Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.
This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.
DEAR VISITOR,
MY BLOG EXISTS ALREADY 13 YEARS AND 2 MONTH.
ON 06/08/2024 MORE THAN 2.161.100
VISITORS FROM 135 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.
THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400GUESTS PER DAY.
THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
30-12-2015
Falklands—The Alien War (I)
Falklands—The Alien War (I)
Former Argentinian Navy SEALs have recently come out of the shadows to disclose not only the gruesome details of the 1982 Falklands war, but also how extraterrestrial forces and aircraft were actively changing the outcome of the battle.
UFOs have a history of visiting conflict zones, but we’ve always suspected they do more than just peacefully observe the battlefield. You’ve probably read an earlier article on our page about former high ranking Russian officials disclosing the fact that they simulated a war every time they wanted to summon a UFO.
We found this story very interesting (more credible than today’s photoshopped pics or forged videos) so we decided to look for other former officials(from anywhere) involved in such mysterious encounters.
That’s how we found out about Gennaro Martino, a former Navy SEAL who was dispatched in the short conflict between Argentina and Great Britain in 1982. He’s 65 now (27 back then) and mysteriously ill with an unknown disease. His relatives believe he’s been somehow poisoned by the secret services because of his knowledge.
MARTINO DURING THE FALKLANDS WAR
As he says, at his age he’s not afraid anymore, so when two of his brothers in arms recently died of different unknown flash diseases, he decided to speak about what he witnessed on the largely unpopulated island during the English siege, before his sickness silences him forever.
nfortunately, we simply don’t have the time and space for his whole story, because he remembers everything to the smallest detail, from the point where his team boarded the ship to when he was back into the safety of his home bed.
He told this story to a provincial Argentinian magazine, which, of course, only comes out in print. He begins his story with a sort of disclaimer:
"You have to understand the complex, complicated situation of our country, our people, even more in that time. We are a patriotic people, and I always thought the government used that against us. We knew we were slaughter lambs, they wanted to get back public support by conquering the island that had no value whatsoever, but the patriotic one.
But we also knew if we didn’t, the people would consider us the traitors and them the good guys. It was a moral hell.”
Next he tells how they got to the island (which was officially in Great Britain’s possession) and occupied it without any resistance, then waited, he uses the same words, like slaughter lambs, for the British to come and smoke them out. When they did, it was absolute chaos and carnage.
There was so much fire from the English that the other Argentinians didn’t notice the ships (UFOs ) or did but thought they were hallucinating cause of the fear, but we both saw them, me and Pero. There were many models,” he remembers, referring to his mate Pedro “Pero” Escalante who recently perished out of unknown causes. “ We were all firing cannon like crazy, but we almost never hit anything, yet when I got home and heard the English death toll, I knew what we’ve seen was real,” he added.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Falklands—The Alien War (II)
Falklands—The Alien War (II)
Former Argentinian Navy SEALs have recently come out of the shadows to disclose not only the gruesome details of the 1982 Falklands war, but also how extraterrestrial forces and aircraft were actively changing the outcome of the battle.
Martino describes the British logistic superiority and how the Argentinian artillery completely missed their bombers or fighter planes, but could also clearly see them going down or moving awkwardly.
"When we saw a plane flying backwards, Pero and I knew something paranormal was happening because their jets weren’t that good. Then we told the others to stop shooting for preserving ammo.
We didn’t want them to think we were crazy, but they immediately complied, that makes me think they saw it as well but never said anything. Then, you guessed. After we stopped shooting, their planes were still falling.”
No one took the English losses too seriously because the Argentinian death and wounded toll was far greater, but Gennaro is convinced alien forces were either trying to stop the conflict, or at least balance it out. The third friend and colleague, by the name of Ezequiel Orozco, was located a few hundred meters from them, around a corner made out or rocky terrain.
The two decided to go check if he saw something out of the ordinary, because he was facing in another direction.
"When I asked him, he looked at Pero, who was very close to him and said ‘Brother, you know me. There’s something else here. I am doubtful anyone will win.’ He was afraid we won’t believe him. But we all calmed down a little after agreeing, and thought we would be shot on site if we left, anyway.”
They got back to their position and started returning fire again, but after a while were the only one standing in that area. It made no sense, at least for them personally, to shoot anymore because they knew they wouldn’t do any damage at all and only give away their exact location.
“So we just sat there for the whole night and watched the raging sky. Just before the day’s fighting was over, they briefly saw what could only have been the mother ship. As their (the British) planes were landing on the decks, a thing, like the ones in movies, appeared only it had no form.
We saw it for maybe less than 2 seconds, but we knew it didn’t go anywhere and it was there the whole time. After we couldn’t see it anymore, a chopper and a plane trying to land just fell in the ocean like flies.”
That was when it got too scary. They first went to Orozco, who was terrified by that point, after seeing what he described as flying saucers smaller than normal cars, and made up their mind to leave immediately no matter what.
His story in the magazine continues, but he says he hasn’t witnessed anything similar ever since, and was even somewhat annoyed by the fact that people expected him to come into contact again with the aliens during his lifetime, saying: “Why should I be chosen for anything? I just saw something people fear, nothing more.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 1/5 - (1 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Why does space Smells like Hot Metal and Welding Fumes?
Why does space Smells like Hot Metal and Welding Fumes?
Have you ever looked at the stars and wondered “What if we were Astronauts?”. Well there are a lot of Perks of being an Astronaut but one out of many which no one could resist is ‘Getting paid for going in SPACE!!’ And for any space lover its like Buying a Ferrari and getting Paid for it!! In short it is nothing else but a Dream Come True.
But have you ever imagined what an astronaut feels when he is up there in space?? Like How would the universe appear to him? Or may be What does Space smells like ?? well this is a pretty intresting question because you can only smell something when the fragrance hits the sensory neurons inside your nostrils. But if this happens with astronauts then the 12 million US$ space suit will be useless as it will not serve the purpose it was designed for!!
But then how can astronauts smell space? Well when they are in space or having a walk on moon some particles or other matter gets stuck on their suit and when these astronauts return to the space station and remove their helmet they get this Distinct smell. So what is this smell like? Some astronaut have reported that the smell is like Burned Steak, Hot Metal and Welding Fumes.
So Why does space Smells like Hot Metal and Weld
Well this is because the space is full of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH’s). These PAHs are organic componud containing only Carbon and Hydrogen and are composed of multiple rings. They are produced when stars and planets are formed but they are also found on Earth in fossil fules like oil and coal and in tar. It can also be found in cooked food like in meat when cooked at high temperatures over open flame.
26,000 light years away there is a dust cloud named ‘Sagittarius B2’, at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. This cloud is stuffed with ethyl formate, an ester. It has no liquid alochol but a lot of different kinds of alcohols have been observed there. The constellation Aquila contains enough space booze that, if liquefied, it could fill 400 trillion trillion pints. That is More than enough for the complete human race.
Galaxies in deep space are seen in a 2005 handout photo from NASA. A giant hole in the Universe is devoid of galaxies, stars and even lacks dark matter, astronomers said on Thursday.
REUTERS
Using single particles of light, scientists from the University of Queensland, Australia, have shown that a photon can pass through a wormhole to interact with its older self. The quantum experiment was aimed at simulation of time travel by quantum particles.
The Collective Evolution, citing the Nature Communications, which published the findings of the quantum experiment, says the difficulty in time travel lies in the existence of “closed timelike curves” (CTCs). A CTC refers to the line of a material particle in spacetime that is closed, enabling it to return to its starting point. The report says CTCs are used to simulate powerful gravitational fields of the kind produced by a spinning black hole. Based on Albert Einstein’s relativity theory, CTCs can theoretically warp or distort existence to bend space-time back on itself, enabling time travel.
The Scientific American says many physicists find the idea of CTCs “abhorrent, because any macroscopic object travelling through one would inevitably create paradoxes where cause and effect break down.”The Grandfather paradox (what happens if a person travels back into time and kills his grandfather?) is a commonly cited example of such a breakdown. However, in 1991, theorist David Deutsch came out with a model showing that CTC-related paradoxes in time travel could be avoided at the quantum level, or the level of the smallest possible unit of any physical property such as energy or matter. He attributed this to the behavior of fundamental particles, which, according to him, follow not the rules of strict determinism but of probability.
The latest experiment, simulating Deutsch’s CTC model, has been conducted by University of Queensland physicist Tim Ralph, along with his student Martin Ringbauer. He points out that though the theory of general relativity predicts strange paradoxes (apparent and logical contradictions) in time travel, such paradoxes seem to disappear when time travel is considered at the quantum level.
An increasing number of physicists agree that particles at the quantum level do not follow the rules of classical mechanics but behave in unexpected ways.
Scientists Tense Ongoing Debate Over Contacting ALIENS
Scientists Tense Ongoing Debate Over Contacting ALIENS
Scientists Tense Ongoing Debate Over Contacting ALIENS
One of humanity’s biggest questions has to be “Are we alone?”
But is that still the right question? To a lot of us Believers who have seen things with our own eyes we already know the |TRUTH, but is the rest of the world now starting to waken…
We have all read in the media over the last couple of years that leading Astronomers have confirmed over 1,800 exoplanets in just our very own galaxy that we live in and estimate that there are around at least 100 billion in total. About 50 of these seem to be habitable. So, chances are EXTREMELY good that we are not alone!
I guess a better/more relevant question for the new age is ~ If ET exists, what exactly should we do about it?
That’s what scientists at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute discussed last month at the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting.
SETI is famous for its series of telescopes that search the skies for messages that look like they could be sent by intelligent extraterrestrial beings. But so far the cosmos have been quiet. SETI often get slated for appearing to be non committal about what they know reference Aliens, and lost a lot of prestige when the US government ‘apparently’ cut funding for them….but you do have to admire what they do and what they are about!
After 50 years of listening, some of the folks at SETI are starting to say it’s high time for a change to the way we search.
“If we’re ever going to make contact, then the burden is on us to do more than listen: We should be initiating the conversation,” the director of SETI’s interstellar message composition, Douglas A. Vakoch, told Business Insider.
Vakoch calls this initiation project Active SETI.
“It may be that signalling of our intention to make contact is what’s really required to trigger a response,” Vakoch said. And so, “the most critical reason to add Active SETI to our search strategy is that this may be the strategy that lets us make contact.”
Artist’s concept of a rocky Earth-sized exoplanet in the habitable zone of its host star, possibly compatible with Kepler-186f’s known data.
Human Kinds Bold Move
Vakock and a few of his colleagues at SETI want to use some of the institute’s powerful telescopes, including the Aerecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico, not just to listen with, but to also send powerful transmissions deep into space that clearly state: We are here and we want to communicate.
This is an extremely bold move for humankind, and not everyone is on board. Those who are hesitant or downright against the idea include some key figures throughout the world: Stephen Hawking, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Elon Musk, and Sean Carroll, to name a few!
Why are these influential men, who became famous for their ‘innovation and intelligence’, so extremely close-minded? After all, if Active SETI does succeed, making contact with an alien race would be the most important discovery in human history, not only from a technological standpoint but from an intellectual one, as well!?
DeGrasse Tyson was very firm on his stance during a recent interview with the Business Insider publication.
“We don’t give our address to members of our own species whom we don’t know. So, the urge to give our home address to aliens? That’s audacious,” he said.
A dubious Genius!?
I guess a problem that we all have to accept is that even though making contact would be the most important discovery in human history, it might also be one of our last discoveries! And no I am not talking about the ET’s visiting us now, because as of yet they have done us no harm (hopefully!).
“We know nothing of ETI’s [Extraterrestrial Intelligence] intentions and capabilities, and it is impossible to predict whether ETI will be benign or hostile.” Of the several dozens of people who signed this statement in a cautionary measure against Active SETI was Elon Musk.
Could we waken some not so friendly neighbours!?
Planet Earth needs help!
Fear of the unknown didn’t stop Ferdinand Magellan, Lewis and Clark, or Neil Armstrong, human history’s most important explorers. But the key difference is that if something goes wrong when we make contact with aliens, we’re not just risking the lives of the few who brave the unknown. The existence of our entire species and the thousands of other species on Earth is at stake….And yes this is the VERY negative view of Alien Contact, however it is a view of many important scientists throughout the world. In U.I.P’s opinion you get good and bad in all walks of life and contact IS IMPORTANT!
Vakoch and his colleagues argue that any alien civilization advanced enough to wipe out life on Earth would already know we’re here. We’ve been transmitting into space since the ‘70s. Anyone advanced enough to obliterate our species would be advanced enough to listen, and would be here by now or are already on their way…..So I guess we are pretty much screwed in that regard.
Speaking On Behalf Of Planet Earth
According to Vakoch Committing global suicide is not the point of Active SETI, emphasizes
“What Active SETI does is announces ourselves to civilizations that don’t have those capacities far in advance of humans,” he said.
Moreover, extinction is just half of the issue here.
“One of the key questions that we raise when contemplating Active SETI is: Who speaks for Earth?” Vakoch told Business Insider. “And the answer is, well, everyone should.”
That’s why Vakoch and his colleagues at SETI launched the study “Earth Speaks”, which solicits online comments from, quite literally, everyone on Earth, or at least everyone with access to the Internet. And the overall theme shining through the thousands of submissions is encouraging.
Many people articulate the fact that they’re ready to make contact, so “I suspect that the idea has been discussed so often that people will accommodate to this discovery pretty readily,” Vakoch said.
And despite the unknowns, deGrasse Tyson did acknowledge how incredible a discovery it would be:
“But here’s the thing: Holding aside those uncertainties, it would be awesome to make contact with an advanced civilization.”
Global Greeting or Global Destruction!?
U.I.P Summary
Either way the Aliens know where we are, the question is do we try and reach out to the “unknown” aliens?!
There is good and bad in every walk of life and I guess the other question is “are there beings out there seeking to take over other planets?” If so then I guess we need to properly review what kind of message we send out there!
Yes some very important Scientists and Astronomers out there believe that we shouldn’t call out to the Universe about we are, but I believe we have already done this back in the 70’s or 80’s with actual coordinates as to where Planet Earth is in the Universe….who knows perhaps some of the ET’s visiting us today are here because of the information we sent out into space?!
I feel that it’s important we do reach out to other life out there in the Universe in order for the Human race to progress through life….but we must be careful with how we communicate, because at the very least we could end shouting out to Beings that have the same kind of temperament as us Human Beings…..With that and advanced technology could equal “Trouble”
The Human Race needs to learn far more about “unity” before promoting where we are in the Universe….
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
29-12-2015
UFO fled night sky ‘like Star Trek’s Enterprise’
UFO fled night sky ‘like Star Trek’s Enterprise’
The USS Enterprise ... John Ford described what he saw as 'going into warp drive'
A pensioner has been left baffled by what he believes was a close encounter with a UFO.
John Ford said it appeared as a bright light hovering in the night sky which he was able to observe for several minutes.
But it was the sudden, dramatic departure that made the biggest impression - which he described as being like the Starship Enterprise of Star Trek fame.
Both Mr Ford, 69, and his wife Joyce, 70, witnessed the strange events above their home in Stoke Manor Close, Seaford, at around 6pm on November 26.
He takes up the story. He said, “My wife and I were about to go out for a meal and, whilst in the porch changing my shoes, there was a tremendous drone-like noise and I could feel a very slight shudder as it seemed to reverberate around the place.
“Quickly moving outside, I just caught sight of the tail lights of a very low flying, and very noisy, helicopter heading in the direction of Newhaven. I suppose under certain circumstances, especially at night, the lights of a helicopter could be mistaken for a UFO, but they are usually very noisy, and not very big or very fast moving.
“However, as I moved towards the car parked on the drive, I happened to glance up and noticed a bright orange coloured light in the sky some distance away, approaching from a north-easterly direction and moving in the general direction of Seaford. Naturally, I thought it must be another helicopter, as it was just blob of light and did not seem to be very high in the sky.
“This ‘light in the sky’ was moving in my general direction and seemed to cover the distance very quickly and, strangely, there was not that familiar drone-like noise as it got closer and closer. As this single blob of light reached a position in the sky, quite close to where I was standing, it suddenly mushroomed into a very bright configuration of light that illuminated a large area of the surrounding night sky, and appeared to be, simply, hovering.
“As I watched this light show, it became apparent that at the centre of this ‘illumination’ I could discern a very definite shape/pattern that was round in outline, possibly more hexagon in appearance, with a sort of cross like structure contained within the main outline. I am quite definite about this ‘shape’ as, on reflection, what I was seeing reminded me very much of a large ground-fixed type of firework display, where you get a prolonged, well-lit defined profile of something or other, that also creates that surrounding aurora against the night sky. However, this was no firework!
“This light spectacle continued for some time, and as I couldn’t quite believe what I was witnessing, I shouted to my wife to come out and have a look, as I needed some reassurance of what I was seeing! By the time she joined me, the light show had started to subside but, nevertheless, it was still clearly visible but had now adjusted its position in the sky.
“Both of us continued to observe this light for some time, which had reduced back down to a clearly identifiable compact shape and was continuing to hover when, very suddenly and without any indication or further movement, this ‘object’ simply shot away at such speed up into the night sky, that within just a few seconds all we could see was a small dot that disappeared amongst the stars. The speed at which it travelled was incredible – I could only liken it to the Starship Enterprise going into warp drive, it was that quick! This last event was slightly unnerving and a bit spooky – what we had just witnessed could not be explained away and there was no mistaking what we had seen.
“This series of events from spotting the travelling light in the sky, to the bright illuminated profile in the night sky and, finally, the manner of its departure, all played out over several minutes. It was not an encounter that was over in a brief few seconds when, subsequently, you may ask ‘did I really see that?’, and may come to seriously doubt what you thought you saw because it was over very quickly – whatever it was we had witnessed, these events had really taken place as I’ve outlined them.
“It was not a helicopter and it certainly was not a plane. Could it have been a drone, or possibly some sort of laser, or even an elaborate firework display of some sort? None of these possibilities sound very convincing or really plausible, though the possibility that it was indeed a UFO may also be a little hard to swallow, but it was very, very convincing.
“My wife and I did see something that was certainly very unusual and thought provoking. I am personally convinced that what I saw was a UFO because it was indeed an ‘unidentified flying object’ in the true sense (but, alas, no sign of any aliens). Given what we had witnessed, and that this series of events had played out over several minutes, I said to my wife, as some form of reassurance and possible later verification, that we couldn’t have been the only persons to have seen this spectacle, and that others would, undoubtedly, be reporting it and that it would be out in the public domain; and, if it was a hoax, that it would be quickly exposed as such.
“So, the fact that I have not read or heard any such reports during the last few days is curious, but perhaps not really surprising, as I am beginning to believe that we did have a UFO experience and that, in a funny sort of way, we were privileged to have experienced this extraordinary event, and that I wanted to put this unique experience on record.”
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough Explained: What Is a Stellarator Machine?
Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough Explained: What Is a Stellarator Machine?
FUSION MILESTONE
Nuclear fusion, which generates energy by fusing atoms together (similar to how the Sun works), is recognized as a safe and affordable way to access potentially limitless energy. At least, it could be a way to do this. Sadly, for all its promise, the secret to nuclear fusion has largely evaded us.
Image via Max Planck Institute
For years, scientists have been working on nuclear fusion. But the extreme temperatures required to fuse the nuclei and manage the atoms proved to be a massive challenge. This is largely because atoms need to reach a temperature of over 100 million degrees for the nuclei to fuse
However, a milestone in the research of nuclear fusion has recently been achieved. The breakthrough was made by German scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics in Greifswald.
Last week, reports stated that, after spending over a billion dollars in a decade long study, the project dubbed the “stellarator” made a significant step forward—it managed to generate a super-heated helium plasma inside a vessel, albeit briefly, using a machine called Wendelstein 7-X.
The experiment wanted to see whether it was possible to heat helium atoms using microwave laser for a sustained period. Although, to date, it was only accomplished for a brief time frame, it is a notable step forward.
The team’s next steps are now focused on using hydrogen for the study, as opposed to helium. And should the studies prove to be successful, it will pave the way for the production of stable fusion technology that can generate abundant, clean and sustainable energy alternatives.
BUT WHAT IS IT?
In order to manage the excessive temperature, a stellarator is used. The name “stellar” is meant to pay homage to stars and the possibility of harnessing the power source of the Sun (which is, of course, a stellar object). Ultimately, a stellarator is a bit of tech that helps to confine hot plasma, and it does so by using magnetic fields to support a controlled, sustained nuclear fusion reaction.
A man by the name of Lyman Spitzer first came up with the idea in 1950. It was one of the first concepts for a functioning nuclear fusion reactor, and after developing it in 1950, Spitzer built it the next year. The main problem with earlier models, and which Spitzer was trying to help improve, is confining the plasma for a long period of time and preventing the most valuable particles (which are the hottest) from escaping the device.
By using a racetrack shape and then twisting one end by 180 degrees (so now we have a figure-8 shaped device), Spitzer was able to help confine the particles.
The idea is, by the time a particle flows from the outside of one of the curved ares through the straight area and into the other curved section, it will be on the inside of the center. In short, the upward drift on one side is counteracted by the downward drift on the other.
Some modern stellarator experiments are Wendelstein 7-X in Germany (where the most recent breakthrough occurred), the Helically Symmetric Experiment in the US, and the Large Helical Device in Japan, though some of the modern arrangements use a series of coils arranged in a helix around the toroid, creating an electrical analog of the mechanical layout.
In relation to the Wendelstein 7-X , it is a device that has a five field-period Helias configuration. It is mainly a toroid, consisting of 50 non-planar and 20 planar superconducting magnetic coils. These help to induce a magnetic field that prevents the plasma from colliding with the reactor walls.
Schema of the coil system (blue) and plasma (yellow). A magnetic field line is highlighted in green on the yellow plasma surface. Image: Max-Planck Institute
NASA’S REVOLUTIONARY ‘PROPULSION SYSTEM’ CAN GET ASTRONAUTS TO MARS IN 39 DAYS
NASA’S REVOLUTIONARY ‘PROPULSION SYSTEM’ CAN GET ASTRONAUTS TO MARS IN 39 DAYS
According to reports, a company from Texas has been chosen by NASA to develop a ground-breaking engine that could send Humans to Mars in less than 40 days. Ad Astra's Vasimr engine is seemingly able of get a spacecraft to Mars in 39 days. This project is just one of the twelve projects presently funded by NASA. Among the revolutionary propulsion system, there are other technologies at present in development; among them are improved habits for humans and smaller satellites that could search space more proficiently.
Vasimr is short for Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket.
Remember, there is a long way to go here since Ad Astra’s Vasimr engine is just one part of the complete spacecraft that could ultimately take astronauts to Mars. Researchers still require to figure out the type of spacecraft astronauts would travel in. The revolutionary engine uses plasma as a propellant and is developed by Texas based company Ad Astra. The engine hit the headlines a couple of years ago when sources showed that this groundbreaking engine could decrease the trip to Mars from months to weeks. The only downside if there is one is that the engine needs a Nuclear power source. In 2013, the company finished the testing of the first prototype.
‘We are thrilled by this declaration and proud to be joining forces with NASA in the final phases of the technology maturation,’ said Dr Franklin Chang Diaz, Ad Astra’s Chairman and CEO, in a statement. ‘We look forward to a very fruitful partnership as we together advance the technology to flight readiness.’ This is just one of the many technologies presently in development that will let NASA to explore and colonize space in a much more efficient manner. ‘Commercial partners were chosen for their technical capability of maturing key technologies and their commitment to the potential applications both for government and private sector uses,’ said William Gerstenmaier, assistant administrator for Human Exploration and Operations at NASA Headquarters.
‘This work eventually will inform the strategy to move human existence further into the solar system.’
Why the mainstream media refuse to acknowledge UFOs
Why the mainstream media refuse to acknowledge UFOs
There’s no subject more ignored, shunned and discounted by the mainstream media than that of UFOs.
It’s absolutely true (this refusal to report, that is) and for the life of me, I can’t understand why. The implications of the ostensibly deliberate disinterest are unfathomable not to mention those of a government cover-up. In fact, the prominent ufologist Stanton Friedman calls it in effect the Watergate of the millennium.
The subject of flying saucers represents a kind of Cosmic Watergate, meaning that some few people in major governments have known since July, 1947, when two crashed saucers and several alien bodies were recovered in New Mexico, that indeed SOME UFOs are ET. As noted in 1950, it’s the most classified U.S. topic.
And note, he unabashedly calls them flying saucers and not UFOs. How can this subject, the subject, the existence of extraterrestrial beings, especially now as the latest iteration of Star Wars breaks all box office records, be of no interest to the media? And moreover, as newsrooms are shuttered, as news resources are pared and slashed, as the current crop of journalistas are desperately shaking the bushes for something, anything, to report on or cover, how can the most fascinating subject that has captivated humans since time immemorial not be leapt upon with the usual ferocity? A cursory review of the Internet reveals numerous countries along with the Vatican openly acknowledging the existence of UFO files and investigations. Do you mean to suggest there exist no enterprising media types who are unwilling to vouchsafe the fact of the investigations themselves without verifying or acknowledging the existence of alien life and interstellar adventure?
I’ve asked this question for years and renew my query, especially in view of one-time chief of staff to Bill Clinton and an outgoing advisor to Barack Obama, John Podesta and his confession this year as to his biggest regret, viz. not securing the disclosure of UFO files. RT’s Manila Chan and I discussed this very topic in The Year in Space: 2015.
Yahoo News reported that at a 2002 presser organized by the Coalition for Freedom of Information, Podesta spoke as to the necessity and importance of disclosing government UFO investigations to the public.
“It’s time to find out what the truth really is what’s out there,” he said. “We ought to do it, really, because it’s right. We ought to do it, quite frankly, because the American people can handle the truth. And we ought to do it because it’s the law.”
Why not jump on his words for that AHA! moment? Especially from the likes of the consummate White House insider. As this is a subject of great interest to me I provide the following opinion and educated hunch.
First, in full disclosure, I’ve never witnessed or viewed anything that I could or would remotely categorize as extraterrestrial, UFO-esque and/or the like. In fact, I never gave the subject much thought for most of my life, choosing instead to believe the oft-cited trope that folks who claim to have observed flying space critters were usually drunk, draft, hallucinating or combinations thereof. I’d laugh at the usual account of some hayseed roused from sleep in his double-wide only to be anally probed by some macrocephalic, almond-eyed central casting ET.
After all, the notion was preposterous. Right?
Wrong.
Enter the Internet and my road to Damascus moment. I happened upon the work of Mr. Friedman, a nuclear physicist and University of Chicago classmate of Carl Sagan, and immediately delved into the subject. I simply had no idea the amount of first-hand accounts, eyewitness testimony, reports and radar records, you name it, that comprised the repository of data. Not to mention the oft-yet misquoted Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14. Yes, No. 14! What about 1-13? Good question, but that’s for another time. But suffice it to say that as for the plenitude of data that you will find when you dip into this subject, the level of misunderstanding and disinformation is simply amazing. Amazing when you consider the certitude employed by those who emphatically reduce the subject to mythology and folklore.
But what about the media and their reluctance and refusal to give any attention to the matter? Here are my suppositions, hypotheses and theories.
Institutional bias. The media reflect the world around us. They take no chances, buck no convention and challenge no public opinion. As far as they know, any suggestion as to the viability of the theory that aliens or extraterrestrial biological entities (EBEs) exist or have been spotted is a no-no. Similar to the notion of the conspiracy theory, these subjects represent a journalistic no man’s land and the unwritten rule is that if coverage of any form is had it will be in a jocular presentation, minimizing any suggestion of the story’s veracity or verity. In other words: It’s understood that it’s to be disregarded.
Scientific illiteracy. This represents the crux of scores of issues that are given short shrift or ignored altogether by an increasingly juvenescent newsroom. Newsers have been told that interstellar travel is pert near impossible for a host of reasons they’ve yet to verify or attempt to comprehend. Unimaginable distances, limitations on light speed are but a few. They’ve simply accepted what is to be excepted.
Blind acquiescence and patellar, Pavlovian governmental obeisance. The last thing your government would want is for there to be an acceptance of the notion that not only have we been visited (and are) but that evidence of such has been kept from the masses. And not because of the usual theory posited that we would run into the streets crazed and panicked à la the 1938 Mercury Theatre’s War of the Worlds, but because interstellar travel most probably involves a means of a locomotion source that didn’t involve chemical combustion such as antigravitic propulsion. And when petrochemical combustion in particular is not necessary, can you imagine the impact this would have on a world economy dependent on the petrodollar and petrocracies?
The dissolution of nationalism and the emergence of the “Earthling.” Just imagine what the world would look like reconfigured to think not as mini-jurisdictional borders such as countries or tribes, sects, religions and the like, but as a complete and contiguous assemblage of Earthlings. So long jurisdictional tiffs. Adios, religious disquietude. Toodle-oo, nationalism and sectarian identification. Hello, fellow inhabitants. “Kumbaya” meets “We are the world.”
Now, let me remind you what the media believe are critical and worthy of mention without surcease – Steve Harvey’s Miss Universe misfire, the latest viral video of a duck playing the piano and anything Donald Trump related. No, that’s front page. That’s the lead. But the umpteenth sighting of potential interstellar, extraterrestrial intelligent craft?! Nope. Not interested. They’re just too busy.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
New Scientific Study Suggests Advanced Alien civilizations could have existed Before the Big Bang New Scientific Study Suggests Advanced Alien civilizations could have existed Before the Big Bang
New Scientific Study Suggests Advanced Alien civilizations could have existed Before the Big Bang
Professor Roger Penrose from the University of Oxford (UK) and Vaha Gurzadian from the Center for Cosmology and Astrophysics, Alikhanian National Laboratory and Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia have published a cosmic map and identified the places in our universe where Advanced Super-Civilizations could have existed before the Big Bang. In the scientific study, researchers examined the anomalies of the map of the Cosmic Microwave Background, which they interpret as evidence of the existence of technologically advanced societies of a time before the emergence of our universe.
In their revolutionary theory, researchers created a map and marked the existence of possible super civilizations with red dots on the map. They suggest that given the current data it is possible that they might have identified the long-lost habitat of super-civilizations that inhabited the universe before the Big Bang.
The two researchers raise interesting questions on the Fermi Paradox and numerous expectations that arise from it. If our civilization wasn’t the first to have come into existence in our cosmic neighborhood, it is possible that many super advanced civilization predate our very own, preceding advanced life on our planet and technological development by thousands of centuries.
The researchers write in their study published on arxiv.org: “The so-called ”Fermi paradox” [1] refers to a puzzle that arises from an expectation that our own civilization is unlikely to have been the first to have arisen throughout our galactic neighbourhood, and if ours were not the first then, owing to the randomness involved in the timing of factors that lead to its development, the likelihood would have been that our civilization would have been preceded by others having an advantage of thousands of our centuries of technological development. The expectation, then, would be that such enormously advanced civilizations would have had ample opportunity to have either visited us or, at least, sent decipherable signals to us by now.”
According to the theory of cyclic cosmology proposed by Roger Penrose, the history of the universe is much more antique than what mainstream science believed for years and consists of a ‘chain’ of era’s.
First a giant black hole swallows the universe to store energy, after which we have the Big Bang which forms the border between the old and the new era. The two physicists propose that lost ‘Alien’ civilizations would be able to transmit information through the collision of black holes.
According to experts, the discovery of gravitational radiation waves certifies the existence of Supermassive Black Holes in the distant past, which consumed the universe and then exploited for the birth of a new system of galaxies. According to the theory proposed by Penrose and Gurzadyan a big bang meant the transformation of the entire mass of the universe into energy, which was accompanied by a change in the world. This suggests a cyclical development of the universe, where the two scientists propose one era (eon) is separated from the other Big Bang.
In their study, Professor Penrose and Gurzadian write: „In accordance with this interpretation, we conclude that, according to CCC, there was an extremely large and very distant concentration of sources, shown in red in Figure 2 just below the equatorial excluded region, over on the right. Also, there was a comparatively close very large concentration of sources rather near the direction of the north galactic pole, just to the right of the picture. If we are to consider signals from previous-aeon beings, then such regions might well be the most promising places to look, as the CCC-interpretation would be that there might well have been vast numbers of very large galaxies in these places, and consequently a large probability of the development and long-term stability of highly evolved technological societies.”
Compte rendu de voyage à Hessdalen (Norvège) - Août 2015
Nous avions déjà depuis plusieurs années formé le projet de nous rendre en Norvège, à la découverte de ses somptueux paysages et de ses fjords. Il nous paraissait dès lors tout naturel de consacrer en prime quelques jours au célèbre site d’Hessdalen, connu pour ses manifestations énigmatiques.
La perspective de rencontrer sur place certains des acteurs de l’étude du phénomène était aussi pour nous stimulante.
Qui plus est, nous avons pu avoir confirmation, par certains de nos contacts en Angleterre, que le professeur Erling Strand, qui est à l’origine des premiers travaux scientifiques sur le sujet, semblait être plus particulièrement intéressé par les manifestations de boules lumineuses ailleurs dans le monde. Des manifestations que nous avons pu observer par nous-mêmes, à l’exemple de celles survenant de façon récurrente dans le Wiltshire (GB) et que nous avons pu filmer (Voir notamment le troisième volet de notre série documentaire « UFOs & crop circles »).
Ce projet de voyage en Norvège s’est concrétisé pour une partie de l’équipe durant le mois d’août 2015.
Localisation d'Hessdalen (Marqueur rouge sur la carte de la Norvège)
Rappel concernant les phénomènes ayant pour siège la vallée d’Hessdalen :
Hessdalen est une petite vallée située dans la partie centrale de la Norvège, au sud est de la ville de Trondheim.
Au début des années 80, les habitants des lieux ont eu leur attention attirée par des phénomènes lumineux insolites. Des centaines de lumières d’origine inexpliquée ont ainsi été observées de jour comme de nuit. Le phénomène a pris de l’ampleur jusqu’à atteindre un pic d’une vingtaine de manifestations par semaine, ce qui a fini par attirer l’attention au-delà des limites géographiques de cette petite vallée.
A l’été 1983, le projet « Hessdalen » a été mis sur pied par un groupe de scientifiques de différentes nationalités, afin de déterminer la nature précise de ces manifestations étranges.
Une campagne d’observation a été organisée entre le 21 et le 26 février 1984, avec la mise en place sur le terrain de toute une batterie d’instruments. Durant cette période, 53 phénomènes ont pu être détectés et enregistrés. A l’hiver 1985, une seconde campagne d’observation a été conduite, mais cette fois, sans succès, aucun phénomène ne s’étant manifesté.
Des lumières étranges continuent d’être observées de nos jours, même si la fréquence de ces manifestations a considérablement baissé par rapport à la période 1981-1984. Ces dernières années, le rythme d’observations se limite à une vingtaine par an. Une station de détection automatique a été mise en place sur le site en août 1998.
Description des phénomènes:
Ces manifestations lumineuses peuvent présenter des caractéristiques très variées d’une fois à l’autre, aussi bien en termes de nombre de lumières observées simultanément, que de couleur, de taille, de mobilité et de durée.
Ainsi, les boules de lumière peuvent être observées soit immobiles soit animées de mouvements désordonnés, des accélérations très brutales pouvant être constatées à l’occasion de ces évolutions. Ces phénomènes peuvent être extrêmement brefs (inférieurs à la seconde), comme ils peuvent se manifester en continu sur une durée dépassant l’heure.
Lorsqu’elles ont été observées en groupe, les témoins ont parfois eu l’impression (vérifiée sur les enregistrements vidéos réalisés) qu’elles évoluaient en formation, ou que leur disposition dans l’espace, les unes par rapport aux autres, ne variant pas, elles étaient portées par une structure solide non observée directement!
Leur luminosité peut également fluctuer ou présenter des pulsations plus ou moins importantes et rapides. Le diamètre de ces boules de lumière s’échelonne généralement entre un et dix mètres.
Les manifestations sont pour l’essentiel observées en dessous du sommet des montagnes qui bordent la vallée ou à proximité du sol, voir de certaines habitations.
Un système radar ayant été installé dans la vallée, il a été possible d’obtenir des détections d’échos d’origine non identifiée que cela soit à l’occasion de certaines manifestations observables à l’œil nu, ou qu’il faille recourir pour un détection optique à des systèmes de vision nocturne (sensibles à l’infrarouge), procurant ainsi une confirmation radar – visuel (les échos enregistrés étant dans la direction du phénomène observé). Des éclairs illuminant toute la vallée ou des flashs localisés ont également été aperçus de temps à autre par les témoins.
Lors de certaines apparitions des effets électromagnétiques ont pu être constatés. Il s’agit de perturbations au niveau de l’alimentation électrique des installations au sol ainsi que du dysfonctionnement de différents équipements lorsque les lumières se trouvaient à proximité. Certains témoins ont également ressenti à ces occasions des nausées, des vertiges, leur sens de l’orientation semblant affecté. Ces symptômes particuliers suggèrent la présence d’un fort champ électromagnétique de basse fréquence.
Comme nous l’avons évoqué précédemment, le phénomène persistant, des études scientifiques ont été entreprises sur le terrain en collaboration avec plusieurs universités. Le physicien norvégien Erling Strand et l’astrophysicien italien Massimo Teodorani sont parmi les principaux animateurs du projet « Hessdalen ».
Le professeur Erling Strand
Divers instruments ont été déployés sur le site (Des réseaux de caméras, dont des caméras infrarouges avec déclenchement d’enregistrement automatisé en fonction des analyses en temps réel des images captées, un sismographe, des analyseurs de spectre optique, un radar, un magnétomètre, un illuminateur laser, un compteur Geiger). Des étudiants sont régulièrement associés au projet pour conduire des veillées d’observation sur le terrain avec des moyens de communication et en coordination avec un centre de supervision aménagé dans une installation en dur.
Malgré tous les moyens déployés sur le terrain sur la durée, les analyses des divers enregistrements obtenus ne permettent pas de conclure de façon certaine quant à l’origine de ces phénomènes. Massimo Teodorani a tendance à privilégier l’hypothèse de plasma thermique (une soupe d’ions et d’électrons), sans pour autant pouvoir en déterminer l’origine.
Si ces phénomènes ont une origine naturelle (Particularité géologique et ou magnétique du site?),
il est étonnant qu’ils n’aient pas été détectés plus tôt, et comment expliquer que les manifestations se soient nettement raréfiées depuis la mise en œuvre des études scientifiques sur le terrain? De plus, diverses anomalies, comme le fait notamment que la température de ces « plasmas » reste constante même lorsque leur taille augmente, implique un apport d’énergie continuel dont l’origine demeure inconnue. De nombreux témoins ont eu l’impression que ces manifestations semblent jouer à cache-cache avec eux, les empêchant la plupart du temps de réussir à les photographier. Par ailleurs, certains de ces phénomènes, après avoir été illuminés par des lasers, ont semblé réagir en faisant varier leur fréquence de pulsation.
D’autres chercheurs suspectent un phénomène d’origine artificielle, peut-être en relation avec des tests de nouvelles technologies classifiées par les militaires (Comme des canons à particules).
En l’absence d’hypothétiques révélations de l’armée, le mystère reste entier, et on ne peut pas écarter une origine encore plus exotique pour ces manifestations.
On aura là aussi noté un certain nombre de similitudes avec les événements qui ont pour siège le col de Vence (Phénomènes lumineux insolites, interférences électromagnétiques, comportement suggérant une forme d’intelligence, caractère insaisissable…).
Cette photographie spectaculaire a été réalisée durant une campagne d’observation en septembre 2007, peu avant 22h. Le temps de pause est de 30 secondes. Le phénomène se déplaçait au dessus de la vallée, du mont Rognefjell vers le mont Finnsåhøgda (Soit une direction ouest-sud ouest).
Un réseau de diffraction a été utilisé sur l’instrument de prise de vue, ce qui donne un spectre lumineux que des scientifiques sont en mesure d’exploiter.
Cette manifestation lumineuse a été accompagnée d’une détection radar, ce qui semble suggérer un support solide et métallique…
Source: Sciencecenter.no
(BjØrn Gitle Hauge)
Trondheim – Vue de la rivière Nidelva qui traverse la ville.
Des paysages somptueux, une nature encore grandement préservée. Ci-dessous un petit aperçu au gré de nos déplacements lors de notre séjour en Norvège, avant d’établir notre camp de base dans la vallée d’Hessdalen.
Croisière dans le Naeroyfjord (Traversée Gudvangen - Kaupanger)
Quelques images revigorantes de la Norvège au mois d'août...
Une captation vidéo fortuite…06/08/2015
La première « anomalie » a été constatée lors du trajet par la route aux environs de la localité de Vossevangen (Environ une heure après avoir quitté Bergen). Pierre est installé en place passager dans le véhicule que conduit Patricia, son épouse. Nous circulons alors le long d’un lac et Pierre filme le paysage à l’aide de son smartphone. La vitre de la portière est baissée. Tout à sa contemplation de la beauté du spectacle qui s’offre à ses yeux, Pierre ne prête pas attention à ce qui se passe dans le ciel. C’est en revisionnant les images plus tard qu’il va remarquer un détail curieux.
La chose est visible pendant une vingtaine de secondes sur la séquence vidéo d'une durée totale de 29 secondes. C’est par contre moins aisé de la mettre en évidence sur des arrêts sur images. En effet le phénomène se présente sous la forme d’une espèce de cigare ou d’ellipse de couleur sombre qui évolue dans le ciel, manifestement à assez basse altitude au dessus des reliefs. Le mouvement, tel qu’on peut l’observer sur la séquence vidéo d’une vingtaine de secondes qui nous intéresse, est rectiligne, sur un plan horizontal et sur une trajectoire d’éloignement. L’objet vole à une vitesse constante et modérée, à priori juste sous la couverture nuageuse. Nous avons isolé quelques images extraites de la séquence vidéo pour vous permettre de vous faire une opinion. Certes, l’éloignement de l’objet (Estimé entre 5 et 7 kms) ne permet guère de disposer de détails vraiment exploitables, mais la taille apparente semble laisser augurer qu’il s’agit d’un objet d’un certain volume, vraisemblablement plusieurs mètres dans le plan longitudinal et également dans le plan vertical. On peut estimer un rapport de 3 pour 1 entre le grand axe, dans le plan horizontal, et le petit axe, dans le plan vertical. L’objet se présente sous la forme générale d’une ellipse, vue légèrement en perspective du fait de sa trajectoire divergente qui le conduit à progressivement s’éloigner jusqu’à disparaitre derrière le relief (Voir images zoomées pour plus de détails, page suivante).
Position de l’objet, au cente du cercle rouge.
La flèche est orienté dans le sens du mouvement tel qu’observé sur la séquence vidéo.
Reconstitution de la trajectoire de l’objet (Zooms successifs en respectant la chronologie – Extraits de la séquence vidéo)
Sur les zooms proposés ci-dessus, on constate que l’objet évolue de la droite vers la gauche en se basant sur les repères du relief.
Compte tenu de la localisation et du sens de circulation de la voiture (Grosso modo de l’Ouest vers l’Est sur cette partie du trajet) on peut en déduire que l’objet aérien suit une trajectoire orientée de l’Ouest vers l’Est-Sud Est)
On peut également remarquer que la partie supérieure de l’ellipse est plus claire que la face antérieure, à l’image de ce que produirait une structure d’aspect métallique éclairée par le soleil. La position de la zone ombrée est cohérente par rapport à la position du soleil, comme on peu en juger en la comparant avec la position des ombres produites par les arbres (Voir photo plan large présentée plus haut).
A l’évidence, cela ne correspond pas à la silhouette d’un avion conventionnel (On ne voit ni ailes, ni empennage). Quant à un ballon dirigeable, cela paraît peu probable. La plupart sont captifs, et sont à vocation publicitaire, donc généralement très colorés pour attirer l’attention.
De quoi peut-il donc bien s’agir?
Localisation de l’évènement du 06/08/2015
Vallée d'Hessdalen
Une partie de l’équipe au pied de la blue box
Erling Strand photographié par l’équipe à l’occasion d’une opération de contrôle périodique des installations.
Les différents organismes impliqués dans l’étude des phénomènes mystérieux d’Hessdalen
Laurent et Mickaël s’apprêtent à lancer un drone au dessus du site.
Extraits d’une vidéo de nuit réalisée lors de notre première veillée à Hessdalen (08/08/2015)
Il n’y a pas de route dans la direction de cette manifestation lumineuse. C’est une zone de forêt dense. Cette source de lumière a fluctué d’intensité durant quelques dizaines de secondes seulement avant de s’éteindre…Son origine demeure indéterminée. Faut-il y voir une nouvelle manifestation du phénomène mystérieux des lumières d’Hessdalen? La question reste posée…
L’équipe autour d’Erling Strand à l’occasion d’une veillée d’observation dans la vallée d’Hessdalen
Le professeur Strand a participé à plusieurs de nos veillées
Photographie surprise du 09/08/2015
09/08/2015 à 15h17. Mystérieuse apparition au dessus du lac Øyungen (*). Nous n’avons rien remarqué, mais quelques jours plus tard, en enquêtant auprès des habitants d’Hessdalen, un témoignage nous a été rapporté alléguant que l’OVNI avait été observé par une adolescente de 14 ans qui se trouvait également cet après midi là sur les bords de ce lac.
Photographie zoomée
Zoom centré sur l'OVNI
Objet en forme de cigare, de couleur très sombre. Manifestement il semble de grandes dimensions.
Le zoom ci-dessus ne révèle pas de détail supplémentaire de structure. La surface de l’objet apparaît lisse. De quoi peut-il bien s’agir?
(* Le lac Øyungen est situé à environ 8 kms au sud, sud-ouest d’Hessdalen).
Un « OANI » sur le lac lac Øyungen le 10/08/2015?
« OANI », ou encore Objet Aquatique Non Identifié, telle pourrait être l’interprétation des images que voici, extraites d’une vidéo tournée le 10 août, entre 16h38 et 17h01. Personne n’a remarqué quoi que ce soit sur le moment, car l’attention de l’équipe était mobilisée par le suivi des évolutions d’un drone piloté par l’ami Laurent.
La scène intéressante se déroule en arrière plan, à la surface du lac à quelques dizaine de mètres de la berge (Sur le bord droit de l’image, la caméra de Christophe, à quoi nous devons cette séquence, étant positionnée sur un trépied). On peut observer en scrutant cette zone de l’image une tâche blanche qui apparait progressivement à la surface du lac au bout de 12 minutes et 30 secondes du début de la séquence vidéo.
Au moment où elle est la plus nette, cette « tâche » se présente sous la forme d’un rectangle blanc, assez aplati. L’aspect va fluctuer dans les minutes qui suivent, à mesure que la chose commence à évoluer. On peut observer à plusieurs occasion des reflets, ou éclats de lumière à sa surface. Il commence par se diriger à petite vitesse de la droite vers la gauche pendant une trentaine de secondes, avant de repartir dans le sens opposé en direction de la berge. Il marque plusieurs arrêts dans sa progression.
Les changements d’aspect pourraient s’interpréter par un possible mouvement de rotation, comme si l’apparition tournait sur elle-même. Sa surface émergée varie, tantôt se découpant au raz de l’eau, tantôt plus nettement visible, sa ligne de flottaison étant alors plus haute sur l’eau. On peut discerner également une masse noire qui semble accolée à la partie blanche et qui apparait sporadiquement peut-être à la faveur du mouvement de giration supposé.
Autant qu’on puisse juger sur les images fortement zoomées (Voir pages suivantes), on ne peut pas invoquer la présence d’un gros volatile, genre cygne, ni d’une barque. On pourrait à la rigueur imaginer un plongeur faisant surface et poussant devant lui un objet de couleur blanche, mais la scène est pour le moins insolite et les limitations de résolution du capteur équipant la caméra ne permettent pas de trancher.
On ne voit pas sur les images disponibles si la chose a pris contact avec la berge, car elle sort du cadre au bout de 5 minutes et 34 secondes.
Plan général du lac filmé en statique, caméra posée sur trépied. Cerclée de blanc, la zone où est apparue la masse blanche. La flèche indique le sens de mouvement sur la majeure partie de la séquence.
Lac Øyungen
Localisation du lac au sud-ouest par rapport à Hessdalen
Photographie surprise du 11/08/2015
L'anomalie est cerclée de rouge.
Arc en ciel après un orage dans la campagne norvégienne (11/08/2015)
Simple orbe due à l’humidité dans l’air, ou phénomène d’origine plus exotique?
Noter la forme allongée pouvant suggérer un mouvement ultra-rapide.
Temps de pose: 1/1040 seconde, ouverture à F/2.2.
Le cliché a été réalisé à l’aide d’un smartphone doté d’un capteur de 16 Mégapixels, sans recours au flash.
Pas d’autre orbe présente dans l’image.
Photographie surprise du 12/08/2015
Flanc de montagne opposé, face à la blue box au cœur de la vallée d’Hessdalen, 12/08/2015 à 16h45 Cadrage d’origine
Zoom 1 - Nous avons repéré une curiosité dans l'image - Zone cerclée de rouge.
Zoom 2 - Temps de pose: 1/485 seconde
Ci-dessus, 2 zooms successifs dans l’image, en focalisant sur un détail curieux. On peut avoir l’impression de la présence d’un objet faiblement lumineux, piquant vers le sol, en laissant dans son sillage une courte trainée. En visionnant ce document, Erling Strand nous a fait part que plusieurs manifestations de ce genre avaient déjà été rapportées au dessus de la zone où a été installée la blue box, hors de portée des caméras qui équipent cette installation…
Photographie surprise du 13/08/2015
Erling Strand et Pierre Beake (13/08/2015).
Quelle est cette étrange masse sombre en arrière plan?
La forme générale de la masse sombre, avec une excroissance à une extrémité, suggère un axe de symétrie. Comme cela a été reporté dans les images ci-dessus, on peut remarquer que l’axe de symétrie supposé de la masse sombre (cf. pointillés Zoom 2) forme un angle important (Peut-être même un angle droit si on tient compte de l’effet de perspective) avec l’orientation générale des nuages visibles en arrière plan. L’hypothèse d’un petit nuage isolé pour expliquer cette masse sombre isolée dans le ciel, et à fortiori très compact, est à écarter car les témoins n’ont rien remarqué de particulier.
Les 3 photographies surprise du 14/08/2015
Pierre pose en compagnie de Christophe au sommet d’une colline dominant les paysages environnants
(A quelques kms au sud d’Hessdalen. Le lac Øyungen est visible tout au fond, en arrière plan).
Une partie de nos appareils de prise de vue sont déployés sur des trépieds. 14/08/2015 – 11h55
Première photographie surprise de la séquence.
Zoom
Un gros point noir est discernable dans le ciel sur ce cliché pris à 12h16 et 39 secondes. Arrivée de l’OVNI???? Ci-dessus un agrandissement de l’image. Photo référencée n°1 dans la séquence.
Pierre photographie Christophe et Laurent qui sont en train de s’éloigner. 14/08/2015 – 12h21 et 50 secondes.
Noter la tâche noire dans le ciel, en haut à gauche (Au centre du cercle rouge que nous avons inséré dans l’image).
Photo référencée n° 2 dans la séquence. La flèche indique le sens supposé de déplacement après reconstitution…
Fort agrandissement de l’image pour détailler la « tâche noire »…Ce n’est à priori pas un volatile, ni un avion…
Là aussi, personne n’a rien remarqué sur le moment.
Photo suivante (Référencée n°3 dans la séquence) réalisée à 12h23 et 3 secondes, soit 1 min et 13 seconde après la photo n°2.
L’OVNI est visible en haut de l’image.
Le groupe n’a pas repéré la présence de l’objet avant la prise de vue.
Fort agrandissement sur l’OVNI.
On note une forme générale évoquant une soucoupe assez aplatie, de couleur grisâtre, avec un rebord très sombre.
L’objet est légèrement flou, peut-être en raison d’un certain éloignement.
On peut noter la forme générale de l'objet évoquant une soucoupe volante!
Sur l’image plan large qui sera réalisée juste après, selon le même cadrage, l’OVNI ne sera plus visible.
En examinant la série des 3 clichés sur lesquels quelque chose est présent dans le ciel, en tenant compte de la direction successive des prises de vues et en formant l’hypothèse qu’il s’agit du même objet, on peut avoir l’impression d’un mouvement général de celui-ci de la droite vers la gauche, par rapport à la position du groupe de personnes sur le sommet de la colline (Soit une trajectoire orientée Nord-Nord Est vers le Sud-Sud Ouest).
Il est intéressant de noter, que cette fois encore, s’agissant de manifestations diurnes, aucune des personnes présentes sur le terrain n’a remarqué visuellement quoique ce soit dans le ciel. Ces apparitions se montrent donc pour le moins furtives, à la différence de manifestations plus conventionnelles, comme celles de volatiles ou d’aéronefs que les personnes n’auraient pas manqué de détecter.
Précisons également qu’aucun son particulier n’a été perçu qui aurait pu attirer l’attention.
Laurent montrant certaines des photos que nous avons réalisées au professeur Erling Strand en présence de quelques uns des résidants de la vallée d’Hessdalen.
Pierre en compagnie d’Erling Strand.
Nous avons convenu de rester en contact et d’organiser une nouvelle expédition en 2016 au vu de ces premiers résultats inattendus mais très encourageants.
Chaudement emmitouflés, à l’occasion d’une veillée sur le terrain… De gauche à droite: Pierre Beake, Erling Strand et Jan Moen qui nous a été d’une aide précieuse.
Un grand merci pour sa gentillesse et la qualité de son accueil).
Pierre en compagnie de notre ami Terje Toftones, chercheur et documentariste norvégien, auteur du film « The portal » consacré aux mystères de la vallée d’Hessdalen.
Nous avons rencontré et sympathisé avec Terje plusieurs années auparavant en Angleterre en enquêtant sur les crop circles.
Une partie de l’équipe « coldevence.com » en compagnie d’Erling Strand à l’occasion de la visite de diverses installations de détections automatiques disséminées dans la vallée d’Hessdalen
De gauche à droite, Benjamin, Christophe, Laurent et Pierre
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
HESSDALEN - PART II - FIN
HESSDALEN - PART II - FIN
Bilan de notre premier séjour à Hessdalen.
Comme on l’aura noté au travers des documents photographiques présentés précédemment, nous avons été confrontés à des manifestations singulières lors de cette première visite.
Pour notre premier voyage en Norvège, c’est en soi assez inattendu, pour ne pas dire inespéré!
L’essentiel de ces singularités a pris la forme de ce qu’il est convenu d’appeler « photographies surprises », celles-ci ayant été d’ailleurs pour leur majeure partie, réalisées en plein jour.
Le moins que l’on puisse dire ce que les phénomènes qui en sont à l’origine sont furtifs ou alors très fugaces, les personnes présentes n’ayant rien remarqué sur le moment.
Ces documents photographiques suggèrent des objets physiques, dont on peut noter au passage qu’ils prennent des apparences d’OVNI dits « classiques », à savoir la forme de soucoupe et de cigare!
On peut également relever que chacune des journées que nous avons passées dans la vallée d’Hessdalen a été marquée par l’enregistrement fortuit d’au moins une de ces singularités!
Cela a de quoi nous questionner. Faut-il y voir des « clins d’œil »? De prime abord cette question peut paraître saugrenue, mais notre déjà long parcours dans l’étude des phénomènes insolites (Depuis plus de trente cinq ans pour les plus anciens membres du groupe), que cela soit en France, en Angleterre ou ailleurs, nous a déjà réservé pareil scénario!
A l’exception de la séquence vidéo réalisée lors de notre première veillée sur le terrain au cours de laquelle nous avons pu capter l’apparition d’une source lumineuse d’origine indéterminée (Certains la diront typique des phénomènes ayant pour siège la vallée d’Hessdalen), nous avons été bredouille à l’occasion des veillées suivantes.
On peut aussi observer que dans ce cas précis, le phénomène lumineux a été observé au niveau du sol, ou dans les arbres, et non dans le ciel, qui plus est dans un secteur fortement boisé, que nous avons pu explorer de jour le lendemain. Même si on ne peut écarter une explication conventionnelle (Liée à une présence humaine), l’endroit dans cette direction est totalement sauvage, dénué de toute voie de circulation pour des véhicules.
L’énigme d’Hessdalen a déjà donné lieu à des investigations scientifiques depuis plusieurs décennies. Des interprétations diverses ont été proposées, sans que le débat ne soit définitivement tranché.
Ce qui interpelle, notamment quand on discute avec la population locale, fort sympathique et accueillante au demeurant, c’est qu’il n’y a quasiment pas une personne dans la vallée qui n’ait pas été témoin d’une voir plusieurs manifestations insolites. Certes les gens ne sont pas blasés, et la fréquence de ces manifestations peut varier dans de fortes proportions.
Ainsi, les témoins rapportent des apparitions aux caractéristiques variées, dont certaines ont un caractère « ufologique » patent! A savoir la description d’objets volants, apparemment bien physiques, aux caractéristiques pour le moins non conventionnelles.
Faut-il rejeter ces témoignages pour se confiner à des manifestations plus « accommodantes » interprétables par des phénomènes électromagnétiques naturels induits par les caractéristiques géologiques particulières des lieux?
Nous avons été nous-mêmes confrontés, au travers des photographies surprises qui constituent l’essentiel de cette première « moisson » d’indices, à des apparitions se présentant sous des aspects bien peu compatibles avec cette proposition.
Un autre détail fort curieux relevé par le professeur Erling Strand, lors de nos échanges, et alors qu’il examinait certains de nos clichés insolites, c’est justement le fait que ces manifestations insaisissables semblaient se jouer des dispositifs de détection installés dans la vallée.
En effet d’autres personnes avaient déjà rapporté que certaines des manifestations se produisaient à la verticale de ces équipements, hors de portée des caméras, comme si une forme d’intelligence était à la manœuvre, défiant la communauté scientifique en agissant de la sorte! Il y a là assurément du « poil à gratter » pour tout esprit rationnel!
Comme on peut en juger, l’énigme semble loin d’avoir été résolue et nous nous sommes promis de revenir en Norvège poursuivre l’enquête.
Thirty-five years ago, fighter pilot Oscar Santa Maria Huerta had a real-lifeIndependence Day moment when he attempted to shoot down a mysterious light-bulb shaped craft, in what to this day remains the only documented case of a military aircraft firing on a UFO.
It was early on the morning of April 11, 1980, and the 23-year-old Peruvian air force lieutenant was preparing for daily exercises along with around 1800 military personnel and civilians at the La Joya Air Force Base, 1000km south of the Peruvian capital.
Lt Huerta, a pilot with eight years’ experience who had been flying combat missions since 19, was ordered to take off in his Russian-made Sukhoi-22 fighter to intercept the strange silvery object that had been spotted floating near the end of the runway.
The object was five kilometres away, hanging in the air about 600 metres off the ground, and was not replying to any communications.
At 23, then-Lt. Huerta managed to fire on — and hit — a UFO.
Source:Supplied
Colonel Huerta was one of many researchers, former military officers and others who gave evidence at a major press event at the National Press Club in Washington in 2013, aimed at pressuring the US government to open its files on UFO encounters.
“It had to come down. La Joya was one of the few bases in South America that possessed Soviet-made warfare equipment, and we were concerned about espionage,” he wrote.
After takeoff, Colonel Huerta flew to 2,500 metres and came in for an attack run. “I reached the necessary distance and shot a burst of sixty-four 30mm shells, which created a cone-shaped ‘wall of fire’ that would normally obliterate anything in its path,” he writes.
Just one of those shells would wipe out a car, but they had no effect on the object. “I thought that the balloon would then be torn open and gases would start pouring out of it. But nothing happened. It seemed as if the huge bullets were absorbed by the balloon, and it wasn’t damaged at all.”
A diagram showing the encounter with the object.
Source:Supplied
The object then shot rapidly skywards away from the base, prompting Colonel Huerta to activate the plane’s afterburner to give chase 500m behind. As they reached the city of Camana, 84km from the base, the object came to a sudden stop, forcing him to veer to the side.
Turning up and to the right, Colonel Huerta attempted to position himself for another shot.
“I began closing in on it until I had it in perfect sight,” he writes. “I locked on the target and was ready to shoot. But just at that moment, the object made another fast climb, evading the attack. I was left underneath it; it ‘broke the attack’.”
He attempted the same manoeuvre two more times, and each time the object escaped by shooting upwards seconds before he could fire.
By this time the object was 14,000 metres above ground. Colonel Huerta decided to attempt an attack from above, so it could not leave his target range, but the object shadowed him all the way up to 19,200 metres — well above his aircraft’s specifications.
Running low on fuel, he realised he couldn’t continue the attack, so decided to fly close to the object to get a better look. It wasn’t until he was 100m away that he realised what it was.
A rough diagram of the object.
Source:Supplied
“I was startled to see that the ‘balloon’ was not a balloon at all. It was an object that measured about 10 metres in diameter with a shiny dome on top that was cream-coloured, similar to a light bulb cut in half,” he writes.
“The bottom was a wider circular base, a silver colour, and looked like some kind of metal. It lacked all the typical components of aircraft. It had no wings, propulsion jets, exhausts, windows, antennae, and so forth. It had no visible propulsion system.
“At that moment, I realised this was not a spying device but a UFO, something totally unknown. I was almost out of fuel, so I couldn’t attack or manoeuvre my plane, or make a high-speed escape. Suddenly, I was afraid. I thought I might be finished.”
Colonel Huerta made his return, gliding part way due to lack of fuel and “zigzagging to make my plane harder to hit, always with my eyes on the rearview mirrors, hoping it wouldn’t chase me”.
“It had no visible propulsion system.”
Source:Supplied
After he landed, the object remained in the place he left it for another two hours, “visible to everyone on the base while it reflected in the sun”.
Colonel Huerta says the craft was witnessed by everyone on the base, many of whom were required to give reports. A June, 1980 document from the US Department of Defence titled ‘UFO Sighted in Peru’, describes the incident, stating only that the object remains of unknown origin.
A similar incident occurred in 1976, when Iranian air force General Parviz Jafariattempted to fire on a UFO but found his equipment malfunctioning. “My equipment was mechanical, and perhaps that’s the reason it could not be shut down, so instead, the object had to jump away at the last minute,” Colonel Huerta writes.
“I find myself in the unique position, at least for the moment, and as far as I know, of being the only military pilot in the world who has actually fired a weapon and struck a UFO. It still gives me chills to think about it.”
Did NASA cameras pick up UFO's flying around Earth?
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Is it Possible That Pre-Modern Human Species May Exist in the Present Day?
Is it Possible That Pre-Modern Human Species May Exist in the Present Day?
In 1989, an archaeological excavation was underway in China’s Yunnan Province, at an ancient cave site bordering a lush, sprawling evergreen forest. To anthropologists, the cave bore certain promise, with the numerous bones that were scattered along its floor. Evidence of fires could be seen also, having been built there over the thousands of years that it served as shelter to ancient humans that came and went through it. These people hunted deer in the nearby forests, piling their bones by the fire pits they built; thus, the remnants of such ancient practices were borrowed in the name given to the site, Maludong, which literally means the “Red Deer Cave”.
Despite the window to an ancient way of life that the cave provided, the samples retrieved from it during the excavation in 1989 were put away in the archives of a museum in southeastern Yunnan, where they would remain, largely forgotten, until now. Recent tests show that the bones, like many similar finds, possess features that resemble our much earlier forbears in the region, particularly that of Homo erectus or Homo habilis. However, despite their likely descent from one of these groups, there are differences as well; the people represented by the bone samples retrieved from Red Deer Cave also suggests a different gait than that of modern humans, and perhaps most curious of all, the bones date back to a mere 14,000 years ago.
The bones, in other words, are relatively young, and this fact has lead researchers studying them in recent months to consider that they could actually have been their own unique species.
For an entirely unique human species to have existed as recently as 14,000 years ago is a tantalizing proposition, and for a number of reasons. Based on the revelation, some researchers have even given credence to the notion—however remote it seems—that there could have been other times where separate human species existed alongside modern humans. But perhaps the most burning question of all is whether that couldstill be the case, even in the present day.
Reporting on the Red Deer Cave revelations, Discovery Newsinterviewed associate professor Darren Curnoe, a researcher with the University of New South Wales who co-led the study of the 1989 bone samples, who spoke of the possibilities regarding a pre-modern human population, which could have managed to survive even into the present day:
“New species are being found all of the time by scientists, but with a large-bodied species like humans, you would think it would be difficult to miss, that someone would have reported it or a scientist found it somewhere (already)… My guess is if any did exist — and I’m doubtful — it would be in a remote place like Siberia, but some very grandiose claims have been made about Yetis and other creatures being Neanderthals surviving today in places like Siberia.”
Curnoe takes obvious care with the statements he makes, as any serious academic should. It is noteworthy, however, that the serious discussion of hypothetical pre-modern humans, and their existence in remote corners of the modern world, has appeared to have undergone something of a renaissance in recent months.
Late last year, Bryan Sykes, former Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Oxford, published a paper titled, “Genetic Analysis of Hair Samples Attributed to Yeti, Bigfoot and Other Anomalous Primates” in the Proceedings of the Royal Society. Sykes’ paper is recognized as the first legitimate, large-scale DNA survey to attempt to account for evidence of large, “anomalous” primates.
Debate over Sykes and his work continued into 2015, and in addition to his DNA test failing to “prove” that any anomalous ape species existed through DNA analysis, doubt was also thrown over Sykes’ conclusion that some of the samples matched a polar bear that existed 40,000 years ago.
Later on, more controversy arose as the press played up the story of Zana, an alleged “ape woman” from the late 19th century, in advance of the release of Sykes’ book, The Nature of the Beast: The First Genetic Evidence on the Survival of Apemen, Yeti, Bigfoot and Other Mysterious Creatures into Modern Times. In the book,Sykes states that Zana, rather than a real-life Yeti, Zana had likely been a slave woman brought to Russia from southern Africa, who perhaps suffered some kind of deformity. She was apparently mute, and had been a likely a victim of horrible mistreatment during her time in Russia as well.
Despite the rollercoaster ride that has been the Sykes research affair, it nonetheless has represented something of a game-changer as far as “cryptozoology” is concerned, since we are finally seeing academicians giving serious treatment to ideas that were once relegated to the lunatic fringe: namely that one (or more) relict hominid species could possibly still exist in the world today.
With this in mind, it is hard not to entertain the stories collected over the years, which seem to tell of startlingly humanlike “beasts” that occasionally emerge from the forests and foothills of the remote Pacific Northwest, or which have allegedly been observed along the remote, snowy passes above the steep slopes of the Himalayas.
If science were indeed ever to help prove, and without further doubt, that such species do exist, then to call such a discovery “game changing” would be an understatement. Instead, it would remove one of our greatest staples of myth and folklore from safe realms of fantasy—the wild man—and bring the creatures, begrudgingly, out into the stark reality of the modern scientific world. It would be a culture shock, not only for this “new” species, but especially for modern humans, to learn that we had not existed alone on our planet all this time, after all.
Hence, perhaps the greatest question, were such a reality ever to be upon us, would be whether we as modern humans are actually ready for a revelation of that magnitude. In the wake of the discovery, it would likely cause us to have to redefine what, precisely, it means to be “human.”
The recent global meeting of the Bilderberg Club brought back to the front pages the mystery about the true influence of some of the secrets about the fate of the planet Earth; these groups seem to have the upper hand when it comes to a lot of things, but just who are they? Intrigues, conspiracies and strategies are just some of the condiments that have always characterized these occult societies who hold a power whose dimension nobody knows completely. Yet, these sacred and mysterious societies appear to be very influential, and their secrets rarely revealed.
These are some of the most important in history.
The Bilderberg club
In 1954, the most influential figures in the world gathered at the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Netherlands to discuss and plan the global agenda for the following year. Since then, they have continued to meet annually, but the content of their conversations is kept a closely guarded secret. Bilderberg is not exactly a secret society, but many conspiracy theorists are concerned with the influence of their annual meetings. Over the next years, the Bilderberg group acquired more importance and in 1957 the first conference took place in the United States, on St. Simons Island, Georgia, which the Ford foundation sponsored with $30,000. Heads of state and important personalities have attended to these meetings, among them King Juan Carlos I of Spain and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands.
The Freemasons
The first Masonic lodge, the forerunner of world Freemasonry, was founded in London in 1717 and still exists. The Masons are characterized by a huge repertoire of codes and rituals and a complex structure of internal hierarchies. Most modern secret societies were inspired by the Masons, adopting many of their ways and modes of operation. The most basic local organisational unit of Freemasonry is the lodge. Usually, the lodges are supervised and governed at a regional level. Freemasonry describes itself as a beautiful system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols.
The Illuminati
The Illuminati are supposed to be that order which secretly rules the world since the Age of Enlightenment. It is originally a branch of the Masons which began in 1776. The Illuminati and the influence of this secret society is enormous and they have been attributed with historical events such as the defeat of Napoleon, the Kennedy assassination or the triumph of Barack Obama in the presidential elections in the United States.
The Rosicrucians
Founded in the early fifteenth century by Christian Rosenkreutz, the Rosicrucian order intended to use occult practices to achieve a global transformation. Two centuries after its creation, the order gained international fame with the publication of three manifestos. They are seen as the driving force behind every major revolution in modern history. The Rosicrucian society holds a doctrine “built on esoteric truths of the ancient past”, which, “concealed from the average man, provide insight into nature, the physical universe and the spiritual realm.”
The Knights Templar
In the early twelfth century, nine knights made a vow to protect pilgrims traveling through the Holy Land. It did not take long before other soldiers joined their cause joined them, and the organization grew accumulating power, wealth and popularity. In popular culture the knights assumed the role sponsors in many other secret societies. The Knights Templar are considered as guardians of the holiest Christian treasures like the Holy Grail or the blood of Jesus. The Templars’ existence was tied closely to the Crusades, and when the Holy Land was lost, support for the Order faded. Members of the society were tortured and executed by French King Philip IV, feudal lords and the Catholic Church, which in the early fourteenth century caused the organization to dissolve. Many speculate and believe that the Knights Templar still exist today, guarding the holiest Christian treasures.
If it were to erupt, the Yellowstone supervolcano would be one thousand times as powerful as the 1980 Mount St Helens eruption, experts claim.
While it has lain dormant for more than 70,000 years, scientists say that we can’t rule out the possibility eruption this may some day take place – although they say the chances are extremely slim.
The Grand Prismatic hot spring in Yellowstone National Park is among the park’s many hydrothermal features created by the Yellowstone supervolcano. Experts say there is a one in 700,000 annual chance of a volcanic eruption.
The volcano at Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming and Montana sits atop ahuge reserve of molten rock and last erupted 640,000 years ago.
It is one of the largest active continental silicic volcanic fields in the world. Silicic is used to describe magma or igneous rock rich in silica.
An in-depth report by How Stuff Works has revealed the process that would take place if the volcano were to blow.
It says that a mixture of magma, rocks, vapour, carbon dioxide and other gases would eventually push out from the ground, creating a dome shape with cracks.
This USGS graphic shows how a ‘super eruption’ of the molten lava under Yellowstone National Park would spread ash across the United States
Pictured is an artist’s impression
The eruption, the say, could kill as many as 90,000 people almost instantly and release a 10 ft (3-meter) layer of molten ash 1,000 miles (1,609km) from the park.
‘The ash would block off all points of entry from the ground, and the spread of ash and gases into the atmosphere would stop most air travel, just as it did when a much smaller volcano erupted in Iceland in 2010,’ the magazine writes.
‘Sulphuric gases released from the volcano would spring into the atmosphere and mix with the planet’s water vapour.
‘The haze of gas that could drape the country wouldn’t just dim the sunlight — it also would cool temperatures.’
But the magma chamber lying directly beneath its surface is not considered large enough to produce such levels, so researchers have been searching for an alternative source for years.
In April, by tracking seismic waves, geophysicists discovered a huge secondary chamber deeper underground that’s so large its partly-molten rock could fill the Grand Canyon 11 times over.
Previous research found a relatively small magma chamber, known as the upper-crustal magma reservoir, directly beneath the surface in 2013 that measures 2,500 cubic miles (10,420 cubic km).
To discover the latest chamber, Hsin-Hua Huang from the University of Utah and his colleagues tracked seismic waves from almost 5,000 earthquakes.
These readings combined data from the University of Utah Seismograph Stations, which collected shallow readings from nearby quakes in Utah, Idaho, the Teton Range and Yellowstone, and from the Earthscope array, which revealed deeper readings from temblors from more further afield.
Each of these quakes created waves that echoed around the supervolcano.
The movement and structure of these waves could then be used to map the earth beneath.
The researchers said in their paper: ‘The Yellowstone magmatic system from the mantle plume to the upper crust’, published in the journal Science, that the reservoir contains around 98 per cent hot rock.
The remaining 2 per cent is molten rock and is too deep to directly cause an eruption, they added.
Last year, a study by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) concluded that a volcanic eruption at Yellowstone would cover cities across the country with ash and shut down air travel and communications.
But it added that it would not herald the end of the United States as we know it, as the latest report has claimed.
The scientists used the program called Ash 3D to model the effects of a Yellowstone ‘super eruption’ and found that cities up to 300 miles from the park would be covered by up to three feet of ash.
Cities further afield in the Midwest would be covered by a few inches and coastal cities such as New York and California would get only a fraction of an inch.
Yellowstone National Park spans the midwestern US states of Wyoming, Idaho and Montana (pictured)
An eruption at Yellowstone would create an ‘umbrella cloud of ash which would expand evenly in all directions driven by the force of the seismic event.
‘In essence, the eruption makes its own winds that can overcome the prevailing westerlies, which normally dominate weather patterns in the US,’ said Larry Mastin, the lead author of the new paper.
The USGS study says that electronic communication and air travel throughout the country would be shut down by an eruption.
A huge cloud of ash thousands of miles across would also likely cause a year-long winter, say the study authors.
The 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora in the Pacific produced an ash cloud tens of miles across caused ‘a year without a summer’ across the globe with snowfall in the North Eastern United States in June.
Areas covered in feet of ash would see buildings at risk of collapse and sewer and water lines blocked, and winds would form large dunes of ash that would cover roads and buildings.
USDECEPT FREE VIDEO – Economic Collapse explains how you can prepare for the NY Stock Exchange collapse in the Fall of 2015. Many Christian prophets have pinpointed Autumn 2016 for the crash. Economists are also predicting a crash soon, without saying it’s this fall.
If i were to erupt, the Yellowstone supervolcano would be one thousand times as powerful as the 1980 Mount St Helens eruption, experts claim. The volcano at Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming and Montana sits atop a huge reserve of molten rock and last erupted 640,000 years ago.
Farming in the Midwest would be devastated by the cloud of ash, and highways across the country would become slippy and treacherous.
The Yellowstone volcano has had three super eruptions – which produce more than 240 cubic miles of ash’ in the past.
One was 2.1 million years ago, another 1.3 million years ago and a third 640,000 years ago.
The last volcanic activity at Yellowstone was 70,000 years ago which produced a lava flow in the south of the park.
In April, scientists at the University of Utah discovered an enormous secondary chamber deeper beneath Yellowstone National Park that’s so large it is partly-molten rock could fill the Grand Canyon 11 times over.
Every Human Must Watch This Video-Survive the End Days is the #1 Program to protect your family from the upcoming Armageddon.Believe it or not,we will have a price to pay and this video will show you why and what it will take to survive the biblical plaques and the end of time.
The world’s spookiest philosopher is Nick Bostrom, a thin, soft-spoken Swede. Of all the people worried about runaway artificial intelligence, and Killer Robots, and the possibility of a technological doomsday, Bostrom conjures the most extreme scenarios. In his mind, human extinction could be just the beginning.
Bostrom’s favorite apocalyptic hypothetical involves a machine that has been programmed to make paper clips (although any mundane product will do). This machine keeps getting smarter and more powerful, but never develops human values. It achieves “superintelligence.” It begins to convert all kinds of ordinary materials into paper clips. Eventually it decides to turn everything on Earth — including the human race (!!!) — into paper clips.
Then it goes interstellar.
“You could have a superintelligence whose only goal is to make as many paper clips as possible, and you get this bubble of paper clips spreading through the universe,” Bostrom calmly told an audience in Santa Fe, N.M., earlier this year.
He added, maintaining his tone of understatement, “I think that would be a low-value future.”
The influential 42-year-old philosopher Nick Bostrom favors the creation of “superintelligent” computers, but only if done with great vigilance, with safeguards to ensure that the machines do not escape human control and pose an existential threat to humanity. (Tom Pilston for The Washington Post) █
Bostrom’s underlying concerns about machine intelligence, unintended consequences and potentially malevolent computers have gone mainstream. You can’t attend a technology conference these days without someone bringing up the A.I. anxiety. It hovers over the tech conversation with the high-pitched whine of a 1950s-era Hollywood flying saucer.
People will tell you that even Stephen Hawking is worried about it. And Bill Gates. And that Elon Musk gave $10 million for research on how to keep machine intelligence under control. All that is true.
How this came about is as much a story about media relations as it is about technological change. The machines are not on the verge of taking over. This is a topic rife with speculation and perhaps a whiff of hysteria.
But the discussion reflects a broader truth: We live in an age in which machine intelligence has become a part of daily life. Computers fly planes and soon will drive cars. Computer algorithms anticipate our needs and decide which advertisements to show us. Machines create news stories without human intervention. Machines can recognize your face in a crowd.
New technologies — including genetic engineering and nanotechnology — are cascading upon one another and converging. We don’t know how this will play out. But some of the most serious thinkers on Earth worry about potential hazards — and wonder whether we remain fully in control of our inventions.
“An ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an ‘intelligence explosion,’ and the intelligence of man would be left far behind.”
I.J. GOOD, a British mathematician and code-breaker, in 1965 █
THE SINGULARITY █
Science fiction pioneer Isaac Asimov anticipated these concerns when he began writing about robots in the 1940s. He developed rules for robots, the first of which was: “A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.”
People still talk about Asimov’s rules. But they talk even more about what they call “the Singularity.”
The idea dates to at least 1965, when British mathematician and code-breaker I.J. Good wrote, “An ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an ‘intelligence explosion,’ and the intelligence of man would be left far behind.”
In 1993, science fiction author Vernor Vinge used the term “the Singularity” to describe such a moment. Inventor and writer Ray Kurzweil ran with the idea, cranking out a series of books predicting the age of intelligent, spiritual machines.
Kurzweil, now a director of engineering at Google, embraces such a future; he is perhaps the most famous of the techno-utopians, for he believes that technological progress will culminate in a merger of human and machine intelligence. We will all become “transhuman.”
Whether any of this actually will happen is the subject of robust debate. Bostrom supports the research but worries that sufficient safeguards are not in place.
Imagine, Bostrom says, that human engineers programmed the machines to never harm humans — an echo of the first of Asimov’s robot laws. But the machines might decide that the best way to obey the harm-no-humans command would be to prevent any humans from ever being born.
Or imagine, Bostrom says, that superintelligent machines are programmed to ensure that whatever they do will make humans smile. They may then decide that they should implant electrodes into the facial muscles of all people to keep us smiling.
Bostrom isn’t saying this will happen. These are thought experiments. His big-picture idea is that, just in the past couple of hundred years, we’ve seen astonishing changes in the human population and economic prosperity. In Bostrom’s view, our modern existence is an anomaly — one created largely by technology. Our tools have suddenly overwhelmed the restrictions of nature. We’re in charge now, or seem to be for the moment.
But what if the technology bites back?
“The future is ours to shape. I feel we are in a race that we need to win. It’s a race between the growing power of the technology and the growing wisdom we need to manage it.”
MAX TEGMARK, MIT physicist and co-founder of the Future of Life Institute █
‘FUTURE IS OURS TO SHAPE’ █
There is a second Swede in this story, and even more than Bostrom, he’s the person driving the conversation. His name is Max Tegmark. He’s a charismatic 48-year-old professor in the physics department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He’s also a founder of something called the Future of Life Institute, which has been doling out Elon Musk’s money for research on making A.I. safer.
Tegmark is something of a physics radical, the kind of scientist who thinks there may be other universes in which not only the speed of light and gravity are different but the mathematical underpinnings of reality are different. Tegmark and Bostrom are intellectual allies. In Tegmark’s recent book, “Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality,” he writes about meeting Bostrom at a conference in 2005 in California:
“After some good wine, our conversation turned to doomsday scenarios. Could the Large Hadron Collider create a miniature black hole that would end up gobbling up Earth? Could it create a ‘strangelet’ that could catalyze the conversion of Earth into strange quark matter?”
In addition to taking the what-could-go-wrong questions seriously, Tegmark and Bostrom entertain optimistic scenarios. Perhaps, they say, Earth is the only planet in the universe that harbors intelligent life. We have a chance to take this startling phenomenon of intelligence and spread it to the stars — if we don’t destroy ourselves first with runaway technology.
“The future is ours to shape. I feel we are in a race that we need to win. It’s a race between the growing power of the technology and the growing wisdom we need to manage it. Right now, almost all the resources tend to go into growing the power of the tech,” Tegmark said.
The MIT cosmologist Max Tegmark is among those who believe that artificial intelligence could be either the best or worst thing to happen to the human race. He and fellow scientists and thinkers have founded the Future of Life Institute, which is pouring millions of dollars into research on A.I. safety. Tegmark has also opposed development of autonomous weaponized machines. (Josh Reynolds for The Washington Post) █
In April 2014, 33 people gathered in Tegmark’s home to discuss existential threats from technology. They decided to form the Future of Life Institute. It would have no paid staff members. Tegmark persuaded numerous luminaries in worlds of science, technology and entertainment to add their names to the cause. Skype founder Jaan Tallinn signed on as a co-founder. Actors Morgan Freeman and Alan Alda joined the governing board.
Tegmark put together an op-ed about the potential dangers of machine intelligence, lining up three illustrious co-authors: Nobel laureate physicist Frank Wilczek, artificial intelligence researcher Stuart Russell, and the biggest name in science, Stephen Hawking. Hawking’s fame is like the midday sun washing out every other star in the sky, and Tegmark knew that the op-ed would be viewed as an oracular pronouncement from the physicist.
The piece, which ran in the Huffington Post and in the Independent in Britain, was a brief, breezy tract that included a tutorial on the idea of the Singularity and a dismayed conclusion that experts weren’t taking the threat of runaway A.I. seriously. A.I., the authors wrote, is “potentially the best or worst thing ever to happen to humanity.”
And CNBC declared: “Artificial intelligence could end mankind: Hawking.”
So that got everyone’s attention.
Tegmark’s next move was to organize an off-the-record conference of big thinkers to discuss A.I. While the Boston area went into a deep freeze in January of this year, about 70 scientists and academics, led by Tegmark, convened in Puerto Rico to discuss the existential threat of machine intelligence. Their model was the historic conference on recombinant DNA research held in Asilomar, Calif., in 1975, which resulted in new safeguards for gene splicing.
Musk, the founder of Tesla and SpaceX, joined the group in Puerto Rico. On the final night of the conference, he pledged $10 million for research on lowering the threat from A.I.
“With artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon,” Musk had said earlier, a line that sent Twitter into a tizzy.
In the months that followed, 300 teams of researchers sent proposals for ways to lower the A.I. threat. Tegmark says the institute has awarded 37 grants worth $7 million.
“What we’re doing every day today is producing super stupid entities that make mistakes.”
BORIS KATZ, artificial intelligence researcher at MIT █
HUMANS VS. MACHINES █
Reality check. More than half a century of research on artificial intelligence has yet to produce anything resembling a conscious, willful machine. We still control this technology. We can unplug it.
Just down Vassar Street from Tegmark’s office is MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, where robots are aplenty. Daniela Rus, the director, is an inventor who just nabbed $25 million in funding from Toyota to develop a car that will never be involved in a collision.
Is she worried about the Singularity?
“It rarely comes up,” Rus said. “It’s just not something I think about.”
With a few exceptions, most full-time A.I. researchers think the Bostrom-Tegmark fears are premature. A widely repeated observation is that this is like worrying about overpopulation on Mars.
Rus points out that robots are better than humans at crunching numbers and lifting heavy loads, but humans are still better at fine, agile motions, not to mention creative, abstract thinking.
“The progress has not been as steady as people say, and the machine skills are really far from being ready to match our skills,” she said. “There are tasks that are very easy for humans — clearing your dinner table, loading the dishwasher, cleaning up your house — that are surprisingly difficult for machines.”
Rus makes a point about self-driving cars: They can’t drive just anywhere. They need precise maps and relatively predictable situations. She believes, for example, that they couldn’t handle Washington’s Dupont Circle.
In Dupont Circle, vehicles and pedestrians muddle their way forward through a variety of interpersonal signals that a machine could not interpret, she said. Self-driving cars struggle with heavy traffic, she said, and even rain and snow are a problem. So imagine trying to understand hand gestures from road crews and other drivers.
“There’s too much going on,” Rus said. “We don’t have the right sensors and algorithms to characterize very quickly what happens in a congested area, and to compute how to react.”
TOO MUCH POWER █
The future is implacably murky when it comes to technology; the smartest people on the planet fail to see what’s coming. For example, many of the great sages of the modern era didn’t anticipate that computers would get smaller rather than bigger.
Anyone looking for something to worry about in the near future might want to consider the opposite of superintelligence: superstupidity.
In our increasingly technological society, we rely on complex systems that are vulnerable to failure in complex and unpredictable ways. Deepwater oil wells can blow out and take months to be resealed. Nuclear power reactors can melt down. Rockets can explode. How might intelligent machines fail — and how catastrophic might those failures be?
Often there is no one person who understands exactly how these systems work or are operating at any given moment. Throw in elements of autonomy, and things can go wrong quickly and disastrously.
Superintelligence hasn’t yet arrived, but clever, interactive robots have. Roboticist Cynthia Breazeal of MIT is the human mind behind a social robot, named Jibo, that is embedded with artificial intelligence software and sensors to enable it to recognize, and interact with, multiple people at once. Breazeal said Jibo will become commercially available in early 2016. Click here to read more about Jibo and other social robots. (Matthew Cavanaugh for The Washington Post) █
Such was the case with the “flash crash” in the stock market in 2010, when, in part because of automated, ultra-fast trading programs, the Dow Jones industrial average dropped almost 1,000 points within minutes before rebounding.
“What we’re doing every day today is producing super stupid entities that make mistakes,” argues Boris Katz, another artificial intelligence researcher at MIT.
“Machines are dangerous because we are giving them too much power, and we give them power to act in response to sensory input. But these rules are not fully thought through, and then sometimes the machine will act in the wrong way,” he said.
“But not because it wants to kill you.”
A living legend of the A.I. field and the MIT faculty is Marvin Minsky, 88, who helped found the field in the 1950s. It was his generation that put us on this road to the age of smart machines.
Minsky, granting an interview in the living room of his home a few miles from campus, flashed an impish smile when asked about the dangers of intelligent machines.
“I suppose you could write a book about how they’ll save us,” he said. “It just depends upon what dangers appear.”
TAKING ON AUTONOMOUS WEAPONS █
The A.I. debate is likely to remain tangled in uncertainties and speculation. In theory, as that original Huffington Post op-ed stated, there’s no theoretical limit to machine intelligence — “no physical law precluding particles from being organized in ways that perform even more advanced computations than the arrangements of particles in human brains.”
But the academic and scientific establishment is not convinced that A.I. is an imminent threat.
Tegmark and his Future of Life allies decided this summer to take on a related but more urgent issue: the threat of autonomous weaponized machines.
Tegmark teamed with Stuart Russell, the artificial intelligence researcher, on an open letter calling for a ban on such weapons. Once again, they got Hawking to sign it, along with Musk, Bostrom, and about 14,000 other scientists and engineers. On July 28, they formally presented the letter at an A.I. conference in Buenos Aires.
Russell said it took him five minutes of Internet searching to figure out how a very small robot — a microbot — could use a shaped charge to “blow holes in people’s heads.” A microrifle, he said, could be used to “shoot their eyes out.”
“You’d have large delivery ships that would dump millions of small flying vehicles, probably even insect-sized, the smallest you could get away with, and still kill a human being,” Russell said.
“I actually think it would be a huge tragedy if machine superintelligence were never developed. That would be a failure mode for our Earth-originating intelligent civilization.”
NICK BOSTROM, philosopher █
UNLOCKING POSSIBILITIES █
After Nick Bostrom’s lecture in Santa Fe, held at the New Mexico School for the Deaf, he went to a book-signing event across town at the School for Advanced Research. His book is a meticulously reasoned, rather dense tract titled,“Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.”
Bostrom, standing at the edge of a courtyard, held forth amid a small cluster of party guests. Then he sat down for an hour-long interview. Reserved, intensely focused on his ideas, the 42-year-old Bostrom seemed apprehensive about whether his ideas could be fully grasped by someone who is not an academic philosopher. He was distracted by the possibility that a gnat, or fly, or some such insect had invaded his water glass.
Asked if there was something he now wishes he had done differently with his book, he said he should have been clear that he supports the creation of superintelligence. Unsurprisingly, most readers missed that key point.
“I actually think it would be a huge tragedy if machine superintelligence were never developed,” he said. “That would be a failure mode for our Earth-originating intelligent civilization.”
In his view, we have a chance to go galactic — or even intergalactic — with our intelligence. Bostrom, like Tegmark, is keenly aware that human intelligence occupies a minuscule space in the grand scheme of things. The Earth is a small rock orbiting an ordinary star on one of the spiral arms of a galaxy with hundreds of billions of stars. And at least tens of billions of galaxies twirl across the known universe.
Artificial intelligence, Bostrom said, “is the technology that unlocks this much larger space of possibilities, of capabilities, that enables unlimited space colonization, that enables uploading of human minds into computers, that enables intergalactic civilizations with planetary-size minds living for billions of years.”
There’s a bizarre wrinkle in Bostrom’s thinking. He thinks a superior civilization would possess essentially infinite computing power. These superintelligent machines could do almost anything, including create simulated universes that include programs that precisely mimic human consciousness, replete with memories of a person’s history — even though all this would be entirely manufactured by software, with no real-world, physical manifestation.
Bostrom goes so far as to say that unless we rule out the possibility that a machine could create a simulation of a human existence, we should assume that it is overwhelmingly likely that we are living in such a simulation.
“I’m not sure that I’m not already in a machine,” he said calmly.
Mexican Government Says Aliens Are Real, American Government Covering It Up
Mexican Government Says Aliens Are Real, American Government Covering It Up
Personally I don’t know when this video was actually aired but it is pretty remarkable to say the least, not just because of the very frank announcement, accompanied with reputable evidence, but also because this was actually aired on mainstream media!
Unfortunately the quality is terrible but the audio content is incredible, and clearly explains to us what is going on. For a government to release this footage to the public is mind boggling, and who ever was responsible for this release I can only imagine what may have been their fate.
As the analyst clearly explains, disclosure is coming, which has been voiced by many alien researchers not for years.
Below you can also watch a hearing on public disclosure from high ranking government officials, military men and astronauts all calling for the government to come forward and admit the existence of aliens;
The Citizen Hearing on Disclosure took place from April 29 to May 3, 2013 at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. The gathering is one of the most interesting in history and listening to their testimonies is enough to convince most. These are not “conspiracy theorists” these are all highly reputable and credible figures who are risking their careers to simply tell us the truth.
Dr Steven Greer has been working on this for more than 2 decades and has been a massive proponent of alien disclosure. Although he is a controversial figure, and is often met with skepticism by both non believers and believers, below he has a very interesting and thought provoking testimony about the shadow government (it’s long, so I recommend downloading it with an mp3 coverter and then possibly listening to it in your car while you drive);
I imagine most of our readers are well aware that alien disclosure is near, the question is, how close? Personally, I think it will be within a decade and when it comes, there will be a Hollywood real life scenario to bring it in.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Alien “city” found on the Moon state Ufologists: Here is how to find it yourself.
Alien “city” found on the Moon state Ufologists: Here is how to find it yourself.
An alien “city” has been found on the Moon according to Ufologists: Here is how to find it yourself.
Is it possible that there are alien structures on the Moon? Or what if, the Moon itself is an Alien structure? For over 20 years, people have debated whether there is something anomalous with Earth’s natural satellite, now it seems that after all, the Moon is filmed with surprises.
According to reports from Ufologists and from several UFO websites, there is an Alien city on the surface of the Moon. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that a highly advanced civilization inhabits a certain region of the moon, and that the existence of these “Aliens” has been covered up by NASA and the United States government.
Have Ufologists gone too far this time? Or is it possible that there are structures on the moon According to THIS Ufologist, we are looking at clear images of a lunar city located inside a lunar crater, and we can all check it out using Google Earth.
Scott C. Waring, editor of the popular blog UFO Sightings Daily firmly believes he has found clear evidence of the existence of “little green men” on the surface of the moon. He believes that the alien city has been constructed on purpose inside the lunar crater. Mr. Waring used Google Moon to locate the crater found in the “Lacus Veris” region.
If you want to check out the alleged alien lunar city or yourself, head on over to this link and get yourself a cop of the software millions of people are using to explore the moon for crashed UFO’s, structures and cities. Once installed, from the View/Explore menu select
“Moon” and enter the following coordinates which will take you to the mysterious alien lunar city: 18° 0’56.81″S 86° 7’35.50″W.
For those of you who don’t feel like installing Google Earth, here are the images of the alleged lunar city:
Mr. Waring circled the area in red where he believes the Alien city is located.
“Looking over Google Moon map I found an alien hive structure inside of a crater. The crater is located just below Lacus Veris and looks far from the norm of what humans would expect an alien structure to look like,” Waring writes. “Near it there is a crater that shows a face, with a large hat or hair, and an eating, the face shows an object like a snake or tough coming from its mouth.”
This isn’t the first time UFO hunters have found strange things on the Moon. According to many people, Earth’s natural satellite is in fact a giant Alien base, which is one of the main reasons humans have not visited the moon lately.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Australia's Most Famous Alien Abduction Case
Australia's Most Famous Alien Abduction Case
Published on Dec 24, 2015
In August 1993, 27-year-old Kelly Cahill, her husband and three children were driving home after a visit to a friend's house. Their routine journey would soon become a harrowing trip into an unknown world of strange beings that occupied space, but were void of color as we know it.
The Dandenong foothills, near Belgrave, Victoria, Australia would have its location forever linked to one of the most unusual sightings of a strange creature in Ufology archives.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 73 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.