Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.
This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.
DEAR VISITOR,
MY BLOG EXISTS ALREADY 13 YEARS AND 2 MONTH.
ON 06/08/2024 MORE THAN 2.161.100
VISITORS FROM 135 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.
THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400GUESTS PER DAY.
THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
07-05-2015
North American Stonehenge Discovered Under Lake Michigan (Video)
North American Stonehenge Discovered Under Lake Michigan (Video)
VIA| Evidence recently unearthed shows that Lake Michigan may have a Stonehenge structure on its floor alongside a boulder with a prehistoric carving of a mastodon.
The sighting happened when Mark Holley, a professor of underwater archaeology at Northwestern Michigan University College and his colleague Brian Abbott voyaged across the lake in a ship furnished with sonar equipment with intent to examine old shipwrecks.
While combing Grand Traverse Bay they observed unique rock formations resembling Stonehenge, and rocks with strange engravings, one which Holley believes to be aMastodon.
“When you see it in the water, you’re tempted to say this is absolutely real,” Holley told reporters.
Experts shown pictures of the boulder holding the mastodon markings have asked for more evidence before confirming the markings are an ancient petroglyph, said Holley.
“They want to actually see it,” he said.
The formation, if authenticated, wouldn’t be completely out the ordinary. Stone circles and otherpetroglyph sites are located in the Great Lakes area.
Ancient structures underneath large masses of water are not all that uncommon around the planet. There are over 100 cities at the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea and even more at the bottom our oceans.
Which raises the question I always ask, “Where did all the water come from?”.
The Sierra Norte location has been included in the Northern Area Extraterrestrial Route (Ruta Extraterrestre Area Norte), a circuit connecting the main UFO sighting locations in the Community of Madrid.
When Steven Spielberg conceived the plot of his 1970s movie “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” (1977) he almost surely knew nothing about of this site in Madrid’s Sierra Norte, but it could have certainly served as the locale for his movie instead of Indiana. This three-dimensional space is none other than the El Atazar reservoir, considered the largest in the community and also one of the main UFO sighting locations in the region.
Its most intense area of activity, in this regard, dates back to the same decade as the one in which Spielberg’s opus was released and subsequent years, at least to the end of the 1980s. In this regard, there are dozens of eyewitness accounts that allege having seen a variety of flying objects in the area – elongated and luminous – with unusual speed and maneuverability that allowed them to dive into the reservoir over and over, emerging only to become lost in the sky. A group of young hikers testified to this, with the corresponding confirmation by other visitors, equally sure of having had a contact experience with extraterrestrial life.
In fact, the relationship between the El Atazar reservoir and the UFO phenomenon is based on such accounts, repeated in the same location to date, but also by the site’s inclusion in the so-called Northern Area Extraterrestrial Route. This is a circuit through the various sighting locations in the region, which include other municipalities such as Pedrezuela, El Berrueco, La Cabrera, La Pedriza or El Vellón, among others.
[Note:UFOs has shown a marked interest in reservoirs since the early days of the phenomenon. Reservoirs such as Wanaque in New Jersey, and Lake Carraizo in Puerto Rico have been magnets for such activity. In South America, the Ingeniero Roggero dam (Moreno, Argentina), the El Yeso reservoir (Chile) and the Jurumirim Reservoir in Brazil have become known for their unusual activity – SC]
From the very beginning of the modern UFO mystery beginning in the 20th Century there were disturbing signs that alluded to something perhaps even more sinister than space aliens. There were indications that evidence led to other conclusions that did not include classified programs by the US and foreign powers or some top secret program hidden from the entire world by an elite group of conspirators.
Possible explanations
Many researchers feel as though the UFO phenomenon is hidden within the folds of demonology. From the Vimamnas of ancient Hindu religion to the secretive abductions of aliens from their mother ships as people sleep, there seems to be a frightening puzzle that is starting to unveil itself with much resistance. The answers to that wicked puzzle may shock and disturb people even worse than having to accept an extraterrestrial presence.
The actions of an elite military expedition in 1942 may hold the key to part of the hideous revelations that await the human race under the worst of possible deductions. Scientists concluding that only crafts that were transcending the barriers of dimensions could possibly reproduce the mystifying characteristic observed of UFO's as they perform their physics defying feats without any clue as to their propulsion capability. That an officer on duty for the city of Dulce, New Mexico observed and reported a flying saucer go right into the face of the Archuletta Mesa limestone like placing one's hand through water seems to indicate the interdimensional travel theory.
Pursuant to war effort
Pressed for the rapid development of a nuclear device that could end World War II for the allies, the 1942 expedition to the Archuleta Mesa region gained support in the eyes of the military and US scientific community. The sparsely populated New Mexico desert was uniquely qualified as a place to hide secret experiments if not the dead! Archeologists had already made some strange discoveries of folklore among local Indian tribes such as the Jicarillo Apaches prominent in the area. They spoke of little devils living somewhere in hiding in the area. The Native Americans spoke of shape shifters and evil spirits. Vague references to an underground system were implied where the little devils dwelled. White settlers in the area has always ignored this as superstitious.
Objectives unfold
A detachment tasked with the mission came from varying locations. Edwards AFB served as one source of supply and personnel. Los Alamos provided additional supervisory figures in addition to Army infantry from other installations. According to author Anthony Sanchez, the expeditionary force was prepared for many contingencies. Perhaps they were, but little were they prepared for what they were about to find.
Where myth and legend merge
We today are told to accept the rumors that beneath the vicinity of Dulce where townspeople often hear strange underground vibrations, where thermographic photos show huge outputs of heat energy that has nothing to do with geological activity, and where a plethora of animal mutilations have been reported for decades that all this indicates the work of space aliens and cooperative experiments with classified US government projects. We are told that horrifying experiments go on several levels below the Archuleta Mesa corridors that have long been adapted for modern habitation as facilities.
Alleged horrors
In his book, UFO Highway, Anthony Sanchez mentions several forms of life that have been merged with human and alien DNA that are both unstable and unpredictable, species he names as scimitars. These entities are capable of shape shifting and becoming deadly killers almost without warning, yet are prevalent within the hidden corridors of the Archuleta Mesa under the aegis of human alien programs.
Universal truth
I might remind many of you that inherent in many religions and ancient cultures are such references to Hades, the Underworld, the netherworld from down under where Hell and the Devil dwell. Is it not somewhat curious that these alien beings reportedly present in the little known underground corridors of the Dulce area have been there according to the accounts of the ancient people for centuries? What has been seen by many as an unholy alliance of high level defense contracting and beings from another world may be only partially right. Perhaps beings from another reality once known very well to those who could distinguish between good and evil is more appropriate.
Disguised or real
Under the guise of a hostile species from another world when in truth they have been here all along seems more in line with the theories of people such as John A. Keel, Emmanuel Swedenborg, and John Forte. Those who dwell alongside us sometimes invisible sometimes not, sometimes luring us into acts we would never think of, or seeming as benevolent guides to a future we cannot know yet, they persist. According to John A. Keel, many UFO witnesses and contactees met with extremely unfortunate circumstances after their encounters. Was this simply bad luck or had evil cursed them?
When the skies reveal
In the Bible references to glimpses of monumental battles between God's angels and Satan's minions were witnessed by disciples as the skies opened and revealed fantastic imagery. In Hindu religious tales battles between competing entities resulted in gigantic aerial explosions that seem like nuclear war even igniting the backs of Elephants on fire in the wake of the terrible spiritual skirmishes of good and evil! Are the continuing events of the Dulce and Archuleta Mesa underground also examples of such enduring struggles involving fallen angels disguised to emulate a timely acceptance of a new myth to distract us from the truth?
In Part VII something wicked awaits a secret expeditionary project commissioned in 1942 hidden form public knowledge for decades now.
Extra information about the article:
More evidence leads to a frightening conclusion over the origin of UFOs.
Afgelopen maand circuleerden op internetfora en blogs artikelen waarin werd gesteld dat in Labinsk in Rusland een 250 miljoen jaar oude microchip was gevonden en dat de vondst was bevestigd door een Russische universiteit. Dat meldt de krant The Epoch Times.
Bewijs van miljoenen jaren oude computertechnologie zou zonder meer indrukwekkend zijn. De Platov Zuid-Russische Staats-Polytechnische Universiteit was belast met het onderzoek naar de ‘microchip’. Het voorwerp werd in 2013 ontdekt door een visser genaamd Viktor Morozov, die het aan de universiteit doneerde.
De universiteit stuurde in november 2014 een verklaring naar het Russische persbureau Max Portal waarin stond te lezen dat de ‘microchip’ in feite een 410 miljoen tot 450 miljoen jaar oud fossiel is van een zeelelie.
Zeelelies zijn stekelhuidige dieren die in de oceaan leven. Ze leven van organische deeltjes die in het water zweven. Ze vangen die met de geveerde armen en brengen ze vervolgens naar de mond. Tot de negentiende eeuw werden zeelelies nog beschouwd als een uitgestorven groep.
Of dit voorwerp nu een microchip of het fossiel van een zeelelie is, er zijn vele mysterieuze artefacten die de vraag doen rijzen of men in de prehistorie al beschikte over geavanceerde technologie en waar die precies vandaan kwam, aldus de krant.
De maan is het hemellichaam dat het dichtst bij de aarde staat en vele mensen zijn erdoor gefascineerd, maken er foto's van en bekijken hem via allerlei telescopen.
Zo is ook een lezer al dertien jaar bezig met het ontrafelen van een raadsel naar aanleiding van een foto die hij maakte van de maan.
We krijgen soms de meest merkwaardige puzzels opgestuurd en onderstaand geval hoort zeker in die categorie.
Een lezer schrijft het volgende (dank!):
Op 24 juni 2002 kampeerde ik met mijn vrouw in Zuid-Wales fotografeerde ik de volle maan boven een bosrand om 00.48 uur.
Jaren later bekeek ik de foto nog eens en ik ontdekte daarop een "vlek". Met Photoshop heb ik het contrast wat verhoogd en bij het vergroten ontdekte ik een soort constructie. Opmerkelijk is dat de constructie veel scherper afgebeeld is dan de omgeving. Dat kan technisch toch niet?
Deze foto's laat ik sindsdien aan zoveel mogelijk mensen zien. Ook stuurde ik ze naar de vroegere website Niburu.nl en naar een website van een orb-onderzoeker.
Ook stuurde ik ze naar Erik von Däniken. Niemand kan mij er iets serieus over vertellen en geen enkele instelling vindt het waard om ze in een groter verband te verspreiden.
Nu stuur ik ze naar jullie.
Wij hebben geen flauw idee wat op die tweede foto staat, maar zijn uiteraard wel bereid om dit verder te verspreiden omdat misschien iemand uit het publiek enig idee heeft waarmee we hier te maken hebben.
Als er dus mensen zijn die een suggestie hebben, laat het ons weten zodat deze al meer dan tien jaar durende puzzel eindelijk kan worden opgelost.
Vol verwachting klopte het hart van veel mensen want op 5 mei zou eindelijk bekendgemaakt worden dat er geen enkele twijfel meer bestaat over Roswell en de buitenaardsen.
Dat tijdens de crash in 1947 bij Roswell van een buitenaards ruimteschip een aantal buitenaardse wezens zijn aangetroffen, waarvan enkelen nog in leven waren.
Het heeft even geduurd, maar we hebben een opname van de presentatie in Mexico City gevonden.
Het is een lange opname van vijf uur, waarbij ongeveer twee uur in beslag wordt genomen door de presentatie zelf.
Een gedeelte van het programma is in het Spaans, maar de presentatie zelf wordt in het Engels gegeven.
Deze begint rond de één uur en 45 minuten in de video. Wij hebben hem zelf nog niet gekeken en het is voor onsdus ook een verrassing wat er gezegd en/of gepresenteerd gaat worden.
Zoals gewoonlijk bij een evenement zoals dit vallen de experts over elkaar heen, waarbij een fiks gedeelte twijfelt aan de echtheid van het getoonde beeldmateriaal.
Daarom is het altijd beter om zelf de presentatie te bekijken en daarna een mening te vormen.
It’s common for ufologists to date the beginning of the “modern UFO wave” to the famous Kenneth Arnold sighting of June 1947. But while Arnold’s sighting certainly marked a turning point in UFO history, it was far from the first sighting of something unusual in the sky. In early 1942, a number of unidentified lights and craft were spotted over and around the city of Los Angeles. One of these objects reportedly hovered over the city for an hour, invoking sporadic fire from multiple anti-aircraft guns, and it was even captured on photograph. The object later vanished, and its identity was never revealed, but the so-called “Battle of Los Angeles” has lived on in popular culture as a reminder of the long history of the UFO phenomenon, and as a revealing case study in the government’s handling of it before the proliferation of military intelligence agencies in the post-war era.
BREAKING NEWS! Roswell UFO Crash Slides Finally Here
BREAKING NEWS! Roswell UFO Crash Slides Finally Here
ET enthusiasts have long been preparing for the big revelation of the controversial Roswell Slides for the first time.
The highly-contested photographs were allegedly snapped by geologist Bernard A. Ray on a Kodachrome film, which prove the remains of an extraterrestrial recovered dead in New Mexico.
Despite dozens of testimonies from locals and experts, the incident has been generally considered fake. UFO investigator Anthony Bragalia has been making a tremendous effort to find evidence of the authenticity of the incident for many years.
Bragalia claims the creature in the slides isn’t a terrestrial being. On his blog, he revealed that professionals from different disciplines who examined the slides closely agree seeing a small humanoid creature and formerly a living thing that isn’t a prop or genetically defective human.
Bragalia explained that the humanoid wasn’t a deformed person, dummy, mummy, simian or dead serviceman. He added that what is shown in the slides is an actual moment in time in 1947. He said science admitted that there are real slides from that year.
Chase Brandon, a CIA agent for 35 years, believes the evidence revealed on May 5 is worth it. Brandon said that he first saw the slides in a vaulted area, particularly in a box labelled as Roswell.
The so-called Roswell Slides were publicly released at an exclusive live-streamed event in National Auditorium of Mexico City, showing an apparent ET body recovered from the 1947 Roswell UFO crash. Popular Mexican television program Tercer Milenio (with Jaime Maussan) organized the event that attracted world attention.
The slides show an alien-looking body lying horizontally on a glass shelf. The alleged ET body is approximately 4 feet tall, with large eyes, small mouth, enlarged skull, thin arms, legs and torsos. The pictures seem to suggest that they were taken after an autopsy since the internal organs have been removed.
Several medical and photographic experts were present at the event, including former Canadian forensic and academic pathology consultant of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Dr. Richard Doble. He said the photo seems to show a deformed human at first glance but after a closer examination he clearly saw that it has only four pairs of ribs instead of 12 in a normal human being. He added that the hands and feet bone structures were very different to a human.
Photographic and medical experts are convinced that the photos are genuine. The list of experts was presented at the Mexico City event and it included photographic analysis expert Dr. David Rudiak, computer enhancement specialist Dr. Donald Burleson, material expert of the Studio MacBeth Ray Dowing, Col. Jeffrey Tau of Pentagon’s Photo Interpretation Department, and former Director of the Chicago Museum of Contemporary Photography Prof. Rod Slemmons.
10 amazing images of the most incredible ancient megalithic site in Peru
10 amazing images of the most incredible ancient megalithic site in Peru
May 6, 2015 - It is perhaps one of the most incredible ancient sites in Peru, a megalithic site that is believed to predate the Inca themselves. The construction features found at Sacsayhuaman are breathtaking, precisely cut stones, sharp edges, smooth surfaces and walls put together in such a way that modern engineers stand in awe when looking at the feature of this ancient megalithic site. Sacsayhuaman is located at an elevation of 3701m above sea level in the northern outskirts of Cusco, Peru.
Modern archaeologists believe that, according to recent studies, the oldest parts of this ancient city were built by the Killke, 1.000 years ago, but Inca legends go far beyond that; stating that this ancient megalithic site was built by gods who descended from the heavens. The stone masonry present at Sacsayhuaman is incredible, with huge walls composed of rocks over 50 tons, squeezed together in such a way as if the rock literally melted, placed together like a puzzle, perfectly fitting into place.
Here we bring you ten amazing images of this ancient megalithic site that you probably haven’t yet seen, in an effort to help understand and get to know Sacsayhuaman better.
This image is incredible, observe the corner of this construction, the stone blocks seem bent, yet everything fits together perfectly, and there is not a chance that a single sheet of paper would fit between these incredible blocks of stone. This is one of the best examples of stone masonry fount at this ancient megalithic site.
These are “thrones” or at least that is what the tour guides explain them to be, but some believe that these flat surfaces are something other. Here we have 13 of these flat surfaces which have been carved out from extremely hard stone. Observe the incredible precision and detail, yet these were produced thousands of years ago.
Another image of a piece of a wall found at the megalithic site of Sacsayhuaman. Notice the different shapes that compose the wall, yet they seem to fit together in such a way as if the stone was made one for another.
Another section found at Sacsayhuaman demonstrating incredible masonry skills. Smooth surfaces were something which was favored by the ancient stonemasons at Sacsayhuaman. Precision and smoothness, amazing details.
Another image demonstrating Sacsayhuamans’ stonemason abilities to shape these huge stones in a unique manner, creating bent corners; something that we have seen in other places on the Planet, Egypt being one of those. Did ancient stonemasons from Sacsayhuaman really have the ability to soften rock?
Notice how these huge rocks seem to have been squeezed together. Some say that they appear to be fused together. Not a single sheet f paper can fit in between these rocks. How did the ancient stonemasons at Sacsayhuaman achieve this precision?
Another breathtaking image of Sacsayhuaman. Some of these blocks of stone have over a hundred tons, they seem to be pressed together fitting into place incredibly well. How did the ancient stonemasons achieve this type of precision? And how did they manage to quarry these blocks of stone and put the into place? Could the ancient Inca legends be true perhaps? That Sacsayhuaman was in fact constructed by gods that came from the sky?
Amazing styles of construction that defy our very own engineering and construction skills today. Observe the precise placement of these walls, and the incredible shapes these blocks of stone have. Sacsayhuaman is truly a wonder of ancient construction.
Another incredible wall at Sacsayhuaman displaying the combination of smaller blocks of stone with much larger ones, yet the difference is very pleasing to the eye. not only is Sacsayhuaman incredibly well constructed, it is incredibly aesthetic.
Sacsayhuaman is place that you have to visit to truly appreciate its beauty, energy and history. Even though we can see and learn much about this ancient megalithic site believed to predate the Inca, some of its mysteries are still hidden in these incredible walls who have a unique story to tell.
51 Pegasi b (artist's conception) is the first exoplanet from which astronomers have detected visible reflected starlight.
Astronomers detect starlight reflected off an extrasolar planet
For the first time, astronomers have detected visible starlight reflecting off a planet orbiting a distant star. The telescope used in the discovery was too small to tell scientists much new about the previously discovered planet. But astronomers say the new technique used promises to reveal much more when combined with better spectrographs and bigger telescopes now in the works. “The ultimate goal is to characterize a planet like Earth,” says team leader Jorge Martins of the Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences in Porto, Portugal.
It is now almost impossible to see exoplanets directly, as they get lost in the glare of their parent stars. Astronomers have gleaned some information about exoplanet atmospheres by observing how the atmosphere absorbs starlight when an exoplanet’s orbit carries it between the star and Earth.
The Porto team used a different method to study a familiar exoplanet, 51 Pegasi b, which 20 years ago was the first exoplanet found orbiting a normal star. Researchers employed an instrument called the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS) attached to a 3.6-meter telescope operated by the European Southern Observatory (ESO) at La Silla in Chile. HARPS is one of astronomy’s most successful planet hunters; it works by scrutinizing stars for wobbles caused by the tug of an orbiting exoplanet’s gravity. That is how 51 Pegasi b—known as a “hot Jupiter” because of its size and closeness to its star—and hundreds of other exoplanets have been found.
To spot the wobble, researchers using instruments like HARPS build up a reference spectrum for the star—how brightly it shines at each wavelength—as if it is at rest. Using that reference, they then look to see if the observed spectrum shifts over time. If the observed spectrum shifts a bit toward the red end, it means the star is moving away—stretching out its light to longer wavelengths. A shift to the blue end means the star is moving closer—bunching up its light to shorter wavelengths. Repeated observations reveal the size and period of the wobble, and from that astronomers can infer some characteristics of the planet that is causing it—without actually “seeing” the planet itself.
The Porto team took their reference spectrum for the star 51 Pegasi and compared it with new, very sensitive observations. In addition to the first set of shifts caused by the star’s wobble, they found a second set of shifts, much fainter and with higher redshifts and blueshifts. These are from starlight that, instead of traveling straight from the star to Earth, first reflects off the planet 51 Pegasi b. It has larger shifts because the exoplanet in its orbit is traveling much faster than its parent star is wobbling.
Such discoveries will have to wait until the team gets time on ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT)—a battery of four 8.2-meter telescopes, also in Chile. Further improvements will follow when a new spectrograph called ESPRESSO is installed on the VLT in 2016 and when ESO’s 39-meter European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) is completed in 2024. “With E-ELT we hope to be able to characterize an Earth-like exoplanet,” Martins says.
“I am very happy they’ve managed to provide independent evidence of this planet and nail down its mass,” says Didier Queloz of the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom, co-leader of the team that originally discovered the planet. 51 Pegasi is, he says, “an emblematic star.”
Sara Seager of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge agrees: “Fantastic to hear a version of the literally original technique for exoplanet atmosphere spectroscopic detection has finally succeeded, but with a [relatively weak] detection, more work is warranted.”
Last night in Mexico City, a special public event was held that showcased a series of controversial Kodachrome slides, which some are promoting as evidence of an “alien” body. The unreleased photos, which have now been referred to for months as “The Roswell Slides”, were believed to have been taken by geologists Bernard and Hilda Ray sometime in 1947. They depict a small, obviously deceased humanoid figure, which some have suggested could be a set of mummified remains in what appears to be a museum display. The event was held by UFO enthusiast and promoter Jaimie Maussan.
“The body appears to have been autopsied,” said historian and UFO researcher Richard Dolan, who had been invited to attend and lecture at the event. “This is fascinating…What really has impressed me is the analysis that has been done on the slides,” Dolan told host George Noory on the late night program Coast to Coast AM shortly after the presentation.
“What they require is the largest number of qualified individuals to look at them in a qualified analysis,” Dolan recommended, noting further that many qualified experts had been present already, some of whom argued that the body in the Kodachrome slide “was not human,” and strangely, that it may not have been a mammal.
“I can’t say that I would bet that it’s a hoax,” Dolan said when asked by Noory if he would bet on the legitimacy of the photo, noting, however, that he had, “been a little more hesitant to connect [the photos] to Roswell” than others involved with the event.
Following the presentation, which was simulcast online as a pay-per-view event, several in the online community displayed less enthusiasm about the photo, copies of which began to appear online shortly afterward.
“A shriveled-up mummified child or dwarf is not a well-preserved “alien” that would, obviously, be preserved in formaldehyde or another chemical,” said author Wm Michael Mott on his Facebook page. “If you bought into this “Roswell Slides” hoax, I have some magic beans to sell to you.”
Similarly, author and blogger Nick Redfern wrote:
“Roswell Slides? Now we have the high res image, the answer is: No! Mummified child. Also, check out the hairy head behind the main head. It too has a small white placard by it. Clearly this is some sort of museum setting, or freak show. Interesting, but it has zero relevance to Roswell.”
Elsewhere, researcher Chase Kloetzke offered the following:
“The more I look at it, the more it [resembles] a museum display case with a mummy of some sort. Even the item it lays upon seems to have “texture”… perhaps woven, such as would be found in some South American or meso-American dig sites; used as Funeral wrappings.”
Providing commentary via his Twitter account, blogger Red Pill Junkie, who was in attendance in the audience at the Mexico City event, shared the following:
Back from the Roswell event. So here are a few personal thoughts 1. My expectations were low but I must say it wasn’t as bad as I’d expected
2. The big question is “what now?” Will they let other researchers conduct inddpendent analysis on them?
3. Best part of the whole thing was the forensic analysis conducted by the Mexican specialists (plus 1 Canadian)
3.2 But now of course comes the questions of who these people are and what are their credentials and experience in previous studies…
4. My opinion at this moment: Either the slides turn into the 2nd Santilli video (i.e. hoax) or the 2nd P-G film (i.e. we need a body!!)
RPJ offered the following supporting illustration with his 4.5-point analysis:
And as reported in The Mirror, UFO enthusiasts elsewhere on Twitter were filing their complaints under the hashtag, “#BeDisappointed“.
Back in February, I wrote an article at Mysterious Universethat offered my own feelings about how this might play out, which included two possibilities about what the photos may show:
A child or infant body with an enlarged head due to brain swelling resulting from hydrocephalus or some similar condition
The mummified remains of a child or otherwise diminutive individual, similar to a number of examples displayed in photographs, which reside today in various museums
In that MU piece, I made a number of tangential observations, questioning how a simple photograph would, by itself, prove anything at all. “[T]he image we have of the purported ‘alien’ which researchers Schmitt, Carey and others are touting as final “proof” of an extraterrestrial body found at Roswell appears to be anything but,” I wrote.I also stated my feeling that we need not resort to ad hominem attacks against Carey, Schmitt, and the others promoting these so-called Roswell slides. I’ve spoken with Carey and Schmitt before, both on and off the microphone, so to speak. We’ve compared notes on things, and in my experience, I’ve found that I don’t generally agree with the majority of their views on subjects pertaining to the study of unexplained aerial phenomena; however, I like them both as individuals. Here again, it’s simply the fact that I don’t think that what they are promoting with the so-called “Roswell Slides” represents anything involving UFOs.
Which brings us to a number of the questions I asked back in February:
How can anything appearing solely in a series of photographs, without a physical specimen to match, offer “proof” that would meet the requirements of science? No biologist, chemist, or physicist would look at a photograph–blurry or not–as being representative of good, physical evidence.
Much like the argument with regard to the “Atacama Humanoid” featured in Stephen Greer’s documentary Sirius, how would anything that was discovered on Earth, let alone something so obviously resembling mummified human remains, offer “proof” of extraterrestrials? What evidence can conclusively present any connection between the two? At least with “Ata,” we had a physical specimen (Note that, as many reading this will already be aware, the Atacama humanoid was proven, despite apparent anomalies, to be human.)
When confronted with extraordinary claims of “alien life,” logic would further dictate, rather than making un-objective guesses that exert a bias equivalent to wish fulfillment, that prosaic explanations would be offered instead, and, if deemed necessary, either accepted or ruled out before leaping to otherwise illogical presumptions (Example: in likelihood, this image shows a case of hydrocephalus, rather than an alien being for which we can account for no known organism (i.e. an alien) against which we can make such an illogical comparison).
There are plenty who disagree with my sentiments about such things, as one commenter had written at the time:
Let’s not dare to study any “pseudoscience” according to Micah.
Much like the argument with regard to the “Atacama Humanoid” featured in Stephen Greer’s documentary Sirius, how would anything that was discovered on Earth, let alone something so obviously resembling mummified human remains, offer “proof” of extraterrestrials?
Honestly the Atacama Humanoid, much like the star-child skull has been studied by scientist with opposing view points. It all smacks of the old “heretical” threats made by the Catholic Church of old, but then again, the Catholic Church itself believes in God, another pseudoscience. So it begs the question of what exactly is pseudoscience? Whatever folk like Micah say that it is? Science will never answer anything if we stop looking for something “different”, thus, I think it is time put the word “pseudoscience” in a well deserved trashcan somewhere.
Contrary to this, there are some instances where I see plenty of need for the study “pseudoscience”, if by that we mean extraordinary claims which still require proof that meets the rigors of professional scientific approval. Science, in truth, often gets a very bad rap, in that people often presume that by saying there is no reliable evidence for something, it has been dismissed.
Science isn’t about taking anecdotal evidence and offering it as “proof”. It’s about applying a methodological approach to studying observable phenomena, in a way that presents physical evidence that can be studied objectively, in a controlled setting (laboratory), and with the hope for repeatable results that clearly define any conclusions that are made.
With regard to reports of things like unexplained aerial phenomenon, I’m not one to dismiss them at all. However, we should think carefully about what the reports may represent. Looking further back, I know that I, like many, came into this area of interest with very naive attitudes at the outset, and in my youth, had seldom looked beyond the weak philosophy that, “if it looks extraordinary, it must be alien.” Skeptic Brian Dunning similarly told podcaster Joe Rogan that, only years prior to his appearance on Rogan’s podcast, that he had essentially taken at face value such things as the Patterson/Gimlin film, which purports to show a female Sasquatch near Bluff Creek, California, was authentic. Who knows, it may still be… but the evidence supporting this seems very weak, based on analysis made by primatologists, anthropologists, special effects experts, and a host of others who have raised serious questions about the film (many of them die-hard Bigfoot enthusiasts, like Peter Byrne and the late Mark Chorvinski).
The point is that, while some may claim they were seemingly born with a “natural gift” of discernment that helps them recognize those things which are obviously bunk, science looks to eliminate the improbable, based on what applied knowledge can help us discern through logic.
Thinking in this manner, several years ago I began to question whether anything represented in UFO reports could reliably steer us in the direction of an “alien” reality. Sure, there appears to be something going on in many UFO reports (and I’m not talking about purported UFO abductions here… I’m addressing observations of seemingly exotic aircraft, with the occasional inclusion of occupants seen on board). But very little reliable evidence exists beyond what many witnesses relate in their first-hand accounts, and hence very little remains which points us toward something non-human. Even if the latter could be reliably proven, it wouldn’t necessarily indicate that life from other worlds had successfully made its way here to Earth; we could suppose in such an instance that we (humans) would still be left with the logical question about the origins of such beings, and to me, calling them “extraterrestrial” is quite a logical leap in the absence of proof to support it.
I considered a number of these sorts of questions, looking at the more reliable grains of the so-called “UFO phenomenon” that trickle down occasionally from a non-alien (and likely human) perspective, in my book The UFO Singularity. In it, while remaining inclusive with regard to the idea that, someplace in our universe, life might indeed exist, nowhere in the book do I support the idea that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth in manned aircraft. I do engage in thought experiments in the book, however, where I make a number of comparisons with popular science (and science fiction) works, which incorporate ideas that include extraterrestrial civilizations, time travel, and artificial intelligence.
Coming back to the Roswell Slides, we have collected a lot of information about purported unidentified flying objects. A vast number of the reports constituting this information can be explained, and with time, and the collection of more data pertaining to nature, history, technological innovations, etc, we will be able to reliably offer solutions to more and more of those reports. With Roswell, we have a story that, over time, has been whittled away at with varying perspectives, opinions, and suggestions that there were indeed technologies – our own – that were being covered up in the interest of national security. These various arguments have driven some researchers, like Kevin Randle, further away from looking at the purported Roswell crash as being anything representative of alien technology.
And for me, as I said back in February, I maintain that to offer still images of a humanoid body, linked to the Roswell incident by virtue of possibly having been made the same year in question, and by two geologists who lived in the general area where the Roswell incident occurred, does little to further the case for an alien vehicle crashing in New Mexico in 1947… let alone the broader UAP phenomenon.
Sure, maybe we should suspend our judgement, and give this a little more time. I’m willing to do that, with respect to all parties involved (some of whom are friends of mine in the community, with whom I will maintain my stance of respectful disagreement, until better evidence if forthcoming). With confidence, however, I feel that if a serious, methodical, and complete scientific treatment were given to this, apart from the independent analysis by experts who claim the figure in the blurry frames is somehow non-human, and perhaps non-mammalian (a truly absurd claim, in my view), we would again find that while searching for aliens, we have indeed found further evidence for intelligent life… right here on Earth.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
The Roswell Slides After the Big Reveal
The Roswell Slides After the Big Reveal
Well, the great reveal has happened and it was… not great. In fact, opinion seems to be running against the idea that this was an alien creature and with many inside the UFO community saying that they were underwhelmed. Even those who are solidly inside the extraterrestrial camp have expressed disappointment in the program and the slides with some suggesting this was all promotion for another Don Schmitt and Tom Carey Roswell book.
Tony Bragalia, who has worked with Schmitt and Carey for months if not years on this, is still convinced that it is nothing earthly and there are scientists who back up his claim. In an article that he has circulated this morning (May 6, 2015), he provided this statement from two of those scientists:
It's nothing like us, we can see that his feet and legs appear to be like that of a reptile and could have evolved from something like a gecko or some similar animal that became larger and developed a large brain and binocular vision. His nose is small, his mouth different from ours. There are parts that could have been removed during autopsy. I[t] seems to have no teeth.
Joint Statement, Luis Antonio de Alba, Anatomist and Physiologist at the National Autonomous University of Mexico and Richard Doble, Canadian Physical Anthropologist.
Bragalia also wrote, quoting Professor Rod Slemmons, Former Director of the Chicago Museum of Contemporary Photography and 1950s Kodak Executive, “It would be really, really hard to fake these slides or to duplicate them if that is what you want to do [.]”
And while all that is somewhat interesting, it doesn’t actually prove anything other than these fellows have expressed an opinion about the slides that don’t actually say anything about it being obviously alien. In fact, the name of the Rochester, NY Photo-scientist who supposedly rendered a positive opinion on the slides dating was not revealed. Bragalia wrote:
The truth is that the name of the photo-scientist is known to researchers and others. It was not publicly revealed for a simple reason: the man was repeatedly harassed at home by strangers. It is known that skeptic Lance Moody and reporter Billy Cox both separately -and within a day of each other- found the leaked name of the scientist and saw fit to call him at home at night out-of-the-blue to question him. Bear in mind that this was before the scientists name had been properly revealed and well before his image analysis report was even released. Understandably, the man was angry and has indicated that he simply does not need this kind of thing in his life.
And while it is understandable that the man would have been annoyed at the telephone calls, it is also understandable that others would want to corroborate the information that was being circulated by those who allege the slides show an alien creature. The real problem here is that they leaked the name, unintentionally, and then are appalled that others wish to verify the information. Lance Moody has written that the Rochester scientist’s verdict wasn’t nearly positive as others have suggested and that he was not named in the great reveal suggests that there are problems with the claims about his testimony.
Or, in other words, the point is moot because the witness was not there to be asked a few questions to clarify the situation.
John Greenewald was as unimpressed as were so many others. To his Black Vault site at:
he posted some rather negative words. “When I woke up the morning of May 6, 2015, I expected to at least see 10, maybe 20, maybe even 50 headlines about this. What did I see? At 8 am in the morning, well after the first news cycle… there were about 3. And those articles ripped apart this story, and profiled it as the joke it was.”
Greenewald quoted from the UK’s Daily Mirror which had said:
Two photographs of a “dead alien” were unveiled at a big money event last night – and immediately dismissed as fake.
A series of ‘UFOlogists’ appeared at the Be Witness meeting last night to reveal images of an extraterrestrial who supposedly crashed to Earth during the infamous Roswell incident in 1947.
The images were found by former journalist Adam Dew, who reportedly turned down interviews with magazines that wanted to cover the story because “they were not offering any compensation” [Which, of course, shows that they weren’t interested as alleged, they just weren’t interested in handing over some cash].
He claimed to have taken steps to verify the pair of alien snaps and said Kodak experts had dated the film to 1947.
But the rest of the world has not had the chance to test the rigour of his methods, because high resolution images of the alien are not yet available.
They are likely to be sold through his production company Dew Media alongside a documentary about the discovery of the slides.
The photos were supposedly found in Arizona, hidden in a collection of snaps owned by oil geologist Bernard Ray and his wife Hilda Ray, who have both died.
Nick Pope, a researcher who headed up a UFO investigation wing at the UK Ministry of Defence, told Mirror Online he was “underwhelmed”.
“It could be a model, or it could simply be a fake image, dressed up to look like a Forties slide,” he said.
Greenewald concluded, “Others took to social networks, and quickly were able to find nearly identical looking ‘bodies’ right here from human civilizations. This, even further, supports the theory this is nothing more than a museum artifact.
”Bragalia, however, wrote, “An overnight poll conducted by Coast-to-Coast radio has thus far tallied over 800 respondents to a survey asking what the nature of the creature:
42% say it is not an alien image.
58% believe it to either be that of an alien, or that they are simply not certain what it is.
The figures, however, aren’t quite that supportive when broken down. It is true that 42.1% voted that it is not an alien, only 28.55% voted that it was, leaving 29.35 % voting that they were unsure. It could be said, that over 71% voted no or unsure, which is nearly three-quarters of those who expressed an opinion. I asked Bragalia and he agreed that what he had written about this was misleading, suggesting that I could correct that.
Here’s what I think, if anyone actually cares at this point. We haven’t had a good look at the high resolution slides and have been offered excuses for why that hasn’t happened. The slides seem to depict a creature, cadaver, corpse, in a museum setting rather than the expected situation if it was truly alien. The array of expert opinion we were told would be offered has not materialized and the statements that have been made seem to be weak. Already there have been pictures of mummies in various museums that seem to resemble to a high degree the body in the slide. There is nothing to tie this to Roswell and I will point out that both Carey and Schmitt did say that these weren’t “Roswell” slides, but their commentary seemed to suggest they believed otherwise.
They provided some witness testimony but it did little to validate the slides. Carlene Green, whose father, Homer Rowlette, said that he had seen the bodies. There are those who worry about the color of them she mentioned, but that isn’t the problem here. She is a nice woman I interviewed a number of years ago, but she didn’t see anything herself. She is a second-hand witness who can only report what her father told her so long ago.
We still have nothing for the provenance; we still don’t know who took the slides, when they were taken, or who even owns them now. It could be Adam Dew who has said that his company owns them, or it could be the brother of the woman who found them. That point has not been clarified.
Today, May 6, we really don’t know anything more than we did on May 4. Nothing was clarified at the big reveal. We have the names of some of the scientists, but certainly not in the numbers we expected. We have a better resolution of the slides, but rather than clarify, they have not done that. They seem to be of a creature in a museum setting given what is seen in the background, but we don’t know. At the end of the presentation we are as confused as we were before it started.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
UFO Alien ‘Smoking Gun’ Photos Unveiled — But UFOlogists Cry Foul At ‘Roswell Slides’ Display
UFO Alien ‘Smoking Gun’ Photos Unveiled — But UFOlogists Cry Foul At ‘Roswell Slides’ Display
The infamous “Roswell slides,” said to be newly discovered photos of an alien creature recovered from a UFO crash at Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947, were displayed publicly for the first time in Mexico City, Mexico, Tuesday night. But the new photos have many of even the most devoted UFO researchers and enthusiasts crying foul.
The buildup to the release of the recently unearthed slides showing the carcass of some sort of a humanoid being had been immense in the community of UFO fans and those who, like Fox Mulder on The X Files, “want to believe” that Earth is regularly visited by highly advanced travelers from other worlds in their own super-sophisticated spacecraft.
But when the slides were finally put on display Tuesday in front of a reported 6,000 spectators at National Auditorium in Mexico City, the reaction was collective groan. An undetermined number of other alien hunters who paid $20 for live streaming video of the event were also unimpressed.
This is one example of what many of the UFO enthusiasts who saw the slides either in person or online found highly disappointing.
And here are a couple of examples of the response from UFO fans, that seemed typical of many who saw the display.
Puxley@Holographic_Me
#UFOLOGY we should all pay penance and wear tinfoil hats for the day...#Roswellslides WTF!!!....haven't we learnt anything yet?
philf@TheDubPunk
#roswellslides well it's certainly succeeded in making me want to move on from all the ufo ET stuff! I'm now a nonbeliever! Nice one!
Other researchers noted that the the “alien” bore an uncanny resemblance to photos known to be taken of mummified children from ancient Egypt and Rome, which reside in museums today.
“I thought immediately it was a child mummy. It’s in some sort of display case,” Biblical scholar Michael Heiser told Britain’s Express newspaper. “I’ve shown the photo to several Egyptologists. They said the same thing. You can see why when you juxtapose the ‘alien’ photo with a child mummy photograph. Funny how they both have the tell-tale body cavity opening.”
Here’s an example of the child mummy photos that he’s talking about.
And Heiser was certainly not alone in his analysis.
The photos were allegedly discovered in the attic of an Arizona couple by journalist and filmmaker Adam Dew, who claims that because the slides supposedly date to 1947, they could not have been faked.
“People in the late 40s were not staging aliens, as far as I can tell,” Dew told the UFO site OpenMinds.tv. “That image of the big head and skinny body didn’t become popular in pop culture until the 60s. So we know that it is not a fake staged alien, as far as I can tell.”
While some UFO researchers backed Dew and continue to insist that the “Roswell slides” actually depict an alien from the legendary “UFO crash” in 1947, Nick Pope — who has run UFO investigations for the British Defense Ministry, said, “I can understand why the UFO community is disappointed and conspiracy theorists are probably already claiming the whole thing was a government plot, designed to discredit the subject and make it look ridiculous.”
An Oopart (out of place artifact) is a term applied to dozens of prehistoric objects found in various places around the world that, given their level of technology, are completely at odds with their determined age based on physical, chemical, and/or geological evidence. Ooparts often are frustrating to conventional scientists and a delight to adventurous investigators and individuals interested in alternative scientific theories.
In 1991, the appearance of extremely tiny, coil-shaped artifacts found near the banks of Russia’s Kozhim, Narada, and Balbanyu rivers brought about a debate that has continued to this day. These mysterious and minuscule structures suggest that there may have been a culture capable of developing nanotechnology 300,000 years ago.
These manufactured coils were initially discovered during geological research associated with the extraction of gold in the Ural mountains. These pieces include coils, spirals, shafts, and other unidentified components.
The ancient coil-shaped artifacts were found in Russia’s Ural Mountains.
According to an analysis from the Russian Academy of Sciences in Syktyvkar, the largest pieces found are mostly copper, while the smallest are made of tungsten and molybdenum.
While the largest of these objects measure 1.18 inches, the smallest are only 1/10,000th of an inch, and many exhibit Golden Mean proportions. Their shape suggests that they are manufactured and not naturally occurring metal fragments. In fact, they have been found to closely resemble the same miniature components of contemporary nanotechnology.
A magnified image of one of the nano coils found in the Ural Mountains. Photo credit: Mysteries of the World, Herbert Genzmer and Ulrich Hellenbrand
Though some have asserted that these tiny structures are merely debris left behind from test rockets being launched from nearby Plesetsk space station, a report from the Moscow Institute determined that they are far too old to have come from modern manufacturing.
In 1996, Dr. E.W. Matvejeva, from the Central Scientific Research Department of Geology and Exploitation of Precious Metals in Moscow, writes that, despite being thousands of years old, the components are of a technological origin.
The pieces were found at a depth between 10 and 40 feet, in a geological stratus between 20,000 and 318,000 years old.
How were humans able to manufacture such tiny components in the distant past, and what were they used for? Some believe that the coils prove the human race enjoyed a sophisticated level of technology in the Pleistocene era, while others assert that the findings are the work of extra-terrestrials.
The artifacts have been studied at four different facilities in Helsinki, St. Petersburg, and Moscow. However, further research into these tiny structures seems to have ended in 1999 with the death of Dr. Johannes Fiebag, a principal researcher of the find.
Onthuld: "Foto's van Roswell-alien die bijna 70 jaar geleden in gecrashte UFO werd gevonden"
Onthuld: “Foto’s van Roswell-alien die bijna 70 jaar geleden in gecrashte UFO werd gevonden”
Onderstaande foto’s tonen naar verluidt het lichaam van een alien die 68 jaar geleden in het wrak van een gecrashte UFO is gevonden. De twee foto’s zijn gisteren tijdens een speciale conferentie onthuld, schrijft de Britse Daily Express.
De Amerikaanse autoriteiten zouden de resten in 1947 hebben gevonden op een ranch in de buurt van Roswell in New Mexico. De gruizige beelden maken deel uit van een verzameling van 40 foto’s die op een zolder van een huis in de staat Texas is gevonden. De verzameling was eigendom van Hilda Blair Ray, een lokale advocaat, en haar echtgenoot Bernerd, een geoloog die werkzaam was in de olie-industrie.
Op de foto’s, die in vergelijking met de rest van de verzameling van uitzonderlijk slechte kwaliteit zijn, is een humanoïde met een groot hoofd in een glazen kist te zien. De onthulling van de foto’s heeft voor de nodige beroering gezorgd. Velen hopen dat ze echt zijn, hoewel sommigen beweren dat het om een hoax gaat.
Foto van de vermeende alien (Slidebox Media)
Op de tweede foto is een onleesbaar label te zien (Slidebox Media)
De website The UFO Chronicles sprak met Tom Carey en Don Schmitt, auteurs van ‘Witness to Roswell’. “Het [wezen] was 1,20 meter lang. Het hoofd is insectachtig. Het hoofd was gescheiden van de romp en er was een gedeeltelijke autopsie gedaan: de ingewanden waren verwijderd en we denken dat het lichaam was gebalsemd. Ik denk dat het fysiek bewijs is. Een foto zegt meer dan 1000 woorden.”
Schmitt zei: “Het is geen fysiek bewijs. Een foto kan wel ondersteunend bewijs zijn als bekend is door wie, wanneer en waar de foto is gemaakt. Het is ook belangrijk om te weten met welk apparaat de foto is gemaakt. Daar hebben we in dit geval geen informatie over.”
Russian military officials have said that they can predict and summon UFOs at their will.
They claim that UFO activity increases when large scale weapons testing takes place. Major General Vasily Yeremenko said in a statement:
“We can say that we learned to summon UFOs in Vladimirovka. To do this, we dramatically increased the number of military flights and movement of the equipment. If the intensity on our side increased, UFOs appeared with the probability of 100 percent.”
The Russians have now put together the below three main conclusions:
Modern science is not yet able to identify such phenomena.
The UFOs could be US or Japan surveillance drones.
The UFOs could be extraterrestrial activity.
According to Svobodnaya Pressa, which is a major Russian news website, the Russian Navy have actually now declassified records of numerous encounters with unidentified objects that technologically surpass anything ever built by humanity….leading to the fact that these UFO’s MUST be of an Alien origin!
A special unique Navy group which is headed by Deputy Navy Commander Admiral Nikolay Smirnov collected information on reports of unidentified objects, delivered by submarines and military ships.
According to Vladimir Azhazha, a UFO researcher and former Military Navy officer:
“Fifty percent of UFO encounters are connected with oceans. Fifteen more – with lakes. So UFOs tend to stick to the water.” Vladimir Azhazha
According to one high level report, a Russian nuclear submarine which was on a combat mission at the time had detected six unknown objects pursuing them. After failing miserably to lose the objects following them, the captain then ordered the submarine to surface, of which the objects followed, departed from the water and flew away at extremely high speeds.
Back in 1982 a group of military divers training at Baikal witnessed a group of what appeared to be humanoid beings dressed in silver suits. Despite the divers trying to catch them, three of them died whilst the other four were injured in this bizarre incident.
According to Captain 1st rank Igor Barklayof Navy Intelligence:
“Ocean UFO’s often show up wherever our or NATO’s fleets concentrate. Near Bahamas, Bermudas, Puerto Rico. They are most often seen in the deepest part of the Atlantic Ocean, in the southern part of the Bermuda Triangle, and also in the Caribbean Sea.”Captain 1st rank Igor Barklayof Navy Intelligence
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
EXCLUSIVE: Alien Roswell Slides▬Be Witness Extraterrestre de Roswell y Diapositivas 05/05/2015
EXCLUSIVE: Alien Roswell Slides▬Be Witness Extraterrestre de Roswell y Diapositivas 05/05/2015
Gepubliceerd op 6 mei 2015
El Extraterrestre de Roswell y Diapositivas Be Witness 05/05/2015 Las Imagenes Tomadas son De : Luis Mariano Fernandez Pimentel ,Periodista Investigador DALE LIKE A LA PAGINA www.facebook.com/OVNISACTUALES1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPARTENOS TU VIDEO Si grabaste algún ovni o tienes fotografías Mandalo a el correo elegido71@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GRUPO PARA EL DEBATE www.facebook.com/VIGILANCIAOVNITIJUANA
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Blythe Intaglios: The Mysterious Anthropomorphic Geoglyphs of the Colorado Desert
Blythe Intaglios: The Mysterious Anthropomorphic Geoglyphs of the Colorado Desert
May 6, 2015 - The Blythe Intaglios, often called America’s Nazca Lines, are a series of gigantic geoglyphs found fifteen miles north of Blythe California in the Colorado Desert. In the Southwestern United States alone, there are over 600 intaglios (anthropomorphic geoglyphs), but what separates the ones near Blythe is their size and intricacy. In total, there are six figures in three different locations, all within 1,000 feet from one another, situated on two mesas. The geoglyphs depict drawings of humans, animals, objects, and geometric shapes, all of which can be seen from the air.
The Blythe geoglyphs were first discovered on November 12th, 1931 by army air corps pilot George Palmer while flying from the Hoover Damn to Los Angeles. His discovery led to a survey of the area, which resulted in the huge figures becoming classified as historical landmarks and referred to as “Giant Desert Figures.” Lacking funds due to the Depression, it would take until the 1950s to investigate the site further.
In 1952, the National Geographic Society and Smithsonian Institution sent a team of archaeologists to explore the intaglios, and an article appeared in the September issue of National Geographic with aerial photos. It would take another five years for the geoglyphs to be restored and fences erected in order to protect them from vandalism and damage. It should be noted that there is visible tire damage on some of the geoglyphs due to the area being used for desert training during WWII by General George S. Patton. Today the Blythe Intaglios are protected by two lines of fences and open to the public at all times as State Historic Monument No 101.
Some suggest these impressive ground carvings were intended to sacred messages to ancestors or drawings to gods. Indeed, from the ground, these geoglyphs are unremarkable and difficult, if not impossible, to decipher. From an aerial view, the images becomes unmistakable which is, of course, how they were first discovered. Boma Johnson, an archeologist for the Bureau of Land Management in Yuma, Arizona said he could not "think of a single [intaglio example] where [a person] could stand on a hill and look at [an intaglio in its entirety].” Today, the Blyth Intaglios rank among the largest of California’s Native American drawings and the likelihood of discovering similar, hidden geoglyphs out in the desert still remains a possibility.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Cuicuilco, the oldest pyramid in the world?
Cuicuilco, the oldest pyramid in the world?
As history goes on we seem to forget the enigmas surrounding our past, civilization and our origins.
Pyramids are present in every corner of the globe, we can find thousands of pyramids with different design and size, and there are thousands of undiscovered pyramids across the globe, waiting to be discovered. We are very familiar with the Giza Plateau and it pyramids, in Mexico, we have numerous pyramids predating the Aztecs and Maya, and in Asia we have huge pyramids that challenge mainstream archaeology. But there are other pyramids that are not so well-known. One of them is the Cuicuilco pyramid.
This pyramid is located on the outskirts of Mexico City and some researches believe that this pyramid, is the oldest pyramid on the planet. Cuicuilco was discovered in the 1920's by archaeologist Manuel Gamio by noticing a strange formation on a natural hill. In 1922 researcher from the University of Arizona, Byron Cummings, began excavations, removing a thick layer of lava and other material to discover a circular pyramid, spread over four levels and built with uncut stones on flattened clay. According to measurements the Cuicuilco pyramid is around 18 meters high and measures 20 meters in diameter, while its original height is believed to have been around 27 meters.
The archaeological site of Cuicuilco is covered by a dense volcanic lava field known as "Pedegral de San Angel". The lava field covers an area of approximately 80km2.
Researchers have also discovered a Stele near the pyramid of Cuicuilco which is considered as proof to point to the connection between the builders of Cuicuilco and the Olmec civilization, believed to be the mother culture of Mesoamerica.
Unlike other pyramids, like the Egyptian, the question is not how it was built, but when. To answer this mystery, researchers took into account the lava which covered the pyramid, suggesting that the Pyramid of Cuicuilco must have been completed before the eruption which covered it with lava. According to scholars, this eruption occurred 8000 years ago, challenging known history once again, since the oldest known American pyramid is believed to be 2000 years old.
Taking in count the timeframe we are speaking of, according to mainstream archaeology, humans were not capable of creating such constructions 8000 years ago.
Because archaeology cannot understand this timeframe, researchers suggest that the construction of the pyramid could have taken place more recently, suggesting that Cuicuilco is not 8000 years old but rather 2100 years. However, physical evidence found at the pyramid, the thick layer of lava and the period when the eruption occurred, places the pyramid around 8000 years ago.
In 1924 numerous female figures carved in stone were discovered at the pyramid. Strangely, these figures are very similar to those found in Europe dating back to the Paleolithic period. Among the figures, researchers have found mysterious looking sculptures depicting beings with helmets and strange-looking suits, resembling modern-day diving suits.
Most importantly, how much would the pyramid of Cuicuilco influence our understanding of history? Is it possible that humans existed on Earth thousands of years before mainstream scholars suggest? And that these ancient humans were technologically advanced? And not as primitive as some researchers suggest?
The fact that the pyramid of Cuicuilco is around 8000 years old, points to the fact that the original pyramid builders could have originated from the American Continent, expanding later in history to other lands.
Currently, the pyramid of Cuicuilco is not being researched, no matter how old or how important the discovery might be for history, scholars have decided to abandon research on the pyramid and its people. Perhaps researchers are afraid that, what they might find, could abruptly change history in many ways.
The "Sea People" have been the subject of endless debate among historians and scholars. Even though little is known about them, numerous theories have been proposed explaining their origin and history. Some of these theories even connect them to the ancient civilization of Atlantis. It is not known who they were, their place of origin, nor do scholars know what happened to the sea people. Therefore, their precise identity remains an enigma for scholars.
The term "Sea Peoples" was first used by Emmanuel de Rougé in 1855, then curator of the Louvre, who noted that "in the crests of the conquered peoples, the Sherden and the Teresh bear the designation of the "peuples de la mer".
Some scholars believe that there is evidence that suggests that the ancient Egyptians knew the identity and origin of the sea people. Basically, the little information we have in fact, comes from ancient Egyptian sources dating from the nineteenth dynasty.
Egyptian sources describe these peoples only from a military standpoint. In the stela of Tanis, an inscription attributed to Ramses II, states: "the unruly Sherden whom no one had ever known how to combat, they came boldly sailing in their warships from the midst of the sea, none being able to withstand them." -Kenneth Kitchen, Pharaoh Triumphant: The Life and Times of Ramesses II, King of Egypt, Aris & Phillips, 1982. pp.40–41
The fact that several civilizations like the Hittites, the Mycenaean and Mitanni simultaneously disappeared around 1175 BC has led scholars to theorize that this was caused by incursions of the sea people.
Reports from Ramses speak about incursions by the Sea Peoples in the eastern Mediterranean confirming the destruction of Hatti, Ugarit, Ashkelon and Hazor. It is noteworthy to mention that these invasions were not only military campaigns, but they were accompanied by large population movements by land and sea, in constant search for new land to settle.
The most important ancient sources cite the Sea Peoples in the Obelisk of Byblos, dated between 2000 and 1700 BC, the Amarna Letters, Tanis Stela and inscriptions of Pharaoh Merenptah.
Historically, the term "Sea People" refers to a group of around ten populations of southern Europe, believed to have been some sort of confederation, which in the late Bronze Age, sailing to the eastern Mediterranean, invaded Anatolia, Syria, Palestine, Cyprus and Egypt.
The first mention of the "Sea People" can be found at the obelisk of Babylon.
Here we have a list of some of these people believed to have been part of the mighty Sea People, eve though the list is quite large, we mention a few of them.
The Sheridan people. They appear for the first time in Egyptian sources in the Amarna letters around 1350 BC, during the reign of one of Egypt's most talked about pharaohs, Akhenaten. In the illustration they are painted with long swords triangular daggers, spears and a round shield. They are equipped with armor and a helmet with horns.
The similarities between the Sheridan Warriors and Sardinia, as well as the similarity of the name with that of Sardis-Sardegna (Sardinia), became, for some, a fact pointing to the origin of the Sheridan people, a population from Sardinia, which is believed to had settled on the island after the attempted invasion of Egypt.
The Sekeles, also called Sakalasa, are another member of the Sea Peoples recorded in inscriptions commissioned by Pharaoh Merenptah (13th century BC). They were associated with the Sicilians, Indo-European people who settled in the Bronze Age.
The Danuna or Denyen, are certainly the most enigmatic people of sea. According to legend, the Danuna left the continent of Atlantis to settle on the island of Rhodes. These people worshiped the goddess Danu, a goddess present in the mythology of many cultures from the Celts to India. This goddess was depicted as a moon wrapped in a snake, allegedly considered the mother goddess of the waters.
Greek mythology says that the inhabitants of the island of Rhodes were called primary Telchines. According to the Greek historian Diodorus, this town had the power to heal the sick, change time and take the form of anything they wanted. They were represented in the form of amphibious beings, believed to have had characteristics of the sea and land, half sea half land. They had the lower body in the form of a fish, with webbed fingers or toes. A little before the flood, they anticipated the disaster and left Rhodes, their homeland, dispersing into the world.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 73 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.