigging for which was evidently recycled for Flight 5, all part of
a debunking scam to dispose of the Roswell case (whatever the actual event may
have been).
In
the Mantell case, someone in an official agency made up a bogus Skyhook balloon
launch from Clinton County airport in Ohio, a launch that never happened (no
such launches till 1951), and passed on the false claim to Ruppelt at BB.
Debunker
astronomer Patrick Moore apparently faked the 1954 "Cedric Allingham" contactee
photo/book hoax.
Over half a
century of UFO, contactee and crashed-saucer stories were invented and/or
disseminated by official agencies as discrediting disinformation that debunks
the UFO subject and UFO researchers.
When I read what Hendry wrote, though, I was
bothered by a number of things besides the patent absurdity of the story, such
as the fact it is not even an assertion of fact but a question, an unanswered question at that. Was
Hendry's source simply playing a rhetorical game? Was it a joke inspired by the
similarity of the words "plane" and "planet"? No UFO report is attached to the
story, as I said, nor any IFO report. No date, no names of alleged witnesses,
whether FAA controllers or not. No "sighting details."
It is clear to me that the story was calculated to
produce shame, and the shame was intended to shut down all thought and critical
faculties. The shame has the effect of allowing misconceptions, stereotypes and
prejudices to fill in the vacuum left by shutting down thought -- in this case
to forget everything we ought to know about airport procedures, even from
watching the movies or television. Debunkers
apparently expect that it will be too embarrassing for critics to ask questions
because it only draws more attention to the uncomfortable (alleged) "fact" that
air controllers cleared a planet, Venus, for landing many times. Embarrassment
and shame obviate the need to
supply any documentation -- no one dares bring up the subject to ask. We are
supposed to accept the story without question and let it have its intended
effect, in this case a very deceitful one.
The Venus-cleared-to-land story is patently so
false, so fraudulent, so outrageous, that it is amazing to me that it hasn't
been exposed sooner. The shaming effect evidently shuts down all thinking,
stops all questioning.
This raises
many disturbing questions: Who in the FAA at Detroit made up this obviously
false story? Why did Hendry not question the story or attempt to get
documentation for at least one purported instance? Why hasn't anyone questioned
this fraudulent and outrageous debunker hoax before? Here we are 34 years after
Hendry's book was published so why hasn't anyone blown the whistle? Hendry's
book has been the darling of skeptics and debunkers, who supposedly epitomize
"critical thinking" yet seem to have trouble critically thinking about their own
"side" (a point that Jerry Clark has been making for years). Maybe there is
some obscure review somewhere that has called attention to this bogus story and
maybe the many other huge errors of astronomy, statistics, math, logic, etc., in
the same book.
And by the way, the falsity of
this story does not mean the opposite is true, that controllers never make
mistakes, never mistake IFO's for UFO's, just that they never foolishly radio
clearances to land to unidentified aircraft or objects in the sky. And my
position on ETH needs to be reiterated here lest I be misunderstood: The
falsity of this story does not prove that UFO's are alien
spacecraft. I do not
accept or "believe in" ET or alien visitation, never have, but others are
welcome to draw their own conclusions as to what the unexplained UFO phenomenon
may represent. I agree with most of Jacques Vallées 5 numbered arguments in
his Five Arguments Against the Extraterrestrial Origin of Unidentified Flying
Objects, JSE, 1990, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 105-117, with corrections and
modifications, and additional reasons of my own, again a discussion for another
time.
The Black Vault has been around for more than 17 years. Run by
only myself, John Greenewald, Jr., Th...
29-10-2013 om 23:18
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
DE NASA HEEFT OVER ALLES GELOGEN
DE NASA HEEFT OVER ALLES GELOGEN
De maan zit vol met leven, en is een schitterend gekleurde bol! In 1994 maakte de Clementine 1,8 miljoen fotos van de Maan. Er werden verschillende soorten fotos gemaakt waaronder ook kleurenfotos. Los gezien van het feit of we naar de Maan zijn geweest of niet, zijn we er zonder twijfel geland. Deze film gaat over wat er op ons stond te wachten en de leugens die vervolgens zijn verspreid. De onderzoekers die aan het woord komen vertellen over zaken die al meer dan 40 jaar verborgen worden gehouden. Dit is zowel verrassend als shockerend. Je vraagt je af waarom ons al die tijd leugens zijn voorgeschoteld. Bewijs is verdoezeld dat er beschavingen zijn geweest op de Maan of dat ze er mogelijk nog steeds zijn. Ons is altijd wijsgemaakt dat de Maan een grijze, kleurloze bol is. De Maan lijkt in werkelijkheid echter op een kleine planeet die wemelt van leven en bouwwerken, zoals de fotos zullen aantonen. Zie hieronder de documentaire over deze grote leugen en cover up aller tijden, genaamd Moon Rising.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
New video footage of a bright UFO recorded in the 
De maan zit vol met leven, en is een schitterend gekleurde bol! In 1994 maakte de Clementine 1,8 miljoen fotos van de Maan. Er werden verschillende soorten fotos gemaakt waaronder ook kleurenfotos. Los gezien van het feit of we naar de Maan zijn geweest of niet, zijn we er zonder twijfel geland. Deze film gaat over wat er op ons stond te wachten en de leugens die vervolgens zijn verspreid. De onderzoekers die aan het woord komen vertellen over zaken die al meer dan 40 jaar verborgen worden gehouden. Dit is zowel verrassend als shockerend. Je vraagt je af waarom ons al die tijd leugens zijn voorgeschoteld. Bewijs is verdoezeld dat er beschavingen zijn geweest op de Maan of dat ze er mogelijk nog steeds zijn. Ons is altijd wijsgemaakt dat de Maan een grijze, kleurloze bol is. De Maan lijkt in werkelijkheid echter op een kleine planeet die wemelt van leven en bouwwerken, zoals de fotos zullen aantonen. Zie hieronder de documentaire over deze grote leugen en cover up aller tijden, genaamd Moon Rising.
