EXCLUSIVE: INSIDE HISTORY'S NEW SCI-FI SERIES PROJECT BLUE BOOK WITH CREATOR DAVID O'LEARY

{ http://www.syfy.com/ }

17-07-2018 om 00:23 geschreven door peter  

Geometry Helps Solve the Mystery of Mars' Water

17-07-2018 om 00:10 geschreven door peter  

FALSE REPORTS CLAIM NASA DESTROYED PROOF OF ALIEN LIFE ON MARS

There almost certainly wasn't any such proof to destroy

17-07-2018 om 00:00 geschreven door peter  

Hawaiian Asteroid-Warning Telescope Passes Key Test

16-07-2018 om 23:56 geschreven door peter  

Scientists Discovered a Quadrillion Diamonds Hidden Deep Within the Earth

'Diamond is not a particularly rare mineral.'

By Sarah Sloat

16-07-2018 om 23:42 geschreven door peter  

Despite SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic racing to be the first to bring tourists to Mars, NASA’s latest photos depict a volatile Martian landscape that might not be ready for a tourist season. Such is the case with the latest photo from the Reconnaissance Orbiter, which reveals a region in the red planet’s south pole that looks to be covered with spiders.

Magnificent Mars: 10 Years of Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

On Thursday NASA released photos captures by the Reconnaissance Orbiter on May 13 of spider formations in the normally ice-capped region of Mars’ south pole. This photo was released just weeks after the Orbiter captured the planet’s mesmerizing blue sand dunes as part of its mission to understand Mars’ geological diversity. The cobalt blue sand dunes could make someone rethink the “red planet” moniker, but the south pole spider fleet is enough to make someone rethink Elon Musk’s proposed colony.

Luckily, these “spiders” aren’t actually organic lifeforms, but are called “araneiform terrain.” It’s a radiating mound that forms when carbon dioxide ice heats up below the surface, causing to change from a solid to gas, much like dry ice here on Earth. Thanks to the sun’s warmth each spring, the carbon dioxide gas trapped below the surface before it builds enough pressure to break through the ice.

Once the gas is released into the atmosphere, darker dust can be deposited around the vent or transported by winds to produce streaks. The loss of the sublimated carbon dioxide leaves behind heaps of dust mounds that look like giant arachnids crawling along the landscape. And there’s nothing like a warm spring day on Mars to help the spider-mounds bloom.

The Martian spiders were captured on film thanks to the Orbiter’s High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment, or HiRISE. The camera, which is operated by University of Arizona, Tucson, has helped NASA decrease the noise and bad pixelation of earlier images by employing a longer warm-up time and is expected to continue returning images that help scientists understand Mars’ diverse and divergent geological properties.

With the commercial race to Mars still on, it’s important to know what to expect before tourist board a spacecraft from Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, or SpaceX, all of which promise to offer trips to the red planet in the near future. Between its blue dunes, violent dust storms, and now blooming spiders, even if the planet cannot sustain organic life, it can at least sustain trippy nightmares.

{ https://www.inverse.com/ }

16-07-2018 om 23:30 geschreven door peter  

High in the Andes Mountains in Chile, unrelenting ultraviolet (UV) radiation blasts the nutrient-poor waters of Laguna Negra and Lo Encañado, two lakes fed by rapidly melting glaciers. In this hostile and remote environment, researchers are trialling life-detection technology to see if we can use it on other planets.

Understanding these lake systems will help scientists to interpret biomarkers in ancient lakes both on Earth or other planets. Although the organisms themselves are long dead, the traces and history of their deaths are encoded in the biomolecules that litter the lakes' sediments.

The implications of these biomolecules extend far beyond the boundaries of these lakes: they could help scientists to recreate the evolutionary history of extraterrestrial life. The scientists' findings were described in a recent article in Astrobiology.

"Once a microbe dies, different physiochemical factors – such as humidity, temperature, oxygen, or the presence of metals – affect the degradation or chemical alteration of its structures and molecular components," says lead author Victor Parro, based at the Centro de Astrobiología, in Madrid, Spain.

Certain biomarkers are characteristic of certain groups of microbes and even particular metabolisms, he says. "From this information it is possible to infer what the environment where they developed was like."

Crater lakes

In the Andes, this can tell us about the paleoclimate of the mountains and their rapidly thawing glaciers. But it could possibly unravel the geochemical and atmospheric histories of other worlds, such as Mars and Saturn's moon Titan.

"These high-altitude lakes in the Andes mountains are interesting for astrobiology because they are exposed to high levels of ultraviolet radiation," says Lewis Dartnell, an astrobiologist at the University of Westminster, in London, who was not involved in the research. "Understanding how microbial life in the lake copes with these UV levels is important for the search for life beyond Earth – on Mars, for example, where there are believed to have once been crater lakes but also very high UV levels. "

The researchers used a Life Detector Chip (LDChip) to hunt for these fragments of life. An LDChip is a biosensor that can detect the presence of life (recent or ancient) from protein fragments and other biomolecules.

"An LDChip doesn't need entire living microbes, it just needs biological material, whether it is alive or dead, recent or ancient, free or as part of large polymers or even organo-mineral particles [which are mineral by-products of life]," Parro says. The chip needs between four and ten amino acids to identify the protein or family of proteins that the amino acids came from.

Testing for life in situ

The LDChip is the core of the Spanish Signs Of LIfe Detector (SOLID), an instrument that can liquidize up to two grams of solid rock, soil or ice, which can then be screened for biopolymers.

Importantly, especially when viewed through the lens of astrobiology, it can test for life in situ.

Researchers can treat these extreme environments as proxies for the remote and harsh conditions on other planets, allowing them to test their theories and technologies on Earth. Astrobiologists often view Laguna Negra as a stand-in for the lakes of Titan.

Understanding water, glaciers and ice is a fundamental part of astrobiology. "Ice and glaciers were and are common in other planetary bodies, such as Mars, and they must have played a critical role in the hydrogeology of those planets, the formation and behavior of ancient lakes, as well as in the development and evolution of potential Martian microbiology," says Parro.

In their study, Parro's team investigated the shallow sediments of the lakes. They reported the presence of sulphate-reducing bacteria, methanogenic (methane producing) archaea, and exopolymeric substances (polymers, such as biofilms, secreted by organisms) from Gammaproteobacteria.

Proof of life

Don Cowan, a professor of microbial ecology at the University of Pretoria, in South Africa, says that their presence is unsurprising and "just what one would expect in a glacial lake sediment".

Asked if they were significant biomarkers, he says that "All are important, in a general sense, in that identification of any of these biomarkers (which are examples of many possible biomarkers) in an 'astrobiological' sample, such as from Mars, would be definitive evidence of life."

A library of biomarkers is the next step in Parro's research. "We need further studies and understanding of what biomarkers we can expect to find in different planetary environments," he says. This involves identifying the most universal ones, discovering how they are preserved and how they respond to radiation and other environmental conditions, and then using that information to hone their tests for the presence of life.

The end game is to see the SOLID instrument with its LDChip on extraplanetary missions to test for biomarkers or assist astronauts in biohazard detection. Until then, the researchers plan to deploy it in as many terrestrial environments as they can, from extreme environments to the veterinary sector, Parro says.

 Explore further: Climbing the ladder to life detection

More information: Víctor Parro et al. Biomarkers and Metabolic Patterns in the Sediments of Evolving Glacial Lakes as a Proxy for Planetary Lake Exploration, Astrobiology (2016). DOI: 10.1089/ast.2015.1342 

{ https://phys.org/ }

16-07-2018 om 23:12 geschreven door peter  

Mysterious ‘Oumuamua is the 1st confirmed interstellar object to pass through our solar system.

By Phil Davis/NASA Science

1. We know it’s not from around here.

The object known as 1I/2017 U1 (and nicknamed ‘Oumuamua) was traveling too fast (196,000 miles per hour, that’s 54 miles per second or 87.3 kilometers per second) to have originated in our solar system. Comets and asteroids from within our solar system move at a slower speed, typically an average of 12 miles per second (19 km per second) . In non-technical terms, ‘Oumuamua is an interstellar vagabond.

Artist’s concept of the interstellar object ‘Oumuamua.

Image via ESA/Hubble, NASA, ESO, M. Kornmesser.

2. We’re not sure where it came from.

‘Oumuamua entered our solar system from the rough direction of the constellation Lyra, but it’s impossible to tell where it originally came from. Thousands of years ago, when ‘Oumuamua started to wander from its parent planetary system, the stars were in a different position so it’s impossible to pinpoint its point of origin. It could have been wandering the galaxy for billions of years.

3. We know it’s out of here.

‘Oumuamua is headed back out of our solar system and won’t be coming back. It’s rapidly headed in the direction of the constellation Pegasus and will cross the orbit of Neptune in about four years and cover one light year’s distance in about 11,000 years.

4. We don’t really know what it looks like.

We’ve only seen it as a speck of light through a telescope (it is far away and less than half a mile in length), but its unique rotation leads us to believe that it’s elongated like a cigar, about 10 times longer than it is wide. We can’t see it anymore. Artist’s concepts are the best guesses at what it might look like.

5. We know it got a little speed boost.

A rapid response observing campaign allowed us to watch as ‘Oumuamua got an unexpected boost in speed. The acceleration slightly changed its course from earlier predictions. Davide Farnocchia, of the Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said:

This additional subtle force on ‘Oumuamua likely is caused by jets of gaseous material expelled from its surface. This same kind of outgassing affects the motion of many comets in our solar system.

6. We know it’s tumbling.

Unusual variations in the comet’s brightness suggest it is rotating on more than one axis.

This illustration shows ‘Oumuamua racing toward the outskirts of our solar system. As the complex rotation of the object makes it difficult to determine the exact shape, there are many models of what it could look like.

Image via NASA/ESA/STScI.

7. We don’t know what it’s made of.

Comets in our solar system kick off lots of dust and gas when they get close to the sun, but ‘Oumuamua did not, which led observers to consider defining it as an asteroid.

Karen Meech, an astronomer at the University of Hawaii’s Institute of Astronomy, said small dust grains, present on the surface of most comets, may have eroded away during ‘Oumuamua’s long journey through interstellar space. She said:

The more we study ‘Oumuamua, the more exciting it gets.

It could be giving off gases that are harder to see than dust, but it’s impossible to know at this point.

8. We knew to expect it.

Just not when. The discovery of an interstellar object has been anticipated for decades. The space between the stars probably has billions and billions of asteroids and comets roaming around independently. Scientists understood that, inevitably, some of these small bodies would enter our own solar system. This interstellar visit by ‘Oumuamua reinforces our models of how planetary systems form.

9. We don’t know what it’s doing now.

After January 2018, ‘Oumuamua was no longer visible to telescopes, even in space. But scientists continue to analyze the data gathered during the international observing campaign and crack open more mysteries about this unique interstellar visitor.

10. We know there’s a good chance we’ll see another one … eventually.

Because ‘Oumuamua is the first interstellar object ever observed in our solar system, researchers caution that it’s difficult to draw general conclusions about this newly-discovered class of celestial bodies. Observations point to the possibility that other star systems regularly eject small comet-like objects and there should be more of them drifting among the stars. Future ground- and space-based surveys could detect more of these interstellar vagabonds, providing a larger sample for scientists to analyze. Meech said:

I can hardly wait for the next interstellar object!

Bottom line: What science knows and doesn’t know about ‘Oumuamua, the first confirmed interstellar object to pass through our solar system.

{ http://earthsky.org/ }

16-07-2018 om 22:56 geschreven door peter  

A startup has released test footage of a flying vehicle that can be 'driven' by anyone and is 'affordable'

{ https://www.disclose.tv/ }

16-07-2018 om 22:42 geschreven door peter  

Three Bright UFOs Filmed Over France in Broad Daylight

This footage captured by Sebastien Monnetver in Lyon, France shows 3 bright UFOs hovering in the daytime. The brights ufos were seen for several minutes before fading away. Good daytime UFO footage can be hard to find! For recent news about UFO sightings visit our YouTube channel!

{ http://beforeitsnews.com/ }

16-07-2018 om 22:33 geschreven door peter  

Checkout This Dynamic New Crop Circle That Was Just Reported in the UK

{ https://www.disclose.tv/ }

16-07-2018 om 22:29 geschreven door peter  

Extraterrestrial and Extradimensional Beings — How They Travel Space and Time

To Understand ET, You Need to Understand Dimensionality

We have talked before about the fact that most extraterrestrial beings visiting our planet are actually extradimensional in nature, but limited to travel within and across dimensional realities within our sub-universe (there are many sub-universes in the cosmos). Sub-universes are what we might call instances, shards, or even forks in technical terms.

The UFOs that we regularly see are often light ships that are interdimensional nature, hailing from a 5D reality or other dimensional reality. Dimensionally speaking, 5D is right next door and certain ET groups have the ability to cross the dimensional veil into our reality. This is referred to as the Interdimensional Hypothesis (IDH). Most of the benevolent ET groups are extradimensional, interdimensional, and frequently transdimensional, as well. UFOs that are metallic in nature are not typically interdimensional and frequently not extraterrestrial either. More on that later, but for now, let’s discuss extradimensionals.

One advantage of IDH proffered by Hilary Evans is its ability to explain the apparent ability of UFOs to appear and disappear from sight and radar; this is explained as the UFO entering and leaving our dimension (“materializing” and “dematerializing”). Moreover, Evans argues that if the other dimension is slightly more advanced than ours, or is our own future, this would explain the UFOs’ tendency to represent near future technologies (airships in the 1890s, rockets and supersonic travel in the 1940s, etc.

It is also worth knowing that the entire cosmos is holographic in nature, and is indeed a matrix with many sub-matrices in existence, as well. Some of the beings exist across multiple dimensions. There aren’t just 11 or 12 dimensions, either. They number in the thousands. Some extensions of multiverse or parallel universes hypotheses are not entirely correct — there is not a dimension spawned at every decision point — only observed realities come into or stay in existence. Most of the other dimensional realities experience time differently than we do, as well. They call it ‘no time’. It doesn’t mean that things don’t progress in a linear fashion, but they are able to perceive multiple possibilities simultaneously. They then choose to train their observation on the possibilities they want to manifest. Many beings can instantly manifest within their realities (which would look like magic to us), but some manifestation requires collective effort/observation over time (like it does with us).

The holographic nature of the cosmos means that the Galactics, as they like to be called, are able to use their projectors (we all project and co-create our realities) to focus on creating the reality that is most positive. It is a co-created, negotiated in real-time, collective reality. Our individual consciousnesses are projections that we create and when married with similar projections from other beings, the collective reality becomes manifest. We are all essentially AI, if you think about the cosmos from a technical/IT perspective. The dark beings are IT experts, in a manner of speaking, and have made a mess of the security infrastructure relative to planet Earth. They are hackers of a sort, and were trying to lead humanity onto a negative timeline. However those efforts were subverted by benevolent extradimensionals.

The Fermi Paradox, as you know, posits that no extraterrestrial nor extradimensional beings have been able to get to our planet. That isn’t true. There have been all sorts of beings, both light and dark, who have visited Earth throughout history. The dark ones considered our reality an experiment and there were all sorts of interventions, including genetically engineering early hominids into a slave species. The reason we, homo sapiens sapiens, do not look like most other hominids and our close cousins, the higher primates, is because we were seeded with DNA from various ET/ED species. Most of them are humanoid, as well. Civilization was also seeded by some of these beings, which was how we developed, very quickly, advanced knowledge of engineering, architecture, astronomy, mathematics, and various cosmological mythologies involving star beings and galactic-level conflicts. This video explains the cosmic back story to what is happening now:

Dark energy is the space between what we might consider visible matter. All matter is fundamentally energy, whether it is light or dark in nature. Dark energy is what we might call the glue that holds all light matter in the cosmos together. Within dark matter is a tremendous amount of what we call zero-point energy, which is the fundamental force behind systems like gravity, light, and the electro-magnetic forces. It is also the mechanism behind what some of us might call soul force, love force, or light force. Dark energy could be compared to wet sand on a beach — we have the ability to make sand castles from it, or it can remain in its natural state. Dark matter, as we call it, is the fundamental force of entropy that allows the sand castles to decay.

Both light and dark energy are what connects everything in the cosmos. At a quantum level, the divine spark of creation resides in dark energy, ready to be manifested into light matter. This is how the big bang happened, and how our sub-universe came into being. The singularity was the original spark and dark energy was the kindling. Dark matter is what causes the fire to go out.

So, how do these beings physically get to our planet/reality? As we have theorized, faster than light or superliminal travel isn’t possible for them either, though it is theoretically possible for them. ET/ED do travel via what we might call conventional means, but they can only travel at a maximum of two-thirds light speed. What they can also do, however, is travel via what we might call wormholes. There are several different types of wormholes — they all persist once created, as long as there is an energy source. Contrary to some sci fi, wormholes are not created on the fly as they are not stable enough when created that way:

• Jump gates are wormholes that persist once they are created. There are several hundred thousand jump gates in our sub-universe alone. They are often referred to as portals and are powered by zero point energy. Jump gates are used for intra-galactic travel.
• Star portals are wormholes that persist, as well, but they rely on the energy of a sun to fuel them. The ‘alien megastructure’ is a grid around a star that is being utilized to power a star portal. It harnesses the solar plasma field as energy. Star portals are much larger than jump gates and many solar systems have them. Since many of their vessels are enormous bio-spheres that are planet-sized, these large portals are necessary. They can travel inter-galactically using these portals.
• There are two forces that are relevant to travel through space and time. One is the attractive force (the pull) and the other is the magnetic or repulsive force (the push). Dark energy is magnetical (repelling) and dark matter is gravitational (attracting) with a weaker magnetical force applied to it. There is an energy field surrounding all planets that is toroidal in nature. It, and many other things, maintain their form through a perfect balance of these two forces:

The Keshe Foundation has been doing a lot of work in this area, using controlled gravitational and magnetic fields powered by zero-point energy.

I’m an anthropologist, not a physicist, but this is how it was explained to me!

{ https://medium.com/ }

16-07-2018 om 22:21 geschreven door peter  

This Week's Top Space Stories!

Photo Credit: MPIA

Photo Credit: DESY, Science Communication Lab

Photo Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

Photo Credit: NASA/SDO

Photo Credit: Paul Schenk/Lunar and Planetary Institute

4. Pretty Pluto maps

Photo Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Photo Credit: M. Kornmesser/ESO

Photo Credit: MPIA

Photo Credit: NASA

Photo Credit: ESO/S. Brunier

Photo Credit: NASA

10. Spooky, singing plasma

Between Saturn and its moon Enceladus, Cassini "heard" the gas giant singing.

[Full Story:There's Spooky Plasma Music Traveling From Saturn to its Weirdest Moon]

16-07-2018 om 22:10 geschreven door peter  

16-07-2018 om 21:25 geschreven door peter  

WETENSCHAPPERS WETEN ZEKER DAT WIJ ALLEEN ZIJN IN DE MELKWEG

{ http://niburu.co/ }

16-07-2018 om 21:15 geschreven door peter  

WOEDENDE BOER MAAIT NEDERLANDSE GRAANCIRKEL KAPOT

Je kunt zeggen wat je wilt over het Nederlandse medium Robbert van den Broeke, maar is er altijd wel wat gaande met hem. 

Nu is het een door Robbert ontdekte graancirkel in Zevenbergen en een woedende boer die het nieuws halen. 

Zo ook op 12 juli toen Robbert de volgende graancirkel ontdekte bij Zevenbergen.

Het is een graancirkel, maar wanneer je bijvoorbeeld kijkt naar een Engelse zoals de volgende, dan zie je het verschil. De Engelse cirkels lijken ook veel groter dan de Nederlandse.

Het volgende is wat Robbert op zijn Facebookpagina vertelt: 

Tussen kwart voor twaalf en twaalf uur kwam er vanuit de rechterhoek een lichtbol zo groot als een tennisbal in het zicht, op het moment dat ik in mijn tuin zat. Deze lichtbol ging rakelings langs me heen en schoot tegen mijn deurkozijn aan en het bolletje loste daar op. 

Op de plek waar het lichtbolletje het kozijn heeft geraakt zie je een grote schroeivlek, daarvan zijn de foto’s te zien in het artikel. 

Op dat moment kreeg ik een drukkend, onrustig gevoel wat ik de dag daarvoor ook al had. Ik kreeg sterk het gevoel dat ik naar Zevenbergen moest, ik kreeg duidelijk een beeld van een grote, zilverachtige ufo die heel rustig boven een graanveld hing, waar drie metaalachtige bollen uitkwamen die licht gaven. Ik zag in het visioen hoe de bollen de graancirkelformatie vormden. Het voelde heel liefdevol en zacht. 

Toen kreeg ik heel duidelijk de straat (straatnaam kan ik nog niet bekend maken, aangezien de boer nog niet op de hoogte is) door in Zevenbergen waar ik de cirkel zou treffen. Daar aangekomen trof ik inderdaad de graancirkelformatie aan die ik in mijn visioen had gezien. Ik voelde duidelijk dat er wezens aanwezig waren van arcturus. De cirkelformatie heeft een zachte , helende roze/gele energie. De graancirkelformatie heeft ook een ritmische energie. 

Toen de boer bericht kreeg van Robbert dat er op zijn land een graancirkel was gevonden, was deze niet blij. 

Maar boer Örjan Schrauwen moet er niets van weten. „Onzin”, vindt hij de vondst. „Ik kreeg een berichtje, dat Van den Broeke iets had gevonden op mijn land. Ik ben gelijk op de machine gestapt en heb het gedeelte van de ’graancirkel’ geoogst.” De schade is minimaal: de paar vierkante meter schelen ’enkele euro’s in opbrengst’. „Maar het gaat mij om het principe”, aldus de agrariër. „Je moet gewoon van mijn land af blijven en niet het graan plat gaan trappen.” 

Zoals te zien op de volgende foto maakte hij korte metten met de graancirkel.

Het volgende is wat Robbert erover zegt op zijn Facebook: 

Hij is zo boos dat hij meteen vandaag de graancirkel er uit maaide uit boosheid, en verder het graan nog niet oogstte, alleen de cirkels zijn er uit gemaaid. 

Ik heb de boer netjes benaderd dat ik het erg vond voor hem dat het op zijn land de graancirkel was ontstaan omdat ik al had begrepen dat hij er niet blij mee was opperde ik het idee om van de graankorrels in de cirkel brood te bakken en dat te verkopen, er zit energie in die korrels van de graancirkel, de opbrengst is dan geheel voor de boer. 

Ik zei ik kan het op mijn facebook plaatsen dat het brood te koop is en dan weet ik zeker dat veel mensen het brood willen kopen. Toen kreeg ik in het chatgesprek "BARST" terug met de foto er bij genomen vanuit de cabine van de graandorser waar op te zien is dat hij de graancirkel weg aan het maaien is. 

Ik betreur het dat hij zo reageert, ik heb hem netjes en lief benaderd, dan denk ik.. kom op denk je nou werkelijk dat ik die cirkels stiekem 's nachts maak?? echt niet tof dit.

{ http://niburu.co/ }

16-07-2018 om 21:10 geschreven door peter  

It’s frequently alleged that NASA may have hidden, obfuscated, or otherwise destroyed evidence of extraterrestrial life in its sixty-year history. While a great deal of these claims are based solely on individuals’ interpretations of NASA photographs or videos, sometimes scientists do actually uncover inconsistencies or irregularities in NASA’s hard data. In 2016, one such case came to light when a pair of astrophysicists published a rebuttal of forty-year-old data gathered on the surface of the Red Planet by NASA’s Viking 1 lander. The article claims that the Viking lander actually uncovered evidence of organic molecules in Martian soil samples, but that the data was either misinterpreted or deliberately hidden.

No way. Government agencies never lie to us, do they?

Now, those claims have been taken one step further as a new study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research now claims that the Viking lander might have actually destroyed evidence of organic molecules – the building blocks of life – by heating them up in its gas chromatograph‐mass spectrometer or GCMS, a scientific instrument which heats/burns substances to determine their composition. Did NASA unwittingly incinerate proof of life (or more realistically, the potential for life) on Mars?

It’s hard to stay. This new study examines data gathered by NASA’s Phoenix lander in 2008 and Curiosity rover in 2013. In their analyses of Martian soil, both rovers discovered the presence of perchlorates, salt compounds used in propellants and to control static electricity in food packaging. When heated to high temperatures, perchlorates break down into other compounds, one of which is chlorobenzene. It turns out that the 1976 Viking lander, the same one accused of possibly having detected organic compounds without NASA admitting as much, detected the presence of chlorobenzene in its GCMS data.

That’s some nice soil you got there. It’d be a shame if someone, I don’t know, burned it to smithereens.

What does this mean? Ultimately, all we know for sure is that NASA likely had evidence of organic matter on Mars forty years ago and either didn’t realize what they were looking at, or intentionally hid the data. Nobody has gone so far as to make that claim yet, but given that the Viking landers cost over $5 billion, it wouldn’t have been a wise funding move to admit that NASA’s flagship lander incinerated the best evidence we had at the time that life may exist or may have existed elsewhere in the solar system.

Viking I

Ultimately, not even all of the scientists involved with this study are convinced that the chlorobenzene is proof that the Viking incinerated organic compounds; one author believes the readings could be the result of terrestrial contamination. Whatever the case may be with this reexamination of the Viking data, this case makes you wonder: could we already have proof of alien life resting in some vault or dataset somewhere and not even know it yet?

Scientist Says He’s Found Alien Footprints On Mars, Accuses NASA Of Cover-Up

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

16-07-2018 om 20:46 geschreven door peter  

One of the most controversial of all of Bob Lazar’s claims (made after he allegedly briefly worked, in late 1988, at a portion of Area 51 called S-4)  is that he read a series of highly-classified documents on various aspects of the UFO phenomenon. One of those documents, Lazar maintained, told a strange and sinister story of a violent confrontation between security personnel at Area 51 and a group of aliens that were in residence and working at S-4, alongside a scientific team. It was a confrontation that reportedly resulted in more than a few deaths. Far more than a few.

Lazar has admitted that he cannot say for sure that the briefing papers he read were the real thing. He has acknowledged that they may have been nothing but disinformation, designed to swamp him with both real and bogus material. Why might the project leaders at Area 51 do such a thing? Simple: if there were concerns that Lazar might blow the whistle on what he knew (which, as history has shown, he did, in 1989), mixing up the truth with a more than liberal amount of lies might have an adverse effect on his credibility. It should be noted that’s exactly what happened. That said, and although he cannot say for sure that the documentation was the real deal, he does recall the contents of the material, in relation to this fire-fight situation.

According to Lazar, the deadly confrontation occurred at some point in 1979, in the S-4 facility. Lazar said: “I believe the altercation came about in 1979, or sometime like that. And I don’t remember exactly how it was started, but it had something to do with the security personnel. The aliens were in a separate room. I think it had something to do with the bullets [the security guards] were carrying, and somehow they were trying to be told that they couldn’t enter the area with the bullets, possibly because it was hazardous – the bullets could explode, through some field or whatever.”

Lazar continued that despite the warning, one of the security guards did indeed enter the room with the bullets – something which resulted in a violent and lethal response from the aliens. Lazar recalled that the papers he read described how the security personnel were all quickly killed by “head wounds.” The same fate befell a group of scientists on the program, too. Timothy Good, who interviewed Lazar at the height of the controversy surrounding his claims, said: “The incident is said to have led to the termination of an alien liaison at the Nevada Test Site.”

It’s important to note that there is a variation on this story. Not from Lazar, who stuck to the story which he read out at S-4. But, from a man named Paul Bennewitz, who in the late 1970s began digging into claims that an alien base existed below the New Mexico town of Dulce. From intelligence personnel at Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, Bennewitz learned of a story of a fatal encounter between hostile aliens and a security team in the lower levels of the Dulce Base. The different location given to Bennewitz is just about the only difference between what Lazar was told and what Bennewitz was told.

Clearly, both scenarios cannot be true, something which means we must give deep consideration to the possibility that the papers Lazar read were not the real deal. They may well have been disinformation. So might have been the data provided to Paul Bennewitz. In other words, there is a strong likelihood that both tales were fabricated and fed to Lazar and Bennewitz as a means to confuse the truth surrounding what is really going on at Area 51 – and which may actually have nothing to do with real aliens, hostile or not.

{ https://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

16-07-2018 om 20:39 geschreven door peter  

The Eerie Sounds of Saturn and Its Moon Enceladus

New research from the up-close Grand Finale orbits of NASA’s Cassini mission shows a surprisingly powerful interaction of plasma waves moving from Saturn to its moon Enceladus.

Researchers converted the recording of plasma waves into a “whooshing” audio file that we can hear, in the same way a radio translates electromagnetic waves into music.

Much like air or water, plasma (the fourth state of matter) generates waves to carry energy.

The recording was captured by the Radio Plasma Wave Science (RPWS) instrument Sept. 2, 2017, two weeks before Cassini was deliberately plunged into the atmosphere of Saturn.

The universe is not only fascinating and full of secrets it continues to surprise us. Listen to the eerie sounds of Saturn and its Moon Enceladus.

Just Released: Eerie Sounds of Saturn and Its Moon Enceladus

{ http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/ }

16-07-2018 om 20:31 geschreven door peter  

Analysis of Stanley Kubrick Confesses To Faking The Apollo Moon Landings, Video, UFO Sighting News.

View image on Twitter

UFO Sightings Daily@UFO_Sightings_X

@TomCruise Hi Tom, you worked with Stanley Kubrick so you know him very well. Can you take a look at this video to tell me if its really him in his last days or not? Thanks, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWX_CffNa-I …

6:03 AM - Jul 16, 2018

• 2
• See UFO Sightings Daily's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Hey everyone. I have tweeted Tom Cruise to ask him to verify if this video below is truly Stanley Kubrick. Since they made a movie just before his death together, I believe Tom could clear this up for us. Lots of regular joes are calling the video a fake, but I have done some analysis of my own of the video and found the following. 

1.  Resonance (grating vibration) is same in both videos. 
2. His voice is slightly higher pitch than others.
3. His hesitations...which are common of him in both videos when speaking. 
4. Vocal Inflections are the same. Meaning his voice rises and lowers in the same places in the sentences. 

Also there are photo similarities that are interesting. 
1. Both wear glasses, but different types. 
2. Both have a receding hairline and beard.
3. Both have matching skin bumps.
4. Both have matching scars between eye lid and brow.
5. Both have bags under and over eyes. 

 

It is my professional opinion that this video of Stanley Kubrick admitting to the moon landings is 100% real. Watch the videos below and compare and contrast for yourself. I also believe that the US gov has spent a lot to time and money on leaving fake comments on Youtube and other sites calling this video a fake in order to control the public perspective of it. This video would be enough evidence in a court of law to convict NASA of lying to the USA and to the world. 

Scott C. Waring

 

{ http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

16-07-2018 om 20:18 geschreven door peter