Kan een afbeelding zijn van 1 persoon

Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.

This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.

Carl Sagan Space GIF by Feliks Tomasz Konczakowski

X Files Ufo GIF by SeeRoswell.com

1990: Petit-Rechain, Belgium triangle UFO photograph - Think AboutIts

Ufo Pentagon GIF

ufo abduction GIF by Ski Mask The Slump God

Flying Sci-Fi GIF by Feliks Tomasz Konczakowski

Season 3 Ufo GIF by Paramount+

DEAR VISITOR,


MY BLOG EXISTS ALREADY 12 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS.

ON 06/04/2024 MORE THAN 1.951.050

VISITORS FROM 134 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.

THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400 GUESTS PER DAY.

THANK YOU FOR VISITING  MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.


Goodbye
PETER2011

De bronafbeelding bekijken

De bronafbeelding bekijken

Beste bezoeker, bedankt voor uw bezoek.

Dear visitor, thank you for your visit.

Cher visiteur, je vous remercie de votre visite.

Liebe Besucher, vielen Dank für Ihren Besuch.

Estimado visitante, gracias por su visita.

Gentile visitatore, grazie per la vostra visita.

Inhoud blog
  • UFO Seen In Video Over New York City’s LaGuardia Airport
  • James Bond, eat your heart out! Futuristic submarine resembles a UFO and can take eight passengers to depths of up to 656ft
  • 'I faced 10ft demon creature aliens in my garden – even the police were nervous'
  • Ship Leaving Sun, 10X Bigger than Earth! April 15, 2024, UFO Sighting News.
  • The Enigmatic Encounter: The Stavropol Territory UFO Incident
  • David Bowie was right - there are spiders on Mars! European Space Agency's spacecrafts snap mysterious arachnid shapes on the Red Planet
  • UFO or drone? 'Flying cylinder' spotted soaring over New York City's LaGuardia Airport baffles passenger
  • UFO-spotting Las Vegas teen traumatized by eight-foot-tall 'demon creature' he claims he saw in his backyard
  • Mars Express Spots ‘Spiders’ at Outskirts of Martian ‘Inca City’
  • Did Chris Mellon just confirm U.S. UFO crash retrievals?
  • ,Brazil’s Bold Approach to UFO Sightings
  • De mysterieuze stad die wetenschappers al jaren verbijstert
  • Watch 4 solar flares erupt from the sun at nearly the same time in extremely rare event
  • US Congressman Says Revealing UFO Technology Is a Threat to Energy Sector: It Can Disrupt World Economy
  • Earth's weird 'quasi-moon' Kamo'oalewa is a fragment blasted out of big moon crater
  • Can NASA's Mars Sample Return Program Be Saved? Some Experts Think So
  • Voyager 1 Just Sent Its First Coherent Message Back to NASA In Months
  • Unveiling the Sky: A Closer Look at The UFOs of Soesterberg Documentary
  • Na reis van 8 miljard jaar bereikte het zonet onze aarde
  • Hubble Has Accidentally Discovered Over a Thousand Asteroids
    Categorieën
  • ALIEN LIFE, UFO- CRASHES, ABDUCTIONS, MEN IN BLACK, ed ( FR. , NL; E ) (3181)
  • André's Hoekje (ENG) (743)
  • André's Snelkoppelingen (ENG) (383)
  • ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr ) (1703)
  • ARTICLES of MUFON ( ENG) (434)
  • Artikels (NL.) (149)
  • ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART (11576)
  • Before it's news (ENG.) (5697)
  • Belgisch UFO-meldpunt / Frederick Delaere ( NL) (11)
  • Diversen (Eng, NL en Fr) (4137)
  • FILER FILES - overzicht met foto's met dank aan Georges Filer en WWW.nationalUFOCenter.com (ENG) (925)
  • Frederick's NEWS ITEMS (ENG en NL) (112)
  • HLN.be - Het Laatste Nieuws ( NL) (1668)
  • INGRID's WEETJES (NL) (5)
  • Kathleen Marden 's News about Abductions... ( ENG) (33)
  • LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG) (10124)
  • Michel GRANGER - a French researcher ( Fr) (18)
  • MYSTERIES ( Fr, Nl, E) (1944)
  • MYSTERIES , Complot Theories, ed ( EN, FR, NL ) (362)
  • Myths, legends, unknown cultures and civilizations (4)
  • National UFO Center {NUFOC} (109)
  • News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG ) (6049)
  • NIEUWS VAN JAN ( NL) (42)
  • Nieuws van Paul ( NL) (17)
  • NineForNews. nl ( new ipv NIBURU.nl) (NL) (3711)
  • Oliver's WebLog ( ENG en NL) (118)
  • Paul SCHROEDER ( ENG) (98)
  • Reseau Francophone MUFON / EUROPE ( FR) (86)
  • références - MAGONIE (Fr) (486)
  • Ruins, strange artifacts on other planets, moons, ed ( Fr, EN, NL ) (559)
  • SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL ) (691)
  • UFO DIGEST / a Weekly Newsletter - thanks that I may publish this on my blog (ENG) (125)
  • UFOs , UAPs , USOS (2967)
  • Vincent'snieuws ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Who is Stanton FRIEDMAN - follow his news (ENG) (16)
  • WHO IS WHO? ( ENG en NL) (5)
  • Zoeken in blog

    Beoordeel dit blog
      Zeer goed
      Goed
      Voldoende
      Nog wat bijwerken
      Nog veel werk aan
     

    The purpose of  this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and  free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category.
    Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
     

    Archief per maand
  • 04-2024
  • 03-2024
  • 02-2024
  • 01-2024
  • 12-2023
  • 11-2023
  • 10-2023
  • 09-2023
  • 08-2023
  • 07-2023
  • 06-2023
  • 05-2023
  • 04-2023
  • 03-2023
  • 02-2023
  • 01-2023
  • 12-2022
  • 11-2022
  • 10-2022
  • 09-2022
  • 08-2022
  • 07-2022
  • 06-2022
  • 05-2022
  • 04-2022
  • 03-2022
  • 02-2022
  • 01-2022
  • 12-2021
  • 11-2021
  • 10-2021
  • 09-2021
  • 08-2021
  • 07-2021
  • 06-2021
  • 05-2021
  • 04-2021
  • 03-2021
  • 02-2021
  • 01-2021
  • 12-2020
  • 11-2020
  • 10-2020
  • 09-2020
  • 08-2020
  • 07-2020
  • 06-2020
  • 05-2020
  • 04-2020
  • 03-2020
  • 02-2020
  • 01-2020
  • 12-2019
  • 11-2019
  • 10-2019
  • 09-2019
  • 08-2019
  • 07-2019
  • 06-2019
  • 05-2019
  • 04-2019
  • 03-2019
  • 02-2019
  • 01-2019
  • 12-2018
  • 11-2018
  • 10-2018
  • 09-2018
  • 08-2018
  • 07-2018
  • 06-2018
  • 05-2018
  • 04-2018
  • 03-2018
  • 02-2018
  • 01-2018
  • 12-2017
  • 11-2017
  • 10-2017
  • 09-2017
  • 08-2017
  • 07-2017
  • 06-2017
  • 05-2017
  • 04-2017
  • 03-2017
  • 02-2017
  • 01-2017
  • 12-2016
  • 11-2016
  • 10-2016
  • 09-2016
  • 08-2016
  • 07-2016
  • 06-2016
  • 05-2016
  • 04-2016
  • 03-2016
  • 02-2016
  • 01-2016
  • 12-2015
  • 11-2015
  • 10-2015
  • 09-2015
  • 08-2015
  • 07-2015
  • 06-2015
  • 05-2015
  • 04-2015
  • 03-2015
  • 02-2015
  • 01-2015
  • 12-2014
  • 11-2014
  • 10-2014
  • 09-2014
  • 08-2014
  • 07-2014
  • 06-2014
  • 05-2014
  • 04-2014
  • 03-2014
  • 02-2014
  • 01-2014
  • 12-2013
  • 11-2013
  • 10-2013
  • 09-2013
  • 08-2013
  • 07-2013
  • 06-2013
  • 05-2013
  • 04-2013
  • 03-2013
  • 02-2013
  • 01-2013
  • 12-2012
  • 11-2012
  • 10-2012
  • 09-2012
  • 08-2012
  • 07-2012
  • 06-2012
  • 05-2012
  • 04-2012
  • 03-2012
  • 02-2012
  • 01-2012
  • 12-2011
  • 11-2011
  • 10-2011
  • 09-2011
  • 08-2011
  • 07-2011
  • 06-2011
    Rondvraag / Poll
    Bestaan UFO's echt? Are UFOs real?Les OVNIS existent-ils vraiement?
    Ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / Non
    Bekijk resultaat

    Rondvraag / Poll
    Denk Jij dat UFO's buitenaards zijn? Do You think that UFOs are extraterrestrial? Les OVNIS sont- ils ET?
    ja / Yes / Oui
    Nee / NO / NON
    Bekijk resultaat

    E-mail mij

    Druk oponderstaande knop om mij te e-mailen.

    Blog als favoriet !
    FORUM

    Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum

    Zoeken in blog

    Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.

    In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!

    In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.

    BEDANKT!!!

    Een interessant adres?
    UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
    UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld
    In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog. Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch... Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels. MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen. MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity... Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com. Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal. Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP. ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
    27-03-2019
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Russian Strange Ray of Light Emerges From The Sky Captured on Camera

    Russian Strange Ray of Light Emerges From The Sky Captured on Camera

    Russian photographer Zhiganov, who initially planned to photograph some of his friends lounging in a hot tub with the aurora overhead in the city of Aptity, Russia quickly changed when he noticed a strange phenomenon, explained as a vertical aurora, in the sky upon he started to film it.

    “It was the first time I ever saw an aurora in such a rarified form” Zhiganov said but I wonder whether it was an aurora or some sort of a laser/plasma beam since it turned into an enormous bright sphere that moved across the surface until it disappeared.

    Here is the amazing video and please decide for yourself whether it is a rare vertical aurora or not.

     UFO Sightings Blogspot

    https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/ }

    27-03-2019 om 20:27 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:Diversen (Eng, NL en Fr)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The Secret Space Program Gary McKinnon 1st Interview in Years by Richard Dolan

    The Secret Space Program Gary McKinnon 1st Interview in Years by Richard Dolan

    UK citizen Gary McKinnon is the most famous UFO “hacker” of all time. Arrested in 2002, he was in danger of extradition to the US for ten years.

    What he found was apparent evidence of a secret space program, including references to “non-terrestrial officers” and ship to ship transfers of vessels not in the U.S. military inventory.

     

    Moreover, a high-resolution photograph, taken from space, of a smooth, cigar-shaped craft. Gary also talks about the repercussions of being sought by the U.S. government, his depression, suicidal thoughts, and more.

    Richard Dolan who interviews Gary is one of the world’s leading researchers and writers on the subject of UFOs and believes that they constitute the greatest mystery of our time.

    UFO Sightings Blogspot

    https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/ }

    27-03-2019 om 20:19 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:UFOs , UAPs , USOS
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.UFO Disclosure: They’re Here! And They've Crashed on Earth Many Times!

    UFO Disclosure: They’re Here! And They've Crashed on Earth Many Times!

    Whoever or whatever is watching us is looking to see what we are doing with our own technology. There have been many UFO Crashes, did they just crash or did we take them down?

    So what triggered project blue book, was it pilot sightings or did something happen? There are many cases from project blue book that defy rational explanation.

    Because of her international perspective on extraterrestrial related phenomena, Paola Harris has consulted with many researchers, including J Allen Hynek and Col. Philip Corso about the best avenues for planetary disclosure with emphasis on the “big picture” and stressing the historical connection.

    https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/ }

    27-03-2019 om 20:12 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Anthropologist Claims UFOs are Actually Time Machines From the Future

    Anthropologist Claims UFOs are Actually Time Machines From the Future

    What do anthropology and UFOs have in common? In his new book, a noted anthropologist looks at the physical descriptions of the bodies and behaviors of extraterrestrials and theorizes that the reason they resemble us so much is that they’re our descendants from a future time and UFOs are actually time machines transporting them back for some kind of strange family reunion. Is this the future version of genealogical DNA tests?

    “The phenomenon may be our own distant descendants coming back through time to study us in their own evolutionary past. The extra-tempestrial are ubiquitously reported as being bipedal, upright-walking, five fingers on each hand and foot, bi-lateral symmetry that they have two eyes, a mouth a nose, they can communicate with us in our own languages.”

    In a recent appearance on KXLF (“Montana’s News Leader”) and in previous interviews like this one by Darkness Radio and on his website, Montana Tech professor of anthropology Dr. Michael P. Masters summarizes his new book, “Identified Flying Objects: A Multidisciplinary Scientific Approach to the UFO Phenomenon,” and his quest to “begin a new and more informed discussion among believers and skeptics alike.” That quest is to use the analytical techniques of an anthropologist who normally looks at human ancestors who partially resemble us and apply them to a study of other human-like species we know only through eyewitness accounts of alleged encounters – extraterrestrials. The end result is that Masters’ analysis suggests we should stop using the description “extraterrestrials” and instead start calling at least some of these future visitors extra-tempestrials.

    “As an anthropologist who has worked on and directed numerous archaeological digs in Africa, France, and throughout the United States, it is easy to conceptualize just how much more could be learned about our own evolutionary history, if we currently possessed the technology to visit past periods of time.”

    Dr. Masters sees the accounts of alien sightings and particularly alien abductions and the subsequent probings and analyses as indications that the visitors are anthropologists like himself, studying their ancestors with a tool he would love to have – a time machine. Imagine how much more we would know of ourselves, our planet and our universe if we could physically travel back millions of years to observe and possibly (let’s not ignore the “butterfly effect”) examine them.

    “Many changes characterize human evolution, but it is primarily tenacious shifts toward habitual upright walking, changes in brain size and shape, facial reduction, reduced body hair, higher intelligence, and the development of increasingly complex tools and culture that most define our lineage. These changes occurred throughout hominin evolution, and have persisted in spite of marked modification to our subsistence strategy, climate, ecology, environment, and system of social, economic, and political organization.”

    The is Dr. Masters’ ‘If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck’ line of abductive reasoning. Through millions of years of evolution and sometimes catastrophic environmental events, humans haven’t changed much physically. It’s the subtle changes that translate into leaps in intelligence and behavior. It makes sense that future humans would want more information on their lesser-developed ancestors too (there goes our self-esteem and superiority complex). In a similar manner, we obviously would like to find out what we’re going to become. Masters warns that this would be difficult.

    “Modern and past human groups would only be capable of comprehending the biology, culture, and technology of these extratempestrials in a limited capacity, as we represent a far more primitive stage of their remote ancestral past.”

    See the resemblance?

    This theory of extratempestrials obviously adds a twist to the the idea of ancient astronauts, with the ‘aliens’ being future humans helping their primitive ancestors build pyramids in return for remembering them with statues and paintings and not destroying the Earth and ruining their future lives. That sounds like the positive conclusion Masters draws from his theory.

    “Coupled with a thorough understanding of the past and modern human condition, these accounts point to the continuation of established biological and cultural trends here on Earth, long into the distant future.”

    We’ll still be here, we’ll still be walking upright, we’ll become smart enough to invent time machines and we won’t turn out too badly.

    Next time you meet an ‘alien’, tell them “You’re welcome.”

    {https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

    27-03-2019 om 19:47 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:UFOs , UAPs , USOS
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Spotlight on Sprague: Young Gun UFOlogist Stays Sane in Mad Field

    Spotlight on Sprague: Young Gun UFOlogist Stays Sane in Mad Field

    Ryan Sprague is a lead investigator and co-host of the CW television series, Roswell: Mysteries Decoded and the author of Somewhere in the Skies: A Human Approach to an Alien PhenomenonHe is also the creator and host of the Somewhere in the Skies podcast on the eOne Podcast network. As a UFO journalist, Ryan has interviewed witnesses from all walks of life about UFO sightings and encounters. He has also interviewed military and intelligence officials about UFOs, writing for such news sites as Open Minds MagazineRogue PlanetOmni Reboot, and Futurism. Speaking on the UFO topic, he has been featured on ABC News, Fox News, Science Channel, and is a regular on Travel Channel’s series, Mysteries at the Museum. He is currently working on his second book. 

    Here, Ryan talks to me about what he has and hasn’t learned from his years in a field that can be inspiring and maddening in equal measure…

    RG: Your podcast recently celebrated its 100th episode. Is it a challenge to deliver quality content every week? How do you select your topics?

    It’s definitely challenging, but the reward far outweighs the challenge. I get messages from listeners from all over the world almost on a daily basis. Some good, some bad, but almost always constructive. I value my listeners’ opinions because, ultimately, the show is for them and not for me. My goal was to shake things up with the show; ask new questions of the UFO phenomenon. So, I wanted to bring unique voices to the UFO discourse. I’ve met so many new people and have learned so much from simply stepping outside the echo chamber.

    RG: What inspires you most about UFOlogy?

    The staggering amount of people who have witnessed the phenomena firsthand. Also, the attention that “Ufology” has gotten these past few years (yes, no matter what anyone says, To the Stars Academy has played a huge part in that). The topic is certainly seeing a resurgence, and even mainstream scientists and academics are taking it more seriously. I need not look further than at least three college/university-level professors who now teach UFOs in their curriculum. The conversation is growing both in terms of how many people are interested and even in the complexity of the phenomena.

    Tom DeLonge’s To the Stars Academy of Arts and sciences is spending big money to position itself in the public eye as the go-to organisation for UFO truth.

    RG: What annoys you most about UFOlogy?

    The divide. There’s room for everyone at the saucer-shaped table, so instead of talking down to one another, in terms of research, approaches, or beliefs, we should engage in healthy debate, take what we want from one another’s work, and build off of it. I’ve personally gleaned something from every person I’ve talked to about UFOs, even if it involved me learning that someone was straight up lying to my face, hoaxing, or simply a fantasist. At least I learned to move on from them and focus on the work at hand.

    RG: Who are your top three UFOlogical heroes or role models, and why?

    The first would have to be my mentor, both in UFO research and my other passion in life, theater. And that is Peter Robbins. He welcomed me with open arms into a world I never knew existed. He is a man of many words and those words pack a punch. We spend hours at our favorite diner in Manhattan, chatting about UFOs, the theater world, and everything in between. They’ve been some of my most memorable moments of living in New York City for the last decade or so, and I wouldn’t trade them for anything.

    Left to right: Stanton Friedman, Cheryl Costa, and Peter Robbins.

    My second UFO hero would have to be Cheryl Costa. Her dedication and resilience continue to marvel me. She created the most comprehensive reference book on UFOs ever written, and I know her work has only just begun. While I focus my research on individuals and stories, she enhances witness testimony with hard data. It’s a task that not many could wrap their head around, let alone put in to such a comprehensive format for the public at large. Lest we forget, she had a very credible and serious interview about UFOs in the New York Times prior to the Secret Pentagon UFO Program story broke.  Costa remains one of the most important researchers this field has ever had.

    Stanton T. Friedman would be my final choice. The time he has dedicated to unraveling the UFO mystery is beyond commendable. He has paved the way for so many of us. His contributions to individual cases, to the field, and to the topic overall, are undeniable, and he remains one of the most level-headed, eloquent, and damn nicest people this field has ever produced.

    RG: What is your own personal goal in this field? Do you have a vision for what you’d like to accomplish?

    My goal is and always has been the same: to make the topic of UFOs accessible to younger people and to legitimize it in any way I can. If I find answers along the way, that’s great. But I’m more interested in the journey than the destination. And that journey has opened my eyes, my mind, and my perspective on this mystery, and so many others. It’s a very personal journey, but I also really enjoy picking up hitchhikers along the way!

    Ryan Sprague in the CW’s ‘Roswell: Mysteries Decoded’ (2019), with co-host Jennifer Marshall.

    RG: Some scholars have suggested that UFOlogy, or the UFO subculture, has clear religious aspects. Do you see any parallels between the pursuit of UFOs and the pursuit of God?

    Absolutely. I often look at the work of Carl Jung when it comes to this intersectionality. He once stated, “By ‘self,’ we mean psychic wholeness, but what realities underlie this concept we do not know… in religious experience man comes face to face with a psychically overwhelming Other.” To me, this means that belief strengthens faith and vice versa. And a huge part of the UFO phenomenon also involves belief. But when it comes to staring up at that UFO, we each bring something truly unique and powerful to the interpretation of what we’re experiencing. In religion, we perceive a divine being as something all powerful and we give it meaning beyond that which we know to be true. We often do this with UFOs as well. We do not know what they are or what they represent entirely, but we give it meaning according to our own life experiences. They are so intrinsically linked, that perhaps we are, as many have contemplated, looking at a modern myth—a technological AND spiritual modern-day religion. I strongly urge all those interested in UFOs to read the recent offering by Diana Walsh Pasulka. After interviewing her on the podcast and reading her book, American Cosmic, I think she’s on to something groundbreaking and revelatory.

    RG: There are many hypotheses to account for the UFO enigma, including man-made secret technologies, exotic natural phenomena, mass hallucination and delusion, and, of course, extraterrestrial intelligences. Which theory do you feel is most credible, and why?

    This may sound non-committal, but I honestly believe it to be all of these and none of these. The more I look in to UFO phenomena, the more I’m convinced we are not dealing with simple nuts-and-bolts saucers from another planet. The phenomenon is deeply malleable and it is ever-evolving. Some UFOs are most definitely man-made and natural phenomena. Some “UFO flaps” could easily be mass hysteria while some could have been an invasion on a miniature scale. Each of the theories has some merit in my eyes because I’m still stumbling my way through all this, just like everyone else. The one thing I can say to anyone out there who may just be dipping their toes in the UFO waters is this: if anyone claims to have a single definitive answer to the UFO phenomena, run. Run as fast as you can and don’t look back. Look forward to those who are still theorizing. We are on the timetable of the phenomena. Always have been. Probably always will be.

    RG: You’ve been studying UFOs for a significant portion of your life; do you feel you’re any closer to understanding the phenomena today than you were, say, 10 years ago? Where do you see the UFO field 10 years from now?

    My sobering answer is no. I don’t think I’m any closer, but I do think I’ve personally made great strides in understanding certain cases, incidents, and how to conduct my own research. If I could go back ten years, I’d tell myself to be more patient and more empathetic. I think my lack of knowledge early on led me to cast judgment very quickly on certain cases. And now, almost a decade later, I am realizing that things aren’t always as they seem. Some cases have become more credible for me and some have unfortunately been cast in to bowels of hoaxes, fabrications, or misidentifications. I was extremely skeptical when I first started out. I’ve definitely become more open to the phenomena and those experiencing it. In ten years’ time, I hope we have a convergence of science and witness testimony, where both can be satisfied with some semblance of an answer to all this.

    RG: What’s next for you? What other projects are in the pipeline?

    Right now, I’m working on some television projects with the wonderful people I worked with on Roswell: Mysteries Decoded. Let’s just say that our investigation into this seventy-two year old case isn’t over. And there are plenty of more mysteries we hope to decode in the very near future. Other than that, the podcast continues weekly, along with my Youtube channel. And I am working on a follow-up book that takes me places I’ve never been before, both with UFOs and possibly interconnected phenomena. It’s a challenge and a journey I’ve set for myself, and one I hope people will want to join me in along the way. Expect my book some time in 2020. I also have some speaking engagements coming up, including Alien Con in Los Angeles! More info on all of my projects and the podcast and book can be found at www.somewhereintheskies.com

    {https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

    27-03-2019 om 19:38 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:UFOs , UAPs , USOS
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Life on Mars? Study Claims Evidence of Mushrooms Growing on Red Planet
    NASA
    Scientists claim they have seen 'evidence' of mushrooms growing on Mars

    Life on Mars? Study Claims Evidence of Mushrooms Growing on Red Planet

    “Is there evidence of life on Mars? An international team of research scientists, in a just published monograph titled “Evidence of Life on Mars? –consisting of a scholarly review of nearly 200 peer reviewed scientific studies– answer this age old question with a resounding “yes.” And they’ve included pictures of Martian specimens, photographed by NASA, which they say support their claims.”

    What would you say if a team of legitimate scientists released a research paper claiming they have analyzed numerous photographs of Mars taken by the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers and concluded that there are mushrooms, algae, lichens and fungi growing not just on the surface of the planet but also on the surface of the rovers themselves? As the cry of “Pareidolia!” (assigning human-related characteristics to objects) rises from the skeptical and educated masses, study co-author and research team member Dr. Regina Dass of the Department of Microbiology at the School of Life Sciences in India responds in a press release with:

    Experts think the white specimens in this Nasa image from Mars are fungi

    “There are no geological or other abiogenic forces on Earth which can produce sedimentary structures, by the hundreds, which have mushroom shapes, stems, stalks, and shed what looks like spores on the surrounding surface. In fact, fifteen specimens were photographed by NASA growing out of the ground in just three days!”

    With an exclamation point yet! That press release is referring to “Evidence of Life on Mars?”, a study published in the Journal of Astrobiology and Space Science Reviews which includes the images taken by the rovers which show the life forms. (Read the study and view the images here.) This isn’t one of those pay-for-publishing-without-peer-review journals either. The editors were so concerned about “negative blow back” that they gave the study to fourteen experts (eight Senior Editors and six independent scientists) for review, and eleven recommended publication.

    NASA has made no comments so far on this controversial paper. That doesn’t surprise co-author Dr. Giorgio Bianciardi of the Department of Medical Science at Siena University. He recalls the equally controversial findings from the 1976 Mars Viking landings.

    “Biological activity on Mars was first detected in 1976. NASA dismissed that evidence then inexplicably refused to equip any subsequent mission with life detection technology. As we detail in our review, there is now considerable evidence supporting Viking’s original findings of life on Mars.”

    NASA generally attribute strange anomalies in Martian photographs to shadows and eroded rocks and says that the methane detected on the planet could have come from other sources besides decaying life forms. The authors agree, saying: “Similarities in morphology are not proof of life.” However, co-author, Dr. Nicolo Cantasano, a geobiologist at Italy’s National Research Council in Rome, reveals the thig however spotted in at least two of the photographs.

    “However, wind would not account for what appears to be masses of black fungi growing on the rovers, and what appears to be white fungi, or bio-corrosion within a sheltered compartment atop the rover Curiosity.”

    The study uses those photos to point out what astronauts on the International Space Station already know … there’s no way to completely sterilize spacecrafts and the fungi could very well have been brought there on the rovers. However Number 2 – if this is the case, it at least confirms that mushrooms and fungi can grow in the harsh Martian environment. It could also reveal where the ground mushrooms came from – chucks of fungi-loaded Earth hurled into space when it was hit by massive asteroids.

    The researchers admit that the only way to prove their speculations is to bring Martian soil back to Earth and urge NASA to pursue this more vigorously. They also admit the obvious:

    “In many respects the observations presented here could be described as circumstantial and do not rise to the level of “extraordinary evidence” thus precluding “extraordinary claims.” Although, collectively, the evidence, in total, weighs in favor of biology, we can only conclude that the question of life on Mars remains unanswered.””

    Does the evidence – photographs that look like mushrooms – really weigh in favor of biology?

    Will the possibility of  ‘shrooms on Mars entice more people to apply for the trip?

    Will you?

     The study states that some experts believe this image shows lichens growing on Mars
    NASA
    The study states that some experts believe this image shows lichens growing on Mars
     Artist's impression of the Mars Express
    AFP OR LICENSORS
    Artist's impression of the Mars Express

    {https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

    27-03-2019 om 19:24 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Huge UFO filmed over Las Vegas 26-Mar-2019

    Huge UFO filmed over Las Vegas 26-Mar-2019

    UFO-LA

    These bright lights were filmed over Las Vegas, Nevada on 26th March 2019.

    Witness report:

     We finished football practice heading back to car when we noticed the two lights in the sky. Viewed 2 very bright lights in sky. Orange bright.

    Source: MUFON

    http://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

    27-03-2019 om 17:20 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Anthropology Expert Claims UFOs are Time Machines Of Our Distant Descendants

    Anthropology Expert Claims UFOs are Time Machines Of Our Distant Descendants

    Most people think UFOs visit Earth from other planets way too far than we could imagine. However, a professor at Montana Tech believes otherwise.

    Michael P. Masters says UFOs are much closer to home. He explains the phenomenon may be our race coming from the future and traveling through time to study their evolutionary past.

    Masters reveals this theory in his newly released book “Identified Flying Objects.” Masters says he uses the science of his explanation about the reason people who report close encounters with aliens always describe these ETs the same way.

    Masters states the alleged aliens are reported as having five fingers on each hand and foot, bi-lateral symmetry with two eyes, a mouth, a nose, as being bipedal, upright-walking and they can communicate with us using our languages.

    Masters, who has a doctorate in anthropology from Ohio State University, understands this study may be called fringe science.  However, in the book, he defends the research.

    Maters stresses he stands by the product and happy to talk about it with anyone. He explains the study is written for his academic peers much as it is for anyone in the UFO community.

    Most people make flippant comments about little green men to show they don’t take it seriously, but the American Defense Department spent $22 million investigating the UFO phenomenon. Dr. Masters believes it is the right time scientists take a serious approach to the study of the phenomenon.

    http://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

    27-03-2019 om 17:17 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:LATEST ( UFO ) VIDEO NEWS ( ENG)
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Would Aliens Save or Destroy Us? Seven Possile Scenarios for Extraterrestrial Contact

    Would Aliens Save or Destroy Us? Seven Possible Scenarios for Extraterrestrial Contact


    Would aliens want to help us or hurt us? In a paper by researchers Seth D. Bauma and Jacob D. Haqq-Misra of Pennsylvania State University and NASA's Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman, the prospect of extraterrestrial contact is analyzed from every conceivable angle.

    [Credit: Seth D. Baum, Jacob D. Haqq-Misra, & Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman]

    Here are seven of the most interesting possibilities:

    1) Detection without any direct contact

    While this seems to be the least exciting option, detection of extraterrestrial intelligence alone would actually have a complex impact on humanity. In the realm of philosophy and psychology, knowing that we are not alone in the universe would change the way we view humanity and our place in the universe. The authors of the paper argue that the impact would be primarily positive, as humans are generally eager for answers to these curious, and sometimes existential, questions. They acknowledge, however, that some would argue that there would be negative consequences as well, particularly in the discovery's effects on religion, particularly Christianity. SETI astrobiologist Paul Davies claimed that, since certain religions are predicated on the notion that humans are uniquely "saved" by a Messiah, religion can only be reconciled with the discovery of intelligent extraterrestrials by acknowledging the existence of other iterations of Messiahs on other planets, or explaining why humans are worthy of being saved while the aliens are not. Similarly, creationist Ken Ham recently stated that intelligent aliens most likely do not exist, but if they do, then they are going to Hell, as Jesus is specifically the savior of humanity. This is a common belief within the Christian religion, but not a universal one. Outer Places interviewed a pastor in Roswell, New Mexico who disagreed with this view: "We don't know the story of other life forms... ours is a story of sin and salvation... but certainly we would believe that God is capable of writing... any story that God wants."

    But even if the discovery of extraterrestrial life seemed to have a negative impact on those who subscribed to certain religions, the authors of the paper argue that blaming this crisis directly on the discovery is the result of a "philosophical mistake," as the extraterrestrials exist whether we discover them or not. Either way, the comfortable notion of our uniqueness in the universe is false, this discovery would only make the pious aware of that fact: "It is the existence of ETI that challenges such worldviews and not the act of detection. If ETI do in fact exist, then the harm has already been done in the sense that such worldviews are already invalid. Detection simply alerts us to this invalidity."

    2) They help us with literally everything

    If the extraterrestrials are more advanced than us, and they are interested in helping us, then they would open our civilization to a whole host of possibilities. They could teach us more about math and science, provide solutions for seemingly intractable problems like hunger, poverty, disease, etc. While this option may seem like wishful thinking, it is consistent with the Sustainability solution to the Fermi paradox. The Fermi paradox essentially asks: if there are intelligent aliens in the universe, where are they? If there are technologically advanced beings who have achieved interstellar travel, why haven't they tried to colonize Earth yet? The Sustainability solution asserts that it is in the nature of intelligent beings to expand exponentially, and as a result they do not last very long as this rate of expansion is unsustainable. The inverse states that, if there are intelligent beings that have been in existence long enough to overlap with us,  then they would likely follow certain habits of sustainable populations. They would see value in and protect their ecosystem, and therefore would be unlikely to colonize for resources. They would also be less likely to expand for expansion's sake, and instead only explore out of curiosity. If they have no need or desire to colonize or conquer us, then it is more likely that they would be cooperative and helpful. 

    3) The aliens try to colonize or destroy us, but we turn the tables on them

    This option is fairly self-explanatory; like in the book/movie/television show War of the Worlds, the film Independence Day, and countless other works of science fiction, the aliens attempt to harm us but are thwarted, either by our human pluckiness or sheer luck. For example, they could be unprepared for the microbial infections found on Earth, like in War of the Worlds. This would mostly be beneficial as a moral victory, although there is also a possibility that we could benefit in other ways, such as reverse engineering their advanced technology.

    4) They kill us with the extraterrestrial equivalent of smallpox blankets

    While we often think of alien invasion as a deliberate destruction of humanity, there is a chance that they could hurt us completely unintentionally by bringing unknown diseases to our planet for which our immune systems have no defense. Similarly, they could destroy our ecosystem even further by bringing invasive species, or destabilize society in a more subtle manner by bringing us advanced technology that we're simply not ready for.

    5) Aliens are just like us, in the worst possible way

    It's possible that at some point in a species' evolution, they become more moral and less selfish. But if that happens, we haven't seen it yet. As a result, it seems likely that selfishness is an inherent quality to intelligent beings. Geographer Jared Diamond discussed the reasons he believes that optimistic scenarios for extraterrestrial contact are unlikely: "The astronomers and others hope that the extraterrestrials, delighted to discover fellow intelligent beings, will sit down for a friendly chat. Perhaps the astronomers are right; that's the best-case scenario. A less pleasant prospect is that the extraterrestrials might behave the way we intelligent beings have behaved whenever we have discovered other previously unknown intelligent beings on earth, like unfamiliar humans or chimpanzees and gorillas. Just as we did to those beings, the extraterrestrials might proceed to kill, infect, dissect, conquer, displace or enslave us, stuff us as specimens for their museums or pickle our skulls and use us for medical research. My own view is that those astronomers now preparing again to beam radio signals out to hoped-for extraterrestrials are naïve, even dangerous."

    The authors of the paper concede that some astronomers believe that aliens would be friendly, but go on to say that just as many believe that aliens may attempt to colonize or enslave us, use us as a source of food, harm us in an attempt to evangelize, or even keep us for entertainment purposes, such as in zoos or gladiator arenas.

    6) They destroy us for the most random of reasons

    This scenario involves aliens that are universalist in their ethics, or beings that have certain principles that have inherent value in themselves, and are not dependent on whether they are beneficial to their particular species (humans do not generally fall in this category). We associate universalism with benevolent, peaceful beings, as they would have no particular reason to harm us simply for being "other" to them. However, whether they intend to harm us or not would be completely dependent on their specific value system. The authors use the example of the novel The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, in which aliens are attempting to destroy Earth simply because they value infrastructure, and our planet is in the way of a hyperspace bypass.

    7) They destroy us because they think we're kind of terrible

    This one is also relatively self-explanatory. Whether they believe we are a threat to their species or not, if they are universalist then they may destroy us if they believe that we are a threat to other civilizations as a result of our tendency to step on any civilization that is less technologically advanced than we are, or a liability to the universe in general as a result of our tendency to destroy ecosystems.

    https://www.outerplaces.com/ }

    27-03-2019 om 01:53 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ALIEN LIFE, UFO- CRASHES, ABDUCTIONS, MEN IN BLACK, ed ( FR. , NL; E )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Would Aliens Save or Destroy Us? Seven Possile Scenarios for Extraterrestrial Contact

    Would Aliens Save or Destroy Us? Seven Possible Scenarios for Extraterrestrial Contact


    Would aliens want to help us or hurt us? In a paper by researchers Seth D. Bauma and Jacob D. Haqq-Misra of Pennsylvania State University and NASA's Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman, the prospect of extraterrestrial contact is analyzed from every conceivable angle.

    [Credit: Seth D. Baum, Jacob D. Haqq-Misra, & Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman]

    Here are seven of the most interesting possibilities:

    1) Detection without any direct contact

    While this seems to be the least exciting option, detection of extraterrestrial intelligence alone would actually have a complex impact on humanity. In the realm of philosophy and psychology, knowing that we are not alone in the universe would change the way we view humanity and our place in the universe. The authors of the paper argue that the impact would be primarily positive, as humans are generally eager for answers to these curious, and sometimes existential, questions. They acknowledge, however, that some would argue that there would be negative consequences as well, particularly in the discovery's effects on religion, particularly Christianity. SETI astrobiologist Paul Davies claimed that, since certain religions are predicated on the notion that humans are uniquely "saved" by a Messiah, religion can only be reconciled with the discovery of intelligent extraterrestrials by acknowledging the existence of other iterations of Messiahs on other planets, or explaining why humans are worthy of being saved while the aliens are not. Similarly, creationist Ken Ham recently stated that intelligent aliens most likely do not exist, but if they do, then they are going to Hell, as Jesus is specifically the savior of humanity. This is a common belief within the Christian religion, but not a universal one. Outer Places interviewed a pastor in Roswell, New Mexico who disagreed with this view: "We don't know the story of other life forms... ours is a story of sin and salvation... but certainly we would believe that God is capable of writing... any story that God wants."

    But even if the discovery of extraterrestrial life seemed to have a negative impact on those who subscribed to certain religions, the authors of the paper argue that blaming this crisis directly on the discovery is the result of a "philosophical mistake," as the extraterrestrials exist whether we discover them or not. Either way, the comfortable notion of our uniqueness in the universe is false, this discovery would only make the pious aware of that fact: "It is the existence of ETI that challenges such worldviews and not the act of detection. If ETI do in fact exist, then the harm has already been done in the sense that such worldviews are already invalid. Detection simply alerts us to this invalidity."

    2) They help us with literally everything

    If the extraterrestrials are more advanced than us, and they are interested in helping us, then they would open our civilization to a whole host of possibilities. They could teach us more about math and science, provide solutions for seemingly intractable problems like hunger, poverty, disease, etc. While this option may seem like wishful thinking, it is consistent with the Sustainability solution to the Fermi paradox. The Fermi paradox essentially asks: if there are intelligent aliens in the universe, where are they? If there are technologically advanced beings who have achieved interstellar travel, why haven't they tried to colonize Earth yet? The Sustainability solution asserts that it is in the nature of intelligent beings to expand exponentially, and as a result they do not last very long as this rate of expansion is unsustainable. The inverse states that, if there are intelligent beings that have been in existence long enough to overlap with us,  then they would likely follow certain habits of sustainable populations. They would see value in and protect their ecosystem, and therefore would be unlikely to colonize for resources. They would also be less likely to expand for expansion's sake, and instead only explore out of curiosity. If they have no need or desire to colonize or conquer us, then it is more likely that they would be cooperative and helpful. 

    3) The aliens try to colonize or destroy us, but we turn the tables on them

    This option is fairly self-explanatory; like in the book/movie/television show War of the Worlds, the film Independence Day, and countless other works of science fiction, the aliens attempt to harm us but are thwarted, either by our human pluckiness or sheer luck. For example, they could be unprepared for the microbial infections found on Earth, like in War of the Worlds. This would mostly be beneficial as a moral victory, although there is also a possibility that we could benefit in other ways, such as reverse engineering their advanced technology.

    4) They kill us with the extraterrestrial equivalent of smallpox blankets

    While we often think of alien invasion as a deliberate destruction of humanity, there is a chance that they could hurt us completely unintentionally by bringing unknown diseases to our planet for which our immune systems have no defense. Similarly, they could destroy our ecosystem even further by bringing invasive species, or destabilize society in a more subtle manner by bringing us advanced technology that we're simply not ready for.

    5) Aliens are just like us, in the worst possible way

    It's possible that at some point in a species' evolution, they become more moral and less selfish. But if that happens, we haven't seen it yet. As a result, it seems likely that selfishness is an inherent quality to intelligent beings. Geographer Jared Diamond discussed the reasons he believes that optimistic scenarios for extraterrestrial contact are unlikely: "The astronomers and others hope that the extraterrestrials, delighted to discover fellow intelligent beings, will sit down for a friendly chat. Perhaps the astronomers are right; that's the best-case scenario. A less pleasant prospect is that the extraterrestrials might behave the way we intelligent beings have behaved whenever we have discovered other previously unknown intelligent beings on earth, like unfamiliar humans or chimpanzees and gorillas. Just as we did to those beings, the extraterrestrials might proceed to kill, infect, dissect, conquer, displace or enslave us, stuff us as specimens for their museums or pickle our skulls and use us for medical research. My own view is that those astronomers now preparing again to beam radio signals out to hoped-for extraterrestrials are naïve, even dangerous."

    The authors of the paper concede that some astronomers believe that aliens would be friendly, but go on to say that just as many believe that aliens may attempt to colonize or enslave us, use us as a source of food, harm us in an attempt to evangelize, or even keep us for entertainment purposes, such as in zoos or gladiator arenas.

    6) They destroy us for the most random of reasons

    This scenario involves aliens that are universalist in their ethics, or beings that have certain principles that have inherent value in themselves, and are not dependent on whether they are beneficial to their particular species (humans do not generally fall in this category). We associate universalism with benevolent, peaceful beings, as they would have no particular reason to harm us simply for being "other" to them. However, whether they intend to harm us or not would be completely dependent on their specific value system. The authors use the example of the novel The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, in which aliens are attempting to destroy Earth simply because they value infrastructure, and our planet is in the way of a hyperspace bypass.

    7) They destroy us because they think we're kind of terrible

    This one is also relatively self-explanatory. Whether they believe we are a threat to their species or not, if they are universalist then they may destroy us if they believe that we are a threat to other civilizations as a result of our tendency to step on any civilization that is less technologically advanced than we are, or a liability to the universe in general as a result of our tendency to destroy ecosystems.

    https://www.outerplaces.com/ }

    27-03-2019 om 01:53 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ALIEN LIFE, UFO- CRASHES, ABDUCTIONS, MEN IN BLACK, ed ( FR. , NL; E )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The Top 10 Most Credible UFO Mysteries Since 1980

    The Top 10 Most Credible UFO Mysteries Since 1980

    27-03-2019 om 01:37 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:UFOs , UAPs , USOS
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Sounds heard from deep space could be evidence of advanced alien technology

    Sounds heard from deep space could be evidence of advanced alien technology

    Some experts believe the fast radio bursts could be evidence of alien technology

    Supernova remnants, one of the suggested sources for 13 FRBs discovered by a Canadian-led team. File photograph: Nasa via The New York Times

    Supernova remnants, one of the suggested sources for 13 FRBs discovered by a Canadian-led team.

    File photograph: Nasa via The New York Times

    Mysterious repeating energy bursts from deep space that some experts have suggested could be evidence of advanced aliens have been detected for the second time.

    The repeating bursts are an example of what are known as fast radio bursts (FRBs), millisecond-long flashes of radio waves whose origin is unknown.

    Most scientists believe they are generated by powerful astrophysical phenomena such as black holes or super-dense neutron stars. But a few scientists have suggested more outlandish theories.

    Prof Avid Loeb, from the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics in the US, argues that they could be evidence of incredibly advanced alien technology.

    FRBs were first detected accidentally in 2007, when a burst signal was spotted in radio astronomy data collected in 2001.

    The new discovery, reported in the journal Nature, was made by a Canadian-led team of astronomers on the hunt for FRBs.


    Over a period of three weeks last summer, the team detected 13 FRBs using a new type of radio telescope, the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (Chime).

    One of the FRBs was repeating. Of the more than 60 FRBs detected to date, such repeating bursts have only been picked up once before, by the Areciboradio telescope in Puerto Rico in 2015.

    Where the FRBs come from is not known, although they are thought to emanate from sources billions of light years away outside our galaxy, the Milky Way.

    Chime astrophysicist Dr Ingrid Stairs, from the University of British Columbia, Canada, said: “Until now, there was only one known repeating FRB.

    “Knowing that there is another suggests that there could be more out there. And with more repeaters and more sources available for study, we may be able to understand these cosmic puzzles – where they’re from and what causes them.”

    ‘Scattering’

    Most of the 13 FRBs showed signs of “scattering”, suggesting their sources could be powerful astrophysical objects in locations with special characteristics, the scientists said.

    Team member Dr Cherry Ng, from the University of Toronto, Canada, said: “That could mean in some sort of dense clump like a supernova remnant. Or near the central black hole in a galaxy. But it has to be in some special place to give us all the scattering that we see.”

    In 2017 Prof Loeb and Harvard colleague Manasvi Lingham proposed that FRBs could be leakage from planet-sized alien transmitters.

    Rather than being designed for communication, they would more likely be used to propel giant spaceships powered by light sails.

    Prof Loeb, who discusses the idea in a paper published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, said: “An artificial origin is worth contemplating and checking.” – PA

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news }

    27-03-2019 om 00:43 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Birth of 'Great Dark Spot' Storm on Neptune Seen for 1st Time (Photo)

    Birth of 'Great Dark Spot' Storm on Neptune Seen for 1st Time (Photo)

    This composite picture shows images of storms on Neptune from the Hubble Space Telescope (left) and the Voyager 2 spacecraft (right). The Hubble image of Neptune, taken in September and November of 2018, shows a new dark storm (top center). In the Voyager image, a storm known as the Great Dark Spot is seen at the center. It is about 8,000 miles by 4,100 miles (13,000 by 6,600 kilometers) in size. The white clouds seen hovering in the vicinity of the storms are higher in altitude than the dark material.

    This composite picture shows images of storms on Neptune from the Hubble Space Telescope (left) and the Voyager 2 spacecraft (right). The Hubble image of Neptune, taken in September and November of 2018, shows a new dark storm (top center). In the Voyager image, a storm known as the Great Dark Spot is seen at the center. It is about 8,000 miles by 4,100 miles (13,000 by 6,600 kilometers) in size. The white clouds seen hovering in the vicinity of the storms are higher in altitude than the dark material.
    (Image: © NASA/ESA/GSFC/JPL)

    For the first time ever, astronomers have witnessed the birth of one of Neptune's enormous "Great Dark Spot" storms.

    Astronomers were studying Hubble Space Telescope images of a relatively small Neptune maelstrom that formed in 2015 when they noticed bright white clouds forming in a different locale on the ice giant. By 2018, a dark storm as wide as Earth had boiled up in that region, the researchers announced in a study published today (March 25) in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

    "We were so busy tracking this smaller storm from 2015 that we weren't necessarily expecting to see another big one so soon," study lead author Amy Simon, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said in a statement.

    The find brings the total tally of observed Great Dark Spots on Neptune to six. The first two such disturbances were detected by NASA's Voyager 2 probe during its Neptune flyby in August 1989, which provided the first up-close look at the mysterious blue planet. Hubble discovered the other four spots.

    Indeed, Hubble imagery has been key in characterizing these dramatic, otherworldly storms. For example, photos captured by the space telescope in 1994 revealed that the two tempests seen by Voyager 2 had dissipated, revealing that Great Dark Spots don't last very long, at least by giant-planet standards.

    "It was certainly a surprise," Simon said. "We were used to looking at Jupiter’s Great Red Spot, which presumably had been there for more than 100 years."

    This spectacular image by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope shows Jupiter's trademark Great Red Spot — a swirling storm larger than Earth.

    (Image: © NASA, ESA, and A. Simon (Goddard Space Flight Center))

    The Great Red Spot, which has been observed continuously since at least 1830, is confined to a narrow latitude range by Jupiter's jet streams. But Neptune's Great Dark Spots wander around the planet much more freely before they're finally ripped apart by high-altitude winds, the researchers said.

    Witnessing the birth of a Great Dark Spot sheds additional light on these mysterious features. For example, the association between the newborn storm and those bright white clouds, which are composed of frozen methane, suggests that the spots take shape deeper in Neptune's atmosphere than previously thought. The methane clouds likely float above Great Dark Spots the way "lenticular" clouds hover over tall mountains here on Earth, study team members said.

    Simon conducted the new study with Michael Wong and Andrew Hsu, both of whom are at the University of California, Berkeley. In a second study — also published today, in the Astronomical Journal — the researchers used Hubble observations to estimate the frequency of Great Dark Spot formation on Neptune. 

    Hubble captures birth of giant storm on Neptune

    The cyclic motion of the Great Red Spot imaged by the Cassini spacecraft. Unlike on Neptune, Thin jet streams on Jupiter keep the Great Red Spot from breaking apart and from changing latitude; it rotates around Jupiter but doesn’t move north or south.

    Credit: NASA.

    Such storms likely crop up every four to six years, the scientists found. And each Great Dark Spot probably lives for just two years or so, though some may reach the ripe old age of six. 

    There's still a lot to learn about Great Dark Spots, however, such as their wind speeds. Further Hubble observations and analyses could help unlock these and other mysteries, study team members said.

    Hubble captures birth of giant storm on Neptune

    A view of the first Great Dark Spot scientists observed on Neptune.

    Credit: NASA.

    "We have never directly measured winds within Neptune’s dark vortices, but we estimate the wind speeds are in the ballpark of 328 feet (100 meters) per second [223 mph, or 359 km/h], quite similar to wind speeds within Jupiter’s Great Red Spot," Wong said in the same statement.

    Mike Wall's book about the search for alien life, "Out There" (Grand Central Publishing, 2018; illustrated by Karl Tate), is out now.

    Follow him on Twitter @michaeldwall.

    Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom or Facebook

    https://www.space.com/ }

    27-03-2019 om 00:30 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    26-03-2019
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.NASA wants to use a helicopter to explore Mars

    NASA wants to use a helicopter to explore Mars

    BY JORDAN STRICKLER 

    Not content to purely rove on Mars, NASA is also taking to the air. The Mars 2020 Rover (which is scheduled to land on the Red Planet in early 2021) will include a helicopter — the first heavier-than-air vehicle to fly in the thin Martian atmosphere.

    Animation of Mars helicopter and Mars 2020 rover. Image credits: NASA / JPL / CalTech

    The helicopter will be deployed from the rover. The rover then will be driven away from the helicopter to a safe distance from which it will relay commands. After its batteries are charged and a myriad of tests are performed, the helicopter will begin the first autonomous flight on an extraterrestrial body in history. The helicopter offers a new way of exploring Mars, one which offers a novel way of exploring places such as Mars.

    The Mars Helicopter’s initial flight will represent that planet’s version of the Wright Brothers’ achievement at Kitty Hawk and the opening of a new era,” said Susan Gorton, NASA’s manager for the Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology (RVLT) project. “For those of us whose research revolves around all things related to flight, that would be a remarkable, historic moment.

    The body of the helicopter will be about as big as a softball. It will weigh just under four pounds (1.8 kilograms) and have two sets of rotor blades — each measuring four-feet long — spinning at 2,400 RPMs. That’s about 10 times faster than any helicopter you might find on Earth. A solar array on the top of the vehicle will recharge the batteries, which will be used to both rotate the blades and keep it warm during Mars’ cold nights (Insight recorded a balmy high of 4 degrees Fahrenheit [-15 Celsius] on March 24).

    The helicopter will only fly some 15 feet above the Martian surface, but don’t dismiss that distance. The intended landing point for the 2020 Rover is the equivalent to 100,000 feet (30,000 meters) above the surface of our home planet, which is almost 19 miles up. No helicopter has reached even half that height here.

    NASA plans to attempt up to five flights, from 330 feet to 3,300 feet (100 to 1,000 meters) away from the lander, each lasting 90 seconds. While it won’t have any scientific instruments on it, the helicopter will have a small high-resolution color imager.

    We envision helicopters opening doors to new types of exploration on Mars,” said Håvard Grip, flight-control and aerodynamics lead for the Mars Helicopter. “In the future, we could imagine doing things like (engaging in) regional exploration using multiple helicopters or going to inaccessible areas or biologically sensitive areas using small helicopters.

    This isn’t NASA’s only rotor-flight machine in the works. A mission aptly-named Dragonflywill hope to introduce a quadcopter lander to Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, in 2020.

    https://www.zmescience.com/ }

    26-03-2019 om 23:56 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.The Very Strong Connection Between UFOs and Nuclear Weapons Storage Facilities

    The Very Strong Connection Between UFOs and Nuclear Weapons Storage Facilities

    The Very Strong Connection Between UFOs and Nuclear Weapons Storage Facilities


    The photo you see above is a real picture taken in August of 1952, it’s a photograph of multiple UFOs taken by the Coast Guard photographer at the time above a US military installation, a common place for UFO sightings. The photo was classified by the US government, and then later approved for release. It was witnessed by multiple ‘professional’ people. (source) (source

    There is no shortage of pictures and videos when it comes to UFOs, here'sanother ‘official’ example you can read about from the Canadian military. Here is another one the Pentagon recently released. 

    It seems to me that the Bentwaters incident is a classic case where an apparent intrusion into our airspace and indeed a landing in our country was witnessed by serious minded people in the military, responsible people doing a responsible job…Bentwaters is in a sense, a benchmark of how not to deal with these matters in the future…I know a good bit about the bentwaters incident…There are only two explanations for what happened that night…The first is that what the people concerned…they claimed that something from outside the Earth’s atmosphere landed at their Air Force base, they went and stood by it, they inspected it, they photographed it, the following day they took tests on the ground where it had been and found radioactive traces. They reported this…and sent it to our ministry of defense.

    The quote above comes from Lord Admiral Hill-Norton, Former Chief of Defence Staff, 5 Star Admiral of the Royal Navy, and Chairman of the NATO military committee regarding what’s known as the Bentwaters incident. It’s an incident that took place in Rendlesham Forest, and remains a very important event and one of the most controversial UFO cases ever – because it’s supported by military testimony as well as military documentation. The area houses nuclear weapons, a fact that was denied for years by authorities, but then admitted to be true. 

    Norton is one of several hundred (and more than 1000 worldwide) military witnesses coming forward to testify to the reality of extraterrestrial visitation. He later went on to say that:

    There are objects in our atmosphere which are technically miles in advance of anything we can deploy, that we have no means of stopping them coming here … [and] that there is a serious possibility that we are being visited and have been visited for many years by people from outer space, from other civilizations. That it behooves us, in case some of these people in the future or now should turn hostile, to find out who they are, where they come from, and what they want. This should be the subject of rigorous scientific investigation and not the subject of ‘rubishing’ by tabloid newspapers.

    The incident at Bentwaters, according to the UK ministry of defence, was described as having “no defence significance.” This didn’t make much sense – how can you tell people that after a Colonel of a nuclear weapons facility and his many men either experienced what they experienced, or all suffered a giant hallucination together, is of no defence significance? Doesn’t make sense, does it? 

    There are examples from all over the world. The same thing has been happening in Russia, with even Wikileaks articles titled, “Unidentified Flying Objects Over Algeria,” providing details regarding the Secretary General of The Ministry of Defense, Colonel Abdelhamid Latrech, and his interest in strange machines which had been maneuvering over Algerian airspace in recent weeks.” 

    The document outlines how these strange objects had been seen near military installations by responsible people. The “responsible people” list is blocked out and states “Limited Official Use,” because the people in question are military personnel. Hundreds of these people have come forward publicly, however, and here is one example. 

    Professor Robert Jacobs (first officer ever awarded with the Air Force guided missile insignia), who was the officer in charge of optical instrumentation at Vandernburg Air Force Base, was responsible for supervising the instrumentation photography of every missile that went down the test range. In those days, the nuclear missiles were called “inter country ballistic missiles” (ICBM’s) because most of them blew up on launch. Their job was also to provide data on why they blew up, so they could provide the engineers good enough engineering sequential photography so that they could see what was wrong with the missile as it took off in flight. 

    What we photographed up there affected me for the rest of my life, and made a huge impact on my understanding of the universe, and of, governmental manipulation of our minds. (source

    In the video below you can also see a recreation of the event. 


    Another incident occurred at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, and is one of the most remarkable events in this history of UFO encounters with the military. This occurred in March of 1967 at a base that was responsible for a large amount of nuclear weapons. Witnesses here saw a red, glowing UFO hovering just outside the front gate. After that happened, all of the nuclear missiles shut down, and went completely dead. 

    Below is a clip of Captain Robert Salas, one of the men involved in the incident, giving his testimony at the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure that took place a few years ago, where a number of academics, politicians, and ex-military gathered in front of several congresspeople to discuss the matter and what happened there. 


    So, Why Is This Happening? 

    There are many theories out there. When military witnesses gathered at the national press club in 2010, the feeling among them was that these UFOs and whoever they are operated by, are sending a message that we are “playing with fire.” But testimony from another high ranking officer who spent his life working in and around nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons facilities offers up a different explanation based on the information he’s been privy to. 

    His name is Colonel Ross Dedrickson, and he said that he and his team constantly received “reports of visits by UFOs over the storage facilities and even some of the manufacturing facilities, and that went on continuously.” He went on to say that they “found that the reports were few and far between, but the security people were reluctant to report many of them because the protocol and the bureaucracy involved in reporting them, they just avoided reporting.”

    We observed the UFOs were very much interested in the facilities (nuclear weapons manufacturing facilities) that were visiting…A couple of nuclear weapons that were sent out into space were destroyed by the extraterrestrials.

    After stating the above, he goes on to use the Vandenburg incident (mentioned earlier in the article) as an example, where they photographed the missile and the UFO as the missile climbed into space. 

    He goes on to state:

    And that is their (extraterrestrials) major concern, to preserve the integrity of the Earth because it affects their own system…There was one incident when we exploded a nuclear weapon over the pacific…and the disturbance that it caused because it shut out communications entirely over the pacific base for a number of hours in which no radio transmission was available at any time…This was one of the things that the extraterrestrials later I learned were highly concerned about because it affected our ionosphere and, in fact, space-craft were unable to operate because of the pollution in the magnetic field, which they depended upon. At the very end of the 70s and early 80s, we attempted to put a nuclear weapon on the moon and explode it for scientific measurements and other things (assess scientific data, reaction and so forth..), which was not acceptable to the extraterrestrials…They destroyed the weapon before it got to the moon….The idea of any explosion in space by any Earth government was not acceptable to the extraterrestrials, and that has been demonstrated by extraterrestrials over and over.

    Watch the full interview where these quotes were taken, HERE

    So, from all of this information we have a few theories. Extraterrestrials are warning us to stop playing with fire and building nuclear weapons, that it’s not in our best interest and we should stop. Secondly, a nuclear explosion is huge, and the energy travels far beyond the physical blast radius and not only affects our solar system, but others as well. Also, as mentioned above, nuclear explosions pollute the magnetic field, something that they rely on to operate their craft. 

    One things for certain, the deactivation of these weapons, along with our willingness to not use our intelligence to create deadly weapons is a must if the human race wants to move forward. Human consciousness is changing, and it is us who must be that change. It is the person working to develop these weapons, seeing through the lies of the justification of making these weapons, and more. 

    Humanity must wake up, and realize that this is a big no no, and, year after year we get closer and closer to more people having that realization. 

    Definitely some interesting things to think about. What are your thoughts? 

    Related CE article: What Happens When A UFO is tracked on Military Radar? 

    If you’d like to read/browse through our UFO/extraterrestrial article archive, please visit the exopolitics sections of our website HERE


    Book Recommendations: www.richarddolanpress.com

    To learn more specifically about UFOs and nuclear weapons, we recommend checking out the work of long time researcher on the matter,Robert Hastings.

    You can see some more declassified documents pertaining to this matter, here

    Thanks to: Collective Evolution 

    http://ufos-disclosure.blogspot.com/ }

    26-03-2019 om 23:44 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:UFOs , UAPs , USOS
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Two ‘Alien’ Beings Can Be Seen Inside A UFO – From Footage Verified By The Turkish Government

    Two ‘Alien’ Beings Can Be Seen Inside A UFO – From Footage Verified By The Turkish Government

    I know, reading the title would instantly have a ‘non believer’ click the X button on the top righthand corner of the screen, and that’s fine, but the truth remains. And that truth is the fact that “there is very compelling evidence that we may not be alone.” Those are the words of Luis Elizondo, who is one member of the To The Stars Academy, a man with a long career within the U.S. Department of Defense, who recently retired from the Pentagon, and was a director of the “Ariel Threats Identification Program.”

    Does it mean the footage below is real? No, but the source is interesting and myself as well as many other UFO researchers in the field, would tell you that it might be one of the few authentic ones out there where occupants of these ‘UFOs’ are seen. The US government has now released UFO footage, more on that below.

    Through To The Stars, the U.S. government has been, and will continue to release footage they’ve collected over many years of UFOs that perform maneuvers which defy, as Elizondo states, our understanding of aerodynamics. They’ve released some pretty amazing ones so far that come with actual electrooptical data and radar tracking reports. Keep in mind, as stressed by Elizondo and various documents that’ve been released prior to this disclosure, that military encounters with UFOs have occurred many times. There are many examples and reports to choose from and I recently wrote an article about an incident which occurred with the Chilean Air Force.

    What’s interesting about the recent mainstream coverage is that they released actual video footage and to be honest, it’s quite discouraging that UFO footage has to be released by the U.S. government in order for it to be considered ‘real.’ Sure, there are still many out here who are going to call it fake, which means one thing, there are a group of defense officials making fake videos, putting them out in the public, and saying they’re real or, it’s actual authentic footage.

    To contemplate the first one is just as intriguing to contemplate the second, but in my mind, there is no doubt that these are indeed real, and we don’t need these videos to come out to prove that.

    The story as to what they are, however, will most likely be controlled by some ‘powerful people’ who oversee governments. Who knows what spin they will put on it via mainstream media, but right now we are currently seeing ‘official disclosure.’


    Related CE Article:


    This is the first time we’ve seen media ‘owned by the establishment’ present the UFO topic in a credible way, which is peculiar for multiple reasons. They told the truth, yet there still seems to be some misinformation with regards to the materials that have been collected in association with these UFOs, as pointed out by the New York Times. You can read more about that here where I go into a deeper discussion and provide details about what the New York Times did not elaborate on.

    This is why the footage below is also intriguing. Elizondo admitted that this type of thing has happened thousands of times and the ‘unofficial’ reports and sightings from citizens of the world have never been considered credible, when some of them very well could be. But we didn’t need Elizondo, again, we’ve had evidence, and even physical evidence of these crafts for a long time.

    Whether or not they are alien is a completely different question and discussion.

    The footage below comes from Dr. Roger Leir, a Doctor of Podiatric medicine, and arguably the best known individual with regards to extracting alleged alien implants. He has performed more than fifteen surgeries that removed sixteen separate distinct objects. These objects have been investigated by several prestigious laboratories, including Los Alamos National Laboratories, New Mexico Tech, and many others. Unfortunately, he passed away in March 2014, but his legacy lives on.You can watch a video of him at the Citizens hearing on disclosure in 2013, here.

    In the film below, you will see what appears to be two beings inside of a UFO. Filmed by multiple film crews in Turkey, it made headlines there. It’s known as the Kum­burgaz, Turkey UFO incident, and involves several witnesses who live in the local village. The video was ana­lyzed by the Sci­en­tific and Tech­nol­ogy Research Board of Turkey (which is sponsored by the gov­ern­ment). They concluded and vouched for its authenticity.

    In conclusion, even though a detailed analysis of the footage is conducted, it might still remain unidentified. Hence, other reference objects need to be recorded in the same frame with the disputable object and further shootings need to be done by ourselves with special equipment in the same location and conditions.

    Accordingly, the term “UFO” (Unidentified Flying Object) which has been used for these sort of dubious objects can also be used for these objects. But, this definition does not mean that these objects are from extraterrestrial (flying saucer etc.) origin.

    The incidents were dramatic. Apparently, for several days disc, metallic spheres, round, and oval shaped unknown craft visited the Sea of Mar­mara just off the coast of Kum­burgaz, Turkey.

    It also so happens that Dr. Lier was there as well and had a powerful camera on hand. Below is a snippet from one of many interviews he’s given describing the experience,

    We’re standing on an elevated deck, which has nothing between us and the water. It was a rather warm night and there was a very very bright full moon. The camera we were using had a 300 mm lens and an electronic doubler. In other words we were able to push or close in on the object 600 times magnification. We started by looking at the moon… the moon was very bright and under these circumstances it’s just the absolute worst time to look for UFOs because the light from the moon pollutes the surrounding sky it’s like, you know, trying to film something at night in the sky in the middle of the city…But anyway…We saw a little bright dot to the left and below the moon and then after getting our focus on the moon we moved the camera over to this little bright light and then started to zoom in on it… and when we got probably 3 quarters of the way from magnification and we’re looking through the view finder and we’re also recording this on the monitor, we see that this light is not a plane. It’s not from a star, it’s not a helicopter, it has a shape to it, which was cylindrical in the front, and then it would  turn time to time and you could see that it was probably crescent shaped…And as we pushed on what we considered the front of the object, now that’s when we were so startled by…we just couldn’t believe what we were seeing…This was a craft that had, whatever you choose to call it…Viewing ports, windows, whatever, three, one big one in the front and one towards each side and the craft externally was being lit by the moon…So you could see that it was a shiny… sort of metallic material.  What you could see through these ports was light that was emanating from the internal portion of the craft and standing there in these portals were some of these beings….They knew we were there filming them it, was like “oh hello, go ahead film away.”  (Interview with Dr. lier

    Whether it be a former Chairman of the Royal Navy telling us that “there is a serious possibility that we are being visited, and have been visited by people from outer space,” a former Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Barry Goldwater telling us that “I do know that whatever the Air Force has on the subject is going to remain highly classified,” or an Apollo 14 astronaut saying that “there have been crashed craft, and bodies recovered,” we have no shortage of high-ranking insiders attesting to the reality of this phenomenon.

    General Carlos Cavero told the world in 1979, “everything” has been “in a process of investigation both in the United States and in Spain, as well as the rest of the world.” On a global scale, “the nations of the world are currently working together in the investigation of the UFO phenomenon” and there is “an international exchange of data.” (source)

    Global Paradigm Shifts & The Human Psyche 

    The thing about global paradigm shifts and human beliefs is that there seems to be a general accepted version of reality. Many people are happy, raising families, enjoying life, and not really worrying about the planet. And that’s ok, as long as it doesn’t turn into a hatred for activists because that seems to be common. The point is, it can be terrifying, belief destroying, and destructive for some to even consider the possibility that this type of thing is real. Our first response, that I believe has been programmed into us, is fear.

    It’s natural to fear the unknown, but where is the line drawn between not being concerned and completely denying a reality?

    At what point does something become a reality? What is ‘reality’ is often what’s presented to us by a small group of people, and that’s far from a conspiracy theory.

    Why don’t we question what’s happening in our world? Perhaps the planet is more important than we are, Earth has been extremely patient with us and is calling for us to change our ways!

    What does this have to do with ET’s? I don’t know, but it’s not all scary stories out there. Just take a look at this one with regards to UFOs and their relationship with nuclear weapons, where the objects deactivated nuclear missiles. This has happened multiple times worldwide, and it’s quite mainstream knowledge. You can read more about it here.

    Based on my research, it seems ‘they’ have been here for a very long time, if there was any real ‘invasion threat’ type of scenario in the works, it would have already happened.

    However, a fake alien invasion scenario could be in the works too, who knows?  You can read more about that in detail here. 

    The UFO/extraterrestrial phenomenon forces us to expand our minds, think outside the box, perhaps show a little more intelligence and come up with more educated guesses with regards to why ‘they’ might be visiting us, and have been. Alien invasion is one of countless possible explanations. Use your imagination 🙂 I don’t feel there is any type of sinister intentions with the majority of races that could be out there, but with some, there most probably is as well. Who knows.

    The topic leaves no area of humanity untouched, and in the greater scheme of reality, it’s probably one very small tiny truth, that doesn’t even represent the tip of the ice berg 🙂

    https://www.collective-evolution.com/ }

    26-03-2019 om 23:21 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ALIEN LIFE, UFO- CRASHES, ABDUCTIONS, MEN IN BLACK, ed ( FR. , NL; E )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.When UFOs Buzzed the White House and the Air Force Blamed the Weather

    When UFOs Buzzed the White House and the Air Force Blamed the Weather

    When a slew of saucer-like sightings was reported over Washington, D.C. in 1952, the Air Force blocked its own investigator from checking them out.
    The White House, 1952.

    The White House, 1952.

    1952 was the year America caught flying-saucer fever.

    So when a rash of strange sightings was reported in the skies over Washington D.C. that summer, the press and the public demanded answers. Were these unexplained radar blips, crafts that in some cases outran jets, part of a nuclear-armed Soviet invasion—a very real threat at the height of the Red Scare? Or were they evidence of something far more mysterious?

    The Washington, D.C. sightings of July 1952, also known as “the Big Flap,” hold a special place in the history of unidentified flying objects. Major American newspapers were reporting multiple credible sightings by civilian and military radar operators and pilots—so many that a special intelligence unit of the U.S. Air Force was sent in to investigate. What they found—or didn’t find—along with the Air Force’s official explanation, fueled some of the earliest conspiracy theories about a government plot to hide evidence of alien life.

    UFO mania takes hold

    It all started in 1947, when a search-and-rescue pilot named Kenneth Arnold reported nine "saucer-like things...flying like geese in a diagonal chainlike line" at speeds exceeding 1,000 m.p.h. near Mount Rainier in Washington State. Within weeks, “flying saucer” sightings had been reported in 40 other states.

    In the name of national security, Air Force General Nathan Twining launched Project SIGN (originally named Project SAUCER) in 1948, the first official military-intelligence program to collect information on UFO sightings. Its investigators dismissed the vast majority as hoaxes or misidentifications of known aircraft or natural phenomena.

    But a few cases remained “unexplained.”

    By 1952, the UFO-investigation unit was called Project Blue Book, led by Captain Edward Ruppelt at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. Ruppelt and his team would probably have continued to investigate a couple dozen sightings a month if not for the April 1952 issue of LIFEmagazine. Just above its knockout cover shot of Marilyn Monroe ran an equally eye-catching headline: “There is a Case for Interplanetary Saucers.”

    The article, written with Ruppelt’s full cooperation, explained the Air Force’s national-security interest in UFOs. And it made a convincing case—through the colorful retelling of 10 unexplained UFO “incidents”—that these unidentified objects were extraterrestrial in origin. As one rocket scientist working on “secret” projects for the U.S. told LIFE: "I am completely convinced that they have an out-of-world basis."

    According to The Washington Post, the number of UFO sightings reported to the Air Force jumped more than sixfold, from 23 in March 1952 to 148 in June. By July, the precise conditions were in place for a wildfire of UFO mania: widespread Cold War anxiety, mainstream press coverage of unexplained UFO incidents and a healthy dose of “midsummer madness.” All that was needed was a spark.

    The Washington National Airport, 1953.

    Mysterious radar blips buzzing over the White House

    Shortly before midnight on Saturday, July 19, 1952, air-traffic controller Edward Nugent at Washington National Airport spotted seven slow-moving objects on his radar screen far from any known civilian or military flight paths. He called over his supervisor and joked about a “fleet of flying saucers.” At the same time, two more air-traffic controllers at National spotted a strange bright light hovering in the distance that suddenly zipped away at incredible speed.

    At nearby Andrews Air Force Base, radar operators were getting the same unidentified blips—slow and clustered at first, then racing away at speeds exceeding 7,000 mph. Looking out his tower window, one Andrews controller saw what he described as an “orange ball of fire trailing a tail.” A commercial pilot, cruising over the Virginia and Washington, D.C. area, reported six streaking bright lights, “like falling stars without tails.”

    When radar operators at National watched the objects buzz past the White House and Capitol building, the UFO jokes stopped. Two F-94 interceptor jets were scrambled, but each time they approached the locations appearing on the radar screens, the mysterious blips would disappear. By dawn of July 20, the objects were gone.

    ‘I tried to make contact with the bogies’

    Nobody bothered to tell Ruppelt, the Air Force’s lead Project Blue Book investigator, about the sightings. He found out a few days later when he flew into Washington, D.C. and read news reports. Ruppelt tried to get out to National and Andrews to interview radar operators and air-traffic controllers, but was denied a government-issued car or even cab fare. Frustrated, he flew back to Ohio with nothing.

    The very next Saturday, the UFOs were back over the nation’s capital. Again, Ruppelt found out through a phone call from a reporter, and immediately called on two Air Force colleagues to check out the situation at National. The same radar blips were back, and radar operators wondered out loud if the dozen or so objects on their screens couldn’t be caused by a temperature inversion, a common phenomenon in D.C.’s hot, muggy summer months.

    A temperature inversion occurs when a layer of warm air forms in the low atmosphere, trapping cooler air beneath. Radar signals can bounce off this layer at shallow angles and mistakenly show near-ground objects as appearing in the sky. Ruppelt’s Air Force colleagues, however, were convinced that the objects on the radar screen weren’t mirages, but solid aircraft.

    To be safe, two more F-94 jets were scrambled to chase down the unidentified targets appearing on radar screens at both National and Andrews. A game of high-speed Whack-a-Mole ensued, where the jets would race to a location targeted by radar, only for the blips to vanish. Finally, one of the jet pilots caught sight of a bright light in the distance and gave chase.

    “I tried to make contact with the bogies below 1,000 feet,” the pilot later told reporters. “I saw several bright lights. I was at maximum speed, but even then I had no closing speed. I ceased chasing them because I saw no chance of overtaking them.”

    Captain Edward Ruppelt, standing, and General John Samford, seated to the right of him, discussing the reports of unidentified flying objects with other Air Force officers at a 1952 news conference.

    Averting mass panic with a disputed theory

    The next day, newspaper headlines across America screamed “Saucers Swarm Over Capital” and “Jets Chase D.C. Sky Ghosts.” The publicity and public panic over the sightings were so great that President Harry Truman himself asked aides to get answers. When they called Ruppelt, he said it could have been caused by a temperature inversion, but more investigation was needed to fully explain both the radar images and credible eyewitness accounts.

    But before such an in-depth investigation could take place, the Air Force called a press conference, the longest such news event since World War II. The Air Force brass had decided, without consulting Ruppelt or the Project Blue Book team, that the best response to the sightings was to feed the press and the public an easy-to-swallow explanation.

    Dodging specific questions about what pilots and radar operators had seen in the skies over the Capitol, Major General John Samford came back again and again to the temperature-inversion theory. Never mind that Ruppelt had since come to the opposite conclusion.

    “The investigators had ruled out the inversion,” says Alejandro Rojas, editor of the UFO news site OpenMinds. “They had examined that situation. The radar operators said, ‘Inversions happen. We know what inversions look like. This is not an inversion. This is not the same thing at all.’”

    To Ruppelt’s disappointment, the Air Force’s press conference worked exactly as planned. The papers reported the temperature-inversion story and the public largely seemed to accept it. In his 1956 book, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, Ruppelt reports that after the press conference, UFO sightings dropped from 50 a day to 10.

    Skeptics, however, weren’t satisfied with the pat government response. Many accused Air Force and Project Blue Book investigators of devious behavior and secret knowledge. It wasn’t until Project Blue Book documents were made public in 1985 that UFO sleuths could see that the closest thing to a government cover-up of UFO sightings in the nation’s capital was actually a conspiracy of ignorance.

    “The Washington UFO flap perfectly illustrates the real government 'cover-up',” says Nick Pope, a UFO journalist who used to run UFO-investigations unit for the British Ministry of Defense. “It’s not a situation where the authorities conspired to keep some terrible truth about UFOs from the people, but rather, the government doing its best to keep people from realizing that they didn't have all the answers.”

    VIDEO TRAILER: Project Blue Book Watch an exclusive clip of the new series Project Blue Book, premiering Tuesday, January 8 at 10/9c on HISTORY.

    26-03-2019 om 22:41 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:UFOs , UAPs , USOS
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Lost for Over 10,000 Years, but This Man Found It!

    Lost for Over 10,000 Years, but This Man Found It!

     
    They said it didn’t exist. Lost For Over 10,000 Years, But This Man Found It! Was it worth it?
     
    Today modern archaeology often works with digital technology. Geophysics has allowed thousands of ancient sites to be located – a huge gain for science.
     
    Namaste Matrix Wisdom. One of the best video-docu’s I’ve seen on this subject especially w/Edgar Cayce aka The Sleeping Prophet. How you tied him & all the others into a phenomenal stream was brilliant. Thank you so much for your time, efforts & loving sistah’s n brutha’s all over the world…wanting them to know the True Truths….be Set Free & above all…Be Empowered…! 5 Star Rating on a 5 Star Rating System….Bravo…!!! HigherWaysWoman

    https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/ }

    26-03-2019 om 22:12 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ARCHEOLOGIE ( E, Nl, Fr )
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Is this proof of LIFE on Mars? NASA's Curiosity rover snaps photos of Martian mushrooms that prove the red planet is home to organic lifeforms, scientists claim in controversial study

    Is this proof of LIFE on Mars? NASA's Curiosity rover snaps photos of Martian mushrooms that prove the red planet is home to organic lifeforms, scientists claim in controversial study

    • Images from NASA's Mars Curiosity show pictures of mushrooms and funghi
    • Some scientists claim these NASA images show the red surface is not barren   
    • The claims from the researchers have yet to be confirmed or refuted by NASA

    Images from the surface of Mars reveal the presence of mushrooms, a group of scientists claim in a controversial new study. 

    It states some images captured by NASA's Curiosity show fungi is growing on the surface of the supposedly barren planet. 

    The claims have yet to be confirmed or refuted by NASA.

    Scroll down for video  

    A study claims some objects captured by NASA's Curiosity show fungi is growing on the surface of the supposedly barren planet (pictured)

    A study claims some objects captured by NASA's Curiosity show fungi is growing on the surface of the supposedly barren planet (pictured)

    The research lists 15 images as evidence of algae, lichens and 'Martian mushrooms'.

    Photographic evidence of such flourishing lifeforms, should the discovery be confirmed, would likely revolutionise our understanding of Mars and life outside of Earth. 

    Dr Regina Dass, of the department of microbiology at the school of life sciences, India, the study's co-author said: 'There are no geological or other abiogenic forces on Earth which can produce sedimentary structures, by the hundreds, which have mushroom shapes, stems, stalks, and shed what looks like spores on the surrounding surface,' the Express reports. 

    'In fact, fifteen specimens were photographed by NASA growing out of the ground in just three days.' 

    It remains unknown why life may have sprouted on Mars but it is possible conditions are more suitable for cultivating life underground than on the surface.  

    The claims have been published in Journal of Astrobiology and Space Science Reviews.

    A controversial piece of research such as this is subjected to extensive vetting by peers within the scientific community. 

    The research states 15 images include evidence of algae, lichens and 'Martian mushrooms' (pictured). The claims have been published in Journal of Astrobiology and Space Science Reviews

    The research states 15 images include evidence of algae, lichens and 'Martian mushrooms' (pictured). The claims have been published in Journal of Astrobiology and Space Science Reviews

    Photographic evidence of such flourishing lifeforms, should the discovery be confirmed, would revolutionise our understanding of Mars. Images from the rover include purported evidence of 'life' on martian rocks

    Photographic evidence of such flourishing lifeforms, should the discovery be confirmed, would revolutionise our understanding of Mars. Images from the rover include purported evidence of 'life' on martian rocks 

    Editors of the journal say six independent scientists and eight senior editors were recruited to scrutinise the study. 

    Eleven recommended publication on the grounds certain revisions were implemented and three rejected the results. 

    Other academics proposed an alternative explanation and say it is more feasible the specimens are hematite, a form of iron oxide. 

    The journal stated: 'Evidence is not proof and there is no proof of life on Mars.

    'Abiogenic explanations for this evidence can't be ruled out.'

    WHAT EVIDENCE DO SCIENTISTS HAVE FOR LIFE ON MARS?

    The search for life on other planets has captivated mankind for decades.

    But the reality could be a little less like the Hollywood blockbusters, scientists have revealed.

    They say if there was life on the red planet, it probably will present itself as fossilized bacteria - and have proposed a new way to look for it.

    Here are the most promising signs of life so far -

    Water 

    When looking for life on Mars, experts agree that water is key.

    Although the planet is now rocky and barren with water locked up in polar ice caps there could have been water in the past.

    In 2000, scientists first spotted evidence for the existence of water on Mars.

    The Nasa Mars Global Surveyor found gullies that could have been created by flowing water.

    The debate is ongoing as to whether these recurring slope lineae (RSL) could have been formed from water flow.

    Meteorites 

    Earth has been hit by 34 meteorites from Mars, three of which are believed to have the potential to carry evidence of past life on the planet, writes Space.com.

    In 1996, experts found a meteorite in Antarctica known as ALH 84001 that contained fossilised bacteria-like formations.

    However, in 2012, experts concluded that this organic material had been formed by volcanic activity without the involvement of life.

    Signs of Life 

    The first close-ups of the planet were taken by the 1964 Mariner 4 mission.

    These initial images showed that Mars has landforms that could have been formed when the climate was much wetter and therefore home to life.

    In 1975, the first Viking orbiter was launched and although inconclusive it paved the way for other landers.

    Many rovers, orbiters and landers have now revealed evidence of water beneath the crust and even occasional precipitation.

    Earlier this year, Nasa's Curiosity rover found potential building blocks of life in an ancient Martian lakebed.

    The organic molecules preserved in 3.5 billion-year-old bedrock in Gale Crater — believed to have once contained a shallow lake the size of Florida's Lake Okeechobee — suggest conditions back then may have been conducive to life.

    Future missions to Mars plan on bringing samples back to Earth to test them more thoroughly.

    Methane 

    In 2018, Curiosity also confirmed sharp seasonal increases of methane in the Martian atmosphere.

    Experts said the methane observations provide 'one of the most compelling' cases for present-day life.

    Curiosity's methane measurements occurred over four-and-a-half Earth years, covering parts of three Martian years.

    Seasonal peaks were detected in late summer in the northern hemisphere and late winter in the southern hemisphere. 

    The magnitude of these seasonal peaks – by a factor of three – was far more than scientists expected.

    26-03-2019 om 21:43 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART
    Klik hier om een link te hebben waarmee u dit artikel later terug kunt lezen.Evidence of Life on Mars? - PART I

    Evidence of Life on Mars? - PART I

    R. Gabriel Joseph1, Regina S. Dass2, V. Rizzo3,
    N. Cantasano4, G. Bianciardi5

    1Astrobiology Associates, Emeritus, Brain Research Neuroscience Laboratory,
    Northern California, USA, 
    2Molecular Fungal Genetics and Mycotoxicology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, India
    3Emeritus, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, I.S.A.FO.M. U.O.S.,Cosenza, Italy
    4Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, I.S.A.FO.M. U.O.S., Cosenza, Italy
    5Department of Medical Biotechnology, Siena University, Italy

    Abstract

    Evidence is reviewed which supports the hypothesis that prokaryotes and eukaryotes may have colonized Mars. One source of Martian life, is Earth. A variety of species remain viable after long term exposure to the radiation intense environment of space, and may survive ejection from Earth following meteor strikes, ejection from the stratosphere and mesosphere via solar winds, and sterilization of Mars-bound spacecraft; whereas simulations studies have shown that prokaryotes, fungi and lichens survive in simulated Martian environments--findings which support the hypothesis life may have been repeatedly transferred from Earth to Mars. Four independent investigators have reported what appears to be fungi and lichens on the Martian surface, whereas a fifth investigator reported what may be cyanobacteria. In another study, a statistically significant majority of 70 experts, after examining Martian specimens photographed by NASA, identified and agreed fungi, basidiomycota ("puffballs"), and lichens may have colonized Mars. Fifteen specimens resembling and identified as "puffballs" were photographed emerging from the ground over a three day period. It is possible these latter specimens are hematite and what appears to be "growth" is due to a strong wind which uncovered these specimens--an explanation which cannot account for before and after photos of what appears to be masses of fungi growing atop and within the Mars rovers. Terrestrial hematite is in part fashioned and cemented together by prokaryotes and fungi, and thus Martian hematite may also be evidence of biology. Three independent research teams have identified sediments on Mars resembling stromatolites and outcroppings having micro meso and macro characteristics typical of terrestrial microbialites constructed by cyanobacteria. Quantitative morphological analysis determined these latter specimens are statistically and physically similar to terrestrial stromatolites. Reports of water, biological residue discovered in Martian meteor ALH84001, the seasonal waning and waxing of atmospheric and ground level Martian methane which on Earth is 90% due to biology and plant growth and decay, and results from the 1976 Mars Viking Labeled Release Experiments indicating biological activity, also support the hypothesis that Mars was, and is, a living planet. Nevertheless, much of the evidence remains circumstantial and unverified, and the possibility of life on Mars remains an open question.

    1. Overview: The Evidence

    Presented here is a body of evidence and observations which do not prove but supports the hypothesis Mars was, and is, a living planet hosting prokaryotes, lichens, and fungi. This evidence includes: 1) Results from simulation studies demonstrating a variety of species can survive in a Mars-like environment (Cockell et al. 2005; Osman et al. 2008; Mahaney & Dohm, 2010; Pacelli et al. 2016; Sanchez et al. 2012; Schuerger et al., 2017; Selbman et al. 2015), particularly if shielded by soil and stone and provided water for which there is now evidence (Malin & Edgett 1999, 2000; Perron et al. 2007; Renno et al. 2009; Villanueva et al. 2015); 2) NASA's Mars Viking Labeled Release experiments (Klein et al. 1976; Levin & Straat 1976, 1979a,b, 2016) which detected evidence which met the criteria established by pre-mission field-tests for biological activity; 3) Observation of specimens which resemble fungi, "puffballs," algae and lichens (Dass 2017; Joseph 2014; Kupa 2017; Rabb 2015; Small 2015); 4) Seasonal waxing, waning, and continual replenishment of Martian methane (Formisano et al. 2004; Mumma et al. 2009; Webster et al. 2018) and which has no obvious purely geological source and 90% of which on Earth is due to biological activity including seasonal plant growth; 5) Observations of digitate silica structures that closely resemble complex sedimentary formations produced by a combination of abiotic and biotic processes (Ruffi & Farmer 2016) as well what appears to be microbial mats (stromatolites) which may have been built by water-dwelling cyanobacteria, possibly between 3.2 to 3.7 billion years ago (Bianciardi et al. 2014, 2015; Noffke 2015; Rizzo & Cantasano 2009, 2011, 2016); 6) Specimens identified as "hematite" which were likely produced in thermal ("hot") springs (NASA 2009; Squyres et al. 2004) and which, on Earth, have been cemented together, via water-dwelling prokaryotes and fungi (Ayupova et al 2016; Bosea et al. 2009; Claeys 2006; Fredrickson et al., 2008; Gralnick & Hau 2007; Owocki et al. 2916); 7) Detection of carbonates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Martian meteorite ALH84001 which has been dated to 4 billion years ago and which were also generated in the presence of water (Clement et al. 1998; McKay et al. 2009; Thomas-Keprta et al. 2009).

    2. The Transfer of Life from Earth To Mars

    One obvious source of life on Mars would be Earth. It is probable that solar winds striking, ejecting and propelling microbe-laden dust and debris in the stratosphere and mesosphere, deep into space (cf Arrhenius, 1908), and microbes dwelling in rock ricocheted into space from Earth by meteor strikes, have repeatedly contaminated Mars and other planets (Davies, 2007; Fajardo-Cavazosa et al. 2007; Hara et al. 2010; Melosh 2003; Mileikowsky et al. 2000; Schulze‐Makuch, et al. 2005) and vice-versa.

    Space craft which landed or crashed on Mars may have also transferred life from Earth to Mars. For example, immediately after sterilization, between 300 to 540 distinct colonies (on average) consisting of millions of organisms, including fungi, vegetative microorganisms, Bacillus, and grampositive cocci (Staphylococcus spp. and Micrococcus spp.) and numerous microorganisms belonging to the genus Streptococcus and the Corynebacterium Brevibacterium group, were found per square meter on the outer surfaces of the Mars Vikings Landers and other space craft (La Duc et al. 2014; Venkateswaran et al. 2012; Puleo et al. 1977). As to species which were not or could not be cultured, and those masses of bacteria and fungi still growing within the interior of this equipment, the number of survivors is unknown.

    Bacillus not only survive dry heat sterilization but tolerate long duration exposure to the radiation intense environment of space (Horneck 1993; Nicholson et al. 2000; Vaishampayan et al. 2012) and in simulated Mars-like environments (Moeller et al. (2012). Various species of Micrococcus also escaped death by sterilization (Puleo et al. 1977) and survive in low Earth orbit, whereas various strains of staphylococcus and Corynebacterium, tolerate simulated space-like conditions (McLean & McLean 2010) and (Corynebacterium) simulated Martian environments (Nicholson et al. (2012) and, as noted, could not be eradicated from space craft. Streptococcus is yet another species which resisted NASA's sterilization attempts, and (although disputed) remained viable after direct exposure to space, including up to 30 months on the moon (Mitchell & Ellis, 1971). Hence, everything sent to Mars may have carried fungi and microorganisms as part of their cargo.

    3. Solar Winds vs Microbes in the Stratosphere and Mesosphere

    Over 1,800 different types of bacteria as well as fungi and algae thrive and flourish within the troposphere, the first layer of Earth's atmosphere (Brodie et al. 2007). Air is an ideal transport mechanism and serves as a major pathway for the dispersal of bacteria, virus particles, algae, protozoa, lichens, and fungi including those which dwell in soil and water. Viable microorganisms and spores have been recovered at heights of 40 km (Soffen 1965), 61 km (Wainwright et al., 2010) and up to 77 km within the mesosphere (Imshenetsky, 1978). These include Mycobacterium, Micrococcus, and fungi Aspergillus niger, Circinella muscae, and Penicillium notatumm 77 km above Earth (Imshenetsky, 1978).

    In one study designed to disprove the possibility NASA might contaminate Mars, samples of Bacillus pumilus were launched via a high-altitude NASA balloon to an altitude of 31 km above sea level (Khodad et al. 2017). Nevertheless, a large number of Bacillus pumilus remained viable; and it only takes one bacterium to produce billions of bacterial offspring. 

    Moreover, due to tropical storms, monsoons, and even seasonal upwellings of columns of air (Randel et al., 1998), microbes, spores, fungi, (along with water, methane, and other gases) may be transported to the stratosphere and mesosphere where they may remain viable (Imshenetsky, 1978; Soffen 1965; Wainwright et al., 2010). As first formally proposed by Nobel Laureate Dr. Svante Arrhenius (1908) solar winds and photons could disperse space-borne organisms throughout the cosmos.

    Hence, it can be readily assumed that microbes not only flourish in the troposphere, but when lofted into the stratosphere and mesosphere many remain viable and may then be blown into space by powerful solar winds (Arrhenius 1908; Joseph & Schild, 2010) where, as shown experimentally, they can easily survive (Horneck, et al. 1994, 2002, Nicholson et al. 2000; Novikova et al. 2016; Onofri et al. 2012; Raggio et al. 2011; Sancho et al. 2007; Setlow 2006).

    For example, between September 22-25, 1998, and as detected and measured by NASA's Ultraviolet Imager aboard the Polar spacecraft, a series of coronal mass ejections (CME) and a powerful solar wind created a shock wave which struck the magnetosphere and the polar regions with sufficient force to cause oxygen, helium, hydrogen, and other gases (Moore & Horwitz, 1998), as well as water molecules and surface dust (Schroder & Smith, 2008), to gush from Earth's upper atmosphere into space. Normally the pressure is around two or three nanopascals. However, when the CME struck on September 24, 1998, the pressure jumped to ten nanopascals. Such events may have occurred repeatedly throughout Earth's history.

    Thus, it could be predicted that some airborne microbes, fungi, lichens, and algae, as well as water and dust, have been repeatedly lofted into the upper atmosphere; that a significant number remained viable, and were then swept into space and propelled by solar winds throughout the solar system (Arrhenius 1908); some of which may have landed on Mars only to go forth and multiply.

    4. Meteorites, Microbes and Ejecta from Earth to Mars

    Although innumerable meteorites disintegrate upon striking Earth's upper atmosphere, those at least ten kilometers across will punch a hole in the atmosphere and continue their descent (Van Den Bergh, 1989). When meteors this size or larger strike the surface, tons of dust, rocks, and other debris may be propelled over 100 km above the planet (Covey et al. 1994; Hara et al. 2010) and ejected into space, some possibly passing through that atmospheric hole before air can rush back in to completely fill the gap (Van Den Bergh, 1989).

    Asteroids and meteors striking Earth may have repeatedly sheared away masses of earth and rock, and blasted this material (and presumably any adhering microbes, fungi, algae, and lichens) into space (Davies, 2007; Fajardo-Cavazosa et al. 2007; Hara et al. 2010; Melosh 2003; Schulze‐Makuch, et al. 2005), where they can easily survive (Horneck, et al. 2002, Mclean & McLean, 2010; Nicholson et al. 2000; Novikova 2009; Onofri et al. 2012; Raggio et al. 2011; Sancho et al. 2007; Setlow 2006). Some of this microbe-laden debris may have later crashed on Mars (Davies, 2007; Fajardo-Cavazosa et al. 2007; Hara et al. 2010; Schulze‐Makuch, et al. 2005) where, as demonstrated by simulation studies, a variety of organisms can also survive (Cockell et al. 2005; Osman et al. 2008; Mahaney & Dohm, 2010; Pacelli et al. 2016; Sanchez et al. 2012; Selbman et al. 2015).

    Experiments have shown that microbes can resist the shock of a violent impact casting them into space (Mastrapaa et al. 2001; Burchell et al. 2001, 2004). Further, a substantial number could easily survive the descent to the surface of a planet (Burchell et al. 2001; Horneck et al. 2002; McLean & McLean 2010), even following high atmospheric explosions, i.e. the Columbia space shuttle explosion (Szewczyk et al., 2005), and despite reentry speeds of up 9700 km h-1 (McLean et al., 2006).

    When meteors strike Earth's atmosphere, they are subjected to extremely high temperatures for only a few seconds. If of sufficient size, the interior of the meteor will stay relatively cool, with the surface material acting as a heat shield. Heat does not affect the material uniformly. The interior may never be heated above 100°C whereas spores can survive post shock temperatures of over 250°C (Burchell et al. 2004; Horneck et al. 2002). Mars has a very thin atmosphere.

    Thus, many species of microbe have evolved the ability to survive a violent hypervelocity impact and extreme acceleration and ejection into space, including extreme shock pressures of 100 GPa; the frigid temperatures and vacuum of an interstellar environment; the UV rays, cosmic rays, gamma rays, and ionizing radiation they would encounter; and the descent through the atmosphere and the crash landing onto the surface of a planet.

    Certainly, surviving organisms dwelling within ejecta from Earth might land on Mars (Davies, 2007; Fajardo-Cavazosa et al. 2007; Hara et al. 2010; Melosh 2003; Mileikowsky et al. 2000; Schulze‐Makuch, et al. 2005). And those which can adapt, would likely go forth and multiply.

    5. Simulation Studies of Life on Mars

    Numerous investigators have found that a variety of species, including bacteria, algae, fungi and lichens, can survive a simulated Mars-like environment, and that survival rates dramatically increase if provided water or shielded by rock, sand, or soil (Cockell et al. 2005; Osman et al. 2008; Mahaney & Dohm, 2010; Pacelli et al. 2016; Sanchez et al. 2012; Selbman et al. 2015; Villanueva et al. 2015). These simulated environments have included those which imitate Martian radiation, temperature extremes and variations, the low surface pressures, atmospheric gas pressures, the distance between Mars and the sun, the Martian summer/winter solstices and spring/fall equinoxes, environmental parameters analogues to the 24 hours 39 minutes circadian cycle of the Red Planet, effects of shielding and aqueous vs desert vs arctic vs subsurface conditions, and in a CO2-enriched anoxic atmosphere.

    For example, Moeller et al. (2012) found that spores of Bacillus subtilis survived simulated Martian atmospheric and UV irradiation conditions, whereas de Vera and colleagues (2014) reported that cyanobacteria collected from cold and hot deserts survived "Mars-like conditions such as atmospheric composition, pressure, variable humidity (saturated and dry conditions) and strong UV irradiation." Nicholson et al. (2012) reported that six subspecies of the genus Carnobacterium collected from a permafrost borehole in northeastern Siberia--considered to be analogs of the subsurface environment of Mars--and nine additional species of Carnobacterium were all capable of flourishing and growing under Mars-like conditions. In yet another study, four methanogen species (Methanosarcina barkeri, Methanococcus maripaludis, Methanothermobacter wolfeii, Methanobacterium formicicum) survived exposure to low pressure conditions similar to Martian surface pressure (Tarasashvili et al., 2013).

    Cyanobacteria also tolerate Mars-like conditions (de Vera et al. 2014). Olsson-Francis and colleagues (2009) exposed akinetes (dormant cells formed by filamentous cyanobacteria) to extraterrestrial conditions, including periods of desiccation, temperature extremes (-80 to 80°C), and UV radiation (325-400 nm), and which displayed high levels of viability in these environments similar to Mars.

    Eukaryotes (fungi, lichens) are also survivors (Armstrong 2017; de Vera 2012; Sanchez et al. 2012; Zakharova et al. 2014). Zakharova et al. (2014) report that microcolonial fungi, Knufia perforans and Cryomyces antarcticus, as well as Exophiala jeanselmei (a species of black yeasts), not only survived but adapted and showed no evidence of stress after long term exposure to thermo-physical Mars-like conditions. Likewise, Onofri et al. (2018), after growing dried colonies of the Antarctic cryptoendolithic black fungus Cryomyces antarcticus and exposing them for 16 months to simulated Mars-like conditions on the International Space Station, found that "C. antarcticus was able to tolerate the combined stress of different extraterrestrial substrates, space, and simulated Mars-like conditions in terms of survival, DNA, and ultrastructural stability."

    Lichens are a symbiotic organism which have been classified as both a prokaryote and eukaryote and are comprised of cyanobacteria and fungi or a eukaryotic algae and fungus (Armstrong 2017; Brodo et al. 2001; Tehler & Wedin, 2008)--species which remain viable when exposed to Mars-like stimulated environments (Olsson-Francis et al 2009; Zakharova et al. 2014). Likewise, lichens easily survive environmental extremes, lack of water, desiccation, temperatures as low as -196°C (Armstrong 2017; Becket et al. 2009), as well as high levels of UV radiation and direct exposure to the radiation intense environment of space (Raggio et al. 2011; Sancho, et al. 2007). Hence, perhaps not surprisingly, studies have demonstrated that lichens remain viable and maintain photosynthetic activity when exposed to simulated Martian temperatures, atmosphere, humidity, and UV radiation (de Vera 2012; De la Torre Noetzel, 2017; Sanchez et al. 2012).

    For example, De la Torre Noetzel et al. (2017) exposed lichens to real space outside the ISS and to a Mars simulated environment for 18 months. The samples remained viable and these investigators reported normal metabolic activity of those exposed to the Mars-like environment.

    Simulation studies performed by numerous teams of independent investigators have thus demonstrated that a variety of prokaryotes and eukaryotes, including cyanobacteria, methanogens, fungi and lichens, could survive and even flourish on Mars, especially if dwelling beneath the soil or rock shelters and provided water--for which there is now evidence (Malin & Edgett 1999, 2000; Perron et al. 2007; Renno et al. 2009; Villanueva et al. 2015). Although controversial, the results from NASA's Mars Viking Labeled Release experiments also suggests that prokaryotes and simple eukaryotes not only survive on Mars but are engaging in biological activity (Klein et al. 1976; Levin & Straat 1976, 2016).

    6. Radiation and Martian Life

    Martian ground level radiation has been estimated to equal "0.67 millisieverts per day" (Hassler et al. 2013). This is significantly and profoundly below the radiation tolerance levels of a variety of prokaryotes (Moseley & Mattingly 1971; Ito et al. 1983) and simple eukaryotes, including fungi which can withstand radiation doses up to 1.7×104 Gy (Saleh et al. 1988).

    Moreover, fungi, lichens and numerous species of microbe are attracted to and thrive in highly radioactive environments (Becket et al. 2008; Dadachova et al. 2007; Tugay et al. 2006; Wember & Zhdanova 2001), even in space. Novikova et al. (2016; Novikova 2009) and Vesper et al. (2008) reported that fungi are invigorated and grow rapidly within the International Space Station as a consequence of the heightened radiation levels. These space-fungi are also impossible to eradicate. Moreover, fungi flourish on the outskirts and along the walls of the damaged and highly radioactive Chernobyl nuclear power plant (Dighton et al. 2008; Zhdanova et al. 2004). Fungi, lichens, and prokaryotes also survive long-term direct exposure to space, gamma, and solar UV radiation and remain viable (Horneck et al. 2002; McLean & McLean 2010; Nicholson et al. 2000; Novikova et al 2016; Onofri et al. 2012; Sato et al. 2011; Tugay et al. 2006; Sancho et al. 2007; Raggio et al. 2011).

    Moreover, fungi (Wember & Zhdanova 2001; Zhdanova et al. 2004) and radiation-tolerant bacteria (Moseley and Mattingly 1971; Ito et al. 1983) will seek out and grow towards sources of radiation which serve as an energy source for metabolism (Dighton et al. 2008; Tugay et al. 2006). Even if their DNA is damaged by radiation levels above their tolerance levels, they can easily repair these genes due to a redundancy of genes with repair functions (White et al. 1999).

    These and other species may also develop adaptive features--a property described as "radiostimulation," "radiation hormesis," and "adiotropism" (Levin 2003; Tugay et al. 2006; Zhdanova et al 2004)--and which also occurs in animals and plants living with increasing levels of background radiation (Adey 1993; Alshits et al 1981; Calabrese & Baldwin 1999, 2000; Zhuravskaya et al 1995). These radiation-induced adaptations include tissue and cellular regeneration and growth (Basset 1993; Becker 1984; Becker & Sparado 1972; Occhipinti et al. 2014; Levin 2003; Maffei 2014; Moment, 1949).

    Tugay and colleagues (2006; Zhdanova et al. 1991, 2004) exposed micro-fungi and fungi to pure or mixed radiation (137 Cs, 123 Te, 109 Cd, 121 Sn), gamma irradiation (121 Sn) 200-400 Gy, and mixed gamma and beta radiation (137 Cs) (100-150 Gy (equivalent to an electron dose of 300-500 Gy), and found that 60% of fungal strains exhibited positive radiotropism, significant growth, and enhanced spoor production.

    The varying levels of radiation on Mars would not be a hinderance to fungi, lichens, and numerous other species.

    7. Evidence of Lichens and Fungi on Mars?

    Four independent investigators, after examining photos taken by NASA's Mars Rovers Opportunity and Curiosity, have observed hundreds of specimens resembling fungi, mushrooms, and lichens on the surface (Dass 2017; Joseph 2014; Rabb 2018; Small 2015). In 2016, Joseph devised a computerized system coded and programmed to quantify, validate, and statistically analyze expert judgments and developed a research-study website which was quantitatively coded and programmed to enable experts to link their computers to that website and examine and rate 25 separate photos of Martian specimens, type in the names of the specimens, and determine the probability these are living organisms. This methodology has been demonstrated to yield scientifically valid and reliable results (Dommeyer et al. 2004; Hewson & Stewart, 2016; Richardson 2005; Watt et al. 2002). The study website was also programmed to link all 25 ratings and responses of each individual expert, to that expert's computer IP address.

    Next, Joseph and his research assistants searched the faculty rosters of every university in the English-speaking world and located over 1000 scientists who had been identified by their universities as experts in fungi, algae and lichens, and over 1000 experts identified as experts in geomorphology and mineralogy, all of whom were invited to participate. Therefore, the "life on Mars" study was based on the judgments of two homogeneous "closed populations" of exerts in subfields of biology and geology (Joseph 2016). Samples from "closed populations" have a high degree of reliability and validity and accurately represent the views of other scientists belonging to those homogenous populations (Dommeyer et al. 2004; Hewson & Stewart, 2016; Richardson 2005; Watt et al. 2002).

    Seventy scientists--40 biologists and 30 geologists--completed the invitation-only, computerized-study which enabled each expert to view; examine; type in the name of each specimen; and to judge, utilizing a computerized four-point probability scale, the likelihood each of these specimens photographed by NASA on Mars, are living organisms:

    1 (0% Probability) - 2 (33% Probability) - 3 (66% Probability) - 4 (100% Probability).

    Each of the participants were informed these specimens were photographed on Mars. Examination of the raw data indicated geologists and biologists agreed on five of their top seven choices and this data was analyzed. Chi-square analyses indicated a significant difference between scientists choosing "1" vs "2" but no difference between those choosing "2" vs "3" and "4," meaning that a significant majority of experts believe there is a high probability these are living organisms.

    A Fisher's exact statistical test was performed and demonstrated that a majority geologists and biologists agreed there is a high probability (vs no probability) of life on Mars, as based on the comparisons of the top five specimens chosen by biologists (p = <0.0008) and geologists (p = <0.0004); and the same is true of the top seven specimens, biologists (p = <0.0001) and geologists (p = <0.0001). Dozens of experts also identified these specimens as "puff balls," "Basidiomycota," "mushrooms," and "lichens." Therefore, a statistically significant majority of experts agree there is a high probability fungi and lichens may have colonized the Red Planet (Joseph 2016). Similarity in morphology, however, is not proof.

    8. Evidence of Lichens on Mars?

    Lichens are composite life forms comprised and consisting of a symbiotic relationship involving algae/cyanobacteria (photobiont) and fungi (mycobiont), the latter of which is largely responsible for the lichens' thallus, mushroom shape, and fruiting bodies (Armstrong 2017; Brodo et al. 2001). The specimens observed on Mars and identified by experts as lichens (Dass 2017; Joseph 2016) closely resemble Dibaeis baeomyces, a fruticose lichen belonging to the Icmadophilaceae family--characterized by stalks which may grow to 6 mm topped by a bulbous apothecia, 1-4 mm in diameter and a crustose granular thallus attached to a substrate (Brodo, et al. 2001; Seminara et al. 2018). Dibaeis baeomyces have been found growing on rocks, in desert sand, dry clay, and in the arctic (Brodo et al. 2001; Jonsson et al. 2008; Platt & Spatafora 2000; Ryan et al. 2002; U.S. Department of the Interior 2010).

    The Martian specimens depicted in Figures 1 and 2 resemble Dibaeis baeomyces in morphology, shape, growth patterns, and size. All were photographed by Opportunity's Panoramic Camera, which, according to NASA's website, has a 1024 x 1024 pixel array and the following specs: The camera's "right eye" specializes in infrared wavelengths and the "left eye" in visible colors, thereby enabling NASA to colorize images. Both "eyes" are mounted at a height of about five feet (1.5 meters), with 11.8 inches (30 centimeters) between them. Image resolution is ~0.04 inch (1 millimeter) per pixel at a distance of 9.8 feet (3 meters), whereas focal length is capable of close ups at ~1.5 inches (39 millimeters), with optimal focus from five feet (1.5 meters). Unfortunately, NASA does not provide any specifications as to the exact distance from the camera, or the precise size of the images. Hence, the estimated size of specimens is based on bore hole size and pixel dimension.

    According to parameters provided by NASA, drill holes are 45 mm in diameter, five mm deep. Based on drill hole comparative parameters, specimens resembling lichens are approximately two mm to seven mm in size/length. Therefore, the Opportunity images of what appear to be lichens (Figures 1, 2) are similar to terrestrial lichens (Dibaeis baeomyces) in growth patterns, morphology, and size. By contrast, these specimens (Figures 1, 2) have little resemblance to terrestrial hematite (Figure 4), NASA's (2007) favored hypothesis. Hematite does not have a thallus or a fruiting-body mushroom shape, or a stalk/stem attached to rocks, or jut-out from rocks at varying angles. These are characteristics of lichens (Figure 3), not hematite (Figure 4). These observations support the Martian-lichens-hypothesis.

    Figure 1. Sol 88, photographed by Opportunity's "left" Panoramic Camera "eye." A significant majority of experts in fungi, lichens, geomorphology, and minerology agreed these may be lichens (Joseph 2016). These lichen-like specimens are estimated to be approximately 2 mm to 6 mm in size/length (based on bore hole specs) and are similar to terrestrial lichens (see text for details). Although there is no known geological process which commonly produces mushroom shaped rocks with stems, it is unknown if these are in fact living organisms. Similarities in morphology are not proof.

    Figure 2. Sol 37, photographed by Opportunity's "left" Panoramic "eye." A majority of experts agreed these may be lichens (Joseph 2016). The average size of these lichen-like specimens are estimated to be 2 mm to 7 mm, and are similar to terrestrial lichens (see Figure 3). However, if these are living organisms, or unusual sediments fashioned by the alien environment of Mars is unknown.

    Figure 3. Terrestrial Lichens / Dibaeis baeomyces. Ranging from 2 mm to 6 mm in size. Photos reproduced by permission: Courtesy of Dragisa Savic (left) and Stephen and Sylvia Sharnoff (right).

    Figure 4. Hematite concretions the size of "pebbles" "marbles" and "golf balls" (the largest five cm) from Utah's national parks. Reproduced with permission, courtesy of Fantasia Mining and Ashley Rouech.

    9. Evidence of Fungi on Mars?

    Lichens are comprised of algae and fungi, and four different investigators (Dass 2017; Joseph 2014; Rabb 2015, 2018; Small 2015) and a significant majority of experts in fungi, lichens, geomorphology, and mineralogy (Joseph 2016) have identified what appears to be fungi on the Martian surface and beneath Martian rock shelters (Figures 5, 6, 13). Fifteen specimens were photographed by the Rover Opportunity increasing in size and emerging from the ground over a three day period (Figure 8).

    Puffballs (phylum Basidiomycota) are round-shaped fruiting bodies that contain trillions of spores which are released as dry powdery "puffs" and which can resemble flakes of dry paint. They sit directly on and are usually attached by short stalks to the ground (Petersen 2013; Roberts & Evans 2011). Thus, the specimens in Figure 5 and 6 resemble puffballs (Figure 7). What appears to be spores may be littering the surrounding Martian surface (Figure 6). By contrast, NASA's favored hypothesis is these specimens are hematite produced in hot-springs (NASA 2009; Squyres et al. 2004).

    Figure 5. Sol 257 photographed by NASA's Mars Rover Opportunity. Martian specimens resembling Puffballs (Basidiomycota), some with stalks and shedding what appears to be spores and the outer cap, lower cup, and universal veil that covers embryonic fungi. To speculate further, the thick coats of white material being shed from the sides of some specimens may consist of crustose, and the white powder-spore-like material may consist of leprose. It is impossible, however, to determine with a high level of confidence if these are in fact living organisms. Similarities in morphology do not constitute proof.

    Figure 6. Sol 182 photographed by NASA Rover Opportunity. A majority of experts identified these specimens as "fungi" and "puffballs" (Joseph 2016). Note what appears to be spores littering the surface. NASA favors a hematite hypothesis.  These specimens, however, also resemble hematite.

    Figure 7. Comparing terrestrial fungi (left) with Martian specimens (right, Sol 221 photographed by the Rover Opportunity at Meridian Planum, Mars). Credits: terrestrial puffballs, photo reproduced from myko.cz, Czech Mycological Society.

    Specimens depicted in Figures 5 and 6 were photographed by the "microscopic imager" attached to the rover Opportunity. According to specs provided on NASA's website, the microscopic imager has a focal length ranging from 0.8 inch (21 millimeters) an optimal focus distance of 2.67 inches (68 millimeters) and can resolve features as small at 0.004 inches (0.1 mm). The original image's size of Figures 6 and 7 was 1024 x 1024 pixels (0.001 inch or 0.031 millimeter per pixel). Based on these stats, the estimated size of the specimens in Figures 5 and 6 range from 1 mm to 50 mm (1 cm to 5 cm). Mature terrestrial puffballs, on average, are approximately 4.267 cm in size (Petersen 2013; Roberts & Evans 2011). In size and morphology several of these specimens resemble puffballs (Joseph 2016).

    The specimens depicted in Figures 5, 6, 8, also clearly resemble spherical hematite (Figure 4) in size, shape, morphology. However, hematite does consist of and does not shed sheaths of what appears to be a thick veil of material coating its outer-surface. Then there is the white fluffy-powdery spore-like material which appears to litter the ground. If not biological, perhaps these thick flakes and powdery substances are clumps of minerals, patina or salt and products of a sedimentological process in reaction to water or the Martian atmosphere that adhered to the contours of Martian hematite and surface features.

    Evidence favoring the fungal/puffball hypothesis is what appears to be the growth and emergence of 15 specimens, over a three day period (Figure 8). Specifically, five appear to increase in size whereas ten emerge from the ground. If they are immature and still growing, this would explain the absence of spores. If they are not growing, and are in fact hematite, then the only other reasonable explanation is that a powerful wind uncovered these specimens by blowing away dust, dirt, and sand.

    Figure 8. Sol 1145-left v Sol 1148-right). Comparing Sol 1145-left vs Sol 1148-right. Growth of fifteen Martian specimens over three days. Specimens labeled 1-5 and marked with red circles have increased in size. Those specified by arrows--Sol 1148-right--demarcate the emergence of ten new specimens which were not visible in Sol 1145-left photographed three days earlier by NASA/JPL. Differences in photo quality are secondary to changes in camera-closeup-focus by NASA. The majority of experts in fungi, lichens, geomorphology, and mineralogy agreed these are likely living specimens, i.e. fungi, puffballs. An alternate explanation is a strong wind uncovered hematite which had been buried beneath sand and dirt.

    10. Wind or Fungal Growth?

    The Opportunity was not equipped to measure wind. However, Opportunity has been subject to extremely dusty conditions. For example, in December of 2013 the average dust factor was estimated by NASA to be .467 (very dusty); 0.964 (mildly dusty) in May of 2014; and 0.725 (moderately dusty) in June of 2016 (NASA 2018). In fact, rather than strong Martian winds blowing away dust, sand, and dirt, they have instead blanketed the Opportunity and its solar panels with so much debris that Opportunity has been subject to repeated episodes of reduced power (e.g. from 700 watt hours to 400), thereby severely limiting its activities. Furthermore, because of dust, Opportunity twice stopped functioning for long periods, including in July of 2007 when solar-panel output dropped to 128 watt hours (NASA 2007) and in June of 2018 when Opportunity finally ceased to function (NASA 2018) and has yet to recover as of February 14, 2019.

    Given these dusty conditions, what is the likelihood that a strong wind would have uncovered the specimens in Figure 8, and not covered them up (and the Opportunity's solar panels) with dust, sand, and dirt? The answer is unknown and a cleansing wind remains a distinct and reasonable possibility.

    Figure 9. Mars Sol 2718 vs Sol 2813-- The exact cause or identity of this specimen (right) is unknown but may represent possible growth of what appears to be a mass of bacteria and fungi on the Mars Rover, Opportunity, after 95 (Martian) days. Photo, NASA/JPL.

    The wind explanation cannot explain why before and after photos, taken by NASA, depict what appears to be large masses of bacteria and fungi growing on the rovers Opportunity and Curiosity (Figures 9, 10, 11, 12). Moreover, what experts identified as fungi growing beneath a Martian rock shelter (Figure 14) is very similar to what appears to be fungi (and biocorrosion) within the shelter of the Curiosity's upper deck (Figures 12, 14). Wind is not a likely explanation for what appears to be biological growth on the rovers. Instead the evidence supports the hypothesis that fungi (and lichens) may have colonized and are growing on Mars.

    Figure 10. Mars Sol 51 vs Sol 1089--Growth of what appears to be a mass of bacteria and fungi on the Mars Rover Curiosity after 1038 Martian days. An alternate explanation is dust and dirt accumulated selectively in this area of the rover. Photo NASA/JPL.

    Figure 11. Sol 51. Mastcam photo of the interior, flooring and shelter of an exposed enclosed compartment in the rover Curiosity's chem cam deck after 51 Martian days. Photo by NASA/JPL.

    Figure 12. Sol 1089. Possible Fungal contamination or bio-corrosion of the interior, walls, flooring, and shelter of an enclosed compartment in the rover Curiosity's chem cam deck after 1089 Martian days? (Compare with Figure 11). Another possibility: chemical contamination or sand and salt which adhered only to the interior surface? Photo Mastcam, by NASA/JPL.

    Figure 13. Sol 1162, Rover Curiosity. Experts identified the white specimens as fungi (Joseph 2016).

    Figure 14. Comparison of an exposed compartment in Curiosity's Chem Cam Deck (Sol 1089 / Left, Figure 12) with Sol 1162 (Right, Figure 13). If this represents coincidence or contamination is unknown.

    11. The Biology of Hematite?

    Four independent investigators and a majority of experts in fungi, lichens, geomorphology, and mineralogy favor a biological explanation for Martian specimens resembling fungi/puffballs as depicted in Figures 5, 6, and 8. NASA (2009) and Squyres and colleagues (2004) argue in favor of hematite and have provided evidence in support of this hypothesis. Hematite, however, is not evidence against biology, but might be further proof of biology. There is evidence that prokaryotes and fungi may play a role in the formation and cementing together of this mineral (Ayupova et al. 2016; Claeys 2006; Owocki et al. 2016).

    NASA has identified what may be "hematite" on the Martian surface as based on photographs utilizing color filters taken from space by NASA's Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft's infrared spectrometer (NASA 2009). Chemical (but non-biological) studies at ground level--via the Rovers "Opportunity" and "Spirit"--also detected the presence of hematite (Squyres et al. 2004).

    Hematite is a mineralized iron oxide which, over thousands of years, slowly forms in hot springs (Anthony et al. 2005; Morel 2013), as well as in volcanoes when temperatures rise above 950 C (1740 F). NASA (2009) and Squyres et al. (2004) have argued that Martian hematite was most likely created in boiling hot springs and hydrothermal vents billions of years ago.

    Likewise, numerous species of bacteria and archaea flourish in hot springs and hydrothermal vents including anaerobic hyperthermophiles, sulfate reducing bacteria (Desulfovibrio desulfuricans), and microbes such as thermophilic archaebacteria Thermus aquaticus (Gerday & Glansdorff 2007; Durvasula & Rao 2018; Robb et al. 2007). And, as noted, there is evidence hematite may be formed in association with biological activity (Ayupova et al 2016; Bosea et al. 2009; Claeys 2006; Fredrickson et al., 2008; Gralnick & Hau 2007; Owocki et al. 2016).

    On Earth, hematite filaments and tubes are similar to structures produced by iron-oxidizing bacteria which suggests the former are fashioned by the latter (Ayupova et al 2016; Claeys 2006; Rajendrana et al. 2017). Moreover, there is evidence that a variety of bacteria help form (by cementing together) or feed upon hematite by extracting energy from iron which precipitates hematite formation (Bosea et al. 2009; Fredrickson et al. 2008; Gralnick & Hau 2007). Oolitic hematite, for example, is fashioned when sediment particles (ooids) on the seafloor accumulate thin layers of lime. Bacteria replace the lime thus assisting in the fashioning of hematite (Claeys 2006; Lowy et al. 2006). Likewise, anaerobes such as Shewanella--a gram-negative, proteobacteria--grows and feeds on hematite and respires on a variety of organic electron acceptors found in hematite (Bosea et al. 2009; Fredrickson et al. 2008, Gralnick & Hau 2007; Lowy et al. 2006).

    Fungi may also play a major role in hematite formation (Ayupova et al. 2016, Claeys 2006; Owocki et al. 2016), the mineral substrates of which have been found "attached to fungal filaments, embedded in the fungal mycelium" (Claeys 2006). As determined by Clayes (2006) fungal interactions with hematite also produce "significant biomechanical and biochemical bioweathering features: strong pitting of the mineral surfaces, exfoliation, tunnelling, dissolution, honeycomb-alveolar structures, perforations, fragmentation, and cementation." There is a strong attachment of fungal hyphae to these minerals, such that "fungi engulf whole blocks of minerals in the hyphal network, irrespective of mineral surface topography" (Claeys 2006). Spherical hematite contains numerous filaments with structures similar to fungal hyphae (Ayupova et al. 2016; Claeys 2006). 

    Hematite fashioned in hot springs or large bodies of water, therefore, may be cemented together and then shaped and fashioned via the assistance of fungal and bacterial activity (Ayupova et al. 2016; Claeys 2006, Owocki et al. 2016; Lowy et al. 2006; Morel 2013). Therefore, like the hematite of Earth, the Martian hematite identified by NASA (2009) and Squyres et al. (2004) could be, at least in part, a byproduct of biological activity and is further evidence that Mars may have been (and may still be) a living planet which was long ago colonized by fungi and prokaryotes including those typically dwelling in water.

    12. Martian Meteorite ALH 84001

    Claims of "nanobacteria" in Martian meteorite ALH 84001 have been vigorously disputed and are not an issue here. As summed up by Martel and colleagues (2012), "...structures resembling terrestrial life forms known as nanobacteria--can be deemed ambiguous at best."

    Likewise, there is controversy over evidence of biological residue, carbonates, and fossilized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)--a byproduct of cellular decay--discovered in ALH 84001, and other Martian meteorites (see Treiman, 2003 vs Thomas-Keprta et al. 2009). Steele et al. (2012), after examining 11 Martian meteorites, report that 10 contain a ubiquitous distribution of carbon found in association with oxide grains and magmatic minerals and which indicate an abiotic origin, perhaps secondary to Martian magmas. Treiman and Essen (2011) also favor an abiogenic explanation.

    Thomas-Keprta et al. (2009) agrees that much of what appears to be biological residue is probably abiogenic in origin. However, her team also argued that at least 25% is biological (McKay et al. 2009; Thomas-Keprta et al. 2009). Martel et al (2012), who argues against nanobacteria, also admits that "the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, magnetite crystals, carbonate globules... are compatible with living processes."

    In fact, the highest concentration of Martian PAHs was embedded in or found alongside those areas of the meteor rich in carbonates (Clemett et al. 1998). Moreover, the magnetotactic residue is not random, but has the characteristic chain-like organization associated with biological activity (Clemett et al. 1998; McKay et al. 1996, 2009). Hence, as based on evidence marshalled by Thomas-Keprta and colleagues (McKay et al. 1996, 2009; Thomas-Keprta et al. 2002), at least 25% of the Martian PAHs found within this ejected sediment may have been produced by carbonate and iron-eating bacteria, magnetotactic bacteria, algae, or fungi around 4 billion years ago (Thomas-Keprta et al. 2009).

    Moreover, the carbonates and biological residue appear to have been produced in an aqueous environment (Halevy et al. 2011; McKay et al. 1996, 2009; Thomas-Keprta et al. 2009). For example, Shaheen et al. (2015), upon measuring carbonate phases and distinct oxygen isotope compositions with ALH 84001, found several episodes of aqueous activity. Halevy et al (2011) have come to similar conclusions which they attribute to "a gradually evaporating, subsurface water body--likely a shallow aquifer (meters to tens of meters below the surface)."

    13. Biology and Martian Stromatolites?

    A detailed analysis of Martian meteorite ALH 84001 revealed high concentrations of carbon compounds, including elongated spheroids and rounded carbonate globs and which had been recycled through water (McKay et al. 1996, 2009; Thomas-Keprta et al. 2002, 2009). Carbonates are typically found in fossil beds of dead sea life. The Martian ALH 84001 carbonate globules also contain cores rich in calcium coupled with dissolved carbonates and magnetite and iron-sulfides which were most likely produced biologically (McKay et al. 1996, 2009; Thomas-Keprta et al. 2002, 2009); i.e. carbonate- and iron-metabolizing bacteria, including cyanobacteria. The outer rims were also oxidized in a pattern typically associated with biological activity; that is reducing and rusting, secondary, perhaps, to photosynthesis, which is also a characteristic of cyanobacteria.

    In 2009, Rizzo and Cantasano reported observations of segmented sedimentary structures bordered by lamina and which they interpreted to be evidence of stromatolites, i.e. microbialites (Rizzo & Cantasano 2009, 2011, 2016), most likely created by photosynthesizing, carbonate metabolizing cyanobacteria living in water (Noffke 2015).

    In 2014, Bianciardi, Rizzo and Cantasano, conducted an extensive observational analysis of sedimentary microstructures coupled with a quantitative, objective, image analysis and compared what appears to be Martian stromatolites photographed by the Mars rover Opportunity, with terrestrial stromatolites and microbialites, so as to evaluate the geometric textural complexity vs "randomness." Bianciardi and colleagues (2014) reported that "the morphometric analysis reveals that both textures, from microbialites (Earth) and from selected MI images (Mars), present a multifractal aspect" and that "Martian and terrestrial textures were extremely similar to each other." Moreover, they found a "textural pattern that is also present in living microbialites as well in recent and fossil stromatolites... characteristic of microbial communities of cyanobacteria." Other investigators have reached similar conclusions (Ruffi & Farmer, 2016; Noffke 2015).

    Ruffi and Farmer (2016), upon examining sediments photographed by the rover Spirit, detected silica structures which closely resemble "microbially mediated micro-stromatolites" as well what could be biofilms with filaments and sheaths. In addition, morphological analyses of sedimentary specimens--photographed by the rover Spirit, at Gusev crater--revealed microstructures organized as intertwined microspherule filaments and which are also observed in Earthly microbialites (Bianciardi et al. 2014).

    Noffke (2015) reported that rocks in the < 3.7 Ga Gillespie Lake region of Mars display sedimentary characteristics which mirror ecological changes over time typical of terrestrial microbiological mats and produced by biological interactions with the environment in regressive bodies of water. Based on an analysis of photographs made by Curiosity's Mastcam camera of Martian outcrops, Noffke (2015) observed macroscopic morphologies and spatial relationships associated with a temporal change in the stratigraphic succession typically produced secondary to colonization by microbial mats; i.e. "centimeter- to meter-scale structures similar in macroscopic morphology"… that include "'erosional remnants and pockets,' 'mat chips,' 'roll-ups,' 'desiccation cracks,' and 'gas domes' which do not have a random distribution but were arranged in spatial associations and temporal successions similar to the "growth of a microbially dominated ecosystem that thrived in pools that later dried completely."

    In a further examination of bio-mineralization processes it was found that Martian sediments are characterized by highly organized microspherules similar to terrestrial stromatolites which consist of voids, gas domes, and layer deformations due to microbial activity and gas excretions (Rizzo & Cantasano 2016). Moreover, a quantitative image statistical analysis comparing 45 microbialites samplings with 50 photographed by the rover also determined the specimens from Mars are statistically and morphologically similar to terrestrial samples with a probability of this occurring by chance being less than 1/28, p<0.004 bianciardi="" et="" al="" 2014="" these="" findings="" therefore="" supports="" the="" hypothesis="" that="" algae="" cyanobacteria="" may="" have="" colonized="" mars="" over="" 3="" billion="" years="" ago="" in="" presence="" of="" water="" span="">

    Figure 15. Sol 820. Green algae, stromatolites, microbial mats, or unusual abiotic sediments? Photographed by the Rover Curiosity Mars Science Laboratory Mars Hand Lens Imager which takes color images of features as small as 12.5 micrometers and at distances between 20 mm and infinity and having a depth of field of 1.6 mm to 2 mm. Note: specimen "A" at bottom center (also depicted in Figure 16). Photograph: NASA/JPL.

    Figure 16. Sol 820. Specimen A (from Figure 15). Evidence of bacterial mat or an unusual abiotic sedimentary formation? Photographed by the Rover Curiosity Mars Science Laboratory Mars Hand Lens Imager.

    Figure 17. Microanalyses of a Martian stromatolite (top) photographed by the Rover Curiosity (Sol 506) compared with a terrestrial stromatolite from Lagoa Salgada, Brazil (bottom). Highly organized microspherules and thrombolytic microfacies are common to both. Earthly Cyanobacteria typically form voids, intertwined filaments, and layer deformation within stromatolites. It is possible these formations were produced geologically in the absence of any biological influences.

    26-03-2019 om 21:26 geschreven door peter  

    0 1 2 3 4 5 - Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen)
    Categorie:ASTRONOMIE / RUIMTEVAART


    Afbeeldingsresultaten voor  welcome to my website tekst

    De bronafbeelding bekijken


    De bronafbeelding bekijken


    MUFON’s New Social Network

    MUFON’s New Social Network


    Mijn favorieten
  • Verhalen TINNY * SF
  • IFO-databank van Belgisch UFO meldpunt
  • Belgisch UFO meldpunt
  • The Black Vault
  • Terry's Theories UFO Sightings. Its a Youtube Channel thats really overlooked, but has a lot of great and recent sightings on it.
  • . UFO Institute: A cool guy who works hard
  • YOUTUBE kanaal van het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt
  • LATEST UFO SIGHTINGS

  • DES LIENS AVEC LE RESEAU FRANCOPHONE DE MUFON ET MUFONEUROP
  • BELGISCH UFO-NETWERK BUFON
  • RFacebook BUFON
  • MUFONFRANCE
  • MUFON RHÔNE-ALPES
  • MUFON MIDI-PYRÉNNÉES
  • MUFON HAUTE-NORMANDIE
  • MUFON MAROC
  • MUFON ALSACE LORRAINE
  • MUFON USA
  • Site du REUB ASBL

    Other links with friends / bloggers # not always UFOs
  • PANGRadio MarcSima
  • Blog 2 Bernward
  • Nederlandse UFO-groep
  • Ufologie Liège
  • NIBURU
  • Disclose TV
  • UFO- Sightings - HOTSPOT
  • Website van BUFON ( Belgisch UFO-Netwerk)
  • The Ciizen Hearing on Disclosure
  • Exopolitics Finland: LINKS

    LINKS OF THE BLOGS OF MY FACEBOOK-FRIENDS
  • ufologie -Guillaume Perrot
  • UFOMOTION
  • CENTRE DE RECHERCHE OVNI PARASPYCHOLOGIE SCIENCE - CROPS -
  • SOCIAL PARANORMAL Magazine
  • TJ Morris ACO Associations, Clubs, Organizations - TJ Morris ACO Social Service Club for...
  • C.E.R.P.I. BELGIQUE
  • Attaqued'un Autre Monde - Christian Macé
  • UFOSPOTTINGNEDERLAND
  • homepage UFOSPOTTINGNEDERLAND
  • PARANORMAL JOURNEY GUIDE

    WELCOME TO THIS BLOG! I HOPE THAT YOU ENJOY THE LECTURE OF ALL ISSUES. If you did see a UFO, you can always mail it to us. Best wishes.

    Beste bezoeker,
    Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere op
     www.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief  maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming!
    DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK.
    BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...


    Laatste commentaren
  • crop cirkels (herman)
        op UFO'S FORM CROP CIRCLE IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS - SCOTLAND 1996
  • crop cirkels (herman)
        op UFO'S FORM CROP CIRCLE IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS - SCOTLAND 1996
  • Een zonnige vrijdag middag en avond (Patricia)
        op MUFON UFO Symposium with Greg Meholic: Advanced Propulsion For Interstellar Travel
  • Dropbox

    Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...


    Gastenboek
  • Nog een fijne avond
  • Hallo Lieverd
  • kiekeboe
  • Een goeie middag bezoekje
  • Zomaar een blogbezoekje

    Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!


    Over mijzelf
    Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
    Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
    Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 73 jaar jong.
    Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
    Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën... Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
    Zoeken in blog


    LINKS NAAR BEKENDE UFO-VERENIGINGEN - DEEL 1
  • http://www.ufonieuws.nl/
  • http://www.grenswetenschap.nl/
  • http://www.beamsinvestigations.org.uk/
  • http://www.mufon.com/
  • http://www.ufomeldpunt.be/
  • http://www.ufowijzer.nl/
  • http://www.ufoplaza.nl/
  • http://www.ufowereld.nl/
  • http://www.stantonfriedman.com/
  • http://ufo.start.be/

    LINKS NAAR BEKENDE UFO-VERENIGINGEN - DEEL 2
  • www.ufo.be
  • www.caelestia.be
  • ufo.startpagina.nl.
  • www.wszechocean.blogspot.com.
  • AsocCivil Unifa
  • UFO DISCLOSURE PROJECT

  • Startpagina !


    ">


    Een interessant adres?

    Mijn favorieten
  • Verhalen


  • Blog tegen de regels? Meld het ons!
    Gratis blog op http://blog.seniorennet.be - SeniorenNet Blogs, eenvoudig, gratis en snel jouw eigen blog!