Wil je een videoclip bekijken en stoort het X-files-deuntje jou daarbij. Schakel het deuntje gewoon uit door in deze kolon, helemaal beneden op de 2 witte balkjes in het blauwe cirkeltje te klikken, tot een pijltje verschijnt. Veel kijk- en luisterplezier en bedankt voor jouw bezoek.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
UFO'S - MET HET LAATSTE NIEUWS OVER UFO'S BOVEN BELGIË EN IN ANDERE LANDEN...
UFO's in België en de rest van de wereld In België heb je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE ww.ufo.be.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandeliiks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal. Since 02/01/2013 is Pieter not only president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
Crop Formation Found In Small Farming Community of Victoria, Honduras On Nov 28, 2015, Photos, UFO Sighting News.
Crop Formation Found In Small Farming Community of Victoria, Honduras On Nov 28, 2015, Photos, UFO Sighting News.
UFOs that land often land in tall fields of grass because it offers the aliens a way of hiding while they look around. This way they are not attacked or seen. They take a lot of precautions...and very few risks, since their life span is thousands of years or more. The field does not look like they were trying to leave a message. Just doing scientific studies. Scott C. Waring www.ufosightingsdaily.com
News states: Source: El Tiempo (Honduras) and Planeta UFO (Argentina) Date: 11.28.2015 Residents of Yoro Alarmed by Alleged UFO HONDURAS. Residents of the town of Victoria, Yoro, are alarmed by an alleged flying object that supposedly landed in the vicinity. According to reports, the area was completely destroyed, which could be due to the power of the "phenomenon." Following the event, local residents are on high alert to the presence of an alleged UFO, an event which -- according to them - had never occured in that area. At the moment, the nature of what could have caused such damage tothe area remains unknown. [Translation (c) 2015 S.Corrales, IHU with thanks to Guillermo Giménez, Planeta UFO]
British Police Officer Claimed UFO Stalked and Abducted Him
British Police Officer Claimed UFO Stalked and Abducted Him
A former officer of West Yorkshire Police, Alan Godfry, still believes he may have been a victim of alien abduction as he nears the 35th anniversary of the traumatising series of events. While on a patrol in Todmorden in the early hours on November 28, 1980, to search for missing cattle, Mr Godfrey claimed a huge UFO spotted him.
It was a fuzzy oval that rotated at such speed and hovered so low over the road that it was causing the bushes on the side to shake.
He was on the outskirts of the town in Burnley Road looking for the farm animals that were reportedly missing. He was about to give up finding the reported missing animals when he claimed to have noticed what he thought a bus approaching from a few hundred metres away.
But as he got closer, he came to a realisation that it was not the commuter bus scheduled to pass at around 5 a.m. Instead, he saw what he described “a large mass.”
He said, “It was a fuzzy oval that rotated at such speed and hovered so low over the road that it was causing the bushes on the side to shake.”
He reported that he stopped to make a sketch of the UFO on his note pad. However, a burst of light overcame him.
The next thing he knew was that he drove his car again further up on the same road and the UFO was now gone. He turned around to see the area where he believed it took place. He found out that the area was wet due to rain in the night and there was a circular path of the dry road in a swirled pattern.
Godfry also noticed his police boots were split at the sole – like he had been dragged along. When he got back to the police station, he realised that he had lost around 15 minutes.
Mr Godfrey initially decided not to report the encounter because of fear to be ridiculed, but on the same day, he heard a lorry driver three miles further out on Burnley Road at Cliviger reported to police spotting “a brilliant white” object at about the same time.
Moreover, neighbouring Halifax police officers also received reports about a “brilliant blue-white glow” coming down Todmorden, also at the same time.
The coming out of other witnesses made Godfry file an official report. Since then, UFO investigators have been looking into his case. The case has eventually become one of the country’s most famous alien abduction cases.
His superiors sent Mr Godfrey for mental health and medical assessments but was found to be fine. British UFOlogist Jenny Randles, who had a chance to get an interview with him, said that he was “refreshingly honest.”
A mysterious unidentified flying object (UFO) on NASA’s images has created speculation among UFO hunters.
UFO chasers believe that the object is flying very close to the Sun, which nothing has been invented so far by humans that could fly that close. They suggest that it’s impossible this object could be some spacecraft from Earth.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) special telescopic cameras took the images to monitor activities around the Sun.
If this object is a kind of alien spacecraft, then it would be about the size of a planet or even bigger. Some UFO hunters suggest the large space object is an alien mothership.
The odd symmetrical object looks like the famous Tyne and Wear landmark, the Angel of the North. Based on human technological standards, such distance from the sun is extremely dangerous.
Are Photographers Telling Lies about the Aurora Borealis?
Are Photographers Telling Lies about the Aurora Borealis?
The increasing popularity of aurora photography in recent years has produced some stunning imagery from unlikely latitudes. However all is not as it seems.There are implications for the wider integrity of photography.
We’ve all seen those images over the past few years (popping up in our Facebook feeds or in the media) depicting spectacular displays of the Aurora Borealis or Northern Lights from Great Britain, Ireland or the lower 48 in the US. Regardless of the location, they’re pretty amazing images. But beneath the wow-factor and thousands of ‘likes’ and ‘shares’ lurks a nasty little integrity issue. These aurora images may be photographic eye-candy, but many of them are pure high fructose corn syrup.
I’ve been fortunate enough to see the Northern Lights twice from Ireland. The first time I saw them in 2004 was in all likelihood a once-in-a-lifetime display, so powerful that at its peak the aurora was directly overhead, and not in the north at all. Auroras from that storm were visible as far south as the Mediterranean, and Ireland was at the heart of the activity, rather than at its southern fringe as normal. The display was intense, bright and constantly moving, with all the colour and vibrancy you would associate with a classic high-latitude event. After a couple of hours of shooting, I spent another hour just lying on my back and gazing into the sky, mesmerised by the natural lightshow going off overhead. Later I found that my images, shot on ISO400 slide film, had captured the scene pretty much as I remembered it.
The second time I saw an Irish aurora was in March of this year. The St. Patrick’s Day event produced vivid and memorable auroras at higher latitudes, but at lower latitudes like northern Britain and Ireland, the display was very faint, at least to the naked eye.
When I drove out from my home on the northwest coast of Ireland for a look, the NOAA Ovation computer model was telling me we were well inside the view line.
Yet I could see nothing. I drove out to the coast, well away from street lighting, killed the car lights, and peered into the inky blackness of the northern sky. After a minute or two I began to wonder if I could discern a faint discrepancy in the sky. Or was it just some cloud? I couldn’t tell for sure. So I set up my camera on a tripod, jacked up the ISO and made a 30 second exposure. And there they were, rendered unmistakeably on the camera LCD as a band of luminous green with upper pillars of delicate magenta. Yet the display was still barely visible to my eyes.
So what was going on? Was the camera sensor somehow embellishing what was there, or were my eyes at fault? The answer harks back to basic school biology lessons on the structure of the human eye. In simple terms, our sight relies on two different types of receptor cell. The first type, cones, respond to bright light conditions and are responsible for giving us colour information. The second type, rods, are used in low-light, but don’t transmit colour. At night we see a largely monochromatic world, unless there is a light source bright enough to kick off our cone cells. So the sensor was recording what was actually there, but the colour was just not visible to my eyes.
I continued shooting, enjoying a half-hour spell just after midnight when the auroras intensified. While still not the stuff of a Discovery Channel documentary, the lights had become much more obvious to the naked eye, containing recognisable structure and faintly discernible colour. Again though, the images on my LCD were much stronger and more colourful than what I was observing directly.
The following day the world of social media was awash with aurora images, including my own. The treatment of most images was not sympathetic. Invariably saturation had been added to the point that some images, taken in a geographically similar location, depicted auroras of lurid brilliance and intensity.
I had posted my own images as they came out of the camera, yet over the following days I felt more and more uncomfortable with them. I fielded many expressions of disappointment from Irish people who felt they had missed out on a rare and spectacular display. I had to tell most of them not to worry because the human experience had been pretty underwhelming.
Like most photographers, I routinely use adjustments in Photoshop (including increases in saturation) to render daylight images that replicate the visual and emotional impact of the original scene. This process always throws up issues of truth and integrity, especially in situations of strong and unusual lighting, where genuinely magical light may be interpreted as too much Photoshop. But this was an entirely unfamiliar situation. Here I was making no adjustments at all, yet feeling as though my image still lacked integrity.
The disparity between eye and camera was exacerbated by the faintness of the display. On delving into the subject a bit more, it turns out that aurora displays with colours visible to the eye are quite rare at lower latitudes. More intense aurora have sufficient brightness to kick our cones into operation and allow us to perceive a great deal more of their colour. Compare the image I shot in 2004 on ISO400 slide film, to those from March 2015, shot at ISO3200 on a Canon 5dmk2: that’s a three-stop difference in brightness. To further complicate matters, anecdotal evidence suggests that while some people may perceive a weak aurora as monochromatic, others viewing from the same location may still be able to discern colour.
So where does that leave us? There are plenty of photographic techniques that allow the camera to see the world in an way that our eyes cannot. Infrared is a good example. Infrared images could never be accused of lacking integrity because the viewer is in no doubt that what they are seeing is a rendition of reality that the eye cannot replicate. Similarly, many modern images of the Milky Way are so clearly removed from what we experience with our own eyes when we look up into the night sky, that they couldn’t be accused of trying to dupe the viewer. Such images can therefore be judged entirely on their own merit.
Perhaps integrity stems from the perspective of the viewer. If aurora images are shared between enthusiasts specialising in astro photography, who recognise the technicalities of what the camera records, there is hardly an issue. But if these images are used as documentary evidence in the media, to illustrate a particular event on a particular night, a problem arises. In this context, the vast majority of viewers will look at these images and infer that this is what they would have seen had they been standing beside the photographer. This may well be untrue, in which case the viewer has been deceived. I’d argue that the majority of images of lower-latitude auroral displays from the last few years would fall into this category, including those used by the most respected mainstream media outlets.
Does it matter? Well I think it does. Great photographs are not simply a rendition of what the camera is able to record. They need creative human input, but equally they must be rooted in the human experience. As a species we are blessed to have evolved the capacity for awe and wonder, which is why images of aurora, and more general photos of landscape and nature, are so popular. However the power of these images relies on the viewer’s sense of its integrity.
Like an undisclosed double exposure, or an unrealistic use of post-processing, misleading aurora images stand to benefit from a short-term popularity, because despite the cynicism of modern discourse, there is a still a balance of credulity in the general audience for photography. But eventually an understanding of this particular gulf between the eye and the camera, and the way it can be abused, will become more widely understood by the general public. The result? A further erosion of society’s trust in the integrity of photography.
Personally I’ve decided I would rather come clean about this kind of aurora photography. Especially at low latitudes, vivid auroral displays remain a rare occurrence, and we only diminish their wonder by pretending to our audience that every faint glow is a wondrous spectacle.
Gareth McCormack is an Irish photographer specialising in landscape, travel and adventure imagery. His images have been used by many of the world’s most prominent magazines and newspapers, including Time, National Geographic and the New York Times. He has also supplied images to many, including Tourism Ireland, Air New Zealand, Microsoft and Warner Bros.
Gareth’s style is characterised by bold and dynamic compositions, galvanised by the use of striking natural light. Visit Gareth’s website.
'It is the oldest sighting we have managed to track down so far.'
Although there are other examples much earlier, Mr Covell said these were open to interpretation, whereas this sighting had evidence.
After its initial disappearance, the UFO then reappeared 'looking like the face of the moon', before splitting into five circular balls of light, according to a report in the Hull Packet newspaper.
The Northampton Mercury report from the time described how the object 'seemed then to form itself into seven small distinct moons or globes of fire which disappeared for the space of a few seconds'.
At the time, Hull's first port had only been built in 1788 and the city was home to just 27,000 people
Many UFO spotters previously believed the first recorded example of a sighting was in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold saw unidentified objects flying over the Cascade Mountains in North America.
At the time, Hull's first port had only been built in 1788 and the city was home to just 27,000 people.
Although it is unclear why aliens would have visited the city, there were many sightings over the region in the following years.
Mr Covell has built up an extensive collection of UFO clippings, from the 19th century to the present day.
One of the strangest cases was reported in 1967, when a UFO was said to have landed in a park on the Longhill estate in Hull.
FAMOUS UFO SPOTTINGS
Ranked as one of the most famous UFO incidents in history, the Roswell incident in 1947 saw UFO hunters claim that the US military had captured an alien aircraft.
While the military maintain that the 'flying saucer' was actually a surveillance device from a classified operation, many still believe it was alien activity.
After a 1952 sighting in Washington, the CIA Robertson Panel was formed.
They were backed up by mysterious radar contacts at three separate airports.
But the US Air Force suggested that changes in the temperature had caused radar signals to bend and give false returns.
In the past month there have been two sightings of possible UFOs, a 'scary but beautiful' UFO was spotted buzzing above an IKEA branch in Siberia, leaving many Russians puzzled by the strange sighting.
The streaking fireball cut through the sky, witnessed over a vast area including Kazakhstan, provoking social media claims about an alien visit.
Footage of the mystery object taken from a car shows it flying over a branch of furniture giant IKEA in the city of Omsk, western Siberia.
A father and son also spotted white orb-like shapes over the sky in Texas and posted the evidence on YouTube.
Although some commenters argued they were military flares.
Army Officer: “Shapeshifting Reptiles Raped Me On The Moon”
Army Officer: “Shapeshifting Reptiles Raped Me On The Moon”
A former female US Air Force worker has made the shocking and bizarre claims shape shifting reptilians raped her on the moon “countless times” during her work as a radar tracking officer.
Niara Terela Isley claims she was abducted by a tall humanoid alien with a tail, and taken to a secret base on the far side of the moon, where the reptilian entities would regularly conduct sexual rituals with their victims.
Ms Isley told how she worked at the Tonopah Test Range, in Nevada, but said she could recall very little detail about her time there.
She claimed security guards raped her in front of an audience after she was jabbed in the neck with a mystery drug while in an underground lair.
Army officer Niara Terela Isley says she was abducted and raped by shapeshifting reptilians on the moon
And then she was raped on the moon, she said.
Ms Isley described the bizarre and shocking series of incidents under hypnosis.
In taped interviews with aquarianradio, she claimed she was taken into space eight to 10 times over several months when she was 25-years-old.
She said the aliens put her to work, having her operate electronic machinery to excavate the darkest parts of the moon.
Describing how she was used for sex almost every night she was on the moon, she said she was regularly passed between the reptilians.
In addition, she said “grey aliens” were present, helping with the work, as well as human “personnel” who were also forced to help the reptilians do their bidding on the moon.
After the abductions, she said she couldn’t remember much of what had happened, including aspects of her work, leading her to think her memory had been wiped.
The incidents stopped in 1980, she said.
She sought hypnosis in an attempt to fill the holes in her memory and it helped her uncover more details about the abuse she experienced on the moon.
Describing her abductor, she said: “He was humanoid and did have a tail.”
She said he had yellow eyes with vertical slit pupils.
On the “dark side” of the Moon, she said: “There was a lot of sexual abuse.”
She also said there was excavation work to expand the “military base”.
It was then that she had to carry out manual labour including “moving boxes”.
Ms Isley, a mum-of-one who now lives in Colorado, said: “At night I wasn’t allowed to sleep and was passed around for more sex.
“I was scared. I knew I had to get back to my daughter so I was pretty compliant. I just didn’t want to do anything that would get me killed.”
Many alien conspiracy theories suggest that the US government is in on abductions, often helping “the greys” do the work.
Theorists claim that is why officials have not fully investigated claims of their own employees and former staff.
Ancient Flight Plans Connecting Ancient Monuments Across The Planet
Ancient Flight Plans Connecting Ancient Monuments Across The Planet
Is there even a slight possibility that ancient mankind learned a way to harness free energy? Energy that they used to achieve amazing accomplishments such as the construction of the Pyramids? Teotihuacan? Puma Punku? Can all of this be connected to extraterrestrial visitors like the Ancient alien theory suggests? How else did ancient mankind achieve this “boom” in science and technology? Can this “Energy Grid” be used as a form of free energy? Free inexhaustible energy that flows naturally around our planet?
What is really interesting is the fact that all of these locations were and still are associated with a large number of UFO sightings, these “visitors” seem to understand the importance of these places and often visit them, as if they feed off of these locations, obtain energy from them.
In Herefordshire England, we have what Ancient Alien theorists call the Ancient Flight Plans. Discovered by amateur archaeologist Alfred Watkins while horseback riding, Watkins noticed that the structures across the landscape appeared to be arranged in straight lines. Four years after that, in 1925 Watkins published his book “The old straight tracks” where he proposed that ancient mankind built monuments and megaliths and that these were connected by a network of straight lines. Referred to as ley lines.
These so called ley lines are mostly found in England and in France. They are geographic markings of a number of places of geographical and historical interest, such as ancient monuments and megaliths, natural ridge-tops and so on.
According to Linda Moulton Howe, The Michael Line in England is a straight line and it is measurable. It’s a magnetic field line that you can measure and it will be higher than other areas around it geographically.
In his book, “The old straight tracks“, Watkins proposed that ancient monuments were deliberately placed along these lines for line of sight navigation and were used as trade routes, but this theory does not seem to hold due to the fact that these lines cross terrains that were difficult to access and to identify so there had to be another purpose to this geometric and precise pattern, some sort of ancient code?
Today there are several researchers that believe that these Ley lines are magnetic in nature and that they delineate the lines of Earth’s unseen energy fields.
More of these geometrical patterns can be found in Denmark, along the northern reaches of the European continent we find the archaeological ruins of a once prospering and mighty Viking fortress dating to 900 A.D. It was Preben Hansson who first discovered a direct line of flight from Trelleborg to other three Viking fortresses, which are also same in design.
What you have here is a direct line that connects four Viking Forts in Denmark, now this is strange, why? because the Vikings were seafaring people, known as might warriors and sailors so these forts in land, aligned precisely do not make much sense, you would believe that Vikings would have constructed forts near water and perhaps in a different pattern.
Researchers have been baffled by the precise design of Trelleborg with courtyard’s divided into four zones, each with four longhouses and gateways open precisely to the four cardinal directions: north, south, east and west. It is clear that the construction and design of Trelleborg would have required great knowledge of engineering.
What is perhaps even mores interesting is the fact that if you draw a straight line and cross the Alps in Europe you will eventually reach Delphi in Greece, known for the Oracle of Delphi and to the God Apollo. According to Greek mythology, every once in a while, Apollo took his “heavenly chariot” and disappeared heading north.
Could all of these patterns and lay lines be ancient flight patterns as the Ancient Aliens theory suggests? How would you explain that the ancient Viking forts in Denmark point to the Oracle of Delphi which leads to the Pyramids of Egypt? It is not a coincidence. It would make sense if these constructions and monuments are long straight lines across our planet’s grids, perhaps these grids were navigational markers that visitors from outer space used, to navigate in straight lines.
If you look the way that our modern-day aircrafts fly, they do it in straight lines, avoiding turns if possible, pilots also guide themselves by landmarks to establish locations and to orient themselves. If our pilots navigate this way and use these spots as orientational marks, could have extraterrestrials visiting us in the past, and even today, also have guided themselves by these locations and grids?
Is there a code encrypted in the location of the monuments around the world, like the pyramids of Egypt? Teotihuacan in Mexico? The Oracle of Delphi? Forming The Earth grid?
The perfect alignment of these locations to the stars and to other monuments around the world is something that was not done randomly. The lay lines, the Earth Grid and the electromagnetic field anomalies that are present in locations around the world are not something random. It is something planned, something elaborate, something that truly seems, out of this world.
9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False- PART I
This article will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one.
The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is still called a theory, instead of a law. The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process.
The DNA in plants and animals allows selective breeding to achieve desired results. Dogs are a good example of selective breeding. The DNA in all dogs has many recessive traits.
A desired trait can be produced in dogs by selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce offspring with that trait. This specialized selective breeding can continue for generation after generation until a breed of dog is developed. This is the same as the "survival of the fittest" theory of the evolutionists.
Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. The same process of selective breeding is done with flowers, fruits, and vegetables.
New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals. Evolutionist fail to admit that no species has ever been proven to have evolved in any way. Evolution is simply pie-in-the-sky conjecture without scientific proof.
If natural selection were true, Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless as everyone else. If natural selection were true, humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict.
If natural selection were true humans at northern latitudes would have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except the Eskimos who have skin that is halfway between white and black. The people from Russia and the Nordic countries have white skin, blood hair and blue eyes. This is the opposite of what one would predict if natural selection controlled skin color.
Many evolutionists argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark-skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark-skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle.
Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. Dark-skinned people have always lived near the Equator, not white-skinned people, even though the dark skin is more uncomfortable in the hot, sunny climate.
Black skin absorbs the heat from the sun's rays more than white skin. Humans show no sign of natural selection based on the environment. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.
Animals like bears, tigers, lions, and zebras living near the equator have heavy fur while humans living north of the Artic Circle have bare skin. A leopard from the jungle near the equator has fur like the snow leopard of the Himalayas.
The snow leopard grows thicker hair but the jungle leopard would also if moved to a cold climate. Horses and dogs grow a heavy winter coat in colder climates. Natural selection isn't working as falsely claimed by Charles Darwin.
The cheetah in Africa is an example of an animal in the cat family with very limited variety in the DNA. Each cheetah looks like an identical twin. The cheetah DNA is so identical that the skin from one cheetah can be grafted into another cheetah without any rejection by the body.
Evolution is Scientifically Impossible
Evolution is a theory developed one hundred and forty years ago by Charles Darwin (N/A actually, by his grandfather in 1794 - before Charles was even born), before science had the evidence available to prove the theory false.
His famous book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, has a title that is now known to be scientifically false. New species cannot evolve by natural selection. Modern scientific discoveries are proving evolution to be impossible. No new scientific discoveries have been found to support the Theory of Evolution.
Life did not start with a bolt of lightning striking a pond of water as claimed by the main stream scientists.
Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time. This is a false statement without any scientific support.
They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys at random and eventually type President's Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense.
Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly.
What are the odds that a simple single cell organism could evolve given the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible. (...)
The Indoctrination System Called "Education"
The educational system teaches children not to think. Any student who uses logic and solid scientific evidence to question the Theory of Evolution is ridiculed and insulted into submission. The students who submit become non-thinking robots who dare not question the dogma presented.
A forth-grade elementary school class was observed at the park playing a three-legged race game, where adjacent legs of the two kids were placed into a bag. The kids must cooperate with each step in order to run. The kids thought it was great fun. The teacher told them they were being trained to cooperate.
Actually, it was brainwashing kids into conforming to a system in which they are not allowed to have individual thoughts or opinions. They must become a "team player" and submit to peer pressure. Communist countries have used this same brainwashing technique for decades.
The brainwashing of school children continues by teaching them there is no absolute right or wrong, and the teacher is absolutely positive about it.
Whatever the children think is right for them is OK. That is of course until they question evolution. They are then told they are wrong. This brainwashing results in children who are unable to think logically, scientifically, and accurately. (...)
[Darwinian Evolution cannot be observed and replicated in order to be scientifically validated and also there is not one single known case of a change of kinds]:
The body and soul of Darwin's Theory of Evolution was the idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. This concept is based on the suggestion that those members of a species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with these superior adaptations.
Darwin's theory suggests that millions of generations later the changes will result in new species. These adaptations are called links or intermediates between the old species and the new.
The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the "evolutionary tree" have many flaws.
One of the best examples of evolution nonsense is the thought that a wingless bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable to his environment. The first wing stubs would be much too small for the bird to fly.
Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary theory of natural selection, which states that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment.
Why would the bird continue for millions of generations to improve a wing stub that is useless? The Theory of Evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species, not the weakest. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage. This is the opposite of natural selection.
According to natural selection, the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly.
We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing, so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed.
Evolutionists say birds grew hollow bones for less weight in order to fly. How would a bird pass this long-term plan to the millions of generations in order to keep the lighter bone plan progressing? The evolutionary concept of growing a wing over millions of generations violates the very foundation of evolution: the natural selection.
Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be found in all species in one way or another. Take fish for example.
We are told by evolutionists that a fish wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a land creature. So let's examine this idea. OK, a fish wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't breathe air. This could happen. Fish do stupid things at times.
Whales keep swimming up onto the beach where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs? That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish story.
The gills of the fish are made for extracting oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and gasps before flipping back into the safety of the water. Why would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and choking continues for millions of generation until the fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of drowning in the water.
One day he simply stays out on the land and never goes back into the water. Now he is a lizard.
Giant dinosaurs literally exploded onto the scene during the Triassic period. The fossil record (petrified bones found in the ground as at the Dinosaur National Park in Jensen, Utah, USA) shows no intermediate or transitional species. Where are the millions of years of fossils showing the transitional forms for dinosaurs? They do not not exist, because the dinosaurs did not evolve.
Books published by evolutionists have shown the giant Cetiosaurus dinosaur with the long neck extending upright eating from the treetops. They claimed natural selection was the reason Cetiosaurus had a long neck. This gave them an advantage in reaching fodder that other species could not reach.
One day during the assembly of a skeleton for a museum display someone noticed the neck vertebrae were such that the neck could not be lifted higher than stretched horizontally in front of them. The natural selection theory was proven to be a big lie.
The Cetiosaurus dinosaur was an undergrowth eater. The long neck actually placed the Cetiosaurus at a disadvantage in his environment, just the opposite from the natural Theory of Natural Selection.
Evolutionists will now claim the animal evolved a long neck because he had the advantage of eating from bushes on the other side of the river. This is typical logic of an evolutionist.
Scientific Fact No. 2 - Species Without a Link Prove Evolution Theory is Wrong
The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic, and scientific proof.
Evolutionists line up pictures of similar-looking species and claim they evolved one from another. The human "family tree" is an example of this flawed theory. Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes.
Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture.
This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus. (...)
The pictures are simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.
Why do they claim the above discovery is "close to the missing link"? The answer is simple. Look at the picture: It is a monkey.
A monkey species that has become extinct. Lots of species have become extinct. Millions of species have become extinct.
It is obviously not similar to a human. Look at the feet with the big toe spread away from the smaller toes exactly like a modern chimpanzee, not like people.
A newly discovered extinct species does not prove a "missing link" has been found.
Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these transitional links have never been found. We only find individual species.
Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link according to similar major features such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud. Darwin was hopeful that future fossils would prove his theory correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has proven his theory to be wrong.
The presence of individual species actually proves they were not developed by an evolutionary process. If evolution were true, all plants, animals, and insects would be in a continual state of change. No two creatures would be identical, because they would not be separate species.
All life forms would be a continual blend of characteristics without a clear definition among the species. Everything would be changing, and every animal, insect, and plant would be different.
The cheetah above proves evolution does not exist. All species are locked solidly within their DNA code.
Evolutionists are going ape over "Ape-Girl"
The fossilized bones of a new animal have been found in Ethiopia near the site where "Lucy" was discovered many years ago.
By the way, Lucy was a monkey, not an early humanoid. The number of bones of the Ape-girl skeleton are unique because Lucy had only a few head fragments.
This find gives us a lot of information about the animal because major parts of the skeleton were unearthed (assuming these are all from the same animal).
It has teeth in the jaw and is said to also have unerupted teeth still within the jaw. The evolutionists call the animal a "human-like" female child about three years of age and an "individual." This is not a "human-like" fossil. It is an "ape-like" fossil because it was an ape.
The evolutionists call the animal a "transitional species" and a human ancestor even though it has a head exactly like a modern-day ape. The jaw is thrust forward and the forehead pushed back and slanted. The true appearance is more easily seen from side picture below.
Ape-girl also has arms "that dangled down to just above the knees. It also had gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it could have been skilled at swinging through trees."
So, it looks like an ape, it has a head like an ape, it has arms like an ape, it has shoulder blades like an ape - It is obviously an ape, not a human, pre-human or humanoid. This animal is simply a young ape. Its size is as would be expected for a young modern-day ape.
The age of this fossilized animal is also very much in doubt. Scientists many years ago claimed a tooth found was Nebraska Man, a pre-human fossil millions of years old. They determined the age of the tooth. The scientists had sculptured an entire ape-like skeleton from information they found in one tooth. These lies were exposed when real scientists found the tooth to be from a peccary, an animal similar to (and closely related to) pigs.
"The 3.3-million-year-old fossilised remains of a human-like child have been unearthed in Ethiopia's Dikika region. The find consists of the whole skull, the entire torso, and important parts of the upper and lower limbs. CT scans reveal unerupted teeth still in the jaw, a detail that makes scientists think the individual may have been about three years old when she died."
Remarkably, some quite delicate bones not normally preserved in the fossilisation process are also present, such as the hyoid, or tongue, bone. The hyoid bone reflects how the voice box is built and perhaps what sounds a species can produce.
Judging by how well it was preserved, the skeleton may have come from a body that was quickly buried by sediment in a flood, the researchers said.
"In my opinion, afarensis is a very good transitional species for what was before four million years ago and what came after three million years," Dr Alemseged told BBC science correspondent Pallab Ghosh. [The species had] a mixture of ape-like and human-like features. This puts afarensis in a special position to play a pivotal role in the story of what we are and where we come from."
"This early ancestor possessed primitive teeth and a small brain but it stood upright and walked on two feet. There is considerable argument about whether the Dikika girl could also climb trees like an ape.
This climbing ability would require anatomical equipment like long arms, and the 'Lucy' species had arms that dangled down to just above the knees. It also had gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it could have been skilled at swinging through trees. But the question is whether such features indicate climbing ability or are just 'evolutionary baggage'."
Evolution is in trouble. The growth of biological knowledge is producing scientific facts that contradict the evolutionary theory, not confirm it, a fact that famous Prof. Steven Jay Gould of Harvard has described as "the trade secret of paleontology."
The fossil record simply does not support the evolutionary theory, which claims there once existed a series of successive forms leading to the present-day organism. The theory states that infinitesimal changes within each generation evolve into a new species, but the scientific fact remains. They don't.
Fossils prove the sudden emergence of a new species out of nowhere, complete with characteristics unknown in any other species. The fossil record has no intermediate or transitional forms. This is popularly known as the "missing link" problem, and it exists in all species. The missing link problem is getting worse, not better, with the discovery of more fossils.
The missing links are not being discovered, which proves they never existed. Darwin assumed transitional forms would be discovered in the fossil record over time, but that has not been the case. The fossil record, or lack thereof, is a major embarrassment to evolutionists.
The fossil record is a serious rebuke of the Theory of Evolution. New species explode onto the scene out of nowhere. New fossil discoveries continue to prove evolution to be wrong.
"Despite the tremendous increase in geological activity in every corner of the globe and despite the discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not been discovered and the fossil record is about as discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the Origin."
A reader of the Michael Denton's book says,
"Denton a Molecular Biologist removes all of the supports (if there ever were any) from Darwin's theory of macro-evolution (continuity of life). Denton blasts all of the previous arguments made by the pro-evolutionists showing that there is essentially no support of macro-evolution in the fossil record. He also, clearly demonstrates that there is no support coming from his specialty molecular biology. In the end the only sound explanation he can make is that life is profoundly discontinuous."
Harvard Professor Gould claims that evolution occurs in spurts, not gradually. This theory attempts to explain the lack of continuity in the fossil record. However, this theory is more troublesome than the gradual change theory. Large jumps or spurts in the fossil record don't prove evolution at all. In fact, they disprove evolution.
The theory that evolution can occur in spurts, because the fossil record shows it did not occur gradually, is a wild stretch of the imagination. Species have some characteristics similar to other species, but similarity doesn't prove any evolutionary link whatsoever. There are more than missing links in biology. There are entire missing chains in 100% of the branches of the evolutionary tree.
Many species are dependant upon another species for their coexistence. Hummingbirds and flowers are a good example. The flower would not be pollinated and would become extinct without the bird. They are said to have coevolved together. That is a stretch of the imagination without any basis in science. There are hundreds of these examples that cannot be explained.
Charles Darwin had concern about his theory of natural selection. He knew that a failure to find the missing transitional links would seriously cripple his theory of evolution, but he was hopeful the missing links would be found some day.
Well, guess what? He died not finding them. Evolutionists have never found the missing links. Each time they announce finding one, it is later proven to be false.
The "Living Fossil" Fish Proves Evolution is Wrong
The Coelacanth fish was touted to be a transitional form with half-formed legs and primitive lungs, ready to transition onto land. This myth was exploded in December, 1938 when a live Coelacanth was caught in a fisherman's net off the eastern coast of South Africa. It is now known that the natives of the Comoro Islands had been catching and eating the fish for years.
It did not have half-formed legs or primitive lungs. It was simply a regular fish that people thought was extinct. Evolutionist claimed the 350 million-year-old Coelacanth evolved into animals with legs, feet, and lungs.
This not the case. We now see that the fish recently caught is exactly like the 350 million-year-old fossil. It did not evolve at all.
The Coelacanth is a star witness against the false theory of evolution. After 350 million years, the fish still doesn't have a leg to stand on.
"The 1.3m-long (4.3ft), 50kg (110lb) coelacanth is only the second ever to have been captured in Asia and has been described as a "significant find". An autopsy and genetic tests are now being carried out to determine more about the specimen. Coelacanths provide researchers with a window into the past; their fossil record dates back 350 million years."
The Archaeopteryx fossil was herald by evolutionists as a significant transitional missing link. The fossil was discovered in a limestone quarry in southern Germany in 1861 and has been debated ever since.
The dinosaur creature appears to be a reptile with bird characteristics of wings and feathers. It had the skeleton of a small dinosaur with a tail, fingers with claws on the leading edge of the wing, and teeth in the jaws.
The owners of the property discovered six fossils of which only two had feathers. This inconsistency smells of fraud from the beginning. Upon close examination the feathers appear to be identical to modern chicken feathers. Click the picture to see an enlargement.
The Archaeopteryx fossils with feathers have now been declared forgeries by scientists. "Allegedly, thin layers of cement were spread on two fossils of a chicken-size dinosaur, called Compsognathus. Bird feathers were then imprinted into the wet cement" according to Dr. Walt Brown.
(...) This example would not have proven evolution even if the feathers had not been forgeries. Finding a few species with characteristics similar to two other species does not prove a link. There should be millions or billions of transitional links if evolution were true, not simply a few.
The Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), with its duck bill and webbed feet, is a unique Australian animal. It and the two species of echidna are the only monotremes or egg-laying mammals to be found on earth.
The marsupials (mammals with pouches, e.g. kangaroos) and eutherians (placental mammals that give birth to well-developed young, e.g. humans) both give birth to live young.
The monotremes have lower body temperatures than other mammals and have legs which extend out, then vertically below them. These features, together with their egg-laying ability, are more like that of a lizard than a mammal. Platypus are readily identified by their streamlined body, webbed feet, broad tail, and characteristic muzzle or bill which is soft and pliable.
The Platypus males have spurs on their hind feet that deliver a poisonous venom like a snake. A Platypus sting is powerful enough to make people sick and kill a dog.
The Platypus of Australia has characteristics of many species but certainly is not the missing link to all of them. In fact, it is not a link to any of them. The Platypus has made a joke of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and his unproven theory of natural selection.
Scientists fraudulently claim a newly-discovered fish is the second bridge fossil gap between sea and land creatures. The scientists have apparently forgotten that the first fossil gap, Archaeopteryx, shown above was also a fraud. Tiktaalik therefore becomes fossil gap fraud number 2.
"Called 'Tiktaalik' by scientists, the fish lived in shallow, swampy waters. Most remarkably, the creature, which was less than 3 feet long, had the body of a fish but the jaws, ribs, and limb-like fins seen in the earliest land mammals."
The claim that the stubby little fossil fins are "limb-like" is a real hoot. The fish doesn't even have fins as large as expected for its size.
The scientists are claiming the fish walked around on the ground out of water and breathed air. This is pure make-believe speculation. No evidence exists that the fish is anything more than just another species.
The excitement about the Tiktaalik fossil is puzzling. Modern-day seals have fins and waddle around on the ground. Modern-day catfish have fins and walk around on the ground. Catfish can live out of water for a long time. Tiktaalik does not provide any support for evolution.
Evolutionists are now claiming that a dolphin captured with two little extra fins near the tail is proof that dolphins evolved from four-footed animals related to the dog.
"Experts believe that the dolphin's ancestor was a dog-like creature which roamed the earth many millions of years ago. And now the extraordinary discovery of a bottlenosed dolphin with an extra set of flippers has provided living proof of the theory. At first glance it looks like any other of its kind. But closer inspection reveals a rogue set of rear fins. Each the size of a human hand, the fins are thought to be the remains of a pair of hind legs, adding to evidence that dolphins once walked on all fours."
The Theory of Evolution states that minute improvements in an individual within a species increases the likelihood of survival of the offspring. These small steps of improvements continue for countless years until the individuals are changed to such a large extent that a new species has appeared.
This progression is an uninterrupted branch of the "evolutionary tree." These lines of progression can be seen in any biology text book for many species, including mankind. They almost look believable...
The siblings of an individual on the uninterrupted branch may fail to develop the minute improvement and may even suffer from an inferior evolutionary change. Each of these individuals represents a new branch on the tree that is moving away from the uninterrupted branch.
Let us say we have 100,000 coexisting individuals in a species such as a horse. Only a few of these individuals will begin new branches that will eventually become a new species such as a Zebra.
The other 99,999 individuals may each begin a neutral or inferior branch that may continue for millions of years but will eventually stop, because the last individual on the branch fails to produce an offspring.
The odds that the branch will stop producing offspring is increased when the minute evolutionary changes are inferior. The theory of survival of the fittest or natural selection also works in reverse to produce death to the branch where the changes are inferior. The branch stops. This part of the tree is dead.
We see in Scientific Fact No. 2 above that the missing intermediary individuals in the branch of the evolutionary tree present a serious problem for the Theory of Evolution. One superior individual of the 100,000 is missing, but now we have an even more serious defect in the theory. Where are the 99,999 inferior branches? How could 99,999 branches go missing?
Actually, the fossil record shows that everything is missing. No individuals of the species existed. None. Most layers of the earth's crust are completely devoid of all life, but then a layer will appear that is teaming with an absolute abundance of separate species, each containing millions of individuals.
This hypothesis of the "missing inferior evolutionary branches" was developed and posted here by the author, Kent R. Rieske, on March 21, 2008.
Thousands of biology professors at universities around the world, including Darwin, have completely missed this serious deficiency in the fossil record, because they have only been searching for the superior evolutionary branches, not the inferior branches.
Where are the fossils of horses with weak bones that fractured early in life and thereby prevented an offspring from continuing the branch? They don't exist, but they should if the Theory of Evolution was true. In fact, the fossil record should be full of dead branches, which is not. The fossil record simply shows individual species that have become extinct.
Scientific Fact No. 4 - Single Cell Complexity Proves Evolution is Wrong
Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water, causing several molecules to combine in a random way, which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms.
This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.
The Theory of Evolution claims that organic life was created from inorganic matter. That is impossible. The top scientists in the world with unlimited laboratory resources cannot change inorganic matter into a single organic living cell.
The smallest living cell has the complexity of a Boeing 747 jumbo jet airplane. The components of the smallest living cell have the obvious arrangement showing intelligent design, just as the Boeing 747 did not appear from random parts stacked near each other in a junk yard. The minimal cell contains more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations.
The smallest single-cell creature has millions of atoms forming millions of molecules that must each be arranged in an exact pattern to provide the required functions.
The cell has an energy-producing system, a protective housing, a security system to let molecules into and out of the housing, a reproductive system, and a central control system. This complexity required an intelligent design. It is much too complex to happen by chance.
The odds that the correct proteins could somehow come together in a functional configuration to make a living cell are so high that it will never happen. The concept that anything can be accomplished by chance given enough time is false. (...)
Darwin's "Tree of Life"
Charles Darwin made a sketch in his notebook in about July 1837 that has come to be known as the Tree of Life. Darwin developed the Tree of Life theory, claiming that some species were lower in the branches of the tree and evolved into the upper branches. He selected species that looked similar to each other and placed them together, like placing the zebra below the horse.
Charles Darwin knew nothing about DNA, the true scientific key to life. He had no concept whatsoever regarding the complexity of DNA. Life did not originate by the accidental sticking together of a few molecules as Darwin taught.
Darwin did not know that the key to a person's identity (DNA) is locked solid in every cell of the body. The DNA does not change because of external adaptation to the environment as taught by Darwin and still falsely taught in universities by biology professors.
The DNA changes only when an egg and sperm are joined to form a new DNA with chromosomes coming from the male and female donors.
The DNA of the baby is strictly controlled by the parents' chromosomes. It cannot be changed by external environmental influences either. The DNA of all life forms, including plants and trees, absolutely destroys Darwin's Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. Environmental influence does not change the DNA in plants, animals or humans.
Scientists have now solidly proven that 80% of the life forms in Darwin's Tree of Life have DNA much different from the adjacent lower DNA and could not have evolved from the predecessor.
Some animals have DNA sequences that are identical to sequences in plant DNA, but they obviously could not be related according to the Theory of Evolution.
Intelligent Design can be Seen in the Smallest Bacteria and the Largest Galaxy
The scientific study of complex biological structures has made enormous strides in revealing Intelligent design in nature.
One example is the motor and propeller propulsion system, called a bacterial flagellum, found in many bacteria, including the common E. coli. The propulsion system of the bacteria has 40 moving parts made from protein molecules, including a motor, rotor, stator, drive shaft, bushings, universal joint, and flexible propeller.
The motor is powered by ions and can rotate at up to 100,000 rpm. It can reverse direction in only 1/4 of a revolution and has an automatic feedback control mechanism.
The size is 1/100,000 of an inch (1/4,000 mm) in width, much too small to see with the human eye. One cannot deny the obvious conclusion that this system has an Intelligent Designer.
"The ATP Synthase motor has the classic stator and rotor structure familiar in man-made motors. It spans a cellular membrane which admits protons (H+) one at a time. For each proton, the motor turns once, adding a phosphate to adenosine di-phosphate and converting it to adenosine tri-phosphate, the universal fuel source of cells."
9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False - PART II
9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False - PART II
Scientific Fact No. 5 - Human Egg and Sperm Prove Evolution is Wrong
The evolutionist ignores the problem surrounding the human female egg and the male sperm in the evolutionary theory. The human female like other mammals has XX sex chromosomes, and the male has XY sex chromosomes.
The female egg contains the X-chromosome, and the male sperm contains either an X-chromosome for the reproduction of a female or a Y-chromosome for the reproduction of a male.
The female eggs all develop within the ovaries while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's womb. Evolutionists claim environmental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain.
However, the environmental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and cannot have any effect upon her offspring. Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent genetic change.
Females cannot be a part of the evolutionary theory for these reasons.
The male sperm are created very differently from the female egg. The sperm are created in the testes of a male on a daily basis. This short time period between the creation of the sperm and conception within the female precludes any possibility that the male can be a part of the evolutionary process.
A harsh winter, or some other environmental condition does not affect the testes in any way that would alter the chromosomes in the sperm. Therefore, the male could not possibly contribute to evolutionary change caused by the environment. This fact applies to humans as well as all other mammals.
There are no ways possible whereby environmental adaptation could occur through the male part of the chromosome. Neither is there any scientific evidence that environmental experiences change the genetic code within the sperm.
Males cannot be a part of the evolutionary process for these reasons. These scientific facts prove evolution of the human species caused by environmental adaptation or any other reason is impossible.
*** *** ***
Alexander: In my opinion, there is not enough evidence to support the author's conclusion regarding "Scientific Fact No. 5." Based on my knowledge, the DNA, which is the software of all living things, can bring improvements to a species, though I agree that it cannot change it into an entirely different kind. The DNA is also responsible for our appearance, otherwise we would all look the same.
The fact that the DNA works as a software, making humans — for example — better adapted to the environment, can be easily proven.
Those who walk bare foot develop extra layers of skin on their soles, or those who work the land with their hands, develop extra layers of skin on their palms. Increased resistance to cold can be observed in the descendants of the nomadic tribes, such as gypsies, even though they are no longer living in harsh conditions.
In conclusion, based on my knowledge, improvements are to be expected, but never radical mutations which would result into an entirely different kind]. *** *** ***
Scientific Fact No. 6 - DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong
The scientific fact that DNA replication, including a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process, proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is, any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.
"Replication also contains built-in error checking. The frequency of errors is about 1 per 100 million bonds (1 x 10-8). Over the entire human genome, that works out to roughly 30 errors every single time the genome replicates.
BUT! There are really only around three errors per replication because of DNA repair. If a repair enzyme finds a mistake, it can fix it, and it can tell which strand is wrong because it can tell which strand is the newly synthesized strand by at the extent of cytosine methylation.
As DNAs exist in cells, many of the cytosines have a methyl group added to them by enzymes called methylases. A new DNA will have relatively few methylated cytosines because it has not been around long enough to have picked up that many methyl groups."
"Without DNA repair there can be some major problems. Xeroderma pigmentosum is a serious ailment caused by mutations in the gene for DNA repair. People with xp develop many skin tumors and other problems because of the number of errors in their DNA."
Mutations (DNA replication errors) are the result of DNA that is replicated with damage that passes on to the offspring. Mutations are very rare because of DNA checking and repair. However, one in every ten million duplications of a DNA molecule can result in a mutation (error).
The mutation changes are random, unpredictable errors that cause crippling diseases, loss of function and the destruction of the host person or animal. Mutations destroy the species. They do not improve the species. Mutations never lead to a new species as falsely claimed by evolutionists.
Evolutionists believe in the "mutation theory" for the origin of the many species. (...) They believe that the "time god" makes mistake after mistake after mistake until VOILA -- we have a hummingbird that can fly backwards.
They claim that multiple mutation mistakes eventually led to humans with color vision that can focus at different lengths and two eyes that are coordinated by the brain in order to judge distances.
Scientific Fact No. 7 - Chaos From Organization Proves Evolution is Wrong
The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics, which has never been proven wrong.
The universe is slowing down to a lower state, not higher. The genes of plants, insects, animals, and humans are continually becoming defective, not improving. Species are becoming extinct, not evolving. Order will always move naturally towards disorder or chaos.
Quoting from the book, Evolution and Human Destiny, by Kohler,
"One of the most fundamental maxims of the physical sciences is the trend toward greater randomness - the fact that, on the average, things will get into disorder rather than into order if left to themselves. This is essentially the statement that is embodied in the Second Law of Thermodynamics."
This scientific law actually refutes and contradicts the Theory of Evolution in its entirety.
There is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA. The chromosome count within each species is fixed. This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female of another species. Man could not evolve from a monkey.
Each species is locked into its chromosome count that cannot be changed. If an animal developed an extra chromosome or lost a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate. The defect could not be passed along to the next generation.
Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible.
(For example) a dog has only 22 chromosomes, whereas a monkey has 54 and a cat has 38. Half of the total number of chromosomes are contained in the female reproductive cells and half are contained in the male, so the exact total number is brought together in the offspring.
Humans have 46 chromosomes. This chromosome count is a steady factor. This determines what is called the "fixity of species" because the chromosome count doesn't vary. People always give birth to people. Dogs always give birth to dogs, etc. The genes can produce variety within the species but cannot result in a different species. (N/A Exactly my point bellow "Fact No. 5").
Genes allow for people to be short, tall, fat, thin, blond, brunette, etc., but they are still all human beings. The chromosomes make crossing of the species an un-crossable barrier. This certainly would hinder any evolution. Dogs cannot breed with cats. This fact stops evolution dead in its tracks.
Sometimes two species are close enough to crossbreed, but the offspring are usually sterile. This is the case when horses and donkeys crossbreed. A male donkey (jackass) and a female horse (mare) will produce a mule. Farmers often preferred mules as work animals prior to the development of the farm tractor.
A hinny is the offspring of a female donkey (jenny) and a male horse (stallion). The hinny and mule usually cannot produce offspring. These animals show that evolution is not possible.
Scientific Fact No. 9 - Origin of Matter and Stars Proves Evolution is Wrong
Evolutionists just throw up their hands at the question of the origin of matter because they know something cannot evolve from nothing. They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the problem.
The fact that matter exists in outrageously large quantities simply proves evolution is wrong. The "Big Bang Theory" doesn't solve the problem either. Matter and energy have to come from somewhere.
The above is an excerpt of a larger article promoting creationism (the religious belief that life, the Earth, and the universe are the creation of a supernatural being), but without bringing any kind of evidence to support it.
The author brings solid scientific arguments to disprove the "Theory of Evolution" as it is today, but disproving it does not implicitly prove the biblical "Creation Story" is correct.
In fact, there are many more arguments to disprove the biblical stories, than there are to disprove the theory of evolution.
Personally, I do believe that all living things adapt and perfect, hence evolve given enough time, but there is simply no evidence of a species mutating into an entirely different kind, and for a good reason: it cannot happen.
Unfortunately for the extremely rigid scientific community (which has gradually become a religion in its own right), the fact that we are here (an obvious change of kinds), cannot be explained.
The way the scientific community sees things is, if science cannot explain how we came to be, then someone or something must have made us, which would fuel even further the baseless and damaging religious dogma.
Consequently, the scientific community will never let go of Darwin's theory of evolution, even though it will never prove that a species can change kinds, hence becoming an entirely different one.
The author, Mr. Rieske, is also stating that there is no evidence whatsoever to support extraterrestrial life, and presents this statement as further evidence that the Biblical stories are correct.
Even though from a scientific point of view there is no official proof yet to attest the existence of advanced extraterrestrial life elsewhere in the Multiverse, even the most conservative scientific estimates say there should be at least tens or hundreds of intelligent civilizations within our own galaxy.
Personally, I'm sure that somewhere in the near future the existence of intelligent life "out there" will be disclosed to the public.
Also, there are plenty of interesting cases of human-alien contact that should have been openly investigated by the main stream scientific communities - which did not happen.
For example, the case of Giovana, an Italian woman who was allegedly kidnapped by the so called "grays" multiple times since she was a child. Her claims were supported by the testimonies of her family, medical accounts, pictures and videos of flying saucers, an alien implant and even an aborted human-alien hybrid fetus. (Video)
All those who involuntarily became involved in her case, including medical doctors, vowed for the veracity of her claims, yet no official investigation was held.
How can we claim to be searching for intelligent life "out there" and at the same time ignore a huge case "in here"? Isn't this evidence of a cover-up?
And this is not a lone case. In fact, anonymous polls (anonymous for obvious reasons) suggest that there might be hundreds of thousands of alien abductees worldwide.
Why isn't there an - open - official investigation taking place? If there is nothing to hide, then why is the government doing its best to suppress this kind of information, instead of the opposite?
Just as important is the historical evidence supporting the hypothesis of human-alien contact in the past. Based on evidence, it is possible that all of the world's religions have been founded as a result of misunderstood alien contact. Today's so called "cargo cults" are rock-solid evidence that it CAN happen.
Though some of the evidence can be easily ignored or dismissed by science (for example, crop circles are considered to be hoaxes by the main stream scientific communities, even though there arescientists who brought solid evidence proving otherwise), there is still plenty of evidence that there is more to the story that we are being told.
Lastly, the hypothesis that vastly more intelligent life forms are seeding planets with life and gradually improving their creation, is a very logical assumption to make, in my opinion.
If you think about it, even our very young species is planning to make Mars habitable in the near future, while genetically engineering plants and animals. One day we will be able to make distant planets habitable and genetically improve the existing native species.
Before concluding this article, I want to thank Mr. Kent R. Rieske for his work and all the scientific data gathered to disprove the "Theory of Evolution" as it is today, which was fervently pushed onto us by the high ranking Freemasons as a disinformation weapon and control tool, in order to mask the intervention of their Anunnaki masters and those who genetically engineered the human species.
Are you searching for the missing link? Here it is, forbidden by both history and science!
For as long as we are not allowed to know our true history, the Secret Societies are in control. For as long as the "Theory of Evolution" as it is today stands, we are nothing else than slightly more evolved "working apes."
Researchers Claim Early Humans Interbred With ‘Mystery Species’ Researchers Claim Early Humans Interbred With ‘Mystery Species’ PUBLISHED 12:54, 29 NOVEMBER 2015 Researchers at the Royal Society in London have claimed that ancient
Researchers Claim Early Humans Interbred With ‘Mystery Species’
Researchers at the Royal Society in London have claimed that ancient humans lived in a ‘Lord of the Rings’ type world, where a mystery species interbred with Neanderthals, Denisovans, and the forerunners of modern humans.
The research, published in Nature, suggests that more interbreeding between species occurred than scientists originally believed, and that one of the participants in the interbreeding contains DNA which is, as yet, unidentified.
Mark Thomas, an evolutionary geneticist at University College London, said: “What it begins to suggest is that we’re looking at a Lord of the Rings-type world – that there were many hominid populations.”
Recent research by scientists at the University of Adelaide in Australia and the Natural History Museum in the UK found that Denisovans bred with modern humans around 50,000 years ago.
“Intriguingly, the genetic data suggest that male Denisovans interbred with modern human females, indicating the potential nature of the interactions as small numbers of modern humans first crossed Wallace’s Line and entered Denisovan territory,” the study authors said.
Researchers at the Royal Society meeting said the interbreeding contributed to the genetic diversity of humans today.
Humans whose ancestors came from outside Africa are around 2% Neanderthal, while some people from Oceania are 4% Denisovan.
David Reich, an evolutionary geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, said Denisovans interbred with an extinct population of archaic humans that lived in Asia, raising questions about this new species.
However, he also noted that the conclusions about interbreeding were based on low-quality genome sequences which he said were flawed.
Chris Stringer, of London’s Natural History Museum, said: “We don’t have the faintest idea [about the identity of the new species].”
I’m often amazed at our lack of knowledge about history. Ordinary people are hungry for this information, yet the organizations responsible to disseminate these facts seem to have an agenda to keep us in the dark. This is especially true when it comes to our ancient human history.
I won’t hold you in suspense with this article: The Ark of Noah has been found. It’s real. I’ll describe the evidence in some detail and end with the historical and religious implications.
How it was discovered
In 1959, Turkish army captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape while examining aerial photographs of his country. The smooth shape, larger than a football field, stood out from the rough and rocky terrain at an altitude of 6,300 feet near the Turkish border with Iran.
Capt. Durupinar was familiar with the biblical accounts of the Ark and its association with Mount Ararat in Turkey, but he was reluctant to jump to any conclusions. The region was very remote, yet it was inhabited with small villages. No previous reports of an object this odd had been made before. So he forwarded the photographic negative to a famous aerial photography expert named Dr. Brandenburger, at Ohio State University.
Brandenburger was responsible for discovering the Cuban missile bases during the Kennedy era from reconnaissance photos, and after carefully studying the photo, he concluded: “I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photo.”
In 1960 the picture [above] was published in LIFE magazine under the heading of Noahs Ark? That same year a group of Americans accompanied Capt. Durupinar to the site for a day and a half. They were expecting to find artifacts on the surface or something that would be unquestionably related to a ship of some kind. They did some digging in the area but found nothing conclusive and announced to the anxiously waiting world that it appeared to be a natural formation.
Most of the global media turned away from the find and it became a non-story.
In 1977 Ron Wyatt visited the site. Obtaining official permission, Ron and others conducted more thorough research over a period of several years. They used metal detection surveys, subsurface radar scans, and chemical analysis — real science — and their findings were startling. The evidence was undeniable. This was the Ark of Noah.
#1 — the Visual Evidence
The first part of the survey was to examine the object and take its measurements. The shape looked like hull of a ship. One end was pointed as you would expect from bow [below: D] and the opposite end was blunt like a stern. The distance from bow to stern was 515 feet, or exactly 300 Egyptian cubits. The average width was 50 cubits. These were the exact measurements mentioned in the Bible.
On the starboard side (right) near the stern there were four vertical bulges protruding from the mud [B], at regular intervals, that were determined to be the “ribs” of the hull [see below]. Opposite to these, on the port side, a single rib [A] protrudes from the mud. You can see its curved shape very clearly. Surrounding it are more ribs, still largely buried in the mud, but visible upon close examination.
Remember that this object, if it is the Ark, is extremely old. The wood has been petrified. Organic matter has been replaced by minerals from the earth. Only the shapes and traces of the original wood remain. Perhaps this is why the expedition in 1960 was disappointed. They anticipated finding and retrieving chucks of wood, long since eroded.
From the position of the object in the middle of an obvious mudflow, it is obvious that the object slid down more than a mile from its original location. Geologists believe it was originally over 1000 feet higher in the mountain and encased in a shell of hardened mud. They think that an earthquake in 1948 cracked the mud shell and revealed the structure. This is confirmed by stories from the surrounding vallagers who tell of its “sudden appearance” around that time.
Biblical accounts of the Ark describe it as having as many as six levels. The assumed shape of the Ark seems consistent with the bulge [C] in the middle of the object. In fact, as we will soon learn, radar scans of the structure suggest that this bulge is the collapsed debris of these levels.
Although most people think of the Ark as being rectangular, that only applies to the top decks. The sleek shape of the hull is necessary to enable the huge ship to remain stable in the water and survive tremendous waves.
#2 — Ground Penetrating Radar
The human eye needs to see reflected light to recognize an object. To visualize what remains below the earth, scientists use microwaves which can penetrate the ground and bounce back when they hit something solid. This technique is commonly used to locate oil and other minerals. Called Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), the apparatus us made from an antenna that transmits, then listens to receive the “echo” and prints the result on a piece of paper. The delay and strength of this echo tell the geologists how solid and at what depth the objects are under the earth.
The team of geologists didn’t scan the entire object. Instead, they marked out lines that crossed the object with yellow tape. Then they dragged the antenna (about the size of a lawnmower) over the lines and watched the output on the paper recorder. When they got a strong “hit” — meaning there was something solid underneath — they would record the position on the tape [above]. Later, when they made a map of the object, the tape and the location of the “hits” they realized that there was indeed a structure underneath the mud.
“This data does not represent natural geology. These are man made structures. These reflections are appearing too periodic… too periodic to be random in that type of natural pace.” — Ron Wyatt of SIR Imaging team
The radar cans revealed this structure [above] under the mud. The symmetry and logical placement of these objects shows that this is unmistakably a man made structure, most likely the Ark of Noah.
#3 — Artifacts retrieved from the Ark
Using the GPR, Ron Wyatt discovered an open cavity on the starboard side. He used an improvised drill to make core sample inside this cavity and retrieved several very interesting objects. Below you can see the artifacts which were sent for laboratory analysis. On the left is the bore hole [see below], followed by what turned out to be petrified animal dung, then a petrified antler and lastly a piece of cat hair.
Even more amazing artifacts were found
Perhaps the most significant find from the Ark itself is a piece of petrified wood. When this was first found it appeared to be a large beam. But upon closer examination it is actually three pieces of plank that have been laminated together with some kind of organic glue! This is the same technology used in modern plywood. Lamination makes the total strength of the wood much greater than the combined strength of the pieces. This suggests a knowledge of construction far beyond anything we knew existed in the ancient world.
Tests by Galbraith Labs in Knoxville, Tennessee, showed the sample to contain over 0.7% organic carbon, consistent with fossilized wood. The specimen was once living matter.
Examination reveals the glue oozed from the layers. The outside of the wood appears to have been coated with bitumen.
Even more surprising were laboratory analyses which not only revealed that the petrified wood contained carbon (proving it was once wood) but there were iron nails [above right] embedded in the wood!
In Genesis 6:14, God told Noah to “make yourself an ark of gopher wood.”
“Gopher wood” is a misreading and scribal error. “Kopher” wood is correct and means wood (any wood) that is covered with Kopher. Kopher isbitumen. In the Genesis text (6:14), the context is clear. The GPR wood used, (a scribal error) is to be covered in KPR. G and K in Hebrew are so similar that inexperienced Hebrew “scholars,” such as those translating the King James Version of the Bible, could have been prone to such errors, indeed, they made many such errors.
Acts 7: 45 & Hebrews 4: 8 are classic examples of such scribal errors.
gpr = “g,” as in gopher, k pr = “k,”as in kopher Pictured right is a simple visual comparison of the letters.
We like to imagine that humanity evolved in a neat sequence of eras, each named after the technology that was discovered. We have the Stone Age (where man developed arrows and stone tools), the Bronze Age (where metals were combined and heated to make tools and household items) and lastly the Iron Age (where iron and steel objects were made by heating iron ore and adding other material — like charcoal — to strengthen it). The Iron Age is usually placed at 1200-1000 BC, yet we have iron nails being used in this extremely old construction
But wait… there’s more!
The most surprising find was discovered with sensitive metal detectors. The team located several strong “hits” that, when dug up, revealed large disc shaped rivets. From simple observation of the metal it was possible to see where the rivet had been hammered after being inserted through a hole [below].
If rivets being used in ancient construction doesn’t impress you, this surely will.
An analysis of the metal used to make the rivets revealed that they were a combination of iron (8.38%), aluminum (8.35%) and titanium (1.59%). Remember these trace metals have survived petrification and so do not indicate the exact content in the original material. (see Report from Galbraith Labs)
We know the aluminum was incorporated in the metallic mixture because it does not exist in metallic form in nature. This implies an extremely advanced knowledge of metallurgy and engineering. Characteristics of an iron-aluminum alloy have been investigated in The Russian Chemical Bulletin(2005) and reveal that this alloy forms a thin film of aluminum oxide which protects the material from rust and corrosion. The addition of titanium would provide added strength. This seems to have worked. The rivets have survived from antiquity!
This was all over Twitter a few hours ago. A few people posted sightings of this green glowing disk over a small town of South Africa. It was at the Cape of Good Hope, over Cape Town. In the enlargement above I made, you can clearly make out its disk shape and glowing bottom center. I once reported such a metallic disk over Cape Town about 3 years ago. I found it on Google Earth map, but after making a video and reporting it on my site, Google did delete it from their map within 2-3 months. (Click here to view it). This UFO today, looks like the same craft. The one that Bob Lazar worked on at Area S4. Scott C. Waring www.ufosightingsdaily.com
Durban – The Twitteratti world was abuzz on Saturday night after a sighting of what is believed to be an Unidentified Flying Object [UFO] in Cape Town. The #UFOSA was trending with various people tweeting pictures of a green light that could be seen from the clouds. @Sindelo tweeted: “First it was those clouds and now green orbs are seen floating around Cape Town. The aliens have come with white supremacy! #UFOSA @PlanetZuma quipped that it was the controversial R4 billion presidential VIP Jet. “Relax people, it was just a test flight of the #GravyPlane. #UFOSA #ZumaJet,” read the tweet.
An anonymous Californian man reported to Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) about his sighting of a saucer-shaped UFO at Dunnigan. He reportedly saw the strange flying object around 40 feet off the ground. It then rose into the sky and moved away, according to the report in Case 60720 from the network’s witness reporting database.
The witness was on his way home from work driving at an exit for County Road 1 when he saw a flashing light at 6:45 p.m. on October 17, 2014.
He first thought of a radio tower until he noticed the light slowly rising and saw no pole beneath it.
The witness pulled off to the side of the road and started recording the object on video using his iPhone 4.
According to his report, the light was first blinking through the clouds. After about a minute, it had risen to the clouds and slowly moved in the north direction over him. At this point, he saw the object in person.
The witness described the object as a perfect black, saucer-shaped object with a triangular pointy tip in the front. He was shocked to see it in detail like his brain was telling him otherwise. The most unusual sighting for the witness was the lights that were blinking in a circular motion, one after another. The object hovered in the sky from approximately 40 feet from the ground, until it was over the clouds. All it did was hover in a straight line.
The witness found it hard to describe the distance of the object from him but estimated it to be about a football field away.
He managed to see the chiseling detail of the flying object, including the lights. Two minutes later, it was grinding, flying, or hovering slowly over his car, close enough so he could see the bottom of the ship. He then turned off the camera and continued his drive towards home.
He claimed to have fully regretted of leaving so early and not observed what it did next. The witness said he left the area with his mind racing, in shock, and in disbelief.
A New Microscope Can See Inside Moving Cells In Real Time, and There Are Videos Written by JASON KOEBLER October 23, 2014 // 03:00 PM EST Earlier this month, Virginia scientist Eric Betzig won a Nobel Prize for a new type of microscopy he developed. Tod
A New Microscope Can See Inside Moving Cells In Real Time, and There Are Videos
Lattice light-sheet microscopy. An ultrathin structured light sheet (blue-green, center) excites fluorescence (orange) in successive planes as it sweeps through a specimen (gray) to generate a 3D image. The speed, noninvasiveness, and high spatial resolution of this approach make it a promising tool for in vivo 3D imaging of fast dynamic processes in cells and embryos, as shown here in five surrounding examples.Lattice light-sheet microscopy. An ultrathin structured light sheet (blue-green, center) excites fluorescence (orange) in successive planes as it sweeps through a specimen (gray) to generate a 3D image. The speed, noninvasiveness, and high spatial resolution of this approach make it a promising tool for in vivo 3D imaging of fast dynamic processes in cells and embryos, as shown here in five surrounding examples.
The problem with that, Betzig and co-authors admit in a new paper published today in Science, is that "many biological processes are too fragile, are too small, or occur too rapidly to see clearly with existing tools."
In their new work, the team describes a method of shooting light in from the side in two-dimensional sheets—a tactic Betzig calls lattice light-sheet microscopy—which allows basically any cell function to be directly imaged in living cells, in real time, without damaging the cells nearly as much as his old method.
What does this mean? Well, it means that we can now watch, in incredible resolution and in three dimensions, nerve cells forming synapses in the brain; cells undergoing mitosis; the formation of an embryo after sperm fertilizes an egg; and even internal cell functions such as protein translation, mitochondrial movements, and muscle flexes.
In fact, the resolution is high enough that Betzig can follow a single molecule as it moves around a cell, a breakthrough that he writes is "essential to understand the molecular basis of cellular physiology."
This video was produced using data obtained via a new imaging platform. The lattice light sheet microscopy was developed by the 2014 Nobel laureate in chemistry, Eric Betzig, at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Janelia Research Campus. The video shows an interaction between a T-cell (orange) and a target cell (blue). T-cells are a key part of the human body's immune response system. (Betzig Lab, HHMI/Janelia Research Campus, Lippincott-Schwartz Lab, National Institutes of Health/Science)
This is huge, because while looking at dead cells or the few relatively slow processes of living cells is certainly interesting and instructive, it's not necessarily groundbreaking. This new method, on the other hand, could be.
"Although structural imaging is certainly informative, a more-complete understanding of how inanimate molecules assemble to create animate life requires high-resolution imaging across all four dimensions of space-time simultaneously," he wrote.
As for the imaging itself, well, the new lighting method allows him to take many more layers of two-dimensional photos, which can then be layered to make videos and the insane photos you see here. He writes that each photo you see here is actually "distilled from tens to hundreds of thousands of raw 2D images acquired from each specimen."
America’s secret airline that flies non-stop to Area 51 and other facilities, has a job opening
America’s secret airline that flies non-stop to Area 51 and other facilities, has a job opening
Janet airline has a job opening – – November 28, 2015 – –(information, courtesy of WheresJanet of Dreamland Resort)
FIRST OFFICER (Pilot)
LOCAL CANDIDATES PREFERRED.
Must have extensive knowledge of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations, the national airspace, and U.S. airman/aeronautical procedures.
The First Officer must have a minimum of 2,000 fixed wing flying hours in-seat with 300 in-seat hours within the last 5 years. At least 1,000 hours must be in turbine-powered aircraft and at least 1,000 hours must be as the pilot in command (PIC). Only pilot time logged in fixed wing aircraft may be counted in the hours totals listed above (specifically excludes simulator, helicopter, WSO, RIO, FE, NAV, EWO, and UAV.)
Flying time must be in accordance with FAA rules and guidelines for the logging of flight time; no “military convesion” allowed.
The First Officer must hold an USA DOT/FAA Class I medical certificate (with EKG if over 40 years old) and a USA DOT/FAA Airline Transport Pilot Certificate (ATP).
Must demonstrate supervisory skills to coordinate the efforts of a flight crew to ensure the safe and efficient conduct of flight operations.
Must qualify for and maintain a TSgovernment security clearance and associated work location access. Must possess a valid state issued driver’s license. Must be willing to domicile in the Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area. Must comply with FAA Part 121 requirements for pilots.
Current TS/SSBI security clearance.
Boeing 737 type rating.
Boeing 737 experience (NG preferred).
(issued by URS, an AECOM Company)
(URS’ predecessor was E.G. & G. AECOM then acquired URS a few years ago)
Bizarre moment three cars ‘LEVITATE’ off the ground inexplicabl (VIDEO)
Bizarre moment three cars ‘LEVITATE’ off the ground inexplicabl (VIDEO)
May the force be with you?
Here is the bizarre moment three cars literally ‘LEVITATE’ on the road and no one can explain what caused it. The mysterious video footage shows the moment three cars are mysteriously lifted off the ground and slamming back to the ground as if looking at special effects from Hollywood. Chinese media reported that it was caused by a piece of ‘steel cable’.
However this theory has been widely rejected by people on social media suggesting that other cars passed next to the three levitating cars without problem. No matter how many times we have already watched the video, we have failed to see a steel cable, or anything else that could have caused the cars to levitate off the ground like they did.
The video, which has left the internet mesmerized has captured the attention of paranormal investigators and Ufologists who all have their very own theories.
Ion the video footage, confused pedestrians can be seen running away from the cars that inexplicably started to levitate. It is not known whether anyone was injured in the peculiar incident. Many users posted on social networks that the ‘steel cable’ explanation is absurd since it is clear that no cable is visible in the video recording.
Since it was posted online, the video footage has received hundreds of thousands of views and many people have tried explaining what went on in the video:
‘The truck on the right snags a cable that is loose on the ground and lays across the road.’
‘The truck starts to move pulling the cable tight and the cable goes up and moves all three vehicles.’
Another agreed, writing: ‘it’s a downed line being dragged by the truck on the right.’
Other users believe that this phenomenon occurred because of some sort of ‘antigravity’ technology tested by the government somewhere in the vicinity. At this point all we can do is watch the video over and over again trying to understand what caused the mysterious phenomenon seen in the video that has gone viral since it was posted not long ago
Since the video has been posted, thousands of user’s suggest that a sinister ‘strange force’ is behind the bizarre accident occurred in China.
Check out the video below and let us know what you think happened here… Was this bizarre accident caused by a ‘steel cable’ as some suggest? Or is it possible there is a far more mysterious explanation to the anomalous video posted online.
Hebben astronomen zojuist de eerste buitenaardse radioboodschap opgevangen?
Hebben astronomen zojuist de eerste buitenaardse radioboodschap opgevangen?
Na de ontdekking van vijf mysterieuze radiosignalen die van buiten de Melkweg komen, wordt door sommige astronomen gespeculeerd dat ze mogelijk zijn gestuurd door aliens.
Het gaat om zogeheten snelle radioflitsen, waarvan er tot nu toe slechts 11 waren opgevangen. Er is nu ook voor het eerst een ‘dubbel signaal’ opgepikt. Astronomen die de gegevens van de Parkes-telescoop in Australië analyseren, staan voor een raadsel.
Emily Petroff van de Swinburne University in Melbourne maakt deel uit van het team dat de signalen heeft ontdekt. Ze twitterde: “We hebben geen idee waar we mee te maken hebben, maar we weten wel zeker dat het iets gaafs is.”
.@SciBry we have no idea what's going on, but we know it's definitely something cool.
De ontdekking wordt al vergeleken met het Wow!-signaal, een radiosignaal dat in 1977 met de radiotelescoop Big Ear werd gedetecteerd door Jerry R. Ehman. Het signaal droeg tekens van niet-aardse oorsprong, maar een herhaling bleef uit.
Snelle radioflitsen werden in 2007 voor het eerst ontdekt, maar nu is ook voor het eerst een dubbele flits opgepikt. Er is tot dusver niets bekend over de herkomst van deze mysterieuze signalen.
Enkele dagen geleden claimden onderzoekers nog dat snelle radioflitsen het gevolg zijn van samensmeltingen tussen zwarte gaten en neutronensterren. Er wordt ook gedacht dat ze veroorzaakt kunnen zijn door pulsars of exotische sterren.
Vanwege de dubbele flits wordt echter serieus rekening gehouden met een intelligente herkomst. Schrijver Nigel Watson zei: “Het zou fantastisch zijn als blijkt dat dit een buitenaards signaal is. Als we erachter komen dat we niet alleen zijn in dit enorme heelal zou dat een enorme impact hebben op onze kijk op het grotere geheel.”
“Het zou UFO-spotters de kans geven om te kunnen zeggen: zie je wel dat aliens bestaan en geïnteresseerd zijn in onze activiteiten,” aldus Watson.
Robledo de Chavela is a municipality located in the western mountains of Madrid. Many ufologists have identified this area as one of the best spots for seeing unidentified flying objects (UFOS). The proximity of the NASA deep space tracking facility and the mysterious tower of the parish church, they say, are points that contribute to the creation of all kind of legends.It was at the start of the 1980s when significant sightings began to occur. Two of them, specifically: the first took place when four silent lights began spinning rapidly over the church belfry for several minutes. Shortly after, these lights aligned to head toward the space tracking station, where they proceeded to vanish.
But these stories do not end with saucer sightings. Around this time, a very tall humanoid was seen as it emerged from what some witnesses described as “a sort of egg” in a forest located between Robledo de Chavela and Valdequemada.
Moreover, around the year 2000, a projectile-shaped UFO was also reported over Robledo. It crossed the entire country and was shown on many domestic news broadcasts. Other local stories suggest that numerous flying saucers have been seen exiting and entering the Valmayor Reservoir in San Lorenzo del Escorial and San Juan, very close to this “mysterious” municipality.
MEXICAN AIR FORCE PILOTS CHASE ALIEN CRAFT OVER MEXICO
MARCH 5, 2004 ……….. CAMPECHE MEXICO
On April 20, 2004 Jaime Maussan was contacted by a high officer of the Department of Defense to have a private meeting and discuss a subject of a high relevant matter. The next day Maussan met General Clemente Vega Garcia, Secretary of Defense and his major staff and was informed about an incident that took place on March 5, 2004 on the aerial space of Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche where an Air Force Merlín C26A Bimotor airplane was doing a routine flight to detect a smuggling drug airplane during an ant-narcotics operation.
The Merlin C26A was equipped with a high tech advanced digital equipment to register and record all the activities during the operation. Powerful sensor detectors like a FLIR STAR ZAPPHIR II and a RADAR AN/PS 143 BRAVO VICTOR 3 were being used by qualified personal aboard the airplane and all the operation was being recorded both in normal and infrared mode. The airplane was under the command of Mayor Magdaleno Jasso Núñez.
The FLIR operator was Lt. Mario Adrián Vázquez and the RADAR operator Lt. German Ramirez, all of them members of the 501 Aerial Squadron. This airplane is programmed only for surveillance and detection procedures, not for interception or combat manoeuvres. Their duty is to detect and identify drug dealers flights and then immediately report them to the base where combat planes are scrambled to intercept those narcotics smugglers. At approximately 17:00 PM the Merlin C26A detected an unknown traffic at 10,500 feet over Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche airspace and according to the protocol and suspecting a drug dealer airplane Mayor Magdaleno Jasso At the same time Mayor Jasso reported by radio to the base that a possible suspect was detected requesting the interceptor planes to be in alert condition. The RADAR AN/PS 143 BRAVO VICTOR 3 was detecting the unknown traffic and the FLIR STAR ZAPPHIR II was recording the object in infrared. As the Merlin C26A tried to approach the unknown traffic to make a visual identification it suddenly in a surprising maneuver escaped flying away at tremendous speed. By this time Mayor Jasso tried to persecute the target but it was very fast. All this was being recorded by the FLAIR and also the radio conversations with the base describing the unexpected maneuver of the unknown. However the C26A still have not made visual contact with the unknown object. Just some moments passed when suddenly the unknown object returned and began following the Merlin C26A in a surprising situation. This was detected by the RADAR and the FLIR while the personal aboard were trying to make visual contact of the unidentified traffic now following them. In seconds the equipment detected now not only one but two traffics following them. The images in both RADAR and the FLIR were clear and unmistakable. But both pilot and personal still couldn’t have visual contact with these two traffics following them adding a great suspense to this disconcerting situation. Mayor Magdaleno Jasso reported to the base the incident that was taking place giving detail of all the information registered by the equipment while keep trying to make visual contact of the unknowns. The FLIR kept recording in infrared every movement made by the two unknown objects that seemed to be keeping their distance from the C26A but still following it. The personal aboard the Merlin C26A were confused and disconcerted seeing the images on the FLIR and the RADAR asking themselves what was going on.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan email@example.com of aan www.ufo.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER OLIVER. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 66 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.