UFO whistleblowers tell Congress 'we are not alone in the cosmos' (video)

UFOs came to Washington again today.

Like previous congressional UFO hearings, today's event featured testimony from current U.S. military personnel who claim the American government has for decades hidden evidence of advanced technologies and otherworldly visitors from the public. A multitude of anecdotes were presented about flying orbs coming out of the ocean, disc-shaped objects, and craft "exhibiting flight and structural characteristics unlike anything in our arsenal." While such claims are nothing new, what is noteworthy about today's hearing are the pedigrees of some of the whistleblowers who testified, including a former U.S. counterintelligence officer, a retired U.S. Navy rear admiral and a former NASA associate administrator. All of them stressed the need for more government transparency, less stigma about the UFO topic and new policies to bring UAP data out of the "black" classified world and into the public domain.  

This isn't the U.S. government's first attempt to investigate the recent wave of UFO claims that began in 2017. A similar hearing was held last year, in which a whistleblower told Congress the U.S. government is hiding evidence of 'non-human intelligence.' 

The Pentagon also created the All-Doman Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) in 2022 to investigate UAP reports and government data about UFOs, but critics, including some government officials, are skeptical of the office's aims and methods. 

Related: 

• UFO whistleblower tells Congress the US government is hiding evidence of 'non-human intelligence'

"AARO is unable, or perhaps unwilling, to bring forward the truth about the government's activities concerning UAPs," Representative Nancy Mace (R-South Carolina) said during the hearing's opening remarks today. "I'm disturbed that AARO itself lacks transparency; even its budget is kept from the public. So if there is no 'there' there, then why are we spending money on it? And by how much? Why the secrecy?"

Other representatives stressed the need for transparency and data analysis today, a common theme of other recent UAP studies. "We have evidence that what we are detecting things, and we know that we don't understand them, and this is worth investigating," Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) said. "I believe we can always be more transparent. To me, this hearing and others are simply about the truth and getting to the facts of what these UAPs actually are."

Luis Elizondo, a former U.S. counterintelligence officer who has been vocal about such claims in recent years, told the assembled representatives at the hearing that "excessive secrecy has led to grave misdeeds against loyal civil servants, military personnel and the public — all to hide the fact that we are not alone in the cosmos." 

We are "in the midst of a multi-decade, secretive arms race  — one funded by misallocated taxpayer dollars and hidden from our elected representatives and oversight bodies," Elizondo stated during his testimony. 

Elizondo, who claims to have previously investigated UFOs as part of a secret Pentagon program, suggested that the U.S. government create a "whole-of-government" approach to studying UAP, create a national UAP strategy and offer protections so that whistleblowers who are "desperate to do the right thing can come forward without fear."

During questioning, Elizondo was asked if some of the "advanced technologies" that have been seen monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe could be operated by aliens or private companies. "Maybe both," Elizondo replied.

Elizondo also stated point-blank to Rep. Mace's questioning that the U.S. government has programs to retrieve crashed UAP and reverse-engineer them, but avoided giving any specifics in an unclassified public setting such as the hearing.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) then questioned Elizondo, asking the former counterintelligence agent about a document he signed that limits him from speaking publicly about crash retrieval programs. "The document said you can't talk about crash retrieval. Well, you know, you can't talk about Fight Club if there's no Fight Club, correct?"

Like other witnesses, Elizondo stated that the alleged excessive government secrecy around UFOs harms national security. In response to questioning from Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), Elizondo stated that, if UAP sightings turned out to be technologies operated by adversarial nations, it would be "an intelligence failure eclipsing 9/11 in order of magnitude."

Retired U.S. Navy rear admiral Tim Gallaudet offered similar testimony as Elizondo. "We know from last year's UAP hearing and recent statements and publications by credible whistleblowers that UAP, NHI [non-human intelligence], and their technology of unknown origin (TUO) represent a new realization that we are not the only advanced intelligence in the universe," Gallaudet said on Wednesday, according to his published remarks. 

"Unelected officials in the U.S. government do not have an exclusive right to this knowledge about the nature of reality. The American people have a right to that knowledge," Gallaudet said. The retired rear admiral also stressed the national security and airspace safety concerns related with UAP sightings, calling them "extensive."

When Rep. Garcia asked Gallaudet and other witnesses what UAP might represent, the retired rear admiral said he believes they are evidence of a "non-human higher intelligence."

Former NASA Associate Administrator for Space Policy and Partnerships Michael Gold also testified at today's hearing, and previously served on NASA's UAP study team. Gold's testimony was more grounded; for example, he stressed the need for NASA to contribute its authority and expertise toward analyzing what UAP data it might already possess and helping dispel the stigma associated with the UFO topic. 

"Our best tool for unlocking the mystery of UAP is science, but we cannot conduct a proper inquiry if the stigma is so overwhelming that just daring to be part of a NASA search team elicits such a vitriolic response," Gold said during today's hearing. "Therefore, one of the most important actions that can be taken, relative to exposing the truth of UAP, is to combat the stigma, and this is where I believe that NASA can be eminently helpful."

Gold added that NASA has a massive archive of data that could possibly contain evidence of UAP, and suggested that artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms could help sort through the agency's trove of data to help shine light on the UFO phenomenon. In addition, the former NASA associate administrator said the agency should develop specialized instruments that might be able to gather useful data about UAP.

Related:

• NASA UFO report finds no evidence of 'extraterrestrial origin' for UAP sightings

Journalist Michael Shellenberger also testified today, telling the representatives that there's a "growing body of evidence that the government is not being transparent about what it knows about unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), formerly called UFOs, and that elements within the military and IC [intelligence community] are in violation of their Constitutional duty to notify Congress of their operations." 

Shellenberger stated that there is a secret program within the U.S. government known as "Immaculate Constellation" whose sole purpose is to collect UFO and UAP reports from military personnel and sensor data and quarantine them away from the rest of the government and military. While he noted that a Pentagon spokesperson has stated no such program exists, Shellenberger recounted prior examples in which the Department of Defense has initially denied knowledge of UAP-related information only to later change its stance and either admit the information exists or release it to the public. 

"The U.S. government appears to know significantly more about UAPs than it is revealing," Shellenberger said at the hearing. "But even those who believe the U.S. government has revealed all that it knows should have no objection to Congressional demands for greater transparency."

To conclude the meeting, Rep. Mace asked each of the witnesses to define what non-human biologics or non-human intelligence mean to each of them.

"I don't think it's a stretch, when you look at the diversity of life on this planet and the size of this universe, to think that there will be more diverse, higher-order, non-human intelligence throughout the universe, and that's probably what's visiting us," Gallaudet said.

Elizondo stated he would take a scientific approach: "The definition would be the ability to react to a stimulus in a manner that requires an intellectual thought process."

Gold, meanwhile, questioned whether non-human intelligence necessarily implies life, suggesting sophisticated artificial intelligence might be responsible for some UAP encounters. Shellenberger simply stated he did not know what they might be.

Related: 

• The search for alien life

In today's hearing, as in other UFO hearings, there was a lot of telling and not a lot of showing. One of the core tenets of these whistleblower testimonies is that much of the credible UFO data is classified and can't be revealed to the public based on the military capabilities that some of that data could reveal. 

Whistleblowers have attested for years that, because advanced or classified sensors and satellites sometimes capture footage or photos of unexplained phenomena or advanced craft, those photos or videos are likewise classified by the U.S. government in order to not reveal America's full surveillance or sensing capabilities. 

Such was the case in 2023 when U.S. military aircraft shot down a mysterious object off the coast of Alaska. The American government has yet to release any imagery from the event, but a Canadian freedom of information request unveiled a photograph earlier this year of a balloon-like object.

Those incidents and others like it, such as a weeks-long drone incursion above Langley Air Force Base in Washington, D.C., were discussed in today's hearing. "The origin of these drones and their operators remains a mystery," Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.) said. "This incident and other sightings near sensitive military installations highlights the complexity of the UAP challenge facing our intelligence, defense and homeland security committees."

{ https://www.space.com/ }

13-11-2024 om 22:17 geschreven door peter  

Read the chilling testimony of Navy veteran due to testify on UFO cover up: 'We're being visited'

• READ MORE: Ex-Pentagon official claims US has recovered alien bodies

By MATTHEW PHELAN SENIOR SCIENCE REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Expert witnesses plan to testify before Congress about a 'constitutional crisis' posed by government secrecy on UFOs — and even 'threats' to scientists investigating these mysterious phenomena.

One, Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, will also speak about secret 'satellite imagery' from a 2017 UFO case that has been illegally hidden from congressional oversight.

'Elements of the government are engaging in a disinformation campaign,' the rear admiral stated in his prepared written testimony submitted ahead of this Wedneday's hearing, '[including] personal attacks designed to discredit UAP whistleblowers.'

Scientists, policymakers and others have adopted 'Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena' (UAP) to more precisely describe UFOs and better incorporate all cases, including startling undersea encounters with apparent 'transmedium' craft.

Another witness, former NASA legal advisor Mike Gold, plans to speak on behalf of scientists, pilots and others who have faced 'negative consequences to their career' for openly pursuing answers to these enigmatic and unusual incidents.

'It's disconcerting when members of the academic community are vilified for even having the temerity to attempt to study UAP,' Gold wrote in his own testimony.

Also slated to testify: Decorated ex-counterintelligence officer Luis Elizondo, who investigated UFO cases while at the Pentagon, and Michael Shellenberger, a reporter who went viral last month with claims from a new UFO whistleblower.

Above, eerie UFO footage captured by hurricane remediation worker William Guy in September 2019 - documenting strange lights off North Carolina's Outer Banks, not too far from the Atlantic Ocean training areas where US Navy pilots reported UFOs in 2014 and 2015

Rear Adm. Gallaudet, who also served as deputy administrator to the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), offered to help Congress obtain the wrongfully withheld UFO satellite data in a classified briefing. 

'I would be happy in a closed setting to provide the dates involved if that would help the committee to formulate a specific request for access,' he stated in his testimony.

The rear admiral has become a prominent voice calling for wider transparency on the topic of UFOs over the past three years, as well as a defender of once senior US intelligence officers, like David Grusch, who have come forward on the issue.

Late last year, Rear Adm. Gallaudet said he found Grusch's account of a decades-old, highly classified UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering program to be credible.

'We're being visited by non-human intelligence with technology we really don't understand,' Gallaudet confirmed, 'and with intentions we don't understand either.'

In his prepared testimony to Congress, expected to be followed by detailed questions from House Oversight, the retired Navy and NOAA official explained that he has witnessed the dangers of government UFO secrecy firsthand.

In January 2015, according to Gallaudet, he received an 'URGENT SAFETY OF FLIGHT ISSUE' inquiry on the Navy's secure internet network from the operations officer of the Navy's Fleet Forces Command — only to have that message just disappear.

'The text of the email was brief but alarming,' he testified, 'with words to the effect [of] "We are having multiple near-midair collisions, and if we do not resolve it soon, we will have to shut down the exercise."' 

'This incident disturbed me,' he added, 'for the remainder of my government service, including my time as an Under Secretary of Commerce and NOAA Administrator.'

Retired Rear Admiral Gallaudet (left), a PhD oceanographer who also served as deputy administrator to the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), will testify on UFOs this Wednesday in Congress. Joining him will be ex-NASA legal advisor Mike Gold (right)

According to a committee spokesperson, Republican congresswoman Nancy Mace (above), chair of House Oversight's Cybersecurity Subcommittee will co-chair the new UFO hearing

'Attached to the email was what is now known as the "Go Fast" video, captured on the forward-looking infrared sensor onboard one of the Navy F/A-18 aircraft participating in the exercise,' he added. 

What the rear admiral found most disturbing about this disappearing Navy email was that clear implication that the need for secrecy surrounding these UFOs — whatever they were — had trumped the very lives of America's fighter pilots. 

'It highlighted a dangerous culture of over-classification, where even pressing safety-of-flight issues could be swept aside under the pretense of secrecy,' he noted.

Based on his own naval experience, the rear admiral inferred that the absence of answers on these life-threatening UFOs meant that the explanation was unlikely to be a 'classified technology demonstrations' by the US Department of Defense (DoD). 

'Because DoD policy is to rigorously deconflict such demonstrations with live exercises,' Rear Adm. Gallaudet wrote, 'I was confident this was not the case.' 

'I concluded that the UAP information must have been classified within a special access program managed by an intelligence agency,' he continued, 'that even senior officials, including myself, were not read into.'

Gallaudet plans to describe these and other episodes of UFO secrecy as 'an absolute outrage' during his upcoming, in-person testimony. 

The retired senior-level official also plans to call out former leadership of the Pentagon's All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) for what he characterizes as 'illegal and unethical DoD disinformation efforts.'

Above, a still from the 'Go Fast' UFO video - captured by Navy Pilots off the coast of Florida in 2015. Rear Adm. Gallaudet plans to testify about receiving a 'brief but alarming' official email regarding the 'Go Fast' incident that mysteriously disappeared from secured Navy servers

Republican congressman Glenn Grothman (above), chair of House Oversight's National Security Subcommittee, is expected to co-lead the UFO hearing Wednesday with Rep. Mace. Above, Rep. Grothman seen entering a secured room for a classified UFO briefing last year 

His assessment will join public comments by ex-NASA scientists, US Air Force personnel, and other UFO whistleblowers who have criticized AARO's performance of its duty to create a historical records report on past UFO cases.

'AARO needs to explain the inaccuracies and incompleteness of AARO's first historical records report,' according to Rear Adm. Gallaudet.

Submitted testimony from former NASA legal advisor Mike Gold praised House Oversight's 'devotion to truth and scientific openness regardless of the ridicule and even spite that the discussion of UAP can engender.'

Gold also served on the US space agency's UFO advisory council last year in a volunteer capacity alongside his official duties as Chief Growth Officer for RedwireSpace a private aerospace company.

'Stigmatization of UAP prevents the gathering of invaluable data that represents our best and only chance to understand the phenomena,' Gold wrote in his testimony.

NASA legal advisor Mike Gold (top right) - who also served on the US space agency's UFO advisory council last year - praised House Oversight's 'devotion to truth and scientific openness regardless of the ridicule and even spite that the discussion of UAP can engender'

This stigma issue, he noted, has resulted in malformed and maladapted official policies that are slowing down the quest for answers on these increasingly controversial debates of these seemingly otherworldly phenomena. 

The ex-NASA official cited decades of poor reporting standards for private pilots who see UFOs.

For years civilian and commercial aviators were told not to report UFOs to federal flight safety regulators but to private citizen UFO hunters, including the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) in Washington state. 

'Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) instructions on the matter are difficult to find, provide obsolete advice (e.g., referencing organizations that no longer exist), and are not generally known or understood by the civilian pilot community,' he said.

Based on his submitted testimony, Gold plans to also credit the efforts of NASA's UFO advisory panel, 'particularly those who encountered ridicule and even threats due to their participation.'  

'The stigma prevents scientific inquiry,' Gold warned in his statement, 'the best tool that we have to understand anomalies, from being fully applied.'

'Moreover, science is driven by anomalies,' he noted. 'The Theory of General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, virtually all of our scientific progress has been based on discovering and studying anomalies.'

VIDEOS

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

13-11-2024 om 21:42 geschreven door peter  

• READ MORE: Doctors raise concerns about Sunita Williams' health on the ISS

By STACY LIBERATORE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

The stranded NASA astronaut at the center of growing health fears has finally broken her silence in a video recorded from space.

Health experts and NASA insiders had raised concerns that Sunita Williams, 59, was rapidly losing weight after photos appeared to show her looking 'gaunt' earlier this month, after spending over 150 days stuck on the International Space Station. 

But Williams hit back at the 'rumors' in a live video published by NASA today, claiming that she has actually put on muscle. 

'My thighs are a little bit bigger, my butt is a little bit bigger. We do a lot of squats,' she said.

She added that she is the same weight as when she launched to the ISS in June, and bizarrely claimed the apparent change in her appearance was due to 'fluid shift.'

'I think things shift around quite a bit, you probably heard of a fluid shift,' Williams said.

'Folks in space you know, their heads look a little bit bigger because the fluid evens out along the body.'

During spaceflight, weightlessness instantly shifts blood and fluids from the lower portion of the body to the upper areas, which can sometimes result in a puffy pace and thinner legs.

NASA astronaut Sunita Williams has broken her silence about fears that her health has deteriorated since becoming stranded on the International Space Station (ISS)

The health concerns surface when a photo from September appeared to she her with 'sunken' cheeks and a thinner frame 

Williams and her crewmate Barry Wilmore, 61, have been living on the ISS for five months after Boeing's faulty Starliner spacecraft was deemed unsafe to return them to Earth.

The mission was initially only supposed to be eight days but the astronauts won't return until February 2025. 

Williams spoke with the New England Sports Network Clubhouse Kids Show Tuesday while more than 250 miles above Earth's surface. 

During the interview, she addressed health concerns, calling them 'rumors,' and discussed her food intake, such as dining on a Turkish fish stew with olives and rice.

Williams did not provide details about her caloric intake while aboard the ISS.

A photo taken September 24 initially sparked health fears. A doctor told DailyMail.com at the time her cheeks looked 'sunken', possibly as a result of rapid weight loss.

Dr Vinay Gupta, a pulmonologist and veteran in Seattle, told DailyMail.com at the time that although she did not seem at a place where her life was in danger, 'I don't think you can look at that photo and say she has sort of healthy body weight.' 

More recently, a NASA source told the New York Post that NASA has been scrambling to 'stabilize the weight loss and hopefully reverse it.'

The unnamed employee who is 'directly involved with the mission' said that Williams has been 'unable to keep up with the high-caloric diets that astronauts must consume' while on the ISS. 

'The pounds have melted off her and she's now skin and bones. So it's a priority to help her stabilize the weight loss and hopefully reverse it,' the NASA source told the New York Post.

Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore before their mission on June 5. Williams said that she is the same weight now as she was at launch

Williams did not touch on her caloric intake while on the ISS, but alluded that she was eating well 

Williams and Wilmore still have to wait about three to four months until they can return to Earth on SpaceX's Crew Dragon.

At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that Williams' alleged health decline will impact this timeline.

But the female body suffers more in space than their male counterparts.

A study assembled by NASA in 2014 found that women have greater loss of blood plasma volume than men during spaceflight, and women’s stress response characteristically includes a heart rate increase while men respond with an increase in vascular resistance.

Read More

• The frightening amount of radiation NASA's stranded astronauts have endured because of Boeing's faulty spaceship 

The loss of blood plasma causes your metabolic rate to temporarily increase while your body mobilizes resources to adjust to the loss of plasma.

And this response can slightly elevate your calorie burn, resulting in weight loss similar to what Williams may be experiencing.

Another study released by Ball University in 2023 also found that women lose more muscle than men in a microgravity environment such as spaceflight.

'The amount of oxygen in the air is lower than it is at baseline, their nutritional intake is not going to be as robust as can be on the ground,' said Dr Gupta.

'Their ability to work out is going to be limited. So every every sort of physiologic variable that defines our well being is going to be suboptimal, especially even in a pressurized cabin, but in, you know, in outer space in their case, right?

'So what you're seeing there in that picture, especially with Sunita, is somebody that I think is experiencing the natural stresses of living at very high altitude, even in a pressurized cabin, for extended periods.'

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

13-11-2024 om 21:00 geschreven door peter  

(Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech).

The new findings could improve the chances of life having once existed on Mars, as well as the likelihood that additional evidence for it may be uncovered during current investigations at promising sites like Jezero Crater, where NASA’s Perseverance rover is currently conducting studies.

Harsh Living Conditions

The cold, dry conditions on Mars right now make it an unlikely place for organisms to be able to thrive, and a demanding place for humans who may undertake extended missions there in future decades.

Yet geological evidence suggests that this might not have been the case in the distant past. Around 3.7 million years ago, Mars may have possessed liquid water and an environment in which at least simple organisms could have thrived.

According to the Tohoku University team, formaldehyde might have also formed during this period of relative habitability on Mars. This is significant because formaldehyde is an important precursor in the formation of biomolecules through abiotic processes.

Modeling Early Mars

The Tohoku University team employed a computer model that allowed them to simulate conditions on the Red Planet long ago and see whether the formation of formaldehyde seemed likely based on the premise that the atmosphere then would have had an abundance of carbon dioxide, hydrogen and carbon monoxide.

Based on their simulations, Mars would have had an atmosphere 3.6 to 2.8 billion years ago that could have provided enough formaldehyde to allow several different organic compounds to form. This is significant since it means there is a chance that organic materials found on Mars could have had atmospheric origins during the earliest geological periods on the planet.

Shungo Koyama, the lead author of a new study outlining the team’s research, says their findings offer potentially groundbreaking insights into what chemical processes might have been occurring on Mars in the past, which provide a clearer picture of the conditions there that might have been conducive to life long ago.

Building Blocks of Life

“Our results show that a continuous supply of atmospheric [formaldehyde] can be used to form various organic compounds, including amino acids and sugars,” the team writes in the paper, offering a potential origin for its presence on the Martian surface.

With formaldehyde’s conversion into ribose, the team reports that “a continuous supply of bio-important sugars on early Mars, particularly during the Noachian and early Hesperian periods,” seems plausible.

Future studies by the team aim to explore geological data NASA’s rovers have collected to find additional clues about the presence of organic molecules on ancient Mars, and compare their models with samples obtained from the planet.

The team’s recent study, “Atmospheric formaldehyde production on early Mars leading to a potential formation of bio-important molecules,” was published in Scientific Reports.

VIDEOS

• Micah Hanks is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of The Debrief. He can be reached by email at micah@thedebrief.org. Follow his work at micahhanks.com and on X: @MicahHanks.

{ https://thedebrief.org/ }

13-11-2024 om 20:38 geschreven door peter  

Lue Elizondo’s Attorney Discloses We Have Working Teleportation & Anti-Gravity Technology

In the recent episode of “The UFO Podcast,” Sheehan said 40 witnesses have come forward with compelling evidence supporting the existence of UFO crafts. These witnesses, he claims, are aware not only of the existence of such crafts but also of the aerospace industry’s involvement in reverse engineering them for weapon development purposes. Sheehan stressed the gravity of the situation, labeling it an “extraordinarily serious problem.”

On “New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove,” Sheehan discussed the information on UFO reverse engineering. He said, “They (the US government) haven’t hit a home run but probably are on first base.” Sheehan discussed his chats with astronaut Edgar Mitchell, spilled details on anti-gravity experiments, and talked about possible advancements in UFO-related tech.

According to Sheehan, the U.S. has known about UFO-related technology since at least 1947. He mentioned conversations with Mitchell, who spilled the beans about experiments in labs trying to figure out anti-gravity. Mitchell revealed they made basic tech that could make objects weigh only half as much. Sheehan also shared a cool story about teleportation experiments, hinting at a possible connection to how UFOs travel without moving conventionally.

Daniel Sheehan: “He’s [Edgar Mitchell] also been at a place, he said that this is a big one that they actually were in one room and they put a coke bottle—I don’t know why they picked a coke bottle for the example other than the fact that it’s kind of archetypal—but they had a coke bottle and they put it on the table and had him put a little tag on it, writing his signature on it. Then had him go into this other room, and he waited there and he heard this kind of weird noise, and this light started to appear on the table, and the coke bottle manifested in the other room with his signature and stuff on the bottle. So, they’re experimenting with this kind of teleportation thing that may have something to do with the way that the UFO vehicles move from one star system to another without having to just travel super fast.”

Sheehan talked about a big change in the 1950s when magazines stopped talking about anti-gravity experiments. He thinks this tech went underground, with the military taking control of the research. It seems like they wanted to keep these discoveries hidden from the public.

About Sheehan’s Anti-gravity comment

In 1989, Bob Lazar explained the UFO propulsion system. He publicly told KLAS-5 TV that “The power source is an antimatter reactor that runs gravity amplifiers. There are actually two parts to the drive mechanism. It’s a bizarre technology with no physical hookup between any of the systems inside. They use gravity as a wave, employing wave guides, almost like microwaves.”

Lazar’s claims seem to be true after a 2020 New York story, “No Longer in Shadows, Pentagon’s U.F.O. Unit Will Make Some Findings Public,” that included some information about how astrophysicist and the Pentagon contractor Eric W. Davis gave a classified briefing to government officials in March 2020 about retrieved “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.” (Click here to read the full article)

At the 29th annual SSE Conference in 2010 in Boulder, Colorado, USA, Dr. Davis responded to the question of UFOs as they pertain to potential physics for traversable wormholes, warp drives, and anti-gravity. During a question and answer session, one questioner asked whether “…properties of UFOs had guided the thinking and research of that initiative.” Dr. Davis answered: “Secretly yes and overtly no.”

Giving a reason for the secrecy, he stated that “UFOs don’t have credibility with mainstream academic researchers,” and that “… policymakers and decision-makers in charge of funding and programmatic… don’t want to hear the topic of UFOs. So, for the purpose of doing this officially, [we didn’t bring in UFOs], but we did consider it under the table.”

Read also:

• This Woman Saw a UFO Landing & Three Aliens Abducted Calvin Parker & Charles Hickson
• David Grusch Reveals Disturbing UFO Secrets to Tucker Carlson: Claims of Death & Physical Harm in Cover-Up

Giving a reason for the secrecy, he stated that “UFOs don’t have credibility with mainstream academic researchers,” and that “… policymakers and decision-makers in charge of funding and programmatic… don’t want to hear the topic of UFOs. So, for the purpose of doing this officially, [we didn’t bring in UFOs], but we did consider it under the table.”

Dr. Davis stated: “We haven’t seen performances that adhere to the warp drive because… basically it’s just between stars and we don’t see UFOs warping anywhere. We see them doing ninety-degree turns and rapid motions. They disappear and reappear. That is undetermined yet.”

He commented on the matter of anti-gravity: “…We have anti-gravity in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity… There are aspects of anti-gravity, the properties of negative vacuum energy, that would create a repulsive force that allows something to levitate up. And UFOs do exhibit that.”

In 2007, Lockheed Martin scientist Boyd Bushman was featured in a UFO documentary by David Sereda titled “From Here to Andromeda.” Bushman discussed his ideas about UFOs and antigravity. He talked about his antigravity experiments and he referred to Bob Lazar, the original Area 51 whistleblower who claimed to have worked on a project “Reverse Engineering” a UFO.

About Sheehan’s comment on teleportation

According to the July 2020 NewYork Times article by Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal, Dr. Davis claimed that “he gave a classified briefing to a Defense Department agency as recently as March about retrievals from ‘off-world vehicles not made on this earth.’” Dr. Davis appears frequently in stories regarding strange Pentagon investigations. He was given $7.5 million by the Air Force in 2004 to research “psychic teleportation,” or the capacity to move between places by using only your mind.

In 2022, a massive database of U.S. government reports was made public through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The database of documents includes more than 1,500 pages of UFO-related material from the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) — a secretive U.S. Department of Defense program that ran from 2007 to 2012.

The report also includes a list of alleged biological effects of UFO sightings on human observers between 1873 and 1994, compiled by the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) — a civilian non-profit group that studies reported UFO sightings. The reported effects of UFO encounters include “unaccounted for pregnancy,” “apparent abduction,” paralysis, and experiences of perceived telepathy, teleportation and levitation.

In 2004 Eric Davis wrote a paper for the U.S. Air Force arguing that teleportation is not just a fantasy but an achievable technology and legitimate science. His paper stirred controversy, with critics labeling it as crackpot science and a waste of Air Force funds. Despite the criticism, Davis, with the Air Force’s permission, discusses his study publicly for the first time in an interview with George Knapp.

David said, “When most of us think of teleportation, images of Kirk, Spock, and the Enterprise come to mind—a convenient transit system depicted in science fiction. However, teleportation is not a form of dematerialization, as portrayed in Star Trek. Instead, it involves moving animated or inanimate objects instantaneously across space, time, or dimensions.”

Dr. Davis discussed research into psychic teleportation, citing declassified documents about Chinese advancements in this field. U.S. intelligence agencies reportedly acknowledge significant progress, envisioning potential military applications such as moving troops behind enemy lines without traditional transport, inserting spies into inaccessible locations, and conducting surprise operations.

While teleportation of matter has been achieved at top research labs, teleporting people remains a considerable challenge due to ethical and practical concerns. Dr. Davis acknowledges that in some teleportation schemes, the original person may need to be destroyed, giving rise to a new individual elsewhere.

While teleporting matter has been achieved in top research labs, teleporting humans remains a more complex challenge. In the interview, Dr. Davis acknowledged the potential risks, including the destruction of the original person and the emergence of a new individual elsewhere. The ethical and philosophical implications, such as the preservation of memories and experiences, remain unanswered due to the absence of a physics or biology of consciousness.

VIDEOS

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

13-11-2024 om 20:18 geschreven door peter  

Watch this private Varda Space capsule's blistering return to Earth in amazing onboard video

13-11-2024 om 18:23 geschreven door peter  

Wat zijn de verschillen tussen Neanderthalers en Sapiens? Weinig, maar fundamenteel voor de evolutie.

door Janine

Neanderthal-Museum, Mettmann/Wikimedia Commons - CC BY-SA 4.0 / Matteo De Stefano/MUSE/Wikimedia Commons - CC BY-SA 3.0

Jarenlang werden Neanderthalers als een inferieure soort beschouwd: gedrongen, dommer, minder complex, wat allemaal tot hun uitsterving zou hebben geleid.

Met de Neanderthaler delen we echter meer dan 99,5% van de genetische erfenis, en sinds enkele jaren zijn experts begonnen zijn figuur opnieuw te evalueren, zozeer zelfs dat ze van mening zijn dat hij veel meer op ons lijkt dan we dachten.

Kortom, de verschillen tussen Neanderthaler en Sapiens zijn niet zo groot, maar hebben toch tot zijn uitsterven geleid. Hoe is dit mogelijk? Laten we dat samen uitzoeken!

De evolutie: twee soorten met elkaar vergeleken

Om te begrijpen wat de echte verschillen tussen Neanderthalers en Sapiens zijn, moeten we, zoals vaak het geval is, beginnen bij hun oorsprong, dat wil zeggen hun evolutie. Beide soorten stammen in feite af van de Homo heidelbergensis, oorspronkelijk afkomstig uit Afrika.

Tegenwoordig weten we dat Neanderthalers afstammen van populaties Homo heidelbergensis die naar Europa en het Midden-Oosten trokken en ongeveer 400.000 jaar geleden verschenen. Sapiens daarentegen stammen af van populaties die in Afrika zijn gebleven en ongeveer 300.000 jaar geleden verschenen.

Hier zijn de eerste overeenkomsten en de eerste verschillen: Homo neanderthalensis en Homo sapiens delen meer dan 99,5% van hun DNA. Sterker nog, wij dragen genen van onze prehistorische verwanten in ons genoom, en andersom: sommige van onze genen werden aan hen doorgegeven en kwamen duizenden jaren later weer bij ons terug.

Kortom, Sapiens en Neanderthalers verschillen niet zo veel van elkaar, zozeer zelfs dat sommige experts zich hebben afgevraagd of het twee verschillende soorten zijn. Toch bestaan ​​er enkele verschillen, en die zijn van cruciaal belang.

Cognitie: twee breinen vergeleken

Paul Hudson/Flickr - CC BY 2.0

Ondanks het gedeelde genoom komen de verschillen tussen Neanderthalers en Sapiens naar voren op fysiek en vooral mentaal niveau.

Neanderthalers hadden een gedrongen bouw, aangepast aan het koude klimaat van het glaciale Europa, en grotere hersenen.

Sapiens daarentegen waren leniger, slanker en hadden iets kleinere hersenen dan hun verwanten, ongeveer 1300-1400 kubieke centimeter groot.

Recent onderzoek, gepubliceerd in Science, heeft aangetoond dat de ontwikkeling van de hersenen wordt beïnvloed door het TKTL1-gen en dat dit bij beide soorten slechts één aminozuur verschilt. Dit verschil leidde ertoe dat Homo sapiens meer neuronen had, ondanks hun kleinere hersenen.

Bijgevolg zou onze soort een complexere neuronale organisatie hebben gehad, een groter vermogen tot innovatie en zelfs een meer gesofisticeerde sociale organisatie. Allemaal elementen van een succesvol evolutionair pad.

Toch zijn zelfs vandaag de dag sommige van onze kenmerken terug te voeren op de genetische erfenis van de Neanderthaler, zoals:

• steil, dik haar;
• een hogere neus, die zich beter aanpast aan lage temperaturen;
• een lagere pijngrens;
• de neiging om 's ochtends vroeg wakker te worden.

De uitsterving: het echte verschil tussen Neanderthalers en Sapiens?

Zoals we al zeiden, gelooft niet iedereen dat de Neanderthalers echt zijn uitgestorven. Natuurlijk is er tegenwoordig niemand meer die tot deze soort behoort, maar de aanwezigheid van hun genoom in het onze staat buiten kijf.

Zelfs vandaag de dag bestaan ​​er nog steeds veel twijfels over het uitsterven van de Neanderthaler. Tot voor kort werd gedacht dat de komst van Sapiens een aanzienlijke impact had op het voortbestaan ​​van onze verwanten. Maar de werkelijkheid is wellicht complexer.

De twee soorten moderne mensen vermengen zich al duizenden jaren en op verschillende momenten in hun evolutionaire geschiedenis. Bovendien zijn directe conflicten tussen menselijke groepen die tot de twee soorten behoren niet gedocumenteerd.

Toch moeten er verschillen zijn tussen Neanderthalers en Sapiens die de verdwijning van de eerste zo'n 30.000 jaar geleden en het voortbestaan van de tweede verklaren. Enkele van de meest recente hypotheses hebben betrekking op

• de evolutie van de hersenen en de functie van sociale samenwerking;
• een grotere genetische variabiliteit en dus een grotere weerstand tegen ziekten;
• een welbespraakte taal en een grotere neiging tot complexe communicatie.

Neanderthalers waren in werkelijkheid niet dom en onbekwaam, maar meer ontwikkeld dan we dachten. Toch zijn de verschillen met onze soort anders en kunnen ze hebben bijgedragen aan hun verdwijning.

Of misschien ook niet, omdat een deel van hen in ons voortleeft en omgekeerd.

VIDEOS

13-11-2024 om 16:34 geschreven door peter  

Throughout the years, reports of alien abductions have emerged from all corners of the globe. 

An alien abduction is generally described as an event in which individuals report being taken against their will by extraterrestrial beings, often undergoing various forms of physical and psychological experimentation. 

Some argue that these experiences could simply reflect the subconscious mind at work or suggest that the abductees may have unknowingly been subjects of classified military experiments. Nonetheless, many abductees share accounts with such remarkable detail and consistency that some researchers feel the phenomenon deserves serious consideration. 

Over time, I’ve shared numerous articles on cases of alleged alien abductions, which you can explore under the "alien abduction" tag below the article. 

Here are two more intriguing cases in which abductees recount their experiences in vivid detail, prompting us to seriously consider the possibility that people may actually be taken by aliens. 

The Betty Andreasson Alien Abduction: A Strange Encounter in 1967 

One of the most detailed and haunting accounts of alien abduction began on January 25, 1967, in South Ashburnham, Massachusetts. That evening, Betty Andreasson’s family experienced a power outage, followed by an eerie red light outside. Peering out, Betty’s father saw five strange beings approaching who soon entered the house, seemingly passing through solid walls. They communicated telepathically and temporarily froze the family in place. 

These beings had distinctive appearances, with pear-shaped heads, wide eyes, and a calm, almost friendly aura. Betty was led to a spacecraft in her backyard and taken aboard, where she underwent strange tests and experienced an otherworldly vision. Hours later, she was returned home, and the aliens left her family unharmed. Initially, Betty viewed her experience through a religious lens, but over time, she came to see it as an alien encounter. 

Years later, her story caught the attention of Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a leading UFO researcher. Under hypnosis, Betty’s fragmented memories resurfaced, revealing consistent details corroborated by her daughter, who had also been briefly unfrozen by the beings. After extensive testing and interviews, investigators concluded that Betty was credible and sincerely believed in what she described. The Betty Andreasson abduction remains one of the most compelling cases in UFO lore.

The 1974 Medicine Bow National Forest Abduction: Carl Higdon's Astonishing Encounter 

Carl Higdon's hunting trip to Wyoming’s Medicine Bow National Forest in October 1974 took a surreal turn when he experienced one of the most bizarre UFO abduction cases on record. Aiming at an elk, Higdon was stunned to see his bullet slow mid-air and drop, seemingly defying physics. Moments later, he noticed an unusual figure—a tall being in a black jumpsuit with rod-like appendages instead of hands—who offered him pills, claiming that one would sustain him for days. 

Higdon, inexplicably compliant, swallowed a pill and suddenly found himself in a transparent structure with two more beings and five frozen elk. He was told they were traveling 163,000 light-years away to the aliens' home planet, which he described as filled with towering structures and an intensely bright sun. 

Two and a half hours later, Higdon was back in Medicine Bow, disoriented and missing his elk. Later medical tests revealed inexplicably high vitamin levels and the disappearance of old lung scars. Adding credibility to his story, other witnesses reported seeing strange lights in the area. Higdon’s experience remains a mysterious case. 

 

{ https://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com/ }

13-11-2024 om 16:15 geschreven door peter  

By NIKKI MAIN SCIENCE REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Mysterious objects were spotted falling from the sky and breaking apart over several states, leaving thousands baffled by the cosmic display.

Streaks of glowing lights appeared over parts of Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas, leaving people questioned were a possible fireball or part of a series of meteor showers.

Dozens of people reported the phenomenon at about 9pm ET, saying the lights streaked through the sky for up to 60 seconds before disappearing.

Witnesses captured the show, revealing what appeared to be a red and orange meteor shower shining bright as it broke up into several parts before it slowly dimmed and disappeared from the night sky.

A Texas resident reported that it 'first seemed like it was going straight up toward the sky then went directly over our head and we could see it breaking up as it traveled directly over us.'

Another person in the Lone Star State described it as 'by far the brightest meteor event I have ever witnessed.'

However, astronomer and orbital debris expert Jonathan McDowell confirmed the light show was caused by a SpaceX Starlink satellite breaking up as it re-entered Earth's atmosphere. 

A Starlink satellite set off a fiery display as it re-entered the Earth's atmosphere on Saturday night

People across Oklahoma, Colorado, Kansas and Texas speculated whether the lights in the night sky (pictured) were caused by fireworks

SpaceX has thousands of its Starlink satellites orbiting Earth to provide internet access to remote areas around the world, launching 98 this year as of mid-October.

At the end of their mission, internet satellites are designed to re-enter the atmosphere to avoid cluttering Earth's orbit with space debris. 

McDowell told Space.com that these satellites 'are dominating' the clutter in Earth's atmosphere, adding that 'there is now a Starlink reentry almost every day, sometimes multiple.'

The satellite re-entered over Washington state and continued southeast before disappearing over northern Texas.

An Oklahoma resident described the satellite as a 'bright fire ball heading southeast, slow moving, looked like it split into 3 parts,' while another called it 'the coolest thing I've seen.'

Some people speculated that the satellite was part of a series of three meteor showers - the Leonids and Southern and Northern Taurids - that reached peak activity this month.

The number of Starlink satellites that have reentered the atmosphere has drastically increased over the last fiver years, jumping from between 50 and 100 per year to around 300 annually. 

'We are seeing a similar increase in the number of satellites now that hundreds of Starlink satellites are starting to come down,' McDowell told Space.com.

The satellite entered over Washington state and flew southeast across the US before fizzling out over northern Texas

Researchers have found that burning up satellites in the atmosphere could destroy the ozone. Pictured: Starlink satellite burning up as it re-enters Earth's atmosphere

Although satellites burning up as they re-enter the atmosphere has become standard practice, researchers have questioned whether the metal particles could destroy the ozone over time.

This is because the satellites are so large and burn up slowly, releasing aerosol particles that are less than one micrometer in size.

A 2023 study found that satellite re-entries have already begun to change the stratosphere's composition.

A NASA WB-57 aircraft found 500,000 single aerosol particles that contained 20 different elements including lithium, aluminum, copper and lead.

Out of all the elements found, aluminum was the most concerning because it could react with the hydrogen chloride - a pre-existing component in the stratosphere - causing it to split apart and destroy the ozone.

Pierre Lionnet, the managing director of ASD Eurospace, a space industry trade association told Science.org that the number of satellites returning to Earth does matter.

SpaceX accounts for more than 6,000 satellites in orbit and the company has already applied to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for permission to launch another 30,000 in low orbit.

Because of the mass volume of Starlink satellites, Lionnet said: 'You have to wonder whether [SpaceX] is creating a major problem 30 years from now.'

Astronomer and orbital debris expert Jonathan McDowell revealed that the mysterious light show was the result of the breaking up of a SpaceX Starlink satellite when it re-entered Earth's atmosphere. 

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

13-11-2024 om 00:41 geschreven door peter  

Scientists propose a shocking new theory for the origin of the moon - and claim the popular 'collision theory' is WRONG

• READ MORE: Our moon went through physical changes during Covid 

By WILIAM HUNTER

Despite being our planet's closest neighbour, scientists have been grappling with the mystery of our moon's origin for hundreds of years. 

Since the 1980s, experts have assumed that our lunar satellite was formed in the aftermath of an explosive impact with the protoplanet Theia early in Earth's history.

But now, a study suggests that this so-called 'collision' theory may not be correct after all.

Instead, researchers from Penn State University say that the Earth might have neatly nabbed the moon as it drifted by in a process called binary-exchange capture.

This radical theory suggests that the moon might have started life as one part of a 'terrestrial binary', a pair of rocky objects orbiting one another.

As this pair passed within Earth's pull, the moon was yanked into orbit while the second body was catapulted out into space.

Lead researcher Professor Darren Williams says: 'No one knows how the moon was formed.

'For the last four decades, we have had one possibility for how it got there. Now, we have two.'

A new theory suggests that the moon might not have been formed by a collision with  an ancient protoplanet but through a process called 'binary-exchange capture'  

Researchers suggest that the moon might have started out as one part of a planetary binary, two large rocky bodies which orbit each other as they drift through space (file photo)

In 1984, scientists gathered for the Kona Conference in Hawaii to come to a consensus on how the moon had formed.

Using the 800lbs (363kg) of lunar material taken back by NASA's Apollo missions, the scientists found that the moon had a similar but not entirely identical chemical composition to Earth.

From this evidence, they came to the conclusion that the moon must have been formed out of debris knocked loose when a celestial body slammed into the young Earth.

This theory was popular because it fits well with much of what we now know about the chemical composition of the moon - but it doesn't explain all the details.

For example, Professor Williams and his co-author point out that, if the moon were formed from a ring of debris slowly condensing into a sphere, we should expect to find it orbiting above the equator.

However, the moon's orbit is actually tilted onto a totally different plane about seven degrees away from the equatorial plane. 

To find an alternative explanation for why this might be the case, the researchers looked at a phenomenon called binary-exchange capture.

This suggests that Earth might have snagged one of a pair of passing rocky bodies and made it into its satellite.

Earlier theories suggest that the moon was formed when a protoplanet called Theia collided with the young Earth. Scientists believe the moon was formed as the resultant ring of debris collected into a sphere 

The binary-exchange capture theory

The moon may have started out as one part of a 'planetary binary', two rocky bodies orbiting each other as they drift through space.

As this binary entered Earth's gravitational pull, the moon might have been yanked out of the binary pair.

The moon would then become the Earth's satellite while the other part of the pair was catapulted into space.

This would explain why the moon doesn't orbit over the equator as we would expect from a collision.

It also provides a reason why the moon is chemically similar to, but not identical to Earth.

In support of this idea, Professor Williams points to the example of Triton, Neptune's largest moon.

Current theories suggest that Triton was pulled into Neptune from the Kuiper Belt where one in 10 objects are thought to be a binary.

Just like our moon, Triton orbits at a significantly tilted angle, leaning 67 degrees away from the planet's equator.

And, according to mathematical models, it is quite plausible that the same thing could have happened to our moon.

In their paper, published in The Planetary Science Journal, the researchers calculate that Earth could have captured an object between one and 10 per cent of its total mass.

At just 1.2 per cent of the Earth's mass, the moon falls comfortably within this range.

The only caveat is that the planetary binary would have had to have passed within just 80,000 miles (128,750km) of Earth at a speed below 6,700 miles per hour (10,800km).

While that might seem incredibly fast, in the scale of the solar system that is the equivalent of a leisurely stroll.

Researchers point out that if the moon were formed from a collision we should expect it to orbit Earth around the equator. But the moon's orbital plane is angled at about 7 degrees from the equator 

Using a mathematical model (pictured), the scientists calculated that the Earth could capture an object between one and 10 times its mass if it was travelling at the right speed and the other part of the binary had a large enough mass. As this graph shows, the Earth is easily capable of capturing something as large as the moon at speeds of up to 3km per second 

The problem is that, even at these sedate speeds, when it first arrived, the moon's orbit would have been massively elliptical much like that of a comet around the sun.

However, the researchers also show how this orbit would have evolved under the influence of tidal forces.

As the moon races around the Earth, the tides would have slightly lagged behind its orbit, exerting a gravitational pull which would have slowly tamed its wild orbit.

Over thousands of years, that constant tug would have made the orbit more regular and circular until it settled into the close orbit it currently has.

Professor Williams says: 'Today, the Earth tide is ahead of the Moon, high tide accelerates the orbit.

'It gives it a pulse, a little bit of boost. Over time, the Moon drifts a bit farther away.'

Now the moon is so far out that both the Sun and Earth pull on it, leading it to drift about 3cm further away every year.

This theory has some key advantages in that it explains why the moon's orbit is so tilted and accounts for the presence of certain chemical isotopes found on the moon and not on Earth.

Scientists believe that Triton (pictured), the largest moon of Neptune, was originally a planetary binary in the Keuper belt before being captured 

As this graph shows, when the moon first arrived, its orbit would be shaped like an oval rather than the circle we are more familiar with 

The researchers admit that their theory would be hard to prove and relies on several 'implausible events' happening at once.

However, Professor Williams maintains that binary-exchange capture is a viable alternative to the standard collision theory and one that merits further consideration.

The researchers argue that planetary binaries may have been more common in the early solar system and could have plausibly gone on to create the moon. 

Professor Williams adds: 'This opens a treasure trove of new questions and opportunities for further study.'

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

12-11-2024 om 23:49 geschreven door peter  

NASA's ice-hunting VIPER moon rover getting ready to slither to the launch pad

Moon-orbiting satellite missions have collected data regarding water on the moon before, but VIPER will get "up close and personal" with the lunar surface, scanning with its scientific tools and investigating soil at varying depths with its 3.3-foot (1 meter) drill. Some of the regions VIPER will explore are permanently shadowed craters that are some of the coldest places in the solar system. It is believed that the bottoms of these craters harbor ice that has been undisturbed for billions of years.

As it conducts its mission, VIPER will be exposed to the extreme environment of the moon and the incredibly cold temperatures of these permanently shadowed areas while having to overcome complex terrain.

Testing of VIPER's systems is a crucial stage for the mission. Andrews explained that, as the team assembles and installs various subsystems onto the rover, they perform "channelization" tests. These trials enable the team to confirm that pieces and parts like cable harnesses and connectors between systems are working. 

"Now, you might think, 'Of course what we installed should work!' But it’s important to remember how complicated these space systems, and planetary rover systems in particular, are," Andrews said. "Sometimes we will perform even more complex tests, like sending a command to the Near Infrared Volatile Spectrometer Subsystem (NIRVSS) instrument to take an image: Is the image taken successful? Is the field of view of the image correct? Did the image make its way into the rover’s avionics for downlink?"

This "test as we go" approach ensures that the NASA team doesn't discover issues that could impact VIPER later in its development or, even worse, when it is unreachable on the lunar surface. 

"So we test as we go to decrease risk later when we’re performing whole-rover environmental tests. This way, if the rover doesn’t work as expected after one of VIPER’s environmental tests, we know it once worked fine, and that can help us more quickly problem-solve what might have gone wrong," Andrews concluded. "The pace in which we’ve been working through the build and subsystem checkouts has been blistering lately, and we’ve had a good run of successes.

"Go VIPER!"

VIDEOS

{ https://www.space.com/ }

12-11-2024 om 20:58 geschreven door peter  

UAP Disclosure Event Following House Oversight Hearing Announced by MUFON and New Paradigm Institute

• The post-hearing event on Capitol Hill will bring together disclosure advocacy groups and activists in the interest of full government transparency on UAP.

WASHINGTON, DC, UNITED STATES, November 11, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ -- In a unified call for government transparency and disclosure on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) and the New Paradigm Institute (NPI) today announced an event set to start 30 minutes after the conclusion of the Wednesday, November 13, 2024, “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth” hearing at 11:30 AM EST. This hearing, held jointly by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Subcommittees on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation and National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs, will feature key testimony on the topic of UAP.

New Paradigm Institute

MUFON

The hearing will be chaired by Representatives Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Glenn Grothman (R-WI), with Ranking Members Gerald Connolly (D-VA) and Robert Garcia (D-CA). Notable witnesses include Dr. Tim Gallaudet, Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy (RET.); Luis Elizondo, author and former Department of Defense official; Michael Gold, Chief Growth Officer, Redwire Corporation, and former National Aeronautics and Space Administration Associate Administrator; and Michael Shellenberger, Founder of Public.

The UAP disclosure event will provide media representatives and the public an invaluable opportunity to hear directly from representatives of MUFON and NPI, two of the most influential civilian organizations committed to advancing UAP disclosure and the need to provide continued support for Congressional disclosure efforts. MUFON and NPI aim to increase public awareness and demand for accountability, urging Executive Branch agencies to reveal information about nonhuman intelligence and technologies of unknown origin to Congress and the public.

Danny Sheehan, Chief Counsel, NPI: “We thank Representatives Nancy Mace and Glenn Grothman for holding this crucial hearing and the witnesses for their upcoming testimony. It is essential that we work together to uncover the truth that has been hidden from Congress and the American people.”

Ron James, Media Relations Director, MUFON: “MUFON has been collecting evidence on the reality of the UAP phenomenon for 55 years. In 2023, we released the film Accidental Truth, featuring some of the hearing’s witnesses. We have actively shared data with Congress and the public as we push for official acknowledgment of nonhuman intelligence among us.”

Confirmed speakers at the UAP disclosure event include:

• Daniel Sheehan, President and General Counsel, New Paradigm Institute (NPI)
• Ron James, Media Relations Director, Mutual UFO Network (MUFON)
• David MacDonald, Executive Director, Mutual UFO Network (MUFON)
• Stephen Bassett, Executive Director, Paradigm Research Group
• Robert Salas, Captain, U.S. Air Force (RET), author of several UFO books
• Jim Garrison, Director, NPI Washington, DC Office, who will moderate

MUFON and NPI invite media representatives and the public interested in UAP transparency to attend the event, which promises expert insights and a compelling discussion on the importance of government accountability in the disclosure era.

Details:

• Time: 30 minutes after the conclusion of the hearing.
• Location: The Spirit of Justice Park (House Lower D Park), South Capitol Street and C Street SW, directly south of the Rayburn House Office Building.
• Livestream: https://mufontelevision.com/hearings/

About the Mutual UFO Network:

Started in 1969, the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) is currently the world’s oldest and largest organization studying the subject. They are dedicated to “the scientific understanding of UFOs for the benefit of humanity.” MUFON deploys active investigators worldwide and has amassed over 155,000 case reports. MUFON has actively participated in the political disclosure process and has provided information to the public.

For more information, please visit https://mufon.com.

About the New Paradigm Institute:

The New Paradigm Institute, a project of the Romero Institute, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit interfaith law and policy center, is dedicated to advocating for the public release of information held by the government surrounding the issue of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), or what has commonly been known as Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs).

Kevin A Wright
Solve Advocacy
+1 703-965-3559
email us here
Visit us on social media:
X
LinkedIn

Distribution channels: 

• Politics, 
• U.S. Politics, 
• World & Regional

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

{ https://www.einpresswire.com/ }

12-11-2024 om 20:38 geschreven door peter  

UK’s Clearest UFO Photo Is Revealed, It Was Set To Be Released In 2072, 100% Authentic

Nick Pope worked for the British Ministry of Defence (MoD) for 21 years. From 1991 to 1994, he was the head of the MoD’s UFO project. He said that during his time in the MoD, he came across several credible UFO cases. One such case involves the photograph from the Calvine Incident.

The story of how the photograph reached the MoD’s office is phenomenal. Mr. Pope said that when he began his investigation into UFOs in 1991, it led him to a poster, hanging on the wall near his desk. The poster was an enlarged-colored photograph of the UFO from the Calvine Incident.

“The X-Files first aired in the UK in 1994 and I acquired the same nickname (Spooky) as Fox Mulder, for obvious reasons,” Nick said. “Mulder famously had his ‘I want to believe’ UFO poster on his office wall and though uncaptioned, I suppose this was my equivalent.”

Most of the UFO photos are either fake, blurry, or just a small dot in the sky, but this particular photo was clear and taken in broad daylight. According to Mr. Pope, the photograph contained an 80-foot diamond-shaped craft with a military jet in the background.

Two unnamed hikers from the Perthshire region allegedly took the photo of a large UFO while walking near the village of Calvine on August 4, 1990. “The photos were then sent to the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS) who then sent them on to imagery analysts at JARIC (Joint Air Reconnaissance Intelligence Centre). Yet at the time, the MoD hadn’t even publicly acknowledged that there was any intelligence interest in UFOs at all,” Mr. Pope explained.

Read also:

• Bob Lazar Explains How Aliens Use Element 115 To Fly UFOs
• FBI Chilling UFO Reports: Recovered 3 UFOs With Alien Bodies In New Mexico & 27,000 Mph Craft
• Ret. US Army Major Showed Deleted UFO Photos Captured By Apollo Astronauts On Moon
• Does This FBI Document Suggest That Nikola Tesla Was An Alien From Venus?

Interestingly, the photo disappeared without any trace when the UFO investigators questioned the MoD whether Americans were testing secret prototype aircraft in the area. Mr. Pope asked the US if the craft belonged to them but they refused to admit it.

According to a 30-year rule in the UK, the MoD was supposed to release the secret UFO dossier on January 1, 2021, but the UK government banned the release for another 50 years. This secret file is said to contain the infamous UFO photo from the Calvine incident. Now, it is set to be released on January 1, 2072.

Photo found after 32 years

UAP Media UK is working hard to bring a serious resource to the British media outlets on the discussion of UFOs. One of the members of this project named Vinnie Adams has been working with Dr. David Clarke and a small team of researchers on the Calvine case from 1990 in Scotland for the last 11 months. (Source)

This led him to discover an original print of the Calvine “UFO,” taken directly from the negatives that were sent by the witnesses to the Scottish Daily Record back in 1990, just after the event occurred.

He also found the original envelope which was sent from the Scottish Daily Record to Craig Lindsay who was the MOD Press Officer that dealt with the case at the time.

Mr. Adams wrote: “According to the copy of the hand-written sighting report that was released by The National Archives (TNA) in October 2008, the witnesses gave an account of their sighting plus the color photographs to what was the joint RAF/Royal Navy Headquarters at Pitreavie, near Dunfermline (which closed in 1996).”

Nick Pope mentioned the details of the Scottish sighting in his 1996 book “Open Skies, Closed Minds,” which prompted a British Parliamentary Question in July 1996 from Martin Redmond, Former Member of Parliament for Doncaster, about the incident:

“To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment his Department made of the photograph of an unidentified craft at Calvine on 4 August 1990; who removed it from an office in Secretariat (Air Staff) 2a; for what reasons; and if he will make a statement.”

Nicholas Soames, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, gave a written reply to the MP’s question:

“A number of negatives associated with the sighting were examined by staff responsible for air defence matters. Since it was judged they contained nothing of defence significance the negatives were not retained and we have no record of any photographs being taken from them.” (Hansard HC Deb., 24 July 1996, vol.282, col 39248W)

Journalist Dr David Clarke, who is also a member of UAP Media UK, was put in touch with retired RAF press officer Craig Lindsay. Craig was involved in the Calvine case back in 1990 as the go-between for the Daily Record and the MOD.

During his involvement in the case, Craig acquired an original print of the elusive photograph. Along with the photo, Craig also kept the original envelope containing the photograph sent by the Daily Record to the MOD.

In May 2022, David interviewed Craig in Scotland and was shown the original print. In June, Craig agreed to donate the photograph to the Sheffield Hallam University Archives, handing it to Dr. Dravid Clarke and Vinnie Adams. The image now resides in its new home at the Sheffield Hallam University folklore archives.

Authenticity of Calvine UFO Photo

Andrew Robinson, a senior lecturer in Photography at Sheffield Hallam University claims the authenticity of the 1990 Scottish highlands UFO photo. In his detailed analysis, he found the image showing no evidence of negative or print-based manipulation, and all visible signs suggest this is a genuine photograph of the scene before the camera. (Source)

Robinson concluded in his study:

• The photograph is a color print from XP-1 or XP-2 chromogenic Black and White C41 film printed on a standard.
• It is not possible to identify the object in the center of the frame. However, the evidence present suggests that this object was in front of the camera in the position shown when the photograph was captured;
• Thus it follows that this is either a genuine unidentified flying object in the sky OR that any construction or manipulation used to create this effect occurred in front of the camera and not in the capturing of the scene on film nor in the subsequent processing and printing of the image;
• The results of this analysis are consistent with, and support the claimed heritage of the print.

UFO image lost for 30 years uncovered

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

12-11-2024 om 18:06 geschreven door peter  

'Otherworldly' crash site discovered on surface of Mars by NASA helicopter

Sinead Butler

An "otherwordly" crash site of another spacecraft was photographed by a NASA helicopter.

Back in 2020, the Perseverance Rover was sent up to the Red Planet with the Mars Helicopter called Ingenuity strapped to the bottom of it.

The initial plan was for Ingenuity - otherwise known as Ginny - to make no more than five test flights within 30 days but in the end, the aircraft surpassed expectations when it completed 72 flights between April 2021 and January 2024.

It's more impressive when you consider the fact that the helicopter was just half a meter (1.6 feet) tall and weighed less than two kilograms (four pounds).

As the first aircraft to successfully complete a powered, controlled flight on another planet, the purpose of the flights was to explore parts of Mars that couldn't be reached by the Perseverance rover.

NASA/JPL-Caltech

One of the notable aerial images was captured in 2022 when the helicopter took photos of debris on the dusty, cold, desert.

"There's definitely a sci-fi element to it. It exudes otherworldly, doesn't it?" Ian Clark, a Perseverance parachute system engineer, told The New York Times.

“They say a picture's worth 1,000 words, but it's also worth an infinite amount of engineering understanding.”

But before you go and make assumptions that Martians or alien life were responsible for the wreckage, this wasn't the case but rather was the result of us humans.

So what was the debris?

Basically, it was landing equipment used to help Ingenuity and the Peersererance Rover land on the surface of Mars in 2021.

In the photos, you can see the upright backshell and the debris which is thought to have impacted the surface at about 78 mph (126 kph).

“The backshell’s protective coating appears to have remained intact during Mars atmospheric entry. Many of the 80 high-strength suspension lines connecting the backshell to the parachute are visible and also appear intact," the space agency said.

“Spread out and covered in dust, only about a third of the orange-and-white parachute - at 70.5 feet (21.5 meters) wide, it was the biggest ever deployed on Mars - can be seen, but the canopy shows no signs of damage from the supersonic airflow during inflation.”

{ https://www.indy100.com/ }

12-11-2024 om 17:28 geschreven door peter  

While concepts for an interstellar spacecraft go back to the early Space Age, interest in the field has grown considerably in the past two decades. This is largely due to the recent explosion in the number of known exoplanets in our galaxy, which currently stands at 5,787 confirmed planets in 4,325 star systems. This is illustrated by concepts like Breakthrough Starshot, Swarming Proxima Centauri, and the Genesis Project. These concepts leverage gram-scale spacecraft, directed energy (lasers), and lightsails to achieve speeds of up to 20% of the speed of light, allowing them to make the journey in decades rather than centuries or millennia.

However, sending crewed spacecraft to other star systems with enough passengers to settle on another planet is far more challenging. As addressed in a previous article, a spacecraft relying on known or technically feasible propulsion methods would take between 1,000 and 81,000 years to reach even the nearest star (Proxima Centauri). While some advanced concepts like Project Orion, Daedalus, and Icarus could theoretically reach Proxima Centauri in 36 to 85 years, the costs and amount of propellant needed are prohibitive.

The alternative to these “go fast” concepts is to settle in for the long ride, which may last centuries or even millennia. This necessitates a spacecraft of sufficient size capable of accommodating hundreds (or thousands) of human beings over multiple generations. To save room and reduce the mass of cargo space, the crews will need to grow much of their food and rely on life support systems that are bioregenerative in nature. In short, the ship would need to be self-sustaining so the passengers could live comfortable, healthy lives until they reached their destination.

Andreas Hein, an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering at the University of Luxembourg and the Chief Scientist at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust, is part of the Hyperion Project’s Organizing Committee. As he told Universe Today via email:

“Think about the difference between a drone and an ocean liner. Previous designs for interstellar spacecraft, such as Orion, Daedalus, and Icarus, focused on uncrewed probes with the primary objective of gathering scientific data from target star systems, including searching for signs of life. In contrast, generation ships are designed to transport a crew, with the primary goal of settling an exoplanet or other celestial body in the target star system. They also tend to be much larger than interstellar probes, though they would likely use similar propulsion systems, such as fusion-based propulsion.”

Generation Ships

The first known description of a generation ship was made by rocketry engineer Robert H. Goddard, one of the “forefathers of modern rocketry,” for whom NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center is named. In his 1918 essay, “The Ultimate Migration,” he described an “interstellar ark” leaving the Solar System in the distant future after the Sun reached the end of its life cycle. The passengers would cryogenically frozen or in a state of induced torpor for much of the journey except for the pilot, who would be awakened periodically to steer the ship.

Goddard recommended that the ship be powered by atomic energy if the technology were realized. If not, a combination of hydrogen, oxygen, and solar energy would suffice. Goddard calculated that these power sources would allow the vessel to achieve velocities of 4.8 to 16 km/s (3 to 10 mi/s), or roughly 57,936 km/h (36,000 mph). This was followed by famed Russian rocket scientist and cosmologist Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky, also recognized as one of the “forefathers of modern rocketry.” In 1928, he wrote an essay titled “The Future of Earth and Mankind” that described an interstellar “Noah’s Ark.”

In Tsiolkovsky’s version, the spaceship would be self-sufficient, and the crew would be awake for the journey, which would last for thousands of years. In 1964, NASA scientist Dr. Robert Enzmann proposed the most detailed concept to date for a generation ship, known as an “Enzmann Starship.“ The proposal called for a ship measuring 600 meters (2,000 feet) in length powered by a fusion thruster that uses deuterium as a propellant. According to Enzmann, this ship would house an initial crew of 200 people with room for expansion along the way.

In recent years, the concept has been explored from various angles, from biological and psychological to ethical. This included a series of studies (2017-2019) conducted by Dr. Frederic Marin of the Astronomical Observatory of Strasbourg using tailor-made numerical software (called HERITAGE). In the first two studies, Dr. Marin and colleagues conducted simulations that showed that a minimum crew of 98 (max. 500) would need to be coupled with a cryogenic bank of sperm, eggs, and embryos to ensure genetic diversity and good health upon arrival.

In the third study, Dr. Marin and another group of scientists determined that the ship carrying them would need to measure 320 meters (1050 feet) in length, 224 meters (735 feet) in radius, and contain 450 m² (~4,850 ft²) of artificial land to grow enough food to sustain them. In short, these proposals and studies establish that a generation ship and its crew must bring “Earth with them” and rely on bioregenerative systems to replenish their food, water, and air throughout generations.

As noted, most studies regarding interstellar exploration have focused on probes or ships and tended to emphasize speed over ensuring passengers could make the journey. As Hein explained, this makes the Hyperion Project the first competition to focus on generation ships and ensuring the interstellar voyagers remain healthy and safe until they arrive in a nearby star system:

“This competition is unprecedented—a true first. To our knowledge, it marks the first time a design competition specifically focused on generation ships has been launched. It builds on our team’s prior research, conducted since 2011, which addresses fundamental questions such as the required population size. This competition uniquely explores the complex interplay between generation ship technologies and the dynamics of a highly resource-constrained society.

“Most studies have focused on the technological aspects, such as propulsion and life support, while often treating the ship’s technology and onboard society as separate issues. This approach is understandable given the challenge of analyzing these interdependencies. We even got the advice to stay away. Our goal is to take an initial step toward exploring and envisioning these interdependencies. We aim to be Cayley instead of Da Vinci. Da Vinci imagined aircraft, but Cayley conceived their basic design principles, which paved the way for the Wright Brothers.”

The Competition

Registration for the competition will remain open until December 15th, 2024, and all participating teams must pay a $20 registration fee. The top three winning entries will be announced on June 2nd, 2025, and awarded $5000 for first place, $3000 for second, and $2000 for third. In addition, ten teams will receive honorary mentions for creative and innovative ideas. For more information, check out Project Hyperion’s website and the Mission Brief.

Per their mission statement, Project Hyperion is a preliminary study and feasibility assessment for crewed interstellar flight using current and near-future technologies. The goal is to inform the public about the future possibility of interstellar space travel and to guide future research and technology development. As they state on their website, the competition has the following theme:

“Humanity has overcome the great sustainability crisis in the 21st century and has transitioned into an era of sustainable abundance, both on Earth and in space. Humanity has now reached the capacity to develop a generation ship without major sacrifices. An Interstellar Starship flies by an icy planet in a nearby solar system. Going beyond the classical examination of the problem of Interstellar propulsion and structural design for a voyage lasting multiple centuries, what might be the ideal type of habitat architecture and society in order to ensure a successful trip?”

Participants will be tasked with designing the ship, its habitat, and its subsystems, including details on its architecture and society. The Project Brief describes other important Boundary Conditions, including the duration of the mission, its destination, and other important considerations. The mission duration is 250 years from launch to arrival at the target star system, consistent with the ship having advanced propulsion capable of achieving a fraction of the speed of light.

To ensure the health and safety of the crew, the ship’s habitat must have atmospheric conditions similar to Earth, protection from galactic rays, micrometeorites, and interstellar dust (necessary for relativistic space travel). The ship must also provide artificial gravity via rotating sections, but “parts of the habitat can have reduced gravity.” The habitat must also provide accommodation and decent living conditions for 1000 plus or minus 500 people throughout the trip. The habitat will also need to be designed in such a way that it can be modified to meet changing needs.

The society’s structure must allow for cultural variations, including language, ethics, family structure, beliefs, aesthetics, family structure, and other social factors. The competition also considers knowledge retention and loss relative to Earth, which they describe as “almost inevitable.” Cameron Smith, an anthropologist at Portland State University and the University of Arizona’s Center for Human Space Exploration (CHaSE), is also a member of Project Hyperion’s Organizing Committee. As he explained to Universe Today:

“[T]he situation of a population, let’s say thousands or even 1500 people, traveling in isolation for centuries would be unique to the human experience. So just as we plan for the health of the architecture and the hardware, maintaining them to keep them in a good state over this time span, we can plan for the health and maintenance of both biology and culture. And we have an excellent guide which is evolution.

“Evolution is at the heart of all life sciences, and it also, in many ways, applies to cultural change through time. Biology evolves, and cultures evolve. And we have learned how to manage our cultures on Earth to fit a wide variety of situations.”

“The idea, however, is to get people thinking about how culture might be adjusted for the unusual conditions I’ve outlined. Separation from Earth, separation from other populations of humans, except by radio or video communication – which will become less and less as they get farther from Earth – what could change through time of the voyage that would require cultural adjustment?”

Throughout the trip, the population must also have access to basic products (clothing, shelter, etc.). The mass of the habitat is to be as low as possible, reliable over the entire duration of the journey, and include redundant systems. The generation ship’s target destination is a rocky planet in a nearby star system (like Proxima b). In an interesting twist, the competition stresses that this planet will have an artificial ecosystem created by a precursor probe, à la Project Genesis. As a result, the crews will not require any significant genetic or biological adaptations to survive in that ecosystem. As Hein explained:

“250 years in a tin can and staying happy, aka. can a society thrive in a severely resource-constrained environment? Answering this question is essential for designing a generation ship and may also offer insights into sustainable futures on Earth. From my perspective, there has been a significant lack of imaginative solutions to this challenge.’250 years in a tin can and staying happy, aka, can a society thrive in a severely resource-constrained environment?’

“Answering this question is essential for designing a generation ship and may also offer insights into sustainable futures on Earth. From my perspective, there has been a significant lack of imaginative solutions to this challenge.”

“We also hope to raise awareness of the complexities underlying today’s technologies. Which technologies could or should be preserved on a generation ship, and which may be lost? Research shows that a society’s population size affects the diversity and complexity of its technologies. Most modern technologies require intricate supply chains involving numerous companies, infrastructure, and regulatory systems. Therefore, a generation ship will likely rely on low-tech solutions unless disruptive technologies, like molecular manufacturing or Standard Template Constructs (as depicted in Warhammer 40k), become feasible.”

An Interdisciplinary Approach

A major focus of the competition is interdisciplinary research, reflective of the organizing committee itself. This has become a trend in space research, thanks in large part to the rise of the commercial space industry. For many companies and non-profits today, traditional research is expanding beyond aerospace engineering and incorporating architecture and interior design, biology, sociology, psychology, agriculture, and other disciplines to create concepts that will allow for healthy and sustainable living in space.

Per the rules, teams must consist of at least one architectural designer, engineer, and social scientist (a sociologist, anthropologist, etc.). As Yazgi Demirbas Pech, an architect and designer with the Organizing Committee, explained:

“We hope this competition will inspire greater interdisciplinary collaboration, emphasizing the value of fields such as architecture and social sciences—especially critical in planning for long-duration, long-distance missions. A holistic approach that integrates these diverse fields can contribute to more sustainable and human-centered solutions for space exploration.

“Unlike traditional architectural practices on Earth, space architecture requires a delicate balance between strict technical constraints—such as limited physical space, extreme environmental conditions, and restricted resources—and the essential human needs for comfort, safety, and psychological well-being. Here, architecture becomes a life-sustaining element, enabling people to live, work, and thrive across vast distances and timescales.

“Through this competition, we invite teams to challenge conventional design principles and redefine what “home” means among the stars. Including architects or architecture students on teams will undoubtedly add fresh perspectives to this thought-provoking competition.”

Solving for Space Solves for Earth

Another important aspect of the competition is the desire to inspire ideas that will also have applications and benefits here on Earth. This is another crucial aspect of the future of space exploration, which includes plans for creating outposts on the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Like a generation ship, missions operating farther from Earth cannot rely on regular resupply missions sent from Earth. This means that habitats must be as self-sufficient as possible and ensure that inhabitants have enough air, water, and food to live comfortably.

For decades, scientists and planners have looked to Earth’s natural environment for inspiration. This was the purpose of the Biosphere 2 project, which conducted two experiments between 1991 and 1994 in which volunteers lived in a sealed biome that mimics Earth’s many environments. Since 2007, the University of Arizona has used the facility to conduct research through its CHaSE program while remaining open to the public.

“Since the 1990s, [Biosphere 2] has been a research center for closed ecosystems as though on a starship, and the research here continues. [I am] actually residing at the biosphere until January, and I am looking at the stars and engaged in all of this right now,” said Smith, who wrote to Universe Today from the facility. As he went on to note, research from this experiment and similar studies have significant applications for life here on Earth, mainly because there is no margin for error in space:

“[T]he planning and preparation going into the starship in terms of its culture and biological protections for the offspring would be very carefully designed to give the greatest protections to them, perhaps in ways more specifically tailored to their survival and good health than in any culture ever on Earth. On the interstellar voyage, things must go just right to survive over multiple generations in the closed ecosystem, so planning and preparation would have to be very thorough.”

Since failure in space often means death, especially when people are stationed far from Earth where rescue missions would take too long to reach them, the technologies future explorers and settlers rely on must be regenerative, fail-proof, and sustainable over time. This research and development will have direct benefits when it comes to the most pressing problems we face here on Earth: climate change, overpopulation, poverty and hunger, and the need for sustainable living. As Pech emphasized:

“I believe that thinking beyond Earth can offer valuable insights into how we might improve life here on ‘spaceship Earth.’ Just as in space, where we face numerous challenges, our planet requires innovative approaches to foster harmony and resilience amidst current global conflicts and challenges.”

There’s also the added benefit of stimulating questions about life in the Universe and where extraterrestrial civilizations (ETCs) could already be traveling among the stars. For decades, scientists have explored these questions as part of the Fermi Paradox. As Hein explained:

“Finally, just as Project Daedalus demonstrated the theoretical feasibility of interstellar travel, we aim to establish a similar ‘existence proof’ for human travel to the stars. Achieving this will add new perspectives to the Fermi Paradox: if we can envision crewed interstellar travel today, a more advanced civilization should have achieved it already. So, where are they?”

Those interested in the competition or have more questions are encouraged to contact the Initiative for Interstellar Studies at info@i4is.org. The i4is will remain open to Q&A until December 1st, 2024.

Further Reading: 

• Project Hyperion

{ https://www.universetoday.com/ }

12-11-2024 om 16:43 geschreven door peter  

Alien Wars on Earth? Exploring Evidence of Extraterrestrial Battles

Throughout history, humanity has looked to the skies with wonder and curiosity, pondering whether we are truly alone in the universe. Among various stories and mysteries surrounding extraterrestrial life, one captivating idea stands out: did alien civilizations engage in battles on Earth long ago? Though it may sound like science fiction, there are ancient accounts and unusual events that hint at this possibility, inviting us to look deeper and consider what might have happened in our skies centuries ago.

The Mysterious Battle Over Nuremberg

One of the most intriguing pieces of evidence suggesting extraterrestrial activity is the reported celestial event over Nuremberg, Germany, on April 4, 1561. On that morning, residents claimed to witness an intense “battle” in the skies, involving strange, orb-like objects and large cross-shaped figures seemingly engaged in combat. Some of these mysterious objects allegedly crashed, leaving observers in awe of what appeared to be an interstellar conflict.

This astonishing event was captured in a woodcut illustration by artist Hans Glaser, who depicted these objects in a scene of cosmic warfare. The woodcut’s authenticity is supported by its creation date and the fact that Glaser was a recognized artist of the time. However, while many are inclined to interpret this as evidence of an alien encounter, skeptics have proposed a more conventional explanation.

Scientists suggest that what the people of Nuremberg saw might have been a natural atmospheric phenomenon called a “sundog” or “parhelion.” This occurs when sunlight interacts with ice crystals in the atmosphere, producing bright spots or “halos” around the sun, which can take on various shapes and colors. Under specific conditions, these halos may appear as multiple suns or unusual shapes, leading the people of Nuremberg to believe they were witnessing a battle in the heavens. Whether a sundog or an extraterrestrial skirmish, the event remains one of the most compelling and widely discussed historical reports of unusual celestial activity.

Ancient Sites and Mysterious Structures

Beyond historical accounts, many point to the massive and seemingly impossible-to-build ancient structures as evidence of advanced knowledge — possibly shared by extraterrestrial beings. Among these marvels are the Great Pyramid of Giza, the giant stones of Sacsayhuamán in Peru, and the vast layout of Teotihuacan in Mexico. While each of these sites is often attributed to impressive feats of human engineering, some believe their precision, scale, and alignment with celestial bodies hint at alien assistance or influence.

For instance, the Great Pyramid’s alignment with the stars in Orion’s Belt, the precise interlocking stones at Sacsayhuamán, and Teotihuacan’s advanced architectural layout continue to puzzle archaeologists. Skeptics argue that these achievements were within the realm of human capability, utilizing tools, basic engineering principles, and a substantial labor force. Still, the fact that many of these structures have defied traditional explanations for centuries fuels the fascination and theories around possible extraterrestrial aid.

Unexplained Accounts of Alien Encounters

In addition to ancient structures, history has documented strange occurrences that sound like alien encounters. For instance, in 1957, Brazilian farmer Antonio Villas Boas claimed to have been abducted by extraterrestrials and subjected to bizarre experiments, even describing his captors in detail. Stories like these are often dismissed as either fantasies or the result of misinterpreted natural phenomena, such as sleep paralysis, which can cause vivid, immobilizing hallucinations.

Additionally, the Apollo 10 astronauts reported hearing mysterious “outer-space music” while flying over the moon’s far side, a sound that puzzled NASA. Ultimately, scientists determined that this “music” was likely radio interference between the spacecrafts’ VHF radios. However, such occurrences persist in sparking speculation about alien contact and whether NASA has shared all it knows.

Ancient Beliefs in Cosmic Battles

Many cultures have myths and stories of cosmic battles involving powerful beings descending from the heavens. These narratives, found in texts from ancient Sumeria to Hindu scriptures, describe wars in the skies that are often depicted as clashes between gods. For those intrigued by the alien theory, these accounts serve as tantalizing “evidence” that humanity may have witnessed battles between extraterrestrial beings, interpreted as divine encounters at the time.

The Scientific Verdict

While theories of alien wars and extraterrestrial influences capture our imagination, science offers more grounded explanations. Phenomena like sundogs, advanced but traditional engineering techniques, and the psychological effects of sleep paralysis and hallucinations provide reasonable accounts for much of what might otherwise be classified as alien evidence. Moreover, most scientists agree that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which means current theories remain speculative without concrete proof.

VIDEO:

• Do We Have Evidence of Alien Wars on Earth?

• https://youtu.be/QbHl1GKMqzU

Whether one believes in ancient alien wars or not, the possibility of extraterrestrial influence on Earth’s past is fascinating. Stories of celestial battles, complex ancient structures, and strange encounters remind us that there is much we still do not understand about our own history and the universe. As we continue exploring space and uncovering Earth’s mysteries, we may eventually learn whether these stories are relics of human imagination or signs of something truly beyond this world.

{ https://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

12-11-2024 om 16:10 geschreven door peter  

• READ MORE: First image released of 'cylindrical' UFO shot down by US fighter jet

By JONATHAN CHADWICK FOR MAILONLINE 

Augmented reality (AR) has already been used in everything from gaming to retail and tourism. 

But the technology has been given its most important role yet, in the new Striker II fighter pilot helmet.

The 4.4lbs (2kg) device has been developed by British defence firm BAE Systems, and presents 'mission-critical' data in front of a pilot's eyes, giving them 'unparalleled situational awareness' as they patrol the air.

From hundreds of miles away, it can discern between another RAF fighter pilot and a hostile enemy aircraft – such as a Chinese spy drone. 

In a real life defence setting, the technology could help fighter pilots shoot down such a threat, helping to protect British skies. 

The RAF has paid £40 million to fit its personnel with the Striker II helmet, of which fewer than 100 currently exist. 

BAE Systems calls it 'the world's most advanced helmet-mounted display' that 'immediately calculates the pilot's exact head position and angle'. 

At BAE Systems' offices in Rochester, Kent, MailOnline's Jonathan Chadwick was given exclusive access to try Striker II during a simulated flight from RAF Valley in Anglesey, Wales. 

Augmented reality (AR) has already been used in everything from gaming to retail and tourism. But the technology has been given its most important role yet in the new Striker II fighter pilot helmet

At BAE Systems' offices in Rochester, Kent, MailOnline's Jonathan Chadwick was given exclusive access to try Striker II during a simulated flight from RAF Valley in Anglesey, Wales 

Nigel Kidd, director of head mounted displays at BAE Systems, worked on the original Striker helmet, developed in the late 1990s. 

This new iteration presents 'more information in a crisper format' including coloured symbols – beyond the typical monochrome green – and integrated night vision, all in a 40-degree field of view. 

'First and foremost, Striker II is a helmet – it keeps pilots safe,' Kidd told me as I step into the flight simulator, modelled on a cockpit of a Typhoon aircraft. 

'But it's not just a helmet – it's a very high performance augmented reality display system.' 

While Kidd wouldn't reveal the exact price of manufacturing Striker II, he admitted each individual helmet 'has a high price'.

'The average person would probably buy a small home for what this would cost,' he told MailOnline.  

Striker II, which is tethered to the inside of the cockpit, is made of carbon fibre and weighs around 4.4lbs (2kg), so it feels quite heavy as I place it over my head.

I can't imagine wearing it for several hours, especially during a high speed flights – although I'm informed it's light compared to other fighter helmets. 

A simulator shows the Typhoon aircraft stationed at RAF Valley prior to take-off. This system is used for pilot training 

BAE Systems was awarded £40 million to develop Striker II for RAF pilots - although the firm wouldn't reveal the cost of each individual helmet. There are currently fewer than 100 in existence

Pictured is the view while wearing the helmet, with speed displayed on the left and altitude on the right. Note the coloured shapes, which denote objects in the air and on the ground 

Striker II: Key features

Inside BAE’s Striker II fighter pilot helmet

Integrated Night Vision

Striker II features a high-performance, digital night vision camera in the helmet, creating a 24/7 capable HMD with no need for heavy, obtrusive night vision goggles. 

Colour symbology

Striker II offers the use of daylight readable color symbology with a binocular 40⁰ field of view. 

Picture-in-picture technology

Striker II supports picture-in-picture technology that displays imagery in a small offset window separate from that of the main display. 

3D audio and active noise reduction

3D audio gives the pilot 360-degree directional audio, so they hear a threat relevant to their position while also seeing it in color symbology. 

Using optical sensors embedded in the aircraft, Striker II immediately calculates the position and angle of the pilot's head. 

This means no matter where the pilot is looking – left, right, up or down – the display is always presented right in front of their eyes. 

I pull the visor down and see a collection of green lines, numbers and symbols, including a target crosshair in the centre and long horizon line through the middle. 

As I take off from RAF Valley, a stack of changing numbers on the left shows my speed, while another stack on the right shows altitude.

But apart from the green markings, there's also a load of shapes in a variety of additional colours – red, blue and yellow. 

These shapes indicate relevant objects in the air and on the ground, which are constantly being detected by a vast network of devices, including drones and radar towers, with signals fed back to my aircraft. 

On the display, different colours correspond to the nature of the object – so threats are presented in red, while 'friendlies' are blue and unknowns are yellow. 

Amazingly, when I move my head and focus on one of these coloured shapes, a small pop-up video clip appears, showing more about what the object actually is. 

Striker II comes embedded with digital night vision (pictured), meaning pilots no longer need to strap night vision goggles in front of the helmet when flying in the small hours 

Using optical sensors embedded in the aircraft, Striker II immediately calculates the pilot's exact head position and angle

For example, I see a short clip that plays on a loop of 'friendly' trucks moving along the ground – a clip which in real life would've likely been filmed by a nearby drone. 

What's amazing is the AR display is being projected onto the visor and then reflected into my eyeballs. 

If I were to stick my smartphone in between my face and the visor, all my camera app would show would be a blank visor – because the reflection is going into my eyes, not my phone's camera lens!

It's probably as close as the RAF will ever get to fitting their pilots with eye implants.  

Striker II also comes embedded with digital night vision, meaning pilots no longer need to strap night vision goggles in front of the helmet as they did with Striker I. 

This was an experience Kidd describes as like a 'sack of potatoes hanging off the front of your head' – making neck ache a real possibility. 

I had expected Striker II's AR display to be a distracting rather than helpful, by presenting the pilot with a barrage of information that could divert attention from the flight path. 

Striker II supports picture-in-picture technology that displays imagery in a small offset window separate from that of the main display

Inside the simulator cockpit, the pilot is presented with additional metrics including a map of the flight path 

RAF pilots will be wearing Striker II while operating Typhoon (pictured), the aircraft manufactured by German firm Eurofighter 

Read More

• First image released of 'cylindrical' UFO shot down by US fighter jet over Alaska in 2023 

But in actual fact, Striker II shows a pilot only the most important metrics that they'll need to operate the plane. 

This is augmented reality in its purest form – helpful yet subtle and unobtrusive. 

Overall, a main benefit of this technology is it means pilots are spending more time with their head up and looking out of the cockpit, not down at the controls. 

This gives them 'a vital advantage' when it comes to split-second decision-making, according to BAE Systems.  

Last year, the firm was awarded £40 million to develop Striker II for RAF pilots who operate Typhoon, the aircraft manufactured by German firm Eurofighter. 

Striker II is still undergoing flight trials with the RAF before it will be used by frontline Typhoon pilots. 

Kidd told me the helmet is also being made available to other Typhoon users in Europe – namely Spain, Italy and Germany – but he admitted 'there is interest from other nations'. 

The Eurofighter Typhoon frontline fleet delivers air security over the UK and its allies 24/7, 365 days a year.

VIDEOS

Why US F-35 Pilots Take 2 Days to Fit Their $400,000 Most Advanced Helmet

F-35 Pilot Wears $400,000 Super Advanced Helmet for the First Time

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

11-11-2024 om 23:41 geschreven door peter  

Uranus mystery is SOLVED after 38 years - and it suggests the planet isn't as weird as we thought

• READ MORE: Uranus' moon could harbour extraterrestrials, scientists say 

By SHIVALI BEST FOR MAILONLINE 

Uranus is often regarded as the weirdest planet in our solar system.

But a new study suggests that the gas giant may not actually be as strange as we thought.

Researchers from University College London (UCL) say that the mysteries surrounding Uranus may have been the result of an unusually powerful solar storm that happened to occur just as a spacecraft visited the planet.

That spacecraft – NASA's Voyager 2 – flew by Uranus back in 1986 and provided the first close glimpse of the planet.

And since then, no spacecraft has been back.

'Almost everything we know about Uranus is based on Voyager 2's two-day flyby,' said co-author Dr William Dunn.

'This new study shows that a lot of the planet's bizarre behaviour can be explained by the scale of the space weather event that occurred during that visit.'

Based on the findings, the researchers are calling for a return mission to Uranus to find out what it's really like when not in the midst of a solar storm.

Uranus is often regarded as the weirdest planet in our solar system. But a new study suggests that the gas giant may not actually be as strange as we thought

Researchers from University College London (UCL) say that the mysteries surrounding Uranus may have been the result of an unusually powerful solar storm that happened to occur just as a spacecraft visited the planet

In January 1986, NASA's Voyager 2 became the first, and so far the only, spacecraft to explore Uranus.

The mission snapped the first images of Uranus – but also discovered several oddities.

Uranus' radiation belts were found to be incredibly intense, while its magnetosphere was nearly empty of plasma.

This meant that there was no apparent source of charged particles to feed those intense belts.

In their new study, the researchers found that a 'hurricane' of extreme solar weather could explain this result.

The hurricane likely squashed Uranus' magnetosphere, pushing plasma out of it and intensifying radiation belts by feeding electrons into them.

And Uranus itself wasn't the only celestial object affected by this event.

Uranus' five moons were long assumed to be dead worlds because of the planet's nearly empty magnetosphere.

NASA's Voyager 2 snapped the first images of Uranus – but also discovered several oddities. Uranus' radiation belts were found to be incredibly intense, while its magnetosphere was nearly empty of plasma. This meant that there was no apparent source of charged particles to feed those belts

But the new findings suggest that the moons could be geologically active after all - and may even have oceans.

'If Voyager 2 had arrived just a few days earlier, it would have observed a completely different magnetosphere at Uranus,' said Dr Jamie Jasinski of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), who led the study.

'The spacecraft saw Uranus in conditions that only occur about 4% of the time.'

Based on the findings, the researchers are calling for a new – and carefully considered - mission to Uranus.

'We now know even less than we thought about what a typical day in the Uranian system might look like and are even more in need of a second spacecraft to visit to truly understand this mysterious, icy world,' Dr Dunn said.

'A big piece of evidence against there being oceans on Uranus's moons was the lack of detection of any water-related particles around the planet – Voyager 2 didn't find water ions.

'But now we can explain that: the solar storm basically would have blown all that material away.

'The design of the upcoming NASA flagship mission to Uranus should be carefully considered in the context of these findings.

'For instance, we might want instruments that could detect nudges to the magnetic field from a moon's salty ocean and instruments that could measure all the particles in the system to test whether we find water or other important material from the moons.'

HOW DOES URANUS'S MAGNETIC FIELD COMPARE TO EARTH'S?

A study analysing data collected more than 30 years ago by the Voyager 2 spacecraft has found that the Uranus's global magnetosphere is nothing like Earth’s, which is known to be aligned nearly with our planet’s spin axis.

A false-color view of Uranus captured by Hubble is pictured 

According to the researchers from Georgia Institute of Technology, this alignment would give rise to behaviour that is vastly different from what’s seen around Earth.

Uranus lies and rotates on its side, leaving its magnetic field tilted 60 degrees from its axis.

As a result, the magnetic field ‘tumbles’ asymmetrically relative to the solar wind.

As a result, the magnetic field ‘tumbles’ asymmetrically relative to the solar wind.

When the magnetosphere is open, it allows solar wind to flow in.

But, when it closes off, it creates a shield against these particles. 

The researchers suspect solar wind reconnection takes place upstream of Uranus’s magnetosphere at different latitudes, causing magnetic flux to close in various parts.

{ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

11-11-2024 om 23:11 geschreven door peter  

US Congressman Says Revealing UFO Technology Is a Threat to Energy Sector: It Can Disrupt World Economy

A thought-provoking interview has recently been conducted between Project Unity host Jay Anderson and the U.S. Congressman Andy Ogles. The discussion focused on the implications of complete UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) disclosure. Anderson asked serious questions to Rep. Ogles about UFOs, revealing that the release of extraterrestrial technology could potentially disrupt the world economy and energy sector.

Rep. Andy Ogles spoke about the difficulty in gathering information due to the compartmentalization of special access projects, emphasizing the need for a methodical and persistent approach to uncover the truth. In the interview, he expressed his concern about UAPs operating in both military and commercial airspace, raising questions about the potential national security threats. He said, “I’m not going to assume I know what it may or may not be. What I do know is there’s a national security issue here.”

He considers various possibilities, including the involvement of experimental aircraft, joint ventures, or foreign adversaries. He emphasizes the importance of avoiding predetermined conclusions and encourages an open-minded investigation to determine the true nature of the UAP phenomenon.

When asked about his personal understanding of UAPs, Rep. Ogles talks about the hope that it might be advanced technology possessed by the United States. He says, “My hope would be… some new technology that we possess… puts us that next generation above our adversaries.” However, he acknowledges the mysterious aspects of UAPs, saying they seem to “defy physics.”

Rep. Ogles then considers the energy implications of the advanced propulsion technology displayed by UAPs. He wonders about the amount of energy needed for such rapid movements and how it could impact the energy sector.

He says, “That being said, these UAPs seem to defy physics. They seem to have some sort of propulsion technology that’s unknown to man as we understand it. So, what does that do to the energy sector? If there’s a new way of thinking about the amount of energy it takes to take a craft that’s hovering and suddenly it’s going Mach one in a matter of seconds – the human body can’t sustain that as we understand it, right? So that craft would have to have next-level technology to protect tissue, if you will, or it’s an unmanned type of craft. Again, there are just a lot of questions that have to be probed. But, if there is this propulsion technology out there and this energy capability out there, not only are we in a renaissance when it comes to aircraft, but we’re in a renaissance in terms of propulsion and energy production consumption. So, again, huge implications across the economic scale, both domestically and internationally.”

He mentions his inquiries in committee about the DOE (Department of Energy), suggesting it could be an ideal place to house top-secret technologies. He says, “If you’re going to house a top-secret Next Level technology, what better place to have it and house it than… nuclear facilities.”

“Everybody knows about Area 51. It’s a testing area… You’ve got this super top-secret, super secure facility that, again, would be ideal to have and to house some new technology, emerging technology that we want to fully master for ourselves and quite frankly control. Because again, as you look at that next generation of warfare, it’s not just tanks and planes. It’s drones. It’s unmanned aircraft. It’s economic. There’s a lot that’s about to happen as we go forward as a superpower and our competitive edge on the global stage.”

Later in the interview, Jay Anderson brings up Congressman Burchett’s positive impression of David Grusch’s testimony during classified briefings. Rep. Ogles says that credible sources have vouched for Grusch’s reliability. He suggests believing what Grusch said, thinking about it carefully, and not trying to say it is wrong without some good proof. Ogles says it is important to keep an open mind, focus on getting answers, and not to try finding faults without good reasons.

Rep. Ogles explains that it does not require unanimous congressional support but rather the speaker’s will to initiate action. He emphasizes the bipartisan interest in addressing the issue and expresses the need for a select committee to ensure transparency and accountability in the investigation. He, along with Congressman Burchett, acknowledges the likelihood of a multi-decade cover-up or compartmentalization due to the secretive nature of special access programs (SAPs) and classified information related to national security.

When asked about evidence suggesting reverse engineering or more exotic propositions, Rep. Ogles mentions the classification of such information and the need for careful consideration. He discusses questions about the origin of technology, whether it is our own creation or recovered from elsewhere, and the potential for reverse engineering.

Read also:

• Ex-US Marine Saw Massive UFO Being Loaded With Weapons By Secret Military In Indonesia Jungle
• US Congressmen Claim Bible Has ‘Pretty Clear’ Evidence of UFOs: Vatican Knows Aliens Are Here

Stephen Bassett, the only registered lobbyist of Washington and founder of Paradigm Research Group, shares the same UFO disclosure concerns that will pose serious implications for the world’s economy.

The PRG researchers claim they have known the reasons why the US authorities were hiding information about UFOs. According to them, disclosing UFO data would lead to the collapse of the entire world economy. Bassett added that all so-called “flying saucers” do not use oil, gasoline, gas, or coal. “They have a different energy system. Without a doubt, a much more complex and deep system based on anti-gravity,” he said.

“Some programs have been removed from the jurisdiction of the White House and Congress and are working somewhere very, very deep, in a ‘hidden mode,'” the researcher emphasized. “I assure you, when the head of state finally officially admits this fact and presents evidence, people will start to worry and want to know more.” But even if the economy stops developing in the current way, it will have new opportunities, Bassett believes.

During an interview with uInterview, he said that UFOs are not unidentified flying objects, as the acronym suggests, but rather alternative energy and propulsion devices. The technology behind UFOs was heavily studied by a team headed by Dr. Vannevar Bush in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, and by 1954, they had developed what is known as “gravity control” and “zero-point energy.”

[Editor’s note] In January 2015, former NASA astronaut Edgar Mitchell sent an email to Podesta, asking him to have an urgent meeting to discuss Disclosure and Zero Point Energy (ZPE). He was concerned about the peace in space. Mitchell wrote: “My Catholic colleague Terri Mansfield will be there too, to bring us up to date on the Vatican’s awareness of ETI. Another colleague is working on a new Space Treaty, citing involvement with Russia and China. However, with Russia’s extreme interference in Ukraine, I believe we must pursue another route for peace in space and ZPE on Earth.” (Click here to read the full article)

However, Dr. Greer stated that the secrecy surrounding this technology went off the rails and became deeply entrenched in compartmented intelligence operations, even causing President Eisenhower to become frustrated with being denied information on the projects.

“The problem became to be, and this is what President Eisenhower warned us about, the secrecy became so enmeshed and compartmented in intelligence operations, that even he as president lost control over it,” Dr. Greer said.

He further stated: “One of our military witnesses, he was a young man working at the White House – which I’m looking at from my place here in Washington, he told us, Mr. Lubkin, who is an attorney, said that Eisenhower was very frustrated that he was being denied information on the projects controlling this issue. So the secrecy went off the rails into these unacknowledged special access projects.”

The disclosure of UFOs would mean the end of oil, gas, coal, and public utilities, as the technology would completely transform the world. Those with trillions of dollars invested in these industries would not be enthused about this possibility. This is the reason for the secrecy, and it has been maintained for 70 years, according to Dr. Greer.

{ https://howandwhys.com/ }

11-11-2024 om 21:15 geschreven door peter  

Russian Influence Operations in the United States: A Historical Perspective and Potential Impact on the UAP Disclosure Movement

Jeremy McGowan

The history of Russian influence operations targeting the United States is as long and complex as the Cold War itself. From the disinformation campaigns of the Soviet Union to the sophisticated hybrid warfare strategies employed by modern-day Russia, the objective has always been the same: to weaken the United States by sowing discord, mistrust, and division within its society. As the UAP disclosure movement gains momentum, there is a growing concern, never spoken out loud, that some prominent voices within the movement could be unwittingly aiding Russian objectives by amplifying narratives that challenge the U.S. government and its security apparatus.

A Historical Overview of Russian Influence Operations

The Soviet Era: Cold War Disinformation Campaigns

During the Cold War, the Soviet Union engaged in a broad array of disinformation campaigns known as “active measures.” These operations sought to exploit the social, political, and racial divisions within the United States to undermine confidence in American institutions and foster civil unrest. One prominent example is Operation INFEKTION, a campaign initiated by the KGB in the 1980s, which spread the false narrative that the U.S. government had created the HIV/AIDS virus as a biological weapon. This operation was executed through a complex network of media outlets, front organizations, and sympathetic journalists who disseminated the disinformation to both domestic and international audiences.

By carefully planting these narratives in credible media sources, the Soviet Union was able to manipulate public perception and create a cloud of suspicion around U.S. intentions. The long-term goal was not just to tarnish the image of the U.S. but to sow seeds of distrust that could be harvested in times of crisis. Is it possible that a similar strategy is being employed today by subtly influencing narratives around the UAP issue, framing the U.S. government as an untrustworthy entity that conceals critical information from its citizens, thus undermining public trust.

Post-Soviet Tactics: Adaptation and Expansion in the Digital Age

With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia inherited not only the remnants of its predecessor’s intelligence apparatus but also a wealth of experience in psychological operations. In the 1990s and 2000s, Russia began to adapt these methods to the digital age. This adaptation was evident during the conflict in Chechnya, where Russian operatives used media manipulation and information warfare to control narratives and justify military actions.

The 2016 U.S. presidential election serves as a modern-day case study in Russian influence operations. The Kremlin employed a sophisticated mix of hacking, leaking, and social media manipulation to polarize the American electorate. The Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian troll farm, was instrumental in spreading disinformation and inflammatory content through thousands of social media accounts posing as American citizens. The campaign sought to deepen existing divisions, foster distrust in the electoral process, and amplify extreme viewpoints.

Is it now possible that Russian operatives are employing similar tactics by using social media platforms and fringe media outlets to amplify claims made by UAP advocates? Are they creating and promoting content that exaggerates the secrecy surrounding UAPs, positioning the U.S. government as an opaque and oppressive entity that is actively hiding the truth from its people. By using bots and troll accounts, are they flooding social media with these narratives, creating an illusion of widespread public support and pressuring the government to respond in ways that could be strategically advantageous to Russia?

Modern-Day Hybrid Warfare: Exploiting New Media and Public Figures

Today, Russia’s strategy has evolved into what is often referred to as “hybrid warfare,” which involves a combination of conventional military power, cyber operations, and psychological influence campaigns. This multi-faceted approach allows Russia to exploit a range of vulnerabilities across different domains. The use of social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, coupled with the exploitation of fringe media outlets and influential public figures, has allowed Russian operatives to reach and influence millions of Americans directly.

Are Russian influence operations now targeting key figures in the UAP disclosure movement by feeding them information through seemingly credible but ultimately deceptive sources. Is it likely that operatives are creating fake whistleblowers or fabricating leaked documents that appear to confirm government cover-ups. They’ve done similar in the past and if so, these could be fed to trusted intermediaries who then pass them on to UAP advocates like Luis Elizondo or Christopher Mellon, who would amplify these narratives, believing them to be legitimate. This process could effectively weaponize their credibility and influence, making them unwitting agents of disinformation.

The UAP Disclosure Movement: A Potential Target for Manipulation

The UAP disclosure movement, driven by individuals such as Luis Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, Garry Nolan, Hal Puthoff, Eric Davis, Timothy Gallaudet, Jay Stratton, and Karl Nell, and a host of others, collectively seeks greater transparency from the U.S. government regarding its knowledge and research into unidentified aerial phenomena. While their intentions may be rooted in a genuine desire for government accountability and public awareness, they are not immune to the sophisticated manipulation techniques perfected by Russian intelligence.

Undermining Trust in Government and National Security Institutions

One of the central narratives of the UAP disclosure movement is that the U.S. government is withholding critical information from the public. This narrative, while appealing to those seeking transparency, can be strategically exploited to undermine trust in national security institutions. If the movement’s leaders are unwittingly provided with exaggerated or fabricated evidence of government cover-ups, they could, in good faith, present this information to the public. This would create a feedback loop of distrust and paranoia, making it more difficult for government agencies to maintain public confidence in their activities.

For instance, the Russian GRU (Main Intelligence Directorate) could, in fact, be planting a false narrative that Lockheed Martin with help from DARPA has been conducting off-books operations without Congressional oversight to reverse-engineer alien technology. This information, disseminated through fake leaks and false experts, could be passed on to UAP advocates, who would then promote it as another example of government deception. The resulting public outcry could force the government to release sensitive information prematurely, potentially compromising national security operations.

Exacerbating Public Distrust and Division

While promoting the idea that the U.S. government is actively deceiving its citizens, the UAP disclosure movement could unintentionally contribute to the broader societal distrust that Russia seeks to exploit. In a society already polarized along political, social, and economic lines, adding a layer of mistrust regarding the government’s handling of UAPs could be a powerful destabilizing force.

Imagine a scenario where Russian operatives manage to infiltrate online UAP communities and spread rumors that the U.S. government is not only hiding information but actively suppressing witnesses and whistleblowers. This narrative, combined with existing concerns over governmental transparency, could push a segment of the population to adopt an increasingly anti-government stance.

The Risk of Co-opted Narratives and Strategic Deception

There is also the potential for co-opted narratives, where genuine concerns about transparency and accountability are twisted into disinformation campaigns that serve Russian interests. Applying this to the UAP disclosure movement, this could involve the strategic release of disinformation that aligns with the movement’s goals but ultimately serves to distract or mislead the public and policymakers.

For example, Russia may be exploiting the desire for transparency by creating fake rumors that claim collusion between U.S. government officials and private defense contractors to conceal UAP technology. If UAP advocates unknowingly amplify these false rumors, they could inadvertently create a smokescreen that diverts attention from more pressing national security threats, such as foreign espionage or cyberattacks. This strategy of strategic deception could hinder the government’s ability to respond effectively to genuine threats, thereby benefiting adversarial actors.

Vigilance and Awareness in the Pursuit of Truth

The UAP disclosure movement, driven by prominent figures with backgrounds in government and defense, has sparked significant public interest and debate. While the movement’s leaders likely have noble intentions, it is important to consider alternatives to their actions and to remain vigilant against the possibility of their efforts being co-opted or manipulated by foreign actors, including Russia.

Understanding the historical context of Russian influence operations in the United States drives home our need for caution. The UAP movement must ensure that its quest for transparency does not inadvertently contribute to narratives that could undermine national security or public trust in government institutions.

{ https://medium.com/ }

11-11-2024 om 20:52 geschreven door peter