British MOD still witholding secret UFO documents.

Dr. David Clarke presents highlights from the final release of UFO files from the Ministry of Defence to the National Archives UK, published on Jun 25, 2013.

The British Ministry of Defence is still withholding high-level UFO public policy papers, along with other UFO documentation, despite the public stance that all material has been transferred to the National Archives, according to John F. Burroughs, a retired USAF security officer. Burroughs, 53, was stationed at RAF Bentwaters in the late 1980's and witnessed one of the most significant UFO events in English history.

Speaking to the Sedona MUFON section meeting on Friday May 16, Burroughs surprised the audience when he presented first results of his analysis of a declassified British MOD document, along with the stunning revelation that the MOD——despite the wide-spread perception that they've turned all classified UFO documentation over to the British National Archives——is still maintaining at least six major UFO/UAP Policy Papers, along with other documentation as classified, including a paper on Defence Policy and UFO's. The last is presumably a clear refutation of the MOD stance that UFOs, or at least UFO reports, are 'not of Defence Significance', however since it remains classified, there is no way to know.

Burroughs' two hour presentation included a brief review of the recently published book by St. Martin's Press, 'Encounter in Rendlesham Forest', co-authored with fellow USAF security officer Jim Penniston and former MOD UFO desk administrator Nick Pope; a discussion of the 'Sedona coordinate', a location specified by one possible decoding of retired Technical Sergeant James Penniston's controversial binary data, and details of Burroughs' struggle with the VA to acquire his complete service medical records, some of which have since been classified by unknown components of the US DOD.

The presentation fit together a number of pieces of an increasingly complex puzzle about what actually happened in the waning days of December, 1980 in a forest outside Joint Base RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge, a key front line Cold War US airbase in East Anglia. It also offered a novel possible explanation of the mysterious classification of his missing medical data, beyond the ongoing scandal of VA lack of treatment of veterans that recently forced the head of the VA to resign.

TIMING IS EVERYTHING

The timeline of events Burroughs recounts is telling

In June, 2000, the MOD shifted the titles of its public information Policy Papers, replacing the term 'UFO' with 'UAP' in order to throw investigators using the FOIA process to find UFO documentation off the trail.
This served to mask documentation from public access on the basis of a technicality.

In December, 2000 the MOD commissioned a Top Secret Technical Memorandum 55/2/00 in 2000, which was intended to provide the pretext for closing down the MOD UFO desk. That Memorandum included a Key Recommendation that:

"It should no longer be a requirement for DI55 to monitor UAP reports as they do not demonstrably provide information useful to Defence Intelligence."

— British MOD Technical Memorandum 55/2/00, December 2000

Subsequent to the internal release of the Technical Memorandum, the UK MOD shut down the public UFO reporting desk and began a process of transferring all of the UFO reports to the British National Archives.

According to a statement by MOD spokesman Dr. David Clarke in a June 21, 2013 video, Britain's Ministry of Defence revealed a new batch of UFO files for sightings which occurred between 2007 and 2009, the final release of such files from Britain. The implication was that the MOD had come clean. The video is attached to this article.

This seeming act of transparency was apparently a ruse, as FOIA requests by Burroughs have revealed two further versions of the truth.

One MOD response to a FOIA request admitted to the existence of the crucial
high-level policy papers. Two of the policy papers, covering the periods of 1971-76 and 1996-2000, respectively, are titled 'UFO policy', while three more covering the periods of June-Dec 2000, Dec 2000-March 2004 and March 2004 are titled 'UAP policy'.

A subsequent MOD response to a follow up request further admitted the existence of a total of 18 unreleased UFO/UAP documents, including one titled 'Defence Policy Issues UFOs'.

"It's no big surprise, I guess, that the MOD is lying about transparency," Burroughs said in a phone interview from his Sedona home. "It's always a cat-and-mouse game with these agencies to get them to admit anything of substance about this subject."

It's now clear that MOD Scientific Memo 55/2/00 was designed to take a page
out of the USAF playbook and provide a pretext for shutting down the MOD UFO report desk, a minimal public relations effort. The tactics mirror the process by which the USAF shut down acceptance of civilian UFO reports, with the refinement that a Top Secret memorandum limited in distribution to 7 copies was used in place of a public commission report.

A HISTORY OF EXTRACTION

In 1966, astronomer J. Allen Hynek in an off-the-cuff conjecture during a hastily arranged press conference, made the regrettable remark that lights observed in Michigan by over 100 witness which had garnered considerable media attention might be attributable to 'Swamp Gas'. It was a historic gaffe making Project Blue Book a laughing stock and triggering then Michigan
Congressman Gerald Ford, the House Republican Leader, in whose district the
sightings had occurred, to call for a congressional hearing on the subject.

That hearing took place on April 5, 1966 under the aegis of the House Armed Services Committee (89th Congress, 2nd Session).

In October, 1966, in the wake of the Swamp Gas incident and the initial hearing, the Air Force selected Dr. Edward U. Condon and the University of Colorado for a UFO research contract to do a study on the Blue Book project, the USAF's largely ceremonial public relations effort to accept and file UFO reports.

A subsequently leaked memo written by staff member Robert J. Low to university officials on August 9, 1966, indicated that the conclusion of the report was a forgone conclusion before it ever began. The memo read in part:

...Our study would be [ostensibly] conducted almost exclusively by non-believers who, although they couldn't possibly *prove* a negative result, could and probably would add an impressive body of evidence that there is no reality to the observations. The trick would be, I think, to describe the project so that, to the public, it would appear a totally objective study but, to the scientific community, would present the image of a group of
nonbelievers trying their best to be objective, but having an almost zero expectation of finding a saucer. One way to do this would be to
stress investigation, not of the physical phenomena, but rather ofthe people who do the observing -- the psychology and sociology of persons and groups who report seeing UFOs. If the emphasis were put here, rather than on examination of the old question of the physical reality of the saucer, I think the scientific community would quickly get the message... I'm inclined to feel at this early stage that, if we set up the thing right and take pains to get the proper people involved and have success in presenting the image we want to present to the scientific community, we could carry the job off to our benefit...
–– Condon Committee member Robert J. Low.

The Condon Committee effort was supported by a second Congressional hearing on July 29, 1968 under the aegis of the House Science and Astronautics Committee. That hearing included Dr. Hynek, the head of the Astronomy department at Northwestern University, Dr. James E. McDonald, Senior Physicist, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, University of Arizona, Dr. Carl Sagan, Dept. of Astronomy, Cornell University, and Dr. Robert L. Hall, Head, Dept. of Sociology, University of Illinois-Chicago among others.

It was the last serious effort at formal government sponsored discourse on the subject. To this day, many, including UFO reality advocate Stanton Friedman view U of A Physicist McDonald's testimony as the best prepared and presented set of unexplained cases ever presented.

Predictably, Condon's summation announced that there was no need for the USAF to maintain effort on Blue Book, despite the contents of the actual report, which includes a number of significant cases labeled 'Unexplained'. As a result, the USAF shut down the project and got out of the business of accepting UFO reports.

The MOD followed the same pattern over four decades later, commissioning a
Top Secret report rather than a sham public accredited investigation that would recommend the shut down of the largely ceremonial MOD UFO report acceptance desk, and, having changed their terminology in advance an in accordance with the key recommendation, did exactly that.

"The memorandum itself is a masterpiece of bureaucratic double-speak," Burroughs stated in a press release accompanying the presentation, "You have to know what you are looking for and understand what is actually being stated."

The plan worked fairly flawlessly, as the MOD Technical Memorandum was largely overlooked by the UFO research community due in large part to the obscurity of wording and the intertwining of excess but relatively useless technical data on the reports, along with vague discussion of 'rare, but natural weather phenomenon.'

This tactic mirrors the content of a press conference held at the Pentagonin 1952 in the wake of the spectacular July sightings over Washington, DC of groups of as many as 7 UFO's of the form of silver saucers of phenomenal performance.

Air Force Director of Intelligence General Samford did make the oft-quoted statement that "However, there have remained a percentage of this total [of sighting reports], in the order of twenty percent of the reports, that have come from credible observers of relatively incredible things."

Samford issued a series of confusing statements discussing weather phenomena, but when pressed by reporters, admitted late in the conference that:

“There is nothing else known in the world that can do those things except the phenomena!”

— Air Force Director of Intelligence Lt. General John A. Samford

The properly confused press duly reported that the USAF felt that the Washington sightings were do to radar reflections resulting from temperature inversions, something the radar operators would later refute, although that was under-reported.

In 1956, Gen. Samford was appointed director of the National Security Agency, a posiction he held until his retirement in late 1960.

DIGGING DEEPER

While self-styled experts such as David Clarke either overlooked or disregarded the significance of the material in MOD 55/2/00 — Clarke would later take a position on MOD staff as a public analyst, Burroughs notes — Burroughs dug deep into the document and discovered some surprising results.

To start with, the MOD admitted there is a real phenomenon, not a weather aberration at the root of the sightings reports data.

"That Unidentified Aerial Phenomena exist is indisputable. Credited with the ability to hover, land, take-off, accelerate to exceptional velocities and vanish, they can reportedly alter their direction of flight suddenly and clearly can exhibit aerodynamic characteristics well beyond those of any known aircraft or missile -- either manned or unmanned."

— British MOD Technical Memorandum 55/2/00, December 2000

This follows similar admissions by the USAF and France.

In a 1947 memo to then chief of staff Curtis LeMay, General Twining stated
that:

“The phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious.”

In 1999 the COMETA Report, compiled by a prestigious panel of French scientific and military experts concluded that:

“They demonstrate the almost certain physical reality of completely unknown flying objects with remarkable flight performances and noiselessness, apparently operated by intelligent [beings].”

— COMETA Report, France, 1999

"These are but a few examples of confirmation that the phenomenon exists and the root cause is something beyond known human engineering capabilities," Burroughs maintains.

The choice of wording is not accidental.

Confirmation of the existence and nature of the phenomenon, Burroughs says, is a crucial and important conceptual distinction from 'Disclosure' of the facts, whatever they may be, as called for by Disclosure advocates.

"Disclosure is a political impossibility." Burroughs maintains, quoting again the COMETA report which concluded in part that:

"It is clear that the Pentagon has had, and probably still has, the greatest interest in concealing, as best it can, all of this research, which may cause the United States to hold a position of great supremacy over terrestrial adversaries, while giving it a considerable response capability against a possible threat coming from space.

Within this context, it is impossible for them to divulge the sources [or conclusions] of this research and the goals pursued, because that could immediately point any possible rivals down the most beneficial avenues. Cover-ups and disinformation still remain, under this hypothesis, an absolute
necessity.

— The COMETA Report, France, 1999

"Confirmation trumps Disclosure," says Burroughs, 'in two respects. First of all it is politically workable. Secondly, it has already occurred."

Public acceptance of the confirmation of the phenomenon has the crucial attribute that it allows the maintenance of 'the orderly functioning of the body politic', a phrase at the heart of the 1953 Robertson Panel report, which was commissioned in the wake of the Washington, D.C, in the summer of 1952. That report was the impetus for a comprehensive program of public indoctrination that lasted for decades.

SYSTEMATIC DISINFORMATION

On one hand, the CIA, under the aegis of 'Project Mockingbird' co-opted the US national media (a transgression of their mandate not to interfere in US internal affairs) and began a campaign to reduce the UFO sightings reports problem to a socially unacceptable topic, the framework of which was recounted in 'The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA played America' by Hugh Wilford.

On the other hand, the CIA quietly funded the National Enquirer and soon the tabloid, which included a patently ridiculous UFO story amid juicy gossip and other low-brow entertainment, was a fixture at every supermarket checkout stand in America. This was documented in Terry Hanson's book 'The Missing Times'.

The combination worked, and soon thoughtful, serious discussion of the UFO topic was socially taboo, the subject reduced to the derogatory memes of 'little green men' in 'flying saucers' studied by people wearing 'tin-foil hats.' This social engineering produced a toxic atmosphere and relegated the UFO research community to a journalistic ghetto of belief driven obscurity.

In recent decades, a frontal assault on this circumstance has been mounted by a number of Disclosure advocates, who demand nothing less than a Presidential admission of 'an extraterrestrial presence on earth'.

Not only is this a political impossibility — the UFO topic is the electrified 'third rail' of American politics, as Rep. Dennis Kucinich discovered in a 2007 presidential candidate's debate — but it assumes as somehow a priori the exact nature of what would be 'disclosed'.

Whatever is known about the phenomenon in the bowels of the US security state is inextricably bound up with justifiably classified information, as the COMETA report notes.

Burroughs credits the concept of Confirmation to Las Vegas space and housing
entrepreneur Bob Bigelow, who made an articulate assessment of the situation in a rare public appearance on George Knapp hosted Coast to Coast AM radio show in March of 2013.

Bigelow said in part:

"So, what I do is I try to distinguish the difference between Confirmation and Disclosure. To me, [there is] a very crucial difference between the way I choose to use those words.

And that is that Confirmation, to me, means simply the acknowledgment that the phenomena exists, that it is real. Getting the truth out that, just simply that the UFO topic is real, that these things really do exist, ET's really do exist.

And that's it. You draw the line, you stop right there. And you have just once and for all, established that it's real.

Confirmation is not Disclosure, it does not require and mean that details need to be immediately flooded out regarding craft and occupants and all kinds of things.

I also see that, to me, Confirmation is in process. I think this is an ongoing effort now, that is accelerating. I think it is on behalf of the phenomenon itself, because the exhibitions continue, and involvement in people's lives continue, so it's not as though there is an abatement in the prosecution of exhibitions on behalf of the phenomena, they don't stop."

— Robert Bigelow to George Knapp, Coast to Coast AM, March, 2013.

WALKING EVIDENCE

Finally, Burroughs presented a detailed correlation between statements in MOD Memo 55/2/00, a 2010 paper by physicist Hal Puthoff, PhD, and a 2003 paper by Jaques Vallee and Eric Davis prepared for Bigelow's National Institute for Discovery Science (NIDS).

The extremely short version of this set of correlations is that observations by witnesses to Rendlesham and Burroughs' own life-threatening heart problems are consistent with the effects predicted by Puthoff's avante-guarde propulsion theoretical paper, which describes a means of engineering space-time to achieve faster than light speed without violating the terms of General Relativity.

Puthoff's paper, published in the peer reviewed Journal of the British Interplanetary Society is avant-guarde theoretical, and thus the correlation Burroughs describes hinges on the ultimate engineering of the Puthoff Drive and measured effects.

But if Puthoff is correct, John Burroughs exhibits the effects of a prolonged and close encounter with a form of blue-shifted EM radiation consistent with a propulsion field capable of interstellar travel.

The implications of that are obvious.

Finally, the British MOD report itself states that:

"The well-reported Rendlesham Forest/Bentwaters event[s] is an example where it might be postulated that several observers were probably exposed to UAP radiation for longer than normal UAP sighting times."

— British MOD Technical Memorandum 55/2/00, December 2000

Add to that the fact that Puthoff's theory of spacetime engineering would result in the paper's words:

"...an individual having spent time within such a temporally-modified field, would, when returned to the normal environment, find that more time had passed than could be experientially accounted for."
–– Puthoff, British Journal of Interplanetary Science, 2010

According to some accounts, Burroughs actually entered the object of unknown origin on the first night.

Both serviceman's watches were 45 minutes out of sync with clocks on the base after the incident.

The MOD report goes on to state:

“Currently the field characteristics of a UAP are unknown, but it is a corroborated fact that...some sort of field is emanated which has adverse effects on some people when they are close to the source.”

— British MOD Technical Memorandum 55/2/00, December 2000

Burroughs includes the following statement in a media briefing PowerPoint presentation developed from his Sedona MUFON Lecture:

"It is reasonable to conclude that the phenomenon I was exposed to in Rendlesham may have been an advanced propulsion system along the lines of Puthoff’s theoretical faster-than-light drive."

— John F. Burroughs, USAF, (Ret)

One of the responses to Burroughs' extensive FOIA request efforts admits that the MOD holds no information on the kind of radiation known to cause his heart condition. That information was not included in Burroughs' medical service records, portions of which have been deemed Classified by the US DOD.

Taken as a whole, it's clear that John Burroughs did not encounter a rare weather phenomenon in the Rendlesham Forest. Rare weather phenomena don't cause time to be slowed, nor do they induce specific life-threatening medical issues in the observer's heart.

Further proof of the nature of what he did encounter is probably locked in his DNA and in the portions of his service Medical Records, which someone at the
DOD has seen fit to Classify so as to deny access to the Veteran's Administration.

"Why would they do that," Burroughs wonders instinctively, part of his law enforcement training, "unless something very important and very sensitive is included in my medical records?"

Confirmation of the true nature of the UFO/UAP phenomenon (as if more was needed) stands as a very likely explanation of what that sensitive something might provide.

Permission is granted to include short extracts of this article on websites and email lists with a link to this original work.

link: http://www.ufohastings.com/articles/has-the-british-ministry-of-defence-released-all-of-its-ufo-files

Cambridge Physicists Find Wormhole Proof

What's the Latest?

Physicists at the University of Cambridge have found a theoretical foundation for the existence of wormholes, which are tubes that connect two different points in space-time. If a piece of information or physical object could pass through the wormhole, it could open the door to time travel or instant communication across enormous distances.
"But there's a problem: Einstein's wormholes are notoriously unstable, and they don't stay open long enough for anything to get through." In 1988, physicists reached the conclusion that a kind of negative energy called Casimir energy could keep wormholes open.

What's the Big Idea?

The theoretical solution reached at Cambridge has to do with the effects of quantum energy, which tells us that even vacuums are teaming with waves of energy. If you imagine two metal plates in a vacuum, some waves of energy would be too big to fit between the plates, meaning that the space-time between the plates would have negative energy. "[U]nder the right circumstances, could the tube-like shape of the wormhole itself generate Casimir energy? Calculations show that if the wormhole's throat is orders of magnitude longer then the width of its mouth, it does indeed create Casimir energy at its centre."

Read more at New Scientist

“We can say little, if anything, about what these patterns [above] signify, why they were cut into rocks, or who created them. For all intents and purposes, they might have been made by aliens.” When a new NASA book on alien communications has a paragraph like that, you better pay attention.

Of course, the scientists and scholars who contributed to Archaeology, Anthropology and Interstellar Communications—a new 300-page volume [1.8MB PDF] edited by Douglas A. Vakoch—are not saying these carvings were definitely made by aliens. They’re saying that, since we don’t really know the origin and meaning of these markings—which were made thousands of years ago all cross Europe, America and India—we can assume that they are made by aliens as a test to what we may encounter when we actually make contact with a civilization from another planet.

It’s a serious book—deep and complex, but quite accessible. I have been going through it and it is truly fascinating stuff. And I’m not only talking about the gem at the top of this article:

Consider again, therefore, the desirability of establishing symbolic/linguistic communication with ETI [Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence]. It is helpful to review some parallels from human existence that pose problems for us today. One of these is “rock art,” which consists of patterns or shapes cut into rock many thousands of years ago. Such ancient stone carvings can be found in many countries [...]
We can say little, if anything, about what these patterns [above] signify, why they were cut into rocks, or who created them. For all intents and purposes, they might have been made by aliens.

NASA is getting ready to communicate with aliens using a new strategy SExpand

A replica of an unusual cup-and-ring-marked stone from Dalgarven, North Ayrshire, Scotland.

The larger picture

That’s only a tiny part of a much larger logical chain that takes into consideration our knowledge on historical and prehistorical Earth, as well as our understanding of biology, evolution, and physics. For example, after going through a number of assumptions about the potential physical and biophysical differences in Chapter 15—titled Constraints on Message Construction for Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence—Vakoch writes about the implications (emphasis mine)

Implications—I

If the reader accepts these assumptions, then our first constraint on possible messages is simple: don’t think of “sound worlds” or music or speech as the domains, vehicles, or contents of ETI messages. Regardless of semiotic concerns (see below), the accessibility of acoustic messaging must remain doubtful. Furthermore, there will be intended and unintended aspects of performance, which elaborate the difficulties of using sound. In my view avoidance of the sound world need not be controversial.

On the other hand, vision and the use of images would appear to be at least plausible. Although spectral details cannot be considered universal, the physical arrangement of objects on a habitable planet’s surface will be shaped in part by gravity (the notion of a horizon might well be universal) and thus multispectral images might plausibly be considered worthwhile for messages. More generally, the implications for considering SETI/CETI as some sort of anthropological challenge need teasing out.

Makes total sense to me.

I won’t quote more of the book here because that would be a worthless exercise, but so far—I’m still eagerly reading it—it’s a really great read.

It’s comforting that NASA is thinking about human-alien communication under a new focus, one that is not purely based on the physical sciences of planetary research or exobiology, but that ties it with our current experience in trying to decipher our own archeological and anthropological past. That, according to Vakoch, is the objective of this volume (emphasis mine):

The chapters in this volume combine incisive critique with hope that there is a response to the skepticism behind these critiques. Addressing a field that has been dominated by astronomers, physicists, engineers, and computer scientists, the contributors to this collection raise questions that may have been overlooked by physical scientists about the ease of establishing meaningful communication with an extraterrestrial intelligence.

These scholars are grappling with some of the enormous challenges that will face humanity if an information-rich signal emanating from another world is detected. By drawing on issues at the core of contemporary archaeology and anthropology, we can be much better prepared for contact with an extraterrestrial civilization, should that day ever come.

You can download it here as a Kindle book or as a universal ePub here. You can browse through it as a PDF right here:

It appears you don’t have a PDF plugin for this browser. No biggie… you can click here to download the PDF file.

Source: SPLOID

Related Stories

This giant skull from Peru is (allegedly) quite similar to skulls found in hundreds of graves across North America from the 1700s through the early to mid-20th Century (read about full story of the Paracas Skulls here).

The Smithsonian Institution aggressively acquired the remains of a vast preponderance of giants’ remains unearthed in North America. Newspaper articles from the period tell the tale. Many of these, thankfully, are published in a book by Richard Dewhurst called The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America.

The technique that Smithsonian curators used to coax people to ship the evidence to them was quite ingenious. First, the museum established itself as the anthropological authority bar none. Often, this was enough to attract flies to the “bug zapper.” And if it wasn’t, then requests were mailed by the museum, which asked to see the evidence.

After bones and artifcacts were shipped from another museum, or from a private party, the Smithsonian then proceeded to “sit on them” for a long, long time. In retrospect, it’s obvious that the material was simply put into a top secret warehouse somewhere. Inquiries from the parties involved would produce stalling. Years typically became one or two decades.

Yes, the Smithsonian’s modus operandi tended to use passive aggressive means to confiscate evidence. This time-honored tradition worked like a charm. Museum staff (from other institutions) tended to give up the easiest. Private parties that had personally discovered or bought the remains were more persistent.

Eventually, though, the person would die, as folks tend to do. When another generation of family members deigned to keep up the fight of getting back their property, the Smithsonian would then shift into second gear: refusing to even acknowledge that it had ever received the skeletons and artifacts.

Most times, the next generation of family members did not keep badgering the Smithsonian. Why? Well, primarily because they were busy with the travails of earning a living and raising a family. Of course, public perceptions about such things might also have been a contributing factor. The sciences had not only brushed off the evidence; they had also taken a firm stand against the possibility that a giant race of hominids once lived in North America, long before the native Americans arrived (assumedly after the giants were no longer).

So, by the 1950′s, children and grandchildren of the original owners of said artifacts, which were stolen by the Smithsonian, could have started to doubt “grandpa’s stories” about a giant skull, copper jewelry, etc. Plausible deniability worked like a charm when new staff and new scientists at the Smithsonian replaced the older generations, which originally accepted the remains. How’s that for sneaky? It’s why I call the Smithsonian “Land of the Lost.”

Notice the red hair on this skull (above), which also has a much heavier cranium and jaw than a human skull, as well as an elongated shape. Most skulls from the Midwest and South of the US were no oblong, but quite a few from the Southwest and West did tend to have an oblong shape. This gives rise to the question: was there more than one species of giant?

I have never tended to think that sasquatches were the same race as the giants that built elaborate structures, massive in size, pyramid, fortifications, and also possessed technology, which, in some cases, was more advanced than ours today. For example, metallurgists cannot duplicate the amazingly strong and light weight copper found in jewelry and equipment used by the giants.

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzMuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy00MkN0WGU3OExkYy9VVFdldmoxTVpiSS9BQUFBQUFBQWxXWS9vUnlfWXFkWEdEOC9zMTYwMC8zMDYyNDRfNjE1MjIyODcxODI2NTQ2XzE3NzcyNzM0Mzlfbi5qcGc=

These men all met strange and tragically premature deaths according to Richard Dewhurst, author of The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America. If this giant skull is real, then it belonged to a giant of truly titanic proportions. The picture pushes the bounds of credulity, even for me. Could it be a fabricated tall tale to cast a shadow of doubt over the other evidence by association?

This technique is called “disinformation,” and it tends to work on the general public like a charm.

Source: http://www.kultusbook.com/2014/05/land-of-lost.html

Related Stories

I looked, and I saw a windstorm coming out of the north—an immense cloud with flashing lightning and surrounded by brilliant light. The center of the fire looked like glowing metal, 5 and in the fire was what looked like four living creatures. In appearance their form was human, 6 but each of them had four faces and four wings. Their legs were straight; their feet were like those of a calf and gleamed like burnished bronze. Under their wings on their four sides they had human hands. All four of them had faces and wings, and the wings of one touched the wings of another. Each one went straight ahead; they did not turn as they moved.

Credit: Streetcap1

Their faces looked like this: Each of the four had the face of a human being, and on the right side each had the face of a lion, and on the left the face of an ox; each also had the face of an eagle. Such were their faces. They each had two wings spreading out upward, each wing touching that of the creature on either side; and each had two other wings covering its body. Each one went straight ahead. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, without turning as they went. The appearance of the living creatures was like burning coals of fire or like torches. Fire moved back and forth among the creatures; it was bright, and lightning flashed out of it. The creatures sped back and forth like flashes of lightning.

As I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces. This was the appearance and structure of the wheels: They sparkled like topaz, and all four looked alike. Each appeared to be made like a wheel intersecting a wheel. As they moved, they would go in any one of the four directions the creatures faced; the wheels did not change direction as the creatures went. Their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around.

Then the living creatures moved, the wheels beside them moved; and when the living creatures rose from the ground, the wheels also rose. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, and the wheels would rise along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels. When the creatures moved, they also moved; when the creatures stood still, they also stood still; and when the creatures rose from the ground, the wheels rose along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.

Spread out above the heads of the living creatures was what looked something like a vault, sparkling like crystal, and awesome. Under the vault their wings were stretched out one toward the other, and each had two wings covering its body. When the creatures moved, I heard the sound of their wings, like the roar of rushing waters, like the voice of the Almighty, like the tumult of an army. When they stood still, they lowered their wings.

Then there came a voice from above the vault over their heads as they stood with lowered wings. Above the vault over their heads was what looked like a throne of lapis lazuli, and high above on the throne was a figure like that of a man. I saw that from what appeared to be his waist up he looked like glowing metal, as if full of fire, and that from there down he looked like fire; and brilliant light surrounded him. Like the appearance of a rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the radiance around him.

This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. When I saw it, I fell facedown, and I heard the voice of one speaking.

Related Stories

“What you can see is a white object not attached to the iceberg, but rather spinning around and changing shape.” He stated.

“This is easily the strangest thing I have ever witnessed in my life.”

Could the UFO be trying to mimic the color and shape of the iceberg in an effort to blend in, with the environment, or is it possibly some kind of new military stealth technology, Whatever it is its weird.

For more high strange visit www.churchofmabusradio.com

Location: Lindley (Steuben) New York
Date: July 25 1977

Time: 2300

The witness heard a noise at his door and on opening saw a 4-foot tall humanoid standing there; he was wearing a suit that was light on top and dark on the bottom. He retired indoors to get his gun and flashlight and stepped out on the porch, playing the light around the yard. The flashlight illuminated an object above a nearby tree; then a beam of light from this object knocked the witness back. Following this the witness remained indoors. Both he and his wife felt cramps, and the witness said that his head felt as though it would explode, his body felt numb, and his ears were ringing. He reportedly saw 6 or 7 UFOs throughout the night, and a number of 4-foot tall humanoids, some of which could be heard on the roof. The beings made a chattering sound. All were gone by 05:00 a.m. Footprints were seen on the grass, and on the roof a metal louver was partially removed.

Humcat 1977-38
Source: Ted Phillips, Douglas Dains, & Dr. Gary Truce for Cufos

Location: Lindley (Steuben) New York
Date: August 1 1977

Time: 02:00 a.m.

Two witnesses involved in a previous encounter, watched 6 or 7 humanoids with glowing green belts, similar to those they had seen the week before. Two of them had grayish glowing belts, and one of the witnesses saw two normal sized human figures that glowed a silvery white instead of green. After an hour of observation they woke a third witness, who saw only blue green lights. When they shone a flashlight beam on one of the figures, it disappeared, but was still there when the beam was removed. It gradually became foggy and at 04:30 a.m. they went to bed, but the two original witnesses thought they could hear the sound of a woman screaming three times, and a door slamming. They again experienced headaches and ringing in their ears. The third witness, who heard a noise like someone chiseling rock and a high pitched chirping sound, did not suffer from headache. They saw no UFOs that night, but others reported objects locally on subsequent nights.

Humcat 1977-42
Source: Douglas Dains for Cufos

For more high strange visit www.churchofmabusradio.com

1977 – At 12:45 a.m. a 26-year old woman and her 13-year-old niece looked out their bedroom window in Lindley, New York before retiring and saw 11 or 12 white lights in a “dipper” shaped formation that were moving about in the sky. One bright light appeared on a hill 300 yards away. They could hear a whooshing sound, then two lights rose in the air. Then next heard footsteps from the creek, about 100 yards away, and saw two small figures floating up and down in front of a tree by the creek. After this they saw several more figures, at various spots, carrying what seemed to be flashlights. They wore tight-fitting, “skin diver” suits with glowing green belts.

A luminous red rectangular object was seen by one of the witnesses. It approached the creek, and then backed away. At this point both witnesses developed severe headaches. They then saw a figure on a distant hill shining a light on a tombstone there, and the stone seemed to rise up into the air and move back and forth. A figure taller than the others, who were less than four feet tall, stood near the light on the hill and called out with an “ooh, ooh” signal. The others all approached him and, five minutes later, deployed back into adjacent fields. One of them approached the house. He came under the second story window and dropped to the ground, as if to conceal himself, he then approached the door and rattled the handle. By this time, 3:45 a.m., the older witness had called her mother, who notified the state police. All of the lights and figures disappeared just prior to the arrival of the police, the lights in the sky being indistinguishable from stars. Both witnesses believed only an hour had passed but actually over three hours had elapsed. They complained of burning eyes and headaches that lasted for two days. Footprints were found in the area.

Sources:

International UFO Reporter, August 1977, p. 36; David F. Webb & Ted Bloecher,
HUMCAT: Catalogue of Humanoid Reports, case 1977-37 (A1742), citing Ted Phillips, Douglas Dains, & Dr Gary Truce for CUFOS).

21-05-2014 om 22:49 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 22:30 geschreven door peter

British MOD still witholding secret UFO documents.

21-05-2014 om 22:20 geschreven door peter

Cambridge Physicists Find Wormhole Proof

21-05-2014 om 21:44 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 21:38 geschreven door peter

May 21 2014

UFO? Meteor flare? There were not any military operations, so we can rule that out. What is your guess?

21-05-2014 om 21:33 geschreven door peter

Mysterious Lights Appear Over Hawaii 2014

May 21 2014

What is your guess? I lean towards the paranormal, and not weather related.

21-05-2014 om 21:27 geschreven door peter

The larger picture

Implications—I

21-05-2014 om 21:23 geschreven door peter

“Mysterieuze feeëncirkels niet gemaakt door termieten”

21-05-2014 om 21:14 geschreven door peter

Enorme sterrenregen in aantocht

21-05-2014 om 21:09 geschreven door peter

Boodschappen naar het verleden sturen? Het kan

21-05-2014 om 21:05 geschreven door peter

Sloot de Amerikaanse overheid een geheim pact met buitenaardsen?

21-05-2014 om 21:01 geschreven door peter

Land of the Lost

21-05-2014 om 10:18 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 10:08 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 10:02 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 01:13 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:47 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:42 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:38 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:32 geschreven door peter

MUFON’s New Social Network

21-05-2014 om 22:49 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 22:30 geschreven door peter

British MOD still witholding secret UFO documents.

21-05-2014 om 22:20 geschreven door peter

Cambridge Physicists Find Wormhole Proof

21-05-2014 om 21:44 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 21:38 geschreven door peter

May 21 2014

UFO? Meteor flare? There were not any military operations, so we can rule that out. What is your guess?

21-05-2014 om 21:33 geschreven door peter

Mysterious Lights Appear Over Hawaii 2014

May 21 2014

What is your guess? I lean towards the paranormal, and not weather related.

21-05-2014 om 21:27 geschreven door peter

The larger picture

Implications—I

21-05-2014 om 21:23 geschreven door peter

“Mysterieuze feeëncirkels niet gemaakt door termieten”

21-05-2014 om 21:14 geschreven door peter

Enorme sterrenregen in aantocht

21-05-2014 om 21:09 geschreven door peter

Boodschappen naar het verleden sturen? Het kan

21-05-2014 om 21:05 geschreven door peter

Sloot de Amerikaanse overheid een geheim pact met buitenaardsen?

21-05-2014 om 21:01 geschreven door peter

Land of the Lost

21-05-2014 om 10:18 geschreven door peter

Related posts:

21-05-2014 om 10:08 geschreven door peter

Related posts:

21-05-2014 om 10:02 geschreven door peter

21-05-2014 om 01:13 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:47 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:42 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:38 geschreven door peter

20-05-2014 om 21:32 geschreven door peter

MUFON’s New Social Network