The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld Ontdek de Fascinerende Wereld van UFO's en UAP's: Jouw Bron voor Onthullende Informatie!
Ben jij ook gefascineerd door het onbekende? Wil je meer weten over UFO's en UAP's, niet alleen in België, maar over de hele wereld? Dan ben je op de juiste plek!
België: Het Kloppend Hart van UFO-onderzoek
In België is BUFON (Belgisch UFO-Netwerk) dé autoriteit op het gebied van UFO-onderzoek. Voor betrouwbare en objectieve informatie over deze intrigerende fenomenen, bezoek je zeker onze Facebook-pagina en deze blog. Maar dat is nog niet alles! Ontdek ook het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt en Caelestia, twee organisaties die diepgaand onderzoek verrichten, al zijn ze soms kritisch of sceptisch.
Nederland: Een Schat aan Informatie
Voor onze Nederlandse buren is er de schitterende website www.ufowijzer.nl, beheerd door Paul Harmans. Deze site biedt een schat aan informatie en artikelen die je niet wilt missen!
Internationaal: MUFON - De Wereldwijde Autoriteit
Neem ook een kijkje bij MUFON (Mutual UFO Network Inc.), een gerenommeerde Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in de VS en wereldwijd. MUFON is toegewijd aan de wetenschappelijke en analytische studie van het UFO-fenomeen, en hun maandelijkse tijdschrift, The MUFON UFO-Journal, is een must-read voor elke UFO-enthousiasteling. Bezoek hun website op www.mufon.com voor meer informatie.
Samenwerking en Toekomstvisie
Sinds 1 februari 2020 is Pieter niet alleen ex-president van BUFON, maar ook de voormalige nationale directeur van MUFON in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Dit creëert een sterke samenwerking met de Franse MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP, wat ons in staat stelt om nog meer waardevolle inzichten te delen.
Let op: Nepprofielen en Nieuwe Groeperingen
Pas op voor een nieuwe groepering die zich ook BUFON noemt, maar geen enkele connectie heeft met onze gevestigde organisatie. Hoewel zij de naam geregistreerd hebben, kunnen ze het rijke verleden en de expertise van onze groep niet evenaren. We wensen hen veel succes, maar we blijven de autoriteit in UFO-onderzoek!
Blijf Op De Hoogte!
Wil jij de laatste nieuwtjes over UFO's, ruimtevaart, archeologie, en meer? Volg ons dan en duik samen met ons in de fascinerende wereld van het onbekende! Sluit je aan bij de gemeenschap van nieuwsgierige geesten die net als jij verlangen naar antwoorden en avonturen in de sterren!
Heb je vragen of wil je meer weten? Aarzel dan niet om contact met ons op te nemen! Samen ontrafelen we het mysterie van de lucht en daarbuiten.
09-01-2026
Astronomers spot record-breaking asteroid the size of seven football pitches - and it could be nudged towards Earth
Astronomers spot record-breaking asteroid the size of seven football pitches - and it could be nudged towards Earth
Out in the depths of space, somewhere in between Mars and Jupiter, is a newly discovered asteroid that’s breaking records.
Astronomers have spotted a celestial rock the size of seven football pitches that is spinning faster than they’ve ever seen before.
The asteroid, named 2025 MN45, is 710 metres in diameter and completes a full rotation every 1.88 minutes.
The fact that it spins so rapidly has baffled experts, who say it must consist of solid rock in order to maintain its shape.
‘Clearly, this asteroid must be made of material that has very high strength in order to keep it in one piece as it spins so rapidly,’ Sarah Greenstreet, who leads the Rubin Observatory’s Solar System Science Collaboration’s Near-Earth Objects and Interstellar Objects working group, said.
‘We calculate that it would need a cohesive strength similar to that of solid rock.
‘This is somewhat surprising since most asteroids are believed to be what we call “rubble pile” asteroids, which means they are made of many, many small pieces of rock and debris that coalesced under gravity during Solar System formation or subsequent collisions.’
While it is currently out in the asteroid belt, hundreds of millions of kilometres away, asteroids and comets have previously been ‘nudged’ into Earth’s neighbourhood by the gravity of nearby planets.
This artist’s illustration depicts 2025 MN45 — the fastest-rotating asteroid with a diameter over 500 meters that scientists have ever found
The lightcurve of the asteroid - the y-axis shows the asteroid’s brightness, and the x-axis shows its phase, or where it is in its rotation
The sighting forms part of a much larger discovery, as scientists have detected 1,900 new asteroids cruising about our Solar System that have never been seen before.
Within this flurry are 19 super and ultra-fast rotating asteroids – with 2025 MN45 taking the new record for the fastest-spinning asteroid with a diameter over 500 meters that astronomers have found.
For their study, researchers collected data over the course of about 10 hours across seven nights in April and May of last year.
They used the Rubin Observatory’s LSST Camera – the largest digital camera in the world – to capture the night sky.
‘Discoveries like this exceptionally fast-rotating asteroid are a direct result of the observatory's unique capability to provide high-resolution, time-domain astronomical data, pushing the boundaries of what was previously observable,’ Regina Rameika, from the US Department of Energy, said.
As asteroids orbit the Sun, they also rotate at a wide range of speeds, the researchers explained.
These spin rates not only offer clues about the conditions of their formation billions of years ago but also tell us about their internal composition and evolution over their lifetimes.
In particular, an asteroid spinning quickly may have been sped up by a past collision with another asteroid, suggesting that it could be a fragment of an originally larger object.
Most asteroids can be found orbiting our Sun between Mars and Jupiter within the main asteroid belt
An illustration of the main asteroid belt, orbiting the Sun between Mars and Jupiter, where asteroid 2025 MN45 can be found
This image, one of the first released by Rubin Observatory, exposes a Universe teeming with stars and galaxies — transforming seemingly empty, inky-black pockets of space into glittering tapestries for the first time
‘Fast rotation also requires an asteroid to have enough internal strength to not fly apart into many smaller pieces, called fragmentation,’ the team said in a release.
‘Most asteroids are ‘rubble piles’, which means they are made of many smaller pieces of rock held together by gravity, and thus have limits based on their densities as to how fast they can spin without breaking apart.
‘For objects in the main asteroid belt, the fast-rotation limit to avoid being fragmented is 2.2 hours; asteroids spinning faster than this must be structurally strong to remain intact.
‘The faster an asteroid spins above this limit, and the larger its size, the stronger the material it must be made from.’
Within the main asteroid belt are space rocks ranging in size from 530km (329 miles) to just 10 metres (33 feet) in diameter.
‘Sometimes, asteroids and comets are nudged into Earth’s neighbourhood by the gravity of nearby planets,’ NASA says.
However, they explained that it is ‘highly unlikely’ an asteroid large enough to cause widespread damage will impact Earth for the next 100 years or more.
Currently, NASA would not be able to deflect an asteroid if it were heading for Earth but it could mitigate the impact and take measures that would protect lives and property.
This would include evacuating the impact area and moving key infrastructure.
Finding out about the orbit trajectory, size, shape, mass, composition and rotational dynamics would help experts determine the severity of a potential impact.
However, the key to mitigating damage is to find any potential threat as early as possible.
NASA and the European Space Agency completed a test which slammed a refrigerator-sized spacecraft into the asteroid Dimorphos.
The test is to see whether small satellites are capable of preventing asteroids from colliding with Earth.
The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) used what is known as a kinetic impactor technique—striking the asteroid to shift its orbit.
The impact could change the speed of a threatening asteroid by a small fraction of its total velocity, but by doing so well before the predicted impact, this small nudge will add up over time to a big shift of the asteroid's path away from Earth.
This was the first-ever mission to demonstrate an asteroid deflection technique for planetary defence.
The results of the trial are expected to be confirmed by the Hera mission in December 2026.
A long-abandoned US military base known as Camp Century was recently rediscovered under the ice after a NASA pilot conducting airborne radar tests captured images of its underground remains.
The base, built in secret during the Cold War, lies about 118 feet below the surface and spreads across an area roughly 0.7 miles long and 0.3 miles wide.
Once described as a self-contained underground town, Camp Century housed a hospital, theater, church and shop, and was powered by a small nuclear reactor.
As Greenland's ice melts at accelerating rates, scientists have warned that hazardous waste left behind at the site could eventually be released into the environment.
That waste includes chemical pollutants, biological sewage, diesel fuel, and radioactive material once thought to be safely sealed in ice forever.
Researchers now say that assumption was deeply flawed. 'What climate change did was press the gas pedal to the floor,' said James White, a climate scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder.
Camp Century was constructed in the late 1950s with the knowledge of both the US and Danish governments under the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement.
NASA scientists captured an image of an abandoned US military base that has been hiding under ice in the
Camp Century was constructed in the late 1950s with the knowledge of both the US and Danish governments under the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement
Danish officials participated in planning and environmental monitoring, and historical reports indicate Denmark approved the disposal of some radioactive waste directly into the ice.
At the time, scientists and military planners believed Greenland's ice sheet would permanently entomb any contamination.
'That idea, that waste could be buried forever under ice, is unrealistic,' White said.
'The question is whether it's going to come out in hundreds of years, thousands of years, or tens of thousands of years. Climate change just means it's going to happen much faster than anyone expected.'
The environmental risk posed by Camp Century has taken on new urgency as geopolitical tensions in the Arctic intensify.
President Donald Trump renewed calls this week for US control of Greenland, citing national security concerns as Russian and Chinese activity in the region grows. 'It's so strategic,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday.
But scientists said the buried base represents a very different kind of security threat, one tied not to military rivals, but to pollution unleashed by a warming climate.
Once described as a self-contained underground town, Camp Century housed a hospital, theater, church and shop, and was powered by a small nuclear reactor
Pictured are US soldiers climbing up to an escape hatch to enter Camp Century
A team of international researchers led by the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the University of Colorado Boulder estimated that Camp Century contains roughly 9,200 tons of physical waste, including abandoned buildings, tunnels, and rail infrastructure.
The site also holds about 200,000 liters of diesel fuel and significant amounts of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, toxic chemicals once widely used in paints and electrical equipment.
PCBs are especially concerning because they do not break down easily and are linked to cancer, immune system damage, and developmental problems.
The Arctic's cold climate has trapped these chemicals for decades, effectively turning the region into a global storage site for pollution released elsewhere.
As ice melts, however, scientists warned that glaciers could become a new source of toxic contamination.
Most former Arctic military sites have undergone cleanup efforts, but Camp Century is one of only five abandoned ice-sheet bases near Thule Air Base that have never been remediated, according to the 2016 study by the CIRES research team.
Camp Century is a US military base built in 1959 that consists of a network of 21 tunnels but just below the surface of the ice sheet ice
Pictured is the entrance to the base before it was decommissioned in 1967
At similar sites, PCB concentrations in some paints exceeded five percent by weight.
In addition to chemical and biological waste, Camp Century also contains radioactive material from the nuclear reactor's coolant system.
When it was buried in the early 1960s, the waste had a radioactivity of about 1.2 billion becquerels, roughly equivalent to the radiation used in a single medical scan.
While small compared to major nuclear accidents, researchers cautioned that its presence adds another layer of risk if containment fails.
The base's tunnel system twists and branches beneath the ice, making it difficult to fully map.
Airborne radar has detected strong reflections that align with known tunnel locations, but scientists say the technology cannot yet identify all buried waste.
Diesel fuel, stored in underground tanks, may still be liquid today, though researchers believe the tanks may have ruptured.
Models suggest that ice flow and snow accumulation could bury solid waste as deep as 220 feet and liquid waste around 305 feet by 2090.
While that means contamination may not surface for decades, scientists stressed that burial does not equal safety.
Camp Century was constructed in the late 1950s with the knowledge of both the US and Danish governments under the 1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement.
Beyond the environmental risks, Camp Century has become a source of political and legal uncertainty.
Responsibility for the cleanup remains disputed between the US, Denmark, and Greenland.
While the waste was left behind by the US, the original 1951 treaty did not account for climate change or Greenland's growing self-governance.
The agreement states that US property in Greenland may be removed or disposed of after consultation with Danish authorities.
But it remains unclear whether Denmark was fully consulted during Camp Century's decommissioning, raising questions about whether the abandoned waste is still legally US property.
Researchers said Camp Century may represent one of the first real examples of climate change triggering an international dispute over long-forgotten pollution, a preview of conflicts likely to emerge worldwide as rising seas and melting ice expose hazardous waste once thought safely buried.
NASA has just revealed that the crew of the International Space Stationwas being evacuated for the first time in history after one of the astronauts suffered a medical emergency.
NASA administrator Jared Isaacman said in a press conference Thursday that Crew-11 would not continue its missionuntil its scheduled return date in February, and that the steps for their safe return would be worked out over the next 48 hours.
'I've come to the decision that it's in the best interest of our astronauts to return Crew-11 ahead of their planned departure,' Isaacman revealed.
The announcement came less than a day after NASA cancelled a Thursday spacewalk due to the medical issue, with officials saying they were 'erring on the side of caution for the crew member'.
Crew-11 includes four astronauts: NASA's Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke, Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui, and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov.
The group was recently joined by Japanese astronaut Koichi Wakata and NASA astronaut Chris Williams, who arrived at the station aboard a Russian Soyuz spacecraft in November 2025.
Isaacman said that Williams will remain on the station with the Soyuz crew to maintain America's presence in space.
While the astronaut who suffered the medical issue was not revealed, NASA's chief medical officer Dr James Polk said the astronaut was not in any immediate danger and they were being cared for by their fellow crewmates until their return.
Crew-11 before launching to the ISS. Pictured (L to R): Roscosmos cosmonaut Oleg Platonov, NASA astronaut Mike Fincke, JAXA astronaut Kimiya Yui, and NASA's Zena Cardman
NASA cancelled a planned spacewalk on Thursday involving the crew of the International Space Station (Pictured) over an unspecified medical issue involving one of the astronauts
Dr Polk added that the medical issue the astronaut suffered had nothing to do with the upcoming spacewalk or any other operations on board the station.
'It's mostly having a medical issue in the difficult areas of microgravity,' Polk explained without going into specific medical details.
NASA officials noted that no special precautions would need to be taken to keep the ailing astronaut safe until their return and called their condition 'stable' until the evacuation plan is finalized.
NASA has never had to bring an astronaut home for medical reasons, but an evacuation plan has been built into every ISS mission, with crew return vehicles kept on standby.
'We are looking for the correct opportunity to use our existing landing sites,' Isaacman said when asked if NASA would be making an emergency landing to get Crew-11 home faster.
'I´m proud of the swift effort across the agency thus far to ensure the safety of our astronauts,' the NASA chief added.
The NASA administrator did note that the space agency did consider this a 'serious medical condition' which forced officials to conclude that the first ever evacuation was necessary.
However, Dr Polk stressed that the astronaut was not in immediate danger which would force NASA to consider rushing the evacuation into an unsafe flight window.
NASA administrator Jared Isaacman (Left) and NASA chief medical officer Dr James Polk (Center) revealed on Thursday that Crew-11 would be returning as soon as possible
JAXA astronaut Kimiya Yui (center) was helping NASA astronaut Zena Cardman (left) and Mike Fincke prepare for the spacewalk before it was postponed
'The crew member is absolutely stable, so I don't foresee massive changes to the timeline or their activities,' Polk said.
Crew-11 arrived at the ISS on August 1, 2025, meaning their return date had been scheduled for late February.
The four astronauts were supposed to leave after Crew-12 arrived on a SpaceX Dragon capsule no earlier than February 15.
Isaacman said that any decision to potentially move up the launch of Crew-12 would not impact the upcoming Artemis II mission planned for February 2026.
He called the two launches 'totally separate campaigns,' meaning there should be no issue in launching Artemis on time. Artemis II will be the first manned spaceflight to orbit the moon since 1972.
Meanwhile, the ISS is required to have astronauts aboard at all times, as they are essential to carry out maintenance, repairs, operate complex experiments, manage life support and perform spacewalks, tasks that automation cannot fully handle, ensuring constant human oversight for safety and scientific output.
Until now, there had never been a crew evacuated ahead of their scheduled departure time from the ISS, however, two spacewalks were recently cancelled because of various health issues among the astronauts.
A mission was cancelled in 2021 when Mark Vande Hei experienced a pinched nerve and was unable to travel outside the ISS.
Another spacewalk in 2024 was called off at the last minute because an astronaut experienced 'spacesuit discomfort'.
Chinese researchers have announced the creation of a new eye-tracking technology powered by the friction between the eye’s surface and the eyelid during blinking, eliminating the need for an external power source.
Currently operational in the lab setting, such a self-powered eye tracking capability could be used to assist people who rely on their eyes to operate electronics and other devices.
“We’ve developed a self-powered eye-tracking system that harvests energy from blinking and can be used to detect eye movements with high precision,” says Yun-Ze Long of Qingdao University.
In dystopian science fiction, tracking eye movements can be used for invasive, nefarious purposes. In the real world, eye-tracking devices allow people who can no longer move most or all of their bodies to control wheelchairs, browse the internet, or operate Internet of Things (IoT) electronic devices. Still, wider adoption of eye-tracking assistance technology has been limited by its size, weight, and power requirements.
According to the research team behind the new eye-tracking technology, currently available options designed to assist people with mobility impairments, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), often degrade in low-light conditions or cause eye strain after prolonged use. Taken together, they challenged themselves to create a self-powered, wearable, more sustainable, and user-friendly device.
“We were particularly surprised by how well the friction layer retained its charge in a biological setting on a rabbit’s eye,” Long said of the TBN’s unexpected performance.
An analysis of the device’s accuracy revealed that its self-powered eye tracker could successfully detect eye movements as small as 2 degrees. This level of sensitivity was complemented with a measured precision of 99%. Long said this level of precision remained under challenging lab conditions meant to test the device’s operational limitations.
“We were also impressed by the system’s ability to maintain high accuracy even in noisy electromagnetic environments,” the researcher explained.
When discussing the implications of their self-powered eye-tracking technology, the Qingdao University research team said their work proves it is possible to harvest usable energy from very subtle body movements, such as blinking.
“It’s designed to be lightweight, comfortable, and helpful—especially for those who rely on eye movements to communicate or interact with the world.” Long said. “It’s an example of how technology can empower people and make daily life more accessible.”
Along with medical settings, the researchers suggested that eye-tracking technology powered by blinking or other subtle movements could be used in virtual reality (VR) settings. This included potential future applications in intelligent driving and space exploration, where monitoring eye movements could offer critical safety and performance advantages.
“The system works in the dark, requires no external power source, and is as lightweight and comfortable as everyday glasses and contact lenses,” Long said, adding that their eye tracker also “turns something as simple as a blink into a source of power and control.”
Christopher Plain is a Science Fiction and Fantasy novelist and Head Science Writer at The Debrief. Follow and connect with him onX,learn about his books atplainfiction.com, or email him directly atchristopher@thedebrief.org.
0
1
2
3
4
5
- Gemiddelde waardering: 0/5 - (0 Stemmen) Categorie:SF-snufjes }, Robotics and A.I. Artificiel Intelligence ( E, F en NL )
Oarfish washes ashore in California as rare planetary alignment unfolds — All signs point to a major Earthquake?
Oarfish washes ashore in California as rare planetary alignment unfolds — All signs point to a major Earthquake?
Regional and global earthquake patterns are raising concern that California may be the next major segment of the eastern Pacific Ring of Fire to release accumulated tectonic strain, potentially in a magnitude 6 to 7 earthquake, or even larger. It is important to note, however, that while seismic stress accumulation is well documented, the precise timing and location of earthquakes cannot be predicted with certainty by current science.
Adding to public speculation, a so-called “doomsday fish” (oarfish) washed ashore in Monterey Bay on December 30, 2025. Oarfish have been linked anecdotally and culturally to major earthquakes, particularly in Japanese folklore. A video and detailed article examining the “doomsday fish” sighting can be viewed here.
At the same time, some independent researchers are pointing to antipodal earthquake activity off the east coast of Africa as a possible indicator of stress redistribution across the planet. Mainstream geophysics acknowledges that large earthquakes can influence stress fields elsewhere on Earth.
Planetary conditions are also being discussed. A rare linear alignment involving Jupiter, Earth, the Sun, Mercury, Venus, and Mars is currently underway, along with a Saturn–Neptune conjunction occurring for the first time in 37 years. This same Saturn–Neptune alignment was active during the period surrounding the magnitude 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake that struck the San Francisco Bay Area on October 18, 1989. See video here.
While geophysicist Stefan Burns reports that the convergence of these indicators suggests the possibility of a magnitude 6.0 or greater earthquake in California, this assessment represents an interpretation rather than a prediction.
As is almost always the case, no government agency or scientific institution supports deterministic earthquake forecasts. Residents are instead told to rely on official seismic monitoring and preparedness guidance, an approach that, for many, effectively means recognizing the danger only once the ground has already begun to move.
Scientists have discovered a mysterious hole on the surface of Mars, and they have no idea what lies inside it.
This pit, located in the Arsia Mons region — one of Mars’ giant volcanoes — could potentially be a skylight leading to a vast network of lava tubes.
Lava tubes are natural caverns formed by flowing lava. Here on Earth, they provide shelter for many life forms, and on Mars, they could offer human explorers much-needed protection from the harsh Martian environment.
So, is this hole the key to unlocking a potential Martian habitat?
A Mysterious Martian Pit — Leading to Where?
There’s no shortage of environmental hazards out to kill any astronaut bold enough to dare set foot on Mars. With Mars having only 0.7% of Earth’s sea-level pressure, humans would have to don a full pressure suit or live inside a specialized chamber. Without these precautions, oxygen wouldn’t circulate in the bloodstream, with potentially fatal consequences.
Radiation, however, remains the primary concern. Although Mars is farther from the Sun than Earth, the absence of a magnetic field and its thin atmosphere mean it’s exposed to much higher radiation levels than Earth. The Mars Odyssey probe has shown radiation levels on Mars are at least 2.5 times higher than what astronauts face on the International Space Station. Furthermore, besides regular exposure to cosmic rays and solar wind, it receives occasional, lethal radiation blasts due to solar flares.
The Photos NASA Sent To Aliens
Any attempt to colonize the Red Planet will require measures to ensure radiation exposure is kept to a minimum. Some of the proposed ideas thus far involve habitats built directly into the ground or even above-ground habitats using inflatable modules encased in ceramics.
However, a promising alternative lies in Mars’ natural landscape. The planet is scattered with deep pits, caves, and lava tube structures that can act as a shield against radiation.
Collapsed sections of these tubes, called skylights, could provide access to these subterranean refuges. This is what scientists believe this newly identified pit could be. It was recently imaged by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO).
The Nature of Martian Pits
Two images of the pit in Arsia Mons. The one on the left was taken a couple of years ago. The one on the right is more recent and shows a side wall, which may mean the hole is not an entrance to a lava tube or cave.
The newly examined pit measures only a few meters across and resides in the Tharsis region — a vast volcanic plain, thousands of kilometers across and elevated about 10 km above the planet’s mean elevation. This area was once very volcanically active, so scientists’ best guess is that the pit is a skylight to a lava tube.
However, that’s not the only option. In another image, you can see an illuminated sidewall, indicating it might just be a cylindrical pit. This raises the possibility that the hole may simply be a pit crater, similar to those found in Hawaii.
These craters form when cracks in volcanic rock widen and collapse, offering no access to underground chambers. In Hawaii, pit craters range from 6 to 186 meters deep and 8 to 1140 meters wide. The Arsia Mons pit is about 178 meters deep, Universe Today reports.
Lessons from the Moon
So, the big question now is: does this hole on Mars lead to a larger underground cavern? We don’t have a straight answer yet. But with time, scientists might be able to study and understand Martian pits as well as they do those on the Moon.
We understand lunar lava pits and tubes much better than those on Mars. Some lunar tubes are thermally stable and have boulder-covered floors. There are even plans for robots to explore these lunar caves, potentially housing astronauts in inflatable habitats.
Mars, with its weaker gravity, should support even larger lava tubes. This would provide extremely valuable shelter on a very unforgiving planet. Perhaps this is not all that different from how the first human explorers made bases in caves as they traveled across uncharted territory, colonizing the world.
However, unlike the Moon, we lack conclusive evidence of their existence on Mars. This intriguing pit on Arsia Mons is part of an ongoing search for Martian lava tubes. Future robotic missions designed to explore these potential underground worlds will be crucial in unlocking the secrets they hold.
Renewed Interest and New Discoveries
In November 2024, a breakthrough study on Earth provided some supporting evidence that Martian caves could act as time capsules. Researchers exploring lava tubes in Lanzarote, Spain, found that the tubes shielded minerals and organic compounds from weathering, effectively preserving “biosignatures” of past microbial life. This confirms that if life ever existed on Mars, a lava tube would be the most likely place to find its fossilized remains, protected from the harsh radiation on the surface.
Meanwhile, the region hosting the pit, Arsia Mons, received a stunning visual update in May 2025.
Arsia Mons, an ancient Martian volcano, was captured before dawn on May 2, 2025, by NASA’s 2001 Mars Odyssey orbiter while the spacecraft was studying the Red Planet’s atmosphere, which appears here as a greenish haze.
NASA’s Mars Odyssey orbiter captured a rare panorama showing the volcano’s summit poking through a vast blanket of morning clouds. This image highlighted the extreme altitude of the Tharsis region (where the pit is located), reminding us that any habitat here would need to contend with not just radiation, but unique atmospheric weather patterns distinct from the rest of the planet.
But there could be other, even more interesting caves.
In late 2025, when scientists identified a potential new class of caves in the Hebrus Valles region. Unlike the volcanic tubes of Arsia Mons, these new candidates appear to be “karstic”—caves formed by the dissolution of bedrock by water. If confirmed, these wouldn’t just be shelters; they would be remnants of ancient aquifers, making them the ultimate “holy grail” for both human habitation and the search for alien life.
This article was originally published in 31 May, 2024, and has been reedited to include additional information.
Does An Ancient Letter From Flavius Josephus Reveal That Jesus Was Real? Some people swear Jesus never existed. That he is just a fairytale or just a clever early-Christian marketing pitch that got out of hand. It’s a spicy claim, and if you only stick to “the Bible says so,” you’ll end up in a shouting match with someone who thinks every ancient text comes with a hidden agenda.
Here’s the part that tends to surprise people: you don’t need to start with the New Testament at all. You can start with a Jewish historian who didn’t write sermons, didn’t join a church, and still dropped Jesus into his history books.Flavius Josephus reveals that Jesus was a real person and that he did exist.
The “zero evidence” line falls apart When someone says there’s “zero evidence” for Jesus outside the Bible, what they’re really saying is, “I haven’t seen anything that looks like a modern blog.” Ancient history doesn’t work that way. You don’t get bylines or headshots from 30 AD. You sift through surviving texts, check motives, and notice who mentions Jesus without preaching. Roman and Jewish writers did exactly that. They were people referencing a real man tied to real events.
Flavius Josephus lived close to the action and the time of Jesus Josephus was born around 37 or 38 AD in Jerusalem, which puts him one generation away from people who remembered Jesus. By his twenties, Flavius Josephus had priestly credentials, political instincts, and a front-row seat to the Jewish revolt that exploded in 66 AD. He surrendered, switched patrons, and kept writing. In his mid-50s, around 93 AD, he finishedAntiquities of the Jews.
Josephus did not write his history as Christian propaganda By AD 71, Josephus had settled in Rome under the watchful eye of Vespasian, writing for Romans who cared about power, order, and what happens when leadership fails. Josephus drops names as cultural markers, not praise. When he does, you’re seeing what people accepted as public knowledge, even stuff they didn’t like admitting.
Josephus mentions Jesus The strongest Josephan reference sits in Antiquities Book 20, Chapter 9, 1, where Josephus talks about the high priest Ananus assembling the Sanhedrin and condemning James. He identifies the James in question as “the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James”.
Josephus doesn’t preach. He doesn’t stop to convince you that Jesus existed. He uses Jesus as a label to clarify which James he means, since “James” and “Jesus” were common names.
The James story also shows how power worked in Jerusalem around AD 62 Josephus places James’ death in the political gap after Porcius Festus died and while Lucceius Albinus traveled to take over, which lets Ananus act before Rome clamps down. Josephus says Ananus “assembled the sanhedrin of judges” and pushed through executions by stoning. People complained. They contacted the king. They even intercepted Albinus to say Ananus had no right to call the council without Roman consent.
King Agrippa removed Ananus after about three months and replaced him with Jesus, the son of Damneus.
The Testimonium Flavianum Josephus also mentions Jesus in Antiquities Book 18 in the passage people call the Testimonium Flavianum. The version preserved in Greek manuscripts includes lines that sound like a Christian confession of faith, including language that treats Jesus as the Messiah and hints at resurrection claims.
Most scholars don’t buy that Josephus, a Jew writing for Romans, suddenly started talking like he became a Christian. Instead, many accept a simpler idea: Josephus likely wrote something about Jesus, and later Christian copyists “touched up” parts of it over time. Or maybe they didn’t and he suddenly decided to join the faith.
Even if you strip away the praise, Josephus still talks about Jesus Once you strip out the lines that sound like worship, the remaining shape looks like something Josephus would write: Jesus as a teacher, a known figure, executed under Pontius Pilate, followed by a movement that kept going. Scholars disagree about the exact wording, because we don’t own Josephus’ original draft.
James D. G. Dunn’s reconstruction captures the kind of plain tone many scholars expect, and it flows into the later James reference in Book 20 without forcing Josephus to confess faith. You don’t need a perfect sentence-by-sentence recovery to see the bigger point. Even a modest reference from Josephus lands outside Christian storytelling.
The manuscript trail explains why people fight over wording We don’t have surviving manuscripts of Josephus from the first century. The oldest known Greek manuscript that contains the Testimonium comes from the eleventh century, the Ambrosianus 370 (F 128) in Milan. That gap invites debate, because Christian monks copied the texts that survived.
Still, you don’t need to panic and throw everything out. Josephus exists in about 120 Greek manuscripts, with dozens predating the fourteenth century, plus roughly 170 Latin translations, some reaching back to the sixth century. Scholars compare these traditions to catch copyist fingerprints, confirm names, and spot odd insertions.
A non-Christian author (Flavius Josephus) talks about Jesus Josephus won’t hand you a modern lab report for miracles or resurrection. Ancient history won’t work that way. Josephus does give you something more basic and more useful: an independent, non-Christian author tying early Christian leadership to a historical Jesus.
So if someone tells you Jesus was invented by a group of fishermen and tax collectors, you can now respond with the truth. Jesus existed. History says so. And here’s all the proof you need.
The giant planet Jupiter has nearly 100 known moons, yet none have captured the interest and imagination of astronomers and space scientists quite like Europa, an ice-shrouded world that is thought to possess a vast ocean of liquid salt water. For decades, scientists have wondered whether that ocean could harbor the right conditions for life, placing Europa near the top of the list of solar system bodies to explore.
A new study led by Paul Byrne, an associate professor of Earth, environmental, and planetary sciences, throws cold water on the idea that Europa could support life at the seafloor. The study was published in Nature Communications.
Co-authors from the Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences include Professor Philip Skemer, associate chair of the department; Professor Jeffrey Catalano; Douglas Wiens, the Robert S. Brookings Distinguished Professor; and graduate student Henry Dawson. Byrne, Skemer, Catalano, Wiens, and Dawson are also members of the McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences.
Study findings challenge life potential
Using calculations that consider the moon's size, the makeup of its rocky core, and the gravitational forces from Jupiter, Byrne and a team of scientists conclude that Europa likely lacks the tectonic motion, warm hydrothermal vents, or any other sort of underwater geologic activity that would presumably be a prerequisite for life.
"If we could explore that ocean with a remote-control submarine, we predict we wouldn't see any new fractures, active volcanoes, or plumes of hot water on the seafloor," Byrne said.
"Geologically, there's not a lot happening down there. Everything would be quiet." And on an icy world like Europa, a quiet seafloor might well mean a lifeless ocean, he added.
Europa's geology and tidal forces explained
For Byrne, a planetary scientist, Europa's appeal extends well beyond the question of life. "I'm really interested to know what that seafloor looks like," he said. "For all of the talk about the ocean itself, there has been little discussion about the seafloor."
Without a submarine, Byrne and co-authors had to combine known facts about Europa with inferences drawn from the geology of Earth and other bodies, including our own moon.
The ice shell on Europa is thought to be 15 to 25 km thick, and the ocean covers the entire moon to a depth of up to 100 km. Even though Europa is slightly smaller than our own moon, it likely holds much more water than Earth.
Beneath that ice and water lies a rocky core analogous to Earth's. While Earth's core still burns hot, Byrne and co-authors calculated that any heat from Europa's core would have escaped billions of years ago.
The team also calculated the gravitational forces from Jupiter, a pull that can be strong enough to keep a moon geologically alive. On its innermost large moon, Io, Jupiter's gravity roils tides and heats the rocks beneath the icy surface. Io, in fact, is the most volcanically active body in the solar system.
The tides on Io are especially violent because the moon has an erratic orbit that periodically takes it closer to Jupiter, but Europa's orbit is relatively stable and distant, lessening the chance for substantial tidal forces, Byrne explained.
"Europa likely has some tidal heating, which is why it's not completely frozen," Byrne said. "And it may have had a lot more heating in the distant past. But we don't see any volcanoes shooting out of the ice today like we see on Io, and our calculations suggest that the tides aren't strong enough to drive any sort of significant geologic activity at the seafloor."
Future missions and scientific curiosity
Europa's quiet seafloor geology doesn't provide much support for any contemporary life beneath the ice, Byrne said. "The energy just doesn't seem to be there to support life, at least today."
Byrne is still excited about future chances to explore Europa, especially the Europa Clipper spacecraft that will fly by the moon in the spring of 2031. That mission—conceived and championed in part by Bill McKinnon, the Clark Way Harrison Distinguished Professor in Arts & Sciences and interim director of the McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences—will take close-up pictures of Europa's surface and provide more precise measurements of its ice cap and ocean.
"Those measurements should answer a lot of questions and give us more certainty," Byrne said.
Even if, eventually, modern Europa is found to be lifeless, Byrne won't be disappointed.
"I'm not upset if we don't find life on this particular moon," he said. "I'm confident that there is life out there somewhere, even if it's 100 light-years away. That's why we explore—to see what's out there."
British military thought there was a ‘basis in fact’ to the UFO sightings (Picture: Getty Images/iStockphoto)
The British military thought there was ‘basis in fact’ toUFOsightings and wanted to get their hands on the ‘extraterrestrial’ technology, previously secret files show.
Confidential memos from the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS) within the Ministry of Defencewarned that ‘unidentified aerial phenomena’ (UAP) were a ‘potential threat’ to the UK in the 1990s.
One internal correspondence from March 4, 1997 reads: ‘Logic would indicate that if significant numbers are reporting seeing strange objects in the sky then there may be a basis in fact.
‘It could be argued that UAPs pose a potential threat to the defence of the realm since we have no idea what they are!’
The report referenced reports in Belgium of low-flying back triangles (Picture: Getty Images)
Intelligence officers appeared particularly concerned about the reports of large, silent, low-flying black triangles which came out of Belgium in their thousands between November 1989 and April 1990.
The reports sparked calls for Britain to try get hold of the technology.
The document noted: ‘A supplementary issue is the possibility of technology acquisition.
‘UAPs do not appear to use conventional reaction propulsion.
‘The Belgian deltas (confirmed by the country’s MoD) hovered for long periods and accelerated quickly to supersonic speeds, outrunning F-16s.
‘If this represents real technology perhaps it should be acquired.’
Another briefing letter, marked ‘Secret UK Eyes B’, acknowledged that the British military did not have the ‘reported technology’.
It added: ‘No matter the origin, the determination of the technology, and possible acquisition, is a matter for Defence Intelligence Staff [DIS].’
The correspondence added that ‘some reports described objects in terms of manoeuvre, speed and shape which lie beyond our engineering knowledge and that which could be reasonably expected from hostile powers.’
The file also stressed that most UFO reports were tenuous, with only a small number that could not be explained immediately.
The documents jokingly dismissed the possibility of alien life as part of fringe conspiracy theories.
The file reads: ‘Mention of UAPs is guaranteed to generate mirth and Little Green Men jokes, possibly because of the fringe element of “crazies”.’
Rendlesham Forest UFO sightings ‘confirmed’
Rendlesham Forest was home to one of the world’s most famous UFO sightings (Picture: Shutterstock / RMC42)
A separate file from the British Military sheds new light on the Rendlesham Forest incident.
Dating back to December 1980, members of the US Air Force stationed at RAF Bentwaters and RAF Woodbridge in Suffolk, England, reported seeing unexplained lights and a craft in the forest.
Witnesses, including high-ranking officers, described seeing a glowing, metallic, triangular object hovering and emitting strange beams of light.
The document says that the Rendlesham Forest ‘landing’ was ‘confirmed by the US unit commander and others’.
It adds: ‘In both [Rendlesham Forest and Belgian] cases the UAP apparently did not use any conventional propulsion system and could hover as well as move at considerable speed.
‘The French have always had an interest in this topic … and I am aware that there is an informal intelligence grouping in the US.’
The sightings sparked front page news
The sighting has fuelled decades of speculation and conspiracy theories ranging from alien encounters to secret military tests.
One UFO expert, Philip Mantle, told Metro he is convinced something happened over those fateful nights in 1980 – but doesn’t necessarily think aliens were involved.
The former Director of Investigations for the British UFO Research Association speculated that soldiers could have come into contact with ‘strange plasma’ that caused ‘electromagnetic effects’.
The previously secret file also claimed to have a ‘Moscow report’ that suggested ‘two military scientists are responsible for UFOs’.
UFO-meldpunt ontving 44 procent meer meldingen: "2025 was rijk aan waarnemingen van vreemde luchtverschijnselen" Artikel door Michaël Torf
UFO-meldpunt ontving 44 procent meer meldingen: "2025 was rijk aan waarnemingen van vreemde luchtverschijnselen"
Artikel door Michaël Torf
De opvallende stijging kan volgens het meldpunt worden toegeschreven aan 2 specifieke categorieën. Enerzijds waren er heel wat meldingen die terug te brengen zijn tot dynamische lichtspots of zogenoemde skytracers.
Die zijn in ons land eigenlijk verboden vanwege lichthinder en gevaar voor het luchtverkeer, maar blijkbaar is die wetgeving niet waterdicht. Volgens het meldpunt kunnen er 30 meldingen aan worden gekoppeld.
Skytracers De stijging in het aantal meldingen kan verklaard worden door een toename van dynamische lichtspots, ook wel bekend als skytracers. Ook al wordt het gebruik daarvan beperkt door de VLAREM II-milieuwetgeving. Deze categorie vertegenwoordigt 30 meldingen.
Brandstoflozing Falcon 9
Een tweede factor die bijdroeg aan de toename was een aanzienlijk aantal meldingen van een brandstoflozing door een Falcon 9-rakettrap (NROL/69) op 24 maart (24 meldingen). Dit resulteerde in de waarneming van een voorbijdrijvende spiraalvormige wolk. Vooral in Limburg was die goed zichtbaar. Melders uit Dilsen-Stokkem, Hasselt, Hamont, en Alken sturen foto’s door.
Spiraalvormig licht
"Spiraalvormige wolk"
Een andere gebeurtenis leidde op 24 maart in haar eentje tot 24 meldingen. Het gaat om "een spiraalvormige verschijning" die iets weg had van een bijzondere wolk. De werkelijkheid was minder idyllisch: het ging om een brandstoflozing door een Falcon 9-rakettrap op 24 maart.
"Het resulteerde in de waarneming van een voorbijdrijvende spiraalvormige wolk", zegt Frederick Delaere, coördinator van het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt.
"Na de lancering van een satelliet werd de overtollige brandstof uit de rakettrap geloosd. Het zijn de kegelvormige gaspluimen, of beter de onverbrande brandstofdeeltjes in de uitgestoten wolken, die zichtbaar worden wanneer de zon erop schijnt. De spiraalvorm wijst erop dat de rakettrap langzaam rond zijn as draaide."
Het fenomeen deed ook in het buitenland het aantal meldingen stijgen.
Zoals in andere jaren waren ook de Starlink-satelliettreintjes van Elon Musk, die soms als heldere lichtjes te zien zijn aan de nachtelijke hemel, een bron van meldingen.
Bekijk hier een interactief kaartje met de verschillende plaatsen van waarneming en de beschrijving van het 'vreemde fenomeen':
Belgisch ufo-meldpunt kreeg afgelopen jaar 237 meldingen, slechts handvol ging over drones
Drones in november hadden amper effect
De plotse verschijning van onbekende drones boven de nationale luchthaven en militair domein in november deed de teller niet tilt slaan. Er kwamen vorig jaar maar 11 meldingen binnen die op de drones betrekking bleken te hebben, tegenover 4 in 2024.
"Bij het analyseren van specifiek beeldmateriaal dat veelvuldig op sociale media werd gedeeld, bleek dat de vermoedelijke drones niet altijd daadwerkelijk drones waren", luidt het.
"In de meeste gevallen werden mensen misleid door gewone vliegtuigen, helikopters, sterren en de Verhees-delta. Dat laatste is een klein, driehoekig, zelfgebouwd vliegtuigje dat al vele jaren regelmatig UFO-meldingen veroorzaakt. Sinds de oprichting van het meldpunt was de delta goed voor meer dan zestig meldingen."
Belgisch ufo-meldpunt kreeg afgelopen jaar 237 meldingen, slechts handvol ging over drones
Bijna-aanrijding met "gigantische vliegende schotel"
De vreemdste melding die het voorbije jaar werd onderzocht is een oudere waarneming uit Budel, net over de grens met Nederland. Daar zou een autobestuurster op 18 maart 2020 op klaarlichte dag tot 2 keer toe zijn belaagd door een schotelvormig voorwerp van 2,5 tot 3 meter groot.
De vrouw in kwestie woont in Bocholt (Limburg). Ze vertelde dat ze, toen ze met de auto op weg was naar haar werk in Eindhoven, op klaarlichte dag bijna een aanrijding had met een grote vliegende schotel met een crème-kleurige onderkant.
Het Belgische meldpunt ontving de waarneming in december 2024 en stelde een onderzoek in "vanwege de hoge vreemdheid". De bevindingen zijn gebundeld in een apart rapport van maar liefst 48 pagina's . Maar een sluitende verklaring is niet gevonden.
Vergeet UFO's: er is ook een 'USO' onderzocht
Tot slot nog dit: er is meer dan enkel vliegende voorwerpen. Het meldpunt boog zich voor het eerst over een zogenoemde U.S.O. (Unidentified Submerged Object of onbekend onderwaterobject). Plaats van waarneming: de Gavers bij Harelbeke, in november 2024 (het onderzoek bij het meldpunt liep vorig jaar).
Een getuige merkte "ongewone lichtverschijnselen" op onder het wateroppervlak. Uiteindelijk bleek het om een duiker te gaan. Ze gebruiken groene lampen onder water omdat dat het meest efficiënt zou zijn.
In de VS zijn vreemde waarnemingen in de zee, in rivieren en waterwegen al langer stof voor discussie. Nu is er ook België dus ook eentje onderzocht, weliswaar met "snel een rationele verklaring".
Belgisch UFO-meldpunt kreeg in 2025 fors meer meldingen!
Belgisch UFO-meldpunt kreeg in 2025 fors meer meldingen!
Geschreven door: Frederick Delaere
Foto: Belgisch UFO-meldpunt
2025 kan worden beschouwd als een rijk jaar aan waarnemingen van vreemde luchtverschijnselen. Het Belgisch UFO-meldpunt registreerde een toename van 44% in het aantal meldingen. Het totaal kwam daarmee op 237, vergeleken met 164 meldingen in 2024. Deze stijging kan worden toegeschreven aan twee specifieke categorieën waarnemingen. Zoals in voorgaande jaren, werd een aanzienlijk aantal meldingen ontvangen die betrekking hebben op dynamische lichtspots, ook wel bekend als skytracers, zulks ondanks de beperkingen opgelegd door de VLAREM II milieuwetgeving.
Deze categorie vertegenwoordigt 30 meldingen. Een tweede factor die bijdroeg aan de toename was een aanzienlijk aantal meldingen van een brandstoflozing door een Falcon 9 rakettrap (NROL/69) op 24 maart (24 meldingen). Dit resulteerde in de waarneming van een voorbijdrijvende spiraalvormige wolk. Tijdens de lancering werd een satelliet in een baan om de aarde geplaatst. Na het loslaten van de lading werd brandstof geloosd, wat leidde tot de vorming van de spiraalvormige structuur, een gevolg van de langzame rotatie van de raket om zijn as. Dit fenomeen leidde ook in andere delen van Europa tot een stijging van het aantal meldingen. Ook de inmiddels welbekende Starlink satelliettreintjes waren weer meerdere keren het onderwerp van verwarring.
Onze Franstalige collega’s van COBEPS (Comité Belge pour l’Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux) hebben voor het jaar 2025 geen statistische gegevens gepubliceerd. In november 2025 werden talrijke meldingen van spionerende drones breed uitgemeten in de media. Deze drones werden waargenomen in de nabijheid van luchthavens, militaire installaties en kerncentrales. Bij het meldpunt bleef het aantal meldingen relatief beperkt. In totaal werden in 2025 slechts elf meldingen ontvangen die later konden worden geïdentificeerd als drones. In 2024 bedroeg dit aantal vier. Bij het analyseren van specifiek beeldmateriaal dat veelvuldig op sociale media werd gedeeld, bleek dat de vermoedelijke drones niet altijd daadwerkelijk drones waren. In de meeste gevallen werden mensen misleid door gewone vliegtuigen, helikopters, sterren en de Verhees-delta. Dit laatste betreft een klein, driehoekig, zelfgebouwd vliegtuigje dat reeds gedurende vele jaren regelmatig UFO-meldingen bij het meldpunt genereert.
Sinds de oprichting van het meldpunt veroorzaakte de delta reeds meer dan zestig meldingen. In het hoofdstuk “Uitgelicht”, verder in dit jaarverslag, wordt uitgebreider ingegaan op diverse interessante meldingen. Zo hebben wij ons voor het eerst sinds de oprichting van het meldpunt gebogen over een waarneming van een U.S.O. (Unidentified Submerged Object of onbekend onderwaterobject). In de Verenigde Staten bestaat reeds geruime tijd ophef rond dergelijke waarnemingen die plaatsvinden in zee, in rivieren en waterwegen. De medewerkers van het meldpunt waren echter in staat om deze U.S.O.snel van een rationele verklaring te voorzien.
Met stip de vreemdste melding die het afgelopen jaar werd onderzocht is een melding uit het plaatsje Budel, net over de Nederlandse grens. Daar zou op 18 maart 2020 een autobestuurder bij klaarlichte dag tot tweemaal toe zijn belaagd door een 2,5 tot 3 meter groot schotelvormig voorwerp. 2025 was tevens het jaar waarin het boek “UFO, Niet te geloven!” werd gepubliceerd. Dit werk, dat ondergetekende samen met Wim van Utrecht schreef, is een uitgave van Borgerhoff & Lamberigts. Meer informatie over het boek en de bestelprocedure is verderop in dit jaarverslag te vinden.
Naast het feit dat wij ons ook in 2026 zullen blijven richten op het onderzoek van UFO-meldingen (en in het bijzonder dan die gevallen met een hoge mate van vreemdheid), streven wij ernaar onze website nog informatiever te maken. De plannen voor de publicatie van een digitaal archief met Vlaamse, vaak vergeten, UFOtijdschriften liggen reeds klaar. Deze oude tijdschriften bevatten af en toe waardevolle artikelen, en het zou zonde zijn indien die verloren gaan. Meer informatie hierover volgt in de loop van 2026.
The year was 1637, and Georg Baresch, an alchemist and renowned collector of antiquities based in Prague, had a baffling mystery on his hands. For years now, he had been in possession of a most unusual item: a bizarre manuscript filled with strange imagery of plants, astrological diagrams, curious structures, human figures, and a range of other curiosities.
This “Sphinx,” as Baresch characterized it, was so strange that it prompted him to reach out to the Jesuit scholar Athanasius Kircher, known for his success in deciphering ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, with hopes of obtaining information that might lead to a breakthrough in solving the mystery of the puzzling manuscript.
Today, the same bizarre treatise first obtained by Baresch in the seventeenth century is known throughout the world as the Voynich Manuscript, and despite the efforts of many since Baresch’s time who have sought to decode it, the document still refuses to give up its secrets. After more than a century of scrutiny, no one has convincingly explained who wrote it, what it says, or even whether its text carries any real meaning at all.
However, new research may finally offer scholars a fresh perspective on this confounding mystery. According to a recent peer-reviewed study, while the mystery of the Voynich Manuscript endures, a new theory strengthens the possibility that the text in a document often referred to as “the most mysterious book in the world” may have once served as a cipher system.
The hypothesis, detailed by researcher and science journalist Michael A. Greshko in the journal Cryptologia, indicates that the famous manuscript bears qualities that seemingly match the technological capabilities of scholars in the Middle Ages, potentially helping to reframe questions about the manuscript that have long perplexed researchers.
The Enduring Enigma of the Voynich Manuscript
Over the years, a range of theories has emerged as to what the purpose behind the Voynich Manuscript may be. One involves the notion that the manuscript could represent glossolalia—the purported phenomenon of speaking unknown languages, generally within the context of religious worship—or even more simply, purely unintelligible words that might have served as part of some form of fraudulent medieval operation.
Other theories hold that the Voynich Manuscript may represent an artificial language which does nonetheless conveys some sort of meaning, or that the language in the manuscript may be a legitimate unknown earlier language that its unknown author attempted to document.
However, another possibility involves the possible use of a cipher—one which may incorporate elements of a well-known language such as Italian, German, or even a “dead” language like Latin that is still widely known.
A portion of the famous Voynich Manuscript, which conveys information related to the healing properties of bathing in medicinal springs. The complete information conveyed in this portion of the text, as with the broader manuscript, remains undeciphered
(Image Credit: Public Domain).
For Greshko, the notion of the Voynich Manuscript as a ciphertext seemed the most appealing, since this approach offers potential avenues toward unraveling its more unusual properties with languages that would have been in use and potentially known to its prospective author(s) in the 15th century. Ultimately, Greshko’s efforts toward unraveling the mysteries of the Voynich Manuscript (VMS) culminated in a fundamental question.
“Is it possible to make a substitution cipher—the most advanced type of cipher available in early 15th-century Europe—that can often create VMS-like ciphertext?” Greshko asks in his recent Cryptologia paper.
Finding answers to this query led Greshko to the development of a method his study calls the “Naibbe cipher,” named after a medieval Italian card game. As opposed to trying to decode the manuscript outright, as has been attempted countless times in the past, Greshko’s cipher works in reverse by transforming ordinary Latin or Italian text into strings of glyph-like symbols resembling the manuscript’s unique language, known to scholars as “Voynichese.”
The system outlined by Greshko employs the substitution of short letter fragments with structured lookup tables, and then, going beyond the use of text alone, introduces elements of randomness with the use of objects that were widely available in 15th-century Europe, such as dice and playing cards.
Intriguingly, the resulting use of the Naibbe cipher produces outputs that Greshko says mirror several of the Voynich Manuscript’s idiosyncrasies, such as patterns in symbol frequency, similarities to typical word lengths that appear in the original text, and positional behaviors that can be associated with certain glyphs in the manuscript.
Additionally, Greshko’s method appears to preserve partial traces of the underlying language, albeit through the recurrence of micro-sequences, and even though no single glyph can be cleanly mapped onto any specific plaintext letters.
For Greshko, all this taken together strengthens the case for the cipher hypothesis, and strongly points to the use of a sophisticated method that would have significantly exceeded conventional substitution ciphers of the period.
Still, Greshko says alternatives cannot be ruled out, such as the notion that the manuscript actually could represent some kind of unknown language—whether that be a language that is now lost to history, which the author of the Voynich manuscript sought to preserve, or possibly some form of invented writing system that might have served a unique purpose.
Greshko also concedes that “in its current form, the Naibbe cipher fails in several major ways,” adding that due to its current limitations, “the Naibbe cipher invites future analysis to address whether and how modifications to the cipher’s general structure can achieve a more complete replication of VMS properties.”
Nonetheless, what Greshko’s work fundamentally succeeds in demonstrating is that a hand-executable cipher—one the likes of which could have been achieved centuries ago when the Voynich Manuscript is believed to have been produced—can indeed reproduce many of its statistical traits. This potentially important work helps to refine questions that will no doubt benefit future efforts toward unraveling “the world’s most mysterious book” by helping to narrow the range of plausible explanations.
Further, the new study provides a clearer framework for understanding how such a baffling text might have been constructed, and why it continues to defy simple explanation more than 500 years after it was written.
Greshko’s paper, “The Naibbe cipher: a substitution cipher that encrypts Latin and Italian as Voynich Manuscript-like ciphertext,” appeared in Cryptologia on November 26, 2025.
Micah Hanks is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of The Debrief. A longtime reporter on science, defense, and technology with a focus on space and astronomy, he can be reached atmicah@thedebrief.org. Follow him on X @MicahHanks, and at micahhanks.com.
Scientists spot a massive object quietly shadowing Earth’s orbit
Scientists spot a massive object quietly shadowing Earth’s orbit
Story byCassian Holt
Scientists spot a massive object quietly shadowing Earth’s orbit
Far from the bright glare of the Moon, a much smaller companion has been quietly keeping pace with Earth, looping around the Sun in a complex dance that only looks like a shared orbit from our vantage point. Astronomers now recognize this object, designated 2025 PN7, as a quasi-moon, a tiny asteroid that appears to shadow our planet without being truly captured by its gravity. The discovery turns a routine scan of the sky into a reminder that even in our own celestial backyard, there are still neighbors we are only just meeting.
Despite the headline-friendly idea of a “massive” new world, the reality is more subtle and scientifically richer: 2025 PN7 is physically small but dynamically significant, a compact body whose path reveals how Earth interacts with the swarm of rocks that share its orbital neighborhood. In practical terms, this is a miniature object with outsized importance for understanding near-Earth space, planetary defense, and even the long-term story of how material moves through the inner Solar System.
Meet 2025 PN7, Earth’s tiny quasi-moon
The object at the center of this story is not a second Moon in any familiar sense, but a modest asteroid that happens to move in step with Earth around the Sun. Cataloged as 2025 PN7, it follows a path that keeps it relatively close to our planet over long stretches of time, so from certain perspectives it seems to hover near us like a faint, offbeat satellite. Astronomers classify such bodies as quasi-moons or quasi-satellites, a label that reflects their gravitational independence from Earth even as they trace a similar yearly journe
What makes 2025 PN7 stand out is not its bulk but its delicacy: observations indicate it measures just 19 units across, a scale that places it firmly in the “tiny companion” category rather than anything approaching a true second Moon. That compact size, combined with its subtle motion against the background stars, explains why it could orbit in this configuration for a long time before anyone noticed, and why its discovery has prompted a fresh look at how many other small neighbors might be sharing Earth’s path around the Sun.
How a “surprise sidekick” was finally spotted
Finding something as small as 2025 PN7 requires both patient sky coverage and sensitive detectors, and in this case the breakthrough came from a survey instrument built precisely for that task. The asteroid was discovered on July 30, 2025 by the Pan-STARRS1 telescope at Haleakalā Observatory in Hawaii, a facility designed to sweep large swaths of the sky for moving points of light that betray the presence of near-Earth objects. That combination of wide-field imaging and repeated exposures allowed astronomers to pick out the faint track of this new body against the static star field.
In social media posts describing the find, researchers likened the object to a “surprise sidekick,” emphasizing that such a small body, only 19 units across, had been quietly accompanying Earth without drawing attention to itself. The discovery at Pan on the summit of Haleakalā Observatory in Hawaii underscores how modern survey programs can reveal companions that would have been invisible to earlier generations of telescopes, even though they share our planet’s orbital neighborhood.
What makes a quasi-moon different from a real Moon
Although 2025 PN7 is already being described as a quasi-moon, that label can be misleading if it is taken to mean Earth has acquired a second natural satellite in the same sense as the familiar Moon. A true moon is gravitationally bound to its planet and orbits that planet directly, tracing a closed path around it while both bodies circle the Sun. In contrast, a quasi-moon like 2025 PN7 orbits the Sun, not Earth, and only appears to loop around our planet because its orbital period and shape are closely matched to ours.
The distinction becomes clearer when compared with other known quasi-satellites, such as (469219) Kamoʻoalewa (2016 HO3), which is described as a quasi-satellite of Earth that, in certain frames of reference, appears to orbit our planet even though it is really circling the Sun. Studies of Kamo have even suggested it may be a fragment of the Moon blasted into space, highlighting how quasi-moons can be both dynamically intriguing and compositionally revealing. By placing 2025 PN7 in this context, astronomers can use its motion to probe the subtle gravitational interplay between Earth, the Moon, and the swarm of near-Earth asteroids.
A companion hiding in plain sight for decades
Orbital reconstructions indicate that 2025 PN7 has likely been accompanying Earth for a long time, its path shaped by the same solar gravity that governs our own orbit. Astronomers analyzing its trajectory have concluded that this asteroid has been shadowing Earth for decades, maintaining a configuration that keeps it relatively close to our planet without ever becoming a conventional satellite. That long-term stability is part of what makes the object so scientifically valuable, since it offers a natural experiment in how small bodies can share a planet’s orbital space over extended periods.
Reports on the discovery emphasize that Astronomers now see 2025 PN7 as an asteroid that has been moving with Earth for decades, effectively hiding in plain sight because of its tiny size and the complexity of its apparent motion in the sky. The fact that such a long-standing companion could go unnoticed until now underscores both the limitations of past surveys and the growing power of new instruments to map the near-Earth environment in far greater detail.
Earth’s “New Cosmic Companion” and what it tells us
Beyond the orbital mechanics, 2025 PN7 has quickly taken on a more evocative identity as Earth’s New Cosmic Companion, a phrase that captures both its proximity and its novelty. Descriptions of the find frame it as The Story of Quasi Moon 2025 PN7, a narrative that situates this small body within a broader effort to catalog the subtle, often surprising structures that share our planet’s path around the Sun. By treating it as a character in that story, scientists and communicators alike are highlighting how even a 19-unit-wide rock can reshape our sense of the Solar System’s architecture.
Analyses of Earth and its New Cosmic Companion emphasize that quasi-moons like 2025 PN7 remind us that space is full of surprises, particularly in the near-Earth region where gravitational resonances can trap small bodies in unusual configurations. The Story of Quasi Moon 2025 PN7 is therefore not just about a single asteroid, but about the dynamic processes that populate our orbital neighborhood with temporary companions, some of which may eventually escape or collide with other objects as their paths evolve.
How surveys and interstellar visitors sharpen our view
The detection of 2025 PN7 is part of a larger revolution in how astronomers scan the sky, driven by systematic survey programs that repeatedly image wide fields to catch anything that moves. One example is the ATLAS project, which has already demonstrated its power by identifying Comet 3I/ATLAS, an interstellar object discovered by a NASA-funded survey telescope in Rio Hurtado, Chile. That discovery relied on a survey strategy that flags unusual trajectories, and the same philosophy underpins the work of facilities like Pan-STARRS1 that are now revealing quasi-moons and other subtle companions.
According to Comet 3I/ATLAS facts, the object was identified through a survey approach that can pick out faint, fast-moving bodies, including those on paths that indicate an origin outside the Solar System. That same survey mindset has also led astronomers to spot other strange visitors, such as the interstellar object discussed in a Jul video that describes something unusual moving through our Solar System and heading our way. By refining these techniques, researchers are better equipped to notice both dramatic interstellar interlopers and quiet, long-term companions like 2025 PN7.
From Oumuamua to 3I/ATLAS: context for small, strange objects
The excitement around 2025 PN7 also reflects a broader fascination with small, hard-to-classify objects that challenge our expectations about what orbits the Sun. Earlier interstellar visitors such as ʻOumuamua showed that not every passing body fits neatly into the categories of comet or asteroid, and subsequent detections have reinforced that lesson. In one widely discussed case, NASA confirmed that a mysterious object shooting through the Solar System was an interstellar visitor and even assigned it a new name, underscoring how quickly such discoveries can reshape scientific debates.
Reports on that event note that NASA experts concluded the object was not bound to the Sun in the long term, marking it as a traveler from beyond our planetary system. A similar story has unfolded with Interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, which passed Earth and is now leaving the Solar System, headed out again after its brief visit. Coverage of Interstellar 3I/ATLAS highlights how even a relatively small body can carry crucial information about conditions in distant star systems, just as a quasi-moon like 2025 PN7 can illuminate the fine structure of our own orbital environment.
Why a tiny quasi-moon matters for planetary defense
On a practical level, the discovery of 2025 PN7 feeds directly into the growing field of planetary defense, which depends on a detailed inventory of near-Earth objects and their trajectories. Even though this particular asteroid is only 19 units across and poses no known threat, its detection proves that such small bodies can share Earth’s orbit for decades without being cataloged, a gap that matters when assessing impact risks. By refining the techniques that revealed this quasi-moon, astronomers improve their chances of spotting more hazardous objects of similar size or slightly larger before they come too close.
The broader survey ecosystem that caught 2025 PN7 is also responsible for identifying other unusual bodies, including the interstellar object highlighted in a An interstellar object video that describes something strange moving through our Solar System. Each of these detections, whether a fleeting visitor like 3I/ATLAS or a long-term companion like 2025 PN7, adds to a statistical picture of how many small objects cross Earth’s path and how their orbits evolve. In that sense, a tiny quasi-moon is not just a curiosity, but a data point that helps refine models used to protect the planet from future impacts.
The quiet revolution in mapping Earth’s orbital neighborhood
Stepping back, 2025 PN7 is part of a quiet revolution in how thoroughly we map the space around Earth, a process driven by better detectors, smarter software, and coordinated survey strategies. Where earlier generations of astronomers might have focused on bright planets and comets, today’s instruments are tuned to pick out faint, fast-moving specks that reveal a rich population of near-Earth asteroids, quasi-moons, and other transient companions. Each new detection, from Kamoʻoalewa to 3I/ATLAS to 2025 PN7, fills in another piece of a complex gravitational puzzle.
As I see it, the real story behind Earth’s so-called “second moon” is not about size or spectacle, but about the precision with which we can now track even a 19-unit-wide rock as it quietly shadows our orbit. The work that identified 2025 PN7, building on survey methods refined in projects like ATLAS and on analyses that recognized quasi-satellites such as Kamoʻoalewa, shows how far observational astronomy has come in just a few decades. It also hints at how many more subtle companions may still be waiting in the data, small in scale but large in what they can teach us about the constantly shifting architecture of our Solar System.
As Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro heads to a New York court to face drug charges, the first images of a top-secret US drone sent to capture him have emerged.
Footage shared online captured a US Air Force RQ-170 Sentinel coming in for a landing at sunrise at a Puerto Rico base after the January 3 raid.
Reports suggested that at least one RQ-170 Sentinel took part in the overnight operation to arrest the Venezuelan president and his wife, who the US has said it does not recognize as the legitimate leader of the South American nation.
Although the Sentinels have reportedly been in service for the last 20 years, the Air Force has only acknowledged their existence since December 2009, when it supported missions in Afghanistan.
During the operation, the drone or drones were operating overhead in Venezuelan airspace, particularly around Caracas, though exact paths haven't been detailed due to their top-secret nature.
Unnamed government officials said the CIA quietly deployed stealth drones over Venezuela for months, using them to track President Maduro’s movements and build an intimate picture of his daily routines ahead of the operation, the New York Times reported.
While the location of the footage is unconfirmed, the airfield could be Roosevelt Roads Naval Air Station in Puerto Rico, which shuttered in 2004.
Images posted online by Air Force Southern appeared to show unit patches worn by military personnel, indicating the RQ-170 Sentinel may have been operating in Latin America since December.
The RQ-170 Sentinel has been in service in the US Air Force since around 2007, and it is believed to have been flying over Caracas during the strike on Venezuela
Military analysts suggested the RQ-170’s likely contribution was long-term, covert monitoring of Maduro’s compound.
They compared it to the weeks of silent intelligence collection that preceded the 2011 operation against Osama bin Laden, when US forces depended on continuous surveillance of a single, high-value location.
The clips captured the growl of the jet engines and blinking lights on the rear fuselage as the drone soared over the US territory.
Along with the RQ-170 Sentinels, over 150 aircraft took part in Maduro's arrest, launching from multiple bases in the region.
The drone was designed by Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works division exactly for this type of mission, providing surveillance of high-value targets inside hostile territory and support for special operations teams like Delta Force, who captured Maduro.
According to The War Zone, there are only about 20 to 30 RQ-170 drones in service, operating from bases like Creech Air Force Base in Nevada.
The 432nd Wing, headquartered at Creech AFB, is the Air Force's primary wing for remotely piloted drones and is believed to be the main operator of the RQ-170.
Creech is also less than 100 miles from the Area 51 base in Nevada, which has become notorious for its development and testing of top-secret aircraft for decades.
The unmanned aircraft is believed to have advanced sensors for mapping and tracking moving targets, infrared cameras to provide nighttime video, and high-tech intelligence tools for intercepting enemy communications.
US forces struck Fuerte Tiuna on Saturday, capturing Nicolas Maduro and his wife without suffering casualties
About 20 to 30 RQ-170 Sentinels are believed to be in use by the Air Force, providing surveillance and tracking targets during military operations
At the same time, military technology experts believe US cyberwarfare units also played a role in the attack, sending the entire target area into a blackout as the raid began.
Part of the strike appeared to have included a massive power outage around Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela's largest military complex in Caracas.
DigitalWarfare.com's James Knight told the Daily Mail before the military operation that US cyber forces had been mapping out targets to strike digitally in Venezuela and other hostile nations for years.
That process included meticulously making sure civilian facilities, such as hospitals, did not lose power if American forces hacked into the country's electrical grid.
As Knight assessed in December, the US appeared to focus its efforts on Venezuela's military C2 networks - the communication systems for the country's troops.
US Air Force Gen. Dan 'Razin' Caine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said: 'As the force began to approach Caracas, the Joint Air Component began dismantling and disabling the air defense systems in Venezuela, employing weapons to ensure the safe passage of the helicopters into the target area.'
'The goal of our air component is, was, and always will be to protect the helicopters and the ground force and get them to the target and get them home.'
President Trump appeared to confirm that US cyber units blacked out the area during Operation Absolute Resolve, saying: 'It was dark, the lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to a certain expertise that we have, it was dark, and it was deadly.'
A centuries-old Bible chronology suggests we are living in a pivotal year, as humanity enters an era of divine judgment, renewal or reset.
A video shared on Instagram by Kaylah Hodgins focuses on timelines found in a Bible published in 1818, which contains the Old and New Testaments along with the Apocrypha, a collection of ancient biblical-era writings long debated over whether they belong in Scripture.
According to the Bible, the world began in 4004 BC. It lists 3,974 years from Adam to Christ, plus another 1,815 years from Christ's birth to the Bible's publication year.
Combined, these figures total 5,789 years from Creation to the early 19th century.
Hodgins then extended the count to include the years since the Bible was printed, arriving at roughly 6,000 years, a milestone some interpret as signaling the close of humanity's current age.
In certain Jewish and Christian traditions, history is seen as following a seven-part structure modeled on the seven days of Creation.
In this framework, the world experiences six 'days,' or 6,000 years, of human labor and turmoil, followed by a seventh 'day' of rest, often associated with a messianic or millennial reign.
Reaching the end of the sixth 'day' is considered a major turning point, marking the close of humanity's current era and the start of a new, divinely guided phase.
A video, shared on Instagram by Kaylah Hodgins, focuses on timelines found in a Bible published in 1818, which contains the Old and New Testaments along with the Apocrypha, a collection of ancient biblical-era writings long debated over whether they belong in Scripture
According to the Bible, the world began in 4004 BC
The theory does not predict a sudden destruction of the planet, supporters have said, but rather a dramatic transition.
Some described it as the end of an age of human dominance.
Others have framed it more vaguely, suggesting major global upheaval, moral reckoning, or spiritual transformation rather than a single catastrophic event.
Biblical scholars, however, have urged caution when interpreting the timeline.
Most emphasized that the Creation date printed in old Bibles reflects one historical interpretation, not a universally accepted doctrine.
The date of Creation was developed by James Ussher, a 17th-century Irish Archbishop and renowned biblical scholar famous for his Ussher chronology, a detailed calculation placing the Bible's creation of the world in 4004 BC.
By carefully adding the lifespans of biblical figures, the ages of patriarchs, and key events such as the Flood, Ussher determined that Creation occurred in 4004 BC, even assigning a specific day, October 23, for when the first “day” of the world began.
Centuries later, Bibles published in the 18th and 19th centuries, including the 1818 edition featured in the viral video, included chronological tables derived from Ussher’s work.
It lists 3,974 years from Adam to Christ, plus another 1,815 years from Christ's birth to the Bible's publication year. Combined, these figures total 5,789 years from Creation to the early 19th century
These tables were often placed at the front of the Bible and gave readers a year-by-year account of biblical history, from Creation to the Bible’s publication date.
Modern theology generally treats Ussher’s chronology as symbolic rather than literal, and scientific evidence places Earth’s age at roughly 4.5 billion years.
Many churches also reject date-based end-times speculation, warning that such calculations have repeatedly failed throughout history.
The viral video has sparked discussion not just among believers but also among historians and social media users curious about the intersection of faith, numerology, and history.
Many commenters are sharing screenshots of old Bibles, debating whether other editions give slightly different totals, or questioning the significance of the 6,000-year framework altogether.
Some see it as a reminder of humanity’s smallness in the span of time, while others treat it as a symbolic countdown that lends urgency to moral or spiritual reflection.
While the Bible itself does not explicitly state that reaching 6,000 years marks the end of human history, apocalyptic interpretations of Ussher’s timeline have persisted for centuries.
The seventh “day” of rest, derived from the Creation story, is often imagined as a thousand years of renewal, justice, or divine rule.
For many, the milestone is less about literal prophecy and more about the cultural and spiritual resonance of imagining the world at the edge of a new age.
Scientists have discovered a new type of astronomical object, calling the strange entity a 'window into the dark universe'.
The object known as Cloud-9 is a completely starless, gas-rich cloud of dark matter located 14 million light-years from Earth.
The cloud's core is a vast, compact sphere of neutral hydrogen, about 4,900 light-years across.
That is more than 1,000 times greater than the distance between Earth and the nearest star, Proxima Centauri.
However, despite containing abundant stellar fuel, astronomers have now used the Hubble Space Telescope to confirm that Cloud-9 contains no stars whatsoever.
Scientists say that makes the cloud a building block of a galaxy that never quite formed, left over as a relic from the early universe.
Co-author Dr Andrew Fox, of the European Space Agency and the Space Telescope Science Institute, told the Daily Mail: 'You can think of it as a failed galaxy.
'A ghostly object that didn’t quite have enough mass to become self-gravitating and cross the threshold into star formation.'
Scientists have discovered a new type of astronomical object, a cloud of dark matter and hydrogen gas that contains no stars. Pictured: Magenta shows radio data from the gas cloud, and the dotted circle shows the peak of radio emissions
Cloud-9 is a previously theoretical type of object known as a Reionization-Limited H I Cloud, or 'RELHIC'.
'The main piece of evidence for dark matter in this cloud is its size,' says Dr Fox,
'A cloud this size needs a source of gravity to hold it together. There are no stars to provide this gravity, and the neutral hydrogen gas does not contain enough mass, so dark matter must be the culprit. Without it, the cloud would simply fall apart.'
By looking at the radiation emitted by gases in the cloud, scientists estimate that the mass of hydrogen within is about one million times that of the sun.
However, for the cloud not to drift apart, Dr Fox and his colleagues estimate that it must contain around five billion solar masses of dark matter.
This discovery is extremely exciting for astronomers because RELHICs like Cloud-9 offer a snapshot into an exceptionally early moment in the universe's history.
Scientists say that the strange object (pictured), dubbed Cloud-9 and located 14 million light-years from Earth, is a failed galaxy that didn't have enough mass to produce stars
Dr Fox says: 'Theories of galaxy formation predicted that there is a minimum threshold of dark matter required to ignite star formation and turn a dark cloud into a luminous galaxy.
'With Cloud-9, we have an example of an object just below this threshold, containing no stars.'
Although some scientists had thought that RELHICs might exist, they have proven exceptionally hard to find.
If the cloud were much larger, the gases would collapse into stars and form a galaxy; much smaller, and it would have fallen apart and blown away.
Co-author Dr Alejandro Benitez Llambay, of the Milano-Bicocca University in Milan, told Daily Mail: 'Cloud-9 is a rare "middle ground" survivor.'
'According to our models, fewer than 10 per cent of halos in this mass range remain in such a pristine state, making Cloud-9 a "missing link" in our understanding of how galaxies are born.'
Likewise, since these objects don't contain any stars, RELHICs barely give off any of their own radiation and are exceptionally difficult to detect.
Cloud-9 was first spotted three years ago by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) in Guizhou, China.
If the cloud had more mass, the gases would have collapsed into stars and formed a galaxy like its neighbour, the M94 spiral galaxy (pictured). Cloud-9 had just enough mass to stay together, but not so much that it formed stars
However, it is only now that researchers have been able to use the Hubble Telescope to confirm that it contains no stars, making it very likely to be a RELHIC.
Lead author Dr Gagandeep Anand, of the Space Telescope Science Institute, says: 'Before we used Hubble, you could argue that this is a faint dwarf galaxy that we could not see with ground-based telescopes. They just didn't go deep enough in sensitivity to uncover stars.
'In science, we usually learn more from the failures than from the successes. In this case, seeing no stars is what proves the theory right. It tells us that we have found in the local universe a primordial building block of a galaxy that hasn't formed.'
The discovery of Cloud-9, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, also makes it likely that there are more RELHICs out there, even in our local neighbourhood.
China's FAST telescope is particularly good at spotting these kinds of dark gas clouds, so researchers hope to discover more in the future.
Dr Fox adds: 'There absolutely should be more RELHICs out there, and we are looking for more candidates. We need more cases to know whether Cloud-9 is an oddball with unusual properties, or alternatively, is fairly typical.'
Dark matter is a hypothetical substance said to make up roughly 85 per cent of the universe.
The enigmatic material is invisible because it does not reflect light, and has never been directly observed by scientists.
Astronomers know it to be out there because of its gravitational effects on known matter.
The European Space Agency says: 'Shine a torch in a completely dark room, and you will see only what the torch illuminates.
Dark matter is a hypothetical substance said to make up roughly 27 per cent of the universe. It is thought to be the gravitational 'glue' that holds the galaxies together
(artist's impression)
'That does not mean that the room around you does not exist.
'Similarly we know dark matter exists but have never observed it directly.'
The material is thought to be the gravitational 'glue' that holds the galaxies together.
Calculations show that many galaxies would be torn apart instead of rotating if they weren't held together by a large amount of dark matter.
Just five per cent the observable universe consists of known matter such as atoms and subatomic particles.
This is the moment deep sea explorers captured an incredibly elusive creature on camera – the giant phantom jellyfish.
Eerie footage shows the rare animal, which has only been filmed around a dozen times, gently pulsing and swirling its way through the water off the coast of Argentina.
It was captured on film by scientists at the Schmidt Ocean Institute, whose remotely operated vehicle (ROV) was on its descent to explore the Colorado-Rawson submarine canyon wall.
At 253 metres (830 feet) down, they came across the enormous ghostly jellyfish, which was first discovered in 1899.
It boasts arms that can reach more than 10 metres (33 feet) long and a main body that measures over a metre (3.3 feet) wide.
It lives anywhere from surface level to 21,900ft deep, but mostly sticks to an area called the twilight zone which is too deep for most light to reach.
In the clip, the jellyfish is lit up by the ROV's lights and appears to be swimming downwards, slowly pulsing as small fish swim around it.
Most impressive are its four long ‘mouth arms’, which scientists believe are used to grab and trap prey, trailing up above it.
Eerie footage shows the rare animal, which has only een filmed around a dozen times, gently pulsing and swirling its way through the water off the coast of Argentina
According to the scientists, giant phantom jellyfish appear to live in all oceans except for the Arctic.
It is assumed they feed on plankton and small fishes, but very little is known about how the jellyfish survives.
It has only been documented around 100 times since it was first discovered, and is thought to be one of the largest invertebrate predators in the deep sea ecosystem.
Two previous sightings of it in the Gulf of Mexico suggest the species might hunt by clinging to subsea structures.
This means its arms would be freed up to trap food, but that sort of behaviour has never been directly witnessed.
Before underwater robots were invented, experts used trawling nets to study deep sea creatures such as this species of jellyfish, known as Stygiomedusa gigantea.
However, when one is captured and brought to the surface, researchers said its silky-looking frame turns to 'gelatinous goo'.
That makes underwater robots the best way to observe the species and learn more about how it survives.
At 253 metres (830 feet) down, they came across the enormous ghostly jellyfish, which was first discovered in 1899
In the clip, the jellyfish appears to be swimming downwards, slowly pulsing as small fish swim around it
While the first specimen was collected 127 years ago, it took 60 years to recognise it as a new species.
A separate research organisation – the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) – say their ROVs have logged ‘thousands of dives’ deep into the ocean, but have only seen the spectacular species nine times.
‘MBARI’s observations of Stygiomedusa gigantea have helped illuminate its ecological role in the ocean’s depths,’ they write on their website.
‘During an expedition to the Gulf of California, MBARI’s ROV Tiburon recorded a fish - the pelagic brotula - alongside a giant phantom jelly. Researchers watched the brotula hover above the bell of its host and swim in and out of the jelly’s voluminous oral arms.
‘The wide-open waters of the midnight zone offer little shelter, so many creatures find refuge in the gelatinous animals that are abundant in this environment.’
What is the giant phantom jellyfish?
Stygiomedusa gigantea is a type of giant deep sea jellyfish that is rarely seen but believed to be widespread throughout the world.
It is thought to be one of the largest invertebrate predators in the deep sea ecosystem.
The jellyfish has an umbrella-shaped bell that can be up to a 3.3ft (1 metre) wide.
It also has four 'paddle-like' arms up to 32ft (10m) long, which, as scientists believe may be used to trap prey because they lack stinging tentacles.
Giant Stygiomedusa have been observed and filmed off the Pacific coast of the United States by and by deepwater robots off the coast of Japan and in the Gulf of Mexico.
The reddish purple coloured creature lives anywhere from surface level to 21,900 feet, but mostly sticks to an area called the twilight zone, which is too deep for most light to reach.
It is assumed they feed on plankton and small fishes, but very little is known about how the jellyfish survives.
A new study argues that AI can never be more creative than humans, but many experts argue that AI's output will only ever be as good as its input — with the goalposts shifting as AI improves in the years to come.
Generative AI will never have human experiences, but it can still be creative.(Image credit: Getty Images)
David Cropley, a professor of engineering innovation at the University of South Australia and sole author of the study, found the limit of AI’s abilities lies somewhere between the amateur and professional level in human beings, meaning AI will never outstrip the creativity of the most talented human artists.
Cropley’s finding, however, has done little to quell concerns that AI will cause creative sectors of the economy to disappear. Experts continue to debate the creative potential of AI, and how we define creativity is one of the biggest stumbling blocks. Just like “smart” or “attractive," "creative” is a very human descriptor that can mean different things in different domains, and that defies easy or quantitative measurement.
Cropley applied the Standard Definition of Creativity to the outputs of various large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT. He found that “while AI can mimic creative behavior — quite convincingly at times — its actual creative capacity is capped at the level of an average human and can never reach professional or expert standards under current design principles,” according to a statement.
"Many people think that because ChatGPT can generate stories, poems or images, that it must be creative. But generating something is not the same as being creative," Cropley said. "Typically, 60% of people are below average when it comes to creativity, so it's inevitable that a sizable slice of society will think that LLMs like ChatGPT are creative, when they're not. Highly creative people will recognize the weaknesses in the generative AI systems."
AI is not human
Jack Shaw of Shawfire Media, an e-commerce strategist who deploys and benchmarks LLMs to generate and test marketing content, said that under some definitions, the assertion of the study is correct. "If creativity means reframing a brief, setting new cultural cues, and taking responsibility for risky choices that could fail, then humans lead. Models synthesise patterns optimized for likelihood; they do not carry intent, lived context, or stakes, and they do not originate goals."
The biggest gap in AI’s creativity is that it will never have a human experience, said Alesha Brown, founder and CEO of Fruition Publishing Concierge Services and Alesha Brown Productions, companies that help authors, thought leaders and brands turn lived experiences into books, films and campaigns.
"No LLM wakes up with a childhood trauma, a cultural lineage, or a moral conflict and decides, 'I'm going to make a film or write a book that could cost me relationships but might free other people'," she said. "That ‘why’ behind the work — the willingness to risk reputation, income, or belonging for an idea — is a big part of what we intuitively count as creativity, and AI doesn't have that. It's an argument about agency and depth, not an ironclad mathematical proof that AI can never match or surpass us."
But AI is creative
But by other benchmarks, AI can be considered creative. Gor Gasparyan, co-founder and CEO of Passionate Agency, a digital intelligence agency that offers digital experiences with a focus on AI engineering, thinks the idea of a mathematical limit to AI creativity is based on an old-fashioned definition of the word that discounts the value of novelty.
"In my practice, AI models produce keywords and theme connections that are novel to our human SEO experts 80% of the time, which leads to content strategies that haven't been considered before," Gasparyan said.
To Iliya Rybchin, founder and principal of AI consulting firm Vorpal Hedge, AI generates creative materials in a very similar way to humans. "Both humans and LLMs rely on the same underlying mechanism — recombining stored patterns under constraints. The real problem isn't that AI 'lacks creativity', it's that we keep packaging creativity in mystical language that collapses as soon as we look at how human creators actually work,” he said.
"We romanticize the novelist staring at a blank page or the chef conjuring a dish nobody has ever imagined before,” he explained — but talented creators pull from their lived experiences, having tasted foods, read literature and learned skills that they then recombine into new variations.“None of this is ex-nihilo creation, it's high-fidelity remix. In reality, creativity is almost exclusively combinatorics."
He added that the claim AI has a mathematical ceiling lower than humans is a math error. "If creativity is the ability to connect unconnected dots, the entity with the most dots wins."
That principle is why AI could match human creativity, said James Lei, CEO of legal class action platform Sparrow. "Creativity is generation plus selection against a purpose," he said. "Generation is the ability to produce many candidates, while creativity requires novelty, usefulness and acceptance by an audience or domain gatekeepers. This is why AI already works for ad concepts, onboarding flows, contract clause options and musical motifs, where quality is measurable and the brief anchors direction."
You get out what you put in
Some experts believe any perceived shortcomings of AI are caused only by a lack of input from humans. For instance, if you can give clear instructions, set ways to judge results and keep improving them through human feedback and tests, Lei adds, AI meets the standard because it generates new options and the process keeps those that add value. "Where it struggles is open-ended, long-horizon agenda setting that draws on lived experience, embodied context and cross-domain judgement."
Vague prompts may also result in AI that outputs a fairly bland idea, said Amit Raj, founder of The Links Guy, an SEO consultancy that uses AI workflows in content marketing tasks. "But give it context, challenge it, refine it and debate with it, and creativity emerges."
Ultimately, the definition of creativity will continue to evolve as long as the debate over the creative ability of AI persists, said Paul DeMott, Chief Technology Officer at Helium SEO. "The argument about how creating something is not equivalent to being creative is the indication that we're shifting goalposts," he said. "Critics claimed AI was devoid of intent, then emotional richness, then originality. We conceptualize creativity as anything humans can accomplish that machines can't, then redefine it when machines break that barrier."
'Artificial intelligence' myths have existed for centuries — from the ancient Greeks to a pope's chatbot
Prometheus – Heinrich Füger (c.1817)
(Image credit: Heinrich Füger, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons)
It seems the AIhype has turned into an AI bubble. There have been many bubbles before, from the Tulip mania of the 17th century to the derivatives bubbleof the 21st century. For many commentators, the most relevant precedent today is the dotcom bubble of the 1990s. Back then, a new technology (the World Wide Web) unleashed a wave of "irrational exuberance." Investors poured billions into any company with ".com" in the name.
Three decades later, another new technology has unleashed another wave of exuberance. Investors are pouring billions into any company with "AI" in its name. But there is a crucial difference between these two bubbles, which isn't always recognised. The World Wide Web existed. It was real. General Artificial Intelligence does not exist, and no one knows if or when it ever will.
In February, the CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, wrote on his blog that the very latest systems have only just started to "point towards" AI in its "general" sense. OpenAI may market its products as "AIs," but they are merely statistical data-crunchers, rather than "intelligences" in the sense that human beings are intelligent.
So why are investors so keen to give money to the people selling AI systems? One reason might be that AI is a mythical technology. I don't mean it is a lie. I mean it evokes a powerful, foundational story of Western culture about human powers of creation.
Perhaps investors are willing to believe AI is just around the corner because it taps into myths that are deeply ingrained in their imaginations?
The myth of Prometheus
The most relevant myth for AI is the Ancient Greek myth of Prometheus.
Prometheus was a Titan, a god in the Ancient Greek pantheon. He was also a criminal who stole fire from Hephaestus, the blacksmith god. Hiding the fire in a stalk of fennel, Prometheus came to earth and gave it to humankind. As punishment, he was chained to a mountain, where an eagle visited every day to eat his liver.
Prometheus' gift was not simply the gift of fire; it was the gift of intelligence. In Prometheus Bound, he declares that before his gift humans saw without seeing and heard without hearing. After his gift, humans could write, build houses, read the stars, perform mathematics, domesticate animals, construct ships, invent medicines, interpret dreams and give proper offerings to the gods.
The myth of Prometheus is a creation story with a difference. In the Hebrew Bible, God does not give Adam the power to create life. But Prometheus gives (some of) the gods' creative power to humankind.Hesiod indicates this aspect of the myth in Theogony. In that poem, Zeus not only punishes Prometheus for the theft of fire; he punishes humankind as well. He orders Hephaestus to fire up his forge and construct the first woman, Pandora, who unleashes evil on the world.
The fire that Hephaestus uses to make Pandora is the same fire that Prometheus has given humankind.
In this 18th-century engraving, Prometheus constructs the first man.
The Greeks proposed the idea that humans are a form of artificial intelligence. Prometheus and Hephaestus use technology to manufacture men and women. As historian Adrienne Mayor reveals in her book Gods and Robots, the ancients often depicted Prometheus as a craftsman, using ordinary tools to create human beings in an ordinary workshop.
If Prometheus gave us the fire of the gods, it would seem to follow that we can use this fire to make our own intelligent beings. Such stories abound in Ancient Greek literature, from the inventor Daedalus, who created statues that came to life, to the witch Medea, who could restore youth and potency with her cunning drugs. Greek inventors also constructed mechanical computers for astronomy and remarkable moving figures powered by gravity, water and air.
The Pope and the chatbot
2,700 years have passed since Hesiod first wrote down the story of Prometheus. In the ensuing centuries, the myth has been endlessly retold, especially since the publication of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or the Modern Prometheus in 1818.
But the myth is not always told as fiction. Here are two historical examples where the myth of Prometheus seemed to come true.
Gerbert of Aurillac was the Prometheus of the 10th century. He was born in the early 940s CE, went to school at Aurillac Abbey, and became a monk himself. He proceeded to master every known branch of learning. In the year 999, he was elected Pope. He died in 1003 under his pontifical name, Sylvester II.
Rumours about Gerbert spread wildly across Europe. Within a century of his death, his life had already become legend. One of the most famous legends, and the most pertinent in our age of AI hype, is that of Gerbert's "brazen head." The legend was told in the 1120s by the English historian William of Malmesbury, in his well researched and highly regarded book, Deeds of the English Kings.
Gerbert was deeply learned in astronomy, a science of prediction. Astronomers could use the astrolabe to predict the position of the stars and foresee cosmological events such as eclipses. According to William, Gerbert used his knowledge of astronomy to construct a talking head. After inspecting the movements of the stars and planets, he cast a head in bronze that could answer yes-or-no questions.
First Gerbert asked the head:
"Will I become Pope?"
"Yes," answered the head.
Then Gerbert asked: "Will I die before I sing mass in Jerusalem?"
"No," the head replied.
In both cases, the head was correct, though not as Gerbert anticipated. He did become Pope, and he sensibly avoided going on pilgrimage to Jerusalem. One day, however, he sang mass at Santa Croce in Gerusalemme in Rome. Unfortunately for Gerbert, Santa Croce in Gerusalemme was known in those days simply as "Jerusalem."
Gerbert sickened and died. On his deathbed, he asked his attendants to cut up his body and cast away the pieces, so he could go to his true master, Satan. In this way, he was, like Prometheus, punished for his theft of fire.
It is a thrilling story. It is not clear whether William of Malmesbury actually believed it. But he does try to persuade his readers that it is plausible. Why did this great historian with a devotion to the truth insert some fanciful legends about a French pope into his history of England? Good question!
Is it so fanciful to believe that an advanced astronomer might build a general-purpose prediction machine? In those days, astronomy was the most powerful science of prediction. The sober and scholarly William was at least willing to entertain the idea that brilliant advances in astronomy might make it possible for a Pope to build an intelligent chatbot.
Today, that same possibility is credited to machine-learning algorithms, which can predict which ad you will click, which movie you will watch, which word you will type next. We can be forgiven for falling under the same spell.
The anatomist and the automaton
The Prometheus of the 18th century was Jacques de Vaucanson, at least according to Voltaire:
Bold Vaucanson, rival of Prometheus,Seems, imitating the springs of nature,To steal the fire of heaven to animate the body.
Jacques de Vaucanson – Joseph Boze (1784)
(Image credit: Joseph Boze, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons)
Vaucanson was a great machinist, famous for his automata. These were clockwork devices that realistically simulated human or animal anatomy. Philosophers of the time believed that the body was a machine — so why couldn't a machinist build one?
Sometimes Vaucanson's automata were scientifically significant. He constructed a piper, for example, that had lips and lungs and fingers, and blew the pipe in much the same way a human would. Historian Jessica Riskin explains in her book The Restless Clock that Vaucanson had to make significant discoveries in acoustics in order to make his piper play in tune.
Sometimes his automata were less scientific. His digesting duck was hugely famous, but turned out to be fraudulent. It appeared to eat and digest food, but its poos were in fact prefabricated pellets hidden inside the mechanism.
Vaucanson spent decades working on what he called a "moving anatomy." In 1741, he presented a plan to the Lyons Academy to build an "imitation of all animal operations." Twenty years later, he was at it again. He secured support from King Louis XV to build a simulation of the circulatory system. He claimed he could build a complete, living artificial body.
Three of Vaucanson’s famous automata: the Flute Player, the Digesting Duck, and the Provençal Farmer, who played the pipe and tambourine. (Image credit: See page for author,Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons)
There is no evidence that Vaucanson ever completed a whole body. In the end, he couldn't live up to the hype. But many of his contemporaries believed he could do it. They wanted to believe in his magical mechanisms. They wished he would seize the fire of life.
If Vaucanson could manufacture a new human body, couldn't he also repair an existing one? This is the promise of some AI companies today. According to Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, AI will soon allow people "to live as long as they want." Immortality seems like an attractive investment.
Sylvester II and Vaucanson were great technologists, but neither was a Prometheus. They stole no fire from the gods. Will the aspiring Prometheans of Silicon Valley succeed where their predecessors have failed? If only we had Sylvester II's brazen head, we could ask it.
The unusual cloud formations has been spotted in north Wales
The unique formations are often referred to as pancake clouds as they appear flat and are sometimes stacked together.
Their official name is lenticular clouds, originating from a Latin word meaning "lens-like".
People visiting Traeth Llanddwyn in Newborough were lucky enough to catch a glimpse of the sight as they drifted over from the Pen Llŷn mountains.
Dove Rosalinda
One local described the sight as "special"
Hikers in Snowdonia and the Llŷn Peninsula were taken aback by the clouds as they made a quick appearance only lasting for about 10 minutes.
Dove Rosalinda often hikes in Snowdonia and said she had seen UFO clouds before.
She described her first time seeing the phenomenon as "special" because they do not last very long.
Dove Rosalinda
Pilots avoid flying near the lenticular clouds as they can cause turbulence
How are UFO clouds formed?
UFO or lenticular clouds form when stable, moist air travels over mountains and creates standing waves in the atmosphere.
As the air cools, it then condenses into flat clouds, often stacking up like UFOs or pancakes.
Lenticular clouds often signify strong winds on the ground below.
The Met Office said: "When air blows across a mountain range, in certain circumstances, it can set up a train of large standing waves in the air downstream, rather like ripples forming in a river when water flows over an obstruction.
"If there is enough moisture in the air, the rising motion of the wave will cause water vapour to condense, forming the unique appearance of lenticular clouds."
The Met Office says pilots avoid flying near the lenticular clouds as they can cause turbulence but some experienced glider pilots like them as it is a visual representation of where the air is rising.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 75 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.