UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN

Artist’s concept of the orbit of the star S2 (sometimes S0-2), shown in light blue. In the next few months, this star is expected to plunge near a gigantic black hole in our galaxy.

Image via S. Sakai/A.Ghez/Keck Observatory/UCLA Galactic Center Group.

One of the fascinating findings of modern astronomy is that large galaxies, including our home galaxy the Milky Way, have supermassive black holes at their cores. The Milky Way’s central black hole is called Sagittarius A* (pronounced “Sagittarius A star”), or Sgr A* for short, and is known to have a mass of about 4 million suns. Astronomers recently watched a gas cloud plunge near the hole, and now they’re watching several stars orbiting near it, in particular a star called S2 (sometimes S0-2). Thanks to recent observations – published in the peer-reviewed Astrophysical Journal in late February, 2018 – astronomers with UCLA’s Galactic Center Group now say they have an “all-clear” to use S2 for a test of Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.

Until now, it was thought that S0-2 might be a double star. Two stars orbiting each other would have complicated the upcoming gravity test.

But a team of astronomers led by Devin Chu of Hilo, Hawaii – an astronomy grad student at UCLA – has found that S2 doesn’t have a companion:

… at least one that is massive enough to get in the way of critical measurements that astronomers need to test Einstein’s theory.

S2 is young and about 15 times more massive than our sun. That’s good; it means it’s bright, helpful because the star is relatively distant from Earth – in contrast to most Milky Way stars we might mention – at 26,000 light-years. Did you catch that number, 26,000 light-years? That’s our approximate distance from the center of the galaxy, and the weird and wonderful physics in play there.

In their recent study, Chu and his colleagues described an analysis of 87 previous measurements of S2, dating back as far as 2000. Of those, 12 were newly reported in this paper, taken between 2014 and 2016.

S2 is expected to make its closest pass by the black hole during 2018, and it’s when the star whips nearest the hole that the relativity test will take place. Astronomers will use the star’s motion to try to confirm the mass of the black hole (now thought to be about 4.15 million solar masses).

And they’ll also use S2’s motion to try to confirm Einstein’s prediction that very strong gravitational fields should “stretch out” wavelengths of light, causing a gravitational red shift.

UCLA grad student Devin Chu is 1st author on the new study, showing that S2 doesn’t have a companion star and clearing the way for the planned relativity tests.

Image via Keck Observatory.

Writing at SciFyWire, Bad Astronomer Phil Plait offered his usual great explanation of what’s about to happen:

[S2] orbits Sgr A* on an ellipse that takes about 15 years to complete. The diameter of its orbit is about 300 billion km [200 billion miles], which may sound like a lot, but we’re talking about a supermassive black hole here! That’s close!

And it gets closer. Because the orbit is an ellipse, the star drops down to a mere 18 billion km [11 billion miles] from the black hole, a positively terrifying close approach. That’s only four times farther from the black hole than Neptune is from our sun.

When it does this, the gravity of the black hole is so fierce it’ll accelerate the star to about 6,000 km [4,000 miles] per second — fast enough to cross the continental U.S. in less than a second …

That close to a black hole, relativistic effects predicted by Einstein’s equations start to become important. For example, the light from the star will have to fight the gravity of the black hole to get to us, losing energy on its way out. This is called a gravitational redshift. When an object approaches or moves away from an observer, the light shifts in wavelength a bit, which is just plain old redshift. The amount of the shift depends on the velocity.

In the case of S2, at closest approach gravitational redshift acts like another 200 kilometers per second added to the star’s motion! That’s enough to measure pretty easily, so astronomers should definitely see that.

Infrared image of the center of our Milky Way galaxy. The position of the Milky Way’s central black hole – Sgr A* – is marked by an orange cross.

Image via ESO/ MPE/ S. Gillessen et al.

Astronomers with UCLA’s Galactic Center Group said they hope to witness the star being pulled at:

… maximum gravitational strength – a point where any deviation to Einstein’s theory is expected to be the greatest.

Tuan Do, deputy director of the Galactic Center Group, said in a statement:

It will be the first measurement of its kind. Gravity is the least well-tested of the forces of nature. Einstein’s theory has passed all other tests with flying colors so far, so if there are deviations measured, it would certainly raise lots of questions about the nature of gravity!

Devin Chu added:

We have been waiting 16 years for this. We are anxious to see how the star will behave under the black hole’s violent pull. Will S0-2 follow Einstein’s theory or will the star defy our current laws of physics? We will soon find out!

Astronomers with UCLA’s Galactic Center Group gather for a photo during a visit to Keck Observatory, located atop Maunakea, Hawaii. Members of the group will return to this site in the spring of 2018 to begin observations of S2 as the star travels towards its closest distance to our Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole.

Image via Keck Observatory.

By the way, in other news about our Milky Way’s black hole, scientists expect the first direct image of Sgr A* soon. So there are big, important research projects in play this year related to the supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy.

Watch for the results of both, later in 2018.

Bottom line: Astronomers report an “all clear” – no companion found for S2, the star orbiting near our Milky Way’s central black hole. They hope to use this star later in 2018 for a test of Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.

Source: Investigating the Binarity of S0-2: Implications for Its Origins and Robustness as a Probe of the Laws of Gravity around a Supermassive Black Hole

Via Keck Observatory

The picture of a small region of Mars above is from the European Space Agency.

What is the STARGATE project? Well, it was a joint effort by the CIA and NSA, along with SRI and a few other academic institutions around the world to study parapsychology (telepathy, , remote viewing, etc). The program lasted more than two decades, and was funded by millions of dollars. You would think that a black budget special access program that ran for more than two decades had some success, and it did. The STARGATE program was used in multiple missions for ‘national security’ and ‘intelligence collection’ purposes, and the United States wasn’t the only country interested in this type of phenomena. For example, here is a document going into detail about certain people (studies by the Department of Defence) with ‘paranormal’ abilities. Here is a cancelled TED talk by Russel Targ, a physicist and co-founder of the STARGATE program sharing everything he knows about ESP.

Here is another example from Russia, of a women who was in the hands of their military for a while.

Here is a great declassified US Air Force report on teleportation, which was made available through the Federation of American Scientists, which also mentions human beings who posses certain abilities.

A CIA document titled “Chronology of Recent Interest in Exceptional Functions of The Human Body in the People’s Republic of China” is another great example of their interest. In the document, it outlines the Chinese government’s interest in parapsychology (remote viewing, telepathy, psychokinesis, etc.) just as the ones above do.

In 1976, a presentation was given at the Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE) on a paper published by the Institute on behalf of Hal Puthoff (now part of the To The Stars initiative who received and released the recent UFO Pentagon footage from the US government) and Russell Targ.

Both of them titled the paper “A Perceptual Channel For Information Transfer Over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspectives and Recent Research.” Remote viewing, which was a large part of the program, had an 85 percent success rate, and it could be taught to other people as well. Remote viewing is the ability to describe a remote geographical location, in detail, from a distant location. It’s as if these people were trained and had the ability to project their consciousness into other areas in which they were not physically located, or at least, somehow, perceive those areas.

Remote viewing also seemed to show that ‘time’ as we know it isn’t what we think it is, as it was also used to peer into the past as well as into the future, with successful ‘hits.’

The dialogue below about Mars is an example of that.

Paul H. Smith, PhD, one of the participants in the Stargate project (now a retired U.S. army major), gives us details from his book, The Essential Guide To Remote Viewing.

He also describes in his book how remote viewing, in multiple occasions, was successfully used to predict future events, and shares his own successful experience of successfully perceiving future events with great accuracy.

One of the participants in the program, Ingo Swann, was able to successfully describe and view a ring around Jupiter, which scientists had no idea even existed. This took place precisely before NASA’s Pioneer 10 spacecraft fly of the planet. You can read more about that here. (source)

“To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon. Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise. . . . The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled laboratory conditions.” (source)

The point is, remote viewing, and other similar phenomena is real, and can no longer be debunked. It’s been validated a number of times. In 1999, statistics professor Jessica Utts at UC Irvine, published a paper showing that parapsychological experiments have produced much stronger results than those showing a daily dose of aspirin helping to prevent heart attacks. Utts also showed that these results are much stronger than the research behind various drugs like antiplatelets, for example.

Even as far back as 1985, a report prepared by the Army Research Institute disclosed that “the data reviewed in this report constitute genuine scientific anomalies for which no one has an adequate explanation for.”

Just because it can’t be explained does not mean it’s not real.

“The statistical results of the studies examined are far beyond what is expected by chance. Arguments that these results could be due to methodological flaws in the experiments are soundly refuted. Effects of similar magnitude to those found in government-sponsored research at SRI and SAIC have been replicated at a number of laboratories across the world. Such consistency cannot be readily explained by claims of flaws or fraud.”

So, What About Mars?

It’s safe to assume that not all which was discovered was declassified. Personally, I believe that declassifying a controversial topic is possibly a tool used by the intelligence community to prolong secrecy. I could be wrong, but it seems that when something is declassified, like the STARGATE program, the general population automatically assumes that that’s all there is/was to it, and there is nothing new left to discover. I don’t believe that’s true, and it (declassifying information) might be away to stop public inquiry into controversial and secretive subjects.

That being said, we recently came across some interesting documents regarding Mars via the Stargate files. As mentioned above, remote viewing was not limited to distance. The viewer could be trying to determine what’s in the next room, or the contents of an envelope they were given, or they could be tasked to remote view, not only another countries defence installations, but planets like Jupiter, as mentioned above, the moon, and now we know that the same thing happened on Mars.

See below:

The CIA was using a remote viewer to look at the planet Mars, not as it is presently, but to peer into the past. Below is an example of how one of these remote viewing sessions went. What’s interesting about the dialogue below is that the viewer mentions a great climate shift.

Fast forward to today, and it wasn’t that long ago when NASA scientists gathered for a press conference letting the world know that, millions of years ago (they really didn’t know when, but just had a general approximation), there was a massive climate change that took place on Mars. Although they claim they do not know what caused this dramatic shift in climate, they know that prior to it, Mars was very much an Earth-like planet, with vast oceans, mountains, lots of vegetation and most likely life. In the conference, they also expressed the high probability that life on Mars still exists today, although if it does it’s probably microbial and located within the interior.

What else did the viewer see? He saw signs of life, now keep in mind that this is before the big climate change, and it’s interesting because he describes them as tall thin humanoids wearing some sort of suit.

The defence employee is constantly asking the viewer to shift coordinates.

After this, if you continue to read the document, the viewer describes large pyramid structures, and much more.

All of this is very interesting, especially when you consider that the remote viewing program had such a high success rate.

What’s so significant about the document above is that there is corroborating information. As you saw, the remote viewer in this case was tasked with remote viewing the Mars, but, again, did so in a time period approximately 1 million years BC.

It’s interesting to note how the remote viewer was ‘brought back.’

You can read the document in its entirety HERE.

Corroborating Information

It wasn’t long ago when renowned scientist Dr. John Brandenburg, who worked for the Government with top-secret security clearances on various projects shared some very sensitive information. He has worked on the Rocket Plume Regolith Interactions on the moon and Mars, Vortex theory of Rocket engine design and the combined Sakharov-Kaluza-Klein theory of Field Unification for purposes of space propulsion and Mars science. Brandenburg was also the Deputy Manager of the Clementine Mission to the moon, which was part of a joint space project between the Ballistic Missile Defence Organization (BMDO) and NASA. The mission discovered water at the moon’s poles in 1994. (Source: page 16 of 18)(source)(source)

Clearly, he knows his stuff. There are hundreds of similar types of people with impressive and verifiable backgrounds relaying some very interesting information to the public.

Whether it’s true or not is up for you to decide.

He stated that the Clementine mission to the moon was actually a photo reconnaissance mission to check out strange structures on the back side of the moon, that were built by somebody else, not our civilization. He did so in the documentary ‘Aliens on the moon.’

Brandenburg has also done extensive research on Mars, having found strong evidence of a past civilization existing millions of years ago before the massive climatic shift. According to him, there was a large nuclear blast that could have caused the climate shift which took place on Mars, and prior to this blast, Mars had a bronze aged civilization, with pyramids and other giant structures, like the face on Mars (pictures above) and aztec looking like head.

Here is a great lecture from Brandenburg where he goes into great detail and provides the evidence.

There are a number of respected scientists in the field who have been trying to tell people that the face on Mars is not just some geological coincidence, but an actual face.

The latest example of research to contemplate this, comes from a fairly new study that was published in the Journal of Space Exploration titled “The Mounds of Cydonia: Elegant Geology, or Tetrahedral Geometry and Reactions of Pythagoras and Dirac?” A study that’s added to the already robust evidence pointing to “artificial surface interventions” on Mars, as the study states.

General Albert Stubblebine, a retired United States Major General, was the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), and one of America’s most distinguished soldiers. He was also chief of U.S. Army Intelligence, with 16,000 soldiers under his command.

He was a major proponent of “psychic” warfare and a key player in the Stargate Project.

Here’s what General Stubblebine had to say about Mars:

“There are structures on the surface of Mars. I will tell you for the record that there are structures underneath the surface of Mars that cannot be seen by the Voyager cameras that went by in 1976. I will also tell you that there are machines on the surface of Mars and there are machines under the surface of Mars that you can look at, you can find out in detail, you can see what they are, where they are, who they are and a lot of detail about them.”

– Dolan, Richard. UFOs And The National Security State: New York: Richard Dolan Press) (source 2)

Multiple insider scientists have come forward, you can read more about that in these articles:

Below is a lecture from from the remote viewer mentioned in the CIA documents above. His name is Joe McMoneagle, and in the lecture he goes into detail about the session.