The purpose of this blog is the creation of an open, international, independent and free forum, where every UFO-researcher can publish the results of his/her research. The languagues, used for this blog, are Dutch, English and French.You can find the articles of a collegue by selecting his category. Each author stays resposable for the continue of his articles. As blogmaster I have the right to refuse an addition or an article, when it attacks other collegues or UFO-groupes.
Druk op onderstaande knop om te reageren in mijn forum
Zoeken in blog
Deze blog is opgedragen aan mijn overleden echtgenote Lucienne.
In 2012 verloor ze haar moedige strijd tegen kanker!
In 2011 startte ik deze blog, omdat ik niet mocht stoppen met mijn UFO-onderzoek.
BEDANKT!!!
Een interessant adres?
UFO'S of UAP'S, ASTRONOMIE, RUIMTEVAART, ARCHEOLOGIE, OUDHEIDKUNDE, SF-SNUFJES EN ANDERE ESOTERISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN - DE ALLERLAATSTE NIEUWTJES
UFO's of UAP'S in België en de rest van de wereld In België had je vooral BUFON of het Belgisch UFO-Netwerk, dat zich met UFO's bezighoudt. BEZOEK DUS ZEKER VOOR ALLE OBJECTIEVE INFORMATIE , enkel nog beschikbaar via Facebook en deze blog.
Verder heb je ook het Belgisch-Ufo-meldpunt en Caelestia, die prachtig, doch ZEER kritisch werk leveren, ja soms zelfs héél sceptisch...
Voor Nederland kan je de mooie site www.ufowijzer.nl bezoeken van Paul Harmans. Een mooie site met veel informatie en artikels.
MUFON of het Mutual UFO Network Inc is een Amerikaanse UFO-vereniging met afdelingen in alle USA-staten en diverse landen.
MUFON's mission is the analytical and scientific investigation of the UFO- Phenomenon for the benefit of humanity...
Je kan ook hun site bekijken onder www.mufon.com.
Ze geven een maandelijks tijdschrift uit, namelijk The MUFON UFO-Journal.
Since 02/01/2020 is Pieter ex-president (=voorzitter) of BUFON, but also ex-National Director MUFON / Flanders and the Netherlands. We work together with the French MUFON Reseau MUFON/EUROP.
ER IS EEN NIEUWE GROEPERING DIE ZICH BUFON NOEMT, MAAR DIE HEBBEN NIETS MET ONZE GROEP TE MAKEN. DEZE COLLEGA'S GEBRUIKEN DE NAAM BUFON VOOR HUN SITE... Ik wens hen veel succes met de verdere uitbouw van hun groep. Zij kunnen de naam BUFON wel geregistreerd hebben, maar het rijke verleden van BUFON kunnen ze niet wegnemen...
15-09-2018
'Humans are ALIEN hybrids' Shock claim ancient astronauts 'engineered mankind'
'Humans are ALIEN hybrids' Shock claim ancient astronauts 'engineered mankind'
HUMANS were genetically engineered by advanced aliens, according to a wild theory in a new book.
HYBRID HUMANS: Author Daniella Fenton claims ancient ETs engineered human race
Ancient astronauts travelled through a "wormhole" in the Pleiades star cluster but couldn't survive on Earth, it's claimed.
Extraterrestrials decided instead to "alter the genetic make up" of early human ancestors so they became more intelligent.
The proof is in the fusion of Chromosome-2 around 780,000 years ago based on the book Hybrid Humans written by Daniella Fenton.
Chromosone-2 is found in all large-brained humans, including Neanderthals and Denisovans, but no other primate species.
"The three species went on to become advanced humans with art, culture and increasingly complex technologies," said Mrs Fenton.
"The fusions site in on an active gene which expresses itself in brain structure, immunity and reproductive functions - important systems for upgrading to a new human species.
"Instead of a small number of humans having the fusion and a large group not having it, instead there was a rapid total replacement with all humans on Earth having 46 rather than 48 chromosomes, this tells us it gave enormous benefits to become so dominant.
"Approximately 800,000 years ago human brain size went into a sudden rapid increase in size and complexity which has long been a mystery to archaeologists."
DANIELLA FENTON
THEORY: Author Daniella Fenton said the DNA of humans changed dramatically due to alien science
She went on: "This was not the only change at this time and two very extraordinary changes are the sudden appearance of miR-941, which played a crucial role in human brain development.
"The gene is highly active in controlling decision-making and enabling language abilities and appeared suddenly formed out of junk DNA."
What Mrs Fenton claims are the "signature of aliens" is dramatic changes to a neocortex gene called ARHGAP11B – associated with sight and hearing in mammals.
The official explanation for Chromosome-2, the second largest in humans, does not involve aliens.
Researcher JW IJdo concluded Chromosome-2 "marks the point at which two ancestral ape chromosomes fused to give rise to human Chromosome-2."
DANIELLA FENTON
HYBRID HUMANS: The book claims aliens engineered mankind 780,000 years ago
“Approximately 800,000 years ago human brain size went into a sudden rapid increase in size and complexity which has long been a mystery to archaeologists.”
Daniella Fenton
The Australian author, who studied equine genetic and is a spirtualist and certified shaman, claims to have physical evidence to support the ancient alien theory.
Her husband Bruce is also a writer who worked on the research.
They researched a book called Alcheringa which promotes the theory an alien spaceship exploded in our atmosphere hundreds of thousands of years ago and the survivors, who couldn't survive without the mother ship, engineered Homo sapiens.
Mrs Fenton claims the melted wreckage of the crashed craft explains the mysterious Australites tektite buttons, unexplained dark glass objects thought to be ejected in meteorite impacts.
She claimed that geologists have dated the remains of a 1km sized melted object to around 780,000 years ago.
She added: "According to a NASA study the resulting liquid glass (containing around 80% silica from melted quartz crystal) formed spheres in space which then instantly froze and began to fall into our atmosphere.
"As they entered they heated and melted to form unique button shapes before landing right across Australasia.
"These Australite tektite buttons are unique in the 4.5 billion year history of our planet and remain a total mystery to science because they can’t understand how they formed."
The Hybrid Human theory also believes the alien astronauts arrived from the Pleiades star cluster, thought to contain several thousand stars.
It is among the nearest star cluster to Earth and the one which is most visible to the naked eye.
It is believed one planet could exist around the star HD 23514 due to the exceptional number of hot dust particles surrounding it.
Mrs Fenton points to how Pleiades has been referenced repeatedly by various cultures.
She said: "All around the world ancient cultures talk about ancestral beings from the Pleiades and portals that connect those stars with this planet, this includes mythology in Japan, Indonesia, Mexico, American Indians, ancient Egypt, Sumeria and Aboriginal Australia."
A painted rock shows that humans tried their hand at symbolism as early as 73,000 years ago, pointing to the roots of modern cognition patterns.
Image credits Christopher S. Henshilwood et al., 2018, Nature.
International researchers report discovering the oldest evidence of abstract drawing to date. The artifact in question is a fragment of polished rock painted with a crosshatch pattern of nine fine lines, unearthed from a 73,000-year-old archaeological stratum at the Blombos Cave in South Africa.
“Do you do portraits, too?”
It’s not easy determining symbolism from art when dealing with some of the earliest graphic productions humanity has ever created. The main difficulty lies in determining whether the splotches of pigment were applied deliberately or not. After intentionality is established, the next step is to determine whether the images you’re dealing with are doodles or storytelling crutches, or whether they held particular meaning.
Needless to say, across the huge divides of time and culture that separate us from our ancestors, both points can be very tricky to handle.
The oldest known sample of art we’ve found before now is the shell of a freshwater mussel engravedwith a zigzag pattern discovered in Tirnil, Java, in a 540,000-year-old archaeological layer. Decorated trinkets discovered in several archeological sites in Africa, likely used for personal adornment, have been dated to roughly 70,000 years ago.
A rendition of the crosshatched pattern seen on the fragment of stone. Image credits Christopher S. Henshilwood et al., 2018, Nature.
Still, art does not necessarily a symbol make. A symbol is a mark, sign, or word that represents an idea, another object, or a relationship. While the main trait of art is beauty or its ability to encapsulate an emotional message, a symbol is, foremost, an abstraction. As such, accurately telling apart art and symbolism is very important for anthropology. Both art and symbols “are a prime indicator of modern cognition and behavior”, the team writes — the latter especially so, since abstraction requires that extra bit of intellectual brawn to handle.
Well, we have new evidence pointing to the roots of abstract thinking at least 30,000 years earlier than previously discovered works suggested.
Abstrart
The artifact, detailed by an international team that includes scientists from Norway, France, South Africa, and Switzerland, is a fragment of siliceous rock (silcrete) adorned with nine fine lines in a crosshatch pattern. It was found during excavations at the Blombos Cave, South Africa, in a 73,000-year-old archeological stratum. According to the team, the lines were drawn using an ocher (the iron ore from which the eponymous color is derived) pencil.
Ocher and silcrete implements used in the reconstruction efforts. Image credits Christopher S. Henshilwood et al., 2018, Nature.
Determining whether the pattern was deliberately drawn fell primarily on the shoulders of the team’s French members, who have a background in the chemical analysis of pigments.
They started by trying to reproduce the lines through various techniques — an approach known as experimental or experiential archeology, as it relies on direct experience gained from experimentation — that were available to the people living around the cave at the time. These included whittling ocher fragments to a point or an edge to see which shape better recreates the lines, as well as applying watery solutions of ocher powder using brushes.
Closeup of the original markings. Image credits Christopher S. Henshilwood et al., 2018, Nature.
They then compared the lines against their ancient counterparts from a microscopic, chemical, and tribological (the science of friction and wear) standpoint. According to the team, the lines were intentionally drawn with a pointed ocher implement (akin to a pencil). As such, the pattern represents the earliest known abstract drawing to date.
Closeup of the reconstructed lines. Image credits Christopher S. Henshilwood et al., 2018, Nature.
With intentionality established, the next step was to decide whether the team was looking at a symbol or just pretty doodles. This step was surprisingly simple, however. Blombos Cave is the site of an ongoing excavation by teams from the University of Bergen (Norway) and the University of Witwatersrand (South Africa) that began in 1991. Over the years, many other objects with symbolic markings — including ocher fragments that feature very similar crosshatched engraving — were uncovered in the same archaeological stratum in which the present artwork was discovered.
It’s been two weeks since the International Space Station’s crew repaired a small leak, but there are far more questions than answers.
On the evening of August 29, ground control operators in Houston and Moscow identified a pressure loss in the ISS, which cosmonauts and astronauts traced to a leak in the hull of the Russian Soyuz MS-09 capsule and repaired with a patch kit. The hole was quite small — about two millimeters in diameter — and didn’t pose a significant safety risk to the crew. Though it didn’t cause the space station to lose much air, it did raise eyebrows.
In the days since, Russian officials have entertained rumors of sabotage to the point that NASA and Russia’s space agency Roscosmos found it necessary to issue a joint statement on Thursday announcing plans for top administrators to meet face-to-face over the matter.
“NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine and Roscosmos General Director Dmitry Rogozin met for the first time yesterday via teleconference to discuss the status of International Space Station (ISS) operations in response to a request from Roscosmos.”
As a result of this teleconference, Bridenstine and Rogozin agreed to an in-person meeting at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan sometime around October 10.
Bridenstine already has a visit to Russia and Kazakhstan planned for that time, as the Russian Soyuz MS-10 spacecraft is scheduled to launch from Baikonur Cosmodrome on October 11, when it will carry NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Russian cosmonaut Aleksey Ovchinin to the ISS.
And while the whole joint announcement may sound extremely diplomatic and collaborative, it is hard to ignore the darker subtext. The release alludes to rumors that have swirled since the leak was repaired. Initially attributed to a micrometeoroid impact, the hull leak has since been blamed on a power drill of some sort. It’s not clear whether the hole happened on Earth or in space.
“We want to find out the full name of who is at fault — and we will.”
“We are able to narrow down the cause to a technological mistake of a technician. We can see the mark where the drill bit slid along the surface of the hull,” Rogozin told RIA Novosti on September 3, as translated for Ars Technica. “We want to find out the full name of who is at fault — and we will.”
Again, it’s not clear whether this hole was made accidentally or intentionally, nor whether it was made in space or on the ground — where perhaps a patch was applied that later dried out and came loose in space, an event that has occurred on a previous Soyuz craft — but Rogozin’s resolve has resulted in the formation of a Roscosmos-led commission into the matter.
Since then, Russian news outlets have speculated on possible sabotage by NASA astronauts, suggesting that the astronauts sought to create an emergency situation in order to get a sick colleague back to Earth sooner.
According to Russian newspaper Kommersant, this version of events is being considered a top possibility. But Rogozin and Bridenstine’s announcement doesn’t hint at this tension, instead laying the bulk of the blame on media reports.
“The Administrator and the General Director noted speculations circulating in the media regarding the possible cause of the incident and agreed on deferring any preliminary conclusions and providing any explanations until the final investigation has been completed,” reads Thursday’s joint statement.
For his part, Rogozin has rejected the rumors.
“The recent gossip and rumors circulating about the incident at the ISS hinder the work of Roscosmos experts and are designed to subvert the friendly relations among the crew members of the space station,” he wrote on Facebook, reported state-owned Russian news outlet TASS on Wednesday. “All statements citing unnamed sources are inadmissible until Roscosmos special commission concludes its work,” he wrote, referring to the anonymous sources on which the news stories fueling the rumors have relied.
Despite this public caution and diplomacy, though, Ars Technica reports that Roscosmos sources have continued to leak inflammatory theories and accusations to the Russian press. Among these leaked accusations is the leading theory, as suggested by Kommersant, that NASA damaged the module in an attempt to force an emergency evacuation for an ill crew member. The logic behind this theory is that because it would require a joint evacuation of astronauts and cosmonauts, NASA could get the evacuation it wanted without having to pay the estimated $85 million for a new Soyuz pod.
Sources for Russian news outlets cited the scratch marks around the hole, which suggest that somebody was drilling in microgravity since it would be harder in that environment to get firm footing for a drill bit.
For its part, NASA crew aboard the ISS has vehemently denied the notion. In an interview with ABC News on Tuesday, station commander Drew Feustel said those claims are ridiculous.
“The crew had nothing to do with this on orbit.”
“I can unequivocally say that the crew had nothing to do with this on orbit, without a doubt, and I think it’s actually a shame and somewhat embarrassing that anybody is wasting any time talking about something that the crew was involved in,” Feustel said.
Needless to say, this whole thing has become a mess.
The Soyuz spacecraft is produced by Russian firm RKK Energia and is the only spacecraft model that currently carries humans between Earth and the International Space Station.
SpaceX, Boeing, and NASA are developing their own capsules. Just a month ago, NASA announced that it would test the Boeing-made CST-100 Starliner capsule in mid-2019 and it would test the SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule in April 2019. The NASA/ESA-operated Orion spacecraft, which is being built by Lockheed Martin and Airbus and would carry four people to and from the ISS, is also in development. These new capsules would reduce or eliminate US dependence on Russia’s Soyuz capsule.
This he-said-she-said situation represents a rare lapse in the usually friendly relationship between US and Russian space programs, a relationship that has remained mostly cordial despite the icy diplomatic relations the countries are experiencing back on Earth. Regardless of how this mess shakes out, the US will soon be able to ferry astronauts to the ISS without Russia.
Employees from the National Solar Observatory in Sunspot, New Mexico, were told to leave as agents rushed to the research centre last Thursday.
The building remains on lockdown, surrounded with yellow tape, as no timeframe has been given to local police for it to re-open.
A post office nearby was also cleared out and employees have been transferred to another branch.
And no one has given an explanation why.
“Maybe one of the employees tried to mail out their finding”
YouTube viewer
"We have temporarily vacated this facility as a precautionary measure," a spokeswoman for the Association for Universities for Research in Astronomy said.
"We're working with the proper authorities on this issue."
But Tyler Glockner, who runs YouTube conspiracy channel secureteam10, thinks astronomers in the observatory spotted something the government did not like.
He speculated, while taking images of the sun, they may have come across a secret military project or even extraterrestrial life.
Tyler went on to add that the FBI would have been brought in to remove any evidence of this.
SG
BIZARRE: The FBI placed the area on lockdown
His video has now racked up more than 300,000 hits in less than 24 hours.
And viewers were quick to share their thoughts.
"They don't even close a school for this long after a shooting, something big has happened," one person claimed.
Another added: "Maybe one of the employees tried to mail out their findings."
And a third claimed: "Suspicious considering that NASA just launched a probe to go within 6million miles of the Sun to take images."
TWITTER
BLOCKED: FBI taped off the entrance to the National Solar Observatory
It is not the first time claims have surfaced over alien life, though.
Why Social Stigma About Unexplained Phenomena Holds Humanity Back
Why Social Stigma About Unexplained Phenomena Holds Humanity Back
Like most other biological systems on this planet, humans are largely motivated by self-preservation and conflict avoidance.
As a species, we tend to avoid associating ourselves with anything that will isolate us from the larger group or make us sound strange, or that might draw negative attention from our peers.
In essence, stigma results in a paralysis of communication.
And when left unaddressed, it exerts a chilling influence over society and across generations. This is true whether we are trying to find the cause for diseases, reasons for environmental change, or primers for global conflict.
Throughout history, there are times when we, as a society, found it more convenient and socially acceptable to ignore uncomfortable topics. The results were often catastrophic both to our moral fiber and the health of our species. Stigma regarding certain psychological conditions once led to a life sentence in an asylum and forced lobotomies simply because stigma prevented families having a conversation about mental illness.
There has been similar social stigma in recent decades around the topic of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), or UFOs — a topic that has been relegated to conspiracy theorists, B-Movie villains, and the weird uncle no one wants to talk to anymore. As was the case with other topics that hold stigma, many people would rather look the other way than be associated with what’s been labeled “crazy,” or “fringe.”
When I was assigned Director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), my colleagues and I experienced enough to know with absolute certainty that UAPs exist. Furthermore, they don’t seem to care if whether or not we believe in them and they are here with or without our permission.
How can we have an honest conversation about National Security and humanity if we can’t even address the topic of a potential threat or opportunity?
Consider this example from pop culture. In the famous Harry Potter series, the evil wizard Voldemort is so vile that other wizards are afraid to even utter his very name. The idea is if you don’t mention his name, it minimizes the threat and makes him less real. But ironically, the stigma of his name only makes him more powerful.
Refusing to acknowledge UAPs in our airspace is no different.
If we don’t overcome the social stigma about UAPs and address them, we may end up on the wrong side of history — only in this case, we’re not talking about fantasy and wizards, we are talking about reality and national security.
Here’s why we can’t afford to allow stigma to drive our fears and bury our heads in the sand:
Social stigma hinders government processes.
Social stigma is often the product of fear concerning topics that have no answers and are poorly understood. Project Blue Book provides a useful example.
From 1952–1969, the U.S. Air Force conducted a series of studies on UAPs. The goals of Project Blue Book were to determine whether UAPs were a national security threat and to scientifically analyze UFO-related data. For 17 years, Project Blue Book compiled reports of tens of thousands of UFO sightings, classifying 700 of these incidents as “unidentified.”
In 1966, the Air Force requested another committee, headed by Dr. Edward Condon, to look into these sightings. Two years later, they released the “Condon Report,” which concluded that the sightings they examined showed no signs of unusual activity. This prompted the Air Force to shut down Project Blue Book the following year.
Upon its dismantling, the project announced that despite nearly one thousand unidentified sightings, there was no evidence of extraordinary phenomena in our airspace.
These dismissive conclusions in the public versions of both Project Blue Book and the Condon Report simply weren’t supported by the facts. There were hundreds of credible eyewitness reports by trained observers, many with high-level security clearances, who witnessed these objects. Our country has put people in the electric chair based on the testimony of just two corroborating witnesses who aren’t particularly trained in the art of observation.
As is the case with other controversial topics, this verifiable evidence was suppressed and diluted due to stigma surrounding the topic of UAPs.
But there are always two sides to an argument.
During the time of the inquiries, the U.S. Government was in the middle of a cold war and, in all fairness, could not afford to be distracted on a wild goose chase for which they had no answers. As long as Americans weren’t under attack from these unusual phenomena, attention was rightfully placed towards more tangible matters. I don’t necessarily agree with that mindset, but I understand it.
Self-imposed stigma often makes a problem worse.
Tabloids and social media have certainly not helped the issue of stigma. These outlets frequently provide their consumers with sensationalized stories that only reinforce the stigma of certain topics.
The rise of social media means that now, everyone has a voice.
But many of those voices are less motivated by truth and instead seek to spread their own agendas. A simple search on Google about the program I once helped run, AATIP, results in hundreds of hits, many of these from purportedly reputable sites with “Deep-State” sources. These sites are run by the same individuals who claim to have inside knowledge of UAPs but have never provided one shred of evidence or proof that they have access to Government insiders.
But not all social media sites or Youtube channels have it wrong. Those sites which emphasize data collection, facts, and objectivity are usually on the right track. Surprisingly, some sites appear to have a strong understanding of the bizarre nature of the phenomena and a few well-placed sources of information. One specific example I have found is “UFOJesus,” a humorous YouTube channel that seems to have some credible inside information and insight.
No matter the medium, frank and honest conversation is crucial to moving forward as a society.
Overcoming stigma is key to our survival as a species.
If there is one thing that nature has shown us time and time again, it’s that we either adapt, or we die out.
As a species, it’s crucial to understand the things we can’t explain, in order to survive. And that means being open to new ideas, possibilities, and data. It’s always been this way, dating back to when mankind lived in caves. If you heard something roaming outside, you had to investigate. If you didn’t, you and your family would be unaware of a potential predator.
At the same time, an animal wandering around outside your cave could also mean food, which would keep your family alive so they could then flourish. If you stayed in the cave and never ventured outside, you might survive the night but probably not in the long run.
When it comes to UFOs, ignoring the unknown is similarly harmful because it might mean failing to seize upon opportunities and new understandings.
As a society, we have to recognize that stigma serves only to keep our heads in the sand. Our future depends on transparency and truth.
Corners of the internet are atwitter about a possible alien coverup after reports that a Blackhawk helicopter and federal agents swooped in and inexplicably evacuated a remote part of New Mexico, including a prominent solar observatory.
The Dunn Solar Telescope at the Sunspot solar observatory hides most of itself underground.
"There was a Blackhawk helicopter, a bunch of people around antennas and work crews on towers, but nobody would tell us anything," Otero County Sheriff Benny House told the Alamogordo Daily News. "I don't know why the FBI would get involved so quick and not tell us anything."
Five days later, the observatory's website confirms the entire facility is closed to both staff and the public until further notice.
"The Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) who manages the facility is addressing a security issue at this time," AURA spokesperson Shari Lifson said in an emailed statement. "It's a temporary evacuation of the facility. We will open it up as soon as possible."
The FBI field offices in Albuquerque and in El Paso, Texas, didn't respond to a request for comment.
Meanwhile, in the vacuum created by the lack of an official explanation, plenty of people on YouTube and social media and in tabloid publications have stepped in to suggest their own.
Some say the evacuation could be part of a government effort to cover up a discovery involving aliens, an impending solar flare or something else extra-planetary. Others on Reddit and elsewhere think the security issue may involve a foreign power attempting to use the observatory's antennas to spy on nearby White Sands Missile Range.
The observatory was built by the military in 1947 when it realized the sun could interfere with radio communications. The National Science Foundation ran the facility from the 1960s until this year, when operation was transferred to AURA and New Mexico State University.
Hopefully it isn't now in the process of being unwillfully transferred to aliens or foreign spies. We shall see.
Thousands are embedding microchips under their skin to 'make their daily lives easier'
Thousands are embedding microchips under their skin to 'make their daily lives easier'
Thousands of Swedish people are having microchips embedded under their skin instead of using ID cards, key cards and even having to purchase train tickets.
3,000 Swedes Have Microchips Installed
It is estimated that 3,000 people have had a microchip installed in Sweden and the chip is smaller than a single grain of rice. The increase in people having chips installed under their skin has been on the increase over the last three years. The microchip technology was first used in Sweden in 2015.
Ulrika Celsing said that the microchip in her hand had helped her to replace the need to carry around many daily necessities. This includes her office key card and gym card. When the 28-year-old arrives at work, she simply has to wave her hand close to a small box and then enter a code, and the door opens.
Rail Line Scans Passengers Hands to Take Fares
SJ Rail Line, which is owned by the state, began to scan passengers hands with microchips to take their fare when they were onboard the train. It has been said that the chips could also be used to make purchases in much the same way as a contactless credit card, but up to now, no one has tested it.
The procedure to insert the microchip is much the same as having a piercing. The chip is inserted by syringe into the hand of the person. Celsing said that she had her chip installed during a work event and all she felt during the procedure was a slight sting. Ben Libberton, a microbiologist for the MAX IV laboratory in Sweden, said that the microchip implants might cause a reaction or infection in the immune system of the body.
Group Micro-chipping Is Becoming the In-thing
There is also the risk of biohacking, modification of bodies using technology. This is said to be on the increase as more people use technology such as Fitbit and Apple Watches. Bionyfiken, a biohacking group from Sweden, began organizing implant parties where people in groups had chips inserted en masse in the US, UK, Germany, France, and Mexico.
50 employees at a vending machine company in Wisconsin had microchips inserted into their hands, and they could use them to purchase snacks, log into their computers and use other office equipment.
The 10 million strong country has proven that Sweden is more willing to share their personal details. Details have been recorded by the social-security system of the country and are readily available. It was said that people could find out the salaries of other people by calling up the public tax authority. Many people in Sweden do not have the belief that the technology is at risk of being hacked. A microbiologist said that the data that is collected is and shared is limited, so there should be no fear of hacking.
The Body Might be the Next Big Platform for Technology
It has been estimated that the human body will become the next big platform for technology. All of the wearable technology of today will be implanted within the body within the next 5 to 10 years. No one wants to carry around a smartphone or smartwatch that is clumsy when they can have the same technology installed in their body.
NASA has selected the five winning designs in the latest stage of its 3D-printedHabitat competition, which include a community of modular pods made from the Martian surface, and a vertical egg-like container.
The On-Site Habitat Competition invited groups to design a sustainable shelter for a crew of four astronauts on a mission to Mars, using construction techniques enabled by 3D printing technology.
Teams had to come up with a solution that tackles the issues of transporting materials from Earth to Mars, as well as the differences in atmosphere and landscape on the new planet.
Each was required to create digital representations of the physical and functional characteristics of a house on Mars using specialised software tools.
"We are thrilled to see the success of this diverse group of teams that have approached this competition in their own unique styles," said Monsi Roman, programme manager for NASA's series of Centennial Challenges.
"They are not just designing structures, they are designing habitats that will allow our space explorers to live and work on other planets. We are excited to see their designs come to life as the competition moves forward."
The top five teams were selected by NASA in partnership with Bradley University of Peoria, Illinois, out of 18 groups from around the globe. Ranked using a points system, they will all share part of a $100,000 prize depending on what score they achieved.
The winning Zopherus habitat is built from materials taken from the Martian surface
Arkansas-based team Zopherus was awarded first place with its modular habitat for humans on Mars, 3D-printed without human interference with materials made from the Martian surface.
In the concept, a lander would scan its surroundings and select an optimum print area, while autonomous robots are deployed from the vessel to gather materials for the 3D printer.
The lander seals to the ground to provide a protected, pressurised print environment, and then mixes materials, and begins to print the hexagonal structure.
Thanks to its hexagonal structure, multiple Zopherus habitats can be printed to stand close to one another, creating a community.
Each structure is built using a specialised composite Martian concrete material – made from ice, calcium oxide and Martian aggregate – which are collected by rovers and fed into the lander for mixing.
A large window on the mezzanine level of each habitat provides expansive views of the Martian landscape, as well as allowing light to nurture a small hydroponic garden for growth of vegetation and production of oxygen.
AI SpaceFactory's habitat boasts an egg-shaped design to deal with atmospheric pressure
AI SpaceFactory came in second place with its vertical, egg-shaped structure, which is designed with a double shell system to deal with the internal atmospheric pressure and structural stresses that would occur on Mars.
Like the Zopherus habitat, the Marsha design is made using materials harvested from the Martian surface, removing the dependency on rockets to transport materials from Earth.
The team developed an innovative mixture of basalt fibre, extracted from Martian rock, and renewable bioplastic (polylactic acid) derived from plants that would be grown on Mars.
Unlike the communal format of the Zopherus habitats, each Marsha habitat stands alone as a separate structure.
Kahn-Yates' design features a series of holes to allow daylight in
Third place team Kahn-Yates also designed its habitats as individual volumes, with sleek, oblong forms intended to minimise the impact from potential dust storms.
After the space-faring module arrives on Mars, its exterior shell would split off as it lands, leaving behind a pre-fabricated core. After landing, a five-axis print arm would extends from the top of the core and print a foundation using materials found on the Martian landscape.
The arm then prints a concrete shell, while secondary nozzles print HDPE (high-density polyethylene) layers on either side of the shell, effectively sandwiching the Martian concrete in the middle.
Daylight is allowed into the habitat by means of reducing or eliminating portions of the central concrete layer in the exterior shell makeup, to have just the HDPE layers as the skin. This would aid gardening and food production, according to the team.
SEArch+/Apis Cor's habitat features a double-shell structure to provide protection from solar radiation
In fourth place is SEArch+/Apis Cor, which submitted a habitat boasting a double-shell design to shelter the structure from galactic solar radiation. The habitat designed by the fifth-place team, Northwestern University, features a unique spherical shell and outer parabolic dome.
The On-Site Habitat Competition is the third phase in NASA's 3D-Printed Habitat Centennial Challenge, which was created to explore construction technologies needed to create sustainable housing solutions on Earth, the Moon, Mars and beyond.
Northwestern University designed a dome-shaped habitat with a unique entryway system
Phase one, the Design Competition, took place in 2015 and required teams to submit architectural renderings. Submissions included Foster + Partners' proposal for a 93-square-metre habitat printed from regolith, the loose soil and rocks found on the surface of the Red Planet.
Phase two, the Structural Member Competition, took place in 2016-2017 and focused on material technologies, asking teams to create structural components.
There are still four more phases of the challenge to follow, culminating in a head-to-head print of finalists' designs in early 2019.
Triangular UFO Caught On Video Moving In The Sky Over El Paso, Texas
Triangular UFO Caught On Video Moving In The Sky Over El Paso, Texas
A driver passing by El Paso, Texas recorded something strange in the sky of what appears to be a glowing triangular-shaped UFO. Ufologists are at a loss with the object moving completely silent.
The video shows the strange object moving at high speed in the sky. The UFO appears to be a glowing triangle with a bright backlight, flying without any sound. Some believe that it could be an extraterrestrial aircraft.
Many reports of triangle-shaped craft around the world but not often they are captured on any media. The capture of this type of flying craft surprised American researchers of extraterrestrial civilizations and the aliens.
As apparent aliens appear on the planet every year more often than before, they are also manifested more and more in a fantastic way. Some observers shared their thoughts about the video after analyzing and verifying its authenticity. They note that it was strange the car appeared to pace the UFO so well.
According to the videographer, he was driving to work and noticing a mysterious light in a triangular shape toward the horizon. He took his Samsung Galaxy S8 smartphone out and snapped photos and a short video.
The incident reportedly took place on August 31, 2018, at 6:25 in the morning. He stared at the sunrise as usual because he had to stop a red light. Before he got on the freeway to work, he noticed the UFO to the right. He thought it was weird, so he took multiple pictures and a short video.
SpaceX Will Fly a Private Passenger Around the Moon on Its Giant BFR Rocket
SpaceX Will Fly a Private Passenger Around the Moon on Its Giant BFR Rocket
By Mike Wall, Space.com Senior Writer
SpaceX's giant Mars vehicle has a crewed moon mission on its docket.
A "private passenger" has signed up for a trip around the moon aboard SpaceX's BFR rocket-spaceship combo, company representatives announced via Twitter this evening (Sept. 13). SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk will fill in the details Monday (Sept. 17), during a webcast that begins at 9 p.m. EDT (0100 GMT on Sept. 18). You can watch the SpaceX moon shot webcast live here, courtesy of SpaceX.
Musk may already have given us a clue about the private space explorer's identity. Somebody on Twitter asked Musk if he was the passenger, and the billionaire entrepreneur responded by tweeting an emoji of the Japanese flag. [The BFR: SpaceX's Giant Spaceship for Mars in Images]
SpaceX has signed the world’s first private passenger to fly around the Moon aboard our BFR launch vehicle—an important step toward enabling access for everyday people who dream of traveling to space. Find out who’s flying and why on Monday, September 17.
Even without the mystery of whom, exactly, SpaceX has signed for the "BFR Lunar Mission" (as SpaceX dubbed it), it sounds like it will be an epic trip.
"Only 24 humans have been to the Moon in history," SpaceX wrote in a subsequent Twitter post. "No one has visited since the last Apollo mission in 1972." NASA's last Apollo lunar mission was Apollo 17, which sent astronauts Gene Cernan, Harrison Schmitt and Ron Evans to the moon in December 1972. Cernan and Schmitt landed on the moon while Evans remained in orbit.
SpaceX announced in February 2017 that two people had signed up for a weeklong trek around the moon, which the company aimed to launch before the end of 2018. That mission was to use SpaceX's Dragon crew capsule and Falcon Heavy rocket. Had SpaceX followed through with that plan, it could have returned humans to the moon near the 50th anniversary of NASA's historic Apollo 8 mission around the moon in December 1968.
But this June, The Wall Street Journal reported that the flight had slipped into 2019 at the earliest. SpaceX representatives told the WSJ that such a mission remained in the company's plans, but they didn't lay out a timeline or other details. Presumably, we will get a timeline on Monday and perhaps learn if the passenger flying on the BFR trip is one of the folks who signed up for the original Dragon-Falcon Heavy flight.
The BFR — which is short for "Big Falcon Rocket" (or the "Big F------ Rocket") — is still under development. It will consist of the most powerful rocket ever built and a spaceship capable of carrying 100 or so passengers at a time to and from Mars, Musk has said. Both of these elements will be reusable.
The BFR's main job will be to help enable Red Planet settlement — that's the chief reason that Musk founded SpaceX back in 2002, after all — but it will also perform a variety of other tasks.
Indeed, Musk has said that SpaceX plans to phase out all of its rockets and spacecraft, letting the BFR take over everything eventually. The company envisions the BFR performing satellite launches, cleaning up space junk, carrying folks on superfast "point-to-point" trips here on Earth — and, of course, helping our species spread out into the solar system, to the moon, Mars and beyond.
WETENSCHAP & PLANEETSpecialisten hebben nieuwe sporen van boorpraktijken in de aan het Internationaal Ruimtestation ISS hangende capsule Sojoez MS-09 gevonden, zo heeft een niet nader genoemde bron uit de Russische raket-en ruimtevaartindustrie aan het Russische staatspersbureau Tass gezegd.
Op 30 augustus ontsnapte er even zuurstof uit het ISS omdat er een gaatje van 2 mm was in de wand van de Sojoez MS-09 die voor bemand transport naar en van de spacemeccano instaat. Het gat werd gedicht, de zes opvarenden waren en zijn niet in gevaar.
De oorzaak van het geboorde gaatje, in een deel van de Sojoez dat niet naar de Aarde terugkeert, is nog steeds niet gekend, allerhande speculaties deden de ronde.
“Er zijn niet alleen binnen de leefruimte van het ruimtetuig sporen van boren gevonden, maar ook op het scherm van het schild, aan de buitenzijde, dat tegen meteorieten moet beschermen en dat zich 15 mm van de drukromp bevindt”, aldus de bron. Bij het boren is door de drukromp gegaan en is de niet-gasdichte wand geraakt, luidde het ook.
Assemblage
Een andere bron uit de ruimtevaartindustrie zegt dat de niet-gasdichte bescherming tegen meteorieten wordt aangebracht vóór de finale assemblage van de Sojoez. In die werkplaats is het ruimtetuig gedetailleerd gefotografeerd. Er zijn geen sporen van boren of een gaatje gevonden, het boren moet later hebben plaatsgevonden, zei de bron. Ook het meteorietenschild is vóór plaatsing gefotografeerd en daar was ook niets aan te zien.
Het ruimtetuig kan dus ofwel tijdens het allerlaatste assemblagewerk of tijdens zijn negentig dagen durend verblijf in de testruimte beschadigd zijn geraakt. Het is zeer onwaarschijnlijk dat dit tijdens het transport naar de lanceerbasis Bajkonoer of daar gebeurde.
Geen nieuwe lekken
Maar een ander staatspersbureau, Sputnik News, meldde op gezag van een eveneens niet nader genoemde bron uit de Russische raket- en ruimtevaartindustrie dat er geen nieuwe lekken zijn gevonden.
Een bron bij de commissie van raketbouwer Enes aargija, die het lek in de Sojoek onderzoekt, sprak tegenover Tass tegen dat nog meer schade aan de capsule is vastgesteld. “Sommige berichten in massamedia omtrent meer schade die op het ruimtetuig Sojoez MS-09 is gevonden stroken niet met de werkelijkheid”, luidde het bij het staatsbedrijf.
Zowel de Russische vicepremier Joeri Borisov als ruimtevaartbureau Roscosmos heeft de berichten van de hand gewezen dat Amerikaanse astronauten verantwoordelijk zouden zijn voor het gaatje in de aan het Internationaal Ruimtestation (ISS) hangende Sojoez-capsule.
Op 30 augustus ontsnapte er even zuurstof uit het ISS omdat er een gaatje van 2 millimeter was in de wand van de Sojoez MS-09. Het werd gedicht en de zes opvarenden waren nooit in gevaar.
De oorzaak van het gaatje is nog altijd niet gekend, maar allerhande speculaties doen intussen wel de ronde. Tot zelfs de insinuatie in de krant Kommersant dat een Amerikaanse opvarende van het ISS verantwoordelijk zou zijn, omdat die zo zijn terugkeer naar huis had willen versnellen.
“Het is absoluut ontoelaatbaar om een schaduw te werpen op zowel onze kosmonauten als de Amerikaanse astronauten”, zei vicepremier Borisov. “Er is een onderzoek aan de gang. Het is verkeerd om een dergelijk verdict uit te spreken.”
Dat het drukverlies zich voordeed nadat het ruimtetuig al maanden in de ruimte was, is wel een “vaststaand feit”, voegde de politicus eraan toe. Het ISS is niettemin een plaats “waar geen politieke onmin is of mag zijn”.
“Roddels”
Als hoofd van het Russische ruimtevaartbureau Roscosmos viel Dmitri Rogozin de vicepremier bij. De “roddels” ondermijnen de vriendschappelijke relaties onder de zeskoppige bemanning, die uit Amerikanen, Russen en een Duitser bestaat. De geruchten “hinderen” ook het werk van de deskundigen van Roscosmos, zo klinkt het. “Alle uitlatingen op gezag van niet nader genoemde bronnen zijn ontoelaatbaar zolang de speciale (onderzoeks)commissie van Roscosmos haar werk niet heeft afgerond”, aldus Rogozin.
Forget about Area 51. That’s old news. A joke. The newer, hipper secret facility is Area 52, and Ancient Aliens has the scoop.
Area 51 is so old and well known that it’s the butt of jokes on movies like Independence Day. People with dial-up know about Area 51. Virtually everyone knows of the “secret” facility. What if, however, as Ancient Aliens suggests, Area 51 were just a coverup for a bigger, experimental extraterrestrial facility?
To make the conspiracy even deeper, what if there were multiple Area 52 facilities? Is there a massive secondary covert operation being obscured by the now not-so-top-secret Area 51?
People who live near Area 51 have reported all sorts of oddities and extraterrestrial tech for decades. There’s no denying something is going on there. Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act, the CIA declassified documents that acknowledged Area 51 in 2013. Located in Southern Nevada, this top secret facility has been the location where revolutionary technology is developed. The military and government, however, have not provided much other than saying the facility is there. No word on the function of the facility.
Giorgio A. Tsoukalos went to meet with a former employee of Area 51 to get more information. According to TD Barnes, a radar and electronics employee for over four decades at Area 51, there is a considerable amount of evidence related to extraterrestrials. There is extensive reverse engineering of top secret craft, with everything from antimatter propulsion and warp drive on the agenda. At one point in the 1980s, they even developed an antiquated bunker-busting tech called “Rods from God.” For all intents and purposes, it was a secret space program.
Hiding decades of alien contact evidence, Area 51 may have outlived its purpose as a strategic military asset. If that’s the case, is it just a decoy?
Tsoukalos took another trip to Rachel, Nevada in 2018. He met with a researcher and a lifelong mining expert. The miner said he’s seen various shady activities, and believes heap mining is being used at Tempiute Mine to hide massive amounts of dirt being removed during the creation of underground facilities. Furthermore, that may be just the tip of the underground iceberg. It’s likely one of many secret government facilities connected by underground high speed trains including the following locations:
Cheyenne mountains in Colorado Springs
Dulce, NM – Archuleta Peak is where UFOs have been sighted
Los Alamos, NM
Albuquerque, NM
Roswell, NM
Area 51, NV
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
On the doorstep of where Orville and Wilbur Wright defied reality, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base serves as one of the most high techs locations in the military. Indeed, it may hold greater strategic importance than Area 51. Furthermore, there have been rumors of aliens at Wright-Pat for a long time, and some underground as well.
Going as far back as the 1947 Roswell crash, the location has been involved with news of UFOs. Wright-Patterson was the home of the Foreign Technology Division, which conducted Project Sign and Project Blue Book. The most famous UFO and foreign technology program, Project Blue Book tracked over 12,000 sightings. Most were categorized as high altitude air planes, but over 700 cases still remain.
Additionally, a former employee named LTC Marion Magruder worked at infamous Hangar 18, and saw quite a bit during his 38 years there. The first day he arrived in 1973 he was told there were aliens.
Montauk Air Force Station
Decommisioned in 1981, the Montauk Air Force Station is widely believed to be a cover for an underground facility. Multiple whistle-blowers say a secret facility under the base is still onging, and the entry is from far away at the Brookhaven National Laboratories. Furthermore, the facility is notorious for experiments using other-worldly technology and human test subjects in what’s commonly called the Montauk Project.
Declassified documents reference something called MKUltra, a program run by the Army and CIA to develop mind control and remote influence abilities. To that end, something called the Montauk Chair, harnessing ET technology & innate psychic abilities, was used to transform reality, to manifest thought into physical reality (telekinesis, remote viewing, teleportation). It’s compared to the Throne of Ptah, who was the god before all other gods in Egyptian mythology. Is the Montauk Chair the same as the Throne of Ptah?
Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program
AATIP and Bigelow Aerospace has been discussed before, and it’s compelling evidence. AATIP allows exception to FOIA requests, allowing the government to be even more covert. Combined with all of the aforementioned, it paints a picture of massive government cover-up.
There you have it. Ancient Aliens proposes a massive government cover-up of alien technology, and it’s all being done under our feet. Do you believe there are secret facilities being obscured by the attention given to Area 51?
Je hebt vast al eens gehoord van Area 51. Maar wat weet je van Area 52?
Je hebt vast al eens gehoord van Area 51. Maar wat weet je van Area 52?
Vrijwel iedereen is intussen wel bekend met Area 51. Maar wat als er naast Area 51 nog een grotere geheime basis is waar bijna niemand iets over weet? Wat als er meerdere van zulke Area 52’s zijn?
Mensen die in de buurt van Area 51 wonen melden al decennialang vreemde waarnemingen.
In 2013 werd het bestaan van de basis officieel bevestigd toen geheime CIA-stukken over Area 51 werden vrijgegeven.
Reverse engineering
In het nieuwe seizoen van Ancient Aliens wordt gesproken met iemand die in Area 51 heeft gewerkt.
Volgens T.D. Barnes, die meer dan 40 jaar op de basis werkte, is er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid bewijs dat verband houdt met buitenaardsen.
Hij zei dat met behulp van reverse engineering technologieën uit topgeheime vaartuigen werden verkregen. Denk daarbij aan antimaterie-aandrijving en de warp drive.
Rods from God
In de jaren tachtig zou er zelfs een technologie zijn ontwikkeld die Rods from God werd genoemd. Die technologie had te maken met een geheim ruimtevaartprogramma.
Er kwam ook een onderzoeker en mijnbouwexpert aan het woord, die zei dat hij in de omgeving van de basis vaak verdachte activiteiten heeft gezien.
Hij suggereerde dat de Tempiute Mine in Nevada wordt gebruikt om een enorme hoeveelheid grond te verbergen die naar boven is gehaald tijdens de aanleg van diverse ondergrondse bases.
Aliens
Volgens hem zijn er vele geheime bases die middels een ondergronds netwerk met elkaar verbonden zijn. Daaronder vallen Dulce, Los Alamos, Roswell en Area 51, aldus de onderzoeker.
Verder werd een oud-medewerker van de beruchte Hangar 18 op Wright-Patterson Air Force Base geïnterviewd.
L.T.C. Marion Magruder, die 38 jaar in Hangar 18 werkte, maakte gedurende zijn carrière heel wat vreemde dingen mee.
Zo kreeg hij op zijn eerste werkdag in 1973 te horen dat er aliens waren.
In defence of conspiracy theories (and why the term is a misnomer)
In defence of conspiracy theories (and why the term is a misnomer)
Jeremy Renner as US journalist Gary Webb in the 2014 film Kill The Messenger. The film is an account of Webb’s role in uncovering CIA links to cocaine importation to the US. Sierra / Affinity,Bluegrass Films,The Combine
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, University of Tasmania
Disclosure statement
David Coady does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
The Conversation UK receives funding from Hefce, Hefcw, SAGE, SFC, RCUK, The Nuffield Foundation, The Ogden Trust, The Royal Society, The Wellcome Trust, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and The Alliance for Useful Evidence, as well as sixty five university members.
Before 2012, if you had voiced suspicions that the Australian government had been anything but open and honourable in dealing with East Timor – its newly independent but impoverished neighbour – you would likely have been dismissed as a conspiracy theorist. But it was then revealed Australian Secret Intelligence Service agents had bugged East Timor’s cabinet office during treaty negotiations over oil and gas fields.
Yesterday’s conspiracy theories often become today’s incontrovertible facts. In the mid-1990s, journalist Gary Webb’s claims that CIA officials conspired with drug dealers bringing crack cocaine into the United States were dismissed by many as a prime example of a conspiracy theory. But the claims were true.
It’s reasonable to suppose many of the views that are now dismissed or mocked as conspiracy theories will one day be recognised as having been true all along. Indeed, the net effect of terms such as “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracism” is to silence people who are the victims of conspiracy, or who (rightly or wrongly) suspect conspiracies may be occurring. These terms serve to herd respectable opinion in ways that suit the interests of the powerful.
Ever since the philosopher Sir Karl Popper popularised the expression in the 1950s, conspiracy theories have had a bad reputation. To characterise a belief as a conspiracy theory is to imply it’s false. More than that, it implies people who accept that belief, or want to investigate whether it’s true, are irrational.
On the face of it, this is hard to understand. After all, people do conspire. That is, they engage in secretive or deceptive behaviour that is illegal or morally dubious.
Conspiracy is a common form of human behaviour across all cultures throughout recorded time, and it has always been particularly widespread in politics.
Virtually all of us conspire some of the time, and some people (such as spies) conspire virtually all of the time. Given people conspire, there can’t be anything wrong with believing they conspire. Hence there can’t be anything wrong with believing conspiracy theories or being a conspiracy theorist.
Thinking of conspiracy theories as paradigmatically false and irrational is like thinking of phrenology as a paradigm of scientific theory. Conspiracy theories, like scientific theories, and virtually any other category of theory, are sometimes true, sometimes false, sometimes held on rational grounds, sometimes not.
It’s a striking feature of much of the literature on conspiracy theories, like much of the literature on terrorism, that authors assume they are referring to the same phenomenon, while a glance at their definitions (when they bother to offer them) reveals they are not.
But seeking a fixed definition of the term “conspiracy theory” may be an idle pursuit, since the real problem with the term is that, although it lacks a fixed meaning, it does serve a fixed function.
A new Inquisition?
It’s a function similar to that served by the term “heresy” in medieval Europe. In both cases these are terms of propaganda, used to stigmatise and marginalise people who have beliefs that conflict with officially sanctioned or orthodox beliefs of the time and place in question.
If, as I believe, the treatment of those labelled as “conspiracy theorists” in our culture is analogous to the treatment of those labelled as “heretics” in medieval Europe, then the role of psychologists and social scientists in this treatment is analogous to that of the Inquisition.
Outside the psychology and social science literature some authors will sometimes offer some, usually heavily qualified, defence of conspiracy theories (in some sense of the term). But among psychologists and social scientists the assumption that they are false, the product of an irrational (or nonrational) process, and positively harmful is virtually universal.
Whenever we use the terms “conspiracy theory”, “conspiracism” or “conspiracist ideation”, we’re implying, even if we don’t mean to, there is something wrong with believing, wanting to investigate, or giving any credence at all to the possibility people are engaged in secretive or deceptive behaviour.
One bad effect of these terms is they contribute to a political environment in which it’s easier for conspiracy to thrive at the expense of openness. Another bad effect is their use is an injustice to the people who are characterised as conspiracy theorists.
Following the philosopher Miranda Fricker, we may call this a form of “testimonial injustice”. When someone asserts that a conspiracy has taken place (especially when it is a conspiracy by powerful people or institutions) that person’s word is automatically given less credence than it should because of an irrational prejudice associated with the pejorative connotations of these terms.
When professional psychologists imply these terms it can constitute a form of gaslighting; that is, a manipulation of people into doubting their own sanity.
I hope and believe that in the future these terms will be widely recognised for what they are: the products of an irrational and authoritarian outlook. Prior to Popper, we got along perfectly well without these terms. I’m sure we can learn to do so again.
Een ode aan complottheorieën en complotdenkers. Lees het artikel van deze docent
Een ode aan complottheorieën en complotdenkers. Lees het artikel van deze docent
Als je vóór 2012 had gezegd dat de Australische overheid geen goede intenties had met betrekking tot Oost-Timor, zou je waarschijnlijk zijn weggezet als complottheoreticus.
Toen bleek opeens dat de Australian Secret Intelligence Service het kabinetskantoor van Oost-Timor had afgeluisterd tijdens onderhandelingen over olie- en gasvelden.
Het gebeurt veel vaker dat complottheorieën later feiten worden, schrijft docent David Coady van de Universiteit van Tasmanië.
CIA
In de jaren negentig claimde journalist Gary Webb dat de CIA samenzweerde met drugsdealers om cocaïne naar de VS te smokkelen. Velen zagen hem als een complotdenker, maar Webb bleek uiteindelijk wel gelijk te hebben.
Coady merkt op dat complottheorieën een slechte reputatie hebben. Mensen die erin geloven worden gezien als irrationeel.
Dat is volgens hem vreemd, aangezien complottheorieën net als wetenschappelijke theorieën en vrijwel alle andere soorten theorieën soms kloppen en soms niet kloppen.
Ketterij
Coady trekt een parallel met de term ‘ketterij’ die in de middeleeuwen in Europa werd gebruikt.
In beide gevallen zijn het termen die gebruikt worden als propaganda, bedoeld om mensen die andere overtuigingen hebben te stigmatiseren en marginaliseren.
Mensen die in onze cultuur worden bestempeld als ‘complottheoretici’ kunnen worden vergeleken met de ‘ketters’ in middeleeuws Europa.
Inquisitie
Vandaag de dag vervullen psychologen en sociale wetenschappers de rol van de Inquisitie, aldus Coady.
Vrijwel alle psychologen en sociale wetenschappers zijn namelijk van mening dat complottheorieën niet kloppen, schadelijk zijn en het gevolg zijn van een irrationeel proces.
Een negatief gevolg hiervan is dat ze bijdragen aan een politiek milieu waarin het juist makkelijker is voor een complot om te blijven bestaan.
Manipulatief gedrag
Een ander negatief gevolg is dat de mensen die worden bestempeld als complottheoretici onrecht wordt aangedaan, stelt de docent.
Volgens Coady zijn het juist de professionele psychologen die een irrationele en autoritaire visie hebben.
Ze maken zich schuldig aan manipulatief gedrag door mensen hun eigen gezond verstand in twijfel te laten trekken, besluit hij.
Mysterieuze evacuatie zonneobservatorium leidt tot complottheorieën over aliens. Wat is hier aan de hand?
Mysterieuze evacuatie zonneobservatorium leidt tot complottheorieën over aliens. Wat is hier aan de hand?
Berichten over de inzet van een Blackhawk-helikopter en FBI-agenten om een deel van New Mexico te evacueren, waaronder een zonneobservatorium, hebben op internet geleid tot speculatie over een cover-up.
Het zonneobservatorium in Sunspot in New Mexico werd vrijdag stilgelegd door FBI-agenten. Mensen in de directe omgeving werden geëvacueerd.
“Er was een Blackhawk-helikopter en mensen werkten rond antennes en torens, maar niemand wilde ons iets vertellen,” zei sheriff Benny House.
Gesloten
“Ik weet niet waarom de FBI er zo snel bij betrokken is en ons niets heeft verteld,” voegde hij toe.
Op de website van het observatorium wordt bevestigd dat de hele installatie tot nader bericht gesloten is.
De Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), die het observatorium beheert, liet bij monde van een woordvoerster weten dat het gaat om een tijdelijke evacuatie.
Buitenaards leven
Op YouTube en in tabloids wordt nu beweerd dat het observatorium is gesloten omdat er een ontdekking zou zijn gedaan met betrekking tot buitenaards leven, die men in de doofpot zou willen stoppen.
Op Reddit wordt gespeculeerd dat een buitenlandse macht de antennes van het observatorium heeft geprobeerd te gebruiken om de nabijgelegen White Sands Missile Range te bespioneren.
Het zonneobservatorium is in 1947 gebouwd door het Amerikaanse leger, nadat het tot de ontdekking was gekomen dat de zon radiocommunicatie op aarde kan verstoren.
De mens stamt af van aliens. Volgens een vooraanstaande wetenschapper is dit het bewijs
De mens stamt af van aliens. Volgens een vooraanstaande wetenschapper is dit het bewijs
Mensen die op aarde leven zijn afstammelingen van aliens. Dat heeft de Wit-Russische wetenschapper Pjotr Vitsjaz gezegd.
Hij deed deze uitspraak over de oorsprong van het leven op onze planeet tijdens een bijeenkomst over ruimtevaart afgelopen maandag in Minsk.
“Waar kwam de mens vandaan? Er is al veel gezegd over het feit dat wij de kolonisten zijn, dat mensen uit de ruimte kwamen,” citeerde zender Belsat hem.
Oude rotstekeningen
“Ik ben van mening dat er […] geen bewijs is dat de mens afstamt van de aap,” zei Vitsjaz.
“Kijk naar oude rotstekeningen,” zei hij volgens persbureau BelaPAN. “Op veel daarvan staan raketten en astronauten afgebeeld.”
“Waar kwamen zij vandaan? Waarom hebben voetafdrukken van mensen die vandaan de dag worden gevonden door archeologen een totaal andere omvang?” vroeg hij.
Buitenaardse oorsprong
We hebben geen bewijs, het is slechts een hypothese, aldus de academicus.
Het hoofd van de Wit-Russische Academie van Wetenschappen zei te hopen dat de theorie over een buitenaardse oorsprong van de mens ooit zal worden bewezen.
De bijeenkomst, waar onder meer 90 kosmonauten aanwezig zijn, duurt nog tot 15 september.
Een sterrenwacht of observatorium is een instituut van waaruit sterren en andere hemellichamen worden bekeken en bestudeerd. Er wordt onderscheid gemaakt tussen professionele sterrenwachten en volks- of publiekssterrenwachten.
In Amerika is een observatorium (National Solar Observatory) dat zich uitsluitend bezighoudt met het bestuderen van de zon. De hoofdvestiging hiervan bevindt zich in Boulder, Colorado, en er zijn een tweetal andere vestigingen waarvan er één zich bevindt in de plaats Sunspot in New Mexico en de andere in Kitt Peak in Arizona.
Nu was er iets bijzonders aan de hand bij het observatorium in Sunspot vorige week.
Het gebeurde afgelopen donderdag en zelfs het nabijgelegen postkantoor werd ontruimd en het personeel (tijdelijk) overgeplaatst naar een ander kantoor.
Maar, het meest vreemde van alles is toch wel dat er geen enkele verklaring wordt gegeven door de FBI. Ze reageren simpelweg nergens op, ook niet op vragen van plaatselijke televisiestations.
Ook de mensen die weggestuurd zijn van het postkantoor kregen geen enkele reden te horen en ook niet hoelang het allemaal zou gaan duren. Ook de plaatselijke sheriff weet niet veel meer dan de bevolking en het gevolg is uiteraard dat er druk wordt gespeculeerd over de reden van de sluiting.
Eén ding is wel zeker, als de FBI er zo snel bij betrokken wordt en zo geheimzinnig doet en alles afsluit, dan is er echt wel wat bijzonders aan de hand.
Zou het kunnen zijn dat ze bij dat observatorium iets ontdekt hebben nabij de zon wat ze eigenlijk niet hadden mogen zien. Hebben ze misschien duidelijk de grote ruimteschepen waargenomen die daar al jarenlang worden gesignaleerd?
Of is het iets anders en heeft het misschien te maken met de nadering van de planeet Nibiru?
Wat het ook is, dit observatorium houdt zich bezig met de zon en alles wat zich daar afspeelt.
WAT DOEN AL DIE VERBORGEN RUIMTESCHEPEN HIER ? ( VIDEO )
WAT DOEN AL DIE VERBORGEN RUIMTESCHEPEN HIER ? ( VIDEO )
Al vele jaren doet zich een vreemd fenomeen voor van grote UFO’s zich proberen te verbergen in wolken.
Het aantal waarnemingen hiervan neemt toe en de vraag is dan ook wat al die objecten hier doen.
De meest gemakkelijke manier om mensen met een kluitje het riet in te sturen is door te zeggen dat er steeds meer vreemde en onnatuurlijke wolken voor komen en dat dit ok is, want we voegen ze gewoon toe aan de nieuwe wolkenatlas.
Zo worden chemtrails nu verklaard als volkomen normale wolken en die geven we de naam homomutatis.
De uitlaatgassen van vliegtuigen veroorzaken condenssporen. Door sterke winden kunnen ze zich uitspreiden tot Homomutatus-wolken.
Zo worden grote vermomde ruimteschepen altijd standaard lenticulariswolken genoemd en zo zijn vreemde en niet natuurlijke/normale zaken gemakkelijk weg te moffelen onder de noemer "wolk".
Door de jaren heen zijn hier talloze artikelen verschenen over vreemd uitziende wolken, soms ook met kleinere UFO’s er omheen. Het zijn waarnemingen van mensen, foto’s en filmbeelden die aan duidelijkheid niets te wensen over laten.
Soms is er ook natuurlijk wel sprake van echt vreemd uitziende wolken en het is dan ook niet zo dat iedere ufo wolk een UFO is.
De mooiste waarnemingen zijn dan ook die zoals de volgende, waar heel duidelijk een kleinere UFO zich losmaakt van een groot vermomd moederschip.
En nu zijn er weer een aantal mooie opnames naar buiten gekomen, zoals de volgende van een waarneming op 9 september boven Reykjavik in IJsland.
Een wolk die niet thuishoort in de lucht zoals die daar op dat moment eruit ziet.
Enkele dagen daarvoor wordt in Bangalore in India ook een merkwaardige wolk waargenomen.
De filmopnames zijn gemaakt op 5 september door een man die onderweg was naar het ziekenhuis toen hij de bizarre lucht boven zijn hoofd ontdekte.
Hierna volgen de bewegende beelden en wanneer er wordt ingezoomd zie je dat er zich een groot object bevindt achter/in de wolken.
De vraag die natuurlijk blijft is waarom al die ruimteschepen hier op dit moment zijn. Misschien in afwachting van grootse dingen die staan te gebeuren op aarde en mogen straks “de uitverkorenen” instappen voor de ruimtereis van hun leven.
Beste bezoeker, Heb je zelf al ooit een vreemde waarneming gedaan, laat dit dan even weten via email aan Frederick Delaere opwww.ufomeldpunt.be. Deze onderzoekers behandelen jouw melding in volledige anonimiteit en met alle respect voor jouw privacy. Ze zijn kritisch, objectief maar open minded aangelegd en zullen jou steeds een verklaring geven voor jouw waarneming! DUS AARZEL NIET, ALS JE EEN ANTWOORD OP JOUW VRAGEN WENST, CONTACTEER FREDERICK. BIJ VOORBAAT DANK...
Druk op onderstaande knop om je bestand , jouw artikel naar mij te verzenden. INDIEN HET DE MOEITE WAARD IS, PLAATS IK HET OP DE BLOG ONDER DIVERSEN MET JOUW NAAM...
Druk op onderstaande knop om een berichtje achter te laten in mijn gastenboek
Alvast bedankt voor al jouw bezoekjes en jouw reacties. Nog een prettige dag verder!!!
Over mijzelf
Ik ben Pieter, en gebruik soms ook wel de schuilnaam Peter2011.
Ik ben een man en woon in Linter (België) en mijn beroep is Ik ben op rust..
Ik ben geboren op 18/10/1950 en ben nu dus 74 jaar jong.
Mijn hobby's zijn: Ufologie en andere esoterische onderwerpen.
Op deze blog vind je onder artikels, werk van mezelf. Mijn dank gaat ook naar André, Ingrid, Oliver, Paul, Vincent, Georges Filer en MUFON voor de bijdragen voor de verschillende categorieën...
Veel leesplezier en geef je mening over deze blog.