While concepts for an interstellar spacecraft go back to the early Space Age, interest in the field has grown considerably in the past two decades. This is largely due to the recent explosion in the number of known exoplanets in our galaxy, which currently stands at 5,787 confirmed planets in 4,325 star systems. This is illustrated by concepts like Breakthrough Starshot, Swarming Proxima Centauri, and the Genesis Project. These concepts leverage gram-scale spacecraft, directed energy (lasers), and lightsails to achieve speeds of up to 20% of the speed of light, allowing them to make the journey in decades rather than centuries or millennia.

However, sending crewed spacecraft to other star systems with enough passengers to settle on another planet is far more challenging. As addressed in a previous article, a spacecraft relying on known or technically feasible propulsion methods would take between 1,000 and 81,000 years to reach even the nearest star (Proxima Centauri). While some advanced concepts like Project Orion, Daedalus, and Icarus could theoretically reach Proxima Centauri in 36 to 85 years, the costs and amount of propellant needed are prohibitive.

The alternative to these “go fast” concepts is to settle in for the long ride, which may last centuries or even millennia. This necessitates a spacecraft of sufficient size capable of accommodating hundreds (or thousands) of human beings over multiple generations. To save room and reduce the mass of cargo space, the crews will need to grow much of their food and rely on life support systems that are bioregenerative in nature. In short, the ship would need to be self-sustaining so the passengers could live comfortable, healthy lives until they reached their destination.

Andreas Hein, an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering at the University of Luxembourg and the Chief Scientist at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, is part of the Hyperion Project’s Organizing Committee. As he told Universe Today via email:

“Think about the difference between a drone and an ocean liner. Previous designs for interstellar spacecraft, such as Orion, Daedalus, and Icarus, focused on uncrewed probes with the primary objective of gathering scientific data from target star systems, including searching for signs of life. In contrast, generation ships are designed to transport a crew, with the primary goal of settling an exoplanet or other celestial body in the target star system. They also tend to be much larger than interstellar probes, though they would likely use similar propulsion systems, such as fusion-based propulsion.”

Generation Ships

The first known description of a generation ship was made by rocketry engineer Robert H. Goddard, one of the “forefathers of modern rocketry,” for whom NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center is named. In his 1918 essay, “The Ultimate Migration,” he described an “interstellar ark” leaving the Solar System in the distant future after the Sun reached the end of its life cycle. The passengers would cryogenically frozen or in a state of induced torpor for much of the journey except for the pilot, who would be awakened periodically to steer the ship.

Goddard recommended that the ship be powered by atomic energy if the technology were realized. If not, a combination of hydrogen, oxygen, and solar energy would suffice. Goddard calculated that these power sources would allow the vessel to achieve velocities of 4.8 to 16 km/s (3 to 10 mi/s), or roughly 57,936 km/h (36,000 mph). This was followed by famed Russian rocket scientist and cosmologist Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky, also recognized as one of the “forefathers of modern rocketry.” In 1928, he wrote an essay titled “The Future of Earth and Mankind” that described an interstellar “Noah’s Ark.”

In Tsiolkovsky’s version, the spaceship would be self-sufficient, and the crew would be awake for the journey, which would last for thousands of years. In 1964, NASA scientist Dr. Robert Enzmann proposed the most detailed concept to date for a generation ship, known as an “Enzmann Starship.“ The proposal called for a ship measuring 600 meters (2,000 feet) in length powered by a fusion thruster that uses deuterium as a propellant. According to Enzmann, this ship would house an initial crew of 200 people with room for expansion along the way.

In recent years, the concept has been explored from various angles, from biological and psychological to ethical. This included a series of studies (2017-2019) conducted by Dr. Frederic Marin of the Astronomical Observatory of Strasbourg using tailor-made numerical software (called HERITAGE). In the first two studies, Dr. Marin and colleagues conducted simulations that showed that a minimum crew of 98 (max. 500) would need to be coupled with a cryogenic bank of sperm, eggs, and embryos to ensure genetic diversity and good health upon arrival.

In the third study, Dr. Marin and another group of scientists determined that the ship carrying them would need to measure 320 meters (1050 feet) in length, 224 meters (735 feet) in radius, and contain 450 m² (~4,850 ft²) of artificial land to grow enough food to sustain them. In short, these proposals and studies establish that a generation ship and its crew must bring “Earth with them” and rely on bioregenerative systems to replenish their food, water, and air throughout generations.

As noted, most studies regarding interstellar exploration have focused on probes or ships and tended to emphasize speed over ensuring passengers could make the journey. As Hein explained, this makes the Hyperion Project the first competition to focus on generation ships and ensuring the interstellar voyagers remain healthy and safe until they arrive in a nearby star system:

“This competition is unprecedented—a true first. To our knowledge, it marks the first time a design competition specifically focused on generation ships has been launched. It builds on our team’s prior research, conducted since 2011, which addresses fundamental questions such as the required population size. This competition uniquely explores the complex interplay between generation ship technologies and the dynamics of a highly resource-constrained society.

“Most studies have focused on the technological aspects, such as propulsion and life support, while often treating the ship’s technology and onboard society as separate issues. This approach is understandable given the challenge of analyzing these interdependencies. We even got the advice to stay away. Our goal is to take an initial step toward exploring and envisioning these interdependencies. We aim to be Cayley instead of Da Vinci. Da Vinci imagined aircraft, but Cayley conceived their basic design principles, which paved the way for the Wright Brothers.”

The Competition

Registration for the competition will remain open until December 15th, 2024, and all participating teams must pay a $20 registration fee. The top three winning entries will be announced on June 2nd, 2025, and awarded $5000 for first place, $3000 for second, and $2000 for third. In addition, ten teams will receive honorary mentions for creative and innovative ideas. For more information, check out Project Hyperion’s website and the Mission Brief.

Per their mission statement, Project Hyperion is a preliminary study and feasibility assessment for crewed interstellar flight using current and near-future technologies. The goal is to inform the public about the future possibility of interstellar space travel and to guide future research and technology development. As they state on their website, the competition has the following theme:

“Humanity has overcome the great sustainability crisis in the 21st century and has transitioned into an era of sustainable abundance, both on Earth and in space. Humanity has now reached the capacity to develop a generation ship without major sacrifices. An Interstellar Starship flies by an icy planet in a nearby solar system. Going beyond the classical examination of the problem of Interstellar propulsion and structural design for a voyage lasting multiple centuries, what might be the ideal type of habitat architecture and society in order to ensure a successful trip?”

Participants will be tasked with designing the ship, its habitat, and its subsystems, including details on its architecture and society. The Project Brief describes other important Boundary Conditions, including the duration of the mission, its destination, and other important considerations. The mission duration is 250 years from launch to arrival at the target star system, consistent with the ship having advanced propulsion capable of achieving a fraction of the speed of light.

To ensure the health and safety of the crew, the ship’s habitat must have atmospheric conditions similar to Earth, protection from galactic rays, micrometeorites, and interstellar dust (necessary for relativistic space travel). The ship must also provide artificial gravity via rotating sections, but “parts of the habitat can have reduced gravity.” The habitat must also provide accommodation and decent living conditions for 1000 plus or minus 500 people throughout the trip. The habitat will also need to be designed in such a way that it can be modified to meet changing needs.

The society’s structure must allow for cultural variations, including language, ethics, family structure, beliefs, aesthetics, family structure, and other social factors. The competition also considers knowledge retention and loss relative to Earth, which they describe as “almost inevitable.” Cameron Smith, an anthropologist at Portland State University and the University of Arizona’s Center for Human Space Exploration (CHaSE), is also a member of Project Hyperion’s Organizing Committee. As he explained to Universe Today:

“[T]he situation of a population, let’s say thousands or even 1500 people, traveling in isolation for centuries would be unique to the human experience. So just as we plan for the health of the architecture and the hardware, maintaining them to keep them in a good state over this time span, we can plan for the health and maintenance of both biology and culture. And we have an excellent guide which is evolution.

“Evolution is at the heart of all life sciences, and it also, in many ways, applies to cultural change through time. Biology evolves, and cultures evolve. And we have learned how to manage our cultures on Earth to fit a wide variety of situations.”

“The idea, however, is to get people thinking about how culture might be adjusted for the unusual conditions I’ve outlined. Separation from Earth, separation from other populations of humans, except by radio or video communication – which will become less and less as they get farther from Earth – what could change through time of the voyage that would require cultural adjustment?”

Throughout the trip, the population must also have access to basic products (clothing, shelter, etc.). The mass of the habitat is to be as low as possible, reliable over the entire duration of the journey, and include redundant systems. The generation ship’s target destination is a rocky planet in a nearby star system (like Proxima b). In an interesting twist, the competition stresses that this planet will have an artificial ecosystem created by a precursor probe, à la Project Genesis. As a result, the crews will not require any significant genetic or biological adaptations to survive in that ecosystem. As Hein explained:

“250 years in a tin can and staying happy, aka. can a society thrive in a severely resource-constrained environment? Answering this question is essential for designing a generation ship and may also offer insights into sustainable futures on Earth. From my perspective, there has been a significant lack of imaginative solutions to this challenge.’250 years in a tin can and staying happy, aka, can a society thrive in a severely resource-constrained environment?’

“Answering this question is essential for designing a generation ship and may also offer insights into sustainable futures on Earth. From my perspective, there has been a significant lack of imaginative solutions to this challenge.”

“We also hope to raise awareness of the complexities underlying today’s technologies. Which technologies could or should be preserved on a generation ship, and which may be lost? Research shows that a society’s population size affects the diversity and complexity of its technologies. Most modern technologies require intricate supply chains involving numerous companies, infrastructure, and regulatory systems. Therefore, a generation ship will likely rely on low-tech solutions unless disruptive technologies, like molecular manufacturing or Standard Template Constructs (as depicted in Warhammer 40k), become feasible.”

An Interdisciplinary Approach

A major focus of the competition is interdisciplinary research, reflective of the organizing committee itself. This has become a trend in space research, thanks in large part to the rise of the commercial space industry. For many companies and non-profits today, traditional research is expanding beyond aerospace engineering and incorporating architecture and interior design, biology, sociology, psychology, agriculture, and other disciplines to create concepts that will allow for healthy and sustainable living in space.

Per the rules, teams must consist of at least one architectural designer, engineer, and social scientist (a sociologist, anthropologist, etc.). As Yazgi Demirbas Pech, an architect and designer with the Organizing Committee, explained:

“We hope this competition will inspire greater interdisciplinary collaboration, emphasizing the value of fields such as architecture and social sciences—especially critical in planning for long-duration, long-distance missions. A holistic approach that integrates these diverse fields can contribute to more sustainable and human-centered solutions for space exploration.

“Unlike traditional architectural practices on Earth, space architecture requires a delicate balance between strict technical constraints—such as limited physical space, extreme environmental conditions, and restricted resources—and the essential human needs for comfort, safety, and psychological well-being. Here, architecture becomes a life-sustaining element, enabling people to live, work, and thrive across vast distances and timescales.

“Through this competition, we invite teams to challenge conventional design principles and redefine what “home” means among the stars. Including architects or architecture students on teams will undoubtedly add fresh perspectives to this thought-provoking competition.”

Solving for Space Solves for Earth

Another important aspect of the competition is the desire to inspire ideas that will also have applications and benefits here on Earth. This is another crucial aspect of the future of space exploration, which includes plans for creating outposts on the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Like a generation ship, missions operating farther from Earth cannot rely on regular resupply missions sent from Earth. This means that habitats must be as self-sufficient as possible and ensure that inhabitants have enough air, water, and food to live comfortably.

For decades, scientists and planners have looked to Earth’s natural environment for inspiration. This was the purpose of the Biosphere 2 project, which conducted two experiments between 1991 and 1994 in which volunteers lived in a sealed biome that mimics Earth’s many environments. Since 2007, the University of Arizona has used the facility to conduct research through its CHaSE program while remaining open to the public.

“Since the 1990s, [Biosphere 2] has been a research center for closed ecosystems as though on a starship, and the research here continues. [I am] actually residing at the biosphere until January, and I am looking at the stars and engaged in all of this right now,” said Smith, who wrote to Universe Today from the facility. As he went on to note, research from this experiment and similar studies have significant applications for life here on Earth, mainly because there is no margin for error in space:

“[T]he planning and preparation going into the starship in terms of its culture and biological protections for the offspring would be very carefully designed to give the greatest protections to them, perhaps in ways more specifically tailored to their survival and good health than in any culture ever on Earth. On the interstellar voyage, things must go just right to survive over multiple generations in the closed ecosystem, so planning and preparation would have to be very thorough.”

Since failure in space often means death, especially when people are stationed far from Earth where rescue missions would take too long to reach them, the technologies future explorers and settlers rely on must be regenerative, fail-proof, and sustainable over time. This research and development will have direct benefits when it comes to the most pressing problems we face here on Earth: climate change, overpopulation, poverty and hunger, and the need for sustainable living. As Pech emphasized:

“I believe that thinking beyond Earth can offer valuable insights into how we might improve life here on ‘spaceship Earth.’ Just as in space, where we face numerous challenges, our planet requires innovative approaches to foster harmony and resilience amidst current global conflicts and challenges.”

There’s also the added benefit of stimulating questions about life in the Universe and where extraterrestrial civilizations (ETCs) could already be traveling among the stars. For decades, scientists have explored these questions as part of the Fermi Paradox. As Hein explained:

“Finally, just as Project Daedalus demonstrated the theoretical feasibility of interstellar travel, we aim to establish a similar ‘existence proof’ for human travel to the stars. Achieving this will add new perspectives to the Fermi Paradox: if we can envision crewed interstellar travel today, a more advanced civilization should have achieved it already. So, where are they?”

Those interested in the competition or have more questions are encouraged to contact the Initiative for Interstellar Studies at info@i4is.org. The i4is will remain open to Q&A until December 1st, 2024.

Further Reading: 

• Project Hyperion

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

12-11-2024 om 16:43 geschreven door peter  

Alien Wars on Earth? Exploring Evidence of Extraterrestrial Battles

Throughout history, humanity has looked to the skies with wonder and curiosity, pondering whether we are truly alone in the universe. Among various stories and mysteries surrounding extraterrestrial life, one captivating idea stands out: did alien civilizations engage in battles on Earth long ago? Though it may sound like science fiction, there are ancient accounts and unusual events that hint at this possibility, inviting us to look deeper and consider what might have happened in our skies centuries ago.

The Mysterious Battle Over Nuremberg

One of the most intriguing pieces of evidence suggesting extraterrestrial activity is the reported celestial event over Nuremberg, Germany, on April 4, 1561. On that morning, residents claimed to witness an intense “battle” in the skies, involving strange, orb-like objects and large cross-shaped figures seemingly engaged in combat. Some of these mysterious objects allegedly crashed, leaving observers in awe of what appeared to be an interstellar conflict.

This astonishing event was captured in a woodcut illustration by artist Hans Glaser, who depicted these objects in a scene of cosmic warfare. The woodcut’s authenticity is supported by its creation date and the fact that Glaser was a recognized artist of the time. However, while many are inclined to interpret this as evidence of an alien encounter, skeptics have proposed a more conventional explanation.

Scientists suggest that what the people of Nuremberg saw might have been a natural atmospheric phenomenon called a “sundog” or “parhelion.” This occurs when sunlight interacts with ice crystals in the atmosphere, producing bright spots or “halos” around the sun, which can take on various shapes and colors. Under specific conditions, these halos may appear as multiple suns or unusual shapes, leading the people of Nuremberg to believe they were witnessing a battle in the heavens. Whether a sundog or an extraterrestrial skirmish, the event remains one of the most compelling and widely discussed historical reports of unusual celestial activity.

Ancient Sites and Mysterious Structures

Beyond historical accounts, many point to the massive and seemingly impossible-to-build ancient structures as evidence of advanced knowledge — possibly shared by extraterrestrial beings. Among these marvels are the Great Pyramid of Giza, the giant stones of Sacsayhuamán in Peru, and the vast layout of Teotihuacan in Mexico. While each of these sites is often attributed to impressive feats of human engineering, some believe their precision, scale, and alignment with celestial bodies hint at alien assistance or influence.

For instance, the Great Pyramid’s alignment with the stars in Orion’s Belt, the precise interlocking stones at Sacsayhuamán, and Teotihuacan’s advanced architectural layout continue to puzzle archaeologists. Skeptics argue that these achievements were within the realm of human capability, utilizing tools, basic engineering principles, and a substantial labor force. Still, the fact that many of these structures have defied traditional explanations for centuries fuels the fascination and theories around possible extraterrestrial aid.

Unexplained Accounts of Alien Encounters

In addition to ancient structures, history has documented strange occurrences that sound like alien encounters. For instance, in 1957, Brazilian farmer Antonio Villas Boas claimed to have been abducted by extraterrestrials and subjected to bizarre experiments, even describing his captors in detail. Stories like these are often dismissed as either fantasies or the result of misinterpreted natural phenomena, such as sleep paralysis, which can cause vivid, immobilizing hallucinations.

Additionally, the Apollo 10 astronauts reported hearing mysterious “outer-space music” while flying over the moon’s far side, a sound that puzzled NASA. Ultimately, scientists determined that this “music” was likely radio interference between the spacecrafts’ VHF radios. However, such occurrences persist in sparking speculation about alien contact and whether NASA has shared all it knows.

Ancient Beliefs in Cosmic Battles

Many cultures have myths and stories of cosmic battles involving powerful beings descending from the heavens. These narratives, found in texts from ancient Sumeria to Hindu scriptures, describe wars in the skies that are often depicted as clashes between gods. For those intrigued by the alien theory, these accounts serve as tantalizing “evidence” that humanity may have witnessed battles between extraterrestrial beings, interpreted as divine encounters at the time.

The Scientific Verdict

While theories of alien wars and extraterrestrial influences capture our imagination, science offers more grounded explanations. Phenomena like sundogs, advanced but traditional engineering techniques, and the psychological effects of sleep paralysis and hallucinations provide reasonable accounts for much of what might otherwise be classified as alien evidence. Moreover, most scientists agree that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which means current theories remain speculative without concrete proof.

VIDEO:

• Do We Have Evidence of Alien Wars on Earth?

• https://youtu.be/QbHl1GKMqzU

Whether one believes in ancient alien wars or not, the possibility of extraterrestrial influence on Earth’s past is fascinating. Stories of celestial battles, complex ancient structures, and strange encounters remind us that there is much we still do not understand about our own history and the universe. As we continue exploring space and uncovering Earth’s mysteries, we may eventually learn whether these stories are relics of human imagination or signs of something truly beyond this world.

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

12-11-2024 om 16:10 geschreven door peter  

• READ MORE: First image released of 'cylindrical' UFO shot down by US fighter jet

By JONATHAN CHADWICK FOR MAILONLINE 

Augmented reality (AR) has already been used in everything from gaming to retail and tourism. 

But the technology has been given its most important role yet, in the new Striker II fighter pilot helmet.

The 4.4lbs (2kg) device has been developed by British defence firm BAE Systems, and presents 'mission-critical' data in front of a pilot's eyes, giving them 'unparalleled situational awareness' as they patrol the air.

From hundreds of miles away, it can discern between another RAF fighter pilot and a hostile enemy aircraft – such as a Chinese spy drone. 

In a real life defence setting, the technology could help fighter pilots shoot down such a threat, helping to protect British skies. 

The RAF has paid £40 million to fit its personnel with the Striker II helmet, of which fewer than 100 currently exist. 

BAE Systems calls it 'the world's most advanced helmet-mounted display' that 'immediately calculates the pilot's exact head position and angle'. 

At BAE Systems' offices in Rochester, Kent, MailOnline's Jonathan Chadwick was given exclusive access to try Striker II during a simulated flight from RAF Valley in Anglesey, Wales. 

Augmented reality (AR) has already been used in everything from gaming to retail and tourism. But the technology has been given its most important role yet in the new Striker II fighter pilot helmet

At BAE Systems' offices in Rochester, Kent, MailOnline's Jonathan Chadwick was given exclusive access to try Striker II during a simulated flight from RAF Valley in Anglesey, Wales 

Nigel Kidd, director of head mounted displays at BAE Systems, worked on the original Striker helmet, developed in the late 1990s. 

This new iteration presents 'more information in a crisper format' including coloured symbols – beyond the typical monochrome green – and integrated night vision, all in a 40-degree field of view. 

'First and foremost, Striker II is a helmet – it keeps pilots safe,' Kidd told me as I step into the flight simulator, modelled on a cockpit of a Typhoon aircraft. 

'But it's not just a helmet – it's a very high performance augmented reality display system.' 

While Kidd wouldn't reveal the exact price of manufacturing Striker II, he admitted each individual helmet 'has a high price'.

'The average person would probably buy a small home for what this would cost,' he told MailOnline.  

Striker II, which is tethered to the inside of the cockpit, is made of carbon fibre and weighs around 4.4lbs (2kg), so it feels quite heavy as I place it over my head.

I can't imagine wearing it for several hours, especially during a high speed flights – although I'm informed it's light compared to other fighter helmets. 

A simulator shows the Typhoon aircraft stationed at RAF Valley prior to take-off. This system is used for pilot training 

BAE Systems was awarded £40 million to develop Striker II for RAF pilots - although the firm wouldn't reveal the cost of each individual helmet. There are currently fewer than 100 in existence

Pictured is the view while wearing the helmet, with speed displayed on the left and altitude on the right. Note the coloured shapes, which denote objects in the air and on the ground 

Striker II: Key features

Inside BAE’s Striker II fighter pilot helmet

Integrated Night Vision

Striker II features a high-performance, digital night vision camera in the helmet, creating a 24/7 capable HMD with no need for heavy, obtrusive night vision goggles. 

Colour symbology

Striker II offers the use of daylight readable color symbology with a binocular 40⁰ field of view. 

Picture-in-picture technology

Striker II supports picture-in-picture technology that displays imagery in a small offset window separate from that of the main display. 

3D audio and active noise reduction

3D audio gives the pilot 360-degree directional audio, so they hear a threat relevant to their position while also seeing it in color symbology. 

Using optical sensors embedded in the aircraft, Striker II immediately calculates the position and angle of the pilot's head. 

This means no matter where the pilot is looking – left, right, up or down – the display is always presented right in front of their eyes. 

I pull the visor down and see a collection of green lines, numbers and symbols, including a target crosshair in the centre and long horizon line through the middle. 

As I take off from RAF Valley, a stack of changing numbers on the left shows my speed, while another stack on the right shows altitude.

But apart from the green markings, there's also a load of shapes in a variety of additional colours – red, blue and yellow. 

These shapes indicate relevant objects in the air and on the ground, which are constantly being detected by a vast network of devices, including drones and radar towers, with signals fed back to my aircraft. 

On the display, different colours correspond to the nature of the object – so threats are presented in red, while 'friendlies' are blue and unknowns are yellow. 

Amazingly, when I move my head and focus on one of these coloured shapes, a small pop-up video clip appears, showing more about what the object actually is. 

Striker II comes embedded with digital night vision (pictured), meaning pilots no longer need to strap night vision goggles in front of the helmet when flying in the small hours 

Using optical sensors embedded in the aircraft, Striker II immediately calculates the pilot's exact head position and angle

For example, I see a short clip that plays on a loop of 'friendly' trucks moving along the ground – a clip which in real life would've likely been filmed by a nearby drone. 

What's amazing is the AR display is being projected onto the visor and then reflected into my eyeballs. 

If I were to stick my smartphone in between my face and the visor, all my camera app would show would be a blank visor – because the reflection is going into my eyes, not my phone's camera lens!

It's probably as close as the RAF will ever get to fitting their pilots with eye implants.  

Striker II also comes embedded with digital night vision, meaning pilots no longer need to strap night vision goggles in front of the helmet as they did with Striker I. 

This was an experience Kidd describes as like a 'sack of potatoes hanging off the front of your head' – making neck ache a real possibility. 

I had expected Striker II's AR display to be a distracting rather than helpful, by presenting the pilot with a barrage of information that could divert attention from the flight path. 

Striker II supports picture-in-picture technology that displays imagery in a small offset window separate from that of the main display

Inside the simulator cockpit, the pilot is presented with additional metrics including a map of the flight path 

RAF pilots will be wearing Striker II while operating Typhoon (pictured), the aircraft manufactured by German firm Eurofighter 

Read More

• First image released of 'cylindrical' UFO shot down by US fighter jet over Alaska in 2023 

But in actual fact, Striker II shows a pilot only the most important metrics that they'll need to operate the plane. 

This is augmented reality in its purest form – helpful yet subtle and unobtrusive. 

Overall, a main benefit of this technology is it means pilots are spending more time with their head up and looking out of the cockpit, not down at the controls. 

This gives them 'a vital advantage' when it comes to split-second decision-making, according to BAE Systems.  

Last year, the firm was awarded £40 million to develop Striker II for RAF pilots who operate Typhoon, the aircraft manufactured by German firm Eurofighter. 

Striker II is still undergoing flight trials with the RAF before it will be used by frontline Typhoon pilots. 

Kidd told me the helmet is also being made available to other Typhoon users in Europe – namely Spain, Italy and Germany – but he admitted 'there is interest from other nations'. 

The Eurofighter Typhoon frontline fleet delivers air security over the UK and its allies 24/7, 365 days a year.

VIDEOS

Why US F-35 Pilots Take 2 Days to Fit Their $400,000 Most Advanced Helmet

F-35 Pilot Wears $400,000 Super Advanced Helmet for the First Time

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

11-11-2024 om 23:41 geschreven door peter  

Uranus mystery is SOLVED after 38 years - and it suggests the planet isn't as weird as we thought

• READ MORE: Uranus' moon could harbour extraterrestrials, scientists say 

By SHIVALI BEST FOR MAILONLINE 

Uranus is often regarded as the weirdest planet in our solar system.

But a new study suggests that the gas giant may not actually be as strange as we thought.

Researchers from University College London (UCL) say that the mysteries surrounding Uranus may have been the result of an unusually powerful solar storm that happened to occur just as a spacecraft visited the planet.

That spacecraft – NASA's Voyager 2 – flew by Uranus back in 1986 and provided the first close glimpse of the planet.

And since then, no spacecraft has been back.

'Almost everything we know about Uranus is based on Voyager 2's two-day flyby,' said co-author Dr William Dunn.

'This new study shows that a lot of the planet's bizarre behaviour can be explained by the scale of the space weather event that occurred during that visit.'

Based on the findings, the researchers are calling for a return mission to Uranus to find out what it's really like when not in the midst of a solar storm.

Uranus is often regarded as the weirdest planet in our solar system. But a new study suggests that the gas giant may not actually be as strange as we thought

Researchers from University College London (UCL) say that the mysteries surrounding Uranus may have been the result of an unusually powerful solar storm that happened to occur just as a spacecraft visited the planet

In January 1986, NASA's Voyager 2 became the first, and so far the only, spacecraft to explore Uranus.

The mission snapped the first images of Uranus – but also discovered several oddities.

Uranus' radiation belts were found to be incredibly intense, while its magnetosphere was nearly empty of plasma.

This meant that there was no apparent source of charged particles to feed those intense belts.

In their new study, the researchers found that a 'hurricane' of extreme solar weather could explain this result.

The hurricane likely squashed Uranus' magnetosphere, pushing plasma out of it and intensifying radiation belts by feeding electrons into them.

And Uranus itself wasn't the only celestial object affected by this event.

Uranus' five moons were long assumed to be dead worlds because of the planet's nearly empty magnetosphere.

NASA's Voyager 2 snapped the first images of Uranus – but also discovered several oddities. Uranus' radiation belts were found to be incredibly intense, while its magnetosphere was nearly empty of plasma. This meant that there was no apparent source of charged particles to feed those belts

But the new findings suggest that the moons could be geologically active after all - and may even have oceans.

'If Voyager 2 had arrived just a few days earlier, it would have observed a completely different magnetosphere at Uranus,' said Dr Jamie Jasinski of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), who led the study.

'The spacecraft saw Uranus in conditions that only occur about 4% of the time.'

Based on the findings, the researchers are calling for a new – and carefully considered - mission to Uranus.

'We now know even less than we thought about what a typical day in the Uranian system might look like and are even more in need of a second spacecraft to visit to truly understand this mysterious, icy world,' Dr Dunn said.

'A big piece of evidence against there being oceans on Uranus's moons was the lack of detection of any water-related particles around the planet – Voyager 2 didn't find water ions.

'But now we can explain that: the solar storm basically would have blown all that material away.

'The design of the upcoming NASA flagship mission to Uranus should be carefully considered in the context of these findings.

'For instance, we might want instruments that could detect nudges to the magnetic field from a moon's salty ocean and instruments that could measure all the particles in the system to test whether we find water or other important material from the moons.'

HOW DOES URANUS'S MAGNETIC FIELD COMPARE TO EARTH'S?

A study analysing data collected more than 30 years ago by the Voyager 2 spacecraft has found that the Uranus's global magnetosphere is nothing like Earth’s, which is known to be aligned nearly with our planet’s spin axis.

A false-color view of Uranus captured by Hubble is pictured 

According to the researchers from Georgia Institute of Technology, this alignment would give rise to behaviour that is vastly different from what’s seen around Earth.

Uranus lies and rotates on its side, leaving its magnetic field tilted 60 degrees from its axis.

As a result, the magnetic field ‘tumbles’ asymmetrically relative to the solar wind.

As a result, the magnetic field ‘tumbles’ asymmetrically relative to the solar wind.

When the magnetosphere is open, it allows solar wind to flow in.

But, when it closes off, it creates a shield against these particles. 

The researchers suspect solar wind reconnection takes place upstream of Uranus’s magnetosphere at different latitudes, causing magnetic flux to close in various parts.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

11-11-2024 om 23:11 geschreven door peter  

US Congressman Says Revealing UFO Technology Is a Threat to Energy Sector: It Can Disrupt World Economy

A thought-provoking interview has recently been conducted between Project Unity host Jay Anderson and the U.S. Congressman Andy Ogles. The discussion focused on the implications of complete UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) disclosure. Anderson asked serious questions to Rep. Ogles about UFOs, revealing that the release of extraterrestrial technology could potentially disrupt the world economy and energy sector.

Rep. Andy Ogles spoke about the difficulty in gathering information due to the compartmentalization of special access projects, emphasizing the need for a methodical and persistent approach to uncover the truth. In the interview, he expressed his concern about UAPs operating in both military and commercial airspace, raising questions about the potential national security threats. He said, “I’m not going to assume I know what it may or may not be. What I do know is there’s a national security issue here.”

He considers various possibilities, including the involvement of experimental aircraft, joint ventures, or foreign adversaries. He emphasizes the importance of avoiding predetermined conclusions and encourages an open-minded investigation to determine the true nature of the UAP phenomenon.

When asked about his personal understanding of UAPs, Rep. Ogles talks about the hope that it might be advanced technology possessed by the United States. He says, “My hope would be… some new technology that we possess… puts us that next generation above our adversaries.” However, he acknowledges the mysterious aspects of UAPs, saying they seem to “defy physics.”

Rep. Ogles then considers the energy implications of the advanced propulsion technology displayed by UAPs. He wonders about the amount of energy needed for such rapid movements and how it could impact the energy sector.

He says, “That being said, these UAPs seem to defy physics. They seem to have some sort of propulsion technology that’s unknown to man as we understand it. So, what does that do to the energy sector? If there’s a new way of thinking about the amount of energy it takes to take a craft that’s hovering and suddenly it’s going Mach one in a matter of seconds – the human body can’t sustain that as we understand it, right? So that craft would have to have next-level technology to protect tissue, if you will, or it’s an unmanned type of craft. Again, there are just a lot of questions that have to be probed. But, if there is this propulsion technology out there and this energy capability out there, not only are we in a renaissance when it comes to aircraft, but we’re in a renaissance in terms of propulsion and energy production consumption. So, again, huge implications across the economic scale, both domestically and internationally.”

He mentions his inquiries in committee about the DOE (Department of Energy), suggesting it could be an ideal place to house top-secret technologies. He says, “If you’re going to house a top-secret Next Level technology, what better place to have it and house it than… nuclear facilities.”

“Everybody knows about Area 51. It’s a testing area… You’ve got this super top-secret, super secure facility that, again, would be ideal to have and to house some new technology, emerging technology that we want to fully master for ourselves and quite frankly control. Because again, as you look at that next generation of warfare, it’s not just tanks and planes. It’s drones. It’s unmanned aircraft. It’s economic. There’s a lot that’s about to happen as we go forward as a superpower and our competitive edge on the global stage.”

Later in the interview, Jay Anderson brings up Congressman Burchett’s positive impression of David Grusch’s testimony during classified briefings. Rep. Ogles says that credible sources have vouched for Grusch’s reliability. He suggests believing what Grusch said, thinking about it carefully, and not trying to say it is wrong without some good proof. Ogles says it is important to keep an open mind, focus on getting answers, and not to try finding faults without good reasons.

Rep. Ogles explains that it does not require unanimous congressional support but rather the speaker’s will to initiate action. He emphasizes the bipartisan interest in addressing the issue and expresses the need for a select committee to ensure transparency and accountability in the investigation. He, along with Congressman Burchett, acknowledges the likelihood of a multi-decade cover-up or compartmentalization due to the secretive nature of special access programs (SAPs) and classified information related to national security.

When asked about evidence suggesting reverse engineering or more exotic propositions, Rep. Ogles mentions the classification of such information and the need for careful consideration. He discusses questions about the origin of technology, whether it is our own creation or recovered from elsewhere, and the potential for reverse engineering.

Read also:

• Ex-US Marine Saw Massive UFO Being Loaded With Weapons By Secret Military In Indonesia Jungle
• US Congressmen Claim Bible Has ‘Pretty Clear’ Evidence of UFOs: Vatican Knows Aliens Are Here

Stephen Bassett, the only registered lobbyist of Washington and founder of Paradigm Research Group, shares the same UFO disclosure concerns that will pose serious implications for the world’s economy.

The PRG researchers claim they have known the reasons why the US authorities were hiding information about UFOs. According to them, disclosing UFO data would lead to the collapse of the entire world economy. Bassett added that all so-called “flying saucers” do not use oil, gasoline, gas, or coal. “They have a different energy system. Without a doubt, a much more complex and deep system based on anti-gravity,” he said.

“Some programs have been removed from the jurisdiction of the White House and Congress and are working somewhere very, very deep, in a ‘hidden mode,'” the researcher emphasized. “I assure you, when the head of state finally officially admits this fact and presents evidence, people will start to worry and want to know more.” But even if the economy stops developing in the current way, it will have new opportunities, Bassett believes.

During an interview with uInterview, he said that UFOs are not unidentified flying objects, as the acronym suggests, but rather alternative energy and propulsion devices. The technology behind UFOs was heavily studied by a team headed by Dr. Vannevar Bush in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, and by 1954, they had developed what is known as “gravity control” and “zero-point energy.”

[Editor’s note] In January 2015, former NASA astronaut Edgar Mitchell sent an email to Podesta, asking him to have an urgent meeting to discuss Disclosure and Zero Point Energy (ZPE). He was concerned about the peace in space. Mitchell wrote: “My Catholic colleague Terri Mansfield will be there too, to bring us up to date on the Vatican’s awareness of ETI. Another colleague is working on a new Space Treaty, citing involvement with Russia and China. However, with Russia’s extreme interference in Ukraine, I believe we must pursue another route for peace in space and ZPE on Earth.” (Click here to read the full article)

However, Dr. Greer stated that the secrecy surrounding this technology went off the rails and became deeply entrenched in compartmented intelligence operations, even causing President Eisenhower to become frustrated with being denied information on the projects.

“The problem became to be, and this is what President Eisenhower warned us about, the secrecy became so enmeshed and compartmented in intelligence operations, that even he as president lost control over it,” Dr. Greer said.

He further stated: “One of our military witnesses, he was a young man working at the White House – which I’m looking at from my place here in Washington, he told us, Mr. Lubkin, who is an attorney, said that Eisenhower was very frustrated that he was being denied information on the projects controlling this issue. So the secrecy went off the rails into these unacknowledged special access projects.”

The disclosure of UFOs would mean the end of oil, gas, coal, and public utilities, as the technology would completely transform the world. Those with trillions of dollars invested in these industries would not be enthused about this possibility. This is the reason for the secrecy, and it has been maintained for 70 years, according to Dr. Greer.

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

11-11-2024 om 21:15 geschreven door peter  

Russian Influence Operations in the United States: A Historical Perspective and Potential Impact on the UAP Disclosure Movement

Jeremy McGowan

The history of Russian influence operations targeting the United States is as long and complex as the Cold War itself. From the disinformation campaigns of the Soviet Union to the sophisticated hybrid warfare strategies employed by modern-day Russia, the objective has always been the same: to weaken the United States by sowing discord, mistrust, and division within its society. As the UAP disclosure movement gains momentum, there is a growing concern, never spoken out loud, that some prominent voices within the movement could be unwittingly aiding Russian objectives by amplifying narratives that challenge the U.S. government and its security apparatus.

A Historical Overview of Russian Influence Operations

The Soviet Era: Cold War Disinformation Campaigns

During the Cold War, the Soviet Union engaged in a broad array of disinformation campaigns known as “active measures.” These operations sought to exploit the social, political, and racial divisions within the United States to undermine confidence in American institutions and foster civil unrest. One prominent example is Operation INFEKTION, a campaign initiated by the KGB in the 1980s, which spread the false narrative that the U.S. government had created the HIV/AIDS virus as a biological weapon. This operation was executed through a complex network of media outlets, front organizations, and sympathetic journalists who disseminated the disinformation to both domestic and international audiences.

By carefully planting these narratives in credible media sources, the Soviet Union was able to manipulate public perception and create a cloud of suspicion around U.S. intentions. The long-term goal was not just to tarnish the image of the U.S. but to sow seeds of distrust that could be harvested in times of crisis. Is it possible that a similar strategy is being employed today by subtly influencing narratives around the UAP issue, framing the U.S. government as an untrustworthy entity that conceals critical information from its citizens, thus undermining public trust.

Post-Soviet Tactics: Adaptation and Expansion in the Digital Age

With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia inherited not only the remnants of its predecessor’s intelligence apparatus but also a wealth of experience in psychological operations. In the 1990s and 2000s, Russia began to adapt these methods to the digital age. This adaptation was evident during the conflict in Chechnya, where Russian operatives used media manipulation and information warfare to control narratives and justify military actions.

The 2016 U.S. presidential election serves as a modern-day case study in Russian influence operations. The Kremlin employed a sophisticated mix of hacking, leaking, and social media manipulation to polarize the American electorate. The Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian troll farm, was instrumental in spreading disinformation and inflammatory content through thousands of social media accounts posing as American citizens. The campaign sought to deepen existing divisions, foster distrust in the electoral process, and amplify extreme viewpoints.

Is it now possible that Russian operatives are employing similar tactics by using social media platforms and fringe media outlets to amplify claims made by UAP advocates? Are they creating and promoting content that exaggerates the secrecy surrounding UAPs, positioning the U.S. government as an opaque and oppressive entity that is actively hiding the truth from its people. By using bots and troll accounts, are they flooding social media with these narratives, creating an illusion of widespread public support and pressuring the government to respond in ways that could be strategically advantageous to Russia?

Modern-Day Hybrid Warfare: Exploiting New Media and Public Figures

Today, Russia’s strategy has evolved into what is often referred to as “hybrid warfare,” which involves a combination of conventional military power, cyber operations, and psychological influence campaigns. This multi-faceted approach allows Russia to exploit a range of vulnerabilities across different domains. The use of social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, coupled with the exploitation of fringe media outlets and influential public figures, has allowed Russian operatives to reach and influence millions of Americans directly.

Are Russian influence operations now targeting key figures in the UAP disclosure movement by feeding them information through seemingly credible but ultimately deceptive sources. Is it likely that operatives are creating fake whistleblowers or fabricating leaked documents that appear to confirm government cover-ups. They’ve done similar in the past and if so, these could be fed to trusted intermediaries who then pass them on to UAP advocates like Luis Elizondo or Christopher Mellon, who would amplify these narratives, believing them to be legitimate. This process could effectively weaponize their credibility and influence, making them unwitting agents of disinformation.

The UAP Disclosure Movement: A Potential Target for Manipulation

The UAP disclosure movement, driven by individuals such as Luis Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, Garry Nolan, Hal Puthoff, Eric Davis, Timothy Gallaudet, Jay Stratton, and Karl Nell, and a host of others, collectively seeks greater transparency from the U.S. government regarding its knowledge and research into unidentified aerial phenomena. While their intentions may be rooted in a genuine desire for government accountability and public awareness, they are not immune to the sophisticated manipulation techniques perfected by Russian intelligence.

Undermining Trust in Government and National Security Institutions

One of the central narratives of the UAP disclosure movement is that the U.S. government is withholding critical information from the public. This narrative, while appealing to those seeking transparency, can be strategically exploited to undermine trust in national security institutions. If the movement’s leaders are unwittingly provided with exaggerated or fabricated evidence of government cover-ups, they could, in good faith, present this information to the public. This would create a feedback loop of distrust and paranoia, making it more difficult for government agencies to maintain public confidence in their activities.

For instance, the Russian GRU (Main Intelligence Directorate) could, in fact, be planting a false narrative that Lockheed Martin with help from DARPA has been conducting off-books operations without Congressional oversight to reverse-engineer alien technology. This information, disseminated through fake leaks and false experts, could be passed on to UAP advocates, who would then promote it as another example of government deception. The resulting public outcry could force the government to release sensitive information prematurely, potentially compromising national security operations.

Exacerbating Public Distrust and Division

While promoting the idea that the U.S. government is actively deceiving its citizens, the UAP disclosure movement could unintentionally contribute to the broader societal distrust that Russia seeks to exploit. In a society already polarized along political, social, and economic lines, adding a layer of mistrust regarding the government’s handling of UAPs could be a powerful destabilizing force.

Imagine a scenario where Russian operatives manage to infiltrate online UAP communities and spread rumors that the U.S. government is not only hiding information but actively suppressing witnesses and whistleblowers. This narrative, combined with existing concerns over governmental transparency, could push a segment of the population to adopt an increasingly anti-government stance.

The Risk of Co-opted Narratives and Strategic Deception

There is also the potential for co-opted narratives, where genuine concerns about transparency and accountability are twisted into disinformation campaigns that serve Russian interests. Applying this to the UAP disclosure movement, this could involve the strategic release of disinformation that aligns with the movement’s goals but ultimately serves to distract or mislead the public and policymakers.

For example, Russia may be exploiting the desire for transparency by creating fake rumors that claim collusion between U.S. government officials and private defense contractors to conceal UAP technology. If UAP advocates unknowingly amplify these false rumors, they could inadvertently create a smokescreen that diverts attention from more pressing national security threats, such as foreign espionage or cyberattacks. This strategy of strategic deception could hinder the government’s ability to respond effectively to genuine threats, thereby benefiting adversarial actors.

Vigilance and Awareness in the Pursuit of Truth

The UAP disclosure movement, driven by prominent figures with backgrounds in government and defense, has sparked significant public interest and debate. While the movement’s leaders likely have noble intentions, it is important to consider alternatives to their actions and to remain vigilant against the possibility of their efforts being co-opted or manipulated by foreign actors, including Russia.

Understanding the historical context of Russian influence operations in the United States drives home our need for caution. The UAP movement must ensure that its quest for transparency does not inadvertently contribute to narratives that could undermine national security or public trust in government institutions.

{ https://medium.com/ }

11-11-2024 om 20:52 geschreven door peter  

Witnesses Announced for Landmark UFO Congressional Hearing

Written by Christopher Sharp  

The names of four witnesses set to testify at next week's Congressional hearing on government transparency and reports of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) have been confirmed.

In a press release, the House Oversight Committee named the witnesses scheduled to appear before its two subcommittees: Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation; and National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs as:

• Tim Gallaudet
  Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy (RET.)
  Chief Executive Officer, Ocean STL Consulting, LLC

• Luis Elizondo
  Author, and Former Department of Defense Official

• Michael Gold
  Chief Growth Officer, Redwire Corporation, and Former National Aeronautics and Space Administration Associate Administrator

• Michael Shellenberger
  Founder of Public

In a joint statement today, Republican Representatives Nancy Mace and Glenn Grothman, who chair the two committees, expressed hope that the witnesses testifying on 13 November 2024 will provide valuable insights and help bring greater accountability to the UAP issue.

The statement read:

“This is our second hearing on the topic of UAPs and the American people are tired of the obfuscation and refusal to release information by the federal government.

“Americans deserve to understand what the government has learned about UAP sightings, and the nature of any potential threats these phenomena pose.

“We can only ensure that understanding by providing consistent, systemic transparency. We look forward to hearing from expert witnesses on ways to shed more light and bring greater accountability to this issue.”

The hearing is expected to cover a range of topics, from submerged UAP sightings reported by submariners to alleged legacy programs focused on retrieving and reverse-engineering advanced non-human materials and craft. 

Journalist Michael Shellenberger's presence suggests that the hearing will also address his recent story about an alleged Unacknowledged Special Access Program run out of the Secretary of Defense’s Office, known as IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION. It was reportedly established to detect and quarantine the military’s most compelling UAP imagery, videos, eyewitness accounts, and electronic sensor evidence.

However, the Department of Defense (DoD) has denied the existence of the alleged program, with spokesperson Susan Gough telling Liberation Times:

“The Department of Defense has no record, present or historical, of any type of SAP called ‘IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION.’”

Liberation Times followed up with the DoD, asking whether it had at any time in the past or present, operated any programs that utilised the codeword ‘IMMACULATE’ or any variation thereof.

In response, Susan Gough stated:

“The department has no record of any use of the word ‘IMMACULATE’ for any DoD Special Access Program or Alternative Compensatory Control Measure.”

Distinguished oceanographer Gallaudet has previously recounted accounts from submariners who encountered unidentified submerged objects, also characterised as UAP, which are transmedium devices or objects capable of moving through water, air and space. 

According to Gallaudet, one 1980s incident involved a U.S. submarine that detected an unidentified, fast-approaching object mistaken for a Russian torpedo, which then slowed, circled, and trailed the vessel before quickly departing. Gallaudet noted that this object’s behaviour and characteristics couldn’t be explained by current or past technology.

The presence of Luis Elizondo, former Director of the U.S. government's previous UAP program, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), will provide him with an opportunity to discuss the threats he has faced since leaving government service and publicly sharing his experiences of UAP interfering with sensitive U.S. defense assets.

Speaking to Liberation Times, Elizondo stated:

“The time has come for our elected officials to be informed of the reality regarding the UAP issue and the long-standing campaign by some in our Government to hide the truth.

“To do this, we will need everyone’s support so we can clear a path for more whistleblowers to feel safe and come forward with what they know. Whether you agree with my position or not, I consider the 13th of November to be YOUR day! I want to also thank the members of Congress for their courage and tenacity, and my fellow witnesses who will be testifying under oath.”

A new name for those following the UAP topic is Michael Gold, a member of NASA's independent study team on UAP. Gold was NASA’s Associate Administrator for Space Policy and Partnerships between 2019 and 2021. Of note, between 2003 and 2016, he was Bigelow Aerospace LLC’s Director of D.C. Operations & Business Growth. 

Gold’s former boss, Robert Bigelow, played a key role in efforts to transfer materials of advanced, non-human origin from Lockheed Martin to a program within the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) known as the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP). 

When efforts failed, those involved in AAWSAP helped establish a Prospective Special Access Program (PSAP) within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as an alternative means to accomplish the transfer. That effort also failed.

Speaking to Liberation Times, multiple sources claimed that these material transfer efforts were blocked by former CIA Director of Science and Technology, Glenn Gaffney, when he held the position.

Gaffney’s alleged interference in the material transfer left those involved—including the now-deceased James Ryder, former Vice President of Lockheed Martin Space Systems, who is said to have led efforts within Lockheed Martin—feeling threatened due to the harshness of exchanges with CIA officials. 

Ultimately, Liberation Times understands that the transfer was blocked by Gaffney, as the CIA’s Directorate of Technology remains the original custodian of the alleged non-human materials, which Lockheed Martin may still possess to this day.

At next week’s hearing, insiders hope that witnesses are pressed on Gaffney’s alleged involvement as a UAP legacy program gatekeeper. 

Liberation Times understands that next week’s hearing is expected to be the first of many on the UAP topic in the House of Representatives, with the aim of establishing a process similar to the Church Committee, which investigated Intelligence Community abuses in the 1970s.

{ https://www.liberationtimes.com/ }

11-11-2024 om 20:27 geschreven door peter  

• READ MORE: Pentagon UFO chief confirms 'alien tech' crash retrieval program

By MATTHEW PHELAN SENIOR SCIENCE REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Scores of new witnesses have emerged with more footage of the eerie 'drone' UFO swarms buzzing key US military sites, including 'a big fireball in a cube' over Area 51.

The Las Vegas-area witness who reported this bizarre cube-shaped object claims to have observed similar strange aerial lights in the area 'over 100 times' since June 2020, adding that these craft 'always seem to head towards Nellis Air Force base.'

Nevada's Nellis base and its sprawling complex about 40 miles northwest of Vegas — including top secret Area 51, now legendary within UFO lore — appear to have faced incursions by craft similar to those that plagued the Air Force in Virginia. 

For at least 17 nights last December, swarms of noisy small UFOs were seen 'moving at rapid speeds' and displaying 'flashing red, green, and white lights' within the highly restricted airspace over Virginia's Joint Base Langley–Eustis.

Vegas natives have posted videos confirming they too have seen more than one red, green or white UFO that 'wasn't flashing like a regular aircraft [or] like a satellite.'

Another witness, who documented one September 4, 2024 case from their own 60-night experience with the odd lights, hoped coming forward might help get answers.

'I live approximately 7 miles from Nellis,' they said. 'Past two months, every single night, I've seen numerous different things going on. Just wondering what it all is.'

General Glen VanHerck of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), has pled with the US Secretary of Defense to authorize a full battery of electronic eavesdropping tools to get to the bottom of the Langley swarm and others like it.

One Las Vegas witness, who documented their own months-long experience with the odd lights near Area 51 on Sept. 4, 2024, hoped coming forward might end their own confusion: 'Just wondering what it all is.' Above, a still from that witness's video, dubbed Enigma #298748

'I lived under a commercial flight pattern near the airport, so I'm very familiar with what airplanes and conventional aircraft look and behave like,' one observer to a September 13, 2022 case (above) stated. 'This was not conventional,' they said of the 'very bright light'

The general, who led the mission to takedown the infamous Chinese spy balloon in February 2023, described Langley's 'drone swarm' wave as unlike any other reported.

And speaking to the Senate Armed Services Committee this past March, General VanHerck's successor as the head of NORAD, Air Force General Gregory Guillot, told lawmakers that still more baffling UFO cases over US bases continue to mount.

'I wasn't prepared for the number of incursions that I see,' General Guillot confessed.

While the new witnesses to the UFO sightings near Nellis were all civilians — working with consumer phone cameras and not the military-grade radar, infrared and NASA imaging tech deployed at Langley — their reports echo the Air Force's own.

'They were flashing weirdly not [like] the normal navigation lights,' one witness reported in their submission to a UFO-spotting app run by start-up Enigma Labs. 

The UFOs during this April 16, 2024 encounter, they said, 'were red in color' and 'traveling very close together.'

Another witness, who documented a November 21, 2023 event, stated that they saw an object that looked deceptively monochromatic until they re-examined the video.

'If you zoom into the actual recording various times, you'll see that it's a round shape and it's spinning and it's multicolored, not just green,' as they described it to Enigma.

Both Vegas witnesses said their sightings appeared to be near Nellis Air Force Base.

General Glen VanHerck (above), the commander of the US Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) from August 2020 to February 2024, said: 'If there are unknown objects within North America [we need to] go out and identify them'

For at least 17 nights in December 2023, swarms of small 'drones' were seen penetrating the highly restricted airspace above Langley Air Force Base in Virginia. Above, a photo taken by an eyewitness of one (or more) of these drones as provided to the Wall Street Journal and others

Above, two USAF F-22 Raptors fly over Joint Base Langley-Eustis in Virginia on June 14, 2018

The repeated appearance of terms like 'drones,' 'unmanned aerial vehicles' (UAV) and 'unmanned aerial systems' (UAS) in the Pentagon's own official reports on these unexplained cases has pointed many observers toward terrestrial explanations.

'Typically sightings near bases such as Nellis and Area 51 where there are a lot of experimental aircraft being tested are assumed to be advanced technology under development,' Enigma Labs consultant Alejandro Rojas told DailyMail.com.

'However, given the admission that UAV are flying in secured airspace over other Air Force bases,' he noted, 'we need to take a closer look at these.' 

Rojas, a seasoned UFO expert and cofounder of the nonprofit , told DailyMail.com that Enigma has received 'a lot of reports near Nellis Air Force Base.'

'Civilian reports and videos of potential incursions by unknown objects from the public are essential,' he added. 'The Pentagon is scratching its head over these.'

'Most cases we receive include videos, along with descriptions of how they move, what they look like, and the directions they come from and are headed to.' 

Although many wished to remain anonymous, several of Enigma's witnesses offered details that spoke to their own credibility, as well as to their efforts to find more prosaic explanations for the odd airborne phenomena that had left them stumped.

'I lived under a commercial flight pattern near the airport, so I'm very familiar with what airplanes and conventional aircraft look and behave like,' one Vegas-based observer to a September 13, 2022 case stated. 

'This was not conventional,' they said of the 'very bright light' they witnessed 'for at least 20 minutes' in the wee hours of the morning, around 4:45am Pacific time.   

Above, one still from Enigma #298748, a case documented on September 4, 2024. 'I live approximately 7 miles from Nellis,' the witness said. 'Past two months, every single night, I've seen numerous different things going on. Just wondering what it all is'

Above, a second still from Enigma #298748, documented on September 4, 2024

'The light was extremely bright, yellowish orange,' they noted. 'It was pulsing and it remain[ed] stationary [...] it seemed to be situated near Nellis Air Force Base.' 

'It was strange,' the witness continued. 'I also checked to make sure it wasn't a star or a planet or any atmospheric phenomenon. Two days later at the exact same time I saw the same object in the same airspace.'

Yet another witness also had repeat sightings around their own December 15, 2023 green light UFO, which made 'erratic movements' before 'just stopping in midair.'  

Only one of these half a dozen or so Vegas-area witnesses reached for otherworldly notions to explain what they saw: the witness to the 'big fireball in a cube' who taped a seemingly distant and very different amber-orange UFO, the night of May 6, 2024.

'They always seem to head towards Nellis [AFB],' the witness wrote. 'I don't believe they are man-made, probably in cahoots with the Air Force.' 

'I feel they are trying to communicate with me,' the woman continued in her report.

Only one these half a dozen or so of these Las Vegas-area witnesses reached for an otherworldly explanation to explain what they saw: the witness to the 'big fireball in a cube' who taped a different amber-orange UFO on video (above) the night of May 6, 2024

Nevada State Route 375 near Area 51 was named 'the Extraterrestrial Highway' in 1996 by the Nevada Commission on Tourism hoping to drawing tourists to this remote part of the state

'They zoom up and down sometimes [...] back and forth sometimes. They're very playful, and they always know where I am,' she added. 

Late last month, the deputy test director for US Northern Command (NORTHCOM) Jason Mayes, explained some of the policy hurdles facing America's domestic defense against any enemy drones encroaching upon sensitive US airspace. 

Mayes, commenting during the counter-drone experiment 'Falcon Peak 2025' at Peterson Space Force Base in Colorado, spoke to both legal and civilian safety issues that have plagued defensive measures to combat UAVs on US soil.

The entire phalanx of potential anti-drone tech available for US bases abroad — including surface-to-air interceptors, gun systems, lasers and high-power microwave weapons — are all currently 'off limits' for bases like Langley and Nellis.

'They're not appropriate for the homeland,' Mayes told reporters with The War Zone. 

More troubling still, even less drastic techniques like signal-jamming have proven tricky for domestic use, over understandable concerns about where a jammed UAV might crash or what other civilian systems nearby might fail due to 'friendly fire' from that jamming. 

'Given the impact of GPS denial, just across infrastructure and all that stuff,' Mayes noted, 'it is a very, very difficult capability to get permissions to utilize.' 

Above, the Area 51 Center in Nye, NV

Out of any of these methods, Mayes noted that blasting drones out of the sky with a focused laser might prove to be the method that meets with policymaker's blessing soonest. 

'I think that we could get to a point where we have approval for that here in the homeland,' Mayes told reporters.

'The biggest thing right now is the impact of the laser when it moves beyond its target. You know, how far is it going? What's that going to do? How long does the laser need to remain on target before it begins to inflict damage and so on, right?'

NORTHCOM's tests, of course, presume the solution to these events are all likely to be earthbound tech — or technology at all — an open question for many observers.

'These incursions highlight the need for a process to identify the objects and get data to the right people, whether that be foreign materials analysis groups inside the military [or] law enforcement,' Rojas told DailyMail.com. 

But: 'With more mysterious situations, like any determined to be dealing with material not made on this planet,' the longtime UFO researcher noted that 'getting that data to scientists who can transparently analyze the cases' will be paramount.

'This last group is the exciting stuff,' Rojas said. 'These are the cases where we will discover something new.' 

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

11-11-2024 om 18:48 geschreven door peter  

America's top city for UFO sightings revealed - and the exact time of day you should watch the skies

By LAUREN ACTON-TAYLOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

If you are hoping to spot a UFO zipping across the evening sky, there is one major US city where your chances are highest, new research has revealed.

Phoenix, Arizona, has been ranked as America's supernatural hotspot, with a whopping 323 sightings in the last decade, according data from the National UFO Reporting Center compiled by BetUS. 

New York City came in second place with 313 reported incidents and Nevada, which is home to the infamous Area 51,  came in third with 309 alleged sightings.

While the data only goes as far back as 2013, Phoenix has long been a hotbed of paranormal activity - with its biggest UFO event occurring on March 13, 1997.

The city has earned the number one spot with a whopping 323 sightings in the last decade alone

Phoenix has long been a hotbed of paranormal activity - with its most major, and widespread, account of UFO sightings happening on March 13, 1997

On this date, hundreds of people reported seeing 'The Phoenix Lights'.  

The sightings were so widespread that even a 12-year-old Meghan McCain claiming she saw them - with what she witnessed that night leaving a mark.

After her mom allowed her 'to go out to the yard to take a look', McCain told the DailyMail.com that she saw 'giant, bright objects floating in a straight line in the distance'.

'Even today, it is hard to explain, and there are varying descriptions of what happened over Phoenix between approximately 7:30 pm and 10:30 pm,' she added.

Years later in 2016, locals in Gilbert, just southeast of Phoenix, claimed they had seen a strange set of three lights moving north to south in the East Valley area.

One resident, Todd, shared footage to his X account, writing in the caption: 'Did anybody else just see a UFO!?' 

Even more eerily, in 2019, a live-stream just outside Phoenix captured a purple beam of light bursting through the foreground, and multiple alleged UFOs were caught zipping through the night sky.

In 2019, a live-stream just outside Phoenix captured a purple beam of light burst through the foreground, and multiple UFOs were caught zipping through the night sky

Around 65 percent of Americans believe that intelligent life exists on other planets, according to Pew Research Center. 

The recent BetUS data showed that some of the other top scoring cities for UFO sightings are in close proximity to notorious locations known for suspected alien activity, such as Area 51 or Roswell, New Mexico. 

Roswell had been dubbed the 'UFO capital of the world' and was believed to be near the site of an alleged alien spaceship crash in 1947 known as the 'Roswell Incident'. 

In the same year, the National UFO Reporting Center was founded and it has processed more than 180,000 reports. 

In 2016, locals in Gilbert, just southeast of Phoenix, claimed to see a strange set of three lights moving north to south in the East Valley area

The city is home to the International UFO Museum and Research Center, which has been open for nearly 30 years and hosts an annual UFO Festival. 

Area 51 in Nevada, meanwhile, is one of the most notorious spots for alien conspiracy theories. The site became forever associated with aliens after an interview in 1989. 

Former government physicist, Robert Lazar, told a Las Vegas news station that the site housed and studied alien spacecraft. He has said it was his job to to recreate the technology for military use, according to National Geographic.    

Other top cities for UFO sightings include Portland, Oregon, in fourth place with 279 reports, and Tuscon, Arizona, ranked fifth with 244 . 

Roswell was dubbed the 'UFO capital of the world' following an alleged spaceship crash in 1947 known as the 'Roswell Incident'. Above, a sign directing Roswell, New Mexico visitors to the start of a '1947 UFO Crash Site Tour' circa 1997

Arizona Man gets excited filming 'UFO' sighting in Arizona

A man takes a selfie with his son in front of a sign at the Alien Research Center in Hiko, Nevada on September 21, 2019

Many cities listed were notably large, with more potential eyes looking at the sky and therefore a higher likelihood of a potential sighting. 

On the West Coast, six California cities featured on the list of 200 - with the state's highest ranking held by Los Angeles which came in seventh place with 222 sightings. 

According to the BetUS, July is best time of year to spot a UFO in New York, Ohio, Colorado and Oregon - with the most common time between 9pm and 10pm. 

For states such as California and Arizona, November is reportedly the best month to watch the skies. 

In 2019, potential evidence of alien life was announced by an Oxford research project, Breakthrough Listen, with hints that the proof would eventually be released to the public. 

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

11-11-2024 om 18:22 geschreven door peter  

Four Chilling UFO Encounters That Changed History

For as long as humans have gazed up at the stars, questions about extraterrestrial life have captured the human imagination. While most UFO sightings have been easily explained, a few remain unexplained and have sparked curiosity, debate, and wonder. This article dives into four landmark UFO sightings—the Roswell crash, the Battle of Los Angeles, the Rendlesham Forest incident, and the Marfa Lights—that continue to challenge our understanding of the universe. These iconic encounters, filled with gripping eyewitness accounts and intriguing expert analyses, have inspired countless theories about the mysteries that may lie beyond our world.

The Roswell Crash: The “Cosmic Watergate”

The Roswell Incident of 1947 remains one of the most famous UFO cases in history. When an unknown object crashed on a ranch near Roswell, New Mexico, the U.S. military initially reported it as a “flying disc.” However, this statement was quickly retracted, with officials claiming the debris was from a weather balloon. This reversal only fueled public suspicion, leading many to believe that the government was hiding evidence of extraterrestrial life. Witnesses reported strange materials at the crash site, including what they described as “memory metal” that would return to its original shape. Over the years, Roswell has become synonymous with UFO lore, spawning countless theories about what actually crashed in the desert and whether it was truly extraterrestrial in nature.

The Battle of Los Angeles: An Unsolved WWII Mystery

In the early hours of February 25, 1942, less than three months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the city of Los Angeles was gripped with fear. An unidentified object appeared on military radar, sparking an intense anti-aircraft barrage that lit up the night sky. Thousands of rounds were fired at the mysterious object, which remained undamaged and eventually disappeared without a trace. The official explanation later suggested the object was a weather balloon, but the public was not convinced. Some witnesses described a large oval shape caught in the crossfire, a detail that continues to fuel theories of an extraterrestrial encounter. The Battle of Los Angeles remains one of the most intense and well-documented UFO sightings, and its mystery continues to resonate with historians and UFO enthusiasts alike.

The Rendlesham Forest Incident: Britain’s Roswell

Known as “Britain’s Roswell,” the Rendlesham Forest incident took place over several nights in December 1980 near RAF Woodbridge in Suffolk, England. Military personnel reported seeing strange lights in the forest, and some claimed to have encountered a triangular craft emitting beams of light. Deputy Base Commander Colonel Charles Halt recorded his observations on an audio device, describing the eerie red and blue lights in detail. Radiation was reportedly detected at the landing site, and broken tree branches suggested something had indeed descended through the forest canopy. While some skeptics attribute the lights to a nearby lighthouse, many witnesses, including Colonel Halt, insist that what they saw was not a lighthouse but a structured craft of unknown origin. This high-profile case has led to extensive investigations and remains a prominent event in British UFO history.

The Marfa Lights: An Enigmatic Light Show in the Texas Desert

For over a century, mysterious lights have appeared in the desert near Marfa, Texas. Known as the Marfa Lights, these orbs have mystified locals and scientists alike. Witnesses describe seeing colorful lights that move against the wind, change direction, and sometimes vanish suddenly. While some scientists speculate that the lights may be caused by atmospheric conditions or natural gases, no theory has fully explained this phenomenon. Reports of the Marfa Lights date back to the late 1800s, before modern technology or vehicles could have been responsible. The lights have become a popular tourist attraction, drawing thousands of visitors each year to watch the glowing orbs dance across the dark Texas sky. The Marfa Lights continue to puzzle scientists and remain one of the most enduring mysteries in UFO lore.

VIDEO:

• The Most Chilling UFO Encounters Ever Documented!

• https://youtu.be/7tZgvrUPrRg

Each of these four iconic UFO encounters has captivated the public’s imagination, challenging what we know—or think we know—about the universe. The Roswell crash, the Battle of Los Angeles, the Rendlesham Forest incident, and the Marfa Lights each provide compelling evidence that there may be more to the UFO phenomenon than meets the eye. Whether these incidents are proof of extraterrestrial visitors or natural phenomena beyond our current scientific understanding, they continue to inspire questions about the mysteries of the cosmos. With new advancements in science and technology, perhaps one day we will finally uncover the truth behind these chilling encounters. Until then, these events remain a reminder of the boundless mysteries that lie in the unexplored realms of space and in our own understanding of reality.

VIDEOS

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

11-11-2024 om 17:18 geschreven door peter  

(Credit: USAF)

Now, additional confirmation of the incident has been obtained by Abbas Michael Dharamsey through documents he obtained through a FOIA request, copies of which were subsequently made available by researcher John Greenewald at his website, The Black Vault.

Although most of the information in the documents is redacted, a declassified summary of the incident is provided, along with a sketch depicting the appearance of one of the UAPs the pilot encountered.

Sketch of “UAP-1” as described by the unnamed USAF pilot during the 2023 UAP incident over the Gulf of Mexico (Credit: USAF via FOIA/A.M. Dharamsey/The Black Vault).

According to the declassified summary, the United States Air Force pilot successfully obtained a radar lock on four unidentified objects and subsequently obtained a screen capture of one of the UAPs, the only one with which visual contact was made.

The declassified summary, as well as the sketch provided to Dharamsey in the FOIA release, both depict an object resembling a NASA Apollo-era space capsule, which possessed a rounded, reddish orange illuminated bottom portion, while the upper section was described as “a three-dimensional cone shape” which featured what resembled “gunmetal gray segmented panels.”

The object, referred to as “UAP-1” in the summary, was observed operating at an altitude of around 16,000 feet, while two of the other objects detected solely on radar were observed at 17,000 and 18,000 feet above ground level. The fourth object was reportedly lost from radar, making any estimates of its altitude impossible for the pilot to obtain.

Although the above data on altitude was obtained, the summary states that no airspeeds were noted for the unidentified objects, although they did not outpace the pilot, who was able to close to within 4,000 feet of UAP-1, at which time the aircraft’s radar began to malfunction and remained disabled.

“Post-mission investigation revealed that a circuit breaker had triggered,” the brief declassified summary concludes, “but that maintenance technicians were unable to conclusively diagnose the fault.”

Sometime after the events described in the summary, Gaetz was reportedly shown the image obtained by the pilot during a visit to Eglin Air Force Base.

“Several months ago, my office received a protected disclosure from Eglin Air Force Base indicating there was a UAP incident that required my attention,” Gaetz later wrote in a post on X. Gaetz said that after learning of the incident, he requested a briefing on the situation and traveled to Eglin, accompanied during the visit by Reps. Tim Burchett (R-TN) and Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL).

Rep. Matt Gaetz speaks during last July’s UAP hearing

(Credit: Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs).

“We were initially denied access to images, radar, and conversation with all members of the flight crew,” Gaetz said. However, Gaetz was eventually allowed to review the photograph obtained by the pilot involved in the UAP encounter.

Gaetz said that he was the only one who was shown the UAP image at the time and that he had an opportunity to speak with the pilot, who told him the objects were observed on radar “flying in a diamond formation.”

“The image was of a UAP that I am not able to attach to any human capability, from the United States or from any of our adversaries,” Gaetz said of the image he was shown.

Describing the incident during a hearing held by the Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs last July, Gaetz also said he had observed a radar sequence obtained by personnel at Eglin during the incident that further corroborated the sighting.

Despite the object’s superficial resemblance to an “Apollo spacecraft,” the description of the incident provided in the newly released FOIA documents appears to describe four objects flying in formation, three of which were detected on radar and maintained altitudes close to 16,000, 17,000, and 18,000 feet respectively, and for a duration long enough that imagery of the nearest object, UAP-1, was obtained. Such circumstances would appear to rule out any conventional object resembling a known spacecraft during reentry, for which details would likely have been easily accessible.

In a posting on X, writer Mick West surmised that “it’s impossible to rule out that it was just a balloon (or four balloons).”

“It might also be an alien spaceship, but I’d put “balloon” at #1 with the current data,” West added.

Apart from balloons, reentry capsules, or alien spacecraft, another object that the pilot’s sketches of “UAP-1” bears a passing resemblance to was described by three witnesses decades ago during a harrowing encounter near Dayton, Texas in 1980.

On the evening of December 29 of that year, 51-year-old Betty Cash was driving home from dinner with her friend Vickie Landrum, 57, and Landrum’s seven-year-old grandson Colby when they observed a bright light in the distance. As the trio approached the stretch of the roadway where the light appeared to be hovering, what they initially mistook for a plane on approach for landing in Houston was revealed to be something else entirely.

A description of the object later offered by UFO chronicler Jerome Clark based on accounts provided by the witnesses described it as “intensely bright and a dull metallic silver … shaped like a huge upright diamond, about the size of the Dayton water tower,” with flames being emitted from the bottom of the object “flaring outward to create the effect of a large cone.”

{ https://thedebrief.org/category/uap/ }

10-11-2024 om 21:58 geschreven door peter  

10 Most Shocking Reveals From Netflix's Investigation Alien Documentary

Knapp is not altogether successful in his endeavor, despite his Peabody and Edward R. Murrow awards for his journalism, a lengthy stint as a TV newsman, and a clear enthusiasm for his thesis. Incontrovertible proof of alien habitation on Earth proves difficult for Knapp to come by, despite there being a wealth of UFO sightings and witnesses eager to share their stories. By the end of Investigation Alien, the audience is left with a collection of intriguing but unproven theories that still require a leap of faith. Here are 10 reveals from the film that Knapp suggests should change minds.

10. Animal Experimentation

Knapp's first port of call is a pair of Oregon ranchers, who have mysteriously lost cattle. Colby Marshall, from Burns, relates how five range bulls on his property were mutilated overnight, their blood siphoned and their genitals, lips, ears, and internal organs surgically removed. Dave Ward, a fifth-generation rancher nearby, has lost 20 cattle in the last 12 months in the same way. Local law enforcement insists a group of devil-worshipers might be responsible, but Knapp has other ideas: strange objects seen in the skies overhead suggest that aliens are experimenting with the livestock's harvested organs.

9. Violence in Colares

Turning to Brazil, Knapp highlights the famous sightings in 1977 in Colares, on the Amazon River, when locals were attacked by airborne vessels. 40 years on, Aurora Fernandes insists that she saw a rotating disc in the sky, from which sprung a red ray of light that pierced three holes in her chest. She smelled ether and described the sensation of having blood taken. Others in Icoraci were attacked in the same way between June 1977 and August 1978. Local journalist Carlos Mendez reports that CIA-like men appeared after the event and collected all the footage or records of the attacks.

8. The Jellyfish Alien

Back in Las Vegas, UFO journalist Jeremy Corbell and Knapp come across footage released by an unidentified whistleblower showing the eerie trail of an unidentified object, now known as the "Jellyfish" UFO, as it floats across a US military base in Iraq. The identity of the informant cannot be revealed as the action to leak the footage would constitute a felony. However, Knapp finds Marine veteran Michael Cincoski, who insists he watched the video while stationed on an Iraqi base in 2018. Circoski says that everyone on base was sworn to secrecy, but that the craft eventually dived into the sea.

7. Tampico And The USOs

The Jellyfish's underwater exploits open up an entirely new area of investigation for Knapp. He notes that many UFO sightings take place over or near a body of water, and ponders whether the 70% of the planet's surface being covered by water might yield a clue to their hiding place. He travels to Tampico, Mexico, where dozens of UFO encounters have been reported just off the coast. He finds that the locals attribute their lack of hurricanes to their UFO protectors, who, they believe, live under the sea. Local meteorologist, Amalia Avalos, laughs this off - it's simply the currents diverting warm water.

6. Kremer's Dot

Undeterred, Knapp enlists the help of underwater archaeologist Rory Kremer, who deep-dives the nearby Channel Islands in search of an underwater UFO headquarters, in an area a local fisherman has claimed his boat was encircled by a bright light, and pulled down, forcing him to cut the anchor. Kremer's examination of the ocean floor is inconclusive, but on one night his cameras pick up a bright dot in the sky, which zooms in and out, before plunging into the sea. Kremer and Knapp together deduce that their investigation is being observed by otherworldly beings.

5. The Arrow Report

In mid-investigation, Knapp's worldview is directly challenged by the very government agency he's seeking to persuade - the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office released its report in January 2022, in which it claimed to have thoroughly investigated 512 incidents of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), and found "no empirical evidence" of alien technology. Enraged, Knapp quotes the famous Roswell incident in 1947, when the USAF issued a press release confirming they'd found a UFO, only to retract it 24 hours later claiming, laughably, that they'd mistaken it for a weather balloon.

4. Indonesian Jungle Sighting

Knapp resolves to counter the Pentagon's report with one of his own and continues his investigation. He turns to former US marine Michael Herrera, who reels Knapp in with a story from Western Sumatra, where, in 2009, Herrera was on a humanitarian mission. There Herrera saw a 300-foot vessel hovering over the brow of a hill, lights rotating and flashing. Herrera's story, however, had a twist: he says the machine was manufactured with rivets and seams. Herrera tells Knapp that he believes the government has copied alien technology to build their very own spaceship. The footage he took, unfortunately, was stolen.

3. The Council Bluffs Incident

George Knapp then finds himself in Council Bluffs, Iowa, chasing down Mike Moore, who in December 1997 was driving with his fire chief father when they saw a red light drop out of the sky. They visited the burning crash site and Mike took away some samples of twisted metal, which he had kept in a box for 25 years. Knapp sends the metal away for analysis and finds it's composed of randomly mixed titanium, magnesium, aluminum, silicon & iron, but not from anything out of this world. Disappointed but resolute, Knapp suggests aliens would be perfectly capable of manufacturing earthly metals.

Related

2. Phoenix Lights

Knapp's most persuasive evidence isn't new. The March 13, 1997, sightings over Sky Harbor airport in Phoenix are well known, and supported by none other than actor Kurt Russell, who was at the airport that day. A multitude of witnesses saw two lights suddenly appear in the night sky, and then four more, indicating a huge, mile-wide boomerang-shaped object. So widespread were the viewings, that the government felt the need to step in to prevent a public panic, claiming that the lights were nothing but flares. Knapp interviews several witnesses, some with authentic-looking photographic evidence, who insist otherwise.

1. Alien Time-Travel

Having failed to conclusively prove his case, Knapp turns to Mike Masters, an anthropology professor at Montana Tech, to answer the "why" question. In Investigation Alien, Masters takes Knapp to the Capitol Reef National Park, Utah to show him 4000-year-old rock paintings depicting men in spacesuits, and short alien-looking creatures with pointy heads and large wrap-around eyes. Intriguingly, Masters posits that after a few more hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, humans would likely look very much like the drawn characters, and drops the bombshell in Investigation Alien that visiting aliens today have likely traveled across time to visit their ancient ancestors.

{ https://screenrant.com/ }

10-11-2024 om 18:09 geschreven door peter  

Trump pledged to reveal the 'truth' about JFK, UFOs and Jeffrey Epstein... which secret will he expose first?

• Follow DailyMail.com's presidential election live blog for all the latest news and updates

By NIC WHITE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Donald Trump promised to get busy remaking the US in his image from his first day in office after his election victory over Kamala Harris.

Many policies on his wide-reaching agenda, though radical, cover bread-and-butter issues like immigration, the economy, and education.

He vowed mass deportations for undocumented migrants and asylum-seekers, a worrying purge of the public service, and controversial tariffs on China.

But Trump also made other promises from the unconventional to the bizarre that he may or may not implement, but will certainly be talking points from day one.

Donald Trump declares victory over Kamala Harris in the 2024 election

Declassifying JFK assassination files

The assassination of President John F Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963, has fascinated the American public for decades - even after the Warren Commission ruled shooter Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.

The secrecy around the investigation and claims of other gunmen and plots by the CIA, Cuba, and the Soviets fueled persistent conspiracy theories.

In 1992, a law was brought in which declared that all the documents about the assassination should be made publicly available by 2017, by which time Trump was in the White House.

About 320,000 files were supposed to be released, but the law allowed officials to postpone some of them on privacy and national security grounds.

Trump delayed the release of some documents until 2021 for those reasons, and released another 19,045 in 2018 with redactions.

President John F Kennedy was gunned down in Dallas on November 22, 1963. This is his motorcade minutes before he was shot

The Warren Commission ruled shooter Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, but there are persistent conspiracy theories

Joe Biden again delayed the release of those files, but made about 13,000 more public over the course of his presidency so far.

But after securing the endorsement of Robert F Kennedy Jr, who is JFK's nephew, Trump promised to make all the rest public and pledged to do so 'early' in his presidency.

'This is a tribute in honor of Bobby. I will establish a new independent presidential commission on assassination attempts, and they will be tasked with releasing all of the remaining documents pertaining to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy,' he said at a rally in Phoenix in August.

RFK Jr believes the CIA was involved in his uncle's murder and wants the files made public to prove it.

Trump said the new commission would investigate all presidential assassination attempts, including his own.

He reiterated his plan to release the JFK documents on a podcast with right wing personality Lex Fridman on September 3.

'They also are pushing me on Kennedy, and I did release a lot, but I had people come to me and beg me not to do it. But I'll be doing that very early on,' he said.

'Kennedy's interesting because it's so many years ago. They do that for danger too, because it endangers certain people, etc etc.'

Trump previously said he got a lot of pushback in his efforts to declassify the files when he was president.

Gerald Posner, who wrote the 1993 Kennedy assassination book Case Closed, said wasn't so sure Trump would follow through.

'You had an opportunity to do it, you said you were going to do it, and you didn't do it,' he told the Washington Post. 

'Now, with the RFK Jr endorsement, maybe that's a quid pro quo, and maybe this time he'll actually do it.' 

Exposing the 'truth' about UFOs

Trump claims the question he is asked most about his time in office is what he learned about extraterrestrial contact.

He was asked on the Fridman podcast if he would 'help push the Pentagon to release more footage (of UFOs), which a lot of people claim is available'.

'Oh yeah, sure, I'll do that. I would do that. I'd love to do that. I have to do that,' he replied.

Trump's comment, along with his history of giving credence to UFO theories, sparked excitement about what he would expose.

UFO 'expert' Nick Pope claimed there was a 'strong possibility of bombshell UFO information being released' next year.

'It's the perfect storm: a maverick, populist President in his second term, and – thus – not up for re-election,' he told The Mirror.

'For those in the UFO community who believe there's been a decades-long conspiracy to cover up the truth about an alien presence, Trump in his second term offers the best-ever hope for pushing back against the Deep State and delivering Disclosure.

'I believe Trump views the subject in the same way as he views the JFK files, where, if there's top secret information still being withheld, it should be declassified and released.'

Trump has on several occasions claimed American military pilots shared UFO sightings with him that they couldn't explain.

'I have met with pilots... they are not conspiratorial, they are not crazy, and they tell me stories that they've seen things that you wouldn't believe,' he said in June.

He told influencer Logan Paul that he believed there was something out there.

'It's very possible there is something. And why wouldn't there be? You look at the universe and you see all of the different planets and you see... look, here we are, one relatively small planet. 

'Why wouldn't there be, on a planet that's 400 times the size? Why wouldn't there be something, somebody?' 

This position is still very different to believing aliens have actually visited Earth, and the CIA's official position is still that they have not.

Trump elaborated on his UFO thoughts in his podcast with Joe Rogan, again citing conversations with pilots.

'I interviewed a few people, it's never been my thing, I have to be honest. I have never been a believer,' he said.

'So I interviewed jet pilots that say they saw something. If you saw them you'd love to have them [on your show]...that were solid people, perfect, great pilots, everything. 

'And they said, 'we saw things sir that were very strange, like a round ball that wasn't a comet or meteor, it was something and it was going four times faster than an F22, which is a very fast plane. 

'And it was round, which in theory is a great shape [for flying].'

Trump added that while the sighted UFOs 'could be' drones or Chinese spy balloons, he remained swayed by the eyewitness accounts of the fighter pilots he spoke to. 

He added: [They are] solid, beautiful people. [They said] this is something sir, this is something. They're not conspiracy guys.'

Releasing the 'Epstein files'

Many Trump fans, including Elon Musk, want him to release all documents relating to the investigation of billionaire child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Epstein, who hung himself in jail, flew numerous well-heeled friends to his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James, where some of them sexually abused children.

The billionaire was known to have many famous friends and acquaintances in Hollywood, politics, and business, and many Americans want to know their level of involvement in his dealings.

Some documents became public last year from a defamation case with his alleged victim Virginia Roberts in 2015, but no one famous was incriminated.

There are rumors of a 'client list' but it has never been proved to actually exist.

Many Trump fans, including Elon Musk, want him to release all documents relating to the investigation of billionaire child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein (pictured in jail)

Trump was asked abut released Epstein-related documents during the Fridman podcast, including if the supposed 'client list' would be made public.

'It's very interesting, isn't it? It probably will be, by the way, probably,' he said.

'I'd certainly take a look at it. Now... Kennedy is very different from the Epstein thing but I'd be inclined to do the Epstein. I'd have no problem with it.'

Trump appeared more cautious in another interview, wary that people could be smeared by potential lies contained in the files.

'Yeah, yeah, I would. I guess I would because... I think that less so because, you know, you don't know you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there because it's a lot of phony stuff with that world,' he said.

'But I think I would or at least... Yeah I don't know about Epstein so much as I do the others (the JFK assassination and 9/11 files).'

Trump himself knew Epstein and was photographed with him (this one at Mar-a-Lago in 1997), but has consistently downplayed his involvement

Trump with Melania, Epstein, and the billionaire sex offender's right-hand women Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago club on February 12, 2000

Trump himself knew Epstein and was photographed with him, but has consistently downplayed his involvement.

'I'm not involved. I never went to his island, fortunately, but a lot of people did,' he said on the Fridman podcast.

However, hours of recorded interviews with Epstein by author Michael Wolff, who interviewed the billionaire for his Trump book Fire and Fury - well before his hideous crimes were exposed - told a different story.

Epstein, in the recordings given to the Daily Beast, called Trump his 'closest friend' and spoke extensively of their relationship. 

'Freedom cities' and flying cars

Trump, in a March 2023 campaign ad, said he planned to build 10 new cities on federal land he referred to as 'freedom cities'.

'In other words, we'll actually build new cities in our country again,' he said. 

'These Freedom Cities will reopen the frontier, reignite American imagination, and give hundreds of thousands of young people and other people, all hardworking families, a new shot at home ownership and in fact, the American Dream.'  

Trump waxed lyrical about how past generations had 'big dreams' and pursued impossible projects, but the country had 'lost its boldness'.

'Under my leadership, we will get it back in a very big way. If you look at just three years ago, what we were doing was unthinkable, how good it was, how great it was for our country,' he said.

'Our objective will be a quantum leap in the American standard of living.'

The freedom cities plan hasn't been mentioned since then, and may go the way of another bizarre idea from Trump's first term - buying Greenland from Denmark.

In the same video Trump said he planned to fill American driveways with flying cars and declared 'America, not China, leads the revolution in air mobility'.

'Dozens of major companies in the US and China are racing to develop vertical-takeoff-and-landing vehicles for families and individuals,' he said.

'Just as the United States led the automotive revolution in the last century, I want to ensure that America, not China, leads this revolution in air mobility. 

'These breakthroughs can transform commerce, bring a giant infusion of wealth into rural America, and connect families and our country in new ways.' 

Some companies are working on these projects, but they are a lot further off than the end of Trump's second term, if they are ever feasible.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

10-11-2024 om 17:28 geschreven door peter  

By ALEX HAMMER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Footage from a new docuseries that seeks to prove the existence of aliens appears to show an unidentified aircraft descending into the English Channel.

Netflix's Investigation Alien follows journalist and ufologist George Knapp as he assembles a crack-team to prove their existence - and it has yielded evidence such as this. 

An expedition commissioned for the Knapp docuseries captured the clip - their second sighting that night.

First, as they operated an ROV off the French coast of Normandy, they saw an illuminated object roughly 200 yards in the distance, first stationary, then speeding away.

It returned hours later, however, when everyone except the night crew was asleep - before plummeting into the waters below. An eagle-eyed mariner was able to capture it on film - seemingly leaving the minds behind the new series at a loss.

Footage filmed by an expedition commissioned by Netflix's Investigation Alien appears to show an unidentified flying aircraft descending into the English Channel

The brief clip appears to show an unidentified 'flying' object transforming into an unidentified 'submerged' object in real-time, experts said

'[This was] with everybody sleeping, with the exception of our night watch guy,' underwater archaeologist Rory Kremer tells Knapp of the clip, which appears to an unidentified 'flying' object transforming into an unidentified 'submerged' object in real-time

'Don't tell me it's going to go in the water,' Knapp says in response, as the orb descends.

'I'll be damned,' he adds after it happens, showing real confusion.

The series' main investigator and narrator, Knapp proceeds to ask for Kremer's professional opinion.

The archaeologist with over 20 years of experience admits he is equally stumped, despite his crew being the ones to capture the clip, 

 'So this is what it does when it thinks that nobody is watching?' Knapp asks before turning to Kremer. 'Have you ever seen anything like this?'

'A willy peter flare is the only thing I know like that that will hang up in the air, but that's not a flare, because there's no smoke going off of it,' the archaeologist says, admitting he has no real answers - at least ones that involve human technology.

'Look at that. It's under the water,' he goes on to exclaim, conceding to Knapp he does not know the craft's nature.

Underwater archaeologist Rory Kremer is seen speaking about the footage his crew caught off the Channel Islands with journalist and ufologist George Knapp, the series' main investigator

'I don't got any answers - do you?' he asks - leaving Knapp to posit that it could be evidence of a subterranean base. 

'You think it's got a base down there?' Knapp asks his friend.

'It could be. It could be.'

The two begin to speak about previous sightings in the region, which stretch back hundreds of years.

'Archaeology is your thing,' Knapp asks Kremer at this point. 'What do you think?'

Kremer responds by pointing to the native tribes that once inhabited the region - and their tales of unknown objects flying.

'All have oral histories of lights they cannot explain,' the expert said, telling Knapp how these sightings off the Channel Islands were 'usually attributed it to gods.'

'It has gone on a long time,' he continued, before touting the clip's importance.

'Archaeology is your thing,' Knapp asks Kremer at this point. 'What do you think?' Kremer responds by pointing to the native tribes that once inhabited the region - and their tales of unknown objects flying.

'I think we really scratched the surface here. There could very well be something underwater.'

Knapp, in a narration provided after the exchanged, agreed.

Pointing to previous reports of undersea anomalies seen skirting the skies as well,  he accused the government of keeping similar evidence under wraps, despite them likely being extraterrestrial in natured.

'I'm going to share this with some insiders I know [to] hopefully get more videos like this released to the public, to get to the bottom of what non human intelligence might be doing in our oceans,' Knapp said of the footage, which has yet to be released to the public.

'This is not us. It's from somewhere else,' he maintained.

The video, meanwhile, does not show the unidentified craft exiting the water after seemingly lowering in.

Investigation Alien - a 'paranormal docuseries [where] renowned UFO reporter [Knapp] investigates new evidence, interviews an array of experts and meets with emerging witnesses who are finally willing to go on the record' - released Friday.

It's now streaming on Netflix. 

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/  }

10-11-2024 om 17:03 geschreven door peter  

No Star Wars: Claims about Elon Musk and a “UFO fighter jet” are Pants on Fire!

Is Elon Musk preparing for real-life "Star Wars"? 

"Breaking News: Elon Musk unveils UFO fighter jet that defies physics," a Nov. 2 Facebook post said. "The spacecraft, named Ethereon, is said to be equipped with propulsion technology that transcends known aerodynamics, utilizing an anti-gravity drive system based on principles of quantum physics." 

The Facebook post is one of many making the same claim. Each post features a photo of a vessel, likely generated by artificial intelligence, each with a different design. 

(Screenshot of Facebook posts)

The posts earned thousands of likes, and commenters appeared to believe the claim, writing, "An amazing achievement!!!," and, "This is an amazing invention of man." 

Musk is no stranger to social media misinformation. He is the world’s richest man, a close ally of President-elect Donald Trump and the CEO of SpaceX, a rocket company that has had several successful launches into outer space. But viral claims about a gravity-defying fighter jet are invented. 

The Facebook post was flagged as part of Meta’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook, Threads and Instagram.)

PolitiFact reviewed Nexis news archives and found no reports of Musk "unveiling" a fighter jet created by SpaceX. The "updates" page on SpaceX’s website makes no mention of a new product that fits this description.

A gravity-defying, physics-shattering spaceship with an "infinite energy source" would have made major headlines – but none exist.

We rate the claim that Elon Musk unveiled a UFO fighter jet that defies physics Pants on Fire!

{ https://www.politifact.com/ }

10-11-2024 om 16:43 geschreven door peter  

Earth's ancient APOCALYPSE: Huge comet hit Earth 12,000 years ago - sparking an ice age that decimated humans, expert claims in controversial Netflix series

• Graham Hancock claims that an ancient super-civilisation lived in Antarctica 
• Scientists argue his claims are pseudoscientific and lack evidence 

By WILIAM HUNTER

It's common knowledge that the dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid 66 million years ago.

But what if that wasn't the only time in Earth's history that a space rock triggered an ancient apocalypse?

In a new Netflix series, controversial author Graham Hancock claims that an ancient super-civilisation in Antarctica was destroyed by a collision with a comet 12,000 years ago.

If true, Mr Hancock's theory would overturn almost everything we know about the story of human civilisation.

However, many experts are concerned that the story of 'Ancient Apocalypse' is misleading, with some dismissing it as 'pseudoscientific.'

In a new season of 'Ancient Apocalypse', controversial author Graham Hancock (pictured) argues that a comet triggered the destruction of an ancient civilisation in Antarctica 

What is the ancient apocalypse theory? 

Beginning in 1995 with his book 'Fingerprints of the Gods', Mr Hancock has been one of the most vocal supporters of the ancient apocalypse theory.

Conventional archaeological wisdom holds that humans first changed from nomadic hunter-gatherers to settled farmers between 10,000 and 12,000 years ago.

This would lay the foundations for the first urban civilisations to arise in Mesopotamia, somewhere around 6,000 years ago.

Mr Hancock, meanwhile, maintains that an ancient civilisation lived in what is now Antarctica for many thousands of years before this time.

Then, around 11,600-12,800 years ago, he claims a series of cataclysmic events led to the demise of these ancient peoples around the end of the Ice Age.

Mr Hancock claims that the Earth was hit by debris from a comet around 12,000 years ago, triggering changes in the climate which led to the end of the Ice Age

The documentary claims that Antarctica was home to an ancient super-civilisation which existed for thousands of years before most archaeologists believe farming was developed 

Mr Hancock describes this period as 'an abrupt episode of cataclysmic climate change', although it's referred to in science as the 'Younger Dryas'.

Controversially, he also claims that the rapid shift in climate patterns was caused by a collision with a comet in what he calls the 'Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis'.

'12,800 years ago the Earth crossed the debris stream of a very large, disintegrating comet and was bombarded by hundreds of fragments, some large, some small,' Mr Hancock says.

'It was the resulting shock of these impacts and airbursts that triggered the Younger Dryas.'

However, before they vanished, this ancient civilisation supposedly travelled the world building monuments and teaching other people the foundations of civilisation.

In the show, Mr Hancock (pictured right) travels around the world to look for evidence in support of his eccentric theory 

In his new Netflix series, Ancient Apocalypse, Mr Hancock follows in the footsteps of these lost humans to find the traces of their history.

In the second season, Mr Hancock once again sets out to find evidence for his theory, this time focusing on the Americas.

Speaking to a number of archaeologists and, inexplicably, actor Keanu Reaves, Mr Hancock travels across the continent looking for structures which hint at a more ancient society.

Mr Hancock says: 'Ancient Apocalypse is my own story, in my own words, of my own boots-on-the-ground investigation into the controversial possibility of a lost civilization of the Ice Age.'

During the show, Mr Hancock meets with actor Keanu Reaves who expresses a distrust for the conventional narrative of human history 

Why is the ancient apocalypse theory controversial? 

While Mr Hancock's theories make for a great documentary, they don't stand up to much scientific scrutiny.

Numerous experts have pointed out that the evidence used in the show is at best flimsy and, at worst, outright misleading.

Dr Flint Dibble, an archaeologist at Cardiff University who spoke with Mr Hancock on The Joe Rogan Experience, told MailOnline: 'Most sites on the show are misrepresented in different ways, sometimes small, sometimes large.'

For example, in the first episode of the new season, Mr Hancock refers to the fossilised footprints at White Sands National Park, New Mexico.

Dr Dibble says: 'He states that archaeologists have not directly dated the footprints at white sands, when in fact the sediments under, part of, and above the footprints are directly dated by OSL [optically stimulated luminescence] providing a direct date for them.'

In the show, Mr Hancock claims that the fossilised footsteps at White Sands, New Mexico (pictured) have never been directly dated. This is completely untrue as the soil above, below, and part of the fossils have been dated

Likewise in season one, Mr Hancock claimed that the 11,000-year-old Göbekli Tepe site in Turkey was built by a society capable of farming.

While the initial excavators thought this was the case, new evidence has clearly shown that bones and seeds at the site were from wild animals - proving the monuments at Göbekli Tepe were built by hunter-gatherers.

In another incident, Mr Hancock interviews the architect Professor Hillman Natawidjaja, who claims that the Gunung Padang site in Indonesia is 25,000 years old.

Shortly afterwards Professor Natwidjaja's paper on the site was retracted due to a 'major error'.

Dr Dibble says: 'The theory is about a lost civilization from the end of the Ice Age, but ignores all the evidence from that period we do have that is distributing across the world, on every continent and in every region.

Experts say that Mr Hancock ignores all evidence which contradicts his theories and misrepresents a number of archaeological sites to support his view 

'It also ignores all the scientific evidence that has amassed over the last 40 years from organic remains that clearly dates the development of agriculture to after the Ice Age in different regions of the world, independently from one another.'

The expert reaction to the show has been so bad that, after the release of season one, many called for Netflix to strip it of its 'docuseries' label.

In an open letter to Netflix, the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) wrote: 'Archaeologists have investigated hundreds of Ice Age sites and published the results in rigorously reviewed journals.

'The assertion that Ancient Apocalypse is a factual “docuseries” or “documentary” rather than entertainment with ideological goals is preposterous.'

According to archaeologists, Mr Hancock has ignored all evidence which shows that agriculture emerged separately around the world about 12,000 years ago 

If Mr Hancock were simply incorrect, this might not have caused much of a stir.

However, some experts also see the theories put forward in Ancient Apocalypse as actively harmful.

In the show, Hancock not only promotes his own ideas, but also attacks scientists who he calls 'arrogant', 'patronising', and 'so-called experts'.

Dr Dibble says that this anti-intellectual streak is part of what makes the show so popular as Hancock rides a growing wave of opposition to experts.

While Dr Dibble says he wouldn't call the documentary 'dangerous', he adds: 'Hancock's narrative both on the show and on podcast appearances promotes a distrust in experts.'

Scientists warn that the documentary's disparaging attitude towards expert opinion promotes a wider distrust of science 

Likewise, a number of archaeologists argue that the narrative of world history Mr Hancock promotes could provide the basis for more harmful ideas. 

In the show, Mr Hancock argues that an ancient lost race is responsible for spreading civilisation to less advanced people around the world.

Experts point out that this implies indigenous people could not have created civilisation without outside assistance.

'It promotes a world view where many indigenous peoples around the world are not responsible for their cultural heritage,' Dr Dibble says.

This led Netflix to cancel a number of screenings of the documentary in Arizona and New Mexico following strong opposition from local tribal leaders. 

Some even argue that this theory shares striking similarities with ideas which have inspired white supremacists.

The documentary also implies that indigenous groups could not be responsible for their own achievements, a view which has been accused of being belittling and linked to theories of white supremacy

In some versions of the myth of Atlantis, which is a clear inspiration for the show, the ancient super-race of the lost city were white Arians.

This idea would go on to inspire some theories of white supremacy which draw on the notion of an ancient Arian race. 

While Mr Hancock does not explicitly mention race in the documentary, he has previously argued that caucasian people arrived in the Americas before Columbus. 

Likewise, Hancock has also claimed that the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl was described as having white skin, a red beard, and blue eyes.

Dr Dibble has pointed out that the trope of white-skinned heroes arriving to bring civilisation was used to justify the Spanish crown claiming lands in the Americas. 

In their open letter, the SAA wrote: 'The theory it presents has a long-standing association with racist, white supremacist ideologies.'

 { https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

09-11-2024 om 23:51 geschreven door peter  

'God of chaos' asteroid could trigger astroquakes when it skims past Earth on Friday the 13th

• READ MORE:  Inside the mission to meet a 'city-killer' asteroid before it hits Earth

By ELLYN LAPOINTE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

When the 'God of Chaos' asteroid flies by our planet in five years, Earth's gravity could cause it to experience 'astroquakes,' scientists have predicted. 

Their research suggests that when the asteroid Apophis - named for the Egyptian God of Chaos - passes within just 19,000 miles of Earth, our planet's gravitational pull will cause it to violently shake.

The theoretical shaking could happen due to gravitational tidal forces, which are the stretching or pulling effect on an object caused by the uneven gravitational pull from another massive body.

The team identified two physical processes that could occur. One would cause rocks and dust to fly off the surface, and the other would trigger landslides that would happen gradually over tens of thousands of years. 

Both would ultimately change the surface structure of the four-billion-year-old asteroid.

Apophis, set for the flyby on April 13, 2029, is a 'city-killer' space rock the size of the Empire State Building. 

If it were to hit Earth directly, its impact would be equivalent to detonating tens or hundreds of nuclear bombs, according to The Planetary Society.

It wouldn't destroy the entire Earth, but it could easily annihilate a city, spreading destruction over a radius of hundreds of miles. 

This illustration shows Apophis' size relative to New York City. A direct hit from this asteroid wouldn't destroy the whole Earth, but it could wipe out a major metropolitan area

Scientists have paid close attention to this asteroid's path since it was first discovered in 2004. Initially, the chances of a potential impact in 2029 were relatively high at 2.7 percent.

But more recent studies have found that the odds are closer to one in two billion.   

A team of researchers led by Ronald-Louis Ballouz, an asteroid scientist at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, investigated what might happen to Apophis when it passes through Earth's gravitational field. 

Asteroids typically have weathered surfaces because they are constantly bombarded by meteoroids in a process called space weathering, Ballouz told Live Science, but astronomers have long observed space rocks that pass close to planets lack weathered surfaces. 

He suspected that the reason why could be because the planet's gravity removes the outer layer of the asteroid's surface.

To test this, the researchers created a computational models of Apophis and then simulated each model's path to Earth while tracking its physical changes, revealing our planet's gravitational pull could drive two different physical processes on Apophis.

The first is earthquake-like tremors that would likely begin about an hour before the asteroid reaches its closest distance from Earth and continue for some time after.

When Apophis encounters Earth's gravity, it could experience tremors strong enough to lift boulders from its surface and allow some rocks to escape into space, researchers say

It's difficult to say how intense this shaking will be. But Ballouz expects it will be strong enough to change Apophis' outer appearance, lifting boulders from the surface and allowing some rocks to escape into space.

The other process is a change in the asteroid's tumbling. Space rocks like Apophis don't rotate on an axis, as planets do. Rather, they tumble somewhat haphazardly through space. 

Earth's gravitational pull could alter Apophis' tumbling pattern, triggering landslides over the course of tens of thousands of years that could further 'refresh' its surface to reveal the layers beneath. 

Read More

• Earth's ancient APOCALYPSE: Huge comet hit Earth 12,000 years ago - sparking an ice age that decimated humans, expert claims in controversial Netflix series 

The research team's findings are currently available on the arXiv preprint database, and have been accepted for publication in the Planetary Science Journal.  

If Ballouz's hypothesis proves correct, it could explain why other asteroids that have been subjected to planetary gravity don't show signs of space weathering on their surfaces. 

But he and his team won't know for sure until NASA's OSIRIS-APEX mission rendezvous with Apophis during its 2029 flyby. 

This spacecraft will study the asteroid for 18 months to document any physical changes that it endured during its encounter with Earth. 

As for whether Apophis could directly hit Earth anytime soon, research has determined that we're safe for at least the next 100 years, according to the Planetary Society. 

But to prepare for the unlikely event that another 'city-killer' asteroid could collide with Earth, NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office is developing ways to deflect or destroy them before they make impact.

VIDEOS

What is the ‘God of Chaos’? New study reveals giant asteroid could hit Earth if…

Asteroid 'God of Chaos' could hit Earth sooner than expected according to experts from NASA

 { https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

09-11-2024 om 23:19 geschreven door peter  

Congress promises to 'pull back the curtain' on secret UFO research as whistleblowers prepare to testify

• READ MORE:  Pentagon reveals military's 'alien tech' crash retrieval program

By STACY LIBERATORE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

US Congress has promised to 'pull back the curtain' on secret UAP research programs conducted in the shadows of the government in a court of law.

A second slew of hearings into UFOs is scheduled for November 13, led by the House Oversight Committee, with former military officials and an aerospace expert set to testify about their knowledge of secret US programs.

Lawmakers have promised 'to explore firsthand accounts of [UFOs]' and 'assess the federal government's transparency and accountability regarding their 'possible threats to national security.'

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), a member of the subcommittee, said: 'The Pentagon and Washington bureaucrats have kept this information hidden for decades, and we're finally going to shed some light on it. 

'We're bringing in credible witnesses who can provide public testimony because the American people deserve the truth. We're done with the cover-ups.'

There will be four witnesses set to testify under oath, including former Department of Defense Official Luis Elizondo and former NASA Associate Administrator Michael Gold.

Congress is set to hold a second hearing about UAPs that it promised will expose the truth to the American public, specifically about the research programs within the government. Pictured is the famous Tic Tac-shaped object seen in the sky over California on November 10, 2004 

Next week's hearing, set for 11:30am ET, will be a joint effort by Rep Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.).

'This is our second hearing on the topic of UAPs and the American people are tired of the obfuscation and refusal to release information by the federal government, they said in a shared statement.

'Americans deserve to understand what the government has learned about UAP sightings and the nature of any potential threats these phenomena pose.

'We can only ensure that understanding by providing consistent, systemic transparency. We look forward to hearing from expert witnesses on ways to shed more light and bring greater accountability to this issue.'

The committee has not released details on cases to be presented on Wednesday but provided the list of witnesses.

Elizondo, a career US Army counterintelligence specialist, previously ran the military's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program.

He recently hosted a private event in Philadelphia on October 28 to reveal an image of an alleged UFO 'mothership.'

There will be four witnesses set to testify under oath, including former Department of Defense Official Luis Elizondo (pictured)

Elizondo recently hosted a private event in Philadelphia on October 28 to reveal an image of an alleged UFO 'mothership.'

'There's a whole lot more here folks,' Elizondo told the audience in a leaked clip. 'I just want to give you kind of a small taste of what's going on 'behind the scenes.''

'We're having pilots, military pilots and civilian pilots in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, report what unimaginably seems impossible,' as Elizondo explained his 'real photo' of a UFO.

'They described it literally 'the mothership,' Elizondo said.

Investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger will also be sworn under oath.

Shellenberger — who is also an academic and a two-time candidate for California governor — went viral last month after publishing one of his anonymous whistleblower's accounts of an alleged UFO data collection program.

That classified UFO data retrieval effort, dubbed 'Immaculate Constellation,' was established in 2017 to 'detect' and 'quarantine' the military's best UFO imagery, along with its best videos, witness testimonies and electronic sensor evidence.

Dr Tim Gallaudet, former rear admiral in the US Navy, launched a probe in March into unidentified submersible objects (USOs), specifically strange sightings on the seabed off the coast of California.

Investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger will also be sworn under oath. He went viral last month after publishing one of his anonymous whistleblower's accounts of an alleged UFO data collection program

Gold is a former NASA Associate Administrator who was part of the agency's UAP study in October 2022, which focused solely on unclassified data.

Over nine months, the independent study team will lay the groundwork for future studies on the nature of UAPs for NASA and other organizations.

The hearing follows the bombshell case last year that was held by Burchett and Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla).

David Grusch - a former high-ranking intelligence official - was one of three military whistleblowers who testified under oath that they had firsthand encounters or knowledge about secret government programs involving technology that is 'non-human.'

He claimed that the US has been in possession of UFOs since 'the 1930s' and has been secretly back-engineering them and carrying out a public disinformation campaign to prevent the details from leaking publicly. 

Ryan Graves, a former pilot, Air Force and intelligence agency veteran David Grusch and Navy veteran fighter pilot Commander David Fravor spoke at the first hearing in 2023

During the hearing, Burchett asked Grusch: 'Personally, have you heard anyone [has] been murdered?' 

Grusch replied: 'I have to be careful answering that question. I directed people with that knowledge to the appropriate authorities.'

He was sworn in Wednesday, along with Ryan Graves, an esteemed former pilot, and Navy veteran fighter pilot Commander David Fravor, who witnessed the 2004 'Tic Tac' UFO.

Graves, a former F-18 pilot with over a decade of service in the US Navy, was the first to give opening statements.

'My testimony is based on information I've been given by individuals with a long-standing track record of legitimacy and service to this country, many of whom have shared compelling evidence in the form of photography, official documentation and classified oral testimony to myself and many various colleagues,' Graves told lawmakers, stating he was driven to share it by a 'commitment to truth and transparency.'

Burchett described the 2023 hearing as 'historical.' 

'I'd like to thank these three brave witnesses here. They took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and, dagnammit, they're doing it,' he continued.

'We're not bringing little green men or flying saucers into the hearing — sorry to disappoint about half of y'all — we're just going to get to the facts.

'We're going to uncover the cover-up, and I hope this is just the beginning of many more hearings and many more people coming forward about this.'

 { https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

09-11-2024 om 21:00 geschreven door peter  

China unveils $36mil new stealth jet fighter built with 'stolen American military technology'

• READ MORE: China launches top-secret military spacecraft CSSHQ into orbit

By MATTHEW PHELAN SENIOR SCIENCE REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

China has posted the first official photo of its brand 'new' stealth fighter.

But if you feel like you've seen it before, there might be a reason for that.

The J-35A jet is rumored to have been built using 'many terabytes' of stolen US military data.

A decade ago, documents leaked by ex-US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden laid out the case that radar designs, engine schematics and other top secret specs from America's $2 trillion stealth F-35 program had been hacked by Chinese spies. 

Photographed in a three-quarter profile, taxiing on the tarmac, the new J-35A is the land-based sibling to China's equally secretive and stealth J-35, which the emerging superpower plans to deploy from its growing fleet of naval aircraft carriers. 

The image came a week ahead of the fighter's November 12 debut at the China International Aviation & Aerospace Exhibition, held at Zhuhai Airport in Guangdong.

At the time of Snowden's leak, China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told reporters that 'the so-called evidence that has been used to launch groundless accusations against China is completely unjustified.' 

But the similarities between the Chinese and the American jets are striking — both have the same characteristic internal weapons bays to maintain its radar-evading stealth shape and aerodynamic air-intake channels beneath their cockpits.

China posted the first official photo of its J-35A stealth fighter (above) on Tuesday, teasing the debut of a jet that's accused of originating with 'many terabytes' of stolen US military data

'For the first time, new equipment such as the medium-weight, stealth multi-role fighter J-35A, the HQ-19 surface-to-air missile and a new type of reconnaissance and strike unmanned aerial vehicle will be on display,' officials told CCTV state television.

But aside from providing the picture of the J-35A, Chinese military spokesman Colonel Niu Wenbo did not provide further details to CCTV on the new craft.

Both J-35 and J-35A were built off China's FC-31 stealth fighter prototype, which has been unofficially documented for years in leaks and snapshots, according to military aerospace author Thomas Newdick.

Newdick emphasized that — while espionage likely played a role in the development of China's fifth-generation stealth fighter fleet — the craft were not outright 'copies.'

'Critical outright differences' are discernable in the new photo, he noted, including twin-engines on the J-35A distinct from the F-35's massive single turbofan engine, and a more slender and sleek design that avoids the some of the F-35's design flaws. 

The J-35A is also reportedly faster than the F-35, capable of a maximum speed of Mach 2.0, compared to the American stealth fighter's top speed of Mach 1.6.

A former deputy captain with the Chinese Air Force's Bayi Aerobatic Team, Zhang Xinmin, told Aaj News that the J-35A had been custom made to withstand harsh conditions, like high-salt and high-humidity environments.

But, as Newdick wrote for The War Zone, 'clearly many elements' were 'at least heavily inspired if not cribbed from the F-35,' including its 'diverterless supersonic inlets' air-intakes on its engines and the shape of its cockpit canopy.

'Even its official designation [i.e. '35'] isn't trying to hide that reality,' Newdick said.

The clearest previous image of China's future carrier-borne stealth fighter known as J-35 surfaced in July of 2020 on Chinese social media Weibo (above)

Carrier fighter mockups of the J-35 (right) and J-15 (left) were spotted on the aircraft carrier Liaoning and posted to social media on what was then Twitter but is now X.com

The expensive program to develop and integrate three variations of the F-35 into America's fighting force has led to at least 29 incidents and accidents over the years.

Last May, an F-35B crashed shortly after attempting a takeoff at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico. 

The F-35B is a variant designed for 'short takeoff and vertical landing' (STOVL), a bulk-adding technical specification that's notably absent from both J-35 models.

The J-35 is the second radar-evading stealth jet in China's military arsenal, after the J-20 'Dragon' which entered service in 2017. 

The J-20 is a 'heavy-duty stealth fighter jet' and the J-35 is a 'medium-sized multi-role stealth fighter jet,' according to Military analyst Wang Mingzhi.

'The primary distinction is that the J-20 focuses on air superiority missions, while the J-35A is versatile, capable of pursuing air superiority and accomplishing a variety of ground and maritime strike missions,' Wang explained.

'In future operations, these two aircraft can precisely target at both land and sea objectives in a coordinated manner, thus playing a crucial role for achieving air superiority,' the analyst continued in a post for China's Defense Ministry website.

The expensive program to develop and integrate three variations of the F-35 into America's fighting force has led to at least 29 serious incidents over the years. Above emergency workers respond to a crash of an F-35B near the Albuquerque International Airport on May 28, 2024

China's defense ministry said the J-35 was built by the Shenyang Aircraft Design and Research Institute, a subsidiary of the Asian country's Aviation Industry Corporation. 

Heavy state-planning and secrecy characteristic of the communist 'people's republic' has shielded the exact cost for any of China's stealth fighters from view — but a 2024 report by defense publication Janes priced the J-20 at $110 million.

But extrapolations, based on estimates from Zhou Chenming of Beijing-based Yuan Wang military tech think tank, place the J-35s at about $21 to $36 million each.

'The price of Chinese self-developed military weapon is normally one-fifth to one-third of the price of a similar US weapon,' Zhou said. And the current reported cost of America's F-35s are around $109 million apiece.

'The J-35 series is designed to be one platform with multiple variants for both Chinese air and naval forces,' the ministry said.

Analysts, including Newdick, have noted that China's new stealth fighter's J-35 version appears to be optimized for takeoff via an 'electromagnetic catapult launch system,' onboard China's latest and state-of-the-art carrier, Fujian.

But photos of fighter mock-ups show the jets will also be deployed from China's older aircraft carriers like Liaoning and Shenyang, via their 'ski-jump' takeoff ramps. 

Above, a visual timeline of the China's progess on the stealth J-35: the original FC-31 airframe (2014), the revised FC-31 (2016), the first J-35 prototype (2021) and an updated J-35 (2022) 

German magazine Der Spiegel was the first to publish the cache of Snowden documents in 2015 that revealed a top secret US government presentation alleging China's theft of 'many terabytes' of F-35 program data.

According to sources, the data breach occurred in 2007 — a cyberattack at the prime defense contractor undertaking America's effort to construct the F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter jet (F-35B), Lockheed Martin. 

Shortly after the Snowden leak, US officials claimed that 'classified F-35 information is protected and remains secure,' according to The Diplomat.

China's cyber-spying operation, which had been code-named 'Byzantine Hades' by US investigators, had first been revealed by Wikileaks in 2011.

Investigators claimed that they had traced the origin of some of these past hacks to a specific unit of the Chinese People's Liberation Army.

German magazine Der Spiegel was the first to publish the cache of Snowden documents in 2015 that revealed a top secret US government presentation (above) alleging China's theft of 'many terabytes' of F-35 program data. Investigators called the alleged op 'Byzantine Hades'

US officials broadly characterized that 'Byzantine Hades' hacking operation as a plot to 'cause serious damage to DoD interests,' according to the top secret power point presentation

It's unclear when US officials may have first suspected that 'Byzantine Hades' had also been working to obtain stealth fighter secrets from Lockheed. 

However they broadly characterized that operation as a plot to 'cause serious damage to DoD interests,' according to the top secret power point presentation leaked by Snowden.

Pushing back on these accusations, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong noted in 2015 that China has sought international collaborations to improve security and prevent hacking. 

'According to the materials presented by the relevant person, some countries themselves have disgraceful records on cybersecurity,' Hong added.

Infamously, Snowden's 2013 revelations as a former contractor to the National Security Agency (NSA) revealed a massive and questionably legal spying program by the agency. The revelations sparked international outrage.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

09-11-2024 om 20:40 geschreven door peter  

Shock photos show physical deterioration of stranded NASA astronaut Sunita Williams

• READ MORE: 'Gaunt' photo sparks health concerns about stranded astronaut

By ELLYN LAPOINTE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Photos have revealed NASA astronaut Sunita Williams' shocking weight loss as she and her crewmate remain stuck on the International Space Station (ISS). 

Williams, 59, and Barry Wilmore, 61, have been living on the ISS for five months after Boeing's faulty Starliner spacecraft was deemed unsafe to return them to Earth. 

A 'gaunt' photo of Williams taken on September 24 recently sparked concerns due to her 'sunken' cheeks which suggested she'd rapidly lost weight.

More recent images also show her with a pronounced facial structure and a thinner frame - a concern given she still has three months until she returns.  

Publicly, NASA has said Williams' is 'in good health' and that she's been undergoing 'routine medical evaluations'.

But behind the scenes, the space agency has been scrambling to 'stabilize the weight loss and hopefully reverse it,' according to a well-placed source. 

The unnamed NASA employee who is 'directly involved with the mission' told the New York Post that Williams has been 'unable to keep up with the high-caloric diets that astronauts must consume' while on the ISS.

Long-stay space missions take a toll on astronaut's health, especially women, leading to weight loss, muscle breakdown, bone loss, heart and vision problems and kidney stones.

NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore on June 5, gearing up for the Starliner launch that would deliver them to the International Space Station 

Female astronauts have been found to lose more weight - particularly through loss of muscle mass - than men during spaceflight.

'The pounds have melted off her and she's now skin and bones. So it's a priority to help her stabilize the weight loss and hopefully reverse it,' the NASA source told the New York Post. 

About a month ago, NASA doctors began working with Williams to help her regain weight, the source said, even before DailyMail.com's original story brought attention to her deterioration.

To stop and reverse her weight loss, Williams could have to eat up to 5,000 calories per day, the source added. 

For comparison, the average woman on Earth has to eat between 1,600 to 2,400 calories to maintain her weight. The source said that Williams started the mission at approximately 140 lbs.

Williams and Wilmore launched toward the orbiting laboratory on June 5 for what was supposed to be a 10 day mission, but have been stuck there for 156 days. 

Now, they are set to return to Earth on SpaceX's Crew-9 Dragon capsule. Williams, Wilmore and the four Crew-9 astronauts will journey home together in February 2025.

By then, the Starliner crew will have spent roughly eight to nine months on the ISS, depending on when in February they splash down. 

During that time, they will have endured microgravity, close quarters and high doses of space radiation.

A doctor has raised concerns about Williams' health, claiming this September 24 showed her looking 'gaunt'

Over the last five months, photos sent back to Earth have offered glimpses into the lives of Williams and Wilmore as they adapt to their unforeseen circumstances. 

Just hours before the Starliner launch on June 5, the crew was photographed beaming in their blue Boeing spacesuits as they geared up for their short mission.

In that photo, the astronauts - especially Williams - look strikingly different than in recent images, including the September snapshot. 

That image was one of several posted on the official ISS Instagram page that showed Williams, Wilmore and the other ISS astronauts making pizza together. 

It recently went viral as the public raised concerns over Williams' shocking appearance.  

In it, she appears 'gaunt,' Dr Vinay Gupta, a pulmonologist and veteran in Seattle, told DailyMail.com earlier this week.

'What you're seeing there in that picture is somebody that I think is experiencing the natural stresses of living at a very high altitude, even in a pressurized cabin, for extended periods,' he said. 

'Her cheeks appear a bit sunken - and usually it happens when you've had sort of total body weight loss.'

'Based on what I'm at least seeing in the photo, I don't think she's quite at a... place where I say her life's in danger.'

'But I don't think you can look at that photo and say she has sort of healthy body weight.'

The NASA source told the New York Post that they were shocked by the image. 'I gasped out loud when I saw the last picture,' they said.

'And it's something we're talking about, but not something we're obsessing about. It's a real concern and everyone is taking it seriously.' 

More recent photos, including one in which Williams and Wilmore pose for a group-shot with the other members of the Expedition 72 crew on October 4, show that Williams is still looking thin. 

NASA declined to comment on the statements made by the anonymous agency employee, and instead referred DailyMail.com back to their original statement which asserts that all astronauts aboard the ISS are 'in good health.' 

Wilmore (front left) and Williams (front right) pose with the other members of the Expedition 72 crew for a photo posted on October 4

The body burns more calories in space as it adjusts to the changes in gravity and tries to maintain its body temperature in cold, harsh conditions.

'They have to eat about 3,500 to 4,000 calories per day, just to maintain their current weight,' the NASA source said. 

'And when you start falling behind, your weight drops fast.' 

To prevent muscle and bone loss, astronauts exercise about 2.5 hours a day, which burns even more calories. 

'There's just things that the human body cannot adjust to, and one of which is, you know, she's probably losing more calories than she's intaking,' Dr Gupta said.

'Her body's probably working harder to do basic things, because the partial pressure of oxygen is lower than it would be on sea level.'

The problem of the body breaking down is a particular worry for women. 

A study assembled by NASA in 2014 found that women have greater loss of blood plasma volume than men during spaceflight.

And women’s stress response characteristically includes a heart rate increase while men respond with an increase in vascular resistance.

Read More

EXCLUSIVE

•  NASA gives health update on astronauts mysteriously hospitalized after space mission 

The loss of blood plasma causes your metabolic rate to temporarily increase while your body mobilizes resources to adjust to the loss of plasma.

And this response can slightly elevate your calorie burn, resulting in weight loss similar to what Williams may be experiencing.

Another study released by Ball University in 2023 also found that women lose more muscle than men in a microgravity environment such as spaceflight.

Williams and Wilmore still have to wait about three to four months until they can return to Earth on SpaceX's Crew Dragon. 

At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that Williams' alleged health decline will impact this timeline. 

Though the Starliner mission has extended significantly, Williams and Wilmore's ISS mission will not be the longest one ever completed by an astronaut.  

That record is held Russian cosmonauts Oleg Kononenko and Nikolai Chub, who returned to Earth aboard Russia's Soyuz MS-25 spacecraft on September 23 after 374 days on the ISS.

More recently, a crew of four NASA/SpaceX astronauts returned to Earth on October 25 after a 232-day stay on the ISS. 

All four crewmembers were taken to the hospital after splashing down. Three received medical evaluations and were discharged that same day, while one was kept for overnight observation. 

NASA has not disclosed any details about why the astronauts required medical attention, or which one was kept overnight.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

09-11-2024 om 20:19 geschreven door peter