Dit is ons nieuw hondje Kira, een kruising van een waterhond en een Podenko. Ze is sinds 7 februari 2024 bij ons en druk bezig ons hart te veroveren. Het is een lief, aanhankelijk hondje, dat zich op een week snel aan ons heeft aangepast. Ze is heel vinnig en nieuwsgierig, een heel ander hondje dan Noleke.
This is our new dog Kira, a cross between a water dog and a Podenko. She has been with us since February 7, 2024 and is busy winning our hearts. She is a sweet, affectionate dog who quickly adapted to us within a week. She is very quick and curious, a very different dog than Noleke.
DEAR VISITOR,
MY BLOG EXISTS NEARLY 13 YEARS AND 4 MONTH.
ON /30/09/2024 MORE THAN 2.230.520
VISITORS FROM 135 DIFFERENT NATIONS ALREADY FOUND THEIR WAY TO MY BLOG.
THAT IS AN AVERAGE OF 400GUESTS PER DAY.
THANK YOU FOR VISITING MY BLOG AND HOPE YOU ENJOY EACH TIME.
The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
26-03-2020
NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars just climbed its steepest slope yet (and snapped a selfie)
NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars just climbed its steepest slope yet (and snapped a selfie)
The car-size rover tilted 31 degrees to crest a hill earlier this month.
NASA's Mars rover Curiosityjust climbed its steepest Red Planet slope to date, after snapping a nice selfie that gives us a better appreciation of the achievement.
Curiosity crested a promontory called the Greenheugh Pediment on March 6, showing considerable perseverance in the process. (Perseverance, by the way, is the name of NASA's next Mars rover, a life-hunting robot that's scheduled to launch this July.)
"It took three drives to scale the hill, the second of which tilted the rover 31 degrees — the most the rover has ever tilted on Mars and just shy of the now-inactive Opportunity rover's 32-degree tilt record, set in 2016," NASA officials said in a statement Friday (March 20).
Opportunity holds several other records as well, including the greatest distance traveled on the surface of a world beyond Earth (28.06 miles, or 45.16 kilometers) and the longest-lived Mars rover. ("Oppy" landed a few weeks after its twin, Spirit, in January 2004 and was declared dead in February 2019, though it last communicated with Earth in June 2018, just before a huge dust storm engulfed the rover.)
Curiosity stopped to take some pictures on Feb. 26, shortly before concluding the historic climb. Mission team members stitched together 86 of these photos to make a mosaic selfie, which gives the lay of the Martian land and also shows a drill hole Curiosity made to sample and study some rock.
The Greenheugh Pediment is on the slopes of Mount Sharp, the 3.4-mile-high (5.5 km) mountain that Curiosity has been climbing since September 2014. The rover's handlers carefully plan out each drive to ensure that Curiosity stays safe.
-"The rover is never in danger of tilting so much that it would flip over — Curiosity's rocker-bogie wheel system enables it to tilt up to 45 degrees safely — but the steep drives do cause the wheels to spin in place," NASA officials said in the same statement.µ
Curiosity landed inside Mars' 96-mile-wide (154 km) Gale Crater in August 2012, on a $2.5 billion mission to determine if the area could ever have supported microbial life. The car-size robot quickly determined that Gale supported a potentially habitable lake-and-stream system in the ancient past and that this environment persisted for long stretches — perhaps millions of years at a time.
Curiosity is still going strong, reading Mount Sharp's rock layers for clues about how, why and when Mars transitioned from a relatively warm and wet world long ago to the cold, dry planet it is today.
Snatching a piece of asteroid Bennu was supposed to be — well, not easy, but certainly manageable: scope out the space rock, find some flat spots, swoop down at one, come back home.
But when NASA's OSIRIS-REx spacecraft arrived at Bennu in December 2018, the scientists and engineers on the mission realized that the asteroid was much, much rockier than they had expected. Like, boulders everywhere. Boulders as big as buildings. Boulders you do not want your fancy spacecraft to bang into.
OSIRIS-REx, which launched in 2016, has a lidar navigation system that would have allowed the spacecraft to recognize obstacles based on the echoes of a light beam the probe produced. But once the mission revealed Bennu's surface in all its rocky glory, scientists and engineers decided it was time to come up with something new.
The result is a process the team is calling Natural Feature Tracking, which relies on the massive image database that OSIRIS-REx has built up in the months since it arrived at Bennu and began taking images of the space rock from every angle possible.
As the probe embarks on a sampling attempt, it will begin taking still more such photos, which its computer system will automatically compare to the archived images showing the path it should be following. If those views don't line up, the spacecraft will automatically retreat for another attempt, rather than risk damage on the perilous surface.
If the system works as planned, it should boost OSIRIS-REx's accuracy: Whereas its lidar system was only designed for accuracy within a site 164 feet (50 meters) across, Natural Feature Tracking will be accurate enough to tackle a target area just 10% that size, NASA officials said in a statement.
Scientists on the OSIRIS-REx mission have selected two target sampling sites on Bennu, dubbed Nightingale and Osprey. The mission's window for sampling opens in late August in order to ensure that the spacecraft can leave Bennu next year. If all goes well, scientists should have their space rock on Earth in 2023.
While we’re practicing social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, EarthSky’s been posting your #SocialDistanceSelfies from places across Earth. But here’s one from quite a bit farther …
It’s the newest selfie from NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover, and it’s stunning.
NASA’s Curiosity rover recently joined in the activity, sending back a beautiful photo of itself at the base of a steep hill, just before it started climbing. NASA posted the selfie on its website on March 20, 2020.
Curiosity snapped the selfie on February 26, 2020, just before the rover crested the “Greenheugh Pediment,” a broad sheet of crumbling bedrock that sits on top of the hill. The image is a stunning 360 degree view of the landscape around the rover, with Curiosity itself the focus of attention. The entire panorama is composed of 86 individual images. At the time the selfie was taken, Curiosity was about 11 feet (3.4 meters) below the spot where it later climbed onto the pediment.
Also visible in the image is the latest drill hole made by the rover, in the bedrock target called “Hutton.”
A Navcam view of Greenheugh Pediment (left side of image), after Curiosity made it to the top of the steep hill.
Not only is the selfie itself impressive, but Curiosity also set a new record for the steepest terrain it has ever climbed so far in its mission, a challenging 31 degrees. This is only one degree of tilt less than that climbed by the Opportunity rover, which set the all-time record of any rover so far on Mars in 2016. That sounds like a potentially dangerous incline, and it could be, but Curiosity is designed to be able to tilt up to 45 degrees safely, thanks to its advanced rocker-bogie wheel system.
It took Curiosity three drives to make it to the crest of the hill, which it reached on March 6, 2020, also known as sol 2,696 of the mission. A sol is one Martian day, which is about one Earth day plus 37 minutes.
People often ask how the rover(s) can take selfies, especially when you don’t see the robotic arm holding the camera in the photos. The arm acts as the “selfie stick” for the rover. Curiosity uses its Mars Hand Lens Camera (MAHLI), which is in the turret at the end of the arm. Since each image only shows a small area, many images are taken and then later stitched together to create the panorama. During this process, the arm itself is removed from the images. MAHLI is primarily used to take close-up images of sand and rocks. As Doug Ellison, a Curiosity camera operator at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), explained:
We get asked so often how Curiosity takes a selfie. We thought the best way to explain it would be to let the rover show everyone from its own point of view just how it’s done.
See the videos below showing how this and other selfies are made:
Last Thanksgiving, Curiosity also took its highest-resolution panorama to date, containing over 1,000 images with 1.8 billion pixels. The view is breathtaking, to say the least. The images were taken between November 24 and December 1, 2019, and then assembled together.
Curiosity landed on Mars in 2012, and since 2014 has been slowly moving up the lower slopes of Mount Sharp, the large mountain in the middle of Gale Crater. The rover has found evidence that a large lake used to fill the crater a few billion years ago, and that conditions at the time were suitable for microscopic life to have existed there. It has also found ancient organic material in rocks and confirmed the existence of the still-unexplained methane in the Martian atmosphere.
Bottom line: NASA’s Curiosity rover has taken a beautiful new selfie photo of itself on Mars.
VREEMDE PATRONEN IN DE LUCHT WORDEN OOK IN HET DONKER GEVLOGEN ( VIDEO )
VREEMDE PATRONEN IN DE LUCHT WORDEN OOK IN HET DONKER GEVLOGEN ( VIDEO )
Wij leven in vreemde tijden en wanneer dan bepaalde gebeurtenissen plaatsvinden, is het zaak om goed alert te blijven. Na een oproep aan onze lezers kwamen er veel reacties op een aantal onverklaarbare zaken, dank allemaal.
Wij hebben talloze reacties ontvangen van lezers met betrekking tot de vreemde vliegbewegingen boven ons land over een aantal verschillende vliegtuigen uit verschillende landen.
Bij de informatie die wij ontvingen zat ook een link naar de Stentor die een artikel heeft gewijd aan dit vreemde verschijnsel en zij concluderen dat dit alles te maken heeft met het in kaart brengen van de bepaalde (natuurgebieden).
Maar ook zij weten niet precies wat de reden hiervoor zou moeten zijn:
Waar de opnames exact voor worden gebruikt is niet bekend. Het vliegtuigje boven de Veluwe is van het Belgische bedrijf Eurosense, dat gespecialiseerd is in ‘geo informatie’. Zij staan 365 dagen per jaar paraat om de lucht in te gaan, maar het heldere weer van vandaag maakt dat de omstandigheden ideaal zijn voor luchtopnames. In België nemen ze echter niet de telefoon op om uitleg te verschaffen.
En dan gaan ze verder met te zeggen dat de omgeving van Zwolle ook recentelijk door Google opnieuw in kaart is gebracht.
Het zou inderdaad kunnen dat men gebruikt maakt van het heldere weer en het rustige luchtruim om nu overal luchtopnames te maken, maar of deze uitleg de werkelijke reden is weten we uiteraard niet zeker.
Ook in andere landen worden dit soort toestellen nu waargenomen:
Ik heb een reactie op artikel over die vliegtuigen over Nederland Mijn zus heeft een artikel gelezen dat in Tsjechië ook vliegtuigen waren gespot met rare vliegbewegingen en ze denken dat coronavirus zo wordt verspreid.
Ook ontvingen wij veel radarbeelden waaruit blijkt dat hetzelfde gebeurt boven Duitsland en zelfs boven de Waddeneilanden.
Een andere lezer schrijft:
Ik heb even gezocht naar een vliegtuig PH-KIO dat boven mijn woonplaats rondjes vloog en te zien op jullie site.
Wij voeren LiDAR metingen uit vanuit ons eigen bemande vliegtuig. LiDAR is momenteel een van de meest nauwkeurige landmeettechnieken waarmee het mogelijk is om met enkele centimeter nauwkeurigheid metingen uit te voeren. Metingen met ons vliegtuig kunnen wij aanvullen met LiDAR-metingen vanaf onze auto en met een landmeting uitgevoerd met gps, tachymeter of 360-graden camera.
Een andere lezer schrijft dit
Normaal doe ik dit nooit , maar Ik wil toch graag reageren op het vreemde gedrag van de vliegtuigen.
Ik vroeg mijzelf 16 maart af waarvoor er zo laat nog continu propellorvliegtuigen in de lucht zijn ( ik woon in de aanvliegroute van Rotterdam airport en dit hoor ik haast nooit), dus dacht ik , laat ik even een keer op de flightradar app kijken. Dan vraag je je toch af, waarvoor vliegt een uit België afkomstig vliegtuig deze route / dit patroon ( zie bijgevoegde screenshots)?
Ik ben op het vliegtuig nummer gaan zoeken bij flightradar en zag op 12 maart het minder drukke patroon boven rotterdam terug ( laat in de avond) de dag erna een korte vlucht in Belgie. 16 maart het drukke patroon ( ook tot in de nacht).
Ik heb op de naam "eurosense" wat op het vliegtuig gezocht en kwam er achter dat dit bedrijf allerlei foto's maakt en geografisch onderzoek doet.
Toen zag ik het bericht op jullie site en zag dat het op meerdere plaatsen was. Dat vond ik nogal raar, vooral in deze tijd. Ik ben verder gaan zoeken op " vliegtuigen zigzaggen" en vond een origineel kranten artikel over dit onderwerp een paar dagen geleden
En dan deze reactie:
Net gesproken met een piloot.
Hij vertelde dat, omdat het luchtruim nu zo stil is, er allemaal vluchten met kleine vliegtuigjes worden uitgevoerd om voor Google maps nieuwe luchtfoto's te maken.
Die vliegtuigjes maken die malle lussen om zo alles goed in beeld te krijgen, Ze mogen nu op plekken komen, waar anders het vliegen verboden is.
Dan iets wat wel heel vreemd is als het (alleen) zou gaan om het maken van foto’s voor Google omdat het zulk prachtig helder weer is.
Dat zou nog te verkopen zijn, als er niet óók in het donker wordt gevlogen, hetgeen wel het geval is.
Wij ontvingen het volgende bericht:
Op 17 maart hoorde ik om 23:25 's avonds een laagvliegend vliegtuig overkomen. Ik woon redelijk dicht bij Rotterdam Airport, dus niet echt iets vreemds. Wat wel vreemd was, was het feit dat dit vliegtuig een paar keer over kwam vliegen om dit tijdstip, en dat vond ik wel vreemd. Dat gebeurt normaliter nooit.
Ik ben een fanatiek vliegtuigspotter tot op zekere hoogte: alles wat over vliegt of wat ik zie wil ik weten waar het vandaan komt, waar het heen gaat en wat voor type vliegtuig het is. Zelf ben ik ook fervent Flight Simulator enthousiast. Dus ik naar Flightradar24.com en ja hoor: ook ik heb een vreemde manoeuvre waargenomen.
Ik heb een foto gemaakt van mijn computerscherm en aan iemand gevraagd - die veel af weet van de luchtvaart - wat deze manoeuvre inhoudt. Deze persoon heeft een jaar in dit vakgebied intensief gewerkt en is veel meer bekend met bepaalde situaties. Mij is in eerste instantie verteld dat deze manoeuvre vaak inhoudt dat het vliegtuig niet mag landen, en dus in een soort "holding pattern" gaat. Echter, wat ik van mijn eigen kennis weet is dat een holding pattern via een FMC (Flight Management Computer) wordt geprogrammeerd of zelf wordt gevlogen, maar dat deze altijd in een ovaal figuur wordt gevlogen. Nooit in het patroon wat wij hier waarnemen.
Nu zat ik het artikel te lezen en heb ik weer even contact gezocht met die persoon. Nu is mij verteld dat het inderdaad wel een vreemde situatie is, want door het gehele land moet eigenlijk een soort landelijk verbod tot landen worden uitgeroepen, mochten zo veel vliegtuigen in een holding pattern op verschillende plekken vliegen. Wat ik wel zag is dat alle zware vliegtuigen (Boeing 737 - 747, Airbus A320 - A330 etc.) zowel vracht- als passagiersvluchten, gewoon normaal de vlucht vlogen zonder afwijkingen.
Wat mij verder opvalt is dat hetzelfde TYPE vliegtuig nabij Rotterdam eerder die dag (denk ik) heeft gevlogen zoals ik kon zien op Niburu:
Wat mij nog verder opvalt is de hoogte van het vliegtuig: deze vliegt ongeveer op 1.2 a 1.3 kilometer hoogte, wat in deze regio voor Rotterdam Airport wel eens wordt aangehouden als het wat minder goed weer is voor een landing. Maar dit vliegtuig vloog naar mijn idee constant op deze hoogte en heeft deze niet verlaten (is ook te zien aan de groene lijn op Flightradar24, en eventueel in de geschiedenis terug te vinden.
In mijn geval betreft het ook een ander vliegtuig (ander serienummer) maar wel hetzelfde type. Ik vind het ook heel vreemd dat op de foto's die jullie hebben gedeeld geen vluchtplan zichtbaar is (waar het vliegtuig is opgestegen en waar het van plan is te landen), want volgens mij is dit te allen tijde verplicht en zou ten minste de opstijg plaats bekend moeten zijn bij Flightradar.
Dus bij deze wil ik jullie een nieuwe foto inzenden, want in principe is dit een nieuwe vlucht die nog niet op de website staat.
Dus, waarom vliegen die vliegtuigen in het donker dat soort patronen als het om zoiets onschuldigszou gaan als het maken van foto’s bij helder weer?
En dan de hoogte kwestie. We kregen het volgende bericht waar onder andere de navolgende foto tussen zat waarop te zien is dat die vlucht op 16000 (krap 5km) plaatsvond met een vliegtuig dat een drukcabine heeft. Deze hoogte is niet geschikt voor het maken van fotos en heeft dus een ander doel:
Hoi,
Bedankt voor je reactie. Ik heb er vandaag nog een aantal gevonden. Die stuur ik hieronder weer mee (als het lukt). Ik zag dat het soms dezelfde (kleine) vliegtuigjes zijn, die vaak van dezelfde vliegvelden opstijgen en landen. Misschien lesvliegtuigjes? Met vriendelijke groet,
Tot zover de info over de vreemde patronen die door veel kleine vliegtuigen in diverse landen tegelijkertijd wordt gevlogen.
Een lezer uit België stuurt het volgende:
Mijn naam is Steve en ik woon in Schilde (nabij Antwerpen) de laatste dagen zie ik tijdens de avond en nacht, zeker met dit heldere weer veel vliegtuigverkeer. Aangezien er bijna geen vliegtuigverkeer is door corona is dit wel raar.
Ook zag ik gisteren een soort lichtpunt in de lucht . Het bleef er toch een paar uur zonder bewegen. Ik schat enkele uren en dan was het weg.
Ik zei nog tegen mijn vriendin: is dat punt jou al eens opgevallen? Maar dan tegen 12u middernacht was het weg.Zondagavond heb ik exact hetzelfde gezien.
Van gisteren heb ik er een foto van genomen,het is niet zo goede kwaliteit sorry daarvoor.
Het feit dat je op de foto de sterren niet ziet en enkel dat punt terwijl ik zelf de sterren heel goed zag wilt zeggen dat dat lichtpunt sterk aanwezig was. Onze tuin is zuid west gericht.
Bovenstaande komt weer enigszins overeen met beelden die we ontvingen van iemand anders, helaas zonder dat we weten waar dit is.
Iemand anders schreef het volgende:
Vandaag om 22:00 hebben wij iets in de lucht zien hangen en ook heen en weer vliegen van links naar recht boven en beneden en vermoedelijk ook draaiend.. Het leek op een schijf met een cirkel eromheen die draaide en continue verschillende lichtflitsen afgaf, alle kleuren van de regenboog. Er is een melding wat preciesin elke detail op die van ons leek . Hij vloog op t einde in een keer in een grote snelheid weg.
Dan over de troepenverplaatsingen:
Iemand schrijft:
Ik wou na aanleiding van het artikel over de grootte troepen verplaatsingen reageren.
Ik heb navraag gedaan binnen defensie dit als oud militair zelf. En had begrepen dat er een grootte oefening was onder leiding van de USA om te kijken of de intra het aan kon wanneer er grootte troepen verplaatsingen waren van west naar oost.
En oefeningen die al bezig waren los van deze van onze eigen defensie zijn ook allemaal terug getrokken naar Nederland vanwege het virus. Dat verklaart de verplaatsingen van onze eigen troepen.
En een ander dit:
Las net over de goederen trein met tanks erop..
Ik werk in Eindhoven in de buurt van het spoor.. en al zeker 3weken rijden er in de avond uren goederen treinen met tanks erop!! Wat me opvalt is dat het savonds gebeurt!!
Wat gaat er gebeuren?
Weer een andere lezer:
Vandaag op de A1 bij onze grensovergang Oldenzaal Duitsland colonnes vrachtwagens, allemaal blanco, geen enkele merk of naamaanduiding, compleet schoon (de meeste wit) zonder enig spoortje vuil. Ongeveer de helft van het vrachtverkeer bestond uit deze voertuigen, de meeste Splinternieuw ogend. Heel veel geparkeerd op stopplaats grensovergang. Bij nadere inspectie uitsluitend Poolse, Russische, Baltische, Oekraiënse kentekens. Verder geen idee, misschien wapentransporten? Kan geen andere verklaring bedenken.
En hier wederom een opname gemaakt op een station, in dit geval Den Haag.
Door het verzamelen van info krijgen wij in ieder geval een duidelijker beeld. Voor beide gebeurtenissen, de vreemde vliegroutes en de verplaatsing van militair personeel, lijken op het eerste gezicht redelijke verklaringen voorhanden te zijn. Als het inderdaad zaken betreft die verhuld worden dan is dat uiteraard voor de hand liggend dat gebruik wordt gemaakt van manieren waardoor wij mensen gemakkelijk genoegen nemen dit soort "redelijke verklaringen".
Het zou niet de eerste keer zijn dat een bevolking totaal wordt misleid. En vanwege de vreemde samenloop van omstandigheden, waarbij er én een virus opduikt én er vreemde vliegroutes worden gevlogen én er veel troepenverplaatsingen plaatsvinden, is het zaak om alert te blijven en uit te kijken naar eventuele andere aanwijzingen.
Eén van die vreemde aanwijzingen is dat ze de termijn voor het verbod op samenscholing van meer dan twee mensen vooruit hebben geschoven naar 1 juni. Dat lijkt een overdreven lange periode, waarbij ze klaarblijkelijk willen voorkomen dat mensen samen komen.
De volgende foto kregen wij via een lezer die deze had aangetroffen ergens op een website in India, uit naar zijn zeggen 2019. Het is een treinwagon, met daarop de naam van het virus Covid-19. Aangezien we geen verdere informatie hadden zijn we wat gaan zoeken en kwamen deze foto tegen in een aantal Italiaanse publicaties, waarvan de mainstream media zeggen dat het een nepfoto is die gemaakt is vorig jaar herfst ergens in Amerika en dat het hier een normale codering betreft voor treinwagons en dat dit dan toevallig covid-19 is.
Geloofwaardig verhaal of niet?
En tot slot nog een beetje vrolijke noot van kunstenaar Matt de kunstenaar, die waarschuwt voor corona virussen die je computer hacken.
Pole Shift: Ancient Megafloods & Mysteries & Science
Pole Shift: Ancient Megafloods & Mysteries & Science
COAST TO COAST AM 2020.
Geological explorer and renegade scholar, Randall Carlson has four decades of study, research, and exploration into the interface between ancient mysteries and modern science. In the first half, he discussed earth changes and catastrophic events, particularly “megafloods.
A media phenomenon, Coast to Coast AM deals with UFOs, strange occurrences, life after death, and other unexplained (and often inexplicable) phenomena.
I was looking over the NASA site Midnightplanets which is a site run by NASA that keeps photos on back up. I found an alien skull in one of the Curiosity rover photos in sol 410. The soul has lots of detail...you can even see two large teeth in its wide open mouth. Its jaw and cheeks and eye ridges are well pronounced. The nose looks human-like, but wider and thicker on the top. The back of the head seems to have a part of the neck and head still attached to it. Awesome fossil find and is absolute proof that aliens once lived on Mars. But the fact that it died laying on the surface and its mouth wide open makes me think it died in terror or pain.
Scott C. Waring - Taiwan
{
25-03-2020 om 21:26
geschreven door peter
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:Ruins, strange artifacts on other planets, moons, ed ( Fr, EN, NL )
Giant Alien Spaceship Crossing The Sun (Live Footage)
Giant Alien Spaceship Crossing The Sun (Live Footage)
It seems as if our sun has a lot of strange and unusually UFO activity this year. You may wonder why so many UFOs have been seen around the sun lately.
As we have written in our previous articles, does it have to do with an approaching solar storm or there is a space war going on?
Now, a new live footage captured by sky-watcher BruceSeesAll yesterday, shows a giant alien spaceship approaching the sun from the left, then crosses the sun to disappear into deep space only to deepens the mystery of the current UFO activity near the sun.
Besides the giant UFO, Bruces captured also what he believes is a second moon which he shows us in the second part of the video.
Did he really captured a second moon? Indeed a second moon exist.
The discovery was made on February 15 by US astronomers Theodore Pruyne and Kacper Wierzchos, using the telescope at Mount Lemmon Observatory. Follow-up observations allowed astronomers to trace its orbit, and calculated that this space rock, designed as 2020 CD3 has been orbiting Earth for about three years.
Other videos of ufo by our sun, selected peter2011
Astronomers have found the edge of the Milky Way at last
Astronomers have found the edge of the Milky Way at last
Our galaxy spans 1.9 million light-years, a new study finds
In this image from the Fermi space telescope, the Milky Way's stellar disk, which runs horizontally along the middle, glows in gamma rays. A vast halo of dark matter engulfs the disk and emits no light at all, which makes measuring the galaxy’s total size a challenge.
Our galaxy is a whole lot bigger than it looks. New work finds that the Milky Way stretches nearly 2 million light-years across, more than 15 times wider than its luminous spiral disk. The number could lead to a better estimate of how massive the galaxy is and how many other galaxies orbit it.
Astronomers have long known that the brightest part of the Milky Way, the pancake-shaped disk of stars that houses the sun, is some 120,000 light-years across (SN: 8/1/19). Beyond this stellar disk is a disk of gas. A vast halo of dark matter, presumably full of invisible particles, engulfs both disks and stretches far beyond them (SN: 10/25/16). But because the dark halo emits no light, its diameter is hard to measure.
Now, Alis Deason, an astrophysicist at Durham University in England, and her colleagues have used nearby galaxies to locate the Milky Way’s edge. The precise diameter is 1.9 million light-years, give or take 0.4 million light-years, the team reports February 21 in a paper posted at arXiv.org.
To put that size into perspective, imagine a map in which the distance between the sun and the Earth is just one inch. If the Milky Way’s heart were at the center of the Earth, the galaxy’s edge would be four times farther away than the moon actually is.
o find the Milky Way’s edge, Deason’s team conducted computer simulations of how giant galaxies like the Milky Way form. In particular, the scientists sought cases where two giant galaxies arose side by side, like the Milky Way and Andromeda, our nearest giant neighbor, because each galaxy’s gravity tugs on the other (SN: 5/12/15). The simulations showed that just beyond the edge of a giant galaxy’s dark halo, the velocities of small nearby galaxies drop sharply (SN: 3/11/15).
Using existing telescope observations, Deason and her colleagues found a similar plunge in the speeds of small galaxies near the Milky Way. This occurred at a distance of about 950,000 light-years from the Milky Way’s center, marking the galaxy’s edge, the scientists say. The edge is 35 times farther from the galactic center than the sun is.
Although dark matter makes up most of the Milky Way’s mass, the simulations reveal that stars should also exist at these far-out distances. “Both have a well-defined edge,” Deason says. “The edge of the stars is very sharp, almost like the stars just stop at a particular radius.”
In the future, astronomers can refine the location of the Milky Way’s edge by discovering additional small galaxies nearby. Astronomers could also search for individual stars out at the boundary, says Mike Boylan-Kolchin, an astrophysicist at the University of Texas at Austin who was not involved with the study. The farthest such stars will be very dim, but future observations should be able to find them.
The measurement should also help astronomers tease out other galactic properties. For instance, the larger the Milky Way, the more massive it is — and the more galaxies there should be revolving around it, says Rosemary Wyse, an astronomer at Johns Hopkins University who was not part of the new work. So far, there are about 60 known Milky Way satellites, but astronomers suspect that many more await discovery.
One of the biggest questions regarding the U.S. Navy's recent disclosures regarding strange encounters with supposedly unidentified flying craft is why are we only hearing about this highly concerning phenomenon from just one service? A fact that isn't commonly understood is that it is not the Navy's job to maintain sovereignty over America's airspace, it is the U.S. Air Force's. If strange and unidentified craft are being detected or seen, the Air Force has the mission to respond and investigate, not the Navy, and it can do so at a moment's notice. So far, the Air Force has been totally mum on this issue, which is extremely bizarre considering the Navy's own messaging surrounding it.
With this in mind, last September, I reached out to the Air Force with a series of very pointed questions regarding what seems like a massive discrepancy in regards to the military branch's ability to execute its homeland air defense mission. What seemed like a good start to finding answers to these key questions quickly turned into something of a nightmare that has made me lose all confidence in the Defense Department's ability to address a subject, which they themselves have actively helped elevate within the public's consciousness, in any meaningful manner.
My initial inquiry to the Air Force resulted in a very positive experience. The folks at the Air Force headquarters' press desk were not phased at all by the topic and seemed eager to look into it on our behalf. After discussing the issue with them directly on the phone, the questions I sent them were specifically written to move the ball forward on this critical aspect of the issue and, in doing so, getting the Air Force on the record about the issue overall in some manner. Ideally, this would have included some background as to the nature of these events from the service's point of view, and especially in regards to its homeland air sovereignty mission, as well as information about whether its own aircrews were experiencing similar encounters.
Here are the questions I fielded to them on September 19th, 2019:
Here is what we are looking for on the ongoing UFO/UAP story with the Navy and the USAF's position and comment on the issue:
Have Air Force pilots encountered any similar unexplained phenomenon on radar, electro-optically, or visually? If so, what is the general frequency and magnitude of these events?
Navy Super Hornet pilots out of NAS Oceana had constantencounters with these objects in 2014-2015, especially on radar. It got so bad that by early 2015 Oceana filed NOTAMs warning aviators about the phenomenon in the warning areas off Virginia. We have talked to the crews directly about this and are in the process of obtaining those NOTAMs and the paper trail leading to their posting. Langley's F-22s, which have superior sensor capabilities in some respects to the Super Hornets, as well the base's T-38 aggressors, are based right next-door and use the exact same warning areas for training daily. Did Langley aircrews experience the same phenomenon? If so, to what extent? What about other USAF assets that use the same airspace for training?
The Navy changed its reporting practices and procedures for encounters with unexplained flying objects significantly due to the massive increase in incidents in recent years. Has the Air Force done the same? If not, why? Does it even have set procedures for these events? If so, what are they?
Has the USAF experienced the same massive increase in incursions of UAPs over its bases and installations that the USN has?
Does the Air Force have similar electro-optical and infrared video of UAPs similar to what the Navy has, or other data for that matter?
Does the Air Force see this phenomenon as a national security threat? What is it doing to mitigate or better understand it?
Thanks so much for your help on this. I think it's critical to clear these details up, especially now that the Navy has admitted that the videos depicting these unexplained craft are indeed real and show objects it cannot identify.
I quickly followed up with another question:
The Navy is saying these things are constantly (as in many times a month or more) busting into controlled or even secured airspace. In 2015, they were out there for days off Virginia in the warning areas, even causing the base to post the NOTAMs due to near misses etc. The USAF is tasked with protecting this airspace. Has the USAF launched alerts and investigated these when the Navy (or maybe even the USAF) was calling them out? What was done in regards to homeland defense when these were in the warning areas so persistently? How did the USAF and its NORAD arm take this issue up during the 2014-2015 incidents and what does the Navy says has occurred constantly all over up through this very day?
Once again, I have to stress that the Air Force has the homeland air sovereignty mission. Fighter aircraft sit on alert across the United States ready to scramble within a matter of minutes to intercept and investigate any unknown craft flying in or near the nation's airspace. This includes what some may traditionally call UFOs. The War Zone has incredibly in-depth evidence of how such an action is taken with regards to the presence of transient unidentified flying objects, let alone ones that are persistently operating in restricted airspace, as was supposedly the case off the east coast of the United States in 2014 and 2015.
Air Force units that fulfill the homeland air defense mission are spread across the country, but those equipped with the highest level of fighter aircraft capability are scattered around the continental United States' maritime perimeter and are also based in Alaska and Hawaii. F-15C/Ds equipped with the most powerful fighter-optimized active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars in the world and carrying Sniper targeting pods for long-range visual target identification primarily fulfill the maritime border defense role in the lower 48 states, with F-22s in Hawaii and Alaska doing the same.
F-16C/Ds, which are also now equipped with AESA radars, based at Andrews Air Force Base just outside of Washington D.C., keep watch over the Capital Region. Other F-16s from a handful of Air Force units that patrol the central U.S. can also help augment the country's perimeter aerial security, but the alert mission is one that must be specifically trained for, with unique protocols and infrastructure requirements. It is resource-intensive and not cheap to execute, either. In other words, it is not something just any fighter squadron, especially a Navy one that has a very different mission focus, can just execute on the fly under normal circumstances.
As such, my questions attempted to fill in a missing part of the Navy's recent UFO-related accounts. If these flying craft were indeed being detected, how is it possible that the Air Force didn't scramble to investigate them, and do so multiple times over the course of these events? If incursions over installations are ongoing, regardless of if they are drones or something far more fantastical, how isn't the Air Force directly involved with investigating and mitigating these potential threats inside the airspace they are responsible for defending?
This is not just a UFO issue, it comes down to America's ability, or willingness, to defend its airspace from non-traditional threats. The threat to the homeland posed by cruise missiles is already palpable, but we are now in an era where lower-end and swarming drone warfare is becoming one of the most preeminent security issues of our time. It's a threat that has recently manifested itself in spectacular ways that some of us have warned would occur for years. So, my questions are just as relevant to the core of our national security as they are to simply finding out new details about mysterious flying objects that seem to have risen to new heights in the public's consciousness in recent years.
After a promising start with the Air Force itself, I was told that the inquiries had been forwarded to the Office of the Secretary of Defense's (OSD) public affairs arm. One public affairs officer, Susan Gough, would be handling the request. At first, this sounded very promising. The inquiry had been elevated to someone in a position that might be able to really add some unique context to the issue.
Sadly, this ended up being anything but the case.
Simply put, my experience with Susan Gough has been the worst I have had with any of the Defense Department's public affairs personnel, ever. What has transpired, or more accurately what hasn't transpired, over the last six months leaves me with no confidence or trust in this official representing the DoD on the issue. This is not personal in any way. She may be a wonderful person, but her behavior has been a clear example of everything the Pentagon's media operations should not be and it certainly is not due to a lack of training or experience. Her resume is impressive and may even be concerning to some who are seeking some morsel of truth regarding this bizarre and historically tortured issue.
My experience is not unique in any way. Others who are working this story have had similar experiences almost to a laughable degree. The reason why so many journalists are interacting with her at all on this issue is that she now holds the entire media/public affairs portfolio on UFOs within the DoD. Sometime shortly before I submitted my questions, the decision was made to funnel every request regarding this issue to her and her alone. The services no longer had control of their own messaging on the matter. Why this decision was made has not been made clear.
I wrote and called Susan Gough for months after my initial inquiries were forwarded to her. No correspondence was answered and no comments were given—not a timeline for delivery or a simple "we cannot comment at this time" response to any of my inquiries.
Nothing.
In the meantime, prolific Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) filer and author John Greenwald over at the Blackvault.com had received a FOIA request that not only had my questions in it, but it also had the internal correspondence within the Air Force concerning answering at least a portion of my inquiries. John was nice enough to let me know he had received the documents and that he would work with me as to their release.
Once again, the whole idea was to get something, anything on record in regards to the Air Force, America's air sovereignty, and this issue. The last thing I wanted to do was publish a story about how the Defense Department won't even acknowledge these questions. I have had absolutely the best experiences with DoD public affairs over many years. We work with them daily in what we do. The vast majority of those interactions are hugely productive. In fact, I have never had a negative relationship with a U.S. military public affairs officer, even on topics that were far from positive for the Department of Defense. Overall, they do excellent work and understand our requests and process them with total professionalism in a timely manner. I cannot overstate how important their job is and how well they usually do it.
With this in mind, I dreaded having to take issue with the Department of Defense on their communications operations. But after nearly three months of getting no replies of any kind, I had to do something.
It wasn't until I sent a very frank letter on December 5th, 2019 that I received this answer from Ms. Gough. This was the first actual correspondence I had with her since my inquiry was made in September:
Hello Tyler,
My sincere apologies. It appears that your emails were being dumped into a junk/spam folder instead of my inbox, so I wasn’t seeing anything from you for a long time. Only just noticed because you are not the only one with a similar complaint. It was not intentional, I assure you, and I’m not quite sure how/why it happened; I get quite a few continuing queries about UAPs from multiple reporters, all with similar questions, so I know it’s not the subject.
I’m sorry, I don’t recall getting a voicemail from you, but I was out of the office for health reasons several times in the last several months, and may have missed it.
Anyway, I will look at your questions this morning, and will get back to you as soon as I can with answers.
Regards,
Sue
I replied very positively, I was so glad we had a breakthrough and I wouldn't have to write about how unresponsive the Department Of Defense's representative on this matter was. Even if they weren't willing to say much, we would actually have that on the record and I made Ms. Gough aware of the internal documents that had some answers to my questions that John Greenwald obtained. So, at least I could get some commentary on those, if nothing else. Above all else, a relationship could begin with the sole point of contact on this topic within the DoD. It's a long game. I was happy to finally be working with Ms. Gough so that future clarifications could be had.
I followed up quickly after her response asking if we could have this wrapped by the end of next week. Her reply stated as such:
"Yes, we should be able to. Thank you very, very much for your patience and understanding!"
Finally, I could slap a deadline on this and give John the heads up that there was progress.
The reality ended up being the complete opposite. Ms. Gough never got back to me. What followed over the next four weeks was me reaching out looking for an update and getting nothing back. This was different though as her original excuses were clearly false because she just went back to doing the same thing even after her apology and acknowledgment of a timeline.
By January 2nd, 2020, yet another month had gone by and it was clear that she had gone dark once again.
This was my email to her:
It's the New Year and still nothing. I haven't heard anything since we last touched base nearly a month ago when you said we could wrap it up the following week. Checked in multiple times. Nothing.
I am holding off another outlet on this with their FOIAs that include the DoD's correspondences with my name all over them, at this point, it is just embarrassing for me. I also find it odd that other outlets seem to have gotten responses and clarification follow-ups. In fact, some of them are people, not outlets.
I really want a good relationship here, as I have with every single one of my DoD PA contacts, rain or shine. I hate writing emails like this, but this is ridiculous and insulting. It has been what? FOUR months?
So what's the next step? Do I have to file a formal complaint over this? Something is really broken here, especially when you have your own aviators claiming that craft are violating our airspace regularly and I can't even get responses to specific questions, some of which were answered months ago in internal correspondences that the department released via FOIA long before I ever got them. In fact, I still don't have them.
Very disappointing and frankly, stunning.
Tyler Rogoway
No response.
On January 7th, I sent another note, stating that I have done everything I can, given her every opportunity to respond, and that months had rolled by since my initial request and it was now weeks past our deadline. Finally, I got another response:
Sorry Tyler, I’ve been out a lot, and just back today. Let me ping the people who owe me the info and see if they have it now.
Clearly, she had something to share, as I had the Air Force's internal emails in my hands for months via John Greenwald's FOIA request.
After that last glimmer of hope, the gaslighting operation was made clear. Once again, Susan Gough disappeared.
By this time I was so exhausted with the issue and a ton of other long-lead projects had come due, so I set it aside. Really, I didn't want to have to explain how terrible of an experience this was and how this DoD official evaded me for months. I thought, 'maybe if I just gave it a little more time she would pop up again.'
That never happened.
At the time of writing this, it has been six months since my original request. I can't thank John enough for being so patient with me on this story. He understood my important working relationship with the DoD and how I wanted to give Ms. Gough every possible opportunity for a professional and positive outcome.
I have no idea what the situation is behind the scenes with this topic at the DoD or what Gough's directives or issues are in regard to it. Yet the fact that after the Pentagon's own personnel have stated that constant intrusions into sensitive airspace have occurred by unidentified craft, they are not willing to even respond to questions about Air Force's role in those events, the service that is responsible for defending that airspace, is damning. The DoD seems to have helped seed interest in this issue, but is now unwilling to offer any explanations or clarifications regarding it. That seems very peculiar if not downright suspicious. For a topic that has been so abused over the decades, this really is an abhorrent stance for the DoD to take and it negates any trust it may have developed on the topic in recent years.
The most troubling part about this whole mess is that at least some of my inquiries actually got answers, ones the DoD shared with a FOIA requester, but not the actual reporter asking the questions. Once again, Gough had at least something to offer, but didn't convey it after months of prodding.
Greenwald's FOIAs show that the Air Force's public affairs officials actually did excellent work looking into at least some of my questions. They did not shy away from the topic and took it seriously, but with one unresponsive person having the authority to actually convey any of that information, it meant that in this case the results of their work were never released.
Here's what the Air Force found out in regards to Langely Air Force Base's F-22 and T-38 aircrews seeing similar objects in the restricted warning areas off the eastern seaboard. You can see the whole exchange below:
It would seem by these emails that the F-22 and T-38 pilots from Langley were not having the same encounters as the Hornet pilots from nearby NAS Oceana. If this is indeed the case, it really puts the Navy encounters in a different light and it does match anecdotally with what we have gleaned through our own background investigation. So, if the Air Force tactical jet pilots were oblivious to the craft flying off the east coast, why?
Certainly, technology isn't an issue. Like the Super Hornet, the F-22 is also equipped with an AESA radar and, in some ways, it has far more capable sensors than the Super Hornet and possesses significantly higher performance. The Navy pilots' UFO encounter stories have also matured a bit as time has gone by and explanations do exist that could explain their encounters off the East Coast that are far from out of this world, but this discrepancy really sets up a new set of circumstances that are even more puzzling than before.
In addition, another short email string appears to shows that the Air Force has not followed the Navy's move to change its policy surrounding how its personnel report encounters with unidentified aircraft and that the incidents that have occurred actually had to do with drones, not something more exotic.
Once again, the disconnect between the Navy and the Air Force's stance on this issue is puzzlingly stark, which is highly intriguing.
We may take a deeper dive into some of these issues at another time, but for now, at least we have some record, albeit obtained indirectly, of the Air Force even looking into these recent encounters directly and even on a unit level. The question then becomes why weren't we informed about the inquiry's findings? Moreso, what about my other questions? Where did they end up? Could answers have been fielded to those questions, as well?
Sadly we just don't know. In fact, we don't even have a 'no comment at this time' regarding this issue from the Pentagon's spokesperson handling it. In the end, it is in the public's interest to know how the media is being treated by the Department Of Defense on this issue after they themselves helped perpetuate it.
Calling the situation disappointing and bizarre would be a huge understatement.
WETENSCHAPEen rijstkorrel groot is het organisme dat een nieuwe studie beschouwt als de vroegste voorouder van het dierenrijk tot nu toe gevonden. Ikaria wariootia is de wetenschappelijke naam van dit wormachtige fossiel dat zo’n 555 miljoen jaar oud is.
De stamboom van de mens en van de meeste dieren gaat helemaal terug tot een soort worm, zo blijkt uit het onderzoek van een wormachtig wezen van 555 miljoen jaar oud. Het is alleszins voorlopig het oudste voorbeeld van een fossiel van bilateria. Bilateria vormen een onderdeel van het onderrijk van de dieren waartoe bijna alle dieren behoren. Sponzen en neteldieren zijn de bekendste soorten die geen bilateria zijn.
Bilateria zijn dieren met een voor- en achterkant, twee symmetrische zijkanten en openingen aan beide uiteinden die verbonden zijn via een darmkanaal. Volgens de wetenschappers van de studie die in het vakblad PNAS verscheen, was de ontwikkeling van een bilaterale symmetrie een cruciale stap in de evolutie van het dierlijke leven. Organismen konden zich daardoor doelgericht bewegen. Het verschafte hen ook een gemeenschappelijke maar succesvolle manier om hun lichaam te organiseren. Van wormen tot insecten, van dinosaurussen tot mensen: enorm veel dieren kenmerken zich door eenzelfde basisplan voor bilaterale lichamen.
Rotsholletjes
Het organisme Ikaria wariootia leefde 555 miljoen jaar geleden in het Ediacarium, het geologische tijdperk waarin leven meercellig en complexer werd. De ontdekking van het wormachtige organisme volgde op die van kleine holletjes die vijftien jaar geleden al aangetroffen werden in rotsen in Nilpena in Zuid-Australië. Wetenschappers vermoedden wel dat het sporen van bilateria waren, maar vonden in de oude afzettingen geen aanwezigheid van wezens.
Pas recent ontdekten onderzoekers Scott Evans en Mary Droser minuscule, ovale impressies bij sommige gaatjes. Dankzij driedimensionale laserscanning werd een regelmatige, consistente vorm van een cilindrisch lichaam met een duidelijke kop en staart en een lichtjes gegroefd spierstelsel blootgelegd.
Zeebodem
Ikaria wariootia was tussen 2 en 7 mm lang en 1 tot 2,5 mm breed. De grootste ovaal paste perfect voor het aanmaken van de holletjes die al vroeger ontdekt waren.
Ikaria wariootia bracht waarschijnlijk zijn leven door met graven door lagen zand op de oceaanbodem, op zoek naar organisch materiaal waarmee het zich kon voeden.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:HLN.be - Het Laatste Nieuws ( NL)
Lake Michigan UFO sightings still unsolved 25 years later
Lake Michigan UFO sightings still unsolved 25 years later
DeJanay BoothDetroit Free Press
The eerie lights filled the sky along nearly 200 miles of Lake Michigan shoreline, from Ludington south to the Indiana border.
On March 8, 1994, calls flooded 911 to report strange sightings in the night sky. The reports came in from all walks of life — from police and a meteorologist to residents of Michigan's many beach resorts. Hundreds of people witnessed what many insisted were UFOs — unidentified flying objects.
Cindy Pravda, 63, of Grand Haven remembers that night in vivid detail — four lights in the sky that looked like "full moons" over the line of trees behind her horse pasture.
"I got UFOs in the backyard," she told a friend on the phone.
Today, the mystery of one of the largest UFO sightings in Michigan history remains unsolved, but it continues to fascinate extraterrestrial researchers, psychologists and history buffs alike.
Pravda still believes the lights were UFOs.
Read more:
Think you've seen a UFO? Here's how to report it
"I watched them for half an hour. Where I'm facing them, the one on the far left moved off. It moved to the highway and then came back in the same position," Pravda told the Free Press on Thursday. "The one to the right was gone in blink of an eye and then, eventually, everything disappeared quickly."
She still lives in the same house and continues to talk about that night.
"I'm known as the UFO lady of Grand Haven," Pravda laugh.
The Detroit News and Free Press, March 20, 1994. The newspapers printed a combined Saturday and Sunday paper at the time.
Detroit Free Press
Where it started
Daryl and Holly Graves and their son, Joey, told reporters in 1994 they witnessed lights in the sky over Holland at about 9:30 p.m. on March 8.
"I saw six lights out the window above the barn across the street," Joey Graves told the Free Press in 1994. "I got up and went to the sofa and looked up at the sky. They were red and white and moving."
Others gave similar accounts, including Holland Police Officer Jeff Velthouse and a meteorologist from the National Weather Service Office in Muskegon County. What's more, the meteorologist recorded unknown echoes on his radar the same time Velthouse reported the lights.
"My guy looked at the radar and observed three echoes as the officer was describing the movement," Leo Grenier of the NWS office in Muskegon said in 1994. "The movement of the objects was rather erratic. The echoes were there about 15 minutes, drifting slowly south-southwest, kind of headed toward the Chicago side of the south end of Lake Michigan."
In 1995, The Free Press published the conversation between the National Weather Service and Velthouse.
"What do you think it is?" said the weather service radar operator.
Velthouse described witnesses seeing five to six objects, some cylindrical with blue, red, white and green lights.
The radar operator said, "There were three and sometimes four blips, and they weren't planes. Planes show as pinpoints on the scope, these were the size of half a thumbnail. They were from 5 to 12,000 feet at times, moving all over the place. Three were moving toward Chicago. I never saw anything like it before, not even when I'm doing severe weather."
Hundreds of reports of suspected UFOs were called in not only to 911 dispatchers but also to the Mutual UFO Network's (MUFON) Michigan chapter.
MUFON, an all-volunteer nonprofit organization founded in 1969, bills itself as the "world's oldest and largest civilian UFO investigation and research organization."
In 1994, the network received UFO reports from Ludington south to the Indiana state line, spokeswoman Virginia Tilly told the Free Press in 1994.
"We're getting 10 or 15 new sightings a day," Tilly said. "We have probably 20 people in various stages of investigating these reports."
The reported UFO sightings was the largest since March 1966, Bill Konkolesky, Michigan state director of MUFON, told the Free Press this week.
The Detroit Free Press, March 8, 1995
Detroit Free Press
"It was one of the big ones in the state. We haven't seen a large UFO (reported sighting) wave since that time," Konkolesky said.
Konkolesky joined the network in 1993. He was not part of the investigation team but still has a copy of an article about the sightings with a picture of the Graves family on the front cover.
MUFON interviewed dozens of witnesses, Konkolesky said, many of whom remain in contact with the organization.
"There was a lot of enthusiasm into the UFO field (then) because of the amount of press coverage. It was outstanding," he said. "They were paying attention to the phenomenon."
Konkolesky said the flying objects reported in 1994 are characterized as "unexplained" and the sightings remain a mystery.
Not so far-fetched
The idea of alien life isn't as farfetched as once thought, with a number of recent discoveries pointing raising the possibility.
In a series of reports from USA TODAY, researchers have studied whether life could exist on a recently discovered "Super Earth" about 30 trillion miles away.
Villanova University astrophysicists Edward Guinan and Scott Engle told USA TODAY that the planet, known as Barnard b, has a temperature of 274 degrees below zero, but "niches of life" may be possible under the ice.
Another group of researchers is studying whether a mysterious object entering the Earth's solar system from interstellar space at a high rate of speed actually is a probe intentionally sent here by an alien civilization. Scientists later decided that the weird object actually was a comet.
And another study reports that more “fast radio bursts" – bright, short-lived pulses of radio waves that come from across the universe — have been detected by astronomers. Some researchers have considered the idea that these bursts could be signals from intelligent aliens, according to Science News.
Other mysteries
The UFO frenzy of 1994 was one in a string of unexplained phenomena in Michigan history.
In 2016, a mysterious phenomenon known as the Paulding Light was reported in the western Upper Peninsula.
Witnesses reported seeing a bright white light, glowing deep inside the woods, changing size and shape before fading into the darkness. Although many individuals believed the flickering lights was because of a car driving over a hill, others believed it to be something supernatural and too bright to be headlights.
A light shines off in the distance seen off of Robbins Pond Road in Paulding, MI where the mysterious Paulding Light appears on Wednesday June 13, 2016 in Michigan's Upper Peninsula.
Ryan Garza, Detroit Free Press
That same year, a photo of a furry creature in the Upper Peninsula surfaced, sparking conversation about a possible Bigfoot. At that time, the Upper Peninsula Bigfoot/Sasquatch Research Organization also reported a sighting near the community of South Branch in Ogemaw County.
In December 2016, the organization led a search for the beast in the Seney National Wildlife Refuge.
Strange Ufo Encounter By Many Witnesses Over Lake Michigan
Strange Ufo Encounter By Many Witnesses Over Lake Michigan
MARCH 8, 1994 ……SOUTH OF HOLLAND MICHIGAN
On the evening of March 8, 1994, residents of Southwest Michigan began seeing strange things in the skies over Lake Michigan to the south of Holland. Blue, white, red, and green lights, sometimes attached to cylindrical objects, and sometimes performing unusual maneuvers, were reported.
911 operators began receiving calls at around 9:30 p.m. about something that looked like “a string of Christmas lights way up in the sky.” It wasn’t just a few people reporting these things; it was counties all up and down Lake Michigan. Some sources said 300 witnesses, including several police officers, saw the lights.
There were so many reports that one of the Ottawa County 911 operators decided to call the National Weather Service radar operator at Muskegon. The conversations that 911 had with the NWS operator were taped and later made their way into the media. The radar operator’s voice could be heard describing abrupt movements of the object and multiple objects appearing on the radar screen.
The Detroit News and Free Press, March 20, 1994. The newspapers printed a combined Saturday and Sunday paper at the time.
Detroit Free Press
He said that what he was seeing could not be precipitation, especially at that height. One object was tracked moving twenty miles in ten seconds.
Holland police officer Jeff Vellhouse spoke to the operator of the Muskegon radar that picked up the radar tracks: “He said he had three things on his radar, and they were in a triangular shape. He said they hovered over Holland and moved southwest. He said that one would move out of the triangular pattern, then move back in.”
The radar operator also reported: “There were three and sometimes four blips, and they weren’t planes. Planes show as pinpoints on the scope, these were the size of half a thumbnail. They were from 5 to 12,000 feet at times, moving all over the place. Three were moving toward Chicago. I never saw anything like it before, not even when I’m doing severe weather.”
It was said that there was no NWS written or taped records of the radar contacts themselves, but Dave Reinhart of BIMUP (Bureau of Investigators of Mysteries & Unusual Phenomena) claimed to have received copies of the NWS radar operator’s report in late 1994. He also said that he had talked to an individual referred to as “Fred”, who worked at Area 51 and who had knowledge that what occurred on the night of March 8, 1994 was some sort of rendezvous of UFOs from the east, west, north, and south.
Scott Ruiter of Grand Haven saw the lights in Grand Haven Township at 10:30 p.m. March 7: “It looked like about five airplanes following each other fairly closely. One would blink, then the other, other and other, right to left,”
The National Weather Service later tried to downplay the radar trackings: “There is no relation between the UFOs and the radar tracks,” said Dean Gulezian, the weather service’s area manager for Michigan. Gulezian said that although the radar did show some echoes, one key thing is the eyewitnesses saw these things at tree-top level, while the radar echoes were from an altitude of 10,000 feet or higher.” (Note above where the first witnesses reported seeing something like a string of Christmas lights “way up in the sky”)
Randee Murphy and her husband, of Ada Township, observed a “huge” shape for about two minutes as it flew slowly about 100 feet over the woods outside their home. “It had four lights,” she said, and “made a soft, whirring noise. It sounded like a single jet engine.” The Michigan flap continued for several days, presumably ending on the 10th. The sightings were never adequately explained.
Supermassive Black Holes Shortly after The Big Bang: How to Seed Them
Supermassive Black Holes Shortly after The Big Bang: How to Seed Them
According to classical theories, these space giants would not have had the time
They are billions of times larger than our Sun: how is it possible that, as recently observed, supermassive black holes were already present when the Universe, now 14 billion years old, was “just” 800 million years old? For astrophysicists, the formation of these cosmic monsters in such a short time is a real scientific headache, which raises important questions on the current knowledge of the development of these celestial bodies. According to classical theories, these space giants would not have had the time to develop in the young Universe. Yet, observations say they were already present. A new study by SISSA proposes a response to the fascinating question
A recent article published in The Astrophysical Journal, by the SISSA Ph.D. student Lumen Boco and his supervisor Andrea Lapi, offers a possible explanation to the thorny issue. Thanks to an original model theorized by the scientists from Trieste, the study proposes a very fast formation process in the initial phases of the development of the supermassive black holes, those up to now considered slower. Proving, mathematically, that their existence was possible in the young Universe, the results of the research reconcile the timing required for their growth with the limits imposed by the age of the Cosmos. The validity of the theory can be fully validated thanks to future gravitational wave detectors namely Einstein Telescope and LISA, but tested in several basic aspects also with the current Advanced LIGO/Virgo system.
The cosmic monster that grows at the centre of galaxies
The scientists started their study with a piece of well-known observational evidence: the growth of supermassive black holes occurs in the central regions of galaxies, progenitors of the current elliptical galaxies, which had a very high gas content and in which the stellar formation was extremely intense. “The biggest stars live a short time and very quickly evolve into stellar black holes, as large as several scores of solar masses; they are small, but many form in these galaxies”. The dense gas that surrounds them, explain Boco and Lapi, has a very powerful definitive effect of dynamic friction and causes them to migrate very quickly to the centre of the galaxy. The majority of the numerous black holes that reach the central regions merge, creating the supermassive black hole seed. Boco and Lapi continue: “According to classical theories, a supermassive black hole grows at the centre of a galaxy capturing the surrounding matter, principally gas, “growing it” on itself and finally devouring it at a rhythm which is proportional to its mass. For this reason, during the initial phases of its development, when the mass of the black hole is small, the growth is very slow. To the extent that, according to the calculations, to reach the mass observed, billions of times that of the Sun, a very long time would be required, even greater than the age of the young Universe”. Their study, however, showed that things could go much faster than that.
The crazy dash of black holes: what the scientists have discovered
“Our numerical calculations show that the process of dynamic migration and fusion of stellar black holes can make the supermassive black hole seed reach a mass of between 10,000 and 100,000 times that of the Sun in just 50-100 million years”. At this point, the researchers say, “the growth of the central black hole according to the aforementioned direct accretion of gas, envisaged by the standard theory, will become very fast, because the quantity of gas it will succeed in attracting and absorbing will become immense, and predominant on the process we propose. Nevertheless, precisely the fact of starting from such a big seed as envisaged by our mechanism speeds up the global growth of the supermassive black hole and allows its formation, also in the Young Universe. In short, in light of this theory, we can state that 800 million years after the Big Bang the supermassive black holes could already populate the Cosmos”.
“Looking” at the supermassive black hole seeds grow
The article, besides illustrating the model and demonstrating its efficacy, also proposes a method for testing it: “The fusion of numerous stellar black holes with the seed of the supermassive black hole at the centre will produce gravitational waves which we expect to see and study with current and future detectors”, explain the researchers. In particular, the gravitational waves emitted in the initial phases, when the central black hole seed is still small, will be identifiable by the current detectors like Advanced LIGO/Virgo and fully characterisable by the future Einstein Telescope. The subsequent development phases of the supermassive black hole could be investigated thanks to the future detector LISA, which will be launched in space around 2034. In this way, explain Boco and Lapi, “the process we propose can be validated in its different phases, in a complementary way, by future gravitational wave detectors.
“This research” concludes Andrea Lapi, coordinator of the Astrophysics and Cosmology group of SISSA, “shows how the students and researchers of our group are fully approaching the new frontier of gravitational waves and multi-messenger astronomy. In particular, our main goal will be to develop theoretical models, like that devised in this case, which serve to capitalise on the information originating from the experiments of current and future gravitational waves, thereby hopefully providing solutions for unresolved issues connected with astrophysics, cosmology and fundamental physics”.
Contacts and sources:
Donato Ramani
SISS-Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati
Ancient Face Found On Moon, Looks Viking, UFO Sighting News.
Ancient Face Found On Moon, Looks Viking, UFO Sighting News.
Date of discovery: March 23, 2020 Location of discovery: Earths moon, right of Dalton Crater Source: Google Moon Google coordinates: 17°30'50.56"N 81°48'43.32"W
I was looking over Google Moon map when I found a face in a crater. I am not sure of the craters name, but it is touching the right side of both Dalton crater and Balboa crater. If the eyes are the window to the soul, then the face is a window to the species. This species looks almost human. It closely resembles Thor from the ancient Vikings. I colorized the face to make it stand out easier and to make it easier to see. The large lips, nose and cheeks all stand out well. It has a beard and thick eyebrows and a small forehead with hair. Its ear seems to be closer to that of a cat or goat. Its eyes are similar to the ancient greek depictions of warriors. The face is everything. Scott C. Waring - Tawian
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:Ruins, strange artifacts on other planets, moons, ed ( Fr, EN, NL )
NASA cuts live feed when colorful UFO appears
NASA cuts live feed when colorful UFO appears
Several days ago a colorful unidentified flying object was captured on the International Space Station live feed camera.
The footage shows the UFO in the distance when it turns around and seemly changing colors moments before NASA cuts the live stream.
It is not the first time that NASA cuts the live feed when a UFO appears and while normally the well known screen appears with the text: "The video from the space station External High Definition Camera (EHDC) has been interrupted due to to either loss of signal between the station and the communications network", this time we suddenly see a blue screen, then the live feed reappears for one second followed up by the blue screen again indicating that NASA intentionally ended the live stream to hide this UFO.
VIDEO: Triangle UFO over Burien, Washington 20-Mar-2020
VIDEO: Triangle UFO over Burien, Washington 20-Mar-2020
In this video that was recorded over Burien, Washington on 20th March 2020 we can see these four orbs that appeared red to the naked eye performing maneuvers to first form the classic triangle formation only to break this formation to form a straight line before disappearing into the darkness of the night leaving just one orb visible. What is going on with the resurgence of these red orbs?
NASA explains why weird, wheel-like blip in space images is not a UFO
NASA explains why weird, wheel-like blip in space images is not a UFO
It might look like Deep Space Nine is visiting our solar system, but it has a scientific explanation.
UFO aficionados recently got excited about a strange shape that appeared in images captured by NASA's Stereo mission. Was it aliens? Nope. It was a reflection.
Stereo, short for Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory, launched as twin space observatories in 2006 on a mission to study the sun and coronal mass ejections. One of the spacecraft is still in operation. Its HI2 telescope captured a nifty view that included Venus and Earth in late February. That's when the mysterious wheel-like shape appeared.
"The strange looking geometrical 'object' is actually an internal reflection of the planet Venus within the telescope optics," NASA said in the update.
This annotated image shows the Lagoon Nebula, Venus and Earth in the STEREO observatory's field of view. The reflected light artifact caused by Venus is circled.
NASA
This isn't the first (and won't be the last) time this sort of reflection has appeared in Stereo's field of view. An annotated look at Stereo data from March 12 shows the Lagoon Nebula, Venus, Earth and the light artifact, which looks like a steering wheel.
It's easy to see how a casual observer could get excited by this weird space blip. In time-lapse movies, the wheel looks like it's traveling through space. It also bears a slight resemblance to some circular sci-fi creations, like the Deep Space Nine space station from the Star Trek series of the same name.
For more fun with internal reflections, visit the Stereo image artifacts page, a delightful collection of images with strange-looking but completely explainable visual artifacts.
A SpaceX Falcon launching from Vandenberg AFB in 2017.
Need more? A recent UFO sighting over Phoenix had “Phoenix lights” hopefuls hoping, but it looks like it was another SpaceX launch. A few days earlier, the camera on another SpaceX launch picked up a UFO near the launch rocket as it descended for a landing. Should we be mad at Elon Musk … or jealous?
“We saw this really bright, bright light shining from an object moving away. It looked like a UFO to us.”
Well, if you haven’t seen a rocket launch on a hazy night, this one (see the photos here) probably struck you as a UFO too. AZ Central reports that Pam Sutton of Maricopa, Arizona, said she and her husband were driving around 7 p.m. and both saw the strange sky anomaly, as did everyone who pulled off the road with them, an editor for the Arizona Republic and former Arizona governor Jan Brewer. The Arizona Republic and local police received numerous calls, before SpaceX cleared things up with an email (wow … what a sense of urgency!) to Phoenix Fire Department’s Capt. Rob McDade.
“We were told it was indeed the SpaceX Rocket launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base.”
SpaceX again … and yes, this one was also launching 10 mini-satellites. While the cases of mistaken identity don’t seem to be bothering SpaceX and CEO Elon Musk, could it be bothering actual UFO pilots?
Heads it’s SpaceX, tails it’s aliens.
“During the streamed launch of SpaceX Starlink 3/18/2020, during the decent of first stage rocket and seconds before the re-entry burn, an object is seen from under the rocket. The object is either stationary and the rocket is falling passed it or the object is traveling in a vertical direction (unknown if up or down).”
That description comes from “Latest UFO Sightings” which posted the video (see it here) and photos, as did a few other sites (here’s another one), not to mention SpaceX itself, which posted the entire launch (watch it here). They report that there’s not much else to report. Launch debris? Certainly a possibility, although one would think SpaceX takes extreme precautions to avoid creating debris that would linger so closely to the only reusable rockets as they land. A drone? Again, SpaceX is doing enough ‘dark’ missions for the military (although this wasn’t one) to make sure no one is trying to catch a glimpse of the launch or the secret cargo. Aliens? Have we exhausted the process-of-elimination yet?
Debris, drones and other natural reasons for this UFO should be alarming to SpaceX and Musk. However, no one seems to be alarmed. Is that a signal that it’s something else? In the meantime, maybe Ken Burns should devote his next documentary to showing all the things in the sky that are NOT alien spaceships. There’s a show that could stretch longer than “The Civil War”!
“Diamonds are forever” is a clever jewelry marketing slogan, a popular James Bond film and the thing that helped geologists find a long lost of an ancient arctic continent that once stretched from Scotland to Labrador, Canada. What’s the bigger deal – the chunk or the diamonds?
“For researchers, kimberlites are subterranean rockets that pick up passengers on their way to the surface.”
Wait a minute … you said this story was about rocks, not rockets and passengers from the center of the Earth!
“The passengers are solid chunks of wall rocks that carry a wealth of details on conditions far beneath the surface of our planet over time.”
Baffin Island
University of British Columbia geologist Maya Kopylova metaphorically describes how igneous rocks called kimberlites pick up diamonds and other ‘passengers’ as they are brought from deep underground to the surface by geological forces. Kopylova and colleagues were studying kimberlites from Baffin Island in Nunavut, specifically from a De Beers Chidliak Kimberlite Province property (and yes, De Beers created the ‘Diamonds are forever’ slogan – see how all of this is connected?). While De Beers obviously wanted them looking for signs of diamonds, the team noticed that the mineral composition of these rocks showed that they belongs to the North Atlantic Craton – which sounds like a movie monster but is actually ancient form of continent. Some parts of this craton eventually became part of North America and Greenland, but others sank beneath the Earth’s crust, never to be seen again.
Never underestimate the lure of diamonds.
“Finding these ‘lost’ pieces is like finding a missing piece of a puzzle. The scientific puzzle of the ancient Earth can’t be complete without all of the pieces.”
In a press release by the University of British Columbia announcing the paper published in Journal of Petrology, lead author Kopylova describes why geologists are so excited about this find. Cratons are billion-year-old parts of the continental lithosphere – the combined ancient crust and upper mantle that eventually broke up to form today’s continents and tectonic plates. The North Atlantic Craton is one, as are the North China Craton, the Sarmatian Craton in Russia and Ukraine, the Amazonia Craton in South America, the Kaapvaal Craton in South Africa and the Gawler Craton in South Australia. Each has its own unique mineral structure which help identify them.
Also called Laurentia, the North Atlantic Craton has had its ups and downs over time, forming parts of early continents and supercontinents. Laurentia is named after the Laurentian Shield, a large area of exposed igneous and high-grade metamorphic rocks that make its area an excellent place for mining minerals and diamonds. How important are these pieces of the Laurentia puzzle?
“With these samples we’re able to reconstruct the shapes of ancient continents based on deeper, mantle rocks. We can now understand and map not only the uppermost skinny layer of Earth that makes up one percent of the planet’s volume, but our knowledge is literally and symbolically deeper. We can put together 200-kilometre deep fragments and contrast them based on the details of the deep mineralogy.”
Believe it or not, while De Beers is obviously on Baffin Island for the diamonds, this is actually part of a graduate student project at the University of British Columbia to help train future geologists. UBC students get samples to study, De Beer gets maps to future diamond mines and Kopylova gets more data to add to the early history of Earth.
And those looking for movie monster ideas get a good one: The North Atlantic Craton Meets Godzilla at the North Pole!
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.