The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie!
Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek!
België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek
In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch.
Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie
Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen!
Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit
Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie.
Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie
Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen.
Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen
Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek!
Blijf Op De Hoogte!
Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren!
Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
18-06-2018
5 Ancient Civilizations That Possessed Advanced Technology
5 Ancient Civilizations That Possessed Advanced Technology
When a person decides to take chances, nothing can stop him. The archaeologist David Hatcher Childress decided to go on a journey only to discover the most beautiful spots on earth that serve as proof for the miracles of an ancient civilization.
1. Ancient civilization Mu or Lemuria
The first civilization appeared 78,000 years on the enormous continent common as Mu or Lemuria. They existed for around 52,000 years when allegedly they were extinct by earthquakes caused by pole switch.
Lemuria Discovered: Sunken Continent of Ancient Civilizations
Even though the Lemurians were not as advanced as other ancient civilizations, they still have their impact in the field of technology. Especially, they were famous in the enduring megalithic buildings.
However, it was said that their biggest accomplishment was the science of government. The Lemurians most likely had one language and one government. The education was their key to success and every child had it as a mandatory duty until 21 in order to become acceptable to attend citizenship school.
2. Ancient civilization Atlantis
People believe that when the continent of Mu sank, the oceans lowered intensely since the water went into the newly formed Pacific Basin. Thus, new lands appeared and joined the Poseid Archipelago of the Atlantic Ocean to form a relatively small continent. This small continent was named Atlantis in the present day, although, it’s real name was Poseid.
"Ancient Mysteries" Atlantis: The Lost Civilization
Atlantis had an ancient civilization that took very advanced steps in the technology. The books A Dweller on Two Planets, first delivered in 1884 by Phylos the Thibetan and its sequel in 1940 called An Earth Dweller Returns, talk a lot about of the creations of Atlantis. The creations involve air conditioners to defeat deadly mist, airless cylinder lamps, electric rifles, mono-rail transportation etc.
3. Rama Empire of India
With the books of India’s Rama Empire being well-kept, it is possible to study this ancient civilization’s history.
Ramayana is not Mythology See the Evidence
For a long time, the dominant opinion was that the Indian civilization was not older than 500 BC. However, in the past century, explorers found the sophisticated cities of Mohenjo Daro and Harappa in the Indus Valley of present Pakistan.
These amazing discoveries forced the experts to reverse the origin dates of Indian civilization thousands of years back.
The archaeologists described the ancient cities are highly advanced with an exquisite city planning. What made it even more significant was that the city’s plumbing-sewage system was better than the one they found in Pakistan and India today.
4. Ancient Civilization of Osirian in the Mediterranean
In the distant past, The Mediterranean was an example of a big and lush land. The ancient civilization that pre-dated dynastic Egypt was famous as the Osirian Civilization. The Nile River that came out of Africa was called the River Stix. Nevertheless, instead of streaming into the Mediterranean Sea, it carried on into the land and then turned west to flow in the deepest part of the Mediterranean Valley. There, it formed a big lake and flowed out between Malta and Sicily.
When Atlantis was demolished by a disastrous catastrophe it resulted in a flood of the Mediterranean Basin that eventually destroyed the Osirian’s cities and forcing them to go on a higher ground.
This ancient civilization constructed gigantic megalithic structures resistant to earthquakes and also had electric power during the time of Atlantis. They had incredible ways of transport that worked on electrical base.
The best discovery of the advanced technology of the Osirians is the platform found at Ba’albek, Lebanon. This platform involves large hewn rocks. Some of them are even 82 feet long and 15 feet thick.
5. The ancient civilization Mayans
Maya Civilization and it's Legend - Full Documentary
The famous Mayan pyramids can be seen from Central America to the Indonesian island of Java.
The amazing pyramid called Sukuh near central Java is one of the most beautiful temples with stone stelae. The pyramid is nearly the same with the pyramids found at the ancient Mayan site at Uaxactun, near Tikal.
The Mayans were an ancient civilization famous for being very intelligent in the field of astronomy and mathematics. They also constructed canals and hydroponic garden cities in the ancient Yutacan Peninsula.
Edgar Cayce mentions the Mayas in one of his readings:“As for a description of the manner of construction of the stone: we find it was a large cylindrical glass (as would be termed today); cut with facets in such manner that the capstone on top of it made for centralizing the power or force that concentrated between the end of the cylinder and the capstone itself. And (secondly) in the temple records that were in Egypt, where the entity acted later in cooperation with others towards preserving the records that came from the land where these had been kept. Also (thirdly) in records that were carried to what is now Yucatan, in America, where these stones (which they know so little about) are now, during the last few months, being uncovered.”
Roswell That Ends Well – Dr. Kevin Randle Man Of Character
Roswell That Ends Well – Dr. Kevin Randle Man Of Character
A truly rare event has recently occurred in UFOlogy. I think a Leprechaun, a rabbit’s foot, and a four leaf clover just gave birth to a horseshoe. We have expectations that once in every billion years we should be able to detect a neutrino. But never, and I mean never could we have expected this.
In this world where it seems, that man’s inhumanity to man rules along with all the morals and scruples that follow such a disposition. People get polarized and stay polarized for life. Plasticity of thought is a withering characteristic. This is a time where the classic adage ‘Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me’ has lost all meaning. People are so touchy and easily hurt. Words are the new sticks and stones. Thoughts proceed words. Thoughts have consequences and can take purchase. Sometimes thoughts and beliefs are wrong.
There has been a mutiny in UFOlogy, in regards to the Roswell Incident.
Just picture a bunch of nerds beating the hell out of each other with their pocket protectors and fake lightsabers. Not really, but something even more unexpected has occurred around the black mailbox. One of the grand masters of the “Roswell Incident” is Dr Kevin Randle. He has done the unforgivable. He publicly stated that he believes that the Roswell Incident is better explained by the prosaic then by proclaiming aliens.
“I asked Randle, if he no longer thinks that the Roswell incident was extraterrestrial, what does he think it was? He said he really doesn’t know. It wasn’t E.T., but it wasn’t a Mogul balloon, either. Randle then launched into a critique of skeptics being unskeptical because they insist that the debris found was from the once-secret Mogul spy balloon project, when the evidence supposedly proves that it was not. Thus skeptics are, he says, as illogical as the ET believers.”
Randle is not the first to regain his senses in all this Roswell stuff, UFO researcher Curt Collins posted the following information to Facebook:
“Roswell Incident” co-author William Moore bailed out in 1997… I wish to advise anyone who might be interested that I no longer am of the opinion that the extraterrestrial explanation is the best explanation for this event.”
Saucer Smear newsletter, Aug. 5, 1997
I have always thought Roswell was a waste of time. It is a gigantic “Hail Mary” pass that stretches across the minds of the true believers. The odds that a civilization sent a spaceship to Earth and then to have it crash is quite extraordinary. Extraordinarily unlikely.
I commend Dr Kevin Randle for his “mea culpa”. He spent 30+ years researching the Roswell Incident. He authored books about it and spoke at innumerable conferences, podcasts, and radio programs. It takes a big person to admit when they were wrong. To change one’s mind in light of new evidence is a virtue, not an issue. Imagine spending your whole life dedicated to a cause and then one day openly admitting you were wrong. I have respected him for what he has accomplished in the past, now I respect him for the content of his character. In the sciences, these things happen more often than in other pursuits. It is part of the scientific method and one of its great strengths, self-correction.
I quote Gordon Bonnet, host of the blog called ‘Skeptophilia’:
“If the truth (my conclusions based ONLY on the evidence), turns out to be different than I thought it was, then my viewpoint on the subject MUST alter/change to reflect this, that is the skeptic’s code”.
This reminds me of much of the sceptical wisdom that I gained from Kevin Randle’s writing in some of his books.
I do agree that Kevin has, in effect, shot himself in one foot at least, and is now in a sort of suspended, neutral, position of being neither pro or con. This is quite a turnaround from his previous books which were all very much pro-ET. He may lose a few friends because of this, but that is a risk one takes in ufological debates. Karl Pflock did a partial turnaround with his two books, his second repudiating much of his first. Bill Moore seems to have recanted long ago. Is there anyone left (Stan Friedman or David Rudiak maybe?) who can revive this Roswell ET corpse, or is it time to finally cremate it?
Let’s now move along…
Can this please be the end of all this Roswell business. Let’s chalk it up to being an unknowable unknown. If there is agreement that Roswell doesn’t involve a crashed spacecraft or pickled aliens, does the incident warrant much further attention? This has gone from a Cosmic Watergate to 1940s balloon identification. If it was Mogul, we have misidentified sky trash. If it’s not Mogul, we have someone else’s misidentified trash. There’s not much to be gained by either side in winning this debate.
WEERNIEUWSVeel Friezen zullen gisterenavond allicht verwonderd naar de lucht hebben gekeken. Daar was een spectaculaire wolk te zien, die deed denken aan een ufo.
Het was natuurlijk geen ufo, maar wat was het dan wel? De Nederlandse meteorologen Wilfred Janssen en Raymond Klaassen geven uitleg: “We zien hier een forse stapelwolk die wil doorgroeien naar hogere sferen. Maar dat lukt niet omdat er sprake is van inversie: een warme luchtlaag boven een koude luchtlaag. Lucht kan opstijgen zolang de omgevingslucht kouder is, maar als die warmer wordt, lukt dit niet meer.”
Geen ufo dus, maar een grote wolk die graag wil opstijgen. De lucht, die niet verder omhoog kan vanwege de warme luchtlaag, stroomt horizontaal en licht dalend weg. Doordat de lucht tijdens het dalen een beetje opwarmt, lost de wolk aan de randen op, met als resultaat deze spectaculaire pannenkoekvorm, die ook veel weg heeft van het ruimteschip uit de film ‘Independence Day’.
NASA/LOIRPEen van de eerste beelden van de maan, veel scherper dan de versie die wereldkundig gemaakt werd.
WETENSCHAP & PLANEETRuimvijftig jaar geleden cirkelden vijf onbemande satellieten rond de maan, die beelden met een extreem hoge resolutie maakten van het maanoppervlak. Toch waren de foto’s die het grote publiek in die tijd te zien kreeg korrelig en van een zeer lage resolutie.
De satellieten Lunar Orbiter I tot V, die in 1966 en 1967 gelanceerd werden, moesten gegevens verzamelen om de perfecte landingsplaats te vinden voor de Apollo-missies. De foto’s die dat opleverde, waren zo scherp dat ze vergroot konden worden tot 16 bij 12 meter.
Na gebruik werden de beelden achter slot en grendel bewaard, ver weg van het publiek. De reden? Als de foto’s wereldkundig gemaakt werden, zouden ze de superieure technologie verraden van de camera’s op de Amerikaanse spionagesatellieten, waarop de apparatuur van de maansatellieten gebaseerd was.
NASA/LOIRPBoven: een beeld dat in 1966 verspreid werd. Onder: het originele beeld dat vrijgegeven werd in 2008, 42 jaar nadat het gemaakt werd.
Aan het einde van de jaren 60, na het Apollo-tijdperk, werden de gegevens op analoge tapes opgeslagen in Maryland. In de jaren 80 werden ze overgebracht naar het Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Californië, om in de jaren daarop van de ene na de andere plaats te verhuizen. Tot Nancy Evans, medestichter van het Planetary Data System (PDS) van NASA, besliste de beelden te digitaliseren.
McMoon
Haar team kreeg een leegstaand McDonalds-restaurant ter beschikking, dat voor de gelegenheid ‘McMoon’ werd gedoopt. Het doel was de tapes te digitaliseren voor ze onbruikbaar geworden waren of de technologie waarmee ze uitgelezen konden worden niet meer bestond.
Toen de NASA-ingenieurs de foto’s in de jaren 60 afdrukten, moesten ze die in een kerk ophangen omdat ze zo enorm waren
De bestanden die dat opleverde waren gigantisch, zelfs naar huidige normen. De beste beelden zijn tot twee gigabyte groot en kunnen zonder kwaliteitsverlies uitvergroot worden tot een enorm aanplakbord. Toen de NASA-ingenieurs ze in de jaren 60 afdrukten, moesten ze de foto’s in een kerk ophangen omdat ze zo enorm waren.
Mozaïek
Het Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project (LOIRP) heeft in totaal tweeduizend beelden van 1.500 analoge tapes gerecupereerd. Naast de allereerste foto van een ‘aardopkomst’, de aarde die opkomt aan de horizon van de maan (zie boven), bevat de verzameling bijzonder gedetailleerde foto’s van Orbiter IV.
Die had als opdracht één groot beeld te schetsen van de volledige voorzijde van de maan. Tussen 11 en 25 mei 1967 nam de Orbiter een reeks foto’s die het hele gebied van de noord- tot de zuidpool en van de west- tot de oostzijde omvatten. Dat leverde een mozaïek op van 12 bij 13 meter.
NASA/LOIRPEen van de gedetailleerde beelden van Orbiter IV.
De toenmalige ingenieurs legden het beeld als een plattegrond op de grond en alle onderzoekers – ook de astronauten – moesten hun schoenen uittrekken om het te verkennen. Zelfs op deze grootte waren de beelden zo goed dat de onderzoekers met vergrootglazen aan de slag konden.
Dit gigantische beeld werd gebruikt om de locaties te bepalen die Orbiter V in nog hogere resolutie ging fotograferen. De beelden van Orbiter V leidden uiteindelijk tot de definitieve locatie waar Apollo 11 zou landen.
Tijdens opgravingen in de buurt van het Oostenrijkse Salzburg is door archeologen een bizarre ontdekking gedaan.
Er is een object gevonden van minstens 800 jaar oud dat als twee druppels water lijkt op de tegenwoordige mobiele telefoon.
Update: 18 juni 2018
Een kleine drie jaar geleden deed onderstaand verhaal de ronde: Archeologen deden tijdens opgravingen een bijzondere ontdekking, want ze hadden een 800 jaar oud object gevonden dat veel overeenkomsten vertoonde met een tegenwoordige Nokia telefoon.
Wat toen alleen maar vragen opriep en wij ons afvroegen of het misschien een grap van die archeologen was, is nu opgelost en het blijkt dat er helemaal geen archeologen in beeld komen.
In 2012 maakten Karin en Max Weingärtner van het kunstbedrijf Art Replik van klei een mobiele telefoon vrij naar een model van een Ericsson, niet een Nokia zoals algemeen werd (en wordt) aangenomen vanwaar de naam Babylonokia, die zelfs de kunstenaars geadopteerd hebben. De bedoeling was ermee bekend te worden als makers van replica’s zoals blijkt uit een computermuis van steen eveneens voorzien met spijkerschrifttekens zoals ook de telefoon. Eén foto echter lekte uit of werd gelekt of kwam in de verkeerde handen terecht, maar toen waren we al in 2015 (deze bewerkte foto, die overal op het internet te vinden is, heb ik bovenaan opgenomen). Het schijnt dat Art Replik zelf met het verhaal is gekomen dat de telefoon was gevonden bij een opgraving in Fuschl am See in de provincie Salzburg in Oostenrijk en dat het zou stammen uit de 13e eeuw vóór Christus vanwege de erop aanwezige spijkerschrifttekens.
En hiermee hebben we het zoveelste Youtube nepfilmpje. Wel jammer, zou wel leuk geweest, maar de waarheid is iets minder spannend in dit geval.
Zij vonden daar iets dat verdacht veel lijkt op de tegenwoordige mobiele telefoon.
Het is een oude kleitablet die eruit ziet als een mobiele telefoon met in plaats van onze moderne tekens, een soort spijkerschrift. Hierdoor lijkt het alsof dit voorwerp oorspronkelijk uit Mesopotamië komt omdat daar het spijkerschrift voor kwam.
Het is niet bekend waar de archeologen in Oostenrijk precies naar op zoek waren, maar waarschijnlijk niet naar kleitabletten voorzien van spijkerschrift.
Toch dat is wat ze hebben gevonden en het leek op de mobiele telefoon waarmee ze waarschijnlijk de volgende foto’s hebben genomen.
Men heeft de kleitablet gedateerd op rond de 13e eeuw. Dat is een tijd waarbij het al duizenden jaren geleden was dat het Soemerische spijkerschrift was ontdekt.
Kleitabletten met daarop spijkerschrift zijn op zich niet ongewoon. Er zijn er in totaal ongeveer twee miljoen opgegraven. Deze schrijftaal was een groot mysterie tot in de 19e eeuw toen de code werd ontcijferd.
Desondanks is de kleitablet uit Oostenrijk bijzonder vanwege een aantal redenen.
Eén is dat het niet gevonden is in de streek waar je het zou verwachten; in Oostenrijk en niet in Iran of Irak.
Er is slechts ooit één keer eerder een object met spijkerschrift ontdekt buiten het bekende gebied en dat is Fuente Magna schaal.
Deze werd ontdekt in het moderne Bolivia. Deze schaal is een raadsel want voor zover bekend zijn de Soemeriërs nooit in Zuid Amerika geweest en dus is de vraag hoe die schaal daar terechtkwam.
De tweede reden waarom de Oostenrijkse vondst opzienbarend is, is natuurlijk omdat deze kleitablet als twee druppels water lijkt op een hedendaagse Nokia telefoon.
Je ziet de twaalf toetsen net zoals op de moderne telefoon, een display en spreek- en menuknoppen.
De overeenkomsten met een moderne telefoon lijken teveel om nog toeval te kunnen zijn.
Anderzijds is er uiteraard toch enige voorzichtigheid geboden omdat de vondst eigenlijk te mooi is om waar te zijn.
Daarom heb je mensen die het wel geloven en zij die zeggen dat het wel nep moet zijn omdat het niet kan.
Voor zover ons bekend staan op dit moment alle mogelijkheden open.
Is er misschien een tijdreiziger geweest zo’n 800 jaar die zijn telefoon ergens in Oostenrijk is verloren?
Is het toch een bizar toeval en is het gewoon een kleitablet welke toevalligerwijze op een moderne telefoon lijkt, met toevallig ook nog eens al de knoppen op de juiste plek?
Is het toch een grap van de archeologen zelf misschien?
Zijn er buitenaardsen geweest die deze telefoon op één of ander manier zijn kwijtgeraakt?
MEER EN MEER AANWIJZINGEN VOOR ONBEKENDE PLANEET ( VIDEO )
MEER EN MEER AANWIJZINGEN VOOR ONBEKENDE PLANEET( VIDEO )
De afgelopen tijd zijn er veel berichten geweest over de alsmaar heftiger wordende aardveranderingen en er komt nu zoveel informatie los dat het nog nauwelijks bij te houden is.
Vooral ook informatie over onbekende planeten die nu op zoveel verschillende plaatsen en door zoveel verschillende mensen worden waargenomen dat er geen ontkennen meer aan is.
Wij worden regelmatig door lezers op de vingers getikt die willen weten waarom wij aan een bepaald onderwerp of een bepaalde bron geen of niet genoeg aandacht hebben besteed.
Waarom doen jullie dit niet en waarom gebruiken jullie die bron niet enzovoorts. Het antwoord is heel eenvoudig: Omdat wij met heel weinig mensen zijn en er maar 24 uur in een dag zitten, zijn wij niet in staat om altijd overal alles te bekijken.
Daarom zijn we ook blij met lezers die ons regelmatig aanvullende informatie toesturen die op zich dan ook weer interessant kunnen zijn voor andere lezers.
Een dergelijk bericht is het volgende en dat gaat over de planeet Nibiru en metgezellen. Het door ons ontvangen bericht (dank!) volgt hierna en wat daarin staat is uiteraard de mening van de lezer.
Dit is het bericht:
Jammer dat jullie nog steeds niet de veel betere en betrouwbaardere bronnen melden/gebruiken voor jullie berichtgeving over het Planet X system (let op: dus het gaat niet om 1 hemellichaam maar om bijv. aantoonbaar nu al DRIE hemellichamen die inwerken op Moeder Aarde, Jupiter schijnt er zo'n 69 te hebben, Venus ook een paar etc.).
Een voor iedereen duidelijke bron (want de beelden spreken voor zich) is op You Tube: Universal News Media. Deze (christelijke) vrouw laat bijna dagelijks sinds de laatste paar maanden beelden zien van FAA webcams uit Alaska. Heel goed is hierdoor te zien hoe snel die hemellichamen intussen dichterbij de Aarde zijn gekomen (bijv. eentje beslaat nu al meer dan de helft van zo'n webcam beeld!) maar ook wordt door haar werk duidelijk hoe hard er door de PTB aan wordt gewerkt om via zeer intensieve chemtrails de zichtbaarheid van die hemellichamen voor de massa te verbergen (wat steeds moeilijker wordt, omdat die hemellichamen zo dichtbij staan). Dan zijn de ongefundeerde opmerkingen van de lezer van jullie artikel van 15 juni daarmee ook weerlegd.
Maar als je echt wilt weten hoe de zaak met het Planet X systeem in elkaar steekt, en hoe dit bijv. aantoonbaar de oorzaak is van de vele aardveranderingen (tot aan het opwarmen van het zeewater, de overal open scheurende en brekende grond en de 'omgekeerde bliksems' aan toe) dan zouden jullie je lezers kunnen verwijzen naar de vele, bijna dagelijkse video's van Doctor Claudia Albers, van Planet X News' Scott C'ione. Zij legt als natuurkundige op uiterst heldere, ook voor leken, wijze uit hoe het allemaal in elkaar steekt.
Overigens: de Zeta's zijn een zeer onbetrouwbare bron, die hun eigen agenda hebben (met steun van bijv. de CIA), en die het bekende recept gebruiken van alle foute bronnen: kleine stukjes juiste info verpakken in het grote, onjuiste geheel, zodat mensen die te weinig ervan weten toch denken dat zij een betrouwbare bron zijn.
Op meerdere webcams, bijv. in Europa (maar begin 2017 heb ik wekenlang kunnen genieten van prachtige beelden in Mexico, naast de opgaande zon, van zeker twee hemellichamen), kun je hemellichamen van het Planet X system (om het zo maar te noemen) zien gedurende bepaalde tijden, bijv. van 15.00 uur - 15.45 uur. Dit dan alleen uiteraard als het onbewolkt is en er geen chemtrails getrokken worden (wat zelden het geval is). Soms 1 stuks, soms twee naast elkaar. Na een paar weken is er dan niets meer te zien, blijkbaar zijn die hemellichamen dan in een andere baan terecht gekomen, want je ziet ze na enige tijd als het ware oplossen in de achtergrond, steeds vager worden. Ik noem die websites niet omdat ik heb ervaren dat, als 'ze' blijkbaar kunnen zien dat je regelmatig op bepaalde tijden naar zo'n webcam kijkt, dan verwijderen 'ze' een paar uur beelden van die webcam of zelfs een hele dag of 1 keer zelfs een paar weken, zodat je niks meer kunt zien. Maar een beetje zoeken op dergelijke webcams levert al snel beelden op van die hemellichamen (meestal rond zonsondergang), omdat ze nu zo dicht bij de Aarde staan. Ook op Buienradar kun je regelmatig 'tweede zonnen' zien op ingestuurde foto's, die naïevelingen dan 'een tweede zon' of 'bijzon' noemen, zonder dat hier verder enig commentaar op komt!
Tenslotte: ook webcam beelden die 's nachts gemaakt zijn, geven spectaculaire beelden. Kort samengevat: het wordt gewoonweg niet meer donker 's nachts, ook niet in Zuid Europa (want in het noorden, zoals Alaska, blijft het nu natuurlijk licht 's nachts) en op bepaalde plaatsen aan de hemel is er nu doorlopend een duidelijke oranjeachtige gloed zichtbaar en is de omgeving bijna net zo helder te zien als overdag, geen zaklampen nodig!
Security Unit Of PM Narendra Modi Receives Report About UFO Sighting Near His Residence
Security Unit Of PM Narendra Modi Receives Report About UFO Sighting Near His Residence
A senior security official said that a report about a sighting of a round UFO hovering over the residence of the Prime Minister on Lok Kalyan Marg in New Delhi briefly fazed security personnel in the VIP area but put their suspicions to rest after the immediate search discovered nothing.
The Perimeter Security Officer gave an “OK Report” to Delhi Police after the search ended.
Dependra Pathak, a Delhi police spokesperson and special commissioner of police, affirmed the sighting but said the inside information of the event could not be disclosed. Pathak explained the sighting was reported but not alarming, and keeping security reasons in mind; more details cannot be shared.
An unnamed officer cited in the first instance said that Special Protection Group (SPG) sent information about the sighting to PM’s security unit of Delhi Police and the Delhi airport operations control centre, which received the report around 7:30 pm. The Delhi airport operations control centre comprises staff from the Delhi International Airport Ltd, Central Industrial Security Force, and the air force.
Immediately, the alert was communicated to the National Security Guards and the Intelligence Bureau. Also, put on high alert was the Delhi Air Traffic Control (ATC).
According to the officer cited above, the Delhi Police was also roped in, which assured a temporary extra deployment on the fringe of the PM’s residence, while other security agencies performed the drill to hunt down the suspected menace.
Such an incident taken place is not the first time. Around 10 pm, on September 17, 2017, the Delhi police security control room received a report about a drone-like object sighting around the Parliament area. However, an ACT’s radar, which cannot capture small flying objects in any case, caught no object.
In the same month, ATC was informed by the Delhi Police control room about the drone-like flying object sighting above a hospital in a southern suburb. However, authorities found nothing.
In November, draft regulations for the use of drones in the country were unveiled. The guidelines for the use of drones will be finalised when the Directorate General of Civil Aviation receives a response from the ministry of home affairs and the ministry of defence.
On Jun 14, 2018 a high speed horseshoe-like UFO has been filmed over France.
The footage shows the UFO speeding through the clouds where it looks like the UFO changes to a horsehoe-like shape but that can be an optical illusion.
Besides the possibility that the witness has caught a UFO, the object could be a drone or a fighter jet and the white shape is the air stream over the wings as it travels super sonic.
Scientists discover over 100 planets that may host habitable life
Scientists discover over 100 planets that may host habitable life
Tristram Clayton interviews Grant Christie, Astronomer at Auckland Observatory, about the discovery of a new solar system just 39 light years from Earth.Daily Mail
Researchers have identified over 100 planets beyond our solar system that may have moons capable of supporting life.
Using data from the Kepler space telescope, scientists identified 121 planets that orbit within the habitable zone of their star.
Each are estimated to be more than three times the width of Earth, and likely all host several large moons, according to the Daily Mail.
This is an artist's illustration of a potentially habitable exomoon orbiting a giant planet in a distant solar system. Photo / NASA GSFC: Jay Friedlander and Britt Griswold
The new research is a collaboration between scientists at the University of California, Riverside and the University of Southern Queensland.
"There are currently 175 known moons orbiting the eight planets in our solar system," says Stephen Kane, an associate professor of planetary astrophysics and a member of the UCR's Alternative Earths Astrobiology Center.
"While most of these moons orbit Saturn and Jupiter, which are outside the sun's habitable zone, that may not be the case in other solar systems.
"Including rocky exomoons in our search for life in space will greatly expand the places we can look."
Kepler launched back in 2009 and has since detected thousands of worlds outside of our solar system.
While scientists are primarily looking for terrestrial – or rocky – planets, Jupiter-like planets that sit in the habitable zone are also considered to be promising, as they may host habitable moons.
According to the researchers, exomoons may even be more favorable for life than Earth, as they receive energy from both the star and radiation reflected off the planet.
But, scientists have yet to confirm the existence of an exomoon.
Using data from the Kepler space telescope, scientists identified 121 planets that orbit within the habitable zone of their star. Illustration / NASA GSFC: Jay Friedlander and Britt Griswold
The new work could help to narrow the search down, with 121 giant planets that may contain such moons.
"Now that we have created a database of the known giant planets in the habitable zone of their star, observations of the best candidates for hosting potential exomoons will be made to help refine the expected exomoon properties,' said Michelle Hill, an undergraduate student at the University of Southern Queensland who is working with Kane and will join UCR's graduate program in the fall.
"Our follow-up studies will help inform future telescope design so that we can detect these moons, study their properties, and look for signs of life."
WHAT IS THE GOLDILOCKS ZONE?
The habitable zone is the range of orbits around a star in which a planet can support liquid water.
This habitable zone is also known as the "Goldilocks" zone, taken from the children's fairy tale.
The temperature from the star needs to be "just right" so that liquid water can exist on the surface.
The boundaries of the habitable zone are critical.
If a planet is too close to its star, it will experience a runaway greenhouse gas effect, like Venus.
But if it's too far, any water will freeze, as is seen on Mars.
Since the concept was first presented in 1953, many stars have been shown to have a Goldilocks area, and some of them have one or several planets in this zone, like "Kepler-186f", discovered in 2014.
Heel wat mensen keken zaterdag iets na 23.00 uur vreemd op. Aan de hemel was een heldere vuurbol was te zien. Ook dinsdagnacht was dat al het geval. ‘Uitzonderlijk zijn vuurbollen niet, zeldzamer is dat ze worden waargenomen’, klinkt het bij volkssterrenwacht Mira.
De vuurbol of heel heldere meteoor werd waargenomen in grote delen van Europa, maar toch vooral in België en Nederland. Onder meer tijdens een optreden van de Amerikaanse rockgroep Foo Fighters tijdens het Nederlandse muziekfestival Pinkpop was de vuurbol te zien. Een van de toeschouwers die het optreden filmde, kon het fenomeen vastleggen op video.
Volgens Philippe Mollet van de volkssterrenwacht Mira zijn vuurbollen heel heldere meteoren of vallende sterren. Het zijn stofdeeltjes van een paar centimeter groot van kometen of planetoïden die in de dampkring terechtkomen en de lucht daarrond laten oplichten. Volgens de eerste schattingen zou de vuurbol de atmosfeer zijn binnengekomen in de regio van Luik en de Hoge Venen, klinkt het bij de volkssterrenwacht.
Zeldzaam zijn zo’n vuurbollen niet. ‘Meestal worden ze niet waargenomen. Maar tijdens de zomer, als mensen buiten zitten, worden ze soms wel waargenomen’, aldus Mollet. Wie een vuurbol wil melden, kan dat op de website van de Vereniging voor Sterrenkunde. Daar hebben ze negentig meldingen binnengekregen over de vuurbal van zaterdag.
Kurz nach dem Foto im letzten Tweet gelang mir um 23:11 Uhr MESZ dieser Schnappschuss: #Mond#Venus#Feuerkugel. Canon EOS 6D, f=180mm, ISO 4000, Bl. 10, t=1,6sec; mit Bildbearbeitung etwas aufgehellt.
Interest in the World Cup may stretch beyond the stars, it has turned out - after reports of a UFO arrival in Russia.
Footage has emerged of a "giant stingray" lighting up the skies over northern Russia.
A nervous woman who spotted the mystery lights in the city of Kirov wrote: “What the hell was that? It doesn’t look like anything I’ve previously seen."
“The aliens have arrived for the World Cup,” said one.
The spooky display was visible from Nizhny Novgorod where England play on 24 June.
Stunning footage shows a stingray-shaped object in the sky over northern Russia
(Image: east2west news)
Some suggested it was aliens arriving for the World Cup
(Image: east2west news)
“Is that a rocket, a fireball or a UFO over Nizhny Novgorod? Talk to me comrades, I'm worried!,” posted Andrey.
The spectacular footage had another explanation, according to Russian space officials.
The eerie light show coincided with a Soyuz-2.1.B launch from Plesetsk cosmodrome in the country’s sub-Arctic Arkhangelsk region.
The rocket with a Glonass-M satellite was at 00.46 Moscow time on Sunday, 17 June.
Stunning footage has been viewed thousands of times online
(Image: east2west news)
The spooky display was visible from Nizhny Novgorod where England play on 24 June
(Image: east2west news)
The satellite was safely delivered to target orbit by a Fregat upper stage rocket, said military officials.
While the Ministry of Defence reported a successful launch, some people on Russian social media went into a panic mode after seeing the spectacular visual display.
It sent some people into a panic(Image: east2west news)
“I’ve seen alien life and it looks like a stingray,” said one.
As it developed, it morphed into a jellyfish in the night sky, said another.
“What an mazing display.”
Glonass is Russia’s own global satellite navigation system.
One said: 'The aliens have arrived for the World Cup,' said one.
'Is that a rocket, a fireball or a UFO over Nizhny Novgorod? Talk to me comrades, I'm worried!' posted Andrey.
Another commented: 'I've seen alien life and it looks like a stingray.'
Others observed that as the aircraft developed, it morphed into a jellyfish in the night sky.
Since uploading the short video of the rocket flight, a number of people suggest that an extraterrestrial phenomenon could have been flying over Russia
The clip shows the UFO, which was spotted in Houston, Texas, yesterday by a man named Shaun.
He revealed how he looked up to the skies to spot something hovering thousands of feet up, even higher than passenger jets passing above.
Shaun said: “I’m not sure what it is, it was hard to get a good shot of it.
“It definitely wasn’t close. I recorded it from my driveway and I live in Jersey Village in Texas.
“We actually have an airport really close which is not an international airport – its out in the woods and I think there is some strange stuff going on up there.”
YOUTUBE
UFO? The bizarre scenes were spotted in Texas
“I’m not sure what it is, it was hard to get a good shot of it”
Skywatcher
Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base is shared facility between the US military and NASA located on the southeast of the city.
The video was originally uploaded to Shaun’s YouTube account, but has gained popularity after being shared on popular conspiracy channel Thirdphaseofmoon.
Since it shared yesterday, it has racked up more than 7,000 hits.
And viewers were quick to share their opinions.
“That is definitely some kind of drone,” one comment read.
Before another claimed: “A secret NASA operation."
The most likely cradles for life inside our solar system
The most likely cradles for life inside our solar system
Scientists still believe it possible that extraterrestrial life could flourish in our own neighbourhood
Georgia Simcox
Portrait of Nasa’s Curiosity Mars rover. Photograph: Nasa
1. Mars
This week, Nasa’s veteran Curiosity rover discovered complex organic matterthat had been buried and preserved for more than 3bn years in sediments forming a lake bed. This means that if microbial life did land on Mars, it would be nourished.
Photograph: JPL-Caltech/Nasa
2. Europa
One of Jupiter’s four Galilean moons, Europa is the sixth-largest moon in the solar system. It is thought to have water oceans beneath the surface and, like Earth, an internal energy source from radioactive decay. This has led to the hypothesis that life may exist in conditions similar to that of Earth’s hydrothermal vents.
Photograph: Nasa/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute
3. Enceladus
Saturn’s sixth-largest moon is mainly covered by ice, and ejects geyser-like plumes of water that contain nitrogen and trace amounts of carbon-bearing molecules. Robotic missions have been proposed to further investigate the moon’s potential to support microbial extraterrestrial life.
Photograph: AP
4. Titan
Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, is thought to have an environment similar to that on primordial Earth. It has a dense atmosphere and liquid methane on its surface. Although methane-based life forms are hypothetical, scientists have modelled conditions under which they may exist. Some experts have said that although life on Titan is extremely unlikely studying the planet could give us valuable insights into how life began on Earth.
Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo
5. Venus
Although the mean surface temperature of this planet is a not very habitable 462C, scientists have suggested that its upper atmosphere could tolerate life in the form of floating microbes that could feed off the carbon 30 miles (50km) up from the planet’s surface. One Nasa scientist has suggested that humans could colonise Venus’s atmosphere using lighter-than-air balloons but considerable engineering challenges – including clouds of sulphuric acid – would have to be overcome.
Could life exist on planets in the star system closest to ours, Alpha Centauri? Dangerous X-ray radiation makes it unlikely for the single exoplanet found so far. But new data suggest better odds for any new planets yet to be discovered.
Alpha Centauri is the closest star system to our sun. Chandra data from May 2, 2017 are shown in the inset, in context of a visible-light image of the Alpha Centauri system taken from the ground.
Image via Optical: Zdenek Bardon; X-ray: NASA/CXC/Univ. of Colorado/T. Ayres et al.
With the discovery of thousands of exoplanets orbiting other stars, the search for life elsewhere has entered an exciting new phase. So far, most of these worlds have been found many light-years away (largely due to the fact that the Kepler Space Telescope, which has discovered the majority of them so far, has focused on a specific patch of sky which contains very distant stars). But what about closer stars? Including, of course, Alpha Centauri, the closest star system to our sun, only just over four light-years away. According to Tom Ayres of the University of Colorado Boulder:
Because it is relatively close, the Alpha Centauri system is seen by many as the best candidate to explore for signs of life. The question is, will we find planets in an environment conducive to life as we know it?
Scientists had thought that there was too much X-ray radiation from the stars in the system for life on any planets to be likely. But now, as announced by NASA on June 6, 2018, there is new evidence from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory, that, perhaps, conditions could be more life-friendly than previously assumed.
Artist’s concept of the exoplanet Proxima b orbiting the red dwarf star Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the solar system.
Image via ESO/M. Kornmesser.
While the other two stars, Alpha Centauri A and B, are both similar to our sun, Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf, which emits much more deadly X-ray radiation. That is bad news for its one known Earth-sized planet, Proxima b. However, observations from Chandra since 2005 show that conditions around the other two stars are about the same or even better than around our own sun. In terms of the radiation, the prospects for life are actually better for habitable zoneplanets around Alpha Centauri A than our own sun, with lower doses of X-rays than similar planets in our solar system, and only slightly worse around Alpha Centauri B, by a factor of five. As Ayres noted:
This is very good news for Alpha Cen AB in terms of the ability of possible life on any of their planets to survive radiation bouts from the stars. Chandra shows us that life should have a fighting chance on planets around either of these stars.
Artist’s concept of super-Earth exoplanet Kepler-22b, which may be habitable. It is not known yet if any other planets orbit the two larger sun-like stars in the Alpha Centauri system, but if there are, some may have conditions suitable for life.
Image via NASA.
It is not known yet if there are any rocky planets orbiting Alpha Centauri A or B, but if so, then there is an increased chance of habitable conditions, although other factors come into play as well, such as temperature, liquid water or lack of it, composition of any atmosphere, etc. One problem with searching for planets there is that both stars are bright and currently closer together because of their orbits, making detection more difficult.
For Proxima b however, the situation is different. It receives an average dose of X-rays about 500 times greater than Earth, and up to 50,000 times stronger during a large solar flare. Not exactly ideal conditions for life.
Comparison of the three stars in the Alpha Centauri system and the sun.
With so many exoplanets being discovered now, it is natural of course to wonder about the star system closest to us. Could life exist there? For the one planet known to exist there so far, the results are not encouraging. But if there are others, and most planetary systems appear to have more than one planet, then the odds are a bit more in life’s favor. We won’t know for sure until/if we find additional planets in the Alpha Centauri system. But even if we don’t, many other worlds are being discovered on a regular basis now, and a growing number appear to have conditions at least suitable for habitability, if not life itself.
Bottom line: The closest star system to our sun, Alpha Centauri, has at least one Earth-sized planet orbiting one of its three stars. Dangerous x-rays from that red dwarf star make life unlikely there, but the prospects may be much better for the other two sun-like stars, if any as-yet undiscovered planets orbit them.
The year was 1967 and the Canadian government was super into aliens.
A collection of documents from 1967 found in the national archives give us a hint into just how seriously the government used to take UFO sightings.
The documents outline how the government investigated UFOs—a process that most likely lasted for years afterwards—and breaks down six cases that are “of interest” to the government in detail. The investigations include a man burned by a UFO in Manitoba, some incredibly weird radar sightings by the Department of Defence, an RCMP officer in Nova Scotia who watched a UFO dive below the water and disappear, and a crop circle found in Alberta that was the first investigated by a government.
The documents were found in the national archive by Chris Rutkowski—a man that could probably be best described as Canada’s Fox Mulder—and recently posted to his Ufology blog. Rutowski routinely goes through Canada’s national archives looking for things like this and described the find as “a gem.”
"What we do have in here is rather interesting reports from qualified personnel and qualified sources and investigated by qualified investigators and still there is no explanation," Rutkowski told VICE. "What that tells me is that the UFO phenomena was taking quite seriously by them indeed."
The intro to the document.
Photo via screenshot.
While the government has some of tUFO research readily available online in a database it is still relatively unknown—especially among the general public—how they actually investigated cases and what the bureaucracy was like. This, Rutkowski says, might be “our best snapshot” into this process.
"This is certainly an interesting snapshot because it does show what was happening before and how it was going to move forward and I think it set the stage for how the Canadian military and government were looking at UFOs from that point onward,” said Rutkowski.
The 27 page set of documents—which Rutkowski was kind enough to direct VICE towards—was prepared by Wing Commander Douglas Robertson (a Canadian Forces officer well-known in the UFO community) for someone we do not know in November of 1967. Rutkowski speculates it could’ve been for a newly-appointed Minister of Defence as “the infamous Paul Hellyer [one of the world’s highest ranking alien believers] had left the position a few months earlier.” At the time, as Robertson writes, the National Department of Defence was the body in charge of investigating UFO reports.
The briefing breaks down the seven military categories of UFOs which include hoaxes, mass hysteria, misinterpretations of natural events, advanced military technology, and psychological conditions. However, the seventh and final category is “unusual sightings which the viewer is unable to identify or explain, namely, UFOs.” Hell yeah.
The documents show that the investigation into UFOs was a little bit of a hot potato in Canada as in it was frequently handed off between departments. When a new report came in, researchers would first decide if the object was a meteor or fireball—if so it would be directed to the NRC. If it was something else it would then be put in one of three categories Class A: worthy of investigation Class B: interesting but you don’t need to look into it; and Class C: boring.
Photo via screenshot.
The investigations varied and could be as simple as an interview or as a complicated as getting several other agencies including the RCMP, NRC, Defence Research Board (DRB) or (weirdly) the Department of National Health and Welfare on board. In many of the cases, you can see that post-secondary institutions like the University of Toronto and the University of Manitoba would help out with analysis. The government would also send professionals to investigate the sites in-depth and if the case was intense enough, partner with the United States.
The document was written during an interesting time for UFOs in Canada. As Rutkowski puts it, 1967 was a high water mark for this type of activity in the Great White North. The briefing indicates there was a jump in reports from 1966 to 1967—from about 40 to 167. The case files showcase A) just how strange these occurrences were and B) just how seriously the government was taking the investigations.
Here are breakdowns of the case studies Robertson concludes “may be of interest” to whoever the intended reader of the briefing may be:
1. Falcon Lake
The first one outlines perhaps Canada’s most infamous “UFO encounter,” the Falcon Lake case. The case revolved around Steven Michalak, a Manitoba man, who says he encountered two UFOs 90 miles east of Winnipeg. While Michalak was analyzing a rock formation he said two flying saucers appeared before him. One flew off at high speed while other landed about 100 feet in front of him. When he reached out and touched the object with his gloved hand, it burned him immediately. The object took off and the exhaust fumes reportedly burned him as well. Michalak was hospitalized for several days as a result.
In the briefing, Robertson writes that soil samples at the site were “analyzed and found to be radioactive to a degree that the samples had to be safely disposed of.” In the briefing, Robertson admits that “neither the DND nor the RCMP investigative teams were able to provide evidence which could dispute Mr Michalak’s story.” Furthermore, the radiologist dispatched to the area was unable to explain why the area was contaminated with radiation. The section ends with “although the investigation has been completed, a satisfactory ending or conclusion is still lacking.”
Many, many things have been written about the Falcon Lake case, including a book Rutkowski wrote with Michalak's son.
2. Calgary UFO Photo
The second case, again made in 1967, revolves around a famous Canadian photograph taken of a UFO near Calgary. It tells the story of Warren Smith who was out for a hike near Nanton, Alberta.
“A UFO suddenly appeared outside of an area of trees a few hundred feet above the observers,” reads the briefing which goes on to explain how Smith was able to snap two photos of the objects. Smith made prints of these shots, which were then sent to the DND. “The prints were subjected to a detailed analysis by the Photo Intelligence Interpretation Centre. The Centre concluded its investigation by stating, assuming the photos by Mr Smith to be genuine, the UFO fit the description of the objects by Mr Smith.”
3. Clear Water Bay
The next case outlined in the briefing is focused on a family that was returning to their home in Clear Water Bay by boat when they encountered a UFO. According to the briefing the object appeared about 50 feet away from “Mr. Green” (how he is referred to in the document) and Green decided to investigate it. When he approached the object ripped towards Green and he “immediately retreated using maximum power.” Then the object returned to its original spot.
Green and his family docked the boat and ran to a nearby home to wake all the occupants so they could come and look at the object. They were able to do so for about 15 minutes until it took off. In a nearby home, a neighbour that was interviewed by the government said that while he didn’t see the object he was “listening to his radio at the time the UFO was sighted and received so much static he was forced to turn it off.”
A “detailed investigation conducted by the DND in cooperation with the RCMP” found that Green was a “reliable, competent, and sincere witness with no indulgence tendencies.” They also checked to see if alcohol was consumed at the time, found none, and tested Green’s eyes. Wilted leaves were found at the top of the trees near where the object was allegedly hovering and some were sent to the University of Manitoba for lab testing. The Department of Forestry also checked and found “that they are unable to explain the reason for the wilting.”
The section ends with “the investigation has been concluded without any fixed conclusions or findings being made.”
4. The RCMP’s Diving UFO
The next sighting was seen by an RCMP corporal out near Barrington Passage, Nova Scotia. The RCMP officer describes seeing an object about 60 feet in length with white lights flying over the water at a low altitude. The object started making a high pitched whistling sound and slammed into the water leaving only one white light visible. RCMP Cpl Wereisky approached the light by boat and it rapidly sank underneath him as he got close. The area was then searched by the Canadian Coast Guard and other boats but nothing was found.
The government conducted a rigorous investigation into this sighting which included an underwater search and wasn’t able to find anything. The government investigation ended, once again, “without finding any fixed findings.”
5. Department of Transportation Radar Sighting
The next investigation outlined in the briefing is one Rutkowski described as being “very unique.” In July of 1967, the Department of Transportation reported that “an unidentified radar target was tracked through seven sweeps of their radar, witnessed by three controllers, and two technicians some 70 miles east of Winnipeg.”
The target was ripping at intense rate. As outlined in the briefing, it increased from a speed of “720 knots [1,333 km per hour] to 3,600 knots [6,667 km per hour] in one minute and ten seconds.” The briefing explains that the five people who witnessed the radar object are “certain it was a radar target and not something associated with mechanical, electrical, or equipment faults.” On the same day in Kenora, Ontario, a similar object was picked up on the radar.
“The unknown object was under the positive radar for 29 minutes,” reads the briefing about the Kenora sighting. “The object followed Air Canada Flight 405 for a period before disappearing from scope. It reappeared and followed Air Canada Flight 927 for a period of time. DOT are unable to explain these radar returns.”
The DND again did an investigation into this and again were unable to find any conclusions.
Camrose Crop Circle
The final case outlined in the briefing is one in Alberta and, according to Rutowski, contrary to popular belief shows that it was in Canada, not Britain, where a government first investigated crop circles. It occurred outside of Camrose Alberta in August of 1967 when “several deep impressions were made in an unknown object in a pasture.”
The Department of Defence sent out a man who is referred to as “Dr. Jones” in the document to investigate and he found “no physical evidence of any damage to trees or shrubs in the field and no evidence to suggest a deliberate interference or involvement by a person.” Rutowski was able to find further documentation of Dr. Jones investigation and again was kind enough to share them with VICE. In the documents, you can see just how in depth the government got with their investigation.
In the documents, Jones said that he believed it could be a “deliberate hoax” but the hoaxers would “require some equipment and a great deal of determination.” He estimates that in order to do such spherical circles the hoaxers would need two wheels on a 30-foot axle that put pressure of three-quarters of a ton on a pasture. Next Jones has us “consider the UFO possibility” and he breaks down the math behind what size a flying vehicle would need to be in order to produce such marks and comes upon 135 tons.
“This load of 135 tons would be in the right ballpark for a large aircraft, or presumably, small space craft,” ends this section of Jones’ report.
Epilogue
After the case studies, Robertson uses the briefing to discuss possible future plans regarding UFO research in Canada and give several recommendations to our unknown reader. He proposes that the DND hands off the responsibility of investigating UFOs to the National Research Council and that the Director of Operations works as the coordinating agency between the DND units providing field investigations and the NRC.
“It is evident that from investigations conducted by the DND, and from the findings made by prominent and highly qualified personnel, that the primary interest of UFOs lies in the field of science, and to a lesser degree, to one that is associated with national security,” writes Robertson.
Robertson writes that the workload in 1967 regarding UFOs was so large that it was actually becoming detrimental to government workers as it took up so much time. He also writes that the government should be more open with the public about their work in UFOs. This is something Rutkowski—even over 51 years removed—still admittedly agrees with.
"By not being able to comment it made it look like there was something to hide. Of course, this document does show there was some very interesting conclusions, some unexplained cases that should have been made more public,” said Rutkowski. “But when a public relations officer just keeps saying no comment, no comment, it shows that perhaps there is something that is being hidden.
"My reading from this document is that the Canadian Forces didn't really know what to do with UFOs either. It's not that they were hiding everything they just didn't have the expertise in the field and the scientific community didn't want anything to do with it so they were kinda hung out to dry."
New results modeling the co-evolution of technological civilizations and their planetary climates suggest that aliens could, much like the Easter Island culture from Earth’s history, suffer self-inflicted collapses due to rapid environmental degradation.Credit: Michael Osadciw, University of Rochester Illustration
Much has been written about the Anthropocene—a proposed new division of geologic time in which humans are a dominant force for planetary change: When did it begin? How might it unfold? And can we, the supposed masters of Earth, actually use our powers to make our planet a better place? Understandably, most of the Anthropocene’s literature to date both in the popular press and peer-reviewed publications has been decidedly Earth-centric. But in a recent series of papers and a new book, Light of the Stars: Alien Worlds and the Fate of the Earth, the astrophysicist Adam Frank argues the Anthropocene’s origins and implications are best understood in the context of astrobiology, the study of life in the universe. The climate change and other environmental effects associated with humankind’s global ascendance, he says, are likely to be universal phenomena manifest for any and every technological civilization that emerges somewhere in the cosmos. Which means the most crucial insights governing the Anthropocene may come less from studying the ground beneath our feet and more from turning our gaze to the heavens.
Scientific American spoke with Frank, a professor at the University of Rochester, about the lessons to be learned from speculations about alien civilizations battling climate change.
What motivated you to write this book?
The book was inspired by some frightening conversations I ended up having with climate change denialists in response to my pieces on that topic for National Public Radio and The New York Times. It was terrifying, really, to see how locked into their perspective these people are and to realize there’s this false narrative about climate change, which we’re stuck in. So this was motivated, in part, by my thinking about how to change the discussion.
Over the years what I’ve come to understand is that human-driven climate change is really an astrobiology problem. It’s not a problem of politics. It’s not a problem of businessmen versus environmentalists. We are talking about something much bigger—a planetary transition, which some scientists label as the Anthropocene. Climate change is just one aspect of this new human-dominated period. My argument is that Anthropocenes may be generic from an astrobiological perspective; what we’re experiencing now may be the sort of transition that everybody goes through, throughout the universe. And there are probably some common features to long-lived civilizations and the planets they inhabit.
I really started exploring this in 2014, when I co-authored a paper with Woody Sullivan of the University of Washington that proposed using dynamical systems theory to model some of these planetary transitions. We argued that it’s possible to identify the basic paths that “exocivilizations” might follow and the feedbacks that might occur when they begin altering their planetary climates. In my latest paper, just published with several colleagues, we went ahead and actually did some of that modeling.
Why would you have any faith in models examining the behaviors of exocivilizations—something no one has ever seen?
I like to draw a parallel to the Higgs boson. This is a fundamental particle that was “discovered” in 2012, but really you could say it was discovered in 1964. That was when three papers appeared extrapolating from well-understood physics to propose this particle that would wait nearly a half century before actually being seen. The details obviously would have to be filled in by actual data, but in that intervening time physicists went quite far in thoroughly extrapolating the particle’s nature.
So, when it comes to thinking about the interactions between an advanced technological civilization and its planet, well, we actually know a lot more about that today than people knew about the Higgs boson 50 years ago. We have lots of examples of planetary climates that we’ve studied right here in the solar system—Venus, Mars, Titan, Jupiter and so on. And we’ve got computer models that can nicely forecast, for instance, the weather on Mars! So we really do understand climate pretty well. And a civilization, to some degree, is just a mechanism for transforming energy on a planetary surface. This gets us into the realms of thermodynamics on global scales, which is super cool.
So as long as we ask the right sort of question—“What is a planet’s response to having this energy dumped into it?”—we have reasonably good “guardrails” that allow us to address it.
But that’s mostly planetary science. What about the social or biological aspects here? How are you modeling that?
Well, just as we understand planetary climates pretty well, we can use the basic, fundamental tenets of life to guide us, too. Organisms are born, some of them reproduce and they die. Living things consume energy and they excrete waste. That should be true even if they’re made of silicon, or whatever.
So the next step is to incorporate principles of population biology, in which the idea of “carrying capacity”—the number of organisms that can be sustainably supported by the local environment—is very important. This approach can be mathematically applied to the state of a planet, too. So in our latest modeling work we’ve got an equation for how the planet is changing and an equation for how the population is changing. What ties them together is the predictable result that as environmental conditions on a planet get worse, the total carrying capacity goes down. A civilization with a population of n will use the resources of their planet to increase n, but at the same time by using those resources they tend to degrade the planet’s environment.
In our study we used these basic ideas to address the question of if, and how, exocivilizations can get through their own versions of the Anthropocene. Our first models were pretty simple but gave us a pretty rich view of the possible trajectories for exocivilizations.
What were the results of your modeling? And do they make you feel optimistic or pessimistic about our own prospects?
In the models we saw these three classes of behaviors, three trajectories: A “die-off,” where the population overshoots the carrying capacity and then dwindles; a “steady state,” where the population growth slows and ends up within the bounds of carrying capacity; and then a “collapse,” where the population and the carrying capacity both just drop like a stone.
It’s important to remember we aren’t trying to say any particular history is bound to play out on any particular planet. We are looking at the average properties of “successful” versus “unsuccessful” trajectories for civilizations reaching this Anthropocene-like planetary transition.
The results actually made me feel both optimistic and pessimistic. I was happy to see we did find sustainable steady states—it could’ve turned out that they didn’t exist. So our models predicted that long-term civilization/planet co-evolution is possible. Hooray!
But we also found trajectories where equilibrium could only be reached after 90 percent of your population died off. It’s not even clear that a complex technological civilization could survive losing nine out of every 10 individuals. It might well just descend into chaos.
And, there was also a fourth and really chilling trajectory we found. It popped up when we looked at how a civilization might switch from high-impact to low-impact energy sources—such as switching from fossil fuels to solar power, for instance. In some of those scenarios, where the population is soaring and the planet is heating up, the civilization shifts to the low-impact energy resource and everything seems to get better at first—but then a collapse occurs anyway. This fourth trajectory is really scary, because it suggests you can make all the right choices and still have things not work out.
Four scenarios for the fate of technological civilizations and their planets, based on mathematical models developed by Adam Frank and his collaborators. The black line plots the trajectory of the civilization's population and the red line shows the co-evolving trajectory of the planet's temperature (a proxy for climate). Credit: Michael Osadciw, University of Rochester Illustration
Why would that happen?
Because planets are complex systems that exhibit nonlinear dynamics. Messing around with a planet’s climate can be like rolling a big rock down a hill. Once the rock really gets going there’s no turning back, and maybe it just shoots right off a cliff.
The climate is basically a giant planet-sized machine with lots of moving parts—the atmosphere, the lithosphere, the cryosphere, the biosphere—and the interactions between those moving parts may be quite sensitive. So if you push it hard enough, even if you stop pushing it shortly after, there isn’t always a way to recover. That’s one of the big messages of the book. We have to start thinking like a planet. Our view of climate change—the faux political debate—is so narrow because we think we’re the first time this has ever happened. We’re kind of like cosmic teenagers who are stuck in our own immaturity.
So where do you think the Earth is in this spectrum of possibilities?
I don’t know the answer yet. I don’t think anyone knows. There needs to be more work done—better models with more realistic climates. There has certainly been a lot of discussion in the Earth science literature about planetary “tipping points,” the idea that you push too far and, woops, now you’re tipped over to another state. People worry about this a lot, that’s clear. But it’s unclear as to where and what exactly the tipping points are, and where we may be relative to them.
Right, but back to the idea of “changing the discussion”—your motivation for writing the book. Surely we could do more with these ideas than just discuss them. Don’t they recommend some action?
Of course they do—but most of those actions are indistinguishable from ones that follow from lots of other work in climate science and policy.
I really do think, though, that the route to our making it through the Anthropocene runs through other planets. We aren’t going to become a sustainable planetary civilization by only dealing with the Earth. I give lots of examples in the book, but one of the best is the fact that the climate models that revealed the possibility of “nuclear winter”—a global cooling caused by the atmospheric effects of a nuclear war—relied heavily on data about Martian dust storms. Talk about cross-fertilization! Those nuclear winter models totally changed the debate about nuclear weapons, and they came from understanding another world.
So we can’t just sit here studying tipping points on Earth at the expense of going out and exploring other worlds and looking for life and intelligence elsewhere, because the knowledge we gain from that is probably essential for our own future. Think of it this way: If you’re sick and you go to the doctor to be cured, the doctor will have pretty limited abilities if he only has ever studied [just] you. If he has studied you and lots of other people, [however,] he’ll have a much clearer picture of what ails you. It’s probably like that with planets and civilizations, too.
Lee Billings
Lee Billings is an associate editor for Scientific American. He covers space and physics.
Astronomers have been searching for a Planet Nine – a world about 10 times Earth’s mass – for about 2 years and have yet to spot it. Maybe there’s another explanation?
Caltech astronomers suggested in 2016 that orbits of these 6 extreme trans-Neptunian objects (in magenta) – all mysteriously aligned in one direction – might be explained by the presence of a Planet Nine (in orange) in our solar system. Despite searches, no Planet Nine has yet been found.
Image via Caltech/R. Hurt (IPAC).
As recently as late May, an international team of researchers presented new evidence for an unknown Planet Nine at the fringes of our solar system. The evidence came from analysis of an oddball object in the outer solar system – 2015 BP519 (aka Caju) – whose unusual orbit had been predicted by computer models used by astronomers who’ve been searching for Planet Nine since 2016. Last week, however, other astronomers – members of the Eccentric Dynamics group at University of Colorado, Boulder – presented evidence that Planet Nine might not need to exist, after all. Ann-Marie Madigan, who leads the group, presented the group’s findings at last week’s American Astronomical Society meeting, which ran from June 3-7, 2018 in Denver. Her team’s statement said:
Bumper car-like interactions at the edges of our solar system — and not a mysterious ninth planet — may explain the the dynamics of strange bodies called “detached objects” …
In the new study, Madigan and colleagues Jacob Fleisig and Alexander Zderic, also of CU Boulder, looked carefully at the orbits of some of these objects. For example, they looked at the small outer solar system body 90377 Sedna, which orbits our sun at a distance of nearly 8 billion miles (13 billion km). The orbits of Sedna and a handful of other bodies at that distance look separated – or detached – from the rest of the solar system. These strange orbits are what led Caltech astronomers Mike Brown and Konstanin Batygin to propose a Planet Nine in the first place.
Brown and Batygin had suggested that an as-yet-unseen ninth planet – four times the size of Earth and 10 times Earth’s mass – may be lurking beyond Neptune. They suggested the unknown planet’s gravity was influencing the orbits of the “detached objects.” Since 2016, astronomers around the world have been searching for Planet Nine, but no one has found it yet.
Does Planet 9 exist? Collective gravity theory DISPROVES mysterious ninth planet in system
Meanwhile, Madigan, Fleisig and Zderic have explored a new idea about the orbits of these outer solar system bodies. The new calculations show the orbits might be the result of these bodies jostling against each other and debris in that part of space. In that case, no Planet Nine would be needed. Madigan said:
There are so many of these bodies out there. What does their collective gravity do? We can solve a lot of these problems by just taking into account that question.
Ann-Marie Madigan, Jacob Fleisig and Alexander Zderic of the Eccentric Dynamics group at CU Boulder.
Madigan pointed out that the outer solar system is:
… an unusual place, gravitationally speaking.
Once you get further away from Neptune, things don’t make any sense, which is really exciting.
Her team’s statement explained:
Among the things that don’t make sense: Sedna. This minor planet takes more than 11,000 years to circumnavigate Earth’s sun and is a little smaller than Pluto … Sedna and other detached objects complete humongous, circle-shaped orbits that bring them nowhere close to big planets like Jupiter or Neptune. How they got out there on their own remains an ongoing mystery.
Madigan’s team didn’t originally intend to look for an alternate explanation for the orbits of detached bodies. Instead, Jacob Fleisig, an undergraduate studying astrophysics at CU Boulder, was engaged in developing computer simulations to explore the dynamics of orbits. Madigan said:
He came into my office one day and said, “I’m seeing some really cool stuff here.”
Fleisig had calculated that the orbits of icy objects beyond Neptune circle the sun like the hands of a clock. Some of those orbits, such as those belonging to asteroids, move like the minute hand, or relatively fast and in tandem. Others, the orbits of bigger objects like Sedna, move more slowly. They’re the hour hand. Eventually, those hands meet. Fleisig said:
You see a pileup of the orbits of smaller objects to one side of the sun. These orbits crash into the bigger body, and what happens is those interactions will change its orbit from an oval shape to a more circular shape.
In other words, Sedna’s orbit goes from normal to detached, entirely because of those small-scale interactions. The team’s findings also fall in line with recent observations. Research from 2012 noted that the bigger a detached object gets, the farther away its orbit becomes from the sun — exactly as Fleisig’s calculations show.
An artist’s rendering of Sedna, which looks reddish in color in telescope images.
These astronomers say their findings may provide clues about another phenomenon: the extinction of the dinosaurs. As space debris interacts in the outer solar system, the orbits of these objects tighten and widen in a repeating cycle. This cycle could wind up shooting comets toward the inner solar system on a predictable timescale. Fleisig said:
While we’re not able to say that this pattern killed the dinosaurs, it’s tantalizing.
Madigan added that the orbit of Sedna is one more example of just how interesting the outer solar system has become. She said:
The picture we draw of the outer solar system in textbooks may have to change. There’s a lot more stuff out there than we once thought, which is really cool.
Astronomers Mike Brown and Konstanin Batygin (@KBatygin on Twitter), both of Caltech, proposed Planet Nine in 2016 and are still trying to investigate it.
Bottom line: Astronomers at Caltech proposed a Planet Nine in 2016, and other astronomers around the world have been searching for it. Yet no one has spotted it. Meanwhile, there’s research suggesting we might not need a Planet Nine to explain the strange orbits of small bodies in the outer solar system.
It’s awesome to be back on the site and bringing new and fresh knowledge for you all to feast on.
I took a long hiatus to contemplate, meditate, and investigate. The knowledge that I have been given to in turn give to humanity is vastly extensive and threads throughout the very thing we all know as reality. You could call me a translator. I somehow know how to explain this very difficult and fantastic revelation to a population that has been subdued and limited.
In a nutshell, I have discovered Ancient Aliens, where they are, where they have been hiding, and the evolution they are now experiencing in harmony with the consciousness evolution of the Human specie.
I did not need a telescope, nor did I need a microscope, although I can show you the existence of Ancient Aliens with either. There is one thing wrong with the mind, once it decides something does not exist, it will try its hardest to keep it that way.
The mind and the brain must become one, trusting each other to provide pure knowledge and insight into what IS, and not so much what is not.
I am here to provide answers to questions that have been pondered for centuries.
I am here to connect dots for researchers that have hit wall after wall by limiting their research to only what is already known.
I can provide an extensive amount of assistance to organizations researching space, searching for extraterrestrials and analyzing the latest changes on the planet.
Humans, in this day and age, tend to think they know everything, and even more-so, that everything is known. This is a limiting factor in the revelation of these Ancient Aliens.
I am the conduit, the ambassador to Ancient Aliens, the one who has been bestowed the sacred ancient knowledge. I am humbled to be the holder of such a delicate and unraveling ball of wisdom. And although I feel humbled, I also feel empowered to spread this knowledge amongst the people of Earth before it is once again locked up.
The true curse of this realm called 3D is the illusion of “reality”.
The Webster Phenomena, the realization of this illusion will actually break the illusion, or the curse of not knowing the truth.
A foolish world is one that does not heed the wisdom of Nature.
Knowledge is the ultimate power.
Check back often as I am reigniting the website and The Webster Phenomena with tons of new images, new fresh blogs, new research and the release of new discoveries, and coming soon a NEW PRODUCTS PAGE!!!
Make sure to show some love on the support page!!!
The Webster Phenomena Ancient Aliens
The Webster Phenomena Part 2 - Seeing Aliens?
Most Incredible Webster Phenomena ET Video Yet
The Webster Phenomena with Patrick Small - Pareidolia or Higher Consciousness?
En décembre 2017, le New York Times dévoilait tout : Le Pentagone a investi plus de 100 millions de dollars dans la recherche sur les ovnis, entre 2007 et 2012. Cette révélation s’accompagnait de la déclassification de documents, et surtout d’une vidéo montrant, en 2004, de pilotes de chasse américains à la poursuite d’un étrange objet ovale blanc, aujourd’hui surnommé le « Tic Tac volant ». Celui-ci avançait à une vitesse folle sans pour autant visiblement posséder de moyen de propulsion.
Ovni : la vérité est au Pentagone - 28 minutes - ARTE
Aujourd’hui, une équipe de chercheurs de Las Vegas, menée par le journaliste George Knapp, a mis la main sur un document officiel de 13 pages contenant l’analyse militaire des événements qui se sont déroulés ce jour-là, rapportait Motherboard le 24 mai.
D’après le rapport, l’ovni vu par les deux pilotes aurait réalisé un piqué, passant de « 60 000 pieds à environ 50 pieds d’altitude en quelques secondes ». Qui plus est, aussitôt repéré par le radar, celui-ci a disparu à une vitesse incroyable, grâce à une « capacité d’accélération, d’aérodynamique et de propulsion avancée ». L’un des deux pilotes a également signalé avoir observé une « perturbation » à la surface autrement calme de l’océan « d’un diamètre de 50 à 100 mètres, quasiment circulaire ». Elle lui a fait penser « aux images d’un appareil plongeant rapidement sous la surface comme un sous-marin ou un navire en train de couler».
Le fichier contient également le témoignage d’un membre expérimenté du porte-avion à l’origine de la découverte. Selon lui, l’ovni ressemblait à un missile balistique. Et la raison pour laquelle il a échappé aux radars est simple : il était réglé de sorte à surveiller les avions conventionnels et non pas les missiles. Si cela peut rassurer ceux que les extraterrestres effraient, l’hypothèse de voir un missile inconnu flotter dans les airs avant de disparaître n’est guère plus rassurante ou logique.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.