Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.
This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.
DEAR VISITOR,
MY BLOG EXISTS NEARLY 13 YEARS AND 4 MONTH.
ON /30/09/2024 MORE THAN 2.230.520
VISITORS FROM 135 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.
THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400GUESTS PER DAY.
THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
Open Minds UFO Radio: Jim Weiner along with his twin brother, Jack, and his friends Chuck Foltz and Charles Rak believe they were abducted during a kayaking trip in Maine in 1976. They had an incredible UFO encounter, and when some of them began having nightmares, they underwent regression therapy, separately. Their accounts of what happened during their UFO encounter in 1976, which they had not remembered consciously, were remarkably similar. In this interview, Jim talks about the events and how they effected his life afterwards.
Jim presently works at Massachusetts College of Art and Design, in Boston, Massachusetts, as an Assistant Director in the school’s Technology Department, where he provides technical and administrative Macintosh computer support to the college’s students, staff, and faculty.
Volgens sommigen is het leven op Mars in het verleden uitgeroeid na een verwoestende kernoorlog. Een foto die momenteel rondgaat op internet zou daar het ‘bewijs’ voor zijn.
Theorieën over verloren beschavingen op de rode planeet zijn er al sinds het moment waarop NASA het beroemde ‘Gezicht op Mars’ in 1976 ontdekte. De wazige foto’s werden geanalyseerd en in korte tijd verrees er een hele stad met piramides uit de woestijn van Mars. Er werden verschillende boeken over geschreven.
Iedere keer als NASA de structuren van dichtbij wilde bekijken, leek het te gaan om natuurlijke formaties. Op 5 november maakte de Indiase Mars Orbiter Mission de foto waar het allemaal om te doen is. Op de foto staat de beroemde Valles Marineris, het enorme ‘litteken’ op Mars dat in 1971 door ruimtesonde Mariner 9 werd ontdekt.
Toen werd op de foto iets vreemds ontdekt. “Beelden die met de Mars Colour Camera (MCC) zijn gemaakt laten duidelijk een mysterieuze wolk zien die zich boven de Valles Marineris bevindt. De wolk heeft de vorm van een paddenstoel en onder de wolk lijkt zich een grote krater te bevinden,” schreef nieuwssite DNA India.
Mysteriousuniverse.org is ook overtuigd: “De wolk heeft zeker de vorm van een paddenstoel en vergrotingen tonen een soort krater die zich onder de wolk heeft gevormd. De schaduw van de wolk strekt zich vanaf de krater uit over het oppervlak.”
Most remarkable UFO sightings in February 2015 by www.Latest-UFO-Sightings.net.
10th February 2015; bright object – San Antonio, Texas
Here’s an infrared video of a huge unidentified flying object flying across the sky above San Antonio, Texas on 10th February 2015.
Witness report:While Skywatching i notice this Low flying Orb above some trees..No FAA navigational light’s were visible only a Huge glowing light…..It appeared to monitoring the area.I decided to pan back using the fence/tree tops as reference points..You can clearly see this U.F.O Orb traveling behind some tree tops…Giving us the altitude it was traveling..This was an awesome sighting due to how Huge and low it was traveling..On the video captures you can see some sort of craft..At some point it travels behind some tree tops and out of view..In my opinion this glowing object was clearly no aircraft or satellite weather balloon..
Author (SAUFOTX @ Youtube)
11th February 2015; UFO formation – Austria
This interesting UFO sighting was taken in the daytime sky above Austria on 11th February 2015. Unfortunately there’s not a lot other info about this footage.
17th February 2015; unknown lights – Florida
New video of an unknown lights in formation hovering in the night sky above US state Florida. This footage was taken on 17th February 2015.
What do yout think about this footage? Please leave your comment below!
23rd February 2015; orb – Utah
Shortly after 11pm on February 23, 2015, many people in Utah, Idaho, Montana and Canada reported seeing a huge sphere of light descend from the sky. Many in the media are claiming this to be “space junk” from a “Chinese rocket”. However this explanation makes no sense at all as space junk, like meteors, only glow brightly as they pass through the upper atmosphere. This object maintained it’s size, shape, and consistent glow for over a minute as it descended to the Earth!
Meer water op Mars dan gedacht: ideale omgeving voor leven - Nieuwsblad.be
Meer water op Mars dan gedacht: ideale omgeving voor leven - Nieuwsblad.be
De planeet Mars was ooit bedekt met meer water dan de aarde. Dat betekent dat Mars een ideale omgeving voor leven had kunnen zijn. Dat hebben onderzoekers van NASA berekend.
Zo’n 4,3 miljard jaar geleden bestond de noordelijke helft van Mars uit water, waarbij de oceaan op sommige plaatsen tot 1,6 kilometer diep was. Die nieuwe inzichten van NASA zorgen ervoor dat de eerdere aanname dat Mars voor het grootste deel een onherbergzame woestijn was, niet klopt. Het gebrek aan water op de planeet werd lang gezien als de reden waarom Mars onbewoond is. Nu blijkt dus dat de planeet wél bewoonbaar had kunnen zijn.
Sinds een tiental jaar werd al aangenomen dat er wel water voorkwam op Mars, maar men ging er van uit dat dat slechts sporadisch was en dat het om kleine hoeveelheden ging. Het was toen nog niet duidelijk dat dat water zowat de helft van de planeet innam en dat er meer water op Mars was dan het water dat we nu op onze aarde hebben.
Water vervlogen in de ruimte
Een groot deel van het water, bijna 90 procent, is gedurende miljoenen jaren vervlogen in de ruimte. Het overgebleven water zou zich in de noordelijke en zuidelijke poolkappen van Mars bevinden.
Onderzoek via drie telescopen
Het team van NASA dat het onderzoek voerde, kwam tot die conclusie door onderzoek via drie verschillende telescopen, en door het waterverlies op Mars over zes jaar en de verhouding tussen gewoon water en ‘halfzwaar water’ (HDO) te berekenen.
Mummified bodies discovered at Pico de Orizaba, the highest mountain in Mexico (Video)
Mummified bodies discovered at Pico de Orizaba, the highest mountain in Mexico (Video)
Mummified bodies emerge from the ice of mountain Pico de Orizaba, Mexico after 55 years.
The expedition in the central state of Puebla was launched on Thursday after climbers found a frozen head sticking out of the glacier near the summit earlier in the week.
The first frozen and mummified body was found 1,000 feet from Pico de Orizaba's peak. The second body was found about 300 feet away from the first body and was also frozen and mummified, according to Juan Navarro, mayor of the town of Chalchicomula de Sesma, near the mountain.
They suspect the bodies are the remains of two Mexican’s climbers, who went missing after an avalanche 55 years ago on the mountain.
A mission to recover the bodies from the Pico de Orizaba was suspended until Monday in order to build a special container to bring the remains intact, one of the rescue workers said.
NASA: Mars had massive, mile-deep ocean – As always, you are witnessing the Scientific matrix money making machine at work advertising on CNN endlessly discovering new stars and Mars one universal deception. This wave of deception, misinformation and control of information is designed to make billions by keeping the gullible and atheists alike hooked to something that fit their faith, hopes or understanding of the world they live in. In what practical ways can the knowledge of a mile-deep ocean help you or your family on earth when humanity and the the scientific community elites know nothing of the Soul of the Cosmos? - http://www.drturi.com/reality-shows-productions/
Can you assimilate, handle and accept the undiluted truth instead? God created the stars and the heavens for INTERPRETATIONS so you may lead a safer more productive life on earth! http://www.drturi.com/finding-jesus-faith-fact-forgery-ufo/ -
A drone flying near California’s Silicon Valley captured video of a UFO shooting across the sky at incredible speed.
It’s unclear when the video was recorded. But the operator of the DJI Inspire 1 drone uploaded the four second UFO video to the video sharing site Vimeo on the night of Thursday, March 5. The drone was reportedly flying at an altitude of 265 feet when the unidentified aerial object whizzed through the sky.
The DJI Inspire 1 drone is equipped with a 4K camera. And, fortunately, the drone operator uploaded the video in its full 4K quality. But, despite the video’s 4K resolution, little detail is visible because the UFO moves so rapidly.
The DJI Inspire 1 drone. (Credit: DJI)
“Assuming the object isn’t purely CGI, it definitely appears to be going at a fair speed,” says Australian news website News.com.au. “One YouTube user estimated the distance travelled as around one mile every one to two seconds. That would give it a speed of around 2890 km/h, roughly 2.4 times the speed of sound.”
Mysterious Universe points out that, at that speed, the UFO “would have created a sonic boom but no sound was reported to have been made by the UFO.”
After uploading the UFO video, the drone pilot sought help identifying the mysterious object on the DJI website’s forum posting, “I have no idea what this is, maybe a bug, Hummingbird, reflection or Alien space craft! The only thing I know for sure is that I did nothing that would cause this. You can analyze it better if you download the video in 4k and go frame by frame. Any other ideas of what it might be?”
It’s difficult to determine if this object is something small close to the camera, or something large far away from the camera. Some have suggested a bug, a bird, a bullet, a secret military aircraft, or even a new drone courtesy of Google or some other Silicon Valley tech giant.
(Credit: Darmino/YouTube)
The drone pilot seems to be genuinely interested in figuring out what was captured on video. The owner of the video states, “I thought it went behind the trees also but after closer inspection, I have determined that I can’t really tell. I can tell you that it was 265Ft high +or – 3 feet at the time. I’m still leaning toward a Hummingbird or bug.”
If the object was, in fact, traveling at “2.4 times the speed of sound,” that’s one insanely fast hummingbird! These birds average a flight speed of 30 m.p.h.–just a little slower than the estimated 1,800 m.p.h. of the UFO.
Although the drone pilot restricted the video to YouTube and Vimeo, you can also watch the video at the top of this story that was posted by user gwhiz2k, showing the UFO at half speed.
What do you think about the UFO in this video? Does it look like a fabrication? Could it be something close to the camera like a bird or a bug? Or did this drone’s camera capture something that could be extraterrestrial?
Which would you prefer: disclosure, about the extraterrestrial presence on Planet Earth, by our own governments; or disclosure from extraterrestrials themselves?
The thing is, whilst our governments are: at the moment, steadfastly refusing to disclose any evidence they have regarding extraterrestrials; the extraterrestrials themselves have already presented us with awe inspiring proof of their presence in our Solar System and skies.
And this evidence was shown to us – in a most spectacular fashion – on the night of the 9 February, 1913.
Now the sketch above (from PDF page 35): drawn by a witness to the Great Canadian Meteor Procession of 1913, mightn't look all that spectacular – it is, after all, only composed of pencil lines drawn on paper (I've inverted the colour scheme to make the image stand out) – but if you compare it to the image below: of an event that occurred a century later in February 2013, you will get a much better understanding of what was seen in the skies over Canada, and across the world, on that eventful night.
(I've flipped this image: of the Chelyabinsk event, horizontally to make the comparison easier.)
(NB The pencil drawing above: along with most of the evidential material that I will be presenting here, is sourced from a paper: 'An Extraordinary Meteoric Display', published by Canadian astronomer Clarence A. Chant in TheJournal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada Vol. VII. May-June, 1913. No3.)
'So what has all this stuff about meteors got to do with ET?' - is the question that you are probably asking right now.
Please read the following extract from Clarence A. Chant's paper very carefully.
" A huge meteor appeared travelling from the south-east, which, as it approached, was seen to be in two parts and looked like two bars of flaming material, one following the other. They were throwing out a constant stream of sparks and after they had passed they shot out balls of fire straight ahead that traveled more rapidly than the main bodies. They seemed to pass over slowly and were in sight about five minutes. Immediately after their disappearance in the south-east a ball of clear fire, that looked like a big star, passed across the sky in their wake. This ball did not have a tail or show sparks of any kind..."
We now need to break this extract down and examine what it is implying it more closely.
"...looked like two bars of flaming material, one following the other." Think about this. A 'bar shape' would imply rectangularity – whether the bar in question was cylindrical or rectangular in cross-section - when seen from the side we: and the witness here, would be seeing a rectangle. Now – as we all know – meteors are supposed to be haphazardly formed, irregularly shaped rocks that plunge into the Earth's atmosphere. So what mechanism could account for this rectangular (or, perhaps, classic cigar-shaped) geometry?
Then there's this: " ...they shot out balls of fire straight ahead that traveled more rapidly than the main bodies...". Meteors enter our atmosphere travelling at tremendous speed (36,000 mph or faster) and then decelerate as friction caused by their passage through the air rapidly bleeds away their kinetic energy. So what we are being told here should be impossible. When meteors break up in the atmosphere some of the debris formed coulddecelerate faster than other pieces – but to accelerate away from the bodies that generated them would mean that there must be some form of energy input/output: completely seperate from the rapidly decaying kinetic energy already possessed by those bodies – at play here.
And it doesn't end there. Consider this: "They seemed to pass over slowly and were in sight about five minutes." Now compare what this witness is saying with this known fact regarding the speed at which meteors travel across the sky: the slowest ever speed – recorded with radar technology – for a meteor's passage was ten miles per second. Now an object traveling at that speed for five minutes would cover a distance of 3,000 miles. This means that an observer on the ground would need to be able to see 1,500 miles in either direction in order to witness the entire event. And this is – of course – impossible due the curvature of the Earth. Therefore these objects couldn't have been travelling at anything like typical meteoric velocities.
Finally, we have the third object reported by this witness. "...a ball of clear fire, that looked like a big star, passed across the sky... This ball did not have a tail or show sparks of any kind..." Here, yet again, we are looking at an object of dubious provenance: given it's un-meteor-like appearance. Consider, the friction generated by a meteor's passage through the atmosphere causes it's surface to both heat up to high temperatures, and also to abrade, so that a glowing tail: composed of hot meteoric material, forms in it's wake. This object didn't have a tail of any description. Why?
So add all of the above together and what do you get? I'll tell you one thing that you most definitely don't get - that is a stream of meteors. These objects can only, really be best described inonlyone way: as Unidentified Flying Objects. And, as you will see, what occurred on the night of 9 February, 1913 was a UFO event of staggering proportions – the magnitude of which hasn't ever been seen before or witnessed since. Which is not to say that it couldn't ever happen again. (Given the ongoing proliferation of sightings of slow moving, silent fireballs in our skies - I'm pretty sure that it will.)
A little background information would be useful at this point. Clarence Augustus Chant: who is generally regarded to be the 'father of Canadian astronomy', did not – unfortunately – witness the great procession himself. But after receiving phone calls, and reading reports of the phenomenon in the press, he realized that something highly unusual had occurred that needed to be investigated. So he wrote to newspapers across Canada asking them to appeal: on his behalf, for eye-witness accounts. Most of what you will be reading here consists of the written accounts from those that responded.
( NB. A PDF version of Chant's paper is available for download on NASA's Astrophysics Data System website.
I would urge you to download this document now – being able to refer to it as you read this article will enable you to appreciate the true nature of this unparalleled event: an event that – should it be repeated – will have an almost unimaginable impact on our future and the way in which we perceive our true place within the cosmos.
Also, please note: for reference purposes, all page numbers given in this article are PDF page numbers; you will need to have Adobe's page thumbnails pane open to locate the extracts used here.)
Now let's continue our exploration of this unprecedented event. This next extract is taken from Chant's overview of the material he'd received from witnesses. It can be found on PDF page 5.
Before we start breaking this extract down, however, we need to understand a little about the man who wrote it. Chant, in his earlier carreer, lectured in physics at the University of Toronto. Here he would have become accustomed to submitting his work to the the rigours of the academic peer review process..So we can, with a degree of certainty, safely surmise that he was a soberly scholastic character: not easily given over to sensationalism or graphic overstatement. Yet, despite this scholastic sobriety, what he has written/reported above is truly sensational.
Think about it. Chant is, here, talking about a disparate collection of haphazardly formed rocks from space: each of a unique size, weight and – most importantly – mass (mass is a component of momentum: IE mass x velocity = momentum). Now whilst these lumps of debris might have entered the Earth's atmosphere travelling at the same, initial velocity, once they encountered atmospheric drag/resistance: which would have affected them all to a different degree, this would have changed dramatically. Those with less mass would have begun to lose forward momentum much more rapidly than their more massive counterparts, as their kinetic energy was absorbed by the molecular gases that constitute the air we breath. And this would have been a runaway process. The more kentic energy given up in this way, the lower these objects would have descended into the increasingly denser atmosphere – causing exponential energy loss. This means that the scenario described by Chant above is a physical impossibility. Meteors could not have maintained any kind of formation in the way described by Chant above. In the real world meteors with less mass would have quickly fallen out of the formation and headed Earthwards. Yet multiple witnesses described these objects maintaining formation over a distance of seven thousand miles. Now I would argue that I have already proven that we are not looking at inanimate lumps of rock here. So, we have to ask, how was this formation maintained? Are we looking at coordination – even communication – between these objects?
Before we attempt to answer that question, let's take a look at - and examine - a few more witness statements.
"About 9 o'clock or a little after as I was on way home from church I saw a large meteor fall to earth, leaving a trail of fire as long as Halley's Comet behind it. Then, turning towards the north, I saw a large black cloud, out of which shooting stars were coming, as it seemed, about 50, each having a line of fire in its path, and disappearing in a large black cloud in the south. After this there began a low rumbling sound like thunder."
From PDF page 25.
This is the only account – to be found in Chant's paper – that describes a meteor falling to Earth. We need to bear in mind here that this witness doesn't report any kind of detonation associated with the event: which would have indicated an impact, only a " low rumbling sound like thunder" afterwards. (I'll be dealing with the sounds associated with the passage of the 'meteor stream' later.)
The main point of interest here is the fact that this witness reports seeing meteors emerging from one cloud and then disappearing into another. This tells us that the stream flew through the atmosphere – not out in space above it.
Moreover, establishing the exact altitude at which these objects flew – from reports which differed considerably - proved to be something of a problem for Chant. To resolve this problem he first of all tries to establish a line on the map, over which the meteor stream passed directly: which he termed 'the meteor trace'. Next he tries to establish the distance between 'the meteor trace' and the various points on the map from which observations were made. Finally he uses the reported angle: given in degrees above the horizon, the 'meteor trace' used as a baseline, and the points from which observations were made to perform a triangulation calculation to arrive at the correct altitude.
In fact, Chant: with this next extract, offers up an intimation that he – himself – suspected that the height of the stream above the ground varied over much of its course.
From PDF page 8.
"...I saw the first meteor at 9.05 it was a little west of north-west from here and travelling nearly towards me. I took it for an aeroplane with both headlights lit, and as it came nearer the sparks falling behind it made it appear more like one...It was very low...just above the hills."
From PDF page 28.
Then there's this:
From PDF page 42.
"...which was still going up...". There you have it. Proof that these objects didn't just fly through the atmosphere – they actually maneuvered within it.
So let us now take a look at Chant's 'meteor trace'. Here's the map - complete with the meteor trace - published by Chant himself:
From PDF page 20
As you can clearly see, the trace (arrowed) shown here describes a straight line with no curves, kinks or angles. Now, in my estimation, a stream of meteors flying a straight course through the sky: at the low speeds described by many witnesses (*see Table One) should, in fact, create a westward curving trace on the ground beneath: because Planet Earth rotates from West to East. And, further to this, it actually rotates at different speeds at different latitudes.
So how fast were these meteors moving? Let's take a look at what some of the witnesses had to say.
Here's another map (to which I've added a few features). I will be referring back to this map as we proceed.
(Map courtesy of Sky & Telescope)
This image/map illustrates a modern version (which includes information from more recent research) of Chant's 'meteortrace': his calculated/imagined straight line onthe map (the line shown here follows the curvature of the planet). The problem with this straight line is purely, and simply the fact that it is straight.
Think about this. For this trace to describe a straight line it has to intersect each successive line of latitude at intersection points that are all on the move: all travelling from West to East at different speeds. So how was this achieved? As I see it, there are two distinct possibilities.
The 'meteor stream' either accelerated – by just the right amount – to meet the eastwards moving latitudinal intersection points at the precise juncture that would keep the line straight as it approached the equator; then the stream decelerated: with equal precision, as it crossed the equator and traveled down into the lower latitudes.
Or – throughout it's flight – the stream: apart from its overall northwest to southeast motion, compensated for the Earth's rotation by also moving, laterally, eastwards to cancel out the westward drift.
Either way – what we would be looking at here are a stream of objects that didn't just follow a flight path: but rather the coordinated trajectory of a stream of objects following a flight plan.
Now all of this does, of course, depend on the fact that the stream moved slowly across the heavens in the manner described by most witnesses. Most, that is, but by no means all. Because Chant's paper does include a few statements that don't agree with this'slow moving' scenario.
In an attempt to try and resolve this issue I began looking at the times: given by witnesses, at which the meteor stream passed specific locations (IE those circled on the map above). But, as you are about to find out, this exercise only served to raise more questions and deepen the mystery even further.
Please check out Table Two. It makes for very interesting – if baffling – reading. With this table I've converted the relevant times supplied by witnesses to Greenwich Mean Time so that direct comparisons can be made.
Click image to see in (enlarged) PDF format.
What then, are we to make of the timing anomalies that have been revealed by the simple process of converting all times given to their Greenwich Mean Time equivalents? Believe me, there is a simple explanation for this.
But first we need to explore the sighting witnessed by Mr A. Y. Porter: from the bridge of the SS Bellucia whilst at sea in the Atlantic, a little further. The following extract is in Mr Porter's own words: its taken from a letter he wrote to W. F. Denning (Denning was regarded at the time - by Chant and his contemporaries – to be the foremost expert on all things meteoric); the letter was dated April 10, 1915.
"....I was on the bridge from 8 to 12 pm. At 10.30 pm I saw the sky lighted up with meteoric fire, starting at north and and going by way of east to south-east. Apparently the height was about 25o above the horizon, but not more than 10-12 miles east of the position of the steamer at that time, continuing until 11.05 pm. It must have been travelling through the earth's atmosphere at the rate of more than 500 miles an hour and fragments were falling off as it passed along. It looked like red and white liquid fire... "
(Before continuing you now need to refer – directly - to Chant's paper. Please read at least some of the witness statements whilst paying careful attention to how they describe the time it took for the meteor stream to cross the sky.)
Once you have a good idea about the average length of time taken for the meteor stream to pass overhead according to the witness satements in Chant's paper: some three to six minutes (approximately), you will appreciate the import of the highlighted text in Mr Porter's statement above. Mr Porter is clearly telling us that his stream of 'red and white liquid fire' (at no point does he use the word 'meteor' – did he even see any individual meteors?) was in view for a full 35 minutes.
This calls into question whether or not Porter even witnessed the same event as that described by Chant. Further to this, if you examine the timing of the event at both Bermuda and Mortlach (and all points in between) in the table above (Table Two) you will begin to have serious doubts as to whether any two statements: from any two witnesses, are actually refering to a single, protracted event. Get the picture? Chant got it wrong. We are not looking at a single 'meteor stream' here. We are looking at multiple streams – of multiple incandescent objects – all airborn: all over the world. We are looking at a coordinated series of aerial events that was staged entirely for our benefit.
For some this was a magical experience:
"...I suddenly found that the whole heavens, from the zenith to the horizon, was full of meteors...They travelled no faster than a crow flies. There was absolute silence..."
From PDF page 39.
So much for the visuals, let's now examine the audio. As you will understand from the last extract, some witnesses: pointedly, remarked on the total lack of any sound that they could ascribe to the meteor stream's passage. Most, however, reported a low rumbling: that they described in various ways, that only reached their ears after the stream had passed beyond the horizon. All of this is highly unusual – given the way that sound waves propagate through the atmosphere. Why - even the wind: which is just moving air, if it is strong enough, makes a noise. So what kind of sound does a fast moving object: that displaces a large volume of air as it goes, create? Well, if that object is travelling faster then the speed of sound then the noise created is horrendous.
The picture below illustrates how the hard-hitting, classic double THUD THUD of a sonic boom is generated.
This shows the shock waves generated by a bullet. It works in exactly the same way for a super-sonic aircraft or meteor/incoming asteroid. You hear the individual booms as the waves pass over you (and scare you half to death). If the object is travelling fast enough the booms will occur too close together to be made out individually: you will hear just one, heart-stoppingly loud boom.
Why then, didn't Chant's contributors include any reasonably accurate description of this phenomenon in their accounts? All real meteors are, by their very nature, supersonic. The only time they cease to be so is when they either burn up or hit the ground. Yet nowhere can anything like this be read in this paper. Were the laws of physics/acoustics different back in 1913? Or were these objects travelling slower than the speed of sound (which would mean – yet again – that they couldn't have been meteors)?
The amount/volume of air displacement does, of course, depend upon the size of the object/objects doing the displacing. Chant discusses this aspect: specifically, the size of the meteors witnessed over Canada, on page 18 of the PDF. On the issue of size he concludes with this:
"...I am inclined to think the largest bodies to have been at least 100 feet in diameter."
From PDF page 19.
Now when it comes to high-speed meteoric objects, a diameter of 100 feet isn't small: it's scary. Such an object travelling at , say, 40,000 miles per hour while close to the ground ( or low over the hills – as described by one of Chant's contributors) wouldn't just create a noise loud enough to implode your eardrums: it would also generate a shock wave powerful enough to flatten buildings. Such objects are killers. In some cases; planet killers.
Luckily for us, however, the 'meteors' that appeared over Canada in 1913 didn't: as I have consistently shown here, behave in a typically 'meteor-like' fashion. They didn't do the things that real meteors typically do. They didn't – for instance – do this:
Tunguska - 1908
The devastation that you see here: which extended over 800 square miles, was caused by a space-rock exploding with, it is thought, the force of 1,000 Hiroshima bombs, over a Siberian pine forest in 1908. (NB. Planetary scientists now believe that the object in question here was no bigger then 30 meters in diameter: IE a little under Chant's estimation of 100 feet for the larger bodies in the meteor stream.) This air burst detonation was triggered by the rapid (very rapid) deceleration induced by atmospheric drag: nothing more. Just simple physics – a simple set of circumstances well understood by science. So the big question here has to be: why didn't any of the objects in the meteor stream suffer the same fate? They were all exposed to exactly the same set of circumstances. Why the different outcome?
Real meteors do not, either, always explode in the atmosphere. Some survive the scorching friction of their descent to make it all the way through to impact. But then, if this had happened back 1913, we'd know about it. We'd have all learned: during history lessons at school, of how, perhaps, Toronto had been reduced to smouldering ruins by a fireball from space. Or how the steamships SS Bellucia and SS Newlands had been overwhelmed by a tidal wave that went on to inundate and destroy South American coastal cities.
Real meteors can do this. Real meteors can, in fact, do much worse. There are lumps of rock out there: looping through space in unstable near-earth orbits, that are a lot bigger than the rock that blew up over Tunguska; or anything seen over Canada in 1913. But then the latter weren't real meteors were they. They were something entirely different. Technology from other worlds perhaps. Maybe we should be attempting to contact those responsible for the Great Event. Who knows? Perhaps they would be willing to help us out – should a real meteor: with planet killer characteristics, ever come our way.
So now my friends it's time to take the plunge, and ask ourselves: what was the purpose of this huge, celestial firework display? What were these signs in the sky trying to tell us?
I know this. It's really quite simple. All they are saying is this: 'We are here'. They've said it once, and they'll say it again. The second time around, however, things will pan out a little differently. Because the next time it happens thousands will record the event with their cell phones and digital cameras. The evidence: that extraterrestrials are disclosing their presence on Planet Earth, will then become undeniable.
My friends, the main event will be foreshadowed by the appearance other aerial phenomena (read Chant's paper) so you will get a warning – be ready.
So keep watching the skies, and keep that camera handy, just in case.
Many thanks for reading.
Peace, Love & Respect
peter dunn
09-03-2015 om 23:26
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
The witness first noticed a very large orange object with dark red, fibrillating light on the bottom descending approximately less than one mile away. Pictured: First Avenue looking west in downtown Albany, OR. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons)
An Oregon witness at Albany reported watching a large, hovering orange object that dropped a sphere before moving away at a high rate of speed, according to testimony in Case 63735 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
The witness had just opened a back door when the object was first seen about 8:15 p.m. on March 4, 2015.
“I noticed a very large orange object with dark red, fibrillating light on the bottom descending approximately less than one mile away at 140 degrees southeast,” the witness stated. “The object stopped and hovered for about two to three minutes.”
The witness reached for his binoculars and noticed a second, smaller object moving out of the larger object.
The witness noticed a second, smaller object moving out of the larger object. Pictured: Albany, OR. (Credit: Google)
“I saw a round sphere with dark red lights going crazy at the bottom of the sphere. It looked like it dropped (shot) out of sides near the bottom.”
The object then began to move.
“The object started to ascend slowly and then took off at a very high rate of speed directly south. It looked like it traveled miles in just a couple of seconds. It was just after dark. No noise.”
Albany is the county seat of Linn County and the 11th largest city in the State of Oregon, population 51,583.
Oregon is currently a UFO Alert Level 5 – with 0.77 sightings per million population based on MUFON February 2015 statistics. Oregon received a total of three UFO reports in February.
As the object moved away, it looked like it traveled miles in just a couple of seconds. Pictured: Albany, OR. (Credit: Google)
The UFO Alert Rating System is based on five levels – 1 through 5 – where states with 4.01 or higher reports per million residents are rated an Alert 1; 3.01 – 4.0 reports are an Alert 2; 2.51 – 3.0 are an Alert 3; 2.01 – 2.5 are an Alert 4; and those states with 2.0 or lower are rated an Alert 5.
Please remember that most UFO sighting can be explained as something natural or man-made. The above quotes were edited for clarity. Please report UFO activity to MUFON.com.
Inuit-oudsten in brief aan NASA: "Aardas is verschoven"
Inuit-oudsten in brief aan NASA: “Aardas is verschoven”
De Inuit vormen de inheemse bevolking van Groenland, Siberië en Alaska. Hun oudsten hebben in een brief aan de Amerikaanse ruimtevaartorganisatie NASA geschreven dat de as van de aarde is verschoven.
De oudsten geloven niet dat de uitstoot van CO2 verantwoordelijk is voor klimaatverandering. Zij zeggen dat de verandering van het klimaat te maken heeft met veranderingen in de lucht. De zon komt niet langer op dezelfde plaats op en de dagen duren langer, aldus de oudsten.
Ze voegden toe dat de sterren en maan ook op andere plekken aan de hemel staan en dat dit invloed heeft op de temperatuur op aarde. De Inuit zijn voor hun overleving afhankelijk van de stand van de maan en de sterren omdat ze een aantal maanden van het jaar in duisternis leven.
De oudsten zeggen ook dat ze het weer niet langer kunnen voorspellen. Daarnaast neemt het aantal ijsberen toe, waardoor de Inuit geregeld oog in oog komen te staan met deze dieren.
De Inuit wonen al honderden jaren in het poolgebied. Ze bouwen in de warmere maanden tenten en tipi’s van kariboehuid en leven ’s winters in iglo’s. Het woord Inuit wordt gebruikt als alternatief voor het woord ‘Eskimo’, omdat die term door sommige Inuit als beledigend wordt beschouwd.
Onlangs verschoof de aardas nog als gevolg van de zware aardbeving bij Japan in 2011. Die was zo krachtig dat het Japanse hoofdeiland bijna 2,4 meter werd opgeschoven naar het oosten. De aardas verschoof daarnaast 10 centimeter.
Let’s talk about the UFOs of Central New York Counties. The five counties of CNY are: Cayuga, Cortland, Madison, Onondaga and Oswego Counties. Below are a few sighting reports from the past couple of years.
It was June in 2013 at about 9:45 p.m. in Kings Ferry, NY in Cayuga County. Sankey, her two kids, and her best friend were on a cliff overlooking Cayuga Lake.
Sankey happened to turn her head and saw a brilliant orange ball coming over the lake toward them. She tells us that at times the orange ball seemed to be pulsing. It appeared to come from the direction of Interlaken.
Sankey says, “I jumped up and said, what the hell, is that?”
Sankey grabbed her camera and franticly began snapping photos. In summarizing the whole experience Sankey tells us;
“It totally confused me. I remember thinking, plane but it had no red and white blinking lights. It wasn’t a meteor but it had no tail. What is it?”
It was the 22nd of February in 2014 down in Cortland County. Frank was driving home from his 3rd shift job when he spotted something unusual in the northern sky.
“I noticed what appeared to be a very large cylinder in the sky. At first I thought it was stationary until I pulled over to get a better look. It seemed to move slowly in a North West direction.”
Frank tells us that the craft didn’t have any wings and wasn’t leaving a contrail. He adds that from his perspective the craft appeared to be much bigger than a commercial jet liner.
“To me it seemed 2 or 3 times bigger but I know it is hard to judge something that high up. I will say this definitely caught my attention when I saw it.”
Over in Madison County back in June of 2012, an Oneida, NY mother was up feeding her newborn about 4 a.m. She glanced out of the window where she noticed a strange light out in the distance over the street lights.
” It was a glowing light orange that looked to be hovering or moving very slowly. Finally it flew over our house and headed west towards Syracuse, NY”
Closer to home, a Cicero resident was driving home one night in September 2013. He tells us that he was on Northern Blvd when he noticed a very bright orange like light off in the northern direction.
“It was unlike any airplane I have ever seen. Upon pulling into my driveway I noticed the orange light was moving in a southerly direction very slowly. Suddenly the bright orange light just “winked out.”
Finally in September 2014, a resident of Fulton, NY was in his house talking on the phone when he glanced out a window and saw two red lights in the sky a short distance away. He says at first he thought they might be a helicopter or an airplane, but as the lights got closer he witnessed something amazing.
“I watched the light just stop, then completely changed direction. They were headed north/south then suddenly they went east, after about ten seconds. They stopped dead… then suddenly they accelerate much faster than anything I’ve ever seen and then poof, gone!”
The counties of Central New York (CNY) are not strangers to UFO sightings. On the other hand CNY isn’t exactly a hot spot either within the context of greater New York State.
A quick snap shot of the five CNY’s counties using the Mutual UFO Network’s (MUFON) database shows us that from 1890 to 2014, the CNY has only logged about 91 sightings. Of course experts tell us that only about one in ten persons report a sighting. So do the math; potentially the NY region may have experienced upwards of a nearly a thousand UFO sighting over the past one hundred twenty four years.
The Myth and Truth about the 13,000 year old Alien Satellite
Some of you might have heard about the infamous Black Knight Satellite and its associated mystery. For those of our readers who haven’t, we’ve prepared this article. Enjoy!
The story begins in 1954, three years before mankind launched its first artificial satellite, the Soviet Sputnik 1. On May 14, 1954, several newspapers published articles centered on a statement belonging to retired Major D. E. Keyhoe. At the time, Keyhoe believed the Earth was circled by one — if not two artificial satellites. Scientists at the famous White Sands government facility in New Mexico were actively researching this possibility and trying to determine the purpose and origin of these objects.
Later that summer, Aviation Week magazine attempted to explain the mystery by saying the two satellites’ orbits had been mapped out at an altitude of 400, respectively 600 miles above Earth.
Pentagon scare over the observance of two previously unobserved satellites orbiting the Earth has dissipated with the identification of the objects as natural, not artificial satellites. Dr. Lincoln LaPaz, expert on extraterrestrial bodies from the University of New Mexico, headed the identification project. One satellite is orbiting about 400 miles out, while the other track is 600 miles from the Earth. Pentagon thought momentarily the Russians had beaten the U.S. to space explorations.”
Keep in mind that this was all happening during the space race, when spirits were high and tensions were higher. The competition between the United States and the Soviet Union fueled the paranoia as each nation raced towards the sky.
Many astronomers suspected a large satellite was indeed orbiting the Earth and by 1960, even the U.S. Department of Defense acknowledged this alien presence.
WASHINGTON, Feb. 10 — An unidentified, silent satellite has been discovered circling the Earth in a near-polar orbit by United States tracking stations, the Defense Department said today. The identity of the mystery satellite — which has been dubbed “the dark satellite” are not known despite nearly two weeks of tracking.”
It wasn’t long before people made the connection between the unknown object and Nikola Tesla. In 1899, he had detected a repeating radio signal and believed it originated in outer space. The enigma surrounding the black satellite was deepened by its strange behavior. Virtually all the artificial satellites had been launched on West to East orbits (following our planet’s natural rotation) while this one circled Earth on a polar orbit, from North to South. Interestingly enough, polar orbits are employed by modern observational satellites that carry out mapping missions. So, was the Black Knight Satellite an observational unit? If so, who put it there?
Some astronomers who claimed to have observed it said the object would disappear, only to reappear in a different place, traveling along a different orbit. They also reported it was moving twice as fast as any other known satellite.
The Black Knight is often mentioned in conjunction with astronaut Gordon Cooper’s historic flight. In 1963, on the last of his 22 days spent in orbit, Cooper radioed Muchea Tracking Station in Australia, telling them that he was able to see a glowing green object rapidly approaching his capsule. Although his sighting had received live coverage by the National Broadcasting Company, reporters were forbidden to question him upon his return to Earth. Although Major Cooper was astern believer in aliens and their presence here on Earth, there is no link between his sighting and the Black Knight.
An interesting yet unverified aspect is the alleged decoding of the radio message the satellite is said to broadcast. As the story goes, ham radio operators who picked up the alien transmission managed to interpret it as a star map that pointed to Epsilon Boötis, a star in the Boötes constellation, located at a distance of 52 light years from Earth. Interestingly enough, in Babylonian mythology, the Boötes constellation was depicted as the god Enlil, the chief divinity among the Anunnakion Earth.
Almost every article on the Black Knight Satellite mentions its age of 13,000 years without referencing the origin of this claim. In 1973, Scottish astronomer and science fiction writer Duncan Lunan said he had succeeded in decoding the message caught by two Norwegian physicists in the 1920’s. The message was said to have come from a probe orbiting the Earth in the same Lagrangian point as the Moon and that probe had been sent a long time ago by the inhabitants of a planet orbiting Epsilon Boötis. The message read:
Start here. Our home is Epsilon Boötes , which is a double star. We live on the sixth planet of seven, coming from the sun, which is the larger of the two. Our sixth planet has one moon. Our fourth planet has three. Our first and third planets each have one. Our probe is in the position of Arcturus, known in our maps.”
The star Arcturus was pictured in the deciphered star map in the position it occupied 13,000 years ago, hence the supposed age of the Black Knight.
Lunan’s theory was picked up by Time magazine and included in several documentaries. However, in 1976 he acknowledged it was flawed and withdrew it, only to revise and reinterpret part of it in 1998.
There are a number of famous photos that allegedly show the alien satellite. The official explanations for the object they show is that it’s nothing more than a thermal blanket that had come off one of the many satellites we’ve put up there. While this might be the case, it only explains the photos and not the Black Knight itself, as the unknown object had been reported prior to these photos.
Another aspect is that these famous photos show an object far smaller than the one indicated in earlier reports, which was said to be as large as a city block. On a side note, the vimanas portrayed in ancient Hindu texts were of similar size. Perhaps there’s a connection between the two.
And since no one can deny the size and scope of the UFO phenomena, it stands to reason that among all reports of flying saucers in our skies and oceans we can fit one more: a huge alien satellite orbiting above our planet.
Like with most things related to the unexplained, there is an aura of misinformation surrounding the Black Knight Satellite. Keep in mind, this is the internet, the place where things come to get blown out of proportion.
One last thing, before you go. In medieval times, a black knight was one who had no allegiance or opted to hide it by covering his colors and emblems, effectively stating that he served no lord. Quite a fitting name for an enigmatic alien watcher, isn’t it?
Using a p8079hp night vision tube and lasers, U.F.O.Lou recorded above Melbourne, Australia something what looks like a spherical object.
It’s known lasers will attract bugs and UFO’s and with this kind of sightings it is always the question, is it a bug or a UFO? If it a bug normally you see something like wings flap however this orb remains spherical.
Also a still shot of the orb (see video) shows rather than a bug a spherical object even it looks as if a human-like figure is in the orb.
Psychicinvestigators.net published an in-depth article about this phenomenon and they said: “It does seem that there is a conscious mind behind the orbs. By looking more closely into the spirit orbs sometimes there does appear to be faces.”
Op Tweede Kerstdag van dat jaar werden er middenin de nacht een aantal vreemde meerkleurige lichten waargenomen.
Eén van de mensen die op die bewuste nacht op nader onderzoek uit ging, was de Amerikaanse luchtmachtsoldaat John Burroughs.
Na die eerste keer verschenen de lichten opnieuw op 28 december en weer was John Burroughs betrokken bij dat onderzoek.
Sinds die gebeurtenis probeert John Burroughs de artsen van het leger ervan te overtuigen dat hij door dat onderzoek bloot heeft gestaan aan grote hoeveelheden straling en dat hij als gevolg daarvan ernstige hartproblemen heeft ontwikkeld.
Nu, eindelijk, na 35 jaar strijden, heeft de Amerikaanse Veterans Administration (dat onderdeel van het leger dat zich bezighoudt met veteranen) deze medische problemen erkend en besloten dat ze de kosten voor hun rekening zullen nemen.
Nu is dit uiteraard goed nieuws voor John, maar zoals zijn advocaat zegt, heeft het leger hiermee toegegeven dat UFO’s bestaan en dat ze voor verwondingen kunnen zorgen.
John heeft altijd gezegd dat hij een fikse dosis straling voor zijn kiezen heeft gekregen in die bewuste nachten en de Engelse regering heeft uiteindelijk bevestigd dat er zich op die bepaalde plek een sterk verhoogde straling voordeed.
De verwondingen die Burroughs en zijn collega’s hebben opgelopen, doen ook sterk denken aan die van de Canadese Stephen Michalak, het verhaal dat wij vorige week publiceerden.
De overwinning die door John Burroughs is behaald is eigenlijk meer dan sensationeel. Het is bewijs dat wat de getuigen 35 jaar lang hebben verteld geen fabeltje was zoals de mainstream media al die jaren heeft geschreven.
Daarnaast heeft dit uiteraard grote gevolgen voor toekomstige claims waarbij mensen schade hebben opgelopen door UFO’s.
VIDEO: Strange lights in the sky above Longview, Texas 5-Mar-2015
VIDEO: Strange lights in the sky above Longview, Texas 5-Mar-2015
Here’s a new footage of a strange craft hovering in the sky above Longview in Texas. This was taken on 5th March 2015.
Witness report: The craft came in low and slow, looking strange as it was going for a landing. You see it speeding up to near impossible speeds as it goes out of sight. I know People will say this is a plane, but ive never seen a plane like this in my life.
Did you see a UFO? Report it using this form or send us e-mail to report@latest-ufo-sightings.net !
Bakersfield, California – 03/08/2015 I was sitting in my front yard having a bonfire with friends around 9:30 pm when I looked up into the sky. Straight ahead of me, probably several miles away, there was a large blue light floating in the sky. Right as I looked up and saw it, it dropped straight down and then disappeared. Almost as if you are holding a ball and drop it straight down from your hand, but the “ball” aka UFO disappeared before it could hit/crash. I was waiting to hear a boom or some sort of crash sound but I never heard anything. It happened very quickly, in a matter of seconds. I have also seen these driving at night back and forth from Taft and Bakersfield. Hopefully I am not the only one reporting sightings in this area, as it seems to be “infested” with UFO’s in the past few years. Sorry I do not have any photos.
Melissa
- – – – -
St Joseph MI – 03/05/15 I was at the Kiwanis dog park at 6:10 am. Morning was dark, with clear skies except for full moon over the trees in southwest corner. Ground was covered with snow, with thick layer of ice. To the northeast I saw 2 radiant parallel beams or columns of light. They were approx 200 feet high in the sky, maybe 150 feet long each, then terminating. Beams were not moving. They were in sky at least 3 to 5 min. I have never seen anything like this in my life. My initial response was, “What is this?” Then became afraid as I realized this was not a search light or other type of known light. As I was leaving the park, I noticed they were gone.
Kimberly
- – – – -
Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines – February 28, 2015 My friends from law school and I were attending a wedding that afternoon and in the evening, the reception was being held at the Roma Vita Resort at the foot of Mt. Makiling in Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines. My friend Sween Escober-Vallescas, using her DLSR camera began taking shots of the view. Upon uploading the pictures on Facebook, that is when we noticed the peculiar white speck in the night sky flying above the mountains. It is shaped like a toy top with a white elliptical halo around it.
Atty
- – – – -
Merced, California – Feb 28th 2015 2:48 pm A ok idk my mom said I should send u guys this pick idk what it is maybe bird plane or something it’s about center to the right in the picture but yeah if u can tell me ur thoughts on it
Sadag
– – – – -
Near Feather Falls Calif. – Tue. February 24, 2015 I was taking a picture of a condensation trail from a jet that had flown over to the west of my house. After I observed the photo I noticed a small speck in the picture,(picture was taken from my phone camera). Not thinking much of it at the time, I discounted it as a particle on the lens or a bug that flew by. A few days later I enlarged it and was surprised to see a disk shaped object with what appeared to have some sort of a reflection at the bottom, indicating to me to be metallic looking. I keep trying to debunk the thoughts I have that it is a UFO. I would like someone to look at it and and inform me what it is. I prefer not to email it. Is there anyone near Oroville or Chico Calif. that I could take it to? Thank you.
Robbie
- – – – -
Newton-le-Willows, Merseyside. – sat.21.feb.2015. This is the first of 3 Celestial Starships filmed of 7 or 8 seen,and was hovering 1.5-2mls.,to E,17-20,000ft.,alt.Probably interstellar,and see vid.no.1,on,youtube,my channel,Robert Newton,MVI_5979.
but if censored,scroll to url,or try,Google,Robert Newton ufo,or,Robert Newton@astralaeos,on Twitter.I now have 245 vid’s.of alien craft,some multiple,and I have lot’s more film.19mls.,E,of Liverpool.
Robert
- – – – -
Bangkok – Mid February 2015 Near Don muang Airport, both myself and my GF whilst eating in evening on our balcony saw a light, not on Don muang flight path, but near the airport. Was bright round white light that was in the sky and had a smaller light underneath fly towards it and then the light just vanished like the light had been switched off. Never seen anything like that before.
Paul
- – – – -
Oak forest – 02/08/2015 It’s north of me its high above. It’s flashing redevery once in a while and it repeats itself. It will start blinking red light crazy None stop then it will start again and It will repeats itself As of right now it is white it doesn’t seem like it’s moving right now. I never seen anything like it. All I do is look at the sky every day I’ve never seen anything like it. I wish I could take a photo of it. I reported lights high above with flashing lights above north of me it is now far southwest of me now in a few hours I’m also going by the moon. I’m also going by the stars and doesn’t add up right
Kurt
- – – – -
11th September 2004, Burghfield, Reading, Berks, ENGLAND Driving back from daughters house early morning, sun not up yet,wife said watch out, as i was looking out of side window, nearly put the van into the ditch, stopped the van and asked her to look out of my window, what do you see i said, “it looks like a spaceship” she said, So heres another UFO sighting, little lights, funny noise,fast, racing across the sky,there one second gone the next, yea we have heard it all before, no concrete evidence, no other witnesses,cant be sure, watched this spaceship for about six minutes, just silently hovering in the same place, no movement as yet, we were about 2oo metres from a M.O.D establishment, cameras all over the place, no way that they didn’t capture the spaceship on these cams, for years wondered why they never showed the videos of the spaceship? always wanted to know why and how they kept this a secret? amazed how this has never been investigated? when i read back of the sighting that morning not much more could i add, except since i’ve looked into more reasons why they haven’t shown this spaceship it becomes obvious to me that the powers to be have suppressed the sighting because of the change of energy source they would have to show the world. as i said we watched for about six minutes the spaceship started to move off, we never saw anything or body get on or off, it moved north for 800 metres then turned east until we lost sight of it, it travelled at about 100 miles per hour, the shape was normal looking spaceship, lights around middle looked like they were flashing, pastel in colour, the actual makeup look of the spaceship was thundery clouds racing through it, this was showing up more as the morning sky was bright blue, not a cloud in the sky anywhere, it was as if they had got the camouflage wrong? weird? we followed the spaceship for 400 metres where it changed course we watched from a motorway bridge, there were many cars both way on that motorway that would have seen the spaceship, also the M4 roundabout cams would have seen it? NOTHING, NO ONE, NOT ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE ANYWHERE, thank you for reading this comment, and you’re probably thinking wow great, exciting,or mans crazy,on drugs,nutter, and when i tell you that the spaceship was the size of Wembley football stadium, most people would agree with you. BUT KNOW THIS, if anyone has the power to ask the people on duty that morning at the M.O.D. who were watching the security monitors, your find that all i saw was true. also these people would have had to report it to their superiors, then M16 NASA they already have this technology is why they are not investigating my sighting, SUPPRESSION of advanced energy technology of course until we find a way of allowing the billions to benefit, the earth’s existence relies on this type of free clean energy. somehow we as custodians of the planet need to come up with a way for the powers of this world to agree to a new energy force which we have, although at this time not being used.
Michael
- – – – -
Center of town Lisbon, LA. – December 16/ 1963 That day the sky was very cloudy and very dark that night. you could not see any stars nor the moon. There was no break in clouds at all. Time was about 7-8PM. When I first saw I was going nearly due east and was beside some of the plant used on the gas plant. There was a split in the clouds that had to be between 6-8 miles wide that a very bright light was shining down through. The split was very straight. The light was shining down lighting up the clouds below it. Above it the clouds were very dark like all the others. That the angle up to the split was about15 degrees. Less than a mile further I made a right turn on a Y in road and continued seeing it. At Sharon LA made a right turn and after a few miles I turned right again heading South seeing it all time. Next night about same time I checked the moon and it was in the west at about 2pm on a clock. This could not haven been the moon anyway because light was a very bright white colored. No photo for I did not have a camera.
The F.B.I. was so overwhelmed with sightings of flying saucers in the 1940s that agents routinely destroyed reports because of lack of filing space, according to documents released by the organization. The policy is outlined in a memo sent on 16 August 1949 to J Edgar Hoover, the director of the bureau, along with documents on UFOs compiled by agents after statements from witnesses. The note, sent by an unnamed FBI agent in San Antonio, Texas, states that the office destroyed UFO reports on the grounds that they arrived “in great numbers” and contained “nothing of FBI interest”. “It is pointed out that the filing of these would result in the rapid accumulation of very bulky files,” the memo continues. The documents are among a batch of papers related to UFO sightings that has been made available through The Vault, the FBI’s online records database. In one intriguing note, sent on 22 March 1950, special agent Guy Hottel, head of the FBI’s Washington field office, wrote to Hoover with information on three “so-called flying saucers” that a witness claimed had crash-landed in New Mexico. According to the memo, an air force investigator stated that three flying saucers had been recovered in the area, along with the bodies of the alien crews.
The memo goes on to add: “Each one was occupied by three bodies of human shape but only three feet tall, dressed in metallic cloth of a very fine texture. Each body was bandaged in a manner similar to the blackout suits used by speed flyers and test pilots.”According to the witness, the saucers were brought down by a “high-powered government radar” in the area that interfered with the spaceships’ controls. “No further evaluation was attempted,” the memo concludes.
In 1947, an object that may have been a weather balloon crash-landed near Roswell, New Mexico, sparking an ongoing conspiracy that US officials captured an alien spacecraft. In a separate incident, Hoover received an urgent teletype message from FBI agents in Salt Lake City, Utah, describing what appeared to be an explosion in the sky that was followed by “the falling of a silver-coloured object.” The sighting, recorded on 5 April 1949 by a guard at the army general supply depot in Ogden, Utah, was reported independently by a military officer and also a highway patrolman, who claimed to see a silver object explode as it approached mountains at Sardine Canyon.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
(2).jpg)
