Not Ancient Aliens: Rethinking the Origins Of Ancient Mysteries

(Before It's News)

As a psychic, when I instruct people on how to read objects, I advise them to forget what you intellectually know the object to be - color,  quality, purpose, etc. Simply act as though this is an unknown  thing of unknown origins.  Let the object tell you what it is.
For this post, I will be asking you to give up everything you've been told about the world and how it was settled and when you let that go - the world suddenly makes sense for the first time ever! 

Let me begin with something you may not see coming - Wisconsin, Peru and Nevada and their similarities-
Wisconsin is an ancient copper mining site.  The Menomonie Indians of north Wisconsin possess a legend that speaks about the ancient mines.  They described the mines as being worked by “light-skinned  men," who were able to identify the mines by throwing magical stones on the ground, which made the ores that contained copper ring like a bell. This practice closely resembles a similar practice that was used in Europe during the Bronze Age. Bronze with a high concentration of tin indeed resonates when a stone is thrown against it. The legend might have confused the start of the process with the result of the process. Even so, S.A. Barnett, the first archaeologist who studied Aztalan, a site near the mines, believed that the miners originated from Europe. His conclusion was largely based on the type of tools that had been used, tools which were not used by the local people. 

Wisconsin is also a state of an enormous amount of animal effigies on the ground at burial mounds.  As well, Wisconsin coincidentally has had plenty of ancient giants - found at burial mounds.  

The dig site at Lake Delavan was overseen by Beloit College and it included more than 200 effigy  mounds that proved to be classic examples of 8th century Woodland  Culture (*a culture that adopted what it knew from a previous culture?). But the enormous size of the skeletons and elongated skulls found in May 1912 did not fit very neatly into anyone's concept of a textbook standard.  First reported in the 4 May 1912 issue of the New York Times, the 18  skeletons found by the Peterson brothers on Lake Lawn Farm in southwest  Wisconsin exhibited several strange and freakish features.  Their  heights ranged between seven and nine feet and their skulls "presumably  those of men, are much larger than the heads of any race which inhabit  America to-day."  Above the eye sockets, "the head slopes straight  back and the nasal bones protrude far above the cheek bones. The jaw  bones are long and pointed, bearing a minute resemblance to the head of  the monkey. The teeth in the front of the jaw are regular molars." On 10 August 1891, the New York Times reported that scientists from the  Smithsonian Institution had discovered several large "pyramidal  monuments" on Lake Mills, near Madison, Wisconsin. "Madison was in  ancient days the centre of a teeming population numbering not less than  200,000," the Times said. The excavators found an elaborate system of  defensive works which they named Fort Aztalan.

So, Wisconsin has - lots of animal effigies, burial mounds with slope-skulled tall skeletons, ancient mining of copper by "people before the Natives" and legends by the local Natives of the "others." 

Let's move on through the Americas -  

Peru is a copper mining area, with findings of ancient giants (Peruvian red-haired, elongated skull people), local legends by Natives of ancient giants being there (red-haired, white-skinned giants who arrived by boats), and animal effigies (Nazca) -

Nevada has copper mining. It also has 14,800 year old petroglyphs (so far the oldest in America), finds of ancient red-haired giants, and legends by the Paiutes of their giant existence and torment in the region. 

"Egyptian tomb in the Grand Canyon," 
"Viking Runes in Wisconsin," 
"Ogham writing in Arizona."

These comments are coming from the mindset of other countries visiting America before we thought they did, but this might very well be wrong.  

Technologies and languages "out of place" also line up with slope-skulled giants who cannot be explained. The one commonality in all of our cultures is giants. 

If we had pyramids in China and South America and Egypt, we had hieroglyphs and runes, stone buildings, mining, and seafaring, it wasn't being designed separately in isolated pockets around the world, it was being visited by the "originators" who spread it and it was eventually adopted by the locals who made it their own.

I propose that the giant culture spread its influence of technology and language around the world as it moved about and languages from other cultures were fashioned from the "original" language.  What we are finding in America is not out of place - for the original settlers - the giants.  This is not otherworldly, but to some it's more of a threat because it means that man cannot take credit for originality, but taking an innovation and running with it.


Perhaps "Runestones" of America is the wrong terminology. Perhaps the Norse were utilizing language they learned from the giants, as were Aztecs, Egyptians and others who started their languages based on the "leap in knowledge" the ancient giants afforded them.  Those languages were a reflection of giants' original hieroglyphics and so there are similarities depending on how much the culture retained the giants' own symbols.


 

Is it easier to believe that Vikings might have arrived with some off-style rune language and left it on rocks around American a thousand years ago up to almost 15,000 years ago? 

Or is it a much easier task to believe that a people who settled here before us were writing upon the rocks in the regions where they settled where there was water, copper, and ideal living conditions for what they sought? 

These white-skinned, red-haired, giants with rune-looking language are dismissed as "possibly Vikings showed up randomly in the Middle Ages." But, did Vikings stay and mine copper?  Were they truly 7-9 feet tall? Did the make civilizations around the Americas and have sloping skulls?

 

Who Built That?


Sacsayhuam

Stone buildings of immense size, stone walls one cannot put a blade between. These are the mysteries that haunt locations known for ancient slope-headed giants finds. Although archaeologists have to accredit any finds to the local Natives, they also readily admit, these building techniques did not jive with knowledge at the time the buildings were built, and that others, such as the Incans, imitated these earlier finds.  Interestingly, these finds were within what would later become the Incan territory in the area of Cusco, Peru.

 At the museum in Cusco, Peru, experts reviewed this mummy and proclaimed, "Although the assessment was superficial, it is obvious that its features do not correspond to any ethnic group in the world."

Note:  Amazing stone structures built before man was supposedly advanced enough to make such massive and precise things happen and ancient giant skeletons in the same region??? 

Pumapunku 

This complex is beside the Tiwanaku site in Bolivia.  This is also the area of ancient giants finds - 

Based upon detailed petrographic and chemical analyses of samples from both individual stones and known  quarry sites, archaeologists concluded that these and other red  sandstone blocks were transported up a steep incline from a quarry near Lake Titicaca roughly 10 km away. Smaller andesite blocks that were used for stone  facing and carvings came from quarries within the Copacabana Peninsula  about 90 km away from and across Lake Titicaca from the Pumapunku and  the rest of the Tiwanaku Site.
One last note is that Native legends around the world speak of ancient  giants, they also speak of those who are more powerful gods who have  knowledge. Quetzalcoatl is a great example.

 
Quetzalcoatl was related to gods of the wind, of Venus, of the dawn, of  merchants and of arts, crafts and knowledge. He was also the patron god  of the Aztec priesthood, of learning and knowledge. This serpent god was part of a triad of agricultural deities.

NOTE:  If someone brought you the knowledge to set up a civilization, build  buildings and farm the land, would this all-knowledgeable person be a  deity?  

Did man in his relatively short evolutionary period since Mitochondrial Eve and the departure from Africa (about 100,000 to 200,000 years ago) manage to discover - 

 

seafaring? 

agriculture?

art?

religion?

language?

hieroglyphs?

tools? 

mining?

architecture?

sculpting? 

Or did we imitate them from the "gods?" Those highly advanced evolutionary specimens that were giant-sized, had left Africa up to 600,000 years earlier than we, and on their path of discovery to new places, learned new ways of conquering the earth and adapting to climates, seas, and spiritual expression?

We know that homo sapiens stole tools from their predecessors, Heidelbergensis in Africa, who had made them much earlier.  We know that Neanderthal had a bigger brain than homo sapiens and his ancestor, Heidelbergensis left Africa around 800,000 years ago, but all of us modern day homo sapiens who came from Mitochondrial Eve left around 200,000 years ago. For a perspective, imagine how it was 1000 years ago compared to now as far as civilization and technology - now imagine that times 600!  That would be the difference in advancement between their descendents and Mitochondrial Eve's. 

These concepts may be unsettling, but much less so than some all-powerful aliens attacking our planet. It's quite obvious by now that homo sapiens own the planet and the technologies that we  were able to evolve at a mentally more rapid pace having rudimentary skills offered early on. This is like teaching a child to read at 5 years of age and then having him able to drink in books for years and years rather than having him try to figure out how to read and take many years to get to that point. 

We had mentors and examples that took care of the simple skills for us, so we could take it and run. Some people might think this threatens man's place on the planet and takes away credit for ancient sites from "Native People," "Vikings" or others, but it means that native people knew to take a concept and run with it and make it their own over time, from religions to language, technology to architecture.

With this point of reference I am proposing, all the "out of place" and "out of time" finds now suddenly make perfect sense. We were halfway there to explaining it when science accepted earlier migrations and Otamid skull types. Let's quite pussyfooting around researchers, and say what we all really know to be true -  there were giants upon the earth and they were our predecessors, teachers, mentors, and to earliest man - gods.

Source: http://www.ghosthuntingtheories.com/2014/04/not-ancient-aliens-rethinking-origins.html