Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.
This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.
DEAR VISITOR,
MY BLOG EXISTS ALREADY 12 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS.
ON 06/04/2024 MORE THAN 1.951.050
VISITORS FROM 134 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.
THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400GUESTS PER DAY.
THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
22-01-2015
Talks Of 7000-Year-Old Spaceships, Shakes Up Indian Science Congress - See more at: http://yournewswire.com/talks-of-7000-year-old-spaceships-shakes-up-indian-science-congress
Talks Of 7000-Year-Old Spaceships, Shakes Up Indian Science Congress
7,000-year-old aircraft that could travel to other planets was one of the startling claims made at the Indian Science Congress earlier this month.
Surprising and unusual discoveries based on ancient Hindu texts, like the Vedas and the Puranas, were presented at a session on “Ancient Indian Sciences through Sanskrit,”…but it did not go down very well with everyone according to the article below by collective evolution, who report:
With Prime Minister Narendra Modi in attendance and various other prestigious scientists from all over the world, the Indian Science Congress is probably the last place you would expect a presentation regarding ancient flying machines that could traverse the Solar System. For the first time in the history of the congress, a presentation was given outlining the depiction of these ancient flying ‘space ships.
These flying machines have been depicted in multiple Sanskrit texts such as the Vedas, the Puranas and more. What’s even more remarkable is the fact that this type of machinery, and the concept of intelligent extraterrestrial life is not limited to ancient Sanskrit (Hinduism and Buddhism), but is found in several different ancient civilizations that span across the globe, according to many scholars and academicians. This doesn’t mean it’s true, but it does mean that the subject should be able to be examined with an open mind, without ridicule and condemnation.
The idea of mixing in a serious talk on ancient Indian flying machines when presentations on more rigid research and science policy issues are being discussed, at a major science conference, in my opinion, is great. It probably opened the minds of many who otherwise would have not even thought about something like this in the first place.
The lecture was given by Captain Anand Bodas, a retired pilot and head of a pilot training facility. The presentation was titled “Ancient Indian Sciences Through Sanskrit.” The lecture sent a jolt through the congress, and didn’t come without any backlash. A NASA scientist, Ram Prasad Gandhiraman was so upset that he started an online petition demanding that the Indian Science Congress cancel the lecture, because (in his opinion) it mixed science with mythology. (source)
According to RT news, here is one quote from the lecture:
“There is a reference to ancient aviation in the Rigveda (Vedic Sanskrit Hymns). The basic structure was of 60 by 60 feet, and in some cases, over 200 feet. They were jumbo planes, the ancient planes had 40 small engines. Today’s aviation does not know even of a flexible exhaust system.” (source) These types of concepts and ideas have been gaining more popularity, which in turn has lead to mainstream television shows like “Ancient Aliens,’ one that is commonly aired on the discovery channel.
While I know that many people are tired of the arguments about the authenticity of MJ-12, and while I really don’t want to open up another assault on my integrity based on my objections to MJ-12 documents, I have discovered something about them that hasn’t been reported. It suggests, once again, who might have had a hand in creating the documents, and it reinforces the idea that these documents were created in the mid-1980s for personal gain and not in 1952 for the President-elect.
I was searching for another file, when I noticed one that was out of place. I opened it out of curiosity and found some notes that related to MJ-12. What this told me was that at the UFO Expo West in Los Angeles on May 11, 1991, Jaime Shandera was lecturing about the Plains of San Agustin. He had this to say:
The people that supposedly found stuff in Socorro did not find stuff in Socorro. The party of archaeological people and the Barney Barnett part of the story; they were at the Corona site, not in Socorro [Plains of San Agustin]. I know [this is] the way you understand it because it’s the way it’s always been written and even the way it was written in The Roswell Incident. That’s wrong. There is new evidence that it was all in the Corona site. The way it happened was this – there were not two sites that were more than one hundred miles or so apart … and the so-called Roswell site was just outside of Corona. The archaeologists and Barney Barnett part of it, that was over in Corona. There was no person that found anything in San Agustin.
Remember, this was in May 1991, and had nothing to do with what Don Schmitt and I had written in our book, UFO Crash at Roswell, that would be published in July 1991, though we had come to the same conclusion. Barnett was not over on the Plains. In May 1991, no one had seen Ruth Barnett’s diary, which, of course, ended the discussion. Karl Pflock and I would publish an article some ten years later that not only suggested that Barnett had not seen the object on the Plains, but that his story had nothing at all to do with Roswell crash.
On that same day, that is May 11, 1991, Antonio Huneeus and Javier Sierra interviewed Bill Moore about some of the things that Shandera had said earlier. Moore was talking about the Gerald Anderson tale and why he did not accept it as authentic. (Interestingly, one of the reasons he rejected it was because the military was segregated in 1947, not realizing that white officers commanded the black units, so one of his reasons for rejecting the tale is false, but that doesn’t matter here.) He confirmed that he was on board with Shandera about the Plains, saying, “There is no reason to believe anything occurred on the Plains of San Agustin on that particular date.…”
Which is, of course, what I and many others have been saying for years. Nothing happened on the Plains. But then Moore said the thing that is quite revelatory. He said, “The original hypothesis was that the object had come down in two places, the first being the Brazel site, the second being the Plains of San Agustin, and that in 1985 I abandoned [it] simply because the only witness who put the thing in the Plains of San Agustin at all was Barnett’s boss, Danley, [who] it turned out, was not sure of the place, and it turned out that Barnett could have been up at the Brazel site…”
Here’s what we know now. According to the documentation supplied by Moore in various arenas, Shandera received the Eisenhower Briefing Document on December 11, 1984. This is based on their displaying of a mailing envelope with a December 1984 date on it (postmarked from Albuquerque, which I mention simply because if I don’t someone will criticize the lack of my noting it) but we have no way of knowing if that envelope actually contained the film. There is nothing to tie it to the film and the EBD. We can document the first public mention of the EBD by a London newspaper on May 3, 1987, though Just Cause did publish a list of members of MJ-12 in December 1985 but not the documents themselves. Prior to that, we have nothing that is reliable about the EBD. We can accept the December 11, 1984, date as reliable, or we can reject it. It actually means little because it is impossible to prove that the date is accurate.
Now, based on the 1991 interview, we have Moore’s statement that he had rejected the idea of a Plains of San Agustin crash in 1985 which, as I noted, is interesting. He tells us that he has rejected it because Danley couldn’t actually provide a location or date for Barnett’s story. This is something that I had noticed when I interviewed “Fleck” Danley in October 1990. It was clear that he couldn’t remember much about what Barnett had said and had I been of a mind, I could have convinced him of almost anything. I realized that his information was severely compromised.
But here’s the thing. Moore, in 1991, was saying that he rejected the Plains of San Agustin in 1985, not because he had in his hand the EBD which mentioned nothing of a crash there, but because he found the Danley information to be wanting. It would seem to me that if I was in possession of a document which gave me precise information about a UFO crash and that had been prepared for the man who would be taking over as President in a few months, that would be the most important source for a change in the basic story. If the Plains was left out of the briefing that would tell me that the information about the Plains was inaccurate and that would be a better source than that of a witness who was easily confused. Or, in other words, I would have said I have a document that tells me the Plains story is no good.
That is, unless I know something about the EBD that others don’t know. If I know the source of the EBD, and I know the document can’t be trusted, then I don’t use it to suggest there was no crash on the Plains. I say something about the lack of reliability of Danley’s testimony.
The other side of this is that we can trace the EBD back to Bill Moore and Jaime Shandera and no further. They are the sources for this document and it seems that they, or at least Moore, are not confident enough in it to use is as source material for his analysis of the situation in 1947. That tells us something very important about the EBD. It tells us that Moore finds the EBD unreliable, and if he has no confidence in it, why should the rest of us?
I will say one other thing. The information contained in the EBD was the best available in the mid-1980s. This is proved once again by Moore’s comment that he abandoned the Plains idea in 1985. He is telling us quite a bit in that one short statement. We should all listen to what he had to say about this because it does answer a couple of burning questions. Posted by KRandle at 11:37 AM
The strange object was recorded by fishermen in the river area. This is not the first time that such phenomena have taken place in the Santa Fe locality.
“Once again, fishermen from the town of Villa Ocampo in the province of Santa Fe were startled by a UFO,” said Sofy Grey to viewers of the TN y la Gente program.
“Extraterrestrial” apparitions of this sort have been seen before in Villa Ocampo, Santa Fe.
On January 5 [2015], a UFO surprised a group of local fishermen in a branch of the Parana River. People at the “Ave Fenix” lodge, at the river's edge, were astonished by the phenomenon, while locals confirm that such apparitions are customary in the area. A few months ago, only kilometers from the town known as El Sombrerito, oddly-mutilated animals were found with their jawbones removed. These same farmers say that these luminous objects are being seen more frequently at any time in the place.
Witness report:On January 20, 2015 I was headed north to work and noticed something to west/southwest direction and pulled into the church to take a look. I had noticed to objects that looked like fireballs heading in a southern direction.
One was training ways behind the other and both had taken on a horizontal path almost.
As I was watching them I noticed a third object just appear out of nowhere high in the sky like it was just dropped. It was going fast and also left a trial behind it.
Object 1.
I snapped pictures of the three for a while and noticed a 4th one appear in the sky but this one was heading north instead of south. As I was snapping a picture I watched it did some kind of a half flip turn upwards and over flip and then was now facing in the southern direction like the other 3.
Object 2 and 3.
The first 2 had gotten too far for me to watch so I focused on the last 2. As the third one kept moving I could see it take on a more straight horizontal path and the tail behind it was getting shorter and then it was like morphing into a sphere that had a glow around it and just pretty much stopped and hovered in place.
While that was going on the 4th one kept dropping in altitude and could see it start to take a slight curve into a straighter line on its path.
Object 4.
The 3rd one was still just hovering in that same area and it seemed like as the 4th one got closer it was starting to light up more like its flames or tail was starting to get longer again and then when the 4th one got to a close enough point the 3rd one starting moving slowly and in a southern direction still then after a few minutes of me watching it just vanished out of sight and I was moving the camera around to locate it but couldn’t see it anywhere so I stopped and headed to work.
The 4th one had moved behind the tree lines and I just seen an orange glow that kept moving when I stopped taking photo’s..
My brother said it’s a meteor but a meteor wouldn’t go from a falling diagonal path to a horizontal path and it would just stop traveling hover in place and just be a white sphere and then light up brighter and then take off or as with the 4th one a meteor would not change its direction and go the opposite direction of the way it came in falling into the atmosphere.
Editor’s Note: Given the above eyewitness report and eyewitness reports of other strange objects falling from the sky in recent months, we may wonder whether these objects are just meteorites, space junk or these objects are coming from an unknown source in space.
There is something going on in space? is it possible that these objects are linked to a space war between two earthly super powers or a space war between an earthly super power and an extraterrestrial race?
MYSTERIOUS PLANE IN PERSUIT OF A TRIANGLE OVER MONTANA JANUARY 13, 2015 …….. GALLATIN GATEWAY MONTANA
A triangular shaped object with no navigation/collision lights flew overhead being followed by an obvious airplane. I stepped outside to take my dog to the bathroom and saw a plane with blinking navigation and collision lights about 30 deg above the horizon, east of Gallatin Gateway. I assumed the plane was coming in to land at BZN. I happened to notice what I thought was a satellite in the same vicinity; at first, I thought it was the ISS as it was big enough. I kept watching it and dismissed that though as it appeared to be moving much slower than other times when I’ve seen the ISS and wasn’t nearly as bright. In fact, I saw that what I thought was a satellite was really two lights–almost vertical–and, when my hand is held at arm’s length, was about as tall as my thumb and forefinger held about an inch apart. It was interesting; I hadn’t ever seen something like that before. I stood there watching it and its direction changed, from headed N to headed W. At first, I still thought it was a satellite: it had no blinking lights, so I just thought it was a satellite in orbit and its orbit happened to curve right then. The longer I watched it though, the more I realized that it was being followed by the plane. Its angle in the sky changed; the lights went from appearing to be vertical in the sky to being parallel with the ground. There were three lights in a triangle shape. It flew right through the constellation Orion, south of Taurus and the Pleiades, and the plane followed behind. At arm’s length, the plane was about a foot behind the object. The heading of both the object and the plane continued to curve slowly around, from west to SW, and it eventually left the Gallatin Valley with the plane following behind, just off to the side. It struck me as odd; the object had no blinking lights AT ALL. Normally at night, even at high altitudes, it’s obvious to tell if something is plane or a satellite, primarily from the blinking lights. This object had no blinking lights, no colored lights–other than white, and they weren’t the same intensity as the “chase” plane. A description of the backgrounds of the observer(s) is useful as well: I have a MS in the quantitative sciences, a BS in Biology, and have been an aviation buff since I was a kid. I don’t drink alcohol or use drugs so could not have been under the influence at all.
UFO Chronicles links us to Top 10 States with The Most UFO Sightings. Oregon did not make the list, which is curious, seeing as how I've seen many a UFO here, including an eerily large and silent — and fast moving! — triangle. Not to mention the famous orange orb, complete with missing time. And all manner of craft, morphing machines, and twinkling things in the skies.
So the question is, am I one of those UFO statistics that say so many sightings mean I am an abductee, or picked by “them,” or another human plaything of the Reptilian Overlords? “They” seem to follow some people.
On the one hand we could say: “Well, kiddo, probably most if not all of those things you've seen were simply man made objects.” I have no doubt at all many of the things I've seen are ours. Drones, climate monitoring devices, weird space station satellites gizmos.
However, we're left with three interesting pieces of data:
Regarding Oregon sightings, we still have the orange orb, with alien tinged dreams and missing time and spooky triangle)
I've been seeing and experiencing UFO and UFO related events since childhood.
My husband, too, has had these experiences since his childhood. Apart, and together, we've experienced — and continue to experience — the UFO Weird.
In that context, the UFOs do seem to be attracted to us. Or, us to them. Or maybe it's just the tracking devices they inserted and we're simply a random sample.
So, while Oregon may not have made the Top Ten list, (though Washington to the north, and California to the south, did) in my little Oregon world, UFOs have been very present.
Extra information about the article:
UFO Chronicles links us to Top 10 States with The Most UFO Sightings. Oregon did not make the list, which is curious, seeing as how I've seen many…
An Oregon witness at Canby was reminded of the 1997 Phoenix Lights case when he saw five lights crossing the sky in a V-formation about 6:30 p.m. on January 20, 2015, according to testimony in Case 62776 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
The reporting witness describes being in his backyard attempting to see the comet Lovejoy when the object first came into view.
“I was sitting in a zero gravity lawn chair with a patio steel chair sitting in front of me to steady my binoculars for better viewing of the comet,” the witness stated. “I could see satellites, and airplanes, but no comet.”
Frustrated at not seeing the comet, his girlfriend came outside to join him.
“Obama was giving his speech and talking about two years of free college (a good time reference). I shrugged her comments off and expressed my frustrations with not being able to find this comet, pointing out where I believed it was and where I was told it would be, pointing things out in the sky. I pointed out the star formation Pleiades and then I pointed out a satellite close by and started scanning the sky for more things I could point out to her.”
But then the unusual object was seen.
The Canby, Oregon, witness said he saw lights in a V-shape pattern closely followed by six or seven lights of the same frequency and size. Pictured: Canby, Oregon. (Credit: Google)
“Gazing into the northwest, something caught my eye. My thought process went as follows – satellite, shooting stars, to an actual object bigger than I have ever seen before.”
The witness screamed to his girlfriend to look at the object.
“I was seeing five lights in a V-shape pattern closely followed by six or seven lights of the same frequency and size. The V-shape was one single, large object, dark enough to see through the clouds and blocking starlight as it passed. It was amazing and short lived.”
The witness then remembered that he was holding binoculars, raised them for a better look, but was unsuccessful.
The witness said the lights were dim, but put off a haze or a slight glow. Pictured: Canby, Oregon. (Credit: Google)
“The lights were dim, but put off a haze or a slight glow. It was fast and there was a plane just below the object as it passed. Please don’t get me wrong – this object was nowhere near the plane and traveled at a much, much faster pace. Man, the V-shape was jaw dropping when I could make out the full object. I couldn’t make out what the other lights were, but just lights traveling at the same pace not far behind. It seemed to be traveling west to north spotting in the northwest at about 45 degrees of the horizon.”
His girlfriend thought she had just seen a shooting star. And without a camera nearby, he was unable to take a photograph of what he had just seen.
“Others had to see this. Others had to be doing exactly what I was doing – looking for the stupid comet.”
Canby is a city in Clackamas County, Oregon, population 15,829.
A second Utah witness in nearby Oregon City, also in Clackamas County, reported watching three lights hovering in a straight line that quickly darted away as described in Case 62783. The event date and time is listed as 7:30 p.m., January 20, but the year is shown as 2014. It is possible with the New Year just arriving that the witness meant the year as 2015. If this is discovered to be true during the investigation, it would mean that this witness saw the object just one hour later than the Canby witness and about eight miles north of Canby.
The witness at Oregon City first saw what they thought was a drone.
“I pulled out of my apt to see a drone-type plane fly away from the sighting prior to me seeing the UFO. But it didn’t look like the normal military drone. Looked like small plane but with only red, slow flashing lights. It was a lot smaller than a plane and closer to the ground.”
The witness then drove to a stop light about 100 feet from his apartment.
“I saw a diagonal line of three ‘big’ star-shaped (circle-ish) lights hovering. Then all of a sudden they darted across the sky – going to the left side of my car. It moved very quickly. Basically just saw a flash of light trail and they were gone. I thought at first it was stars, but they were too big and too close to the ground to be stars. I was very shocked and curious when this happened.”
The witness uploaded an illustration of the scene: Illustration 1.
Witness illustration of the events that began about 6:30 p.m. on January 20, 2015, over Canby, Oregon. (Credit: MUFON)
Please remember that most UFO sightings can be explained as something natural or man-made. The above quotes were edited for clarity. Please report UFO activity to MUFON.com.
A man photographed what he asserts to be a UFO floating over Crystal Beach in southeast Texas on the evening of December 11, 2014.
The witness, Larry Nash, was reportedly working at a construction site in Crystal Beach when he noticed a bright object in the sky. His co-workers also reportedly observed the strange-looking UFO.
“It was round in shape to the naked eye. Like a giant bubble,” he explains to local media outlet the Beaumont Enterprise.
(Credit: Larry Nash/Beaumont Enterprise)
He also describes this “bubble” UFO as having a metallic appearance.
Nash photographed the object with his phone’s camera. He asserts that the color of the UFO changed back and forth between green and purple. But, as the Beaumont Enterprise reports, “Nash said his phone’s camera didn’t do the sighting justice, saying the images don’t accurately show the changing colors.”
The witnesses continued watching the UFO for approximately 45 minutes before they were instructed to resume their work.
Some have suggested that the object in Nash’s photos is an atmospheric phenomenon known as a sundog or parhelion, which appears in the sky when sunlight shines through ice crystals in the air. But Nash is unsure about what he an his co-workers observed. He has reportedly reached out to “alien enthusiasts” for help with identifying the unusual aerial object, but that approach hasn’t been successful.
Galactisch transportsysteem: "Melkweg bevat mogelijk wormgat naar ander sterrenstelsel"
Galactisch transportsysteem: “Melkweg bevat mogelijk wormgat naar ander sterrenstelsel”
In het centrum van de Melkweg bevindt zich mogelijk een reusachtige ingang naar een ander sterrenstelsel. Deze poort zou groot genoeg zijn voor ruimteschepen. Volgens een nieuwe studie kunnen we net als in de film Interstellar door wormgaten reizen.
Het is theoretisch gezien mogelijk om via wormgaten in een oogwenk van het ene punt in de ruimtetijd naar het andere te reizen. De nieuwe theorie, waarover wetenschappers schrijven in het tijdschrift Annals of Physics, volgt op de ontdekking van een supermassief zwart gat in het centrum van ons sterrenstelsel.
Volgens de Italiaanse onderzoekers kan dit zwarte gat in werkelijkheid een wormgat zijn. De wetenschappers, die hun conclusie hebben gebaseerd op ingewikkelde wiskundige modellen, zeggen dat de poort gemaakt kan zijn van donkere materie, een onzichtbare en mysterieuze substantie waar naar schatting een kwart van het heelal uit bestaat.
“Ons sterrenstelsel kan één van deze tunnels bevatten,” zei professor Paulo Salucci van de internationale school voor geavanceerde studies SISSA in Triëst. “Sterker nog: de tunnel kan net zo groot zijn als de Melkweg zelf. Maar er is meer. We kunnen door de tunnel reizen, net als in de film Interstellar.”
Wormgaten die in de natuur voorkomen zijn vermoedelijk microscopische scheurtjes in de structuur van de ruimtetijd. Maar het wormgat in het centrum van de Melkweg is waarschijnlijk groot genoeg om een ruimteschip op te slokken. De Melkweg kan dus een soort galactisch transportsysteem zijn.
“We beweren niet dat ons sterrenstelsel een wormgat is, maar op basis van onze modellen behoort deze hypothese zeker tot de mogelijkheden,” aldus Salucci. De wetenschappers vermoeden dat ook andere spiraalvormige sterrenstelsels, zoals Andromeda, wormgaten bevatten.
De onderzoekers schrijven: “Onze resultaten zijn van groot belang omdat we bevestigen dat spiraalvormige sterrenstelsels mogelijk wormgaten bevatten. Donkere materie kan de drijvende kracht zijn achter de vorming van zo’n wormgat.”
Astronomers detected a mysterious, brief radio signal in New South Wales using the Parkes Radio Telescope.
Known as Fast Radio Bursts, short signals like this one are comparatively new phenomenon. Scientists are yet to determine their origin.
It was in 2007 that Fast Radio Burst first occurred when astronomers discovered it after looking through related data from the Parkes Radio Telescope. Then six more bursts have been reportedly found in archival data of the Parkes Radio Telescope, and another similar burst discovered from Arecibo telescope data in Puerto Rico. However, one of these brief signals had not been detected in real time until recently.
A team of Australian astronomers lead by Emily Petroff developed a method to search for Fast Radio Bursts. The effort paid off on May 14, 2014 when a Fast Radio Burst was detected for the first time in real time. Researchers then alerted other telescopes from different parts of the world. Scientists successfully scanned multiple wavelengths with twelve telescopes investigating the signal. But ScienceDaily explains researchers found nothing even though they successfully detected the radio wave burst while it happened and could quickly make follow-up observations at other wavelengths such as x-ray waves, ultraviolet light, infrared light, and visible light.
Astrophysicist Daniele Malesani explains that the efforts were not wasted because they did not see light at other wavelengths, which eliminated variety of astronomical phenomena related to violent events, such as gamma-ray bursts from exploding supernovae and stars, which otherwise prospects for the burst.
The team concludes that the radio burst came from 5.5 billion light years away. However, the mystery remains despite the fact that astronomers learned more about this mysterious Fast Radio Burst phenomenon through eliminating some possible sources.
So, what are these radio signals? Where do they originate? What may be causing the signal? Possibilities include evaporating black holes, alien communication, and merging neutron stars.
A cigar-shaped UFO was moving across the sky at approximately the speed of an airplane starting at 4:38 pm on 17th of January 2015, as reported by a Maine witness at Bangor.
Riding in a vehicle with her husband driving, the witness saw the mysterious flying object heading towards them.
According to the reporting witness, she looked out the car window to her right and spotted what looked like at first a long, metallic blimp going down at tremendous speed near them. Reportedly moving as fast as an airplane, the UFO didn’t make any noise at all.
Terrified by what she had seen, she pointed out the unusual aerial object to her husband. She described the strange thing similar to a blimp structurally but long and narrow enough to be regarded as a cigar-shaped UFO.
The reporting witness tried to search online to know if there are planes resembled the UFO, and she also asked her father, who has been a pilot and an amateur astronomer.
The witness said that a half-scale model of an airship was the closest thing that would resemble the UFO, but this airship has not been flown yet and still being constructed as far as her knowledge is concerned. She also noted the flashing red and white lights at the tail of the craft on her report to MUFON.
The witness observed the object until it flew out of sight. She said that what puzzled her most were the speed and complete silence as it flew upwards and quickly out of sight. She claimed that she also saw a flying saucer once several years ago and said she was happy for the second time around because she has a fellow witness to a mysterious event.
This testimony can be accessed in Case 62745 in the witness reporting database of Mutual UFO Network.
Homeland Security Videotaped Two UFOs Over Airport In Puerto Rico
(video )
Down below UFO video was allegedly obtained from sources inside a Puerto Rican federal agency shows two UFOs over Rafael Hernandez International Airport, Puerto Rico.
The video was reportedly shot by an infra-red camera aboard a Homeland Security helicopter in the Puerto Rican city of Aguadilla at 1:23 am of April 26, 2013.
This video was uploaded to YouTube by José Martínez, a member of the Puerto Rican Research Group.
He explains that the video was shot by a helicopter from Rafael Hernandez International Airport, which was formerly a United States Air Force base called Ramey Air Force Base. Several federal agencies are currently housed at the Rafael Hernandez International Airport.
Rafael Hernandez International Airport, Puerto Rico
“In the video you can see how the object moves very quickly. In one part of the video you can see how the object is thrown to the sea at extreme speed,” and when it comes back out of the sea, there are “two objects on the screen.”
Researchers reportedly conferred with authorities from the Puerto Rico Joint Forces of Rapid Action (FURA), a division of the state police of Puerto Rico that coordinates operations between Puerto Rico police and U.S. federal agencies.
These authorities confirmed that the UFO video was taken by a camera aboard a Black Hawk helicopter.
When asked by YouTube viewers for more information about this video showing UFOs in Puerto Rico, Martínez responded by saying that, in order to protect the
identity of his federal agency sources at the airport, he “cannot give more details.”
Every year countless UFO sightings are reported from around the globe. Most of them can be accounted for. But a select few are still considered unsolved…extra-terrestrial puzzles that police investigators, government officials and even medical communities cannot explain. These are the unique, often untold stories that have captivated UFO experts and researchers imaginations for decades. These are the Close Encounters.
Rev William Gill and the 1959 Boianai Visitants - what he saw and what he believed
Bill Gill was one of the most compelling and impressive UFO witnesses I had ever met. We corresponded and talked often about his remarkable experience. His experience witnessed by other members of the Boianai mission in Papua New Guinea in 1959 will be examined in Season 2 of Close Encounters on the Discovery Canada channel. I have tremendous respect for Bill Gill and I hope that the Close Encounters story accurately addresses his extraordinary experience - one of the best cases ever reported.
The image is from a video I took from Rev Gill's last UFO lecture, Brisbane, 14th June 2003.
Bill Gill's extraordinary journey from skeptic to believer needs to be carefully stated.
He was never a believer, but he simply stated that he saw what he saw. (the video excerpt at this link is from "UFOs are Here (1977)") His whole life after the Boianai sightings was somewhat affected and why publicly he was patiently willing to consider all possible explanations the extremes of some skeptics and some ET believer apparently hurt the family. He supported serious attempts to analysis and investigate his sighting, even if they were skeptical or explanations that were not alien UFOs.
Bill Gill's letter to David Durie dated 25/6: I am almost convinced about the "visitation" theory. There have been quite a number of reports over the months, from reliable witnesses.
I do not doubt the existence of these "things" (indeed I cannot now that I have seen one for myself) but my simple mind still requires scientific evidence before I can accept the from-outer-space theory. I am inclined to believe that probably many UFO's are more likely some form of electric phenomena - or perhaps something brought about by the atom bomb explosions, etc.
At this stage Bill still left open in his mind the idea of "visitation" - visitation by aliens, the Americans or whatever.
Then with the 26th sighting he write the next day 27/6:
Now, less than 24 hours later I have changed my views somewhat. Last night we at Boianai experienced about 4 hours of UFO activity, and there is no doubt whatsoever that they are handled by beings of some kind. At times it was absolutely breathtaking.
He discussed with the native witnesses that night the theories about "flying saucers" some believe they were from other planets, some believe they were from leading nations on Earth, so he was still keeping an open mind and passing that perspective onto the native witnesses. So by 27/6 with the first nights experience, he was certain there had been visitation, but still doubt by what. With "Convinced Bill" he was only convinced he saw what he saw, and it was his "good natured sequel" to his initial skepticism. Theories - he had none he was certain of. He mentioned that the object was manned by "beings of some kind" but was being somewhat "tongue-in-cheek" as he was only certain of what he saw, not what it was.
Ernie Evennett, a trader saw a UFO that same night (26/6) from across the bay. When he arrived at Boianai on 27/6 he was asked by natives, "Taubada (pigeon English for Sir), did you see the American Air Force last night? We did at Boianai."
So clearly Boianai natives and Gill were still entertaining "the American" visitation idea, but he was open to the ET idea, but still not totally certain.
With the night of 27/6 the "visitation" idea was verified in Gill's mind. He now no longer had any doubt of the "visitation" being real. He had his notes, he had his witnesses and plenty of others had seen things. He still wasn't prepared to say they were alien.
He was soon back in Australia and gave a lecture to the Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society on October 28, 1959, of which I have a full transcript. He had also said similar things to the ABC TV: "I accept the possibility of life on other planets …. But I've no theory, merely because I haven't had time to think about it."
This was pretty much where he stood publicly for the rest of his life. He certainly believed in what he saw, it was real and it was a visitation by someone, of what he was never sure. His religious sensibilities harboured another possibility beyond ET, the Americans, and he kept this largely to himself. However this theory, and it was only a theory he would explore and think about a lot, it "came out" in his last lecture on 14th June 2003. I recorded his presentation. At the end he said, somewhat I thought in "tongue-in-check" but I suspect he was floating his idea that he had researched. What were they? He looked for something he had found. "This is the punchline" he said, what they might be. He then described the story of cosmonauts in space seeing "angels" - very large "men", glowing light, etc. So that was what he put forward as an idea. The evidence see this Pravda report, which described what had been rumoured and mentioned for years since it was alleged to have happened in 1985:
For Rev Gill I think while he couldn't prove it, so he did not present it forcefully, it was an explanation that did not seriously confront his religious thoughts. As far as I know this was the closest he came to saying this, that maybe the Boianai "visitants" were "angels", perhaps "angels" to him, "aliens" to others, but certainly real, certainly "visitants" - a term preserved by Randolph Stow in his novel "Visitants" - which opens with a prologue referring to the sightings.
So thats it, my understanding of the evolution of Bill Gill's thoughts on his sighting. Not really belief, but anchored in fact, and apparently privately mediated by his faith. But he put that out there as just an idea for thinking about. Perhaps the glowing "radiance" "sparking, etc that surround the "men" and the object led him privately in that direction. Publicly "aliens", "Americans" or "aliens", he did not know, but he was certain of what he saw.
Was the UFO sighting above Western Massachusetts on 14th January 2015 releasing a Morse Code?
Was the UFO sighting above Western Massachusetts on 14th January 2015 releasing a Morse Code?
New amazing video footage of a Huge bright UFO sighting recorded in the night sky Western Massachusetts on 14th January 2015. Was the UFO releasing a Morse Code?
New interesting video footage of a bright glowing UFO sighting recorded while hovering in the sky for hours.
Witness said: This clip contains footage of a large orb (UFO) that hovered in the sky for hours just after sunrise. As we filmed chemplanes started to spray right on top of the orb covering it from view. There is also an image of comet Lovejoy at the end of this clip and a few words on the suspicious nature of recent comets and their new green color.
Jagged UFO spotted hovering over New York on 14th January 2015
Jagged UFO spotted hovering over New York on 14th January 2015
New interesting video footage of a dark UFO sighting recorded while hovering above New York on 14th January 2015.
Witness said: Happened in New York in the afternoon of 01/14/2015. Was there for about 3 minutes and making a weird sound that cause the birds to fly away. As I filmed on my iPhone it completely shut off with the over heat sign showing, which I found pretty weird. Take a look through the gallery below for a similar UFO sighting in London last year.
The self-seeking, grandstanding charade continues. Project Blue Book archives were just released, as many people may now be aware. And one of the funny things is that nowhere in those archives on the website hosted by John Greenwald can I find any mention of…Billy Meier, let alone the photograph of his that the New York Post used when they featured the FoxNews report:
The New York Post used one of Billy Meier’s UFO photos form 1975 in their article about Project Blue Book
Isn’t it interesting that one of the preeminent chasers of lights-in-the-sky goes to all the trouble to post the gloriously inconclusive results of Project Blue Book when – for years – I’ve been asking, urging, prodding him to “discover” the Meier case? Unfortunately, I’ve made John very angry for doing so. I apparently showed little respect for his “boy wonder” approach to the field of UFOlogy, which has an implied seal of approval from UFOfficialdom, the powers that be, etc.
Last year I not only pressed John about the Meier case, I included him in an email to my list of skeptics, telling them that I was going to include them among those who were now saying the case is authentic. This delightful little ploy elicited a lot of responses, of which John Greenwald’s were the most pointed, unambiguous and clear in revealing his ignorance, bias and, most likely, evidence that he really must have some kind of support from those who maintain suppression of the Meier case. The only other alternative is a level of amateurish, arrogant incompetence that, time and again, pays off in our beloved, dumbed down America with some sort of success.
So here are excerpts from our exchange in which John leaves no doubt at all about…
John’s brilliant conclusions as a “UFO researcher”:
“Unfortunately, most of your evidence is laughable, at best…You back a story that is a hoax, in my honest opinion.”
Regarding the WCUFO…and John’s self-assessment of his own brain capacity:
“In closing, here is one of your ‘evidence’ photos which I attached below. I feel this, is more than enough proof, that the Meier case is a joke. I am confident to say this photo is not photoshopped, edited, or tweaked in ANY way. I’d be comfortable agreeing with you. However, anyone with a first grade photography lesson, can tell you this is not a spacecraft from another planet nor does it resemble anything larger than a large shoebox set inches away from the camera. It is clearly an object very close to the camera, while the house in the background goes softly out of focus. Anyone else with half a string bean for a brain, can also tell you that the majority of Meier’s photos always have part of the craft not captured on film. The example below, the bottom. Other examples, the top. Why? The model is sitting on something, or strung up hanging from a string. It’s as simple as that – in my opinion. The others where you can see the craft in the distance? I would venture a guess that these models are literally thrown and a photo is snapped. Why? They always appear to be the same approximate distance from the camera, and always appear to be in the same trajectory. My opinion, of course, but your photos are NOT the smoking gun.”
Regarding the prophecies:
“All those other silly ‘prophecies’ that you claim Meier made, consist of writings with links to news stories claiming Meier is the next Jesus, or whatever you may be claiming to your followers. No proof when any of these rantings were written, or even if they were written by Meier at all. Other areas of your site consist of the copy and paste of thousands of pages of all sorts of stuff that really make no sense whatsoever. “
Regarding providing “proof”:
“You want to provide proof? Setup a video camera, and have one of Meier’s alien friends sit on camera, and give their predictions, prophecies, teachings, whatever they want to give for the human race to see, instead of these ridiculous photos and silly ‘prophecies’ which appears to be the only proof you guys can conjure up. Because if there really was a message to spread to all of us lesser-lings from the more enlightened and higher powers like you and Meier – I wouldn’t think an intelligent, alien race, would travel millions of light years, and find some Swiss guy with no public outreach ability, to trust all their intergalactic wisdom to, then trust a man like you to run around and spread that message of light around the planet, while cursing all those who don’t believe you.”
Maybe about now, dear reader, you’re wondering (or not) just why the Project Blue Book archives were released and posted on his site.
It’s clear that John thinks that I’m a rude, nasty guy, taking all of the fun out of the game of chase-your-own-tail trivia that UFOlogy is to him. I have the bad taste to call out people who pretend they’re grown up, important persons without demonstrating the tough, competent seriousness and…character to carry the weight and responsibility that bringing forth the truth demands.
So, John Greenwald, my willfully ignorant, self-important, young friend, please enjoy this photo of the WCUFO that was displayed in Times Square while you were carrying on about your precious lights-in-the-sky:
I’m also adding a few links below that effortlessly rebut your adolescent critiques of the Meier case and its evidence. Maybe, if you get a glimmer of the truth, if it isn’t too harsh and disruptive for your profit-oriented agenda, you’ll wonder just…why you’ve had a rather easy time maintaining a platform that helps to distract from, and disinform about the only scientifically proven, still ongoing Billy Meier UFO contact case.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 73 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
