The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
10-03-2015
Ancient Pyramids found in Antarctica
Ancient Pyramids found in Antarctica
September 13, 2012 - Pyramids have been discovered in the Antarctic, according to a news article on Scienceray.com. A team of 8 explorers from America and Europe claim to have found evidence of three man made pyramids ‘peaking’ through the melting ice, states the author:
Can it be possible that Antarctica was once warm enough in the recent past to actually have had an ancient civilization living there? And even more perplexing is the question of if an advanced culture did develop there, are there any structures still remaining that are buried underneath the ice? Amazingly a team of researchers is making the claim that they have found evidence of several ancient pyramids on the ice covered continent of Antarctica.
So far, the team has not released much information on their discovery although a few pictures have been leaked on the internet recently. I will let you be the judge on if these pictures truly display artificial pyramids or just the rocky tops of mountains but the images are intriguing and definitely warrant further research in my opinion. Three of the images are shown below.
Photobucket Pictures, Images and Photos Besides these images, the team is remaining pretty silent with their discovery until more research can be conducted on these pyramids. I was able to obtain some small bits of information from a friend of one of the team members though. The team is made up of 8 explorers from America and several European countries. Two of the pyramid structures were found approximately 10 miles inland while the third one was very close to the coastline. The team is currently planning an expedition to physically reach at least one of the pyramids to determine if it is natural or artificial. No time frame was given as to when this expedition will be taking place though.
So, what is your opinion on these pyramids? Are we on the verge of perhaps one of biggest archaeological discoveries ever or are these structures nothing but natural formations? Be sure to stay tuned to this one.
The shocking discovery of ancient man-made pyramids under the thick ice and snow of Antarctica would change our perception of human history forever.
Scholars and Egyptologists have long suspected that the Sphynx is far older than first estimated, possibly over 10,000 years old.
Scientists discovered that evidence of water erosion on the ancient statue, still the world’s largest, tells a story of climate change from rainy hot jungle to desert in afew thousand short years.
If the climate in Egypt changed this quickly, is it not equally possible that the Antarctic climate could have also changed drastically in the same time?
Legends speak of pyramids in the Antarctica, of the lost city of Atlantis being covered not just under water, but encased in ice.
In ‘The Myth of the Twelve World Pyramids’ author James Donahue explained the legend in March, 2006:
“…The first, he said, is located under the ice in Antarctica. The others are in Tibet, Lumeria (a legendary lost continent in the Pacific region), Atlantis, Mexico, Peru, Europe, Australia, Canada,Middle East, United States and finally Egypt.
I believe pyramids, or at least the remnants of what may once have been large pyramid type buildings, have been found…
What interested me was a prophetic message in the information about the Antarctic pyramid.
It says this structure is a portal to other planetary systems and its function is to assist in the comings and goings of alien entities who have been part of the history of Planet Earth.
“These entities came to the planet in great spaceships and interacted with those who lived on the planet, in the water, and below the surface,” the messenger says.
The kicker comes with this: “And when this book is found, the ice shall melt from this place, revealing starships created by this pyramid, left behind as reminders of their work and interaction on your planet.”
That the book is known is a clear indication that if it is ancient, it has indeed been “found.”
That we are watching with alarm the global warming reports that warn that both the Arctic and Antarctic regions are melting.
Many of us could live to see the day when the entire continent of Antarctica will be exposed, as will all of the ancient artifacts that once existed there.
If a giant pyramid and starship is found there, it will change the thinking of the world forever.”
To this date we have not quite managed to re-create the great pyramids. The Chinese were the last to attempt it, and it was as they say, a big ‘fail’.
We quite simply, don’t have the technology.
So who – or what – did have the technology before the Antarctica ice froze over?
If the Antarctica pyramids are found to be man-made instead of ‘natural’ formations, that is going to be the million dollar question – well that and who gets to take the new spaceship out on the first test drive?
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
Buzz Aldrin Describes His Out-Of-This-World Encounter With A “UFO”
Buzz Aldrin Describes His Out-Of-This-World Encounter With A “UFO”
March 10, 2015 - Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong landed on the moon on July 20, 1969 as part of the the Apollo 11 mission. A week ago, Aldrin presented #Apollo45, a social media movement and new YouTube channel, devoted to honouring the 45th anniversary of that improbable mission. Buzz Aldrin held an AMA onRedditabout a week ago, replying to queries on a range of matters, and giving his view of people who consider the landing was fake, his major regret from the mission and guidance for confident future astronauts. Buzz Aldrin also acquired the prospect to put rumours to rest that the Apollo 11 team spotted a UFO in space. When he was asked that if he believed in aliens, Aldrin repeated Carl Sagan: “Extraordinary observations require extraordinary evidence.” He comprised a story that UFO-enthusiasts have been adhering to for years:
“On Apollo 11 in route to the Moon, I observed a light out the window that appeared to be moving alongside us. There were many explanations of what that could be, other than another spacecraft from another country or another world – it was either the rocket we had separated from, or the 4 panels that moved away when we extracted the lander from the rocket and we were nose to nose with the two spacecraft. So in the close vicinity, moving away, were 4 panels. And I feel absolutely convinced that we were looking at the sun reflected off of one of these panels. Which one? I don’t know. So technically, the definition could be “unidentified.””
He started to explain that statistically, life is assured to occur somewhere else in the Universe and could very well be in our own Milky Way, but he does not consider for a second that what they saw on the way to the moon was anything like alien. Buzz Aldrin also said that the passion that was present for NASA to push limits and go to the moon is missing from America today. In the late 1960s, NASA signified nearly 4% of the federal budget. Nowadays, it is closer to 0.5%. Transformed public attention will be vital for human examination of Mars and further beyond, which is the next border of space travel.
When he was asked about if humans should return to the moon, Buzz recommended that might be better suitable for other countries that haven’t done it yet, while the US must help others but continue observing onward. He also comprised this guidance for the astronauts who will turn out to be the first to visit Mars and set up a lasting colony:
“Realize that you are perhaps the most ambitious, the most historical pioneers that the earth has produced since its beginning. And you are given a great honor in spending the rest of your lives pioneering for mankind. AND HAVE FUN!”
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
An interview with Dan Schreiber about The Great UFO Conspiracy
An interview with Dan Schreiber about The Great UFO Conspiracy
The following feature is available free for reproduction in full or in part.
This Saturday night (14 March) sees More4 dedicate its schedule to some out-of-this-world programming for Aliens Night. In an all new one-off documentary airing first on More4's Alien Night, comedian and presenter Dan Schreiber has gone in search of some of the Britons who believe in a huge government cover-up of extra-terrestrial life.
The Great UFO Conspiracy will air Saturday 14 March at 9:05pm on More4.
You’ve made a film, The Great UFO Conspiracy – what’s it all about?
It’s looking at the phenomena of conspiracy theories to do with aliens UFOS. Most of the time, when you think about that stuff, you think of the USA, of Area 51 and Roswell and so on. It all seems to be America-based. But actually, Britain has a huge role in the constant stream of theories of what’s going on. And this country has some of the largest ever encounters that are acknowledged worldwide by the community. So I wanted to find out more about the people who are leading the front, who think there’s something more going on.
Is this an area you’ve been interested in in the past?
Yeah, I’m interested in it in a slightly lateral, leftfield kind of way. I love the storytelling. I love the way the theories are put together. I see it as a type of storytelling that nobody really acknowledges. It’s a group of people looking at a thing and coming up with an alternative story and timeline for. And they all contribute to it, worldwide. And it adds to this bigger story, this growing, creative idea. The difference between them and me is that they believe it to be true, whereas I don’t. But I don’t think that should step in the way of admiring what’s a great story.
How much of this did you know before you embarked on your journey? Did what you encountered surprise you?
Oh, I was totally surprised. My background is in making sure that I know virtually everything about a subject before I get involved with it. That’s from a background of working on shows like QI. But on this show, the production team didn’t want me to find out anything beforehand. They wanted me to be put into the situation and learn on the spot. So I did go in thinking I’d know the majority of the theories, but there are so many of them, you just can’t get a handle on them. And also, all the theories that I thought were dead, like crop circles, are now alive again, and being reinterpreted. For example, we know they were created as a prank, but now the theory is that the pranksters were actually having their actions controlled by aliens. I love it that you can’t seem to kill a conspiracy theory – it will find a new way to live.
Almost by definition, these are people who are very suspicious of the motives of others, especially establishment organisations like broadcasters. Was it difficult to get them to trust you?
It’s a really odd one. They all seem to hate the BBC with a total passion, They think everyone’s involved. But this thing has grown so big, as an industry, that people are making their living off the back of talking about these theories or writing books about them. There’s so much money now being made that you can live your life by these theories. So they have to co-operate with the devil, because they know they can get more exposure for a talk that they’re going to do, or a book that they’re going to do.
What did you think if the people you spoke to?
I really liked them all, and found them really interesting. And one thing that struck me was that when we weren’t talking about UFO stuff, they’re all really chatty, nice, friendly, likeable people, who liked a laugh and liked to talk about football. One of them, a guy called Tony, very openly says that the last few years of his life have been absolute hell, he’s gone through various things. We didn’t go into what that was – I imagine depression was involved – so they’re not all completely rounded, happy, optimistic people. But if you’re sitting in a pub and start talking about acting or movies, they’re all interested in talking about that stuff.
Some of these guys seemed a convinced the authorities were after them. Do you think any of them were genuinely scared for their safety?
Tony says that he is, or certainly that he was. I spoke to a guy called Timothy Good, he struck me as someone who was just reporting facts, very much in control. He didn’t seem scared at all. Some of them I found it hard to tell. I didn’t know where the jokes stopped and the beliefs began. So this guy Miles was an example. If we were meant to be meeting someone, and they’d be running late, and you’d receive two of the same text, he’d say “When you get two, it means the government are watching you, and that’s why she had to disappear.” And then you’d wonder if he actually believed that, or was just winding me up.
Where do these ideas germinate from?
That’s a good question. I went to a conference, and everyone was doing these talks, and I had a weird feeling. I do stand up comedy, and half the time you’re trying out new material to see how it’s received, and at this conference, it felt the same. People were standing up and offering new theories and new connections they’d made, and sussing it out with the crowd. It felt like a new material night for theories. But I think that these theories just seem to pop up out of nowhere.
You don’t try to debunk these theories. Why did you adopt that approach?
That wasn’t the focus of the show for me. None of us wanted to make something that was laughing at these people. It was more a matter of going “Look, this is an actual thing that’s happening, and millions of people around the world believe in it,” and if you’re at a dinner party and you’re sitting next to one of these people, you can either say that they’re mad, or dangerous, or idiots, or you could have a good conversation with them. I’m more interested in just hearing from them what they think is going on and why. If you see a documentary with Richard Dawkins, you don’t have time to understand what the religious person thinks, because Dawkins is shouting them down. That’s in no way productive for a conversation.
What are your own theories about extra-terrestrials?
I think that there’s alien life out there. I almost think it would be weird to think that there wasn’t, the Universe being what it is. I just don’t think that we’ve necessarily been visited yet. All they’ve done is gone one step further, and then added a whole conspiracy side to it, with the government being involved.
Lastly, I can’t let you go without asking you, after all those years of working on QI, what’s your favourite fact?
Let’s see. Oh, there’s a great one which always makes me laugh. You know the DVDs you get with the anti-piracy bit with the dramatic music at the beginning? It turns out they didn’t have the permission to use that song. The guy sued them and got money. That’s so wonderful. The other one I really like, which is from one of the QI books, is that in 1895, the only two cars in Ohio crashed into each other.
In search for legendary “City of the Monkey God,” explorers find the untouched ruins of a vanished culture. Some say this could be the city Bigfoots inhabited at one point in time. This video explains the fascinating discovery:
A series of cave paintings discovered 80 miles (130 kilometers) from Raipur, India have been making quite a stir among proponents of the ancient astronauts theory. The paintings show numerous featureless figures, some of them wearing what appear to be space suits. There are also representations of disk-shaped objects with what look like antennas and landing gears. Despite being 10,000 years old, the cave paintings are in very good condition. Local legends tell of the “rohela people” – the small ones that would descend from the sky in flying vehicles. They would take away one or two people which would never be seen again. Are these legends simply the product of imagination or are they describing ancient alien encounters?
NUMEROUS ALIEN DISC BUZZ PAN AM COMERCIAL FLIGHT JULY 14, 1952 …….. NORFORK VIRGINIA AREA
On the evening of July 14,1952, a Pan American World Airways DC-4 was on a routine flight, ferrying from New York to Miami with ten passengers and a crew of three, including, Captain F. V. Koepke, First Officer William B. Nash and Second Officer William H. Fortenberry. The sun had set an hour before though the coastline was still visible, and the night was clear and almost entirely dark. With the aircraft set on automatic pilot, while cruising at 8000 feet over the Chesapeake Bay approaching Norfolk, Virginia, they were due to over fly the VRF radio range station in six minutes and make a position report. In the mean time, since this was Fortenberry’s first run on this course, Nash, in the left pilot’s seat, was orientating Fortenberry by pointing out landmarks and the distant lights of the cities along the route.
Nash had just pointed out the city of Newport News and Cumberland, ahead and to the right of the plane, when unexpectedly a red-orange brilliance appeared near the ground, beyond and slightly east of Newport News. The brilliance seemed to have appeared all of a sudden and both pilots witnessed the startling appearance at practically the same moment. In the excitement someone blurted out, “What the hell is that?” Captain Nash later described their initial observations… “
Almost immediately we perceived that it consisted of six bright objects streaking toward us at tremendous speed, and obviously well below us. They had the fiery aspect of hot coals, but of much greater glow, perhaps twenty times more brilliant than any of the scattered ground lights over which they passed or the city lights to the right. Their shape was clearly outlined and evidently circular; the edges were well defined, not phosphorescent or fuzzy in the least and the red-orange color was uniform over the upper surface of each craft.”
“Within the few seconds that it took the six objects to come half the distance from where we had first seen them, we could observe that they were holding a narrow echelon formation, a stepped-up line tilted slightly to our right with the leader at the lowest point, and each following craft slightly higher. At about the halfway point, the leader appeared to attempt a sudden slowing. We received this impression because the second and third wavered slightly and seemed almost to overrun the leader, so that for a brief moment during the remainder of their approach the positions of these three varied. It looked very much as if an element of “human” or “intelligence” error had been introduced, in so far as the following two did not react soon enough when the leader began to slow down and so almost overran him.”
What occurred next utterly astonished the pilots. The procession shot forward like a stream of tracer bullets, out over the Chesapeake Bay to within a half-mile of the plane. Realizing that the line was going to pass under the nose of the plane and to the right of the copilot, Nash quickly unfastened his seat belt so that he could move to the window on that side. During this interval, Nash briefly lost sight of the objects, though Fortenberry kept them in view below the plane and both would later recollect. “All together, they flipped on edge, the sides to the left going up and the glowing surface facing right. Though the bottom surfaces did not become clearly visible, we had the impression that they were unlighted. The exposed edges, also unlighted, appeared to be about 15 feet thick, and the top surface, at least, seemed flat. The shape and proportion, they were much like coins. While all were in the edgewise position, the last five slid over and past the leader so that the echelon was now tail-foremost, so to speak, the top or last craft now being nearest to our position.”
This shift had taken only a brief second and was completed by the time Nash reached the window. Both pilots then observed the discs flip back from on-edge to the flat position and the entire line dart off to the West in a direction that formed a sharp angle with their initial course, holding the new formation. The pilots had noticed that the objects seemed to dim slightly just prior to the abrupt angular turn and had brightened considerably after making it. Attempting to describe the objects extreme actions, Nash proposed, “The only descriptive comparison we can offer is a ball ricocheting off a wall.”
µAn instant later, two more identical objects darted out past the right wing, from behind and under the airplane at the same altitude as the others and quickly fell in behind the receding procession. They observed that these two seemed to glow considerably brighter than the others, as though applying power to catch up. As they stared after them dumbfounded, suddenly the lights of all of the objects blinked out, only to reappear a moment later, maintaining low altitude out across the blackness of the bay, until about 10 miles beyond Newport News when they began climbing in a graceful arc that carried them well above the plane’s altitude. Sweeping upward they randomly blinked out and finally vanished in the dark night sky. Describing the disappearance of the objects some years later, Nash wrote, “As they climbed, they oscillated up and down behind one another in a irregular fashion, as though they were extremely sensitive to control.
In doing this, they went vertically past one another, bobbing up and down, (just as the front three went horizontally past one another, as the initial six approached us. This appeared to be an intelligence error, ‘lousing up the formation’)—they disappeared by blinking out in a mixed-up fashion, in no particular order.”
Open Minds UFO Radio: Jim Weiner along with his twin brother, Jack, and his friends Chuck Foltz and Charles Rak believe they were abducted during a kayaking trip in Maine in 1976. They had an incredible UFO encounter, and when some of them began having nightmares, they underwent regression therapy, separately. Their accounts of what happened during their UFO encounter in 1976, which they had not remembered consciously, were remarkably similar. In this interview, Jim talks about the events and how they effected his life afterwards.
Jim presently works at Massachusetts College of Art and Design, in Boston, Massachusetts, as an Assistant Director in the school’s Technology Department, where he provides technical and administrative Macintosh computer support to the college’s students, staff, and faculty.
Volgens sommigen is het leven op Mars in het verleden uitgeroeid na een verwoestende kernoorlog. Een foto die momenteel rondgaat op internet zou daar het ‘bewijs’ voor zijn.
Theorieën over verloren beschavingen op de rode planeet zijn er al sinds het moment waarop NASA het beroemde ‘Gezicht op Mars’ in 1976 ontdekte. De wazige foto’s werden geanalyseerd en in korte tijd verrees er een hele stad met piramides uit de woestijn van Mars. Er werden verschillende boeken over geschreven.
Iedere keer als NASA de structuren van dichtbij wilde bekijken, leek het te gaan om natuurlijke formaties. Op 5 november maakte de Indiase Mars Orbiter Mission de foto waar het allemaal om te doen is. Op de foto staat de beroemde Valles Marineris, het enorme ‘litteken’ op Mars dat in 1971 door ruimtesonde Mariner 9 werd ontdekt.
Toen werd op de foto iets vreemds ontdekt. “Beelden die met de Mars Colour Camera (MCC) zijn gemaakt laten duidelijk een mysterieuze wolk zien die zich boven de Valles Marineris bevindt. De wolk heeft de vorm van een paddenstoel en onder de wolk lijkt zich een grote krater te bevinden,” schreef nieuwssite DNA India.
Mysteriousuniverse.org is ook overtuigd: “De wolk heeft zeker de vorm van een paddenstoel en vergrotingen tonen een soort krater die zich onder de wolk heeft gevormd. De schaduw van de wolk strekt zich vanaf de krater uit over het oppervlak.”
Most remarkable UFO sightings in February 2015 by www.Latest-UFO-Sightings.net.
10th February 2015; bright object – San Antonio, Texas
Here’s an infrared video of a huge unidentified flying object flying across the sky above San Antonio, Texas on 10th February 2015.
Witness report:While Skywatching i notice this Low flying Orb above some trees..No FAA navigational light’s were visible only a Huge glowing light…..It appeared to monitoring the area.I decided to pan back using the fence/tree tops as reference points..You can clearly see this U.F.O Orb traveling behind some tree tops…Giving us the altitude it was traveling..This was an awesome sighting due to how Huge and low it was traveling..On the video captures you can see some sort of craft..At some point it travels behind some tree tops and out of view..In my opinion this glowing object was clearly no aircraft or satellite weather balloon..
Author (SAUFOTX @ Youtube)
11th February 2015; UFO formation – Austria
This interesting UFO sighting was taken in the daytime sky above Austria on 11th February 2015. Unfortunately there’s not a lot other info about this footage.
17th February 2015; unknown lights – Florida
New video of an unknown lights in formation hovering in the night sky above US state Florida. This footage was taken on 17th February 2015.
What do yout think about this footage? Please leave your comment below!
23rd February 2015; orb – Utah
Shortly after 11pm on February 23, 2015, many people in Utah, Idaho, Montana and Canada reported seeing a huge sphere of light descend from the sky. Many in the media are claiming this to be “space junk” from a “Chinese rocket”. However this explanation makes no sense at all as space junk, like meteors, only glow brightly as they pass through the upper atmosphere. This object maintained it’s size, shape, and consistent glow for over a minute as it descended to the Earth!
Meer water op Mars dan gedacht: ideale omgeving voor leven - Nieuwsblad.be
Meer water op Mars dan gedacht: ideale omgeving voor leven - Nieuwsblad.be
De planeet Mars was ooit bedekt met meer water dan de aarde. Dat betekent dat Mars een ideale omgeving voor leven had kunnen zijn. Dat hebben onderzoekers van NASA berekend.
Zo’n 4,3 miljard jaar geleden bestond de noordelijke helft van Mars uit water, waarbij de oceaan op sommige plaatsen tot 1,6 kilometer diep was. Die nieuwe inzichten van NASA zorgen ervoor dat de eerdere aanname dat Mars voor het grootste deel een onherbergzame woestijn was, niet klopt. Het gebrek aan water op de planeet werd lang gezien als de reden waarom Mars onbewoond is. Nu blijkt dus dat de planeet wél bewoonbaar had kunnen zijn.
Sinds een tiental jaar werd al aangenomen dat er wel water voorkwam op Mars, maar men ging er van uit dat dat slechts sporadisch was en dat het om kleine hoeveelheden ging. Het was toen nog niet duidelijk dat dat water zowat de helft van de planeet innam en dat er meer water op Mars was dan het water dat we nu op onze aarde hebben.
Water vervlogen in de ruimte
Een groot deel van het water, bijna 90 procent, is gedurende miljoenen jaren vervlogen in de ruimte. Het overgebleven water zou zich in de noordelijke en zuidelijke poolkappen van Mars bevinden.
Onderzoek via drie telescopen
Het team van NASA dat het onderzoek voerde, kwam tot die conclusie door onderzoek via drie verschillende telescopen, en door het waterverlies op Mars over zes jaar en de verhouding tussen gewoon water en ‘halfzwaar water’ (HDO) te berekenen.
Mummified bodies discovered at Pico de Orizaba, the highest mountain in Mexico (Video)
Mummified bodies discovered at Pico de Orizaba, the highest mountain in Mexico (Video)
Mummified bodies emerge from the ice of mountain Pico de Orizaba, Mexico after 55 years.
The expedition in the central state of Puebla was launched on Thursday after climbers found a frozen head sticking out of the glacier near the summit earlier in the week.
The first frozen and mummified body was found 1,000 feet from Pico de Orizaba's peak. The second body was found about 300 feet away from the first body and was also frozen and mummified, according to Juan Navarro, mayor of the town of Chalchicomula de Sesma, near the mountain.
They suspect the bodies are the remains of two Mexican’s climbers, who went missing after an avalanche 55 years ago on the mountain.
A mission to recover the bodies from the Pico de Orizaba was suspended until Monday in order to build a special container to bring the remains intact, one of the rescue workers said.
NASA: Mars had massive, mile-deep ocean – As always, you are witnessing the Scientific matrix money making machine at work advertising on CNN endlessly discovering new stars and Mars one universal deception. This wave of deception, misinformation and control of information is designed to make billions by keeping the gullible and atheists alike hooked to something that fit their faith, hopes or understanding of the world they live in. In what practical ways can the knowledge of a mile-deep ocean help you or your family on earth when humanity and the the scientific community elites know nothing of the Soul of the Cosmos? - http://www.drturi.com/reality-shows-productions/
Can you assimilate, handle and accept the undiluted truth instead? God created the stars and the heavens for INTERPRETATIONS so you may lead a safer more productive life on earth! http://www.drturi.com/finding-jesus-faith-fact-forgery-ufo/ -
A drone flying near California’s Silicon Valley captured video of a UFO shooting across the sky at incredible speed.
It’s unclear when the video was recorded. But the operator of the DJI Inspire 1 drone uploaded the four second UFO video to the video sharing site Vimeo on the night of Thursday, March 5. The drone was reportedly flying at an altitude of 265 feet when the unidentified aerial object whizzed through the sky.
The DJI Inspire 1 drone is equipped with a 4K camera. And, fortunately, the drone operator uploaded the video in its full 4K quality. But, despite the video’s 4K resolution, little detail is visible because the UFO moves so rapidly.
The DJI Inspire 1 drone. (Credit: DJI)
“Assuming the object isn’t purely CGI, it definitely appears to be going at a fair speed,” says Australian news website News.com.au. “One YouTube user estimated the distance travelled as around one mile every one to two seconds. That would give it a speed of around 2890 km/h, roughly 2.4 times the speed of sound.”
Mysterious Universe points out that, at that speed, the UFO “would have created a sonic boom but no sound was reported to have been made by the UFO.”
After uploading the UFO video, the drone pilot sought help identifying the mysterious object on the DJI website’s forum posting, “I have no idea what this is, maybe a bug, Hummingbird, reflection or Alien space craft! The only thing I know for sure is that I did nothing that would cause this. You can analyze it better if you download the video in 4k and go frame by frame. Any other ideas of what it might be?”
It’s difficult to determine if this object is something small close to the camera, or something large far away from the camera. Some have suggested a bug, a bird, a bullet, a secret military aircraft, or even a new drone courtesy of Google or some other Silicon Valley tech giant.
(Credit: Darmino/YouTube)
The drone pilot seems to be genuinely interested in figuring out what was captured on video. The owner of the video states, “I thought it went behind the trees also but after closer inspection, I have determined that I can’t really tell. I can tell you that it was 265Ft high +or – 3 feet at the time. I’m still leaning toward a Hummingbird or bug.”
If the object was, in fact, traveling at “2.4 times the speed of sound,” that’s one insanely fast hummingbird! These birds average a flight speed of 30 m.p.h.–just a little slower than the estimated 1,800 m.p.h. of the UFO.
Although the drone pilot restricted the video to YouTube and Vimeo, you can also watch the video at the top of this story that was posted by user gwhiz2k, showing the UFO at half speed.
What do you think about the UFO in this video? Does it look like a fabrication? Could it be something close to the camera like a bird or a bug? Or did this drone’s camera capture something that could be extraterrestrial?
Which would you prefer: disclosure, about the extraterrestrial presence on Planet Earth, by our own governments; or disclosure from extraterrestrials themselves?
The thing is, whilst our governments are: at the moment, steadfastly refusing to disclose any evidence they have regarding extraterrestrials; the extraterrestrials themselves have already presented us with awe inspiring proof of their presence in our Solar System and skies.
And this evidence was shown to us – in a most spectacular fashion – on the night of the 9 February, 1913.
Now the sketch above (from PDF page 35): drawn by a witness to the Great Canadian Meteor Procession of 1913, mightn't look all that spectacular – it is, after all, only composed of pencil lines drawn on paper (I've inverted the colour scheme to make the image stand out) – but if you compare it to the image below: of an event that occurred a century later in February 2013, you will get a much better understanding of what was seen in the skies over Canada, and across the world, on that eventful night.
(I've flipped this image: of the Chelyabinsk event, horizontally to make the comparison easier.)
(NB The pencil drawing above: along with most of the evidential material that I will be presenting here, is sourced from a paper: 'An Extraordinary Meteoric Display', published by Canadian astronomer Clarence A. Chant in TheJournal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada Vol. VII. May-June, 1913. No3.)
'So what has all this stuff about meteors got to do with ET?' - is the question that you are probably asking right now.
Please read the following extract from Clarence A. Chant's paper very carefully.
" A huge meteor appeared travelling from the south-east, which, as it approached, was seen to be in two parts and looked like two bars of flaming material, one following the other. They were throwing out a constant stream of sparks and after they had passed they shot out balls of fire straight ahead that traveled more rapidly than the main bodies. They seemed to pass over slowly and were in sight about five minutes. Immediately after their disappearance in the south-east a ball of clear fire, that looked like a big star, passed across the sky in their wake. This ball did not have a tail or show sparks of any kind..."
We now need to break this extract down and examine what it is implying it more closely.
"...looked like two bars of flaming material, one following the other." Think about this. A 'bar shape' would imply rectangularity – whether the bar in question was cylindrical or rectangular in cross-section - when seen from the side we: and the witness here, would be seeing a rectangle. Now – as we all know – meteors are supposed to be haphazardly formed, irregularly shaped rocks that plunge into the Earth's atmosphere. So what mechanism could account for this rectangular (or, perhaps, classic cigar-shaped) geometry?
Then there's this: " ...they shot out balls of fire straight ahead that traveled more rapidly than the main bodies...". Meteors enter our atmosphere travelling at tremendous speed (36,000 mph or faster) and then decelerate as friction caused by their passage through the air rapidly bleeds away their kinetic energy. So what we are being told here should be impossible. When meteors break up in the atmosphere some of the debris formed coulddecelerate faster than other pieces – but to accelerate away from the bodies that generated them would mean that there must be some form of energy input/output: completely seperate from the rapidly decaying kinetic energy already possessed by those bodies – at play here.
And it doesn't end there. Consider this: "They seemed to pass over slowly and were in sight about five minutes." Now compare what this witness is saying with this known fact regarding the speed at which meteors travel across the sky: the slowest ever speed – recorded with radar technology – for a meteor's passage was ten miles per second. Now an object traveling at that speed for five minutes would cover a distance of 3,000 miles. This means that an observer on the ground would need to be able to see 1,500 miles in either direction in order to witness the entire event. And this is – of course – impossible due the curvature of the Earth. Therefore these objects couldn't have been travelling at anything like typical meteoric velocities.
Finally, we have the third object reported by this witness. "...a ball of clear fire, that looked like a big star, passed across the sky... This ball did not have a tail or show sparks of any kind..." Here, yet again, we are looking at an object of dubious provenance: given it's un-meteor-like appearance. Consider, the friction generated by a meteor's passage through the atmosphere causes it's surface to both heat up to high temperatures, and also to abrade, so that a glowing tail: composed of hot meteoric material, forms in it's wake. This object didn't have a tail of any description. Why?
So add all of the above together and what do you get? I'll tell you one thing that you most definitely don't get - that is a stream of meteors. These objects can only, really be best described inonlyone way: as Unidentified Flying Objects. And, as you will see, what occurred on the night of 9 February, 1913 was a UFO event of staggering proportions – the magnitude of which hasn't ever been seen before or witnessed since. Which is not to say that it couldn't ever happen again. (Given the ongoing proliferation of sightings of slow moving, silent fireballs in our skies - I'm pretty sure that it will.)
A little background information would be useful at this point. Clarence Augustus Chant: who is generally regarded to be the 'father of Canadian astronomy', did not – unfortunately – witness the great procession himself. But after receiving phone calls, and reading reports of the phenomenon in the press, he realized that something highly unusual had occurred that needed to be investigated. So he wrote to newspapers across Canada asking them to appeal: on his behalf, for eye-witness accounts. Most of what you will be reading here consists of the written accounts from those that responded.
( NB. A PDF version of Chant's paper is available for download on NASA's Astrophysics Data System website.
I would urge you to download this document now – being able to refer to it as you read this article will enable you to appreciate the true nature of this unparalleled event: an event that – should it be repeated – will have an almost unimaginable impact on our future and the way in which we perceive our true place within the cosmos.
Also, please note: for reference purposes, all page numbers given in this article are PDF page numbers; you will need to have Adobe's page thumbnails pane open to locate the extracts used here.)
Now let's continue our exploration of this unprecedented event. This next extract is taken from Chant's overview of the material he'd received from witnesses. It can be found on PDF page 5.
Before we start breaking this extract down, however, we need to understand a little about the man who wrote it. Chant, in his earlier carreer, lectured in physics at the University of Toronto. Here he would have become accustomed to submitting his work to the the rigours of the academic peer review process..So we can, with a degree of certainty, safely surmise that he was a soberly scholastic character: not easily given over to sensationalism or graphic overstatement. Yet, despite this scholastic sobriety, what he has written/reported above is truly sensational.
Think about it. Chant is, here, talking about a disparate collection of haphazardly formed rocks from space: each of a unique size, weight and – most importantly – mass (mass is a component of momentum: IE mass x velocity = momentum). Now whilst these lumps of debris might have entered the Earth's atmosphere travelling at the same, initial velocity, once they encountered atmospheric drag/resistance: which would have affected them all to a different degree, this would have changed dramatically. Those with less mass would have begun to lose forward momentum much more rapidly than their more massive counterparts, as their kinetic energy was absorbed by the molecular gases that constitute the air we breath. And this would have been a runaway process. The more kentic energy given up in this way, the lower these objects would have descended into the increasingly denser atmosphere – causing exponential energy loss. This means that the scenario described by Chant above is a physical impossibility. Meteors could not have maintained any kind of formation in the way described by Chant above. In the real world meteors with less mass would have quickly fallen out of the formation and headed Earthwards. Yet multiple witnesses described these objects maintaining formation over a distance of seven thousand miles. Now I would argue that I have already proven that we are not looking at inanimate lumps of rock here. So, we have to ask, how was this formation maintained? Are we looking at coordination – even communication – between these objects?
Before we attempt to answer that question, let's take a look at - and examine - a few more witness statements.
"About 9 o'clock or a little after as I was on way home from church I saw a large meteor fall to earth, leaving a trail of fire as long as Halley's Comet behind it. Then, turning towards the north, I saw a large black cloud, out of which shooting stars were coming, as it seemed, about 50, each having a line of fire in its path, and disappearing in a large black cloud in the south. After this there began a low rumbling sound like thunder."
From PDF page 25.
This is the only account – to be found in Chant's paper – that describes a meteor falling to Earth. We need to bear in mind here that this witness doesn't report any kind of detonation associated with the event: which would have indicated an impact, only a " low rumbling sound like thunder" afterwards. (I'll be dealing with the sounds associated with the passage of the 'meteor stream' later.)
The main point of interest here is the fact that this witness reports seeing meteors emerging from one cloud and then disappearing into another. This tells us that the stream flew through the atmosphere – not out in space above it.
Moreover, establishing the exact altitude at which these objects flew – from reports which differed considerably - proved to be something of a problem for Chant. To resolve this problem he first of all tries to establish a line on the map, over which the meteor stream passed directly: which he termed 'the meteor trace'. Next he tries to establish the distance between 'the meteor trace' and the various points on the map from which observations were made. Finally he uses the reported angle: given in degrees above the horizon, the 'meteor trace' used as a baseline, and the points from which observations were made to perform a triangulation calculation to arrive at the correct altitude.
In fact, Chant: with this next extract, offers up an intimation that he – himself – suspected that the height of the stream above the ground varied over much of its course.
From PDF page 8.
"...I saw the first meteor at 9.05 it was a little west of north-west from here and travelling nearly towards me. I took it for an aeroplane with both headlights lit, and as it came nearer the sparks falling behind it made it appear more like one...It was very low...just above the hills."
From PDF page 28.
Then there's this:
From PDF page 42.
"...which was still going up...". There you have it. Proof that these objects didn't just fly through the atmosphere – they actually maneuvered within it.
So let us now take a look at Chant's 'meteor trace'. Here's the map - complete with the meteor trace - published by Chant himself:
From PDF page 20
As you can clearly see, the trace (arrowed) shown here describes a straight line with no curves, kinks or angles. Now, in my estimation, a stream of meteors flying a straight course through the sky: at the low speeds described by many witnesses (*see Table One) should, in fact, create a westward curving trace on the ground beneath: because Planet Earth rotates from West to East. And, further to this, it actually rotates at different speeds at different latitudes.
So how fast were these meteors moving? Let's take a look at what some of the witnesses had to say.
Here's another map (to which I've added a few features). I will be referring back to this map as we proceed.
(Map courtesy of Sky & Telescope)
This image/map illustrates a modern version (which includes information from more recent research) of Chant's 'meteortrace': his calculated/imagined straight line onthe map (the line shown here follows the curvature of the planet). The problem with this straight line is purely, and simply the fact that it is straight.
Think about this. For this trace to describe a straight line it has to intersect each successive line of latitude at intersection points that are all on the move: all travelling from West to East at different speeds. So how was this achieved? As I see it, there are two distinct possibilities.
The 'meteor stream' either accelerated – by just the right amount – to meet the eastwards moving latitudinal intersection points at the precise juncture that would keep the line straight as it approached the equator; then the stream decelerated: with equal precision, as it crossed the equator and traveled down into the lower latitudes.
Or – throughout it's flight – the stream: apart from its overall northwest to southeast motion, compensated for the Earth's rotation by also moving, laterally, eastwards to cancel out the westward drift.
Either way – what we would be looking at here are a stream of objects that didn't just follow a flight path: but rather the coordinated trajectory of a stream of objects following a flight plan.
Now all of this does, of course, depend on the fact that the stream moved slowly across the heavens in the manner described by most witnesses. Most, that is, but by no means all. Because Chant's paper does include a few statements that don't agree with this'slow moving' scenario.
In an attempt to try and resolve this issue I began looking at the times: given by witnesses, at which the meteor stream passed specific locations (IE those circled on the map above). But, as you are about to find out, this exercise only served to raise more questions and deepen the mystery even further.
Please check out Table Two. It makes for very interesting – if baffling – reading. With this table I've converted the relevant times supplied by witnesses to Greenwich Mean Time so that direct comparisons can be made.
Click image to see in (enlarged) PDF format.
What then, are we to make of the timing anomalies that have been revealed by the simple process of converting all times given to their Greenwich Mean Time equivalents? Believe me, there is a simple explanation for this.
But first we need to explore the sighting witnessed by Mr A. Y. Porter: from the bridge of the SS Bellucia whilst at sea in the Atlantic, a little further. The following extract is in Mr Porter's own words: its taken from a letter he wrote to W. F. Denning (Denning was regarded at the time - by Chant and his contemporaries – to be the foremost expert on all things meteoric); the letter was dated April 10, 1915.
"....I was on the bridge from 8 to 12 pm. At 10.30 pm I saw the sky lighted up with meteoric fire, starting at north and and going by way of east to south-east. Apparently the height was about 25o above the horizon, but not more than 10-12 miles east of the position of the steamer at that time, continuing until 11.05 pm. It must have been travelling through the earth's atmosphere at the rate of more than 500 miles an hour and fragments were falling off as it passed along. It looked like red and white liquid fire... "
(Before continuing you now need to refer – directly - to Chant's paper. Please read at least some of the witness statements whilst paying careful attention to how they describe the time it took for the meteor stream to cross the sky.)
Once you have a good idea about the average length of time taken for the meteor stream to pass overhead according to the witness satements in Chant's paper: some three to six minutes (approximately), you will appreciate the import of the highlighted text in Mr Porter's statement above. Mr Porter is clearly telling us that his stream of 'red and white liquid fire' (at no point does he use the word 'meteor' – did he even see any individual meteors?) was in view for a full 35 minutes.
This calls into question whether or not Porter even witnessed the same event as that described by Chant. Further to this, if you examine the timing of the event at both Bermuda and Mortlach (and all points in between) in the table above (Table Two) you will begin to have serious doubts as to whether any two statements: from any two witnesses, are actually refering to a single, protracted event. Get the picture? Chant got it wrong. We are not looking at a single 'meteor stream' here. We are looking at multiple streams – of multiple incandescent objects – all airborn: all over the world. We are looking at a coordinated series of aerial events that was staged entirely for our benefit.
For some this was a magical experience:
"...I suddenly found that the whole heavens, from the zenith to the horizon, was full of meteors...They travelled no faster than a crow flies. There was absolute silence..."
From PDF page 39.
So much for the visuals, let's now examine the audio. As you will understand from the last extract, some witnesses: pointedly, remarked on the total lack of any sound that they could ascribe to the meteor stream's passage. Most, however, reported a low rumbling: that they described in various ways, that only reached their ears after the stream had passed beyond the horizon. All of this is highly unusual – given the way that sound waves propagate through the atmosphere. Why - even the wind: which is just moving air, if it is strong enough, makes a noise. So what kind of sound does a fast moving object: that displaces a large volume of air as it goes, create? Well, if that object is travelling faster then the speed of sound then the noise created is horrendous.
The picture below illustrates how the hard-hitting, classic double THUD THUD of a sonic boom is generated.
This shows the shock waves generated by a bullet. It works in exactly the same way for a super-sonic aircraft or meteor/incoming asteroid. You hear the individual booms as the waves pass over you (and scare you half to death). If the object is travelling fast enough the booms will occur too close together to be made out individually: you will hear just one, heart-stoppingly loud boom.
Why then, didn't Chant's contributors include any reasonably accurate description of this phenomenon in their accounts? All real meteors are, by their very nature, supersonic. The only time they cease to be so is when they either burn up or hit the ground. Yet nowhere can anything like this be read in this paper. Were the laws of physics/acoustics different back in 1913? Or were these objects travelling slower than the speed of sound (which would mean – yet again – that they couldn't have been meteors)?
The amount/volume of air displacement does, of course, depend upon the size of the object/objects doing the displacing. Chant discusses this aspect: specifically, the size of the meteors witnessed over Canada, on page 18 of the PDF. On the issue of size he concludes with this:
"...I am inclined to think the largest bodies to have been at least 100 feet in diameter."
From PDF page 19.
Now when it comes to high-speed meteoric objects, a diameter of 100 feet isn't small: it's scary. Such an object travelling at , say, 40,000 miles per hour while close to the ground ( or low over the hills – as described by one of Chant's contributors) wouldn't just create a noise loud enough to implode your eardrums: it would also generate a shock wave powerful enough to flatten buildings. Such objects are killers. In some cases; planet killers.
Luckily for us, however, the 'meteors' that appeared over Canada in 1913 didn't: as I have consistently shown here, behave in a typically 'meteor-like' fashion. They didn't do the things that real meteors typically do. They didn't – for instance – do this:
Tunguska - 1908
The devastation that you see here: which extended over 800 square miles, was caused by a space-rock exploding with, it is thought, the force of 1,000 Hiroshima bombs, over a Siberian pine forest in 1908. (NB. Planetary scientists now believe that the object in question here was no bigger then 30 meters in diameter: IE a little under Chant's estimation of 100 feet for the larger bodies in the meteor stream.) This air burst detonation was triggered by the rapid (very rapid) deceleration induced by atmospheric drag: nothing more. Just simple physics – a simple set of circumstances well understood by science. So the big question here has to be: why didn't any of the objects in the meteor stream suffer the same fate? They were all exposed to exactly the same set of circumstances. Why the different outcome?
Real meteors do not, either, always explode in the atmosphere. Some survive the scorching friction of their descent to make it all the way through to impact. But then, if this had happened back 1913, we'd know about it. We'd have all learned: during history lessons at school, of how, perhaps, Toronto had been reduced to smouldering ruins by a fireball from space. Or how the steamships SS Bellucia and SS Newlands had been overwhelmed by a tidal wave that went on to inundate and destroy South American coastal cities.
Real meteors can do this. Real meteors can, in fact, do much worse. There are lumps of rock out there: looping through space in unstable near-earth orbits, that are a lot bigger than the rock that blew up over Tunguska; or anything seen over Canada in 1913. But then the latter weren't real meteors were they. They were something entirely different. Technology from other worlds perhaps. Maybe we should be attempting to contact those responsible for the Great Event. Who knows? Perhaps they would be willing to help us out – should a real meteor: with planet killer characteristics, ever come our way.
So now my friends it's time to take the plunge, and ask ourselves: what was the purpose of this huge, celestial firework display? What were these signs in the sky trying to tell us?
I know this. It's really quite simple. All they are saying is this: 'We are here'. They've said it once, and they'll say it again. The second time around, however, things will pan out a little differently. Because the next time it happens thousands will record the event with their cell phones and digital cameras. The evidence: that extraterrestrials are disclosing their presence on Planet Earth, will then become undeniable.
My friends, the main event will be foreshadowed by the appearance other aerial phenomena (read Chant's paper) so you will get a warning – be ready.
So keep watching the skies, and keep that camera handy, just in case.
Many thanks for reading.
Peace, Love & Respect
peter dunn
09-03-2015 om 23:26
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:News from the FRIENDS of facebook ( ENG )
The witness first noticed a very large orange object with dark red, fibrillating light on the bottom descending approximately less than one mile away. Pictured: First Avenue looking west in downtown Albany, OR. (Credit: Wikimedia Commons)
An Oregon witness at Albany reported watching a large, hovering orange object that dropped a sphere before moving away at a high rate of speed, according to testimony in Case 63735 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
The witness had just opened a back door when the object was first seen about 8:15 p.m. on March 4, 2015.
“I noticed a very large orange object with dark red, fibrillating light on the bottom descending approximately less than one mile away at 140 degrees southeast,” the witness stated. “The object stopped and hovered for about two to three minutes.”
The witness reached for his binoculars and noticed a second, smaller object moving out of the larger object.
The witness noticed a second, smaller object moving out of the larger object. Pictured: Albany, OR. (Credit: Google)
“I saw a round sphere with dark red lights going crazy at the bottom of the sphere. It looked like it dropped (shot) out of sides near the bottom.”
The object then began to move.
“The object started to ascend slowly and then took off at a very high rate of speed directly south. It looked like it traveled miles in just a couple of seconds. It was just after dark. No noise.”
Albany is the county seat of Linn County and the 11th largest city in the State of Oregon, population 51,583.
Oregon is currently a UFO Alert Level 5 – with 0.77 sightings per million population based on MUFON February 2015 statistics. Oregon received a total of three UFO reports in February.
As the object moved away, it looked like it traveled miles in just a couple of seconds. Pictured: Albany, OR. (Credit: Google)
The UFO Alert Rating System is based on five levels – 1 through 5 – where states with 4.01 or higher reports per million residents are rated an Alert 1; 3.01 – 4.0 reports are an Alert 2; 2.51 – 3.0 are an Alert 3; 2.01 – 2.5 are an Alert 4; and those states with 2.0 or lower are rated an Alert 5.
Please remember that most UFO sighting can be explained as something natural or man-made. The above quotes were edited for clarity. Please report UFO activity to MUFON.com.
Inuit-oudsten in brief aan NASA: "Aardas is verschoven"
Inuit-oudsten in brief aan NASA: “Aardas is verschoven”
De Inuit vormen de inheemse bevolking van Groenland, Siberië en Alaska. Hun oudsten hebben in een brief aan de Amerikaanse ruimtevaartorganisatie NASA geschreven dat de as van de aarde is verschoven.
De oudsten geloven niet dat de uitstoot van CO2 verantwoordelijk is voor klimaatverandering. Zij zeggen dat de verandering van het klimaat te maken heeft met veranderingen in de lucht. De zon komt niet langer op dezelfde plaats op en de dagen duren langer, aldus de oudsten.
Ze voegden toe dat de sterren en maan ook op andere plekken aan de hemel staan en dat dit invloed heeft op de temperatuur op aarde. De Inuit zijn voor hun overleving afhankelijk van de stand van de maan en de sterren omdat ze een aantal maanden van het jaar in duisternis leven.
De oudsten zeggen ook dat ze het weer niet langer kunnen voorspellen. Daarnaast neemt het aantal ijsberen toe, waardoor de Inuit geregeld oog in oog komen te staan met deze dieren.
De Inuit wonen al honderden jaren in het poolgebied. Ze bouwen in de warmere maanden tenten en tipi’s van kariboehuid en leven ’s winters in iglo’s. Het woord Inuit wordt gebruikt als alternatief voor het woord ‘Eskimo’, omdat die term door sommige Inuit als beledigend wordt beschouwd.
Onlangs verschoof de aardas nog als gevolg van de zware aardbeving bij Japan in 2011. Die was zo krachtig dat het Japanse hoofdeiland bijna 2,4 meter werd opgeschoven naar het oosten. De aardas verschoof daarnaast 10 centimeter.
Let’s talk about the UFOs of Central New York Counties. The five counties of CNY are: Cayuga, Cortland, Madison, Onondaga and Oswego Counties. Below are a few sighting reports from the past couple of years.
It was June in 2013 at about 9:45 p.m. in Kings Ferry, NY in Cayuga County. Sankey, her two kids, and her best friend were on a cliff overlooking Cayuga Lake.
Sankey happened to turn her head and saw a brilliant orange ball coming over the lake toward them. She tells us that at times the orange ball seemed to be pulsing. It appeared to come from the direction of Interlaken.
Sankey says, “I jumped up and said, what the hell, is that?”
Sankey grabbed her camera and franticly began snapping photos. In summarizing the whole experience Sankey tells us;
“It totally confused me. I remember thinking, plane but it had no red and white blinking lights. It wasn’t a meteor but it had no tail. What is it?”
It was the 22nd of February in 2014 down in Cortland County. Frank was driving home from his 3rd shift job when he spotted something unusual in the northern sky.
“I noticed what appeared to be a very large cylinder in the sky. At first I thought it was stationary until I pulled over to get a better look. It seemed to move slowly in a North West direction.”
Frank tells us that the craft didn’t have any wings and wasn’t leaving a contrail. He adds that from his perspective the craft appeared to be much bigger than a commercial jet liner.
“To me it seemed 2 or 3 times bigger but I know it is hard to judge something that high up. I will say this definitely caught my attention when I saw it.”
Over in Madison County back in June of 2012, an Oneida, NY mother was up feeding her newborn about 4 a.m. She glanced out of the window where she noticed a strange light out in the distance over the street lights.
” It was a glowing light orange that looked to be hovering or moving very slowly. Finally it flew over our house and headed west towards Syracuse, NY”
Closer to home, a Cicero resident was driving home one night in September 2013. He tells us that he was on Northern Blvd when he noticed a very bright orange like light off in the northern direction.
“It was unlike any airplane I have ever seen. Upon pulling into my driveway I noticed the orange light was moving in a southerly direction very slowly. Suddenly the bright orange light just “winked out.”
Finally in September 2014, a resident of Fulton, NY was in his house talking on the phone when he glanced out a window and saw two red lights in the sky a short distance away. He says at first he thought they might be a helicopter or an airplane, but as the lights got closer he witnessed something amazing.
“I watched the light just stop, then completely changed direction. They were headed north/south then suddenly they went east, after about ten seconds. They stopped dead… then suddenly they accelerate much faster than anything I’ve ever seen and then poof, gone!”
The counties of Central New York (CNY) are not strangers to UFO sightings. On the other hand CNY isn’t exactly a hot spot either within the context of greater New York State.
A quick snap shot of the five CNY’s counties using the Mutual UFO Network’s (MUFON) database shows us that from 1890 to 2014, the CNY has only logged about 91 sightings. Of course experts tell us that only about one in ten persons report a sighting. So do the math; potentially the NY region may have experienced upwards of a nearly a thousand UFO sighting over the past one hundred twenty four years.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.
_A2.jpg)
