NIEUW: Blog reclamevrij maken?


Stille Pagina

Beste bezoeker,

Wil je een videoclip bekijken en stoort het X-files-deuntje jou daarbij. Schakel het  deuntje gewoon uit door in deze kolon, helemaal beneden op de 2 witte balkjes in het blauwe cirkeltje te klikken, tot een pijltje verschijnt. Veel kijk- en luisterplezier en bedankt voor jouw bezoek.

Inhoud blog
  • Astronaut Snaps 'Mind-Blowing' Aurora Picture from Space
  • Russia Has Four Potential
  • Mysterious X-37B Military Space Plane Nears 1 Year in Orbit
  • Aliens are among us. The authorities remain silent
  • A struggle for coherence
  • After 3 UFO encounters, retired educator and Nogal resident calls himself a believer
  • UFO sighting that terrified a city
  • What UFO sightings tell us about earthlings
  • UFOs…Seriously LIVE! Ep 2 – Space Force, UFO Leaks, Project Blue Book and more!
  • NASA admits $400M Mars Opportunity rover could be lost forever
  • Audio reveals creepy details of UFO mystery
  • Scientists May Have Evidence of Universes That Existed Before Our Own
  • Mysterious, Massive Structure Spotted in China’s Gobi Desert
  • UFOs-Aliens - 'Ancient Aliens’ on History Channel beats CNN in prime time!
  • Three Green Orbs Recorded Over Lake In British Colombia, Canada, Photos, UFO Sighting News.
  • Long Black UFO Sighted Over Harrison, New Jersey, August 5, 2018, UFO Sighting News.
  • UFO Shot Down Over Turkey Explodes Over City, Aug 13, 2018, Video, UFO Sighting News.
  • The Golden Age of Space Exploration: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Cosmos (Op-Ed)
  • Grand Canyon - UFO crash 4000 years ago?
  • ALIEN LIFE ( FR. , NL; E ) (1571)
  • André's Hoekje (ENG) (732)
  • André's Snelkoppelingen (ENG) (378)
  • ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr ) (344)
  • ARTICLES of MUFON ( ENG) (312)
  • Artikels (NL.) (143)
  • Before it's news (ENG.) (5609)
  • Diversen (Eng, NL en Fr) (2815)
  • FILER FILES - overzicht met foto's met dank aan Georges Filer en (ENG) (691)
  • Frederick's NEWS ITEMS (ENG en NL) (110)
  • - Het Laatste Nieuws ( NL) (882)
  • Kathleen Marden 's News about Abductions... ( ENG) (28)
  • LATEST UFO-NEWS ( ENG) (4593)
  • Michel GRANGER - a French researcher ( Fr) (12)
  • MYSTERIES ( Fr, Nl, E) (117)
  • MYSTERIES , Complot Theories, ed ( EN, FR, NL ) (4)
  • National UFO Center {NUFOC} (105)
  • News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG ) (6042)
  • NIEUWS VAN JAN ( NL) (37)
  • Nieuws van Paul ( NL) (13)
  • NineForNews. nl ( new ipv (NL) (2987)
  • Oliver's WebLog ( ENG en NL) (116)
  • Paul SCHROEDER ( ENG) (98)
  • Reseau Francophone MUFON / EUROPE ( FR) (82)
  • références - MAGONIE (Fr) (486)
  • SF-snufjes ( E, F en NL ) (280)
  • UFO DIGEST / a Weekly Newsletter - thanks that I may publish this on my blog (ENG) (123)
  • UFOs (560)
  • Vincent'snieuws ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Who is Stanton FRIEDMAN - follow his news (ENG) (16)
  • WHO IS WHO? ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Zoeken in blog

    Beoordeel dit blog
      Zeer goed
      Nog wat bijwerken
      Nog veel werk aan
    The purpose of  this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and  free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category.
    Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
    Archief per maand
  • 08-2018
  • 07-2018
  • 06-2018
  • 05-2018
  • 04-2018
  • 03-2018
  • 02-2018
  • 01-2018
  • 12-2017
  • 11-2017
  • 10-2017
  • 09-2017
  • 08-2017
  • 07-2017
  • 06-2017
  • 05-2017
  • 04-2017
  • 03-2017
  • 02-2017
  • 01-2017
  • 12-2016
  • 11-2016
  • 10-2016
  • 09-2016
  • 08-2016
  • 07-2016
  • 06-2016
  • 05-2016
  • 04-2016
  • 03-2016
  • 02-2016
  • 01-2016
  • 12-2015
  • 11-2015
  • 10-2015
  • 09-2015
  • 08-2015
  • 07-2015
  • 06-2015
  • 05-2015
  • 04-2015
  • 03-2015
  • 02-2015
  • 01-2015
  • 12-2014
  • 11-2014
  • 10-2014
  • 09-2014
  • 08-2014
  • 07-2014
  • 06-2014
  • 05-2014
  • 04-2014
  • 03-2014
  • 02-2014
  • 01-2014
  • 12-2013
  • 11-2013
  • 10-2013
  • 09-2013
  • 08-2013
  • 07-2013
  • 06-2013
  • 05-2013
  • 04-2013
  • 03-2013
  • 02-2013
  • 01-2013
  • 12-2012
  • 11-2012
  • 10-2012
  • 09-2012
  • 08-2012
  • 07-2012
  • 06-2012
  • 05-2012
  • 04-2012
  • 03-2012
  • 02-2012
  • 01-2012
  • 12-2011
  • 11-2011
  • 10-2011
  • 09-2011
  • 08-2011
  • 07-2011
  • 06-2011
    Rondvraag / Poll
    Bestaan UFO's echt? Are UFOs real?Les OVNIS existent-ils vraiement?
    Ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / Non
    Bekijk resultaat

    Rondvraag / Poll
    Denk Jij dat UFO's buitenaards zijn? Do You think that UFOs are extraterrestrial? Les OVNIS sont- ils ET?
    ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / NON
    Bekijk resultaat

    E-mail mij

    Druk oponderstaande knop om mij te e-mailen.

    Blog als favoriet !

    Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum

    Zoeken in blog


    Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.

    In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!

    In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.


    UFO's in België en de rest van de wereld
    In België heb je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch... Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels. MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen. MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity... Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder Ze geven een maandeliiks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal. Since 02/01/2013 is Pieter not only president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Astronaut Snaps 'Mind-Blowing' Aurora Picture from Space

    Astronaut Snaps 'Mind-Blowing' Aurora Picture from Space

    18-08-2018 om 02:00 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Russia Has Four Potential

    Russia Has Four Potential "Killer Satellites" In Orbit, At Least That We Know About

    The threat these so-called "space apparatus inspectors" pose is an example of what conflict in space might look like in the future.

    Without any such agreement, what constitutes an attack on a nation’s interest in space has remained up for debate. It’s a gray area made more complicated by the likelihood that the United States and its potential opponents have satellites in orbit that they don’t acknowledge are vital to national security or are up there at all.

    “Is jamming an attack? Is a laser an attack? Does it have to be a kinetic hit on a satellite to be an attack?” Douglas Loverro, then-Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy, asked during a talk in 2016. “It’s really difficult to go ahead and justify how you might attack somebody’s homeland if they’ve taken out a satellite that you don’t even admit exists.”

    Unfortunately, it is clear that basic definitions of what constitutes conflict in space, if nothing else, are necessary now, more than ever. Without them, there is only an increasing possibility for dangerous miscalculations.

    The activities of Russia’s latest inspector satellite, China’s own anti-satellite developments, and the United States’ plans for space-based ballistic missile defense weapons all show that these issues will only continue to become more pronounced in the future, whether there is any sort of international treaty that seeks to govern military activity in space or not.

    • Contact the author:

    18-08-2018 om 01:47 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Mysterious X-37B Military Space Plane Nears 1 Year in Orbit

    Mysterious X-37B Military Space Plane Nears 1 Year in Orbit

    18-08-2018 om 00:41 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.NASA admits $400M Mars Opportunity rover could be lost forever

    NASA admits $400M Mars Opportunity rover could be lost forever

    17-08-2018 om 22:43 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Scientists May Have Evidence of Universes That Existed Before Our Own

    De bronafbeelding bekijken

    Scientists May Have Evidence of Universes That Existed Before Our Own

    Are we living in the only universe? If you believe like many that we reside in a multiverse, then answer this question: do we live in the FIRST universe? If that’s too big of a query to wrap your brain around, here’s a little help from an esteemed mathematician, with a little more help from the beyond in the form of Stephen Hawking, who thinks the answer lies in black holes:

    “What we claim we’re seeing is the final remnant after a black hole has evaporated away in the previous aeon.”

    What University of Oxford mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose and his colleagues “claim we’re seeing” is radiation that appears to have passed from a previous universe (which he calls an “aeon”), which supports Penrose’s theory of “conformal cyclic cosmology” which proposes that the universe is not the product of a single Big Bang but instead is going through an ebb and flow of Big Bang expansions and dying universe compressions. This, of course, would contradict the prevailing theory of cosmic inflation, which hypothesizes that the universe is expanding infinitely.

    Got it so far? Still skeptical? Let’s bring in the late great Stephen Hawking and his “Hawking points.”

    “Though seemingly problematic for cosmic inflation, the existence of such anomalous points is an iplication of conformal cyclic cosmology (CCC).”

    In a paper published on the pre-peer review website, Penrose proposes that Hawking points – a singular spot of radiation emitted from black hole – are actually exit-entry points between dying-birthing universes and the radiation itself is a remnant from the previous aeon passed on to the current one. At this point, if you’re up on your Hawking points, you’re probably screaming, “But Hawking was never able to prove they exist!”

    Not so fast, says Penrose. His study claims that one or more things-that-could-be-Hawking -points have been found by the BICEP2 (Background Imaging of Celectronic Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization) project, a muscular mapping of the cosmic microwave background (the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the Big Bang) which has identified 20 swirling patterns of polarizations (a great name for a band) called B-modes (a great name for the band’s backup singers) on the far edges of the map near the beginning of the universe we’re in right now.

    Penrose and his colleagues believe these swirls are the smoking points proving the theory of conformal cyclic cosmology.

    “Although of extremely low temperature at emission, in CCC this radiation is enormously concentrated by the conformal compression of the entire future of the black hole, resulting in a single point at the crossover into our current aeon.”

    Should we break out the champagne (real and non-alcoholic) and invite our Hindu friends over to celebrate the proof of Vedic cosmology and the four Yugas? Unfortunately, Penrose’s study and simulations are based on the map released by the BICEP2 project, not the raw data which could contain contradicting points to the Hawking points. The map only goes back to about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, not to the bang itself, and other researchers say Penrose has not yet disproved the theories that the swirls or rings are light being bent by massive objects we can’t see yet.

    Will a chain of banging-and-imploding universes that lasts forever be proven by the B-modes before the next aeon arrives? If science had a category for “most popular theory,” anything connected to Hawking would be a winner. }

    17-08-2018 om 22:12 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The Golden Age of Space Exploration: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Cosmos (Op-Ed)

    The Golden Age of Space Exploration: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Cosmos (Op-Ed)

    17-08-2018 om 01:37 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Breakthough: The Equation Of Gravity Discovered

    Breakthough: The Equation Of Gravity Discovered

    Breakthough: The Equation Of Gravity Discovered

    New extraordinary discovery made by Jean Seimple, who sent, a few days ago, the formula of the fundamental constant of Gravitation, G, one of the unresolved mysteries of physics, to all the major scientific journals of the world.

    After dozens of secrets revealed and relayed by Disclose TV, such as Atlantis-Antarctica, the meridian of Greenwich, The Secret of Jesus Christ, the Ark of covenant, Planet X etc ... the list is long! A new breathtaking discovery that will make history!

    INTERSTELLAR in reality!

    Here is his press release published in France, just few minutes ago.

    Discovery of the Equation of the Fundamental Constant of Gravitation.

    Pyramid Apocalypsia.

    By Jean Seimple, August 15, 2018.

    « A big step towards the stars... »


    A new Great Day for Humanity. (Picture, Interstellar.)

    Dear readers,

    thanks to all my work on the Great Pyramid, of its authenticity and its coherence, I managed, while staying on the path of the truth, to make one of the greatest discoveries of our time...

    The discovery was transmitted a few days ago to the scientific community, with the hope of awakening men.

    From the scientific publication:

    (Available online in its intergrality, with its geometric and theoretical assumptions, here)

    Proposition for the Formula, Definition and Mathematical Value of the Universal Constituent of Gravitation, G.

    By Jean Seimple.

    (Note by Jean: All this was unknown, the constant of proportionality of gravity, one of the most important and mysterious constants of physics, is only estimated by physical measurements.

    References are written at 10 ^ -9 instead of 10 ^ -11, e.g. 6.11 x 10 ^ -11 = 0.0611 x 10 ^ -9.)

    Reference of the constant G used:

    SI value recommended by CODATA (Data Committee for Science and Technology.)

    (CODATA 2014 Newtonian constant of gravitation NIST, 2017.)

    G(ref.) 0.0667 408(31)10^^-1.s^-2

    Proposition of the fundamental formula of the constant G:

    1. First writing

      Number Brand


    10 (π -1 / 2π ²) – 1, is the multiplying coefficient of the inverse of the perimeter of the circle

    C = 2π ² / π -1, whose radius r = π / π -1, is the only solution of the equality, Pi x r = Pi + r.

    Circle Screenshot Product Design

    √((5π /6) -1), is a remarkable proportion Pi (~ √ Φ).

    Numerical value :

    G = 10 (π -1/ 2π ²) -1 / √ ((5π /6) -1)

    G = 0.0667 792...

    This solution of G, corresponds to 99.942 % to G(ref.) = 0.0667 408(31)10^^-1.s^-2.

    (Note from Jean: the probability that this formula that follows from a unique solution of Pi, falls on one of the most important value of physics is a coincidence, it's almost zero... perfection belongs to Heaven.)

      1. Second writing

        Milliseconds Brand Logo

    G = 0.067482...

    ~99 % of G(ref.)


    We can suppose the existence of at least, 9 other space of PI of lower densities in a time slightly shifted from ours and thus unobservable, which would correspond to the famous 'dark energy'/'dark matter' of the cosmology (...)

    That in a standardized universal system, the formula of A.Einstein is written, E = m π².

    That there would be a small 'black hole' in the center of each elemental particle of matter, in the image and probably at the origin of the black holes of the cosmos.


    I. If this formula wins the interest of the scientific community, I would like it to be named, "The Antarctic Formula".

    II. By a moral and conscience contract, I authorize the commercial use of this publication, asking that a 'nice proportion' of the income collected, be donated to the benefit of a charity dedicated to children.


    Thanks to the Architect of the Great Pyramid.

    Triangle Angle


    This is therefore the irrefutable scientific proof that the Pyramids of the Giza were built by a civilization superior to us.

    The lie is over.

    In my last video (en sub), I announced that it would probably be the end of a long series, thinking to have arrived at the end of the road, as twice already in the past.

    This path that I followed was the path of truth, which took me very far, as you can see; and at the end of this road, there will be, I think, the builders and this incredible architect.

    So it is with another truth that I will finish.

    'For verily I say unto you,' as the son of Man, who is related to this pyramid as I have revealed, this scientific publication, is not intended to be judged by scientists, but that it is the publication and the Heaven through it, who will judge them...

    As guarantors of the laws of the universe, these guardians of the temple, these men of science, will be the first to be judged, because the true science is the science of the truth and without truth, it remains only the law of the men...

    Those who work for the truth.

    We will see then, who work for the truth and those who will continue to lie.

    The masks will fall.

    As I have announced, we are at the time of the Apocalypse, the time of revelation, the tearing of the veil, the time of judgment, and the hour of judgment comes...

    If I tried to transmit the message with my heart, to touch the men of heart, I needed for others... To Hit their minds!

    It was the plan of God.

    Prepare... and may God keep you.

    Jean Seimple.

    * * *


    Amazing new revelation of Jean Seimple, remember, he explained and demonstrated, that a planet-comet, will cross our solar system very soon and cause upheaval on earth... to observe the current intense volcanic activity and the climate change, I think its effects are already felt and so as he says, be prepared...

    To share, massively, for our children !

    The divine plan...

    Earth /m/02j71

    And the key that explains everything...

    Long Did It Take To Build Great Pyramid Of Giza Cairo

    1 Pi, 1 Phi, 1 Cubit, all in meter...

    Our children will have the stars...

    Facebook Cover Photo Children Photograph

    "In my childhood dreams, I had two powers that allowed me to escape the clutches of the monster and that other children did not have.

    The first was that I could jump from a great height and land smoothly... The second was to be able to rise above the ground, very slowly, to reach the space, where I could contemplate, the earth and the stars ... "

    That too, it's amazing...

    Source }

    17-08-2018 om 00:46 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Russian Spacecraft Witnessed Behaving Unlike Anything Seen Before

    Russian Spacecraft Witnessed Behaving Unlike Anything Seen Before

    We don’t know for certain what it is and there is no way to verify it.

    That’s how one State Department adviser recently described the unexplained behavior of a mysterious Russian satellite in orbit. Where’s the Space Force when you need it? If reports are correct, they might be called into action sooner than we think. Anomalous satellite activity has become somewhat commonplace over the last few years as the world’s superpowers vie for space supremacy. Reports of Russian “killer” satellitessecret space bases, and black rocket launches have surfaced, leading some intelligence agencies to suggest war in space is coming.

    World War III might be Space War I.

    World War III? More like Space War I.

    Now, remarks made by the U.S. Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance seems to suggest that the Russians are indeed up to something fishy in orbit. While speaking at the recent Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, assistant secretary Yleem Poblete stated that an unknown Russian craft or satellite in orbit has begun displaying anomalous activity which have U.S. intelligence analysts scratching their heads:

    In October of last year the Russian Ministry of Defense deployed a space object they claimed was a “space apparatus inspector.” But its behavior on-orbit was inconsistent with anything seen before from on-orbit inspection or space situational awareness capabilities, including other Russian inspection satellite activities. We are concerned with what appears to be very abnormal behavior by a declared “space apparatus inspector.”

    Could she be describing the mysterious “capsule” allegedly sent to the ISS last October? Could this be related to the mysterious destruction of several satellites over the past year? It’s unclear. Whatever the case is, satellite-to-satellite warfare is clearly now a chief concern for defense agencies. The entire military and intelligence apparatus relies on the instantaneous global connectivity provided by satellites, and without them the military is ‘blind’ in many ways.

    Some of these secrets are hiding in plain sight. There is likely a lot going on in space we dont yet know about.

    Don’t worry: the X-37B will save us.

    Is this merely further saber-rattling to justify the creation of the Space Force, or is the Russian military truly up to something nefarious in space? With all of the disinformation on all sides right now geopolitically speaking, it’s tough to say. One thing is certain: tin foil hats aren’t strong enough to protect your skull from debris from falling space fighters. You’re gonna need a bunker for that. }

    16-08-2018 om 18:53 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Phytoplankton Is Affecting Earth's Climate in the Ocean's 'Twilight Zone'

    Phytoplankton Is Affecting Earth's Climate in the Ocean's 'Twilight Zone'

    15-08-2018 om 22:29 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Meteorite Bombardment Likely Created the Oldest Rocks on Earth

    Meteorite Bombardment Likely Created the Oldest Rocks on Earth

    15-08-2018 om 21:51 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.A Fireball and a Wall of Sound: What NASA's Epic Solar Probe Launch Felt Like

    A Fireball and a Wall of Sound: What NASA's Epic Solar Probe Launch Felt Like

    15-08-2018 om 21:39 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.As the Mighty Quasars Flow

    As the Mighty Quasars Flow

    Are billions of black holes behind some of the universe’s mysterious energy signals?

    Black holes, such as the one in galaxy NGC 3783 illustrated above, are some of nature’s most prodigious spewers of energy. Could that energy be enough to account for a long-standing mystery?
    ESO/M. Kornmesser

    Gaze up at the sky on a clear night, far from the city lights, and you might see the moon and some stars, a few planets and maybe even the fuzzy glow of the Milky Way. “In between, there seems to be nothing but emptiness and darkness,” says Xiawei Wang, an astronomy graduate student at Harvard University. “At least that was our view of the cosmos until 50 or so years ago when astronomers realized that space was not as empty as we once thought.”

    In 1964, astronomers were surprised to discover a uniform sea of radiation coming from all directions, all the time. Later dubbed the cosmic microwave background (CMB), this low-energy light turned out to be the residual radiation from the Big Bang itself, cooled during its journey over the past 13.8 billion years. Studying the CMB has led to tremendous insights about the structure and composition of our universe, its exact age and even its shape.

    In the decades since, astronomers have learned there’s much more to the unseen universe, finding background radiation at practically every wavelength observed. The highest frequency and most energetic background signals they’ve found are made up of a form of light called gamma rays, plus exotic particles called neutrinos and cosmic rays. And, unlike the CMB, the source of these emissions is still enigmatic. No one knows where they come from.

    In three recent papers, Wang and her adviser, Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb, advanced a new idea that suggests not one source for this high-energy background, but literally billions.

    It all comes down to a phenomenon called quasar outflows.


    Initially discovered as unexplained signals picked up by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at Bell Laboratories (above), the cosmic microwave background (below) — the universe’s oldest light — is now mapped with incredible accuracy.

    NASA/WMAP Science Team

    A Chorus of Quasars 
    Quasars are among the most luminous objects in the universe. Each one greatly outshines the combined output of all the stars in their host galaxies. (For instance, in 2015 astronomers announced they’d found a quasar that shines some 400 trillion times brighter than our sun.)

    All large galaxies have giant black holes at their centers, and a quasar forms when one actively starts feeding, pulling in matter like gas and dust. But this stuff doesn’t fall directly into the black hole — it circles around the abyss at ever-increasing speeds while spiraling inward. Eventually, the cosmic food becomes so hot (from friction) that it pours out light before some of it makes its way into the black hole. The object that generates this prodigious amount of light — the black hole and cloud of debris swirling around it — is a quasar.

    But a black hole doesn’t eat everything in sight; its mouth is simply not big enough. Some of the surrounding material gets ejected in different ways. Ten percent of known quasars shoot out matter — at more than 99 percent of the speed of light — through a pair of spectacular jets.

    Astronomers seeking a source for that exotic, high-energy radiation took a close look at these powerful jets. But observations showed they weren’t enough: All the universe’s quasar jets could account for only about half the gamma rays, and none of the neutrinos and cosmic rays.

    The unexplained emissions, according to Wang and Loeb, may stem from a more subtle feature of every quasar: their milder but steadier outflows. What a black hole doesn’t eat, or shoot away in jets, it flings off at relatively moderate speeds — a few thousand miles per second, or about 1 percent the speed of light. After interacting with the local gas, these outflows can ultimately produce small amounts of all three components of the high-energy background: gamma rays, neutrinos and cosmic rays.

    Individual outflows don’t release enough energy for us to notice, which is why no one really considered them before — but a big enough number of them would add up. And in Wang and Loeb’s scenario, the process is taking place at every quasar in the universe. A little energy times a lot of sources could, in theory, produce all that mysterious energy.

    Running the Numbers 
    Wang and Loeb set out to see if the numbers backed up their premise. In 2015, they started by focusing on gamma rays. Step one was trying to determine the tiny amount coming from each source. It wasn’t easy. They had to approach the problem theoretically because the emissions from an individual quasar are actually too weak for direct measurements. Drawing upon emissions in other wavelengths that they could observe for guidance, Wang and Loeb eventually came up with an estimate.

    The next step was to factor in contributions from the billions of quasars in our universe to figure out the total gamma-ray signal from all quasar outflows. This calculation was also complex, incorporating estimates of the total number of quasars, their general distribution in the sky and the range in observed brightness. (Brighter quasars emit more gamma rays.) In the end, the total value Wang and Loeb arrived at, miraculously, was about half the gamma-ray background signal — perhaps comprising the “missing” half quasar jets could not explain.

    Encouraged, they repeated this exercise in late 2016 and early 2017 for neutrinos, and then cosmic rays. In both cases, their tallied sums closely matched experimentally obtained values for the neutrino and cosmic-ray backgrounds. The numbers could work, suggesting they might have found the answer to the high-energy background problem.

    An active black hole lies at the center of galaxy Centaurus A.An active black hole lies at the center of galaxy Centaurus A.
    ESO/WFI/MPIfR/APEX/A.Weiss et al./NASA/CXC/CfA/R. Kraft et al.

    The Full Score 
    Unfortunately, the idea remains hypothetical until astronomers can get direct measurements of all three forms of radiation coming from a single quasar outflow. Luckily, more sensitive instruments for detecting gamma rays, neutrinos and cosmic rays are in the works.

    If their quasar outflow idea is ultimately confirmed, it would do more than just clarify a long-standing astronomical puzzle. “It would be another step toward answering the question of what’s out there in the universe and where it comes from,” says Wang. “Sometimes, the answers to the biggest questions in science lie in small and subtle things. These less visible entities are often neglected, but in the aggregate, they can be brighter and more powerful.”

    She compares the situation to a piano concerto. The piano is loud enough to drown out any of the dozens of individual string instruments in a full orchestra. But when you put all the strings together, their contribution is substantial. In the same way, the cumulative output of quasar outflows could make a difference on a cosmic scale.

    So the next time you look at the night sky, “remember that what we see with the naked eye is a tiny, tiny fraction of the things happening in the cosmos,” says Wang. Appreciating the piano concerto of the universe involves learning to hear all the instruments, no matter how faint and unimportant they might seem.

    Behold the Mighty Quasar: The Science Behind These Galactic Lighthouses }

    15-08-2018 om 18:21 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Here's How Ludicrously Fast A Space Probe Is

    Here's How Ludicrously Fast A Space Probe Is

    14-08-2018 om 20:53 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.'Waarschijnlijk geen aliens in Omega Centauri'

    { }

    14-08-2018 om 00:58 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Rand van zonnestelsel mogelijk voorgoed veranderd door ontmoeting met andere ster

    14-08-2018 om 00:47 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The Mystery of Jupiter’s Swirling Colors Is Finally Solved, Scientists Say

    Anew study has finally offered an explanation for Jupiter’s trippy colors and unusual swirls. These gaseous swirls have become the most recognizable aspect of the giant planet but also one of its most puzzling features. A team of scientists says they now understand what causes the planet’s distinctive color bands and why these swirls behave the way they do.

    Astrophysicists Navid Constantinou and Jeffrey Parker have put forward a new theory that Jupiter’s jet streams, which control the flow of gasses around the planet’s outer atmosphere, are actually cut off and shaped by magnetized gasses from below Jupiter’s surface. Their findings were published in The Astrophysical Journal on Thursday.

    Those majestic Jupiter swirls, up close.


    Scientists have known that the colorful stripes of ammonia clouds that shape Jupiter’s look are guided by jet streams, or strong wind bands that sweep the gaseous planet. On the surface, these jet streams behave similarly to those on Earth’s atmosphere, but take on a different functionality below Jupiter’s atmospheric clouds. Thanks to the latest measurements from NASA’s Juno mission, which arrived at Jupiter on July 2016, scientists discovered these jet streams extend 3,000 kilometers (roughly 1,800 miles) deep before stopping abruptly, leaving Constantinou and Parker to wonder what causes such an exact end.

    To get to the bottom of these jet streams, Constantinou and Parker created a mathematical model based on what is known about Earth’s own jet streams and weather patterns. Jupiter, which mostly consists of hydrogen and helium, experiences intense gas pressure below its surface which can force the electrons loose from hydrogen and helium molecules. Once these molecules are free to move around, they create electric and magnetic fields. And it just so happens that Jupiter doesn’t experience that level of pressure until the gas reaches 3,000 below the surface, precisely where the jet streams stop.

    The team found that these jet streams flow to dictate the trippy patterns on Jupiter’s surface and end precisely at 3,000 kilometers due to pressurized magnetic fields. These magnetic fluctuations then influence the patterns and movements seen from space.

    Constantinou and Parker say these calculatio

    ns bring scientists one step closer to unraveling the mysterious interior of the gas giant. They plan to continue studying Jupiter’s magnetic fields and hope to one day see the planet as a space laboratory and example of how atmospheric flows can work on other planets.

    Photos via NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Gabriel Fiset, NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Kevin M. Gill © CC BY }

    13-08-2018 om 22:26 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Wake Up, Opportunity! Engineers Have an Awesome Playlist for NASA's Sleeping Mars Rover

    Wake Up, Opportunity! Engineers Have an Awesome Playlist for NASA's Sleeping Mars Rover

    13-08-2018 om 22:02 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.High-Energy Whodunit: The Origins of the 'OMG Particle'

    High-Energy Whodunit: The Origins of the 'OMG Particle'

    13-08-2018 om 21:30 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.L’univers, une machine à voyager dans le temps ?

    De bronafbeelding bekijken

    L’univers, une machine à voyager dans le temps ?

    Un télescope à l'échelle de la planète - science

    Le radiotélescope Alma, perché à 5.000 m dans le désert de l'Atacama, au Chili, épie les signaux radio venus de très loin, émis il y a des milliards d'années par les premières galaxies du jeune univers. Car regarder loin, c'est regarder dans le passé...

    La lumière ayant une vitesse finie (environ 300.000 km/s), elle met un certain temps à nous parvenir. Ainsi, nos yeux ne voient donc jamais le monde tel qu'il est mais tel qu'il était dans le passé. Pour notre environnement immédiat, ce délai n'a pas de conséquences, si ce n'est sur le plan philosophique. Le décalage de temps n'est alors mesurable qu'avec des instruments de très grande précision.

    Il en va tout autrement en astronomie. Ainsi la Lune est en moyenne à 380.000 km de nous et la lumière qu'elle nous renvoie met donc un peu plus d'une seconde pour nous parvenir. On dira que la Lune est à environ 1 seconde-lumière. Le Soleil, lui, se trouve à 8 minutes-lumière : nous le voyons tel qu'il était 8 minutes auparavant.

    Alma observe les premières galaxies de l'univers

    Les étoiles, elles, se trouvent bien plus loin, à des années-lumière, et les autres galaxies sont plus éloignées encore. La plus proche de notre Voie lactée, dite d'Andromède, se trouve à 2,55 millions d'années-lumière. Pour les plus lointaines, les distances se mesurent en milliards d'années-lumière. Les observer revient donc à regarder très loin dans le passé. L'univers étant âgé de 13,7 milliards d'années, nous voyons donc les galaxies les plus lointaines telles qu'elles étaient au début de l'histoire de notre monde : ce sont les premières à s'être formées, ce qui nous renseigne sur la jeunesse de l'univers.

    Cependant, le signal qui nous en parvient est très faible. De plus, par effet Doppler-Fizeau, ce rayonnement est décalé vers les grandes longueurs d'onde et c'est dans le domaine radio que l'on obtient les plus fortes émissions. Voilà pourquoi les astronomes ont réalisé des « radiotélescopes » et les ont voulus de plus en plus grands, à l'instar d'Alma (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array), de l'ESO. Ce vaste ensemble de 66 antennes paraboliques de 12 m de diamètre, installé à environ 5.000 m d'altitude, sur le haut plateau du désert de l'Atacama, au Chili, est si sensible qu'il peut recueillir des signaux venus des premiers âges de l'univers.

    La Machine à Explorer le Temps !

    © Futura, vidéo : ESO

    Voyage temporel n°1  : ne pas bouger

    En lisant cet article, vous êtes déjà en train de voyager dans le temps. Vous êtes 40 secondes dans le futur depuis le début de cet article. Nous sommes tous en train de voyager dans le temps, tout le temps. Mais je vous l’accorde, ce type de voyage dans le temps est aussi peu impressionnant qu’ennuyeux. J’imagine que vous voulez voyager dans le temps par rapport à d’autres personnes.

    Voyage temporel n°2  : marcher

    On sait depuis plus d’un siècle que le temps et l’espace sont juste deux composants d’un seul temps spatial. Plus on se dé place vite, et plus le temps passe lentement. Si vous faite le tour de votre pâté de maison (100 mètres de côté), vous serez 3  femtosecondes plus jeune que votre ami resté à la maison ! Et ça c’est déjà la classe !

    Voyage temporel n°3  : se lever

    On sait également depuis plus d’un siècle, que plus la gravité est forte et plus le temps passe lentement. En vous levant, vous êtes plus éloigné du centre de la Terre. Ainsi la gravité est plus faible au niveau de votre tête qu’au niveau de vos pieds. En vous tenant debout pendant une minute, vos pieds sont plus vieux de 10 femtosecondes que votre tête ! Les satellites GPS subissent encore moins de gravité et ils voyagent vraiment plus vite dans le temps que nous. C’est pourquoi leur horloge sont calibrées pour fonctionner plus lentement.

    Le grand réseau d’antennes submillimétriques de l’Atacama (ALMA) }

    13-08-2018 om 20:26 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Evidence Suggests the Moon Isn’t What We Think – Someone Might Have Put It There NAAM: Kolom1 Kolom2 Kolom3 Kolom5 Kolom6 Contract OK Kolom23 Kolom8 Kolom9 Kolom10 Kolom11 Ko

    Evidence Suggests the Moon Isn’t What We Think – Someone Might Have Put It There

    "It is not out of the question that artifacts of these visits still exist, or even that some kind of base is maintained (possibly automatically) within the solar system to provide continuity for successive expeditions. 

    UPDATED The Moon is Not What You Think

    "Because of weathering and the possibility of detection and interference by the inhabitants of the Earth, it would be preferable not to erect such a base on the Earth’s surface. The Moon seems one reasonable alternative. Forthcoming high resolution photographic reconnaissance of the Moon from space vehicles – particularly of the back side – might bear these possibilities in mind."

    – Carl Sagan (source)

    Controversy has surrounded the Moon for a very long time, we have leaks, research and information from some very credible sources who have, over a span of decades, been relaying to the public that our Moon is not what we think it is, and that there’s also some type of extraterrestrial presence on the Moon.

    One example would be the testimony of Colonel Ross Dedrickson, who was responsible for maintaining the inventory of the nuclear weapon stockpile for the United States, he had a long stint with the US Atomic Energy Commission, you can view his obituary here.

    Shortly before his passing, he told the world that the US tried to detonate atomic weapons on the Moon for scientific purposes, measurements and whatnot and that this project was halted by extraterrestrials, who would not allow us to detonate any nuclear weapons in space.  

    These were some interesting comments because he is one of the hundreds of high ranking military people who have alluded to such things, and we also have a declassified report by the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center from June 1959 that shows how seriously they were considering the plan, called Project A119.

    We know for a fact that they wanted to investigate the capability of weapons in space, and if they did, we also know that we would never be told, similar to the testing that goes on here on planet Earth.

    Then, we have remote viewers from the STAR GATE program who have ‘seen’ strange structures and humanoid creatures on the Moon, like Ingo Swann (from his book, titled Penetration), for example. 

    He wasn’t the only one from the program who did, I have personally had conversations with Dr. Paul Smith, a retired army veteran who spent a decade in that program, he also relayed to me that something strange is happening on the Moon. Many from within that program have been very outspoken about an extraterrestrial presence.

    You can read more about the remote viewing program here. We’ve published numerous articles about it.

    Multiple whistleblowers have also spoken of strange structures on the Moon, and it’s become so obvious that some academicians are trying to do what they can to bring attention to it. 

    For example, a recently published a paper in the Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far side of the Moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C. Titled “Image Analysis of Unusual Structures on the Far Side of the Moon in the Crater Paracelsus C,” it argues that these features might be artificial in origin, meaning someone other than a human being built them and put them there.

    It’s not just the Moon, a physicist from the University of Tennessee Space Institute, Dr. Horace Crater, recently published a paper in The Journal of Space Exploration that, along with the NASA Viking images, hints “strongly at artificial surface interventions.”

    The list is long, and the idea that somebody else is on the moon is nothing new, even the Deputy Manager for the Clementine Mission to the moon in 1995 said it was really a photo reconnaissance mission to check out structures on the far side of the Moon that wasn’t put there by humans…

    But this article is not about what’s on the moon, it’s about what exactly the Moon is.

    It’s also noteworthy to mention that the United States has been criticized by Russia for concealing artifacts they collected from the Moon.

    Moon Made by Giant Impact with Earth - New Evidence | Video

    What is the Moon?

    "Perhaps strangest of all the anomalies are the many indications that the moon may be hollow. Studies of moon rocks indicate that the moon’s interoior differs from the Earth’s mantle in ways suggesting a very small core or none at all. A 1962 study found the interior of the moon to be less dense that the exterior."
    Jim Mars, from his bookOur Occulted History

    Is the moon hollow? Many intellectual minds seem to think so, but despite what’s really being talked about, these theories are still considered unconventional by the mainstream, who like to push their own theories and teach them as fact.

    Perhaps the reason why the US has not disclosed their artefacts from the moon, including all of the rocks, is because from what we do have, studies of moon rocks have shown that the Moon’s interior is far different from the Earth’s mantle which suggests a very small core, or, no core at all.

    In 1962 Gordon MacDonald, a NASA scientist, published a study that stated, “Indeed, it would seem that the Moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.”

    According to MIT’s Sean C. Solomon, “The Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the Moon’s gravitational field…indicating the frightening possibility that the Moon might be hollow.”

    "The most startling evidence that the moon could be hollow came on November 20, 1969, when the Apollo 12 crew, after returning to their command ship, sent the lunar module (LM) ascent stage crashing back onto the moon, creating an artificial moon quake. 

    "The LM struck the surface about forty miles from the Apollo 12 landing site, where super sensitive seismic equipment recorded something both unexpected and astounding – the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour." 

    Frank Press of MIT stated, "…none of us have seen anything like this on Earth. In all our experience, it is quite an extraordinary event. That this rather small impact…produced a signal which lasted 30 minutes is quite beyond the range of our experience."

    How Did The Moon Get To Where It Is?

    Conventional wisdom tells us that yes, the Moon may have originated elsewhere and at some point came to orbit our planet. It tells us that it was formed from debris after a space object smashed into Earth, while another theory states that Earth captured the Moon via its gravitational pull when it was wandering through the solar system…

    Despite that our current theories are accepted as fact, there is absolutely no evidence for the conventional hypothesis. According to Russian scientist Isaac Asimov, an American writer and professor of biochemistry at Boston University,

    "It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the Moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."

    Asimov also emphasized that,

    "We cannot help but come to the conclusion that the Moon, by rights, ought not to be there. The fact that it is, is one of those strokes of luck almost too good to accept."

    Other members of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (Vasin and Scherbakov, 1970), run by the Russian Government, published an article titled, “Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?

    This article offered another explanation for how the Moon may have been created. This seems to be a better hypothesis because there is actually a considerable amount of evidence that points towards something suspicious happening on the Moon.

    "It’s easier to explain the non-existence for the Moon, than it’s existence."
    NASA scientist Robin Brett
    "The best explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist."
    Irwin Shapiro, Harvard Astrophysicist

    Think about it… The Moon is in a nearly perfect circle, when it comes to its origin, all the while being synchronized with its period of revolution, so one side always faces the Earth.

    As Mars points out,

    "This circular orbit is especially odd, considering that the moon’s center of mass lies more than a mile closer to the Earth than its geometric center. This fact alone should produce an unstable, wobbly orbit, much as a ball with its mass off-center will not roll in a straight line."

    Were The Sumerians On To Something?

    Many within this field are really into ancient Greek, and ancient Sumerian lore. Take Apollo 12 astronaut, Al Worden, for example, who made some very interesting comments about the Sumerians as well as extraterrestrial life in a live interview you can watch here.

    In the late 1960’s, a senior scientist from the Planetary Science Institute, William Kenneth Harmann, stated he believes that the Moon results from a collision between Earth and another body at least the size of mars. This became known at the Big Whack theory, and it correlated to the story told in ancient Sumerian tablets…

    According to several interpretations of Sumerian tablets, most notably from Zecharia Sitchin, more than 4 billion years ago, a large watery world called Tiamat was in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. 

    Nibiru, a planet that supposedly enters into our solar system once every 3,600 years, caused Tiamat to crack under gravitational stress. Tiamat was cracked in half when one of Nibiru’s moon’s knocked into it, which also knocked a large portion of mars.

    This is very interesting because recently scientists have confirmed that Mars used to be a very watery world, an Earth-like planet. There is even large amounts of evidence for ancient life on Mars before what appears to be a dramatic climate shift. Scientists hypothesize that the climate shift was a result of a large collision… The larger chunk of Tiamat became planet Earth.

    So, it’s interesting to make that connection.

    Back to the Moon!

    "It’s important to remember that something had to put the moon at or near its present circular pattern around the Earth. Just as an Apollo space-craft circling  the Earth every 90 minutes while 100 miles high has to have a velocity of roughly 18,000 miles per hour to stay in orbit, so something had to give the moon the precisely required velocity for its weight and altitude…

    "The point – and it is one seldom noted in considering the origin of the moon – is that it is extremely unlikely that any object would just stumble into the right combination of factors required to stay in orbit. ‘Something’ had to put the moon at its altitude, on its course and at its speed. The question is: what was that ‘something?"

    It’s hard to believe that the precise and stationary orbit of the moon is simply a coincidence …

    "Is it also a coincidence that the moon is at just the right distance from Earth to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? While the diameter of the moon is a mere 2,160, miles against the sun’s gigantic 864,000 miles, it is nevertheless in just the proper position to block out all but the sun’s flaming corona when it moves between the sun and Earth." 
    – Mars

    According to Asimov,

    "There is no astronomical reason why the Moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."

    With all of the evidence that has surfaced showing an extraterrestrial presence on the Moon, to me, the spaceship theory proposed by Michael Vasin and Alexander Scherbakov (mentioned above) makes the most sense.

    According to Mars,

    "The spaceship-moon theory may come closer than any other in reconciling the contradictions inherent in the origin and amazing orbit of the moon. However, such a consideration is supposed to be outside the discussion of educated and rational people. 

    "The circular logic of conventional science regarding the origins of the moon runs something like this: We know that extraterrestrials don’t exist, but we do know that the moon exists and has been mentioned throughout human history. We humans did not create it nor place it in orbit around Earth,  it must have been done by extraterrestrials. But because we know they don’t exists, we will simply call it an anomaly and will not publicly say any more about."


    What Is The Moon's Real Name?

    The Moon - Is NOT What We've Been Told! }

    13-08-2018 om 19:18 geschreven door peter

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)


  • RFacebook BUFON
  • Site du REUB ASBL

    Other links with friends / bloggers # not always UFOs
  • PANGRadio MarcSima
  • Blog 2 Bernward
  • Nederlandse UFO-groep
  • Ufologie Liège
  • Disclose TV
  • UFO- Sightings - HOTSPOT
  • Website van BUFON ( Belgisch UFO-Netwerk)
  • The Ciizen Hearing on Disclosure
  • Exopolitics Finland: LINKS

  • ufologie -Guillaume Perrot
  • TJ Morris ACO Associations, Clubs, Organizations - TJ Morris ACO Social Service Club for...
  • Attaqued'un Autre Monde - Christian Macé

    WELCOME TO THIS BLOG! I hope that you enjoy the lecture of all issues. If you did see a UFO, you can always mail it to us. Best wishes.
    Beste bezoeker,
    Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan
    oliver.d.julian| of aan Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief  maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming!

    Laatste commentaren
  • vmZZvxbWE9b (D0nDSjBm)
        op Crop Formation Found In Small Farming Community of Victoria, Honduras On Nov 28, 2015, Photos, UFO Sighting News.
  • O9HU8ltvcST (WOxMBGcwaqpa)
        op SETI scientist claims: If Aliens did visit us, they’d take control over everything
  • eFvZENe4G (QNDMgXhpq)
        op Desert Man of the UFOs
  • Dropbox

    Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...

  • Nog een fijne avond
  • Hallo Lieverd
  • kiekeboe
  • Een goeie middag bezoekje
  • Zomaar een blogbezoekje

    Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!


    Over mijzelf
    Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
    Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
    Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 67 jaar jong.
    Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
    Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën... Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
    Zoeken in blog


  • AsocCivil Unifa

  • Startpagina !


    Een interessant adres?

    Blog tegen de regels? Meld het ons!
    Gratis blog op - SeniorenNet Blogs, eenvoudig, gratis en snel jouw eigen blog!