(VIDEO) An Entire Fleet of UFOs Was Filmed While Flying Below a Jet Plane

30-11-2015 om 18:46 geschreven door peter  

The MUFON New Mexico Gig – Reviewed

This past weekend I spoke at the annual MUFON New Mexico gig, which was held at the Cleveland High School, Albuquerque. It was an excellent event, for which around 350 people turned up. The speakers were myself, Nick Pope, and John Alexander. The conference theme was: ” What Does the Government Really Know?” As many of you may be aware, between 1991 and 1994, Nick Pope worked in an office of the British Ministry of Defense that handled UFO reports – chiefly from the British public and with a much smaller percentage originating with the military, airline pilots, and the police.

John Alexander’s bio, in part, reads as follows: “Dr. John Alexander has a long history of traveling a fine line between traditional science and studying various phenomena. He has been judicious in applying a scientifically-trained, critical eye while personally encountering many situations that defy conventional explanations. While in the military he formed an ad hoc inter-agency group to study aerial phenomena (UFOs). This is a little known aspect of his work as the group insured no paper trail existed that could be traced by outsiders.”

Things began in fine fashion on the Friday night, with an excellent dinner – all thanks to John and Susan LeMaster. As is often the case at such dinners, new friendships were made, old friendships were rekindled, and a lot of fascinating chatter went on. As for the event itself, it went down very well. In addition to the 300-plus crowd that came to attend the conference, the Albuquerque Journal was there to cover it. And a lot of people who were completely new to the subject, but who wanted to learn more about it, came along.

John Alexander

John Alexander was the first speaker and he gave a fascinating presentation that covered some intriguing areas. He’s a man with a notable background, as his Wikipedia page notes: “He enlisted in the Army as a private in 1956, and retired as a Colonel in 1988. He graduated from the University of Nebraska (BGS, Sociology) in 1971; from Pepperdine University (MA, Education) in 1975; and from Walden University (PhD, Education) in 1980. Commander, Army Special Forces Teams, US Army, Thailand, Vietnam, 1966-69. Chief of human resources division, US Army, Ft. McPherson, GA, 1977-79. Inspector general, Department of Army, Washington, 1980-82. Chief of human technology, Army Intelligence Command, US Army, Arlington, VA 1982-83. Manager of tech. integration, Army Materiel Command, US Army, Alexandria, VA, 1983-85. Director, advanced concepts US Army Lab. Command, Aldelphi, MD 1985-88.”

John made it clear that during the course of his career he came across more than a few people in the world of military, government, and intelligence who had personalinterests in the UFO phenomenon. He never, however, came across any evidence for the existence of a deeply hidden, super-secret group along the lines of the so-called “Majestic 12″ or “MJ12.” It should be noted, though, that John is not skeptical about the existence of UFOs. It’s the matter of what the government knows – or doesn’t know – that he takes issue with. In the Q&A after the presentations, John and I were in agreement that the UFO phenomenon appears to have the ability to manifest according to the perceptions, beliefs, and pop-culture imagery of the people of different eras. We’re talking about 19th century phantom airships; 20th century Foo Fighters, Ghost Rockets and Flying Saucers; and 20th and 21st century Flying Triangles.

Nick Pope

As for Nick Pope, he gave an overview of the British Ministry of Defense’s role in the UFO subject, its UFO history, and its reasons for looking at UFO reports. Some of the more notable and thought-provoking cases were discussed – including various reports of the aforementioned “Flying Triangles,” a subject taken very seriously during the time Pope was handling UFO reports for the MoD. Echoing John Alexander with his views on UFOs and the US Government, Pope does not believe that any arm of the British Government, MoD, or military is sitting on a crashed UFO or several. He does admit, however, that the MoD has received more than a few notable reports over the years and decades. Pope also revealed the MoD has found another 18 UFO files that should be coming up for declassification in the near future.

My lecture on the Men in Black was, in part, on the history of the phenomenon – dating back to the likes of Albert Bender and Gray Barker. But, it was also based around showing the audience how and why the truly weird MIB have nothing to do with anygovernment. They are far stranger. As I told the audience, real-life equivalents of Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones are the very last things the MIB are. “Non-human” would be far better terminology.

There was a lively Q&A session, too. It followed the lectures and covered such issues as SETI, UFO Disclosure, alien-human hybrids, synchronicities, Bigfoot, and more. And then there was the day after. Definitely one of the stand-out events was a Sunday morning visit to the home of UFO researcher/author, David Marler – which all of the speakers, organizers, and helpers attended. David has a massive (and I do meanmassive) collection of UFO books, magazines, periodicals, memorabilia, UFO collections from various old-timers from Ufology, and an incredible body of material on the Contactee movement, and much much more, too – including a garage full of filing-cabinets filled with things like old newspaper clippings, rare journals and way more. First issues of both Fate and Gray Barker’s Saucerian are on display, too.

David also has a couple of items of note for those interested in the “Flatwoods Monster” saga of 1952 – including one publication which has a 3-page hand-written statement from Kathleen May, one of the original witnesses to the monstrous thing. Then there is an old “gate clearance” card for access to the Roswell base way back when, and which is contained in David’s collection. The signature on the card is that ofMajor Edwin Easley. As Provost Marshal, he was one of the central figures in the Roswell crash saga and who gave a very carefully worded statement on the incident to Roswell researcher Kevin Randle more than a few years back. And then it was all over, and all too soon. As is so often the case with such events! But, there will be a 2016 gig, and so if you missed this one, I would urge you to go along next year. You won’t be disappointed.

 TAGS: David Marler, Dewey Fournet, mufon, ufo

{ http://mysteriousuniverse.org/ }

30-11-2015 om 18:38 geschreven door peter  

30-11-2015 om 18:31 geschreven door peter  

Blue moon - in pictures

A blue moon is an additional full moon that appears in a subdivision of a year: either the third of four full moons in a season, or a second full moon in a month of the common calendar.

The moon rises over people gathered on Glastonbury Tor [Getty Images]

The full moon rises over the illuminated Kazan Kremlin with the Qol Sharif mosque illuminated in Kazan

A blue moon rises behind the torch of the Statue of Liberty

An American Airlines passenger airplane from Miami crosses the blue moon in California

A full moon, known as the Blue Moon, is seen over north London

The moon over the Beatles statues on Penny Lane, Liverpool

The moon rises over a statue on the Whitley Bay Dome, on Tyneside

Blue Moon over the U.S. Capitol

The moon rises over people gathered on Glastonbury Tor

Blue moon over Massachusetts

Blue moon seen through the clouds in the sky over Skopje, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

A full moon, known as the Blue Moon, is seen over the Staten Island Ferry in New York

{ http://www.express.co.uk/ }

30-11-2015 om 18:22 geschreven door peter  

PICTURED: Does this picture prove aliens in a UFO watched the Moon landings?

ALIEN hunters hope a newly found anomaly in pictures taken during the Apollo 15 moon landings could be the proof they were looking for that NASA astronauts were not alone during the mission.

30-11-2015 om 18:07 geschreven door peter  

Fargo: Epic Crime Show or Unexpected UFO Documentary?

The enigmatic UFOs in the show that won multiple Emmy Awards are all references to real events.

 

As many of you know Fargo was a Coen brothers directed movie from 1996, which recently got made into a well-known, critically acclaimed TV series.

 

The first season caught the eye of cult, crime based movie lovers but the second isn’t yet over and already has everybody hanging on the edge of their seats. This is a good thing from an UFOlogic point of view, because people are, and will continue asking questions about the short sequences in which different characters encounter either UFOs, bright lights or strange drawings.

 

 

While the first season was your classic one man murder spree, the second is an all out war between, very well chosen, organized crime, represented by the Kansas City Mob, and a local criminal family from Minnesota. The story, in its entirety, is real and only the names have been changed.

 

The show also references the infamous encounter of deputy Val Johnson from 1979, who claims a bright UFO first observed him for a short time before quickly accelerating in his direction and making contact, leaving him unconscious for almost 40 minutes. When he woke up, he also realized his watch had at one point stopped for a quarter of an hour, but was now running perfectly.

 

But this particular incident hasn’t yet come to light in the show. Instead, we were all left jaw hanging, just like Rye, who, at the end of the first episode of season 2, after leaving a body trail at a diner, encounters bright and strange flying lights just before being run over by Peggy.

 

Keep in mind that, at the beginning of each episode, there’s a disclaimer saying that the story we are watching is entirely real and only the names have been changed. So if the piles of bodies and acres of grave digging are historically accurate, so must be these alien encounters, which were also reported at the time by some local papers and news agencies.

 

 

Then, in a later episode, when the Native American tracker named Hanzee goes to the diner in order to investigate the murder scene and possibly find out what happened to Rye, he also encounters an alien ship, probably the same one.

 

This time, we are given a fast glimpse holding many mysterious details, because the scene only lasts, on screen, for a few seconds. However, in these short seconds we can clearly see Hanzee closing his eyes and acknowledging the UFO presence. Then, after we see the tree line shadow move from one side of the road to another in a 2 hour time lapse, he opens his eyes and immediately finds the piece of head light that helps him identify the hit and run car.

 

The Iroquois confederation tribes are known to hold alien communication knowledge or to have at least developed a mental defensive mechanism against UFOs. Some people concluded that Hanzee was somehow helped by the aliens in finding the broken piece of glass, while other believe he just took a mental defensive stance, for two hours, until the UFO left.

 

The second theory is also backed by the fact that Rye stared directly into the mysterious bright lights and, well, died. Some people on Reddit have also observed that the clock in the diner only had one hand.

 

Just as we were trying to make sense of these scenes and preparing for more encounters, we got another short puzzle on our hands in episode 7, when Lou’s wife went into a room up stairs at her father’s house and found a wall full of strange drawings. We haven’t got a clue what happened to her mother, who is absent from the story, so she might’ve been abducted. Others think it was the Sheriff himself who was the architect.

 

 

The series’ writers could also be trying to subtly show people that the late 70s and early 80s were the period when UFO encounters were so common and the problem got so serious that the governing forces decided to take it into the Sci-Fi area by making blockbuster movies.

 

The first scene in episode one depicts an actual shooting of such a movie, while during the cinema murders scene later in the series, a UFO movie was playing.

 

If you watch Fargo and noticed something we didn’t please leave it in the comments.

 

IF you haven’t watched Fargo yet, we suggest you do so, immediately. It’s on Mondays at 10 eastern on FX. 

 

http://ufoholic.com/

{ http://7tales.net/index.php }

30-11-2015 om 17:58 geschreven door peter  

Levitating Cars, Policeman Stalked By UFO And Andy Kaufman’s Death

(Before It's News)

The Fortean Slip 98 The Andy Kaufman Is Still Alive Episode. This week Chris, Steve and Matt talk about whether or not Andy Kaufman hoaxed his own death. They also discuss paranormal investigators on the search for evidence, levitating cars (which we explain) and a police officer who claims he was stalked by a UFO.

THIS WEBCAST IS UNCENSORED. If you enjoy this, please check out http://theforteanslip.blogspot.com/

30-11-2015 om 17:45 geschreven door peter  

Possible Missing Time Affects Military Man’s Career

(Before It's News)

30-11-2015 om 17:40 geschreven door peter  

Vreemde UFO boven DEN BOSCH, Nederland ( VIDEO )

{ www.NIBURU.nl }

30-11-2015 om 17:32 geschreven door peter  

Alien Craft Sits Watching During Apollo 15 Walk On Moon, Nov 2015, Video, UFO Sighting News

Date of sighting: November 29, 2015
Location of sighting: Mt Hadley, Earths moon
Source photo: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a15/AS15-85-11453HR.jpg

This UFO was found in an old Apollo 15 image during their moon walk. The UFO has two wings that bend downward. A perfectly balanced ship on both sides and its center is directly aimed at the astronauts walking on the moon. Watching them. Awesome discovery by Streetcap1 of Youtube.
Scott C. Waring
www.ufosightingsdaily.com

{  http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

30-11-2015 om 17:23 geschreven door peter  

UFO Cloud Over Greensboro, North Carolina On Nov 29, 2015, Photos, UFO Sighting News

Above photo has added shadows only. You can even see the bottom of the ship, the dome top and the thin dome bottom.

Date of sighting: November 29, 2015
Location of sighting: Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
News source:  http://myfox8.com/2015/11/29/ufo-cloud-spotted-in-greensboro/

I wanted to see the detail of the cloud so I added some shadow to it and I began to see a domed bottom area of the UFO. The UFO itself looks gold but is covered in thick layer of cloud. The shading cut through it about 80%. Its a well known fact among UFO researches that UFOs frequently create a thin layer of cloud around their ships in order to observe humans closer without frightening them. 
Scott C. Waring
www.ufosightingsdaily.com

Myfox8.com News states:
GREENSBORO, N.C. – Has a “UFO cloud” been spotted in Greensboro? Check out this photo that was sent to FOX8’s Chad Tucker that features a cloud that bears a striking resemblance to a UFO. Joseph Stewart‎ sent the photo on Sunday and said the “flying saucer-looking cloud” was spotted near Brassfield Shopping Center on Battleground Avenue in Greensboro. “It may not make the news, but I thought it would bring a smile,” Stewart‎ said on Facebook. “Have a blessed Sunday.”

Above screenshot has added shadows only.

{ http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ }

30-11-2015 om 17:19 geschreven door peter  

Crop Formation Found In Small Farming Community of Victoria, Honduras On Nov 28, 2015, Photos, UFO Sighting News.

Date of sighting: November 28, 2015
Location of sighting: Victoria, Honduras
Source: http://www.inexplicata.blogspot.ca

UFOs that land often land in tall fields of grass because it offers the aliens a way of hiding while they look around. This way they are not attacked or seen. They take a lot of precautions...and very few risks, since their life span is thousands of years or more. The field does not look like they were trying to leave a message. Just doing scientific studies.
Scott C. Waring
www.ufosightingsdaily.com

News states:
Source: El Tiempo (Honduras) and Planeta UFO (Argentina) Date: 11.28.2015 

Residents of Yoro Alarmed by Alleged UFO HONDURAS. Residents of the town of Victoria, Yoro, are alarmed by an alleged flying object that supposedly landed in the vicinity. According to reports, the area was completely destroyed, which could be due to the power of the "phenomenon." Following the event, local residents are on high alert to the presence of an alleged UFO, an event which -- according to them - had never occured in that area. At the moment, the nature of what could have caused such damage to the area remains unknown. [Translation (c) 2015 S.Corrales, IHU with thanks to Guillermo Giménez, Planeta UFO]

{ http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/ } 

30-11-2015 om 17:10 geschreven door peter  

British Police Officer Claimed UFO Stalked and Abducted Him

A former officer of West Yorkshire Police, Alan Godfry, still believes he may have been a victim of alien abduction as he nears the 35th anniversary of the traumatising series of events.
While on a patrol in Todmorden in the early hours on November 28, 1980, to search for missing cattle, Mr Godfrey claimed a huge UFO spotted him.

It was a fuzzy oval that rotated at such speed and hovered so low over the road that it was causing the bushes on the side to shake.

He was on the outskirts of the town in Burnley Road looking for the farm animals that were reportedly missing. He was about to give up finding the reported missing animals when he claimed to have noticed what he thought a bus approaching from a few hundred metres away.

But as he got closer, he came to a realisation that it was not the commuter bus scheduled to pass at around 5 a.m. Instead, he saw what he described “a large mass.”

He said, “It was a fuzzy oval that rotated at such speed and hovered so low over the road that it was causing the bushes on the side to shake.”

He reported that he stopped to make a sketch of the UFO on his note pad. However, a burst of light overcame him.

The next thing he knew was that he drove his car again further up on the same road and the UFO was now gone. He turned around to see the area where he believed it took place. He found out that the area was wet due to rain in the night and there was a circular path of the dry road in a swirled pattern.

Godfry also noticed his police boots were split at the sole – like he had been dragged along. When he got back to the police station, he realised that he had lost around 15 minutes.

Mr Godfrey initially decided not to report the encounter because of fear to be ridiculed, but on the same day, he heard a lorry driver three miles further out on Burnley Road at Cliviger reported to police spotting “a brilliant white” object at about the same time.

Moreover, neighbouring Halifax police officers also received reports about a “brilliant blue-white glow” coming down Todmorden, also at the same time.

The coming out of other witnesses made Godfry file an official report. Since then, UFO investigators have been looking into his case. The case has eventually become one of the country’s most famous alien abduction cases.

His superiors sent Mr Godfrey for mental health and medical assessments but was found to be fine. British UFOlogist Jenny Randles, who had a chance to get an interview with him, said that he was “refreshingly honest.”

30-11-2015 om 17:01 geschreven door peter  

Alien Hunters Find The Mother Of All UFOs Nearby

A mysterious unidentified flying object (UFO) on NASA’s images has created speculation among UFO hunters.

UFO chasers believe that the object is flying very close to the Sun, which nothing has been invented so far by humans that could fly that close. They suggest that it’s impossible this object could be some spacecraft from Earth.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) special telescopic cameras took the images to monitor activities around the Sun.

If this object is a kind of alien spacecraft, then it would be about the size of a planet or even bigger. Some UFO hunters suggest the large space object is an alien mothership.

The odd symmetrical object looks like the famous Tyne and Wear landmark, the Angel of the North. Based on human technological standards, such distance from the sun is extremely dangerous.

{ http://www.latest-ufo-sightings.net/ }

30-11-2015 om 16:58 geschreven door peter  

Are Photographers Telling Lies about the Aurora Borealis?

The increasing popularity of aurora photography in recent years has produced some stunning imagery from unlikely latitudes. However all is not as it seems.There are implications for the wider integrity of photography.

We’ve all seen those images over the past few years (popping up in our Facebook feeds or in the media) depicting spectacular displays of the Aurora Borealis or Northern Lights from Great Britain, Ireland or the lower 48 in the US. Regardless of the location, they’re pretty amazing images. But beneath the wow-factor and thousands of ‘likes’ and ‘shares’ lurks a nasty little integrity issue. These aurora images may be photographic eye-candy, but many of them are pure high fructose corn syrup.

The extraordinary progress in digital photography has galvanised a revolution in night-time photography. Only ten or 15 years ago, really good photos of the Aurora Borealis or Milky Way were pretty scarce. A majority of photographers were still using expensive, low-ISO slide film, and the guesswork of long exposures, reciprocity failure and using the bulb setting were enough to scare many enthusiasts away. The development of digital sensors with high usable ISO made it much easier to experiment with this previously dark art (pardon the pun). Results are now much easier to achieve, and invariably of higher quality and impact. The ability to predict auroral displays and disseminate this information on the internet has also vastly increased the numbers of photographers ‘in-the-know’ about upcoming displays.

I’ve been fortunate enough to see the Northern Lights twice from Ireland. The first time I saw them in 2004 was in all likelihood a once-in-a-lifetime display, so powerful that at its peak the aurora was directly overhead, and not in the north at all. Auroras from that storm were visible as far south as the Mediterranean, and Ireland was at the heart of the activity, rather than at its southern fringe as normal. The display was intense, bright and constantly moving, with all the colour and vibrancy you would associate with a classic high-latitude event. After a couple of hours of shooting, I spent another hour just lying on my back and gazing into the sky, mesmerised by the natural lightshow going off overhead. Later I found that my images, shot on ISO400 slide film, had captured the scene pretty much as I remembered it.

The second time I saw an Irish aurora was in March of this year. The St. Patrick’s Day event produced vivid and memorable auroras at higher latitudes, but at lower latitudes like northern Britain and Ireland, the display was very faint, at least to the naked eye.

When I drove out from my home on the northwest coast of Ireland for a look, the NOAA Ovation computer model was telling me we were well inside the view line.

Yet I could see nothing. I drove out to the coast, well away from street lighting, killed the car lights, and peered into the inky blackness of the northern sky. After a minute or two I began to wonder if I could discern a faint discrepancy in the sky. Or was it just some cloud? I couldn’t tell for sure. So I set up my camera on a tripod, jacked up the ISO and made a 30 second exposure. And there they were, rendered unmistakeably on the camera LCD as a band of luminous green with upper pillars of delicate magenta. Yet the display was still barely visible to my eyes.

So what was going on? Was the camera sensor somehow embellishing what was there, or were my eyes at fault? The answer harks back to basic school biology lessons on the structure of the human eye. In simple terms, our sight relies on two different types of receptor cell. The first type, cones, respond to bright light conditions and are responsible for giving us colour information. The second type, rods, are used in low-light, but don’t transmit colour. At night we see a largely monochromatic world, unless there is a light source bright enough to kick off our cone cells. So the sensor was recording what was actually there, but the colour was just not visible to my eyes.

I continued shooting, enjoying a half-hour spell just after midnight when the auroras intensified. While still not the stuff of a Discovery Channel documentary, the lights had become much more obvious to the naked eye, containing recognisable structure and faintly discernible colour. Again though, the images on my LCD were much stronger and more colourful than what I was observing directly.

The following day the world of social media was awash with aurora images, including my own. The treatment of most images was not sympathetic. Invariably saturation had been added to the point that some images, taken in a geographically similar location, depicted auroras of lurid brilliance and intensity.

I had posted my own images as they came out of the camera, yet over the following days I felt more and more uncomfortable with them. I fielded many expressions of disappointment from Irish people who felt they had missed out on a rare and spectacular display. I had to tell most of them not to worry because the human experience had been pretty underwhelming.

Like most photographers, I routinely use adjustments in Photoshop (including increases in saturation) to render daylight images that replicate the visual and emotional impact of the original scene. This process always throws up issues of truth and integrity, especially in situations of strong and unusual lighting, where genuinely magical light may be interpreted as too much Photoshop. But this was an entirely unfamiliar situation. Here I was making no adjustments at all, yet feeling as though my image still lacked integrity.

The disparity between eye and camera was exacerbated by the faintness of the display. On delving into the subject a bit more, it turns out that aurora displays with colours visible to the eye are quite rare at lower latitudes. More intense aurora have sufficient brightness to kick our cones into operation and allow us to perceive a great deal more of their colour. Compare the image I shot in 2004 on ISO400 slide film, to those from March 2015, shot at ISO3200 on a Canon 5dmk2: that’s a three-stop difference in brightness. To further complicate matters, anecdotal evidence suggests that while some people may perceive a weak aurora as monochromatic, others viewing from the same location may still be able to discern colour.

So where does that leave us? There are plenty of photographic techniques that allow the camera to see the world in an way that our eyes cannot. Infrared is a good example. Infrared images could never be accused of lacking integrity because the viewer is in no doubt that what they are seeing is a rendition of reality that the eye cannot replicate. Similarly, many modern images of the Milky Way are so clearly removed from what we experience with our own eyes when we look up into the night sky, that they couldn’t be accused of trying to dupe the viewer. Such images can therefore be judged entirely on their own merit.

Perhaps integrity stems from the perspective of the viewer. If aurora images are shared between enthusiasts specialising in astro photography, who recognise the technicalities of what the camera records, there is hardly an issue. But if these images are used as documentary evidence in the media, to illustrate a particular event on a particular night, a problem arises. In this context, the vast majority of viewers will look at these images and infer that this is what they would have seen had they been standing beside the photographer. This may well be untrue, in which case the viewer has been deceived. I’d argue that the majority of images of lower-latitude auroral displays from the last few years would fall into this category, including those used by the most respected mainstream media outlets.

Does it matter? Well I think it does. Great photographs are not simply a rendition of what the camera is able to record. They need creative human input, but equally they must be rooted in the human experience. As a species we are blessed to have evolved the capacity for awe and wonder, which is why images of aurora, and more general photos of landscape and nature, are so popular. However the power of these images relies on the viewer’s sense of its integrity.

Like an undisclosed double exposure, or an unrealistic use of post-processing, misleading aurora images stand to benefit from a short-term popularity, because despite the cynicism of modern discourse, there is a still a balance of credulity in the general audience for photography. But eventually an understanding of this particular gulf between the eye and the camera, and the way it can be abused, will become more widely understood by the general public. The result? A further erosion of society’s trust in the integrity of photography.

Personally I’ve decided I would rather come clean about this kind of aurora photography. Especially at low latitudes, vivid auroral displays remain a rare occurrence, and we only diminish their wonder by pretending to our audience that every faint glow is a wondrous spectacle.

About Gareth

Gareth McCormack is an Irish photographer specialising in landscape, travel and adventure imagery. His images have been used by many of the world’s most prominent magazines and newspapers, including Time, National Geographic and the New York Times. He has also supplied images to many, including Tourism Ireland, Air New Zealand, Microsoft and Warner Bros.

Gareth’s style is characterised by bold and dynamic compositions, galvanised by the use of striking natural light. Visit Gareth’s website.

{ http://phogotraphy.com/ }

30-11-2015 om 00:41 geschreven door peter  

Moon-like orb floating over the skies of Hull in 1801 is the first recorded sighting of a UFO on earth

• The first recorded sighting of a UFO has been found by a Hull historian
• An orb appeared in the sky in June 1801 which looked like a 'moon' 
• It was described as bathing the city's streets in blue light

By PHOEBE JACKSON-EDWARDS FOR MAILONLINE

A blue orb seen floating across the city of Hull in 1801 is believed by UFO spotters to be the first sighting of its kind.

The object was seen flying over the city and documented in newspaper reports from the time.

It was midnight on June 19 when witnesses saw 'an immense moon with a black bar across it' loom over the Humber from the South West.

A historian has discovered the first recorded UFO sighting from 1801 which was senn flying over Hull, pictured another possible sighting

Hull historian and author Mike Covell, 37, discovered the reference to the moon-like orb after trawling through archived newspapers from the early 1800s. 

Mr Covell told the Express: 'This looked more like a Death Star. It bathed the entire city in blue light, which must have been terrifying.

'It is the oldest sighting we have managed to track down so far.'

Although there are other examples much earlier, Mr Covell said these were open to interpretation, whereas this sighting had evidence.

After its initial disappearance, the UFO then reappeared 'looking like the face of the moon', before splitting into five circular balls of light, according to a report in the Hull Packet newspaper. 

The Northampton Mercury report from the time described how the object 'seemed then to form itself into seven small distinct moons or globes of fire which disappeared for the space of a few seconds'.

At the time, Hull's first port had only been built in 1788 and the city was home to just 27,000 people

Many UFO spotters previously believed the first recorded example of a sighting was in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold saw unidentified objects flying over the Cascade Mountains in North America.

At the time, Hull's first port had only been built in 1788 and the city was home to just 27,000 people.

Although it is unclear why aliens would have visited the city, there were many sightings over the region in the following years.

Mr Covell has built up an extensive collection of UFO clippings, from the 19th century to the present day. 

Mysterious activity in the sky has always intrigued people and just this month, two more believed UFO spots have been seen

One of the strangest cases was reported in 1967, when a UFO was said to have landed in a park on the Longhill estate in Hull. 

In the past month there have been two sightings of possible UFOs, a 'scary but beautiful' UFO was spotted buzzing above an IKEA branch in Siberia, leaving many Russians puzzled by the strange sighting.

The streaking fireball cut through the sky, witnessed over a vast area including Kazakhstan, provoking social media claims about an alien visit.

Footage of the mystery object taken from a car shows it flying over a branch of furniture giant IKEA in the city of Omsk, western Siberia.

A father and son also spotted white orb-like shapes over the sky in Texas and posted the evidence on YouTube. 

Although some commenters argued they were military flares. 

{ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ }

30-11-2015 om 00:28 geschreven door peter  

King Tutankhamun tomb scans suggest '90 per cent chance' of hidden chamber

Experts say there is a 90 per cent chance the young King's tomb is also the resting place of Queen Nefereti

A British archaeologist has said there is a 90 per cent chance the tomb of famous Egyptian king Tutankhamun has a hidden chamber also containing the remains of Queen Nefereti.

Dr Nicholas Reeves believes Tutankhamun may have been rushed into an outer chamber of what was originally Nefertiti's tomb when he died at age 19.

Experts had previously said there was a 60 per cent chance the ancient Queen's resting place was in the tomb but are now even more confident after scans suggested the existence of a secret chamber.

Read More: Space experts say Mars has acid fog which eats away rocks and is caused by volcanic eruptions

The announcement came at a press conference in Egypt with Egyptian Antiquities Minister Mamdouh al-Damaty.

Speaking of the development, he said: "We said earlier there was a 60% chance there is something behind the walls.

"But now after the initial reading of the scans, we are saying now its 90% percent likely."

Further investigations are now needed and the new evidence will go to Japan for analysis.

Getty

"There is, in fact, an empty space behind the wall based on radar, which is very accurate, there is no doubt.

"We cannot say at this point however the size of the space behind the wall," Japanese radar specialist Hirokatsu Watanabe told the conference.

Discovery of Nefertiti, who is believed to be Tutankhamun's step-mother, would shed light on what remains a relatively mysterious period of Egyptian history.

Read More: Ancient Britons mummified their dead just like the Egyptians

King Tut, as he is affectionately known, died around 1323 BC.

His tomb was discovered in 1922 by another British Egyptologist, Howard Carter.

But Egyptologists remain uncertain over where Nefertiti died and was buried.

30-11-2015 om 00:13 geschreven door peter  

Army Officer: “Shapeshifting Reptiles Raped Me On The Moon”

A former female US Air Force worker has made the shocking and bizarre claims shape shifting reptilians raped her on the moon “countless times” during her work as a radar tracking officer. 

 

Niara Terela Isley claims she was abducted by a tall humanoid alien with a tail, and taken to a secret base on the far side of the moon, where the reptilian entities would regularly conduct sexual rituals with their victims.

 

Ms Isley told how she worked at the Tonopah Test Range, in Nevada, but said she could recall very little detail about her time there.

 

She claimed security guards raped her in front of an audience after she was jabbed in the neck with a mystery drug while in an underground lair.

 

 

 

Army officer Niara Terela Isley says she was abducted and raped by shapeshifting reptilians on the moon

 

And then she was raped on the moon, she said.

 

Ms Isley described the bizarre and shocking series of incidents under hypnosis.

 

In taped interviews with aquarianradio, she claimed she was taken into space eight to 10 times over several months when she was 25-years-old.

 

She said the aliens put her to work, having her operate electronic machinery to excavate the darkest parts of the moon.

 

Describing how she was used for sex almost every night she was on the moon, she said she was regularly passed between the reptilians.

 

In addition, she said “grey aliens” were present, helping with the work, as well as human “personnel” who were also forced to help the reptilians do their bidding on the moon.

 

After the abductions, she said she couldn’t remember much of what had happened, including aspects of her work, leading her to think her memory had been wiped.

 

The incidents stopped in 1980, she said.

 

She sought hypnosis in an attempt to fill the holes in her memory and it helped her uncover more details about the abuse she experienced on the moon.

 

Describing her abductor, she said: “He was humanoid and did have a tail.”

 

She said he had yellow eyes with vertical slit pupils.

 

On the “dark side” of the Moon, she said: “There was a lot of sexual abuse.”

 

She also said there was excavation work to expand the “military base”.

 

It was then that she had to carry out manual labour including “moving boxes”.

 

Ms Isley, a mum-of-one who now lives in Colorado, said: “At night I wasn’t allowed to sleep and was passed around for more sex.

 

“I was scared. I knew I had to get back to my daughter so I was pretty compliant. I just didn’t want to do anything that would get me killed.”

 

Many alien conspiracy theories suggest that the US government is in on abductions, often helping “the greys” do the work.

 

Theorists claim that is why officials have not fully investigated claims of their own employees and former staff.

 

http://yournewswire.com/

{ http://7tales.net/index.php }

30-11-2015 om 00:06 geschreven door peter  

Ancient Flight Plans Connecting Ancient Monuments Across The Planet

Is there even a slight possibility that ancient mankind learned a way to harness free energy? Energy that they used to achieve amazing accomplishments such as the construction of the Pyramids? Teotihuacan? Puma Punku? Can all of this be connected to extraterrestrial visitors like the Ancient alien theory suggests? How else did ancient mankind achieve this “boom” in science and technology? Can this “Energy Grid” be used as a form of free energy? Free inexhaustible energy that flows naturally around our planet?

 

What is really interesting is the fact that all of these locations were and still are associated with a large number of UFO sightings, these “visitors” seem to understand the importance of these places and often visit them, as if they feed off of these locations, obtain energy from them.

 

In Herefordshire England, we have what Ancient Alien theorists call the Ancient Flight Plans. Discovered by amateur archaeologist Alfred Watkins while horseback riding, Watkins noticed that the structures across the landscape appeared to be arranged in straight lines. Four years after that, in 1925 Watkins published his book “The old straight tracks” where he proposed that ancient mankind built monuments and megaliths and that these were connected by a network of straight lines. Referred to as ley lines.

 

 

These so called ley lines are mostly found in England and in France. They are  geographic markings of a number of places of geographical and historical interest, such as ancient monuments and megaliths, natural ridge-tops and so on.

 

According to Linda Moulton Howe,  The Michael Line in England is a straight line and it is measurable. It’s a magnetic field line that you can measure and it will be higher than other areas around it geographically.

 

In his book, “The old straight tracks“, Watkins proposed that ancient monuments were deliberately placed along these lines for line of sight navigation and were used as trade routes, but this theory does not seem to hold due to the fact that these lines cross terrains that were difficult to access and to identify so there had to be another purpose to this geometric and precise pattern, some sort of ancient code?

 

Today there are several researchers that believe that these Ley lines are magnetic in nature and that they delineate the lines of Earth’s unseen energy fields.

 

More of these geometrical patterns can be found in Denmark, along the northern reaches of the European continent we find the archaeological ruins of a once prospering and mighty Viking fortress dating to 900 A.D. It was Preben Hansson who first discovered a direct line of flight from Trelleborg to other three Viking fortresses, which are also same in design.

 

 

 What you have here is a direct line that connects four Viking Forts in Denmark, now this is strange, why? because the Vikings were seafaring people, known as might warriors and sailors so these forts in land, aligned precisely do not make much sense, you would believe that Vikings would have constructed forts near water and perhaps in a different pattern.

 

Researchers have been baffled by the precise design of Trelleborg with courtyard’s divided into four zones, each with four longhouses and gateways open precisely to the four cardinal directions: north, south, east and west. It is clear that the construction and design of Trelleborg would have required great knowledge of engineering.

 

What is perhaps even mores interesting is the fact that if you draw a straight line and cross the Alps in Europe you will eventually reach Delphi in Greece, known for the Oracle of Delphi and to the God Apollo. According to Greek mythology, every once in a while, Apollo took his “heavenly chariot” and disappeared heading north.

 

Could all of these patterns and lay lines be ancient flight patterns as the Ancient Aliens theory suggests? How would you explain that the ancient Viking forts in Denmark point to the Oracle of Delphi which leads to the Pyramids of Egypt? It is not a coincidence. It would make sense if these constructions and monuments are long straight lines across our planet’s grids, perhaps these grids were navigational markers that visitors from outer space used, to navigate in straight lines.

 

If you look the way that our modern-day aircrafts fly, they do it in straight lines, avoiding turns if possible, pilots also guide themselves by landmarks to establish locations and to orient themselves. If our pilots navigate this way and use these spots as orientational marks, could have extraterrestrials visiting us in the past, and even today, also have guided themselves by these locations and grids?

 

Is there a code encrypted in the location of the monuments around the world, like the pyramids of Egypt? Teotihuacan in Mexico? The Oracle of Delphi? Forming The Earth grid?

 

The perfect alignment of these locations to the stars and to other monuments around the world is something that was not done randomly. The lay lines, the Earth Grid and the electromagnetic field anomalies that are present in locations around the world are not something random. It is something planned, something elaborate, something that truly seems, out of this world.

 

http://worldtruth.tv/

{ http://7tales.net/index.php }

29-11-2015 om 23:11 geschreven door peter  

9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False- PART I

This article will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one.

The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is still called a theory, instead of a law. The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process. 

The DNA in plants and animals allows selective breeding to achieve desired results. Dogs are a good example of selective breeding. The DNA in all dogs has many recessive traits.

A desired trait can be produced in dogs by selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce offspring with that trait. This specialized selective breeding can continue for generation after generation until a breed of dog is developed. This is the same as the "survival of the fittest" theory of the evolutionists.

Darwin's complete quote can be found here

New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals. Evolutionist fail to admit that no species has ever been proven to have evolved in any way. Evolution is simply pie-in-the-sky conjecture without scientific proof.

If natural selection were true, Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless as everyone else. If natural selection were true, humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict.

If natural selection were true humans at northern latitudes would have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except the Eskimos who have skin that is halfway between white and black. The people from Russia and the Nordic countries have white skin, blood hair and blue eyes. This is the opposite of what one would predict if natural selection controlled skin color.

Many evolutionists argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark-skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark-skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle.

Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. Dark-skinned people have always lived near the Equator, not white-skinned people, even though the dark skin is more uncomfortable in the hot, sunny climate.

Black skin absorbs the heat from the sun's rays more than white skin. Humans show no sign of natural selection based on the environment. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.

Animals like bears, tigers, lions, and zebras living near the equator have heavy fur while humans living north of the Artic Circle have bare skin. A leopard from the jungle near the equator has fur like the snow leopard of the Himalayas.

The snow leopard grows thicker hair but the jungle leopard would also if moved to a cold climate. Horses and dogs grow a heavy winter coat in colder climates. Natural selection isn't working as falsely claimed by Charles Darwin.

The cheetah in Africa is an example of an animal in the cat family with very limited variety in the DNA. Each cheetah looks like an identical twin. The cheetah DNA is so identical that the skin from one cheetah can be grafted into another cheetah without any rejection by the body.

Evolution is Scientifically Impossible

Evolution is a theory developed one hundred and forty years ago by Charles Darwin (N/A actually, by his grandfather in 1794 - before Charles was even born), before science had the evidence available to prove the theory false.

His famous book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, has a title that is now known to be scientifically false. New species cannot evolve by natural selection. Modern scientific discoveries are proving evolution to be impossible. No new scientific discoveries have been found to support the Theory of Evolution.

Life did not start with a bolt of lightning striking a pond of water as claimed by the main stream scientists.

Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time. This is a false statement without any scientific support.

They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys at random and eventually type President's Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense.

Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly.

What are the odds that a simple single cell organism could evolve given the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible. (...)

The Indoctrination System Called "Education"

The educational system teaches children not to think. Any student who uses logic and solid scientific evidence to question the Theory of Evolution is ridiculed and insulted into submission. The students who submit become non-thinking robots who dare not question the dogma presented.

A forth-grade elementary school class was observed at the park playing a three-legged race game, where adjacent legs of the two kids were placed into a bag. The kids must cooperate with each step in order to run. The kids thought it was great fun. The teacher told them they were being trained to cooperate.

Actually, it was brainwashing kids into conforming to a system in which they are not allowed to have individual thoughts or opinions. They must become a "team player" and submit to peer pressure. Communist countries have used this same brainwashing technique for decades.

The brainwashing of school children continues by teaching them there is no absolute right or wrong, and the teacher is absolutely positive about it.

Whatever the children think is right for them is OK. That is of course until they question evolution. They are then told they are wrong. This brainwashing results in children who are unable to think logically, scientifically, and accurately. (...)

[Darwinian Evolution cannot be observed and replicated in order to be scientifically validated and also there is not one single known case of a change of kinds]:

Scientific Fact No. 1 - Birds Prove Natural Selection is Naturally Wrong

The body and soul of Darwin's Theory of Evolution was the idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. This concept is based on the suggestion that those members of a species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with these superior adaptations.

Darwin's theory suggests that millions of generations later the changes will result in new species. These adaptations are called links or intermediates between the old species and the new.

The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the "evolutionary tree" have many flaws.

One of the best examples of evolution nonsense is the thought that a wingless bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable to his environment. The first wing stubs would be much too small for the bird to fly.

Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary theory of natural selection, which states that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment.

Why would the bird continue for millions of generations to improve a wing stub that is useless? The Theory of Evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species, not the weakest. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage. This is the opposite of natural selection.

According to natural selection, the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly.

We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing, so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed.

Evolutionists say birds grew hollow bones for less weight in order to fly. How would a bird pass this long-term plan to the millions of generations in order to keep the lighter bone plan progressing? The evolutionary concept of growing a wing over millions of generations violates the very foundation of evolution: the natural selection.

Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be found in all species in one way or another. Take fish for example.

We are told by evolutionists that a fish wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a land creature. So let's examine this idea. OK, a fish wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't breathe air. This could happen. Fish do stupid things at times.

Whales keep swimming up onto the beach where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs? That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish story.

The gills of the fish are made for extracting oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and gasps before flipping back into the safety of the water. Why would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and choking continues for millions of generation until the fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of drowning in the water.

One day he simply stays out on the land and never goes back into the water. Now he is a lizard.

Giant dinosaurs literally exploded onto the scene during the Triassic period. The fossil record (petrified bones found in the ground as at the Dinosaur National Park in Jensen, Utah, USA) shows no intermediate or transitional species. Where are the millions of years of fossils showing the transitional forms for dinosaurs? They do not not exist, because the dinosaurs did not evolve.

Books published by evolutionists have shown the giant Cetiosaurus dinosaur with the long neck extending upright eating from the treetops. They claimed natural selection was the reason Cetiosaurus had a long neck. This gave them an advantage in reaching fodder that other species could not reach.

One day during the assembly of a skeleton for a museum display someone noticed the neck vertebrae were such that the neck could not be lifted higher than stretched horizontally in front of them. The natural selection theory was proven to be a big lie.

The Cetiosaurus dinosaur was an undergrowth eater. The long neck actually placed the Cetiosaurus at a disadvantage in his environment, just the opposite from the natural Theory of Natural Selection.

Evolutionists will now claim the animal evolved a long neck because he had the advantage of eating from bushes on the other side of the river. This is typical logic of an evolutionist.

Scientific Fact No. 2 - Species Without a Link Prove Evolution Theory is Wrong

The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic, and scientific proof.

Evolutionists line up pictures of similar-looking species and claim they evolved one from another. The human "family tree" is an example of this flawed theory. Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes.

Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture.

This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus. (...)

The pictures are simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.

Close to the Missing Link -- Oldest Human Ancestor Discovered

Why do they claim the above discovery is "close to the missing link"? The answer is simple. Look at the picture: It is a monkey.

A monkey species that has become extinct. Lots of species have become extinct. Millions of species have become extinct.

It is obviously not similar to a human. Look at the feet with the big toe spread away from the smaller toes exactly like a modern chimpanzee, not like people. 

A newly discovered extinct species does not prove a "missing link" has been found.

Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these transitional links have never been found. We only find individual species.

Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link according to similar major features such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud. Darwin was hopeful that future fossils would prove his theory correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has proven his theory to be wrong.

The presence of individual species actually proves they were not developed by an evolutionary process. If evolution were true, all plants, animals, and insects would be in a continual state of change. No two creatures would be identical, because they would not be separate species.

All life forms would be a continual blend of characteristics without a clear definition among the species. Everything would be changing, and every animal, insect, and plant would be different.

The cheetah above proves evolution does not exist. All species are locked solidly within their DNA code.

Evolutionists are going ape over "Ape-Girl"

The fossilized bones of a new animal have been found in Ethiopia near the site where "Lucy" was discovered many years ago.

By the way, Lucy was a monkey, not an early humanoid. The number of bones of the Ape-girl skeleton are unique because Lucy had only a few head fragments.

This find gives us a lot of information about the animal because major parts of the skeleton were unearthed (assuming these are all from the same animal).

It has teeth in the jaw and is said to also have unerupted teeth still within the jaw. The evolutionists call the animal a "human-like" female child about three years of age and an "individual." This is not a "human-like" fossil. It is an "ape-like" fossil because it was an ape.

The evolutionists call the animal a "transitional species" and a human ancestor even though it has a head exactly like a modern-day ape. The jaw is thrust forward and the forehead pushed back and slanted. The true appearance is more easily seen from side picture below.

Ape-girl also has arms "that dangled down to just above the knees. It also had gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it could have been skilled at swinging through trees."

So, it looks like an ape, it has a head like an ape, it has arms like an ape, it has shoulder blades like an ape - It is obviously an ape, not a human, pre-human or humanoid. This animal is simply a young ape. Its size is as would be expected for a young modern-day ape.

The age of this fossilized animal is also very much in doubt. Scientists many years ago claimed a tooth found was Nebraska Man, a pre-human fossil millions of years old. They determined the age of the tooth. The scientists had sculptured an entire ape-like skeleton from information they found in one tooth. These lies were exposed when real scientists found the tooth to be from a peccary, an animal similar to (and closely related to) pigs.

'Lucy's baby' found in Ethiopia - BBC News - September 21, 2006

"The 3.3-million-year-old fossilised remains of a human-like child have been unearthed in Ethiopia's Dikika region. The find consists of the whole skull, the entire torso, and important parts of the upper and lower limbs. CT scans reveal unerupted teeth still in the jaw, a detail that makes scientists think the individual may have been about three years old when she died."

Remarkably, some quite delicate bones not normally preserved in the fossilisation process are also present, such as the hyoid, or tongue, bone. The hyoid bone reflects how the voice box is built and perhaps what sounds a species can produce.

Judging by how well it was preserved, the skeleton may have come from a body that was quickly buried by sediment in a flood, the researchers said. 

"In my opinion, afarensis is a very good transitional species for what was before four million years ago and what came after three million years," Dr Alemseged told BBC science correspondent Pallab Ghosh. [The species had] a mixture of ape-like and human-like features. This puts afarensis in a special position to play a pivotal role in the story of what we are and where we come from."

Climbing Ability

"This early ancestor possessed primitive teeth and a small brain but it stood upright and walked on two feet. There is considerable argument about whether the Dikika girl could also climb trees like an ape.

This climbing ability would require anatomical equipment like long arms, and the 'Lucy' species had arms that dangled down to just above the knees. It also had gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it could have been skilled at swinging through trees. But the question is whether such features indicate climbing ability or are just 'evolutionary baggage'."

Evolution is in trouble. The growth of biological knowledge is producing scientific facts that contradict the evolutionary theory, not confirm it, a fact that famous Prof. Steven Jay Gould of Harvard has described as "the trade secret of paleontology."

The fossil record simply does not support the evolutionary theory, which claims there once existed a series of successive forms leading to the present-day organism. The theory states that infinitesimal changes within each generation evolve into a new species, but the scientific fact remains. They don't.

Fossils prove the sudden emergence of a new species out of nowhere, complete with characteristics unknown in any other species. The fossil record has no intermediate or transitional forms. This is popularly known as the "missing link" problem, and it exists in all species. The missing link problem is getting worse, not better, with the discovery of more fossils.

The missing links are not being discovered, which proves they never existed. Darwin assumed transitional forms would be discovered in the fossil record over time, but that has not been the case. The fossil record, or lack thereof, is a major embarrassment to evolutionists.

The fossil record is a serious rebuke of the Theory of Evolution. New species explode onto the scene out of nowhere. New fossil discoveries continue to prove evolution to be wrong.

Evolution: A Theory in Crisis by Michael Denton

Michael Denton says,

"Despite the tremendous increase in geological activity in every corner of the globe and despite the discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not been discovered and the fossil record is about as discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the Origin."

A reader of the Michael Denton's book says,

"Denton a Molecular Biologist removes all of the supports (if there ever were any) from Darwin's theory of macro-evolution (continuity of life). Denton blasts all of the previous arguments made by the pro-evolutionists showing that there is essentially no support of macro-evolution in the fossil record. He also, clearly demonstrates that there is no support coming from his specialty molecular biology. In the end the only sound explanation he can make is that life is profoundly discontinuous."

Harvard Professor Gould claims that evolution occurs in spurts, not gradually. This theory attempts to explain the lack of continuity in the fossil record. However, this theory is more troublesome than the gradual change theory. Large jumps or spurts in the fossil record don't prove evolution at all. In fact, they disprove evolution.

The theory that evolution can occur in spurts, because the fossil record shows it did not occur gradually, is a wild stretch of the imagination. Species have some characteristics similar to other species, but similarity doesn't prove any evolutionary link whatsoever. There are more than missing links in biology. There are entire missing chains in 100% of the branches of the evolutionary tree.

Many species are dependant upon another species for their coexistence. Hummingbirds and flowers are a good example. The flower would not be pollinated and would become extinct without the bird. They are said to have coevolved together. That is a stretch of the imagination without any basis in science. There are hundreds of these examples that cannot be explained.

Charles Darwin had concern about his theory of natural selection. He knew that a failure to find the missing transitional links would seriously cripple his theory of evolution, but he was hopeful the missing links would be found some day.

Well, guess what? He died not finding them. Evolutionists have never found the missing links. Each time they announce finding one, it is later proven to be false.

The "Living Fossil" Fish Proves Evolution is Wrong

The Coelacanth fish was touted to be a transitional form with half-formed legs and primitive lungs, ready to transition onto land. This myth was exploded in December, 1938 when a live Coelacanth was caught in a fisherman's net off the eastern coast of South Africa. It is now known that the natives of the Comoro Islands had been catching and eating the fish for years.

It did not have half-formed legs or primitive lungs. It was simply a regular fish that people thought was extinct. Evolutionist claimed the 350 million-year-old Coelacanth evolved into animals with legs, feet, and lungs.

This not the case. We now see that the fish recently caught is exactly like the 350 million-year-old fossil. It did not evolve at all.

The Coelacanth is a star witness against the false theory of evolution. After 350 million years, the fish still doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Fisherman catches 'living fossil' - BBC News - August 1, 2007;

"The 1.3m-long (4.3ft), 50kg (110lb) coelacanth is only the second ever to have been captured in Asia and has been described as a "significant find". An autopsy and genetic tests are now being carried out to determine more about the specimen. Coelacanths provide researchers with a window into the past; their fossil record dates back 350 million years."

The Archaeopteryx fossil was herald by evolutionists as a significant transitional missing link. The fossil was discovered in a limestone quarry in southern Germany in 1861 and has been debated ever since. 

The dinosaur creature appears to be a reptile with bird characteristics of wings and feathers. It had the skeleton of a small dinosaur with a tail, fingers with claws on the leading edge of the wing, and teeth in the jaws.

The owners of the property discovered six fossils of which only two had feathers. This inconsistency smells of fraud from the beginning. Upon close examination the feathers appear to be identical to modern chicken feathers. Click the picture to see an enlargement.

The Archaeopteryx fossils with feathers have now been declared forgeries by scientists. "Allegedly, thin layers of cement were spread on two fossils of a chicken-size dinosaur, called Compsognathus. Bird feathers were then imprinted into the wet cement" according to Dr. Walt Brown.

(...) This example would not have proven evolution even if the feathers had not been forgeries. Finding a few species with characteristics similar to two other species does not prove a link. There should be millions or billions of transitional links if evolution were true, not simply a few.

The Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), with its duck bill and webbed feet, is a unique Australian animal. It and the two species of echidna are the only monotremes or egg-laying mammals to be found on earth. 

The marsupials (mammals with pouches, e.g. kangaroos) and eutherians (placental mammals that give birth to well-developed young, e.g. humans) both give birth to live young.

The monotremes have lower body temperatures than other mammals and have legs which extend out, then vertically below them. These features, together with their egg-laying ability, are more like that of a lizard than a mammal. Platypus are readily identified by their streamlined body, webbed feet, broad tail, and characteristic muzzle or bill which is soft and pliable.

The Platypus males have spurs on their hind feet that deliver a poisonous venom like a snake. A Platypus sting is powerful enough to make people sick and kill a dog.

The Platypus of Australia has characteristics of many species but certainly is not the missing link to all of them. In fact, it is not a link to any of them. The Platypus has made a joke of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and his unproven theory of natural selection.

April 6. 2006 - Tiktaalik is the latest fossil gap evolutionary fraud;

Scientists fraudulently claim a newly-discovered fish is the second bridge fossil gap between sea and land creatures. The scientists have apparently forgotten that the first fossil gap, Archaeopteryx, shown above was also a fraud. Tiktaalik therefore becomes fossil gap fraud number 2.

"Called 'Tiktaalik' by scientists, the fish lived in shallow, swampy waters. Most remarkably, the creature, which was less than 3 feet long, had the body of a fish but the jaws, ribs, and limb-like fins seen in the earliest land mammals." 

Tiktaalik fossil

The claim that the stubby little fossil fins are "limb-like" is a real hoot. The fish doesn't even have fins as large as expected for its size.

The scientists are claiming the fish walked around on the ground out of water and breathed air. This is pure make-believe speculation. No evidence exists that the fish is anything more than just another species.

The excitement about the Tiktaalik fossil is puzzling. Modern-day seals have fins and waddle around on the ground. Modern-day catfish have fins and walk around on the ground. Catfish can live out of water for a long time. Tiktaalik does not provide any support for evolution.

Evolutionists are now claiming that a dolphin captured with two little extra fins near the tail is proof that dolphins evolved from four-footed animals related to the dog.

"Experts believe that the dolphin's ancestor was a dog-like creature which roamed the earth many millions of years ago. And now the extraordinary discovery of a bottlenosed dolphin with an extra set of flippers has provided living proof of the theory. At first glance it looks like any other of its kind. But closer inspection reveals a rogue set of rear fins. Each the size of a human hand, the fins are thought to be the remains of a pair of hind legs, adding to evidence that dolphins once walked on all fours."

This is utter nonsense!

Scientific Fact No. 3 - Missing Inferior Evolutionary Branches

The Theory of Evolution states that minute improvements in an individual within a species increases the likelihood of survival of the offspring. These small steps of improvements continue for countless years until the individuals are changed to such a large extent that a new species has appeared.

This progression is an uninterrupted branch of the "evolutionary tree." These lines of progression can be seen in any biology text book for many species, including mankind. They almost look believable...

The siblings of an individual on the uninterrupted branch may fail to develop the minute improvement and may even suffer from an inferior evolutionary change. Each of these individuals represents a new branch on the tree that is moving away from the uninterrupted branch.

Let us say we have 100,000 coexisting individuals in a species such as a horse. Only a few of these individuals will begin new branches that will eventually become a new species such as a Zebra.

The other 99,999 individuals may each begin a neutral or inferior branch that may continue for millions of years but will eventually stop, because the last individual on the branch fails to produce an offspring.

The odds that the branch will stop producing offspring is increased when the minute evolutionary changes are inferior. The theory of survival of the fittest or natural selection also works in reverse to produce death to the branch where the changes are inferior. The branch stops. This part of the tree is dead.

We see in Scientific Fact No. 2 above that the missing intermediary individuals in the branch of the evolutionary tree present a serious problem for the Theory of Evolution. One superior individual of the 100,000 is missing, but now we have an even more serious defect in the theory. Where are the 99,999 inferior branches? How could 99,999 branches go missing?

Actually, the fossil record shows that everything is missing. No individuals of the species existed. None. Most layers of the earth's crust are completely devoid of all life, but then a layer will appear that is teaming with an absolute abundance of separate species, each containing millions of individuals.

This hypothesis of the "missing inferior evolutionary branches" was developed and posted here by the author, Kent R. Rieske, on March 21, 2008.

Thousands of biology professors at universities around the world, including Darwin, have completely missed this serious deficiency in the fossil record, because they have only been searching for the superior evolutionary branches, not the inferior branches.

Where are the fossils of horses with weak bones that fractured early in life and thereby prevented an offspring from continuing the branch? They don't exist, but they should if the Theory of Evolution was true. In fact, the fossil record should be full of dead branches, which is not. The fossil record simply shows individual species that have become extinct.

Scientific Fact No. 4 - Single Cell Complexity Proves Evolution is Wrong

Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water, causing several molecules to combine in a random way, which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms.

This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.

The Theory of Evolution claims that organic life was created from inorganic matter. That is impossible. The top scientists in the world with unlimited laboratory resources cannot change inorganic matter into a single organic living cell.

The smallest living cell has the complexity of a Boeing 747 jumbo jet airplane. The components of the smallest living cell have the obvious arrangement showing intelligent design, just as the Boeing 747 did not appear from random parts stacked near each other in a junk yard. The minimal cell contains more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations.

The smallest single-cell creature has millions of atoms forming millions of molecules that must each be arranged in an exact pattern to provide the required functions.

The cell has an energy-producing system, a protective housing, a security system to let molecules into and out of the housing, a reproductive system, and a central control system. This complexity required an intelligent design. It is much too complex to happen by chance.

Evolution: A Theory in Crisis by Michael Denton page 263;

The odds that the correct proteins could somehow come together in a functional configuration to make a living cell are so high that it will never happen. The concept that anything can be accomplished by chance given enough time is false. (...)

Darwin's "Tree of Life"

Charles Darwin made a sketch in his notebook in about July 1837 that has come to be known as the Tree of Life. Darwin developed the Tree of Life theory, claiming that some species were lower in the branches of the tree and evolved into the upper branches. He selected species that looked similar to each other and placed them together, like placing the zebra below the horse.

Charles Darwin knew nothing about DNA, the true scientific key to life. He had no concept whatsoever regarding the complexity of DNA. Life did not originate by the accidental sticking together of a few molecules as Darwin taught. 

Darwin did not know that the key to a person's identity (DNA) is locked solid in every cell of the body. The DNA does not change because of external adaptation to the environment as taught by Darwin and still falsely taught in universities by biology professors.

The DNA changes only when an egg and sperm are joined to form a new DNA with chromosomes coming from the male and female donors. 

The DNA of the baby is strictly controlled by the parents' chromosomes. It cannot be changed by external environmental influences either. The DNA of all life forms, including plants and trees, absolutely destroys Darwin's Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. Environmental influence does not change the DNA in plants, animals or humans.

Scientists have now solidly proven that 80% of the life forms in Darwin's Tree of Life have DNA much different from the adjacent lower DNA and could not have evolved from the predecessor.

Some animals have DNA sequences that are identical to sequences in plant DNA, but they obviously could not be related according to the Theory of Evolution.

Intelligent Design can be Seen in the Smallest Bacteria and the Largest Galaxy

The scientific study of complex biological structures has made enormous strides in revealing Intelligent design in nature.

One example is the motor and propeller propulsion system, called a bacterial flagellum, found in many bacteria, including the common E. coli. The propulsion system of the bacteria has 40 moving parts made from protein molecules, including a motor, rotor, stator, drive shaft, bushings, universal joint, and flexible propeller.

The motor is powered by ions and can rotate at up to 100,000 rpm. It can reverse direction in only 1/4 of a revolution and has an automatic feedback control mechanism.

The size is 1/100,000 of an inch (1/4,000 mm) in width, much too small to see with the human eye. One cannot deny the obvious conclusion that this system has an Intelligent Designer.

Molecular Motors in Bacterium - University of Michigan;

"The ATP Synthase motor has the classic stator and rotor structure familiar in man-made motors. It spans a cellular membrane which admits protons (H+) one at a time. For each proton, the motor turns once, adding a phosphate to adenosine di-phosphate and converting it to adenosine tri-phosphate, the universal fuel source of cells."

Molecular Motor in Algae Cells Work Together - Science Daily - February 25, 2009;

{ http://humansarefree.com/ }

29-11-2015 om 22:53 geschreven door peter