Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.
This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.
DEAR VISITOR,
MY BLOG EXISTS NEARLY 13 YEARS AND 4 MONTH.
ON /30/09/2024 MORE THAN 2.230.520
VISITORS FROM 135 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.
THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400GUESTS PER DAY.
THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
28-02-2015
Breaking News! Flying Disc [CRASH] Into Frozen Lake? Canada Military [UFO-Recovery] 2/19/2015
Breaking News! Flying Disc [CRASH] Into Frozen Lake? Canada Military [UFO-Recovery] 2/19/2015
Could 1947 Just Have Happened Again? Reports Just Tonight! Original Correspondence As Follows Submitted To Thirdphaseofmoon! Quote Mark “Apparently a disc shaped craft was seen crashing through the ice on the lake, at least one person got photographic evidence but has since been detained by the Canadian military. UFO crash in rural Manitoba Canada: A UFO crash landed into a frozen lake within the last 24 hours on a Indian reservation in rural Manitoba.
“I have contact with a former resident of the reservation and their family still lives on the reservation and informed them about the situation this evening.
I have also been informed that nobody is allowed to leave or enter the reservation at this time and that the military has been going door to door talking with residents. They are telling the residents that they are conducting emergency training exercises, but there has been an extreme cold front in Manitoba over the last 2 days and it is extremely dangerous to spend time outdoors for any period.
The military has moved in all their equipment effectively blocking any view of what may have crashed into the water or what they are doing there, but I’m sure they are recovering the evidence.
I will get back in touch with in a few hours, I was told the name of the reservation but it was very long and hard to pronounce, I will get the exact spelling of the reservation in a few hours when I meet with my contact and I will forward any new information over.”
When you get up above the earth, you look down and begin to see shapes. Many are made naturally and others are ancient sites, usually circular. The ones in South Africa (below) were dated around 300,000 years!
South Africa
Pisco Valley, Peru
Circlestone, Superstition Mountains, AZ
Stonehenge, UK
Jordan
Wales
Suffolk, UK
Denmark
Utah
Russia
France
Scotland
Ohio
Ireland
India
New Mexico
What did this shape mean to the ancients? It is repeated in clusters like grapes, with a lines bisecting it, in consecutive circle within circle and spiral forms.
COSTA MESA CALIFORNIAI would carpool with my husband each workday for college. He would work in his office and I would grab a bit of sleep as it was still very early and before my classes started. It was 4 AM when I was putting down my seat as usual to take my nap.
It was dark in the parking lot, I put my blanket over myself and closed my eyes and felt a presence. I can’t say if I heard anything but I just felt something there perhaps the figures cast a slight shadow. I turned onto my back to look out the window and suddenly I could not move or scream. I saw 2 figures that appeared like the grays I have heard of.
They were a little taller than the car. They had a light gray and smooth flesh appearance. I could not move my head so I could not look at their bodies much but to see their heads. I was caught by their eyes. Very dark and deep looking and had the almond shape.
The shape of their heads was elongated and larger than their bodies. An metal cold cylindrical instrument with a needle on the end of it, was coming through the window at me and it started entering my head. The area at the instrument at the window seemed almost like melted glass if I could find words for it. I wanted to move away from it but couldn’t move at all.
It hurt like a searing, burning intense pain. I was thinking my thoughts to them, “stop, go away, don’t” but they didn’t communicate with me in any way that I remember. I was terrified! I just wanted them to stop what they were doing. It felt as if that tool that had a needle with a long handle had gone into my sinuses above my right ear.
I couldn’t believe it seemed as though it was going through the metal and the glass of the car and into my head! How? I could not move at all but for my eyes and that seemed to be a bit limited? The tool retracted instantly and they were gone as quickly as they appeared.
I could move again. I was out of that car so fast and into my husbands office so fast! I was now hysterically telling him what just happened and he thought that I had just had a nightmare but it was very real. I had not had time to go to sleep.
I have had sinus issues and have since gone out on permanent disability. I had a sinus surgery and they told me that they found rat cells? I asked how that could be? The doctor changed the subject and never did answer me.
I feel that it had to have come from that time in the parking lot. I have had pain in that same area of my head off and on since that attack. I get a searing pain that I can’t really even think when it happens. I call them attacks.
I don’t know what they did but I don’t like them at all! They have caused me a lot of continued pain. For me the object was the tool they sent into my head as I did not see any craft.
Slideshow: a collection of photographs that show an unnatural orange light moving across the Saugatuck Reservoir in Nov., 2013. Each picture is an eight-second exposure, taken one-after-another, meaning each photograph shows the distance traveled by the light in eight seconds. (Note: an earlier version of this story incorrectly stated the time-lapse pictures were taken in October.)
In the fall of 1966, a dentist driving down Route 53 through Redding and Weston noticed something unexplainable hovering over the Saugatuck Reservoir.
The dentist, Dr. Harry Neilsen of Darien, later described what he saw as “a large, triangular glow bearing red and white lights” just above the horizon near the large reservoir, a news wire service reported in December of that year.
This event would prove to be the first of many published reports of strange, often red-orange lights in the skies above both Redding and Weston. The reports, found in old newspaper articles and on UFO reporting sites, have been compiled and today, almost 50 years since the first report, Hersam Acorn Newspapers has what may be the first photographic evidence of the phenomenon.
Taken in November and December of 2013, the digital photographs by Wilton Bulletin reporter Christopher Burns show an unnatural orange light moving horizontally and slowly just above the tree-line on the southeast side of the Saugatuck Reservoir, near the Easton/Weston town line.
The light is so bright in the photographs that a clear reflection of it can be seen in the water of the reservoir.
Andrew Flynn, a Reddingite who was with Mr. Burns while he took the pictures, said the light was bright and immediately unfamiliar.
“Living just outside of New York City, planes and helicopters are seen quite often. When I first saw this light I was with a group of people and it was immediately identified as something out of the ordinary,” Mr. Flynn said.
And it didn’t happen just once, Mr. Flynn said. During the winter of 2013, he “continued to see it time and time again.”
The Saugatuck Reservoir was constructed in the late 1930s on the site of a hamlet known as Valley Forge. In the 1700s, Valley Forge was made up of farms and swampland. In the 19th Century, the village was a vital industrial center, boasting iron and steel mills and factories along the Saugatuck River.
But in the early part of the 20th Century, Bridgeport Hydraulic Company bought up most of the land, dammed the Saugatuck River and flooded the valley to create the reservoir to serve the city of Bridgeport to the south.
The majority of the reservoir is located in Weston, where 75% of the town’s land is protected from development in perpetuity. In fact, the entire eastern shore of the reservoir borders Centennial State Forrest, where no development has been allowed.
A map shows the point on the reservoir where the photos were taken, and the estimated location of the lights. (Click the maps to enlarge)
Historical sitings
In addition to the 1966 lights siting, a string of Redding Pilot articles from the mid-1970s report a very similar phenomenon.
“Moving in a straight path across the sky was a large yellow globe, the brightest thing in the clear evening. It moved from west to east above the tree line at a fairly good speed and then disappeared over the horizon,” one Pilot editorial from 1976 reads. “[The woman] explained how the bright sky-thing had kept pace with her car as it moved north into Redding; then it suddenly changed direction and headed east.”
In the editorial account, the light would later return to the home of the woman, where she and her husband saw it hovering again.
Another story in The Pilot, “Encounters Too Close for Comfort” from 1978, goes into even greater detail.
Leon Adams reported seeing a strange light as he drove to work the midnight to 8 a.m. shift in the boiler room at the Gilbert and Bennett Wire Mill in Georgetown.
The article reads, “At first the light was stationary and looked as if it hung directly over the factory, Mr. Adams said, but as he approached it, he realized the UFO was more distant. He estimated its location as above the Saugatuck Reservoir because the brightness lit up the trees … He tried to think of likely explanations for the object, but the light had been too bright, particularly when it began to spin and show colors, to have been a helicopter, a plane, or a search light.”
The first page of a proofread draft of an article titled “Encounters Too Close for Comfort” which appeared in a 1978 copy of The Redding Pilot newspaper. To see copies of all news articles related to the lights, click here.
More recent reports
At least two more Redding Pilot articles from the 1970s discuss strange lights in the skies above Redding, Weston, and even Easton. Such grouped sitings might have beeen written off as the work of a prankster had the orange lights not continued to be reported from that time up until today.
Four reports of lights in the sky were published by the National UFO Reporting Center in the early 2000s. One, from February 2011, discusses a light above Devil’s Den, a nature preserve near the Weston/Redding border.
“Last night at 8 p.m. I looked out [of] my living room window and noticed a flashing bright red light low on the horizon a mile or so away over the Devil’s Den area on the Weston/Redding border. It was low in the sky and unusually bright, much brighter than any airplane lights, flashing and drifting very slowly.”
Weston’s Animal Control Officer Mark Harper grew up on the reservoir and often works in the area, but told Hersam Acorn last year that he has never heard of the orange lights.
Weston Police Chief John Troxell, who has been with the Weston Police Department for 34 years, said he can’t recall any reports regarding lights over the reservoir.
On the other hand, a former Redding Pilot reporter told the newspaper that even 40 years after he saw the lights on BlChampignons snijdenack Rock Turnpike, he still remembers them. The Weston Forum has decided to keep his report anonymous at this time.
“In my mind, definitely UFO(s),” he wrote in an email Feb. 16 of this year. “Years later, someone suggested the possibility they were helicopters from Sikorsky. But they changed direction too quickly and moved way too fast. Never seen anything like it before or since.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------eston Forum Reporter Patty Gay contributed to this story.
Anyone with their own story about the Redding/Weston lights is encouraged to send a brief note about the experience to CBurns@WiltonBulletin.com.
To see all of the newspaper articles associated with the lights, click this link.
For a timeline of all 11 published reports of the lights, click this link.
28-02-2015 om 01:27
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
27-02-2015
UFO-MANIA : "Now here's a Real Ufo"
UFO-MANIA : "Now here's a Real Ufo"
"This is a video I saved from YouTube back in May, 2012. The video was uploaded with the same title, without quotes. I was not able to find the original upload. *I have no further information regarding the origin of this video.* - - - Personally, I've never been able to settle on whether these are even "flying objects," or an unusual but interesting atmospheric effect being created by someone/something. If you look closely, there do seem to be vague silhouettes of what might be buildings "above" the mountain range. Or maybe they're other mountain tops? At 0:51, one of the objects exhibits an interesting blinking effect. I don't believe it's CGI, but I'm no expert on that. I've sure as hell never seen anything like it, even online. I'm all ears for explanations, but I'll admit that I tend to lean more toward it being an atmospheric phenomenon. What do you think?"
27-02-2015 om 23:46
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Des drones ont survolé Paris deux nuits consécutives, planant au-dessus de zones sensibles ou touristiques dont la Tour Eiffel, les Invalides et l'ambassade américaine. Le 20 janvier dernier, un autre engin avait été aperçu au dessus de l'Elysée. Cette mini vague de drones sur la capitale survient après celle plus inquiétante de survols du parc nucléaire français par des appareils non identifiés. Alors qu'aucun responsable de ces intrusions n'a été interpellé, certains témoignages concernant le survol des centrales nucléaires de ces derniers mois laissent entrevoir une toute autre histoire : et si ces drones avaient une origine beaucoup plus énigmatique ?
En quatre mois, les deux tiers des 19 centrales nucléaires françaises ont été survolés à une ou à plusieurs reprises. Et les centrales ne sont pas les seules visées par ces inquiétantes tournées d'inspection aériennes: dans la nuit du 26 et 27 janvier, le site militaire de l'île Longue, dans la rade de Brest, où sont abrités les quatre sous-marins nucléaires lanceurs d'engins français a aussi été visité. Dans la seule soirée du 31 octobre 2014, pas moins de six sites ont été visités entre 18 heures et 22 heures : les centrales de Saint-Laurent-des-Eaux (Loir-et-Cher), Dampierre en Burly (Loiret), Belleville-sur-Loire (Cher), Fessenheim (Haut-Rhin), Flamanville (Manche) et Penly (Seine-Maritime).
Une telle simultanéité sur une vaste étendue de territoire suppose une organisation et une logistique sans faille, guère à la portée d'une bande de plaisantins équipée de drones vendus dans le commerce.
«Le survol des centrales nucléaires est interdit dans un périmètre de cinq kilomètres et de 1.000 mètres d'altitude autour des sites. L'espace aérien au-dessus des centrales nucléaires est surveillé par l'armée de l'air, dans le cadre d'un protocole avec EDF», rappelle l'AFP.
Pourtant, après trois mois de survols qui remettent en cause la sécurité du parc nucléaire français, aucune arrestation n'a été effectuée, aucun drone n'a été abattu et aucune piste sérieuse n'est envisagée, du moins publiquement. On ignore même quels types d'appareils sont utilisés : «Les témoignages de gendarmes recueillis sur le site de Crès-Malville parlent de survols dans des conditions météo de vents de 70 km/h et avec de la pluie. On a des hélicoptères à Golfech qui suivent pendant 9 km ces drones. On a un drone qui circule entre Flamanville et la Hague sur 18 km. La thèse des petits drones que l’on pilote le nez sur la clôture ne tient pas» résume pour Science et Avenir Yannick Rousselet, en charge de la campagne sur le nucléaire chez Greenpeace.
"L’armée se trouve confrontée à une stratégie soutenue par une technologie 'exogène'"
Pour l'instant, les drones qui survolent les centrales françaises sont donc au sens le plus littéral du terme des OVNIS, des Objets Volants Non Identifiés. De fait, la communauté française des spécialistes des OVNIS n'a pas tardé à s'emparer du sujet : l'ufologue Claude Levat a écrit le 6 décembre une «lettre ouverte au ministre de la Défense Jean-Yves Le Drian» qu'il interpelle en ces termes :
«L’armée se trouve confrontée à une stratégie soutenue par une technologie "exogène". La même méthodologie peut nous faire craindre une poursuite aggravée de ces manifestations avec démonstrations ostensibles vis à vis d’un public non "préparé". En conséquence en tant que citoyens concernés par la défense du territoire, nous avons l’honneur de vous demander votre opinion concernant cette question.»
Une technologie «exogène», autrement dit non terrestre sous-entend Claude Lavat...
Le Geipan (groupe d'études et d'informations sur les phénomènes aérospatiaux non identifiés), l'organisme officiel dépendant du CNES en charge de l'étude des PANS (Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non identifiés, la terminologie scientifique désormais en vigueur pour désigner les OVNIs) a aussi été saisi par l'ufologue Jacky Kozan, de l'association «l'Académie d'ufologie» : «Vous avez certainement pris connaissance par les média nationaux et étrangers du fait que nos installations nucléaires civiles et militaires sont depuis plusieurs semaines survolées par des “engins non identifiés”. Ces nouvelles ont été confirmées fin octobre 2014 par un directeur national d’EDF s’exprimant sur les chaînes de télévision, en utilisant l’expression “engins volants non identifiés”. En conséquence et sans information provenant du GEIPAN, nous vous demandons de nous faire connaître les résultats d’une enquête qui a certainement été diligentée par le GEIPAN.»
Contrairement au ministère de la Défense, Xavier Passot, responsable du GEIPAN nommé en 2011 n'a pas tardé à répondre : «Pour votre information, le GEIPAN n’a pas été sollicité sur cette affaire récente de survol de centrales nucléaires. (…) Le GEIPAN, qui n’a été sollicité ni par EDF, ni par la gendarmerie, ni par aucun témoin sur cette affaire, n’a aucune activité sur ce sujet, si ce n’est la veille sur les informations de la presse. Et vous savez que nous n’avons pas mission d’aller chercher des observations inexpliquées. Nous sommes bien sûr très curieux de l’origine précise de ces engins volants, mais étant donné le lourd dispositif déjà déployé par la gendarmerie sur le sujet, l’apport du GEIPAN sur cette affaire serait bien maigre.»
Interrogé sur France Culture à propos de ces survols, Xavier Passot confirme mais laisse transparaître quelques doutes sur la version officielle : «Je n'ai pas reçu personnellement de témoignages. Tous les témoins de ces survols sont des employés des centrales nucléaires. Mais je sais qu'une personne a vu quelque chose près de Golfech et a contacté les gendarmes. L'observation a été classée drone (…) Je ne sais même pas sur quels critères tous ces objets ont été identifiés comme des drones. J'espère que c'est sur de bons critères mais je n'en suis pas absolument certain.»
"Nous savons qu’un témoin a déposé à la gendarmerie un témoignage d’observation à Sistel"
Xavier Passot évoque aussi dans sa réponse à Jacky Kozan cette observation d'un PAN près de la centrale de Golfech, le jour d'un survol de drone, le 30 novembre 2014 : «Nous savons toutefois par les forums qu’un témoin a déposé à la gendarmerie un témoignage d’observation à Sistel. Comme d’autres témoins ont observé un drone survolant la centrale de Golfech ce jour-là, ce témoignage a rejoint le dossier de l’enquête judiciaire en cours sur le survol des centrales nucléaires par des drones.»
Ce témoignage, publié sur le forum Mystères des Ovnis est le seul à notre connaissance dans lequel un témoin extérieur à EDF corrobore le survol d'une centrale nucléaire et fournit une description précise de l'objet impliqué, à supposer qu'il s'agit du même objet que celui signalé par la direction de la centrale. Or, le récit du témoin, Marc T., ajoute encore au trouble concernant la nature exacte de cet engin volant:
«Observation du 30 Octobre 2014, entre 20h50 et 21h00. La maison où je me trouvais se situe en hauteur, sur l'un des coteaux de la commune... Avec une vue dégagée sur la Centrale de Golfech. (…) On ne voyait qu'un gros point lumineux de couleur blanche (sans couleur) à l'horizon direction Nord Est vers Donzac (au dessus de Donzac pour être plus précis). A environs 4 à 5 kilomètres de nous et à une altitude de 200 m environ (pas beaucoup plus haut que les tours de la centrale elle-même). (…) Puis il a commencé à bouger lentement à très faible vitesse. Tout en pivotant sur lui-même comme pour amorcer un virage. A ce moment là, j'ai pu voir aux jumelles (et mon ami à l’œil nu) une seconde lumière de type flash. Comme un stroboscope. (...) Puis, il a commencé à se déplacer de plus en plus vite, à la vitesse d'un petit avion de type Cessna. Il se dirige maintenant plus vers St Loup, pour ensuite effectuer un virage assez serré se dirigeant alors dans notre direction. A mesure qu'il s'est rapproché de nous, j'ai pu voir aux jumelles un point rouge assez distinctement, assez brillant lui aussi. (…)
A environ 300 m de nous, de face, toujours avec son gros spot blanc, il reste presque immobile environ 15 à 20 secondes. J'ai alors eu le temps, mon ami aussi, de voir sa forme de face. C'est à ce moment là qu'il est le plus prêt de nous. Il a alors une forme "d'avion". Il ne faisait aucun bruit... rien du tout. On pouvait entendre la moissonneuse-batteuse sur le coteau d'à côté (à notre droite) mais rien pour cet objet. J'ai donc pu voir deux ailes. Son envergure faisait bien 6 à 7 m.
"J'ai observé un ovni triangulaire, noir mat avec trois lumières clignotante"
(…) Toujours aux jumelles, maintenant à 500 m de moi, mais cette fois de profil, j'ai été très surpris car j'avais beau le suivre (il n'avançait pas très vite) je n'arrivais pas à lui donner une forme précise. J'avais bien vu ces ailes juste avant, mais cette fois pratiquement de profil, je ne voyais pas bien les contours de l'objet. Ça faisait un peu l'effet d'un mirage dans le dessert.»
Résumons : un gros objet de six à sept mètres d'envergure, des lumières clignotantes, une forme floue «comme un mirage», une vitesse variable allant du sur-place à celle d'un avion de tourisme, aucun bruit, des «flashs stroboscopiques» que le témoin a interprété comme les flashs d'un appareil photographique... Il est clair que ce type de «drone» ne se trouve pas au supermarché du coin. Ci-dessous, une reconstitution de l'objet vu par les témoins :
Mais il y a plus étonnant encore. Le témoin a rapporté son observation aux gendarmes qui lui auraient confié avoir eux aussi vu quelque chose : «En discutant avec les gendarmes qui ont été très à l'écoute, ils m’ont dit avoir vu plus tard dans la soirée vers 21h50, près de l'un des ponts de la Garonne (…), quelque chose d’encore plus gros, bien plus imposant, presque comme un avion de ligne mais de forme carrée...»
Ce n’est pas la première fois que la centrale de Golfech est survolée par un engin mystérieux. En 2010, deux employés de la centrale ont observé et filmé un objet pour le moins insolite si l’on en croit cette description qui figure dans une enquête réalisée par l’ufologue Christophe Albiero: «Cela s'est déroulé le 6 octobre 2010 entre 20h15 et 20h17 à la centrale nucléaire de Golfech, à quelques mètres du bâtiment de sécurité du site. Il faisait très beau, le ciel est très clair, pas de vent, pas de nuages, visibilité parfaite, pas d'arbres vue complètement dégagée. J'ai observé un ovni triangulaire, noir mat avec trois lumières clignotantes blanches à chaque extrémité, et une rouge clignotante au centre. L'objet volait à basse altitude, j'ai pu le voir de très près. Il était assez grand et se déplaçait très lentement. J'ai pu le suivre a pied en marchant parallèlement à sa trajectoire. A un moment donné je me suis retrouvé pratiquement sous l'objet.
"L’objet est donc passé très près des deux réacteurs nucléaire"
Celui-ci ne faisait aucun bruit (moteur, sifflement etc), il n'y avait pas de souffle, pas d’odeur. L'objet a continué sa route en silence puis à environ trente mètres de moi sur ma gauche, il a pivoté sur sa droite puis est parti toujours lentement en prenant de l'altitude se dirigeant vers une colline. (…)
Je travaille à la centrale nucléaire de Golfech. L’objet était si bas que pour nous il n'était pas au dessus de la centrale mais bien à l'intérieur aussi haut que les cheminées de la centrale d’environ 150/200 m. L’objet est donc passé très près des deux réacteurs nucléaire. Il a survolé l'allée centrale, le bâtiment sécurité du site sans déclencher d'alarme à notre grand étonnement.»
Les deux témoins, Pascal et Sofiane, âgés de 44 et 20 ans à l’époque, ont contacté le GEIPAN mais ils sont en désaccord complet avec la conclusion assez lapidaire du rapport de l’organisme public: «Observation probable d’un avion».
Les OVNIS et les centrales nucléaires semblent entretenir un rapport complexe depuis des décennies en France et dans le monde. Au point d’inquiéter les autorités responsables ?
Peut-être, du moins si l’on en croit cet article du Canard Enchaîné consacré à une affaire de piratage informatique mené à l’encontre d’un militant de Greenpeace paru le 8 avril 2009.
L’hebdomadaire révèle que des enquêteurs du groupe Geos, chargés d’un audit de la sécurité de la tour EDF de La Défense «ont mis la main sur un rapport confidentiel de 260 pages consacré aux… extraterrestres.»
Que penser enfin de cette confidence de Pascal Pezzani, directeur de la centrale nucléaire du Blayais, elle aussi survolée le 13 octobre dernier ?
Lors de la «présentation des résultats 2014 et des perspectives de la centrale nucléaire» Pascal Pezzani, rapporte «Sud-Ouest» a «minimisé» les problèmes de sécurité: «Ici, on n'a pas vu de drone. On a vu un ovni et il n'y a eu aucun impact sur la sûreté de nos sites.»
Hawaï veut établir des relations diplomatiques avec les extraterrestres
Hawaï veut établir des relations diplomatiques avec les extraterrestres
Hawaï a installé un "sanctuaire pour les visiteurs de l'espace" ainsi qu'une aire d'atterrissage pour leurs ovnis. Objectif avoué : établir "des relations diplomatiques" avec les extraterrestres.
Établir des relations diplomatiques avec les extraterrestres : tel est l'objectif quelque peu atypique poursuivi par le Gouvernement légal d'Hawaï à travers son "sanctuaire pour les visiteurs de l'espace", vaste champ de lave situé à l'est de l'île et rendu "attirant" par les nombreux objets futuristes qui y trônent désormais. "Cet endroit peut même faire office de piste d'atterrissage", assure l'un des membres de l'organisme indépendantiste, Garry Hoffeld, au Wall Street Journal."Ce projet est toutefois purement symbolique", justifie-t-il. "Nous n'espérons pas vraiment voir un OVNI se poser sur l'île dès demain, mais nous voulons malgré tout faire de cet endroit un lieu d'accès facile aux populations étrangères dans le but d'avoir une vraie connexion intelligente avec les extraterrestres."
Par cette initiative, le Gouvernement légal d'Hawaï, qui se réclame légitime depuis sa création, en 1999, espère en fait populariser ses revendications souverainistes. "On veut annoncer au monde et à l'univers qu'Hawaï est là, qu'Hawaï est de retour, qu'Hawaï est un pays neutre", ambitionne Garry Hoffeld. La création de l'aire d'atterrissage extraterrestre permettrait donc avant tout de donner une utilité internationale à l'archipel. Une première étape avant d'y voir se développer des ambassades internationales et des consulats, selon Hoffeld. Quoi qu'il en soit, le ministre de la Justice du Royaume d'Hawaï, une autre organisation indépendantiste, étudie d'ores et déjà la manière dont les lois sur la citoyenneté et l'immigration pourraient s'appliquer aux aliens. (A.V.)
Waar komt heldere roze wolk boven Tucson vandaan? - HLN.be
Waar komt heldere roze wolk boven Tucson vandaan? - HLN.be
Bron: Buzzfeed, ABC News
RuimtevaartVroege vogels in Tucson (Arizona) waren gisterochtend getuige van een felle roze wolk boven de stad. Die verscheen aan de vroege ochtendhemel na de lancering van een NASA-onderzoeksraket.
Het tuig werd om 05.26 uur gelanceerd vanop een legerbasis in White Sands, in de naburige staat New Mexico. Een heldere roze wolk sierde daarna gedurende twintig minuten de vroege ochtendhemel.
Het kijkspel was het gevolg van zonlicht dat scheen op de dampen die bij het afschieten van de raket waren vrijgekomen, bevestigen functionarissen van de militaire basis.
Talloze ochtendmensen in Arizona spotten de roze verschijning en deelden foto's via sociale media.
De lancering van de raket was eerst voorzien voor maandag, maar werd uitgesteld omwille van slechte weersomstandigheden.
A woman recorded video of a UFO over Lewisburg, Mississippi in the early morning hours of Thursday, February 26.
The witness, Angela Ashton, says she was in bed when she saw a “bright blinding light” through her large bedroom window just after midnight. She raced outside with her camera to record the unusual aerial object.
(Credit: Angela Ashton/WMC)
She describes the UFO as triangle-shaped and extremely large. She thinks the object was “at least the size of a football field.”
The object was completely silent as it hovered for approximately twenty minutes over a nearby field. According to the witness, the UFO then shot straight up into the sky and disappeared. Unfortunately, the disappearance wasn’t captured on video. Ashton says she only managed to capture a few seconds of video because it was cold outside.
Local NBC affiliate WMC-TV contacted purported drone expert Robert Estes for his opinion. After watching Ashton’s video, Estes doesn’t believe the object in the video is a drone because most drones “don’t have lights like you see in the video.”
(Credit: Angela Ashton/WMC)
Estes also opined that the UFO could simply be a plane.
But Ashton, who is a “certified Paranormal Investigator” with Cryptic Shadows Paranormal Research, and claims to have researched UFOs for more than fifteen years, is convinced that what she observed was extraterrestrial.
UFO Buzzes Nuclear Plant In Mexico, Latest Of Many UFOs Seen Hovering At Nuke Facilities
A UFO filmed hovering over nuclear power plant in Veracruz, Mexico, and posted to YouTube November 7 is just the latest in a long series of UFO sightings over and near nuclear facilities — as history of ominous sightings that stretches back six decades, to the earliest days of nuclear energy production.
The UFO video from Laguna Verde Nuclear Power Plant, a 24-year-old nuke owned and operated by the Mexican government, was purportedly shot with a cell phone camera on November 5 by an engineer at the power plant. The 91-second-long video, viewable above, definitely shows something hovering over the nuclear reactors. But what?
While technically a UFO because the object is “unidentified” and flying, speculation among commenters on the video’s YouTube page, which as received more than 40,000 views so far, ranges from “toy,” to “party balloon,” to the more sinister “Russian spy thing.” By “thing,” the commenters mean a drone, that is, an unmanned aircraft of some kind. But a drone could be anything from a harmless toy to a military surveillance or attack aircraft.
Or is the video simply a hoax? So far, no experts have examined the Mexican UFO video closely enough to weigh in. Of course, some viewers of the video see it as an authentic recording of an alien spacecraft. Scott Waring, of the popular UFO Sighting Daily blog, speculates that “aliens are interested in our technological advances and how we make energy, while impacting the Earth with pollution.”
Another possibility, Waring believes, is that he video shows a damaged alien spacecraft “harvesting” energy from the Laguna Verde nuke to “get home.” While Waring’s speculation will likely be taken with a grain of nuclear powered salt by most observers, the fact remains that nuclear power plants have been unusually common sites for UFO sightings.
The phenomenon dates back to 1950, when a number of scientists working on a then-secret nuclear energy project at Los Alamos spotted a disc-shaped UFO zig-zagging across the sky at an altitude of about 2,000 feet. Two years later, similar UFO sightings were reported UFOs hovering over newly-built nuclear plants in Washington and South Carolina.
More recently, a 2012 UFO video from Mexico was also captured at a nuclear power plant. And in April of this year, a series of UFO sightings were reported at McGuire Nuclear Station in North Carolina.
The Salem Nucelar Power Plant in New Jersey has also been the site of numerous UFO sightings, which like all UFO incidents, may have an innocent explanation, but one has not yet been forthcoming.
UFO Sightings Military Airforce Transport Flanked By Flying Saucer? What Is It? 2013
UFO Sightings Military Airforce Transport Flanked By Flying Saucer? What Is It? 2013Footage just into Thirdphaseofmoon of what looks to be a Flying Saucer Escorting or Flanking a Military Airforce Transport !
AMAZING PHOTO OF A TRIANGLE CRAFT OVER VALLEY FORGE PENNSYLVANIA JANUARY 7, 2015
VALLEY FORGE PENNSYLVANIA On this particular evening I was driving home from work.
Because of where I live, I always take Gulph Rd through Valley Forge Park to and from work. I was driving NW on Gulph Rd towards Phoenixville away from King of Prussia, when I noticed three very bright lights just over the tree line in the distance (I think I noticed them just about the time I passed the Washington Memorial Chapel).
The lights were side by side. At first glance it looked to be an airplane of some sort. But as I drove closer I realized whatever it was, was too bright and too low to be a plane.
I actually started to think that maybe they had built a tower in the park with lights at the top of it, but I knew that wasn’t logical because I would have seen this tower/monument by now. I also started to realize that whatever it was, wasn’t stationary.
It was moving, but slowly. When I was finally back on a straight part of the road, I had decided that this was just too weird and started snapping pictures. As I got closer it was more apparent to me that this wasn’t a plane or a helicopter.
I considered pulling over, but had someone behind me. It was also very dark and 17 degrees outside. But after my car had finally passed the lights (I couldn’t describe anything beyond that because of how bright the three lights were) I decided to look back at it out my driver side window.
This is when I realized that it was literally just above the tree line and shaped like a Triangle. Once I was past the lights I could distinguish the shape vividly.
After my experience I was a little shaken up. I called my mom, who thought I was just pulling her leg. But after I sent her the pictures, she was convinced. She even went as far as to research sightings in Valley Forge. She came up with two interesting stories.
One, was of George Washington, who had reported witnessing a UFO in the now park. And a few years ago someone else had reported a very similar story to mine, which made me feel less crazy. I have been living in the area for almost 5 years now, and I visit the park often.
I know this park in and out. I know what the planes flying overhead look like. And I’ve seen my fair share of helicopters and drones. This to me was just so weird and unexplainable.
It took me almost a week to even send in my story.
I’m open-minded about unexplainable events, but I personally do not come to conclusions without thinking about it first.
Even if this was totally explainable, it was still weird and definitely a story worth sharing.
This case is under investigation by MUFON Pennsylvania investigators.
Wetenschap Het was een populaire theorie maar onderzoek met het hoofdzakelijk Belgische Rosina-instrument op de Europese komeetsonde Rosetta toonde aan dat het niet (exclusief) kometen zijn die water naar onze planeet hebben gebracht. Dat zei Johan De Keyser van het Belgisch Instituut voor Ruimte-Aëronomie (BIRA) vandaag in het Planetarium van Brussel bij de voorstelling van de eerste missieresultaten.
De Rosetta is op 2 maart 2004 met een Ariane-5 draagraket gelanceerd en bereikte de komeet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in augustus vorig jaar. Later kon de meegevoerde lander Philae bij wijze van wereldprimeur landen op het hemellichaam dat net als andere kometen geacht wordt meer te leren over het ontstaan van ons zonnestelsel.
Eén van de instrumenten op Rosetta is de Rosina-massaspectrometer die hoofdzakelijk van Belgische makelij is en die voor de studie van de atmosfeer van de komeet dient. Het BIRA in Ukkel werkte daarvoor samen met de bedrijven IMEC (Leuven) en OIP (Oudenaarde).
Rosina leerde dat de hoeveelheid gas, die (aan 500 meter per seconde) ontsnapt uit de nucleus van de "staartster", varieert in de tijd, met name naargelang de rotatie (in 12,5 uur) van het hemellichaam rondom zijn eigen as, met een temperatuur van min 170 bij nacht en min 100 graden per dag. Ook de locatie op de komeet speelt een rol in die variatie.
Uit de eerste resultaten blijkt dat de komeetkern maar een losse samenhang van materiaal is, met een dichtheid van 1/2 gram per kubieke centimeter
Maar ook de verhouding van de uitgestoten relatieve hoeveelheden H2O (water), koolstof (CO) en koolstofdioxide (CO2) als belangrijkste bestanddelen van de atmosfeer varieert, wat - ook dankzij metingen van het MIRO-instrument - terug te voeren is naar de samenstelling van het komeetoppervlak.
Inzake de bestanddelen van de atmosfeer stelde Rosina een massabereik van 18,98 tot 19,05 ame vast, met dus een gemiddelde van zowat 19. Dit is onder andere terug te voeren tot HDO (deuterium), een zwaardere vorm van water. Maar gezien het H2O van onze oceanen dominant aanwezig is bij een massa van 18 ame kan het dus niet dat (alleen maar) kometen water naar de Aarde hebben gebracht, zo luidt een uiterst belangrijke conclusie van het onderzoek van 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.
Voorts is voor het eerst de acceleratie van het ïoniseren (elektrisch geladen maken) van de neutrale gassen gemeten.
De uitgestoten stofdeeltjes zijn blijkbaar maar een losse aggregatie. Overigens is ook de komeetkern maar een losse samenhang van materiaal, met een dichtheid van 1/2 gram per kubieke centimeter. Maar verbazend genoeg lijkt er ook stof in de buurt te blijven en lijkt het zelfs rond de nucleus te draaien.
Sommige wetenschappers zitten dankzij Rosetta met de handen in het haar, want er blijkt een breuk of barst tussen de twee delen te zijn. Wat dit is en of dit nog evolueert, is niet geweten.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:HLN.be - Het Laatste Nieuws ( NL)
UFO neergestort in Canada? ( update+ video )
UFO neergestort in Canada? ( update+ video )
De internationale UFO gemeenschap is in rep en roer vanwege een mogelijk neergestorte UFO in een bevroren meer in Canada.
Het leger zou zijn uitgerukt, toegangswegen afgesloten en diverse getuigen melden dat ze een schijfvormig object hebben gezien.
Update: 27 februari 2015
We zijn nu enkele dagen verder na de vermeende crash van een UFO in het Canadese Lake Winnipeg.
We ontvingen een aantal reacties, waarvan de volgende heel interessant is omdat er op meerdere plaatsen diezelfde avond vreemde lichten zijn waargenomen.
Met enige verbazing de zogenaamde verklaringen gelezen van het Amerikaanse leger over de ufo.
Het word nog interessanter: in 10 staten, van Arizona tot Alberta word dezelfde nacht ook een vreemd licht gezien. Ook met foto's erbij.
De verklaring was: een ruimtesonde van China teruggekomen en uiteengevallen, EN een neergestorte meteoriet.. Vijf foto's, waarvan op de laatste inderdaad een meteoriet (groen) te zien is.
Maar hoe geloofwaardig is het dat in EEN nacht
1-een meteoriet neerstort 2- een ruimtesonde neerstort 3-het leger oefende met een vliegtuig op een plek waar later 'iets' is neergestort??
Allemaal komen ze uit om en nabij dezelfde richting! Lijkt er meer op dat gezien de enorme aantallen mensen die iets zagen ze niet de waarheid willen vertellen.
Na wat navraag te hebben gedaan stond de ISS Live Stream ook op blauw scherm toen. Geen idee waar die op dat moment vloog, maar dat lijkt bijna niet meer toeval te noemen allemaal.. Ook vreemd is dat er bijna niks over vermeld word op andere sites/kranten/tv's.. Wat denken jullie??
Navolgend een voorbeeld van wat sommige mensen in de lucht zagen.
Volgens een andere lezer zou de foto die hierna volgt de bewuste opname zijn die men uit alle macht probeert te onderdrukken:
Dan is er nog de volgende video waarvan iemand zegt dat de neerstortende UFO is gefilmd door een getuige. Dit is te zien op ongeveer een minuut in de video.
We zijn uiteindelijk nog niet veel wijzer geworden, behalve dat de lichten op meerdere plaatsen zijn waargenomen.
Het probleem blijft dat het aangeboden materiaal niet op echtheid kan worden geverifiëerd.
We blijven optimistisch en hopen dat er alsnog een aantal getuigen die na te trekken zijn naar voren komen.
Origineel artikel: 24 februari 2015
Vorige week woensdagavond circuleerden er allerlei berichten op de sociale media dat er vreemde lichten (UFO) waren waargenomen boven Lake Winnipeg in Canada.
Even later veranderden die berichten in dat er een schijfvormige UFO was neergestort in het bevroren meer en dat het leger ter plaatste was om de bergingsoperatie uit te voeren.
Vervolgens zijn er dan allerlei verwarrende berichten van getuigen die dingen zouden hebben gezien.
Hier komt direct het probleem om de hoek kijken. Onmiddellijk duiken namelijk de firma’s die veel geld verdienen met het maken van nepvideo’s zoals de beruchte Blake Cousins van Third Phase of the Moon op dit verhaal en komen met allerlei verhalen en getuigenverklaringen.
Onderstaande is ook weer zo’n foto gemaakt door “een getuige”, maar er bestaat geen enkele zekerheid over de echtheid ervan.
Maargoed, als we dat soort dingen terzijde schuiven dan blijft er nog steeds een interessant verhaal over.
Het Canadese leger komt met een vage verklaring dat ze daar net “toevallig” aan het oefenen waren. Dit is het meest gebruikte excuus van overheden en defensie wanneer er sprake is van UFO-activiteit.
Ook een wel heel merkwaardige verklaring van Luitenant-Colonel Paul Davies, leider van het team van het Canadese leger dat eveneens “toevallig” oefende op het hulp bieden nadat een vliegtuig was neergestort.
Davies vertelde dat het vreemde licht dat mensen hadden gezien afkomstig was van een vliegtuig dat meedeed aan de oefening en dat in staat is om bijna verticaal op te stijgen.
“Daarom lijkt het alsof het licht recht de lucht ingaat, maar dat is niet zo”. Het vreemde is dat geen van de mensen die de lichten meldden iets gezegd hebben over dat ze recht de lucht in gingen. Men had het over een licht dat zichtbaar was en vervolgens leek neer te storten.
Kortom, het lijkt erop dat er inderdaad iets merkwaardigs is gebeurd in Canada.
Echter, met al die nepbedrijven die bewust kletsverhalen rondstrooien, wordt het er niet gemakkelijker op om de waarheid boven tafel te krijgen.
Waarschijnlijk is even rustig afwachten de beste strategie en dan hopen dat er echte, betrouwbare getuigen naarvoren komen die kunnen worden geïdentificeerd.
The reporting witness was 9 years old at the time she saw a black, vertical, rectangle hovering above, just south of where she and her cousin stood. Pictured: Markham, Ontario, Canada. (Credit: Google)
A Canadian witness at Markham, Ontario, recalled a daylight sighting from the spring of 1987 where an object described as a “black door” hovered in the sky, according to testimony in Case 63531 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
The reporting witness was a 9-year-old in 1987 playing with her cousin in a field behind her home during daylight hours with a clear sky.
“I looked up at the sky and saw a black, vertical, rectangle hovering above, just south of where we stood,” the witness stated. “I remember looking over at my cousin who was also staring at it and asked her if she saw it too. She said yes.”
The witness described the object.
“We both thought it looked like a black door or doorway. We stared at it for several minutes waiting to see what would happen. It barely moved, although it did appear to be shaking or vibrating slightly.”
The witness said the object barely moved, although it did appear to be shaking or vibrating slightly. Pictured: Markham, Ontario, Canada. (Credit: Google)
The witnesses’ mother called from their backyard asking the kids to come inside for dinner.
“We left the field and the ‘black door’ and went back to my house. We never discussed it with my parents and I’ve never seen anything like it since.”
The witness is hoping someone has a similar incident to share.
“The reason why I decided to share my story is because I want to know if anyone else has a similar story to mine or can shed some light on what we saw. Recently I asked my cousin if she remembered what we saw in the field behind my house when we were kids. She responded immediately saying, ‘Do you mean the door in the sky? I’ll never forget it!’”
The witness said the black rectangle was hovering between 75-100 yards above the ground.
The object was shaped like a door and hovered between 75 and 100 yards above the ground. Pictured: Markham, Ontario, Canada. (Credit: Google)
Markham is a city in the Regional Municipality of York, lies within the Greater Toronto Area of Southern Ontario, Canada, population 301,709.
Please remember that most UFO sighting can be explained as something natural or man-made. The above quotes were edited for clarity. Please report UFO activity to MUFON.com.
UFO Sightings and Videos: Are They Fake or Genuine?
UFO Sightings and Videos: Are They Fake or Genuine?
Extraterrestrials have been identified through strange shadows in the sky, flying saucers, or even unusual marks left on fields. Countless of UFO sightings have been reported by different individuals around the world over the years. Unidentified flying objects or UFOs have been involved in many conspiracies and controversies. Nobody can actually prove how true they are since nearly all traces disappear throughout the course of history. While many would find UFO and alien stories true, many others are still in doubt. So, how will you know if you see something extraordinary? Here are some incidences that will serve as your reference.
McMinnville UFO (Oregon)
A UFO appeared on the lens of the camera from an Oregon farmer couple in May 1950. According to wife Evelyn Trent, she first saw the object before it sped off out of their view. Evelyn described the object as a silvery, metallic disk.
Most UFO sightings happened near US Air Force bases, so it has been many times mentioned in UFO sighting reports. Perhaps, the most popular until today is still the Edward’s Air Force Base Sighting. An astronaut, at the same time a test pilot, filmed a classic saucer. The UFO was a silver and a smooth saucer that was approximately 30 feet in diameter. It had 3 legs that believed to be a landing gear. However, as the witness was about to submit the photo, it apparently disappeared.
A group of friends claimed they saw glowing, diamond shaped object that was about the size of a water tower blocking their way. Known as the Piney Woods Sighting, it brought emotional, mental and physical trauma to the group due to chemical poisoning in the area. They claimed to have seen helicopters escorting the UFO away from them.
Some have attributed these incidences to government conspiracy, but nobody knows what these occurrences tell, and one can only guess.
An unknown radio signal, which may have come from a black hole, colliding neutron stars (or – for those who ‘believe’ – alien life), has been picked up by astronomers live for the first time ever. Its origins remain mysterious.
The fast radio bursts are quick, bright flashes of radio waves that last only milliseconds, but still emit as much energy as the sun in an entire day.
This is the first time that these radio waves have been spotted live. The first burst was picked up in 2007 by sifting through old data at the Parkes Radio Telescope in Eastern Australia. Only seven others have been seen since then.
This time, the mysterious waves were picked with the use of 12 telescopes in Australia, Chile, Germany, Hawaii, India, California and the Canary Islands.
Because they observed the radio waves in real time, they were also able to try and find other wavelengths, like x-rays or infrared to find out their source…but remained unable to find anything.
“The fact that we did not see light in other wavelengths eliminates a number of astronomical phenomena that are associated with violent events such as gamma-ray bursts from exploding stars and supernovae, which were otherwise candidates for the burst,” Daniele Malesani, of the University of Copenhagen, told Astronomy Magazine.
The radio waves were polarized, which suggests that they were near an object with a large magnetic field.
“The theories are now that the radio wave burst might be linked to a very compact type of object – such as neutron stars or black holes – and the bursts could be connected to collisions or ‘star quakes,’ he added.
The radio signals originated up to 5.5 billion light-years away, from outside our Milky Way Galaxy and that they were caught by astronomers possibly up to a decade after they happened.
The catch took place in May 2014, but the results of the study got published this week in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
No one knows where exactly such waves come from, or what causes them. Astronomers have postulated that the mysterious signals might be emitted by exploding stars or supernovas; a collision of binary neutron stars or binary white dwarf star could also be a source.
One more possible reason could be a blitzar – a supermassive neutron star that should have become a black hole, but is spinning so fast that it is temporarily prevented from collapsing.
“We found out what it wasn’t. The burst could have hurled out as much energy in a few milliseconds as the Sun does in an entire day. But the fact that we did not see light in other wavelengths eliminates a number of astronomical phenomena that are associated with violent events such as gamma-ray bursts from exploding stars and supernovae, which were otherwise candidates for the burst,” Malesani said.
Having set “the trap,” the team is now waiting to catch another burst and maybe get some answers to the mystery.
There are a number of things that come to mind when I posted this article. Could these radio waves be coming from an intelligent life form? Is it possible that they’re being emitted from Saturn (aka Satan in astrotheology)? Do they have anything to do with the collapse of the matrix? Are they possibly distress signals from the ongoing Orion Wars, signifying an end to universal tyranny?
One thing we can be sure of is that science çand the mainstream media will write this off as “nothing to see here”.
Humans should start sending messages to planets in habitable zones in the hope that alien life-forms might hear us, scientists have said.
Space experts at the Search for Extra Terrestrial Life (SETI) project said the time has come to stop passively listening for signs of intelligence in other worlds and actively start seeking contact.
Kepler Space Telescope captured tens of thousands of stars in the constellation of Cygnus and Lyra
SETI was founded 20 years ago to monitor the cosmos for signals of alien life and involves astrophysicists from institutions like Harvard University and the University of California. However as early 1960 scientists were scanning space for clues to other civilizations.
Douglas Vakoch, the Director of Interstellar Message Composition at the SETI Institute, said we should now start devising a message to send to planets which have recently been discovered in the "goldilocks zone" – areas of space where it is neither too hot nor too cold for life to exist.
Kepler-186f, the first validated Earth-size planet to orbit a distant star in the habitable zone
"For over a half century, scientists engaged in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence have sought evidence of the existence of other civilizations by searching for intentional radio signals," he said
"As we move into the next half century we should expand our strategies, so we are not only passively listening, but also transmitting intentional, information-rich signals.
"With recent detections of Earth-like planets in the habitable zones of other stars, we have natural targets for such transmission projects.
"We should repeatedly target a set of nearby stars over the course of several months or years.”
The Kepler Telescope
NASA’s Kepler Telescope has so far found more than 3,800 planets in habitable zones which could hold liquid water, and life. Experts say targeting them with a signal is the best hope of making contact with new worlds.
However the content of a message has been hotly debated. To find out what humans would like to say to aliens, SETI founded a site called Earth Speaks and asked people to devise an interstellar message.
The smallest-ever planet outside our solar system has been spotted by NASA's Kepler space telescope - a rocky planet similar in size to the Earth
While women tended to offer friendship, and even coffee and biscuits in their missives, men were more likely to talk about science and inquire about their civilisation. Overall the main theme was asking for help from aliens rather than seeking to impart the wisdom of Earth.
Mr Vakoch said humans have a "cosmic inferiority complex" and automatically assume that extra-terrestrials will be more technologically advanced than us and so have nothing to learn.
But he added: "Humankind has a range of experiences and insights that cannot be imagined by any other civilization.
"Though extraterrestrials may be more technologically advanced we are, they will never be more human. It’s the breadth of our human experience that we should be conveying in our interstellar messages."
The experts at SETI say that governments must start working together to devise the message. The equipment to send basic messages already exists and scientists say that reluctance ‘more political than technical.’
Seth Shostak, Senior Astronomer and Director, Center for SETI research, said some people resisted the approach, fearing it could alert our presence to dangerous extra-terrestrial races.
"It’s very controversial,” he said, “There are some people who think this might be dangerous.
"The idea that you are somehow endangering Earth I don’t think holds any water because we have been broadcasting into space willy nilly since the Second World War – televisions, FM radio and radar.
"These signals have been going into space for 70-somethng years so they are quite far out and any society that could come to Earth and incinerate Belgium, if they think they deserve it, is fully capable of picking up these broadcasts.”
But he admits that it is a gamble whether visiting aliens will come in peace.
“Nobody knows if they are friendly or not,” he added.
“You could be optimistic and think they are all friendly or figure they are like ones in the movies and hellbent on destruction. I suspect there is a whole range.
“Earth has been sitting around for 4 billion years with life on it and nobody’s thought to destroy it.
“It may be they want to proseltyse. The other thing is that they are just interested in the culture – that’s what’s special about us. Maybe they are interested in rock ‘n’ roll. Maybe they want Cliff Richard.”
However American scientist and futurist David Brin believes it is a mistake to try and contact alien worlds.
"We are the youngest of all technological races in the cosmos, like an orphan child who suddenly finds herself wandering a strange jungle that’s quiet, too quiet,” he said.
"Perhaps you have the kind of personality that says: "What the heck! I might as well shout and see what happens!"
"That’s all very well if the only one you are putting at risk is yourself. But when that risk is also imposed upon our children -- all of humanity and our planet – is it too much to ask that we discuss it first?"
The scientists were speaking at the annual Association for the Advancement of Science AAAS annual conference in San Jose.
Well...here we go again. Another round of pleas that our government disclose what they know about UFOs and extraterrestrial life. The political parties have started the process of whittling down their nominees for president...thus, the question of disclosure becomes a part of the rhetoric.
But, of course, some of us realize that it will never happen. Better stated, a true disclosure will never be offered to the public...unless it become so obvious that there really are non-terrestrial beings and advanced interstellar craft. Then an announcement of some kind may be forthcoming.
I found the following article this morning:
Push is on for 'comprehensive' extraterrestrial hearings on Capitol Hill
We’ve recently seen a drone crash a congressional hearing on drones, but what would happen if there was a hearing on extraterrestrial life?
Stephen Bassett, executive director of Paradigm Research Group and founder of the Extraterrestrial Phenomena Political Action Committee would like to find out.
While he’s pushed for congressional hearings on the topic in the past, Bassett is launching a new effort to overcome the “truth embargo” about the government’s involvement with alien life forms.
It comes in the form of “The Congressional Hearings Initiative.”
“Once this evidence is properly looked at, the way it should be, any reasonable person will come to the same conclusion,” Bassett told Roll Call.
Bassett is flooding approximately 180 members of Congress with meeting requests.
And if Basset gets his way, he doesn’t just want some skimpy meeting done for show.
“The goal is to get one of the committees to commit for comprehensive hearings,” Basset said. “Not three witnesses, come up [to] the Hill for half a day and give ’em a spiel. I’m talking about 25, 30, 35 witnesses, at least, testifying over a week, two weeks if possible. The reason is we’ve got those witnesses and the issue is not an issue that you can dispense with something trivial.”
Two people Bassett should get in his corner: John Podesta, President Barack Obama’s counselor, and former President Bill Clinton.
Considering Podesta’s comments that his “biggest failure” was not securing the disclosure of UFO files, it’s a natural fit.
And as far as Clinton, he did once tell Jimmy Kimmel that maybe the only way to united the world would be with an alien invasion.
So really, a congressional hearing on extraterrestrial life could also double as a world peace hearing.- Sun Times
So now we should have a former U.S. President and former White House insider 'helping' to find the truth. Mmm...are we to believe that President Clinton never reviewed any information pertaining to UFOs and alien beings while he was in office? The same question goes to John Podesta. Why didn't they make the effort to disclose the information at that time? Yeah, that's right...they wouldn't have dared chance it. I'm sorry that I seem cynical...but this shell-game, in my mind, is absurd.
During the 36th annual Kennedy Center Honors in 2013, President Barack Obama joked that he was making history for going where no president had gone before.
While honoring Oscar-winning actress Shirley MacLaine, who claims she has seen UFOs before, including "a mothership", Obama mentioned Area 51, a secret military installation north of Las Vegas that many in ufology believe is home to crashed flying saucers and alien bodies.
"Now, when you first become President, one of the questions that people ask you is, 'what's really going on in Area 51?'" Obama said. "When I wanted to know, I'd call Shirley MacLaine."
"I think I just became the first President to ever publicly mention Area 51," Obama added. "How's that, Shirley?"
I want to state that I truly believe that it is rational to assume that non-terrestrial beings exist and that these beings, in some capacity, may currently inhabit this planet. I have interviewed many experiencers and have seen some incredible evidence as an investigator. I'm totally convinced that humanity is being observed and manipulated by these highly advanced species...a process that has continued for millennia. There has been speculation that our species is a hybrid of human and alien DNA. This may very well be true but it has yet to be to be confirmed scientifically. Then again, our DNA strain may be so ancient that distinct human and alien genes may be impossible to isolate. Nevertheless, this is not what I want to write about at this time.
Since the 1950’s, Hollywood has been producing movies that deal with UFOs and alien beings. Most of the early films were full of hokey costumed creatures, tinfoil covered spacecraft and ridiculous story lines. On the other hand, we were given the impression that these aliens were either malevolent or were here to make sure the human species did not destroy itself.
Eventually, these B-movies science fiction thrillers evolved into high priced, computer enhanced mega productions that garnered millions of fans (ex. ‘Star Wars', ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind”, etc.). Technology provided instant gratification with the ability for anyone to pop in a tape, then later a DVD, into the player at their convenience. We just sit back, relax and watch in high definition (and sometimes in 3D) wondrous interstellar craft and amazing alien beings interact with our species, either in the present time or long into the future. The plots and stories are a multiplicity of good vs. evil...and everything in between.
Yes...I fell into the same trap. My interest in the UFO and extraterrestrial phenomenon was exacerbated by Hollywood’s magic and the ability to make me wonder if what they portrayed may actually be close to the truth. Whether we are just being entertained or witnessing a primer for what we can expect is the real question. In other words, are we being conditioned...programmed, brainwashed or however you want to phrase it. Are we being made ready for the inevitable?
In the summer of 1996, Twentieth Century Fox released the film Independence Day It projected the tale of an alien mothership with a mass one-fourth of that of the Moon, that entered Earth’s orbit and deployed several dozen saucer-shaped destroyer spacecraft. Each of these craft are 15 miles in width and positioned over some of Earth's major cities. These destroyer craft coordinate and eventually deploy a WMD capable of leveling large cities, as well as dispatching the inhabitants. The U.S. President and most of his Cabinet reach safety at Area 51 where they discover that the aliens had visited Earth previously. Three dead aliens, as well as a complete attack craft, had been recovered and were stored underground. At the end of the day, which happened to be July 4th, the humans figure out how to destroy the aliens worldwide and ultimately become independent again.
‘Independence Day’ was written/directed by Ronald Emmerich and written/produced Don Devlin, the same pair who had previously created the film Stargate Not only did ‘Independence Day’ rejuvenate the science fiction genre in films but visually introduced us to alien forces plotting a strategic and tangible invasion against earth.
In today’s ufology, it’s my opinion that a majority of witness comments and theories, certainly the most well-known accounts, are usually based on film narratives produced in the 90’s and beyond. There are popular notions that predate this period, namely famous UFO crashes and retrievals. But after some analysis it seems the bulk of the modern UFO lore can be traced to the last two decades, as well as to a handful of individuals.
I’m not implying that the UFO and extraterrestrial phenomenon is somehow a myth. As I stated earlier, I believe there are beings of equal or higher intelligence that not only travel to this planet or dimension, but may also inhabit it as well. On the other hand, these beings and their appearance, mannerisms and mode of transportation are most likely not the same as our popular culture describes them. I’ll admit that I am as guilty as others in using some of these popular descriptions when I post on my blog, though I try to avoid it as much as possible.
We can debate the arguments for disclosure and if the world is ready for that reality, but at the end of the day, those arguments are still based on assumptions that still lack credible evidence. Even if there was some evidence that supported the theories that the government had intimate knowledge of alien beings, disclosing the existence or visitation to our planet of non-human entities would certainly qualify as a ‘world after’ event (ex. ‘world after 9/11’). I think the government knows more about UFOs and alien beings than it publicly acknowledges, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are covering up secret agreements, underground bases, genetic hybridization or any knowledge of where extraterrestrials come from.
Those people who are interested and involved in the study of UFOs and extraterrestrials need to look at the logical evidence that is provided and not compare it to the computer generated flash and stories used for entertainment. As well, an absolute need for disclosure serves only as security for our conscience. Real disclosure will not be on human terms. Disclosure will be on their terms, the non-terrestrials, whether we can accept that or not...Lon
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.